All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 25, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
56:17
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Will Deep State TRAITORS Flee Country If Trump WINS?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Welcome to the show.
Thanks so much for being with us.
As always, this is the Mill Sun Report.
My name is Paul Harrell, and you guys know the drill.
We cannot do the program without you guys watching every single day.
So the deep state, okay?
I feel like I'm starting every program the exact same way, but we cannot get over these assassination attempts.
It's ridiculous.
The deep state wants President Trump dead.
And as we told you yesterday, they want to kill two birds with one stone.
A successful assassination of Trump that gets pinned on Iran in an intel oligarch false flag frame job would accomplish two things.
The obvious would be that Trump, who believes in the concept of the nation state, Which is a threat to the satanic globalists' aspirations of building the Tower of Babel 2.0 would be dead.
And the media would then use his death to launch another war in the Middle East which would see more young American soldiers die for nothing.
Who knows?
With Trump gone, a hot war with Russia would be inevitable and we would condemn our children to live through World War III and nuclear destruction.
These are the stakes with Trump apparently leading in the polls.
Even polls that typically put their thumb on the scale for Democrats.
President Trump needs to stay alive if we want the chance.
Just the chance of avoiding World War III. But the intel oligarchs who are in charge and running the country on blackmail.
Yes, blackmail is apparently the fuel that runs D.C. and pop culture with the help of Intel operatives like Jeffrey Epstein and Puff Daddy P. Diddler The same intel oligarchs who told us in 2020 the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian propaganda and disinformation.
The same intel oligarchs who framed Trump for treason.
The same intel oligarchs who I suspect set up the entire tenant media scandal to not only keep the Russian collusion narrative hoax alive, but to attack the credibility of large factions of right-wing media by making everything those content creators say and report on Russian propaganda.
These intel oligarchs, in the wake of Trump surviving two assassination attempts that we know of, have endorsed Kamala Harris for president.
It's no surprise, really.
If Trump is elected again, these people may have to flee the country.
Breitbart News' Christina Wong has this headline.
Quote, Back Harris, including some who signed the Hunter Biden laptop letter.
More than 700 members of the deep state, a mixture of high, mid, and low-ranking government officials and staffers, signed the letter endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris on Sunday.
In a move reminiscent of the letter 51 former intelligence officials signed, claiming the Hunter Biden laptop was In fact, it goes on, So for more about this story,
the host of the Blood Money podcast and the founder of the America Happens Network, Vem Miller, is joining us now.
Vem, welcome to the Millstone Report.
Thank you so much for coming on the program.
Thank you so much for having me on your show, Paul.
Really appreciate it.
Yes, absolutely.
What are your thoughts on this?
This is no surprise here, right?
We obviously have the intelligence community doubling down on their preferred candidate.
You know, these people are running scared, you know, especially with things like the PDD files, the Epstein files coming out.
I mean, you're essentially talking about a group of treasonous individuals.
And this is where we run into a problem in this country is that what they are doing has many shades of treason, has many shades of crimes against humanity.
Diluting our population is actually a form of genocide.
You don't have to go around killing people.
To try to genocide a culture, a population, right?
Which is really what's happening.
Now, the issue is that our courts are controlled by bar agents, right?
They're not necessarily upholding the law in a manner that is conducive to the rights of we the people, and we see this across the board.
So this is the fraud that we've been under for a really long time.
So it's not surprising that these people are wanting to flee the country because once you start pulling that thread, you know, we're talking about lies about the Hunter Biden laptop.
We're talking about lies about our elections, lies about Donald Trump.
Once you start pulling that thread and you understand why they're doing that, really they're trying to save their skin.
And I have no doubt that these people We'll try to flee the country if Trump does win.
Or, frankly, if Trump gets assassinated and Vance wins, I don't think Vance might even be worse than Trump in terms of what he's going to do to these people.
So I just don't know where they run at this point, really.
I mean, there's a few places I could think of, but...
Well, I mean, you know, it really comes down to, you know, trying to hold on to power, right?
And are they just going to essentially, you know, literally burn the world down in order to hold on to power?
I mean, I also think, and I've talked about this before, I think there's a global financial component to this.
We have the Western financial system.
Where we basically can run an economy based on fiat.
It doesn't make any sense at all.
We live in a financial iron curtain.
Then you've got the other half of the world that appears, you know, the BRICS nations and everything else, they're kind of tired of the U.S. dollar tyranny, quite frankly, where we basically have the ability to print gold, not actual gold, but, I mean, if it's the world reserve currency, then we've got a system where we've achieved what people, what alchemists were trying to do hundreds of years ago.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, understanding the Federal Reserve System, and we've gone on the Blood Money Podcast, but also part of the America Happens Network, we've forensically gone into the laws of the Federal Reserve.
I mean, there is nothing more ridiculous than how we print money and how it's backed by nothing.
And this is why we print so much money.
And we're cool with sending it to places like Ukraine and all these other countries, because it's literally worthless when you look at it.
And it's worthless because it is backed by nothing.
The only thing that it's backed by is the fact that anybody that says, hey, your dollar is actually worthless.
It's backed by nothing.
