Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 18, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:55:59

Logos Academy Episode 5: Faith and Leadership

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Alright, ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome everybody to episode 5 of Logos Academy.
	It's a little dark out today.
	It's been a really overcast day.
	Today we're going to discuss faith and leadership on the show.
	Again, it's the fifth episode of the show.
	One moment, I'm going to pull the chat room up here so we can make sure we see everybody.
	Bear with me.
	If I can find it.
	There we go.
	Okay.
	So today we're going to talk about faith and leadership.
	This is a topic of importance.
	I think leadership specifically.
	I'm actually probably going to reverse the topics.
	And I'm going to talk about leadership first and then faith second.
	But I do think these things intertwine a little bit.
	And we have to...
	Analyze how they should be handled moving forward.
	We have a lot of arguments and misconceptions and there's a lot of maybe confusion and a lack of direction in the...
	We'll call it a movement right now, but movement is a really tough word to use, seeing as most people in the world that are starting to figure these things out and wake up to what's going on in the...
	Political sphere.
	They don't exactly know who to follow, or where to go, or what path to take.
	I participate in a lot of Twitter spaces, and in these spaces, there's a question that comes up all the time.
	They'll say, hey, I'm starting to see a lot of problems in my country, a lot of issues with Jewish power, and what's going on in modern society, and I don't know what to do.
	What can I do?
	We get this question all the time.
	A lot of people are Waking up, they're figuring these things out, they're on the path or the ramp upwards, but they don't know how to participate, and rightfully so.
	You can't just jump in full force for a lot of situations.
	A lot of people know that they're going to get some kind of social backlash or outcasting.
	I'm getting a weird pop-up on my computer here.
	Hold on.
	Okay, that was weird.
	A lot of people are worried about the social backlash that comes with saying these things.
	I don't expect everybody to put their face out there and start advocating for some of the things that we advocate for publicly.
	You're going to get social backlash.
	You're going to probably lose your job or lose friends and family and things of the sort.
	Not everybody can just jump in full force and put their whole head in the water.
	You have to dip the toe for most people.
	When a lot of these people ask, where do we go?
	What do I do?
	They are essentially looking for a leader.
	They're looking for somebody to guide them in the right direction and push them forward with the circumstances that we have.
	We don't really have a leader right now.
	We don't have any one guy that we can look at and say, oh, he's the go-to.
	That's the authority here.
	We don't have...
	Any single person that we can look at and trust that they have our best interest at heart.
	Everybody has a different person.
	Some people are following a guy like Stu Peters.
	Some people are following a guy like Alex Jones.
	Some people are following a guy like Thomas Sewell.
	You have these different people in different categories.
	And...
	No one has the one authority that kind of determines where we go moving forward.
	So what we have to start doing in this situation of confusion and mix-mashing of understandings of things, we have to start determining what a leadership is or what a leader is or what leadership material is rather Who constitutes that material?
	Who can be a leader for us moving forward?
	No group, no movement, no organization has ever functioned without a leader of some kind.
	And this isn't to say that we're supposed to just sit on our asses and wait for the guy to come save us.
	That's not what we're saying here.
	You obviously have to take your own actions.
	But one of those actions is to start to determine who a leader is.
	What are the qualities that constitute a leader?
	And Who meets those criterium?
	And just meeting the criterium isn't enough to be a leader in a lot of these circumstances.
	So, thank you, Kate.
	Welcome.
	I see we've got a lot of people coming to the chat.
	I'll kind of let some people filter in first, then we'll get maybe a little more into the topic.
	I see there's a lot of people coming in right now.
	Welcome, welcome.
	I see we've got a lot of people over on the Odyssey.
	Odyssey.
	Hello, folks.
	Yeah, a lot of people, unfortunately, look at Trump as a leader.
	And, you know, the thing is, Trump holds some of those qualities that we'll discuss.
	But he does lack in the...
	Well, in other qualities, right?
	So there's a lot of qualities.
	There's good qualities.
	There's bad qualities.
	And he certainly holds a lot of those good qualities.
	He's good at rousing up a crowd.
	He's got a good charisma.
	He has a good...
	I guess we'll call it a masculine kind of energy about him.
	However, his convictions are laid in the wrong places.
	And he does not advocate for the people that are necessary for things to change.
	You never will see him advocating for the collective white people or white America.
	He loves to stand on the stage and talk about black America and Israel and all these different minority groups that are not the mass populace, but he never seems to stand up for the mass populace, which is where he gets the majority of his vote.
	And you have to question why that is.
	That's a good explanation.
	Carl says Trump is a proof that a golden mouthpiece is more effective than actual results.
	That's a very good point.
	So this is the problem we have right now.
	A lot of people look to social media influencers as leaders in our society.
	They look at a guy, Lucas Gage is probably a really good modern example of this.
	They look at him as a leader, but he's not really a leader.
	He's an influencer, right?
	The leaders have to be somebody that has these qualities.
	We'll go into these qualities a little bit, but A couple qualities that are for a leader, specifically.
	Number one is they have to have firm conviction.
	A leader has to be somebody that sets a standard, sets this kind of line, and moving forward says, this is the line.
	This is what must be done.
	This is how things must be done.
	And if anything doesn't meet that criterion, it's out.
	So a leader has to be authoritarian and they have to be convicted.
	Secondly, a leader has to be charismatic.
	They have to be able to wake people up.
	They have to be able to keep people enthralled, grab their interest, pull their attention, and excite them so that they're able to listen.
	A lot of people aren't going to listen to...
	Let me try to think of an example of a guy who's Really intelligent.
	Maybe somebody like Jared Taylor, as an example.
	Jared Taylor is a very smart guy.
	Very, very intelligent.
	But he doesn't hold that energy, that spirit that's required to rouse up people against something, or for something, rather.
	He doesn't have that energy that's required in that.
	So, he can't lead.
	He doesn't hold the qualities that are necessary.
	A good leader has to be strong.
	They have to be intellectual.
	They have to have an understanding of the circumstance.
	That's a really big one.
	There's very few people, I feel, that have that really strong understanding of the circumstance that we're in are extremely...
	educated on the plagues around us and then have the solution.
	You can't have the solution and the understanding of how to move forward without the knowledge.
	Think about this militaristically.
	If you're a general, a general is a guy who's very, very intelligent when it comes to warfare.
	He has a good understanding of what troops to use for what circumstances, where to align those troops, how to suggest them into certain directions.
	This This is lacking in a lot of leaders today.
	They don't have the knowledge that is required to figure out what to do.
	Do we infiltrate the system?
	Do we work from outside the system?
	Do we do a combination of both of these things?
	Not a lot of people are talking about these types of situations.
	And without that kind of question, without looking at a leader and determining...
	A plan of action moving forward.
	Well, if they don't have that plan of action, they're really not a leader, right?
	A leader has to have a plan.
	They have to have a way forward.
	This is where we go.
	This is how we take these things.
	And this is how it's done, right?
	We stick to the plan.
	We don't have a plan.
	We don't have leaders.
	Dude, I didn't say I was.
	Thank you, though.
	Appreciate that.
	Holokoff with a $1 super chat.
	He says, Logos revealed.
	Hope all is well.
	It is, brother.
	It is.
	Thank you very much.
	I appreciate that.
	Yeah, experience is a good quality for leadership as well.
	A leader will have a lot of experience in several fields.
	They have to have on-the-ground experience.
	Let's look at National Socialist Germany as a really good example.
	When Hitler came to power Undoubtedly, he was a very astounding leader.
	He was able to flip his economy on its head.
	He was able to have this massive uplift in society and the social apparatus of the country.
	Only a good leader could do these things, and especially in this extremely short time frame that he was capable of doing that.
	This is because he had experience.
	You look back, he was in war.
	He fought in war, so he had militaristic experience and an understanding of that.
	He was educated.
	He read a lot of works.
	He was philosophically inclined, and he was very inclined on what we'd call the social question.
	And the social question is...
	It's a very broad question, but it's an important question, especially for a leader.
	Social question is essentially, what helps society?
	Social and society.
	Social is what is good for the society.
	The society is the apparatus where people socialize with each other.
	Being social...
	Is how well you can work with others in your community.
	How well you can uplift people in your community.
	Be around them.
	You might not agree with everybody in your community, but you have to be able to uplift them and have this human level of Ability to exercise with these people.
	And this is the problem with a lot of some of our movements that are moving around right now.
	They're inherently antisocial, right?
	So we have to have this healthy combination.
	There is people that are in the system.
	They want to infiltrate the Republican Party and fix this through the voting system.
	And there's people that are outside of the system that want to revolt against the system and put something new in its stead.
	The problem is we have to have a hybrid of the two.
	Again, we mention this all the time on the show, but black and white is a really dangerous kind of a circumstance.
	We need to have that gray area where we can look in between the lines.
	And say, you know, sometimes a little bit of white is good here and sometimes a little bit of black is good here.
	We have to swash the colors, right, in the painting and figure out where things belong in what circumstance.
	And this is something that a lot of people don't like to do.
	We get people in very fervent camps.
	Whether you see this in, like, Antifa is probably a solid example.
	They become...
	Very convicted in one specific category, and this is the way things are.
