All Episodes
Previous Next
June 27, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
58:46
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: Obergefell Decision TRIGGERED Rainbow REVOLUTION In America
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thanks so much for being with us.
Always great to be with you.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Got a great show planned for you tonight.
Tonight, as we told you, I guess a couple of nights ago at this point, this week marked the anniversary of the Dobbs decision, which ended Roe versus Wade tyranny against the states.
But since it's the month of June, and June is the month when Supreme Court decisions are made public, this week, yesterday, in fact, was also the anniversary of the Obergefell decision, which created the right, constitutional right, out of thin air, To get gay married.
The Biden administration made sure to crow about it over on X when they posted this, quote, Today we celebrate the anniversary of the monumental marriage equality ruling, Obergefell v.
Hodges.
This case moved our country forward, he says, and made possible because of the courageous couples and advocates in the LGBTQI plus community who fought for Wow.
Did you see the rainbow on the White House?
That's what stuck out to me.
Little did we know that that was only the beginning of the rainbow.
Or rainbow tyranny.
We now know so much.
We now know it wasn't going to stop with the rainbow on the White House.
We now know this was never really about two people of the same sex who love each other very deeply and who just want to be left alone and just want to get married.
No, we now know this entire movement was about conquering and occupying America.
And while I do not doubt that there were and still are some gays who did just want to be left alone and did not want to take it to the level that it is now where we see the LGBTQRSTLNE, would you like to buy a Val Mafia, coming for our kids...
Here we are, surrounded by dangerous vipers, similar to Lott, holed up in his house the night of Sodom's destruction with fire and brimstone.
Yes, there are pro-gay groups who want to drop the T from the LGBT or the Gays Against Groomers group.
Yes, there are gays who think all of this has gotten way out of hand, way out of control.
But let me tell you why they're still wrong.
The Rainbow Revolution, as I've come to call it, has always been about taking dominion in conquering America and the West because this whole societal upheaval, this whole thing, has focused on glorifying sin and making it our personal and national identities in a blatant act of rebellion against God.
And when we're dealing with sin and when we're proclaiming that sin is good on a national level, the spiritual components that come into play cannot be overstated.
We, you know, wrestle not against flesh and blood, right?
So the spiritual rulers, the principalities, they use a nation like ours that proclaims that sodomite marriage is real, first of all, and good for you.
As a flag to claim, to plant, to claim the land for the kingdom of darkness.
And because the root of all of this is a sin issue and about promoting sin, the sin cannot help behave like a cancer that spreads until the host is dead.
The wages of sin is death, and all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
The sinning, though, just doesn't stop at gay mirage.
Because it's a path.
There's no rest.
There's no deviation.
Once the sin has taken hold and efforts to turn back have failed, the journey down the path continues.
And it gets darker and darker and darker until the light disappears.
And what's worse, you don't even remember what the light was like.
Doesn't that analogy explain, at least in part, why the sexual perverts are now coming for our children?
I mean, this group of degenerates, they no longer recognize the innocence of children.
Think about that.
They are lost in a dark room, in a very dark place, totally blind and reaching with their arms stretched out, ready for their next fix, whoever they can grab.
And to them, the dark room may as well be the inside of a first-grade classroom where a trans flag has replaced old glory.
Think about the sin in our own individual lives.
In the Christian life, it's a true statement that if you are not warring against your sin and attempting to kill it, then it will kill you.
That's the reality of the Christian life.
The Rainbow Revolution didn't stop, though, and rest with their new possessed rites of gay mirage because the taking of ground or the advancement of that sin does not know how to stop.
It's not in its nature.
And to be clear, the sin we're talking about here, the sin nature is the nature of us.
It's mankind's nature.
It is our sin nature that is the reason why, left to our own devices, we hate God and his statutes and are not capable of loving him except for his sovereign grace and mercy.
Jesus can and does save sinners from themselves, from their sin and their sin nature.
Still, and I get it.
Some are surprised at the speed, at the acceleration with which the rainbow cultists took control of our country.
I mean, gays used to represent at most 5%, and that's a charitably high percentage.
They used to represent at most 5% of the population.
But you would think 80% of our country is gay based on messaging and propaganda.
Joe Biden says the Obergefell case, quote, moved the country forward.
And he's right about that.
We certainly did move.
The country is further down the path of darkness and death.
And at the moment, we're currently being invaded by a third-world barbarian horde.
And nations that behave like ours tend to get conquered, or they tend to get sold out by their leaders, or both.
All of the above.
So, I say all of that, what's the answer, though?
What's the answer?
I'll give you the short answer.
You may not like it.
Christians need to be Christians.
What does that mean?
Well, that starts, first of all, personally, at home, love God, worship God, war against your own sin, love your family, raise your children in the fear and admonition of the Lord, love Christ's church, find a church that preaches the gospel if you haven't and you don't go to one.
Pray for repentance in your own life, but also pray for the wicked perverts ruling our society right now to repent of their evil ways.
Yes, they too can be saved.
Jesus can save them.
And then here, pray for the real Christian leaders that we have left.
Pray for more to be raised up.
And pray that they use their political power to honor God, punish evil, and reward good, regardless of what the mainstream media says.
Pray for more Christian journalists.
And as a Christian, wherever you are, whatever you do, be a Christian in the profession, in the calling, in every sphere of influence you have.
Don't check your faith at the door and bow down to the pluralistic society lie.
That's what got us here in the first place.