We just attack those countries, destroy them, assassinations, all kind of stuff, right?
But the cat's out of the bag now.
You have so many individuals.
In fact, right before this call, I was talking to a gentleman that...
It teaches people the fraud of the Federal Reserve, teaches people things like trust law, getting out of the system, becoming a private citizen as opposed to being part of the public trust under their jurisdiction.
And the reason why this phenomenon is happening is because way too many people have been injured by the system.
And we talk about foreign countries and wars and that sort of thing.
Let's talk about the effect that this Federal Reserve System has had on our bar.
On our courts, let's talk about the unequal justice that is a direct result of this Federal Reserve nonsense, you know?
So it's not just we're destroying countries overseas with this fake fiat currency, we're destroying America.
And this is why we see a generation of men that don't even know what being a man is.
Women are going and doing ridiculous things with body counts and all this sort of thing and promiscuity and mental health issues.
I heard something like 54% of Liberal women, because of their own actions, have mental health issues.
I mean, the whole thing stems, the issue stems from the spreader of reserve currency.
And I think the quicker we get the gold-backed currency, the quicker we back it up by not just gold and silver, but, you know, you could back it by cattle, any resources, anything that's worth anything, right?
That's where I think our country returns to a semblance of normality.
Because no longer will they be able to print ungodly amounts of money to enrich themselves.
And you pull that plug, that's one of the biggest issues we have right now.
Yeah, you know, hearing you talk about that, I kind of hang my head in shame, really, about stuff that I said on talk radio, you know, 10 plus years ago, about the free market system and capitalism and everything else.
And again, on paper, those are good things.
But what you're saying here is...
It's under this umbrella of a system that is essentially rigged.
In a way, I've heard some people say, this was actually a criticism back in the day, like, oh, the Federal Reserve, they don't know what they're doing.
They think they can set inflation and set these numbers the way we set the thermostats in our home.
But as I've come, I've come to believe that that's exactly what they can do.
They actually can.
They actually can set the economic conditions exactly the way we would set our thermostats in our home because, you know, it's a system that's built to just ensure that, you know, the people in charge stay in charge.
And on that, feel free to respond to that.
But I also have another theory.
I remember, and I know we're getting way off the original topic of these Intel oligarchs, but I think it's all conducive.
Yeah, it's the same.
I remember when the national debt, I remember the Tea Party 2010.
I remember everybody was talking about the national debt.
When I first started in my career, it was $12 trillion, and now it's $30 trillion.
People don't talk about it as much, but I've come to the conclusion that there's something that we don't know.
There's really not a giant difference, if you understand how much a trillion dollars is, between 12 and 30.
It's an insane amount of money.
$1 trillion is $27 million a day for 100 years, with money still left over after the 100 years.
And so that's an incredible amount of money.
And so I came to the conclusion like, okay, well, the national debt really must not matter until somebody wants it to matter.
And I think that's another component here, where we kind of have a crisis that's in a glass case, ready, just like the 2008 financial crisis, ready to create whatever they want to do, and then they can take even more authority.
Yeah, yeah.
And the sad aspect of all this, I got to mention this documentary we just did called Bundy vs.
Deep State, right?
It's at the top of the AmericaHappens.com website.
If you go on there, it's the first documentary there.
The reason why this is so consequential to this conversation is because That documentary is essentially about the Bundys and some legal experts filing lawsuits against the federal government.
Why are they filing lawsuits against the federal government?
Because the federal government, for those people that know the Bundy standoff of 2014, claim that they own 20% of the land in Nevada, which is BLM land, which stands for Bureau of Land Management.
This was the same land that the Bundys are living on, okay?
Now, you start, like, looking at why that's happening, you realize that Nevada has almost as much gold as the entire mainland of China, as well as other natural resources.
If Nevada was a country, it would be the fourth strongest, financially speaking, country in the world, right?
We have enough gold in Nevada where we could pay off our entire national debt with gold alone, right?
But what is the federal government doing, okay?
And I highly recommend, this is one of the most important documentaries, and I don't say that because we made it.
I say that because in the process of this lawsuit being filed, one of the lead architects of the lawsuit, we believe 99.999% was assassinated right before our eyes.
And people that watch this documentary, especially the last 20 minutes, are going to see this man go from being a healthy, Vibrant 65 year old man to being skin and bones within five weeks and then dying using the same hospital protocols that killed so many people that quote unquote had COVID and a very sad story.
But if you look at why this man was targeted, well, he was going out to the federal government for all this gold because what the federal government's done through Corrupt individuals like Harry Reid, who, by the way, is the architect of the Obama-Biden-Harris regime, is Harry Reid.
He's the first one that started calling people that were really fighting for their rights like the Bundys, domestic terrorists.
And this is explained in this documentary, right?
And the reason this freaks them out so much is because if the power goes back to the states where they control their gold and hence and therefore the people, we the people of Nevada, all of a sudden start benefiting from those riches.
The economy changes.
All of a sudden you don't have to work three jobs because there's so much wealth within the state.
Well, what are they doing?
They're stealing that to sell to the Chinese and Canadians using loopholes in the law.
