It is the first show of the week, actually, unfortunately.
I did not make it to Monday's show.
I was kind of feeling a bit under the weather.
So we're here today, and we have quite an interesting show set up.
If you guys have been watching my show for a very long time, you've probably seen a show very similar to this.
I won't say it's exactly the same, but you've definitely seen one that's somewhat similar.
So...
We'll see if there's any long-time listeners in here that are familiar with it.
But it's episode 7 of Logos Academy today.
We're going to be talking, the title is Weimar Conditions.
So that's what we'll be talking about and I'll kind of get into what exactly that means in a minute here.
But in the meantime, welcome everyone.
We'll let some people fill in and say hello.
Got quite a bit of news as well.
Some pretty good news actually.
So we'll lay out some of that as well.
I see we've got, in reality in here, welcome, Klasia, Janice, Moondog.
Welcome, guys.
Get caught up here. - Sure.
Okay, so we are live on Odyssey, we're live on Twitter, we're live on Rumble, and we are live on FTJ. Don't forget, if you guys aren't already on FTJ, go ahead and make yourselves an account over there.
It's ftjmedia.com.
Unfortunately, Dave Geharry, who owns the website, he also owns Money Tree Publishing, and just today the news broke that the A payment processor that is used for Money Tree Publishing has now dropped Money Tree Publishing and they will no longer work with them.
I guess it's because the knowledge that is in those books is something they don't want you to see, which gives you all the more reason to go over there and get some of those books.
So a couple of things to kind of lay out before we get into the actual topic of the show today.
I had two tweets go viral this week, both of which are actually very important tweets.
So I'm actually going to pull them up really quickly and show you guys what exactly it was.
It kind of fits perfect with the topic for today as well, which is fantastic.
Let's see how I can pull this up.
Here we go.
It should work.
Yeah.
Awesome.
Okay, so this is the first tweet.
Let me see if I can kind of zoom in on that a little more.
Yeah, that's way better.
All right, so this is the first tweet.
I tweeted this a couple days ago.
It's just a page of Mein Kampf.
It's actually the final page of the second chapter of Mein Kampf.
Where Hitler talks about Marxism and the Jews that are in connection with Marxism.
And he basically states that Marxism is a worldview that is incongruent with nature and will eventually lead to the ruin of mankind.
So I posted that quote, and it's gotten 730,000 views in the last 48 hours, something like that.
So it's good to see.
It's very...
It's very eye-opening, and it's kind of a massive white pill when we're watching the narrative shift in real time.
We're actually watching people become comfortable reading these things, hearing about them, because it's not this crazy, hateful nonsense that everybody makes it out to be.
And the one other thing that went viral, literally the day after, which is really important, is Monica Schaefer's video.
I posted it for her, where she was talking about her learning the truth about the Holocaust and discussing this with her deceased mother, kind of apologizing to her mother's spirit for kind of Criticizing her when she was alive for talking about these things in a very negative light.
And now her eyes have been opened to the truth and she made this video.
So if you guys have not seen this video, I'm actually going to link it in the chat rooms.
I really want you guys to watch this.
It's a fantastic video.
Let me throw it in the chats for you guys.
All right.
She's a wonderful woman.
She's got a very kind soul.
And you can tell that this is a very important topic to her.
So go ahead and give that video a watch.
Give it a share.
It's been making the rounds on Twitter, that's for sure.
A lot of people have been sharing it around.
I also have an interview with Monica Schaefer that's on my Odyssey channel, if you guys want to check that out.
I'm actually going to be posting it to my Rumble very shortly.
I haven't done it yet, but I will be doing it very soon.
So you guys can check that out.
So, a couple things for this week.
Tomorrow, I think I'm going to go live with a bit of a marathon show.
I'm not sure if I'm going to go 12 hours.
I might go 10.
We'll see.
I'm definitely going to shoot for 8 and we might go 10.
That's what we're going to try to do.
I'm going to go live at noon tomorrow and we're going to start that up.
I'm going to do a fundraiser show tomorrow.
I had a couple people bring this idea up to me.
You guys know how I am about asking for donations and stuff.
I really don't like to do that.
I think it's very Jewish.
However, I do really need to upgrade some things with the setup here, especially now that I'm on the Stu Peters Network.
The show is increasing in numbers that are being able to see it.
I want it to also increase in quality at the same time.
So I'm going to get a new webcam.
I'm going to get a stand for my webcam.
I'm going to get a filter for my microphone so you guys aren't hearing so much background noise or swashes in the background, as I've been told.
So I'm going to work on getting all these things.
So we're going to do a fundraiser show tomorrow.
I'm going to start at noon.
I'm going to set it for eight hours, and we'll shoot as long as we can.
If it's going really well, I'll force myself to kind of go a bit longer.
I'll guarantee eight hours.
That's what we'll do.
We're going to say it's at least eight hours.
If we hit a certain goal or something like that, maybe I'll shoot for 12, just to kind of show you guys my appreciation.
And I think I'm going to make it a call-in show.
I don't have, like, an insane amount of very fresh, new, insightful material to cover.
So I think we're just going to do a call-in show, and that'll steer the direction in a couple different areas.
Might talk about solutions a little bit.
We also got an interesting guest coming on on Friday.
Actually, I'm curious how many people know who she is.
One in the chat, if you guys are familiar with, Leonardo.
She's an Albanian woman.
She's a comedian.
She's been making the rounds.
She's been on the Alex Jones Show and a couple other pretty big podcasts.
One, if you guys are familiar with Leonardo.
Two, if you are not.
She's on Twitter.
She's pretty big on Twitter.
Yeah, myself as well.
I think the last couple lines of Chapter 2 are, I mean, you can't read that and think that guy was evil.
evil.
It's impossible.
Yes, Awe, yes.
Awe, yes.
What do you mean, Chain Reaction?
We started with a...
We had an intro.
I had a five to eight minute intro music playing.
You didn't miss much.
You didn't miss much.
Welcome in.
Okay, so a couple people know her.
Not too many, it seems like.
Interesting.
You got banned on Twitter?
Yeah, she actually just got unbanned on Twitter.
She was banned as well.
A lot of people have been getting banned on Twitter.
Yeah, so she's going to be coming on for Logos Academy Episode 8 on Friday.
So it's going to be at 4 p.m.
Eastern on Friday.
And then Saturday, I think I have something going on Saturday.
Hold on, let me, bear with me, folks.
I'm going to grab a bottle of water and I'm going to grab my schedule.
I don't have it at my desk.
I should.
All right.
One second, guys.
All right.
Yeah, a lot of people have been banned and unbanned.
Well, August, that's a bit much.
I don't know that much.
But that sounds a little excessive.
Okay, so...
Let me see my schedule here.
Sorry.
I have so much going on, it's so hard to keep up without physically looking at this thing all the time.
Looks like I don't have anything, actually.
I thought I had something on Saturday.
Maybe not.
Okay, so you guys can expect a show tonight.
Oh, okay.
All right, I'm so all over the place here.
Okay, so we're going to do an eight-hour marathon show tomorrow, from noon to 8 p.m.
And then I have a Twitter space tomorrow, actually, at 9 p.m.
I completely forgot about, so...
We're going to be in a Twitter space with Ian Malcolm tomorrow at 9pm Eastern.
So we'll do noon to 8 for the marathon show tomorrow.
It'll be an 8 hour show.
We'll do a call-in kind of format.
And it's going to be a fundraiser again.
So we can try to upgrade some of the things on the setup here.
I do want to get a better quality webcam.
I also want to get a stand for the webcam.
A lot of people have been complaining that the webcam is jiggling.
So I don't know if that's the case.
Do I believe in God?
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
No, this is not Asha logos.
Different logos.
And then we'll be live again on Friday.
Leonardo will be joining us at 4pm Eastern, which I haven't written that down yet, so let me do that.
I'm getting a little behind here, folks.
Even the schedule is failing.
Oh, we'll also be live with G-Man at 1pm Eastern on Friday.
Friday.
I don't know how I forgot that.
Okay.
Additionally, we got a couple other interviews coming up in the, in the beginning of next month.
We're looking to have Sam Parker on the show.
We're getting a date set up with him, so that'll be happening soon.
And then we also have Converse coming on, the guy who organized the JP conference.
I'm going to have him come on, let him promote the JP conference a little bit.
bit.
We'll talk about it.
All right.
So that's the schedule of That's about everything that's kind of coming up, or in the near future, at least.
So, let's kick into the topic today.
We want to talk about Weimar Solutions.
I've got two speeches from Adolf Hitler that we're going to analyze today.
We're going to read over.
Again, if you've been watching this show for...
Probably a year, a year and a half, you've probably seen me do a show very similar to this.
There's going to be a little bit of different insights, because obviously I'm learning every day as well.
So you guys will maybe see some different thoughts, but...
I believe we've read these speeches before on my stream.
Actually, I'm certain about the one.
I'm not certain about the other one.
But this is going to break down some of the confusion, some misunderstandings about Adolf Hitler, and talk about Weimar conditions.
I'm sure everybody's seen the meme or has heard this going around, Weimar conditions, Weimar solutions.
So what are Weimar conditions?
We have to analyze that for ourselves, figure out what exactly that means.
Is this just a An economic situation?
Is this a political situation?
Is this a social one?
What are Weimar conditions?
We all know, everybody talks about the degeneracy that was running rampant in Germany.
Everybody attributes that to Weimar conditions.
However, you very rarely hear people talk about the political side of things, right?
How the government was being run at that time period.
What some serious problems were in the German economy.
We'll just say kind of state.
There was a lot of political issues that were going on at the time, many of which exactly mirror what we're experiencing today.
I mean, it's a direct image of what we have going on in our government.
So we're going to read this speech first to kick us off, and this is going to kind of get us into...
Understanding what exactly the conditions were in the Weimar Republic, what they were looking at politically for their country, right?
Voting right and left wing things, things like that.
So we're going to talk about that a little bit.
Let me pull this screen up.
I think that's going to be too big, but we'll try it.
We'll see.
Let's find out.
Here we go.
Yeah, a little bit too big.
Okay.
You know what?
Maybe...
Hold on.
Maybe I should zoom in here.
Bear with me.
I want to make sure we can really read along with me.
Okay, way better.
How's that?
Is this legible?
Can you guys read this in real time?