And in the meantime, amidst all of that, as we watch and pray and see how God's going to shake this out, again, pray for the Tower of Babel 2.0 system they're building to come crashing down.
But in the meantime, of all of that, you have to find time to laugh.
Laugh.
C.S. Lewis wrote in his book, The Screwtape Letters, that demons hate laughter because they don't understand it and it's because the concept of joy is totally foreign to the demonic realm.
Why would they have it?
And that is why the joy of the Lord is a Christian's strength and true strength, and that's why the Bible says that.
So, for all of you guys out there who listen a lot to this program, how's that for black pill bulimia?
You speak of there being great laughers.
I trust this does not mean that you are under the impression that laughter as such is always in our favor.
The point is worth some attention.
I divide the causes of human laughter into joy, fun, the joke proper, and flippancy.
You will see the first among friends and lovers reunited on the eve of a holiday.
Among adults some pretext in the way of jokes is usually provided, but the facility with which the smallest witticisms produce laughter at such a time shows that they are not the real cause.
What that real cause is, we do not know.
Something like it is expressed in much of that detestable art which the humans call music, and something like it occurs in heaven, a meaningless acceleration in the rhythm of celestial experience quite opaque to us.
Laughter of this kind does us no good and should always be discouraged.
Besides, the phenomenon is of itself disgusting and a direct insult to the realism, dignity, and austerity of hell.
Oh, that's fantastic.
So if you don't want to read C.S. Lewis's The Screwtape Letters, I've just given you a good resource on YouTube.
I believe they have every chapter.
It's actually read or narrated by...
Monty Python, famous John Cleese.
I don't know if you saw that up on the screen there.
So it's a great book on tape.
It's fantastic.
I think I read it 10 years ago.
And I've also listened to the book on tape, which is really good, by John Cleese.
Check it out.
I think you'll really enjoy it.
It gives a lot of insight into the tactics of the enemy.
And I think we need to know that more than ever right now as this country is careening down the slippery slope.
And in the meantime, I mean, you have churches that are still growing in the midst of all that.
You have God's remnant, God's people that are still worshiping him.
And so there is certainly, this is all certainly coming to a culmination, specifically with the United States of America, one way or the other, right?
Christ is going to come back.
Christ inherits the nations.
But we don't know if the United States is going to be here when that happens in its current form.
We certainly do not.
Let's go to the screen, shall we?
This is a tweet from, I guess, one of the Babylon Bee guys.
I found this very interesting because this was written...
Over in 2022, which I know this is an old one.
Yeah, because Obergefell was back well before that.
Yeah, so anyway.
He's saying, don't do it.
They will come for your children.
So the headline here from the Babylon Bee is about a time traveler.
A time traveler emerging from a portal at Obergefell hearing.
Don't do it.
They will come for your children, screams time traveler.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Again, you've got to find time to laugh.
And then, of course, here is the dementia patient and the tweet that somebody wrote for him, presumably getting geared up for the debate.
So...
Let me know what you think.
Sound off.
We're going to have a little update here.
The contest, just so you know, we'll tell you more about this in a minute.
The contest for the free Left Wing Will and the Red Pill card games that we're going to give away in celebration of my 40th birthday is still open, so it's going to remain open until tomorrow, and we will do the drawing tomorrow during the program, and we'll give away some games.
What did I say?
Five games?
So, yeah, feel free to...
We'll have more information on that here in just a minute.
In other news, we have this story, which is extremely disturbing.
Considering what this country endured, considering what we all went through since 2020 to now, the blatant censoring of the government, or by the government, of the people, of the truth, whether that was the COVID vaccines, whether that was whether COVID came from a lab, whether that was...
Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine can actually work.
Whatever it was, we had the government.
They were pressuring social media companies.
Of course, the social media companies were happy to do it as well because they love the government, right?
The left in this country and those on the right, some of those on the right, the Uniparty, they love the government, you know, stepping in and controlling the people and censoring the people.
What we experienced with COVID was something I think a lot of us never dreamed could happen here in the United States of America.
The internet was...
Originally this tool that was going to make the free exchange of information easier, and of course it worked too well, so the government tyrants, just like the Chinese, but we heard back, I mean, you remember back in the early 2000s when we all had the internet?
And we would hear these horror stories about third world countries or Middle Eastern countries limiting the internet access.
When a country wants to crack down on its citizens, they would turn the internet off so they couldn't get the brutality out to a Western media or to any media for that matter.
Remember how China, we used to hear China would crack down on the internet and their speech there.
And we would just think, well, that can't happen here.
And yet it did.
It happened throughout 2020.
It happened throughout 2021.
It's still happening today.
Even though Elon Musk has owned Twitter, there were Christians who had their accounts suddenly permanently banned a couple of days ago for no reason.
They were never given an example of a tweet.
There are still people in that company that just don't want Christians to have a voice, or they don't want anyone that goes against the narrative to have a voice.
And right now, a biblical Christian expressing a biblical worldview, there is nothing more dangerous than a biblical Christian expressing a biblical worldview unapologetically online right now.
There's nothing that's more of a threat to the regime than that.
Period.
But anyway, the Supreme Court is going to allow government control of speech, and they basically hid behind this concept of standing.
It says the states that brought this lawsuit about the government pressuring social media companies, they weren't able to demonstrate standing.
They weren't able to show standing, so we don't have to rule on it, basically.
This is from the conservative Treehouse.
