Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 13, 2025 - Stew Peters Show

01:58:06

UNCANCELABLE Meets Germar Rudolf!!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, for Israel, as one French historian once said, it's the founding myth of Israel.
	The justification for...
	The occupation of the quote-unquote Holy Land, the Promised Land, and the ethnic cleansing and mass murder of the Palestinians.
	So you're saying without the Holocaust, Israel doesn't really have a leg to stand on when it comes to, you know, seeing through to fruition everything that they're demanding and asking for?
	It would have half a leg.
	I mean, everybody has a right to exist and to be somewhere, but the way that it's being done, the way it's justified, and the way they...
	Manage to strong arm the West to unconditional support and look the other way, no matter what atrocities are being committed in the West Bank, in Gaza, wherever else.
	That definitely is fueled by feelings of guilt and by feelings of not raising the quote-unquote false issues that could get people in trouble.
	And so the Holocaust narrative gives, as I've described it, Zionism and Judaism the perfect sword and shield, shield for defense, sword for attack, to push their narrative, to push their agendas, and to fend off any attack that comes if they do something that's morally indefensible.
	Were you raised to be skeptical about this?
	Not at all.
	Okay, so were your parents like the Holocaust believers?
	Yes, we all were.
	They were not supportive, quite to the contrary.
	How did you stumble across these lies and these fallacies?
	Well, first of all, I had an interest in history, in German history.
	That comes from my father's side.
	My father had been expelled from what used to be East Germany.
	It's now the western part of Poland.
	The province of Silesia, their family had been there for living there for the better part of 700 years.
	And after the Second World War, they, with all the other millions of Germans, were ethnically cleansed.
	So it had an impact on my family's history.
	So I was raised as a boy seeing the...
	Ethnic cleansing that Germans had suffered after the Second World War, which many people are not even aware of, that after the Second World War, some 12 million Germans were ethnically cleansed from Eastern Europe and East Germany.
	Just twice the official narrative, by the way, of the Holocaust death toll.
	Yeah, they were ethnically cleansed.
	That doesn't mean they were murdered.
	The official death toll of that ethnic cleansing is, I think, around 2.7 million.
	You would have to add other victims of the carpet bombing, the hunger blockade that went on until 1948, the mass deportations to Siberia of Soviet POWs and the continued containment of disarmed enemy forces by Americans.
	So if you tally up the victims of what was going on...
	During the war, toward the end, and after the war, that germs were mass murdered or victims of hunger blockade and so forth, you end up with the order of magnitude that's similar to what is claimed for the Holocaust.
	So you find out that these things are not true how?
	And then what impact did this have on your life?
	Interest in Germany, but only for the victims, the germs as victims, because that was part of my family.
	My mother was victim of a carpet bombing.
	She had lost her thumb in a shelter, and she was traumatized by it.
	So I saw the victims, germs as victims, but I wasn't very much interested in germs as perpetrators.
	But that then came up in school over and over again.
	I think I had three times that I went through Holocaust education.
	I mean, indoctrination.
	I mean, so at this point, you're like, you're a Holocaust believer.
	A double Holocaust believer.
	Holocaust on the Germans as civilians and on the Jews as civilians.
	So you're looking into this because it's like, well, if somebody was led to really kill 6 million people and they were all Jews and they were in these gas chambers and these horrific things happened to them, what could push somebody to the point where they would want to do that to a group of people?
	I mean, was that part of your motivating factor?
	No.
	Initially, it was unfathomable to me.
	To question this narrative.
	For me, like for almost everyone else, people who do that are Nazis, are inter-Semites, are right-wing extremists, are the kind of people you don't want to associate with.
	Is that associated with the right-wing Holocaust denial?
	Absolutely.
	Really?
	Neo-Nazis, yeah.
	The extreme right.
	And I didn't want to be part of it.
	I consider myself conservative, patriotic, right, but within what they call the arc of constitutionality in Germany, so I didn't want to get anywhere outside of the acceptable realm.
	Now, things happened then when I was just graduating.
	That a friend of mine gave me a book he was about to throw away.
	I was a bibliophile.
	I read a lot of books.
	And he said, I have these books.
	I throw them away.
	Either you take them or I throw them away.
	No, no, don't throw them away.
	You can't possibly.
	So one of these books was by a French teacher of history and geography named Paul Rossigny.
	And he wrote about what he had done research about the gas chambers.
	His background, which I learned from that book, but later on even more intensely in his background, is he was a Frenchman who during the war organized a little resistance group in northern France and tried to help people who wanted to get out of the occupied zone to get false papers, Jews among them.
	And he was caught doing that by the German occupational forces, was arrested and was sent to a German concentration camp in 1943. So he was in Buchenwald concentration camp as an inmate and then in Dora concentration camp where they built the so-called V-weapons.
	And what was the alleged crime?
	Well, he was, as far as I understand, just helping people to get out of France by organizing illegal or forged...
	Identity papers, forged visas, forged passports, whatever it was he was doing.
	Very similar to here in the United States, how people go to jail for helping to smuggle illegals into our country, right?
	Yeah, he was trying to smuggle them out.
	Yeah, anyway.
	So he's the kind of person that is the extreme opposite of what you consider.
	He was actually, as a youngster, he was...
	Briefly a communist, then he was a socialist later after the war, briefly even in the French Parliament.
	So on the left, or left-wing radical even, he was a pacifist.
	He was a resistance, not fighter, but a resistance activist against the German occupation.
	He ended up being inside a camp as an inmate.
	He survived that barely.
	He was a full invalid after the war because of the sufferings he had to do during the camp time.
	So he's...
	A person you would listen to, you would expect not to have an agenda to whitewash the Nazis because he suffered.
	He fought against them.
	He suffered under them.
	Yet still, there he was writing this book saying, I have experienced the camps.
	My co-inmates have...
	Distorted the story, have exaggerated things and have even invented gas chambers because some of them said there were gas chambers in Buchenwald.
	No, they weren't.
	He said they weren't.
	And it is now generally confirmed that Buchenwald camp didn't have homicidal gas chambers.
	But there are a few, some of them back then, even prominent French people who said, I was there, I saw gas chambers.
	So this French...
	Teacher got skeptical.
	How was it proven that the gas chambers didn't exist?
	I mean...
	Well, the burden of proof is the other way around.
	You have to have something in the forensic record, in the documental record, or even in the anecdotal record, if you want to be weak on evidence of what you insist, that shows that something's been going on.
	But in Buhoat, there definitely isn't.
	So these few people who made up that stuff had to backpaddle, had even to admit one of them said, well, it may not have existed here, but it existed somewhere else.
	In general, it is a true story because it has existed somewhere else.
	And I'm just using that as a picture to depict the general Nazi atrocities.
	Now, if everyone acts like that, well, okay, it may not have been here, but somewhere else.
	Tonic story based on rumor.
	And wartime rumors is not a good thing.
	That's crazy.
	I mean, how sick do you have to be to think these things up and then live a life?
	I mean, basically, it becomes your whole identity at this point.
	I mean, you're one of the people who survived a Nazi gas chamber.
	For some, it has become.
	There are some prominent people who, after the war, made a living of it or built their reputation on telling stories.
	I cannot wrap my head around it, how it can be.
	There's, for sure, a world.
	That embraces them, that encourages them, that expect them to tell these stories.
	A lot of the survivors, when you see over the 80s, 90s, into the 2000s, and it's now trickling out because they're just too old or too few around.
	So they were going to classrooms, to conference centers, into museums and exhibitions, and giving speeches to audiences, many of them impressively young people, high school students or even middle school students.
	They are under a lot of pressure because they know the audience expects a story and you better deliver.
	And if there is not a gas chamber in it, it's like coming to a fair and there's no rollercoaster, right?
	Who would go, right?
	So the gas chamber and the strategies connected to it is something that the audience expects.
	And if there's a survivor, you do not deliver or even say, no, I didn't experience it.
	So it's like the Holocaust is like an entertainment spectacle is basically what you're saying.
	Oh, yeah.
	When you see the masses flocking to Dachau camp in West Germany, which is the biggest fear.
	Is the whole thing fake?
	I mean, are you a full-blown Holocaust denier at this point?
	It depends on how you define the Holocaust.
	I would say the label Holocaust denier is already a misnomer.
	Because there is no such thing as a unique event, the Holocaust, that you could deny.
	The Holocaust is an event that has, or is an umbrella term that describes events stretching three, four years, encompasses an entire continent, and affects thousands, if not tens of thousands, of individual crime scenes.
	Is that a party that happened on one day where Adolf Hitler woke up and said, today we're going to have a Holocaust?
	Right.
	So you have to look at basically every single one of these events and locations and figure out what happened and what did not happen.
	Some of it may have happened.
	Some of it didn't.
	Some of it was distorted.
	So it's a very complex picture that you start investigating.
	And the deeper you go, the more complex it becomes.
	So there is no clear yes and no and black and white answer.
	It's fascinating that you started out looking at this.
	To basically solidify the victimhood narrative of the Jews and the Germans, what was the first piece of evidence that you stumbled across where you were like, hold on a second.
	I mean, this doesn't add up.
	You know, when I read that Frenchman's book, it shook the ground, the moral ground on which I stood.
	The moral ground on which I stood was human, Nazis, the bottom of evil.
	It's our zero point of the moral scale.
	And from there on, it can only get better.
	And then you somehow accept the possibility that not everything told us about this may be true, that there may be a side to the story where people have invented and lied about it, which is immoral too.
	So it's not any more black and white.
	They are perpetrators of atrocities and they are inventors of atrocities.
	So things look different and then...
	At the same time, the moment you doubt, and you have been inculcated with this feeling that doubters have to be these Nazis, extremists, only though they doubt and question, you suddenly feel, am I now a person like that?
	Am I suddenly a neo-Nazi?
	I don't want to be in that corner.
	And I had trouble accepting myself having doubts, but I can't...
	Purge doubts.
	Doubts are just there.
	Somebody, you read something, and the thought of doubt comes, and I felt guilty for doubting.
	And then I realized, wait a minute.
	What kind of society do we live in where I feel guilty for just doubting?
	Aren't we all taught in school to be skeptical, to be doubtful of what we have presented?
	By authority, particularly in Germany, we have to learn the lesson of totalitarian dictatorships.
	They present you with facts, ram it down your throat, and you have to accept it.
	After the war, Germans are being taught in school, and I've had that numerous times.
	Be critical.
	Don't take what comes from authority at face value.
	Insist on research, on making up your own mind, and critically investigating the facts.
	But then it comes to this topic, and the story suddenly flips.
	You're not allowed to doubt.
	You're not to check.
	You're not to question.
	You're not to be critical.
	You have to take at face value.