I guess I'll keep the camera at the bottom here.
Is everybody able to see that?
that you can read that okay August I don't I don't have time for that right now If you message me privately, I'll look at it.
Looks good?
Okay, perfect.
Perfect.
great okay so this is a speech from Adolf Hitler This is April 12th, 1922.
If you guys want to actually read any of these speeches for yourself and start to kind of understand where this guy was coming from, I'm going to give you guys the link in the chat room of the website.
This is a fantastic archive.
It has like every speech on it in English, in French, in German, you name it.
It's in every language.
So I highly recommend that you guys check that out.
It's a fantastic archive, really.
There is no better archive, not that I'm aware of, at least.
It's got even interviews that he was a part of, which are extremely rare to come across.
It's not just speeches.
Excuse me.
Still kind of catching up from Monday.
I do apologize for not having a show on Monday, folks.
I was quite a bit under the weather.
Yeah, that's a good point.
He says, one difference between now and then is that people today have been indoctrinated and conditioned to make them uncomfortable addressing these topics.
That's true.
You know, that's one thing that was not present in the Weimar Republic.
You know, when people would start to talk about Jewish power and Jewish overrepresentation in the media or things like that, there were like common anti-Semitic newspapers.
You could just go and pick one up and kind of read it yourself.
So it wasn't like it was this taboo thing that no one talked about or looked at.
So.
All right, let's let's get into it here.
So again, this is April 12th.
This is a very early speech, 1922.
We have to kind of put that into perspective.
He didn't come to power until 1933.
So this is 11 years before he came to power.
So a couple things to understand about that that makes this far more important.
Number one, that would mean he's in the muck of things, right?
He's in the circumstance of society that we're in today, in this time period.
He's sitting exactly where we are, watching things decay around him.
Things are becoming corrupted.
And now he's thinking, okay, what's going on here, right?
And he starts talking about it.
And now...
What's really important to understand is if you read a speech that's this old, let's say you believe this mumbo jumbo lie that Hitler was this madman who created all of these misdirections and was manipulating people in his speeches and all of this.
Look, the guy would be like, what, 30 at this point or younger, right?
He's not...
There's no way he was some kind of mastermind creating some kind of crazy propaganda.
Let me look up what year he was born.
Just to give you guys a perspective here.
I think it was 89.
Could be wrong.
Yeah, 89.
So, he would be...
32, 33 at this point.
So, this is important to understand because we're talking about a person who's, you know, spent most of their life looking at social issues, right?
No, it was 89, 89, just look it up.
Alright, so let's get into the speech here.
It's going to start a little bit slow, and then it'll start to kick in and get very relatable after like two or three paragraphs in.
So it'll be a little slower in the beginning, but it is important that you just hear the beginning part to kind of understand it.
So he states, after the war, production had begun again.
And it was, he's talking about World War I, by the way.
It was thought that the better times were coming.
Frederick the Great, after the Seven Years' War, as a result of superhuman efforts, left Prussia without a penny of debt.
At the end of the World War, Germany was burdened with her own debt of some seven or eight milliards of marks, and beyond that, was faced with the debt of the rest of the world, the so-called reparations.
So you talk about the Treaty of Versailles was a very powerful and damning document for the German people.
You have to think about that.
For those who are not familiar with the Treaty of Versailles, the Treaty of Versailles basically stated that Germany was the culprit for the creation of World War I, and they were then forced to pay billions and billions of dollars to this So,
you have a situation now.
Country loses a war, goes into this debt.
It's told you have to pay all this money here, here, here, here to all these different countries.
And now, what he's saying is, if Germany is building up their economy and their society...
Every time they kind of get some reserves or kind of get some backups for spending so that they can help the infrastructure and the architecture and things around their society, they're shoveling this money straight out of the country as a form of reparations.
so they can never really look after themselves at this point.
The German people, after 25 or 30 years, in consequence of the fact that it will never be able to pay all that is demanded of it, will have so gigantic a sum still owing that practically it will be forced to pay, to produce more than it does today.
What will the end be?
And the answer to that question is pledging of our land, enslavement of our labor strength, Therefore, in the economic sphere, November of 1918 was in truth no achievement, but it was the beginning of our collapse.
And in the political sphere, we lost first our military prerogatives, and with that loss went the real sovereignty of our state, and then our financial independence.
For there remained always the reparations commission, so that practically the We have no longer a politically independent German Reich.
We are already a colony of the outside world.
So, in a way, this is a lot like...
Think about the Founding Fathers in America when they first came to the New World.
I mean, they were British citizens, right?
They were English citizens.
And the Crown was forcing them to pay taxes and levying all of these weird restrictions on the Founding Fathers.
So they came to a point where...
They said, look, we're not actually even fending for ourselves anymore.
We're beholden to a higher entity, and we don't want to be beholden to that anymore.
So therefore, they created a revolution.
They declared themselves independent of that entity.
That's how we got this country today.
So it's a very similar circumstance, right?
They're in a spot where they're not beholden to themselves.
They don't have sovereignty over themselves.
They're beholden to these foreign groups and foreign entities.
And now they're saying, okay, we need to stop this.
How do we stop this?
Right?
So...
Again, Weimar conditions.
And again, we talked about this a couple shows ago when we were talking about how our society has turned from one of capitalistic, community-driven nature into what we would look at as a corporate oligarchy that is really just draining the country out of its wealth.
And everybody's beholden to foreign entities.
So...
For example, if you have Jews flooding your country and taking reins of power, especially in the financial sector, and again in their Talmud, it states that usury is an acceptable practice, which is pretty much immoral in the Western world, or is seen as such, or was at least at one time.
It's kind of breaking down like everything else in the moral fabric.
However, if they take power and they have all of this means to do these usurious practices, let's say, for instance, you get a home loan and I want to get a $300,000 house.
I put down a 20% down payment and I take out a loan for the rest.
With this loan on the rest, I'd pay $60,000, so I'd owe $240,000.
With the $240,000 that I owe, I have to pay interest on that.
If I pay the minimum every single month, the interest rate is going to be higher.
If I pay the maximum, it's going to be lower.
This is common sense.
What happens is, when I'm working, Doing my job, taking my time, making my money, making my daily bread.
Now, all of my money that I'm paying to upkeep this house or own this house eventually, I'm now giving this group of people that would be considered a foreigner all of my labor.
So I'm beholden to a different entity.
And this is why a usury in general is a really bad practice.
It's why things like the Federal Reserve are extremely bad because it's not federal and they don't have reserves.
It's literally a sham.
It's an open sham.
They have nothing to do with our government.
They're a private entity.
So that's the situation we're in right now.
Most American citizens are not beholden to their own devices.
I'm not describing capitalism.
I disagree with that.
Capitalism...
It certainly can be an aspect of capitalism.
But you can have a capitalistic society that does not have usury present in it.
I don't think capitalism itself is the problem.
I do think that capitalism has problems to it.
However, I don't think it's the primary problem.
Capitalism functioned very well in the early 1900s, late 1800s, before we had all of this...
Overt Jewish control in our country.
We'll agree to disagree on that.
Alright, let's continue.
Where were we?
Okay, here we go.
We've contributed to this because so far as possible, we humiliated ourselves morally.
We positively destroyed our honor and helped to befoul, besmirch, and deny everything which we previously held as sacred.
I think that's pretty congruent.
If it be objected that the revolution has won for us gains in social life, they must be extraordinarily secret, these social gains.
So secret that one never sees them in practical life.
They must just run like a fluid through our German atmosphere.
Some may say, well, there is the eight-hour day.
And was a collapse necessary to gain that?
Will the eight-hour day be rendered any more secure through our becoming practically the bailiff and the drudge of the other peoples?
One of these days, France will say, you cannot meet your obligations.
You must work more.
So this achievement of the revolution is put in question, first of all, by the revolution itself.
So think about this.
Again, very interesting parallels in our society today.
So talking about this...
Revolution.
He's talking about the November Revolution, which was a communistic one.
They say, the country's getting so much better.
We're in a really good state now.
Everything is fantastic.
Look at all the social change.
We have the same thing today, by the way.
Our governments, especially, we look at the left wing doing it, but the right wing is no different.
They champion this lady MAGA and all this shit.
When you look at When you look at America today, the progressives, even the term itself is very subversive.
We're making social progress.
That's kind of how they framework this.
But there is no progress.
What is progress?
Fags dancing in the street in front of your children, butt naked?
Is that social progress?
Yeah.
So to these people, it's social progress.
But to anybody with a brain, with logic and some kind of moral compass, that's not social progress, not in the slightest sense of the word.
So they're experiencing this exact same thing in the Weimar Republic.
They're saying, oh, you know, it's progress.
Well, what's coincidental as well is it's called the Weimar Republic, right, which means it's supposed to be a Republican form of government, and it was a democracy as well.
So it's kind of the same thing we have here.
We're supposed to be a constitutional republic, but you've got your Republicans on TV saying democracy, democracy, democracy, right?
So it's a sham.
The system sucks.
Further, Then someone has said, Since the revolution, the people has gained rights.
The people governs.
Strange.
The people has now been ruling three years, and no one has in practice once asked its opinion.
Treaties were signed, which will hold us down for centuries.
And who has signed the treaties?
The people?
No.
Governments, which one fine day presented themselves as governments.
And at their election, the people had nothing to do save consider the question.
They are there already, whether I elect them or not.
If we elect them, then they are there through our election.
But since we are a self-governing people, we must elect the folk in order that they may be elected to govern us.
So again, same circumstance we're in.
A lot of people are beginning to realize this left and right thing is a sham.
It's just a game.
It's not functional.
and it won't be ever.
I agree with that, August.
I highly agree with that.
It's a very good statement.
So let's continue.
Then it was said, freedom has come to us through the revolution.
Another of those things that one cannot see very easily.
It is of course true that one can walk down the street.
The individual can go into his workshop and he can go out again.
Here and there, he can go to a meeting.
In a word, the individual has liberties.
But in general, if he is wise, he will keep his mouth shut.
For if in former times, extraordinary care was taken, that no one should let slip anything which could be treated as Les Majestés?
I'm not exactly sure.
I'm so bad with French.
Now a man must take much greater care that he doesn't say anything which might represent an insult to the majesty of a member of parliament.
So, again, here we are in this exact same circumstance.