The Supreme Court rejected the standing of the state of Missouri and five individuals in the censorship and free speech case surrounding social media.
The court came down in a 6-3 decision.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion.
Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented to the minority.
So here we have...
Kavanaugh, who's essentially a snake on this.
Coney Barrett, who's a snake.
You know, so much for the, quote, conservative court.
And if you don't think this could be the breakdown of the trans issue, you're wrong.
I mean, look, I know, I would hope that Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh wouldn't side with the child abuse, but you have no idea what kind of pressure will be on them to do it.
Again, for those of you who don't know, earlier in the week, the SCOTUS decided to hear oral arguments in October for the Tennessee law that bans transgender care, which is child abuse, bans child abuse for minor children.
And so this time next year, we may very well have a case that says, where the Supreme Court comes down and says states may not regulate transgender surgery and gentle mutilation and chemical castration.
And if that happens, the court will just be demonstrating themselves as an illegitimate power there.
There is no way that state governments that have any sort of conscience at all can legitimately allow children to have their genitals and breasts mutilated while doctors in their own state call it health care.
This will be a bridge too far.
But anyway, they caved on the free speech aspect of things.
They want the government to be able to censor speech.
The background on the case is very familiar to this audience.
Again, this is conservativetreehouse.com writing this.
As the Biden administration was previously blocked by lower courts from telling social media platforms to remove content against their interests, today the Supreme Court rejected the standing of the plaintiffs, essentially giving a green light to the USA government to begin controlling social media platforms again.
If you read the opinion, I would strongly urge readers to focus the beginning of page 11 on Justice Barrett's opinion.
It is obvious in the three or four pages that followed that the court was looking for an exit from the free speech issue.
Denying the case on standing grounds became their justification for the cop-out.
Barrett goes out of her way to make the standing issue the crux of the majority opinion.
Comey Barrett dismisses all the instances of censorship and coerced removal under the auspices that the relief sought by the plaintiffs was for future harm, not past injury.
The lower courts had ruled the government could not interfere with speech in the future without establishing that each individual plaintiff was harmed specifically by each action of the government.
Social media platforms did some censorship and content removal on their own without government direction because in color revolutions and Marxism you don't have to tell them.
You think Lois Lerner had to tell the IRS agents to shake down the Tea Party groups?
No.
No, because they were their own radicals.
They had bred their own converts, their own totalitarians that worked at the IRS. They didn't have to be told to actually go and shake down those Tea Party groups back in the day.
Likewise, these social media, we know that some of these guys are former government employees anyway, and it's just a revolving door where you don't know where the corporation ends and the government begins, or vice versa.
It's a complete joke.
Anyway, therefore, they write, it becomes impossible for the court to determine which censorship decisions were made by the government coercion and which were made by the social media platform with ordinary moderation rules being applied.
And there, you actually see it there, a note from the opinion where she, you know, just to read a little bit here, she says, a note of caution, if the plaintiffs were seeking compensatory relief, The traceability of their past injuries would be the whole ballgame, but because the plaintiffs are seeking only forward-looking relief, the past injuries are relevant only for their predictive value.
If a plaintiff demonstrates that a particular government defendant was behind her past social media restriction, it will be easier for her to prove that she faces a continued risk of future restriction.
I think Robert Barnes has another take here.
This is when SCOTUS wanted to play Pontius Pilate and evade responsibility for the 2020 election issues, they cited standing.
When SCOTUS needed to let the U.S. FDA get away with lying to kids about vaccines, they cited standing.
And now the SCOTUS greenlights state censorship citing standing.
Which is apparently a made-up idea that didn't exist until the 20th century anyway.
It's not constitutional.
The Supreme Court essentially abdicated their responsibility to rule on this case.
They took up by citing standing and doing a Pontius Pilate and washing their hands of the whole thing.
Robert Barnes was right.
Yeah, and then here's Jeff Younger.
Again, Jeff Younger, his child got kidnapped by his ex-wife, taken off to California to be trans.
Tweet from Julie Kelly.
ACB joins Roberts and three other liberals, as well as Kavanaugh, to write an opinion overturning Missouri lawsuit.
This is number two.
The plaintiffs fail by and large to link their past social media restrictions and the defendants' communications with the platforms.
The state plaintiffs, Louisiana and Missouri, refer only to action taken by Facebook against a Louisiana state representative post about children and the COVID-19 vaccine.
But they never say when Facebook took action against the officials post, a critical fact in establishing a causal link, nor have the three plaintiff doctors established a likelihood that their past restrictions are traceable to either the White House officials or the CDC.
So you can just see this is nothing but a bunch of wordsmithing to try to get the government out of being...
Look, everybody and their mother knows exactly what the government did.
To people all across this country, they know what the government did now, thanks to the Twitter files.
They know what the social media companies were doing because they're a bunch of leftist totalitarians.
We all know, everybody knows what they did.
The Supreme Court just doesn't want to hold anybody accountable.
They don't want to tell the government that they can't do these things.
It's absolutely insane.
I mean, this is a classic example of the government just lying.
I mean, they lie to us all the time and we know it, but here's another example that they just lie constantly and then they refuse.
When they're caught in the lie, the system completely fails.
Completely fails.
And I wouldn't put it past somebody in the intelligence community to have convinced one of these justices, hey, look, there's sources and methods involved here.
You really can't make this ruling because then, I mean, you know, because this is national security.
I guarantee you somebody brought up national security nonsense that we really need to have.
Look, we know all of this.
We know what happened in 2012 when Edward Snowden leaked all of those NSA documents.
We know about X-Key score.
We know about...
These software companies being co-opted, being subverted by the intelligence agencies.
We know when, for example, Microsoft would come out with a new software that you had the government banging on the doors of the software companies demanding that before it goes to market, the government needs the backdoor key to get in.
The government needs to have access to the software on their end.
This is all documented in the Edward Snowden documents, right?
Right.
And so the same thing goes with the social media companies as well, right?
I mean, big tech, all that stuff is now all social media, and they want access to it.
They want access to it.
Really, really sad and pathetic.
Absolutely sad and pathetic.
All right, we're going to take a break and a reset here.
When we come back, we'll tell you a little bit more about the game giveaway and what you can do if you missed yesterday's episode.
Don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report back in just a moment.
Did you hear that gold hit an all-time high?
And based on market analysis, it could soar even higher?
With inflation increasing, global tensions escalating, and central banks buying gold at record levels, the gold boom could skyrocket to over $7,000 an ounce.
In fact, experts claim that, quote, the gold investing madness is just getting started.
That's why I partnered with the highest-rated gold company, Goldco.
They have earned over 6,000 five-star reviews from tens of thousands of happy customers who diversified their savings with gold and silver.
Today, GoldCo is offering you up to 10% instant match in bonus silver with a qualified account.
Visit Paul4Gold.com for bonus silver and a free gold and silver info kit.
What are you waiting for?
Join the tens of thousands of people who have already joined the gold rush and diversified their savings with gold and silver.
Visit Paul4Gold.com today.
Listen, the economy is not going back to how it was before.
Remember how quickly it all went bad?
First it was inflation, then another housing market bubble, banks started crashing, and now the Fed is laying the groundwork for a digital currency.
Your money is being attacked from almost every angle.
So at this point, you could bury your head in the sand and pretend everything will get better, or take advantage of this opportunity to protect your wealth while you still can.
So write this down, because you'll not only get the chance to protect your retirement savings now, you could get up to 10% instant match in bonus silver from my precious metals partner, GoldCo.
You heard that right.
Up to 10% in bonus silver from GoldCo.
When you visit Paul4Gold.com or call 844-904-GOLD, don't miss what could be your best opportunity to protect your retirement savings today.
Head over to Paul4Gold.com or call 844-904-GOLD now.
Welcome back, folks.
We are right back here with you.
We're going to tell you a little bit about the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
We'll get back to some programming here in just a moment.
The Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company is a veteran-owned and operated coffee company that imports coffee beans from around the world.
They roast them back home here in the United States.
They also donate a portion of the profits of every bag sold to Homes for Our Troops, which is a publicly funded 501c3 nonprofit organization that builds and donates specially adapted custom homes nationwide for severely injured post-9-11 veterans to enable them to rebuild their lives.
At the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company, they're committed to providing high-quality coffee beans while making a difference in the lives of other people.
Costa Rican coffee beans have a bright, pleasant acidity.
Flavor notes of citrus and tropical fruits with a higher caffeine content as well, this makes for the perfect cup of coffee for breakfast or a good pick-me-up in the middle of the day.
Go to beardedsargeant.com slash millstone right now and save 15% when you use promo code PAWL.
That's beardedsergeant.com slash millstone.
15% when you use promo code Paul.
And also, Left Wing Will and the Red Pill, the game that laughs at the left's expense.
So, a little bit more about this as we...
Are talking about this particular game that I wrote.
We want you to get one.
You can use promo code Paul at leftwingwill.com and say 15%.
But I am turning 40 years old this Saturday.
I just can't believe that.
But I'm turning 40 years old.
I'm going to have a midlife crisis right here on the air.
So we decided to give away some games.
A friend of mine said, hey, you're turning 40, why don't you give some games away to the audience?
I said, okay, yeah, that's kind of a reverse thing.
I'm supposed to get gifts.
But yeah, I get it.
I get it.
So, over here, let me find the...
Yeah, so this is the Twitter thread.
We already had plenty of people comment on it after I mentioned it yesterday.
I just made a post.
You can go to at RealPaulHarrell.
You see it right there.
Let's see...
Right there.
Okay.
So it's on the lower third there.
At Real Paul Harrell is the Twitter handle.
Go there and find this post.
I would love for you to follow me if you can.
If you haven't, go ahead and follow me.
And then comment on this post.
And, of course, you see, you know, follow me comment here.
I will draw some names for...
We're going to try to give away five games.
We've got somebody named Die Glock.
Enter me, please.
Love the Milsen Report.
Happy birthday.
We've got another user here.
A bunch of letters.
Blue Falcon is the handle.
Looking forward to the show.
Keep up the good work.
Anyway, we're going to enter these names in.
We're also going to enter the likes in as well because there's some that already followed, I know, that just went ahead and liked the post.
So feel free to go find that out.
And then tomorrow, so you only have until tomorrow, and we are going to put all the names, and we'll draw five names, and then I'll get you guys information.
I'll probably reach out and direct message you on Twitter or X to get your information, and we'll go from there.
So, yeah, it's going to be fun.
We're going to really – I hope you enjoy the game.
It's a great game.
And if you don't want to do that and you just want to buy the game, again, my name, Paul, gets you 15% off.
Leftwingwill.com, made in America.
It's a game that laughs at the left's expense.
You tell Leftwing Will's story, and I think you're going to really like it.
And it's meant, again, to make people laugh.
It's meant to bring people together, make them laugh, which, again, we just told you in the previous segment, is something that the demonic, they're not big fans of.
So Tucker Carlson went to Australia.
I don't know if you heard about this.
There's several viral video clips that have made the rounds that really show you how to deal with a media that knows so much that isn't true.
Newsweek writing that Tucker Carlson's viral confrontation with reporters, or I'm sorry, let's see here, with reporter cheered by conservatives.
Yeah.
Newsweek.
Tucker Carlson went to the land down under and got verbally entangled with local journalists drawing rave reviews.
Now, this was incredible because not only did Tucker call out the journalists for nonsense, he actually, in the land of Australia, you know, they had...
I mean, didn't they have COVID camps?
I'm pretty sure.
Was that New Zealand that they tried it out on?
Anyway, in that area of the world, certainly they had places where people that didn't want to go by COVID restrictions, and there was all kinds of tyranny they tried out in Australia and New Zealand that they didn't quite get to here, at least not all across the country here.
Here is Tucker gets this question about Vladimir Putin.
Take a listen to this.
You've preempted my question on Putin.
Putin!
Putin!
I think you did strategically because you knew it's what we'd ask.
Putin!
He's so bad!
Did he make you take the COVID shot?
Take the what?
The COVID shot.
No, he didn't.
Sorry, sorry, sorry, sorry.
The COVID shot saved probably tens of millions of dollars.
Oh, yeah, yeah, definitely, definitely.
Safe and effective.
This is why everyone loves the media.
It's like a time capsule.
It's like...
It's like you're like the last Japanese soldier on Okinawa.
You think the war's still going.
It's hilarious.
It's really funny because they can't stand...
I really think this is the way to go.
The absolute level of mockery.
Because at some point they have to realize that they are spouting things that are nowhere near the truth.
Or I guess more importantly, that there is a vast amount of people that...
It's not even like they're on the fence about the COVID vaccine.
Well, it may have.
I mean, there are people that are just firmly accepting.
They're not buying their propaganda and they firmly believe the opposite.
To the point that hearing their version just now makes people laugh.
I mean, it also kind of makes me angry, but it's so comical.
Like, again, the lone Japanese soldier that's still on some Japanese island somewhere that still thinks the war's going on, and it's been 10 years.
And nobody came and got them.
That's what these journalists now are looking like.
On not just COVID, but like everything.
I mean, you can go back to Russia collusion.
You can go back, you know, even further.
And really, the more and more the mainstream media just takes whatever the government tells them and puts it out there as fact, indisputable fact, and that if you argue with it, there's something wrong with you.
If you don't believe it, there's something wrong with you.
That's being completely rejected.
And now journalists are, and you saw this in 2020, you saw this in 2016, you saw this in 2020, you know, at the Trump rallies where people would just mercilessly, the attendance there would just mercilessly mock the journalists who were there to cover it.
It is hostile towards them.
People are hostile towards this journalistic cabal because they are reporting information and they're intentionally deceiving people.
They're intentionally deceiving people with the hopes that they will make choices in their lives based on that faulty, deceitful information, thereby being the secret to their own demise.
It's really sick when you think about it.
It's not just about brainwashing or keeping their candidate in office or whatever.
It's really the enemy, the late pollster.
He was a Democrat, and he was a Democrat pollster.
His name was Pat Cadell, with a C. C-A-D-E-L-L, I think.
Pat Cadell.
You guys may remember him.
I remember him just because when I was on talk radio during the 2012 election where we had Mormon Mitt Romney against Barack Obama, like we had really any real choice at all.
And we now know who Mitt Romney really is and was at the time.
But in the wake of the Benghazi scandal, we remember how we have the soldiers in Benghazi that died.
They were hung out to dry.
Then the administration lies and tries to blame some tape.
Anyway, all of that, during that scandal and the media and how criminal they were, Democrat pollster Pat Cadell said, he's the first person that I ever heard say this in the 2012 election, he says, the American media are the enemy of the American people.
I thought to myself, wow, that's strong language.
And that was in 2012, and he's absolutely true.
They failed to report that story.
You had, remember, Obama, and not that it even mattered, but you had Obama and Mitt Romney on the debate stage, and she steps in and tries to correct Romney on something that he said, you know, foreign policy and the Benghazi thing, and they just lied for each other.
And so he said, Pat Cadell, he said, well, media is the enemy of the American people.
They don't want to cover this clear blunder and just tell people the truth.
And of course, social media explodes and now the Supreme Court says, oh yeah, the government can pressure social media companies, which is where an ever-increasing amount of people are now getting their news from these places and now the government has a say in that.
Sick.
But yeah, this is how we've got to deal with them.
The way Tucker just laughs in their face, I think, is fantastic.
It's almost a continuation of Trump.
Say what you want to about Trump, and I get it.
But as somebody who was in the media at the time, just on radio...
You had all of these other guys that would accept the presuppositions, the false presuppositions.
These are our candidates, our candidates.
They would accept the presuppositions of the journalists' questions, even if they were based in lies, because they were just trying to get positive press coverage, and they never, ever listened.
They never, ever listened to something like Rush Limbaugh, who was like, it doesn't matter what you do.
They're never going to cover you favorably, ever.
They're never going to do that.
He was exactly right.
And so Trump comes in, and if the media landscape is like a club, and the journalists are the DJ, and they set the beat, Trump comes in with his own sound system and just refuses.
And we're probably hopeful.
Well, CNN's tried to rig the debate where he can't do that, and we'll see.
But anyway, the whole thing is fascinating to me.
And so I feel like Trump, at least the 2016 Trump, gave a master class in how to not go along with the beat that the mainstream media put out there.
And Tucker, who's been in media, he's certainly continuing that tradition.
Here he is talking more about the vaccines.
A media should be, like, holding these people to the fire on that.
Or the vax injuries and deaths.
Yeah.
Which are manifold.
They're everywhere.
Are you joking?
And in, like, countries that actually believe in science, and there are a few in Europe, they're looking at the, and every vaccine causes injuries, every single one.
One of my children was injured by a flu vaccine.
This is known.
In the United States, we're not allowed to sue.
We can sue makers of playground equipment, totally fine.
You can sue anybody for anything.
Gun manufacturers, you cannot sue vaccine manufacturers.
And every vaccine causes injuries, every single one.
And there's a database publicly available in the United States that shows you how many.
And the COVID vax, the mRNA vax from Pfizer, has caused more injuries, self-reported injuries, than all the previous vaccination campaigns for the last 50 years combined.
And no one in the media has written a story about it.
Because, well, there are a couple of reasons.
One is that Pfizer is one of the largest advertisers on television in the United States.
And the point is not to sell the, and I worked in television my whole life, so I can, this is not speculation.
The point is not to sell some weird drug for rheumatoid arthritis to TV viewers.
Because people can't prescribe their own drugs.
No, that's not the point.
This is not a retail sales pitch.
This is an insurance policy that the drug makers are buying with the big media companies, where your biggest advertiser, maybe if we have a lot of VAX injuries from a brand new product, you won't say too much, and they don't.
I think that's completely corrupt and shameful.
And I have to say, I was fired over a year ago so I don't have to worry about this or be defensive about it because I don't have a job.
So there is a certain freedom in unemployment.
And so I sympathize with you guys who work for these companies that are truly corrupt and you sort of know that but you don't want to deal with it because you've got kids and a mortgage.
I get it.
I've been there.
But let's just be honest.
Everybody else knows what it is.
Everyone else knows how corrupt you are.
And so there's a reason they have contempt for you.
I'm just saying.
There's a reason they have contempt for you.
Yeah, so now he's talking directly to the journalist saying, yeah, I mean, you guys are a total joke and you're frauds.
And everybody knows it.
People in Australia know it.
People in America know it.
People in the West know it.
I mean, the one thing that we have in common with Western governments, Australia, Europe, America, the one thing we have in common is that we're represented by people that just fundamentally hate us.
We're all represented by people that actually hate the people they're supposed to represent.
They actually hate the people that they're governing right now.
By their actions, not by their words.
By their words, they say they love us and they're doing what's right by us, but their actions, it tells a completely different story.
Alright, now here's the last clip of Tucker Carlson in Australia and then we're going to move on because we have one rhetorical millstone to hand out, but we also have to...
Ah, we have to talk about...
Oh, anyway, I'm going to save it.
Well, I'll just say this.
It's just gross.
We've got this clip of this lady who claims that she never felt closer to God than when she kissed a woman for the first time.
So we're going to move on to that story here in a minute.
I'm going to tie it all together.
Here's the last clip of Tucker from Australia, and this is the one that is kind of the most devastating and has made most of the rounds of Tucker just absolutely destroying a journalist based on the white replacement theory question.
Hi, Tucker.
Thank you so much for your address today.
So you talked a little bit about immigration, and in the past you've talked about how white Australians, Americans, Europeans are being replaced by non-white immigrants in what is often referred to as the great replacement theory.
Have I said that whites are being replaced?
I don't think I said that.
Well, it's been mentioned on your show 4,000 times.
Really?
When did I say that?
On your show?
I said whites are being replaced?
You have said that before.
Really?
Yeah.
I would challenge you to cite that, because I'm pretty sure I haven't said that.
I said native-born Americans are being replaced, including blacks.
Native-born Americans.
Native-born Americans.
Americans who, like, black Americans have been, African Americans, have been in the United States for, in many cases, their families over 400 years.
And their concerns are every bit as real and valid and alive to me as the concerns of white people whose families have been there 400 years.
So I've never said that whites are being replaced.
Not one time.
I believe that's untrue.
We just met, but when our relationship starts with a lie, it makes it tough to be friends.
Let's pull that back.
I'm happy to explain what I do think.
You actually can't say it because I didn't say it, and I don't believe it.
And I'm telling you that to your face, so why don't you just accept me at face value.
My concern is that the people who are born in the country are the main responsibility of its leaders.
And as noted earlier, when those leaders shift their concern from the people whose responsibility it is to take care of To people around the world, to put their priorities above that of their own citizens, that's immoral.
And they are being replaced in my country.
People were born in the United States.
And the birth rate tells the whole story.
They're not at replacement rate.
And so the US population is growing because we're importing people from other countries.
And my view is that happy people have children.
And a functioning economy allows them to do that.
And we don't have that.
And so you need to fix the economy and fix the culture and make it so that people who want to have kids can.
You don't just go for the quick sugar fix of importing new people.
Now, I mean, he is absolutely right about that aspect of it, but you notice how he talks about how the birth rates are low, and he says that it's all native-born, which includes a lot of white people.
That includes a lot of white people.
That includes a majority white people.
It includes a minority of black people, and then the rest of the Asians and Hispanics that are native.
They're naturally born here in the United States.
They're actually born here.
He's saying that our leaders are selling that population out and the economy and everything else.
And so he says, but I'm not just saying white people are being replaced.
I'm saying native-born people are.
And that's just kind of a, it's a way to get around having to admit that there's nothing wrong with being white.
And I'm not saying that Tucker believes that there's something wrong with being white, but it's just like saying, look, we know that anti-white racism exists.
We know that that's rampant.
So why doesn't this go right along with it, which is essentially, look, the world's no longer allowed to have majority white countries anymore.
And that's clearly what is, that seems to be what the agenda is.
And that's what's happening to the United States of America.
Tucker doesn't want to necessarily go that far, but it is still, I feel like, a useful contribution to the debate saying, look, the great replacement, while Tucker doesn't want to single out, you know, white people declining in America, he is saying, look, why would you import to replace?
Why not let people have children in America, which they're not?
Now, that is an interesting thought, right?
And he ties it directly to the economy.
If people are struggling, they don't want to have kids because people who are happy have children.
You know, happy families that know where their next meal is going to come from tend to have more kids is his hypothesis, and I think he's right about that.
That's my position.
And if you think that's racist, that's your problem.
I never called you a racist.
But of course you are suggesting, and I must say one of the reasons people don't like people like you in the media is that you never say exactly what you mean.
Your slurs are all by implication, and you're about to tell me the great replacement theory is racist or anti-Semitic, whatever.
I've said what I've said to you right now, like a hundred times in public.
I hope to, if I live long enough, say it a hundred more times.
I think it's completely honest and real, not racist or scary.
It's factually true.
It's not a theory.
It's a fact.
And the whole point of your question was to be like, you're a scary racist.
And my response is, no, I'm not.
Okay, well, how about no more lying in your questions, and then I'll answer it.
Okay, well...
This is the same theory, or as you say, idea, that has inspired the New York Buffalo shooting where 11 black Americans were killed.
Oh God, come on.
You know what I mean?
It's also inspired...
It's not, first of all...
It's inspired the worst, one of the worst Australian guns of all time...
How do they get people just stupid in the media?
I guess it doesn't pay well.
Look, I'm sorry, I've lived among people like you for too long, and I don't mean to call you stupid, maybe you're just pretending to be, but...
I've never...
I'm totally against violence.
I'm totally against the war in Ukraine, for example, which doubtless you support.
And like all dutiful liberals support more carnage.
I don't.
I hate mass shootings, actually.
Nothing I said...
What does it mean to inspire something?
My views are not bigoted against any group.
They're honest.
They're factual.
That's not hate.
That's reality.
And my views derive from my deep concern for Americans, actually.
Americans aren't having kids because they can't afford to.
And nobody in charge cares.
And so that's my position.
That doesn't inspire mass shootings.
How dare you try to tie me to some lunatic who murdered people?
How dare you, actually?
And in fact, I mean, do you know what I mean?
I'd be like, you know, Hitler wore those shoes.
A lot of people are saying that you're like Hitler.
Can you explain those shoes?
Hitler wore exactly the same shoes.
And you're like, I've got nothing to do with Hitler.
That's how I feel about your absurd, disingenuous question.
Right, so therefore you support gun control?
What?
I thought it couldn't get dumber, but it did!
No!
I don't support disarming, law-abiding people so they can't defend themselves, so the government has a monopoly on violence?
I don't think so.
First of all, in my country that's illegal, as you know.
But moreover, it should be illegal in every country.
A sovereign person has the right to defend himself and his family.
Period.
And that said, I'm...
Why do I worry for the Aussies in the room that are now on some sort of Australian extremist watch list just for attending this Tucker Carlson speech?
Totally opposed to harming anyone.
Anyone.
Have you been calling?
Are you concerned about the war in Ukraine?
And the countless innocents being murdered there every single day?
I doubt you are.
Probably Putin bad.
I am.
I'm a Christian.
I hate violence.
I hate mass shootings.
I have guns at home and often on my personal I'm in the United States, I'm proud to say.
Because I want to defend myself and those I love against violence.
That's the point.
I'm not perpetrating crimes.
I'm not shooting strangers.
I'm defending what I love.
And if you're against that, I guess I would ask why.
Why would you be against that?
Well, so you don't think you harbor any kind of responsibility for these hate crimes?
I'm sorry.
I'm trying to be charitable.
I'm trying to be charitable.
I was like, maybe you're just pretending to be dumb.
Now I don't think it's an act.
Tucker, thank you for taking those questions.
I'm sure you enjoyed some questions from the press.
Actually, I loved it.
I just feel sorry.
I mean, because I got here and the country's so unbelievably beautiful and the people are so cheerful and funny and cool and smart.
I'm like, your media's got to be better than ours.
It can't just be a bunch of castrated robots reading questions from the boss.
And then, it turns out it's exactly the same.
Maybe even a tiny bit dumber.
Yeah.
There you go.
That's the viral clip.
Tucker in Australia.
And he, again, is absolutely...
To me, it's a masterclass if you've got to deal with these people.
He certainly does a good job of that.
And again, I think laughing and mocking these people in there, it's like the only way to do it at this point.
Because...
I mean, they're so bought into the lies and the brainwashing that they don't.
And a lot of it's just so...
It's because they also just...
They believe...
It's a lot of self-worship involved.
They believe that they're morally superior and that they are perfect.
A lot of these people believe they're perfect.
When it comes to their political opinions.
And they really do believe that having the right political opinions is what is going to essentially save them and make them a good person.
That's the truth.
Alright, so we have this for you.
In the fact that we did celebrate, we were on the...
Well, we didn't celebrate it.
the Biden administration, again, supports this week, the anniversary of the Obergefell decision, which gave the, uh, fake rights to get gay married.
Uh, we've talked about at the opening of the show, we talked about how that kind of, uh, put us on this fast track to degeneracy.
And they're now coming from our kids, but the slippery slope, you've got this Obergefell decision that started the rainbow revolution.
And then from that, uh, we now are having to deal with things like this, Here is a man who thinks that they're a woman thanking an American corporation for, I guess, enabling him in this delusion.
You would have never thought this would have happened.
This would be a huge deal.
If you'd have seen this the day after the Obergefell decision where they made up the right to get gay and married...
You'd have been like, what?
And yet here we are.
And now so many people think this is normal.
So not sure if you knew, but normally I wear contacts, but I ran out.
So today I'm in glasses.
Um, I just got back from the gym and I just want to say one thing I am truly grateful for is planet fitness.
They have been awesome during my transition.
Ever since I talked to management and let them know I was transitioning, they let me use the locker room that I identify with.
So they have been fantastic.
Little things like that just go a long ways in validating me and affirming me and letting me know that that's a safe space for me to exist in.
He's all me, me, me.
Yes, he is.
And so where else does Obergefell lead us?
Well, it leads us to this tweet by John Root, and he decides—I guess he gets it from Jubilee Media— And this is making the rounds, but again, we are now on the...
I'm not just saying, look, I want to be gay.
People are now saying, oh no, being gay is holy.
Being gay actually gets you close to God.
Listen.
The time that I felt most filled with the Holy Spirit was when I kissed a woman.
That is when I was filled with peace and joy.
That is a personal experience, just like you are having personal experiences.
My personal experience and my community and my family all bear witness to the beautiful fruit of the Spirit of God being in my relationship with my wife and in our children.
Can you link that fruit back to the Bible?
Ow!
The time that I felt most...
So, we're to a point now where...
I mean, everybody back before the woke gay infiltration of our churches, you just never thought...
No one would have ever thought, look, if you're gay, you're obviously just in open rebellion before God, and you would admit that.
But now we're to the point where no...
We're going to somehow twist these relationships that are an abomination, these sins that are called abominations, and we're going to start saying that there's godly, heavenly fruit in my life because I never felt closer to God until I kissed a member of the same sex.
So, the guy in the end there, can you link that fruit to the Bible?
The answer is no.
No, she can't.
Link that fruit to the Bible, regardless of how much she wants to, regardless of how much she wants her sin, she wants to eat her cake and have it, regardless of how much she wants that to be true, it's not.
True.
And for more on that, we go to a few years ago, Pastor Votie Bauckham.
He addresses this very succinctly because there's some people on the left, like this woman, who would say, well, Jesus never really said anything specifically about homosexuality, so that means that I can be gay, and that's why I feel closer to God when I kiss another woman.
You don't have to panic when someone says, well, will Jesus never address the issue of homosexuality?
First of all, you're wrong because he did address it in Matthew 5 and Matthew 19.
Second of all, Jesus is a member of the Godhead.
You can't separate the Father from the Son and the Spirit.
You cannot separate Jesus from the Father and the Spirit on the issue of homosexuality.
Jesus was there in Sodom and Gomorrah.
He was raining down fire and brimstone.
Jesus is the author of Leviticus.
Thirdly, the Bible is one story, not many.
You can't separate the teaching of Jesus from the teaching of his apostles.
And finally, if you take that line of argumentation, you would have to eventually be okay with pedophilia because Jesus never said anything about that.
So can we dispense with that one?
Yes, absolutely.
We can, but they're not going to want to do it.
They certainly don't want to do that at all.
And before we run out of time, lastly tonight, we leave you with this.
A lot of talk.
You know, we're in the middle of the election season, and we're going to hear all about that if you listen to the mainstream media outlets.
The question is, who actually up there is for the biblical Christian worldview?
I mean, one may not hate Christians.
But this is what kind of made me chuckle right before we came on the air.
What kind of government do you want?
This guy Brian O'Nolan says, we want strange women lying in pawns, I guess, strange women lying in pawns distributing swords are no basis for a system of government.
Supreme executive power is derived from the masses, not because some watery tart threw a sword at you.
Anyway, great Monty Python reference.
That's a great political strategy or slogan.
You know what?
Everything is so crazy.
The Supreme Court is selling this out.
We've got the Republican uniparty establishment selling this out, whether it's on immigration, whether it's on abortion, whether it's on whatever.
And it's like, you know what?
Let's just go with...
At this point, might as well go with Monty Python.
And go with strange women lying in ponds just handing out swords.
Because that's essentially the leaders that we have now.
You would think that the leaders we have now are essentially just people who have been crowned, given authority from some watery tart that threw a sword at them.
That is all the time that we have for this edition of the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
It's always great to talk to you.
Unless I'm providentially hindered, I'll be back here tomorrow wishing you a happy Friday.
And don't forget, go to at RealPaulHarrell on Twitter and like that thread, comment on that thread that says left wing will give away.
We're going to be giving away some games.
We'll put your name into a drawing and we'll draw it later at RealPaulHarrell.
That's all the time that we have for tonight.
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection