All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 17, 2025 - Stew Peters Show
56:46
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Zelensky Calls for Creation of European Military Force
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for being with us.
I want to remind everybody that this portion of the program is brought to you by Red Vive Health Network.
You can go to redvivehealth.org slash Paul for more information on terrific red light panels.
And we'll give you more information on that coming up later in the broadcast.
But redvivehealth.org slash Paul.
Okay, so, man, I got to tell you, this has been an incredible weekend.
Just in terms of the headlines, I was bookmarking so many things, and I knew this was going to be difficult.
But, I mean, my show prep this morning was a little stressful because there's just too many things going on.
We have this reaction from J.D. Vance.
We got this speech from J.D. Vance that he gave.
We covered it, the one in Munich, on Friday.
And then the fallout from this has just been...
I mean, I never thought that CBS News...
I mean, we shouldn't be surprised, but I guess I still am.
I guess there's a level of naivete that I have, I'll confess that, where CBS News decides to just go full...
CBS News is now covering for the totalitarian freaks in Germany that are arresting citizens over memes, arresting citizens over posts on social media that they deem racist.
That's now a crime in Germany.
And I've asked this question many, many times, and considering what Zelensky's calling for, the creation of a European military to help continue to fight Russia, to get more dead Ukrainians, more dead Russians, the question has got to be asked, who are the godless communists today?
Look, I mean, I know the Soviet Union, okay?
I know the USSR from history.
I mean, you go, look, they were godless.
That's kind of what's required in communism.
You can't believe in a higher power, anything higher than the state.
The state is the highest power.
I get all that.
So we create NATO. Right?
We have the Berlin Wall.
We create NATO. And NATO exists...
Hear me now.
NATO existed to protect Christian Europe from the godless communist Soviets.
Is Europe Christian now?
Is Europe Christian now?
Who are the godless communist Soviets?
Who are acting like communists today?
And this is why they can't stand what J.D. Vance pointed out.
They can't stand the fact that the American people have voted for things like free speech.
The American people have voted in a democratic process for things that are traditionally known in Western democracies to be supported.
Things like, you know, freedom of conscience.
We're not going to bind your conscience.
And yet, here we are.
And this is why they're so offended.
J.D. Vance comes to Munich on Friday and says, hey, you guys got to quit censoring people.
Hey, Britain, you guys got to quit arresting people for silent prayers outside of abortion clinics.
Hey, Germany, you guys don't need to have these draconian speech laws.
You don't need to go arrest people for hurting somebody's feelings.
Right?
I mean, sticks and stones, right?
I mean, it's preposterous.
And the reaction to this, coupled with...
Trump trying to get peace in Ukraine and talking to Putin.
Secretary of State Rubio talking to Putin.
Secretary of Defense Hegseth saying, look, NATO membership is off the table.
And so there is a huge power shift here.
There's huge geopolitical things that are going on.
And Europe doesn't like it, and so now Zelensky over the weekend calls for the creation, while in Munich, the same place where J.D. Vance was, calls for the creation of a European military force.
Then you've got CBS News coming alongside this narrative, trying to debunk J.D. Vance by interviewing German police, going on raids with German police while they're arresting citizens over social media posts.
Okay, and then we also have the 60 Minutes reporting on the poor, pitiful federal workers that no longer have jobs because President Trump shut down the corrupt, the military-industrial complex-backed USAID. We've got a lot to get to, and I know we're not going to have enough time for it.
We have a story out of Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The city police there say they will not enforce immigration laws.
We have an update from the Rick Warren Post where he said that because Jesus was on the Middle Cross while he was crucified, that means he also was a centrist when it comes to political issues.
The political issues of today, like trans and kids, he has now deleted that tweet and...
Sort of apologized, but to be quite honest, it's just not good enough.
We also have a lady pastor that gave a sermon on Genesis 1, or Genesis 3, 315, you know, that whole chapter, Genesis 3, talking about Eve's agency, and when Eve ate the apple, that was actually a good thing.
That was actually a good thing.
That was actually a way to get...
To get closer to God because it was the tree of knowledge.
I mean, it's a lie straight out of the pit of hell.
I saw one pastor say that, and he's exactly right.
But we're going to dive right in, and we're going to do our best to cover these stories, but I just know that we're going to run out of time today and not get to all of them.
But let's go ahead and go first.
So on Friday when I got off the air...
One of the things that I created, I used the Grok AI. I call this Trumping Zelensky.
So this is what, I mean, you know, not literally, but Zelensky needs to shut it in the background because we don't want U.S. soldiers in Ukraine.
We don't want the bloodshed to continue.
We don't want the meat grinder to continue.
And by the way, this guy, he suspended elections.
There are no elections.
Trump, last week, low-key reminded everybody, hey, this guy isn't very popular in his own country.
If they reinstituted elections, he's essentially intuiting.
If they reinstituted elections, Zelensky wouldn't win because the people are tired.
They basically kidnap young kids from the street, off the street.
There's plenty of video of this in Ukraine.
And send them to the front lines because they're running out of people.
Russia has plenty of people.
Ukraine doesn't.
There's a huge population difference between those two countries.
So here we go in the background.
Trump and Putin shaking hands.
At this point, this guy's a puppet.
And I think Trump is treating him like a puppet.
But he doesn't like that he's a puppet now.
And his friends like Lindsey Graham and the money laundering depot that is Ukraine, a uniparty, both Republican and Democrat.
Money-laundering depot.
This country's been used for corruption.
And let's hope we find out even more about how much foreign aid and how corrupt it actually is.
Speaking of that, so Mark Lynch.
Here's a guy named Mark Lynch.
He's actually challenging Senator Lindsey Graham in a primary.
Lindsey Graham says he wants U.S. soldiers' boots on the ground in Ukraine.
And he says Ukraine and NATO. Now, he's kind of counter-signaling...
Well, let's just listen to the clip, because it is fascinating that he...
I mean, again, Lindsey Graham never met a war he doesn't like.
For you, do it what you did for us.
Make Ukraine a NATO member.
Well, yeah.
Make Ukraine a NATO member.
Yeah, I'm okay with you being NATO. I'm just being honest with you.
I think there are a few countries who are not.
My idea is a little bit different.
I want Putin to know if he ever does this again, you go into NATO right away.
I want to take the mystery out of what happens if there's another invasion.
You get sanctioned.
There's a bunch of bad things coming your way.
We'll have...
We'll have troops on the ground in Ukraine.
We'll have American business interests.
We'll have a Ukrainian military that nobody in the right mind wants to fight.
But how about this idea?
If we can't get this man in NATO, like, right now, can we tell Putin, sorry, if you ever do this again, he's going in NATO, like, right away?
Do you think he'd do it if that was clear to him?
Now again, this is happening in the context of Hegseth, Trump, Rubio, basically saying, look, NATO is not a thing.
The reason the war started is because Biden said that Ukraine could be a NATO and other people were saying, hey, we need to make Ukraine a NATO member.
That's the whole reason why the war happened.
And Lindsey Graham is sitting here saying, yeah, okay, maybe you're not going to be in NATO, but if it's happening again, you need to be in NATO, and troops on the ground.
Essentially conscripting our country, America, to, once again, this Article 5 thing in NATO, conscripting us to have to spill American blood over there if Putin were to do something like this again.
No thanks.
Tired of American soldiers dying overseas.
This has been happening basically my entire lifetime.
As somebody who's 40 years old, I want you to put your...
For those of you who are older, I saw a poll.
Mark Mitchell over at Rasmussen was saying that Trump's approval rating is going up, but it's going down among people who are like 65 and older.
And I think that's fascinating.
It's fascinating to see.
I think many of them are probably still believing the hype.
Many of them are probably still believing the lying media about what's really going on with Elon Musk and Doge and everything else.
I think it's a fundamental ignorance of just how evil and corrupt our country has been for a very, very long time, both parties.
Anyway, it's just funny to me.
It's like, oh yeah, decency, decency.
As soon as the media tells you that our government isn't decent, there's so many people out there that have like our own personal crisis and can't sleep at night, you know, because they depend on this reassurance.
Anyway, this is ridiculous.
And the fact is that Kash Patel could have been confirmed, but instead all these senators rush over to meet with Zelensky over the weekend.
Here he is, Zelensky calling for the creation of a European NATO without the U.S. Let's be honest, now we can't rule out the possibility that America might say no to Europe on issues that threaten it.
Many, many leaders have talked about Europe that needs its own military, an army, an army of Europe.
And I... I really believe that time has come.
The armed forces of Europe must be created.
That is a desperate man right there, ladies and gentlemen.
That is a very, very desperate and scared man.
Here he is, Zelensky, saying he blocks the mineral rights agreement.
Trump wants the mineral rights because we've given them billions of dollars.
I don't have subtitles on that.
Anyway, according to this, Zelensky says, I blocked the agreement with Trump on mineral rights, assuming that that report is true.
Here he is, Derek Evans reminding us, this is them.
Again, you know, yucking it up together.
Rather than confirming Cash Patel as FBI director, our senators are drooling over wannabe dictator.
It's not wannabe.
He is a dictator.
He suspended elections.
This is suspended elections.
This is not wannabe territory.
This is dictator territory.
That's John Cornyn.
That's Lindsey Graham.
Hang in there.
Hang in there.
Yeah, okay.
Hang in there.
So this was the scene over the weekend.
Hang in there.
I mean, we have members of...
The Republican Party over there, and I mean, say what you want, this is counter-signaling what Trump is trying to do in his administration, getting peace.
They're propping up Zelensky, and I think it's because what we all suspect, there are a lot of skeletons in Ukraine.
It goes a lot further than just Joe Biden saying, hey, stop the prosecution of my son or you're not getting the billion dollars.
Fire the prosecutor or you're not getting a billion dollars.
This is not just a Democrat issue in Ukraine.
There's something much bigger at work here.
Now, one senator who I believe stayed home is the Alabama senator named Tommy Tuberville who went on the war room.
And just a little quick clip here.
Jim Ferguson from Freedom Train International pointing out that this is Tuberville's view of what Putin wants.
Take a listen to this.
We'll draw a line here.
He doesn't want Ukraine.
He doesn't want Europe.
He's got enough land of his own.
He just wants to make sure that he does not have United States weapons in Ukraine pointing at Moscow.
Yeah.
Okay, simple enough.
Simple enough.
Now, this may be hard for people 65 and older to understand if the only thing you've heard and you've believed and you put the Ukrainian flag in your profile pic and the only thing you've heard over the last four years, you haven't heard any alternative media on this, is that Vladimir Putin is the focus of evil in the modern world and he's going to take over all of Europe.
Which, by the way, by the way, More on that in just a minute.
Here is Zelensky.
I will never accept any decisions between the United States and Russia about Ukraine.
Never.
President Trump said this week.
He did not say yes when he was asked if he sees Ukraine as an equal member in the peace process.
He did say later that Ukraine would have a seat at the table.
Have you been given...
Any assurances that Ukraine will have an equal seat at the negotiating table?
So I will never accept any decisions between the United States and Russia about Ukraine.
Never.
And our people, never.
And our adults and children and everybody.
It can't be so.
This is the war in Ukraine against us.
And it's our human losses.
We're thankful for all the support, unity between USA. In USA, around Ukraine support, bipartisan unity, bipartisan support, we're thankful for all of this.
But there is no any leader in the world who can really make a deal with Putin without us, about us.
Well, we're going to put that theory to the test.
We're going to see if that is, in fact, an accurate statement.
Because, I mean, from Trump's standpoint, you know, now Ukraine wants to act like they're a sovereign country when we have given them billions and billions and billions and billions of dollars.
You don't really have sovereignty at that point, in my opinion.
You don't.
And we'll figure it out.
I mean, you know, look, if NATO is the United States.
There is no NATO. Without the United States.
So, in this situation, somebody who wants to use it, somebody like Trump, has all the leverage that they could possibly need in this situation.
So, allegedly, Europeans, they're outraged.
They're so triggered by J.D. Vance's speech that he gave.
And this is where I ask the question, are Europeans the godless communists the USSR used to be?
Honest question.
Question I've asked many, many times over the last couple of years.
Rubio goes on CBS. Why would our allies or anybody be irritated by free speech and by someone giving their opinion?
We are, after all, democracies.
The Munich Security Conference is largely a conference of democracies in which one of the things that we cherish and value is the ability to speak freely and provide your opinions.
And so I think if anyone's angry about his word, they don't have to agree with him, but to be angry about it I think actually makes his point.
I thought it was actually a pretty historic speech, whether you agree with him or not.
I think the valid points he's making to Europe is we are concerned that the true values that we share, the values that bind us together with Europe, are things like free speech and democracy.
Okay.
Free speech and democracy are the things that bind us to Europe.
So, and I talked about this before Christmas.
If those are no longer the values of Europe, then are they a democracy?
Now, don't get me wrong.
Don't hear me say, like, I'm not a free speech absolutist.
I think I used to be, but I'm certainly not now, just because you go read the founders, the founders, again, of our country weren't sitting around saying, like, hey, the First Amendment gives people the right to give pornography to kids.
That's not what they thought at all.
Blasphemy laws were on the books for a reason.
They stood court challenges.
People were convicted for that type of thing.
And I'm totally fine with that because I think those things are good.
I think banning some things are good sometimes.
But fundamentally, that is not what is being argued here.
Europe is banning speech because people are critical of the government policies on immigration.
And people go on social media and they show the world what the reality is versus what the lies and the spin that the media over there and the government says that it is.
The government says that immigration and a pluralistic society is good for you, and you need to love it and appreciate it.
And then when people take to social media and notice that the illegal or the vast immigration, the legal immigration that their country, you know, importing the third world is actually making their streets less safe, their daughters are being raped, people are being stabbed.
And when people point that out, the government doesn't want...
The people to protest.
The government doesn't want the people to organize.
The government doesn't want...
This is what...
It's speech that's critical of the government is what they're censoring fundamentally.
So these European countries that are doing this are not for freedom.
They're not for the type of freedom that we have here.
At all.
And so if that's what binds us together, Marco Rubio, by his own words, we can say that we're not bound to Europe.
That Europe actually has become fundamentally opposed to what it is that we at least say that we stand for on paper.
And they really got mad that J.D. Vance pointed out their hypocrisy.
And we also have Charles Haywood writing that the media, by the way, rescheduling our interview with Charles Haywood, he got messed up last week.
The media is very dumb.
I suppose that's the most interesting lesson of the past six months.
With our enemies, there's no they're there.
They are just stupid, he writes.
And in the rare instances where individuals are not stupid, on the other side, they are choked by the stupidity around them.
I think is completely correct.
If you watch like a CNN panel, you realize that they're not giving up on the woke.
We live in a world that this exchange with Rubio went on to where they basically said, hey, Hitler rose to power.
They're saying Hitler now rose to power because of free speech, which is preposterous.
But it just goes to show you that...
We've been taught what to hate, and everybody I disagree with, their whole mindset is anyone that I disagree with is Hitler.
Anyone that says something I don't like is Hitler.
It's totally preposterous.
Here's a war clandestine saying that Ukraine is a disturbing example of how powerful propaganda can be.
Ukraine is the only military on Earth with literal Nazi forces.
Did you know that?
Remember that?
The Azov Battalion, they're actual Nazis.
Zelensky is also a dictator that canceled elections.
The irony here is so rich, yet the global USAID influence...
You see how everything's connected with what Trump is attacking right now in the federal government?
The global USAID influence machine convinced the world that Ukraine is a beacon of democracy.
And the guy's a dictator.
He's canceled elections.
They can make the sheep believe anything.
Democrats accuse everyone they don't like of being a Nazi.
They accuse everyone of threatening democracy.
And then turn around and send hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to Ukraine, and they worship a literal Nazi military dictator who canceled elections.
This is the power of propaganda.
By the way, War Clandestine, if you don't know, is a great follow.
I don't agree with everything he says.
You know, we always have to put that caveat in there now, which is really, really dumb.
Just because it's like...
I've got to stop doing that, because I'm just part of the problem at that point, right?
Anyway, I digress.
The fact of the matter is, this guy was instrumental, war clandestine, was instrumental in exposing the bioweapons labs in Ukraine that the media said was a conspiracy theory.
And then Marco Rubio, then senator in Victoria Nuland, in a Senate committee, admitted that the U.S. does fund bioweapons labs in Ukraine, and they were very worried that Russia was going to get their hands on them.
This was at the height of the invasion.
Let's see, what is this one?
Yeah, I mean, just to be a reminder, based on this, like, we can be reminded of this speech right here on the Sean Ryan podcast.
The leader, I forget exactly which official it was within the European Union, but sent Elon this threatening letter that basically said, we're going to arrest you if you platform Donald Trump, who, by the way...
So Europe...
So this is in September 11th of 2024, before the election.
J.D. Vance reminding everybody that Europe sent, or some European country, sent Elon Musk saying, hey, you better not let Donald Trump on Twitter.
You're promoting.
We're going to arrest you.
We're going to fine you.
It's insane.
So we don't have the same values as Europe.
Maybe we have the same values as the European people.
I think we have to look at Europe.
The way we look at people in North Korea, you know?
Although, I don't even know what I believe about that country at this point, right?
Because I question everything that is fed to us.
But, you know, you need to look at the people of Europe as essentially being oppressed by their leaders, which is the same thing that you can say about us.
You know, I know there's an actual transfer of power going on right now with Trump getting in office, but, I mean, if you look at the intel oligarchy, you look at the intel agencies, you look at USAID, you look at all of these systems and bureaucracies that are set up to actually make it tougher on the American people, we very much are living under oppression, and we're just starting to see a little bit of sunlight here, right?
We're seeing some light at the end of this tunnel.
But here's Donald Trump, still working for peace.
I think he wants to stop fighting.
I see that.
We spoke long and hard.
Steve Whitcoff was with us for a very extended period, like about three hours.
I think he wants to stop fighting.
They have a big, powerful machine, you understand that.
And, uh...
They defeated Hitler and they defeated Napoleon.
They've been fighting a long time.
Speaking of Napoleon.
But I think he would like to stop fighting.
Do you think he wants to hold with Ukraine?
No, I think he wants to stop.
That was my question to him.
Because if he's going to go on, that would have been a big problem for us.
And that would have caused me a big problem.
You just can't let that happen.
So Trump's saying Putin...
Doesn't want the whole of Ukraine.
He's not going to keep advancing.
Even though Zelensky is putting out this idea that there's 150,000 troops in Belarus that are going to invade even more.
He doesn't want to keep...
They are going to probably keep much of the land that they have now.
And this is so...
I've been telling you...
I mean, the warmongers, the military-industrial complex, this whole exercise in propaganda has just been refusing to take the L and trying to get this to such a quagmire that U.S. troops have to get involved.
That's been the goal this entire time.
Many of those eastern Ukraine provinces want to be Russian, by the way, and voted such, and have actually been being bombed and attacked by Ukraine since 2014. But here he is, the chairman of the Munich Security Conference.
Alright, I'm going to read this because there's a community note on it.
The chairman of the Munich Security Conference literally broke down in tears today over J.D. Vance's speech on Friday, criticizing European leaders.
Europe is currently being governed by extremely unstable and unserious people, men without any chests.
So the clipping of this video is misleading.
The emotional outburst did not happen after mentioning Vance's speech, but at the conclusion of the speech, which was his farewell speech as the chairman.
Somebody's a Sicilian.
The guy that posted the initial video says, This is ridiculous, community note.
The chairman did indeed cry while talking about J.D. Vance's speech at the Munich Security Conference.
The clip above is shortened, but not at all misleading.
And any links to the video, turns out the video has been taken down.
They have removed the video so people can see for themselves.
But anyway, you be the judge.
This video is edited, but take a listen.
After the speech of Vice President Vance on Friday, we have to fear that our common value base is not that common anymore.
I'm very grateful to all those European politicians that spoke out and reaffirmed the values and principles that they are defending.
No one did this better than President Zelensky.
Let me conclude, and this becomes difficult.
So we don't have common values anymore.
Thank you.
We don't have common values anymore.
I don't even really care if he cried or not or whatever.
He's leaving as chairman, and if that's true, whatever.
The fact of the matter, the content of his speech is preposterous and ridiculous.
And, I mean, we don't have the same values as Europe anymore.
Their values are about censorship and war.
I mean, let's just think about that.
Their values are about censorship and war.
Over the weekend, we heard that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is now desperately asking for a meeting with President Trump, according to this report, is ready to send British troops into Ukraine, which is a sovereign country.
I guess that's their prerogative, but still could risk World War III and the ability of pulling the U.S. in.
You never know.
Here's Donald Trump.
As Putin predicted, see, Lord Bebo.
I don't know who this is.
The dogs are coming to Trump's leg to wiggle their tails.
Starmer is now asking for a meeting with President Trump.
I just signed a letter to him.
He asked for a meeting and I agreed to the meeting.
We're going to have a friendly meeting.
Very good.
We have a lot of good things going on.
But he asked to come and see me and I just accepted his asking.
Do you have a date for that, sir?
Very soon.
I think he wants to come next week or the week after.
And what do you hope to discuss?
I don't know.
It was his request, not mine.
He wants to discuss more bloodshed in Ukraine, more Ukrainians that need to be continued to send to the meat grinder.
They want the Russian war to continue.
And Scott Ritter posting this.
What happens to Europe when Trump realizes that Russia more aligns with American traditional family values than any European nation, than any nation in Europe?
So, just a reminder on that idea.
Right before the United States performed a successful color revolution in Ukraine in 2014, in 2013, Vladimir Putin passed an anti-LGBTQ Propaganda law.
Basically banning LGBTQRSTLNE. Would you like to buy a vowel propaganda in Russia in 2013?
Which goes against the European...
If you want to be a member of the European Union, you have to have gay marriage on the books.
And so there are countries that don't want that.
I believe there were big protests in Serbia over all of this.
We don't talk about sovereignty.
Yeah, you're a sovereign country unless...
You do something that we don't like.
There's an African nation that banned sodomy, and Biden basically threatened them.
They're like, oh, okay, we're going to go to war in Africa next.
This was a couple of years ago.
It's like, well, why can't a country do that if that's what they want to do?
That's what the people want, you know?
It's just odd.
We can call them all.
Like I was saying, if the leaders of Europe want to ban speech and become totalitarian freaks, the people can take matters into their own hands and can participate.
Of course, but they're scared, right?
That's why they're going on raids, as we're going to see here in a minute.
But the fact of the matter is, what are we doing now?
What are we now doing in this country?
We are ending...
We're trying to end.
There are judges blocking.
But Donald Trump's saying, look, no more.
Like, Russia did not let it get to transing kids.
I want to be clear here.
Russia banned LGBTQ propaganda in 2013. We did no such thing in our country.
And now we have doctors that will go on camera.
They'll go down to the end of a legislative table.
Doctors!
People that are supposed to be looking out for our health, our well-being, people who know what medicine is, we're at least told, if they're not a slave to Big Pharma, which they are, doctors in their white coats operating essentially as the new priestly class of our society will go to the end of a legislative table and will look legislators in the eye and say, giving...
Puberty-blocking hormones to children is health care.
Giving puberty-blocking hormones to kids, delaying puberty, delaying the growth of their bones, the density of their bones, in some cases irreversibly not allowing that they will not have kids.
They are giving up their reproductive rights.
They're giving up the ability to be a mother or a father themselves.
Let's also talk about top surgery.
Oh yeah, that's health care.
They're calling it health care.
They're calling barbary and butchery health care for kids.
And we as this country now that we elected Trump, and there are Christian red states and state legislators all across the country that are fighting this, we're trying to pull this back.
We're desperately trying to claw our way back up the slippery slope and say, no, actually that's child abuse.
What you're talking about is child abuse and you're a liar by saying it's health care and good for the kids.
It's evil.
It is evil.
Are they transing kids in Russia?
Honest question.
I think this is a fairly excellent point and it raises a lot more questions than it answers, but it is what it is.
It is what it is.
Alright, we're going to get to CBS News here in a minute, but man, I told you, this show is just jam-packed.
Before we get any further, though, I've got to tell you about Red Vive Health.
RedViveHealth.org slash Paul.
That's where you want to go for these amazing red light panels.
Now, you've heard me tell it before, but we're talking about two different.
And if you look up anything about red light panels, because there are other competitors out there.
But if you look up anything about red light panels, you don't just want the red light, folks.
You also want the near-infrared light.
And that's what these Red Vive panels actually do.
They have both wavelengths.
You get the red light, you get the near-infrared light.
So two different wavelengths.
So don't be fooled by the imitators out there that are not going to give you both.
Of these different wavelengths.
So these two wavelengths are naturally emitted by the sun.
But with these panels, you've got targeted doses.
And it produces a healing effect on the body.
We're talking about like, at first, I had a family member try the one I have, who has back problems.
And the next day, he could tell a huge difference.
And he said...
So, it's basically like, initially, you're talking about like an analgesic feeling.
Wow, I feel better.
That really did well.
It's because it stimulates the mitochondria, you know, the two wavelengths combined.
You're actually getting to the organs.
But if you keep doing it, okay, the benefits just get better and better, according to these studies.
So, you can get immediate relief in some instances, but you also are going to get...
You know, long-term relief the more you use it, okay?
And you look better, you feel better.
And so it's not just for people with chronic pain.
It's also for people that want better skin.
It's also for people like me that want to have, that's tired of having all these energy crashes.
I want you to look into this and I want you to give them a call or go to the website and peruse their information.
So it's right there.
You see it on the lower third.
Red Vive with a V. V-I-V-E for those of you not watching.
Just listening.
RedViveHealth.org slash Paul.
That's RedViveHealth.org slash Paul.
Lighting your way to wellness.
And this is also a great way for you to support the work that we're doing here on the program.
We can't do this without you.
Thank you so much, Red Vive.
It's great to partner with the great folks there, and they are really fantastic partners.
Okay, so let's get into this.
It's 38 past the hour here.
All right, J.D. Vance.
So this is CBS News.
J.D. Vance goes and gives such a refreshing speech in Munich.
And CBS News decides to support the totalitarian government of Germany.
And this is what it sounded like.
I can't believe this is the world we live in.
Insult somebody in public.
Yes.
Yes, it is.
And it's a crime to insult them online as well?
Is it a crime to insult somebody in public?
Yes.
Yes, it is.
And it's a crime to insult them online as well?
Yes.
The fine could be even higher.
If you insult someone in the Internet.
Why?
Because in the Internet, it stays there.
If we are talking face-to-face, you insult me, I insult you, okay, finish.
But in the Internet, if I insult you or a politician...
That sticks around forever.
Yeah.
The prosecutors explain German law also prohibits the spread of malicious gossip, violent threats, and fake quotes.
If somebody posts something that's not true.
You know, you're not supposed to gossip.
The Bible teaches, you know, we don't need to gossip.
So is that some sort of Christian nationalism?
Just a question.
And then somebody else reposts it or likes it.
Are they committing a crime?
In the case of reposting, it is a crime as well because the reader can't distinguish whether you just invented this or just reposted it.
That's the same for us.
It's incredible to like to hear it actually come out of their mouths.
Isn't it kind of wild?
This is just basic stuff that's been ingrained to us that, no, this is not right for a government to do.
Breaking hate speech laws can include jail time for repeat offenders.
Is it a crime to insult somebody in public?
Unbelievable.
J.D. Vance saying insulting someone is not a crime and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-U.S. relationships.
This is Orwellian.
And everyone in Europe and the U.S. must reject this lunacy.
He's exactly right.
And again, in this particular, we're talking about speech that exposes the government and the emperor as having no clothes.
And that's the speech they're going after.
That's the speech they're going after.
Michael Cassidy, who is a, I call him a Christian hero, who ripped the statue of the Baphomet head off.
You know, they put a pagan statue up at the Iowa State House.
And he was there and he couldn't handle it and was convicted.
And so he ripped down an idol, literally tearing down an idol.
And the Satanists all got upset.
Even Republicans were like, well, we've got to, you know, the Satanists, you know, they've got freedom of religion too.
You don't have, see, and this is the difference.
This is the difference.
So it's not lost on me of what we're talking about here.
Michael Cassidy, by the way, immediately, as a believing Christian himself, turned himself in to accept the consequences of Caesar, whatever those were, and of course they dropped the charges and everything's fine now.
The German government is more troubled by people saying mean things online than foreigners killing and raping their citizens, the rotten fruits of leftism on full display.
Exactly.
Very well said, Michael.
So Andrew Torba reminds us, let's watch this video first.
Well, no, we'll read it first.
So Torba is the founder and CEO of Gab, which is an alternative, we all know Gab, alternative social media.
You know, he allows free speech on his platform.
You can say whatever you want.
Illegal content does not allow pornography, unlike X, where you never know when some random thing is going to pop up on X. But Andrew Torber writing on X, Over the past eight years, Gab has been consistently telling the German government to get bent.
They send them emails demanding unmasking of German IP addresses so they can go arrest the citizens.
He writes, Again, J.D. Vance gives an excellent speech on Friday.
Sixty minutes is like, actually, totalitarianism is good.
Inside, six armed officers searched a suspect's home, then seized his laptop and cell phone.
Prosecutors say those electronics may have been used to commit a crime.
The crime?
Posting a racist cartoon online.
At the exact same time across Germany.
More than 50 similar raids played out.
Part of what prosecutors say is a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech.
Online hate speech.
There we go.
It's really not a question of whether or not to ban.
It's what to ban.
I think banning things is good sometimes.
But what are you going to ban?
By the way, we still need to make those t-shirts.
Banning things, dot dot dot, is good sometimes.
Or banning things is good, dot, dot, dot.
Sometimes.
I don't know.
Also, we have 60 Minutes coming alongside, and they want to report on the plight of the poor, laid-off federal worker.
Now, listen, anytime somebody loses a job, yes, personally, you know, it's difficult.
But where were these reports from 60 Minutes when people lost their job for refusing to take the vaccine that their private company was mandating because they believed everything that Anthony Fauci said, who is a pagan and not a Christian, by the way?
And I try to throw that in there because I think people who are non-Christians are going to have a higher fear of death.
But then a Christian, because if you believe the Bible, then to die is to gain.
But we're finding out now that it's actually much worse than that, because Fauci was essentially behind all of this stuff, the creation of the virus.
We're finding all of that out now, in terms of funding it, covering up that it came from a lab.
But anyway, the poor plight of the fired federal worker.
People are really scared.
I think that...
You know, 12 days ago, people knew where their next paycheck was coming from.
They knew how they were going to pay for their kids' daycare, their medical bills, and then all gone overnight.
All gone overnight for Christina Dry and Adam Dubard, fired this month in the chaotic shutdown of foreign aid, distributed by the U.S. Agency for International Development, USAID. More than 8,000 USAID employees were sent home by the administration.
They're not looking for competency.
They're not looking for if you're good at your job.
They're looking for peer loyalty tests.
And if you don't give it, you will be punished.
And they had to leave the building.
By the way, this is the same lady that ABC interviewed as Doge took over the building.
And then there were these big protests with Senators grandstanding.
And ABC News interviewed her, and she said that when Doge came in the building, she had to take down her rainbow flags.
Actually, she took down books that she had on display that she thought were incredible.
Discriminating.
Don't know what those books were, but what book would you have to have that people would think you're with the communists?
Again, here's the...
You know, with Joe Biden, Joe Biden or the Democrats and some Republicans would say, oh yeah, we have the same values as Europe.
Oh, we've got the same values as Europe.
It's only now that we have an actual transfer of power that...
We have our American officials are pointing out that we actually don't have the same values.
Who are the godless communists of the 21st century?
Who are the godless communists today versus who were the communists in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s and 80s?
Honest question.
I had to leave the building.
And these are folks who had decades and decades of public service serving USAID across administrations, from, you know, George Bush to Obama to the first Trump administration.
Yeah, so, I mean, yeah, where Trump trusted that the whole apparatus wasn't going to be turned on him and he was going to be framed for treason a couple of times.
Oh yeah, sure, that's great.
Notice they still, I mean, they're hanging on this, and this is going to be effective messaging, I guess, for people 65 and older, but the idea of bipartisanship.
You know, I mean, these people served in different administrations, Republican and Democrat, but they're the same.
That's what people need to understand.
This is the same.
We're talking about taking, we are taking on the intelligence apparatus that we're likely going to find out killed John F. Kennedy.
Conclusively going to find that out.
That's what we're talking about here.
At least that's one potential understanding of the different sides right now.
The swapping out, the transfer of power from one group of elites to another group of elites.
I'm not naive.
I know that that's the case.
And then Donald Trump, he channels his inner Napoleon.
And he tweets this, and boy, it said everything.
I'm going to run out of time here for sure, but this set the internet on fire.
He who saves his country does not violate any law.
And in the wake of these judges, and we've all been saying it, you get some random judge that's like, oh, actually, no, your executive order that prevents the transiting of children and going to defund hospitals that continue to mutilate children.
I'm the president now.
I'm just some random judge, and now I'm the president, and I invalidate your law.
One moment.
I'm the president now.
It's ridiculous.
I don't know.
I don't know why Donald Trump exactly tweeted this.
I don't know what he was thinking, but maybe that's what he was thinking when he tweeted, he who saves his country does not violate any law.
Right?
Or maybe he's thinking that the country has been lost since 1961, 1963. Maybe he's thinking that.
Maybe he's thinking that the country's been lost since then.
And maybe he's a guy that was shot in the ear, and maybe he recognizes that this apparatus that he's working to reform or clean house or eliminate certain agencies...
Is an apparatus that was totally turned against him, not only when he was in office, but when he was running for office as they spied on his campaign.
I don't know.
It makes you think.
Like, he's got four years, right?
And then he's done.
And four years to just hand it back over to the same people that have allowed this nonsense.
So you either have to make real sweeping change and the judges are going to try to stop you.
And then it's up to you.
Okay, what are you going to do?
Do you ignore the judges?
Or do you try to get it to the Supreme Court and assume that the Supreme Court rules in your favor?
But what if they don't?
Because you never know with these guys.
Interesting.
Interesting times that we live in.
Here's some of the reactions to Donald Trump tweeting this, that you don't break a law if you're trying to save the country.
Somebody named Dan McLaughlin, this is some un-American monarchy nonsense.
The president is above some laws because there are things legally only he may do, but his entire office remains a creature of law.
And R. McIntyre just reminding that Abraham Lincoln certainly...
Abraham Lincoln just totally rewrote the book on the law and the Constitution and what sovereign states are allowed to do.
All to preserve the Union, history tells us.
But fundamentally, the country has been totally different since the Civil War.
I think we all know that.
In a lot of different ways.
It's not just the freeing of the slaves, but it's what happened after that.
Don't take anyone seriously.
C.J. Engel writing, don't take anyone seriously who is outraged at Trump's tweeting about his executive power, yet is a fan of FDR, the New Deal, and the managerial revolution that eradicated the old constitutional limits on the executive branch.
The present regime was built on a systemic power grab.
Okay, Engel here is exactly right, and this is what they don't like.
We have never, in my lifetime, really never had a president.
You know, take Ronald Reagan, for example.
Okay?
You know, conservatives like to say Ronald Reagan was amazing.
And he certainly could have done worse than Reagan.
But you look at Reagan who said, I'm going to end the Department of Education, and then he doesn't.
Okay?
You look at Reagan who tried to get border security with an amnesty bill and then didn't.
Then you look at Reagan who, after he got shot, was never really the same in terms of his vigor.
You know, I think commitments to actually doing what some of the things he said he was going to do.
So what we really have here is the executive authority, which all these agencies, all these bureaucrats exist under the executive, but if you've got one executive to the next, regardless of which party it is, that loves the big administrative state, but then you get one guy who says, I don't like the administrative state and I'm going to get rid of it.
And because of the power grab that happened incrementally over the decades, now you've got a guy.
The president actually does have an immense amount of power.
The constitutional limits on the executive authority have not mattered for a very, very long time.
And I'll give you something better.
All of these agencies are unconstitutional.
Every single one of them are unconstitutional.
Any agency that makes a rule...
Whereas if citizen breaks it, they get fined or go to jail, is unconstitutional.
Because Congress is abdicating the non-delegation clause.
It's very clear in Article 1, Section 1, all legislative powers herein granted.
There is nothing constitutional about Congress creating new legislative bodies.
We're not going to call them that.
We're going to call them...
And those agencies get to set a rule that has the force of law if you break it.
That is Congress abdicating their law-making legislative authority to unelected bureaucrats, I would argue, the entire thing.
Every agency under the executive, because they'll say, well, Congress created, because in many of these cases, Congress created the agency, and they are the ones that expanded the executive branch.
Every one of them is unconstitutional if they can make a rule and put people in jail for not following the rule.
They don't call it a law.
They didn't make a law.
They made a rule.
But the rule is created from a law, and Congress abdicates by delegating their lawmaking authority to people that are not elected.
And there have been constitutional people that have been saying this for a very, very long time.
And we're just, you know...
And now, who knows?
Maybe there's people, I think there are people in the administration, that agree with me.
By the way, they may not have said it, but they do.
And if you take a shot at the King, you better not miss.
Winding things down here.
Man, we're going to have to get to this.
We're going to have a great show tomorrow, depending on what else breaks between now and the next 23 hours.
William Wolfe having some great stuff there.
But we're just fundamentally out of time.
Let me see if I can end somewhere.
So we were going to talk about this Grand Rapids situation.
We were going to talk about Rick Warren, but we're out of time with Rick Warren and his apology.
Oh, this is what I'll say.
I'll leave it here.
This is good.
NPR tweeting, some white people may choose, because it feels neutral, they may choose the yellow thumbs up.
Or the yellow emoji skin tone?
Because it feels neutral.
But some academics argue opting out of just admitting that you're white in your text messages by using a white skin tone signals a lack of awareness about white privilege akin to society associating whiteness with being raceless.
So my question when I saw this is, well, which is it?
Are white people a race or are we not?
I mean, because it seems to me that white people are not a race when the media doesn't want us to be.
We have no culture.
We have no racial identity.
But then if we decide to use the Simpson color, the Simpson's color, the yellow, we're now ignoring our whiteness and our benefit and our privilege.
Privilege, that's right.
Privilege.
I don't know.
Which is it?
They just want to have it both ways.
I, just so you know, innocently enough, innocently enough, I use the yellow.
I've never changed it to white.
So maybe I'm just associating whiteness with being raceless.
Maybe I should change it.
You know what?
I think they've made me a white identitarian by this tweet.
I guess I need to switch to the white thumb.
That's all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'm going to be back here tomorrow, 11 central, delivering you the news.
My name's Paul Harrell.
God bless everybody out there watching.
Have a great rest of your Monday, and I'll see you tomorrow.
We'll see you tomorrow.
Here we go.
Sorry about that.
▲
Export Selection