And I made a video on this on Twitter, actually, which was inspired directly by that paragraph.
Where I talked about the difference between freedom and liberty, right?
So our founding fathers, when they talked about this concept of freedom, they used freedom and liberty not as interchangeable words, but they were very different.
Liberty simply means you have legal freedoms, right?
Political freedoms to go out, do things that you want to do.
I wouldn't even say political freedoms, right?
Just physical freedoms, right?
Like rights that allow you to do something.
Freedom as a concept is far more of a spiritual concept.
Freedom means...
Freedom to express yourself.
I'll give you a great example.
A lot of people don't want to talk about specifically this speech.
A lot of people would go like this and irk back and flinch when they see somebody reading this speech, which, by the way, has nothing crazy or hateful in it at all.
It's very factual, very logically driven and laid out extremely well.
But people cringe at this, right?
And why do they do that?
Because they're not free.
Their thoughts are not free.
They have this emotional, psychological pressure on them, this social pressure that's telling them, this is foreign.
Don't talk about this.
This is bad.
This is evil.
Oh God, that's hateful.
So their brain is telling them, don't do this.
It's a subconscious problem.
So they're not truly free.
They self-censor themselves.
They're scared to say things like faggot.
They think, oh, that's rude.
That's mean.
That's hateful.
Well, 20 years ago, people were saying faggot on the television.
They were saying it everywhere.
Everywhere people were saying it.
Why has that stopped?
Did it stop because the world has more faggots now?
Or did it stop because there's a social pressure that's being insinuated on the populace in order to accept this behavior?
That's what it is.
It's a social pressure.
So, That's the concept of freedom here.
When you're beholden to those social pressures and you're fearful to say things that you believe are true or correct, because of that backlash, this is a self-censorship, which is the essence of being not free.
You're a slave to social pressures, right?
You can be a slave to drugs.
You can be a slave to vice of any kind, but you can also be a slave to social pressures, which is what a lot of people are.
Again, that was talked about very well by Ted Kaczynski in his book, Industrial Society and Its Future.
He talks about this over-socialization process that people go about in society.
And when they become over-socialized, they get to a point where they say, I can't handle that.
That's hateful.
That's bad.
That's not good.
And they won't even look at these things, right?
Okay.
And we ask who was responsible for our misfortune.
Then we must inquire who profited by our collapse.
It's really important.
Extremely important.
Today, as America is crumbling and most common white peoples are being displaced, we are losing our overall income.
Our family unit is being destroyed.
What group of people lives here today in the United States that is doing far better as we do far worse?
It's not the blacks.
I don't think they're doing very much better.
They're still hanging around the ghetto in the hood.
It's not the Asians.
I don't see Asians running amok in the government.
I don't see them in the White House everywhere.
I don't think it's the Muslims.
So who is it?
Who is benefiting from our collapse, the things that are collapsing around us, this decay that's in our society, right?
We have OnlyFans, Pornhub.
Who owns these things?
Who's benefiting off of this degeneration of our culture?
Who benefits from that?
I think it's a rhetorical question.
Let's continue.
And the answer to that question is that banks and stock exchanges are more flourishing than ever before.
We were told that capitalism would be destroyed.
And when we ventured to remind one or other of these famous statesmen and said, don't forget that Jews, too, have capital, then the answer was, what are you worrying about?
Capitalism as a whole will now be destroyed.
The whole people will now be free.
We are not fighting Jewish or Christian capitalism.
We're fighting very capitalism.
We are making the people completely free.
This is very congruent to today.
A lot of these left-wing agitators will use terminologies such as we have to destroy whiteness and capitalism.
They want to take down people like Elon Musk for being a Really annoying.
For being a white guy who has all of this capital, right?
They look at it as immoral and evil, but you very rarely see these people actually point to any Jews that have an overwhelming, well overrepresented amount of capital in society in comparison to their population.
There's plenty of not wealthy Jews as well, that are just regular Orthodox Jews living in their Orthodox community, which makes it even worse, right?
We talk about When you talk about black crime, you talk about 13% of the population doing 50% of the crime, right?
But then you say, well, it's not really 13% because it's mostly men, so it's more like 7%.
Well, it's kind of the same thing here with Jews, right?
They're 2% of the population, but not all of them are rich.
So it's really like, what, 0.4% of the population that has this much power?
That's insane.
It's absurd.
It's crazy to think.
Christian capitalism is already as good as destroyed.
The international Jewish stock exchange capital gains in proportion as the other loses ground.
Think about Bernie Madoff, right?
Madoff with all the Christian's money.
If you guys are familiar with Bernie Madoff, he was this big pyramid scheme guy, big Wall Street guy who's Jew.
Stole like something like $60 billion or $16 billion.
It was a crazy amount of money, right?
Everybody else suffers, he gains, right?
Same kind of situation here.
It is only the international stock exchange and loan capital, the so-called supra-state capital, which has profited from the collapse of our economic life, the capital which receives its character from the single supra-state nation, which the capital which receives its character from the single supra-state nation, which is itself national to the core, which fancies itself to be above all
Which places itself above other nations and which already rules over them.
Sound accurate?
The international stock exchange capital would be unthinkable if it would never have come without its founders.
The supranational, because intensely, national capital.
Now, when they say supra, that means, like, international, right?
Like, they have their nation over everything, okay?
So this is where you get this term, the international Jew, right?
From Henry Ford, he wrote that book.
What that means is simply that they are national themselves.
They hold this national entity, this national love for themselves, no matter where they go.
And they're willing to allow all others to suffer at the behest of that.
A great example would be Jonathan Pollard.
He was a dual citizen, dual Israeli citizen who stole, stole U.S. secrets, governmental secrets, documents.
I believe he shared them with China, probably Israel as well.
And Donald Trump pardoned him.
I don't I don't know.
He wasn't in very long and he was pardoned by Donald Trump.
And then he flew back to Israel and he lives lives there scot free.
Which, by the way, is exactly what Hitler describes in Mein Kampf.
He says, the Jews don't want a national state for themselves because they care about the land of Palestine.
What they really want is a place for their international world swindle, so that when they're caught in all these other nations doing immoral and corrupt things, they can now flee somewhere, right?
And avoid, they'll have state sovereignty so they can avoid any kind of backlash.
That's Jonathan Pollard in a nutshell.
That's exactly what he did.
He came here.
He doesn't care about our country or America or anything like that.
He claims he does.
He claims he's an American citizen.
He comes here.
He steals U.S. secrets.
And then he goes and he literally gets pardoned by Zion Don.
And he goes and moves back over to Israel.
And they praise him.
They give him awards and stuff.
It's insane.
Base Wozniak, not the time for that question.
I'm in a pretty important monologue here, but another time.
Ask that another time.
Alright, where are we at?
Here we go.
The Jew has not grown poorer.
He gradually gets bloated.
And if you don't believe me, I would ask you to go to one of our health resorts.
There you will find two sorts of visitors.
The German who goes there, perhaps for the first time for a long while, to breathe a little fresh air and to recover his health.
And the Jew who goes there to lose his fat.
And if you go out to our mountains, whom do you find there in fine brand new yellow boots and splendid rooksocks, in which there is generally nothing that would really be of any use?
And why are they there?
They go up to the hotel, usually no further than the train can take them.
Where the train stops, they stop too.
And they sit about somewhere within a mile from the hotel like blowflies around a corpse.
These are not, you may be sure, are working classes.
Neither those working with the mind, nor with the body.
Now this is extremely important.
What he's describing here is...
We're talking about Jews like Bernie Madoff, Jonathan Pollard.
They're not manual laborers.
They don't do what constitutes work.
What constitutes work?
Well, in Hitler's definition, what constitutes work is that which benefits the nation, that which benefits the people.
Well, a guy like Rydvinsky, the Jew who owns OnlyFans and profits off of all these women selling themselves naked online, Is that work?
Is that a concept of work?
Is he a workman?
No, that's not work.
Bernie Madoff, when he just speculates money on the stock exchange and steals billions of dollars from the populace, is that work?
Does that benefit the community?
No, it doesn't.
How about the rabbi who owns Pornhub?
Does that work?
Is he working?
It's not work.
Right?
So that's kind of what he's getting at here, and his definition of work is that which benefits the community.
So if what you're doing is not benefiting the community, it's not work.
It doesn't conceptualize true work.
With their worn clothes, they leave the hotel on one side and go climbing.
They would not feel comfortable coming into this perfumed atmosphere in suits which date from 1913 or 1914.
No, assuredly, the Jew has suffered no privations.
While now, in Soviet Russia, and this is a really important piece, right?
We had a discussion, one of our first shows on the Stu Peters Network, on Logos Academy here, we discussed communism and the Jewish connections to communism.
So listen to what he has to say here.
While now, in Soviet Russia, the millions are ruined and dying.
Chichurin, and with him, a staff of over 200 Soviet Jews, travels by express train through Europe, visits the cabarets, watches naked dancers perform for their pleasure, lives in the finest hotels, and does himself better than the millions whom once you thought you must fight as bourgeoisie.
So again, This is extremely important.
We're talking about communist revolution.
What was the thing here?
It was class warfare.
They got the peasantry and the lower level people to feel we're oppressed, we're in a bad situation.
Down with the bourgeoisie.
Down with the bourgeoisie.
So guess what?
They brought down the bourgeoisie and look what happened.
He's going to describe it here.
It's very important.
The 400 Soviet commissars of Jewish nationality, they do not suffer.
The thousands upon thousands of sub-commissars, they do not suffer.
No.
All the treasures which the proletarian in his madness took from the bourgeoisie in order to fight so-called capitalism They have all gone into their hands.
So it's a dupe.
It's a trick, right?
They came in.
The Jews came in.
They brought Marxism.
They brought this idea of Bolshevism to the people.
And they said, look, let's tear these people down, right?
Down with this corrupt capitalistic system and the rich people.
They did the exact same thing with Black Lives Matter, right?
Which was co-founded by Alicia Garzia.
She's a half Jew, half black, right?
And what happened?
They took all this money, all this funding money to help the community, to help the innocent poor black people.
And look what happened.
A couple of them at the top, they own mansions now.
They spend like $4 million on mansions.
They're buying supercars, right?
Who benefited?
Nobody.
The country was wrecked.
It was burned.
I mean, no one benefited from this situation, except for that small little few.
Most of which are, again, Jewish, unfortunately.
Mattering Ram, what's up, brother?
Welcome.
Nice to see you.
Let's continue.
Once the worker appropriated the purse of the landed proprietor who gave him work, he took the rings, the diamonds, and rejoiced that he had now got the treasures before only the bourgeoisie possessed.
But in his hands, they are dead things.
They are veritable death gold.
They are no prophet to him.
He is banished into wilderness, and one cannot feed oneself on diamonds.
For a morsel of bread, he gives millions in objects of value.
But the bread is in the hands of the state central organization, and this is in the hands of the Jews.
So everything, everything that the common man thought that he was winning for himself flows back again to his seducers.
Again, they would like you to think we have to take down this evil white Christian capitalist regime.
Then you take it down and guess what?
All that money that you think you're going to get for yourself, then somehow things are going to get better.
It goes right back into the hands of Jewish finance.
Let's continue.
And now, my dear fellow countrymen, do you believe that these men who with us are going the same way will end the revolution?
They do not wish to end the revolution, for they do not need it.
For them, the revolution is milk and honey.
Now, this is so important, okay?
We talk about guys, shitheads like Charlie Kirk, and I will always say that of him.
He is a coward.
He is spineless.
He is a sellout.
He's a terrible human being, okay?
People like him, the reason they gatekeep and they don't allow this revolution, a real revolution to happen, they're talking about how awful this communism is and Marxism and all the trannies are so bad.
It's a distraction.
Because here's the thing.
If we were actually to overthrow this system and fix what's happening in our society today, guys like Charlie Kirk, they wouldn't have their pedestal up on their talk show, right?
Where you can end every Friday and say, Shabbat Shalom, folks.
Goodbye.
Goodbye, everybody.
Don't forget to buy my dog powder.
He's a coward.
He's a piece of shit.
And he doesn't actually care about fixing the system.
If he did, he would talk about these real things.
Anytime someone talks about these real things, watch him.
He backtracks.
Great example, when he was doing one of his Turning Point USA events, and he would take questions from the crowd.
Somebody came up and he said, Charlie Kirk, what do you think about Israel attacking the USS Liberty?
Charlie Kirk shuts him down, interrupts him mid-sentence, and says, I will not have conspiracy theories talked about in my place.
Why is he doing that?
Why is he?
That's not a conspiracy theory.
He's the guy that hates people calling someone conspiracy theorists, right?
I thought that was awful when they called all the anti-vaxxers conspiracy theorists.
I thought he hates that term.
So why is he calling this guy a conspiracy theorist for pointing to the fact that Israel, our supposed greatest ally, is attacking American soldiers in order to get us into a conflict on their behalf?
Well, the reason he shuts that down, think about it.
The only reason.
The reason Charlie Kirk has to shut that down is because of where his finance comes from, where his power comes from.
Again, we're underneath a system that is controlled by Jewish finance.
It's controlled by Jewish capital.
So if you want to be rich in this system, if you want to be really wealthy, you have to kiss Jewish ass.
That's the way this functions.
And he does this frequently.
That's why he ends his Friday shows with, Shabbat Shalom, everyone!
Because he needs to stay on that good side.
And he's spreading the evangelical gospel, which teaches us that Israel and Jews are God's chosen people, which is just insanity.
So it's really important that you understand why he's doing that, why he's shutting that guy down.
It's not because he really doesn't think that that happened.
And he really thinks it's a conspiracy theory.
It's because he knows if that gets discussed and it looks anything like he's promoting a message like that or even hearing it out, he's going to lose his funding.
He's going to get the call.
They're going to say, oh, oy vey, I saw you allowed that at the conference today.
I'm not too big on that one, Charlie.
Well, we're going to have to cut one of your shows here, right?
So he has to do this.
He's a coward.
He's beholden to foreign interests, not our people.
Continuing.
And further, they cannot end the revolution.
For if one or another amongst the leaders were really not seducer, but seduced, and today driven by the inner voice of horror at his crimes, were to step before the masses and make his declaration.
We have all deceived ourselves.
We believe that we could lead you out of misery, but we have in fact led you into a misery, which your children and your children's children must still bear.
He cannot say that.
He dare not say that.
He would, on the public square or in the public meeting, be torn to pieces.
Right?
So, they never will admit...
On their own volition that they are in the wrong, right?
A guy like Charlie Kirk, he won't say, oh yeah, you know, the Republican Party is just as bad, right?
No, no, it's just the left.
It's the left.
No, the whole system is rotten.
It's the system.
It's the two-sided, two wings of the same bird, right?
We hear this all the time.
The system is decayed and corrupted.
It has nothing to do with the left or the right.
This is how they keep the game going.
It's the circus act, right?
Charlie Kirk's walking on the tightrope in front of everybody.
And the longer he walks on that tightrope, the longer we keep paying attention to that, the worst things are going to continue to get in real time right in front of us without any real change.
My phone is blowing up.
Let's continue.
But among the masses, there begins to flow a new stream, a stream of opposition.
It is the recognition of the facts which is already in pursuit of this system.
Sound familiar?
Sound familiar?
It already is hunting the system down.
It will one day scourge the masses into action and carry the masses along with it.
And these leaders, they see that behind them, the anti-Semitic wave grows and grows.
And when the masses once recognize the facts, that is the end of these leaders.
If you guys think about that quote for a second, it's a fantastic quote.
Because it's exactly true.
As the facts come out, People start to see these things.
They're going to lose hope in guys like Donald Trump, who's on a shackle in Israel.
They're going to lose hope in guys like Charlie Kirk, who ends the shows with Shabbat Shalom.
They're going to lose hope in guys like Matt Walsh, who smear the National Socialists by equating Magnus Hirschfeld, the Jewish pedophile, with them, saying that he was a trainee promoter, whatever the hell he was, that he was congruent with them.
Right?
They fear this.
They fear this.
Every single one of these conservative commentators notice it.
They'll defend Jews above anything at all costs.
They have to keep this system going.
That's why anti-Semitism is the worst crime ever in their eyes.
Because just like he just said, that's the end of these leaders.
That's why you have Donald Trump on the stage saying we're going to make anti-Semitism death penalty.
And you got guys talking about how anti-Semitism is the worst thing ever.
And it's not an American value.
It's a dupe.
It's a swindle.
Now, here's where it gets really important.
This is where it gets very deep to analyze.
And thus the left, so he's talking about the parties of the right and left, okay?
The left is forced more and more to turn to Bolshevism.
In Bolshevism, they see today the soul, the last possibility of preserving the present state of affairs.
They realize quite accurately that the people is beaten so long as brain and hand can be kept apart.
For alone, neither brain nor hand can really oppose them.
So long, therefore, as the socialist idea is coined only by men who see in it a means for disintegrating a nation.
So long can they rest in peace.
So this is why you've got people like Bernie Sanders running with this socialistic platform.
Because...
This corrupt system, people are getting tired of it.
They're getting exhausted by it.
The Jew has studied revolutionary tactics for thousands of years.
They pretty much are the inventor of it, to be entirely honest.
So when they see this public sentiment rising, that people are getting upset with the way things are in society, they know people are going to be driven to action eventually.
So their goal is to corral you into their form of action, which is socialism, right?
We have to all be communists.
We have to take down the bourgeoisie, right?
We have to take down whiteness, take down capitalism, right?
It's communistic socialism.
It's fundamentally different from national socialism.
We're going to get into that concept and that understanding in a minute here, because people have to understand this.
These two are not the same.
The term socialism, just like every other term that Jews adopt, they corrupt it.
They corrupt the term dictatorship.
We discussed this on the other show two weeks ago, or a week and a half ago, right?
Dictatorship.
Literally, go look at the definition.
If you have an old dictionary anywhere near you, a dictionary that is 1920 or earlier, read the definition of the word dictator.
It just means a sole ruler.
That's not a negative thing.
It's not a positive thing.
Then go on Google and look up the definition of the word dictator.
And literally the word tyrant is in the definition, which means an oppressor, one who takes advantage of the people.
Well, that's not what the word means.
Why are they trying to make it mean that?
Because they want you to think dictatorship is evil.
Because in a dictatorship, you can't run this game of corruption because a dictator will say, no more.
That's done.
We're not allowing that any longer.
That's how a dictatorship functions.
You can't do that in a democracy.
No one's going to step in and say, no more faggots dancing in the street naked in front of children.
Who's going to do that?
You can say it.
But now you've got to vote it into reality, right?
Which means you're voting against the swamps of immigrants, retards, trannies, homos, liberals.
You're voting against all that.
Good luck.
Good luck getting it out of existence, right?
It's a game.
It's a game.
The longer you play the game, the more of a fool you are.
Let's continue forward.
But it will be a sorry day for them when this socialist idea is grasped by a movement which unites it with the highest national pride, with nationalist defiance, and thus places the nation's brain, its intellectual workers, on this ground.
Then this system will break up, and there would remain only one single means of salvation for its supporters.
To bring the catastrophe upon us before their own ruin.
I.e.
false flags, right?
Kind of what the circumstance is.
Drive the nation to ruin.
To bring it to the scaffold.
To introduce Bolshevism.
So the left neither can nor will help.
On the contrary, their first lie compels them constantly to resort to new lies.
There remains then the right.
And this party of the right...
It meant well, but it cannot do what it would because up to the present time, it has failed to recognize a whole series of elementary principles.
I think this is pretty accurate so far.
The left wing, they won't help because they don't want to help.
They have to continue to get more and more radical to keep this game continuing itself.
Now, on the right side, They do kind of mean well in some ways, right?
I truly believe maybe a guy like Charlie Kirk wants to see American citizens happy, right?
He probably does want to see Americans with big families or whatever.
But the problem is, with a guy like Charlie Kirk, is he wants to see himself happy way more.
There's a self-interest that's present in people like him.
All right, and this is where we have to look at A guy like Stu Peters, for example.
Stu Peters has a very large platform, one of which he has been kind enough to invite me onto.
Knowing what my content is, knowing I'm talking about things like this, if that guy was self-interested, he wouldn't have me on, and I wouldn't be here discussing this.
He's not self-interested.
He's interested in the truth.
He's interested in people starting to understand these things.
I truly believe he's still learning a lot himself, as am I. We all are.
We're learning every day.
So give people a little bit of slack sometimes.
We have to look at where that slack is deserved, though.
A guy like Charlie Kirk deserves no slack when he shuts somebody down.
And he says, the USS Liberty is a conspiracy theory.
Shut your mouth.
That's pretty important.
Scroll a little more here.
So again, talking about the right wing, he says they failed to recognize some elementary principles.
Let's go into those principles.
In the first place, the right still fails to recognize the danger.
Again, what's the danger?
We talk about it all the time here.
The danger is Jewish power, Jewish over-representation, Jewish supremacy, if you want to call it as such.
That's the danger.
Does Charlie Kirk ever talk about that?
Does he ever speak on it?
Does Matt Walsh ever talk about it?
No.
In fact, they're actually employed by these people in most cases.
These gentlemen still persist in believing that it is a question of being elected to a Lontag or a post of ministers or secretaries.
Now, what does he mean by that?
What he means is a guy like Trump, for example.
Let's just say Trump was 100% our guy.
He's really our dude.
He gets to power, and he says, I'm going to fix the wall.
I'm going to put a wall up.
Then you watch, he sits in, I'm sure everybody's seen the video where he's sitting with Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, and they're arguing, oh, we're not going to vote that in, no, no, right?
Chuck Schumer's a Jew, Nancy Pelosi is a self-proclaimed Shabbos Goy, right?
So they say, no, no, we're not voting that in, we're not voting that in.
That's the thing with this majority rule thing.
They can pay people to vote one way, and if they can pay enough of those spineless cowards off, nothing can ever actually get done, because the mass majority is always going to be holding things hostage.
It's a corrupt system.
A real leader would be able to go in and say, okay, walls up.
No more of this mass immigration.
This is ridiculous.
This is a national threat.
This is a serious threat.
And we're playing like argumentative high school games in the White House to decide if we can get this voted in or not.
What the hell is that?
I mean, seriously, what are we dealing with here?
This is absurd.
So he says exactly this.
They think that the decision of a people's destiny would mean at worst nothing more than some damage to their so-called bourgeoisie economic existence.
They have never grasped the fact that this decision threatens their heads.
They have never yet understood that it is not necessary to be an enemy of the Jew for him to drag you one day on the Russian model to the scaffold.
They do not see that it is quite enough to have a head on your shoulders.
And not to be a Jew, that will secure the scaffold for you.
So you don't even have to be anti-Semitic for them to not like you.
If they recognize you as an intellectual threat, it's the same situation.
It's no different.
In consequence, their whole action today is so petty, so limited, so hesitating, and pulsilanimous that they would like to But they can never decide on any great deed because they fail to realize the greatness of the whole period.
So again, they see the tranny thing.
They're pointing to the symptoms.
They fail to look at the bigger picture.
To take a couple steps back, they're working from within the frame.
They're in the frame.
They live inside the frame.
They function in that frame.
And because of that...
They can only look from inside of it.
They can't look from the outside.
So those of us who understand the system is failing and it's corrupt, we can step outside of that frame.
We can look at the whole frame and say it's rotten to the core.
The wood is rotting around that frame.
And the frame has to be replaced entirely.
Excuse me, I took a little drink break here.
We're not going to do a halfway mark break today.
Okay.
Consider it a makeup for not doing a show on Monday.
I do apologize.
I was very under the weather on Monday.
So we are at the halfway point.
We're actually at the halfway point of the speech, too, which kind of works so perfectly.
So we're going to continue.
We're going to finish this speech.
It's a long one, so...
What do we think so far, folks?
Are you getting some insights from this?
Scale of 1 to 10, how insightful has this speech been so far, about halfway through?
1 to 10, how insightful or relevant is it for you today, reading this?
And in the meantime, while we're waiting for people to give their feedback, don't forget, folks, if you're not following me on all my platforms, please make sure to do that now while we're taking this little brief intermission.
You can follow me over on Odyssey.
That's where the majority of my videos are archived at.
It's odyssee.com, so O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
You can find me on there at Logos Revealed.
And you can also find me on Rumble.
It's logos revealed I on Rumble.
There's an I at the end.
Same with Twitter.
It's logos revealed I and we have an I at the end of that.
I need to get myself like a link tree thing created because I don't have one of those.
And I think that would be really beneficial.
Okay, good.
A lot of people seem to be taking it well, enjoying it.
- Yeah, great.
All right, let's continue.
Let's continue.
And then there is another fundamental error.
They have never got it clear in their own minds that there is a difference on how...
Great a difference there is between the conception national and the word dynastic or monarchist.
This is a little less relevant for us today, but it still holds.
They do not understand that today it is more than ever necessary in our thoughts as nationalists to avoid anything which might perhaps cause the individual to think that the national idea was identical with petty everyday political views.
So, This is extremely important, this line, okay?
What he's saying is, being nationalist doesn't have anything to do with fighting about trannies, or fighting about pedophiles, or fighting about abortion, or fighting about, well, the border maybe a little bit just because of the nature of that conflict.
But being nationalist means to fight for the benefit of the people always.
It's not about like, oh, you think the vaccine's good?
You think it's bad?
That's right.
Being nationalistic is above all of these things.
You're taking a different scope, right?
Not allowing this divide between left and right.
So if you have someone that's left-wing and they don't think like you do and they're a little more...
Let's just say they're just retarded liberal, right?
You don't have to hate them for that.
You shouldn't be throwing them down for that.
Instead, wake them up to a higher sense of community, right?
A collective sense.
Okay.
They ought day to day to din into the ears of the masses.
We want to bury all the petty differences and to bring out into the light the big things, the things we have in common, which bind us together.
That should weld and fuse together those who have still a German heart and a love for their people in the fight against the common hereditary foe of all Aryans.
How afterward we divide up this state, friends, we have no wish to dispute over that.
The form of a state results from the essential character of a people.
Results from necessities which are so elementary and powerful that in time every individual will realize them without any disputation.
When once all Germany is united and free, we can learn something from this.
Truthfully, we've got a lot of movements right now.
White nationalist crew.
We've got the National Socialist crew.
We've got Groypers.
We've got just kind of regular truthers, libertarians, right?
All these different movements, all these different groups are starting to wake up and figure this out.
Well, listen to what he's saying here.
We have to cut those petty differences.
Recognize that bigger picture.
Don't worry about the religious dogma, right?
Debating theology with each other, debating...
You could debate strategy, right?
As long as we're not throwing ad hominems at each other and insulting each other, but be mad about it, right?
If I think you're wrong...
Let me lay out a couple factual reasons as to why I think that.
And if you think I'm wrong, do the same.
Don't say, hey, Logos, you're a scrawny faggot.
You're wrong.
That doesn't help anybody.
Who does that benefit?
This is low level.
So when you're having these discussions, and this is something everybody can learn from, I've seen so many people with this problem, it's present almost everywhere in our collective people right now, is this problem of not being able to debate something with somebody on genuine grounds.
It comes from an emotional agitation factor, rather than like, hey, let's really look at this for what's good and bad out of it.
You see people debating about religious dogma a lot.
You get people that are, oh, I'm pagan, oh, I'm Christian, oh, I'm Catholic.
You have to be Catholic.
You have to be Protestant, right?
And they start arguing with each other and they shit-fling with each other and they say, oh, well, you're a Protestant and you people have done this and that and that's how evangelism started.
Oh, and you're a pagan, so you're a barbaric.
Look, You can debate things with people, but don't throw the insults at each other because it doesn't help anybody.
I see it a lot.
Someone will disagree with something I say.
And you only actually lend credence to what I'm saying, by the way.
When I'm reading a Hitler speech and you come in, you're like, oh, you're a hateful asshole.
Hitler was an evil Nazi and you're a faggot.
It's like, okay, you're not really helping anybody to believe what you're saying at all, actually.
It's...
It's not beneficial to anyone.
It doesn't help anyone.
So if you really care, if you're genuine, if you really want to come to a conclusion on things about what's right and what's wrong, refrain from the insults as best you can.
I know it's not easy sometimes.
Control those emotions.
It's what men do.
Moving on.
And finally, they all fail to understand that we must, on principle, free ourselves from any class standpoint.
Okay, now this is important, right?
So when we talk about this two forms of socialism, we've got communistic socialism and we've got national socialism, right?
Communistic socialism wants to remove the classes and have one kind of base blanket.
Everybody's the same.
Everybody gets the same.
That's equity.
National socialism says, hey, we want to get rid of the classes, but not because we want to pull everybody down to that lowest common denominator, right?
But because instead, our interest is to make sure that these people don't have conflicts with each other.
We want everybody to be on the same page with each other.
So it's the same concept, but you have to look at the motive behind each one.
The motive behind national socialism is for the benefit of the people.
The motive behind communism is for the benefit of that group that controls the people.
So you have to look at these motives.
You have to look at how they were done in real time.
I mean, look, when Hitler came to power, we didn't see gulags opening up with German citizens being thrown in the gulag for saying things that the government didn't like.
Actually, they were really lenient on political persecutions, on some serious problems inside of their movement.
Actually, it was probably pretty detrimental to them that they were so lenient.
So on the other side of things, you go to Soviet Russia, which was just basically Jewish Russia, right?
And you look at what...
They create this gulag system.
They just start throwing people in left and right without question.
Well, I mean, you know, the results are obvious.
One cares about the people and one doesn't.
Let's continue.
It is, of course, very easy to call out those on the left, in quotes.
You must not be proletarians.
Leave your class madness.
While you yourselves continue to call yourself bourgeoisie.
They should learn that in a single state, there is only one supreme citizen.
Right.
One supreme citizen.
Honor.
And that is the right and the honor of honest work.
They should further learn that the social idea must be the essential foundation for any state.
Otherwise, no state can permanently endure.
So again, going back to that concept of what does work mean?
What does work constitute?
Again, it's not running an OnlyFans or being the CEO of OnlyFans.
It's not work.
The guy's sitting on his ass profiting off of all of the community, all of our people being destroyed by that.
No one benefits from it.
Yeah, sure, in the short run, you might get some sensational pleasure from being a degenerate who's purchasing all of these women's OnlyFans and staying on that.
But in the long run, you're at harm.
Now you're not creating a family.
Now you're not focusing on...
You're also losing a good care for women.
You're losing what that real sense of loving the beauty of a woman is.
It's a very different thing.
It's becoming objectified rather than looking at it as something that's pure and beautiful.
Further...
They should further learn...
We already did that, sorry.
Certainly a government needs power.
It needs strength.
It must, I might also say, with brutal ruthlessness, press through the ideas which it has recognized to be right, trusting to the actual authority of its strength in the state.
But even with the most ruthless brutality, it can ultimately prevail only if what it seeks to restore does truly correspond to the welfare of a whole people.
That the so-called enlightened absolutism of Frederick the Great was possible depended solely on the fact that though this man could undoubtedly have decided arbitrarily the destiny, for good or ill, of his so-called subjects, he did not do so, but made his decisions influenced and supported by one thought alone, the welfare of his Prussian people.
It was this fact only that led the people to tolerate willingly, nay joyfully, the dictatorship of the great king.
This is, again, it's kind of a problem we have with a guy like Donald Trump, right?
Donald Trump, when do you ever hear the guy advocating for white people, right?
The majority bulk of this nation, the majority of his voter bloc, when do you ever hear him positively advocating for white people?
When you hear him talking about how he likes being white or he's proud of his heritage, you don't hear it ever, right?
I'm proud to be an American.
What the hell does that mean?
You know, America is the only country without a racial buildup, right?
You look at Korea, they have a racial buildup.
You can look at a Korean, you know, that's a Korean.
It doesn't matter if it's South or North Korea.
You can see them physically and say that's a Korean, right?
You can look at Japanese people and say, oh, that's a Japanese guy.
You can look at Irish people, Scottish people.
They have a very strong genetic line.
You can look at Scottish people and say, oh, that guy's a Scotsman.
I know for a fact that he's a Scotsman.
Can you ever look at an American and say, that's genetically an American?
No, because we don't have a racial buildup.
And this is one of the fundamental problems of our country right now.
We have no racial buildup.
So you don't know what your community is.
If I live Where I live, right?
And I got a black neighbor and a Muslim neighbor and a Mexican neighbor and an Asian neighbor and a white neighbor and a faggot neighbor and a tranny neighbor.
How the hell...
Where's the community at?
Where's the community?
We have completely fundamentally different worldviews.
We have different political beliefs.
We have different beliefs as to what our body parts are, what we should be born in, right?
How the hell do I... In the 80s, in the 70s in America...
When it was homogenous and most of the people were Christian and most of the people were white, they had family barbecues.
They had block barbecues where everybody would come out on the block.
The whole neighborhood would come out and they'd all cook a barbecue together, right?
So where is that?
You can't do that now because it's not the same, right?
How do you get along with people that you can't – you don't even know if I can say sir to you if you're going to take offense to that, right?
Right.
There's no community in that.
This is a fundamental problem.
I see we got Fox Dye with a $5 investment.
Thank you very much, Fox.
He says $14.88.
Thank you very much.
I really appreciate that.
And Andy Woffin with a $10 investment as well says, you bring unique perspective, Zach, which ultimately leads to the truth to anyone that will listen.
Thank you very much.
I agree with you.
I think people are willing to hear these things out.
It's kind of hard to refute them.
I found that myself once I started looking into these things.
Thank you, too, very much for the investments.
Don't forget, if you guys do want to support the show, All the links to do that are down in the description below.
We've got Entropy that'll give you a chance to do a live super chat, which I'll respond to in real time.
And then we also have Odyssey, which people are supporting through Odyssey right now.
You can support straight through that.
We've got the Bitcoin wallets as well, but it's less interactive with the stream.
So if you want it to be a little more interactive, Odyssey and Entropy are the best ways to do that.
Okay, so let's continue forward here a little bit.
And the right, talking about the right wing again, has further completely forgotten that democracy is fundamentally not German.
It is Jewish.
It is completely forgotten that this Jewish democracy, with its majority decisions, has always been, without exception, only a means towards the destruction of any existing Aryan leadership.
This is a fundamentally important quote, okay?
You have to really understand what this means.
When you look at history, ancient Rome, we love Rome, right?
Everybody loves Rome.
Everybody loves ancient Greece.
But are you watching, when you look at ancient Rome and ancient Greece, do you look at the Greece that was a democracy?
Because Greece was a democracy at one point for a little bit.
Is that what we revere?
No!
We revere authoritarian Greece that inserted itself into the fold and said, this is what's right.
This is what needs to be done.
We don't look at Roman democracy and go, wow, oh, the Romans were so insightful.
Right?
No.
We look at one of the greatest Arian thinkers in history is Socrates.
Okay?
And Socrates wrote the book.
I bring this up all the time.
Let's do it again.
It's important to know.
Hold on.
Socrates wrote the book The Republic.
Okay?
Let me pull this up really quickly.
All right?
It's a fantastic book.
If you care at all about European history and culture, you want to learn about what our true belief system is, our philosophies.
This is the cornerstone of Western philosophy.
You're not going to get anything better than this.
Okay?
And in this book, It's a whole treatise against democracy, physically.
That's fundamentally what this is.
And there are insights in this from 2,300 years ago that are still relevant today due to human nature.
I highly recommend this book.
Please, take a moment.
Read this book.
Foxteye used to watch me on YouTube years ago.
I was never really on YouTube.
So you must be thinking of somebody else.
I never really did YouTube ever.
I think you're framing me.
No, I'm kidding.
I really don't think that was me.
I'm sorry, the book is written by Plato.
It's the words of Socrates, though.
It's Socrates' philosophies.
Apologies, yeah.
They are the philosophies of Socrates.
Socrates was Plato's teacher, so the philosophical concepts come from Socrates.
Plato is basically writing out the works of Plato.
What he considered to be the greatest teacher of all time.
I don't really attribute the philosophies to Plato so much.
Sorry, my apologies.
Slip on words.
Further.
The right does not understand that directly every small question of profit or loss is regularly put before so-called public opinion.
He who knows how most skillfully to make public opinion serve his own interests becomes forthwith master in the state.
So...
Who controls the media?
It's really all this boils down to, right?
And that can be achieved by the man who can lie most artfully, most infamously.
And in the last resort, he is not a German.
He is, in Schopenhauer's words, the great master in the art of lying, the Jew.
And finally, it has been forgotten that the condition which must precede every act is the will and the courage to speak the truth.
And that we do not see today either in the right or in the left.
That's fundamental right there.
You don't see that in either party.
The left doesn't speak the truth because they need nonsense to prevail.
They're completely against nature.
They're against any kind of harmony or order in society.
And the right doesn't speak the truth because, like we said earlier with Charlie Kirk, they need to keep that pedestal.
There are only two possibilities in Germany.
Do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises.
One day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to disassociate themselves from it.
This is very prophetic and important.
And that party is either the left, and then God help us, for it will lead us to complete destruction, to Bolshevism, Here,
too, there can be no compromise.
There are only two possibilities.
Either victory of the Aryan or annihilation of the Aryan and the victory of the Jew.
Now, this is very important.
Again, we talk about the fundamental opposites of Aryan worldview and Jewish worldview.
For example, the Aryan West is, in history, In history, the Aryan West, we're patriarchal, right?
You take your father's name upon birth, right?
You hold his legacy and his heritage.
Jews are matriarchal.
If your mom's Jewish, then you're Jewish, right?
Look at all the women that control Jewish movements.
Feminism, it's a Jewish idea, right?
They're opposite of us in many ways.
What's good for us is bad for them.
What's good for them is bad for us, right?
It's a...
We're incompatible.
They're the only group of people that carries this law book with them.
And they say, oh, my law here matters more than the law of the nation I live in.
Every other group of people created their own nation with their own laws that were in their sector.
They don't do that.
They've never done that.
Now they have Israel, but they're still not doing it.
They're still here.
Fox die.
No, that's fine.
No problem at all.
Oh, my neck is killing me.
Sorry, folks.
Further, it is from the recognition of this fact, from recognizing it, I would say, in utter dead earnestness, that there resulted the formation of our movement.
There are two principles which, when we founded the movement, we engraved upon our hearts.
First, to base it on the most sober recognition of the facts.
And second, to proclaim these facts with the most ruthless sincerity.
And this recognition of the facts discloses at once a whole series of the most important fundamental principles which must guide this young movement, which, we hope, is destined one day for greatness.
So now they're going to lay out the fundamental principles that they decided were necessary for fixing the problems that we're in.
Now, let's look at this and let's see.
Yeah, thank you, Nico.
We'll find out if you're right.
We sure will.
I'm sure we will.
So let's see how much of these principles would work today if we put them into reality, right?
Excuse me.
Number one, national and socialism and social are two identical conceptions.
It was only the Jew who succeeded through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory.
That's really important.
Okay, it's a...
They're inverting the reality of things.
Because if you look in the Renaissance era, we had a lot of philosophical thinkers that were socialist in nature.
It's social well-being.
Social, right?
To be social is good.
It benefits the community.
But socialism as a Jewish entity is something completely wholeheartedly different.
At the founding of this movement, we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours, of the identity of these two conceptions.
Despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we Christened it, National Socialist.
We said to ourselves, to be national means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people, and if necessary, even to die for it.
Now again, does this sound like a hateful maniac at all?
It's really simple to just call this guy a hateful maniac.
And similarly, to be social means so to build up the state and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interests of the community of the people and must be, to such an extent, convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community, of the people as to be ready to die for it.
And then we said to ourselves, there are no such thing as classes.
They cannot be.
Class means caste, and caste means race.
If there are castes in India, well and good.
There it is possible.
For there, there were formerly Aryans and dark Aborigines.
So it was in Egypt and in Rome.
But with us in Germany, where everyone who is a German at all has the same blood, has the same eyes, speaks the same language, here there can be no class.
Here there can be only a single people.
And beyond that, nothing else.
So this is important.
So when you look at ancient Rome, for example, Classes were in ancient Rome, right?
There were different tribes.
Rome would take over.
They would conquer a tribe.
They would pull tribes into their way of statesmanship.
They had a lot of tribes underneath them.
So all of these different tribes are different racial groups.
And these different tribes with different characters, they're castes, right?
So the Roman people were obviously always at the top.
And then these other ones were on that lower rung, right?
So it's very important to understand that, this class and caste situation.
Certainly we recognize, just as anyone must recognize, that there are different occupations and professions.
There is the stand of the watchmakers, the common laborers, the painters or technicians, the engineers, officials, etc.
Stand there can be.
But in the struggles, which these...
I guess it's probably stand...
Have amongst themselves, for the equalization of their economic conditions, the conflict and the division must never be so great so as to sunder the ties of race.
Again, they should have this lower kind of...
keep away from these pitiful conflicts, right?
Dogmatic conflicts or whatever.
And if you say, but there must, after all, be a difference between the honest creators and those who do nothing at all, certainly there must.
That is the difference which lies in the performance of the conscientious work of the individual.
Work must be the great connecting link, but at the same time, the great factor which separates one man from another.
The drone is the foe of us all, but the creators are, It matters not whether they are brain workers or workers with the hand.
They are the nobility of our state.
They are the German people.
We understand under the term work exclusively that activity which not only profits the individual but in no way harms the community.
Nay, rather, which contributes to form the community.
Again, this is where we get that explanation of things like OnlyFans and Pornhub and all this.
This is not for the community.
This does not help the community.
In the third place, it was clear to us that this particular view is based on an impulse, which springs from our race and from our blood.
We said to ourselves that race differs from race, and further, that each race, in accordance with its fundamental demands, shows externally certain specific tendencies.
And these tendencies can perhaps be most clearly traced in their relation to the conception of work.
This is pretty important.
The Aryan regards work as the foundation for the maintenance of the community of people amongst its members.
This is where we get that concept of the noble farmer.
This has always been an important concept in our history.
Do you ever see Jews talk positively about a farmer?
Ever?
Have you ever seen a Jew praising farm work or talking about how important farming is for society?
It's not for them because, again, that means that...
Farm work is only important if you own a land and you care about continuing that nation that's on that land, that country, that concept.
They don't care about that.
Look at Israel.
Israel doesn't produce much of its own stuff.
They take a lot of imports in, right?
The Jew regards work as the means to the exploitation of other peoples.
Can we look at Bernie Madoff, Rudvinsky with OnlyFans?
You name it.
It's all over the place.
The Jew never works as a productive creator without the great aim of becoming the master.
He works unproductively, using and enjoying other people's work.
So when you think about a guy, again, the OnlyFans guy, all these women that are selling themselves off, they're still not working, right?
But they're, I guess we'll say laboring, not really necessarily.
They're doing the lifting, right?
It's not anything impressive.
It's actually repulsive, right?
It wouldn't be conceptualized as work either.
However, the Jew is just benefiting off of all of them.
It's kind of like a pimp, right?
So that's not work.
They're not doing anything themselves.
And thus, we understand the iron sentence which Momsen once uttered.
The Jew is the ferment of decomposition in peoples.
That means that the Jew destroys and must destroy because he completely lacks the conception of an activity which builds up the life of the community.
So if he doesn't understand farm work, if he doesn't understand community activities, right, that build the foundation of a society, he'll always be destructive, right?
And this is throughout all of history.
We've seen the exact same circumstance.
We're talking about a literal different psychological type here.
And therefore, it is beside the point whether the individual Jew is decent or not.
This is so fundamentally important.
Think about this very hard.
In himself, he carries those characteristics which nature has given him, and he cannot ever rid himself of those characteristics.
And to us, he is harmful.
Whether he harms us consciously or unconsciously, that is not our affair.
We have consciously to concern ourselves for the welfare of our own people.
So you get a lot of people who say, I know a good Jew.
I know a good Jew.
Sure, you might.
Maybe 5% are good.
Maybe 20% are good.
Maybe 49% are good.
Maybe 80% are good.
But if the percentage that is bad is so poisonous to our society, is it worth living with the good at the cost of our own livelihood?
I mean, we're talking about literal extinction in many cases.
We look at what's happening in Ireland through mass immigration.
We look at what's happening in Britain, in America, right?
Are those couple good ones that we might get along with that might be nice and Is that worth all of the stress that the other ones bring us?
Think about that.
Number four.
And fourthly, we were further persuaded that economic prosperity is inseparable from political freedom.
And that therefore, that house of lies, internationalism, must immediately collapse.
So, he's anti-globalist.
That's what he is.
To put it in layman's terms.
We recognize that freedom can eternally be only a consequence of power, and that the source of power is the will.
Consequently, the will to power must be strengthened in a people with passionate ardor.
And thus we realized, fifthly, that we as national socialists and members of the German Workers' Party, a party pledged to work, must be on principle the most fanatical nationalists.
We realize that the state can be for our people a paradise, only if the people can hold sway therein freely, as in a paradise.
We realize that a slave state will never be a paradise, but only, always, and for all time, a hell or a colony.
Again, this is exactly congruent with the founding fathers and the revolution that we had, right?
They were becoming a slave state.
They were owing all of their money to a foreign entity, the crown.
And they were saying, look, we're not going to live in slavery.
We're going to declare ourselves independent.
And then sixthly, we grasp the fact that power in the last resort is possible only where there is strength.
And that strength lies not in the dead weight of numbers, but solely in energy.
Even the smallest minority can achieve a mighty result if it is inspired by the most fiery, the most passionate will to act.
World history has always been made by minorities.
And lastly, if one has realized a truth, that truth is valueless so long as there is lacking the indomitable will to turn this realization into action.
These were the foundations of our movement, the truths on which it was based and which demonstrated its necessity.
For three years, we have sought to realize these fundamental ideas.
And of course, a fight is and remains a fight.
Stroking in very truth will not carry one far.
Today, the German people has been beaten by a quite other world, while in its domestic life it has lost.
Kind of like America.
No longer has it any faith.
But how will you give this people once more firm ground beneath its feet, save by the passionate insistence on one definite, great, clear goal?
How do you fix people?
How do you give them something to have faith in unless you have a path that's laid out for them?
That's what he's saying.
We need that.
People are desperately...
Urging for that today in the United States.
In the whole West, I shouldn't even say the States.
Thus, we were the first to declare that this peace treaty was a crime.
Then, folk abused us as agitators.
Kind of like today, right?
If you talk about these things, you're a bigot or an anti-Semite or you're hateful.
Same thing.
We were the first to protect against the failure to present this treaty to the people before it was signed.
Train's a little egregious.
Again, we were called agitators.
We were the first to summon men to resistance against being reduced to a continuing state of defenselessness.
Once more, we were called agitators.
At that time, we called on the masses of the people not to surrender their arms, for the surrender of one's arms would be nothing less than the beginning of enslavement.
Okay?
Really important, because they're always trying to spin this lie that Hitler took guns, and they were like, they didn't want people to have guns.
That was nuts.
We were called.
No, we were cried down as agitators.
We were the first to say that this meant the loss of Upper Salacia.
So it was, and still, they called us agitators.
We declared at that time that compliance in the question of Upper Silesia must have as its consequence the awakening of a passionate greed, which would demand the occupation of the Roar.
We were cried down ceaselessly again and again, and because we opposed the mad financial policy which today will lead to our collapse, what was it that we recalled repeatedly once more?
Agitators.
And finally, we were also the first to point the people, this is my favorite quote, I think, my favorite paragraph, one of the most eye-opening paragraphs I ever read from Hitler.
We were the first to point the people on any large scale to a danger which insinuated itself into our midst.
A danger which millions failed to realize, and which will nonetheless lead us all into ruin.
The Jewish danger.
Today, people are saying yet again that we are agitators.
I would like here to appeal to a greater than I, Count Lershenfeld.
He said in the last session of the Lontog that his feeling as a man and a Christian prevented him from being an anti-Semite.
This is Charlie Kirk in a nutshell.
Evangelical Charlie Kirk.
Well, I can't be anti-Semitic.
That would be anti-Christian of me.
Judeo-Christian values.
No different.
I say,
In Boundless Love, as a Christian and as a man, I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in his might and sieged the scourge to drive out of the temple the broad of vipers and adders.
How terrific was his fight for the world against this Jewish poison?
Today, after 2,000 years, with deepest emotion, I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that he had to shed his blood upon the cross.
As a Christian, I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.
And as a man, I have the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world some 2,000 years ago, a civilization which was driven to ruin through this same Jewish people.
Then indeed, when Rome collapsed, there were endless streams of new German bands flowing into the empire from the north.
But if Germany collapses today, who is there to come after us?
German blood upon this earth is on the way to gradual exhaustion unless we pull ourselves together and make ourselves free.
Now, think about that in our circumstance, looking at the collective Aryan or white peoples of the Western world.
If we If we fail, if we collapse, who's going to come after us?
Who do you think is going to create civilization if the Western world is to collapse?
If we go extinct?
I don't think there's a lot of options here.
And if there's anything which can demonstrate that we are acting rightly, it is the distress which daily grows.
For as a Christian, I have also a duty to my own people.
And when I look on my people, I see it work and toil and labor.
And at the end of the week, it has only for its wage wretchedness and misery.
When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them.
If I did not, as did our Lord 2,000 years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people is plundered and exploited.
And through the distress, there is no doubt that the people has been aroused.
Externally, perhaps apathetic.
Accurate.
But within, there is ferment.
And many may say, it is an accursed crime to stir up passions in the people.
And then I say to myself, passion is already stirred through the rising tide of distress, and one day this passion will break out in one way or another.
And now I would like to ask those who today call us agitators, what then have they to give the people as a faith to which it might cling?
Nothing at all.
For you yourselves have no faith in your own prescriptions.
That is the mightiest thing which our movement must create.
For these widespread, seeking, and straying masses, a new faith, which will not fail them in this hour of confusion, to which they can pledge themselves, on which they can build, so that they may at last find once again a place which may bring calm to their hearts. so that they may at last find once again a That's the speech, folks.
Now, again, to look at that and put it into perspective of where we are today, the parallels are eerie, eerie to say the least.
But it's not necessarily about the parallels themselves.
It's not about, oh, you know, we're in the same circumstance and we're just trying to illustrate that we're in the Weimar Republic.
Sure, we can say that.
We actually might be in a worse circumstance than that.
That doesn't matter.
That's not what this is about.
What this is about is if we understand that we are in this condition, if we are in this circumstance, how do we get out of the circumstance?
How do we save ourselves?
Well, the blueprint's here.
You read it in that speech.
It's in MindComp.
It's present.
We have the blueprint.
We literally have the guide that says, here is how you fix the problem.
Here is how you get yourself out of the problem.
It's there.
We have a choice to acknowledge that or to say, oh, it's hateful, it's evil, it's terrible.
People that think that this man was some psyop or fucking Rothschild agent or half-Jew or any of this stuff that people try to smear him as...
They clearly have not read these things.
They have not looked into this very deeply because if you read this and you still somehow have that thought in your mind, it shows that you're not fully grasping things or you're just not being genuine.
I've read just about every speech I get my hands on.
I've read Mein Kampf front to back several times.
No PSYOP. Here's the thing.
Let's lay it out like this.
If that's a PSYOP, we're fucked anyway, right?
If that was a PSYOP, everything's a PSYOP. I mean, I'm a PSYOP, and your dog is a PSYOP. You know what I mean?
We have to be realistic on things.
To call him a PSYOP, it's disingenuous, and it's ill-sighted.
And again, let's say you're right, which you're not.
I'll just lay it out.
You're not.
But let's say you were.
Okay?
So then who could save us?
If that whole thing was a PSYOP, who could save us?
I don't think anybody, right?
So that's blackpilling.
It's nonsense.
It's just simply not true.
The blueprint is literally there.
It's laid out.
You want to fix your society and where we're at?
There it is.
It's there.
And again, not everybody's going to do that.
Not everybody's going to read into these works and care that much about Social life, right?
Everybody has a different view on things.
Not everybody wants to be into that, educated on history and philosophy and things of the sort.
Not everyone's going to be like that.
But the people that are really valuable that can be like that, we need them.
We need them to start looking into these things.
We need to break down all of this nonsense of people looking at it and flinching and saying, oh, oh, geez.
Yeah, that's a good point.
What Camp Lindbergh said, he says, it's true regardless who says it.
That's exactly my point, right?
It doesn't matter if that was Hitler or somebody else.
All those things are fundamentally factual and based and grounded in truth.
So you can choose to avoid them and call them hateful and think the guy sucks, but you can't argue with what's being laid out there.
That stuff all still stands.
Whether he was a PSYOP or not, that still stands.
And again, there's no logic in that.
Why would they want to psyop a guy into teaching everybody how to fix the problem?
That's like, okay, sure.
And then he got everybody killed after teaching them all, and now we can all still go look at that?
It just doesn't make any sense.
Chain reaction with a $3 investment on Odyssey says, all dissident movements attract outcasts who are in it for themselves, not the movement that's That's a very good point.
The rebels, the dregs of society, will always want to be a part of dissident movements.
They hate authority no matter what authority was.
If Hitler was in power tomorrow, they'd hate him too.
It's no different.
I would entirely agree, August.
Lovely to hear.
Glad I've adequately laid out the thoughts of the man.
Don't forget, folks, if you guys do want to support this show, keep things like this going.
It's not free to run a show like this, so all the options to do so are in the description below.
We've got Entropy.
It'll give you a live super chat option.
We haven't really seen any Entropies in a bit, so I'm sure it's still functioning.
I don't know if it's on my end or not, but We also have Odyssey.
You guys can support through there.
And we've got the Crypto Wallets, which is a more maybe anonymous way to support.
Only thing I will ask is if you do support via Crypto Wallets, if you would send me a private message on Telegram or Twitter and just inform me that you've sent something so that I know who it was that did it and I can thank you for that because it is anonymous.
I have no way of really telling.
If you do do something like that, please do let me know so I can thank you for supporting my work.
I really do appreciate it.
So, we're coming up on the end of the show here.
We've got about five minutes left, and then we're going to do a bit of a closeout.
But I want to thank you guys.
We had a lot of viewers today.
We've got over 1,000 on Rumble.
We've got about 2,000 on Twitter.
We've got about 100 on Odyssey.
We've got a lot of people in here.
Excuse me.
And I greatly appreciate all of you tagging along and listening to what I would consider one of the most important speeches for the current day and the Current circumstance that we are in.
So I really appreciate all of you for tuning into this and being a part of the chat room.
Excuse me.
I got hiccups.
So thank you to everybody that has been nice in the chat room and had some insightful things to say.
I always appreciate the good conversation pieces.
I know I was a little bit less interactive with chat.
I wanted to make sure we got through that speech, and that's kind of hard to do when you're...
when you're doing a live chat at the same time.
So make sure, again, we'll run down the platforms.
I want you guys to follow me on everything, okay?
Please follow me on Odyssey.
Odyssey is the main one.
That's the one I promote the heaviest, okay?
Because Odyssey has my entire archive.
Every video I have ever done on anything is up on my Odyssey channel, okay?
Minus, I think there's like two or three videos that I was unable to get the file for, but...
So here's the link in the chat.
Please, folks, take a second to just follow me on Odyssey if you do not already.
I have a massive archive of like 250 videos on there.
A lot of really insightful stuff going on.
I can promise you you're going to learn something, right?
Also, follow me on Twitter.
I'm going to link to Twitter as well.
Really want you guys to follow me on Twitter.
I've been...
Putting a lot of stuff out on Twitter.
We just had a massive tweet go viral.
I literally tweeted out a screenshot of Mein Kampf, and it went majorly viral, like 700,000 views on it.
Crazy, crazy to think about.
People are really starting to wake up to this stuff.
A lot of people were like, oh, it's hateful, it's awful.
But very many people were very...
Happy to see that.
I also just posted Monica Schaefer's video for apologizing to her mother for criticizing her about the Holocaust and giving her a hard time about that.
So I posted that video as well, which is also going majorly viral.
It has almost 400,000 views.
Massive, massive stuff coming up on...
On Twitter.
And we got a lot of projects in the works.
Again, we're going to be live.
I'm going to go live tomorrow, folks, at noon.
It's only going to be on my Odyssey and my Rumble.
I don't have a time slot on the Stu Peters Network on Thursdays.
So if you guys want to catch that show, make sure you're on my Rumble channel or my Odyssey channel.
Make sure that you guys are watching over there.
It's going to be a fundraiser stream.
We're going to set a goal for the show.
I don't know what that number is going to be yet.
I have to crunch some numbers and figure out what everything is going to cost for my setup here.
But we're going to be fundraising.
For a new webcam, a higher quality one.
We're going to be fundraising for a stand for that webcam.
So we stopped this jiggle here.
A lot of people have been complaining about the jiggle of the webcam.
And then we're also going to invest in a cover for the microphone.
A lot of people have been complaining about background noises and stuff.
And I've been informed that that's a good way to stop that.
I'll look at everything else that I can find.
And we'll go from there.
And Nico, I mean, hey brother, you're welcome to think whatever you want.
Just be realistic and be grounded in fact.
Stu dropped his Jewish Gold co-sponsor last week.
And I'm also not funded or contracted with Stu.
I'm taking no finance.
So I'm doing this show free of charge because I care about the truth and the message.
You can say things, but just be honest.
That's gay.
It's just gay.
Coming in and saying nonsense.
It's just gay.
Yeah, I'll figure out what it's going to cost total, and I'll set the goal for that.
And the way I'll do it, as a thank you to you guys, if we hit that goal, I'll run a bonus show on Saturday or Sunday to give you guys an extra stream, because I don't have anything set up for Saturday or Sunday right now.
Also, on Friday, we're going to be live at 4pm Eastern on the Stu Peters Network, on my own channel as well.
You can find that.
4pm Eastern, I'm going to have Leonarda on.
I think her last name is Joni.
She's a comedian.
She's an Albanian woman.
Pretty based from what I've seen so far.
So we'll have her on.
We're going to talk about some of these things.
Get to know her a little bit better.
And then coming up in the beginning of next month, we're going to have Sam Parker on.
We're going to have a couple other really interesting names coming on.
Converse with the JP conference.
And one other thing I want to promote to you guys is FTJ. If you guys are not on FTJ Media, it's a new up-and-coming platform.
It's by a good man.
His name is Dave Geharry.
He runs a good show.
Sorry, things are freezing on my computer.
So here is the link to FTJ Media.
Make an account over there and follow me on FTJ Media.
It's slowly growing.
It's a small platform right now, but we're trying to grow it a little bit.
Completely no censorship, no ability to have censors or anything like that.
So make sure that you guys get yourselves on there and start following people over there in the event that I get banned on Rumble or Odyssey or whatever the case may be.
You can always find my stuff there.
Leonardo will be coming on on Friday, 4pm Eastern, so two days from now.
Hi, buddy.
Hi.
Sorry.
Yep.
I'm closing out.
I'm closing out.
I'll give you some...
Yep.
I know.
Sorry.
My dog wants attention.
Are my DMs open on X? No.
My DMs are open on Telegram.
If you guys want to contact me, Typically what I would say is tweet me on X and I will open my DMs to you.
The problem is I am...
My notifications this week, I can't...
I literally can't even...
There's no way I can keep up with them.
It's like thousands of notifications.
So...
Sorry, I can't really keep up with the notification.
So message me on Telegram if you want to chat with me privately, at LogosRevealed.
And if you don't have Telegram, you don't want to put yourself on there, you can also email me.
It is LogosRevealed88 at gmail.com if anybody wants to contact me privately with questions, concerns, inquiries, whatever the case may be.
And we got No with a $3 investment over on Odyssey.
Thank you very kindly.
Says, if what's told to be true about the Holocaust is factual, the campaign to stifle any questioning wouldn't be necessary because the truth does not mind being questioned.
I agree.
Absolutely agree.
Monica Schaefer did a really great video on that.
Go check it out on my Twitter, guys.
It's a great video.
Share it around.
She's a wonderful woman.
She deserves far more attention and recognition.
She's truly got a beautiful soul.
She's a great woman.
All right, folks.
We're coming up on the last couple minutes here, so we're going to close it out.
Thank you guys again very much for tuning into the show.
It's been a really good show.
I enjoyed this one for sure.
Yeah, replay will be up on the Stu Peters Network.
It'll be up on my Odyssey channel in a couple hours as well.
It'll be up on my Rumble, so you guys can see that replay wherever you would like.
All right.
Thank you guys so much for watching.
Really appreciate it.
It's been a great show.
Weimar conditions, Weimar solutions.
Let's think about it.
Let's talk about it, all right?
I'll see you guys tomorrow at noon.
Eight-hour special.
Gonna be doing a fundraiser show, okay?
Make sure you guys are there.
Support the show.
It's gonna be a call-in show, too, so you can call in with questions, thoughts, concerns, whatever you have.