	If you don't think exactly like this, then you are against me, and I hate you, and that's the way these things are.
	And this is overly polarizing.
	We saw it with the vaccine as well, in the whole COVID agenda, for what that was worth.
	With this whole vaccine circumstance, if I was to just go up to somebody, and I'm against this whole Right and left paradigm stuff.
	I don't believe in it.
	So if I was to go to somebody and say, yeah, I'm not for the vaccine.
	I think that's crazy.
	People will jump in and they're like, oh, well, that means that you're a Trump supporter.
	And it's like, no.
	So things become so polarized that you have to put yourself in a camp.
	And if somebody says any one little thing that can be interpreted as not being a part of that camp, war begins.
	People start to People start to attack each other at mass scale.
	And we see this far too often on so many circumstances.
	It's not just politics.
	It's not just religion.
	You see this on all these different kind of levels.
	So a leader understands how to control those circumstances.
	They control...
	Not allowing people to pull one way or the other in this full position.
	We have to have, you said it pretty well, nuance.
	We have to have a nuance in our discussions.
	Yeah, I agree.
	It's a diversity of thought and a diversity of tactic, right?
	Not to be confused with the modern conception of diversity, which is a terrible and very diluted one.
	It's dangerous.
	It's dangerous.
	So we have to look at who's capable of being leaders today, because one thing we do need is we need a leader.
	We need somebody that can step in and Cut out the arguments that happen in between peoples and groups.
	Cut out the misconceptions and miscommunications.
	We have to have somebody that can control these circumstances.
	And again, it has to have a plan of action.
	What's the plan?
	Everybody knows society's collapsing.
	Everybody knows that our government is corrupt.
	Everybody knows that everything around us is in a state of decay.
	But no one's laid out the plan.
	Some people say we have to vote harder.
	Some people say we have to infiltrate the Republican Party and fix the party from within.
	Some people say that we need to revolt against all of it and tear it all down.
	What's the plan?
	Right?
	Everybody has their own thought, but there still is no necessarily a plan that's laid out for anybody to see.
	There's no document where, you know, you can just go and read it and say, okay, this is what we're doing, steps one to ten, and then we'll have our society back and we'll be in a good spot and we'll be rid ourselves of this treasonous government.
	No one has that plan.
	No one has a constitution, so to speak, of how things should go.
	And without that, we're without a sense of direction.
	And this is very problematic.
	Because right now, a lot of people feel the pressures, the stresses of a collapsing society, and they're lashing out against this with no real direction.
	And without that direction, it's never going to really be beneficial for anyone.
	One said, we need to gain wealth and power.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Wealth and power are definitely a piece.
	There are a lot of...
	How do I say this?
	There's a lot of things that need to be done.
	Wealth and power are only one piece of the puzzle.
	Being wealthy and powerful...
	It helps, obviously.
	It will sway our ability to take care of some of these things.
	But that in itself won't fix the problem.
	If we don't have men that are, again, strong and convicted and intelligent with that wealth and power, it's kind of worthless.
	Look at a guy like Elon Musk, for example.
	He's got wealth and power, but he's not convicted.
	So he's too scared to lose that wealth or that power.
	And therefore, he'll bend the knee to to these censorship directives.
	You know, he's the one that always claims this is a free speech platform and we don't censor any voices.
	And then, you know, you get the circumstance where we're seeing people getting demonetized on platforms.
	We're seeing people lose their voices and get censored left and right.
	And that's because he needs to keep up his his power and wealth.
	So he'll bend the knee to groups like the ADL who decide, you know, hey, Elon, if you don't stop so-and-so's account, we're going to pull out advertiser revenue.
	And he doesn't want to lose the advertiser revenue.
	So he does what he has to do, right?
	He bends the knee.
	And this is the problem.
	That's not a leader.
	He has the material assets to be a leader, but he doesn't have the psychological assets to be a leader.
	That's a good point.
	Okay.
	He says, the movement has always been like herding cats.
	Too many chiefs.
	Nobody wants to be an Indian.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	This is a common problem.
	Everybody thinks they know the path forward.
	Everybody thinks that they are the one that's going to be the next guy leading us out of the darkness.
	And that's where kind of ego and pride come into play.
	A good leader has to have a very large control over his ego and his pride.
	Every man has an ego.
	Every man has pride deep down inside of them.
	We all have it.
	To say that we don't would be insane.
	But a good leader knows how to channel that and hold it back in certain circumstances.
	Let's think of an example here.
	Say...
	I'm to come to power, and I'm the overruling president.
	I'm the dictator of society, and I get to run how things are done.
	You could be a good dictator and you could be a bad dictator.
	We've talked about this before.
	So a bad dictator would be one who has a cabinet of people that are advisors that are trying to give him advice on certain things such as military endeavors or financial advice or things of the sort.
	A bad dictator would be one that ignores all that advice and says, nah, I don't want to listen to what you have to say.
	I think I know better.
	A good dictator would be one who looks at it and says, You make a good point here.
	I'm going to allow my pride to go down and think that maybe you know something better than me in this category.
	No one's going to be an expert in every single field.
	There's no such thing.
	There's no one man who's an expert in military endeavors, an expert in history, an expert in philosophy, an expert in on-the-ground tactics, an expert in...
	There's no one man that is capable of all of those things.
	You have to be able to delineate some of those different thoughts or different feelings into other people.
	You have to let people take the reins on some things.
	And if you're not capable of doing that, then your pride and your ego are going to get in the way of true leadership.
	So a good leader has to be devoid of, not devoid of ego, but they have to have a control of ego and not allow it to blind them in these circumstances.
	A good leader unites the people.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	A good leader has to be a unifying force.
	They have to be able to get people to look aside from their differences.
	One of the biggest differences right now in our movement is that people have a hard time between faith.
	Faith is...
	And we're going to go into faith in a little bit.
	That'll be the second half of the show, but...
	Faith is a really important one that a lot of people are arguing about right now.
	You've got people talking about pagan between Christian, or I am a Catholic and you're Orthodox, or I'm Protestant and you're Catholic.
	And people are arguing a lot over faith right now.
	And those arguments over faith, they have to be quarreled because they're getting in the way of a lot of genuine progress.
	I've watched a lot of these...
	Faith or theology-driven arguments cause some really serious problems.
	Yeah, a good leader has to be humble.
	Yeah.
	They have to be humble.
	They can't have these ego trips where they need to constantly tell everybody why they're better than them, have these dick-measuring competitions.
	We can't have that.
	Men can do that.
	The soldiers can do that.
	That's what men do.
	They're competitive.
	They want to fight with each other.
	They want to get a hand up against each other.
	But leaders, a leader rather, cannot do that.
	John, I agree with that.
	I definitely agree.
	Uh, Saruk Blinken.
	Again, this is where a moral code and an ethical code needs to come into play, right?
	So we have to have some kind of basis for behavior, a line, a standard that needs to be met, right?
	You know, if you are...
	A meth user.
	Are you allowed to be in this movement or with us in this fight?
	No.
	You either have to get rid of that behavior or you're just not allowed here.
	There has to be this line of conduct, right?
	Are pedophiles allowed to be working with us in what we're trying to do?
	No.
	There's a clear line on that, right?
	Sex offenders, or we have to have a moral and ethical code, a line that says, all right, this is a behavior that doesn't matter how smart you are.
	It doesn't matter how powerful you are.
	There has to be a line that's drawn.
	And that's a hard piece.
	That's a really hard piece.
	Degenerates need not apply.
	Yeah, well, that's another thing.
	We have to decide what is a degenerate, right?
	What constitutes a degenerate?
	Because there's many things that can fit into this category, right?
	Again, a sexual deviant, we can call a degenerate.
	Like a guy who has a chronic porn problem where he's constantly watching porn and masturbating.
	Is that person a degenerate?
	Yeah, they are, but are they degenerate enough that we can't have them helping us with things?
	Is somebody that has that problem, it is a degenerate problem, but is someone that has that problem, really, do they need to be shut out of a movement because of that?
	That's something that can be fixed, right?
	And it's not like entirely detrimental to the cause.
	It's a good one, Aoi.
	a little bit of like a motivational speech needs to be present.
	That's okay.
	That's a, that's a really good point.
	Uh, He says, I think being a purist is not going to work, but there also does need to be a line drawn in the sand.
	That's kind of exactly what we're saying earlier, right?
	We can't have it black and white.
	There has to be a middle ground in between, a nuance to these things, right?
	This idea that, like...
	Nobody who watches porn can be anywhere near us.
	That's crazy.
	You have to have some nuance to what your thought process is.
	The lines can be drawn, but they have to be drawn at a reasonable standpoint.
	If someone smokes cigarettes, does that mean that they can't be around us?
	We obviously want to encourage them not to smoke cigarettes anymore.
	But does that mean they can't be around us just because they smoke cigarettes?
	If a guy's got a tattoo on his leg, is he automatically out?
	Obviously, we want to encourage guys to not do that to themselves, but does that mean that it crosses the line, right?
	Yeah, good point.
	Very good point, actually.
	Yeah, dude, obviously we're at that point, right?
	I don't agree with leaving them to their own devices.
	I don't think that's healthy either.
	But I do agree that we should always be trying to uplift people and help them as best we can.