And how do they do that?
One of the methods is We're good to go.
We believe the guy that was the architect of the lawsuit was assassinated because he started exposing this stuff.
What they didn't know is that there's other legal experts behind Mike Little.
I don't believe they knew that because this literally happened two days before the man was going to file this lawsuit because it is so consequential.
And now the lawsuit's moving forward.
The Bundys have filed it.
They're going forward with it.
Well, frankly, there's a lot of danger involved in this because this literally breaks their government fraud.
Once you take the power from the federal government, return it to the states, all of a sudden you just snip them in a very clean, nonviolent, completely lawful fashion.
Wow.
That is fascinating.
What is the name of that documentary again, if people didn't catch it?
Bundy versus Deep State.
It's on the americahappens.com website right up top.
And now if you scroll to the bottom, there's actually a Bundy versus Deep State section You could download the lawsuit in its entirety, all 600 pages, 89 pages of the lawsuit, 500 pages of exhibits.
There's a few exhibits missing that do exist in the public domain.
I think there's like 35 exhibits.
There's five or six missing, but the meat and potatoes of it is there.
Anybody that wants to know how they're committing this fraud, read this lawsuit because this is a repeatable lawsuit, right?
You do this in Nevada.
And by the way, we know the lower courts are going to bounce this out, but we know there's no way that they could bounce it off the Supreme Court.
Because it's unimpeachable that the federal government doesn't own an inch of land in Nevada, right?
So it's going to happen eventually.
And God knows how many people are going to have to die in the process.
You know, we saw what happened with Mike Little.
You guys could see what happened with Mike Little.
But it is a very true thing.
And then it's repeatable across all states because this is the fraud whereby which the federal government takes away the state rights.
It all has to do with state rights, in my opinion.
Wow.
And you know, what you're saying totally changes that 2014 Bureau of Land Management standoff.
I mean, I remember that.
I remember covering it.
I was covering it more on the Second Amendment idea, because we thought it was about to pop off, and it's like, well, one of the reasons it didn't is because You know, people were armed, like average citizens were armed, right?
The employment back down, by the way.
There's little details.
I sorry to interrupt you, Paul, but real quickly.
But there was moments during that standoff.
So the 200 federal agents showed up, 2000 militia members, and we the people showed up, right?
And there was moments where The federal government, the agents of the federal government could have been mowed down.
That thing could have been the start of the civil war.
Luckily it wasn't, but that's how high the tempers were because the people that are involved in this world know a key fact.
In Nevada, Southern Nevada, there was 54 ranchers in 1992.
53 of those 54 ranchers were forced into going into contract with the federal government for grazing rights.
All 53 as a result of the contract that they entered went bankrupt.
There's one rancher left, the one rancher, Cliven Bundy, who didn't sign the contract with the federal government.
So it's very obvious this is not about saving turtles or whatever other ridiculous thing these globalist environmental groups are pushing for because they were the impetus to the attack on the Bundys because they kept suing the federal government and eventually the federal government got tired of suing them and they're working in coups with one another anyways once you go into this topic.
The long and short is they didn't want that to happen.
And Bundy won that because he simply did not go into business with the federal government because he knew their agenda.
It's a world economic forum agenda of getting us, you know, first into factory farm foods, which is very unhealthy versus the Bundy cattle, which is very healthy.
And when you see the document, you'll understand why.
But then bugs and all these other things, you know, starving us to death.
Why are they trying to remove the rancher when it's the healthiest form of protein we could get?
Of course.
Yeah, exactly.
Wow.
I mean, that really is the beginning.
You really think about it.
I mean, the government has been slowly weaponized against the people, but really and truly what we're seeing now, you definitely could see the beginning of in 2014 with what they were doing to Bundy and to the rest of those ranchers.
It's just incredible.
Matter of fact, we have briefly covered a story about a South Dakota couple that is in it with the National Forest Service right now.
They've been indicted, the Maude family, over nonsense.
I mean, just the weaponization.
Now, you mentioned something that could have popped off into a civil war.
So here's my question to you about really both of these assassination attempts.
I think the link with both of these assassination attempts is that in both cases, if Trump would have died, the stories the media were reporting – First of all, you take Crooks, that he was a Republican.
No, right?
That the Secret Service just messed up that day.
No, right?
All of those failures.
The media would have told us everything was fine.
It was just a tragedy.
No one would have believed that story, right?
After all of the lawfare, they killed him.
That's what the average person, especially a Trump supporter, would be.
And I think it was designed to be that flimsy of a story.
Mm-hmm.
people to react or to get federal agent provocateurs disguised as Trump supporters to react to bring us to the brink of civil war to bring martial law in to cancel the elections likewise if Trump would have been killed a you know a couple of Sundays ago the the guy Ralph is essentially this international man of of espionage I'm I mean, he's a media darling.
He's a mockingbird media darling.
He goes to Ukraine.
He's all in for the State Department and the CIA narrative about Ukraine and Russia and all this other stuff.
No one would have believed this was just some random crazy person.
They would have thought, wow, this guy has intelligent asset written all over him.
