All Episodes
Previous Next
May 30, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
57:57
Millstone Report w Paul Harrell: America's Proxy WARS Leading To WW3, Can Ruling Elites Be REPLACED?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
rainbow Gestapo, the goose-stepping gay lobby, all of that stops right now.
People say we need to make America great again.
I completely agree.
We may need to make Gallows great again.
Literally so many people that need to have a millstone put around their neck and tossed into the sea.
Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to the Millstone Report.
My name is Paul Harrell.
Thank you so much for being with us.
As always, we can't do the show without you.
We've got a great show for you.
We're going to talk a little bit about World War III. Not only is America inching towards World War III, the average freedom-loving folks, we just want to raise our families, but we're bracing for World War III. NATO governments who refuse to take the L in Ukraine are now saying that Ukraine,
which is really just code for NATO because it's NATO or the U.S. providing them weaponry and training, they're now saying that Ukraine should launch missiles deep into Russian territory.
Specifically, Western leaders are now saying that Russian bases inside of Russia should be attacked.
Now, this would be a major escalation, which is why Putin is now warning that most European countries have dense populations covering small landmasses.
Essentially, he is saying that if you poke the bear, European civilians will die if Russia were to respond in kind.
And maybe that's the whole point.
Apparently, Western governments are now the new godless communist Soviets who have no problem sacrificing their own populations for what they perceive to be the greater good.
If COVID taught us anything, it taught us that.
And if that means that NATO is intentionally provoking Russia to kill European civilians, so NATO has a pretext to engage in a full-scale land war against anti-LGBTQ Russia, then get ready.
And speaking of poking the bear, Colonel Douglas McGregor is reporting that the average Egyptian citizen has accepted the fact that Israel's ethnic cleansing of Gaza is going to lead to a full-scale war between Muslim nations and Israel.
So, the question is, when do these proxy wars the U.S. is funding in both the Ukraine and Israel get to such a point that we just drop the word proxy and admit that World War III is here?
Now, specifically concerning the secular nation-state of Israel, writer Frank Wright, over on X, his Substack and LifeSite News, has been drawing attention to Benjamin Netanyahu's long history of telegraphing where the U.S. will fight its next war.
Here is Netanyahu on NBC News from way back in 1990.
Watch.
You say you don't want to talk of war, but no less than Shimon Peres has said that the appearance is that Israel is trying to push the United States into war.
And there's a report out of Jerusalem that Israel is demanding a commitment from the United States that America put an end to the Iraqi military threat.
I don't know about these reports.
I do know what our policy is.
We share, in fact, the policy with the United States.
Because, you see, what is threatened by Iraq is not just Israel.
Everybody is threatened by Iraq.
If Saddam Hussein maintains, if he devours that prey and keeps it, He will go after other prey.
If he gets out of Kuwait but remains with his war machine intact, who can say that tomorrow or a year or two from now he won't turn on some other target?
It may not be Israel.
It may be somebody else in the region.
It could be Turkey.
It could be Saudi Arabia again.
It could be anyone.
So the question is really, how do we neutralize the threat posed by this vast war machine that Iraq has in the wake of the Gulf crisis?
Are you denying that Foreign Minister Levy translated a message to U.S. Ambassador Brown that in effect asked for a U.S. commitment to end the Iraqi military threat?
Well, I don't get into diplomatic conversations, but I think I've stated our policy, and I think it's very much your policy.
That is, the question is really, how do we ensure that these weapons of destruction, these missiles, these chemical weapons, the nuclear program that is fast accelerating in Iraq, that these do not pose a threat in the aftermath of the crisis, assuming it gets out of Kuwait.
This is an issue for the entire international community.
And again, if this can be done by peaceful means, we support it.
How concerned are you, sir, about the scheduled face-to-face meetings involving President Bush, Saddam Hussein, and their top advisors?
We listen, Brian, to the assurances coming from President Bush, the clear-cut statements that I heard yesterday on TV here from Secretary Baker.
We understand that the U.S. is firm on its policy, and again, if they can achieve their policy by this means, we have obviously no objection.
You have no concern about potential linkage to the Palestinian issue in those talks?
Well, of course, Saddam will try to raise it.
He is trying to raise it.
But you have no concern that the United States will buy into it?
The United States, again, has assured us that it will not fall into this trap.
They expect Saddam to do it as we do.
They expect him to try to throw dust in the world's eye by trying to shift attention to us and to create these false symmetries between his aggression in the Gulf and Israel's self-defense in the War of 1967.
It's all so familiar at this point.
Very interesting, to say the least.
Here's a quote from Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress way back in 2002.
Quote, Now this was in 2002.
What you just heard was in 1990.
So Iraq and Iran.
And Iran, by the way, he goes on, is also outpacing Iraq in the development of ballistic missiles that they hope would reach the eastern seaboard of the United States within 15 years.
He goes on.
I guess that does not include California, but it does include Washington.
A third nation, by the way, is Libya as well.
Libya, while no one is watching under the cloak, is trying to rapidly build an atomic bomb capability.
So you have here now three nations.
Not surprisingly, all three have been implicated in the past in terrorist activity using the clandestine means of terror and proxies.
End quote.
There's that word again.
Proxies.
So knowing all of that, Israel and Netanyahu, basically they've been granted...
I mean, if we look at where we are now, where we were then versus where we are now, Israel and Netanyahu has been granted two of his three wishes...
Iraq was toppled twice.
Libya was conquered.
We know what happened to Muammar Gaddafi.
And the only one left standing now is Iran.
