Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 10, 2025 - Stew Peters Show

01:36:22

Logos Academy Episode 35: Mein Kampf Chapter 2 Continued

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome, everybody.
	It is Logos Academy, episode 35. A little bit delayed.
	It's been quite a bit.
	We've been doing some other stuff, and I've got a lot organized now, so we've got a very nice week ahead of us.
	There's going to be a lot of very interesting shows.
	Today, we're going to be picking back up on episode...
	Well, with episode 35, we're going to pick up on chapter 2 of Mein Kampf.
	We're going to rehash what we talked about before just a little bit, and we're going to hop back in.
	We'll be starting on the top of page 29 in Chapter 2. Like usual, we'll wait.
	We'll let some people fill in before we start the reading.
	While we are waiting, I've got a couple interesting things coming up this week.
	So this is going to be the only MindConf reading that we'll do this week.
	I have David Duke coming on my show Wednesday at 4pm Eastern.
	I'm sure pretty much everybody is familiar with David Duke.
	Whether you see him as an infamous figure or a famous figure, I'm sure almost everybody here will be at least familiar with who David Duke is.
	So that's going to be Wednesday at 4pm Eastern.
	And then on Friday, I'm going to be doing a book analysis.
	of Battle for Berlin by Joseph Goebbels.
	It's a really nice work, and it kind of ties in with reading Mein Kampf.
	It's discussing how the National Socialist Party was taking over these little towns and epicenters and becoming a mass movement, their process in that endeavor.
	That's a really interesting read.
	I'm going to be analyzing it with one of the translators.
	from Antelope Hill Publishing.
	So he'll be joining us at 4 p.m.
	Eastern on Friday to discuss that.
	I'll kind of introduce him a little bit and then we'll do an analysis of the book.
	And he's pretty well read on the subject, so I'm sure he'll enjoy to discuss that with me.
	Also, tonight, after my show is over, I am doing a space on JQ Radio.
	If you guys are familiar with JQ Radio.
	I'm sure most people probably know what JQ Radio is.
	If you don't, it's a 24-hour Twitter space radio channel that runs every single day.
	And they, well, they talk about the JQ, the Jewish question.
	So I run a bi-weekly segment on there, Mondays at 7 p.m.
	Eastern.
	It's called National Socialist Mondays.
	So you guys want to learn more about National Socialism, some of the philosophies behind it, the principles that are laid out.
	Maybe even the history of it.
	I do my best to provide answers to people's questions in those spaces.
	It's a little more interactive than maybe a show like this where I'm just reading Mein Kampf and I'm giving an analysis.
	There's not a lot of room or wiggle room for somebody to come in and ask me a question when I'm in the middle of reading.
	It's not exactly that easy.
	So I do my best in the Twitter spaces to kind of be a little more interactive and answer some direct questions.
	So you guys can watch that.
	That'll be tonight, about an hour after my show ends.
	So if you guys want to chime in, if you want to come up, you got questions to ask or you want to add a point in, feel free to join that Twitter space and get yourself involved.
	Also, one other thing I'll say, just because it's on the schedule as well, this Thursday at 7 p.m.
	Eastern, I'm going to be...
	On JQ Radio again with Monica Schaefer.
	She's going to be interviewed on JQ Radio, kind of going into her background a little bit, who she is, how she came to the views and things like that.
	She has a lovely video called Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust.
	If you guys haven't seen that, take a minute, watch it.
	It's a really, really powerful video.
	She has a very inspirational story.
	She has a very healthy feminine energy that kind of brings in a lot of people.
	It's very hard to I've got a lot of other shows coming up.
	I'm going to wait until they get a little bit closer in, but we've got interviews coming up, book analysis, book readings.
	There's a lot of stuff coming up this month.
	I know I've been...
	On a little bit of a hiatus, I've been kind of organizing some things behind the scenes, picking up on a couple personal projects, and I finally feel that I've got those done, so I've got a pretty healthy schedule looking forward for this month and potentially next month as well, actually.
	So we'll be doing a lot of reading of Mein Kampf, we'll be doing a lot of reading of other books, or not reading of them, but analysis of them or reviews of them, as well as some interviews and some interesting discussions.
	So make sure that you guys are Tuning in for this coming couple weeks because there's going to be a lot of interesting stuff going on, especially Wednesday with David Duke.
	It's going to be a good show.
	And as always, share the stuff around.
	Hop over onto my Twitter.
	Share my stuff around on Twitter.
	I've been growing exponentially on Twitter.
	We're at 23,000 followers and counting.
	So make sure that you guys are over there sharing the work there as well.
	Helping the growth move in that direction.
	With that said, we're going to get into the reading here because I don't want to wait too long.
	Otherwise, we're not going to get enough done because there's a lot to get done here.
	Today is going to be a very interesting read.
	There is a lot to analyze in the next coming pages, which is why we stopped where we did because it's going to be extensive moving forward here.
	A lot of stuff that we want to actually pause and discuss while we're reading because it is going to be very interesting, to say the least.
	So for those that want to follow along, if you have yourself a physical copy of the book or if you're following a PDF online, I highly recommend that you do so, especially a physical book.
	Get yourself a physical copy.
	Sit there with a pen and just take some time.
	And while you're listening in to this reading, actually...
	Underline some things.
	Take some notes on the side for yourself.
	Draw some conclusions for yourself or even draw some comparisons.
	Maybe you read something that's very similar.
	Check my book.
	My book is loaded with all kinds of shit on the sides, underlines.
	You name it.
	It's very in-depth.
	This is not a book that you just want to listen to.
	You want to study this book, take your time with it.
	Really pay attention to what's being laid out because it's a very important book.
	Collapsing Society, not right now because we are doing a book reading show.
	However, if you want to discuss that maybe later, like I said, I will be on a JQ radio space at 7 p.m.
	Eastern this evening.
	So you can ask me a direct question then.
	Like I said, I want to focus on the reading here.
	I want to get straight into it because we do have a lot to cover.
	And I want to try to get this chapter done in two or three shows, which is not going to be easy.
	We're going to try.
	Okay, so for those that do want to follow along, it's the Stalag edition of Mein Kampf.
	You can get a physical copy for yourself on MoneyTreePublishing.com.
	Common spelling for all of that, one word.
	You use code LOGOS, L-O-G-O-S. When you check out, you'll save yourself 10%.
	There's also PDF versions.
	If you go online, you just look up Mein Kampfstilog Edition PDF, you'll find it there as well.
	So you can easily find this book.
	It's one of the easiest books to find for sure.
	Okay.
	That said, let's start at the top of page 29.
	Okay.
	We're going to start on the last paragraph of 28, just so that we make sure we're catching everything that we were discussing before.
	Okay.
	Besides my interest in the social question, I naturally devoted myself with enthusiasm to the study of architecture.
	Side by side with music, I considered it queen of the arts.
	To study it was for me not work, but pleasure.
	I could read or draw into the small hours of the morning without ever getting tired.
	And I became more and more confident that my dream of a brilliant future would come true, even though I should have to wait long years for its fulfillment.
	I was firmly convinced that one day I should make a name for myself as an architect.
	The fact that, side by side with my professional studies, I took the greatest interest in everything that had to do with politics did not seem to me to signify anything of great importance.
	On the contrary, I looked upon this practical interest in politics merely as part of an elementary obligation that devolves on every thinking man.
	Those who have no understanding of the political world around them have no right to criticize or complain.
	It's a good quote.
	On political questions, therefore, I still continued to read and study a great deal.
	But reading had a probably different significance for me from that which it has for the average run of our so-called intellectuals.
	I know people who read interminably, book after book.
	Page after page, and yet I should not call them well-read.
	Of course they know an immense amount, but their brain seems incapable of assorting and classifying the material which they have gathered from books.
	They have not the faculty of distinguishing between what is value and what is worthless in a book, in order that they may retain the former in their minds, and if possible, skip over the latter.
	While reading, or, if that not be possible, when once read, throw it overboard as useless ballast.
	And again, this is kind of what we discuss with Mein Kampf, why it's so important to study this book, is exactly what he's laying out here, is that you get people that will...
	I'm going to use him.
	I use this guy every time, and I hope somehow, someway, he's listening to every show I do, because I hate him.
	Charlie Kirk is a very good example.
	This guy probably reads a lot of books.