Again, it would have sparked, I believe, some sort of conflict, giving them the excuse to cancel elections and really just go full mask off communism.
Do you agree with that assessment?
Oh, 100%.
100%.
One thing I wanted to mention, though, you had mentioned 2014 as being kind of the tipping point for the Bundy standoff.
Really, it started in 1992 when the BLM had, Bureau of Land Management had posters on their wall about getting rid of the ranchers.
So one thing I want to be very clear is this has been a long...
This didn't happen overnight.
In the early 90s, they were already planning on removing the rancher.
In terms of what you had said about the potential Trump assassination, yes, I 100% agree.
But I think, you know, there was a book by an economist, I can't remember in the early 1900s, where he gives a lot of intrinsic value to how humans react and the unpredictability Of their reaction, right?
And, you know, I think the bad guys think that, hey, you kill Trump, and then all of a sudden, it's like, we're, our tyranny is all good.
And I simply do not think that that's the way it plays out.
I see this country, and I do think this is a better option than going into Kamala Harris presidency, a stolen election.
Which is very apparent right now that if she does win, it will be a stolen election.
I do believe that we're better off seceding as a nation and having half the nation.
I could see Texas seceding and then a bunch of other states following.
Under constitutional principles, I'd rather be part of half of the United States nation, like the United States minor or whatever it's called, than trying to go along with this nonsense.
Because it's very clear that these guys want to get us into 15-minute cities.
They want us to do something that's much worse than Stalin-type communism or Hitlerian agendas.
This is much worse because they have the technology to suppress us right now.
So I'm a huge fan of secession if they try to steal this.
The technology exists.
We have the technology to enslave ourselves.
And, you know, you can argue that we are already really far down that path.
It's interesting that you say that.
So just on a standpoint of, you know, I use the term Christian red states because, especially in the South, that seems to be what's going on when you look at some of the laws they're passing, you know, to protect kids from the degeneracy and that sort of thing.
And I think one of the silver linings, obviously Roe versus Wade being overturned was a great thing and sent it back to the states.
I'm not exactly thrilled to where the official Republican position on that is right now, but I understand that's just the reality that we're in right now.
But one of the things that it did was it It reawakened this concept of states' rights, right?
Of a nation, of different patchworks of laws.
And I think that's really, really good.
However, if Kamala steals it and gets in, packs the Supreme Court or whatever, it's only a matter of time before we get another ruling from the Supreme Court saying, no, you have to let this parent drag this child to a drag show to be ogled by half-naked you have to let this parent drag this child to a It's only a matter of time before we can no longer pass laws governing ourselves and protecting kids, right?
Based on that, I don't think we're going to go along with it.
I really don't.
I think the individual states are going to start reasserting themselves and governing themselves in ways that are in stark opposition to what the federal government wants.
And I think that does inevitably lead to a conflict.
I mean, when you are going down this path of devilry and hell, and you're telling the rest of the citizens that they have to go along with it and they have to bend the knee, there's eventually going to be a giant conflict with it.
So I agree with you on that point.
Yeah, and frankly, this might be, with how bad things have gotten, this might actually be essential for there to be some sort of conflict.
I'm not condoning violence.
I'm not saying that.
Of course not.
But if you look at how crazy it's gotten, we're talking about castrating children, and this is even a logical conversation.
And calling it health care.
And instead of calling it abuse, which is what that is, we're saying, no, this is health care?
Yeah, we allow too much.
I mean, abortion is not healthcare, you know?
It's a tiny fraction of women that get raped and they keep using these, you know, almost like the Hail Mary scenario to justify the mass slaughter of children, to justify the castration of children, right?
So, I mean, it is so beyond ridiculous.
The fact that we're even talking about this is ridiculous.
This should not even be a topic of conversation.
In fact, I got to tell you, Paul, about this Show that we do on America Happens, you know, it's kind of a quirky little show, but it's about a guy, it's about an alien named Mr.
Disco Ballhead that is from Disco Ballhead Planet, and he observes the silly earthlings and all the dumb things that they're doing, right?
It's actually, I apologize, I don't know, can we curse on this show?
Is there if I throw up?
I try to avoid it, but hey, you know, I mean, we're not, we're technically not bound by the FCC. Okay, so the name of the show is Un-F-F-U-C, you know?
You're right.
Your Mind.
And it's with Mr.
Discoble.
And it's all about really undoing the brainwashing because the effect of brainwashing on this earth seems to be very powerful because we're accepting things that are absolutely ridiculous, right?
And Ronald Reagan at one point said, you know, if the aliens are observing us, he was talking about UFOs, I think it was 1986, like how would we, if there was an alien invasion, how would we react?
Right.
All of a sudden, you know, Earth, you know, everybody would join together.
We'd have like harmonious ideas and that sort of thing.
And that's the gist of this show, because it's really like if you're observing this from a distance and you're not part of the brainwashing, we're beyond ridiculous.
I mean, the whole Earth looks like we've literally lost our minds.
And I especially feel strong about that topic when it comes to children.
Because as a child, you know, when I was growing up, you know, just a little bit of what I observed.
You know, I had friends that used to get dressed up as girls when they're eight, nine years old.
They didn't know better because they haven't reached that age of sexualization, right?
And now you have these psycho teachers that would see that sort of thing where a kid's just playing dressed up.
He doesn't know the difference, you know, at that point because they're not sexualized.
And they would grab that shoulder and put them on hormone blockers, cut the person's, you know, penis off.
You know, I mean, we saw what happened with that kind of abuse with a gentleman like Michael Jackson.
That stuff leads to disaster.
That stuff leads to a life not fulfilled, to be castrated, chemically castrated at such a young age.
Yet we're doing it wholesale because of third wave feminism or whatever.
I mean, it's absolute insanity.
And, you know, Mr.
Disco Ballhead, our resident alien at the America Happens Network, I think makes a lot of humor with that topic.
I'm definitely going to check that show out.
I really am.
You bring up an interesting point.
I think the reason why these teachers, they look at that, and a lot of them are sexual deviants themselves.
We're consumed by sex.
Everything is through the lens of sex.
But a child isn't sexual.
But they project that.
It's like our value as human beings.
You're not valuable unless you focus on You know, your sexual proclivities and, like, that's everything.
That's all you are.
All you are is who you want to sleep with.
That's it.
Well, a child doesn't want to do that, and so they can't comprehend that innocence.
And so all they can do is take it and destroy it and put kids on a path, a dark, dark path.
So you raised the industry board.
I'll give you the last word, Van Miller.
Sure.
Sure.
You know, I want to mention something that actually another podcaster had mentioned.
He said that, look, this stuff's so ridiculous that until a bunch of alpha males walk into our government office with big red crosses, and I'm not talking about violence, but definitely making their presence known with strong imagery that combats their Luciferian imagery, until that happens, none of this stuff is going to correct itself.
because until these people understand that you have crossed the line and now you're putting yourself in danger for child abuse, for genocide, because that's what it is.
Look at the crimes against humanity, what genocide entails.
What they're doing is genocide when you erase somebody's identity.
You don't have to murder people unless we as men make a point of just fucking Follow our laws or you're going to get into trouble because you're somebody committing crimes against humanity on this land.
I don't know if this gets anywhere.
But, you know, real quickly, just to wrap it up, for the viewers out there, definitely check out AmericaHappens.com.
We have a great feature section.
We also are on Roku, Amazon Fire, Apple TV. We're on X. Our X handle is AmericaHappens1.
Mine is not VenMiller, which is spelled VEM, by the way, right down there.
Because I didn't get my Twitter 1.0 account back.
So I used to be Vim Miller.
I'm not Vim Miller now.
So definitely follow us.
And we appreciate you checking out our work.
Hey, absolutely, Vim.
And it's great to meet you.
And I'd love to do this again sometime on whatever topic.
Originally, I just want to make everything good.
Originally, our topic was on the 700 deep staters that have endorsed Kamala.
No surprise.
We talked everything from corrupt financial system to try to stop the abuse of our children.
I love it.
I think it's fantastic.
And by the way, the reason I brought up the Bundy versus Deep State thing, which is what was the substance of most of our conversation, is because it directly ties into that.
It directly ties into the 700 agents.
And it really exposes why they're doing this.
Because they're doing this to fill their pockets.
We show how they fill their pockets.
And that's what this is all about.
Ben Miller, appreciate it, sir.
Thank you so much for being with us.
We'll do it again soon.
Thank you, sir.
Alrighty, folks.
That's all the time that we have for this episode.
But we're going to take a break, and we're going to come back, so don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report, and we'll be back here in just a moment.
We are in a situation where the markets will correct itself.
The bulls will continue to die down very, very quickly.
My question to you is, what are you doing right now to protect yourself?
We have accounts that can grow with the S&P 500, sometimes even better, that have a rotator index that can go to commodities, treasuries, S&P and NASDAQ. Not quarterly, not monthly, but daily.
And right now, interest rates are lowering.
I can't offer this for a long time, but right now they're still offering a 20% sign-on bonus within a guaranteed environment, insurance-based product.
That's why it's guaranteed.
It's out of the stock market, out of the Wilk agenda, anti-CBDC, anti-DEI, anti-communism, private insured account.
We can get a 20% bonus for a 0.95 annual fee.
The only bad part is you only have access to 10% a year, but typically your money is going to double within 4 to 6 years on average because it's going to average about 7 to 14% a year depending on the index, on the growth.
Past performances is not indicative of future results.
But it doesn't matter because you have principal protection.
You don't have principal protection right now.
If you're just stuck in the stock market, you know you need to make a change in 2024.
Then give us a call, 813-448-3446, or visit us at CortezWM.com.
and listen all right folks welcome back to the show millstone report uh Great interview there with Van Miller.
Really, I can't wait to have him on again, because obviously you can tell he's a wealth of information about everything that's going on.
Really good, yeah, but no surprise, Intel oligarchs endorse Kamala Harris, and this story was over at the Breitbart News.
Deep staters back.
These are the same guys that told us about the Hunter Biden laptop being Russian disinformation.
Of course, we all know that.
