All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 13, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
55:56
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Assassination LIMITED HANGOUT, Secret Service Failure RED HERRING
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
This is the one that weaponized, not me.
She weaponized.
I probably took a bullet to the head because of the things that they say about me.
They talk about democracy.
I'm a threat to democracy.
They're the threat to democracy with a fake Russia, Russia, Russia investigation that went nowhere.
We have a lot to get to.
Lindsey?
Welcome to the program, ladies and gentlemen.
Thank you so much for being with us.
This is the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
And as always, we cannot do the program without you guys watching every single day.
So in that clip right there, the ABC News moderators, they wanted to move right along from that topic.
It's incredible.
Donald Trump was almost assassinated And folks rarely mention it these days.
It's like the nation has moved along.
Nothing to see here.
Now obviously, we know the reason for that.
The answer for that is because the media knows the failed assassination story only helps Donald Trump.
After all, the Intel agency-controlled mainstream media has propagandized Americans effectively.
What do I mean by that?
Well, we have been conditioned to always root for whoever or whatever is presented to us as the underdog.
We love a good underdog story.
They have trained us to always give our sympathies and our partiality to anyone who is presented as a victim.
And because of the failed assassination attempt, Donald Trump, in typical conspicuous fashion, is arguably now the ultimate victim.
Which, you know, is driving the communists absolutely insane, and that's why they hardly ever mention the story.
When Trump survived, the bullets meant to send this nation into a civil war, giving Washington all the pretext they needed and desperately wanted for martial law, no elections, and, I think, domestic drone strikes against American dissidents, quite frankly.
They would have made the reaction to Trump's assassination worse than the assassination itself.
It would have been J6 on steroids.
And the shoddy story about the lone gunman that to this day is full of holes and makes no sense, makes absolutely no sense.
Was likely, in my opinion, intentionally concocted so no rational person on the right would ever accept it as truth, which would have been the bait to get people to rebel.
Now, by the grace of God, that didn't happen.
Because Trump was spared, so was America, at least for the time being.
But about the shoddy story that to this day still makes absolutely no sense.
The red herring of the failed assassination, in my opinion, seems to focus on the failure of the Secret Service.
This is the acceptable, limited hangout.
Getting to the bottom of the Secret Service failure instead of focusing on the background of the shooter or who was helping him and were there multiple shooters.
Basically, the real inquiry here should focus on Whether the intel agencies set this whole thing up to kill President Trump?
That's the real question.
And that's the one I've been asking since all of this happened.
For one simple reason.
The U.S. government was involved in some way, shape, or form in successfully assassinating President John F. Kennedy.
Now I'm not naive to this fact.
Many of you are not either.
And that fact alone should inform how we investigate the failed assassination attempt of Donald Trump.
And it also means That every government report should be looked at with a high degree of skepticism.
What are they really trying to hide?
Now, here is Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri on Jesse Water Show talking about the failures of the Secret Service.
Some new whistleblower reporting.
What are they telling you now, Senator?
Jesse, what I'm learning now is that the lead advance agent that day in Pennsylvania, this is the agent that was in charge of Trump's entire trip in Pennsylvania, that this agent actually failed one or more of her training exams When she first joined the Secret Service.
I mean, the pattern that is emerging here, Jesse, from whistleblowers who've come forward to me now over and over again, is that the Trump rally was undermanned.
It was understaffed.
They did not have people who had experience on it.
And now this advance agent, I'm told, may have failed one or more for training exams and was known not to be a top quality agent.
I mean, this is absurd.
And the fact that the director Will not level with the American people about what's going on here is just totally unacceptable and unbelievable.
So, I guess, I mean, part of this inquiry, again, whistleblowers, from the beginning of the assassination attempt, the failed assassination attempt, from the beginning, I mean, we almost instantly had reports, I think it was Hawley was the first one, of Secret Service whistleblowers.
Okay?
Whistleblowers that were contacting senators' offices and, you know, basically saying, hey, look, something's really, really wrong here on the Secret Service.
So this is nothing new.
The DEI component, though, that's kind of what he's saying here, right?
I mean, we remember the videos of, you know, the...
I don't know, the actress Melissa McCarthy.
We had Secret Service agents, women, females, that looked like Melissa McCarthy.
They didn't know how to holster their gun properly.
It was just completely...
Nonsense, right?
And people shorter than, you know, drastically shorter than President Trump.
I mean, the whole thing was just a giant spectacle, right?
But now we're hearing, according to the latest report, that, okay, the woman, that's what he said, the woman in charge failed her exam.
So that's one aspect of this.
Again, they're bringing in the DEI Just like they're bringing the DEI up, you know, when it comes to the people that are going to be our, you know, future doctors and future airline pilots, right?