	Right.
	We have to have a standard, but the standard...
	Okay, here's the thing as well.
	If we're living in ancient Greece and we set a bar of standard, that bar is going to be a lot higher than if we set that same bar today in modern society.
	Modern society is so decayed, so decrepit.
	There are very few people that can reach a very moral standard that is necessary that...
	The standards have to be lower.
	I'm not saying we should have low standards, but the bar naturally has to be lower because it's already so low.
	If everybody's down here on the first rung of the ladder, we have to tell them, hey, we'd like to see you on rung four.
	Now, when everybody gets to rung four, then we can say, hey guys, we'd like to see you on rung eight.
	You can't tell them to go all the way up to the top when they're starting at such a low point right now.
	It's like telling a A heroin addict on the street who's homeless to like, hey bud, just clean up your act, get a car, get a job, and start doing what needs to be done.
	The bar is too high for somebody like that, right?
	You have to have this reasonability to the bar.
	The bar has to be there, but it has to be reasonable as well.
	And it has to have, there's a hierarchy system, right?
	There has to be levels to it.
	So a guy who can reach the eighth bar is in a different category of people in a society or in a movement than a guy who can only reach the fourth peg, right?
	And a guy who can only reach number one, when they're that low, that's when those people need to start being weeded out entirely.
	And it's like, okay, you're not adequate for this.
	You don't belong.
	What do I think about a Pajit Jewish alliance?
	Yeah, that's interesting.
	Very interesting.
	Related to the history of the SA and the SS... Yeah, I mean, it's a good analogy.
	The SA was...
	They were more of the muscle, right?
	The standards could be a lot lower for the SA. They're like ground troops, right?
	I'll put it in even simpler terms that are even easier to understand.
	Think about the military.
	The standards for a general are a lot higher than the standards for a sergeant, which are higher than the standards for an infantryman.
	The infantry, the standards are pretty base.
	It's like, hey, can you hold a rifle?
	Can you run?
	Do you have stamina?
	Can you stay in the desert for two weeks?
	You know, like, it's more about, like, physical attributes.
	That's the standard for the infantrymen.
	The general, it's like, it doesn't matter if the general can hold a gun.
	Can you direct a group of people?
	Can you save lives?
	Can you make sure that we're not making unnecessary sacrifices?
	You know, do you have the intelligence to know when and when not to attack on a certain sector?
	So the standards have to be higher the higher up your rank is.
	So this is why all systems in history have had a hierarchy.
	We look at our government.
	Our government right now, albeit it's decaying and it's very intertwined and it's really become beholden to these corporate interests.
	But aside from that, before this was the case, there's a hierarchy, right?
	The president, there's a higher standard for a president than there is for a senator.
	And there's a higher standard for a senator than there is for a mayor.
	And there's a higher standard for a mayor than there is for a common working person.
	So you have to have a hierarchy.
	And in that hierarchy moving forward, you have to determine what the standards are for each hierarchy.
	So again, the standard of...
	Let's use heroin.
	It's an extreme example, but let's just use that for an example because it's important.
	Someone who's a heroin addict, they don't fit in any of it.
	They can't function in society.
	They can't be a civilian in society because they can't be civilized.
	They don't meet that standard, so they're not on the page at all.
	They don't belong in the hierarchy whatsoever.
	Then you go up a notch and you say, okay, now we need ground men, men who can just run around and push that message, right?
	So what's the standard for them?
	The standard for them has to be, again, very simple.
	Behave, have some kind of discipline amongst yourself that you're not more destructive than you are beneficial.
	And you have to be fit.
	You have to be motivated.
	You have to have an enthusiasm level to you.
	That's the next standard.
	Then moving up another notch.
	People that are spreading the word of what's going on, like a propaganda minister.
	What's the standard for them?
	That person has to be sober.
	They have to be completely sober.
	They can't be drinking.
	They can't be on hardcore drugs of any kind.
	They can't even really be a pot smoker.
	They need to be sober, a sober-minded person, because they need to be able to navigate each and every conversation with very, very careful picking at threads.
	They have to be very, very careful in their delivery and their approach.
	And then you go up even further and you go to leader.
	That person has to be devoid of all of these problems.
	They can't be on drugs.
	They can't be a drinker.
	They can't be egotistical.
	They can't be obese.
	The standards have to be so much higher.
	So it's a hierarchy.
	And those standards have to fit for each person in that hierarchical body.
	That's how society always has functioned.
	That's why the standard for, well, that's even hard to use because the standards for police officers nowadays are absurd and pathetic.
	I mean, the standards for police, I mean, we're hiring like obese women as police officers.
	So that standard doesn't really apply here.
	here.
	We can't even really use that as an example.
	Here's a good comment.
	Someone says, maybe a lot of people could have potential, but everyone has been misled all their life.
	Everything promoting vice and materialism.
	Perhaps a little bit of healthy reinforcement is all that it would take to wake people up, but they have never seen it before.
	That's a good point, yeah.
	They do need healthy reinforcement.
	Everybody needs that.
	All men, especially, very much need healthy reinforcement.
	They need that That peer pressure from their peers to push themselves to be a little bit better, whether that's to exercise more, whether it's to read more, whether it's to quit the cigarettes, whatever the case may be, all men need that peer pressure.
	That's why in a friend group, you want to have guys that are competitive.
	You don't want guys that are just like, don't give a shit about things.
	They're like, yeah, you are who you are, man.
	Do what you want to do.
	You need competitive male counterparts who want to be better than you and you want to be better than them.
	And you're at wit's end with each other every day trying to see who's better.
	Kate says women should not be allowed in leadership positions or protection positions like police officers, military, etc.
	Absolutely, yeah.
	Women should never have a position of authority.
	Realistically, women should not be voting.
	That should have never been made a thing in society because we have a different scale of reason as to why we vote.
	Men vote I'll explain this because there's going to be a falsity in this when I state it, and then I'll explain that falsity and patch that up.
	Men vote based on logic.
	Women vote based on emotion.
	Women are emotional creatures.
	Men are logical creatures.
	Obviously, a logic-driven creature is going to vote on something that is...
	Logically and data-drivenly the most important thing moving forward.
	Women are going to vote for, oh, that guy has got nice hair, or, oh, he's cute, or, oh, his wife was in one of my favorite movies, right?
	So, that's dangerous.
	It's really dangerous, actually.
	I saw some clip of a woman saying that she was going to vote for Kamala Harris just because she's cute.
	What the...
	Okay, great.
	Lovely.
	First off, it's not even true.
	And secondly, how does that help anybody?
	They're not voting for adequate reasons.
	Now, granted, in the modern age, even this paradigm is backwards because there's a lot of men that vote for bad reasons too.
	There's a lot of effeminate, emotionally driven men that vote on emotion as well.
	So we're in a really tough circumstance with that.
	It's a little bit of a different case.
	But essentially...
	Excuse me.
	I did not get a lot of sleep last night.
	Essentially, voting should have higher standards in itself.
	Voting...
	We really need high standards for voting.
	18-year-olds should be...
	Think about this in the States.
	You can vote at the age of 18, but you can't drink until 21.
	That in itself is a really damning situation.
	You can...
	You can't drink, but you can vote on a person who might change a law for the ability for you to drink.
	Think about that.
	That's just insanity.
	Voting at 18 is incredibly stupid.
	I don't know who thought that one up.
	I think it's nonsensical.
	Really, I don't think people should be voting until they're like 25, 30.
	I think only people who have been well-seasoned in the course of life should be able to vote.
	We don't want the youth voting.
	The youth has to learn.
	Too many kids that are heavily misguided.
	you know, the mistakes you made at 18 compared to what you, where you live now in your life are drastically different for almost everybody.
	Yeah.
	That that's a, that's another piece as well.
	You There should be a level for people that are grown adults.
	What's the line for those people for voting?
	We've got grown adults that are alcoholics or are perpetual children who just never will grow up.
	They shouldn't be voting.
	There really should be almost like an IQ test that has to be taken in order to determine if you're capable of voting or not.
	Again, we need standards.
	We just don't have enough standards in society.
	Things are just so ambiguous.
	It's like, oh, just whatever you want.
	It's a good point.
	Kate says, it's that low, in my opinion, because they know younger people are too easily influenced.
	And that's a...
	That is a case.
	Our system is so backwards.
	The reason that they want children voting is because they can manipulate children to vote where they want them to.
	It's the same reason that they're bringing in all the immigrants from all over the world.
	They're bringing them in because they want them to vote on behalf of what they want done.
	In the past, only property owners had the right to vote.
	Is that your position?
	Yeah, I'd agree with that.
	I would agree with that.
	Because being a property owner means that you've contributed to society in some way, shape, or form.
	You can't...
	Well, even that's hard.
	But it at least means you've done more than somebody who's...
	If you can't at least function enough to own your own property, you really shouldn't be voting, right?
	I think that's a good standard.
	I think it's a very fair standard.
	Authoritarian.
	That's great.
	There are special cases.
	You're always going to find gifted individuals.
	Say what you will about a guy like Nick Fuentes, but for his age, he's done something pretty impactful.
	He's woken up a lot of people.
	He's got this massive cult following behind him.