	Probably reads a lot of New York Times bestsellers, you know, these shitty, you know, conservative works that are bullshit, right?
	There's not anything of real merit or value inside of most of these.
	And so you can read all of these and you can gain a little bit of knowledge of this or that or this or that, but without being able to kind of drag these pieces in into one complete worldview and articulate it as such.
	It's kind of meaningless, right?
	So as an exemplification, what we do on this show very often, you know, I always reference pictures here on the wall, a new picture, by the way.
	I always reference Plato, and I reference the Republic and the allegory of the cave.
	And to, you know, relate...
	This philosophical concept into something that's happening inside of modern society or something that we're viewing in front of us, that is what makes a book valuable.
	That's what makes reading a book valuable, is being able to take that experience from the book or that thing that's laid out and relate it into the modern world or relate it into how it can be used in the future.
	You need to take that valuable aspect and use it to your advantage.
	And all of these other things...
	For instance, in the Republic, Plato talks about democracy, he talks about anarchy, he talks about tyranny, he talks about oligarchy, and he talks about Timurkey.
	Well, Timurkey is a form of civilization that doesn't exist anymore.
	We haven't had a ruling Timurkey in hundreds of years.
	It's not something that's valuable to us today, so we can remove that from our mind in thought and in analysis and focus on the parts that matter, right?
	We live in what they call a democracy.
	It's supposed to be a constitutional republic, but we live in what has been subverted into a democracy today, so therefore it's important to analyze that piece and read what he's saying there.
	And this is why Mein Kampf is the most important book right now in the modern age, because everything that's being laid out here...
	His experience with this corrupt system that he was living underneath and his hardships that he went through and seeing all of the terrible things around him, the societal decay, this is something we experience today.
	And this is a man who came to a solution on these problems, and it's now our duty to do the same.
	And that's why we have this, right?
	Okay, moving forward.
	Reading is not an end in itself, but a means to an end.
	Its chief purpose is to help towards filling in the framework which is made up of the talents and capabilities that each individual possesses.
	Thus, each one procures for himself the implements and materials necessary for the fulfillment of his calling in life, no matter whether this be the elementary task of earning one's daily bread or a career taken up in response to a higher call.
	Such is the first purpose of reading.
	And the second purpose...
	is to give us a general knowledge of the world in which we live.
	In both cases, however, the material, which may have acquired through reading, must not be stored up in the memory on a plan that corresponds to the successive chapters of the book.
	But each little piece of knowledge thus gained must be treated as if it were a little stone to be inserted in a mosaic.
	So that it finds its proper place among all other pieces and particles that help form a general world picture in the brain of the reader.
	This is where we get Hitler's concept.
	He's going to use this term a lot.
	I believe we discussed it just on our last reading show.
	Right, which is a German word that essentially means worldview, right?
	However, it's more in-depth than a worldview.
	It has this kind of grounded conviction inside of it that kind of brings it all together, and that's very much what he's laying out here.
	Otherwise, only a confused jumble of chaotic notions will result from all reading, and this jumble is not merely useless, but it also tends to make the unfortunate possessor of it conceited, for he seriously considers himself a well-educated person and thinks that he understands for he seriously considers himself a well-educated person and thinks that he understands Right, again, imagine, you know, you read Naomi Wolf's book about COVID tyranny, right?
	And she's giving you all these, you know, kosher talking points and talking about how the lockdowns are just like Nazi Germany, right?
	By shaping your worldview around how awful the situation of COVID was, you at the same time are shaping your worldview of how World War II was by extension.
	And this actually gives you a false framework of how that was laid out.
	And now you're put in a position where you're losing understanding.
	While you're gaining understanding of one thing, you're actually losing understanding of something else.
	This is very dangerous, and this is why it's very important that you're careful what you read.
	And if you are reading something that's from a bad source, that you're diligent in reading through and ensuring what is correct and what is cannon fodder in the writings.
	Continuing.
	He believes that he has acquired knowledge, whereas the truth is that every increase in such knowledge draws him more and more away from real life, until he finally ends up in some sanatorium or takes to politics and becomes a member of parliament.
	Such a person never succeeds in turning his knowledge to practical account when the opportune moment arrives.
	For his mental equipment is not ordered according to the broad lines of human existence, but in the order of succession in which he read the books and their contents is stored in his mind.
	If fate should one day call upon him to use some of his book knowledge for certain practical purposes in life, fate would have to name the book and give the number of the page, for the poor noodle would never be able to find the spot where he gathered the information now called for.
	But since the page is not mentioned at, the critical moment the wise fool finds himself in, a state of hopeless embarrassment.
	In a high state of agitation, he searches for analogous cases, and it is almost certain that he will finally hit on the wrong prescription.
	Were this not so, there could be no explanation for the political achievements of our highly placed government officials, unless we assume that they are due to malice and chicanery.
	Rather, Now, this is really important.
	So, what Hitler's saying here is, again, we're going to use Charlie Kirk as the example.
	A guy like Charlie Kirk who reads all these books, he thinks he's really educated, he thinks he's this virtuous fighter on behalf of America, the concept of America, and the American people.
	Well, if he has all of this false knowledge from reading these New York Times bestsellers, I have...
	A couple of these horrendous books on my shelf just to analyze them and really show how pathetic these things are.
	And they are extremely pathetic.
	So if a guy like Charlie Kirk actually thinks he's doing the right thing, this is what Hitler is saying.
	He's saying, you know, this guy is just, he's pathologically weak.
	He's not actually, you know, a malicious actor, so to speak.
	You know, maybe he is.
	But for the most part, a lot of these people that are in positions like that They're not necessarily malicious.
	They're just weak individuals with an extreme lack of knowledge, and therefore they don't have the direction that's required for the position that they're in, right?
	Moving forward.
	On the other hand, a man who has cultivated the art of reading will instantly discern in a book, a journal, or a pamphlet what ought to be remembered.
	Because it meets his personal needs or is of value as general knowledge.
	What he thus learns is incorporated in his mental conception of this or that, problem or thing, further correcting the mental picture or enlarging it so that it becomes more exact and precise.
	Should some practical problem suddenly demand examination or solution, memory will immediately select the requisite information from the mass that has been acquired through years of reading and will place this information at the service of a man's powers of judgment so that he may gain a new memory will immediately select the requisite information from the mass that has been acquired through years of reading and will Only thus can reading have any meaning or value.
	The speaker, for example, who is not the sources of information ready to hand which are necessary to a proper treatment of his subject, is unable to defend his opinions against an opponent, even though those opinions be perfectly sound and true.
	In every discussion, his memory will leave him shamefully in the lurch.
	He cannot summon up arguments to support his statements or to refute his opponent.
	So long as the Speaker has only to defend himself on his own personal account, the situation is not serious.
	But the evil arises when fate places at the head of public affairs such a soi-de-sant, know-all, who is, in reality, knows nothing.
	Now, this is very important as well.
	So think about if I was to, you know, obviously I advocate for national socialism quite publicly.
	I recognize that it's a very healthy solution to a very serious problem that we have today.
	Now, you have a situation here where, imagine if I had read nothing about National Socialism.
	I just watched a couple of Hitler videos and speeches, and I was like, oh, wow, that seems really cool.
	He seems like a cool dude.
	I think these Jews are lying.
	And then I go on to a show to debate a Jew or debate somebody or discuss this issue to someone.
	And I have zero requisite knowledge that I've read up on to provide for an argument, right?
	So if someone says, oh, well, Hitler did this or Hitler did that, and it's, you know, obviously a false statement.
	If I don't have the knowledge required or the intellectual backing in order to argue how or why he didn't do such a thing, my arguments are not sound.
	And it actually ends up making my argument for national socialism or for the correctness of its principles Look even worse, because I have no grounding to defend it.
	And this is really important.
	So this is why people that are spreading the message, it's important to be educated on what that message is.
	It's very easy to walk around in the streets and throw a Roman up and scream white power and things like this.
	And again, there is some kind of merit to these things.
	This is pushing a social...
	A social pressure in the right direction.
	It pushes the Overton window in a different way.
	But now we're going to hit a time for ourselves when we have to actually make these arguments publicly.
	And when we're confronted against these things, we have to have the knowledge required to argue back.
	We have to have some kind of grounding underneath ourselves that gives us the right to that argument.
	It's like somebody who's a devout Christian coming to you to knock on your door and preach the Bible, and they come to preach the Bible, and they haven't read the Bible.
	They just say, hey, you really should follow the words of Jesus, and you go, oh, well, what is Jesus saying here, or what does Jesus lay out here?
	And you can't answer it because you haven't read the Bible yourself.
	Well, how are you going to preach that to somebody else if you have no knowledge of it but yourself?
	It's very important to have that.
	Okay, moving forward.
	From early youth, I endeavored to read books in the right way, and I was fortunate in having a good memory and intelligence to assist me.
	From that point of view, my sojourn in Vienna was particularly useful and profitable.
	My daily experiences there were a constant stimulus to study the most diverse problems from new angles.
	And as much as I was in a position to put theory to the test of reality and reality to the test of theory, I was safe from the danger of losing myself in a haze of theories on the one hand and becoming superficial on the other.
	My everyday experiences at that time made me determined to make a fundamental theoretical study of two most important questions apart from the social question.
	It is impossible to say when I might have started to make a thorough study of the doctrine and characteristics of Marxism were it not for the fact that I then literally pitched head foremost into the problem.
	Okay, so this is where he's now going to discuss coming into Marxism, seeing Marxism for the first time, and recognizing the true inner nature of it, right?
	Which, again, our politicians today, you get Donald Trump or somebody, they'll say Marxism is bad.
	But they would not talk about the source of Marxism.
	Who's driving Marxism?
	Who are the people that have brought it here?
	Who are the intellectual leaders of it everywhere that you look?
	The newspaper writers, the article writers, the book writers, the filmmakers, everybody that's promoting Marxism.
	There is about an 80% over-representation of Jews.
	Take a brief second here.
	Okay, continuing.
	Thank you.
	What I knew of social democracy in my youth was precious little, and that little was, for the most part, wrong.
	Now, if you're not familiar with social democracy, social democracy was a movement inside of Germany.
	It was a party, a social democratic party.
	Yet again, there was a lot of Jews involved in this party, and they were openly very left-wing Marxist.
	So this is very important to know for moving forward because he's going to reference these people quite a bit.
	The fact that it led the struggle for universal suffrage and the secret ballot gave me an inner satisfaction.
	For my reason then told me that this would weaken the Habsburg regime, which I so thoroughly detested.
	I was convinced that except at the cost of sacrificing the German element, the Danubian state could not continue to exist.
	Even a long and steady Slavization of the Austrian Germans would not have constituted a guarantee that the empire would endure, because it was very questionable if, and how far, the Slavs possessed the necessary capacity for preserving the state as such.
	Therefore, I welcomed every movement.
	That might lead toward the final disruption of that impossible state, which, to continue to exist, would have to stamp out the German character in 10 million people.
	Now, this is also a really important piece because you get this argument from a lot of individuals.
	They use this as an argument as to why Hitler is, he wasn't good pro-white.
	He wasn't a good pro-white advocate because of his statements about slobs, right?
	People, you know, they exaggerate this and state that he wanted to exterminate Slavic people.
	It's no different than the exaggeration that he wanted to exterminate Jews.
	But what he's saying here, what's very important is it's not necessarily specifically anti-Slav, right?
	You have to think about it through this lens.
	We live in America today.
	We can see that the, not the Slavization, but the negrification of our culture, Is detrimental to us.
	It's not natural to us.
	It's not something that's good for our people.
	It's not in connaissance with our moral fabric or our ethics.
	Therefore, it's dangerous for that element to be pushing itself into our country.
	Now you have young white dudes who are wearing backwards snapbacks and baggy pants and they're talking like they're black and Ebonics and slang and all this garbage.
	And this is...
	This is what he's seeing happen in Germany.
	Now, mind you, it's obviously not as extreme, but in the state of Austria, under the Habsburg monarchy, you have all of these people who are of German blood, who Hitler attributes for the creation of this state and all the good things that are inside of it, and now they're bringing in...
	These Slavic elements, which are now changing the culture, they're changing the way that the country is constituted.
	This is very important for us to understand, because this is what's happening to us today in America, right?
	It's not Slavic in that sense, but it's other groups of people, other cultures are coming in here, and it's more extreme because we're talking, you know...
	Fundamentally different cultures, not even different white cultures, but completely fundamentally different cultures.
	So we got a super chat on FTJ from Aquarius.
	Thank you, brother.
	With a $14 super chat, he says, looking sharp, Zach.
	Thank you, sir.
	I appreciate you.
	Thank you very much for the super chat as well.
	And don't forget, folks, if you do want to support the show...
	Super chat options are in the link in the description.
	We've got Entropy.
	We are on FTJ. Rumble, Odyssey, you can super chat on any of those channels.
	I will read them live, and they are very much appreciated.
	As always, everything that is put in as support to the show goes right back into the show, whether it's books, something better for the actual setup of the show or atmosphere, whatever the case may be.
	And I do appreciate it.
	Thank you very much again, Aquarius.
	Okay, continuing.
	The more this babble of tongues wrought discord and disruption, even in the parliament, the nearer did the hour approach for the dissolution of this Babylonian empire.
	That would mean the liberation of my German-Austrian people, and only then would it become possible for them to be reunited with the mother country.
	Accordingly.
	I had no feeling of antipathy towards the actual policy of the social democrats.
	That its avowed purpose was to raise the level of the working classes, which in my ignorance I then foolishly believed, was a further point in favor of social democracy rather than against it.
	But the feature that contributed most to estrange me from the social democratic movement was its hostile attitude towards the struggle for the preservation of Germanism in Austria and its undignified wooing of the Slav comrades who received these approaches favorably as long as any practical advantages were forthcoming, but otherwise maintained a haughty reserve, thus giving the suitors the answer.
	Their behavior observed, deserved.
	Now, again, this is...
	Exactly what we're experiencing in the United States, right?
	So Social Democratic Party, that would be our just Democratic Party, the left, right?
	They want to bring in all of these brown elements into our society.
	They want to get all of these people into here, right?
	So again, not the Slavization, but the Negrification of our country.
	And instead of an anti-German sentiment that they're expressing, it's now expounded, and it's just a blatantly anti-white.
	Sentiment that these people are expressing.
	I mean, this is in how much literature on the left, most of which are Jewish, you know, white fragility, angry white men, treason to whiteness, loyalty to humanity, all of these fucking Jewish works that are promoting anti-white messages publicly.
	This is what was happening in...
	In Austria at the time, except it wasn't anti-white, it was just simply anti-German, right?
	And they were moving Slavs in, in order to move this cultural shift, this cultural change.
	And it's not even about Slav or German, right?
	Because do it in the inverse.
	Let's say there's a Slavic state and a German government becomes in control of the Slavic state and starts pushing German culture and German language and German heritage onto the Slavic people.
	It would be just as detrimental to them because it's culturally not sound for them.
	And in the same way that he states that the Slavs wouldn't be able to uphold a German state, the Germans wouldn't be able to uphold a Slavic state because they're different peoples with different cultures.
	That's a very important piece to understand.
	An inherently anti-Slavic sentiment that he holds.
	It's rather a sentiment against this mixing of any culture into his people.
	He wants his people and his culture to be as unified and harmonious as possible, which obviously we see is a very necessary thing for a healthy civilization.
	So it happened that at the age of 17, the word Marxism was very little known to me.
	While I looked on social democracy and socialism as synonymous expressions, it was only as the result of a sudden blow from the rough hand of fate that my eyes were opened to the nature of this unparalleled system of duping the public.
	Hitherto, my acquaintance with the Social Democratic Party had only been that of a mere spectator at some of their mass meetings.
	I had not the slightest idea of the social democratic doctrine or of the mentality of its partisans, but now was suddenly brought face to face with the products of its teaching and what was called its Weltanschauung.
	In this way, a few months sufficed for me to learn something which in other circumstances might have required years of study, namely, that under the cloak of social virtue, This is his conclusion.
	This is a very interesting conclusion.
	And we can see how this is happening today, correct?
	Birth rates are declining.
	Now, some might say, well...
	They're extincting the white race, right?
	That's not the human race.
	The problem is, who are the benefactors of civilization, of higher culture, of philosophy, of the greatest inventions in history?
	They're the collective European peoples, right?
	Aryan bloodlines.
	So, with these people going extinct, human progress will actually...
	It will revert.
	It will go backwards.
	We will lose inventions.
	We will lose cultural standards.