Cue Lindsey Graham advocating for the bombing of Iranian oil fields.
I've been saying for six months now, hit Iran.
They have oil fields out in the open.
They have the Revolutionary Guard headquarters you can see from space.
Blow it off the map.
It just never gets old.
Writer Frank Wright has been monitoring the situation closely as several articles he's posted and he continues to post across different platforms and he joins us now to share more.
Frank, welcome to the Millstone Report, sir.
Thank you so much for being with us.
It's a pleasure to see the thanoterotic homosexual death cultist, Lindsey Graham.
It's always a pleasure.
Yeah, I mean, Lindsey Graham, there's not a war out there that he doesn't like, I guess.
Unless it were a war against neocons.
There's a great meme showing him plastered with the sponsorship of General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman and so on.
And I think we ought to see that with the big Israel flag in the middle of it as well.
But to get to the situation at hand, you remember from the first video Netanyahu spoke about your policy is our policy or in fact our policy is your policy.
Now it's curious he would say that in 1990 because as you mentioned he went before Congress in 2002 as I would like to mention a private citizen to speak to Congress on the Israeli perspective on the war in Iraq that was coming.
And he advised Congress on that day, urged them, in fact, to take preemptive strikes against Libya, Iraq and Iran.
Now, eight days after this, the United States national security position changed.
A grand strategy document came out on the 20th of September, eight days after his presentation, shall we say, his attempt successfully to sell what became the war on terror to the United States.
And it mentioned in Article 5 the need, the urgent national security objective of preventing the development of weapons of mass destruction in other countries that may threaten our friends, said the United States, as well as itself and its allies.
Obviously it omitted to mention that the one nation that has developed nuclear weapons and has repeatedly threatened to use them and has denied their possession is Israel, of course, which is a rogue state and has denied any attempt at any international inspection of its nuclear arsenal, which to this day it will not admit it possesses.
Well, you know, and if they admitted, I guess if they admitted to it, then maybe there could be calls to have inspections, you know?
So that's one of the reasons why.
Well, there has been.
Yeah.
So this is incredible where we are.
So World War III, I mean, a lot of people think it's already started, quite frankly.
It just hasn't...
I don't know.
What do you think on that?
I mean, is this going to lead?
Can America afford to be in a war against all these Arab nations as well as against Russia and China at the same time?
The first thing to say about this is that none of the wars that America has lost, and they've lost them all in the last several decades, none of them have made any military sense whatsoever.
They've not satisfied any military objectives.
They've been ideological campaigns at best, and this is no different.
The difference here, however, is that it does have a very low nuclear threshold, because the rogue state of Israel, as it should be correctly described, It has a terrifying policy called the Samson Option.
That's its nuclear doctrine, in which it states that it will launch a first strike nuclear attack, including on European capitals, in order to bring about Armageddon should the existence of Israel ever be threatened.
The allusion to Samson, of course, is the fellow who brought down the temple, killing himself in the process.
This is absolutely horrifying.
It is so insane that if you describe it in simple terms to people, they simply can't believe it.
So, does this conflict have the potential to drag us into a world-ending scenario?
Yes.
Does it have a military solution?
Probably not.
Most estimates of combat power From NATO rely on the idea of the projection of power towards what's called a near peer.
Now a near peer is the condescending term used in NATO documents to describe a peer such as Iran or Russia, who aren't quite as good as us.
But the trouble is, is that by the time you've gotten near to them, because they're a very long way away, your supply chains mean that that peer is a peer.
In fact, it probably exceeds your combat power because you have to project power many, many miles away.
And as you know, it's extremely difficult to do so.
So can the United States win a land war against Iran?
No.
Does it have any realistic possibility of doing so, when that would probably trigger the military intervention of every country opposed to Israel in the region, including Turkey, which itself has the major NATO base at Inchilic, which has long been the jump-off point for Near East Asian NATO operations.
It also contains the American nuclear arsenal in that region as well.
This is an extremely sensitive situation.
There have been covert agreements between countries such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and potentially Turkey to guarantee the exchange of nuclear weapons in the event of a full-scale war.
This is obviously known to US war planets.
But again, I would stress the distinction between military minds in places like the Pentagon and the ideologues who start these wars for entirely different reasons.
My assessment of the situation in the Middle East is that the US has lost control of the situation.
It does not have the power to dictate to Israel, which is the wild card in this situation, and has probably fully realized Moshe Dayan's prescription for its national security posture, which is to become a mad dog That anyone is afraid of annoying.
I think that that's true.
I think Israel is a mad dog and members of its parliament, including its cabinet, have in the past months called for the use of nuclear weapons in Gaza.
This is insane.
These are the people you're dealing with.
Some of those people, some of those people, those extreme religious Zionists, themselves believe in a kind of perverse Armageddonism anyway.
So to them, the end of the world might even be a desirable objective.
Again, a position so insane that to describe it in plain English makes the speaker seem mad.
But I assure you, it's not me.
What's wild about that is that I remember the post-9-11 talking points.
We're going to get to this article here in just a minute.
About how, you know, one of the problems when we were facing Islamic jihadists or Islamic terrorism was the idea that mutually assured destruction just simply didn't really scare, you know, the Islamic culture, right?
And what you're saying here is that that's the same really claim that you can make about Israel in their view of the end times.
I mean, if you have that Samson option, I mean...
It's absolutely terrifying, is what it is.
Now, you were talking about the situation in Israel and the atrocities there.
This is your piece over at LifeSite News.
And it says, Israel is censoring and killing journalists bravely covering their atrocities in Gaza.
Let's see here.
We drop down where everybody can see it.
Israel's media shut down Israel.
It's gathered pace in recent days.
Of course, they passed this law.
They banned Al Jazeera.
We covered a little bit of that here.
With the forcible closure of one news outlet, the confiscation of the equipment of another.
And this is getting worse.
And I kind of feel like this also kind of coincided with a lot of what we were seeing in the United States.
some of these protests on college campuses, at least when they initially started, before they started being funded by the Pritzkers and George Soros, people were getting the images of these atrocities on TikTok, which is something that the United States now wants to ban.
And so now, it was shortly after that, that Israel starts really shutting down the media outlets in there that were covering a lot of the atrocities that we've seen.
I mean, women and children.
The stuff I have seen, Frank, and I know you've seen it too, it's absolutely gut-wrenching.
It's disgusting to see body parts of children everywhere.
But that's what's actually going on here.
And this idea that every woman and every child is a human shield.
Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton recently said that every death in Gaza is because of Hamas.
And that's just simply not true.
That's insane.
That's absolutely sane.
It's heartless, and it's certainly unchristian.
What are your thoughts?
Well, this is one of the most difficult things I had to write recently, having seen practically relentless atrocities since I began covering it.
One of the most difficult things I did was I interviewed...
from the Patriarchate of Jerusalem Monsignor Shamali who described how two of the parishioners in the Catholic Church compound in Gaza had been killed by an Israeli sniper intentionally whilst in the church compound.
One was going to the toilet when she was shot dead.
The second was the woman's daughter who went to give her assistance and when she went to help her dying mother she too was shot dead by an Israeli sniper.
No apologies been forthcoming.
It was one of at the time 11 instances of unarmed women in safe zones being shot dead by Israeli snipers, presumably for sport.
Now that was extremely disturbing.
This story that you're showing here, further down it details how there's a journalist who I think was the bureau chief for Al Jazeera in Gaza and He was on the air when he was informed that his wife, his son, his daughter and his grandchild had all been killed in a strike that Israeli sources later confirmed was intentional.
So they intentionally killed his family.
Two weeks later they killed his eldest son as well who was also a journalist.
There are heartbreaking videos.
I know we hear that phrase a lot but to watch this man carrying the corpse of his infant granddaughter Out of the hospital is simply unspeakably bad.
However, there he is.
That's him coming out of the hospital having seen his dead wife.
It's horrendous.
The situation was...
He went back to work the next day.
He said that he owed it as a duty to his family to tell the world what was happening and of course he worked for Al Jazeera and this is a story that It really takes the mask off the narrative that we're pushed to sell this war to us when you see things like this.
Now, this was not the worst thing I've seen.
I've probably seen more of the worst things than anyone who isn't actually covering the war every day.
The worst thing I saw was yesterday, and it's the only thing that's made me break down in tears and be incapable of carrying on.
I came across a video which was from a couple of months ago about a Palestinian doctor who due to the embargo on anaesthetics Israel refuses to allow anaesthetics into Gaza and has done periodically since its blockade began in 2007 saying that they may have a dual use for Hamas.
It also disallows water purification and has cut off the water into Gaza so all the water that they drink must be delivered by trucks which Israel routinely holds up and manually inspects despite x-ray machines having been donated by European nations to perform these inspections safely in minutes Israel then delays these deliveries for weeks resulting in well people suffering extreme thirst and of course starvation from the hold up of their miniscule food supplies but anaesthetic medicine
has been Restricted from entry into Gaza, there are no anaesthetics.
This doctor had to perform an amputation on his daughter's leg with little more than a pair of scissors in his own kitchen and filmed himself while so doing.
He said the hospital was five minutes away but it had been destroyed.
Israel has bombed 32 of 36 hospitals from memory yesterday.
And so it left this man with no alternative.
His daughter was injured in a missile strike which injured other members of his family and he had to amputate her lower leg somewhat above the ankle in his own kitchen on the table without any medicine at all.
And he does this on camera.
I would strongly suggest you do not watch this.
Because of all the things I've seen, all the dismembered corpses and burning human beings, this thing's going to haunt me for the rest of my life, and I wish I'd never seen it.
Yeah, I saw the beginning of the video, and I clicked away for that very reason.
The stuff that's going on there, and there's a lot of Americans, and there's a lot of Americans that just don't know, right?
We are certainly a propagandized country.
We have a mainstream media that essentially is telling us that...
I mean, if you had a poll tested a war, I've said this many times...
What happened with Russia and Ukraine, people had to figure that out all over again.
Oh, the media lied to us 24-7 on COVID? Got it.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, they're liars.
But they're telling us the truth about Russia and Ukraine.
And then they figured out, eh, no.
And at least in conservative circles or whatever, on right circles, we push back on that.
I think a lot of hearts and minds were changed.
Yeah, they're lying to us about that as well.
But if you had a poll tested one war...
That would all of a sudden kind of captivate America back.
It would be a war in the Middle East where Israel is directly threatened because there are so many people that believe that Israel is our greatest ally and everything else.
And there's a lot that goes into that, right?
There's a lot of people that believe that there's, you know, in the evangelical Christian space, there's eschatology implications here that are really only 150 years old versus the 1,800 years of church teaching of what they used to teach about Israel being the church.
But all of that aside, there's still a ton of Americans who don't realize that there are Christian churches in Gaza, or there were Christian churches in Gaza, right?
And so we have to consistently just get the word out to get people to relearn the message, oh, once again, hey, the media is lying to you intentionally 24-7.
They are not telling you the truth about what's really going on in the Middle East.
I want peace.
I want peace, and that's what I pray for.
I want the bloodshed to stop.
And yet there are people who say, quite frankly, some of them say, well, that's just what people over in that part of the world do.
Do you think that the Muslims, the Muslim nations, are going to essentially attack Israel and unite and essentially spark, what could spark World War III? No.
I think it's obvious at this stage that the people who have been told, consistently told, throughout my entire life who are the unhinged lunatics, say Iran or, you know, the mad mullers and so on, these people have shown enormous restraint.
And they continue to do so as an ongoing massacre takes place before the eyes of the world.
Now Iran certainly has the capability to destroy Israel and so in fact independently of Iran does Hezbollah which has an estimated arsenal of over 130,000 modern rockets.
I think around a third of those being hypersonic missiles which cannot be counted by Israel's Iron Dome.
Interestingly enough, in the recent exchanges, it was shown that some of these missiles could change their trajectory mid-air, which renders these countermeasures completely ineffective.
That was a demonstration by Iran and Hezbollah that they can hit Israel when and where they want to.
And they can.
Now, the fact that that was limited and that there were no civilian deaths, that's not accidental.
There was a meeting in Qatar which was attended by the CIA chief William Burns, who's probably the only serious person remaining in the United States government who isn't illuminated.
He went there to broker a deal through the Qataris with the Iranians to make sure that there was what was called by the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal a calibrated response.
Once that calibrated response had happened following Israel's illegal attack on a consular service, which was recognized as a violation of international law, and everybody recognized as well that the Iranians had a right to reply.
And they did so in a calibrated manner agreed through back channels with the United States.
The question then was would Israel comply with another calibration?
It refused to communicate with the United States government for a 12-hour period which caused intense concern.
But then it emerged that it would and it wouldn't launch what would effectively be a third world war by launching a counter-strike Causing massive civilian casualties.
I think the fact that we've seen restraint not just from Iran, but also from Russia, let's not forget which still possesses the world's largest nuclear arsenal and can outproduce NATO's shell production on its own by a factor of 10 to 1.
We don't have the supply chains to fight these kind of wars.
And I don't think we have the metal to do so either, and nor the personnel.
It is not the 1990s.
The armed forces in NATO have changed, and we are basically guided by delusional fanatics into unwinnable wars, which reminds me of Julian Assange's 2001 remark.
The goal is not a successful war.
He said, it's a permanent war.
What is that?
It's really frustrating.
I mean, I don't understand this.
Well, okay, we're going to respond.
We're going to let you know we're going to respond through back channels.
Don't get me wrong.
I don't want World War III. But why all of this theater?
I mean, it just seems fake.
You know, you have that one meme that's...
You know, shows the Iranian drones going and the Iron Dome, you know, taking care of some of them.
And it's like, you know, U.S. tax dollars, you know, funding the Israel.
And then the other side is like somehow also our tax dollars because, of course, the U.S. gave pallets of cash to Iran.
What are your thoughts about how – I mean, doesn't that just seem fake?
Well, it's not theater, because as I said, the point of the Iranian attack was to show the Israelis that they can strike military targets with absolute precision and can't be stopped when they do so.
If you look at what they did, they obviously drenched the air with low quality but high density drones.
But the important stuff did get through, and it would again.
And it showed the Israelis that we can hit you where we want, when we want to.
Make no mistake about that.
That was the point.
The real importance of whether the doctrine of calibration would be respected was on the Israeli side.
And as I said, they broke off comms for 12 hours.
They routinely do this.
They've done this throughout history.
They didn't inform the United States government of their sudden attack in 1981 on the Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak, which outraged President Reagan and to which he remarked, I fear that Armageddon is upon us.
They never do so.
They never tell their so-called greatest ally, and they certainly never apologized sincerely for the attack on the USS Liberty, which remains a scandal to this day, and Congress refuses to investigate, despite all the surviving crew members attesting to the fact that the Israelis knew, producing evidence to the fact, They machine gun the survivors in the water as well, their intention to kill everyone.
Israel has routinely acted in a way that would be extremely perverse for even one of your closest enemies to do so, with a dedication and unilateralism that generally affirms Moshe Dayan's idea of it becoming a mad dog.
Now, that might sound a bit strong.
And it might sound a bit strong because the United States media, much as ours in Britain, is basically the product of what you might call a liberal democratic branding exercise.
In the 1920s, liberal democracy was invented.
It was invented by people like Walter Lippmann, who was a specialist in advertising.
He wrote a book called Public Relations.
Together with people like John Dewey, and inspired by the ideas of people like Edward Bernays, who was Freud's nephew, himself an advertising guru, wrote a book called Plotkender.
He invented a system called liberal democracy which he said was the government by elites, and it was its responsibility not to follow public opinion but to manufacture consent, he said.
He invented that phrase.
By creating public opinion for the public consumption.
He said this was an answer to the question.
He said the question was is that power could either follow public opinion or public opinion could follow power.
And we ended up with the latter system.
It was branded as liberal democracy, but for a hundred years we have been ruled in the West by an intentional system of propaganda.
Now that propaganda seemed convincing when we were counterposed to an evil empire in the Soviet Union.
But with the loss of that balance, all the dirty tricks of regime change, subterfuge and the immense war machine that had grown up underneath the Cold War began to turn inwards onto the democracies themselves and began to be used in a new enterprise called the War on Terror, which is what took place of the vaunted peace dividend that we were all advertised as the end of the Soviet Union.
You'll notice that no one talks about a peace dividend anymore.
And that's because the war machine discovered a new purpose.
And that purpose had a lot to do with Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli policy of preemptive strikes.
Unbelievable.
Really great stuff.
We're talking with Frank Wright.
He's going to join us on the other side of this break.
Folks, if you're good, are you good to do that, sir?
Happy days.
All right.
Okay, so we're going to be right back with Frank Wright.
Don't go anywhere.
This is the Millstone Report.
Back in just a moment.
War.
Inflation.
Rate hikes.
Banks crashing.
To call it shocking isn't even scratching the surface.
Many of us expect a financial crisis to happen, but how suddenly it could happen is frightening.
Is this how the next financial crisis begins?
We all don't know.
Which might explain why gold and silver are surging to record levels.
And if the value of the dollar continues to decline?
The demand for gold and silver could continue to rise.
So don't let your hard-earned wealth fall victim to the bad decisions of bankers, regulators, and politicians.
I've decided to exercise control over my money by buying precious metals.
Call the precious metals experts at GoldCo today at 844-905-GOLD or visit Paul4Gold.com to learn more about how gold and silver could help safeguard your hard-earned savings.
Today, Gold Co.
is offering you up to 10% instant match and bonus silver with a qualified account.
Call 844-905-GOLD or visit paul4gold.com.
Alright folks, welcome back.
It's the Millstone Report here.
Thank you so much for being with us as always.
And before we go any further this evening, I want to tell you about Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company.
The Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company is a veteran-owned and operated coffee company that imports coffee beans from around the world and roasts them back home here in the United States.
They also donate a portion of the profits of every bag sold to Homes for Our Troops, which is a 501c3 nonprofit organization that builds and donates specially adapted custom homes nationwide for severely injured post-9-11 veterans to enable them to rebuild their lives.
At the Bearded Sergeant Coffee Company, they're committed to providing high-quality coffee beans while making a difference in the lives of other people.
Costa Rican coffee beans have a bright, pleasant acidity and flavor notes of citrus and tropical fruits.
With a higher caffeine content, this makes a perfect cup of coffee for breakfast or a good pick-me-up.
Go to beardedsergeant.com slash millstone right now and say 15% when you use the promo code Paul.
That's beardedsergeant.com slash millstone, beardedsergeant.com slash millstone, and say 15% when you use my name Paul.
Also, we have Left Wing Will and the Red Pill.
Full disclosure, once every time I see the character, I laugh.
This is the game that I created.
Actually, I wrote this game.
Left Wing Will and the Red Pill.
This is Will.
He's a typical leftist who argues without having any facts.
He believes in climate change.
He even believes in using rags for toilet paper, you know, to save the planet.
You get to tell Left Wing Will's story.
It's a card game.
Over 400 cards in the deck.
You make different combinations.
And towards the end of the game, whenever you're ready to end it, you can, you know, decide, hey, does Left Wing Will get red-pilled?
Does he finally come out of his ridiculous pro-LGBTQ sodomite ways?
I don't know.
We don't really know if he's gay or not.
Sometimes some cards indicate that he may be.
If you play the game, don't play it in front of your leftist friends.
But if you do, make sure you record it and tag us with vigor.
Again, leftwingwill.com.
Use promo code Paul and save 15% as Well, we're joined once again by Frank Wright is with us.
Frank, thank you so much for being with us.
You are a prolific writer, sir.
We were just going over a piece of yours on LifeSite News.
You also have a fantastic sub-stack.
I want to get to that here in a moment.
But before we do anything else, I want to show people your Twitter profile.
I'm going to throw it up on the screen right here.
So I noticed that your cover photo is the Tower of Babel.
I talk on this program a lot about how really what seems to be the plan, if you will, to enslave humanity seems to revolve around a Tower of Babel 2.0.
What do you think about it?
Why do you have the Tower of Babel, assuming that's what that is, in your profile pic?
Well, yeah, that is what it is.
And you're the first person to ask me about it.
Of course, you know, I mean, a lot of what I wrote about, or rather, what I like to say, a lot of what the voices tell me to write down is about propaganda.
And it's surprising to people that our system, the Western system, isn't in fact free, but is a tightly contained system that's based upon the refinement of propaganda.
And he's done very well about that.
He's been doing that for nearly a century.
Sorry, just over a century actually.
So yes, you know, the Tower of Babel is a very good metaphor for where we live now.
And you know, you can see what happens when we attempt to build this town.
I mean, not that we participate in it personally.
We kind of inhabit the consequences of it.
But it is a reckless endeavour and it is an endeavour that does include an attempt to ascend to heaven and indeed to replace God.
I do describe liberalism in one of my sub-stack series on propaganda as the third religion of man.
Being, you know, an attempt to completely replace Christianity without Christ.
A value system that attempted to do so intentionally.
Drawing on the work of people like Matthew Arnold, He said in the 19th century in a book called Culture and Anarchy that we should replace religion, its central mysteries, with things like poetry and art.
He said that it had a function, but of course, you know, God was nonsense and liberal humanists like him could never believe in these kind of superstitions.
And I think something of Matthew Arnold's vision has come to pass.
Because you can see, you know, obviously for the smoke classes, you do have art or rather the degenerate mess that they call it, which is a money laundering exercise for people with no talent.
But also because these people do hate beauty, you have things like sports for the masses and celebrity worship and even consumerism and the commodity fetishism.
It's a fetishistic commodity system.
Which is basically a superstitious culture.
You know, if I buy these shoes, I will gain the power of the athlete that advertises them.
For example, it's quite similar to wearing a lion's skin and thinking you're going to be brave.
This is, in fact, how advertising works.
And the products that they sell you through the advertising system, these products aren't just things for you to buy and wear.
They're also products for you to believe in.
The production of belief is basically manufactured in the same way as they sell you a pair of shoes or something to eat.
And it was designed by people who did that.
The early pioneers of what was then called propaganda and was later called public relations in a public relations exercise, oddly enough, because propaganda sounded a bit too on the nose.
There are people like Walter Lippmann, who went on to be a founding member of the Council of Foreign Relations.
I mean, if you're an extremely sad person with a barren social life like myself, you often read the Council of Foreign Relations because it really is the governing body of liberal democracy.
If you want to know what tomorrow's hells are going to be today, what nightmares our masters have planned for us, read the House magazine Foreign Affairs or go look at the Council on Foreign Relations website.
It was set up, I think, in 1921 by Walter Littman and others precisely to direct the ideas that the elites would push at their democratic populations.
And that's what's happened.
One of the major myths of the 20th century is beginning to unravel around us now.
The most heavily propagandized people in the world are the people of the United States and Great Britain and all the other countries of the West that consider themselves free and immune to propaganda.
This is bizarre and actually an inversion of reality.
How did this come to pass?
It's because nobody realizes, because they've been propagandized since they were born, that liberal democracy's power expressly replaces that of the baton with propaganda.
This was its purpose, to use the formation of public opinion, known by Walter Lippmann as the manufacturer of consent, to replace the authoritarian use of explicit force.
This was the illusion of freedom that it gave you.
And then it trapped you in a consumer system of manufactured desires, so you would never really think outside the box that they were selling you, and you wouldn't look too hard into the product it contained, which, I might add, is continuously shrinking in size and quality, whilst the branding gets ever better.
That's exactly the same as your political policies.
They are all getting worse, but the adverts are brilliant.
And they continue to improve.
Now, wars are sold in this way, as is the central myth of the 20th century, that the West is free and superior to everyone else by virtue of the system, its rules-based order, whose rules are never explained to those who are ruled by them, but the rulers know them very well.
And that is to direct public opinion by the deliberate manufacture of consent, or what you might call narrative control, or is more properly known as censorship and propaganda.
That's incredible.
I mean, that is an incredible summary of where we are today.
We are essentially cogs in a machine.
We look down our nose at a country like North Korea and their citizens, and we think, oh, well, that's what a totalitarian regime looks like.
You know, when Kim Jong-un dies, or Kim Jong-il, I get the two confused.
When the last one passed, you had this manufactured crying.
You had all the, or at least that's what it was sold as.
You had all these people in the streets wailing, and it did look fake.
It did look forced.
Hey, we need to act like.
But are we any more free than them when we have all of these constructs around us, when we have every major institution, the government, professional sports, you name it, You know, banks, major corporations that sell us food that's poison, they all tell us the same thing.
They all adopt the same narratives, whether it be diversity, equity, inclusion.
America is bracing right now for the Pride Month, which is a month where, you know, gays across this country are going to celebrate sodomy and, you know, sodomite mirage and pride and everything else.
And yet, you know, everyone, it seems like every major institution across this country is going to promote it.
It's now in all of our movies.
It's in TV. It's in our music.
And so in a big way, the Tower of Babel is apropos, right?
Because the Lord says, hey, go spread out across the face of the earth, right, and subdue it.
And yet Babel was about, no, we're going to consolidate power, we're going to create a super city-state, and we're going to build a tower to heaven.
And that's what we're trying to do.
And so my prayer, and I tell this to the audience many times, is that our prayer should be that this Tower of Babel 2.0 that they're creating is destroyed, and that the Lord would have mercy and do it, or use men to do it.
And it's really scary when you think about it, that this is where we are today.
I also wanted to ask you this, Frank Wright, over on your sub stack, let me see if we can throw this up here, right here.
So this one here, counter-populism, you broke this, I guess today, May 30th.
The ruling elite and Project Cope.
Now again, I don't want to diminish the...
I agree with this.
Populism is the rejection of liberalism.
But not to get hung up on images.
This image right here of the Star of David with Rainbow...
This is something that I find fascinating because, again, back to what many Americans don't know, they may try to tie the secular nation state of Israel with the Bible or religion or something like that or Christianity, but in reality, this is a state that embraces all of the stuff that Christian fathers are trying to protect their families from coming up this June, right?
The rainbow, the LGBTQRSTLNE, would you like to buy a vowel?
Community.
And it also goes with what's going on in Ukraine.
I've covered this many times, but when Russia invaded Ukraine a couple of years ago, the lament that was out of the head of MI6, okay, MI6 says, oh no, the LGBTQ gains are going to be erased because Putin has invaded Russia.
And so then it dawns on me that the West and NATO, our chief foreign policy export, right?
When we say we need to export democracy, what that really means now, or at least a key component of it, It's the rainbow, right?
We are now, you know, you look at NATO and it was created to, at least this is my interpretation, NATO was created to protect the Christian West or Christian Europe from the godless communist Soviets.
Yesterday on the program we talked about how Ronald Reagan called them godless, prayed for them that they would one day know God, right?
And it seems like the roles are reversed.
When Putin bans LGBTQ propaganda in 2013 and then the Maidan Revolution, the U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine happens the very next year, to me it just seems like we've got a country in Africa that wants to give pedophiles the death penalty and then they pass anti-sodomy laws.
And you'd think Joe Biden is going to go to war with them.
Like, that's the next country on our list.
After we're done with Gaza, after we're done with Russia, we're going to go after these countries that are standing up and saying, no, we don't want homosexuality to be promoted as a viable lifestyle.
What do you say to all of that?
Well, first thing I would say is that Israel is the gayest country in the world.
And if you look at the Times of Israel reports of 2015 where it makes this claim, it actually is true.
And not only that, they're proud of it.
So, of course they are.
Because who is more proud than a fundamentalist?
Celebration of the Fundament as the centre of life breeds fundamental illness.
But yes, Israel is the gayest country on earth and it proudly announces itself in its own press as such every anal month that comes round.
And we are about to be assaulted by that, aren't we?
Secondly, as for NATO, I interviewed a fellow who is largely credited with influencing the Trump camp's foreign policy posture on NATO. A dormant NATO was the title of Dr.
Samantha Mitra's paper.
He recommended that the US count its costs in Europe and strategically withdraw from its overwhelming financial burden of committing to European security guarantees, leading to what he called, Dr.
Mitra called, a dormant NATO. Now in that exchange where I interviewed him last November about this posture which caused a lot of controversy saying Trump was going to abandon NATO and so on.
Nonsense of course.
The United States is going to keep a nuclear deterrent in Europe and everything else.
Just not troop capacity and not an enormous taxpayer burden that will threaten to start a war with Russia for no reason that we can't possibly win.
But he said that NATO was an ideological bureaucracy.
And that was a remarkable statement.
Dr.
Mitra is an extremely well-respected realist.
He's a very distinguished academic and obviously advises the incoming Trump administration, so he's not without influence either.
However, I had to test his claim.
So I did.
I went to the NATO website and sure enough, if you go there yourself right now, you will see that it is committed to practically every rainbow and globalist policy you can imagine.
The dictates of NATO are non-military in that respect, and as I said before, this explains much of the adventurism of the so-called free world.
It doesn't really make military sense, but it makes ideological sense.
That's one of the memes that I preferred myself.
You can find this if you want to get on a list like me.
And if you're watching this, you probably already are, so good luck with that.
But there's a great meme that says if you don't want to send your sons to die for gay sex in Ukraine, then you can't call yourself a patriot.
If you don't want to send your sons to die for gay sex in Ukraine, then you can't call yourself a patriot.
Wow.
No, you're exactly right.
And so, yeah, that is very well said.
I'm glad that you echo my sentiments, because it really is fascinating when we think...
And this is the problem with America.
I'll just stick with America, because that's what I know.
I've said I just don't know UK politics that well.
But we have a situation where, and this I'm sure still applies in the UK, both sides think they have the moral high ground, right?
And so I don't really know how you resolve this.
I don't know how this gets over with, and we have peace, when you have Both sides that believe strongly that transing kids, sexualizing kids is the moral and right thing to do.
And then you have other Americans, a lot of them, that think absolutely not.
We think that's evil.
We think that's wrong.
We think it's wicked.
We want a government that punishes evil and rewards good.
But what the other side, they're completely inverting what good and evil are.
They're calling good, evil, and evil good.
So where do we go from here?
I mean, where do you think?
How does this resolve itself?
Are there rumblings in the UK of people standing up and rejecting this?
Because fundamentally, what I see is almost every institution is really not serving the people.
We're in the midst of a cascading failure of confidence in every single institution that's supposed to be for the good of the people, but by their actions, they actually hate us.
Yes.
Yes, that's the point.
All of these institutions are captured by an ideology whose policies result to basically national suicide.
The destruction of the value of life itself, the meaning of the truth, facticity, so the idea that things can be facts, and everything else of value in life alongside that, including your culture, your heritage, you, your family, your God, your history.
Everything's made worthless by that.
It is a machinery that ultimately devours everything of value in human life to feed itself.
Now I think it's corrupted practically every institution because I'm a religious extremist.
I believe that it's corrupted every institution except the traditional Catholic Church.
So yes, I think that that's a rather depressing picture to paint but let's face reality.
Now as to what's going to happen, well I've never believed in mass awakening and there's never been a revolution where people have awoken en masse and all that.
That too is a lie to prevent anything ever happening.
What really matters is, can you bring in a counter-elite?
Can a new elite come in?
Whatever the elite does, given the fact that I've just demonstrated to you that for a century the peoples of the West have blindly followed a propaganda system without even knowing it's there, what it demonstrates is that people will do what they're told.
So it depends who's doing the telling.
Is there any possibility of replacing the current elite?
Yes.
The reason that you see extremely accelerated and rebarbative attempts to intensify government-directed censorship and to attach penalties to noticing the obvious out loud Because all the conspiracy theories have proven to be true, of course.
You have to make them illegal and make it illegal to say it.
Why are they doing this?
It's because they're desperate, because they know that they're finished, because the crisis that we face, the diplomatic crisis, the political crisis, the financial crisis and the moral crisis, these have all been created by the politics of fantasy.
The utopianists who are in charge have destroyed the real world by trying to inflict their insane ideas upon it instead.
And we are all paying the price.
None of them ever suffer any consequences for the immense damage that they've done to us, to our democracy, to our standard of living, to our beliefs, to God, and to all those countries that they've destroyed abroad.
Resulting in the outflow of millions of migrants who would otherwise have stayed home.
If we had had a peace dividend, as we were promised in 1990, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, none of this had to happen.
But instead, we got a death machine, a liberal Zionist gay death machine that also loves windmills, But hates anything that you like.
Whether you are a lefty or a righty, whether you believe in God or not, whatever you prize in life is going to be devoured by this machine.
That is an argument made by reality, not by online religious extremists such as myself.
You can see it.
If you prize anything, the machine is going to devour it because it is jealous of other sources of explanation.
Anything with any explanatory power to challenge the fantasy fairy tales of the regime of death We'll be destroyed.
This is what you're seeing now.
In Britain, for example, politicians of the left and the right who had any remaining convictions are being purged from both parties of government, forming them into a managerialist uni-party that has absolutely no principle other than the preservation of its own power.
These are acts of desperation in the end game of a system that has lasted slightly over 100 years, but I think we will live to see its end.
Wow.
And I agree, you know, you say replacing the elite with a different kind of elite.
I mean, that obviously assumes the fact of life, that there's always going to be elites in some capacity, you know, shape or form.
Douglas McGregor, Colonel Douglas McGregor recently, well, I don't know, it's not recent this time, it was a month or so ago, he tweeted that America is facing...
A revolution.
The question is, will it be a Cromwellian revolution or a French-style revolution?
Now, as somebody who is not a Catholic, I'm a Presbyterian, so I'm a Protestant, I find Cromwell fascinating.
And if you give me two options, I'm going with Cromwell over the French Revolution.
What do you think?
Yeah, I get it.
I understand why you'd say that.
Look, I did write a piece on how to overthrow the state in another desperate attempt to be arrested whilst I'm on air speaking to you.
In it, I explained that there's a difference between the kind of Bolshevist or Jacobin French revolutionary violence, which in every case, actually, This resulted in the mass murder of ordinary people.
Most people don't know that about the French Revolution, but it killed, I think, 200,000 ordinary citizens and only got rid of around 1,700 aristocrats.
The Bolsheviks, of course, killed nearly 100 million people across the 20th century.
Now, the difference between that and a coup d'etat, which was how the October Revolution was secured in Russia by Leon Trotsky, or Lev Davidovich Bronstein, as we should really call him, and 1,000 men.
In three days, he overtook the Russian state and captured it.
A coup d'etat effectively can be a bloodless coup.
This is where you, with determined specialists, some men of steel and plenty of planning, simply seize the government.
Now, before we get ahead of ourselves and start talking about the practicalities of overthrowing the state, I would like to point out that I believe in elite theory.
And that is, in order to change things, you don't need a mass movement.
You need a credible elite.
Is there an elite?
Yes, there is.
Does it know it is one yet?
No, it doesn't.
The creation of the counter-elite is an accident of power.
What's happened over the last 30 years since the fall of the Soviet Union is that people of principle, conviction and talent have been systematically excluded by liberal democracy because they are simply disloyal to its utopian nonsense.
This means that genuinely competent people of all political stripes have been pushed out of the system.
This accidentally creates a counter-elite and its actions you are now seeing in left and right populism across the European continent and in the United States itself.
All populism is, is a general rejection of the policies of national suicide.
As John Gray, the British philosopher of liberalism, has pointed out, it's just a reaction to liberalism.
That's all it is.
It's just people saying, no, we don't like it.
And why would they say that?
He also pointed out that no one ever tells you this, but the government has a duty to the people.
And if it doesn't discharge these duties, it isn't legitimate.
What does that mean?
It means if the government does not do three basic things, then it has no right to rule you.
Regardless of whether it wins elections or how popular it says it is in the polls, if the government cannot secure the country such as its borders, if it cannot stop crime, If it cannot guarantee some prosperity for its people, and if it has lost the public trust more than it retains it, then it has no legitimacy.
Now these conditions, security, prosperity and trust, these are not satisfied by any of the leading liberal parties of the world, and they are all liberal parties.
The idea of liberal being a distinction between conservative and progressive is nonsense.
What you can vote between in the West is liberals of the left, liberals of the right, and liberals of the extreme radical faction.
This is what liberal democracy is.
Very well said.
Really, really interesting, thought-provoking, Frank Wright.
I appreciate it.
We've got your Substack up there.
People can go find out more and subscribe, frankwright.substack.com.
I'm going to give you the last word, sir, and then we're out of time.
Oh yeah, do not despair.
You know, hold fast to the Lord and seek the grace of God.
I think that the explanatory power of the Catholic Church is unrivaled.
And I would say that because I'm a fundamentalist extremist.
But there really is no need to despair.
What you must do is you must remember that you are not obliged to go insane with the rest of the world.
You can stand apart from it.
You don't have to be of it, although you are in it.
And if you've managed to stay sane this far after one of the greatest propaganda campaigns ever seen under lockdown to drive you mad and to drive you into an unvaccinated If you've survived this with your sanity intact, then reach out to others.
It is your duty as a social missionary to help the walking wounded of the information war That has now replaced the pretense of liberal democracy.
Try to think of yourself as a social missionary.
Try to see those people that you have learned to despise as casualties of a wicked system and try to build those bridges because the one thing that will help you, should things get worse and they may well do, is not bullets and it's not beans.
It's human bonds, human social relations.
And for that, you need compassion, decency, and wisdom.
You should go out and make friends while you still can.
Wow.
Yeah, love.
I like it.
That's the answer.
Frank Wright, I appreciate you so much, sir.
Thank you.
It's been a pleasure meeting you, and I'd love to do it again sometime.
Oh, me too.
God bless you.
▲
Export Selection