Director Cheadle, we know, had a priority to make 30% of the Secret Service women.
So this woman fails, maybe once, maybe twice, maybe more.
And doesn't matter, Cheadle still makes her in charge of the protective site detail for Butler, knowing that there was an Iranian threat Yeah, see, this is what's so hard to understand, is that if this individual had failed one or more of her training exams, if she was known not to be really one of the Secret Service's top agent, she's in the Pittsburgh office, why was she put in charge of the entire trip, Jesse?
I mean, the whole thing.
She was in charge of the whole works, from the time the president landed to the time he went to Butler.
It's just totally inexplicable.
And Jesse, one other thing.
I'm told by people who are close to and have knowledge of the Secret Service's own internal investigation that the Department of Homeland Security is leaning on the Secret Service not to comply with document requests to Congress.
A couple of things here.
This is why I mentioned the phrase red herring earlier.
Don't get me wrong.
I'm not saying that there weren't failures in the Secret Service.
And I'm not saying that Homeland Security has a ton of incentive to not let the real truth get out.
I'm not saying any of that.
But you hear what Jesse Waters said there.
He talked about knowing that there was an Iranian threat.
Come on, give me a break.
As I've said on this program before, I find it entirely implausible to believe that this was the Iranians.
Again, it's like trying to convince me that Bashar al-Assad gassed his own people.
Did the one thing, the one thing Obama said you can't do, that's a red line.
Do not gas your own people.
And he says, oh, well, then I'm just that crazy.
I'm going to invoke the regime-changing neocons to come in and depose me and Muammar Gaddafi me or Saddam Hussein me.
He did the one thing that would end his rule and end his country.
If it was Iran that had done this, that's essentially what they're saying.
The people in charge of Iran who want to stay in power and don't want their entire civilization to collapse with a war...
A direct war with the United States.
And by the way, the whole Iranian narrative came way after...
The Iranian narrative came way after Donald Trump had been assassinated...
Or had the attempted assassination.
And it was as the story that I believe intentionally was supposed to have holes in it to invoke a civil war...
Was not making any sense.
And so, the shiny object over here...
Oh, it must be Iran.
Okay?
Must be Iran.
Must be another...
Country that just so happens is going to get us back into the Middle East in another war.
Okay, I don't believe it for a second.
But these are the narratives that they are trying to push, and it is part of just a broader cover-up of all of this.
Now, it's not just Republicans, and so this is going to be the other narrative you're going to hear, because I saw this on X the other day.
You've got Senator Blumenthal, okay, big Democrat Senator Blumenthal is now out there saying what he has been briefed on behind closed doors is alarming and shocking about what the failures of the Secret Service.
I think the American people are going to be shocked, astonished, and appalled by what we will report to them about the failures by the Secret Service in this assassination attempt on the former president.
But I think they also ought to be Appalled and astonished by the failure of the Department of Homeland Security to be more forthcoming, to be as candid and frank as it should be to them in terms of providing information.
And we are going to absolutely insist on the truth and the whole truth in documents and testimony As members of the United States Senate, but also as citizens.
What did you learn new today when you said they were going to be a poll?
I'm not going to go into what we have learned in specifics.
I'm giving you my reaction.
And we will have a report very, very soon that I think will Absolutely shocked the American people, or should, about the lapses and lags in the protection that was afforded that day and the breakdown in communication, failure in responsibility.
Is that a report coming today or tomorrow?
Shocked and appalled, he says.
Senator Blumenthal, we're going to be shocked and appalled at the report that the Senate is going to release.
So, yeah, what would really shock the nation?
That the intel agency set this whole thing up to kill the political rival that is against the uniparties' geopolitical goals, is against the standing global order, maybe?
That would be shocking.
Something tells me that the report is not going to say that.
Is that report coming out tonight or tomorrow?
No.
So the report, not going to come out, you know, today or tomorrow, anytime soon.
Here we have this.
So where I originally found this was over on ex-fellow Arkansan, Juanita Broderick.
She says, boom, Senator Blumenthal on the attempted assassination of Trump.
Quote, holy hell, she says.
So, and also we have the Jesse Waters clip that we just heard that's also over on X about the DEI aspects of this and how the former director, Cheadle, wanted 30% of the Secret Service agents to be female.
Now, so that doesn't discount that that's a huge problem.
I mean, right?
But we have to see these narratives.
We have to see these counter-narratives.
We have to see this as a limited hangout.
Go look up what the phrase, limited hangout, it's an intelligence phrase.
Where, you know, essentially says, okay, we're going to, I'll give you a perfect example.
Excuse me, I've got a little bit of a cough.
A little losing my voice on this Friday.
Happy Friday, by the way.
A great example of a limited hangout is the lab leak theory when it comes to COVID. So with COVID, you know, we had the initial reports that, hey, this thing didn't come from a bat wet market.
This was not natural.
This leaked out of a lab.
Okay.
And that's actually kind of a two-pronged thing because...
There were those saying it leaked out of a lab, and then there were those saying that not only did it leak out of a lab, this was a man-made.
So there are two things.
This was a man-made bioweapon, the spike protein.
So there were people that didn't even want to admit that.
They still don't want to admit that.
It just leaked from a lab.
So now, inside the U.S. government, we now know they have admitted it leaked out of the lab from China.
There's your limited hangout.
We're now admitting, oh, so all of the conspiracy theories, all of the conspiracy theories that were maligned, all of the censorship that went on back on Dorsey's Twitter and Zuckerberg's Facebook and everything else were all vindicated.
We were right and nothing else to see here.
But the fact of the matter is that's the limited hangout.
They're admitting the lesser of the evil.
So that they don't have to admit the full truth, the bioengineering behind it, and the fact that it wasn't just China.
It was created here in the United States.
And Senator Rand Paul is, at least, even in some of his op-eds this year, has acknowledged a guy by the name of Ralph Baric and how we need to look into him.
And Ralph Baric and his work at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
And how the Department of Defense, that this, that the, you know, what's it called?
Anyway, where you enhance the virus, the name is a gain-of-function.
So the gain-of-function research that's been done, and it obviously ties to Anthony Fauci and everything else.
Like, COVID was a United States operation.
Okay, we were involved.
Our taxpayers were involved.
We were doing things here in America that we shouldn't do, and then we outsource it to China, and then it leaks.
Accidentally leaks, right?
Right.
And then of course we know about the bioweapons facilities in Ukraine and how that was a conspiracy theory.
Anyway, so that's the example that I can give you.
I think it's the most recent example that I can give you.
Of what I would consider to be a limited hangout.
And so with the Trump assassination story, they're going to create limited hangouts.
They're going to take this.
I think the whole operation, again, was designed to create a civil war, was designed to get the power they wanted.
They may not have canceled the elections.
Nikki Haley would have gotten the nomination.
And right now, we would have a race between two women, Kamala Harris and Nikki Haley.
So essentially, we would be going to war regardless of who the president was.
And you know what?
If Trump gets elected, we may still go to war.
But he has a four-year track record of not doing that, and he says he wants peace.
When they tried to hamstring him in the debate the other night and tried to get him to say, you know, do you want Ukraine to win the war?
Do you want it to win the war?
And all he said was, no, I want to end the war in peace.
And, you know, I was talking to somebody about that.
It's like, why, you know, why didn't he say he wanted Ukraine to win the war?
And it's quite simple.
Ukraine cannot win the war.
He wasn't going to say that.
I actually think he should have said it.
He should have said, here's the truth.
Ukraine cannot win the war.
They are not able to win it.
Now, on that topic of war, we have William Wolfe.
Who said this last night, World War III ticked up the watch, a World War III watch ticked up last night.
Pray for peace.
William Wolfe tweeting, using NATO partner-supplied missiles to launch internal strikes on Russia.
This is insane.
Do they want World War III? Well, yeah, after the failed assassination attempt of Donald Trump, I think they do.
We've got this headline, Putin threatens war as Western allies near deal on missile strikes in Russia.
So, think about it from this standpoint.
For all of the talk of people saying that Kamala won the debate, as the fallout has continued, I don't think she has.
I don't think she did.
Obviously, I think Trump won on substance regardless, but...
Have you guys seen the social media cat memes?
They're eating the cats.
They're eating the dogs.
They even took one of the clips that was from an avowed socialist that was trying to slam Trump, and they've actually elevated it, and the guy is saying, I didn't make this video, this mashup to help Trump.
I made it to hurt Trump bullets helping Trump.
And the TikTok responses from young people are just, it's through the roof.
It's through the roof.
Now, whether that translates to votes or not, I don't know.
But I'm just saying the perception is very much reality.
And right now, on the social media front, it's not looking good at all for Kamala.
So, as we've been saying since January of this year, as this program came back from the holiday break, we have been saying, what are they going to do?
It's an election year.
Is it going to be another pandemic?
Is it going to be something else?
Is it going to be an attack on the power grid?
Is it going to be a war?
Are they going to cancel the elections?
Do we have the elections at all?
World War III right now, a nuclear war with Russia, would certainly give the Congress all the authority, or at least, I mean, it would give them the gumption, I guess, to destroy this country further and cancel elections.