Well, one of the things I want to get to, you know, one of the things that Van Miller said there is this is not going to stop until alpha males go into our government buildings and start essentially standing up for what's right with the same fervor that society stands up for what is evil.
Standing up for what is good.
He even said with crosses...
And saying, you know, we're going to stop this nonsense, right?
And that got me thinking, and this is actually a perfect segue into our friend, friend of the program, Dr.
Stephen Wolf, who is the author of The Case for Christian Nationalism, a very successful book that's still ruffling feathers because he is embracing historic Protestant Christian political thought and saying, hey, I think we need to take a look at this.
I think cultural neutrality is a myth.
I think the secular society has gotten us where we are today, the abuse of kids and calling abusive children health care.
And so he's actually been traveling abroad recently.
He's back in the U.S. He reached out to me the other day.
He's back in the U.S., but he's been traveling abroad giving lectures and that sort of thing.
And so, Stephen Wolf, I think he missed the Haitian pet cooking controversy.
Okay, so what I mean by this, he wasn't as active, I don't think, on Twitter.
And so at the fundamental basis of that, you had big Eva Christians who were triggered by the, you know, calling out the fact that the Haitians, whether they're there legally or not, have invaded the town of Springfield, Ohio, and have invaded the town of Springfield, Ohio, and have essentially brought the third world to that town.
A town of 60,000 gets 20,000 migrants from Haitia.
Well, this is now a Haitian town, okay, because the gap between the cultures, the gap between the civilization.
You could say gap if that makes you uncomfortable.
You could just use the word difference.
But, you know, I think it's a gap.
And I think I'm willing to say, are you, that a first world country is better than a third world country, okay?
And the values of the people in the first world country...
are better than the values and the conditions and or the conditions in the third world country.
It's really not controversial.
It's only controversial if you buy into this propaganda that we've been raised on, which essentially Makes us want to destroy our civilization and feel guilty about the prosperity we have that other people don't.
Being made to feel guilty about a better functioning society that disproves multiculturalism and everything's equal.
This is what, especially my generation, I was born in 1984, which by the way, it's like I wonder if when it's all said and done, we'll look back, and those who are born in 1984 are actually going to witness the Orwellian nightmare that is 84.
Anyway, Stephen Wolfe, the author of The Case for Christian Nationalism, this is what he says, and this is sparked controversy across Christian X. He says, But to prefer your people over other peoples.
Christianity, as the true religion affirming what is true, good, and beautiful, commands you to love all.
Okay.
I think Big Eva is all on board with that statement, but to prefer your people over other peoples.
And this has sent many into a frenzy, a whatabout frenzy.
Some people call it a Jesus-juke frenzy.
Here's John Harris, who's got a really good podcast that's, let's see, Conversations That Matter.
Check his podcast out, by the way.
He just says, hey, this is an obvious truth and people are losing their minds over.
You're exactly right.
Here is a guy by the name of Samuel Say.
He took issue with this.
He's a Christian author.
I believe he lives in Canada.
He says, if he means Christianity commands me to prefer Christians over other people, he's right.
If he means Christianity commands me to prefer people with my skin color over other people, he's shamefully wrong.
But these peculiarly vague tweets have become the norm with Mr.
Wolf.
This is a good conversation.
This is a healthy exchange between Christian brothers.
Brian Sauvé.
Brian Sauvé says, actually, this is boilerplate reformed ethics.
If you are to be a godly man, you have duties to love to some that are more intense than they are to others.
If I fail to provide for my household, I've denied the faith.
If I fail to provide for your household, I haven't.
Samuel says, of course.
But given much of what has been by many Reformed people on this platform, quote, my peoples, end quote, doesn't always mean just their household, hence my tweet.
And then Brian Sauvé responds, again, the boilerplate reformed way of thinking about hierarchies of responsibility and duty from the family on up to the nation and the ethics surrounding these things is through the fifth commandment, reasoning from the family to the nation.
It's a constant thread in reformed ethics.
Having special concern for your people, the family, on up to your kinsmen and nation, is natural, good, right, proper, and just.
To fail in this affection would be evidence of some defect somewhere.
He goes on to say, Paul spoke this way concerning his kinsmen, according to the flesh, that he had a particular concern for them, Romans 9.3.
Summarily, all of this is biblical and represented in the Reformed tradition, so why the rabble-rousing when Dr. Wills...
Wolfe says what all of our Reformed forefathers do?
Samuel says, And Brian says, the people that Stephen Wolf is referring to in this talk, because there's a full talk about it in an article about it, are my particular people.
I have a particular duty to love them in a way I don't love the people of other nations, though I am called to love them as well in a way fitting my distant relationship to them.
See, we are so brainwashed by what has essentially become, you could call it race-baiting, but we've just been, in this country, or in the West, we're so potentially triggered by what before the 20th century was just obvious, self-evident truths.
But to point it out, all he's doing is point it out.
And you know, he's pointed it out in the wake of this Haitian situation that got some in the big even circles.
Oh, I can't believe these Christians are criticizing Haitians, right?
We're supposed to love our neighbor.
And the point is, it wasn't loving your neighbor.
The residents of Springfield that lived there before the Haitian invasion are actually suffering, as evidenced by countless people.
These testimonies that are circulating online, they're suffering.
So what about loving them?
It was unloving to them.
It was unloving.
It was not loving the neighbors of Springfield to allow them to be invaded by Third Worlders.
But anyway, Brian Sovey says, He says,
Samuel say, by the way, who is black?
He says, so are black Protestants, including in these particular people.
And Brian Sauve says, not all of them everywhere in the world, no.
But some of them, absolutely.
He says, I'm not talking about a group of co-extensive within the church.
That's a different thing.
I'm talking about an earthly reality, which, though less important than the heavenly reality, is still an important category that affects many aspects of life.
Did you listen to the talk?
I know it's a big ask for a social media conversation, but it captures my thinking on this well.
So anyway, it goes back and forth or whatever.
So when I said at the beginning of the show, ladies and gentlemen, when I said that the nation state, I mentioned, we were talking in the broader scope of things, that one of the reasons I think, and it may be a small reason, and it may be insufficient to fully describe why they want to kill Donald Trump, But I think one of the reasons is because he is not opposed to the concept of the nation state.
He's not opposed to the concept of nations are good.
We've always had nations.
We've always had borders.
We've always had different people groups within the nations.
And the globalist idea is a Tower of Babel idea.
It's completely against that.
We're not going to have nations.
We're not going to have distinct nations, right?
There can be Christian nations, and there can be many Christian nations that share You know, share what it means to have a Christian society being populated full of Christians who believe in Jesus Christ.
But each one of those Christian nations can actually look a little different.
Right?
You know, they have the main thing that binds them together, which is God and the heavenly kingdom.
But you also have many different distinctions, like language, for example.
It would be a big one.
So, for example, I might have the most in common, in terms of the lowest common denominator, With somebody from Ghana.
A Christian.
A Christian.
I believe in Jesus.
He believes in Jesus.
Okay?
But you put the two of us in a room and tell us to build a civilization together, how would that even work?
Right?
And so, all of this conversation is just bringing up this fact that we're now afraid of.
Essentially, the self-evident natural state of things that there are nations and nations are okay.
We are up against forces that don't want nations.
We are up against forces that want to deny what is just natural in terms of having more.
It's easier to love your family.
It's easier to love your family.
uh than it is to love the stranger this is this is a natural thing that doesn't mean you don't love the stranger when you're given the opportunity but you have a greater affection for your children and your wife and your family than you do people outside of that and that then that also would uh in the hierarchical sense would go towards your city your county your state your nation okay now uh we have somebody named lizzie
uh marbach who says i prefer to hang out with my own family more than i prefer to hang out with other families Is this hateful?
Is it hateful?
Is Big Eva going to say that's hateful?
Do you understand?
There's probably some people like, well, why are you having this conversation?
Yes, it is necessary.
It is necessary because of how some of these people, like Russell Moore, who is Big Eva and not even on the right, how they want to shame Christians who are standing up for the nation-state, standing up for strong borders, in order to love the people that actually live here now.
Stephen Wolfe.
So somebody criticized this.
So a guy by the name of Dr.
Kevin M. Young, who is a heretic, he is a heretic that apologizes for, makes excuses for, you know, homosexuality and sodomy and claims to be a Christian.
And he says that Stephen Wolf's statement, let me read Stephen Wolf's statement again.
He says, Christianity, as the true religion, affirming what is true, good, and beautiful, commands you to love all but to prefer your people over other people's.
This guy says that Kevin M. Young says literal heresy, literal evil.
To where a guy by the name of David Banson says Christianity literally commands the opposite.
But hey, we got to go.
We got to the place many of us knew we were going to get to two years ago.
Meaning this Banson guy has never liked what Stephen Wolf has had to say.
And he's taking a lot of criticism.
This Banson guy's taking a lot of criticism for essentially retweeting who many people believe to be a heretic who is pro-gay and saying that the Bible doesn't speak the way the Bible clearly speaks.
And Stephen Wolf just actually says, I believe him.
That's why David and his neocon friends send Southern boys to fight in foreign wars for, quote, freedom, end quote.
And we can't have a Big Eva controversy on X without Owen Strayen joining the fray.
This is a guy who is very, very sensitive to people like Dr.
Stephen Wolf.
He says, just so we're clear, if you're a Christian and your people aren't blood-bought Christians by your own lips, then your people genuinely aren't blood-bought Christians.
This has massive implications eternal.
He's kind of getting roasted in the comments.
Neo-Orthodox Disrespecter writes, You're being pedantic.
Of course we belong to the eternal eschatological church, a people purchased by Christ, but we also belong to a natural family, tribe, and nation.
Those are our people too.
This little spat on Christian X is necessary.
This is a necessary thing that has to happen.
Um...
Again, Lizzie Marbach.
My son is one years old, and he's not a regenerate Christian yet, according to Lizzie.
She writes, Is my son not my people?
And then, of course, my favorite...
No, that's not my favorite.
Here's another one.
Will you find sin even in Paul's attitude then?
Romans 9.
Owen, balance is key.
Opposing a certain view by going far into the opposite is not a proper theological position.
You are doing nothing productive by erasing any kin relationships and bonds when opposing kinism.
This is my favorite response to it.
A guy by the name of David Negley has the post, the screen grab from...
Lord of the Rings, I swear to you, I will not let the white city fall, nor our people fail.
And then Boromir says, wow, Aragorn, white nationalist much?
That's fantastic.
Anyway...
That's that little spat.
But back to the Haitians.
Megyn Kelly reminds us on Twitter, to all of those on the left and in the media spilling barrels of ink on whether they're eating the pets in Springfield, anyone care about the fact that they're raping the children in Nantucket?
This report from Bill Mulligan in a multi-day operation on Nantucket Island ICE's Boston office announces they arrested four illegal aliens who are charged with raping or sexually assaulting Nantucket children or residents, all of whom were released from local custody despite the serious charges.
And then they list these criminal freaks who have no business in our society.
They have no business being here in our society.
So...
Do I think they're stealing pets and cooking them?
Yeah, because number one, the city manager said back in March on tape that they've fielded complaints, regardless of what David Muir said on ABC News during the debate.
Never mind the fact that we have the reports of them picking up the geese in the park and everything else.
But Megyn Kelly raises an excellent point.
Does it really even matter when they're doing way worse to the animals, or I say way worse to the children than the animals?
Elon Musk echoes it exactly.
So yeah, this is a big deal.
And it's a conversation that needs to be had, desperately needs to be had.
So in other news, Christianity Today, which is a liberal rag, which works hand-in-glove with, you know, really David Franch of the New York Times.
Christianity Today, run by Russell Moore, again, who was the useful, the useful, quote, Christian who went and robbed Reiner's film God and Country to try to slander all Christians.
Tried to promote the boogeyman, the Christian nationalist boogeyman.
I'll say this on the program again for those of you who are new to the show.
Whether you like the term Christian nationalist or not, it doesn't really matter.
If you believe in Jesus and if you vote, congratulations.
According to the left, you are a Christian nationalist.
And that is all they need to put you in a boxcar in the future.
And there are two types of people, I think, in the Christian community.
See, I love to use that word, Christian community, because the media will never use the word Christian community.
They reserve words like community for the LGBTQ community.
That's why I actually try on this show.
I don't succeed all the time, but I try on this program to never use the phrase LGBTQ community.
I try to use the words, you know, oh, I don't know, enclave or mafia or...
But not community, because community implies this neutral, non-threatening veneer, right?
But Christians do have a community.
So within the Christian community, I think there are two types of people.
There are those who believe...
We're on the path to them putting Christians in boxcars, and we're behaving accordingly.
And there are those who haven't come to that conclusion yet.
The Christians, and I do believe there are genuine Christians out there who have not come to this conclusion yet.
Those who have not come to that conclusion, they look at those of us who have and the things that we're doing, or the things that we're saying, or the things that we're preparing for, and they look at us like we're crazy.
They look at us like, oh my goodness, I think you may have made an idol out of politics.
And they don't understand that, actually, no, Christians, you can make an idol out of anything.
You can make an idol out of politics.
But on the other side, Christians can also care really deeply about certain issues and not be an idol.
They can care deeply for their families and want to protect them from a culture that's wanting to devour them, from a culture that's setting their sights on our children and our families and our way of life.
Is that wrong to point out?
Does that make people fear a nationalist bent?
Anyway, Mike Cosper of Christianity Today sat down with NIH director, former NIH director, Francis Collins, to talk about the lessons learned during COVID, things he'd do differently, the nature and limits of science and the experience of having your own community the nature and limits of science and the experience of having your own It was a remarkable conversation, according to Mike Cosper.
Thankfully, former Trump administration official William Wolfe did not let him off the hook, says that you're sick, you're deeply sick.
Shame on you for promoting this wicked man, Mike Cosper.
And I concur.
I actually concur because I think what happened to our kids during COVID and the people that are still apologizing for it deserve millstones around their neck.
William Wolfe also goes on to say that Francis Collins should be tried for crimes against humanity, not...
not platformed on a, quote, Christian, end quote, podcast.
Christianity Today magazine is truly doing the work of its father, the father of lies.
Tell me what you think about that.
Also, speaking of millstones, look at this.
Smash Bales reminding us, here's a first United Methodist Church wanting Christians to stop quoting scripture.
Yeah, you heard that right.
They shame Christians by saying, stop walking around with a mouth full of scriptures and a heart full of hate.
Again, they're disguising hate for actual biblical fidelity and wanting people to turn for their sins, repent of their sins, and trust in Jesus Christ to save them.
But, you know, the Bible and the truths in the scripture can make people very angry, which is why, and we'll cover this tomorrow, but that's the reason why you can't spell out Jesus on a Coke can, the little automated Coke can things that they're but that's the reason why you can't spell out Jesus on a Coke can, the little automated Coke can things that they're doing, but you can put Buddha, The computer won't let you spell the name of Jesus on a Coke can.
Did you know that?
It's going viral.
That's all the time we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll be back here tomorrow wishing you a happy Thursday.
God bless everybody out there watching.
▲
Export Selection