	Morals and ethics will start to dwindle further and further.
	The less power that white people have, the less institutions that we have that are solely of our people, the more and more society and humanity as a whole will start to decay because we are the creators of that.
	This is just the way things are.
	This does not mean that other people are cannon fodder and don't matter at all, but we have to recognize that fact.
	In the same sense, when we look at a dog, we're talking about scales of value here.
	When we look at dogs, if I'm a hunter and I want to go duck hunting and go shoot a duck and have a dog help me track that duck down and help me hunt, well...
	Am I going to bring a hound dog, which is very profitable and valuable for specifically this, or am I going to bring a poodle to help me duck hunt?
	Obviously, I'm not going to bring a poodle to duck hunt because it's not bred for that.
	And other peoples are not bred for civilizational creation.
	It's just the way it is.
	Now, that's not to say that other peoples don't have civilizations.
	Obviously, the Asiatics have quite nice civilizations to some extent.
	You see these throughout the world.
	I mean, look at Africa.
	Look at all of Africa.
	No civilization was ever created on their own.
	When we came and went to their countries to go into their diamond mines and get their precious minerals, these people didn't have written language.
	Well, to an extent.
	They had a little bit, maybe.
	But they didn't have philosophy written out.
	They didn't have architectural design.
	They didn't have water systems and sewer systems.
	For Christ's sake, the Romans, the ancient Romans...
	Thousands of years ago had all of this, right?
	So there's a very clear line of human progress in one way or another, and we have to recognize that value.
	That doesn't mean that these other people are worthless cannon fodder yet again, but we have to recognize that value.
	And if we don't admire that value and keep that value in lock and in stow, well...
	We see what's going to happen.
	Again, we're watching societal collapse.
	As white people are losing power, you're seeing societal collapse in every single one of our countries.
	Every single day is getting worse and worse and worse.
	Depression is skyrocketing.
	Anxiety, obesity, literal mental illnesses, everything is just skyrocketing through the roof.
	Suicide rates are going up.
	Cancer is going up.
	Everything you can think of that is bad and negative is going up in all of our societies.
	And it's not...
	Coincidental.
	It's happening in all of them all at the same time.
	It's not an accident.
	So we got another Super Chat on FTJ from Redpilled with a $20 Super Chat.
	He says, you're doing God's work.
	Good man.
	Thank you, brother.
	You've been extremely supportive of the show.
	I really appreciate that.
	I've gotten some of your offline Super Chats as well.
	I really appreciate it, brother.
	I just want to mention that I catch all of those, and I really do appreciate it.
	And folks, again, if you do want to support the show, I appreciate that everyone's doing it on FTJ. They do have the lowest processor fees, so we're not paying a bunch of money to some Jewish.
	Middleman in the fold.
	Okay.
	Continuing.
	I first came into contact with the Social Democrats while working in the building trade.
	From the very moment I started work, the situation was not very pleasant for me.
	My clothes were still rather decent.
	I was careful of my speech, and I was reserved in manner.
	I was so occupied with thinking of my own present lot...
	I did not take much interest in my immediate surroundings.
	I had sought work so that I should not starve, and at the same time so as to be able to make further headway with my studies, though this headway might be slow.
	Possibly I should not have bothered about my companions had it not been that on the third or fourth day an event occurred which forced me to take a definite stand.
	I was called upon to join the trade union.
	At that time, I knew nothing about the trade unions.
	I had had no opportunity of forming an opinion on their utility or inutility, as the case might be.
	But when I was told that I must join the union, I refused.
	The grounds which I gave for my refusal were simply that I knew nothing about the matter, and that anyhow, I would not allow myself to be forced into anything.
	Probably the former reason saved me from being thrown out right away.
	They probably thought, That within a few days, I might be converted or become more docile.
	But if they thought so, they were profoundly mistaken.
	After two weeks, I found it utterly impossible for me to take such a step, even if I had been willing to take it at first.
	During those 14 days, I came to know my fellow workmen better, and no power in the world could have moved me to join an organization whose representatives had meanwhile shown themselves in a light.
	At first, my resentment was aroused.
	At midday, some of my fellow workers used to adjourn to the nearest tavern, while the others remained on the building premises and there ate their midday meal, which was, in most cases, a very scanty one.
	These were the married men, whose wives brought their midday soup in dilapidated vessels.
	Towards the end of the week, there was a gradual increase.
	I understood the reason for this afterwards.
	They now talk politics.
	I drank my bottle of milk and ate my morsel of bread somewhat apart from the others, while I circumspectly studied my environment, or else fell to meditating on my own harsh lot.
	Yet I heard more than enough, and I often thought that much of what they said was meant for my ears, in the hope of making me adopt...
	A definite attitude.
	But all that I had heard had the effect of arousing the strongest antagonism in me.
	Everything was disparaged.
	The nation, because it was held to be an invention of the capitalist class.
	How often I had to listen to that phrase.
	The fatherland, because it was held to be an instrument in the hands of the bourgeoisie for the exploitation of the working classes.
	The authority of the law because that was a means of oppressing the proletariat.
	The school system as a means of training not only slaves, but also slave drivers.
	Religion as a means of doping the people in order to exploit them afterwards.
	Morality as the badge of stupid and sheepish docility.
	There was nothing that they did not drag in the mud.
	At first, I remained silent, but that could not last very long.
	Then I began to take part in the discussion and a reply to their statements.
	I had to recognize, however, that this was bound to be entirely fruitless, as long as I did not have at least a certain amount of definite information about the questions that were discussed.
	I therefore decided to consult the sources from which they claimed to have drawn their so-called wisdom, and with this end in view, I studied book after book, pamphlet after pamphlet.
	Meanwhile, we argued with one another on the building premises.
	Day by day, I was becoming better informed than my companions on the subjects on which they claimed to be informed.
	Then, a day came when the more redoubtable of my adversaries resorted to the most effective weapon they had to replace the force of reason, namely, intimidation and physical force.
	Some of the leaders among my adversaries ordered me to leave the building or else allow myself to be flung off the scaffolding.
	As I was quite alone, I could not put up any effective resistance, so I chose the first alternative and departed, having however learned a lesson.
	I went away full of disgust, but at the same time so deeply moved that it was quite impossible for me to turn my back on the whole situation and think no more about it.
	When my anger began to calm down, the spirit of obstinacy got the upper hand and I decided that at all costs, I would get back to work again in the building trade.
	This decision became all the stronger a few weeks later, when my little savings had entirely run out and hunger clutched me once again in its merciless grip.
	I had no alternative.
	I got work again and had to leave for the same reasons as before.
	I tortured myself with the question, are these men worthy to belong to a great people?
	The question is profoundly disturbing, for if the answer is in the affirmative, then the struggle to defend one's nationality is no longer worth all the trouble and sacrifice we demand of our best elements if it be on behalf of such a rabble.
	On the other hand, if the question is in the negative, then our nation is poor in human material.
	After days spent in such meditation and introspection, I was depressed and saw before my mind's eye the ever-increasing and menacing army of people who could no longer be reckoned as belonging to their own nation.
	Now, again, this is something that we see in America today.
	You know, so many people are so far off.
	I mean, you have physical people who are of white descent.
	That are talking about how white people need to go extinct and white people are terrible and white privilege is awful and apologizing for white privilege.
	They actually hate themselves.
	They hate their own existence.
	Is that a group of people that's worthy of being a part of us?
	When you look at the founding fathers and the greatness of a country like America in its creation and all of the wonderful things that have been done here in its history, these people that drag it through the mud and treat it like dog shit and talk about how it's a terrible, oppressive nation and it's built on slavery and all this nonsense rhetoric that, again, comes from these left-wing Marxist circles.
	Do these people deserve to be a part of such a country that's laid this out for them?
	Do they deserve that?
	I mean, seriously.
	We have to really question that to ourselves.
	It was with changed feelings that some days later I gazed on the interminable ranks of Viennese workmen parading four abreast at a mass demonstration.
	I stood dumbfounded for almost two hours.
	Watching that enormous human dragon, which slowly uncoiled itself there before me.
	When I finally left the square and wandered in the direction of my lodgings, I felt dismayed and depressed.
	On my way, I noticed the Arbeiterzeitung, or the workers' journal, in a tobacco shop.
	This was the chief press organ of the old Austrian social democracy.
	In a cheap cafe, Hitherto, I had not been able to bring myself to do more than glance at the wretched thing for a couple of minutes, for its whole tone was a sort of mental vitriol to me.
	Under the depressing influence of the demonstration I had witnessed, some interior voice urged me to buy the paper in that tobacco shop and read it through.
	So I took it home with me and spent a whole evening reading it, despite the steadily mounting rage provoked by the ceaseless outpouring of falsehoods.
	I now found that in the Social Democratic Daily Papers, I could study the inner character of this movement much better than in all their theoretical literature.
	Sorry, I was a little loud.
	What a discrepancy between the two.
	Between the literary effusions which dealt with the theory of social democracy and their high-sounding phraseology about liberty, human dignity, and beauty, the air of profound wisdom, the disgusting moral pose, and the brazen prophetic assurance, a meticulously woven glitter of words to dazzle and mislead the reader, and on the other hand...
	The Daily Press spreading this new doctrine of human redemption in the most vile fashion.
	Now, this is really key, right?
	Because this is exactly their methods today.
	You know, they talk about freedom and equality and, you know, racism is evil.
	We're all one in the same.
	We have to accept gays.
	You know, we have to accept homosexual marriage.
	And then we also have to accept them.
	Adopting children, two men, adopting a baby.
	And then we also have to accept when they decide that that baby is actually a different gender than it was born, we have to accept that they can revert that and change it however they would like.
	We just have to accept it all.
	It's all equality.
	We have to be fair.
	So, you know, it sounds nice.
	They make it out like it's this wonderful, peaceful utopia.
	But in reality, it's suicidal.
	It's death.
	It's societal death, cultural death to allow these things to continue to perpetuate themselves.
	Continuing.
	doing.
	No means was too base, provided it could be exploited in the campaign of slander.
	These journalists were real virtuosos in the art of twisting facts and presenting them in a deceptive form.
	The theoretical literature was intended for the simpletons of the soi-disant intelligentsia of the middle and upper classes.
	The newspaper propaganda was intended for the masses.
	This probing into books and newspapers and the study of the teachings of social democracy reawakened my love for my own people.
	And thus, when it first seemed an impassable gulf, became the occasion of closer affection.
	now again this is the same today you You know, when you go into these, you know...
	Literature halls where they're doing, you know, Marxist studies and they have Marxist meetings and organizations.
	They're reading Noel Ignatieff's work about treason to whiteness, his loyalty to humanity.
	When you go into these places, they have this literature that's meant for those that are willing to study literature and take a deeper interest in it.
	But for the most part, they do propaganda through very simple and base means.
	They have, you know, some social media posts that go out there or they have some, you know...
	TV shows.
	Most of their propaganda is actually in sloganeering.
	It's just in simple words.
	Think about build back better.
	This is a very good example of that.
	Or again, racism as a word.
	This is a very heavily propagandized word.
	And it's a word that breaks down any kind of genuine, healthy nature on things.
	Or hateful is a propagandized word, right?
	Oh, oh, it's so hateful.
	And everybody's afraid of being hateful.
	It's the biggest sin of modern society, is hating something, being hateful.
	Folks, hatefulness has been around since the dawn of time.
	It's a natural human emotion.
	It's always going to exist.
	It's not going to go away.
	It's a healthy emotion.
	It's a defensive emotion.
	So, when they try to convince people that it's hateful to not like homosexuals, or they even go further, they call it homophobic.
	Homophobic.
	I'm not afraid of faggots.
	I'm disgusted for faggots.
	I'm not homophobic.
	I'm not scared of them.
	Phobic means scared.
	So, instantly, even giving credence to the term itself, you're already submitting the argument.
	To the aggressor.
	By even using that word or giving any kind of credence to the word.
	It's the same with xenophobic.
	Scared of other people in other cultures.
	I'm not scared of them.
	I just don't want them here.
	It's not compatible.
	It's simply not compatible.
	I don't want them here.
	I'm not afraid.
	I'm not afraid of having all these people in my country.
	That's a very key thing.
	They use language and rhetoric against us.
	And if we...
	If we use that same language or if we accept that same language, we're giving them the slack.
	We're already setting them ahead of us in the argument by even using terms like homophobic and arguing against it.
	It's just egregious, right, on moral grounds.
	We're coming up on about the one hour mark, folks.
	I think I'm going to take a brief little intermission.
	I'll address the chats a little bit if you guys have something in the chats.
	We'll take a short break, we'll read the chats a little, and then we'll hop back on to the reading.
	I just want to rest my throat a little.
	That's a nice chat.
	Collapsing Society says, Ever since I started watching your show, Zach, I've been motivated to start dressing more formally.
	I think it would be pretty epic if us whites started dressing like they did centuries ago.
	Yeah, even decades ago.
	In the 50s and 60s in the United States, people dressed amazing.
	They wore a suit everywhere they went.
	You had farmhands wearing dress slacks and button-up shirts doing farm work.
	Now people can't even do that to go to the grocery store.
	I'm happy to inspire people to dress nicer.
	It's a cultural standard that we need to uphold.
	It's the thing.
	Our standards are just so low in society.
	Somebody has to set the bar.
	When you go around everywhere and everyone around you is wearing sweatpants and jeans and ripped up jeans with some Jewish t-shirt with a Calvin Klein logo on it, there's no incentive for you to want to dress nicer.
	So some people that are...
	Revolutionary are going to need to start setting that standard moving forward.
	When you see people of value and merit walking around dressed nicely, it encourages you to do the same.
	So that's something that we need to start encouraging big time.
	It's very major.
	Chats are actually a little bit slow today.
	Does anybody have any questions about the reading, about the book, any thoughts?
	I'll address a couple things in the chat while we're taking this little break.
	In the meantime, don't forget, guys, if you do want to support the show, a couple ways to do so.
	Number one is share it around.
	Go on Twitter.
	Follow me on Twitter.
	Repost my stuff.
	Just push it out there.
	Get more people familiar with it.
	Show a friend.
	Show a friend one of my videos.
	Uh, my stuff can be pretty, pretty elementary level to try to wake some people up.
	I've got quite a few videos that'll do that.
	Uh, that's a really good way to help my work.
	And additionally, if you have, uh, some extra money laying around the, the Jewish shekels are, uh, are coming in nice for you at the moment.
	Uh, you can always support the show financially.
	Uh, there are links in the description to do so.
	You can super chat on Odyssey.
	Actually, I think Odyssey is having a problem right now.
	So probably not on Odyssey at the moment, actually.
	But you can Super Chat on FTJ. You can Super Chat on Entropy, Rumble.
	Just a friendly reminder, if you guys do want to support on Rumble, make sure that you do it on my personal Rumble.
	If you want the support to go to me, you can always support the Stu Peters Network.
	Just know that any Super Chats that go on the network channel will not go to me.
	So if you want to support me directly, you can do so from my channel.
	I always recommend FTJ. It's got the lowest transaction fees.
	3%.
	3% processor fee.
	Okay?
	Rumble has a 20% processor fee.
	So you're paying the middleman a shitload of money.
	FTJ, they take no cut at all.
	It's the processor itself that's taking that.
	Fascist Fish, thank you, brother.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Gandalf, thank you very much.
	Glad you caught the show live.
	It's nice to see.
	The word spinster journalists are expert at appealing to our sense of virtue and manipulating our better selves into a virtuous purity spiral of one upmanship to see who can be the most virtuous in propagation to public approval.
	all.
	Yeah, that's a very good point.
	It's that pathological altruism, right?
	Jews are very familiar that we're a very altruistic people.
	We want to help people.
	We want to do the right thing.
	We want to do good by everybody.
	And that's how they exploit this...
	Homosexual shit in society and the multiculturalism, they're able to force all of this in by just making it seem that it's not virtuous to be against that, right?
	Oh, that's hateful, it's mean, it's crude, you're not thinking about that person's feelings.
	And, you know, feelings are definitely somewhat important in society, but you have to realize that there's a time when feelings don't matter anymore, right?
	Think about a child, right?
	You want to do right by a child and, you know, you don't want to hurt a child's feelings.
	But sometimes the kid wants ice cream for dinner and it's going to hurt their feelings to tell them, no, you can't have ice cream for dinner.
	You have to have real fucking food.
	You got to eat vegetables.
	And that might hurt the kid's feelings, but it's what's best for the kid, right?
	And in the same sense, it might hurt some, you know, morbidly obese fat fucks feelings to call him fat, but they need to hear it because they got to fix themselves.
	They're killing themselves.
	It might hurt somebody's feelings to say that it's disgusting that you're gay.
	But it is.
	It's repulsive.
	And you can't reproduce.
	You're literally...
	What's the point in existence?
	You have no purpose in life other than self-pleasure and fulfillment.
	There's zero other grander purpose in life.
	The entire purpose of life is like the entire purpose of water.
	It's a cycle.
	It's a cycle.
	We live.
	We procreate.
	We die.
	We live, we procreate, we die.
	It's a cycle.
	So if the cycle of life is what makes life exist, the second that you break that cycle and you no longer participate in that cycle, you are literally destroying the purpose of life itself.
	That's why homosexuality is bad.
	It's as simple as that.
	People have a hard time hearing that, but it can hurt your feelings all you want.
	This is the truth.
	You can recognize it or not.
	If everybody was gay, we'd go extinct.
	It's clearly a bad thing.
	It's not natural.
	That's very well said.
	Dan says, tolerance is the opposite of honor.
	I agree with that.
	That's a very good statement.
	We need more honor in society.
	We have very little honor.
	honorable men are far and few between.
	Yeah, I agree.
	And most of these homosexuality, transgenderism, a lot of this is just sexual deviancy.
	It's a fetish for a lot of them, truthfully.
	And one they have no control over, right?
	Self-control is also a very honorable trait that's almost non-existent in society.
	While we're still at our little halfway point, just a friendly reminder, folks, schedule this week.
	We've got David Duke coming on Wednesday at 4 p.m. Eastern.
	We've got a book analysis of Battle for Berlin by Goebbels on Friday at 4 p.m. Eastern.
	Right after the show, an hour after we're finishing this show, we're going to be hosting a Twitter space, National Socialist Mondays.
	We do it every other Monday on JQ Radio on Twitter at 7pm Eastern.
	You guys can go and ask me questions.
	You can come and join the speaker category.
	You can bring up a point if you'd like.
	It's a very open panel, so feel free to join in for that tonight.
	And then we're also going to be on JQ Radio for a Twitter space on Thursday at 7 p.m.
	Eastern with Monica Schaefer.
	We're going to be giving her a nice little interview.
	Wonderful woman.
	I really recommend that you guys catch that.
	She always does a very good job explaining our worldview in a palatable manner.
	Yeah, David Duke's going to be an interesting show.
	I know he's a bit of a talker, so I'm going to have to find a way to reel that in because it can be a little bit difficult to get a question in.
	I want to make sure we can actually ask him a couple things, not just one.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	All right, we're gonna hop back into the reading, folks.
	We are, for those following along, we're reading the Stilag edition of Mein Kampf.
	We are on page 35, and we're on...
	We're going to be starting on the sixth chapter of page 35. Okay, let's continue.
	During the years that followed, I became more independent, and as I did so, I became better able to understand the inner cause of the success achieved by this social democratic gospel.
	I now realized the meaning and purpose of those brutal orders which prohibited the reading of all books and newspapers that were not red, and at the same time demanded that only the red meetings should be attended.
	In the clear light of reality, I was able to see what must have been the inevitable consequences of that intolerant teaching.
	The mentality of the broad masses is accessible only to what is strong and uncompromising.
	Like women whose inner sensibilities are not under the sway of abstract reasoning, but are always subject to the influence of a vague emotional longing for the strength that completes her being, and who would rather bow to the strong man than dominate the weakling.
	In like manner, the masses of the people prefer the ruler to the suppliant, and are well led with a stronger sense of mental security by a teaching that brooks no rival than by one which offers them a liberal freedom.
	This is crucial, right?
	The masses are effeminate, right?
	That doesn't mean, like, the men are literally, you know, soy boys, although we're hitting that critical mass.
	We're getting pretty close, right?
	But the masses are inherently effeminate.
	Effeminate, right?
	They're driven by emotion rather than by stern reasoning than logic, right?
	So again, you have this kind of like right brain, left brain thing where we've got logic on one side and emotion on the other.
	A lot of people, especially today, it's...
	It's taught in our schooling system and, you know, our society as a whole.
	It's trained into people that the way to think is the emotional way.
	It's always to think about someone's feelings, think about the emotions, rather than think about the logic of what is right and wrong, right?
	And we get this when we get into the question of eugenics, right, or euthanasia for extremely unhealthy offspring.
	You know, say you have somebody, you have a child that's extremely unwell, they're going to live a terrible life physically because of some kind of biological issue that they have upon birth.
	You know, a lot of people have a hard time coming to the conclusion that it might actually be better to cut that life off before the suffrage that that person has to experience expounds itself indefinitely.
	And this is in nature.
	The thing is, nature is not driven by emotion.
	Never has been and it never will.
	We see this.
	I've used this example many times on my show, but we see this with birds.
	Birds, if they have a couple birds, a few offspring, and when they go to fly south for the winter, if one of the baby birds has a broken wing or is sickly or ill, not only do they leave it behind when they leave to fly south, again, survival of the fittest, They'll actually kick it out of the nest physically, leave it for dead.
	They intentionally kick it out of the nest and leave it for dead, knowing that the sickness of that one could end up harming the rest.
	This is nature.
	Nature is cold-hearted reason.
	There's no emotions coming in between.
	You don't see in the animal kingdom...
	When the mama bird goes to kick the baby bird out of the nest because he's got a broken wing, you don't see the other baby birds going, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa.
	That's so mean.
	He's going to suffer.
	They don't do that because they're not driven by...
	Here's the problem.
	Mankind has consciousness.
	We can make our own choices.
	And that can be extremely dangerous if those choices are uneducated or if they're guided by...
	Something like emotions.
	Because emotions, it's not real.
	It's not grounded in anything.
	What's emotional to me could be not emotional to you.
	You can watch a Holocaust movie and it can make you bawl your eyes out.
	I could watch a Holocaust movie and it can make me laugh my ass off.
	So emotion, it's all perceptible.
	It's all depending on the individual.
	Logic and reason are not.
	They're sound.
	They're here to stay.
	What's logical and reasonable right now, A thousand years later will be logical and reasonable yet again, because that's the way these things work.
	Let's continue.
	They have very little idea of how to use that freedom, and thus they are prone to feel that they have been abandoned.
	They feel very little shame at being terrorized intellectually, and they are scarcely conscious of the fact that their freedom as human beings is impudently abused.
	Nor have they the slightest suspicion of the intrinsic fallacy of the whole doctrine.
	They see only the ruthless force and brutality of its determined utterances to which they always submit.
	Now, this is another good example here, what he's putting out.
	There is an experiment that was done years ago in the United States.
	It's called the Solomon-Ash experiment.
	You can look this up.
	It's the conformity experiment.
	A Polish Jew who did this conformity experiment and he takes a line graph.
	And there's three lines on this graph.
	There's A, there's B, and there's C. And A is clearly shorter than B. B is all the way up here.
	Or maybe it's a little bit like this.
	But it's very obvious that A is shorter than B on this line graph.
	And he would hire eight to a dozen people.
	To specifically say that B was the longer line, even though A was actually the longer line, or maybe I mixed it up, but whichever line was longer, if A is longer, he would hire people to say that B is longer, even though it was very clear that A is longer.
	And then he would have a new contestant come in, or a new test subject, we'll say, come in and...
	He would have them look at the graph.
	They would clearly see that A is longer.
	And before he would allow them to vote on that, he would show them the results of the other people that participated in this experiment.
	And once they saw that everybody else said B, even though they could clearly with their two eyes see that A was longer, they would vote B. Because they want to conform to the rest of the mass.
	As Hitler said, they feel abandoned.
	They don't want to feel abandoned.
	They don't want to feel alone.
	They don't want to be the outcast.
	There's very few people that will break away from that.
	Because social pressure is what makes things move.
	And this is the very fantastic thing about the situation that we're in today.
	Is that hundreds of years, or decades ago, the Jews have done an extremely good job.
	At putting this social stigma and this social pressure against anti-Semitism.
	So people won't say something negative about Jews, not because they actually think it's morally wrong or not because they don't think Jews are good people or they think they're great people, whatever the case.
	They simply won't say anything about Jews negatively because they don't want to be that outcast.
	They don't want to feel like that lone person on the island who stands out of the crowd.
	They want to feel that they're a part of a community of a group.
	And this is the key about where we're going now.
	As anti-Semitism, as Jewish behavior is being exposed on a global scale much more publicly, we're now hitting this critical mass where people feel comfortable saying negative things about Jews because they see everybody else doing it.
	And now that they see everybody else doing it, they feel, oh.
	That's okay.
	It's socially acceptable now.
	Now I can participate in this activity.
	That's the key, right?
	And this goes for everything.
	And this is why having control over our media is of the utmost importance.
	Because if you don't have control over your media and you have Jews pushing drug usage in your media...
	Which they do, by the way.
	How many documentaries does Vice News have about somebody doing fucking LSD in the woods with their buddies or doing meth or doing heroin or some other drug, right?
	This is a promotion of drugs.
	Whether you see it that way or not, even if they framework it as a negative thing to do, society is seeing that more and more people are doing it.
	It normalizes the behavior, and now they don't feel like they're the only one.
	It's kind of that good old, when you're a kid, And your parents say, hey, I don't want you stealing anything from the store.
	And you go to the mall with your buddy and your buddy steals something off the shelf.
	And now you go steal something too because you saw him do it and you feel like you're doing it together.
	And now you go home and your parents go, you stole that?
	I thought I told you not to steal.
	And then what does the kid say?
	Well, Jimmy did it first.
	Jimmy did it.
	I was just doing it with him.
	So people want to feel with somebody.
	right?
	They don't, they won't do that alone.
	There's a lot of times where you see this a lot with men too, like young boys.
	They're, if they're in a group with other boys, they're a hell of a lot more likely to do something stupid that they wouldn't do alone because they feel now there's a comfort to do it, right?
	There's that social atmosphere present for it.
	Okay.
	Continuing.
	If social democracy is opposed by a more truthful teaching, then, even though the struggle be of the most bitter kind, this truthful teaching will finally prevail, provided it be enforced with equal ruthlessness.
	Within less than two years, I had gained a clear understanding of social democracy, its teaching, and its weapons.
	I recognize the infamy of that technique whereby the movement carried on a campaign of mental terrorism against the bourgeoisie, which is neither morally nor spiritually equipped to withstand such attacks.
	The tactics of social democracy consisted in opening, at a given signal, a veritable barrage of lies and calumnies against the man whom they believed to be the most redoubtable of their adversaries.
	Until the nerves of the bourgeoisie gave way and they sacrificed the man who was attacked, simply in the hope of being allowed to live in peace.
	We see this exactly in our conservative atmosphere as well, right?
	You have these conservative commentators.
	The left will ruthlessly attack one of these guys and others will just throw him under the bus.
	Oh yeah, he was.
	Yeah, he is.
	He is a bit racist.
	Yeah, yeah.
	We're shunning him too because he's racist.
	He's against Indian immigration.
	We don't want anything to do with him.
	That's racist.
	They're doing that just simply because of the social pressure of everybody else going against the guy.
	Rockwell says, Hi Zach, are you not streaming on X anymore?
	Yes, I am streaming on X. Unfortunately, X has been down all day, up and down.
	It's been giving me a lot of problems and I couldn't get my stream going when I started today, so I'm not for that reason.
	But the hopes always proved to be foolish, for they were never left in peace.
	The same tactics were repeated again and again, until fear of these ruthless fanatics exercised, by sheer force of suggestion, a paralyzing effect on their victims.
	Through its own experience, social democracy learned the value of strength, and for that reason, it attacks mostly those in whom it sees real metal.
	Which is indeed a very rare possession.
	On the other hand, it praises every weakling among its adversaries, more or less cautiously according to the measure of his mental qualities, known or assumed.
	They have less fear of a man of genius who lacks willpower than of a vigorous character of mediocre intelligence.
	And at the same time, they highly commend those who are devoid of both intelligence, The Social Democrats know how to create the impression that they are alone the protectors of peace.
	In this way, acting very circumspectly, but never losing sight of their ultimate goal, they conquer one position after another, at one time by methods of quiet intimidation, and at another by sheer daylight robbery.
	These tactics are based on an accurate estimation of human frailties and must lead to success with almost mathematical certainty, unless...
	The other side also learns how to fight poison gas with poison gas.
	Weaker elements must be told that here it is a question of to be or not to be.
	This is the circumstance, by the way.
	You can tell people that and you could say it in...
	This kind of sentimental sense.
	But this is the truth right now.
	We're actually in a spot here, demographically, where if this continues on the way that it is, the collective European peoples will go extinct on this planet.
	It is to be or not to be.
	You either fight and we continue to exist, or you trickle off into liberal fantasies and we go extinct forever because you didn't want to hurt people's feelings.
	That's the choice.
	That's the crossroads that we're at right now.
	I also came to understand that physical intimidation has its significance for the mass as well as for the individual.
	Here again, the psychological effect has been calculated to a nicety.
	Intimidation in workshops and in factories, in assembly halls, and at mass demonstrations will always meet with success.
	As long as it does not have to encounter the same kind of intimidation in a stronger form.
	Then, of course, the Social Democratic Party will raise a horrified outcry and appeal to the authority of the state, which it has just repudiated and will, in most cases, quietly achieve its aim amid the general confusion, namely,
	to discover some bovine creature holding an unimportant, I'm sorry, an important government position who in a vain attempt to curry favor with the dreaded opponent in case of future trouble is ready to finish off those who dare oppose this world enemy.
	Give a good example of this.
	As much as he's a piece of human garbage, Jordan Peterson says, Everybody's familiar with this fucking scumbag.
	But Jordan Peterson used to do speeches at colleges and lectures and things like this.
	And there's this famous video where he's standing there trying to do a speech.
	He's arguing with these liberals and, you know, listen here, bucko!
	And a group of, like, agitators, they might have been Antifa, they were clearly left-wing individuals, you know, fucking pink hair and all this nonsense.
	And they're standing there and they're just screaming into a massive microphone over him so that he cannot talk, right?
	This is their method of intimidation.
	If you can't hear the guy talk and he's going to be too much of a coward to actually fight you and not let you do that, this is how these people succeed.
	Now the second that he's to turn around and go grab their microphone and unplug it and throw it across the yard so that they can't do this anymore, what do they do?
	They call the police.
	They call the police and they say, he touched our stuff, he's hateful, he's mean, he's assaulted us, and they play this game.
	This is exactly what Hitler's laying out right here.
	This is their strategy.
	It's the method.
	The impression which such successful tactics makes on the minds of the broad masses, whether they be adherents or opponents, can be estimated only by one who knows the popular mind, not from books, can be estimated only by one who knows the popular mind, not from books, For the successes which are thus obtained are taken by the adherents of social democracy as a triumph of the righteousness of their own cause.
	On the other hand, the beaten opponent very often loses faith in the effectiveness of any further resistance.
	The more I understood the methods of physical intimidation that were employed, the more sympathy I had for the multitude that had succumbed to it.
	I am thankful now for the ideal which I had to go through at that time, for it was the means of bringing back Bringing me to think kindly again of my own people.
	And as much as the experience enabled me to distinguish between the false leaders and the victims who have been led astray.
	For those who had been misled in this way can only be described as victims.
	Again, think of, you know, as much as you want to hate these trannies that are going all over TikTok and doing the...
	He, him, they, them, and all these gay pronoun things.
	These people are victims, man.
	They're mentally ill.
	They're being completely bludgeoned by this Jewish idea of how to secure yourself happiness.
	They're victims.
	We got 13-year-old kids cutting their dicks off.
	These are victims.
	If I attempted to give a faithful picture of those on the lowest rung of the social ladder, my picture would be incomplete.
	If I did not add that even in the social depths, I still found light in the shape of a rare spirit of self-sacrifice and loyal comradeship, contentment, and a modest reserve.
	This was true especially of the older generation of workmen.
	Although these qualities were disappearing more and more in the younger generation, owing to the all-pervading influence of the big city, yet among the younger generation also, If these men,
	who in many cases meant well and were upright in themselves, were, as far as their political activities were concerned, in the ranks of the mortal enemy of our people, that was because they, as decent work people, did not and could not grasp.
	Furthermore, it was because no other section of the community bothered itself about the lot of the working classes, and social conditions finally proved more powerful than any feelings which might have led them to adopt a different attitude.
	A day was bound to come when want gained the upper hand and drove them to join.
	The Social Democrats.
	Let's take a brief little breather here.
	This is a very long chapter.
	We are definitely not going to finish this in two shows.
	We're going to get close, but it's probably going to end up being three.
	It's getting a little bit hot in my room here.
	Okay.
	Thank you.
	It's crazy how quickly the weather changed.
	I think we might do a stopping point there, actually.
	because if I read further, it's going to be very hard to find an adequate stopping point.
	I think that's where we're going to stop.
	That's about 10 pages for today.
	So we'll start on the...
	Fourth chapter of page 38, the next time that we pick up.
	Again, I know it's only 10 pages in a day, which doesn't seem like a lot.
	But in this specific chapter, there's a lot of analysis required.
	It's just so relatable to what we're experiencing in modern society.
	And it's very important that we draw those connections.
	Because the more you draw those connections and justify the things that Hitler is saying...
	The more it becomes very clear that this is not a madman.
	A madman can't be that correct on fucking everything.
	A madman doesn't say something and then 100 years later, every single thing he said and laid out is happening exactly as said.
	That's not a madman.
	If anything, it's a philosophical prophet.
	It's very important that we very heavily break these things down and just show exactly how relatable it is.
	to our modern system and what's happening today.
	Yeah, certainly.
	Quality over quantity.
	And I do want to apologize again for...
	We were on a little bit of a two-week break.
	I just...
	I kept telling myself, hey, I'm going to do it today.
	I'm going to do it today.
	But if I come on and I don't have the mindset that's required to do a reading like this, I just can't do it.
	I'm not going to have the passion that's required, as well as providing a deep, serious analysis of the things that we're reading.
	I need to have a lot of energy for it.
	I need to be in the right mindset.
	So please do understand.
	I know it's been a little bit since we've done a show.
	We're sacrificing the quantity aspect for a higher quality.
	And I hope you guys found this to be insightful or helpful.
	Curious in the chat, I always like to just get a general gauge.
	What did you guys think of the reading today?
	1 to 10 on the reading?
	Rate it 1 to 10. Any thoughts, feedback?
	I would love to hear it.
	Thank you, by the way, folks.
	We got a lot of new followers on Rumble today.
	Really appreciate that.
	Rumble channel has been growing quite a bit.
	We got a nine.
	Good.
	George, is it well lit enough?
	Is the lighting good for it?
	Does it match the lighting?
	Thank you.
	I appreciate it.
	This is my absolute favorite painting historically.
	It's such a cultured painting.
	It really is.
	Thank you, Cronin.
	I appreciate you watching.
	You're more than welcome to watch.
	I always put these up as rebroadcast so you guys can watch them in the future.
	Waythorn, thank you very much, brother.
	I appreciate that.
	Don't forget, I am going to shill one more time.
	I hate doing it.
	I really do.
	I had somebody have a pretty stern talking to me about the fact that I don't shill enough.
	I don't even know how to perceive that.
	If you guys do want to support the show, it is greatly appreciated.
	Again, I am a one-man band here.
	I put a lot of hours and work into this, so every little bit of support is extremely appreciated.
	I cannot thank you guys enough for all the people who have supported the show with Super Chats.
	If you guys do want to support the show, again, if you're strapped for cash and you can't support financially, that's fine.
	It's not an obligation by any means.
	And you can support other ways.
	You can share it around.
	You can show a family member one of my Logos Academy videos where I do the whiteboard series.
	Show a family member something that they maybe don't know.
	Plant some seeds in their mind.
	But if you do have a little bit of extra money laying around, you guys want to help support the show, the options to do so are down in the description below.
	I've got a link to a bio.site.
	You can support through FTJ, Entropy.
	You can support through Rumble as well at the moment.
	If you're a crypto guru, you can support through crypto wallets.
	I have a boatload of different options on the crypto exchange.
	It's called the CryptoTree or CoinTree in my bio site link.
	You guys want to support that way.
	I greatly appreciate it.
	And again, just a friendly reminder, everything that you guys support with.
	It goes right back into it.
	Whether it's books or a new webcam or a microphone or a filter, whatever the case may be, it all goes right back into it.
	Mein Kampf is a life changer, yeah.
	I read and reread Mein Kampf many times, many times.
	It's terrible, Tommy.
	It's awful.
	Sorry to hear.
	Thank you, guys.
	I'm glad you guys enjoyed the reading.
	So, again, I will pick up on the reading probably next week.
	We're stacked on shows this week.
	I have a lot of guests coming on, so we're not going to do any more reading this week, but we will pick back up on it next week.
	I think we'll probably do it on...
	Probably Monday next week, I'll try to do.
	I think that'll be the best time to do it.
	I'm getting hot.
	I think I'm going to have to take a break here.
	It's crazy.
	Alright, again, we have David Duke coming on Wednesday, 4pm Eastern.
	We've got Battle for Berlin being analyzed on Friday at 4pm Eastern.
	And in about an hour and a half, we're going to be doing a Twitter space on JQ Radio, National Socialist Hour, if you guys want to support that, or not support that, join that rather.
	You guys can hop into the Twitter space.
	It's free to do.
	You can speak.
	It's pretty much an open panel almost every time.
	And ask me questions about National Socialism.
	You can bring points up about National Socialism or certain things for discussion.
	Very much all is appreciated.
	I really like the open discussion of things.
	So, thank you guys for that.
	I see we got Legan Duke, if I'm saying that correctly.
	Legan?
	Legan?
	Legion?
	Legan?
	I'm sorry if I'm saying that wrong.
	I feel like an asshole.
	With a $100 super chat on the Stu Peters Network.
	He says, great work.
	Keep it going, please.
	Thank you, brother.
	I appreciate that very much.
	Just a friendly reminder.
	I don't mind either way, but just a friendly reminder.
	Any Super Chats that are done in the Stu Peters Network Rumble Chat, those do not go to me.
	I don't get a dollar of that.
	So if you do want to support me directly, you have to do Super Chats on my Rumble channel.
	But nonetheless, I still appreciate you supporting Stu's network.
	It's very kind of you.
	Thank you very much.
	He said the video is frozen on Rumble.
	It looks good on my end.
	Looks perfect on my end, actually.
	Man.
	Okay.
	Sweating my ass off here.
	This is crazy.
	It's got to be like 100 degrees in here.
	This is insane.
	It's the first day that it's been over 50 in my area.
	And somehow I'm already heat stroking in here, man.
	Okay.
	Yeah, I don't know what's causing that issue.
	Hopefully we can get that fixed.
	Hopefully it's not on my end.
	I don't seem like anything's wrong on my end, but...
	It's always there.
	Alright, I think we're going to close up here.
	Legion, he says, I'll support another way.
	Brother, thank you.
	I appreciate it.
	Again, it's not an obligation.
	I do greatly appreciate it.
	Any options that you prefer, you can do super chats however you would like.
	Thank you, sir.
	I really do appreciate the support.
	It's extremely kind.
	It very much helps me in my endeavors.
	I'm actually...
	I need to get a new book drop.
	I haven't gotten any new books in quite a while, so I think that's the next thing I'm going to invest in.
	I'm going to get some more books because I'm overdue for sure.
	All right, that said, folks, thank you guys for watching.
	I really appreciate it.
	It's been a very energetic show.
	I hope you guys can probably see that I have a little more energy than I had.
	Probably last couple shows beforehand.
	I was kind of forcing myself a little bit.
	I was overcrowding myself with things.
	Took a little bit of a breather.
	Sometimes we just got to do that.
	Take a breather.
	Spent a little time looking a little more inwardly and kind of focusing on some things myself.
	I'm feeling back.
	I'm feeling extremely motivated.
	Really super energetic and motivated and excited on things.
	Things are just going in the right direction.
	They really are.
	We'll keep it rolling, folks, every day.
	Keep spreading the message.
	Keep participating.
	Do what you can to help the cause.
	Whatever your role is, make sure that you fill it in.
	Okay, folks?
	That said, have a wonderful day, and I'll see you guys on the National Socialist Space in about an hour and 20 minutes.
	And if you guys aren't in there, I'll see you guys on Wednesday, 4 p.m.
	Eastern.
	We're going to be joined by David Duke.
	It's going to be a very interesting show.
	Hopefully I'll be able to get a couple questions in if I'm lucky.
	Alright, thank you folks.
	Really do appreciate it.

▲