Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 13, 2024 - Stew Peters Show

01:50:52

Logos Academy Episode 3: The Menace of Communism

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are live.
	Welcome everybody to episode three of Logos Academy, the newly refined series, which is really the name of my old series, which will now be renamed.
	We're going to kind of keep Logos Academy as more of a broad category.
	So welcome everyone.
	Please let me know that the audio is okay on both Rumble and Odyssey.
	I know we've been having some initial issues.
	First, setting up the show.
	Let me just double check here.
	Make sure I got both the chats open so we can see.
	Please do let me know that the audio is working well.
	It seems to be okay on my end.
	So if that's the case, we can hop right into the show, hopefully.
	Audio's fine.
	Okay, good.
	Good.
	All right.
	Great to hear.
	Awesome.
	Perfect.
	All right.
	Well, welcome everyone.
	So it's episode three.
	This is the third show of the week.
	Again, we are live on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 4 to 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	You guys are not yet familiar with the schedule.
	That's how we're doing it from here on out.
	We're on Odyssey, as usual.
	We've been on Odyssey for about two years now, I think it's been.
	We're on Rumble now on the Stu Peters Network.
	And again, a major thank you to Stu for platforming my show and getting it out to a larger audience.
	I greatly do appreciate that.
	And we're live on FTJ, which is Dave Geharry's website.
	If you guys aren't familiar with Dave Geharry, he's been in the scene for a long time, probably about three decades.
	Sorry, that noise was probably not good.
	He's been around the scene for about three decades.
	He was one of the initial guys that actually helped to expose the truth about the USS Liberty.
	He interviewed a lot of the survivors in the early days.
	Dave's a really good dude.
	And he set up FTJ, which is ftjmedia.com.
	It's a free speech platform, no censorship.
	It's literally owned by one of our guys, so you can guarantee yourself that.
	And he also owns Money Tree Publishing, which has a lot of really good books up there.
	Maybe I'll promote that at the end of the show.
	I figured out how to actually pull things up on the stream so you guys can physically now watch some of the things that I'm looking at.
	I finally got a hold of that, so you guys will have some...
	Links being pulled up from time to time here, or some different sources on the screen so we can look at things together, and it's not just me kind of babbling off to you guys about what's going on.
	So as you guys can see from the topic, today we're going to talk about the menace of communism.
	And I think we've adequately described it in quite a few shows in the past of a massive Jewish overrepresentation in both Bolshevism and communism, which are very similar things.
	Bolshevism is maybe just a little offshoot of it.
	So we're going to talk about that Jewish influence today.
	We're going to really kind of beat it like a dead horse and show you guys just exactly how often and how consistent this is.
	So we'll kind of kick off in a second here.
	I just want to allow some more people to fill into the chat and then we'll get started up.
	I do see we have quite a few people coming in right now.
	And I do appreciate everyone.
	I hope everyone caught the show on Wednesday.
	We had Dominic Trippi on.
	We talked about 9-11.
	That was a pretty good show.
	He's a good dude.
	He was a great guest host.
	So it was nice to have him.
	We'll have some more guests coming on towards the end of the month.
	Some authors and some people have created some documentaries.
	Got a couple things lined up.
	And one thing I do want to promote is tomorrow on my Odyssey channel, I do not have a time slot on the Stu Peters Network on Saturdays, so tomorrow I will be only on my Odyssey at 9pm Eastern.
	I'm going to be joined by Joel Davis.
	If you guys aren't familiar with him, he's a...
	Prominent white nationalist from Australia.
	Very intelligent guy.
	Very well-spoken.
	We're going to be talking about quite a few things.
	So you guys can catch that.
	It's going to be tomorrow at 9pm Eastern.
	And that'll be the last show of the week.
	I'm not doing anything on Sunday.
	We're going to kick back up on Monday again with the weekly schedule.
	So make sure you guys do catch that.
	Alright, let's kick us off.
	So, I want to talk about communism as an ideal, talk about it as a kind of historical thing, and point out the influencers that are behind communism and the ones that have spread it throughout history.
	So, it's one thing to make communism, or it's one thing to be a communist, but when it comes to countries, when it's spread places, who's in charge of that?
	Who's bringing that over here?
	So, we're going to discuss that a little bit today.
	We'll start with the obvious.
	I think everybody knows Karl Marx.
	Karl Marx was the writer of the Communist Manifesto.
	Karl Marx was a secular Jew.
	Now, that's a very important term.
	For those who are not familiar with the term secular or what exactly it is that secular means, secular basically means non-religious or does not believe in God.
	So a secular Jew would be somebody who is not Jewish by religion, so therefore they would have to be, by definition, Jewish by race.
	So this is where we have to draw that first line of distinction and understanding, and this is something that Many are still confused on today.
	I see this argued in a lot of circles, you know, are Jews a religion or are they a race?
	Well, we can look at Karl Marx as a primary example to prove that they are in fact a race and consider themselves as such.
	Karl Marx actually, being the secular Jewish communist that he was, actually wrote documents against Judaism.
	He talks very negatively of Judaism as a religion.
	So, It goes to show you there's got to be some kind of fundamental ideal that he stems his ideology from.
	And this would be the Talmud.
	And if you guys have not seen the first episode of my whiteboard series titled Jewish vs.
	Gentile Law, I go into this pretty deep and I explain how if you actually look at communism, it's essentially the fulfillment of the Talmud.
	There's a passage in the Talmud that states that all property of all nations is This is a quote from the Talmud.
	And this is essentially communist doctrine put into play.
	Well, it's the reverse, right?
	It's an ideology that spawns from the Talmud, and then communist doctrine actually capitalizes on that ideology and puts it into reality.
	So you see this with communism specifically.
	Private property, the seizing of private property.
	Well, isn't this not an exact fulfillment of that quote?
	You can seize up any property without any scruples.
	And this is exactly what the communists did.
	They want to remove all forms of private property.
	They still advocate for it today in the United States.
	The abolition of private property is one of their big goals.
	And then you have Marxist groups like Black Lives Matter.
	Which was founded by two black Marxists, one of which is actually a half-Jew.
	And they founded Black Lives Matter.
	And they themselves state, hey, we want to abolish private property.
	But then you see as they get all these donations and they get all this funding from all these different sources, they start buying off mansions and having their own big cozy homes.
	So they're not really against private property.
	But it's really convenient to say that, right?
	It's a really good...
	Subversive tactic to take down the fabric of society and virtue signal to a greater amount of people.
	Communism is absolutely the fulfillment of that Talmudic doctrine of removing private property from the individuals.
	Because we saw in Communist Russia, as that private property was removed, let's look at the heads of all of these different categories.
	The Bolshevik Revolution, as an example, There are FBI documents, declassified FBI documents, where an American correspondent that was working in the USSR actually stated that he said, it's probably not wise for me to say this, but about 90% of the Bolshevik Revolution was actually Jewish rather than anything else.
	I'll actually give you the direct numbers.
	Give me one second here.
	I'll get the book here.
	I do recommend this book as well.
	You know, a lot of times people will talk about Freemasonry is the bad thing.
	It's all Freemasonry that has these issues.
	Here's a book that kind of goes into this pretty deep.
	It's called Freemasonry and Judaism.
	Such a glare.
	I hate that.
	I don't know how to fix the glare.
	It's Freemasonry in Judaism.
	It's by Vicomte Leon de Ponsens.
	He was a French writer.
	And he wrote a book describing the French Revolution and the overwhelming Jewish representation in that.
	However, I want to point to some very important statistics that he touches on via the Bolshevik Revolution.
	So he talks about the Bolshevist administration and Out of 545 members of the Bolshevik administration, 447 of them were Jews.
	Only 30 of them were Russians.
	And then we have some other smaller ethnic groups.
	So, again, we see this massive over-representation of the Bolshevik party.
	One of the most obvious cases being Leon Trotsky.
	Leon Trotsky, for those who are not familiar with Leon Trotsky, was actually born Lev Bronstein, a common occurrence you will see with a lot of these types.
	They change their name to sound less Jewish, and they start up communistic movements, or they start up groups like...
	Like Nambla or things like this.
	They even fund things like BLM, things of the sort, which we'll go into that in a little bit.
	So Leon Trotsky was actually born Lev Bronstein.
	He changed his name to Leon Trotsky to sound more Russian so that he could start the Russian Revolution.
	Well, Russian Revolution, right?
	So they started the Bolshevik Revolution over there.
	Now, how Trotsky got there is a very interesting story, one that I think not many people actually know much about.
	So Trotsky was heavily financed by bankers in the United States, much of which were Jewish as well.
	So we can go into a couple of these bankers here.
	Some of the people that were financing Trotsky that he's known to have meetings with were Jacob Schiff, Kuhn, Loeb& Co.
	I think everybody is familiar with Kuhn, Loeb& Co.
	Still one of the biggest firms today in the United States.
	American Jewish Establishment.
	And he also was in cahoots with Rosa Luxemburg.
	For those who are not familiar with her, she was the head of the Communist Party, or one of the main communist agitators, rather, in Germany, where the National Socialists, when they were coming to power, had to deal exactly with this same problem that Russia was dealing with as well.
	So Leon Trotsky starts the Bolshevik Revolution under the orders of...
	If I'm pronouncing that correctly, I hope I'm pronouncing that right.
	Another secular Jew.
	It's very important to realize how many times these people are secular because it really hammers home that point that they are in fact a race and not just a religion.
	They certainly can be religious as well.
	However, it is more times than not that they are a race first and that religion is kind of a second aspect or a second piece to the equation.
	So, Trotsky starts this Bolshevik revolution.
	They kill the Tsar in Russia, and they start implementing through things like the KGB and whatnot.
	They start implementing censorship.
	And another thing that they do is, I believe his name is Yuri Bezmenov.
	I think that's his name.
	Yuri Bezmenov actually did a lecture in the United States.
	I want to see if I can find a short clip of this to play for you guys.
	Because Yuri Bezmenov talked about communist infiltration in a country and how exactly it is that that happens.
	He goes into that pretty in depth.
	I want to see if I can find just a little clip of that for you guys.
	Let's see.
	Let's see.
	It's a really good example.
	So for those who are not familiar with Yuri Bezmenov, he was a KGB detractor who left the Soviet Union, came to the States and started warning people about what they were going to do in the United States.
	So in this clip we're going to watch, he talks about how to demoralize a nation.
	And this is the same process that they took in Russia as well.
	They took this in Germany.
	They do the same process pretty much everywhere you look.
	So let's watch this clip here.
	Let me see if I can get it up on the screen.
	I think I can handle it.
	Find out.
	I'm getting a little better with this technology every day.
	I do apologize.
	I know I'm young, but I am Boomer Tech.
	All right, here we go.
	There we go.
	All right, so we'll watch a little bit of this.
	We're not going to watch the whole thing.
	thing it's about a 15 minute clip but we'll watch the first couple minutes you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
	you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
	you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
	you you you there really no sound on the video I'm not.
	Oh man, why is that a problem?
	I'm trying to figure out why it is that that happens.
	Okay, alright.
	Maybe we're not going to be able to watch videos for now.
	We'll see if I can get that fixed.
	No sound on the video.
	Why would that be...
	See, I said I'm slowly getting better with the technology.
	Slowly.
	Okay, it seems that the sound is only not on Rumble, so it must be a Rumble Studio issue.
	Alright.
	Forget that.
	We'll continue to just talk on the subject.
	I need to set up an audio capture channel.
	Alright, I'll have to learn that.
	We'll do that on the next show.
	Again, it's one step at a time.
	Every day I have one more thing that I know, so we just got to take it day by day.
	The show will get better each time, given a little more time.
	Anyways, to go back to what we were talking about, Leon Trotsky, he goes and he starts the Bolshevik Revolution, and when you look at how exactly this is done, I'll kind of summarize what Yuri Besmanov says.
	It's a process of demoralization.
	So what they'll do is they will destroy the moral fabric of the society.
	They do this in many ways, and we're seeing this today.
	We'll touch on a couple things.
	But they destroy the moral fabric of society, and as that moral fabric decays and is slowly worked away, people become apathetic.
	They lose their gusto for life.
	They lose their kind of motivation to participate in things.
	So...
	You see this today.
	A lot of the things they push, such as the anti-white hatred, is a really big one.
	They will push pornography, all forms of degeneracy that you can possibly think of.
	It's a big problem.
	So, yeah, bear with us.
	We're definitely getting better with the technology.
	Like I said, I'm not good with technology.
	I'm still learning these things.
	It's Rumble Studio.
	I've only been using this for three days, so I got to get a little more used to the platform.
	So they start this up over in Russia with this Bolshevik revolution.
	And now over in Russia, it was slightly different, their tactics.
	So in Russia, the goal of the revolution over there or the communist method of destabilizing the country was to have class warfare.
	It was to take the upper class or the bourgeoisie and take the proletariat and have them fight each other, right?
	Actually, it was really to use the proletariat as a battering ram against the bourgeoisie, which was the ruling class.
	So they instigate this class warfare.
	And this starts what is a revolution, right?
	It creates tensions in the state.
	It creates divisions amongst the populace.
	We're at today.
	I mean, we're literally on that kind of same ballpoint in the United States today.
	We have a very divided, very tense nation.
	The only difference today is we now are divided by race.
	So they take identity groups rather than class groups.
	So instead of dividing us by class, they try to divide us by identity groups, right?
	Oppressed and oppressor, things of that sort.
	It's the same concept.
	It's just put into a different format because race is a much larger issue in modern America than class is in comparison to Russia at that time.
	Obviously, class is still a slight issue in America.
	Not a slight one.
	It's an issue, but it's not as bad as the racial issue.
	It's not as easy to instigate class hatred in the United States where it's a very free market kind of place as it is to instigate racial hatreds.
	So we look at how exactly they do this.
	When the Bolsheviks were over in Russia, and there was a lot of communistic Jews in Germany at this exact same time, at the Frankfurt Institute, and Frankfurt Institute, we talked about this on the Stu Peter Show the other day, but the Frankfurt Institute came over into the United States to Columbia University, which is in New York City.
	And let me go down the list here a little bit so people can understand the Some of the things that happened in Columbia University.
	So one of the things that happened in the Columbia University was the institution of critical theory.
	Now critical theory was a social and economic theory that basically was to destabilize classes, cause a lot of social warfare, right?
	Cause those tensions we were just talking about.
	Now, let me just go to show you guys so you can understand exactly the culprits behind critical theory.
	Pull this down.
	Here we go.
	Awesome.
	Okay, so let me move this over just a tad.
	There we go.
	All right, so Critical Theory was a school of thought at the Frankfurt School.
	It was started up by Herbert Marcuse.
	I'm just going to show you guys.
	Each and every person on this list is, in fact, Jewish.
	Herbert Marcuse is one.
	You've got a Theodore Adorno is another Jew.
	And I do recommend that you guys look into these characters individually because you'll see a lot of subversive activities behind each one independently, let alone this whole Frankfurt School.
	So they came up with these theories.
	Here's Fromm.
	Fromm was actually a communist in America as well.
	He joined a communistic party in America.
	I think my screen just froze.
	What the hell?
	I don't understand this.
	Hold on.
	My screen is frozen.
	Why?
	Oh, technology.
	You never fail.
	Okay, here we go.
	Max Horkheimer was also another example of this.
	You see these examples basically all over the place.
	They put this into very liberal terms.
	This is what communist doctrine will do.
	It acts like it's for the betterment of the people.
	We're speaking to save people.
	You see this with Black Lives Matter.
	Again, this is just a perfect example for a lot of these things.
	You look at Black Lives Matter and It talks about uplifting black people in society and trying to help them out.
	How many blacks benefited from Black Lives Matter existing?
	In what way did any black people benefit from that organization?
	Basically, nobody at all benefited, right?
	The only thing that happened is mass riots, the destabilization of the economy and things around us, the moving...
	Actually, a lot of blacks who lived in these predominantly black ghetto neighborhoods were A lot of the businesses, after all this looting happened, they moved away.
	So a lot of blacks were actually harmed by these events.
	So they play it off as if they're trying to help these people, but instead it's actually just a manipulation tactic with some kind of ulterior motive behind it.
	And that ulterior motive with communist doctrine is simply to break down the moral fabric of society and cause chaos.
	So that was critical theory, this social and economic piece, right?
	However, now we can talk about critical race theory.
	Everybody's familiar with critical race theory today.
	And critical race theory...
	Is basically the exact same thing as critical theory.
	They just put the word race in there, right?
	So instead of class warfare and class tensions, they now change this and they rework it to racial warfare and racial tensions.
	So it's taking the same tactic and just kind of manipulating the strategy just a little bit.
	So, again, this was brought to you from the Frankfurt School, the Frankfurt Institute, rather, to Columbia University, where a lot of these doctrines come from.
	Specifically, critical theory is one of them.
	And again, you'll have plenty of conservative commentators will talk on the television and say, hey, you know, critical theory, critical race theory is this terrible thing.
	But they'll never go to the source of it.
	They'll never say where critical race theory comes from.
	They won't tell you that it spawns from critical theory itself.
	And where critical theory came from and who created it.
	They don't want to tell you these things because if it links back to those Jewish connections, a lot of these people have beholden finance, especially these political commentators.
	Somebody like Charlie Kirk is an example.
	They have a lot of funding and finance from these people.
	So if they were to say something that they don't like, they're going to lose their funding, they're going to lose their platform, their show, and they're certainly worried about that.
	That is why you never hear these people talk about it.
	So let's talk about...
	I want to talk about Emma Goldman.
	For people who are not familiar with Emma Goldman, she was a communist revolutionary.
	It came from Russia, moved to the United States.
	Let me pull up her profile as well so we can look at her a little bit.
	She was actually...
	She was in a relationship with a man by the name of Alexander Berkman, both of which are, again, secular Russian Jews with communist leanings.
	And Alexander Berkman is a really interesting case, one that I think more people need to know about.
	Let me pull him up as well.
	Let's see if I can find him.
	Here he is.
	Alexander Berkman was a proponent of what they call propaganda of the deed.
	Again, if you saw my show with Stu Peters not long ago, we talked about propaganda as a concept.
	It was founded by a Jew, actually.
	It was founded by Edward Bernays.
	So many people in the United States, when you hear the term propaganda, everyone thinks this is some kind of national socialist thing that only the Nazis did it and they created it and they came up with it in this really evil and demonic way.
	And this is actually an inversion of reality.
	When you look at national socialist propaganda, aside from demonizing what they considered their internal enemy, which were majority communistic Jews, they showed exactly what kind of social change they wanted in society.
	They had a positive, uplifting propaganda showing social change, showing people a better society, giving people something to positively look forward to in the future.
	Meanwhile, you look at the propaganda of a guy like Edward Bernays, and Edward Bernays, he is widely known.
	One of the most important things that he's done was actually popularize cigarettes for women.
	They called them torches of freedom.
	He actually kind of wrapped this into some kind of feminist ideal and convinced women to start smoking cigarettes, that it was good for them and it was cool and it would liberate them from the patriarchy, right?
	Again, these virtue signals that act like they're for you, they act like they want to help you, And then the end goal is now women are getting mass amounts of lung cancer.
	And I'm sure everyone here knows how unattractive it is to see a female smoker.
	It's not a pleasant thing at all.
	So that's not the only thing that Edward Bernays was involved in.
	Edward Bernays was also involved in a governmental overthrow of a democratically elected government in the country of Guatemala.
	He was one of the main proponents of the propaganda that kind of instigated that.
	So this is where propaganda stems from.
	And the reason I say this is because if you look at a guy like Alexander Berkman, they look at what they call propaganda of the deed.
	Now, this is a different type of propaganda.
	This is essentially propaganda through action.
	So what this states is if you are a communist revolutionary and you want to go kill somebody or you want to go blow something up, that is propaganda of the deed.
	The deed itself shows a form of propaganda.
	So Alexander Berkman actually attempted to assassinate a very, very popular and wealthy American businessman.
	Let me show you guys him.
	Henry Clay Frick, who worked with some Pennsylvania railroads.
	He was a very large man, very well-known at the time.
	And they tried to kill him as a form of propaganda of the deed.
	They actually failed in their assassination.
	Let me see if we can find...
	I'm sure it's here.
	Here it is.
	In 1892, during the Homestead strike, Alexander Berkman attempted to assassinate Frick.
	On the 23rd, Berkman, armed with a revolver and a sharpened steel file, entered Frick's office in downtown Pittsburgh.
	So, he...
	Frick was hit in the left earlobe, interestingly enough, and he did not die.
	He survived this attack.
	He was able to break through this.
	But this is just one example.
	There are many examples of attempted assassinations, attempted terroristic attacks, which kind of negates a very important theory.
	You hear things such as White supremacy is a threat to this country.
	White supremacy is trying to tear down the nation.
	They're violent.
	They're evil.
	And if you look at a really good example to show you just the...
	The double standard, I guess we'll call it, in this narrative.
	Everyone here is familiar and pretty rightfully so outraged with the January 6th event.
	On January 6th, we know that a lot of what I would just basically call American patriots walked through the Capitol.
	They physically walked through the Capitol building.
	They didn't have firearms.
	They were not dressed in military fatigues.
	This was not an organized coup or insurrection of any kind.
	It's a simple protest that these people were having.
	They're rightfully upset with their government.
	So they go ahead and they walk through.
	And these people, as we can see today, are I mean, they're still being jailed today.
	The FBI is still hunting for people that went to that event, did nothing wrong but walk through a place, and they're targeting them, trying to imprison them, and take them down.
	Well...
	Some might say, okay, it's a gross injustice, but it is what it is.
	Well, let's look on the other side of the fence.
	We have a woman like Susan Rosenberg.
	And this is one of the most important examples, just to show you the level of nepotism and favoritism that works in society in the United States.
	So Susan Rosenberg is a communistic Jew, and we're going to go really deep on this woman because it's very important that people understand exactly how subversive she was in her activities.
	She was in affiliation with two organizations, one being the May 19th Coalition and the other one being the Weather Underground Organization.
	The Weather Underground Organization, for those who aren't familiar, they were...
	It was popularized in the media when an interview came out and one of the members stated that a topic of contention in their meetings was if it was morally okay to kill white babies.
	This was a topic of discussion that these people had in their meetings.
	They were actually talking about if it's a moral justice to kill white babies.
	You always hear this term, you know, if Hitler was a baby, would you kill him, right?
	They talk about that all the time.
	This is exactly...
	They were actually having a moral discussion to determine if killing white children was somehow a good thing.
	That's insanity, right?
	I mean, who in their right mind would even discuss something like that, let alone advocate for it?
	And there were many people in these groups advocating for it.
	So Rosenberg today is a feminist, but back in the day, she still holds the same Marxist tendencies.
	She's just changed her way about going about this.
	But back in the day, she was a part of an absurd amount of terrorist activities.
	They were robbing armed cars or armored money trucks.
	What would they call them?
	Garda trucks, I guess it'd be called.
	They were robbing these.
	They would actually blow them up and rob them.
	They were breaking people out of jail, breaking people on the FBI's most wanted list.
	They were assassinating police officers, bombing police stations and headquarters.
	And more importantly than all, they bombed the U.S. Capitol building.
	For some reason, this is almost never discussed.
	Let's see if I can actually find the year that this was done.
	I want to say it was 71 or 81.
	It's, of course, not on here.
	So she was a part of the bombing of the United States Capitol Building.
	There's a good documentary on this.
	You can actually probably look it up on YouTube.
	Just look up.
	Bombing of the U.S. Capitol Building.
	Weather Underground or May 19th.
	And it should come up.
	I think you guys will see that for sure.
	But there's a really good documentary on this.
	It's pretty short, too.
	It's like 25 minutes, something like that.
	And they talk about the bombing of the U.S. Capitol building and how these people did this and advocated for it.
	Now, interestingly enough, Rosenberg, who bombed the United States Capitol building, remember, she bombed it.
	She took an explosive device and blew up a sector of the building.
	The people we're talking about right now, Walked through the building and they're being put in solitary confinement.
	They're going through harsh imprisonment conditions.
	Literal patriots who love the country walked through the building in a form of protest.
	This woman, who openly advocates the violent overthrow of the government, bombed the building and she was pardoned by Bill Clinton on his final day of office.
	He physically pardoned her.
	See this here.
	And she was caught with, I think it was like 700 pounds of explosives in a warehouse, which means that they were all, you know, they were planning to do far more activities of bombing and blowing things up as well.
	Let's see.
	I want to go into one other thing with Susan Rosenberg.
	Rosenberg as well was a part of, or she is on the board of a funding group that's called Thousand Currents.
	Thousand Currents funds Black Lives Matter.
	It's one of the actually heaviest funders of Black Lives Matter.
	If you look at Black Lives Matter as an organization, the...
	The profile photo of the logo of Black Lives Matter is just a communist fist.
	They painted it black to appeal to black people.
	Same with, if you look at the Jewish Defense League.
	Let me actually see if I can pull that up.
	The Jewish Defense League has a logo.
	It's exactly the same.
	I don't know why when I'm opening these tabs.
	There we go.
	Keeps freezing.
	Jewish Defense League was also...
	Here is their...
	Photo.
	That's not it.
	I'm getting better at this.
	We'll get there.
	The star with the fist inside of it.
	Again, it's just a communist fist.
	And they put the Jewish star behind it.
	So it's the communist fist to appeal specifically to Jews.
	Just like Black Lives Matter is the communist fist to appeal to blacks.
	They were known for a lot of terroristic activities.
	The Jewish Defense League.
	I won't go into them today.
	Because that's a whole different rabbit hole.
	But these are...
	They use the same symbol for everything.
	It's how you can tell what they're doing.
	So...
	Black Lives Matter, you see them, you know, they're going out and they're rioting in the streets.
	And now the conservative media props us up like this is just some, you know, huge organization of black people who are organizing these like racial riots and inflammations.
	But then you look at the Kyle Rittenhouse situation, which is there's something very special about this situation when you analyze it on its face.
	When Kyle Rittenhouse goes to this event, this rally, he goes to clean up some stuff and do whatever he wanted to do.
	Obviously, the media smeared him and tried to say things that he was there to kill people or whatever nonsense.
	He wanted violence.
	He brought a firearm for protection.
	He knew that things were quite violent over there.
	But what's very interesting is...
	A place full of blacks, right?
	This is a riot or whatever, a protest for black people.
	It's full of black people, okay?
	And. Kyle Rittenhouse goes running away, he gets chased by a mob and the process of getting chased by a mob, three people attack him and he turns around and he fires on all three of these people.
	And coincidentally, just as a coincidence, all three of the people that were shot in this were Jews, all of the all of them were fair skinned Jews.
	How does that work?
	That you go to a Black Lives Matter rally, and in a horde of what is violent blacks, somehow you shoot Jews?
	Those are the people that are attacking you?
	So you can see they instigate these things, and they essentially inflame the tensions, right?
	You see this pretty much everywhere.
	So they drag us together and then they tear it apart, right?
	They kind of do this double game because there was a time when in the United States we had segregation, we were separate peoples, and they forced us to live together so that they could cause tensions amongst us.
	You look at...
	Martin Luther King wrote that.
	Well, he didn't write it.
	He had the I Had a Dream speech.
	And Martin Luther King, another declassified FBI document.
	Let me see if I can actually find that as well.
	Martin Luther King was, in fact, a communist agent.
	And his speechwriter was Stanley Levinson, who was a devout communist Jew who actually was quoted in this document.
	He was quoted in this document stating that Martin Luther King is not to say a single word without his approval.
	So let's see.
	Here's the document.
	I don't know how well you guys can see this.
	Let me zoom in a little bit.
	Too much.
	There we go.
	So, a declassified FBI document discussing Martin Luther King and his Jewish writer.
	Let me see if we can find it.
	Here we go.
	One of King's principal advisors was Stanley David Levinson.
	He was a New York City attorney and businessman and a shrewd, dedicated communist.
	Levinson had spent the major part of his life advancing communist interests.
	He gravitated to Martin Luther King in 1956, and he's dedicated in his support as he has been in advancing communistic goals.
	So, I want to see if I can find the quote, too, where it is stated that Martin Luther King was not to say anything without their approval.
	Here we go.
	Here is a...
	Quote, from Levison, passed to the General Secretary, Gus Hall.
	He states, King is a wholehearted Marxist who has studied it because he believes in it and agrees with it, but because of his being a minister of religion, does not dare to espouse it publicly.
	Let's see if we can find the actual other quote.
	where's the quote about him not to say anything hmm I'm I might have scrolled over it.
	I don't have the exact line.
	But anyways, so again, you see this time and time again.
	These people are co-opted.
	Ben Shapiro went on television like five months ago or so and mentioned that Rosa Parks was actually...
	Put on to do this whole media endeavor of going on the bus and complaining about the seat ordeal so that they could specifically record it, make it a big spectacle in the media, and cause more problems.
	This was done by the NAACP. They co-opted her to do this.
	The NAACP was founded by a couple rabbis, not one rabbi, several rabbis, interestingly enough.
	You see them co-opting these things time and time again.
	I see we have quite a few.
	I wasn't looking at the Twitter chat.
	I do apologize.
	I see we have a lot of people talking over on Twitter.
	Thank you, folks.
	Take a sip of coffee.
	Take a little break here.
	I did not get a lot of sleep last night.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Just kind of catching up on these chat rooms.
	Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by E. Michael Jones.
	It's a pretty decent book.
	Yeah, I would definitely recommend that book.
	I don't agree with all of the stuff that he lays out, but I do think that that book is pretty solid.
	Is that Levison in that photo?
	Let me see if I can find that because I know I've seen that photo.
	Let's see if we can pull that up.
	It's not coming up.
	I am familiar with the photo.
	There's quite a few photos with Martin Luther King with some rabbis and whatnot.
	If he was any more involved in their things, they probably would have made him kiss the wall eventually.
	But I don't think he survived long enough for that.
	So, let's move forward here.
	I've got a couple more things that I specifically wanted to discuss on this show today.
	Let's pull these up.
	Okay, so we talked about Weather Underground.
	We talked about May 19th Coalition.
	And basically what I'm doing when we discuss a lot of these different topics is I kind of broad brush.
	I give you guys some of the initial facts that you need to understand for these topics so that you can look into them a little more in the future.
	So, that's kind of the gist.
	I don't like going too deep and overboard on the topics.
	Otherwise, I think it can drone on a little bit.
	If I give the fundamental facts and allow people to look into it themselves, I think it's a little more compelling in that way.
	So one more character I wanted to talk about is Noel Ignatieff.
	Now, Noel Ignatieff is a really important example of many of the problems that we have in society today.
	Noel Ignatieff was a communist Jew who...
	I don't remember where he was a professor.
	He was a professor at a university.
	Let's see if I can find the university he was at.
	Here's his book for what it is worth.
	Is there a way you can get in touch?
	Yeah, just message me on Twitter.
	Okay, here we go.
	We have Noel Ignatieff.
	He was a...
	Was he a professor?
	Oh, he was a professor at Harvard.
	Sorry, there we go.
	I should have known that.
	No, I'm sorry.
	He was a graduate of Harvard.
	Where was he a professor?
	No, maybe he was.
	Yeah, he looks like he was at Harvard.
	Yeah.
	He served as a tutor for Harvard.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	So he was at Harvard.
	So he was a communist and he wrote this magazine.
	This is a really important magazine.
	It's literally called Race Trader.
	And the magazine Race Trader essentially advocates that all racist people should mix together into one kind of hosh-posh and lose their initial identity.
	And this is kind of beneficial for a creed of communism.
	When people don't have a nationalistic identity, they don't have something that they can have pride in.
	It's just one more way to break down the moral fabric of society.
	So, race trader, let me just read you guys the summary of the magazine.
	He states, what we believe, the white race is a historically constructed social formation.
	It consists of all those who partake in the privileges of Of white skin in society.
	So just dumbing race down to skin color already.
	Now this already is a really big problem, right?
	Are Japanese people white?
	Because their skin's pretty white, right?
	There's some Japanese people with some really white skin, so are they white?
	No, there's genetic differences, right?
	So raced as this concept of just skin color is insane, right?
	Talk about brown, right?
	Well, okay, there's Arabic people that are brown.
	There's Taiwanese people that are brown.
	So are they all one race?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	When you just kind of color coat races, you really smear things up and no pun intended, but you whitewash everything, right?
	So...
	The idea of whiteness just being a privilege based on skin color in itself is already a really absurd assessment.
	And a lot of people are falling for this.
	You see this today all the time.
	White supremacy.
	Capitalism is evil, and it's because it's run by white supremacists who have white privilege just because they live and their skin is white.
	It's absurd.
	Its most wretched members share a status higher in certain respects.
	Then that of the most exalted persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that degrades them.
	Now, this is really interesting because let's say tomorrow 5,000 white people were to move to Thailand.
	American whites moved to Thailand, 5,000 of them.
	And one of us decides to write Taiwanese people are brown, and the structure that they have doesn't let white people benefit as much in their society.
	We just moved here, by the way.
	Their Taiwanese system doesn't let us run their country the way we want to.
	We can't have enough power in their homeland.
	Therefore, that's a product of their brownness, and we have to abolish brownness as a moral good.
	It doesn't make any sense, right?
	It's absurd for a group of people to come to a host nation and tell the host of that country how things should be run.
	And this is the core essence of the problems of multiculturalism.
	This concept that is discussed again as this big virtue signal where everybody's supposed to be happier under a multicultural state.
	Multiculturalism causes nothing but anarchy because when you live with neighbors who are radically different from all different sectors of the world, all different cultures, moral systems, every single person is going to have radically different takes.
	I mean, just as an example, and I've used this example before on my show, so if you've seen it before, I do apologize, but One of the examples is, let's say you have white America, which is a heavy farming country.
	It's always been very big on farmland.
	So you come to white America, and now we say, okay, let's invite in Muslims.
	Now, Muslims...
	I'm sorry, not Muslims, Hindus.
	I always mix that up.
	Hindus.
	So Hindus come in, and...
	Now, everybody knows that Hindus worship cows as God.
	They think the cow is the embodiment of a God.
	So for them to murder a cow, to kill a cow, to butcher a cow or eat a cow is a moral wrongdoing.
	So if they come to our civilization where it's majority white farmers and we obviously butcher cows because we eat steaks quite a bit, like probably the most famous food in America is steaks, burgers, right?
	Which is cow meat.
	So they come and they say, wow, you're killing our God.
	We don't think that's right.
	Now, if they come to power in our country, what they're going to want to do is they're going to want to change the laws and make it that cows can't be killed because that's a moral stance for them.
	Well, now, the white farmers that live here are going to say, wait a minute, wait a minute.
	This is how I make my livelihood, right?
	From my stock, from butchering my cattle and selling the beef.
	This is just a small, a very minuscule example of how different cultures meshing in a society will create clashes.
	Things that are unreconcilable.
	That will never be something that can be agreed upon.
	If we're to accept Indian laws in our country, if we allow Indians to rule over, Hindus, and create their law system, now our whole entire structure in society has to reshape itself because The burger is an American staple, right?
	I mean, how many burger joints are in the United States?
	Everybody likes having a burger.
	So the whole society has to physically reform itself just off of one thing.
	We're just talking about cows here.
	Right now, imagine another group of people.
	We look at the Jewish Talmud.
	They come in and they have a doctrine.
	That states that every single person that's not them should be used by them.
	Right now, if they come to power in your country, how do you think they're going to handle that power?
	Well, they're not going to handle it very morally if they think that you are simply there to serve them.
	And this is what we see in our society today.
	And again, we have to make this distinction very clear when we talk about this.
	This is not just some random hatred for a group for no reason out of the blue, just for fun.
	When we look at this on its face, we say, look, this group of people that's ruling over our civilization, look at the things they're doing with it.
	They're all immoral behaviors.
	And I don't care what group of people it is.
	I don't care.
	Again, it could be orange people or green people or purple people.
	It doesn't matter what they are, right?
	If they're doing immoral wrongs in my society, I'm calling that out.
	And it just happens to be that right now in my society, the majority of people that have power are Jews, and they're doing great immoral deeds with these powers.
	Pornography, mass immigration.
	Look at our politics, how far things have degraded.
	We have to point to these things.
	We have to discuss these things.
	Now again, you're going to be called anti-Semitic.
	You're going to be called...
	Bigoted or racist or whatever the case is.
	But all of these are words to shut down your speech.
	There's no value to the word anti-Semite.
	There's no value to the word racist.
	It's not valuable.
	It's not a piece of argument.
	If I'm to sit and have a debate with you, we're going to sit and have a formal discussion where...
	You believe this way, and I believe this way, and we need to come to figure out who is correct in this discussion through Socratic method or whatever kind of dialogue is necessary.
	Racist.
	Me saying, oh, you think that's racist?
	That word doesn't have any logical substance behind it.
	It's an emotional attack.
	It's to try to smear your character, get you kind of thrown off out of the conversation and put you on a defensive, right?
	Because most people will say, whoa, I'm not racist.
	Set that aside.
	It's not a matter of being racist or not.
	It's not a matter of being anti-Semitic or not.
	We're logically analyzing facts.
	And to be labeled as something for having an analysis in America, where freedom of speech is the staple of civilization, right?
	Freedom of speech.
	To have somebody try to push back on your speech with weird emotional buzzwords, it's insane.
	It's absurd, right?
	And we see this everywhere.
	I mean, anti-Semitic is one term.
	Racist is one term.
	Homophobe is a term.
	Homophobe is actually coined by a Jew, George Weinberg.
	So was racism.
	It was coined in the Soviet Union.
	So all of these terms are specifically to stifle honest discussion.
	For me to say...
	Hey, I see an over-representation of Jews in Hollywood.
	That's not anti-Semitic.
	That's a factual statement.
	They'll actually state it themselves.
	There's plenty of articles on CNN and things of the sort where they say the exact same thing.
	Then to say the things that they're doing with that power is extremely immoral.
	They're pushing a lot of overly sexualized films.
	I personally believe horror films are actually extremely immoral.
	A lot of these are...
	Think about the psychology of a horror film.
	If you look at history, when does anything have any kind of resemblance of that, of innocent, half-naked women being murdered for the sake of murder?
	It's a weird, perverse category, and it's always very sexualized.
	If you guys really pay attention to horror films, it's always been a category of film that really disgusts me, but even more so when you really kind of boil it down and look into why that's being done and who's behind it.
	Look at the writers for most of the horror films.
	You'll see the same pattern time and time again.
	Yeah, horror films are terrible for that reason.
	Okay, we're coming up on the one hour mark.
	We're about halfway through the show, folks.
	I might take a brief intermission.
	I wish I had like a clip to play you guys.
	I just don't have the ability to have you guys hear anything.
	That's the problem.
	I kind of want to take it.
	I'm just going to take a personal intermission.
	I'll still be sitting here.
	I'm just going to read the chats for a moment.
	We're just going to take a little break from the monologue for right now.
	We're one hour into the show.
	Don't forget, guys, if you don't already follow the show, make sure that you do so now on everywhere that we are live.
	We're live on Odyssey at Logos Revealed.
	We're live on Twitter on both Stu Peters' channel and my channel on Twitter.
	We're live on Rumble on the Stu Peters Network.
	Thank you guys for following over there as well.
	And we're also live on ftjmedia.com, which is Dave Geharry's new platform that he's co-hosting with Giuseppe.
	Two very intelligent men who are well studied on this subject and talk about it quite frequently.
	So please make sure that you guys follow all the different platforms.
	Don't forget, if you guys do want to support my show specifically, again, I know a lot of people here are probably supporters of the Stew Network, so if you do want to continue to support him, please do so.
	Don't choose one or the other.
	But if you also want to continue and support my work to help me keep this show running, all the options to do so are in the description below.
	You can support through Entropy, which is probably the best way to do so.
	You can support through Odyssey directly, which is my...
	Basically my main spot, my home base, I guess I would say, for my content.
	And you can also support through crypto wallets.
	We have crypto wallets as options.
	I know some people like those kind of more anonymous choices.
	So there's all those options there.
	I'm actually thinking about getting signed up for Buy Me A Coffee.
	I've heard of that platform.
	I haven't really looked into it enough, but I'm contemplating getting set up on there as well.
	And all your support does help to keep this show running indefinitely.
	It's a very educational show.
	It takes a lot of time and effort to read these books and learn some of these things to teach people.
	So your support is greatly appreciated.
	Thank you, gentlemen.
	I appreciate it.
	I see we have a lot of nice comments in the chat, so I do appreciate those.
	Apologies again that I was not reading the Twitter chat earlier.
	I didn't even realize we had people talking in there.
	Twitter chats typically a little bit slower than the other ones.
	I see we've got Annie with a $10 super chat says, good luck with your in depth, your new endeavor and may you spread far and wide the challenges of the greatest race ever created.
	Thank you very much, Annie.
	Make sure you guys throw the Romans up for her.
	Very kind support.
	I do appreciate that.
	Yeah, you know, it's been nice being on the new network.
	We've got 30,000 views on both of our shows so far.
	Well, almost on the first show, but basically 30,000 views per show that we've done so far.
	So that's really nice to see.
	Hopefully a lot more people are hearing this message and taking heed of the message.
	I hope I can be educational to anyone that's listening.
	I know for my listeners on Odyssey who are typically used to a lot more information than what you're getting right now, I know my message might seem...
	Maybe a little softer, but we are reaching an audience of people that might not be familiar with these topics yet, and we have to come in with kind of an introductory standpoint.
	So it'll progress itself as the shows go on, but I'm essentially introducing myself to people that, for all I know, don't know anything about this.
	So I'm trying my best to get this to as many people as possible, because I do believe this is the most important problem in the world right now.
	And thank you again for the very kind super chat.
	I gotta like pound this coffee.
	I did not get much sleep last night.
	I need to slow the boat down a little bit.
	I've been doing quite a bit.
	Alright, so...
	Hello from Australia.
	Awesome.
	It's nice to see someone from Australia in here.
	Thank you very much.
	I'll tell you, and no affront to you, my name is almost never spelled correctly.
	I don't know if that's because the way I spell it is odd, but very few people have spelled my name correctly.
	Just for anyone wondering, it's Z-A-C-H-H. I don't know why.
	A lot of people do it with a K or they do it with just a K with no C or just a C with no H. It's very interesting, but very few people actually put it the way mine is actually spelled.
	I don't know if I have the rare spelling or what.
	Thank you, Julia.
	No problem.
	I'm happy to bring the education to you guys.
	It's very hot in my room, too.
	I'm sweating.
	Alright, folks, we're coming up on the second half of the show.
	Again, we're set for a two-hour time slot for all of the shows, Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays at 4pm Eastern to 6pm Eastern.
	We have a two-hour time slot every single day.
	And...
	We're coming up on the second hour of this show.
	We talked about communism in the first hour and the Jewish influence on communism.
	I want to drag the topic a little bit away from the title and talk about Some of the...
	We'll say more psychological or spiritual aspects of this.
	I think that's equally important.
	Really quickly, I see we got another super chat.
	Night Nation Review, Nick, he put a $5 super chat in.
	He says, people who are the naysayers and purity spiralers have really lost sight of the bigger picture.
	It is the most important that the message of the JP... Yeah, you know, I see a lot of people that are upset with...
	I understand.
	People are impatient.
	When you learn about these things and you figure out what's going on in the world and you see all of the corruption and decay around us, I can understand how a lot of, especially young men, become extremely impatient.
	They want this to be fixed now.
	I do too.
	I understand.
	But it is a long game.
	We have to take our time with it.
	It's certainly not an easy endeavor that we are upon.
	Think about all of the men in the past that have followed on this same path.
	They've lost their money, they've lost their social status, they've lost their lives in some cases.
	We look at JFK, which is one of the most unfortunate and terrifying events.
	A lot of great men have fallen to express this problem and try to wake as many people up to it as possible.
	We have to be willing to make those sacrifices.
	We have to understand that this is a long game.
	It's a marathon, not a race.
	We cannot just sprint through this endeavor.
	We're going to have to take our time with these things.
	People are learning.
	It took me a long time to learn this too.
	I had to read...
	Umpteen books, spend hours watching documentaries.
	Fortunately, I'm a person who really likes to look at these things.
	I love to study.
	I have an inquisitive mind, and when I see something that I don't know or understand, I instantly take interest.
	I'm like, how can I learn more?
	Luckily, I learned extremely fast because of how much time I spent learning it.
	If I would have parceled it out like a normal human being, I probably would have taken a lot longer to learn it, but I would spend eight hours a night studying these things.
	Obviously, you're going to learn it a little bit quicker than someone who spends maybe an hour a day looking into it or two hours a day or something.
	When you fully understand it, then you jump in.
	You throw yourself headfirst into the water.
	I see we got another super chat from Chain Reaction for $5.
	He says, what he said, mod him on Rumble.
	I will look into getting some mods on Rumble.
	I don't have the ability to do that right now, so I have to just figure out how to do it with the sign-in process and whatnot.
	It's just the way that this is done.
	I'm only through the studio.
	It's a weird thing.
	I'll have to figure out how to get some mods set up on Rumble.
	I will set them up.
	I'll talk to Stu about that over the weekend.
	We'll see if we can hopefully have some mods set up by Monday.
	I know of a couple people that are consistent watchers of the show that I know will watch.
	Zatch, yeah, that's an interesting spelling of the name as well.
	Okay, anyways, to get into some of the more psychological aspects of what's happening in society and this moral decay.
	I think there's a lot to be discussed.
	And I want to talk about the difference between some companies before they We're controlled by this corporate Jewish finance when they were controlled by, you know, a sole independent Gentile creator and what they've become in the process of things.
	And one of the better examples that we have today is Disney.
	I'm sure everyone is familiar with Disney's essentially an attack on our children, right?
	I mean, they're openly attacking children with these weird homosexual, transgender ideologies.
	In general, overly sexualized things.
	And this is not for children.
	Children are not here to be sexualized.
	I saw a video...
	This is probably like five, six months ago.
	There was a woman from the WHO who was actually teaching a five-year-old boy how to masturbate.
	Not physically touching the child, but she was showing him on a whiteboard, essentially.
	Kind of like a chalkboard, I guess.
	She was showing him the process of masturbation and how that works and explaining why it's a good thing to do.
	It's unbelievably terrible to be teaching children things like that at that age.
	It's already a bad enough thing that adults are doing it chronically, but now we're going to be indoctrinating children to do that chronically.
	This is sickening.
	It's messed up.
	And it's only one symptom of a greater issue.
	It's ridiculous how deep this goes.
	But you look at Disney, Disney's owned by Bob Iger, and many of the representatives on Disney are Jewish.
	The Board of Executives is majority Jewish.
	And they're pushing all these weird transgender things and sexualized ideologies for children.
	Well, what's really interesting is when you look at Disney...
	30 years ago, they weren't doing that.
	20 years ago, they weren't doing that.
	They actually had fantastic movies 20 or 30 years ago.
	And they all...
	When you watch...
	When you watch all those older movies, there's a moral lesson that is being portrayed in every single film you watch.
	So pay close attention to those older movies.
	It's always teaching kids a greater picture.
	I'll never forget, I don't really watch TV anymore, so I can't really touch on if that's the case today.
	But the earlier seasons of Spongebob...
	We're very cultured.
	There was some really good writing in these, and they always taught a moral lesson to the youth.
	So I'll never forget this episode.
	I still don't forget it today.
	And it's a very good moral lesson.
	In the episode, SpongeBob is the main character, and he's a sponge under the sea, for those who aren't familiar.
	And the manager is a crab, and he's greedy.
	He's always looking for money.
	That's his kind of character role on the show.
	And these big business executives come to him and they offer to buy out his business.
	And he says, you know, money can't buy me.
	This is my shop and I'll never get rid of this.
	And they offer more and more money.
	And eventually he caves and he says, yes.
	And he sells his sole owned business, right?
	His little brainchild.
	He sells that.
	And the workers stay there, obviously.
	And when these new people come and they buy this out, they corporatize the entire thing.
	They turn it into this big corporate franchise with this really catchy name that's basically the same everywhere they go.
	And they go into the back of the kitchen and the patties, it's a burger joint.
	So instead of...
	Flipping the burgers on a grill.
	They're actually processed as sludge through this big vaporizer thing.
	And then they just put food coloring on them.
	And all the people are watching televisions and being brainwashed as they're sitting there watching these things.
	And then the crab, it shows him living his personal life.
	And he's depressed because life is boring without his job, his labor that he lives for.
	He decides to go back to the franchise and get a job as a dishwasher there just for something to do.
	When he goes there, he starts seeing all these things.
	He's seeing how they've literally taken the soul out of the company.
	When he sees this, he loses his cool and he basically breaks everything and then buys the company back or sells it for full price or whatever.
	They sell it at full price and he buys it back from them for all the money that he spent beforehand.
	The moral lesson of the whole story is don't sell out.
	Don't accept money over morals.
	Don't leave your labor just for some short-term money because the money isn't worth it.
	And it's a really, really solid lesson for children.
	It's an amazing lesson for children.
	It teaches them to put friends and family and things that they care about above money.
	I always thought that was an amazing lesson.
	Now you watch the same show, SpongeBob Today, which has been...
	The show itself, funny enough, coincidentally, ironically, I guess, has been franchised as well.
	And now all the episodes, it's just like silly, goofy laugh tracks, and there's nothing serious to the show anymore.
	They've destroyed it.
	They took the soul out of it.
	And there's no moral lessons in any of the episodes.
	They've completely just eviscerated a phenomenal, fantastic show with really solid writing that was educational to children and entertaining at the same time.
	Because it's important, if you're going to watch something as a kid, if you're going to spend your whole day watching TV, you might as well at least get some kind of moral lesson out of it at the very minimum.
	Since you're going to sit and rot on the couch.
	So you see this exact thing with Disney, right?
	Disney gets bought out by corporate interests.
	Again, majority Jewish.
	And these corporate interests...
	They destroy the company.
	They literally rip the soul out of it.
	They've politicized children's movies to completely just...
	It's like sludge for the brain.
	It's terrible.
	It's psychological sickness.
	Spiritual sickness.
	It's poisonous.
	So this is just, again, one example.
	They're all over in society.
	Even cars.
	Cars are a good example of this.
	You look at cars back in the 40s and the 50s.
	They were beautiful, man.
	They were unique.
	They had all kinds of different shapes and designs and patterns and looks.
	Different paint jobs that were all...
	You could look at a car.
	If you looked at your neighbor's car and you saw their car, it's like, yeah, that's Joe's car.
	I know that's Joe's car.
	You look today, it's like every car looks the same.
	It doesn't matter if you're driving a Honda or a Ford or anything.
	They all look identical, basically.
	They just have a little bit of a different paint color.
	And there's very few cars anymore, unless you buy one of these stupid supercars, which are absurdly expensive.
	There's very few cars that even have nice colored paint on them.
	They're all just...
	Black, tan, white, silver.
	The soul is gone.
	There used to be a soul in those cars.
	You look at those old cars, and there's a soul in that, a creative spirit that spawns from those, and it's gone.
	It's been ripped out for corporate interests.
	Good point.
	As Rook Blinken says, same goes for architecture.
	It's exactly the same with architecture.
	The soul has been taken out of the architecture.
	Art as well.
	Arthur Kwon Lee, who's also on the Stu Peters Network, he talks about this quite a bit.
	He's an artist.
	The art, they've taken the soul out of the art.
	Whether it's the moral message that's behind the art, he's a Christian painter, so he has a moral message behind his art, or even the design itself.
	You look at art and history.
	Art for our people has always been A symmetrical, even, harmonious stature, right?
	When you look at a sculpture of the thinker or you look at a beautiful museum with the pillars on every side, these are symmetrical pieces.
	You look at it and you can't distinguish a difference between that side or the other.
	They're perfectly symmetrical.
	Now let's look at this...
	Dada art and brutalist art.
	These are very Jewish inceptions.
	And these arts are anarchistic.
	They're chaotic.
	They're all over the place.
	And let me just show you guys an example of this.
	For those who aren't familiar...
	It's disgusting how bad this is.
	And they tell you to interpret...
	If you don't understand what that art is, they tell you you're just not ambitious enough.
	You just can't see it yourself.
	So one of these famous artists that does this nonsense, his name is Mark Rothkowitz.
	And he wrote or he drew a painting.
	Where is it?
	He drew a painting called Number Six.
	And this painting sold for $140 million the first time he sold this painting.
	Let's see if we can find you guys a picture of this.
	You don't want to throw up.
	And by the way, just so everyone knows, this is a money laundering scheme.
	When they sell art for this much money, especially when it's art like this, this is a money laundering scheme, okay?
	This...
	How do I pull this over?
	This painting, right here, sold for $140 million.
	$140 million for this.
	It's three strokes of paint.
	And it's not symmetrical.
	You see, it's intentionally not...
	This is to mock you, by the way.
	It is intentionally not symmetrical.
	It's to show you this is what we popularized and you have to accept it.
	This is spiritual decay.
	When the greatest art in the world is this, when this is what's in the popular art museums, it takes the spirit out of the country.
	Now, when you go to an art museum and there's this wonderful, beautiful sculpture of a guy like this, the thinker, right?
	There's a lot of symbolisms that you're seeing in this.
	Okay, the thinker, what's he doing?
	He's thinking, right?
	This is representative of philosophy, of grander ideals, right?
	He's got a good stature, a good bodywork, right?
	He's symmetrical.
	He's built well.
	He's a beautiful genetic specimen.
	They're giving you They're giving you an image to aspire to with this art.
	They're giving you something special to advocate for.
	This shit, with the three strokes of paint on it, that is spiritual decay.
	It is spiritual death when people accept that as the finer arts.
	And especially when it's being sold for $140 million.
	$140 million.
	Again, this was...
	Drawn by Mark Rothko, I'm sorry.
	He was born Marcus Yakilevich Rothkowitz.
	So obviously, again, changed the name, took the wits off, right?
	So he can sound a little more Europeanized so that when he came to Ellis Island, he wasn't quote-unquote persecuted and then somehow becomes a multimillionaire selling $140 million worth of paintings.
	Look, his father, just on the term we were talking about before, Was a Marxist who was violently anti-religious.
	Okay.
	And they always have to throw the little victim shtick in here.
	In an environment where Jews were often blamed for many of the evils that befell Russia, which we've unequivocally proven, Rothko's early childhood was plagued by fear.
	They always have to give the little victimhood thing.
	They're never the culprits.
	It's not possible.
	Art is just another example of this massive spiritual decay that we have in society.
	It's all-encompassing.
	It's in the art.
	It's in the architecture.
	It's in the cars.
	It's in the writing of television shows.
	And all of this is just a sign of a corporate oligarchy ruling over your country.
	And this is so, so important for people to understand.
	Everybody here is under the impression that we live in a capitalistic democracy, right?
	It's a capitalistic democracy.
	No, we're living in an oligarchical tyranny.
	There's a huge difference.
	I'm going to explain how this works.
	In a capitalist society, which America was 40 years ago, In a capitalistic society, what was the buzz phrase?
	Let's see if anybody in the chat can say what the buzz phrase was.
	What was one of the biggest American capitalistic slogans in all of American history?
	It's the one that everybody knows.
	It's about retail.
	Retail stores.
	See if anybody in the chat knows what I'm talking about.
	Massive American slogan.
	The American ideal.
	In a capitalistic society.
	There we go.
	The customer is always right.
	Right?
	This is a great ideal.
	By the way, this holds, just like the thinker does, this holds something special in it.
	Just this phrase.
	The consumer is always right.
	The customer is always right.
	This phrase holds something very special inside of it.
	And what that specialness is, it's stating that in a capitalistic society, we always have to remember That the individuals who are buying our goods, buying our products, keeping us alive, they matter the most.
	Our whole society functions on how much we appease each other in the community, how much we provide for each other in that community.
	Folks, when's the last time you heard somebody say, the customer's always right?
	I haven't heard it in a decade.
	Have you heard that in a long time?
	You go to Walmart now, do they say the customer's always right?
	No, they go, I'm trespassing you off the property.
	Right.
	They don't do it anymore.
	There is no more the customer is always right and the consumer matters to us.
	So the reason for this, just so you guys understand this, the reason is not because people forgot.
	It's because that value has been diluted.
	It's gone.
	It's completely lost itself.
	Because in a capitalistic society where...
	I'm Zach.
	I open up a bread shop down the road.
	And I'm selling loaves of bread.
	I'm selling muffins.
	I'm selling all kinds of baked goods.
	And you come in and you're Johnny Joe.
	And you come into my shop and...
	You're like, oh, hey, you know, I want to buy this.
	I want to buy that, right?
	I rely on you and your purchases to keep my bread shop running, correct?
	So therefore, it's in my interest to make sure that you have a good atmosphere when you come into my store, that you are treated politely when you come into my store, that the prices are reasonable when you come into my store.
	All of these are my responsibilities to make sure that I am giving you the best product to encourage you to buy my stuff, right?
	So it's...
	I'm...
	Essentially, I am slaving for you for the benefit of both of us, right?
	This is a community-based thing here, a capitalistic society when it functions in this way.
	Here's the difference.
	Here's what we've lost.
	Now, in the modern age, Walmart was like that at one point, by the way.
	Walmart actually used to care about the customer.
	The customer was always right.
	I think they actually used to have signs that said the customer is always right in Walmart.
	They've lost that, and here's why they've lost that.
	Now, their investment firms, BlackRock and Vanguard and all these different companies, are completely invested in them with billions of dollars, and they own most of their shares.
	So now if you're Walmart...
	Actually, I'll give you Target.
	Target's a really fantastic example of this.
	If you're Target and you're beholden to Vanguard and BlackRock and all these big investment firms, and they say, hey, Target, we're going to give you a $3 billion contract to push LGBTQ clothing in the kids' section.
	Now, Target might have a moral quandary with that.
	They might say, eh.
	I don't know if I really want to do that, but $3 billion?
	Okay.
	So they take the deal, okay?
	And they put all the tranny stuff in the kids' section.
	Now the consumer can come in and they can say, this is immoral.
	I don't like this.
	I'm not shopping here.
	I'm not going to buy that product.
	Now, in a functioning capitalistic society, if the consumer said, I'm not shopping here, I'm not buying that product, Well, me, as the owner, I have no choice but to appeal to you.
	I have to appeal to you so that you keep buying off of me.
	Now, if me, as the owner, I'm funded $3 billion by BlackRock and Vanguard, and you come in and you go, whoa, whoa, I don't like that.
	I'm out of here.
	I'll go, all right, see ya.
	I don't really care how many shirts I sell.
	I just got a fat paycheck.
	See ya, buddy.
	Why would I care?
	Who cares?
	So, it's not capitalistic anymore.
	The consumer literally doesn't matter.
	You're irrelevant, and that's why the products are losing their soul, because in a capitalistic society, you have a duty to make a good product so people buy it, right?
	If you live in a corporate oligarchy where a bunch of people just send you finance to make some hosh-posh product and it really doesn't matter how much you sell of it and people's standards are so low anymore anyway, you have no incentive to make a good product.
	You see this with video games, movies, television, cars, everything we're talking about has slowly lost all of its creative purpose because the consumer doesn't matter anymore.
	You don't matter as a consumer.
	The corporate guy that cuts the paycheck and tells the guy who owns the store what to do, he matters more because he's got more money than you.
	That's the fall of a capitalistic society.
	This is where we are right now.
	We are not living in a capitalistic society.
	Do not confuse yourself.
	This goes straight in line.
	With this democratic aspect of it, which by the way, we were never supposed to be a democracy.
	Democracy is the most corrupt form of society.
	Our founding fathers hated the concept of democracy.
	John Adams himself stated, there never once was a democracy that did not kill itself.
	We're watching it in real time.
	This democracy is killing itself.
	Everything around us is collapsing.
	So We look at how that idea, that concept of democracy or a constitutional republic, even that in itself has been diluted.
	The idea is you're supposed to have choice in what happens.
	You're supposed to control your own sovereignty and destiny.
	They passed legislation in the 50s that stopped states controlling their own sovereignty.
	And additionally, when you push yourself to the modern day now, your politicians are bought out by those same entities that have bought out the corporations that no longer give a fuck about the consumer.
	So if the corporation doesn't care about the consumer because they've been bought out, why do you think the politician cares about the consumer when they've been bought out?
	Because it's the same deal, right?
	If you're a politician, your whole idea is to appease the populace because if you don't appease the populace, they're not going to vote for you.
	Well, who cares now?
	What does it matter now?
	People's standards are so low.
	You go to the Republican National Committee and they got trannies on the stage and Muslims singing.
	None of the actual people that represent the country's values are even talked about, let alone advocated for.
	We're in an oligarchical tyranny.
	We have transitioned long ago, and people have to recognize that.
	We are no longer in some capitalistic constitutional republic.
	It's not a thing anymore.
	They subverted the constitutional republic into a democracy, and democracy always begets anarchy.
	And we're working ourselves into that phase right now.
	We're going from democracy into a phase of anarchy.
	Take a brief little...
	Brief little break here.
	I'm getting pretty excitable in these monologues.
	catch up with the chat, see what people have to say.
	I'll tell you, his coffee's waking me up a little bit, I got to say.
	Okay.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So there is no more interest anymore in appealing to the consumer, to the population.
	That just doesn't hold on their plate.
	They don't even think about it.
	And who can blame them in a system like this?
	In a system that actually promotes these things, who can blame them?
	And you know, I commend...
	All the people that looked at the Bud Light advertisement with the tranny and said, you know, I'm not supporting this.
	And they shot the Bud Light cans and they said, this stuff sucks.
	I'm not for this anymore.
	I can have sentiment with it.
	But the problem is, and this is just reality, your boycott doesn't matter.
	There's not $3 billion to boycott.
	The people that are funding these corporations print the fucking money.
	They print the money as much as they want.
	So the more you boycott, the more they're going to print to give to these corporations, which means the more inflation is going to go up, which means essentially the more you boycott, the less wealthy we all become.
	It's a game you can't win when you play through the game.
	That's the problem.
	When you try to play with the rules of the game, you can't win the game.
	They're printing the money.
	It doesn't matter how much money you withhold from people that literally print it, right?
	It's like withholding candy from the guy that owns the candy factory.
	What are you doing?
	There's no value in that, right?
	He doesn't care how much candy you withhold from him.
	Weezen, that's certainly a part of it, that's certainly a part of it, yes.
	And again, I feel for the people that do the boycotts, because they have good sentiments.
	They're very healthy sentiments.
	But it's actually not getting anywhere.
	Has Bud Light gone out of business?
	Did they stop selling their products?
	No, they're actually doing just as good as they were.
	Actually, if you look at their quarterly, it's probably up.
	They're doing better.
	Who cares?
	They don't care.
	They literally don't care at all.
	Same with Target.
	When it boycotted Target for having the tranny sec, did it stop anything?
	They're still going.
	Now, if you boycott a small business, yeah, it'll work, right?
	If you boycott a cell phone place or a mom and pop shop, a brick and mortar place, sure, you can probably get something done doing that, but you're not boycotting a massive corporation that's funded by the largest investment firms in human history.
	You're not boycotting them.
	Or you can.
	Again, you can boycott them, but you're not going to beat that system.
	You might put a dent in it, but you won't beat it.
	Actually, if you want to boycott something, the only place that we could adequately boycott that would make a damage or a dent would be banks.
	If you want to boycott something, boycott banks.
	Because they literally thrive off of interest on the money that's printed.
	So if you keep the money for yourself and they're not taking the interest on it, It puts them in a very odd spot.
	Boycotting banks would be the smartest thing that the American populace could do over any other thing.
	Not the smartest thing.
	think there's still better things we could do than boycott banks, but it's far better than boycotting any corporation.
	Yeah, he says, people get all giddy when they see the temporary...
	Dip in the stocks.
	However, in a few months, that is not the case anymore.
	And status quo is back.
	Yeah.
	Actually, they're probably better than ever at the end of it.
	And you know those corporate guys are sitting in their office laughing when the populace is like, yeah, we're sticking it to them.
	Bud Light, fuck you.
	We're sticking it to them.
	You know they're sitting there laughing like, oh my God, look at the dumb guy.
	They have no idea what they're talking about.
	That's a good point.
	Yeah, it shows how twisted the morality is.
	Tonitra says, people should boycott all of those mass-produced products mainly for their own health benefits.
	Stay away from beer, the testosterone killer.
	That's actually a really good point.
	When you look at Bud Light, they should be protesting Bud Light for the sake of their own, for them, right?
	Bud Light is terrible for you.
	Give me one sec, folks.
	I gotta get a tissue.
	I'm getting like an allergy attack here.
	One moment.
	Sorry about that.
	I'm getting a weird allergy attack.
	I just came out of nowhere.
	It's affecting my eyes, too.
	My eyes are getting really watery.
	I agree.
	Welcome, everybody.
	I see we have a lot of new people coming in the chat.
	I appreciate everyone chatting.
	It's a little hard to keep up with all the chats since we're in so many.
	Mattering, nice to see you, my friend.
	Ernst Morris, hello, everyone.
	So we've got about 20 minutes left on the show.
	We covered the first hour and a half.
	Hour one, we talked about communism and the people behind communism.
	The next half hour, we just talked about how our society has decayed due to these corporate interests, which, in a way, there are some communistic aspects to that.
	The way that they do strikes and whatnot and how they control corporate finance.
	But for the most part, this is kind of a different problem with a little bit of a different dynamic to it.
	So we've got about 25 minutes left on the show.
	I just want to, again, remind everyone that tomorrow I will be live with an interview at 9 p.m.
	Eastern.
	And that is going to be only on my Odyssey channel.
	I don't have a time slot on the Stu Peters show on Saturdays.
	So that's going to be 9 p.m.
	Eastern on Odyssey.
	Again, if you don't follow my Odyssey channel, I really want to highly recommend everybody take a moment to follow me on Odyssey.
	It is odyssee.com slash, well, I don't know if you do the slash, but O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	And then you'll follow me.
	My account is Logos Revealed.
	And I have a lot of videos archived on there.
	I think we're almost at 250 videos explaining these topics in depth, always through a factual lens.
	Always through a factual lens.
	That's really important.
	We never speculate on things.
	We never create conspiracies of things.
	We're always based in fact here in our discussions.
	You just blow my nose one more time, guys.
	guys.
	I'm sorry.
	Not a good time for an allergy attack.
	I've Very odd timing.
	So, to talk about, you know, I know a lot of people ask, how do we fix these problems?
	You know, like, we can sit here, we can talk, there's millions of problems.
	We can sit here and beat this shit out of problems all day.
	We can talk about problems for probably the next 10 hours.
	But I know a lot of people are always curious of how we can fix these problems and what a good path moving forward is.
	And especially for those that are essentially the consumer populace that would have been protesting against Bud Light or protesting against the transgender stuff in Target and in the schools and things of the sort.
	You know, what can they do to fix some of these problems?
	Because I know that that is a way that they're trying to fix them.
	But again, we described why that's not going to fix it.
	And it's not their fault that that won't do it.
	It's not that they're not doing it good enough.
	It's simply that it's just not an adequate line of action.
	So the other option that we have is looking at creating some kind of foundation, some grassroots situation where we can change this system, the system itself.
	Not the things around the system, but the system itself.
	So...
	Not around the system.
	Let me say not the products of the system, but the system itself.
	So for example, when you look at these corporations that are so corrupted and just demonic in essence, you can't fix that through the corporate situation, right?
	You can't, like a consumer can't attack that corporation to fix the situation.
	The only way is to fix the system that upholds that corporation in that manner.
	So we have to look at this from a different perspective.
	And then we have to look at who majorly controls this system, who is the major player that owns most of the banks, owns the media, owns Hollywood, owns the revolutionary movements that have destroyed a lot of the fabric of society, who has legalized a lot of these awful things that we see.
	And again, we have to look at this Jewish over-representation.
	We have to point to this logically and ask ourselves, why is it that they're doing this?
	And if they are doing this, people should know, right?
	Everybody has to know.
	And that's why, again, we hear these buzzwords of anti-Semitic and hateful and bigot and all these things, because they don't want you to talk about it.
	They want you to keep it to yourself.
	They want you to be scared to say anything in fear of getting attacked by your friend or your neighbor or the media or your family members.
	They want you to be afraid of getting attacked.
	They want you to keep yourself silent with your own...
	Censor your own thoughts.
	You know how they censor you on the internet?
	That's only, that's a step two in their process.
	Before they ever censored people on the internet, they were censoring your thoughts, right?
	Questioning yourself.
	You're thinking, hmm, can I say this without getting banned?
	Hmm, I don't know if I'm going to say it or not, right?
	A lot of people back in the day, especially, I was around some younger guys that did a lot of gaming.
	And in the gaming scene, there was a lot of streamers on there.
	There's still a lot of streamers on there on Twitch and things like that.
	And these streamers, a lot of them do not like the homosexual nonsense going on in society, right?
	They would call it faggotry.
	Well, you can't say that on a platform like Twitch, you'll get yourself removed almost instantly.
	You'll probably get removed on YouTube for saying that.
	So people start policing their own words.
	They start literally policing their own speech to make sure that they can keep up their platform.
	They They can keep up their revenue.
	You have to say it like it is.
	You can't hold back from these things.
	I know it's not easy.
	A lot of people have to make sacrifices, but if you're a little person, and when I say little, I mean lesser known.
	I don't mean you're five foot two.
	If you're a smaller or lesser known person, And you don't want to lose your 9 to 5.
	You don't want to get all the social backlash from saying these things.
	Remain anonymous, you know?
	And you don't have to go out and create your own podcast and put your face out there like I'm doing.
	You don't have to go out in the streets and parade around with your face out there.
	But what you can do is, what everybody, every single person in this chatroom can do is...
	Support the people that are taking those risks, that are putting that message out there, whether it's myself, whether it's Stu Peters, Candace Owens, Lucas Gage.
	I mean, there's people all over the place doing this thing, right?
	Any of these people, if you support them, the people that are confident enough to do it, especially the ones with the bigger platforms, the bigger the platform, the better.
	If you support them and encourage them to do these things, they will continue to.
	So a really good example, a person in a situation like Candace Owens, what does she have to gain from talking about this?
	She knows she's going to be smeared in the media.
	She knows she's going to lose her platforms.
	She knows she's going to lose an absurd amount of revenue.
	She knows she's going to be attacked by basically everybody around her.
	What's the incentive to say the truth about these things?
	There's only one, and that's a moral incentive.
	So what we can do as individuals is we can give her a second incentive.
	And you can start to push under the comment section and say, you know, really good job saying this.
	Really good job saying that.
	You know, oh, great point.
	You know, by the way, this guy was a Jew.
	Did you know that?
	Oh, by the way...
	Did you know that APAC is a part of this?
	Oh, did you know that?
	And the more we do that, the more we show that support, backing the message, the more incentive these people have to continue doing this.
	And then when one does it, it incentivizes another to do it.
	And it incentivizes more to do it until it becomes a snowball effect.
	And slowly, right now, we're...
	We're pushing really slowly.
	We're pushing the ball, right?
	And we have to push it just to the edge so that we can push it down that mountain.
	And once we hit that slope, it's an ever-growing ball from there.
	And we're really close, man.
	I mean, I'm talking we're right at the edge of that slope right now.
	And the second it hits the edge of that slope, every single person is going to be talking about this.
	Everyone will be, they won't worry about that fear.
	Really weird allergy attack.
	I do apologize, guys, for the nose blowing.
	It's very annoying.
	So...
	Yeah, I agree.
	I agree.
	So it's up to us to do our best to wake as many people up as we can, incentivize the people that are taking the time, taking the sacrifices, putting the effort in to say these things, to put it out there for everyone to understand.
	That's your duty as an individual.
	That's what every single person here can do.
	And a warning to you, if you're afraid to get out there, you're afraid to tell the truth about Jewish power, about AIPAC, lobbies like this.
	If you're scared to say something about them because of the consequences you might get, which will be maybe social backlash, maybe a financial toll, maybe a hit piece in the media about you, whatever the case may be.
	You should be far more afraid of what comes if you don't say something.
	If everybody stays silent, if no one pushes against this, what comes next is far worse than any ostracizing from society, all the social backlash that you receive, the constant hate-mongering, right?
	None of that is even close to the difficulties that you will have if these people succeed in taking over fully, which they're very close.
	Just as much as we're close to pushing this narrative into the mainstream, these people are also just as close to their literal goal of world domination, which is a psychotic doctrine that they have no scruples about pushing on.
	So The time is now.
	The time could never be closer.
	It is literally now.
	You have to talk about these things now, because if you don't, we saw what happened in Russia.
	You're going to end up in a gulag.
	They're going to be coming to your house and stealing your children.
	And then you're going to be forced, by the way, when they're taking your kids from you, you're going to be forced to say something about it.
	And at that point, saying something about it will be punishable by death.
	Because the first thing they did in the Soviet Union when they came to power, the first law that was passed, anti-Semitism was made punishable by death in the Soviet Union.
	It was the very first law they passed.
	Good, good.
	I see we have Kate in the chat says, there will be social backlash.
	I got kicked out of my church.
	I had gone to for years for talking about this, but it was still better than not saying anything.
	Absolutely.
	You're absolutely correct.
	And I'm going to tell you something.
	I can't remember where I was saying this.
	I might have been on a Twitter space the other day.
	This is really important to understand.
	You'll lose people through this.
	I've lost friends.
	I've lost family discussing these things.
	They're incapable of looking into it and seeing the greater picture here.
	They think I'm coming from some weird, hateful place or something of the sort.
	You will lose people.
	Absolutely.
	That's an inevitable occurrence here.
	But I promise you can take my word on this.
	I promise you this because it's my direct experience.
	All those people you lose will be a fifth of the value of the friends that you are going to make through these encounters.
	When you meet people that are spreading this same message, that have the conviction that you do, that are spreading the That understand the importance of what we're talking about.
	That have the moral fabric inside of them to care for what's happening.
	Those people are a hundred times better than any single person you will lose through talking about these things.
	I can guarantee you that 100% without a doubt.
	Yep.
	We're at a very polarized time.
	So we have, we have a choice.
	It's essentially now or never.
	This goes one of two ways.
	Either everybody starts pushing this out there and saying it the way it is, and things get fixed, or we allow it to keep happening and we go under a tyranny that's far worse than what we're dealing with right now, one where you won't be able to speak your mind freely at all.
	Even if it's something that's meaningful or logical, you won't even be able to say that you believe in Jesus Christ or you're proud to be white or you want to teach your own children.
	All of these things will become completely foreign in this coming society.
	So you have a choice.
	Everybody has that choice now.
	I think we might close a little early today, folks.
	We covered the topics I wanted to cover.
	I got through all my notes here, and I'm having a weird allergy attack.
	This thing came out of nowhere.
	I don't understand it at all.
	I don't really get allergies all that much.
	It's not even a reason to have them weather-wise or anything.
	So let's do an outro.
	Let's do a little bit of an outro.
	Promote some things.
	Make sure everybody knows where to go.
	So first things first.
	Make sure that you follow me on all my platforms.
	I'll lay them all out one more time.
	I'm on Odyssey.
	O-D-Y-S-E-E dot com.
	It's a logos revealed on Odyssey.
	I've got a catalog of 250 videos where I discuss all these problems in depth.
	I have interviews, whiteboard lectures, Monologue streams, much like we've just done right here.
	Plenty of content on there for you guys to watch.
	So make sure that you guys go check that out.
	Follow me on Twitter.
	It's at LogosRevealedI on Twitter.
	There's an I at the very end of it.
	So you can follow me on there.
	I've got a lot of unique content on Twitter, clips that aren't found anywhere else, things of that sort.
	Let me see here.
	Make sure that you follow me on ftjmedia.com.
	FTJ Media is owned by Dave Guharri and Giuseppe Vafonculo.
	Both of them have made it to the ADL's hate page.
	They're on there as Viral and Anti-Semites.
	They have a website here that I do want to recommend everyone checks out.
	Let me close this down.
	There we go.
	This is MoneyTreePublishing.com.
	So MoneyTreePublishing, all one word,.com.
	There's a shop of all kinds of works that you can read.
	Dave Gahari is the owner of this website.
	He's got a lot of good books out there.
	We've got The Synagogue of Satan.
	It's a good book.
	It teaches you about the history of these people.
	The Host and the Parasite.
	That's a good book as well.
	Hellstorm is a good one.
	I do recommend Hellstorm.
	Exposing the Lies of History.
	If you're very new to these things, that's a really good book to read.
	Jews of the Problem is pretty decent.
	International Jew by Henry Ford.
	Definitely a good one to share to your older generation who really likes Henry Ford as a character.
	Not many people know he wrote that book.
	Obviously, Mein Kampf is on here.
	Mein Kampf, the Stalag edition.
	Most important and authentic edition of Mein Kampf that you can get.
	It's not heavily annotated.
	They don't put weird foreign quotes in there that are not relevant.
	So I do recommend that you guys get that version, if any.
	Myth of German Villainy is pretty decent.
	Six Million Factor Fiction puts the Holocaust down to a science.
	Disproves a lot of the claims that are made.
	Jewish Supremacism by David Duke.
	There were some E. Michael Jones books on here, but they ran out of stock, so they'll be coming back.
	And then White Power and Siege.
	These are both also very good books.
	You guys can buy any of these books.
	And just to show you how they function.
	I have a coupon code on these books.
	So say...
	Wow, that's a very expensive book.
	Is that a movie?
	Oh, it's a movie.
	That's why.
	Let's do this one.
	Okay, so say you want to get the color version of the book.
	You would add it to your cart.
	And when you go to check out...
	There's a coupon code right here.
	You're going to type in code LOGOS, L-O-G-O-S. You apply that coupon code.
	And you can see that you get 5% off of the purchase.
	I'm sorry, 10% off of the purchase.
	Yeah, 10% off of the purchase.
	So this is a really good way to support myself and Dave Geharry as well, as well as get yourself some really interesting literature.
	He's going to be getting some more books on the website in time, so I know there's not a crazy amount up there yet.
	They're getting some more going.
	So you guys do want to support my show.
	That's another really good way to do it.
	And you benefit as well.
	Everyone benefits.
	It's a win-win-win.
	Dave Geharry gets support to his website.
	He does a lot of stuff for our people.
	You get to support my work as well and help me continue doing things in the future.
	And additionally, you get to support yourself with some education.
	So I really do recommend that people go and get some stuff over on MoneyTreePublishing.com.
	Finally, make sure that you're following me on the Sue Peters Network.
	This is my third show on the Sue Peters Network.
	It's been a blast here so far.
	We've had over 1,000 viewers for every show.
	We've got 30,000 total views on the first two videos, which is fantastic.
	I really appreciate that, folks.
	And share.
	Share it around, guys.
	Share my clips, especially on Twitter.
	Share my stuff around.
	Get this message out there.
	Push it around.
	Show it to some people that need to see it.
	When should we see a book from me?
	I'm working on that.
	That's going to be a long time.
	That's going to be a very long time.
	I'm not going to put any kind of a date on that or a deadline because I want to make sure I'm really getting it out there in a correct manner and I don't want to rush it.
	So I am in the process of writing something, but I expect it to be quite a while.
	I'm not going to put any kind of date towards that.
	So...
	I do appreciate that question, though.
	It's a nice question.
	Yeah, so follow me on the Stu Peters Network.
	I believe Stu is going to be going live at 6 p.m.
	Eastern, right after I'm done here, so in about 10 minutes.
	So I'm going to close out.
	Follow Stu.
	Follow me.
	Make sure to spread all of our stuff everywhere that you can.
	Get that message out there, ladies and gentlemen.
	Thank you all so much for watching.
	I greatly appreciate it.
	It's been another wonderful show.
	And I will see you guys Monday.
	Actually, well, I will see you on Odyssey tomorrow at 9 p.m.

▲