	He's very intelligent, and he's been able to direct these people in the exact way that he wants them.
	It's impressive to say the least.
	Yeah, so lines of standards are very important.
	And that has very little to do with leadership, truthfully.
	But then it also comes down to, can a collective body determine what standards are?
	Because if 50 people are determining the standards for 5,000 people, How do we know those 50 people uphold a good enough level of standard that there's not going to be some kind of personal bias in what they're making the standards out to be, right?
	Like imagine if you got 50 people making standards and like three of them are drug addicts and five of them are like morally decrepit psychopaths and you got a couple pedophiles voting.
	It's like, well, then the standard thing doesn't really matter, right?
	So the less people that there are making the standards, the better, realistically.
	Yeah.
	Because it's less likely that those standards will be hampered by one individual's personal bias or personal problems that they're kind of trying to give some slack for.
	Video games are a whole nother discussion.
	I won't go into that.
	That'll get down a rabbit hole.
	So leaders are important and no movement, no historical thing has ever been done in history without good leaders pushing it forward.
	Whether it's Julius Caesar in history.
	I mean, even when you look at a figure like Christ, right?
	He was lacking maybe in some of the categories of leadership, but for the most part, There was a lot of leadership material there.
	He was convicted.
	He had a plan, a path forward.
	These are things that people require.
	I think these are the two biggest ones.
	It's having a plan, having a set way.
	This is what we want to do and this is how we want to do it.
	And secondly, it's having a standard, a line of standard that everybody must fit to.
	And if you don't fit to it, there needs to be that authoritative body that says you just can't participate.
	You can't be here.
	Because this is the problem with our society.
	We've let things slack so much that everybody can be wherever they want, and people just kind of shrug off a lot of these bad behaviors or these negative things in society and say, well, it's not really my problem.
	It's a free country, do what you want kind of a thing.
	It's like, yeah, we are in a free country, but...
	It's not going to be free very long if we keep letting people that are completely destructive entities inside that country continue to perpetuate their behaviors throughout the whole of the body, right?
	Yeah, Kate, that's a hard thing to back up and reverse.
	Thank you.
	I agree.
	And this is why democracy is bad.
	Again, we'll quote...
	We said this on Monday.
	Someone quoted it in the chat.
	And it's a Benjamin Franklin quote where he says, democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
	Right?
	It's a good analogy because democracy...
	You're always going to have somebody with their own personal bias voting for something that they want done.
	Let's say tomorrow, America became 51% minority groups, or black, we'll just say.
	And 49% white.
	So we became the minority tomorrow.
	In a democratic country, the majority, so if all 51% of those black people voted that white people should be mass exterminated, they could just do that.
	They could just make that vote and then now that's law.
	That's the problem here, right?
	They could say whiteness is inherently evil and we must take down the white structure.
	Therefore, it's now legal to kill them all as long as everyone votes for it.
	And if they get the mass majority of votes, then there you go.
	You have your two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner.
	So, again, this is why a constitutional republic is so important because they can't do that.
	There's a set standard of The Constitution is the standards, right?
	The Constitution literally says, you have the right to bear arms.
	It doesn't matter who the fuck votes on it.
	It doesn't matter how they vote for it, how many people vote on it.
	You have the right to bear arms.
	You have the right to freedom of speech, right?
	It doesn't matter how many people vote on it.
	It doesn't matter how many organizations try to censor it and take it down and pay people off to block it out.
	You have that right.
	The right is existent.
	I agree.
	Fixing the family unit would fix a lot of these problems.
	If you have better men in the household, you would have better father figures that were creating better children, which would make better men in the future, and it's a cycle, right?
	Right.
	That's a cyclical process.
	Those who are on welfare should not have the right to vote.
	They have the incentive to vote for more money for themselves.
	Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
	Anyone who has a dual-sided incentive should not have the right to vote.
	Voting should be very, I don't want to say holy, but it should be a thing that is very honest and high trust.
	Voting should not ever be for personal gain.
	Even when you look at People that like Trump, right?
	That voted for Trump.
	What's the reason they give?
	They're like, oh yeah, you know, gas prices were better under Trump.
	The economy was better.
	It's like, oh, all right.
	Yeah.
	But was the country overall, you know, is that still going to be better?
	Like, we have more options in the world, man.
	Trump and Biden aren't the only two people in the world here.
	I'm sure there's people that could do it better.
	And that's the problem is we're in a system where it doesn't, it doesn't matter who the hell you vote on.
	So that's a problem in itself, right?
	The voting system needs to be radically changed, rather not reformed.
	You can't reform this.
	We're so far beyond the point of reform.
	Yeah.
	I agree with that.
	I agree with that.
	All right, folks, we're coming up on the halfway point on the show.
	I'm going to take a little breather, fill up my tea a little bit.
	As usual, we'll take the little one-hour break in between.
	I think that's good because I'm not monologuing as bad today.
	I'm interacting with the chat a little more today, but these shows where I monologue, I need some breaks in between, especially if I'm talking for so long.
	I'm also very tired today.
	I did not get a lot of sleep last night.
	I got to...
	I gotta take some, like, horse tranquilizers to go to sleep, man, or something.
	I have not been getting good sleep in weeks.
	Get, like, one good night every couple weeks.
	It's really weird how it works.
	Keep waking up, like, after three hours or something.
	Alright, I'm gonna throw you guys some music.
	We're gonna take a brief intermission.
	We're gonna use the restroom.
	I'm gonna fill up my tea here.
	My tea's actually really cold.
	I'm probably gonna dump this one and get a hot one.
	Let's get some music going here.
	All right. I will be. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right.
	All right.
	All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All
	right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right. All right.
	Thank you.
	I appreciate the patience.
	Yeah, I do need some kind of little in-between break kind of show that goes on for that one hour mark.
	Because I am probably going to take those breaks regularly.
	Not regularly, like constantly, but you know what I mean.
	One break per show.
	Washington Trials, not...
	Nice.
	Happy to hear that.
	that that's great yeah spaces are time consuming I spend way too much time on those things.
	They become very addictive.
	The problem I have is I still have to figure out how to get audio on my computer for like Rumble.
	You guys probably didn't even hear the music.
	That's right.
	I forgot.
	You guys can't even hear the audio.
	Like the music audio that was on.
	Okay, Nick.
	Sounds good.
	Sounds good.
	I'll shoot you a message.
	Voodoo Ranger, welcome, brother.
	Nice to have you in here.
	Hope you're well.
	Alright folks, we're at the halfway point for everybody that's listening in.
	Don't forget, if you don't already, follow me on my platforms.
	I'm going to do the daily spuel.
	Go ahead and follow me over on Odyssey.
	It's O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	You can find me on there at Logos Revealed.
	We just hit 2,500 followers over on Odyssey.
	We've been on there for a little bit over a year, maybe a year and a half, something like that.
	It's been a very eventful year on that channel.
	We've got something like 300 videos almost archived onto there now.
	We've got interviews and all kinds of discussions, guest hosts, you name it.
	We've done it.
	So make sure that you guys catch that or follow that channel and catch the stuff that's on the channel because there's a lot of really good content over there.
	Some older content.
	I've interviewed...
	James Mason, the author of Siege.
	Actually, I've interviewed quite a few different really good book authors, probably too many to even mention, so I won't go down the list, but I've interviewed a lot of people, a lot of activists, a lot of intellectuals, you name it, and I've probably interviewed it or...
	Will in the future.
	So make sure that you guys check some of that stuff out over on my Odyssey channel.
	Also, follow me on Twitter.
	I've been doing these Twitter spaces.
	We've been doing all kinds of different clips on Twitter, trying to kind of grow the message out there a little bit.
	So make sure that you're following me on Twitter.
	It's at LogosRevealed.
	Revealed, I definitely recommend everybody does that.
	Will you be doing more classroom whiteboard videos in the future?
	No.
	Yeah.
	I literally have the next one mapped out and written up and I have the microphone set up for it.
	I just haven't done it.
	I can't do it during the day because if I do it during the day, there's an awful glare on the whiteboard.
	So I have to do it at nighttime.
	And I've barely been home, to be entirely honest.
	I've been out doing a lot of different work.
	I'm doing a lot of painting.
	I'm going to try to make some time for it.
	I know I keep saying it, but I have to actually just sit and do it.
	Jake Hoban, you don't get paid anything for streaming on Odyssey.
	Odyssey.
	The only way to...
	The only way that I'm really paid is through support, through viewers, from the audience.
	Anybody that invests in the show, that's pretty much the income for the show.
	I don't really get ad revenue or anything like that.
	I don't have any sponsors or anything.
	So it's...
	If you do want to support the show, all the options to do so are in the description below.
	You can support through Entropy, which will give you a live super chat.
	You can support through Odyssey, which will do the same thing.
	And you can also support through the crypto wallets if you're one of those crypto people.
	I know there's a lot of crypto guys out there, so that option is open as well.
	What's my name?
	Zach, but we obviously go by Logos Revealed online, as we're discussing right now.
	Speaking of investments, we got a very base one from Moondog with a 1488 investment.
	Thank you, brother.
	Greatly appreciate that.
	I'm sure you guys get the Romans in the chat for him.
	I really appreciate you.
	He says, hails.
	Hails, my friend.
	Thank you.
	Veritas says, you have a problem, Zach, and have had Is your mic volume for some reason if always lower than your audio music volume?
	I can't move the microphone any closer to my mouth.
	Here is about as close as I can have it.
	Otherwise, I'm leaning in and then I start to get neck problems from leaning into the mic too much.
	I can turn the gain up on it.
	I'll do that.
	Let me do that right now.
	Hopefully that'll get louder.
	Let me know.
	It's about as loud as I can put it without it turning into really scratchy, staticky stuff.
	I need to get better at technology.
	That's one thing that needs to be done.
	I am so bad with technology, it's not even funny.
	So yeah, you can find me on Odyssey.
	You can find me on Twitter.
	You can find me on...
	I have my own Rumble channel as well.
	I know a lot of people that are watching on Rumble are obviously watching on the Stu Peters Network, and I do appreciate you if you're over there watching.
	I'm also on my own Rumble, which is Logos Revealed Eye.
	And please, folks, don't forget to follow Stu Peters as well on the Stu Peters Network.
	It's very kind of him to give me this platform and allow me to try to reach a larger audience with my videos and content.
	I mean, we've been getting 20,000 to 30,000 views per video, which is pretty magnificent.
	You know, that's, that's a, that's a really good amount.
	I sound like a pilot on a plane making announcements.
	Is that a good thing?
	I hope that's a good thing.
	I don't know if that's good audio or bad.
	And the last thing I do want to promote, folks, is ftjmedia.com, which is owned by Dave Kharry.
	It's a brand new platform that's been circulating.
	Free speech platform, no censorship.
	You can make an account over there.
	It's ftjmedia.com.
	It stands for Freedom, Truth, Justice.
	This could also stand for something else if you're clever enough.
	Great.
	Okay, so coming up on the second half of the show, we talked about leadership on the first half.
	I actually reversed the topic, so I wanted to talk about leadership second, but I think it was better to talk about it in the first half, just the way the conversation was going.
	So we're going to come back to the other topic, which is faith.
	And I don't mean religious faith when I say faith.
	Obviously, everybody has their own Religious faith in a god or a higher power or even just a religious doctrine.
	Everybody has their own faith in that regard.
	And you're all entitled to that faith.
	And I very rarely discuss theology on this show.
	I'm not a theological scholar.
	I'm not one that wants to impose my theology on anybody else, nor do I want them to impose theirs on me.
	So we really don't discuss theology very much over here.
	So when we're saying faith, we mean faith in a leader.
	So faith is how much ability or how much confidence that you will put into an individual or a plan.
	And faith in a leader is also a very important thing.
	So as much as we can have a good leader, somebody that is a benevolent leader or a strong leader...
	We still need somebody that...
	Some kind of group of people that has faith in that leader, that can put faith in their plan of action moving forward.
	That's a very important piece to the puzzle here.
	So faith is a very difficult thing.
	No one has...
	Well, actually, there are...
	Sadly, there are people that do...
	There are people that still have faith in our government, for what you want to call it ours, in the government of the United States.
	There are some people that still have faith in that governmental system.
	That faith is waning because we've recognized putting your faith in the wrong direction, putting your faith in illegitimate rulers or bad actors can be very destructive.
	A perfect case example is We talked about this earlier, but I have a grandfather who believed everything that the government told him at first and decided he's a big Trump guy.
	He's like Trump till the day he dies.
	And Trump went on the stage and said, hey, you know, take the vaccine.
	I recommend it.
	Go ahead.
	Go for it.
	So he had so much faith in Trump as an individual that he followed suit and he took the vaccine.
	About a week and a half after he took his vaccine, he had a stroke.
	Terrible, terrible consequences have ensued physically on his health from taking that vaccine.
	And it's because he had faith in this person.
	And the craziest part is he still has faith in Trump today.
	He made up some excuse and said, oh, you know, he didn't know any better.
	He was tricked.
	It's like, well, if you're following a leader that could be that easily tricked to mass poison the populace, it's like, all right, I guess, go ahead.
	Right, right.
	So we need to have a leader and we need to have a group of people that has faith in that leader.
	They have to be devout in their following for that leader.
	They can't be willing to, or they can't be swayed away from that leader's abilities, right?
	Look at National Socialist Germany will use this as an example.
	Again, we use this as an example on the show almost all the time because there's so many good examples from it.
	But you look at Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party, and they had a lot of disputes inside the party itself and the inner working of the party.
	There was a lot of people that came in and wanted to countersignal what the party was doing or tear it down.
	Otto Strasser was a really good example.
	Otto Strasser was financed by some Jewish bankers from New York.
	And he tried to take down Hitler from within the party.
	He didn't have actual faith in what Hitler was doing.
	So he went against him.
	And when people go against their leaders, it creates a problem.
	Everybody suffers from this, not just the person that went against the leader or the leader themselves.
	But everybody will suffer from this because the collective peoples that are behind all of this or underneath all of it, rather, they will suffer because the structure itself is suffering.
	So we need people with faith.
	And this is where we get to this...
	Excuse me.
	This is where we get to this issue of...
	I lost the word I was going to use.
	Completely lost the word.
	Oh, the issue of traitors.
	Traitors are a really big problem.
	Traitors are probably worse than an enemy itself.
	All of the people in our government who have sold out to corporate interests, sold out to international Jewish finance, who have thrown their people under the bus, They're traitors, in essence.
	And traitors are the biggest sinners on planet Earth.
	There's nothing worse than a traitor.
	Cadriano has that lovely quote.
	If he had a bullet, if he had one bullet and he had to choose between a traitor and the enemy, he would shoot the traitor every time.
	And that's because traitors are an enemy working within.
	They harm you from behind.
	They stab you in the back.
	They shoot you in the back of the leg.
	An enemy is always in front of you.
	You always know that they're against you.
	And it's easy to navigate someone that you know is against you.
	It's very hard to navigate against somebody that you believe is with you or on behalf of you.
	And they're actually manipulating things from behind closed doors.
	So traders are a really big problem.
	And anyone that is a traitor to a leader moving forward in any movement that we create, there has to be a serious punishment for traitors.
	And there should have been one for the traitors in our government today.
	The fact that there has not been one yet just goes to show how truly corrupt and decayed the system is from within.
	There's no accountability.
	There is zero accountability whatsoever.
	No one is being arrested for their crimes.
	What happened to this Ghislaine Maxwell?
	Why isn't she in jail yet?
	Why is she still moseying around?
	Traitors are terrible.
	And we live in a system that...
	Props traitors up.
	It props these terrible, treasonous bastards up to the top of society to just continue their reign of terror untampered by anybody else.
	And again, it goes back to democracy.
	We talk about democracy so consistently, but it's because of how bad it is.
	It's...
	It's the net negative example for everything.
	This is why a democracy can never function, because in a democracy, you can't hold anybody accountable for their actions.
	It's impossible.
	How do you hold accountable the Democratic Party for everything they're doing?
	You have to you have to hold individuals accountable and you can't hold the individuals accountable.
	If those individuals are intertwined into a system that they're not even the ones that are really doing most of the heavy lifting.
	They might be the spokesperson for the heavy lifting, but they're not even really doing it.
	They maybe pull the lever, but they're told what lever to pull.
	So how do you hold anybody accountable in a system like that?
	That's why we need some kind of authoritarian leadership that can hold people accountable for what they do.
	That's a good one.
	John says, like all immigrants who betrayed their homeland and abandoned their family.
	That's a really good point.
	This whole mass immigration nonsense.
	A lot of these people are absolutely betraying.
	You have to look at why they're doing it, right?
	When people look at America as a foundation and they say, oh, you know, it's the free world.
	I want to go over there and have a good livelihood.
	They are.
	They're betraying their homeland.
	Because instead of staying and trying to make their home better, where their people live, they come to a different place to try to essentially make their own individual life better.
	It's a self-interest.
	That's a traitor in the truest sense.
	Still hot.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, Brother Nathaniel is an interesting case.
	I don't know what to think of him.
	He is essentially a traitor to his own, but that's a weird spot.
	I think some of these people do have a bit of an identity crisis.
	I don't know what to think about that.
	I'm curious, just for a show of hands, because it's a topic that's been discussed a lot in the because it's a topic that's been discussed a lot in the chat room Folks, one in the chat, if you know somebody in your family that took this, we'll say vaccine, even though it's not really a vaccine.
	One in the chat, if you know someone in your family that took it and had some kind of health defect from taking the vaccine, whether it was a stroke or a heart attack or paralysis or whatnot.
	One in the chat, if you know someone in your family that had that problem.
	Two, if you do not.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	A lot of ones.
	Jeez.
	We've got a couple twos, but a lot of ones.
	That's an interesting one.
	She said, my husband is sick constantly after taking it.
	I've noticed that.
	I have some family friends that their whole family took the vaccine and they're sick constantly.
	They're getting sick like every other week.
	It's really odd to me.
	Wow.
	A lot of ones.
	A lot of ones.
	Turbo cancer.
	Yeah, see, that's really interesting.
	I have a family friend.
	Well, I guess it's not a family friend.
	It's a friend of my wife's who her husband...
	Took this vaccine and he was actually kind of cramming it down other people's throats, which is a shame because that's always how this is.
	And he died not long ago.
	He came down with cancer out of the blue.
	He had like a lump on his back.
	And within like four months, it had spread to the entire body and killed him.
	I mean, it really was turbo cancer.
	Wow.
	That's a lot of ones.
	Sorry to hear about those stories.
	And again, this goes to show we have a treasonous government.
	They allowed this.
	No one's talking about this on the media.
	No one's talking about this on the television anymore.
	They've just completely let this narrative die out.
	They haven't talked at all about the effects that these things have caused in people.
	It's basically brushed under the rug.
	It's a damn shame.
	I am get this.
	I am the only person in my entire bloodline that did not take the vaccine.
	That's crazy.
	And I tried to warn a couple people.
	Some of my family I'm not too close with, so I never even really talked to them before this whole thing happened.
	But I tried to warn quite a few of my family members, and they all ignored it.
	And the craziest part is most of them regret taking it.
	Now, I'm curious, just for a show of hands again, since we just went over that topic.
	Put a three in the chat if those family members that you have that had problems regret taking the vaccine.
	I'm very curious about that because there's a lot of people that are literally being, you know, they're coming down with cancer and all these awful things from the vaccine and they still don't attribute it to the vaccine itself.
	I see that a lot as well where people actually don't regret taking it.
	But I think a lot of them regret it.
	Yeah, there needs to be justice.
	There absolutely needs to be justice for these things.
	Interesting camo.
	very interesting okay a lot of threes I mean, that's good that people actually regret it.
	It means they were able to see that they made a mistake.
	That's step one, at least.
	I do have most of my family members that took the vaccine...
	Sorry, feedback.
	Most of my family members that took the vaccine do, in fact, regret it.
	They're not happy with the decision that they made, which is good.
	I mean, that's good that they see that.
	That's a step.
	It's definitely not where we need to go, but yeah.
	And again, this is why we need some kind of authoritarian leadership to step in and there has to be punishments for this.
	I mean, these people, not only did they poison the populace, but they actually made millions and billions of dollars poisoning the populace and are happier and better off than they've ever been in their entire life from this.
	Yeah, see, that's the crazy part to me, is the people that don't regret taking the vaccine.
	That's quite something.
	Holocaust with a $5 investment says, I have told immigrants in England multiple times from when I was 13 years old that they are deserters to their own country and parasites to mine.
	Yeah, I mean, deserting your country is a treasonous behavior.
	It's absolutely treasonous.
	It's like...
	Well, you know, if America was still on the foundation that it was originally on, even being a deserter to your state would have been considered very bad, right?
	Now, obviously, we've become so internationalized that no one even really has pride in their home state very much.
	Well, some people do.
	Not many, though.
	But there has to be accountabilities for treasonous actions.
	We need some kind of authoritarian government to step in and stop what is happening and punish those who do it.
	Because when people can do a mass wealth transfer in society like this, poison the populace, and then get away with it with their pockets fatter, what's stopping them from doing it again?
	When there's no repercussions, there's no punishment for the actions that have been done, what's stopping them from doing this again?
	Thank you, by the way, Holocaust, for the investment.
	I greatly appreciate it.
	John says, I think of my state as a nation, as the founding fathers did.
	Good, good.
	We should.
	That's how you're supposed to look at your state.
	You're supposed to be proud to be from your state.
	The states were sovereign, you know, back in the day, but.
	Tanitra says, I was blackmailed by many people to take the vaccine.
	They would say that I won't be able to meet them, pick up my personal belongings from their homes, etc.
	Many of the people that I know slash knew went full bananas with the vaccine.
	Yeah, I had a grandfather.
	This is very sick.
	I have a grandfather who took the vaccine.
	Not the grandfather I was discussing before, but my other grandfather on my paternal side.
	Who took this vaccine.
	Luckily, he didn't have any health repercussions from it yet.
	And he insisted that I take this thing.
	I mean, insisted and insisted.
	And I'm like, look, I'm fine.
	I'm healthy.
	I'm young.
	I don't need this damn thing.
	Alright, you know...
	If you're compromised, sure.
	I still don't think you should have taken it.
	I don't think anybody should have taken it.
	It's a literal weapon.
	But whatever.
	You want to take your thing, man.
	I don't think you should do it.
	I told him not to.
	He wasn't having it.
	And then he turned around and he said something to me like, at least it's not killing people.
	And I looked at him like...
	Dead in the eyes.
	Really?
	You just said that?
	Yeah, it absolutely is.
	There was a very awkward encounter there.
	He kind of turned around and then like obviously regretted the statement, but he tried to tell me that I can't come to see him if I don't take the vaccine, which is a logical, it's a logical fallacy.
	I mean, literally there's no logic in this at all.
	I take a vaccination.
	A vaccination makes me safe against the disease, right?
	That's the purpose of a vaccination.
	So if I take it and I'm safe from the disease and you come up and you don't have it, it wouldn't matter if you bring the sickness to me because I'm safe from the disease.
	It doesn't stop the spread.
	Everybody knew that from day one.
	No vaccines.
	So if I come up, it doesn't matter if I'm vaccinated or not.
	If I come visit you and you're vaccinated, you should be safe.
	It's a logical fallacy.
	It's insanity.
	So I talked to him about that.
	He kind of turned that around.
	Then he texted me one day out of the blue.
	And the guy, he's definitely got a serious alcohol problem.
	He's been an alcoholic his whole life.
	And he says to me, I will cut you a deal.
	I'll quit alcohol if you take the vaccine.
	That's sick.
	That's sick.
	I will stop poisoning myself if you poison yourself, is essentially what that statement was.
	That's a very sick circumstance to have a love and family member put you in.
	Yeah, Moondog, you're right.
	It played off that high trust, altruistic kind of mentality.
	Wow, Kermie.
	Yeah, that's insane.
	That's absurd.
	But I have the utmost respect for all of those who experienced that peer pressure from their families and the friends around them and held strong in their conviction.
	Again, that's what constitutes real leaders and real men is people that are willing to let those things aside and say, I don't care.
	Yeah, it was a sick proposition.
	And I told him, I said, I'm not taking it.
	So I'm sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	I said, you should want to stop drinking for your own benefit.
	It shouldn't have to be for, there shouldn't be an ultimatum there.
	That's just sick.
	Really, Taras, that's good.
	That's great.
	It's good that you were able to pressure him out of taking it.
	I know a lot of people fell for it.
	And a lot of people listen to the pressure of the media and the government over the pressure of their own kin, which is sad.
	That's a good, well, it's interesting that you say that, Kermie.
	Kermie says...
	She has 130 IQ. There's no demographic who can't be swayed.
	When it comes to vaccines or the things that we're talking about, propaganda tactics, IQ doesn't really have anything to do with it.
	It's an emotional manipulator tactic.
	They were emotionally manipulating people into taking this thing.
	So IQ has very, very little to do with this circumstance.
	It's more about...
	It's more about conviction.
	You can be a complete buffoon and have a strong conviction.
	Retards can have strong conviction.
	But when you're a very high IQ person that's easily socially pressured or has this easy emotional sway, it's a different circumstance.
	Holocaust with another $1 investment.
	Thank you very kindly.
	You've been investing a lot today.
	It says, I will send some info on how to test for blood clots and remedies.
	Not 100% perfect, but it will tell you if there's clots forming.
	Prevention is the best cure.
	I've been working on a remedy which should lower clots.
	Great.
	Awesome.
	That's great to hear.
	Good point.
	Those who are harmonized with nature didn't cave in.
	And this is important, right?
	Because the vaccine being a litmus test here, for those that are not going to cave to social pressure and that will, that was step one of the process, right?
	Because now there's other things.
	Are you going to cave to the social pressure of being called anti-Semitic?
	That's a curious one.
	That's a curious one.
	Because basically all of the people who have been labeled anti-Semitic are also all of the people that didn't take the vaccine.
	You almost fall into the exact same boat.
	Because once you realize this overwhelming Jewish influence over our government, you're essentially forced to speak about it.
	And if you're too scared to speak about it due to the social backlash and being called an anti-Semite or a bigot or hateful or whatever...
	You know what I mean?
	These are litmus tests.
	These are litmus tests.
	Holikoff with another $1 investment says, I may be deserting England to come to the USA for six months at a time, but that's so I can be around more racially I may be deserting England to come to the USA for six I mean, look...
	The way I see it, moving into the future, I think it's actually most intelligent for us to all be conglomerating to the United States.
	I think the United States has the biggest ability or chance at pulling itself out of this problem over any other country.
	I don't think it's...
	In a sense you're abandoning the homeland, but you're abandoning it to go to a group of people that comes from your homeland with the interest of saving us all.
	I truly believe America is going to be the one that kickstarts what happens.
	Ethno Nationalist with a 1488.
	Very base investment.
	Thank you, sir.
	I appreciate you, my friend.
	He says, invest in our folk.
	Oh slash.
	We should guys get the Romans up for him.
	Thank you, my friend.
	And I really do appreciate all the investments, folks.
	Don't forget, every investment that you put into the show...
	Go straight back into the show.
	We are going to probably do a fundraiser stream.
	I've been really debating on if I want to do it or not.
	And if I do do it, I think I'm going to do it this Sunday.
	But I'm really thinking about doing a fundraiser stream to upgrade my setup a little bit.
	I could use a higher quality camera.
	This is a very old camera.
	It was a cheaper one.
	So...
	I'm probably going to run a fundraiser for that.
	A couple other things.
	I'll kind of write like a list out and come up with a goal number and we'll do a fundraiser stream.
	And I'll make it a long one.
	I'll do like a marathon stream.
	England is lost.
	I don't think it's fully lost.
	I don't think anything that we have had in the past is fully lost.
	I believe it's in dire straits right now, but I don't believe it's lost yet.
	My current camera runs on Steam.
	Steam-powered camera.
	That's funny.
	When you say the women's suffrage movement, do you mean like feminism?
	Is that what you're referring to?
	because I would agree with that.
	Feminism is extremely destructive in many ways.
	It hurts the family unit.
	It hurts the fabric of society.
	It hurts the woman in the household.
	It hurts the workforce.
	I mean, feminism is extremely destructive.
	It's one of the most dangerous things that's ever insinuated itself upon society.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Well, look, look at, I mean, look at feminism has run so rampant in our societies.
	Look at this OnlyFans phenomena.
	I mean, it's such a prevalent product of that Where we have women who are making a living selling their body online.
	No woman that's doing that is ever going to want a family.
	They're not going to want to have a husband and settle down.
	And how do you think about this?
	Really think about this.
	Put this in a perspective.
	It's hard as a man to do so, but just think about it.
	A woman in that position who is selling herself online for money and making a killing doing it, What incentive will she ever have, or what respect will she ever have for men moving forward?
	How can you respect men when every guy you talk to is drooling out the side of his mouth and wants to see you naked?
	You can't respect men because men don't respect you because every man around you has no respect for you.
	Yeah, we need women to be proud to be mothers again.
	That's a big piece.
	Women are not proud of that.
	That has to be fixed.
	Well, again, the equal rights piece is, is, uh, is interesting, right?
	Um, um, Women being politically equal, it's a little bit irrelevant.
	It's like, yeah, let's give women the equal right to be lumberjacks.
	Well, where the hell are all the women lumberjacks?
	They have the equal right now.
	Where are they?
	It's not about equality.
	It's not about the right to do something.
	It's about the intrinsic nature of that something that's being done.
	And women naturally don't want to be lumberjacks.
	Where are all of the female deep-sea welders?
	Where are they at?
	Anybody seen one yet?
	These are high-risk jobs.
	Men take these jobs.
	How many women are building skyscrapers and walking on top of the scaffolding on the top of skyscrapers?
	It's not the place.
	It's not the place for them.
	The thing is, those people that are emotionally manipulated into this agenda...
	They like to go, oh, so you don't think women should be able to do things?
	You're hateful.
	Look, this goes both ways.
	And that's the thing here.
	No one likes to talk about this.
	But this goes both ways.
	I don't want men babysitting children.
	I don't think men should be babysitting babies.
	I don't think men should be babysitting toddlers.
	I don't think that's right.
	Do you trust men in that position?
	Because I don't.
	We know how men are.
	It's very hard to trust a man doing that.
	And they're also not as good at it.
	They don't have that nurturing kind of mentality to themselves.
	It's not naturally inherent in them.
	Yeah.
	Male babysitters should be outlawed.
	it's sickening.
	Kermie with a $5 investment.
	Thank you very much.
	Says, for anyone ever blackpilled about the future, take 15 minutes to learn about what our ancestors have been through.
	I'll save this video.
	I'll give it a look.
	Unfortunately, I can't play any videos on the stream anymore.
	Well, not anymore, but not right now because of the problems I'm having with this Rumble Studio.
	I have to get a little bit better with the audio thing and figure that out.
	I don't have children yet, but I would never let a male babysit my child.
	Holocoff with another $1 investment.
	Thank you, sir.
	You've been doing a lot tonight.
	He says, the real problem with the clot shot is people overcomplicated the arguments on both sides.
	My argument was the pharmaceutical companies were granted unlimited legal indemnification.
	If they won't risk their share price, don't risk your health.
	It was harmful by their own definition.
	I agree.
	I definitely agree with that.
	Weimar conditions require Weimar solutions.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	I'd argue the conditions are actually worse.
	I think there's a strong argument to be had that the conditions are actually worse.
	Garethos, I am on Twitter, Odyssey, and Rumble.
	We are no longer on GTV. Thank you again, by the way, to Kermy and Holocaust for the support.
	I appreciate those guys.
	Yeah, yeah, that's a good, that's a good point.
	You will see some of those Butch Dyke construction workers.
	And they're angry at the world.
	They're very angry people.
	I've had Butch Dyke teachers in school when I was a kid, and they're angry.
	They're rude.
	They're terrible with children, too.
	I don't know if you noticed that.
	Butch Dyke teachers are like horrendously terrible with children.
	Thank you.
	Feminism is one of the largest destructive forces.
	I would put it in the top five.
	I think that's an accurate assessment.
	Because it doesn't just hurt one thing at a time.
	It hurts a lot of the fabric of society.
	That's the thing.
	It's a very multi-pronged attack.
	It's a good point.
	Authoritarian says, I'm willing to meet women in the middle and ensure protections from being mistreated, but would prefer we return to traditional gender roles.
	Yeah, I agree.
	I mean, like, again, we're not advocating Sharia law here and saying they have to hide themselves from society and be locked in the basement or whatever.
	But there has to be roles that each are fulfilling.
	And the thing is, women are happier in those roles.
	I've never met a 40-year-old woman that climbed the corporate ladder and played the whole corporate game and is happy with their lot in life.
	They're not happy.
	They're miserable.
	They're alcoholics.
	They're on antidepressants.
	They're on anti-anxiety meds.
	They're stressed beyond belief.
	They're not happy.
	So...
	You know, it's insanity.
	Even the ones that are so fervently in favor of women being in the corporate workplace, they're not happy either.
	Even if they played that game, they're not happy.
	They might advocate for it for some weird, illogical reason, but they're not happy.
	Chain reaction with a $5 investment says women abuse slash murder children at four to six times the rate of men.
	But let's not mention that because that would be sexist.
	Yeah, I don't know about that statistic, but that's quite an interesting stat if that's true.
	It's probably because they're around children more, I would assume.
	Again, we also have a backwards society where women are not holding up those traditional roles.
	And that probably opens that up a lot.
	It's like a yellow star now.
	Nice.
	Thank you, Chain Reaction, again for the investment.
	I appreciate that.
	Yeah, it's a good point.
	Burt says, Judaism has six genders traditionally, so that's why they're neurotic.
	And this is the problem.
	All of these things that are poisonous to our society, when we look at them on their face, these are actually natural and inherent to a Jewish society.
	So it's a matter of our roles, our societal systems are so backwards and That what's poison to them is healthy for us and what's healthy for them is poison to us.
	And that's never going to change.
	And that's why we're incompatible with each other and why you see expulsions throughout the thousands of years of history and why we're on the verge of the same situation now.
	I mean, you can see the public sentiment is rising up against this.
	We're never going to be compatible with each other.
	It's not possible.
	I've only met one woman in my life who played the independent strong woman game and is actually happy.
	My grandmother's sister, she never had a husband, never had a significant other.
	She lived on her own in this little house for her whole life.
	Took care of her garden, worked at some...
	Antique place for years.
	She substitutes the no children with cats because that's basically what women will always do.
	If they don't have children and they're lonely, they'll get cats.
	She substituted it with cats.
	She seems happy.
	She's not an angry person.
	She's not a miserable person.
	I mean, she's such an exception to the rule.
	No, it's healthy for them, Aoi.
	It's what they think is right.
	What we think is right is opposite to what they think is right.
	This is the problem.
	Again, I use this analogy.
	I use it all the time.
	The question of Hitler, right?
	When you hear the media bound up and beat the drums and talk about how Hitler is the most evil man in the world and how he's so terrible and so awful.
	Well, it's because who owns the media?
	Who thinks that way?
	He's terrible for them.
	Because you have to think about what Hitler did.
	He wanted this homogenous social state form where everybody is uplifting each other in their own community only.
	And if that happens, a parasitic class is incapable of weaseling its way into a society like that.
	So obviously they're going to hate that.
	To them, Hitler is evil.
	But to us, I mean, when you look at what he did, if everybody adopted those ideas, everybody in America would adopt those ideas right now.
	If you read off the 25 fundamental points of national socialism to every person in America and change the word Germany to America, they would all agree with them.
	Then you say Hitler wrote that and now all of a sudden they change their opinion on it because they have an emotional the same way with the vaccine.
	They have an emotional manipulation against this individual that they really don't know anything about.
	Just like they had an emotional take on the vaccine that they really knew nothing about.
	Because first off, they wouldn't even be calling it a vaccine because it's not a vaccine.
	And they wouldn't be all worried that other people that are unvaccinated are a risk to them and might kill them because it doesn't make there's no logical sense in that.
	They're emotionally manipulated into these things.
	And this is the circumstance here with Adolf Hitler.
	They're emotionally manipulated against the guy.
	They don't know what he stood for.
	They have no idea the things that he said.
	And if you were to read off the stuff he said and not attribute it to him, they would agree with you.
	And the second you attribute it to him, now they go, oh, now I don't agree with you.
	So, think about it like a dog with a flea collar.
	I always use this analogy.
	We have a dog, a flea collar, and a tick.
	The tick needs to live off the dog because the dog is its host.
	It sucks the blood off the dog, and that's how the tick survives.
	It's a parasite.
	Because that tick needs to survive that way, if a dog wears a flea collar, the tick views the flea collar as evil because the flea collar keeps the tick away from being able to latch onto the host.
	The dog itself will love the flea collar because the dog sees the flea collar as a way to relieve itself of the itch and the stressors that come from allowing that tick to be a part of it.
	We have the same issue here in modern society.
	When you look at Adolf Hitler and National Socialism as an ideal, you have the...
	The tick or the parasite being Jewish power, Jewish money, Jewish influence in our society.
	And we, as the hosts of the nation, are essentially the dog.
	And national socialism is the flea collar.
	It's the thing that protects us from these problems.
	So we view national socialism as a good thing.
	They view it as evil.
	And anyone that equates with them is more times than not, they're parroting the same thing that they've heard on the media, these emotional buzzwords about mass murder and genocide and all this nonsense that didn't happen.
	So...
	It's an emotional manipulation.
	There's very little logic that's placed into the understanding of these things.
	And without that logic, without that true understanding of things, we're forever going to have the parasite on our leg.
	So think about it in that fashion.
	Yeah, that's a good point, Tenetris.
	It's a very good point.
	There's very little logic in the arguments that were leveled against me.
	Actually, not very little.
	There's none actually.
	Yeah, Volcano says, "Ever since this equality has been Volcano says, "Ever since this equality has been shoved down our throats, societies are collapsing in record time.
	Absolutely.
	This will always be the case.
	Again, I think we talked about this, it might have been last show, but there's a difference between equal rights and equal opportunity.
	Right?
	So, we use the analogy of a ladder.
	If you put a ladder up against a house, and you got a guy who's 550 pounds, and you got a guy who's 150 pounds, and you can say, oh, you guys both have the right to try to climb that ladder.
	Yeah, they've got the equal right to try to climb that ladder.
	Do they have the equal ability to climb that ladder?
	So, what's the purpose of the right if you don't have the ability?
	It doesn't matter.
	If people don't have the ability, they shouldn't be given the right.
	It's pointless.
	That's why we're talking about voting, right?
	If people don't have the ability to vote properly, they shouldn't be given the right to do so.
	I see how we.
	Yes, it doesn't harm them the way it harms us, though, because that's the nature of a sociopath.
	Well said, John.
	He says, people love to talk about Rome, but they don't comprehend it was the diversity that took it down.
	Yes, diversity is what destroyed Rome.
	And I'm sure there was also a parasite class in Rome that pushed that diversity.
	Yeah.
	Or, not pushed it, but fanned the flames of it, so to speak.
	Because there's always any country that has mass diversity, any nation.
	Well, it's not a nation.
	First off, it's not a nation anymore when it becomes diverse.
	Because a nation is a tribe.
	So, if a tribe of Irish people find Ireland, and they make Ireland for the Irish...
	And then British people come in and Germans come in and Italians come in and Spaniards come in and they all start putting their own cultures and stuff into the society.
	It's no longer a nation because it's not a tribe anymore.
	Now it's just a country.
	It's just a political body that has these different groups in it.
	And Under such diversity, you're always going to have conflicts amongst each other.
	It's going to be an everlasting circle of conflicts.
	And it's in the Bible.
	I mean, you're right.
	It's in the Bible.
	Diversity has destroyed many empires and continues to do so.
	That's a good point as well.
	Authoritarian said Christianity also played a role in the fall of Rome as well.
	So here's the thing about Rome specifically.
	Rome as a concept, what people have to understand is these ancient civilizations like Rome and Greece and Egypt...
	They had their own gods, and their own gods were tribal gods, which was essentially connected to the civilization itself.
	So think of it in this fashion.
	If you have your own civilization and your own tribe of people that controls that civilization and come up with your conception of gods and things that you have reverence for, the faith is not based around It's not necessarily fully a spiritual concept, but it's based around the people itself, the idea of Rome.
	When people went and fought in a country, when the Romans went and fought the Greeks or they fought somebody else, they were fighting for the higher ideal of Rome.
	When your great-grandfathers went and stormed Normandy on June 6th at 6 a.m., Coincidentally, right?
	Sure.
	When they went and stormed Normandy Beach, they weren't fighting for the ideal of America, right?
	They were fighting for democracy and to protect against world domination, right?
	They weren't fighting for a higher ideal of America.
	And that's the problem that we have.
	We don't have that higher faith in the civilization itself.
	And without that faith in the civilization and the Continuation of that civilization, we're a bit misguided in things.
	That's not to say that we can't have people that are Christian and whatever their personal religious faith is, but they also have to have, again, faith can be a religious thing and faith can be just a general material-based thing or a grounded in the reality thing, not necessarily spiritual in that sense.
	And we have to have it in both ways.
	So you can have your religious spiritual faith, but you also have to have that faith in your own civilization and the continuance of your people, which is something that is really lacking today.
	Extremely lacking.
	Well said.
	Wolfie says, when the Bible says to help your neighbor, do you think the neighbor means the entire world or just your people?
	It's a very good point.
	It's a very good point.
	They weren't talking about your international neighbors in the Bible.
	Nowadays, people only fight for their paychecks instead of their country.
	Yep, I agree with that.
	I agree with that.
	Yeah.
	Uh, Hassan, when was that?
	Neighbor in the Bible, I believe, is a purposely mistranslated word that originally meant kin.
	Yeah, I would agree with that.
	I would certainly agree.
	I think that's a fair assessment.
	So folks, we're coming up on the last couple minutes of the show here.
	We've got about five minutes remaining.
	I just want to say thank you, everybody, for tuning into the show today.
	Thank you for all the investments on the show today, a very kind level of investments.
	Please make sure that if you guys want to continue to see these shows in the future, that you do take some time to invest, whether it's a dollar or a million dollars or a trillion dollars.
	Really, I do appreciate all of it.
	Oh, yeah.
	Nick, he is a moderator.
	He's got the thing next to his name.
	Ian Space?
	Oh, yesterday.
	Daniel, I'm not a griper.
	No, thank you, though.
	Yeah, I didn't even say a single word in Ian's space yesterday, Hasan.
	I wasn't even really there.
	I was into co-host, but our secondary co-host did not show up, so I wasn't really even in the space.
	Probably not the best time for us to have a debate there, or it's not really a debate, a discussion there anyway, because the space was about, like, Twitter algorithms and stuff.
	Sometimes if it's, um...
	If we're going to have a discussion like that, it has to be in a space that's a little more free room, if that makes sense.
	We were supposed to have that revolved around a very specified topic, but unfortunately, the guy that was supposed to show up never did.
	So I really didn't I didn't even say a word in the space and ever participated.
	Alright, folks.
	Make sure to take a moment and follow me on all my channels.
	We're on Odyssey.
	Again, it's O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	I want to put the link in the chats for you guys if you guys want to follow me on Odyssey.
	I would really appreciate that.
	The Odyssey's been growing a lot.
	We've got a very large archive of videos over there.
	So there's a link for everybody.
	I don't know why I just put it in the Odyssey.
	That's kind of dumb.
	Make sure that you're following me on Twitter.
	It's at LogosRevealedI.
	I'll put the Twitter account in the chat as well.
	We're nearing 10,000 followers on Twitter.
	Twitter has been...
	My account has been growing very fast.
	I think I had something like 2,000 followers a month and a half ago.
	ago, so it's been growing very quickly.
	Yeah, San, there'll be a time for it whenever we're in more of a kind of free roam type Feel free to hop in and we'll discuss.
	Okay, thank you guys.
	I appreciate everybody for watching.
	I appreciate all the investments today and all the chatters.
	I will see you guys tomorrow.
	I will be on Blonde in the Belly of the Beasts show at 4pm Eastern.
	She's going to interview me.
	I don't know what she's going to interview me about yet, so we'll see what kind of questions she comes up with.
	I'm a little bit excited for that.
	I also will be live on Friday at 4 p.m.
	Eastern with episode 6 of Logos Academy.
	And I will be live on Saturday.
	Saturday is a big show, guys.
	Please make sure you catch Saturday.
	I have Laurent Goynet coming on the show.
	He's a French author who wrote the book The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, which is a fantastic book.
	So make sure you guys catch that.
	that.
	That's going to be a really interesting one.
	All right.
	Thank you, folks.
	I do appreciate all of the viewers today and all of the very kind chats, and I'll see you guys tomorrow at 4 p.m.
	Eastern on Blonde in the Belly of the Beast, her show.
	I'll tweet it out on my Twitter.
	I'm not familiar with the direct link that she's going to be using, so once she makes a post about it, I'll put it on my Twitter.
	Alright, thank you, folks.
	I will talk to you guys, or I'll see you guys tomorrow at 4, and I'll talk to you guys on Friday at 4 on Episode 6.

▲