Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 17, 2025 - Stew Peters Show

01:55:23

Logos Academy Episode 34: Mein Kampf Chapter 2

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Welcome everybody to episode 34 of the Logos Academy.
	A little bit of a delayed episode.
	It's been about a week or so since we've been live.
	Our last show was with Ian Malcolm.
	We had originally posted this show to be done, and then I had some things come up and I wasn't able to actually do the show.
	So today we're going to be finally picking up on chapter 2 of Mein Kampf.
	I know that a lot of people are excited for that.
	I've had quite a few comments about my delay, so I do apologize again.
	As usual, we're live on Odyssey, we're live on Rumble, Twitter, Rumble Studio, we are live on FTJ, and we're live on Entropy as well.
	I guess we're muted on Odyssey.
	Let me fix that really quickly.
	All right.
	If you guys are on Odyssey and you refresh, that should fix it.
	I don't know why Odyssey is the only platform that seems to do that.
	Okay.
	We're live on Twitter as well.
	I don't think I mentioned that.
	With that said, we don't have a very special schedule this week, which I think is a good thing.
	So all of the shows this week are just going to be me reading Mein Kampf.
	I don't have any guests coming on or anything else that's going on of major importance.
	So we're going to really get into Chapter 2. I'm hoping I should be able to finish Chapter 2 within three shows.
	I don't see why I couldn't.
	It's one of the longer chapters, but we should be able to get through it.
	So I'll wait a couple minutes.
	We'll let some people filter in, and then we will get into the show.
	I just want to wait.
	I don't want to start up before people are in here.
	Okay.
	I actually have to get all these chat rooms situated as well.
	Let's do that.
	Okay.
	Welcome, Delta.
	It's nice to see you.
	And hello, Camo.
	Nice to see you as well.
	I think we got a super chat on FTJ.
	Look.
	It's loading a little slow for me right now.
	Oh, it looks like that was actually...
	I don't know when that was.
	An hour ago?
	JS1488. I don't know if you're in here right now, but thank you very much for the 1488. It's very kind of you.
	Demo, we're going to be reading Chapter 2 of Mein Kampf.
	We've already read Chapter 1. We'll add some analysis to it as well so that it's meaningful rather than just hearing a robot read the book.
	Yes, I did upload the...
	I uploaded this episode previously, or at least I put the stream out there, like the thumbnail and everything, but I actually didn't go live.
	I never actually did the episode.
	I had some things come up really last minute, so I had to cancel the episode after I had it all set up and everything.
	So we have not actually started chapter 2 we're going to start that today Need to find chapter 1 chapter 1 is up on It's on my Rumble channel.
	It's on my Odyssey channel.
	And it should be up on the Stu Peters Network as well.
	We did Chapter 1 in...
	I think we did that in one episode.
	I believe.
	So, Chapter 2 I think is going to take me two episodes.
	It might take me three.
	Chapter 2 requires a lot more analysis than Chapter 1. Chapter 1 you're really just kind of reading it.
	There's a lot to look at inside of Chapter 2. We'll wait until about 4.05, 4.10.
	We'll start the show.
	I just don't want to start before everybody's in here.
	We'll give people a little bit of time.
	It's a fantastic title.
	I really highly recommend that you, yourself, in the audience, pick up this book and read it yourself.
	Or read along with me while we read.
	It's one thing to listen to an audiobook of Mein Kampf.
	I've heard of a lot of people that have done so.
	And there's nothing wrong with listening to an audiobook.
	But the problem is that you're not going to be able to really study the book.
	And this book is something...
	I've read this book half a dozen times.
	And each time I read it, I still feel like, oh wow, that's something I don't recall.
	I'm picking up something new or a different insight is coming to mind.
	This is a book to be studied, not just read.
	It's very long.
	It's very deep philosophy.
	It's really not a basic reading level type book.
	So I really recommend that you do more than just listen to an audiobook because a lot of people only listen to the audiobook and then they feel like they now understand it.
	And I just don't think that's the case with such a strong work.
	AJ, welcome.
	Nice to see you.
	Yes, Demo.
	I've read the book many times, many times.
	And you can find the book online if you really want to read online.
	Again, I do recommend you get a physical copy so you can physically, you know, underline things and pay close attention to it.
	I know, that's why I said half a dozen.
	That's why I said half a dozen.
	Let me see here.
	I'm just going to pull up all my chat rooms.
	I don't have the Twitter chat pulled up yet.
	Feedback.
	Great.
	Okay.
	I think in the future, too, for these readings, I might reset up that lav mic that I have.
	that might have some better audio quality on it.
	Okay.
	All right.
	All the chat rooms are set up.
	So if you guys are typing anywhere, I will see it.
	Again, we're live on FTJ, Odyssey, Rumble, Twitter.
	I think that's everything.
	Rumble Studio as well.
	We're live on Entropy too.
	I don't really feel like people watch shows on Entropy though.
	They just support there.
	So I don't really promote that platform.
	Yeah, and Volan, I don't think that's accurate.
	This is one problem, I guess, before we get into the reading that's so important for people to understand.
	Hitler is the most lied about man in all of history.
	You will not find an example of someone that's been lied about more furiously, more in-depth.
	There are so many lies on so many levels.
	Some of them are really pathetic lies that are so ridiculous.
	The claim that he had one testicle, right?
	And then they range up to him being a Jewish Rothschild agent.
	You have to understand this.
	When you read this guy's works, first off, when you read his early speeches, 1922, 1925, in this area, you have to remember this.
	He was not a popular man.
	He was not financed by anybody.
	He was not in the mainstream.
	He was an essential, literal nobody.
	No one would have recognized that name hearing Hitler at this time.
	So he has no reason in those years to be fomenting any kind of conspiracy or great big lie, as is always claimed.
	And when you read these speeches, there are very clear sentiments in there that are profound, and they're just correct.
	You can't disagree with the sentiments that are laid out in these early speeches.
	So this shows that This guy is not controlled opposition, right?
	As he grew larger and larger, and this is what people do even today.
	Myself, as a very, you know, much more micro example, but when I started my show, everybody's like, oh, you know, interesting, this Logos guy, okay, cool, this, this.
	Then as my show started to grow and I started getting more traction, all of a sudden the claims come out of the woodwork that, I don't know, that Logos guy might be controlled opposition.
	This happens whenever people see somebody gain traction.
	And there is a correct sentiment in here that the system does everything in its power to ensure that natural people do not gain traction.
	But this doesn't mean that no natural person can gain traction.
	We take it to this extreme where people go, anybody that's in the public eye that's got any kind of income or any kind of...
	This is schizophrenic, right?
	We have to be leveled and realize that there are certainly a lot of cases of that.
	It's all over the place.
	But there are natural growth examples out there.
	They exist.
	They're just certainly not common.
	And that's where you have to, as an independent thinker, you have to analyze the person in question.
	If somebody is controlled opposition, there's going to be some kind of subversion that they are putting out there, right?
	So they might be super good on the Jewish question.
	They might be super good on history.
	They might be super good on all of these revisionist kind of perspectives.
	And then they might promote race mixing or promote cultural degeneracy, like watching pornography or having sex with hundreds of women.
	You know, there might be somebody that is actually really good on all those cultural pieces, but then they refuse to discuss the Jewish question and they say that this is radical, this is conspiracy.
	And then there's people that are good on all of it.
	And then they look at the Hitler question and they say, well, actually he was a Jewish Rothschild agent.
	And these are all, if somebody is controlled opposition, something in their rhetoric has to be subversive.
	Otherwise, what are they opposing, right?
	Like controlled opposition has to be opposing something.
	So if they're not opposing anything intellectually in the worldview that we're holding, then they're not controlled opposition.
	So that's how you have to analyze that and decide who is and who is not controlled in some way, shape, or form.
	And again, many are.
	They're everywhere.
	And there are people that might not be controlled, but they just have bad rhetoric.
	That exists too.
	That's not to say that there isn't such a thing as people...
	Just not understanding one point or another.
	You know, there's some people that I know that were devout Zionists, and then they realized, like, holy shit, this is psychotic, and they became national socialists.
	And then even maybe they didn't understand the racial question at first when they started learning these things, and then they come to an understanding of it.
	There's a learning process in this, you know.
	No one is born into these ideals.
	You have to study and learn these things because Obviously, our education system is not allowing these ideals to be pushed out there.
	There is a deep motive from the system to suppress our inherent instincts that are present inside of us, these natural instincts of self-preservation, of morality.
	These are being beaten out of us.
	You know, even bullying, right, as an example.
	A really homosexual term.
	I absolutely hate the term bullying.
	It's just gay.
	Specifically because it's how it's used.
	But this idea that bullying is a bad thing and it's immoral, this is actually a campaign against natural instincts, right?
	So when you go to school and kids bully somebody or they shame somebody in school, they typically are shaming people that are obese or gay or really awkward, weird people.
	So children don't have a social filter.
	We have social filters.
	You've been through a process of socialization, whether it's through the education system, whether it's being on social media, in the workplace, whatever the case may be, you've been through a socialization process.
	So when you see somebody that comes up to you and they're wearing sunglasses and you think the sunglasses look stupid, you might just say to them politely, oh yeah, those sunglasses aren't really for me.
	I don't really like that.
	Because you're socialized.
	You don't want to be like an asshole.
	A child, they don't have that social filter.
	They see the person that is wearing sunglasses.
	And they go, those sunglasses are ugly, right?
	This is where that term, you know, kids say the darndest thing.
	That's where this comes from, right?
	They don't have that social filter.
	So they have this intrinsic thing inside of them where they can still recognize when things are unnatural and odd.
	And they call it out like that.
	And this is where bullying stems from.
	This is where shaming stems from.
	It's a very healthy and eugenic thing.
	It's not a bad thing.
	But society is trying to train people out of those natural instincts.
	Anyway, to wrap back and close up the point, the idea that Hitler was a Rothschild agent and that he was somehow Jewish and working on their behalf, well, you have to understand, and it's just important that we preface this before we get back into this book, and I'm probably going to preface this quite often.
	Is that this is the ultimate black pill demoralization method, okay?
	So Jews are recognizing, holy shit, people are waking up to the fact that we are controlling their countries, that we are destroying their nations.
	They're starting to see this, and they don't trust us anymore.
	They're becoming anti-Semitic.
	So if they're becoming anti-Semitic and they do not trust us...
	And they start looking into things like National Socialism, which we don't want them to look into because it's a solution to their problems with us, then our best course of action as Jews would be to take Hitler, the figurehead of National Socialism and quote-unquote anti-Semitism, and actually smear him himself as a Jew.
	Because now the people that are becoming anti-Semitic themselves will even discredit him just on a different basis.
	It's the ultimate demoralization method that basically states that there's no solution to this problem and we all just have to go extinct and allow the Jews to take world power and we lose.
	That's the ultimate black pill.
	So I really encourage that you don't fall into that way of thought and that you study a little more on Hitler and National Socialism and less on the people that are giving you their opinion of it.
	That's kind of the problem here.
	There is so much of people studying what Alex Jones says about Hitler or what QAnon says about Hitler or whatever some subversive character has to say about Hitler rather than looking into Hitler or National Socialism or the people around it themselves.
	It's very important.
	Okay, so with that said, let's get into Chapter 2. Again, for anybody that wants to follow along and read with us...
	We are reading in the Stalag edition of Mein Kampf.
	Let me just show you this really quickly so you know which version we are reading.
	Okay, mine's a little beaten up, bad shape, falling off the binding, right?
	Done quite a bit of damage to this book.
	We are reading a Stalag edition, so if you want to read along, there's two ways you can do so.
	You can either go on...
	It's probably not on Google.
	But if you look into or just Google or web search, Mein Kampf Stalag Edition PDF should be on the archive.
	You should be able to find it.
	You can also get a physical copy of the book.
	I recommend that you get one on MoneyTreePublishing.com.
	I do have a coupon code over there.
	It's code LOGOS, L-O-G-O-S. You'll save yourself 10%.
	I get a small royalty for it as well, so you're helping everybody out.
	That would be much appreciated.
	And I always encourage people to read along again.
	It's better than just listening.
	All right, so, chapter two.
	This is Learning and Suffering in Vienna.
	Starts on page 16 of the Stalag edition.
	I had, however, one misgiving.
	It seemed to me that I was better qualified for drawing than for painting, especially in the various branches of architectural drawing.
	At the same time, my interest in architecture was constantly increasing, and I advanced in this direction at a still more rapid pace after my first visit to Vienna, which lasted two weeks.
	I was not yet 16 years old.
	I went to the Hof Museum to study the paintings in the art gallery there, but the building itself captured almost all of my interest.
	From early morning until late at night, I spent all my time visiting the various public buildings.
	And it was the buildings themselves that were always the principal attraction for me.
	For hours and hours, I could stand in wonderment before the opera and the parliament house.
	The whole Ringstrasse had a magic effect upon me, as if it were a scene from the Arabian Nights.
	And now, here I was for the second time in this beautiful city, impatiently waiting to hear the result of the entrance examination.
	I was so convinced of my success that when the news that I had failed to pass was brought to me, it struck me like a bolt from the blue.
	Yet the fact was that I had failed.
	I went to see the rector and asked him to explain the reasons why they refused to accept me as a student in the General School of Painting, which was part of the academy.
	He said that the sketches which I had brought with me showed unquestionably That painting was not what I was suited for, but that the same sketches gave clear indications of my aptitude for architectural design.
	Therefore, the School of Painting did not come into question for me, but rather the School of Architecture, which also formed part of the Academy.
	They found it hard to believe that I had never been to a school for architecture and had never received any instruction in architectural designing.
	When I left the magnificent Hansen Building, Within a few days,
	I myself also knew that I ought to become an architect.
	But of course, The way was very difficult.
	I was now forced, bitterly, to rue my former conduct in neglecting and despising certain subjects at the Rielschule.
	Before attending courses at the School of Architecture at the Academy, it was necessary to attend the Technical College, but a necessary qualification for entrance to this college was a matriculation certificate gained at the higher grade school, which I did not possess.
	As far as one could foresee, my dream of following an artistic calling seemed beyond the limits of possibility.
	After the death of my mother, I went to Vienna for the third time.
	This visit was destined to last several years.
	Since I had been there before, I had recovered my old calm and resoluteness.
	My former self-assurance had come back, and I had my eyes steadily fixed on the goal.
	I was determined to be an architect.
	Obstacles are placed across our path in life, not to be boggled at, but to be surmounted.
	And I was fully determined to surmount these obstacles, having constantly before my mind the picture of my father, who had raised himself by his own efforts to the position of civil servant, though he was the poor son of a village shoemaker.
	I had a better start, and the possibility of winning through was greater.
	At that time...
	My lot in life seemed to me a harsh one, but today I see in it the wise workings of providence.
	Adversity had me in its grip and often threatened to smash me, but the will grew stronger as the obstacles increased, and finally the will triumphed.
	I want to point, this is a very important line, understanding when National Socialist Germany came to power, one of the first films.
	That they released was entitled Triumph of the Will.
	And this is a very important concept that comes from Nietzsche.
	If you read into Nietzschean philosophy, he discusses the will, the will to power, right?
	So Hitler is really extrapolating on this kind of a mindset.
	And he's looking, he's searching for that will to power.
	And the second that they came to power...
	They released that film, Triumph of the Will, expressing that the will succeeded, right?
	It triumphed.
	I am thankful for that period of my life because it hardened me and enabled me to be hard.
	And I am even more thankful because I appreciate the fact that I was thus saved from the emptiness of a life of ease and that a mother's darling was taken from comfortable surroundings and handed over to adversity.
	As to a new mother.
	Though I then rebelled against it as too hard a fate, I am grateful that I was cast, against my wishes, into a world of misery and poverty, and thus came to know the people for whom I was afterwards to fight.
	It was during this period that my eyes were opened to two perils, the names of which I scarcely knew hitherto and had no notion whatsoever of their terrible significance for the existence of the German people.
	These two perils were Marxism and Judaism.
	For many people, the name of Vienna signifies innocent jollity, a festive place for happy mortals.
	For me, alas, it is a living memory of the saddest period of my life.
	Even today, the mention of that city Arouses only gloomy thoughts in my mind.
	The very name of that Fasian town spells five years of poverty.
	Five years in which, first as a casual laborer and then as a poor painter, I had to earn my daily bread.
	And a meager morsel, indeed it was, not even sufficient to still the hunger which I constantly felt.
	That hunger was the faithful companion which never left me and shared in everything I did.
	Every book that I bought meant renewed hunger, and every visit I paid to the opera meant the intrusion of that inalienable companion during the days that followed.
	I was always struggling with my unsympathetic friend, and yet during that time, I learned more than I had ever learned before.
	Apart from my architectural studies and rare visits to the opera, for which I had to deny myself food, I had no pleasure in life.
	I read a great deal then, and I pondered deeply over what I read.
	All of my free time after work was devoted exclusively to study.
	Thus, within a few years, I was able to acquire a stock of knowledge, which I find useful even today.
	But over and above that, there formed in my mind during those years an impression of life and a Weltanschauung.
	Now, it's a very important word that I want to really hammer on.
	You're going to see this word a lot in this work.
	Weltanschauung, which the most accurate English translation we have of the word would be worldview.
	However, it's very important to understand that Weltanschauung is a little deeper than a worldview.
	You can have any worldview that exists.
	A Weltanschauung is something that's super grounded inside.
	It's an unshakable worldview, something that is just completely concrete.
	So when you hear this word Weltanschauung, understand that this is something that is deeply bound to his psyche.
	It's not something that, oh, I kind of thought this way.
	It's something that he was thoroughly convicted in.
	It's very important to understand when you hear the word Weltanschauung.
	Let's continue.
	On the contrary, I am firmly convinced today that, generally speaking, it is in youth that men lay the essential groundwork of their creative thought, wherever that creative thought exists.
	I make a distinction So,
	this is a very important delineation, right?
	It's not to state that old people are not wise.
	There is a wisdom that comes with age.
	But he's saying that this is directed with experience.
	It's not directed with some form of psychological ambition.
	Very different concepts.
	For those that are just joining in, we are on page 18 on paragraph 6 or 7. We're going to 7 here.
	8 actually.
	These furnish the building materials and plans for the future.
	And it is from them that age takes the stones and builds the edifice, unless the so-called wisdom of the years has smothered the creative genius of youth.
	The life which I had hitherto led at home with my parents differed little from that of many others.
	I looked forward without apprehension to the morrow, and there was no such thing as a social problem to be faced.
	Belong to the small bourgeoisie class.
	Now, bourgeoisie would be more of an upper class.
	It wouldn't be what you would consider, like when we talk in modern society, of the elite, right?
	They wouldn't be that high up.
	But the bourgeoisie would be like a middle to upper class type people, and in more cases than not, more conservative in their worldview.
	Very important word.
	word, you're going to hear that word a lot.
	Therefore, it was a world that had very little contact with the world of genuine manual laborers, for, though at the first this may appear astonishing, the gulf which separates that class, which is by no means economically well off, from the manual laboring which is by no means economically well off, from the manual laboring class is often deeper than
	The reason for this division, which we may almost call enmity, lies in the fear that dominates a social group, which has only just risen above the level of the manual laborer, a fear lest it may fall back into its old condition, or at least be classed a fear lest it may fall back into its old condition, or at So what he's saying is the bourgeoisie is this being the more middle-class
	As it comes up from this lower working class of people, from the poverty class, they...
	Instantly kind of get this disgust and this distaste for the poor people, the poverty-stricken class.
	And it's actually out of this kind of self-conscious fear that they will fall back into that class set, right?
	So now that they have this spot that they're in, they look down on the ones that are where they were before.
	Because they achieved this and they love to separate themselves from that, right?
	They want to be disassociated from that.
	It makes them feel that their achievement is greater than it naturally is.
	And this is important as well as we go further.
	Hitler's concept of socialism, right?
	He wanted to remove these kind of class conflicts because in a healthy and homogenous society, if this person is less well-off than you...
	Wealth-wise, right?
	That doesn't mean that they should accrue enmity from you, but rather they should be seen as a brother who is struggling, right?
	There should be this kind of sense of community where we have that brotherhood around us.
	And obviously, as a society becomes more and more multicultural, that becomes more and more impossible because you have different moral views, you have different ethics, different cultural values.
	So it becomes even harder to feel that sense of brotherhood as a society becomes more multicultural where we are today.
	Continuing.
	Moreover, there is something repulsive in remembering the cultural indignance of that lower class and their rough manners with one another.
	So that people who are only on the first rung of the social ladder find it unbearable to be forced to have any contact with the cultural level and standard of living beyond which they have passed.
	Thus it happens that very often those who belong to what can really be called the upper classes find it much easier than do the upstarts to descend to and intermingle with their fellow beings on the lowest social level.
	For, by the word, upstart.
	It's a little bit of a typo there, I think.
	I mean everyone who has raised himself through his own efforts to a social level higher than that to which he formerly belonged.
	In the case of such a person, the hard struggle through which he has passed often destroys his innate human sympathy.
	His own fight for existence kills his sensibility to the misery of those who have been left behind.
	From this point of view, fate had been kind to me.
	Circumstances forced me to return to that world of poverty and economic insecurity, above which my father had raised himself in his early days.
	And thus the blinkers of a narrow petite bourgeoisie, bourgeois, sorry, education were torn from my eyes.
	Now for the first time, I learned to know men and I learned to distinguish between an outer polish or coarse manners and the real inner nature of people.
	At the beginning of the century, Vienna already ranked among those cities where social conditions were iniquitous.
	Dazzling riches and loathsome destitution were to be found side by side.
	This is obviously very reminiscent to anybody who's been in any of these big cities.
	We go to Atlantic City, New York City, Chicago, Memphis, any of these big cities, and they have these...
	Very clear centers where there's all these really nice architectural buildings.
	Well, maybe not even nice in the modern age.
	Typically now they're just glass skyscrapers, right?
	But buildings that are clearly hosting wealthier, more cultured and intelligent people, right?
	And then literally you go a block outside of that and it's just...
	Poverty.
	There's homeless people all over the streets.
	You're completely in the ghetto.
	People are out hanging out on their porches, sleeping at the pump at the gas station.
	The gas stations have bulletproof glass around the cashier.
	And this is, you know, a block outside of the place.
	A really good example of this, actually, is our capital, Washington, D.C. If you've ever been to the capital, go get gas from the capital.
	Go to the Capitol and then go fill yourself up with gas from there on the way back.
	I'm telling you right now, you're not going to be comfortable, even if you go midday.
	It's one block outside of the Capitol.
	It's a moat of degeneracy and disgustingness that just circles around these massive city epicenters.
	This is what he's describing here in Vienna, but this also exists in every modern city in the United States of America.
	And I would argue it probably exists in London and all of the places in Europe now that have been infested with multiculturalism and degeneracy and everything of the sort.
	Continuing.
	In the center and in the inner city, one felt the pulse beat of an empire which had a population of 52 millions with all the perilous charm of a state made up of multiple nationalities.
	The dazzling splendor of the court acted like a magnet to the wealth and intelligence of the whole empire.
	And this attraction was further strengthened by the centralizing policy of the Habsburg monarchy itself.
	This centralizing policy was neither in order to hold together that hodgepodge of heterogeneous nationalities, Vienna was not merely the political and intellectual center of the Danubian monarchy.
	It was also the industrial center.
	In contrast to the vast numbers of military officers of high-ranked state officials, artists, and scientists, there was still a vaster army of workers.
	Abject poverty rubbed shoulders with the wealth of the aristocracy and the merchant class.
	Thousands of unemployed loitered in front of the palaces on the Ringstrasse and below that Via Triumphalis of the old Austria, the homeless huddled together in the murk and filth of the canals.
	There was hardly any other German city in which the social problem could be studied better than in Vienna.
	But here, I must utter a warning against the illusion that this problem can be studied from a higher social level.
	This is a very important point he's going to make here.
	Both are harmful.
	The first, because it can never go to the root of the problem.
	The second, because it evades the question entirely.
	And this is really akin to, if you look at these conservative pundits, right, that speak on the television.
	I'm going to use Charlie Kirk as the example.
	Charlie Kirk, if you ever hear this, fuck you, you are a rodent.
	Worst guy in the world, literally, without exception, in our conservative pundit scheme.
	They act like they understand the social problem.
	They act like they feel for the people.
	But again, they have no ground experience with the social problem.
	A guy like him, he's never lived in a multicultural city, so he doesn't know how destructive something like multiculturalism is.
	He's never seen these with his eyes in person.
	So he can say nice things and pretend like he cares about people, but he'll never truly understand.
	So like Hitler is describing here, it's a lot of superficial talk and sentimental delusions that come from people like this.
	I believe that maybe somewhere inside of there, Charlie Kirk might have some sentiments where he really feels like he cares about the average working man and the average American, but he has delusions as to...
	What those sentiments are.
	He doesn't understand how to fix it.
	Hey, just be Christian and vote for Trump and all of a sudden it's all fixed.
	It's all done.
	It's all done.
	That's not how it works.
	There's so many levels to the social problem.
	As we'll read further, Hitler describes them very well in depth.
	I do not know which is the more nefarious to ignore social distress, as do the majority of those who have been favored by fortune and those who have risen in the social scale through their own efforts, or the equally supercilious and often tactless but always genteel condensation or the equally supercilious and often tactless but always genteel condensation displayed by people who have a craze for being charitable and who plume themselves on sympathizing with the
	Of course, such persons...
	Sin.
	To a degree, which they, with their lack of instinctive understanding, are unable to realize.
	And thus they are astonished to find that the social conscience on which they pride themselves never produces any results, but often causes their good intentions to be resented.
	And then they talk about the ingratitude of the people.
	Does that make sense?
	So again, exactly.
	Charlie Kirk is just a perfect example for this because he is the ultimate sleazebag of the modern age, right?
	And he fits this description exactly, right?
	He says all these things on his show.
	He's trying to appeal to the sentiments of the people.
	He says, wow, we need to make America great again.
	We got to take this country back.
	We need to reinstall morality into the country.
	Yeah, sure.
	That's all true.
	All fine and dandy.
	Don't necessarily disagree with you on this.
	But then he's got these Jews on his show who are like, you know, multi-billionaires or multi-millionaires, and they're explaining to the average common man, well, here's how economics actually work.
	Well, this is why we need to flood our country with Indians.
	You understand?
	We need more people because we don't have jobs being filled, right?
	So now Charlie Kirk gets all of his ideas from this political system that he's been trained underneath.
	And he reads all these things from these Jewish intellects.
	And so he has no understanding of what the actual sentiments of the people are.
	He only has an understanding of a Jewish framework of what society is supposed to be constituted as.
	So he's telling his base audience of people who...
	Are desperately looking for solutions that your solutions will be handed to you by the Jewish overlords that despise your existence and are the actual reason for the situation that you find yourself in today.
	So it's a complete disconnect and he will always be despised for that, whether he likes it or not.
	Moving forward.
	Such persons are slow to learn that social activity is something very different and that they cannot expect gratitude since they are not distributing favors but establishing rights.
	This is a key, okay?
	Because so many people think that to fix the social problem, to fix the way things are, you just got to do charity, right?
	Go on a Christian mission to...
	Haiti and build them some churches or to go to the homeless people and give them some free food or to go to like a little area where people have drug addicts all over the place and let's give them free needles so that they at least are doing it cleanly, right?
	So what Hitler's saying is it's not about doing favors for people and giving charitable actions.
	But it's about establishing rights.
	You're establishing sound social conditions in existence so that these people don't fall down these roads of drug abuse or multicultural behaviors or transgenderism.
	You want to set up social circumstances so that people don't fall into these things that are social ills, right?
	Rather than, oh, well, now that people already have the social ills, let's just give them charity and then maybe that'll fix it.
	This is so important because if you go to a heroin addict on the street and you just give them cash or give them free food or give them free clean needles, you're not going to help that person.
	You're furthering their decay because people need to struggle in order to survive.
	They have to learn through hardship.
	No great man in history has ever been created from being lazy and getting handouts.
	They have to earn.
	Greatness.
	Greatness is achieved.
	It's not gifted.
	And if your social work to fix society is through handouts and charity, you're enabling people to be lazy victims that just want everything handed to them.
	This is why reparations is one of the most destructive ideas towards all of society, let alone the fact that it's racially on sound.
	Set that aside.
	But the fact that people are going to get handouts, that's going to somehow make the country better or make their lives better?
	No.
	It's going to make it exponentially worse.
	Look at most of the people, and you can see this displayed perfectly.
	If you go to an inner city that's extremely multicultural, where these people are all having 8-10 children so that they can collect more and more welfare for each child that they have, you look at their house, it's a complete shithole.
	They live in these little row homes that are all full of moss.
	The cement is crumbling.
	The grass never cuts three feet high.
	They don't give a shit about where they live.
	They don't care about any of it.
	But each and every one of them, without exception, has the newest iPhone and a 2024 Lexus that they're driving around.
	When you give people money, when it's a handout to them, they don't value it and use it appropriately.
	They just throw it.
	They throw it away.
	Because they're getting rid of it as easy as they got it.
	People that earn their money, they want to save it.
	They want to take care of it.
	They want to do good things with it.
	Let's continue.
	I was protected against the temptation to study the social question in the way just mentioned, for the simple reason that I was forced to suffer myself.
	It was therefore not a question of studying the problem objectively, but rather one of testing its effects on myself.
	Though the rabbit came through the ordeal of the experiment, this must not be taken as evidence of its harmlessness.
	When I try today to recall the succession of impressions received during that time, I find that I can do so only with approximate completeness.
	Here, I shall describe only the more essential impressions and those which personally affected and often staggered me.
	And I shall mention...
	The few lessons I learned from this experience.
	At that time, it was for the most part not very difficult to find work, because I had to seek work not as a skilled tradesman, but as a so-called extra hand, and had to be ready to take any job that turned up by chance, just for the sake of earning my daily bread.
	Thus, I adopted the same attitude as all those emigrants who shake the dust off Europe from their feet With the cast iron determination to lay the foundations of a new existence in the new world and acquire for themselves a new home.
	He's referring to those who have created America, the new world.
	Liberated from all the paralyzing prejudices of class and calling, environment and tradition, they enter any service that is open to them, accepting any work that comes their way, filled more and more with the idea That honest work never disgraced anybody, no matter what kind it may be.
	So I was resolved to enter what was for me a new world and make my way.
	I soon found out that there was always some kind of work to be got, but I also learned that it could just as quickly and easily be lost.
	The uncertainty of being able to earn a regular daily livelihood soon appeared to me the gloomiest feature in this new life upon which I had entered.
	Although the skilled worker was not so frequently thrown idle as the unskilled worker, yet the former was by no means protected against the same fate, because though he might not have to face hunger as a result of unemployment due to the lack of demand on the labor market, the lockout and the because though he might not have to face hunger as a result of unemployment due to the lack of demand on the The lockout and the strike deprived the skilled worker of the chance to earn his bread.
	The element of uncertainty in earning one's daily bread The country lad who migrates to the big city feels attracted by what has been described as easy work,
	which it may be in reality, and shorter working hours, and especially by the magic glamour of the big city.
	Accustomed in this country to earn a steady wage, he has been taught not to quit his former post until a new one is at least in view.
	As there is a great scarcity of agricultural labor, the probability of long unemployment in the country is very slight.
	It is a mistake to assume that the lad who leaves the countryside for the town is not made of such sound material as those who remain at home to work on the land.
	On the contrary, experience shows that it is the more healthy and more vigorous that emigrate and not the reverse.
	Among these emigrants, I include not merely those who emigrate to America, but also the farmhand who decides to leave his native village and migrate to the big city, where he will be a stranger.
	He is ready to take the risk of an uncertain fate.
	In most cases, he comes to the town with a little money in his pocket.
	And for the first few days, he is not discouraged if he should not have the good fortune to find work.
	But if he finds a job and then loses it in a little while, the case is much worse.
	To find work anew, especially in winter, is often difficult and indeed sometimes impossible.
	And there's a very great German film, by the way.
	Let me see if I can really quick find it.
	There's a fantastic German film that actually explains...
	Or shows what we're talking about here.
	Let me see if I can find it quickly.
	Yeah, here it is.
	This film is called Der Vorlorn Son.
	And this is a film about a German man who is a mountain climber.
	He's like a lumberjack, right?
	And he's a lumberjack for a living.
	And he earns a really good living in Germany.
	And he practices all these cultural traditions.
	And some beautiful American woman from the big city of New York comes and meets him in Germany.
	And he becomes infatuated and decides that he wants to experience the Big Apple.
	And he moves to New York and he experiences all of these social ills that we're talking about.
	And they display it very well.
	I know a lot of people, it helps to kind of visualize things like this.
	This is a really good film to do so.
	So this is Der Vorlorn Son.
	It's a 1934 film.
	And I'll spell it for you because it is in German.
	The English translation is The Prodigial Son.
	And it is D-E-R space V-E-R L-O-R E-N-E space S-O-H-N. I highly recommend if you want to even further understand how Germany saw the social problem that you watched that film, It'll really very well display exactly what Hitler's trying to put across here.
	Yes, Sojourn.
	Well, the situation has changed.
	The immigrants are not of the same character, right?
	So he's speaking from Evidently a European perspective.
	God.
	Okay, let's continue forward.
	I do see a lot of people, by the way, asking what we're reading.
	This is Mein Kampf.
	We're on chapter two right now.
	We're on page 22 in the second paragraph.
	So two, two, two, two, two.
	A lot of twos.
	Continuing.
	For the first few weeks, life is still bearable.
	He receives his out-of-work money from his trade union and is thus enabled to carry on.
	But when the last of his own money is gone and his trade union ceases to pay out because of prolonged unemployment, then comes real distress.
	He now loiters about and is hungry.
	Often, he pawns or sells the last of his belongings.
	His clothes begin to get shabby.
	And with the increasing shabbiness of his outward appearance, he descends to a lower social level.
	And, in addition to his physical misery, now mixes with a class of human beings through whom his mind becomes poison.
	Now, this is really important, okay?
	So, what he's saying is, when a good person with a good work ethic comes into one of these big cities and they try their best to, you know, make a life for themselves in these places, Being with those people that murk and mire in these big cities that are of these very low levels, you become poisoned with them.
	And again, in this film, Devor Lawrence's son, they exactly exemplify that.
	He hangs out with this bum on the street who basically teaches him how to avoid the police and steal things.
	So it shows you how this happens.
	And to exemplify this in the modern age, think about anybody who...
	Grows up and they want to be a Hollywood star or they want to be a content creator in Los Angeles with all the other inspirational people that are really wealthy.
	And what happens to most of these people?
	Most of these Hollywood people become complete drug addicts, degenerates, sex addicts.
	I mean, they completely lose themselves entirely.
	They're cultural.
	They're social level.
	Okay, so this is important, because in our society today, the social problem is very backwards.
	So their social level raises, right?
	They become more wealthy, they become more famous, popular, but their cultural level decreases in that same process, right?
	So it's this kind of like inverse of circumstance that we're dealing with, and that shouldn't be the case, right?
	Like your social level and your cultural level should rise as one and the same.
	They should be intrinsically bound.
	In a society that cares about culture, that would be so.
	This is the Stilag edition of Mein Kampf, by the way.
	Let's continue.
	When he has nowhere to sleep, and if this happens in winter, as is very often the case, he is in dire distress.
	Finally, he gets work, but the same story repeats itself a second time, then a third time, and now it is probably much worse.
	Little by little, he becomes indifferent to this everlasting insecurity.
	Finally, he grows used to the repetition.
	Thus, even a man who is normally of industrious habits grows careless in his whole attitude towards life and gradually becomes an instrument in the hands of unscrupulous people who exploit him for the sake of their own ignoble aims.
	He has been so often thrown out of employment through no fault of his own That he is now more or less indifferent as to whether the strike in which he takes part in is for the purpose of securing his economic rights or is aimed at the destruction of the state, the whole social order and even civilization itself.
	Though the idea of going on strike may not be to his liking, yet he joins out of sheer indifference.
	I saw this process happen before my eyes in thousands of cases, and the longer I observed it, the greater became my dislike for that mammoth city which greedily attracts men into its bosom in order to break them mercilessly in the end.
	When they came, they still felt themselves in communion with their own people at home.
	If they remained, that tie was broken.
	I was so buffeted about my life in the metropolis that I myself tasted the physical experience of such a lot and felt the effects of it on my own soul.
	One other thing became The sudden change from work to idleness and vice versa, and the constant fluctuation thus caused between earning and expenditure, finally destroyed the sense of thrift in many people, and also the habit of regulating expenditure in an intelligent way.
	The body appeared to grow accustomed to vicissitude, eating heartily in good times and going hungry in bad.
	Indeed, hunger shatters all plans for regulating expenditure in better times when employment has again been found.
	The reason for this is that the deprivations which the unemployed worker has to endure must be compensated for psychologically by a persistent mental mirage in which he imagines himself eating heartily once again.
	And this dream develops into such a longing that it turns into a morbid impulse to cast off all self-restraint when work and wages turn up again.
	Therefore, the moment work is found anew, he forgets to regulate the expenditure of his earnings, but spends them to the full without thinking of the morrow.
	This leads to confusion, even in the little weekly housekeeping budget, because the expenditure is not carefully planned.
	At first, the earnings will last perhaps Often, there are a wife and children at home, and in many cases it happens that these become infected by such a way of living, especially if the husband is good to them and loves them in his own way and according to his own lights.
	Then the week's earnings are spent in common at home.
	Within two or three days.
	The family eats and drinks together as long as the money lasts, and at the end of the week, they hunger together.
	Then the wife wanders about futively in the neighborhood, borrows a little and runs up small debts with the shopkeepers in an effort to pull through the lean days towards the end of the week.
	They sit together midday to the midday meal with only meager fare on the table and often even nothing to eat.
	They wait for the coming payday, talking of it and making plans.
	While they are thus hungry, they dream of the plenty that is to come.
	And so the little children become acquainted with misery in their early years.
	The evil culminates when the husband goes his own way from the beginning and the wife protests, simply out of love for the children.
	Then there are quarrels and bad feeling, and the husband takes to drink as he becomes more and more estranged from his wife.
	He now becomes drunk every Saturday, fighting for her own existence and that of the children.
	The wife has to dog his footsteps on the road from the factory to the tavern in order to get a few shillings from him on payday.
	This is a very common problem that we have in the modern age as well.
	So, I know people directly who...
	Had a husband who would work, work, work.
	You know, he would do his nine to five.
	And the second he would get off work, he wouldn't even come home to his wife.
	He would first stop at the local bar and he would hang out there for three or four hours or whatever, come home late at night and he's pissed drunk.
	And he's just, the distance begins to...
	Create itself between the two, right?
	And when there's children involved in the situation, it becomes even worse for the child.
	I know many people, personally, and I don't have...
	I'm not a socialite where I'm, you know, making a shitload of friends.
	But I know many people, personally, that live exactly a life like that, where they go to work every day.
	On the way home from work, they stop at the liquor store or the local bar, and the rest of the night is drinking to forget that they live in a terrible society, in terrible circumstances.
	And then they wake up the next day and they repeat that process.
	And a lot of times, especially in the modern age, this is mixed with antidepressants, antipsychotics, which accelerates the fact that these people have no strength to live for their own sake.
	They become, as Hitler said, indifferent.
	All right, continuing.
	All right.
	Then, when he finally comes home, maybe on the Sunday or the Monday, having parted with his last pence, terrible scenes take place.
	I have had actual experience of all of this in hundreds of cases.
	At first, I was disgusted and indignant, but later on, I came to recognize the whole tragedy of their misfortune and understand the profound causes of it.
	They were the unhappy victims.
	Of evil circumstances.
	And this is, again, this is so fundamentally important.
	The average person, again, that we just described who goes to work every day and they're so upset with their lot of life that they get off work and they're drinking themselves into a stupor to just ignore the fact that they live in this terrible society.
	If the society itself was healthy, if it was well-founded, if it was a good society, they wouldn't feel the need to live like this.
	So they are, as he states, they are the unhappy victims of evil circumstances.
	And we have to look at, again, who has created these circumstances for us.
	Housing conditions were very bad at that time.
	In Vienna, manual laborers lived in surroundings and appalling misery.
	I shudder even today when I think of the woeful dens in which people dwelt, the night shelters and the slums, and all the tenebrious spectacles of Ordor, loathsome filth and wickedness.
	What will happen one day when hordes of emancipated slaves come forth from those dens of misery to swoop down on their unthinking fellows?
	For unthinking they certainly are.
	Unthinkingly, they allow things to go on as they are, little dreaming in their insensibility that the day of reckoning must inevitably come, unless fate is appeased.
	Betimes.
	Today, I thank Providence for having sent me to such a school.
	There, I could not refuse to take an interest in matters that did not please me.
	This school soon taught me a profound lesson.
	In order not to despair completely of the people among whom I then lived, I had to differentiate between their outward appearance and their way of living on the one hand, and the reasons for their development on the other.
	Then, I could bear everything without discouragement, for those who emerged from all this misfortune and misery, from this filth and outward degradation, were not human beings as such, but rather the lamentable results of lamentable laws.
	In my own life, similar hardships prevented me from giving away to a pitying sentimentality at the sight of these degraded products, which had finally resulted from the pressure of circumstances.
	The sentimental attitude would have been the wrong one to adopt.
	Even in those days, I already saw that there was a two-fold method by which alone it would be possible to bring about an amelioration of these conditions.
	Namely, to awaken a profound sense of social responsibility for the creation of a better basis for our future development, combined with a ruthless determination To prune away all incorrigible growths.
	Now, this is also very important as well.
	This is a very liberal mindset that Hitler is describing here.
	This idea of wanting to help everybody, wanting to look out for your fellow man.
	This is very liberal, which breaks down this idea that...
	Again, Hitler was a madman who wanted to kill everybody and get everybody killed, right?
	And he even hurt and killed German people and all this bullshit that you constantly hear.
	Does this sound like a man that hates humanity?
	Does this sound like a godless man?
	This sounds like the polar opposite.
	This is a man who thanks providence.
	He's thanking the almighty creator for the circumstances he was put in, the hardships he was put through.
	He's thanking.
	The creator for putting him through this.
	And then additionally, he is thoroughly studying and sympathizing with the lot of the common people, which he himself even states most people that were in his circumstances or a little higher circumstances than him wouldn't even spit in their direction because they were so dissatisfied with the thought of ever being in that spot ever again.
	Very interesting.
	Just as nature concentrates her attention not on the preservation of what already exists, but on the selective breeding of offspring in order to carry on the species, so in human life also,
	it is less a matter of artificially improving the existing generation, which owing to human characteristics is impossible in 99 cases out of 100. But more of securing from the very start a better road for future development.
	This is, by the way, if you agree with that statement here, you believe in eugenics.
	This is a eugenic statement, right?
	It's not about taking the people that are already decayed and decrepit and they've lost their way.
	Imagine in society, What makes more sense here?
	We have thousands upon thousands of drug addicts and alcoholics who are stumbling around aimlessly inside of our society.
	What's a better thing for us to do?
	To spend resources, time, effort, trying to help all of those people, many of which do not want to be helped or can't be helped because they are too far gone, or set up new conditions for the youth that is to come.
	In order that they don't fall into that way of life by way of circumstances.
	Obviously, the latter is much smarter, right?
	To set the ground for the new rather than to try to fix the old.
	During my struggle for existence in Vienna, I perceived very clearly that the aim of all social activity must never be merely charitable relief, which is ridiculous.
	But it must rather be a means to find a way of eliminating the fundamental deficiencies in our economic and cultural life.
	Deficiencies which necessarily bring about the degradation of the individual, or at least lead him towards such degradation.
	The difficulty of employing any means, even the most drastic, to overcome the hostility towards the state prevailing among certain criminal classes.
	is largely due to an attitude of uncertainty regarding the inner motives and causes of this contemporary phenomena.
	The reasons for this uncertainty are not to be found in a sense of guilt for having permitted this tragedy of degradation.
	That feeling paralyzes every serious and firm resolve and so contributes to the vacillating and therefore weak and ineffectual application When an age is no longer burdened with its own consciousness of blame in this regard,
	then and only then will it have that inner tranquility and outer strength necessary to cut off drastically and ruthlessly all parasite growth and root out the weeds.
	So, again, we have social ills that are He's obviously using parasitic growth for very clear, symbolic reasons.
	But all of these social ills, and he'll describe this very shortly here, moving a little bit forward, these stem from, you could stem them from the cultural Marxism, right?
	That is activating all of these things, right?
	It could be labeled as maybe the soft cause.
	But to blame just an ideology.
	Rather than the people that are fomenting said ideology is a mistake, right?
	Because let's say, for instance, we root out cultural Marxism out of society, right?
	We just get rid of it.
	Like, it's no longer in practice.
	It's no longer agreed upon.
	Everybody just ignores it.
	Well, the people that created cultural Marxism still exist.
	They're still working and operating inside of society and pushing ideals that are, they'll just, they'll reframework them.
	They'll just move them into a different direction.
	They'll give them a different name, right?
	Let's take a little breather here.
	I'll interact with the chats a little bit.
	We'll take a little five minute break.
	Evola, what do you mean?
	I don't see much of a difference in Odyssey, personally.
	Yeah, it's very it's very profound.
	Without the Zoom situation.
	Again, for all those people that are coming in a little bit late, we are reading chapter 2 of Mein Kampf.
	We're currently on page 25 of the Stalag edition, about halfway through the fourth paragraph.
	I'm going to continue through.
	through.
	I don't know how many pages are left of this.
	It's a long chapter.
	I We're definitely not finishing this today.
	Maybe not even in the next two shows.
	This will probably take three shows, I think.
	Because the pauses are going to become more and more frequent as the insights that are laid out become more and more profound.
	This will probably be done by the end of the week if we catch all three shows.
	Just need to take a brief breather.
	I get like loud and excitable when I read Mein Kampf and when I analyze it.
	So I tend to need to take a couple of breaks here and there.
	By the way, folks, while we're in a little intermission, Don't forget if you guys want to support the show and help us keep this show going, options to do so are all in the description below.
	You can do Super Chats on Rumble, Odyssey, FTJ.
	You can do them on Entropy as well.
	I always recommend FTJ for Super Chats because the processor fee is the lowest.
	It's like 3%.
	So you're not paying a middleman to do a Super Chat, right?
	I think Rumble is like 20%.
	Odyssey is like 7.5%.
	a half.
	So you're paying the middleman big time on these other platforms.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	National Socialist Germany, they were a little too polite on Jews being in certain positions in the SS, in the SA. They were a little too open about that.
	I think that needs to be a little more strict.
	No Jews should have authority over things that we're doing.
	Of course, Renstar.
	I'm glad you're enjoying.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Also, folks, another way to support the work is share it around.
	Share it around.
	Put it out there.
	Repost it up on Twitter.
	Post it into your Telegram groups wherever you're at.
	Got to get more people reading Mein Kampf or at least hearing it out.
	I just posted a quote from Mein Kampf last night on my Twitter.
	From like chapter, I believe it's chapter 11?
	No, it's much further back.
	I'm not sure which chapter it is, but it's pretty far back.
	I posted it yesterday.
	It's just over 24 hours ago.
	This Mein Kampf tweet has 1.4 million views.
	So people are starting to get comfortable with Mein Kampf.
	A lot of fags are commenting under it and whining.
	With their typical social programming, they know absolutely nothing about Adolf Hitler at all.
	He was genocidal.
	Genocidal, they say.
	Again, listen to...
	We're reading and analyzing this.
	Does this sound like a genocidal psychopath?
	Seriously.
	guy was that was way too polite I probably just a heads out I probably won't be doing any other book readings This one's going to take long enough anyway.
	This will probably take a good five months for us to get through in its entirety.
	So I probably won't be doing any other book readings on my stream.
	I don't really like doing book reading analysis streams.
	I just think it's super important with this book.
	People need to read it.
	I've recommended it to many people.
	People are lazy.
	They are.
	I'm sorry.
	People are just fucking lazy.
	They don't want to read it themselves.
	So I'm just trying to do this to encourage others to read the book and really start to understand what this guy was saying because I don't think very many people actually understand it.
	There's a lot of really good points that he lays out frequently.
	Delta Lima with a $10 Super Chat over on Rumble.
	Thank you, sir.
	I appreciate that very much.
	Thank you for supporting the show.
	First Super Chat of the day.
	Thank you, my friend.
	Yeah, it is a tough read.
	It is a tough read.
	I mean, you gotta remember, you're reading political philosophy, you're reading social ills, you're reading into like...
	How society should function, how history works.
	You're reading into military conflicts and how they've harmed foreign policy.
	There's just so much that you're getting into here.
	It's a deep read.
	It really is.
	Aoi, welcome.
	Welcome, nice to see you.
	Annie, are you talking to me?
	I don't think you're talking to me.
	me.
	All right, folks, another minute or two, and I'll get back to this reading.
	All right, let's continue. let's continue.
	Thank you.
	Because the Austrian state had almost no sense of social right or social legislation, its inability to abolish those evil outgrowths was manifest.
	I do not know what appalled me most at the time, the economic misery of those who were then my companions, their crude customs and morals, or the low level of their culture.
	How often does our bourgeoisie rise up in moral indignation?
	On hearing from the mouth of some pitiful tramp that it is all the same to him whether he be a German or not and that he will feel at home wherever he can get enough to keep body and soul together.
	They bewail such a lack of national pride and express their horror at such sentiments.
	But how many people really ask themselves why it is that their own sentiments are better?
	How many of them understand that their natural pride in members of so favored a nation arises from the innumerable succession of instances they have encountered which remind them of the greatness of their country and their nation in all spheres of artistic and cultural life?
	How many of them realize that pride in their country is largely dependent on knowledge of its greatness in all those spheres?
	Do our bourgeoisie circles ever think what a ridiculously meager share the people have in that knowledge, which is a necessary prerequisite for the feeling of pride in one's own country?
	I mean, think about this.
	When you look at the Conservative Party and they want people to be patriotic, right?
	We need more patriots, right?
	How can people care?
	About America when most of them are completely uneducated on it.
	I mean, how many of us have seen these videos where they go on the street and interview random citizens who are like 20s, 30s, even 40s, 50s?
	And they talk to these people and they don't know how many stars are on the American flag.
	They don't know how many stripes are on the American flag.
	They can't even name who the second president was.
	They don't know the First Amendment.
	It's like, how can people like that have a pride in America?
	They don't know anything about it.
	They have no idea what it is.
	Now, obviously, again, we're not talking about these other races who have no interest in the foundation of America because their kin didn't find this country.
	It's not a matter of that for them.
	But our people, our own racial brethren, who have zero fundamental understanding of what this country is, how can they have pride in it?
	How can you be a nationalist if you don't know shit about the nation that you live in?
	Because your education system would rather teach you about what gender you are or loving all human beings and men can have babies and all this gay nonsense that's just meant to distract you from an actual source of real education, of an actual identity, right?
	People identify with their nation, okay?
	Any dictionary before the year 1940, pick it up, the word nation, the definition is race.
	So you can't have a pride in your nation, your race, your country.
	You can't identify behind that if you don't know what it is.
	And so, because most people don't know what it is, and they don't identify with their nation, they need to identify with something.
	So they identify with their pronouns, or they identify with their religion, or they identify...
	With their sexuality or their gender, right?
	This is intentional.
	They take your identity out of you.
	They extract it from you.
	That natural inherent identity that's existing in you at birth.
	And they insert gender identity, pronoun identity, all these weird psychotic fucking things that are obviously wrong and just a waste of time.
	And that's why the people that are this way...
	Are mentally ill.
	They're not mentally ill because they're mentally ill and that's why they're transgender.
	It's the inverse.
	Or it's half of an inverse, right?
	Their mental illness comes from the fact that they don't identify with anything.
	They're not grounded in anything but gender, which is like a ridiculous fallacy, right?
	Continuing.
	It cannot be objected here that in other countries, similar conditions exist, and that nevertheless, the working classes in those countries have remained patriotic.
	Even if that were so, it would be no excuse for our negligent attitude.
	But it is not so.
	What we call chauvinistic education, in the case of the French people, for example, is only the excessive exaltation Of the greatness of France in all spheres of culture or, as the French say, civilization.
	The French boy is not educated on purely objective principles.
	Whether the importance of the political and cultural greatness of his country is concerned, he is taught in the most subjective way imaginable.
	Education ought always to be on broad, general lines, and these ought to be deeply engraved by constant repetition if necessary.
	In our case, however, we are not merely guilty of sins of omission, but also of positively perverting the little which some individuals had the luck to learn at school.
	The rats that poison our body politic gnaw from the hearts and memories of the broad masses, even that little which distress and misery have left.
	Let the reader...
	Try to picture the following.
	There's a lodging in a cellar, and this lodging consists of two damp rooms.
	In these rooms, a workman and his family live seven people in all.
	Let us assume that one of the children is a boy of three.
	That is the age at which children first become conscious of the impressions which they receive.
	In the case of highly gifted people, traces of the impressions received in those early years remain in the memory up to an advanced age.
	Now, the narrowness and congestion of those living quarters are not conducive to pleasant relations, and thus quarrels and fits of mutual anger arise.
	These people can hardly be said to live with one another, but rather on top of one another.
	The small misunderstandings which disappear of themselves in a home where there is enough space for people to get away from one another for a while, here become the source of chronic disputes.
	As far as the children are concerned, the situation is tolerable from this point of view.
	In such conditions, they are constantly quarreling with one another, but the quarrels are quickly and easily forgotten.
	But when the parents fall out with one another, daily bickering often develops into rudeness, such as cannot be adequately imagined.
	The results of such experiences must become apparent later on in the children.
	One must have practical experience of such a...
	Milieu?
	Milieu?
	if I'm saying that correctly, in order to be able to picture the state of affairs that arises from such mutual recriminations when the father assaults the mother and maltreats her in a fit of drunken rage.
	At the age of six, the unfortunate child begins to be aware of sordid facts which an adult would find revolting, infected with moral poison, undernourished in body and with its poor little head alive with vermin.
	The young citizen goes to the primary school.
	With difficulty, he barely learns to read and write.
	There is no possibility of learning any lessons at home.
	On the contrary, the father and mother themselves talk before the children in the most disparaging way about the teacher and the school and they are much more inclined to insult the teachers than to put their offspring across their knee and knock sound reason into a Now, this is very important.
	You see this a lot in modern society, and I see this a lot.
	With blacks.
	You see this constantly.
	Their kid will go and do something wrong at school, smoke a cigarette in the bathroom, or call the teacher a bitch or something.
	And they come running down into the principal's office when the kid gets in trouble.
	And, oh, my baby didn't do that.
	My baby ain't done nothing like that.
	We don't do that.
	Uh-uh.
	My baby an angel.
	Right?
	So there's no accountability on the child ever.
	They don't learn a lesson of discipline or behavior.
	No, it's just the racist principle was mad at little Tyrone for his behavior, right?
	And this is seeding into a lot of white people, too.
	I'm seeing this more and more as well.
	It's not purely a black thing.
	It certainly is.
	I see a lot of white parents, typically, again, of more degenerate stock, who will go and they'll defend their kid.
	When I got in trouble in school as a child because I did something wrong, My family wasn't running into the principal's office and yelling at the principal and telling them that they're assholes for disciplining me.
	They were taking me home and they were disciplining me for doing something that was incorrect at school.
	That's how it's supposed to work.
	But we live in a society where parents will side with their kids' bad behavior over to school.
	I mean, how many parents, like, when their kid's in high school, they literally smoke weed with their fucking children.
	And then their children goes to school and gets caught with weed in their bag and the parent goes and yells at the principal for getting mad about it.
	Right?
	There's the parents doing it themselves.
	Continuing.
	What the little fellow hears at home.
	Does not tend to increase his respect for his human surroundings.
	Here nothing good is said of human nature as a whole and every institution, from the school to the government, is reviled.
	No matter what the subject, religion, morals, the state, social order, they rail against them all and drag them down into the dirt.
	When the lad leaves school, at the age of 14, it would be difficult to say what are the most striking features of his character.
	Incredible ignorance, insofar as real knowledge is concerned, or cynical impudence combined with an attitude towards morality which is really startling in one so young.
	What position can a person fill in the world which he is about to enter, if to him nothing is sacred, if he has never come into contact with anything noble, but on the contrary has been intimately acquainted with the lowest kind of human existence?
	The child of three?
	Has got into the habit of reviling all authority by the time he is 15. Again, using, you know, black ghetto as the example.
	Think about how they look at police.
	Do they have any respect for police?
	Right?
	We used to be in a society where you had respect for the authority of civilization and police.
	And when they pull you over, you say, oh, yeah, sorry, you know, I was speeding.
	Here's this.
	Here's my ID. You know, I apologize.
	Now we're in a circumstance where they get pulled over by the police.
	I ain't got to show you my license.
	I ain't got to show you my...
	You do.
	I mean, it's like it's part of a traffic stop.
	You're suspected of a crime.
	It's like there's no respect.
	There's no respect for authority.
	This is very dangerous for society.
	It has far-reaching implications.
	By the way, I see Annie Waffin with a $10 Super Chat over on FTJ says, I like when you do these readings and interpret for your audience.
	Thank you very much for the support.
	This seems to be something that people really enjoy.
	I always get compliments on specifically the MindConf reading and analysis.
	People really seem to enjoy it.
	Like I said, we will be doing this front to back, all the way through.
	Thank you again very much.
	I appreciate it.
	Matias.
	Very cold.
	Okay, continuing.
	Okay.
	in a reformatory for young people where he acquires the final polish And his bourgeoisie contemporaries are astonished at the lack of patriotic enthusiasm which this young citizen displays.
	Day after day, the bourgeoisie world sees how poison is spread among the people through the medium of the theater, the cinema, gutter journalism, and obscene books.
	And yet they are astonished at the deplorable moral standards and lack of national feeling among the masses.
	As if the overdone sentimentality of the cinema, rubbishy papers, and such like could lay a foundation for the recognition of the greatness of one's country, apart entirely from the earlier education which the individual has received.
	Thank you.
	I think that's a very accurate portrayal of the circumstance we live in today.
	If you're a child and you grow up and you're looking through Twitter and it's loaded with pornography, it's loaded with Fight Club, all those Fight Club clips that are all over Twitter with people beating the shit out of each other, kicking the shit out of some kid in the bathroom.
	You're listening to music like Cardi B. Where she's talking about sex and drugs and money.
	And then she's uploading videos on her Instagram profile about how to appropriately suck dick when most of her audience is below the age of 18. It's sick.
	This is a sick upbringing.
	So yet again, how can anybody have a patriotic enthusiasm or a nationalistic pride or some kind of high moral standards and this cultured atmosphere when you grow up around that?
	Culture isn't something that you just like...
	Are inculsated with at birth.
	It's something that is put into people.
	It's something that we practice.
	It's a tradition.
	Traditions are practices that are passed down through experience and repetition.
	So what are we practicing and repeating today?
	Sexual degeneracy, cultural degeneracy, drug usage.
	All of these things are promoted openly.
	So this is the culture now.
	And that culture is through, you know, especially through this ghetto music that we have in the modern age, this culture is being repeated and repeated and repeated.
	And now you have children that are four or five years old brandishing a gun going, ah, I'm gonna pop you, I'm gonna pop you.
	They're four or five.
	It's ridiculous.
	I...
	Thank you, Orange Park.
	But yeah, I don't do the whole...
	Globe or flat thing.
	I don't really care either way.
	Mash section, you'll get there, brother.
	Give it time.
	Alright, continuing.
	I then came to understand quickly and thoroughly what I had never been aware of before.
	Namely, That the question of nationalizing a people is first and foremost one of establishing sound social conditions which will furnish the foundation necessary for the education of the individual.
	For only when family upbringing and school education have inculsated upon the mind of the individual a knowledge of cultural and economic and above all of the political greatness of his own country then and only then.
	Will it be possible for him to feel proud of being a citizen of that country?
	This is a lovely quote, by the way.
	Pay attention to this one.
	If you're reading the book, underline.
	I can fight only for something that I love.
	I can love only what I respect.
	And in order to respect a thing, I must at least have some knowledge of it.
	As soon as my interest in the social question was once awakened, I began to study them thoroughly.
	A new and hitherto unknown world was thus revealed to me.
	Jay, if you're looking for a book website to get literature like this, I have two websites that I recommend that I am partnered with.
	MoneyTreePublishing.com.
	So it's one common spelling.
	Code Logos, L-O-G-O-S, you'll save 10%.
	We got White Power over there.
	Mein Kampf, The International Jew, Synagogue of Satan.
	There's quite a plethora of books over there.
	And additionally, I am partnered with Antelope Hill Publishing.
	Again, common spelling.
	And there's a lot of literature on there.
	Battle for Berlin, there's fascist literature, Christian nationalist literature, national socialist stuff.
	I mean, there's a lot of stuff up there.
	You can find it all over there.
	Both websites, code Logos, L-O-G-O-S, you'll save yourself 10%.
	Let's continue.
	In the years 1909 and 1910, I had so far improved my position that I no longer had to earn my daily bread as a manual laborer.
	I was now working independently in a small way, as a painter in watercolors.
	This métier was a poor one indeed, and as far as earnings were concerned, for these were only sufficient to pay for the bare necessities of life.
	Yet it had an interest for me, in view of the profession to which I aspired.
	Moreover, when I came home in the evenings, I was now no longer dead tired as formerly, when I used to be unable to open a book without falling asleep almost immediately.
	My present occupation was, therefore, in line with the profession I aimed at for the future.
	here.
	Moreover...
	I was master of my own time and could arrange my working hours better than formerly.
	I painted in order to earn my bread, and I studied because I liked it.
	Thus, I was able to acquire that theoretical knowledge of the social problem, which was a necessary complement to what I was learning through actual experience.
	I studied all the books which I could find that dealt with this question, and I thought deeply on what I read.
	I think that the people among whom I then lived considered me an eccentric person.
	Besides my interest in the social question, I naturally devoted myself with enthusiasm to the study of architecture.
	Side by side with music, I considered it queen of the arts.
	To study it was for me not work, but pleasure.
	I could read or draw into the small hours of the morning without ever getting tired.
	And I became more and more confident that my dream of a brilliant future would come true, even though I should have to wait long years for its fulfillment.
	I was firmly convinced that one day I should make a name for myself as an architect.
	The fact that, side by side with my professional studies, I took the greatest interest in everything that had to do with politics did not seem to me to signify anything of great importance.
	On the contrary, I looked upon this practical interest in politics merely as part of an elementary obligation that devolves on every thinking man.
	Those who have no understanding of the political world around them have no right to criticize or complain.
	I think that's a fantastic line as well.
	You know, we have...
	How many people exist today that are...
	They want to complain about the trannies.
	They want to complain about multiculturalism.
	They want to complain about Marxism.
	They want to complain about all these different societal ills.
	But they have no interest in looking into why it's happening.
	I have so many family members that come to me and they're like, oh man, I was at Wawa the other day and there was this nigger there who had his speaker blaring out loud while I was in line.
	It was so frustrating to listen to.
	Oh my God, all of my neighbors are getting more and more brown.
	Oh my God.
	And they complain, they complain, they complain, they complain.
	And I asked him, I said, where do you think this comes from?
	Why do you think all these people are in our country now?
	Why do you think this is happening so fast?
	Where do you think this comes from?
	And they literally don't even want to think about it.
	They don't want to even open their brain and analyze it for even a second.
	They just go, well, whatever, who cares?
	It's just shit.
	All of these people are just...
	They're complacent.
	They want to complain about something, but they don't have the gusto to try to improve it.
	It's quite interesting, too, because when I make posts on Twitter or whatever about Jewish power and what these people are doing, so many times I get people to say, oh my god, all you do is complain about you.
	You complain, you complain.
	I'm not complaining.
	I'm exposing.
	I'm laying out facts.
	I'm not going, oh my god, my country's so bad.
	There's so many Jews here.
	They're ruining everything.
	I'm not complaining.
	I'm discussing.
	I'm making dialogue about the most important problem in the world right now.
	Texan brother, you're in the wrong place with this Jewish rhetoric, dude.
	Thank you.
	I appreciate it, but I think you've been watching too much Alex Jones.
	Hitler wasn't a Freemason.
	He wasn't Jewish.
	We discussed this in the beginning of the show.
	Yeah, that's true.
	There is a hard line with boomers in discussing the Jewish problem.
	It's something that's very deeply seated in there.
	And again, you have people like Charlie Kirk to blame for that problem.
	I think we might stop on 29.
	Because I'm going to find...
	It's going to be hard to find a stopping point in the next couple pages here.
	Thank you.
	That's what we'll do.
	We're going to stop on 29. When we pick back up, we'll pick back up at the very top of 29. I am going to be doing this again Wednesday.
	We'll be live on Wednesday.
	So with that said, I hope you guys enjoyed this.
	What do we think, folks?
	One out of ten on that reading.
	And again, please do let me know, how do you feel about the analysis?
	Is it a good analysis?
	Is it too much?
	Is it too little?
	What are the general thoughts?
	I want to make sure that the audience is enjoying the reading and it's captivating.
	It's very important.
	It's actually, we've heard all these things before.
	These are common Jewish talking points.
	You still think it's like Frankists and Satanists and stuff, dude.
	Newsflash.
	Some people think it's the Kazarians.
	Some people think it's the Zionists.
	Some people think it's the Marxists.
	Guess what?
	Jews were reviled and kicked out of every country before the Zionists existed.
	They were kicked out and reviled before Marxism existed.
	They were kicked out and reviled before Frankism existed.
	They were kicked out and reviled before the Pharisees existed.
	They've been kicked out and reviled everywhere they've gone.
	It's a genetic Jewish problem.
	You can attribute all of these different ideologies that have spawned from these people, but it's the genetic people themselves that are the problem.
	This is the source, the source, right?
	Imagine German people.
	Start going everywhere, right?
	And people go, oh, those Germans are evil.
	It's the Nazis.
	No, no, it's the Goths.
	No, no, it's the Vikings.
	No, no, wait, wait, wait.
	No, it's the Vandals.
	It's psychotic.
	If it's one group of people with a genetic basis that have all these different ideologies and different segments that spawn off of them for centuries, and for all those centuries are hated and reviled by the ideology that they have, it's clearly the people in stole.
	That are the problem, right?
	It has nothing to do with the ideals.
	The ideals are a product of the people themselves.
	This is like a very common, like, I'm just so tired of hearing it.
	I'm exhausted with it.
	this uh because arians it's the it's the yeah well jews were kicked out of countries way before the kazarians were ever a thing dude good okay People seem to enjoy.
	All right, that's great.
	It's good to hear.
	Yeah, okay, look.
	I'm not saying there's nobody that's not Jewish involved.
	Obviously, there are some Jews involved, some non-Jews involved with what's going on, absolutely.
	We have traitors to our country.
	Again, many of them are just useful idiots, they're stupid, like Charlie Kirk, right?
	Others, like Donald Trump, might be a little more involved in that process.
	But nonetheless, without the Jew corrupting our people with finance and these different degeneracies, the problems...
	I'm not saying we wouldn't have any societal problems, but the problems we have now that are as extrapolated and serious as they are now wouldn't exist.
	Jews are a heavily racially admixed people.
	The reason that they are so racially admixed over every other people while still remaining that cultural identity is because throughout history, their method of conquering a nation is different than everybody else's method.
	You have to understand, we're talking about a group of people that are not compatible to the rest of human society, okay?
	They are racially admixed because they went into every civilization and conquered it by marrying into the royalty and subverting the civilization from within.
	Every other group of people took over a civilization through outright warfare.
	Rome, how many civilizations did they conquer through outright warfare?
	Britain, how many civilizations?
	The Chinese, all these people, they conquered civilization outright.
	Jews married within, that's why they're racially admixed.
	They still hold that Jewish thing above anything else, right?
	I'm a German Jew.
	I'm a French Jew.
	They're always a Jew.
	They're always a Jew, no matter what.
	That Jew piece is always the most fundamental, the most important.
	It never, never secedes.
	It's always Jewish.
	They're always the Jew deep down.
	Very important to understand.
	And additionally, you have to understand, and Hitler's going to explain this later in the book, but state form.
	Every group of people that's existed ever, their state is on the soil.
	They create a government.
	They create a state structure.
	They create a civilization.
	That's where their state is.
	Okay?
	Jews?
	They're a state within a state.
	Their state is mobile.
	Think about it as like this cloud entity that moves around everywhere you go, and it has all its ideals in it, all its racial basis is in it.
	It's a state within the side of a state.
	What people fail to also understand, the Jewish quote-unquote religion, look at the Old Testament.
	Read into these people.
	Read into their history.
	It's based in their genetics.
	It's based in their experiences as a people, their traditions that they have.
	They don't eat pork.
	Why don't they eat pork?
	Because the Jews back in Egypt, there was a plague that was going around from pigs that was killing Jews.
	So they practiced the tradition by not eating pork because back then it didn't affect their religious compatriots.
	It affected their racial brethren, their tribe.
	This is the key.
	This is what they've always focused on.
	They're...
	As much as...
	I don't like theological debate here, but when we look into all of the ancestral religions that are subversively titled paganism, all of these ancestral religions have one thing in common.
	They are grounded to a racial, civilizational concept.
	They're grounded to the people, the tribe.
	The Roman gods are for the Roman people.
	The Greek gods were for the Greek people.
	The Egyptian gods were for the Egyptian people.
	This is what people fail to understand.
	The Jews, historically, their religion is grounded with their race.
	It's a history of their race and their racial experience as a people.
	And they still practice it today.
	We aren't doing that.
	We're not doing that so we don't have that full rooted understanding of what our history is.
	And this is why they've always been able to form a state within a state everywhere they've gone because their racial...
	Their religion is linked to their race.
	So they're always Jewish first.
	It doesn't matter if they're religious or not.
	They're just Jewish first.
	Think about all of the Jews that are subverting society today.
	Karl Marx, the founder of communism and Marx.
	He wasn't religious.
	George Soros isn't religious.
	I doubt Larry Fink is religious.
	Seth Rogen's not religious.
	just like most of the Jews that are destroying civilization, they're not religious.
	You can say that, Wiesn, sure.
	Yeah.
	Ouslander Rouse with a $1 Super Chat.
	Thank you, sir.
	He says, great presentation.
	Thank you very much for the Super Chat.
	I appreciate it.
	Just a friendly reminder, and I don't mind either way.
	All Super Chats that are done on the Stu Peters Network through Rumble Studio, those go to Stu, not me.
	So if you do want to support me and my channel, I've got my Rumble that I'm live on.
	We're live on Odyssey, FTJ, all my other platforms.
	Descriptions down below.
	You can check all of them out.
	But if you do want to support me directly, that's the way to do so.
	No pressure either way.
	I do appreciate you supporting the network either way.
	I just know that that doesn't go to me.
	Yeah, you know, and I look, I'm not I'm not in the camp of people that thinks that, you know, all we have to do is be like white racialists and everything is solved.
	Obviously, there has to be some kind of moral structure.
	There's other things involved in that.
	We have some kind of...
	We absolutely need to understand racial tribalism because this is why the Jews succeed.
	It's why they have world power.
	It's why they're benefiting everywhere that they go.
	Because the people in Australia that are running the Australian government, that are Australians, they don't feel any kind of genetic, blood-bound connection to the people of Britain or England.
	But the Jews that are financing the people in Australia and the Jews that are financing people in England, they feel a blood-bound connection with each other.
	They're directly connected with each other.
	And they're working on the same goal with each other.
	So they have the connection.
	We don't.
	And even more so in a place like America, where it's predominantly Euromuts that have all these different varying identities.
	So tribalism is absolutely necessary.
	We need to have a foundation of tribalism.
	But there has to be, it's more than that.
	You know, a lot of people say, oh, all that matters is like, hey, white power, and that's it.
	That's not the thing here.
	Like, yes, white people need to have some kind of sovereign power inside of their countries where they have control over their own destiny.
	Otherwise, we are going to go extinct.
	That's a fact.
	But we need to have a moral structure inside of that.
	We need to have a political structure inside of that.
	We're not going to just be like a tribe of people living in huts and villages, throwing spears at anybody that pisses us off.
	We have to have decency that has to exist.
	All right.
	I'm done with the rant.
	I got a little upset.
	Done with the rant.
	I hope you guys enjoyed the show.
	I hope you guys enjoyed the reading.
	Thank you very much for tuning in, folks.
	Don't forget, share the show around.
	Give it to other people.
	Share it on Twitter.
	Share it on your Telegram channels.
	Tell your friends about it.
	Whatever.
	Share it all over the place.
	If you want to go a step above and beyond, don't buy yourself a case of beer this week.
	That's degenerate.
	Take half of it.
	Support the show.
	Do a little super chat on the show.
	Everything that goes into this show, everything that I receive from this show.
	It goes directly back into it.
	Most of it turns into me getting books, which I read, and then give the information to more people.
	So your support is always greatly appreciated.
	It helps me going in this Jewish financial system that we are unfortunately stuck underneath.
	Thank you, folks, for listening.
	Thank you for your time.
	This has been a wonderful show so far.
	I really appreciated today's show.
	Auslander Rouse, thank you very much, brother, with a super chat of a dollar over on Rumble, he says.
	Here's a dollar for you.
	Thank you, sir.
	I appreciate that very much.
	Sir or ma'am.
	Sorry, I don't know either way.
	But thank you very much for the support.
	I appreciate that.
	Okay, rebroadcast will be up for anybody that missed the show.
	I'll put that up.
	It'll be up tonight.
	Rumble and all those other platforms, it goes up right away.
	But Odyssey, it will be up tonight.
	And I will be live on Wednesday, 4 p.m.
	Eastern.
	We're going to pick up right where we left off on page 29 at the very top.
	So again, if you guys want to follow along.
	Mein Kampf, Stalag Edition.
	You can get a PDF online.
	However, I highly recommend you get a physical copy so you can underline and you can really read it yourself, highlight some things that you find important.
	I don't highlight books.
	I think it's gay, actually.
	I underline them with ink pen.
	I don't highlight.
	It's weird.
	But you're welcome to do that if you want to do that.
	Just know it's gay.
	I'm joking.
	But if you guys do want to get a physical copy of Mein Kampf, Stalag Edition, Money.
	TreePublishing.com, all one word, common spelling.
	Mein Kampf's on there.
	International Jew by Henry Ford's on there.
	That's on my shelf there.
	Siege by James Mason's up there.
	White Power, George Lincoln Rockwell, they're all over there.
	There's a Holocaust, Fact or Fiction, all of it.
	It's all up on there.
	Code Logos, L-O-G-O-S. You're going to save yourself 10%.
	You're getting yourself a nice book.
	You're supporting a person that's been in our movement for like three or four decades.
	And you're supporting me with a small royalty.
	So it's all appreciated.
	Thank you guys so much for listening.
	It's been a wonderful show today.
	I have a lot of energy today.
	I feel good after that reading.
	My comp always kind of gets me going.
	It puts the passion in my bones.
	All right.
	Thank you guys so much.
	Appreciate you watching.
	I'll see you guys on Wednesday, 4 p.m.
	Eastern, page 29. Have a good Monday.
	I'll talk to you guys on Wednesday.

▲