All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 26, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
56:42
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Comey's Covert Honeypot Exposed, States want Gay Marriage Abolished
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thanks so much for being with us.
My name is Paul Harrell.
This is the Millstone Report.
That's the show you're watching.
Congratulations.
You found it.
We've got a great show for you.
We've got a lot to get to today.
Man, it's all over the place today.
Once again, it's just another day where it's kind of like Christmas morning if you're a reporter.
There's just so many stories to cover and there's not enough time to cover them.
That much is sure.
Before we go any further, we want to thank our partner, our sponsor for this portion of the program is Red Vive Health.
Go to redvivehealth.org slash Paul and check out the fantastic dual wavelength red light panels offered by Red Vive.
And we'll tell you a little bit more about them here in just a moment.
We're going to start first with a white pill this morning.
Yeah, we're going to go with a white pill this morning.
And it comes from the New York Times.
It comes out of the...
Isn't that crazy?
It comes right out of the New York Times.
Here's the white pill.
I refuse to pay for this.
So, thankfully we've done a little research and we've figured this out.
So the New York Times has in their morning newsletter, One Nation Under God.
Americans have stopped leaving Christianity and the country is overwhelmingly spiritual.
A new report has found.
So I'm not going to pay to read this, but apparently Andrew Torba has the ticket.
And he's the one that, you know, this is the morning white pill.
So we have this, where they ask a Christian preacher, you know, Woke, subversive Russell Moore, can American Christianity survive?
Or maybe that's something he wrote.
Is it?
I can't remember exactly.
But the nuts and bolts of it are this.
New York Times writes, the answer appears to be yes.
American Christianity can survive.
People have stopped leaving churches in mass, according to a new study released this morning by Pew Research.
America's secularization is on pause for now, likely because of the pandemic and the country's stubborn spirituality.
Most Americans, 92% of adults, say they hold one or more spiritual beliefs that Pew asked about.
Here's a few of the questions here.
People have a soul or spirit in addition to a physical body?
86%.
That's a huge one, and I'll tell you why here in just a minute.
Do you believe in God or a universal spirit?
83% said yes.
Is there something spiritual beyond the natural world?
79% said yes.
Is there a belief in an afterlife?
Heaven, hell, or both?
70%.
One or more of the above, according to Pew, 92%.
Now, this is a big deal.
And I'll tell you one of the reasons why it's a big deal is because when I was growing up, Atheism was what was being debated.
You had a lot of people from, I guess you could say, the boomer generation.
In that generation, not that atheism doesn't exist in these up-and-coming generation or in millennials or that sort of thing.
Certainly, people my age succumbed to that.
I remember in high school, you kind of knew who the atheists were.
Of course, I grew up basically in the equivalent of the Shire.
Where, you know, you're in the Bible Belt and everybody essentially believes in God in some way.
Certainly a Christian culture undergirding everything, which is a very good thing.
But that's why everybody knew who the atheists were.
I knew who the atheists were in my class.
I think there was two of them, I guess.
Two that I know of, at least, that were outspoken about it.
And so that's certainly, and I guess technically I'm a millennial, so that...
You know, that was there.
But the reason it was there is because the older generation, you know, whether it was Gen X or the boomers, they were pumping out.
They were promoting.
The media was promoting, you know, this idea of science and it's disproving the existence of God and everything else.
And thanks to the Internet, there's plenty of resources out there that debunk that.
The real battle here is that the generations, you know, millennials and those coming up, they're battling this New Age paganism where evil is more just kind of overtly revealing itself, and people are now kind of assuming that there is some form of spirituality.
And that actually, once you kind of get, you know, atheism is no longer the default, it actually makes having conversations with people If you can get them to recognize that there's evil and that we are being, as Tucker Carlson even says, being acted upon by outside forces that we can't see, then there's also good and there's objective good.
And I argue, obviously, I believe that that objective truth is found in the character of God that we read about in the Bible and Scripture.
So this is a big deal, and it's very encouraging.
And what's more encouraging about it to me is how the New York Times is writing about it as a negative.
They're writing to their audience, obviously, which is full of anti-Christian urbanites, for the most part.
And they are basically lamenting.
The lamentations of the New York Times this morning is that those stubborn Christians are making inroads, and people are turning back to churches.
People are turning back to spirituality.
Obviously, just being spiritual doesn't save you from your sins, right?
We know that.
Repenting, putting your faith in Jesus, that...
That is where salvation is.
But the landscape is different than it was with the atheists when I was growing up.
You don't hear about it as much.
Instead, you hear about actual witches casting spells, trying to prevent Donald Trump from getting in office.
You hear the overt pagan and Satanism.
That's out there.
Things like the Sisters for Perpetual Indulgence.