Obviously, we know Zelensky over in Ukraine canceled his.
Putin threatens war as Western allies near deal on missile strikes in Russia.
This is yesterday's news, and the reason Putin is saying this is because he's trying to Warn the United States.
And really this is more about warning the NATO countries in Europe.
Britain and the U.S. So this is what's happening today.
Britain and the U.S. are poised to cross a decisive Rubicon in the Ukraine war on Friday at a White House summit where they will discuss plans to allow Kiev...
To strike targets inside Russia with Western-supplied missiles.
In a bid to scare off the West, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned on Thursday he would regard such an agreement as tantamount to NATO directly entering the war.
This will mean that NATO countries, the United States, and European countries are fighting Russia, he said.
So what does that mean?
Well, it doesn't necessarily mean nuclear war, but it does mean that Putin is essentially saying, look, if you guys do this, if you give Ukraine Western technology and then you're going to use that to attack deep inside of Russia, then Poland and Germany and these other countries are going to wake up and not have any power.
I think at a bare minimum, that's what that means.
These NATO countries are going to wake up and they're going to have their infrastructure devastated.
Devastated.
Donald Trump himself says, hey, Donald Trump accuses Obama of giving the hypersonic missile technology to Vladimir Putin.
Donald Trump says, hey, Russia went ahead and built them, and we didn't.
You can look back a decade ago, and Western media and Western officials were laughing at the idea that Russia was going to build missile technologies that are superior to our own, or this hypersonic missile technology.
And even today, you still hear this bogus narrative.
I know Victoria Nuland was on a show the other day talking about how Russia thought they were going to be in Kiev in five days and their military was a disaster.
And all that's propaganda.
All that's propaganda.
That's not at all.
Obviously, that wasn't the goal.
But we still have this propaganda that Russia's military force is just...
It's almost like they want us to believe they're a third-world country.
Right now, they're the most organized, largest standing force in the world right now.
Anyway, all that to say, they mean business, and we just keep poking the bear, and the intel agency-controlled media continues to disseminate this superiority complex that America has over Russia, and we don't.
We simply don't have what they claim.
Anyway, it's all talk.
And so, yeah, if we do this, if the White House and the West agree and they start supplying weapons, what does William Wolf here say?
Let's see.
They want to supply missiles to launch internal strikes in Russia.
If they do this, Vladimir Putin is going to respond, and it's going to be devastating for Europe.
And then what do we do, right?
Well, we'll have to endure the headlines that we have to get involved in the war, that we have to escalate this to World War III. There's already talk.
That they may institute the draft in the United Kingdom to go fight this war.
They desperately want another war.
They desperately want it to be with Russia.
This is a war that has been planned for a very, very long time.
And it was always supposed to escalate to this.
It was supposed to be a proxy war in 2012.
Barack Obama, I mentioned Bashar al-Assad, but Barack Obama told Bashar al-Assad, you crossed the red line, and then of course we found out, and Russia was involved, by the way, in sending the gas canisters, I think, to a lab in Britain where the sarin gas that was used to gas Syrians ended up being a plot from Turkey, according to Seymour Hersh's article, The Red Line and the Rat Line.
Look it up, it's a fantastic article.
It was all a false flag.
It was a false flag.
Okay?
And so we were planning without congressional authority to bomb Damascus back to the Stone Age.
And then at the last minute, Obama said no.
For whatever reason, I think he knew that the American people just were not with him.
Not even close.
Congress wasn't with him.
And so he pulled back.
And then you fast forward to 2016 and the debates between Trump and Hillary.
It was very, very clear, it was very obvious that if Hillary was elected, we were going to war in Syria.
We were going to depose Bashar al-Assad and we were going to fight the Russians by arming Muslims who wanted to kill Americans that just, you know, differed over how to do it.
Excuse me, some wanted to chop off our heads, some just wanted to blow us up.
Anyway, this is pretty wild stuff.
Pretty wild stuff.
So anyway, World War III watch kicked up last night.
It was a big deal.
In the meantime, you got Donald Trump who's out there saying, hey look...
If I'm elected, we're not going to tax overtime in this country.
I think the American people are going to be shocked.
Wrong class.
Today, I'm also announcing that as part of our additional tax cuts, we will end all taxes on overtime.
You know what that means?
Think of that.
Thank you, God.
Thank you, everyone.
That gives people more of an incentive to work.
It gives the companies a lot.
It's a lot easier to get the people.
And you know, I went to some economists, great ones, and I said, what do you think?
They said, it would be unbelievable.
You'll get a whole new workforce by doing that.
No taxes on overtime.
The people who work overtime are among the hardest working citizens in our country.