	This is a complete contradiction of what I have been told and taught in school.
	And I realized this society is hypocritical.
	And it made me mad.
	That was all I was initially.
	But then, just as it so happens, the same friend who had given me a book earlier made me get a new edition of a book by a Swiss scientist who was discussing the use and abuse of the Nazi period in German history for current political means in Germany,
	where opponents in the political arena or even competitors in the same party Badger each other with what they call the Auschwitz Club.
	If you can put your opponent or your competitors somewhere in the context of Nazism, of neo-Nazism, of anything that Hitler allegedly did wrong, and basically the understanding is Hitler did everything wrong, you can't even say that even if he wanted to get everything right, he must by accident have gotten something.
	No, if he wanted to get everything wrong, sorry.
	By accident, he might have gotten something right.
	But you cannot say that in Germany.
	By law, actually, if you say anything positive about Hitler and the Third Reich, it's already a crime.
	If you want to say anything positive, you have to swallow it.
	What would be considered positive?
	I mean, what would be something that could end you up in jail if you're opining about the actions of Adolf Hitler?
	I want to go back to Germany, and therefore I don't want to say no.
	Because it will get me in prison.
	Well, don't you already have arrest warrants there?
	Yes.
	How much time are you looking at?
	I have no clue.
	An arrest warrant is out there in order to catch me.
	What they're then charging me with is a different story.
	In your case, it's kind of a go-away warrant.
	We don't want to deal with you.
	It's not extraditable here.
	It's not extraditable elsewhere.
	It's only here in Germany.
	You know, the system is automatic.
	If you do something, they have to issue an arrest warrant.
	If not, then the media find out.
	They'll grill you and fry you.
	You don't know the one thing that they've cited as, yep, we want Guillermo arrested.
	I wanted to get a new passport because my passport had expired in 2019 and therefore I applied after COVID was over and the travel restrictions were lifted again and I applied for a passport and they denied it.
	And basically the only reason to deny a new passport is because you have an arrest warrant out.
	So I litigated against the German government and found out that there were 14 arrest warrants out.
	Twelve of which had already expired, because in the German system, depending on the offense for which the arrest warrant is out, it expires after so many years.
	Yeah, they sunset.
	They have...
	Right.
	In that case, it's normally five years.
	So that was from 2017, twelve of them, and I applied 2022, just after they had expired.
	What do you call that?
	That's the statute of limitations.
	Correct.
	Yeah.
	So these are misdemeanors.
	First degree, so they're the highest misdemeanor.
	You can commit up to five years imprisonment, and so they also expire after five years.
	They can file extensions up to another five years.
	And if this has something to do with Holocaust denial, which you're quite certain it does, would a jury of your peers in Germany just throw away the key?
	There is no such thing as a jury trial in Germany.
	They got rid of that in the 70s, too.
	So you have, in that case, three professional trials and three lay judges, what they call it, as far as jury goes.
	That's basically a function that jury has, but they're in the minority when it comes to decision-making, and when it comes to show, usually they are influenced by the three professional judges and go with their opinion.
	Well, I mean, how likely would it be to get a judge who doesn't want to be the guy that says, I have locked up the most notorious anti-Semite that still lives, the most notorious Holocaust denier, the author and publisher and presenter of the Holocaust Encyclopedia?
	On the other hand, if you don't do it...
	And they say, well, I looked at this guy and at his material, it is scientific, it's scholarly, whether he's right or wrong is not for me to say, but the German constitution clearly says if it's scholarship, if it's science, it is free, and the government is not allowed to censor or punish people for that.
	However, if a judge were to do that, and we have a case from the mid-1990s where a German right-wing politician was...
	Introducing research to audiences of the nature that I've done.
	He was put on trial, and the judge, the panel of judges gave him a mild conviction, and they justified the mild conviction.
	I can't remember what it was anymore.
	It was just a year, maybe even a year on probation initially.
	I can't remember exactly.
	They justified it that he's a good man, he meant well, he's a patriot, he wanted to give Germany means of defending itself against accusation, and that should be a permissible reason to give a mild sentence.
	So they didn't even acquit.
	But that was enough for a massive storm in the media, for demand of prosecuting the judges, in particular the judge who had written that opinion.
	This judge was eventually put in front of the alternative.
	Either he's going to get prosecuted and sent to prison for this mild conviction, or retires early with a reduced pension.
	And he took the latter option.
	So it was very clear.
	It was actually just around the time when I went on trial with my own conviction, and we saw in the files that my judges were getting...
	The paperwork of this pending case and eventually case that was decided all the way up to the Supreme Court so that they figure out what do they have to do that they don't lose their career or get imprisoned themselves.
	They have to convict without mercy.
	That's the message to the German judges and they have learned that lesson well.
	So much about the independence of the judiciary.
	So I learned...
	To come back to my story, I learned then from another book that there was evidently a guy in the United States who is an expert at execution technologies.
	In the United States, several states have the death penalty, capital punishment, and there need to be ways to kill people, and there need to be experts who maintain, design those devices.
	I'm a huge proponent of the death penalty.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yes.
	Okay.
	It should be in every state.
	And without prejudice, every convicted pedophile should immediately walk out of the courtroom and face an execution on television.
	I wouldn't argue against that certain people wouldn't deserve death.
	For me, it's a matter of reversibility of a potential judicial error.
	If it turns out...
	If you're caught fucking a kid.
	Well, if you have clear-cut evidence, forensic evidence, and so forth...
	Well, I mean, our judicial system says beyond a reasonable doubt.
	That doesn't mean it's always beyond a reasonable doubt.
	If a conviction is based on...
	Is it going to be a perfect process?
	Probably not.
	Will you wrongfully execute?
	Yeah, but I think you're going to get it right more times than not.
	Well, we're getting a straight line.
	You ended up in this place for a reason.
	And yeah, that's a conversation for another day, but please continue.
	So, he was reporting that this guy was asked to go to Auschwitz in another camp and do research and take his knowledge as an expert at gas chamber executions.
	Because several states used to have, here in the United States, used to have homicidal gas chambers to kill people with gas, and it happens to be the very same gas that is said to have been used at Auschwitz.
	Which was called?
	Hydrogen cyanide.
	Okay.
	Trademark during the war and before the war, Zyklon B, a pesticide that is designed to be.
	And as such, it was used all over the world to combat rats, mice, corn beetles, lice, and so forth.
	So before you continue, here in the United States, there were...
	Many states, or a handful of them at least, that used Zyklon B as the method to deliver death to those that they were executing?
	Not Zyklon B. Hydrogen cyanide is the active ingredients.
	How you administer is different ways.
	Zyklon B is one form that is liquid hydrogen cyanide soaked into gypsum pellets, which releases the liquid cyanide as a gas.
	And how long would it take to kill somebody using that method of delivery?
	That can take a long time because it releases the gas so slowly.
	Okay, so give me an example.
	Like five minutes?
	Depending on...
	Yeah.
	More like an average 10-20 minutes at least.
	10-20 minutes for a person to die.
	If you're in a small room and you have lots of it there.
	And you have ways of getting the gas out.
	So if some Zyklon B were in the HVAC system here in this studio, would we die?
	Sooner or later, yes.
	Depending on the concentration, how much gets blown in, yes, you would.
	Now, some of us may figure it out because it has a certain smell, and I know how it smells, and if anyone tries to cast me with cyanide and I have a way out...
	Not to say that we're trying to.
	I'm just, you know, with multiple different rooms and studios in this facility, and with the air moving around the way that it is, I'm just trying to kind of wrap my head around...
	How concentrated it needs to be?
	Does it need to be an impenetrable room where there is no other flow of anything other than this substance that's designed to kill you?
	I haven't looked into it, so I'm relying on your knowledge.
	I mean, how perfect does the chamber have to be?
	How airtight does it have to be in order to do this successfully?
	Successfully, it would be...
	In most circumstances, it's just a matter of whether it would be in a way as witnesses have claimed it has been.
	Could you do it in a place with a wooden door?
	Yes.
	Okay.
	The issue is the wooden door has to open outward if you execute people because they realize they're getting murdered.
	They suffocate.
	They struggle.
	They want to get through that door.
	They will die primarily in front of that door.
	They will block the door.
	You can't have a door opening up inside.
	The door opening outside has to be panic-proof because if you have a lot of people in there, they're going to panic and they can trample down concrete walls if a mass of people is panicking.
	This is where a wooden door becomes a problem.
	It's not the gas sealing in the gas.
	It will seep through.
	As long as nobody stands on the other side sniffing around, that's fine.
	The airtightness is not so much of a problem.
	Of course, the story is that the SS doctors and others were looking from the outside constantly to check the process.
	They would probably have to have worn a gas mask doing so with wooden door because it seeps through.
	So that story is not quite credible right there.
	But when it comes to the real issue, it's panic-proof.
	All doors ever installed at Auschwitz gas chambers, whether they were fumigation gas chambers or the claimed homicidal gas chambers, had wooden doors made of just wooden planks.
	And they would not have been panic-proof.
	We see how they were anchored.
	We see how the walls were designed.
	And we know they would not have been panic-proof.
	So after just one or two gas things, probably already with the first one, they would have been trampled down.
	That would have been.
	So steel doors with massive walls and them having anchored in there properly would have been required.
	But it is definite that they didn't exist at Auschwitz because there was a company from Dusseldorf, Banninghaus, who had, on request of the Auschwitz authorities, offered them for 19 fumigation gas chambers.
	That's the only reason why the Auschwitz camp ever ordered steel gas-tight doors.
	Of course, they could have misused them, built them somewhere else.
	The problem was they were never actually sent.
	In mid-1944, the company for the...
	So there were no steel doors at Auschwitz?
	There were not.
	At Auschwitz, how many people were said, according to the official orthodox narrative, to have been gassed?
	To death by murder at Auschwitz.
	Who do you ask?
	Today's historian?
	The historians 70 years ago?
	Sure.
	I mean, run me through them.
	The story starts out numerically right after the war with the Soviets claiming that 4 million people were murdered there and most of them, I guess.
	This is the narrative that was upheld by the Eastern Bloc until the Eastern Bloc collapsed.
	And then the Poles came out and said, nah, nah, nah, nah, it's not true.
	And this is the four million that was inscribed in 19 different languages in 19 different places memorializing the four million people.
	They're no longer there.
	They're no longer there.
	And then the story was, well, the Poles invented the...
	Three million victims, and they kind of said, well, one million Jews died and three million Poles because they wanted to make themselves look like the bigger martyrs and the bigger victims, which isn't quite correct.
	If you go into the record, there were general claims that everyone was murdered there, not just Poles.
	But anyway, that's the way it was done to kind of make sure the Jews don't get the blame, even though...
	Jewish historians and Jewish people were pushing the narrative just as much.
	In what period of time is it reported, or had it been, up until this 4 million number?
	I mean, it's been debunked at this point.
	Would you say that it's been properly debunked?
	Yes.
	I mean, they corrected the narrative.
	At first, they said 1.5 million.
	Which is inscribed in the new plaques that you'll find in Auschwitz there.
	And then in 1903, the historian of the Auschwitz Museum came up with a study and he said it's just a little over one million, so the one and a half is still exaggerated.
	And the Chicago Tribune did an article on this as well in the early 90s, saying gone now are the numbers.
	I think it was called fixing or correcting the numbers at Auschwitz was the official.
	Pretty much every major newspaper in the world around that time.
	So let's just take the one million.
	I mean, have you looked into what time period it would have required to gas a million people to death at that place and then properly dispose of their bodies, which we'll get into?
	If you had had the proper technical equipment, panic-proof doors...
	Which they didn't.
	Which they didn't.
	Equipment that would have evaporated the hydrogen cyanide from the gypsum pellets fast and swiftly of naft.
	Which they didn't.
	Which they didn't.
	And so it goes on.
	If everything of that would have been in place...
	And none of it was.
	None of it was.
	They had the means.
	They could have done it.
	They were the technologically leading nation in the world.
	Had they set their mind to it, no problem, but they didn't.
	The gassing wouldn't have been the bottleneck.
	It could have been done.
	The bottleneck would have been the cremation of the dead corpses.
	If you do it right with a poison gas, you can bump off a lot of people relatively quickly.
	The problem is what do you do with the bodies?
	And this is where the pinch comes in.
	We have...
	A lot of material showing the cremation facilities that the German authorities built in Auschwitz.
	And we have actually published a study, a three-volume study, just on that topic going in every nook and cranny.
	The documents are so detailed that we can completely reconstruct not only those cremation furnaces, but we can, from the record that we have, from coke deliveries, from...
	Reports on how much coke was used, in which time, and how many corpses were cremated.
	There are records, actually, that the germs kept in the cremation furnace.
	We know how much coke it takes, how much time does it take, how much these cremation facilities that we had, how many corpses they would have been able to cremate with the technological system they had there.
	The upper limit of what you come to is around 100,000, maybe a little bit more.
	Is what you would be able to successfully cremate and dispose of the bodies with the facilities that were there.
	Were these facilities reconstructed by the Soviets?
	One of them.
	We have two camps.
	We're talking about Auschwitz where the crime is said to have happened.
	It's the main camp where the system in the Auschwitz area started out in 1940 and 1941. And then they built a second camp originally planned as a POW camp that's called Bilkenau.
	It's a few miles away.
	I mean, the time period of when all of this allegedly occurred by those who say, yeah, indisputably for a fact this happened, six million Jews died.
	That's the number.
	Anything less than that is, you know, you're an anti-Semite of the worst order.
	You should be executed.
	This didn't happen that long ago.
	And I've got to believe that in times of war, as important as it is now, aerial reconnaissance would have been important then.
	It was.
	And so I would imagine that there were photographs taken from war planes or from spy planes, you know, these areas.
	Have you seen any of them?
	Yep.
	That's where the definite nail in the coffin comes in for the mainstream Holocaust narrative.
	Oh, really?
	Yes.
	What do the photos show?
	All right.
	Let's first say what the photos should show.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	We're talking about May, June, July 1944. The Americans have conquered most part of Italy.
	That gives into their hand airports that are within range for the reconnaissance and bombers they have to reach Upper Silesia to go to Auschwitz.
	And during that time, the Germans were deporting hundreds of thousands of Jews from Hungary to Auschwitz.
	The record shows that a third of them were sent to forced labor places.
	But the mainstream narrative says that all these Jews, more than 400,000, roughly 430,000, Pretty much all of them were shipped to Auschwitz, gassed there within a few weeks.
	So they had, within a few weeks from mid-May to early July, 430,000 corpses.
	And a cremation capacity through all these years of only 100,000.
	What do you do?
	Yeah, I mean, what do you do?
	430,000.
	Let's put that into perspective.
	I go to Minnesota Wild hockey games.
	That arena holds roughly 18,000 people, and it's massive.
	Yeah, you have to have 30 of those.
	Assuming everybody's going to sit in a seat, and I understand that they're not all seated, they're corpses, they can be stacked like coordinates.
	Massive amount of corpses.
	How high would the piles be?
	That's a lot of bodies.
	The mainstream narrative indeed says, well, the cremation furnaces wouldn't have been up to it, so...
	Hundreds of thousands of bodies were burned outdoors on giant pyres all over the place.
	If you look at the facts, actually, the cremation capacity was even much lower than the mainstream claims by a factor of 10. So you end up with even more.
	At the height of that deportation, combined with mass outdoor cremations, toward end of May, a week of almost daily...
	10,000, 15,000, 20,000 Jews arriving at Auschwitz every single day, allegedly murdered every single day and burned on open fires every single day.
	10, 15, 20,000.
	Right.
	Every day.
	Every day for a three-month time period.
	Now we have experiences from the hoof-and-mouth disease in England that broke out in 2001 when a massive amount of cattle and livestock had to be, or they thought they had to be culled.
	They didn't have cremation capacity for those, so we have large outdoor cremation pyres burning all over England, Wales, Scotland.
	There are photos of that showing how a pyre with several hundred or a thousand cows and so forth burned.
	Now, you have to multiply that by ten to get to the order of magnitude that would have burned in Auschwitz.
	You can imagine that around Auschwitz there would have been...
	Massive pyres burning all over the place with smoke covering wherever the wind blows it.
	So airforters you see from that time period must have on them a large part of the camp from there on downwind completely covered in smoke.
	Of course.
	Plus the commation furnaces going full blast.
	Every single of those chimneys need to burn, need to emit smoke.
	To some degree.
	So exactly on May 31st, actually the germs had a reconnaissance airplane go over there and make photos.
	And in June and July, the Americans and Canadians were having airplanes going over and covering the area.
	So there are four, five, six very clear pictures of this Birkenau camp showing what was going on during those weeks and months.
	Clear skies, no smoke from any crematorium and nothing.
	There is one little fire in some of these photos of an area of magnitude of maybe a campfire or something where maybe a few corpses were burned, maybe just trash, maybe some old rags and clothes we don't know.
	But not 10, 15, 20,000 a day for three months.
	Just an area of a few square meters, not.
	Hundreds of thousands of square meters, acres of smoke developing.
	And it would stink.
	I mean, a burning body.
	So there are the wartime documents showing nothing.
	Nothing.
	But that was just a picture that was taken on one day.
	Maybe they weren't burning bodies that day.
	Pyres don't...
	You can't turn them on and off.
	As I said, every single day they would come in, so every single day they would have been burning right at that time.
	You may have that argument on some days in June, July, when maybe there were some interruptions in between, but even then you would see the scars, you would see the piles, you would see the...
	Areas around it, if you move massive amount of corpses, massive amount of firewood, the landscape would be scarred.
	You would see traces even if they weren't.
	But their smolder, these massive pyro smolders for days on end.
	So even if you have a few days of interruption in between, you would see that.
	But every single one of these pictures, see?
	Peaceful camp.
	Didn't happen.
	It did not happen.
	Period.
	Everybody knows about Pizzagate.
	Everybody knows that it's true.
	Everybody knows about the satanic Hollywood elite pedophiles taking this adrenochrome stuff to try to de-age.
	It's disgusting.
	Nobody's ever going to do that.
	Everybody does want to de-age, though.
	Now you can.
	Go to uncancellablehealth.com.
	It's not a hoax.
	Uncancellablehealth.com.
	You've probably seen testimonials on my Rumble channel.
	This is actual de-aging.
	Reversing the aging process at the stem cell level.
	Uncancellablehealth.com.
	Uncancellable.
	The show continues right now.
	Speaking of supporting your kids, please support your child's natural immunity as we begin the school year.
	Z Spike Gummies.
	This week, we have a special sale.
	Promo code SPN20 for 20% off site-wide, and that includes subscriptions at ZStack.
	So if you want the subscription, 20% off, including that, hurry over and get your order in right now.
	The promo code expires on the 16th of September.
	zstacklife.com slash spn zstacklife.com slash spn we'll be right back so since there are no corpses in mass graves either which would be the only emergency exit that the mainstream had okay if they weren't burned they were just buried somewhere no they weren't either the only other solution is they weren't killed how do we know that they weren't buried
	they would have found that we have actually on the same uh air photos we see four elongated areas of scarred landscape 100 meters long and some 10 meters wide Okay.
	And they have partly grown grass on them already.
	So that is spring 1944. It looks like mass graves, but they are closed and they are already growing grass on them.
	They're older.
	We know that at Auschwitz, a massive typhus epidemic broke out in 1942. How many people died from typhus, according to the original or official records?
	We can estimate the total death toll that we can see from documents, that are documented, where we actually almost tell the names and where the people came from because the Germans registered them properly and they certified their death.
	To a large degree, covered in various documents, we can pinpoint the death toll of Auschwitz at 135,500.
	Okay, so, wait a minute.
	You said that the Germans were, like, basically checking you in like you were at a hotel.
	They were keeping records.
	Like in a prison.
	Okay, yep, sure, there you go, at a prison.
	Mark shots, they get booked like everyone goes into prison, and they have massive amounts of photos.
	So shouldn't there be a million of those records?
	At least.
	If everyone that was sent to Auschwitz was admitted to the camp, yes.
	However, Auschwitz was a main railway hub.
	If someone was sent to Auschwitz, that doesn't mean he ended up in the Auschwitz camp as a registered inmate.
	Yeah, but they were being processed there, right?
	Yes, but not necessarily admitted.
	Here in the state of Minnesota, let's just talk about here, you're going to prison, right?
	You've done something, you're going to prison for 20 years.
	Every inmate goes to St. Cloud.
	They go to the St. Cloud State Penitentiary.
	That's the central hub.
	From there, they get on transports, and they go throughout the different state.
	After they have been brought in and registered and their mug shots and entered as a Department of Corrections inmate, and then depending on their crime and the severity of it, they go to one of these facilities, whether it be minimum, maximum, medium security, whether they're a child molester, then they go to Moose Lake.
	But they all go to St. Cloud.
	Is that basically kind of what Auschwitz was?
	No.
	Okay.
	No, that's weird.
	To some degree, yes.
	Auschwitz had a transit camp where people were temporarily admitted.
	They were not officially recorded as being admitted to the camp.
	Would their picture or name have been taken?
	I'm not sure.
	Probably not all of them, maybe none of them.
	Well, that's why you don't have records of all these deaths.
	We have some records of these people, so we know that more than 100,000 people went through that transit camp.
	But then there is a lot of people who actually did not go to the Auschwitz camp.
	Auschwitz was a massive complex.
	There were satellite camps, as they call it, when the typhus epidemic erupted.
	We have records of French, Dutch, Belgian Jews sent to Auschwitz.
	And at the moment where the camp is put on lockdown because the epidemic is completely out of control, at that point in July, August 1942, up to 500 people die in the camp every day of typhus.
	So at the end of that year, 1942, tens of thousands of people had died.
	They didn't have built the new crematoria yet.
	They didn't have basically any cremation capacity.
	The old crematoria and the old camp was actually shut down in the summer for overuse, for having to be repaired.
	They ended up with tens of thousands of inmates that died.
	They couldn't get burned, and they ended up probably in those mass graves.
	Later on, the record shows they were exhumed because it was a swamp area.
	These corpses were lying in the drinking water supply, groundwater.
	They were poisoning, potentially poisoning the drinking water of the whole region.
	So they had to exhume them again.
	I don't care if you exhume them or not.
	I'm never drinking that water again.
	Then they burned them on pyres, and that's where probably the true core of the story comes from.
	1942, early 43, that happened.
	So you're saying, ostensibly, it's plausible that they would have exhumed these bodies because they were contaminating the drinking water, and then those corpses, the people, they would have been, these typhus victims, would have possibly been...
	Cremated on pyres.
	Okay, and then was there evidence of...
	Because crematory were just being built.
	They didn't exist yet.
	The first one went into operation in March of 1943. So we're talking late 1943. So how many people?
	If they were thrown into fires and burned, how many people, roughly?
	10,000, 15,000, maybe 20,000.
	Total.
	Yeah.
	And would there be evidence of that, the remains?
	Yes.
	Even if you exhume mass graves of that magnitude, you would find still...
	Leftovers here and there.
	Hole in the ground, fresh soil.
	I mean, all kinds of different pieces of evidence.
	And was all of that found?
	The poles in the 1960s did some pilot study trying to locate something and to come up with something.
	And they did find something, but only traces, a little bone here, a little hair here.
	But they didn't find mass graves containing tens of thousands of bodies.
	So since the result was not...
	What they were looking for, they let it disappear into a drawer.
	They didn't find mass graves or any evidence of tens of thousands of people who were murdered and then later burned.
	Not only that, they didn't find the evidence of hundreds of thousands of them or a million or more.
	Right.
	And that's why they let it disappear in a drawer.
	It was never published.
	Now, some collaborator in the museum...
	We made a partial copy of it and sent it to a German revisionist author, and then he published parts of it, but it's only a little subsection, so we know it exists.
	We don't have the full picture of it.
	Now, the Auschwitz authorities in the 60s, when they did that, didn't have access to the air photos I just described.
	On the air photos, you can see the area.
	That's where you have to look.
	That's where you have to do the examination, because that's where probably the masquerades were, because those air photos, the first ones, were released by the CIA. Suspect of document forgery and messing.
	In 1979 only, and years afterwards...
	You're saying that the CIA would make something up?
	They have tempered with photos.
	They put certain things in there that would make their...
	How do you know that?
	Because they let an inmate column march, and they say these inmates are being marched to the gas chamber, and they accidentally drew it marching over the roof of one of the barracks.
	So these spots were drawn onto the image.
	And these are official CIA photographs that were released for public?
	No, they are official Air Force photographs, but they were released by the CIA with a news report in the context of the 1978 miniseries Holocaust.
	Whoops.
	That was then giving the Holocaust narrative a big boost in Western societies, and then a year later they released that.
	So did that movie, Schindler's List.
	Right.
	Right.
	The Holocaust movie in 1978 was the first big boost.
	Schindler's List was another one of those rocket stages that propelled it into outer space.
	So in school, and just thinking back to my middle school and high school, talking about the Holocaust, it was very limited in its scope, what we would talk about.
	We knew about Auschwitz.
	We knew Hitler was bad.
	We knew that six million Jews were killed.
	We knew that they were put into concentration camps, that they were gassed, and that they were burned.
	Horrible.
	I mean, this Adolf Hitler is just, I mean, he's a terrible person.
	The world doesn't miss him.
	Wow.
	Who could ever do that?
	But that was like, and I think pretty consistently throughout the United States.
	That's about as deep as it goes.
	Obviously, post-secondary education, you get lecturers, you get historians, you get people that are going into this in more intricate detail.
	But what is everybody missing about the real Holocaust story?
	Not the facts of the Holocaust, but what other aspects?
	Because this didn't just, like you said, it didn't just happen on one day.
	So if you were to educate somebody about the Holocaust, what are we all missing?
	The roots of the story.
	Nazi gas chambers, the roots of the story.
	What I was missing.
	35 years of trying to figure out what happened.
	Because the picture is so massive, you can get lost in the words of information and for the trees don't see the forest anymore.
	And that's what has happened to me.
	And that's when I wrote the Holocaust Encyclopedia.
	I had to get my act straight.
	I needed to master the whole territory, structure it, organize it, and make it consistent.
	And that's when I started connecting dots and see connections that I didn't see before.
	Who's done it?
	If the narrative of homicidal gas chambers is wrong, how did it come about?
	How did it evolve?
	By whom was it developed that it reached the state that we're told today?
	Because publishing books and translating them and re-editing them on the various camps where the crime is supposed to have committed, there are basically six camps we're talking about.
	Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibu and Treblinka.
	They're all located in what is today Poland.
	For each and every single one of them, you see that the narrative that was initially told during the war is something completely different than what we are told today.
	For instance, if we look at Auschwitz, initially the whole story started in late 1941 that the Polish underground resistance was telling a story that the Germans were testing new war gases on Soviet POWs.
	They wanted to hitchhike.
	The fear of the First World War, of war gases being used, which never happened during the Second World War, in order to stir up hostile feelings toward the Germans.
	There was nothing to it, as we today know.
	No new war gas were ever tested upon.
	It didn't get their feedback, and they step-by-step figured out if we throw the Jews in there, we get the attention of the world.
	Particularly the Western world, the media are...
	Very sympathetic, if not partially owned or controlled by a lot of Jewish influencers.
	And if Jews are the victim of the Nazis, that's a better story to get attention.
	So the Polish resistance shifted from Soviet PRWs or even Polish inmates being the victims to Jews being the victims.
	But at the end of the war, you have stories of electrocution chambers for the various camps, all the things that are refused.
	Basically rejected today by mainstream historians.
	Electrocution didn't happen.
	Vacuum mass death chambers didn't happen.
	Steam chambers didn't happen.
	You see that for most of these camps, to one degree or another, these stories were told toward the war's end.
	But at the end, we today end up with a completely cleansed story where everything is consistent, where everyone tells the same story when at the end of the war, when memories should have been fresh and clearest.
	And best, the anecdotal record was a complete mess.
	Everybody was just telling a different story.
	How did we get from that story to the story we are told today?
	And this is, when I put this together, I saw how it was done.
	To give you two examples, pure extermination camps, and that's not Auschwitz.
	Auschwitz was a mix, according to the mainstream narrative.
	Between forced labor camp and extermination camp, it's said to have had both functions.
	They are the three pure extermination camp, or I should say four, Belzer, Chemno, Sobibor, and Treblinka.
	Chemno being a minor one, a little bit of an outlier.
	If we look at how the narrative was formed, Treblinka, that's where the story starts.
	Treblinka was already during the war, the biggest story.
	There were allegedly three million victims today.
	We're talking about 700, 800,000, some say a million, but back then, three million.
	Execution was allegedly done with electrocution, vacuum chambers, engine gas, steam.
	Everything was possible.
	At war's end, we have the Polish judiciary prepare show trials against former Germans who ran the camps.
	And they had to come up with a consistent story, how to put them on trial.
	The Maidane camp was the first one that was still doing the war, actually, in late 1944. Auschwitz, right after the occupation of Auschwitz, I always avoid the term liberation.
	The Red Army didn't liberate anyone, not even camp survivors.
	If you look at the Red Army going into Auschwitz, women were raped, some of the inmates ended up deported to Siberia.
	The Red Army didn't liberate anyone.
	So, conscience was occupied.
	The story was then, again, as varied as with trivial income.
	The judge who was interrogating...
	Inmates that had managed to flee from Treblinka.
	Treblinka in the summer of 1943 had an uprising, an inmate uprising, a successful one, where several hundred inmates managed to escape.
	Many of them at war's end testified in front of that Polish investigative judge.
	And we have now access to the records we didn't have until the 1990s, actually.
	Access to the original interrogation records, and that shows that those witnesses completely contradicted each other.
	Some of them actually changed their mind.
	Or murder happened with vacuum chamber.
	No, it happened with diesel engine exhaust or engine exhaust.
	One of the witnesses in three interrogations flipped each time.
	So you can see that the witnesses are just making up stuff from whole cloth and they have no agreement on anything.
	What Judge Lukashkiewicz did is take a witness testimony, one witness testimony only, That had plagiarized a story that was put out by the Polish underground in November 1942. Back then they had come up with a story that there were a number of gas chambers in Treblinka and people were steamed to death.
	It was the official position of the Polish government in exile, including during the military tribunal in Nuremberg, that Treblinka was a steam gas chamber facility.
	One witness, Jankel Wiennik, initially during the war still testified, ah, the people were murdered with chlorine there.
	Then he learned about the official position in the paper of the Polish government about the steam chambers.
	He plagiarized that story, even plagiarized the camp map, down to the details, the numbering, legend, everything, but replaced the steam chamber with an engine exhaust.
	Wukashkiewicz took that, threw out all the other witnesses that were contradicting that story, and wrote the definite history of the camp in a paper that he published in 1946. Next, he went over to Sobibor, a similar camp, a third of this, the smallest actually.
	In Sobibor, the testimonial record...
	It was fascinating because almost all witnesses there agreed, or the majority of them agreed, that murder was done with chlorine, which the mainstream today totally rejects, and that the gas chambers there had collapsible floors.
	So after the murder, they would open up, the victims would fall down into carts running on rails somewhere in the basement underneath, and they would ferry them away to mass graves or to pyre burnings or whatever the case may be.
	And you have the majority of the victims, if they'd say any details, they all agree on that.
	But this story of chlorine murder with collapsible floor, you will find nowhere in today's narrative.
	It's completely swept under the carpet and forgotten.
	How did Lukaszkiewicz get from a story that the witnesses agreed on, which is technical nonsense?
	Because such a massive hydraulic facility would have taken years to test to build.
	The war would have been long over before it would have run.
	How did you get from that story that some of the witnesses agreed upon?
	So we had a similar inmate uprising, people got away, and evidently they sat together and came up with a story.
	Some feedback here?
	No, that's actually they're testing the tornado sirens.
	They do it every week at this time.
	Okay, all right.
	Or on the first something of the month, they do it.
	And so it's just kind of something that I'm used to.
	All right.
	Okay.
	Will Koskiewicz cop it?
	The story he had just invented for Treblinka the year before in his article on Sobibor, which he published a year later in 1947. Completely rejecting all witness accounts, all without exception.
	Well, one thing that's really, I've always had a problem wrapping my head around, is if a million people disappeared, they were murdered.
	Two million or four million or six million people disappeared.
	Where did they go?
	Where are their family members?
	Why aren't they screaming out or haven't been?
	Yeah, my uncle was murdered at Auschwitz.
	Were they all killed too?
	Were there no witnesses because all the witnesses were murdered as well?
	Were their entire families gone?
	What about these so-called Holocaust survivors that we have heard?
	We have the numbers that are claimed for these camps.
	In those camps, Balzac, Sobibor and Treblinka, they were murdered there, buried there, and at the end they find out, oh, after Khartoum allegedly, or around that time when they realize mass graves can be found and we may not win that war, we have to dig them all up and burn them.
	And for Treblinka, the story is that within 120 days, more than 700,000 corpses were burned on pyres.
	And a similar story goes for the other camps.
	Now...
	The Achilles heel of both the mainstream narrative and the narrative of us Holocaust skeptics is, what happened?
	We know these people were deported to these camps.
	There are two options.
	Either we skeptics say they were then taken farther east.
	The original plan was, as can be seen from the documents, the Germans wanted to resettle the Jews.
	Initially, when France collapsed and the war against the Soviet Union wasn't going on, they had the idea maybe we can take the colony of Madagascar from France and give that to the Jews instead of Israel.
	That didn't go anywhere because the Anglo-Saxon powers were ruling the waves and Germany couldn't do anything.
	So then the war against the Soviet Union started with massive initial...
	Territorial gains and they were expecting that the Soviet would collapse.
	The Soviet Union, yeah, they expected that the Soviet Union would collapse relatively quickly and that they had all the territory of the Soviet Union to resettle the Jews there.
	Temporarily.
	Until after the war, they get out of Europe, out of maybe farther to Siberia or to Africa, wherever they wanted them out.
	This is what the documents say.
	The mainstream says this is just euphemisms for murder whenever they talk about resettlement and relocation, evacuation.
	What they really mean is that they were killed.
	Yes.
	This is what the mainstream says.
	Now, if you look at the record, there is nowhere in the record any explanation of which term is supposed to mean what.
	If an order comes from higher up, resettle these people.
	And then you get the verbal order, you should really kill them.
	If you have no proof that you were actually supposed to kill them and you kill a lot of people, when somebody says here, it says resettle.
	You have committed a crime.
	You weren't supposed to do that.
	You're in trouble.
	So this is a problem because there's no record anywhere that this was indeed a code language.
	Looking at the actual records that we have, it is a fact that many Jews were indeed resettled.
	They sent whole families, sometimes with barracks, with material to build barracks and with the ability to have furniture and so forth, to the east.
	And then we have receiving German authorities in the occupied areas complaining about getting these thousands and tenths of thousands of Jews that they cannot put anywhere because these cities had just been through a war zone.
	Nor do they want them there for a...
	A whole litany of different reasons.
	A lot of the housing is destroyed from the war, so the local populace has fled, has run away, and whatever is there, they didn't have any housing, there was not enough food, so there was a real problem, a massive conflict between the occupational powers having to receive all these Jews.
	So there is definite documentation.
	Yeah, they were shipping them east.
	We don't have the complete picture because these occupational authorities...
	I just don't know how all of these things can disappear.
	It wasn't that long ago.
	That's what I keep on thinking to myself.
	You have, of course, you need to understand that toward the end of the war, you had the collapse of the army group center within a few days or weeks.
	The Russians made massive advances.
	Area where the resettlement is said to have taken place and where we have some documentation that did take place, Belarusia got overrun by the Soviets so quickly that the Germans couldn't even pack their stuff and leave or destroy anything.
	Collapse of the army group means that they were overrun.
	The Soviets were good at hiding everything that had anything to do that could exonerate the Germans.
	When we're talking about the research that we've done, 35 years of research of publishing the detailed Holocaust Handbook series with 53 volumes now, it's the most detailed and thorough research series on the Holocaust in its core, extermination claim.
	If you say the Holocaust is one of the best documented events in history, if not the best one, it is because of our series.
	If you compare that with what the mainstream has done, it puts the mainstream to shame.
	That research was possible only because the Soviet Union collapsed.
	And in the 1990s, access to those archives, some of them were completely hidden in secret, became possible.
	And after a few years, actually, on pressure from the West German, then reunited German government, those archives had to be closed again.
	And you could get access only to them if you're an accredited professor of something.
	But by that time, we got a lot of material out and we have relationships to mainstream professors who help us out getting material still to this day.
	This is the stuff we have found.
	A lot of other stuff, we wouldn't be surprised if it's still hidden, if it's still inaccessible.
	And some of it may just have been destroyed.
	So obviously there's accountability in the sense that anybody that talks about this can be thrown in jail.
	They can be nuked off of the internet.
	They can lose their job.
	They can be outcast.
	And this is in modern-day accountability for Holocaust denial.
	But what about the accountability that was realized then for the people who allegedly committed these crimes?
	You know, were there trials?
	How were these people dealt with, these Nazis, these Germans, these horrific mass murderers?
	Well, it starts off, as I mentioned, the very first trial was done around the Majdanek trial in Poland in late 1944. A typical Stalinist show trial.
	If you wish, it actually started earlier in 1943. The Soviets staged two show trials in Kharkov, now Kharkiv, and in Krasnodar.
	And the claims there were basically around mass executions, but also the so-called gas vans.
	The background story basically is that the Soviet KGB, one of the KGB heads of the Moscow region, invented gas vans in the 1930s.
	They were having these prison transport vans, and they would pipe.
	The gasoline engine exhaust into the rear and kill dissidents on the way from prison to the Lubyanka or wherever they were going.
	They're found after the collapse of the Soviet Union documentation showing how this was invented, how this was done.
	So the Soviets were deploying gas vans to murder people already before the outbreak of the war.
	During the war, they were using their own technology, murder technology, to project on the germs.
	They changed the technology.
	That was a fatal mistake by saying the germs used diesel trucks with diesel engines.
	And that is particularly a high news because...
	Diesels are so evil and lethal.
	When the opposite is true, diesel exhaust gas actually has hardly any carbon monoxide, which is the short-term lethal component in exhaust gas.
	Diesels work with a lot of excess of oxygen, and therefore their exhaust gas has hardly any carbon monoxide.
	So mass murdering with diesel exhaust is pretty much borderline impossible.
	By making that mistake, they even had...
	Forensic research done on alleged victims they exhumed after they had reconquered the territories after months or years in the soil, they exhumed the victims, analyzed the tissue, and could allegedly find carbon monoxide in the blood still then, which is complete baloney because the decomposition after so much time would have made an analysis even today with a modern technology borderline impossible, let alone in the 1940s.
	Plus, diesel didn't have...
	Massive amounts of carbon monoxide.
	It wouldn't have created the tissue saturated with carbon monoxide.
	So the forensic research there was done completely bogus, like they did in Khartoum when they re-examined their own mass murder victim, Stalin's own mass murder victim, pinned that on the germs with fake forensic expert reports.
	That's what Soviets have done during the war and after the war, fake expert reports, fake forensic reports, to pin all kinds of things on the germs.
	It did continue again with Majdanek in that trial.
	The claim of the Majdanek Polish-Stalinist show trial was that 1.7 million victims of that camp, most of them in homicidal gas chambers, and seven gas chambers were actually claimed by a mixed Polish-Soviet expert commission.
	What about the personnel that it would take to actually carry this?
	I mean, how many people would have had to have been working at these extermination facilities where millions of people allegedly were murdered?
	My dad never saw anywhere close to even a fraction of that many people being sent there.
	So the whole story is completely made up.
	You don't even have to think about it.
	If we just go down the line...
	After the war, a Polish judge, Wukashkiewicz, the same I just talked about, invented the story about Treblinka and Sobiba, downgraded the 1.7 million to 360,000, but kept the seven gas chambers.
	After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1992, the next Polish historian in charge of the museum reduced it from 360,000 to 235,000, kept the seven gas chambers.
	Then we came on the scene with our research on Majdanek.
	Gone into the archive, looking at all the documents and forensic evidence, and concluded all the homicidal gas chambers that were claimed were actually fumigation chambers, or clothed drying chambers, laundry rooms.
	There's no evidence at all that they were homicidal gas chambers, and there's a complete record of fatalities in the camp, all recorded, all accounted for.
	42,200, I think, died in the camp.
	And the forensic evidence of the facility is still there, where at that point in time, the Polish authorities still claim there were homicidal gas chambers, clearly showed for a number of technical reasons couldn't have been.
	Like doors opening to the inside, they would be blocked.
	Doors that could be opened with a latch from the inside.
	How do you lock anyone in if you can't open it from the inside?
	Simple windows that could have been smashed.
	And no...
	What about the idea of just learning that you're going to go there in the first place?
	I mean, if your family member has already gone there, or somebody that you know, or millions, allegedly, of victims have been off, murdered, gassed, tortured, raped, all of these atrocities that were claimed had happened.
	And the Nazis came to your village or your town or your city or your area to take you and to take your kids, and there would just be no resistance to that at all whatsoever?
	I mean, that these people, a smaller number of people, would be able to overpower this amazing mass of people?
	If I know that I'm going to my death, I'm fighting to the death, especially if my kids are going.
	I mean, that would be a resistance that I think would be...
	Was right next to the city of Lublin.
	A large city in Poland, and it could be overlooked from the outskirts and everyone could look into it.
	Everything was completely plain and open for the Polish civil population, for the underground, for everyone to see.
	So, had there something going on during the war, all of Poland would have known it.
	All of the world would have known it.
	Not just some underground group making some atrocity propaganda claims that don't go anywhere during the war, pretty much.
	Yes.
	The same is true for Auschwitz.
	Auschwitz, as I mentioned, was a railway hub.
	It was a major railway hub for germs going east, west, north, south.
	Tens of thousands of people going there, civilians, military.
	And the camp was not caught on and off, particularly the Birkenau camp.
	So had anything gone on there, the world would have known.
	But obviously that was not the case.
	People going there were not.
	Fighting to, you know, knowing they're going to their certain death, a lot of uprisings and revolts would have happened.
	There are a few, as I mentioned, Treblinka and Sobibor at the end of the history, at the end, when everything was done and they were winding it down, then they had an uprising a little late.
	In Auschwitz, they had one little revolt in October 1944, but it wasn't all that big of an event.
	So, the exception.
	As you would expect it, any major prison and camp has revolt here and there once in a while, but not a major uprising.
	In Auschwitz, at the end of the war, between early 1944 and the end of the camp, more than 200,000 inmates were transferred back to the western part of Germany to avoid being captured by the Russians to keep them working.
	200,000 people, 200,000 potential witnesses.
	Not murdered because there were witnesses.
	No.
	Left alive, kept alive for the most part.
	I mean, in the Western camps where they came at the end, conditions deteriorated so much that a number of them still died of epidemics, starvation and so forth because of higher powers, literally speaking.
	You were doing these things.
	Wouldn't you have had to kill them?
	Normally, if you would expect...
	If you want to get away with something.
	If you had murdered a million people and you have witnesses there, you want to...
	Yeah, this is the story.
	Of the so-called Sonderkommando, the people, the inmates that were allegedly forced to run the gas chambers and the crematoria for the SS, who were so forced that they willingly obliged to kill their fellow inmates mainly.
	You need to realize that the Auschwitz story says one million people were killed.
	They're mainly Jews, and they were killed by their own inmates, fellow inmates.
	They were.
	Supervising them when they undressed.
	They were supervising them and making them go into the gas chamber and let them agree to the door being closed.
	And then at the end, they would take the corpses, look for gold.
	All this was done by...
	How many people were allegedly, supposedly, supposed to be able to fit in one of these chambers?
	Depending on which, the major ones.
	The claim...
	There's a difference between reality and claim.
	The claim goes up to 3,000.
	The packing density in the gas chambers is up to 20, sometimes even 25 people per square meter, which is physically impossible.
	But if you want to get to the 4 million, which was the story back then, you have to stack them high, even though it's physically impossible.
	And how would you control that many people to get them to go in there willingly?
	To stack on top of what, am I going to climb on your shoulders and not resist any of this at all?
	First of all, you have mixed male, female, all of them.
	They don't know each other.
	They have to get naked.
	And then you have to have them cooperate by lining up densely, which requires discipline, practice.
	How do you get soldiers to line up densely?
	I have been a recruit, and I know the first time I'm trying to make us line up, it was a mess.
	It takes some practice.
	It requires cooperation.
	All these things couldn't have been expected.
	It just didn't happen.
	And it's fascinating the amount of control and censoring and narratives and wars that have been fought and are still being fought right now because we're at war, obviously.
	And all of it hinges on...
	On this narrative.
	All of it hinges on substantiating the fact that all of these millions of people lost their lives.
	And I don't know if it was one of your research topics or not, but did you look into Hitler while you were doing this?
	I mean, would you...
	No, and it's still a little bit of a blind spot of mine because I don't want to go...
	Because it doesn't really matter or...
	At the end of the day, it probably does.
	I have just enough on my plate as it is.
	And looking into Hitler means looking into his worldview, his politics, his ideology, and that kind of stuff.
	And this is something I want to stay out of.
	Because that's a lot of speculation.
	I mean, you don't really know.
	You can look into, well, he was a Christian or he was controlled by Jews or he was paid by Jews or he was evil or he was great.
	That is an opinion.
	I guess that would require a lot of speculation.
	But this is objective, black and white, scientific.
	I want to stick to the facts.
	I want to get the facts straight.
	Initially, just for myself, I wanted to understand and have a certain ground under my feet again after things had been shaken up by the first things I read.
	As I mentioned, the American execution...
	I mean, if conditions of Weimar Germany, if the conditions that were set forth by these Bolsheviks...
	The transgenderism and Magnus Hirschfeld and all of these characters, if it was just a fraction as degenerate and horrific and horrible and pornographic and pedophilic as it has been described or as I have found in the research that I have done, I couldn't blame a person for wanting to rid his society of that, to save their children so that their children could not be subjected to this anymore.
	But that's an opinion.
	The Holocaust itself, you would have to look into the command or control structure of the people who allegedly were behind the masterminding of this massive kill-off of people.
	So, if it wasn't Hitler, then who was it?
	When it comes to the motivation, the political motivation of the National Socialists, I'm talking about moral...
	Decay in the Weimar Republic, I don't think that was a major driving force.
	If you look at how they won the elections, what was it that made people rally behind the National Socialists?
	Millions of them, by the way.
	If you look at a Trump rally, it's nothing in comparison to...
	It was not polemicizing against the Jews.
	That didn't get the message.
	It was not polemicizing against pornography, decay of culture, and so forth.
	These are footnotes.
	What really caught people is, as in most elections, is your wallet.
	Germany was in economic freefall and collapse at that time, and it was completely disorganized.
	The political structure of the Weimar Republic was just not capable of handling such an economic...
	Crisis on that scale.
	Plus, you have the issue of the German minorities abroad being suppressed, persecuted, and ethnically cleansed when we're talking about the areas nowadays in Czechoslovakia, the Sudeten area, Austria faring even worse.
	What people don't realize is that for 500 years, Austria was the heart of Germany.
	It was considered as much a part of Germany as Bavaria or Prussia.
	Bavaria, Prussia, Austria were kingdoms within Germany.
	So Austria felt Germany, wanted to be part of Germany, was kept out, and they were suffering even more under this economic collapse after the First World War.
	So there was the will of making radical changes, having a strong man who cleans up.
	The system to agree that it is possible to handle this economy with decisions that were lost in parliament, the German parliament.
	There were so many little parties, they couldn't get any stable government together.
	And from that perspective, let's get rid of it, have a strong person, solve the crisis.
	A little bit like the Romans did in their empire when they ever had a major crisis like that with the war against Hannibal.
	They had the strongmen come in.
	They called him a dictator.
	He gets the right to solve the problem for half a year.
	And if he succeeds, then he can retire with richness and land and so forth.
	And the National Socialists, it was Hitler's kind of program.
	Give me four years' time.
	That was a normal administrative period like it is here in this country.
	Just give me four years' time and I'll fix it.
	So he came to power in 1933. Then he had the emergency laws passed where the majority of the parliament, which at that point wasn't even National Socialist, I think they had just 48%.
	So he took care of a lot of things by executive order immediately.
	The parliament agreed to suspending civil rights.
	Unfortunately, that was never unsuspended.
	And he got the powers to actually implement executive order, a massive amount of drastic changes.
	Unilateral authority.
	Right.
	But that was mainly focused on solving the problems economically, as well as Germany was partly occupied.
	The Saarland and the Ruhr area were occupied by foreign powers and they were exploited economically.
	Germany didn't have control of the main economic resources of its country, which is the Ruhr area and Sartor.
	What was the driving force behind that occupation?
	France.
	Everybody knows about Pizzagate.
	Everybody knows that it's true.
	Everybody knows about the satanic Hollywood elite pedophiles taking this adrenochrome stuff to try to de-age.
	It's disgusting.
	Nobody's ever going to do that.
	Everybody does want to de-age, though.
	Now you can.
	Go to uncancellablehealth.com.
	It's not a hoax.
	Uncancellablehealth.com.
	You've probably seen testimonials on my Rumble channel.
	This is actual de-aging, reversing the aging process at the stem cell level.
	Uncancellablehealth.com.
	Uncancellable.
	The show continues right now.
	Speaking of supporting your kids, please support your child's natural immunity as we begin the school year.
	Z Spike Gummies.
	This week we have a special sale.
	Promo code SPN20 for 20% off site-wide, and that includes subscriptions at ZStack.
	So if you want the subscription, 20% off, including that, hurry over and get your order in right now.
	The promo code expires on the 16th of September.
	ZStackLife.com slash SPN. Zstacklife.com slash SPN. We'll be right back.
	England was going along with it.
	America was looking the other way because they didn't want anything to do with the USA treaty because it was against their ideals.
	So America rejected responsibility.
	The French are really disgusting people.
	I've never met a Frenchman that I really like.
	No, I wouldn't say that.
	I haven't met a Frenchman that I like.
	I love the French people.
	You do?
	They're just so soft and so weak.
	It's a matter of personal preference.
	Well, the death penalty and the French.
	We disagree on these things.
	All right.
	The French and the German people have been at each other's throat for many centuries.
	The French have been chopping up territory from Germany over centuries until Germany reverted it in 1871. They didn't like it, and then they got into the First World War, and so it was tit for tat.
	Not good.
	But at the end of the day, to solve the economic problems, you had to end the occupation and the draining, the exploitation of Germany through the Versailles Treaty.
	And that's what he basically managed to do without causing a war, to get the other powers to back off.
	And he liberated Germany from the occupation, from the fetters of the Versailles Treaty.
	And economy went through the roof.
	And talking about four years, 1937, all other countries in the world were still suffering from the major economic crisis resulting from the 1928...
	Stock crash in the United States, which actually initially started in Germany and in Austria with bank collapses.
	That's where it all started because Germany was so exploited and drained in Austria that their financial system collapsed and that then triggered massive recall of investments to America and this led to the major collapse in America.
	Germany had pulled itself out.
	It was flourishing.
	It was going through the roof economically at a time when all the rest of the world was still suffering from the consequences.
	So something was done right.
	1937, the occupation had ended and Germany started looking into getting back the territories they thought they should have maintained after the First World War.
	Had there been a fair referenda in certain areas, Germany would have gotten this.
	The same way Putin's looking at Ukraine now.
	Well, if it is that way, whatever fair referendum means, they eventually got somewhere in Austria, voted to 90-something percent to join with Nazi Germany.
	The Saarland did, which was partly controlled by France.
	The Sudeten area eventually was merged.
	There was no referendum there.
	And then there was a conflict with Poland, which led to the Second World War because Poland didn't want any referendum there.
	Had Hitler said, okay, the four years are over.
	I fixed it, which he did.
	And would have gotten back to, okay, we suspend the suspension of the civil rights.
	We suspend the suspension of the parliament.
	We go back.
	Even grant the communists the right to have their party, which at that point was outlawed.
	He was so popular and successful at that point that he could have allowed anyone to compete with him as a party and he would have won elections for...
	For decades to come.
	But he didn't.
	He kept tight fist control over everything, and that is my opinion that led then to catastrophe.
	But, I mean, if it was successful and people loved him, why would he allow the opportunity for the theft of an election or for his assassination or for, you know, somebody who...
	Wanted him removed.
	Allow them any opportunity to do that.
	If the people really loved him, why would they want him removed?
	Not removed, no.
	But give liberty back.
	Give civil rights back.
	Stop your enemies from having...
	But weren't people enjoying their lives under the rule of Hitler?
	If he was that massively popular...
	Not all of them.
	Not those who were sitting in the concentration camps.
	But you said that he was massively popular.
	Yes.
	And that hands down there's not anybody on the planet that could have defeated him in a free and fair election.
	You can have massive popularity and still do injustice.
	That's true.
	To the minority.
	But you can't have massive popularity and still lose an election.
	Well, we don't have to agree on it, but for me, there are two constituting parts of a wise way of running a government.
	Inalienable civil rights and right to self-determination.
	I always put that in there.
	And that was violated by the Nazi regime.
	And you, of course, have the popularity aspect.
	You can call it democracy or whatever, the vote of the masses.
	But if that is not God railed in with inalienable rights...
	Democracy is not more than a lynch mob.
	Well, democracy is fake.
	It's a construct.
	It's when two wolves and a lamb decide what's for dinner.
	That's democracy.
	That was Nazi Germany.
	Well, the way that wars are fought.
	They were minority and they were the lambs and they were eaten.
	Yeah.
	Not good.
	This small group of elites is going to prove a point or needs to make some financial or economical move here, or they need to preserve themselves, self-preservation.
	So they just, these few elites start a war with these few elites, and pretty soon you have hundreds of thousands of people that don't even have, they have no stake in the game.
	They don't have a dog in the fight.
	They have no reason.
	I have no reason to go to Afghanistan and kill people until my government tells me that I do.
	Until the CIA creates my enemy, until the Rothschilds fund both sides of the war, then I have a reason to come and kill you.
	Because I'm told that that's what I'm going to do, because that's patriotic, that's noble, that is spreading democracy.
	The best example is actually the first Iraq war for its invasion of Kuwait.
	Weapons of mass destruction.
	Gas chambers.
	Incubator babies.
	It always involves kids.
	The lies always involve kids.
	Iraq is preparing gas chambers for all Jews.
	German company delivers gas chambers, Cyclone B gas chambers to Iraq.
	There were news headlines in the Jewish press in 1992 in preparation of, that's right, gas chambers to justify war.
	Completely invented.
	Like in the first runaround.
	And yet in the first World War II, when in the middle of it, gas chamber claims against Germans or their allies were made.
	I mean, do you think, I mean, if Hitler were, do you think, first of all, do you think that he's one of the most lied about men in human history?
	Can we agree on that?
	Yes.
	I mean, there was a lot of lies told about this guy.
	This one, I want to make that clear for myself.
	Before the war started, Hitler had on his conscience roughly a thousand people dead.
	He had the Rumpur against his own people, several dozen of his originally owned supporters from the USA. Wait a minute, you're saying that Hitler is personally responsible for the deaths of a thousand people?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Well, personally, but...
	That's sure different than six million.
	No, the comparison you have to make is when it comes to the clash of the two big dictatorships in Europe.
	Or in Eurasia, I should say.
	The Soviet Union in Germany, starting in June 1941. You had Hitler.
	At that point, when the war broke out, actually, they divided up Poland together, you know, in 1939. Hitler had 1,000 people on his conscience.
	The Rumpur people, the 100 Jews, they were killed in the pogrom in November 1938. And then you have all the people who died in concentration camps that shouldn't have been incarcerated had there been a rule of law.
	A lot of people who were put in their protective custody to prevent them from committing crime before they had crimes.
	By the way, a rule that Canada has just introduced, they call that peace bonds.
	They can put people in prison up to a year if they assume that a person would speak up in a way that would cause trouble.
	It's the same kind of law that the Nazis had.
	The Nazis didn't have a year limitation.
	They could lock people up without crime.
	Well, don't worry.
	Donald Trump is calling for deportation or executions for anti-Semitic.
	Yeah, great.
	So anyway, you have eventually the collision between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
	At that point, Nazi Germany had on its conscience 1,000 people dead, and Soviet Russia had something like 10 or 20 million.
	So we're talking five orders of magnitude more mass murder or death caused in the Soviet Union than in Nazi Germany.
	And yet still, the United States decides to...
	Side with Soviet Russia.
	Which, by the way, they've done already way before the war.
	The Roosevelt administration acknowledged the Soviet Union.
	Up to that point, it wasn't even acknowledged as a legitimate government because of the revolution.
	And then massive economic cooperation.
	Stalin built up his military machinery, which was designed to overrun all of Europe and conquer all of Europe.
	Yeah.
	With the help...
	Of the United States getting licenses to build vehicles, getting licenses for all kinds of technical equipment and helping them with massive help of financial and material nature already before the war, but most certainly during the war.
	I don't want to give the impression that I want people to choose this idea, either for Hitler or for Stalin in this war.
	I just want to see...
	Make clear that black won white picture, that this war was a perfect example of a good war against bad, bad against, good against evil, black against white.
	And the good ones were the ones who won.
	The Soviet Union, up to the outbreak of the war, with 10 to 20 million civilian victims, cannot have been part of a good side of anything.
	That doesn't mean that the National Socialist regime was a good one either.
	There is no black and white in these conflicts.
	You see, in the Second World War, like in most wars, if not all wars, the biggest butcher wins.
	And the biggest butcher is always the evilst.
	What I mentioned in the show before, I think, Germany had invented nerve gases in the 1930s by accident.
	Actually, when they, in the laboratory, discovered it, the whole lab team died.
	That's how they discovered it, because suddenly everyone in the laboratory died and they didn't know what was going on.
	They had to have an investigation to figure out what they had just invented.
	It was, I think, in 1937, 1938, something like that.
	I can't remember exactly.
	You could look it up on Wikipedia, even Tabun, T-A-B-U-N, the first nerve gas ever invented by the germs.
	They started stockpiling it.
	Of course, having chemical weapons was banned after the First World War, and therefore it was not...
	It was a war crime just to be in possession.
	Right.
	But every site kind of had them.
	Right.
	Only in case that the other site would use them had something to retaliate with.
	Same thing with these alleged nukes.
	Right.
	It's the same nowadays.
	ABC weapons are all banned.
	But they all have them just in case the other side does something so that we can retaliate, whatever that means.
	So it's the same game there.
	The Germans stockpiled it in bunkers deep underneath the Earth so that even an accidental bombing by the Allies couldn't set it free because that would have been devastating.
	To such a degree, they stockpiled it that it would have been enough to win the war.
	The Germans didn't need the atom bomb.
	Since the early 1940s, they had something that was...
	Way better.
	Because if you drop a rocket of that stuff on a city, the city will be completely intact.
	Nothing destroyed.
	Every living creature in there will be dead.
	And you can't occupy it for weeks or months to come because that gas will still kill you if you want to go in there.
	And you need to wait for wind and time to disperse it and make it not effective.
	It's much better than a nuclear bomb.
	You can't go in there for years and everything is destroyed.
	And the United States had two bombs.
	And after that, they had to bluff against Japan because they're nothing anymore.
	The Germans had stockpiled the stuff.
	That would have been enough for Moscow, for Washington, for New York, for Chicago, for London, for Liverpool, for everything.
	Did they use it?
	There was a discussion, and I learned about it just not too long ago, unfortunately.
	I didn't hold on to that piece of information.
	I have to dig it up again.
	When, as I mentioned already before, 1944 Army Group Center, the German Army Group Center, Central Russia, collapsed.
	That was basically trying to control Belorussia.
	And got overrun by Soviet forces.
	It was clear the war is lost right there.
	They can't hold the Eastern Front and the Russians will be in Germany in no time.
	Which is what happened.
	And at the same time, of course, the Western Allies were invading from the West.
	The Germans were not really focused on the West.
	They were fine with being conquered by the Americans.
	They didn't want to be conquered by the Soviets.
	So the General Staff, Joint Chief of Staff, was seriously discussing using the Tabun nerf gases against the Soviet forces to make the Soviet forces collapse and win the war in the East, at least.
	And Hitler put in his veto.
	It's not going to happen.
	Hitler had been traumatized during the first war in the trench warfare when he was at some point even injured by war gases.
	Some sort of chemical weapon.
	Yeah, mustard gas or something.
	So we're not going to use this, we're not only going to not use this against our people, but not against enemies.
	We are not going to use...
	We'd rather go down in history as the ones that have been vanquished and totally destroyed than stoop down to the point where we use that kind of weapon.
	I want to tell our audience where to get this.
	That is Hitler's attitude to using poison gas against masses.
	A complete no and veto.
	I want to tell our audience where to go.
	HolocaustEncyclopedia.com.
	You've arranged for a special discount if they use the promo code StuLikesBooks.
	Why is it important that everybody has this, in your opinion?
	I have it.
	I've read.
	I mean, this isn't something that you're going to sit down and read in a day.
	And you've got the entire series.
	Yes.
	HolocaustHandbooks.com.
	All 53 books can be downloaded.
	There's free PDFs.
	Or you find a link where you can get a hard copy.
	This is free.
	I mean, this guy's got a ton of work involved here, and this is free.
	He's telling you right now, Holocaust Handbooks, you can have them all for free.
	I don't know.
	I bought the hard copy.
	I'm a believer in having physical copies of things.
	All the information is free online, holocausthandbooks.com.
	As a website, you click on the letter, you click on the words, and you find all the entries.
	Even with audio files, you can listen to them.
	There's even a downloadable EPUB version, free, that you can put on your device so you don't have to pay anything.
	I want this information to be spread as far and wide as possible that is lowering the obstacle that maybe people feel is in the way that separates them from that information.
	A lot of it is psychological.
	I don't want to touch it.
	I don't know if I'm getting in trouble.
	Do I have to identify myself?
	Do I have to put my payment information in there?
	Do I have to have my name in a database that can be found by someone?
	There are some countries where this can be a problem.
	You don't have to do that.
	You can get everything for free.
	We're not counting downloads.
	We are not registering anyone.
	You go there and get it.
	It is important.
	Because this is...
	As I say, the topic, the Holocaust topic, is the cork in the bottle that prevents the discussion, let alone resolution, of so many central problems of Western society nowadays.
	The Chinese don't have a problem with that because it's not part of their culture and history.
	But when it comes to Western society, we are talking about demographic collapse.
	Which the white population all over the world is going through right now.
	To some degree or another, faster or slower, but we're all there, headed for it.
	How do you tackle this topic?
	We need to have a cultural change.
	We need to have a revolution of love.
	I say that.
	The meaning of life.
	It's the creation and raising of new life and love.
	Because without it, there won't be any life.
	If you go into Western societies, how you're being taught in society or in school what the meaning of life is?
	Self-realization.
	Hedonism.
	Materialism.
	Enjoy life.
	It is not about family.
	It's not about children.
	It's not about love and life.
	It's about materialism.
	And this is what destroys Western civilization.
	If you want to get this message across nowadays, let's preserve our heritage.
	Let's preserve our people genetically.
	Everyone has the right.
	Every living creature has a right to want to procreate and down genetically and culturally what we have built.
	Why do we Europeans not have that right?
	Because you hear that very quickly.
	If you want to say, let's stick together.
	Let's prevent this demographic collapse.
	Then you get badgered over the head.
	This is a policy that is right-wing extreme.
	Racist, whatever.
	Dangerous.
	And in Germany, you hear quickly, you know, this expression, if I translate it.
	Girl, spread your legs.
	The Fuhrer needs soldiers.
	That's the ideology that is claimed the Nazis had.
	They wanted girls to have babies.
	So that the Führer can add soldiers to wage his imperialistic war.
	It's a complete distortion of what really went on.
	This is today battered.
	People are getting battered with this kind of propaganda bullshit to prevent them to realize their core meaning of life.
	And once women are in their 40s and 50s, have had no children, then when the gate closes and it's too late, a lot of them regret it and they see I'm a dead end.
	Genetically, culturally, in every God, I have lived at the end of the day for nothing.
	And it's too late.
	This is a sad story.
	This is only the first chapter of the eradication of mankind from this planet.
	We have right now a massive problem that we are overpopulated with almost 9 billion people.
	But now...
	China is going through a demographic collapse, and they won't even admit it, but they say they have 1.2 billion people, and this is a forgery of statistics.
	They're probably down to 7 million already.
	India has just prided itself that they got to the point where they dropped from four kids per woman down to only two kids per woman in just 20 or 30 years, whereas England took 150 years to go there.
	India...
	Has dropped underneath the reproductive value they need to maintain their population.
	And they keep dropping.
	Everyone's dropping.
	If we go down that route on the entire planet, Brazil has dropped down under that line five years ago or so.
	The entire civilization is having a problem.
	We need to find a way of making, creating and raising new life in love the core of our meaning again.
	Elon Musk is trying to get this message across.
	Sometimes a little bit of an awkward approach, but he's right.
	And for us in the West, for Europeans...
	How can a guy be right about love and the meaning of life when he wants to put a chip in your brain?
	Right.
	A lot of things are awkward about this guy, but he has seen the demographic collapse China is going through.
	Germany is at the forefront of collapse.
	They started it first.
	You had me until Elon.
	Okay.
	You're talking about something so important, life and love and the purpose.
	Germany is so attractive to immigrants that Germany can tackle the tensions, the social tensions and the economic tensions that come from economic collapse by patching it up with having immigrants.
	China can't do this.
	China is so massive that you're not going to have hundreds of millions of people migrating to China.
	It's not going to happen.
	There are just not these people around anymore.
	China is going through demographic collapse without reversal and without remedy.
	And Elon Musk saw it there.
	Well, Germany is going through a collapse here, but you can have immigrants.
	You're going to have immigrants, whether you like it or not, because if you don't have babies, somebody else will.
	That's just a law of nature.
	In China, it's not going to work.
	And on the planetary scale, Black Africa right now is the only one that has still population growth, and the rest of the world is stagnant now, are getting there, and it's going to collapse.
	But for us culturally, Europeans who are leading the charge in self-extinction among the human race, giving a bad example and everyone's following, we need to find a solution.
	And the solution is to look into making motherhood, fatherhood, familyhood, such a thing, a core value and...
	Making people realize it's not how many cars and nice furniture and big house and gadgets you have that matters, but it's love to your offspring.
	That gives you meaning in life.
	I've unfortunately learned it twice the hard way with two broken up families to a large degree as a result of the persecution I've suffered.
	You lose your children.
	In my case, they are dead, but I lost contact with them.
	That hurts so much you realize what is important.
	It's a lesson I don't want people to learn the heart way.
	But there's nothing going on in our schools that tells this very important story.
	And the reason why you can't do it is because this story is being ramped down our throat.
	This was an ideology that was trying to breed humans and therefore telling someone to have babies is bad.
	This is all wrong.
	And if you find out the Holocaust story at the very core is not true, still.
	Jews were persecuted and a lot of other minorities were persecuted and that's not right.
	I'm not going to whitewash Hitler here.
	But the Holocaust, the gas chamber narrative is wrong and it is being used to then distort the whole picture.
	The National Socialists were family loving and children loving.
	And this is something positive.
	I don't care who does it.
	Family loving and children loving is positive.
	If the communists do it, if the national socialists do it, whoever does it is right.
	So by getting the cork out of the bottle, opening the discussion and preventing people from using this weapon as a debate stopper, as a club to beat over your head, to depict you as a bad person, you can show you're the one who's lying, you're the one who is distorting.
	I have the evidence here.
	I have noticed...
	As soon as you have the arguments in the encyclopedia, people stop polemicizing and arguing the point because they're going to lose it.
	If you are competent, you don't have to bring up the topic.
	Your opponent in a discussion will.
	And then you can fire back and sink his ships.
	It's very important to be able to have the factual information when you're confronting these people.
	And then debates open everywhere else.
	That's right.
	It's not a debate stopper anymore.
	Which is what we hope that this program does as well, is that debate, open discourse, honest discourse becomes uncancellable in a society where everything seemingly is becoming cancelled other than...
	The official orthodox narrative, the arbiters of truth, the arbiters of life and death, have become these sick governments that are waging war against their own people.
	And I think that's the real Holocaust that we should be talking about.
	HolocaustEncyclopedia.com, that's where you should go.
	HolocaustEncyclopedia.com.
	Enter the promo code StuLikesBooks if you want a discount and your plug.
	When I wrote the encyclopedia, this is a big work.
	For some, it may be too big.
	They may be wanting...
	Something in a nutshell.
	This is why I have written this book.
	It's a condensation down to the essential of the story, the Nazi gas chambers, the iconic facility that supposedly has been used for that mass murder.
	How was the story created?
	If you want that book, if you go to holocaustencyclopedia.com, there's a link that says bookstore.
	That goes to where all of our books are being offered, armrec.co.uk.
	And you can find this book there.
	This is just 100 pages, a little bit over 100 pages of text, and that gives you things in a nutshell.
	Nazi guest chambers, the roots of the story.
	One thing I want to say about this book.
	I found out all these sex camps where the mass murders had to have happened were in Poland.
	The narrative, as we are taught today, was created by four individuals.
	Three of them, investigative judges, Polish investigative judges, and another one, a Polish historian, on the Balzac camp.
	It is Wukashkiewicz, Vladislav Betnacz, Jan Zain for Auschwitz, and Eugenius Schreut for Balzac.
	None of them are Jews.
	They were...
	Blackies of the Stalinist post-war Polish judiciary who, in the name of Stalinism, communism, streamlined and invented that story in their ongoing propaganda war against Germany and later the West.
	Depicted as a continuation, West Germany in particular, predicted as a continuation of Nazi Germany.
	That was what the Eastern Bloc was doing throughout the Cold War.
	Those Polish judges took the narrative, the chaotic, anarchic narrative that was mainly based on Jewish witness accounts, but they were mostly completely contradictory and nonsensical, streamlined it and made a narrative out of it, published it in their journals and magazines, and then that was...
	Conveyed to Western historians, and they aided hook, light, and sinker, and the West German judiciary.
	Some of these publications that the Poles put out were in German language.
	At that time, after the war, the German language was illegal in Poland.
	If you look at the map, I have a map in here.
	You overlay the borders of Germany in...
	Before the First World War, and the Poland as it is today, you see that more than half of the territory that Poland consists of today used to be Germany.
	After the First World War, Poland got a good chunk, and after the Second World War, much more.
	Poland...
	Had a massive interest of justifying the ethnic cleansing of 7 million Germans from these East German territories and claiming that territory and inculcating into the Germans a guilt feeling that would never, that would basically break their back, their back of self-confidence, national self-confidence, national pride, and would never get them back up on their feet and demanding justice.
	The Poles needed a justification.
	For territorial conquest and ethnic cleansing that was seven times as big as Zionists needed justification for territorial conquest and the ethnic cleansing of one million Palestinians in the Middle East.
	So you have two main players here who had an interest in ramming down and creating and ramming down that story down primarily the German nation.
	The Poles, a much bigger one.
	And the main actors in this drama of creating this narrative, plus the Zionists who actually, if you look at the history of Israel and the Zionists using that narrative on a large scale, it started with the 1961 Eichmann trial.
	Before that, Israel was on a war of conquest and economic development.
	They actually wanted to conquer the Suez Canal already in 1950. It had a false flag operation.
	So Israel has been at it ever since its creation.
	But they didn't use back then in 1948 or in the 50s the Holocaust narrative to the degree as they did from 1961 onward.
	So they were kind of late to the parties.
	Yeah.
	The actual narrative started being developed in the Western camps by the Allies, Western Allies, only as they moved in.
	The Soviets were starting it with their gas van show trials in 1943, as I mentioned.
	The Polish underground was developing gas chamber stories, sending it to the exile government in London since 1941-42, and were at it ever since.
	Of the narrative is Stalinist Communist Poland.
	A very important remark here.
	I'm a German.
	My father was ethnically cleansed with his family from East Germany.
	I'm saying these things to make it understandable how it evolved.
	I am not sitting here saying I want Germany's territories back.
	We're done in Europe killing each other over territories.
	That message goes to Russia and Ukraine too.
	Poland and Germany are friends now.
	There are no boaters anymore.
	If I, as a descendant of my family coming from Silesia, decide I want to settle there and live there, I can do so.
	There is no reason anymore in today's Europe to talk about territorial disputes.
	It's over.
	I am explaining this, why it happened, what the motives were, and how it was done, not in order to have restitution or so, just for understanding.
	So I want to get that message clear.
	I'm not trying to badger polls.
	I want the polls to understand, too, that they are captive of this problem, too.
	The entire world has been captive of this problem and has been trapped inside of a bubble under the empire of lies that originates with what should be the most highly documented event in all of world history.
	But there has never been a factual source that you can turn to, and now there is.
	Thank you very much.
	35 years, 53 volumes on the Holocaust Handbook series.
	Too much to wrap your head around it, even for me.
	That's why I created it for myself to understand it and for everyone else to have it concisely together and accessible.
	The conversation, just having it in public may cause you to feel a little bit uncomfortable.
	Having it in private can have you shuddering and cause you to be uncomfortable.
	You have been there.
	I have been there.
	You felt guilt.
	I felt hesitancy.
	When all of this first started getting brought to my attention regarding the Jewish question and the Jewish problem and the empire of lies and the Holocaust and Hitler and all of these different things, these were untouchable topics.
	No longer should they be.
	Information is knowledge.
	Knowledge is power.
	Go to the bank and educate yourself.
	Challenge yourself to step up and open up your mind and really, really break out of the matrix and into the real world.
	HolocaustEncyclopedia.com.
	Guillermar, thank you very much.
	We have the red pill on the cover.
	There it is.

▲