That really twisted, sick group that was allowed to do their display.
And we see the open...
And the reason, by the way, that's why you see the open sexualization of kids.
That's why you see this movement towards normalizing pedophilia.
And as that evil reveals itself, which in many ways is just a natural, built-in...
This societal destruction mechanism, as people reject God, there is no foundation for that society, but people are now seeing the evil and saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, I don't like that.
Now, we're going to talk about that here in a minute.
So we're going to talk about the slippery slope because that's how we got here.
We got here via a slippery slope.
One thing has led to another.
And we still have a lot of people that haven't connected those dots yet.
They haven't realized that if you have a problem with just how bad our society has gotten, walking right up to that cliff, And you want to end that, like the transing of kids.
There's a lot of non-Christians that are like, man, the transing of kids is ridiculous, it's evil, I hate it.
But they're not willing to crawl their way back up the slippery slope and say, maybe us rejecting God's definition of marriage between one man and one woman leads to transing kids and calling it health care.
Leads to genital mutilation and calling in healthcare.
There are some that are not willing to connect those dots.
Today on the Millstone Report, I'm going to do my best to connect those dots.
But before we do, again, that's a great white pill to start off the day.
There are some reports that you've got Representative Paulina Luna.
This is just a follow-up on what we started the program with yesterday.
It says, A.G. Pambani scheduled the release of the Epstein client files for noon on the 29th of February.
We'll see if that happens.
I'm just saying that there's a little bit of movement there for people that want that.
And by the way, we already know a lot about the Epstein files and everything else.
It's just curious as to what else could be released because it's just a lot of people in light of...
It all goes back to Ghislaine Maxwell getting arrested, prosecuted, sentenced to jail for trafficking kids to no one.
And I think that's the issue here, is that really, you know, the government may be releasing files and admitting things we already know, but will there be arrests?
Will there be prosecutions wherever it leads?
I think that's really the question, and I won't hold my breath.
I really won't.
I really won't.
So, James Comey.
James Comey is now being investigated for a covert campaign to put honeypots inside the Donald Trump campaign in 2016. Washington Times with this headline, FBI looking into Comey's off-the-books honeypot operation targeting 2016 Trump campaign.
FBI leadership is starting an investigation, now that Kash Patel's in there, into the origins of the agency's plan a decade ago to infiltrate the campaign of presidential candidate Donald Trump using two female undercover, quote, honeypot, end quote, agents.
Imagine how sick you'd have to be.
Look, and I get it.
I know in the world of espionage, sex is always a trap and that sort of thing.
I get it.
But do you imagine, like, I mean, if that's like the cloak-and-dagger environment, I mean, doesn't that all but guarantee that the heads of these types of organizations just can't operate within a Christian framework at all?
I mean, I guess unless we're actually going to say, you know, we're at war, like an actual war, then deception is, I don't know, it's just something I was thinking about.
I mean, imagine how sick you'd have to be to be like, okay, we've got an asset, we've got this girl, and we want you to use your body to take somebody out politically.
We want you to use your body so that we can get blackmail on somebody and get them to do what we want them to do.
Imagine how evil and sick and twisted you would have to be.
To orchestrate that.
I think we just take it for granted because we've seen James Bond movies or we've seen spy movies or we know that this stuff goes on.
It's been going on for a long time across the world, right?
It'll probably always go on.
But to actually be the guy that sits down and says, we've got these two assets, they're attractive women, we want them to go and sleep with people and then we want them to...
We want to get blackmail on them or we want them to collect intel.
Man, to actually be the guy, you know, for all the talk of the Me Too movement and toxic masculinity, but to be James Comey, to be that guy orchestrating this allegedly.
Just think about you.
What would you have to do mentally and spiritually to be able to say, yes, let's do it?
What kind of person do you have to be?
And these are the people who have been running our government for a very long time.
As we see that they've stacked the National Security Agency full of trans people who have hijacked chats.
We're going to see that here in a minute, by the way, because that's part of this slippery slope that I was mentioning earlier.
But what's funny to me is this is how Fox News...
Now, I don't watch Fox News, like, habitually.
Go over to maybe a family member's house.
It's on.
I watch it.
I don't watch Fox News.
I get my news from a lot of different sources.
The internet, obviously X is incredible.
When I was watching this clip, I was thinking to myself, is there an average or maybe a stereotype of a Fox News viewer?
That's like watching this and listening to the presentation like, Honeypot!
Honeypot!
Oh, wow!
It just seems like there's some pearl clutching in this clip.
It was really funny to me.
Let me cue it up here.
Alright, here we go.
Plan to infiltrate President Trump's first campaign by using two undercover agents in a so-called Honeypot operation?
I'm sorry.
That's Brian Kilmeade.
With this, you know, this is big news.
And it is, but like, just the way he's presenting it is funny to me.
I don't know why.
Maybe you can tell me why.
Trying to infiltrate President Trump's first campaign by using two undercover agents in a so-called honeypot operation?
Whoa!
Todd Pyro joins us with details.
Todd.
This is big.
Under the leadership of new FBI Director Cash Patel.
And Deputy Director Dan Bongino, the Bureau, has reportedly launched an investigation into the agency's plan to infiltrate President Trump's first campaign using two female undercover agents.
The Washington Times reporting that the program was launched in 2015 by then-FBI Director James Comey.
The honeypot scheme.
was actually kept off the books, and according to a whistleblower, Comey's investigation was separate from Crossfire Hurricane.
You, of course, know that as the FBI's operation that looked into allegations Trump's campaign colluded with Russia.
A whistleblower disclosure says, quote, the case had no predicated foundation, so Comey personally directed the investigation without creating an official case file in Sentinel or any other FBI system.
The FBI has multiple methods of protecting highly sensitive investigations, so Comey did not have a legitimate reason not to officially create an official investigation file or have a filed number.
FBI leaders are reportedly looking for those once-undercover agents who are said to have infiltrated the Trump campaign at high levels.
Back over to you.
This story is insane.
Thank you so much, Todd.
The whistleblower said that Comey personally directed it and using two female undercover agents as honeypots.
They say it usually refers to an undercover operative who feigns sexual or romantic interest to obtain information on a target.
So were these honeypots targeting Donald Trump?
Were they targeting people on his team?
Were they women that we were seeing on air all the time traveling with him?
If this is true, he's a dirty cop.
And this is the same thing that is a lesson.
They did the same thing to Martin Luther King Jr. as well and recorded him to use as leverage.
So the FBI, which was supposed to have reformed if this report is true, apparently never reformed at all.
Apparently.
Apparently, I mean, they were supposed to have reformed, but apparently, I mean, they just never reformed at all.
I go back to what I said yesterday.
It was like, these people thought they could never get caught.
They're full of people that have no...
They're not Christians, and so therefore they're not worried about, you know, worried about doing things that are morally questionable.
And if you've got all this technology, you've got all these agents, you've got all this, everything, you know, why wouldn't you do it?
Why wouldn't you do it?
We're asked, well, why would they do this?
This is the FBI. Why would they do this?
Why would James Comey do it?
He's not a good guy.
He's not a good guy.
Most of them are not.
Human nature is not good.
Okay?
Apart from Christ.
So, next up we have this.
Jake Tapper over at CNN is now writing a book called Original Sin, President Biden's Decline, its cover-up, and speaking of guys who are just not very good people.
President Biden's decline, its cover-up, and his disastrous choice to run again.
Jake Tapper is now writing a book or it's coming out or it's already been written.
And yet Jake Tapper, people are circulating this clip, when Jake Tapper actually got to interview Lara Trump, Donald Trump's daughter-in-law, he...
Basically, you know, made fun of her for suggesting that Biden was obviously in mental decline.
Jake, it's very clearly a cognitive decline.
That's what I'm referring to.
It makes me uncomfortable to watch the money on stage search for questions.
It's so amazing to me that...
And try and figure out an answer.
A cognitive decline.
You're trying to tell me that what I was suggesting was a stuttering...
I think that you were mocking his stutter.
Yeah, I think you were mocking his stutter.
And I think you have absolutely no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline.
I would think that somebody in the Trump family would be more sensitive to people who do not have medical licenses.
You don't have a medical license.
You need to be more sensitive.
And now he's writing a book about Biden's mental decline and the cover-up of his mental decline, which Lara Trump was trying to expose, and he wasn't having any of it.
This is why Tim Pool says Jake Tapper is evil.
A lot of that being exposed right now.
A lot of it.
So that brings me to this.
That brings me to kind of my main topic today.
Slippery slope, gay marriage to transing kids.
Okay, now there's a lot of data points on the slippery slope, in my opinion, and we talk about it a lot, but fundamentally for this one, we're going to talk about gay marriage, or gay mirage, as some call it, and...
The steep decline to trans and kids.
And, you know, I use trans and kids, but there's a lot of other things that go along with that.
I don't know, like stacking your national security agency full of people that are proponents of this type of behavior.
So, we have this from Newsweek.
There's now a push for Supreme Court to overturn gay mirage in multiple states.
Lawmakers, let's see here.
Lawmakers in multiple states have introduced measures urging the Supreme Court to strike down Obergefell v.
Hodges, the landmark 2015 decision that established the nationwide right to same-sex marriage.
What does it matter?
Well, since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Wade in 2022, ending the constitutional right to an abortion, there have been concerns that the nation's highest court could also remove other rights, including...
The right to same-sex marriage.
Now, the reason why that's the case is because Obergefell's overturning of Roe, the logic there was, for real, like, if you go read the Constitution, it doesn't say anything about abortion, and there's that thing called the Tenth Amendment.
I mean, this is clearly a state's issue.
Now, I actually, you know, I think abortion is murder, and so, like, what kind of United States, united country do you have when you've got, you know...
You've got the blue states populated by the purple hairs that are murdering their children.
And then you've got the red states that are like, no, we're not.
Of course, even in the red states with the abortion pill, the way it is, abortions have actually gone up because they made CVS and Walgreens.
Basically, it's like a new version of Planned Parenthoods on every corner in America now.
So we've got issues with that.
But all I'm saying is the logic behind the decision was, hey, The federal government has no business in this.
We have no business.
The debate was being had in the 60s and in the 70s.
The states were debating this issue.
What is life?
Is it just a clump of cells?
Life of conception?
And there was this patchwork of laws that were emerging in the states.
And then the Supreme Court comes along in 1973 and just takes the debate away.
Just says, we're going to end it.
Nope, there is no debate.
They Johnny-sweeped the legs the whole operation, and then, you know, no one could have the debate anymore.
Abortion was the law of the land.
And so they corrected that with Dobbs, and now they may correct it with Obergefell, because if there's no mention of abortion in the Constitution, well then guess what?
There's clearly no mention of marriage anywhere in it.
And so based on that logic alone, the whole decision is null and void.
It doesn't make any sense.
It's ridiculous.
The piece goes on.
Obergefell was decided by 5-4.
Now it's a 6-3 conservative majority.
But you've got these Republican-controlled state legislators.
The Idaho House of Representatives voted to pass a resolution that calls on the court to undo Obergefell.
But experts have told Newsweek that the court can revisit the decision only if there is a case where the issue of same-sex marriage is raised.
Polling by Gallup shows that a majority of Americans continue to believe marriage between same-sex couples should be legal, 69%.
Now listen to this.
Though it's found there's a wide partisan gap, 83% of Democrats support it compared to just 46% of Republicans.
And this is where we've got to really go to work here.
And I'm just going to say it.
You're not going to get this number out of Republicans low.
You're not going to get it to go down.
Until we address the feminism that is also still alive and well, the feminism at the expense of the patriarchy, you're not going to get that number to go down until you address this, right?
The sin of empathy is, what did Josh Dawes say, the sin of empathy is why women never hear the word no.
And that's fundamentally what you're saying when it comes to this issue about abortion.
But back to the slippery slope.
Here we go.
This was in 2015, folks.
2015. Ten years ago.
Ten years ago this June, in the middle of Pride Month.
We get that decision.
Obergefell.
Gay marriage.
The law of the land.
And Barack Obama, the first black president, put a rainbow on the White House.
That's right.
A rainbow on the White House.
And since Barack Obama put a rainbow on the White House, this country has descended into depths of sexual madness.
This country has created for itself what I call a woke sex religion.
And anyone who protests, even if you're on the Democrat side, you are canceled.
You are maligned.
This country...
And when I say this country, I'm talking about the government and all of its corporations controlled by BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, used this moment and this radical woke sex religion ideology to control and infect every major American corporation in the country.
And they forced it down our throats.
This one event right here, Barack Obama, rainbow in the White House, was the signal.
We're going to message the LGBTQ propaganda.
We're going to message it in the NBA. We're going to message it in Major League Baseball.
We're going to message it in hockey.
We're going to message it in the NFL. We're going to message it in Hollywood.
We're even going to find a way to take the last socially acceptable version of masculinity, which was the black rapper.
And we're going to find a way to make the black rapper, the music industry, the black music industry, we're going to find a way to make them accept homosexuality and the LGBT propaganda.
We're going to take Eminem, this white guy, who had gay slang words in his music, we're going to make him come out and apologize for that.
And it happened.
And this was the event.
This was it.
And again, since we have descended down the slippery slope, we basically, we poured water on it, we iced it down, we got a bobsled, and we've been careening down that slippery slope ever since this decision on gay marriage.
Or gay mirage.
And where does it lead?
Where has it led?
It leads to stuff like this.
Now look at this.
Look at this photo.
This is a photo of a gay couple, two men, with their shirts off, holding a baby that's just been taken from its mother.
This is surrogacy, the surrogacy thing, where we're now told that this image is just as good for the child, just as acceptable for the child, as it would be if the child was with its mother.
And then they do this very strange thing.
I don't understand why the men feel the need to get naked.
It's just not good.
It's not good at all.