And for too long no one in Washington has been looking out for them.
Those are the people.
They really work.
They're police officers, nurses, factory workers, construction workers, truck drivers and machine operators.
It's time for the working man and woman to finally catch a break and that's what we're doing because this is a good one.
And I think it's going to be great for the country.
So that's why we will be saying that if you're an overtime worker when you're past 40 hours a week, think of that.
Your overtime hours will be tax-free.
Okay?
Good?
You're going to have it, too.
I mean, that's a huge...
That's a really big deal to those who are...
In the workforce, it just gives a lot of incentive to continue building the country back, honestly.
It's a big deal.
So that's what Donald Trump is proposing.
I'm sure we can expect Kamala Harris to mimic this tax policy exactly in the near future.
We're going to pause here just for a minute and we're going to tell you about some of our great sponsors.
The first thing we're going to talk about is What is an America First investment strategy?
Well, there's a lot of different ways to spend your money and invest your money.
And most of the time, though, unfortunately, if you're going to do traditional investment vehicles, you're going to be funding the very companies that actually hate you, hate your family, hate the idea of Christianity.
That's why you need to check out Carlos Cortez, Cortez Wealth Management, and find out what an America First investment strategy is.
The consultation is free, so what do you have to lose?
You see it right there, faith-based, fiduciary, conservative.
They specialize in America First investments, so you're not going to use your money, and you're not going to fund your money, essentially use it against your own family.
So what is an America First retirement plan?
You need to go to CortezWM.com.
That's CortezWM.com or call 813-448-3446.
If you go to the website right there, you can get your guide, your America First retirement plan right there.
You just click on that link you see on your screen.
CortezWM.com.
Again, 813-448-3446.
Also, the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
This is a veteran-owned coffee company that imports coffee beans from around the world.
They roast them back home here in the United States.
They donate a portion of the province of Every Bag sold to Homes for Our Troops, and they're rebuilding veterans' lives by giving them homes for severely injured post-9-11 veterans.
Fresh Costa Rican coffee beans, you can get it ground, or you can get the whole bean.
A lot of people want to grind it yourself.
Have you seen the coffee memes about how you drink your coffee and they try to put you in a political box?
Like if you do the poor, then you're more liberal.
If you do the French press, you're a little less liberal.
If you just do a regular coffee pot, then you're conservative.
Anyway...
I don't think that...
I actually am a French press guy myself.
But anyway, it's great tasting coffee.
Check it out.
BeardedSargent.com slash Millstone.
And when you use my name, Paul, you save 15%.
Left Wing Will and the Red Pill.
This is the card game that I created.
Give it a try.
This is going to be a great hit at your next party game where you get to tell Left Wing Will's story.
He is a stereotypical leftist.
While boycotted Memorial Day, Will created his own holiday, which he named...
Let's see.
Let's see what it was.
Just pull a random card.
He named a sci-fi fantasy graphic novel about Wilmo, Elmo's paraplegic abusive uncle who is a victim of systemic racism day.
So they don't all totally work, but you can tell that we've put a lot of effort into it.
And don't think that that's probably one of my favorite cards in the whole game.
That was a last-minute addition, too.
It's a 400-card deck.
Leftwingwill.com saves you 15%.
That's 15% off when you use my name, Paul.
Leftwingwill.com.
I'm not kidding you.
That may be one of our best cards.
A sci-fi fantasy graphic novel about Wheelmo.
Elmo's paraplegic abusive uncle who is a victim of systemic racism.
I'm sorry.
I'm laughing at my own jokes.
I mean, there's all things.
Will likes fantasy crystals.
You name it.
Opens an Etsy store that never really comes to fruition.
This is the guy.
This is the typical, stereotypical leftist, if you will.
Alright, so let's get back to it, shall we?
So there's a few things.
This is the next thing I want to talk about.
This is a great piece.
We've covered this all week.
What's going on in Springfield, Ohio.
The Haitian influx.
How it's affecting the homeless population there.
Taylor Hansen has been doing great work, and this is the latest that I have seen from him.
And it's absolutely...
I'm just going to let you see it for yourself, because everybody needs to watch this.
This is what the Haitian immigrants are doing.
This is what they're doing to Americans.
They're making their lives much, much harder, more difficult.
Are you homeless out here in Springfield, Ohio?
Yes, me and my baby both are.
How long have you been homeless for?
I've been here in Springfield since January and I've been homeless the whole time.
The whole time?
Yep.
Do you feel like the Haitians or kind of the influx of the Haitian immigrants are taking away from resources that you could potentially have?
100%.
100% before they came here, we could get housing.
Young single moms could actually afford to pay rent.
Now that they're here, $900 for a two-bedroom?
How is a young single mom supposed to pay that on top of her kid?
We gotta fight for our money, our food stamps, our medical, everything.
We gotta fight for it, but they get to come here and just get it handed to them?
That's not fair to my daughter.
Not me, my daughter.
That's taking from my baby, and I'm not okay with that.
It has to end.
So in the past, you know, this would have been a time for free market conservatives to pile on this woman because of the, you know, I mean, look, welfare, the idea, yeah, can welfare disincentivize people to actually pull themselves up by their own bootstraps? can welfare disincentivize people to actually pull themselves up by Yeah, all of that is certainly true, but we're way beyond that argument.
The programs are here, and we can all agree that they should go to Americans.
They should not go to Haitian refugees when Americans that are actual citizens are suffering and have lives that are worse off.
Thank you.
And yet here we are.
And you'll have leftists and even big evangelical leaders that are now on Twitter, Chastising and criticizing those of us that are basically saying that we're not being good Christians by having a problem with mass immigration that is demographically destroying this country and making it unrecognizable to where in a generation...
I honestly think they want to set up something like what's going on with South Africa.
That's what I think.
The anti-whiteism is not a made-up thing.
It certainly is real.
I was listening to a local debate in my town the other day.
It was a state senate race.
And they got a real liberal woman, you know, Democrat, criticized, just openly criticized the current state senator because he's a white man.
And he doesn't understand his white privilege, but I as a white woman, I do understand.
Anyway, it's just real cringe.
Anti-whitism is rampant, and it also has actual real policy implications.
This girl talking about the plight of her and her baby, they're white people.
Done!
They're taking from our children.
Not us.
Our children.
The future of our country.
And that's not okay.
I'm 100% not okay with that.
It's 100% disrespectful to us.
Granite, I respect the fact that you got a war going on, okay?
You could come over here and respect our customs.
Don't come here taking away from us.
Respect it.
Fight with us.
So she's saying she wants the Haitians, if they do come over here, they need to respect our customs and our culture.
So the question is, is that even possible?
Is it possible for that to happen when there's so many of them?
Is it possible for a third world mindset to become a first world mindset just because you've moved geographic locations?
Right.
And I would say the answer is no, number one, and it's certainly no if you're putting 20,000 of them together in a population of 60.
They have no incentive to change because they're around all of their same people that they used to live with.
It's an invasion and it's a declaration of war against the community there.
That's what it is.
So no.
So, I mentioned Big Eva types.
There's no more Big Eva stereotypical leftist than a guy by the name of Phil Vischer.
Phil Vischer is, you may know who he is, he's the guy that created VeggieTales, the Christian cartoon where the tomato and the cucumber, you know, tell you Bible stories and everything else.
I mean, the body of work for the most part is good, right?
I don't think Tom and Larry have had an episode where they push their beds together like Bert and Ernie, you know, to subtly proclaim that they're now gay.
I don't think the tomato and the cucumber have done that yet.
I hope they haven't.
Although if they do, it won't surprise me because of Phil Vischer's left-wing political takes.
Phil Vischer says this, quote, migrant crime is exploding, talking about Trump.
Migrants are eating our pets, talking about Trump.
And then he says this, our willingness to believe claims with no factual support simply because they paint migrants in a negative light shows how thoroughly we are all failing to love, quote, the least of these.
William Wolfe says you should read your Bible sometime.
Phil Vischer.
Hi, William.
This is what they all do.
So I've interacted with Phil.
I was calling Phil out, calling his ideas wrong a couple of weeks ago when he was attacking Megan Basham in her book Shepherds for Sale, which, by the way, if you haven't read it, you need to.
It's fantastic.
And that's what he said to me.
I criticized him.
I can't remember exactly what I said.
I'd have to go back and look.
But he responded to me.
Hi, Paul Vischer.
It's this way of saying, well, I said hi to you, so now it's like in the South, you can criticize somebody and it not be gossip or sin against that person as long as you start your sentence with bless their heart or end your sentence with bless their heart, right?
So, you know, this is the same deal, but it's, hi, William.
I will look for the passage that says it's okay to spread falsehoods if those falsehoods affirm my existing hatred for a group of people God loves.
See, they don't care.
Phil Fisher doesn't care about the evidence.
He doesn't care about the testimony of that woman.
He doesn't care about those people saying they have seen them take ducks out of a park and lop their heads off and eat them.
He doesn't care about the Facebook post where we see severed pigs' heads and carcasses left by the reservoir of Springfield, Ohio.
He does not care.
Somebody named Gabriel says, it's been confirmed that this is happening.
Also, number two, all migrants are not the least of these.
Phil Vischer, hi Gabe, where has this been confirmed?
Here is probably the best take on this, I think, and that's from Allie Beth Stuckey.
She decided to engage Phil Vischer in his leftism, right?
Again, Phil Vischer was called out in Megan Basham's book, Shepherds for Sale.
Again, check it out.
And the people that are called out in this book, they do not want to recognize that they are part of carving out a safe space for Marxist ideology and Marxist thought within the church.
They don't want to believe that their left-wing political opinions are based on lies and false presuppositions.
They don't want to believe any of that.
That's what this really is about.
For all of their talk about we don't need to be political or make idols of politics, when their opinions are pointed out to be factually incorrect, they get political themselves.
Matter of fact, they are actually, in my opinion, way more obsessed with politics than people on the right are.
People on the right have political opinions and they hold on to those loosely, I think, because what they hold on to more firmly...
Are the biblical principles that are in their hearts that they have subscribed to, and those principles that are hard and firm and built on a rock inform their political opinions domestically.
Anyway, and that gets confused with, oh, don't make it idolatry.
Again, a Christian can care deeply about something and it not be an idol.
Allie Beth Stuckey, I guess, talking to Phil Vischer, I guess you could dismiss all the claims of the citizens of Springfield, Ohio, Phil.
You could ignore the woman whose elderly mother-in-law was mowed down by a Haitian immigrant who still hasn't been held to account.
You could minimize the death of 11-year-old Aidan Clark, who was killed by a Haitian immigrant who ran into a school bus while driving without a license.
You could erase the names of Molly Tibbetts, Lakin Riley, and Kate Steinle from your memory.
You could do all of that and convince yourself that doing so is loving the least of these or welcoming the foreigner, but it's not.
It's selling out your neighbor.
It's abandoning your duty to the community in which God has providentially placed you.
It's failing to seek the welfare of the city in which you're in exile, Jeremiah 29.7.
It's cruel.
It's irresponsible.
It's misguided, toxic empathy, not truth-filled love.
Remember what I said at the top of the show about how the intel agency oligarchs have successfully trained us to root for the underdog?
That's certainly affecting Phil Vischer when it comes to the immigrant situation.
She goes on, Allie Beth Stuckey, In both the Old Testament and New,
you will only find support for the concepts of borders, walls, order, laws, and foreigner assimilation.
Israel's command to love the foreigner was paired with very strict commands for how the foreigner must conduct himself.
God gave us borders and nations for our good.
He is a God of peace and it is a gift when he gives us mechanisms for mitigating chaos.
Mitigating chaos through the policies we support is a great way to actually love the most vulnerable.
Every nation, not just America, has both the right and responsibility to put the well-being of its people first.
Again, I pulled that quote because I thought that was an excellent, excellent retort to Phil Vischer trying to say.
That there's no evidence of the migrant crime that's exploding or that the migrants are eating pets or animals at the park.
And he's trying to criticize Christians as not loving, failing to love the least of these, making this a gospel issue.
You're a bad Christian if you don't want hordes of immigrants from the third world to invade your city.
You're a bad Christian, Phil Vischer says.
I wonder if he'll make a Larry and a tomato and cucumber show about that.
An episode about that.
I wonder.
This is a good story.
Robin DiAngelo has put out a statement.
So Matt Walsh has a new movie coming out, Am I Racist?
Where he essentially trolls in disguise people to get them to admit the crazy things they believe.
Crazy things like Will would believe here.
Crazy things like that.
Very similar to that documentary he did, What is a Woman?
The idea is if you get the left to admit what they actually believe in public, I mean, it's so ridiculous to the average person, and they really kind of want to keep a lot of that stuff under wraps.
And so Robin DiAngelo, actually, this professor, PhD, she's put out a statement because she knows this movie's coming out.
She's trying to get in front of it.
And I have to say, this statement is really hilarious to read.
Again, think of this.
This is a PhD, Dr.
Robin DiAngelo.
And she's a far leftist.
And this is what she said.
I'm just going to read part of it.
She says, Back in 2023, I was contacted by a group who claimed to be making a documentary film called Shades of Justice.
I already love it.
I already love that part.
Shades of Justice.
About efforts to address racism in the United States.
They planned to interview anti-racist activists, authors, and thought leaders in service of supporting the cause of racial equity.
They offered me between $10,000 to $20,000 for an interview, and I said, let's meet in the middle with $15,000.
And agreed to participate.
She says, I've since donated the sum to the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.
When I arrived for the interview, a few things felt off.
The grips would not make eye contact with me, and the interviewer, who was introduced as Matt, appeared to be wearing an ill-fitted wig.
Well, I think, well, I mean, she knows that now.
Did she really know that then?
I don't know.
Matt presented himself as someone new to anti-racist work and seemed earnest, and his questions did not come across as adversarial.
By the end, however, things got weird.
She says, Matt asked what I thought about reparations for black Americans.
I said that I agreed with reparations but that it was not my area of expertise.
He then pulled up a chair.
Think about this.
He then pulled up a chair and invited a black crew member who went by Ben to sit with us, took out his wallet, and handed Ben some cash.
He said that if I believed in reparations, I should also give Ben cash.
While some black people have asked white people to engage in reparations by giving directly to individuals, reparations, she writes, are generally understood as a systemic approach to past and current injustice.
The way Matt set this up felt intended to put Ben and I on the spot.
Because Matt was pushing this on us, I expressed my discomfort and checked in with Ben to be sure he was okay with receiving the cash in this way.
And Ben assured me, oh, he was.
So I went to my wallet and I handed him my cash.
And the interview ended.
I was so unsettled by the way Matt manipulated the last scene that I emailed the contact person who went by the name of Lee Hampton to explain that this scene was not an example of reparations and could mislead viewers.
I asked that they not use it in the film and shared several resources overviewing legitimate systemic efforts for reparations.
He assured me that he understood and that they had not yet decided whether to address reparations.
He never again contacted me or answered an email.
After reviewing the sequence of events and discussing it with colleagues, I realized that they had lied about their agenda and I had been played.
I spread the word on my networks and unfortunately last month I started receiving hateful and misogynistic emails.
Some reference the Daily Wire Ben Shapiro's website, which announced that the film is indeed being released.
It is not titled Shades of Justice, nor is it meant to support the anti-racist cause.
It is a Borat-style mockumentary titled, Am I Racist?
and designed to humiliate and discredit anti-racist educators and activists.
The statement goes on.
It's pretty funny.
The reason I bring it up is because Nate Fisher of New Founding has, I think, a really good take on this.
Nate Fisher writes, one key point from D'Angelo's statement points to a pessimistic future for the diversity, equity, and inclusion sector.
She says, That's part of the statement we didn't get to, but Nate did.
Nate says that this part of the statement, this alone may have significant impact.
High trust environments allow fluid collaboration and increasing risk slash undermining trust within the leftist ecosystem We'll impose an enormous cost on their work.
This is doubly true in the DEI space, he writes, where their doctrine requires they avoid traditional class-based discrimination.
The normal way to navigate lower trust environments is to have formal and informal clubs that serve as higher trust islands for fluid business interaction, but diversity, equity, and inclusion explicitly denounces such clubs.
The only alternative will be costly and tedious verification mechanisms that make large amounts of collaboration impractical and deeply unpleasant.
It's hard to estimate ultimate impact, but a high profile operation like Matt Walsh here could deal a serious blow to trust within the DEI sector.
That's There's another way to say that.
It's that everybody knows what you guys are doing now and the public opinion is against it.
And so if you don't want to be exposed further, you're going to have to close ranks because we're sending people in and we basically want to make fun of you.
We not only want to And this is the genius behind doing it, you know, from a comedy standpoint, making fun of their ridiculous ideas.
They cannot stand to be made fun of.
They cannot stand laughter.
And they don't want to be the butt of the joke.
And so, it's going to start breaking down, and they're going to start having more dysfunction because they're not going to trust whether or not they're in a safe space.
It's pretty funny when you think about it.
It really is.
Did Tim Walz call Kamala Harris a prostitute?
Because this started, and I love this story, as a young prostituter.
A prostituter.
Kamala Harris talked about going in that courtroom for the first time.
Kamala Harris for the people.
Because this started, and I love this story, as a young prostituter.
Kamala Harris talked about going in that...
Courtroom for the first time.
Kamala Harris, four of the people.
Because this started, and I love this story, as a young prostitutor.
I don't know.
I mean, it does kind of sound like he's saying prostitutor.
As a young prostitutor.
Oh, it's an unfortunate slip of the tongue, it is.
When your running mate is accused of being, you know, a floozy in her younger days.
So, yeah, it's very...
Very unfortunate.
You know what we haven't been able to get to in a while?
And I apologize.
We're out of time.
We didn't get to Calvin Professor Christian Dumez, the author of Jesus and John Wayne.
But we will.
We've got some rhetorical millstones.
We've got to hand out a bunch of them next week.
That's all the time.
That we have.
This is the time of the show, though, where I tell you that if you don't go to church, please go to church.
Find a church that preaches the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Have a blessed weekend.
And those of you that do go to church, have a great Lord's Day.
We'll see you next time here on the Bill Stull Report.
▲
Export Selection