Joshua Hames from the Reformation Red Pill podcast says, Six or seven years ago, I can remember hearing Christian pastors saying that gay couples should have the right to adopt children.
Indefensible.
This is the kind of disordered wickedness that brings fire down from heaven.
Not only should pastors be condemning such perversions from the pulpit, but precisely because we love our neighbors we should be looking to both legislate and stigmatize this wickedness into oblivion.
The society that approves of such behavior will not be a society for too much longer.
May God grant us repentance.
Yes, that's the optimum phrase there.
May God grant us repentance.
Now, I would submit to you that this being normalized, even among conservatives, people congratulating this type of, I think it's honestly a form of human trafficking, renting the womb of a mother and paying the mother, and I don't care if the mother, well, the mother's voluntarily, well, she shouldn't be.
The idea that this baby is better off right after being born, look, you can still see this baby is fresh out of the womb, and it's immediately been handed over.
He's immediately been handed, or she's immediately been handed over.
This is sick stuff, man.
A baby needs its mother.
Now, I mean, obviously, I think a baby needs its mother and its father.
But one thing I do know is a baby right out of the womb needs its mama.
That's what it needs.
It's sick stuff, man.
And I will tell you, we are here because of this.
The rainbow in the White House, baby.
That's why we're here.
And people need to figure it out.
People need to connect the dots.
People need to understand.
And I'm talking to the Republican Party, too, obviously.
This is why we're here.
Connect the dots, man.
When you reject God's definition of what marriage is and what family is, well, then it can be anything.
And that's why we're here.
This is a progression, okay?
Where else does it lead?
Well, it leads to men competing in women's sports.
All of you more secularists, libertarian, or people thinking things have gone too far.
Think about it.
Just think about it for a second.
It also leads to men and women's sports.
And here is state representative Laurel Libby.
This is a state representative out of Maine.
And she said, let me just play this for you.
Basic truth.
Boys participating in girls' sports is not fair.
Agreed.
The progressive left would have us to believe that allowing a biologically male athlete to dominate in a girls' league is somehow inclusive and pro-woman.
What a twisted perspective.
In 1967, Catherine Switzer, Alright, so...
You can go watch that speech.
It's very lengthy.
The bottom line is she gave a speech similar to that on the floor of the House of Representatives in Maine, and now the liberals in Maine were so triggered by it, they have stripped her of her voting power until she basically does some sort of walk of shame or some sort of loyalty test to where she can get her vote back.
The chair understands that the member does not intend to submit an apology to the body.
The member will be in violation of House Rule 401, Part 11. The member will not be able to cast a vote or speak on the floor until the member has come back into compliance with House Rule 401, Part 11. Can't vote, can't do anything, been stripped of representing her constituents.
Okay, so all this talk of democracy, this is all we've got to say for democracy.
Well, so it's a function of our republic that we have a representative republic we send people.
And because of this, because of the rainbow on the White House in 2015, we now have representatives who have been duly elected by their citizens to represent them.
They have taken...
A hard stand against men competing in women's sports, and now they're being stripped of their voting authority in an American legislature?
Are you kidding me?
So not only do we have the assault on the family, it's an assault on freedom of speech, on the freedom of conscience.
It's an assault on how we govern ourselves and how we are allowed to have debate.
And I'll say one more thing on this.
State Representative Laura Libby violated unspoken blasphemy laws of the state of Maine.
And so this is just a reminder for all of you.
By the way, we used to have blasphemy laws on the books here in America that withstood court challenges until 1933. The idea was, you're not going to publicly blaspheme the triune God of the Bible.
You're not going to do it, and people were arrested for that and punished for that.
You say, well, oh no, we don't want to do that.
Well, it's not a question of whether or not you have blasphemy laws.
Every society is going to have some form of blasphemy laws, and in the state of Maine, if you say that men are men and women are women, you've violated their blasphemy laws.
It may not be on the books, but it's unspoken, and that's what they're doing.
They're publicly shutting this lady for standing up for what's obviously an easy, self-evident truth.
That so many people are blind to because we're worshipping demons.
It's pretty incredible when you think about it.
The slippery slope is real, ladies and gentlemen.
The slippery slope is real.
What else do we have?
What else does that rainbow lead to?
Well...
We've now got Pam Bondy that's ordering California, Maine, and Minnesota to comply with federal laws to stop their woke policies of allowing men to play in women's sports.
And she tells them that they'll face legal consequences if they continue.
That's a very good thing.
That's a blessing.
It also shows that it's okay.
For politicians to use power and do things that are righteous and good by ending these ridiculous practices.
Donald Trump Jr. says, it still amazes me that there are some states that allowed this type of insanity to begin with.
I would love for people like Don Jr. and others to ask, well, how did they allow the insanity?
How did they allow the insanity?
How?
How'd they do it?
How did we get here?
This was a progression.
This was incrementalism, an incremental step-by-step path to hell.
And it's still going on, even though we're fighting back and we've had great wins.
But now's the time to actually stop this.
I mean, where else does the rainbow lead?
Jeff Younger, the CIA and NSA hired a bunch of mentally ill nutjobs.
So our national security apparatus hires people with gender dysphoria.
According to CNN, CNN is now reporting that deep state bureaucrats, which we can only assume are these trans people hired to work at the NSA and spy on us, and they hijacked these government chats to talk about their trans lifestyles.
CNN reporting that deep state bureaucrats are threatening to sell state secrets if Trump isn't nice to them.
Okay, if Trump isn't nice to them, they're going to sell secrets.
Now, does that sound like what a reasonable person would do?
Or does that sound like what a crazy person would do?
Because if they do it, they're going to be caught.
It sounds like these are some of the same people that are, you know, in the NSA talking about their sex lives in chats.
Christopher Ruffo, there is a battalion of male-to-female transgenders within the American intelligence apparatus.
They hate Italians and libs of TikTok.
They fantasize about pseudo-vaginas.
They are in charge of the most sophisticated spying machine in human history.
Think about that for a second.
The most sophisticated spying machine in human history is being run by members of the LGBT who do not like Christians.
Why is that?
Rainbow in the White House.
Slippery slope is real.
Say it with me, ladies and gentlemen.
Incredible.
Shadow of Ezra.
Intelligence agencies have now openly launched a coup against President Trump, warning mainstream media that if Doge cuts their funding, they'll resort to selling state secrets to foreign nations.
Meanwhile, rogue agents at the FBI are actively erasing evidence and wiping servers, ensuring crucial information never sees the light of future investigations.
This is why you can't reform them, just shut them down.
It really does demonstrate how for so long this country has had people that...
Just actively hate the citizens and what this country, you know, was founded as.
We're going to take, let me do this.
We're going to talk about Red Vive Health.
I'm going to tell you about Red Vive Health.
It's redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
Experience the healing power of red light with Red Vive devices that emit red and near-infrared, which is very important.
The two wavelengths are very important.
Don't buy these imitators that only give you one wavelength.
You've got red light and near-infrared light.
It's designed to reduce your muscle and your joint inflammation and pain, stimulate cellular energy, speed up recovery, boost skin collagen, strengthen your body, and boost your mood.
Red light therapy is for your health.
Two different wavelengths.
They're naturally emitted by the sun, but these panels put them in targeted doses.
You see the testimonials there.
You should go to the website.
Even if you're not ready to buy yet, redvivehealth.org.
Go do your own research.
That's what this movement is all about, especially in the context of people like RFK Jr. trying to make America healthy again.
We're talking about the first red light, right?
The first wave.
It's going to be absorbed by your skin.
That leads to enhanced skin health, collagen production, which leads to anti-aging benefits.
Any ladies out there listening?
I know looking young is important.
It's important to me, too.
Near-infrared light, which is the other wavelength, is going to penetrate deeper into the body, which reaches your bones, muscles, tissues, your cells, folks, at the cellular level in your organs, stimulating the mitochondria, which is the powerhouse of cellular respiration.
You're going to look better.
You're going to feel better.
Guys, you're going to perform better.
And we need to have Troy from Red Vive on.
I've been talking to him, spoken with him about this.
We really need to, I want you guys to buy this to not only support the show, but I want you to buy it because this really is incredible.
It's changing the way, it's changing my health.
It is changing my health for the better.
And so go there right now, light your path to wellness, shop at redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
That's redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
And I think you're going to really love this.
I really do.
Okay.
Let's go to Ukraine.
A couple of weeks ago, I told you that they were going to...
that these massive geopolitical alignments are going to expose this fake relationship that we have with Europe.
This fake relationship that's been...
I mean, it's just been a mask.
It's the whole thing.
The NATO, all of it.
The European Union, NATO, it's all just...
You know, Nigel Farage, when Brexit actually happened, you know, urges like, look, the European Union needs to be confined to the dustbin of history.
I think we'll find that NATO is shortly going to follow suit.
So let's start with this.
I'm not going to listen to this whole thing, but this was sent to me by a listener of the program.
So Jeffrey Sachs, so I talk a lot on this program about...
The 2014 Maidan Revolution of Ukraine.
But we really have to start.
Jeffrey Sachs has a much better memory and just institutional knowledge of what happened.
And this was sent to me, again, by a listener.
So we're going to listen to a little bit of it because it actually goes back to the 90s.
But it goes back much further than we think.
So take a listen to this.
This is not an attack by Putin.
On Ukraine in the way that we are told every day.
This started in 1990. February 9, 1990, James Baker III, our Secretary of State, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War II. Gorbachev said that's very important.
Yes, NATO doesn't move, and we agreed to German unification.
The US then cheated on this, already starting in 1994, when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine.
This is when the so-called neocons took power.
And Clinton was the first agent of this.
And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic.
At that point, Russia didn't much care.
There was no border other than with the Königsberg.
But other than that, there was no direct threat.
Then the U.S. led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad.
By the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart.
The Russians didn't like that very much.
But Putin became president.
They swallowed it.
They complained.
But even Putin started out pro-European, pro-American, actually, asked maybe we should join NATO. When there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship.
Then 9-11 came.
Then came Afghanistan.
And the Russians said, yeah, we'll support you.
We understand to root out terror.
But then came two other decisive actions.
In 2002, the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty.
This was probably the most decisive event.
Never discussed in this context.
But what it did was trigger the U.S. putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire, direct threat.
In 2004-05, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine.
This is what I was talking about.
We talked about the 2014 color revolution.
Specifically with Ukraine in 2004 and 2005. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine.
And then that brings us to 2014 and Victoria Nuland and everything else.
So now we have news that there's going to be a peace agreement.
There's certainly going to be a mineral rights agreement.
Spectator Index saying that U.S. and Ukraine reach a deal on minerals and resources.
Trump says Volodymyr Zelensky will put boots on the ground in the United States on Friday to sign it.
Martyr Made over on X says, he kind of breaks down the deal, just like the 30,000-foot view of what's gone on over the last three, four years.
For those of you keeping score, Ukraine lost 15% of its territory to its enemy, 50% of its minerals to its sponsor, And all it cost them was 20% of their population.
This is what Professor Mearsheimer meant when he said, we were walking Ukraine down the Primrose Path.
That's exactly right.
And look, I know we've had a regime change, maybe the first actual transfer of power in the United States since the 60s, but I know we've had this regime change and everything else, but I mean, just to look at what happened, look at what we've done.
Look at what Europe, NATO, and America did.
By sending all of these Ukrainians that never had a chance against the Russians to their deaths.
For what?
What did we do this for?
It's sick, man.
It really is sick.
And now we have articles like this from Foreign Policy Magazine.
Stephen M. Walt.
Yes, America is Europe's enemy now.
America is Europe's enemy, they're saying.
All because we're trying to end a war and stop the dying.
And yeah, Trump wants those mineral rights.
Globalists are losing control of the American deep state.
They understand it is an existential threat, according to Jeff Younger, and we should immediately initiate subversion operations in Canada.
Now, this is because, and this has made headlines over at The Last Refuge, Canada's Freeland says she will form nuclear-armed alliance against the United States.
Canada's top four moon bats...
Held a debate to decide which of the leaders of the Snow Mexicans, that's what they're calling Canadians now, will take control of the party now that Justin Trudeau is leaving.
Christia, take your bank account.
Freeland is the top contender.
For now, the Snow Mexicans, the number one priority is fighting the United States President Donald Trump.
No other issue had anywhere near the level of importance or time during the debate.
Let's go back.
Let's take a listen to this.
This is what she's saying.
People are like...
They can't believe she would say that.
The U.S. is turning predator.
And so what Canada needs to do is work closely with our democratic allies, our military allies.
I've been foreign minister.
I know how to do that.
That's why I would start with our Nordic partners, specifically Denmark, which is also being threatened, and our European NATO allies.
I would be sure that France and Britain were there who possess nuclear weapons.
And I would be working urgently with those partners to build a closer security relationship that guarantees our security in a time when the United States can be a threat.
So she's saying the United States is a threat.
We need...
A nuclear deterrent against the United States.
I think they're taking that 51st state thing pretty serious.
I think they should at this point, especially after they said that.
Think about that.
The potential next Prime Minister of Canada is saying that they want a nuclear-armed alliance against the United States.
Do you think in any world Donald Trump would ever tolerate that?
Ever.
It's insane.
It's absolutely insane what's going on.
But, again, we are in the midst.
I think it's...
What I would say is it's like...
It's like foreshadowing.
I think...
What I'm trying to say is...
2024 with RFK and everything else...
The Republican Party became even more of a coalition party than it's ever been before.
But at this time, the coalition was just like a political earthquake, just a political realignment, a complete political realignment.
And what I mean by that is the Democrats used to be for peace, not war.
And it was the Republicans that were like, no, Iraq, Afghanistan, good.
The biggest anti-war movement in this country for peace is within the Republican Party now.
Let's talk about big corporations and how they're sometimes evil.
Some of you might think they're all the time evil.
The Democrats, they were very weary.
You don't hear that very much out of them anymore.
I'm thinking mainly of RFK Jr. saying, look, these corporations have bought off the regulatory agencies that are there to regulate them.
Our food is poison.
I mean, you know, the idea...
I was watching...
Man, what movie was that?
It was a couple years ago.
I watched this movie and the hippies.
It was a movie with hippies in it.
And all they wanted to do was just have some land and live off the land.
Well, where is that contingent today?
That's not on the left, man.
That's on the right.
It's just fascinating what's going on.
And so this upheaval in American politics in an actual transfer of power is now foreshadowed.
Okay, well, what do we actually have in common with Europe if they're going to censor speech?
They're a democracy that censors speech.
And now they're very upset that Donald Trump is saying, hey, look, I want peace in Russia.
Now, peace in Ukraine.
I'm going to make a deal with the Russians.
Now, okay.
We're kind of winding down the show, but I do have to say, this was the weirdest thing.
This was very strange.
There's this AI video that, best I can tell, February 10th, 2025, somebody made an AI video.
It was posted by this guy named Bender.
And it was, somebody said, welcome to Trump-topia.
So this is about Gaza.
Just watch this real quick.
This is cringe, man.
There is no way around this, okay?
Watch this.
So Gaza 2025, what's next?
Let's see if I can get that.
So it's this whole...
All right.
So this thing was posted, again, back on February 10th, but then Donald Trump posted this video...
On his Truth Social last night at 10.51 Central Time.
And for those of you that are listening on the podcast, it's this AI version of Gaza in the rubble, and then it basically transforms, best I can tell, into some sort of Trump theme park.
And there's AI versions of Trump and Bibi Netanyahu sipping on the beach, sipping Mai Tais.
And it's...
I don't know what to make of it.
It's cringe.
There's golden statues of Trump.
There's golden balloon heads floating around of Trump and that sort of thing.
I mean, as we talk, we focus, you know, as we just focused about the carnage and the death, you know, in Ukraine, between Ukrainian people and Russian people, the stuff that's gone on in Gaza, I mean, the absolute obliteration of Gaza, the Christian churches that were in Gaza.
That's what I think.
I think about the Christians that were in Gaza that were, you know, totally wiped off, wiped out.
You know, you have thousand-year-old buildings that are gone.
And now, of course, we have this idea that, you know, when Trump brings Netanyahu in and he says, look, I mean, you know, we're going to own Gaza.
And there's all kinds of people, you know, that have a million different perspectives on that and are very untrustworthy of it.
And I get it.
I totally understand.
What's gone on in Gaza has been terrible.
Ethnic cleansing, in my opinion.
I mean, it just has.
I don't want death.
I guess, as I said, the Party of Peace, that coalition, that's what I want.
I don't want anybody to die.
And so, a lot of people have strong feelings about this.
One theory that I did hear about was, though, that this...
Trump posting this AI is kind of like also trying to motivate the Arab countries.
Like, hey, if you guys don't get together and figure this out, I am going to put a Trump theme park in Gaza.
But I have no idea.
There's no way around it.
I mean, it's cringe, and a lot of people were freaking out about it, you know, melting down about it last night.
I mean, not melting down.
It turned a lot of heads.
That's for sure.
Let's see.
We've got about two minutes.
We missed Crockett.
We ran out of time for Crockett.
Let's see if she's got two things there.
Trump talked about tariffs.
Let's see here.
We're going to miss the gaslighting here.
Hopefully we'll get to some of this.
Let's end on a positive note.
It's fascinating.
Nicole Shanahan.
So we got a white pill in the beginning of the show.
We'll bookend it with a white pill at the end.
Nicole Shanahan is now claiming she's a Christian.
She's claiming that she was baptized by a, quote, lady bishop and her husband.
Obviously, you know my skepticism there because I already don't believe in women clergy.
You don't have to convince me.
But that is not to say...
Hear me.
That doesn't mean that...
People come to Christ only in my preferred context, okay?
This is an incredible story, and it's a win.
I mean, it really is.
And again, I'm sure I don't know anything about the theology necessarily of this, but her story is really sweet, and she talks about basically spiritual warfare, that the reason she became a Christian is because the Christian message...
Has the tools or the armor of God, as she says, to actually combat the spiritual forces that are against us.
And she talked about her sin, and she talked about wanting to be forgiven from it.
You need to go read this story.
We don't have time because we're out of time.
But this is incredible that RFK's running mate, Nicole Shanahan, recently was baptized and now says that she is a Christian.
That's all the time we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll be back here bringing you the news, wishing you a happy Thursday.
And until then, God bless everybody out there watching.
Thank you so much.
Follow me on X at RealPaulHarrell and follow at X America News.
We'll see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection