All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 6, 2024 - Stew Peters Show
46:26
JESUS. GUNS. AND BABIES. w/ Dr. Kandiss Taylor ft Marley Hornick
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
HeavensHarvest.com, promo code KANDICE, and I want you to get prepped.
We don't know what's coming.
Who knows?
But regardless whether it's a hurricane, national disaster, or the whole government shuts down, they have awesome deals on freeze-dried food.
In fact, they have a new item.
It's freeze-dried cans.
It's a lot less expensive than the big barrels.
Go there.
heavensharvest.com, promo code Candice, and check them out. - Hey everybody, welcome to Jesus, Guns, and Babies, I'm your host, Dr.
Candice Taylor, and we have an awesome show to start the new year of 2024 out.
It's about elections.
Imagine that.
This is the year for elections, so this is going to be the perfect way to start 2024.
I'm going to read Scripture, Proverbs 6, 16 through 19.
There are six things the Lord hates.
Yeah, the Lord hates things.
Can you believe that?
Seven that are an abomination to him, haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among his brothers.
So my number one pet peeve in life is lying.
I hate lying.
So you can imagine how much I hate election fraud.
I hate that our freedom is going to be stolen and is being stolen by lies and fraud.
And so I'm so excited to have our guest today.
Her name is Marlee Hornick and she knows a lot about election fraud and a lot about elections.
And so welcome Marlee to Jesus Guns and Babies.
Thank you so much, Candice.
It's a pleasure to be here with you.
It's a pleasure to have you.
And so I want to start by letting my people, my audience, know kind of who you are.
And they do better when they know who you are and then they listen to what you say and they respect it.
So if you can start out by kind of telling us some background about you, like how you got involved and kind of who you are as a person, if you don't mind.
Sure.
I'm a homeschool mother and a homesteader in the Hudson Valley of New York State.
And I suppose after the 2020 general election, I became...
I guess I just wanted to get involved more than I had been, and I became the organizer of a New York State effort to audit the voter roll database.
Basically, you know, in New York we were home, told that we were no longer essential To our economy, to our nation.
And if we wanted to become essential again, we would have to participate in a brand medical experiment, of which many of us were highly suspect.
And so instead, we were home and we got a copy of the New York State voter rolls.
And we just started poking around at it, assuming that because New York is such a deep blue state, it probably wouldn't produce much of interest.
But since we were in this circumstance, we might as well take a look.
One of our closest or most immediate findings, I would say, was that we almost immediately discovered that the 2020 general election was certified with 272,000 more votes counted than voters who voted.
The way that we found this out was because in October of 2021 we discovered that the records were still being altered.
And so one of our researchers downloaded a file on one day and the other researcher downloaded the file a couple of days later and they started arguing about who had the correct number and it turned out they both had the correct number because the 2020 certified data from nearly a year earlier was still being adjusted.
So anyway, that started us down a path that was long and tangled with New York Citizens Audit, an organization that I founded for the purpose of auditing the voter rolls, auditing the voter data, and bringing that information to officials statewide and requesting audits, professional audits, of the New York State Board of Election data.
Anyway, that ended up leveraging into launching a national effort, of which I am now the CEO, United Sovereign Americans, based on the approach taken by New York Citizens Audit strategically and how to present all of the facts we had uncovered.
You see, as you well know, Candace, there are so many people who are doing this extraordinary research nationwide and have uncovered Fact, after fact, after fact about circumstances where our elections failed to meet provable standards of the law.
The question that we have all had is, first of all, how come these are not being heard seriously?
And second of all, what did it really add up to?
And that's exactly what New York Citizens Audit first did with the New York data and now United Sovereign Americans is organizing in at least 20 states now.
I don't even know how many states are now in our data team.
I think it's 25.
But where we're literally measuring the validity of our 2022 federal election across America based on official data received from the boards of elections that is required to be accurate under federal law.
So it's kind of like this circumstance where there's nothing they can really do about our findings because it's their own data and their own laws.
You know, it's interesting when you were talking, I was thinking the cover-up is always worse than the crime.
And so, you know, they stole elections and then they were trying to still fix it to make it be what it had to be when they released it because of all the ORRs and all the research.
And it's like...
I'm still trying to cover it up, and it's just more and more obvious and apparent in every single state when they're doing this that we know, we see.
And so when is a judge, when is it going to get to the Supreme Court and them say, you know what, voting is the highest right of the land, and if you mess with it, it's treason.
And the punishable offense for treason in the Constitution is death by hanging.
And so stop.
Just stop.
Stop cheating.
And that's what the people are so frustrated about, grassroots.
I ran for governor and I had 60,000 volunteers and we, grassroots all over the state of Georgia, really all over the country, I had grassroots support.
They would do phone calls for me and write letters and do things they could do from their state and help me in Georgia.
These people are so frustrated because nothing, they don't see anything changing to protect our freedom.
And so I'm so thankful for people like you that found organizations and their organizations So tell us what you are doing and where you see us going in 2024 and getting because voter rolls are kind of your specialty, right?
Yes, that's a big part of what United Sovereign Americans focuses on, is the voter roll data.
A little bit different than some other approaches where it's like the, I would say the underlying idea is to clean the voter rolls.
But we don't consider the voter rolls to be cleanable.
If something can be cleaned, like a dirty dish, right?
You've eaten off a plate, and so you take it to the sink, and you run it under hot water, and you scrub it with soap, and you rinse it, and you put it to dry, and now it's clean.
But the voter roll databases are...
So chock full of invalid and inexplicable anomalies that they can't be considered cleanable.
And that is a big part of our approach because the main principles of election validity are very simple.
Were the votes, were the voter rolls accurate?
This is a requirement of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
One of the four purposes of that act is the maintenance of accurate and current voter roll lists.
Number two, were the votes counted from eligible voters?
Which is just basically that straight out of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
And it's very clear in the 14th Amendment, if states deny or in any way abridge the vote of their eligible citizens, they lose representation proportionally.
So the issue of whether people are abridging the vote, meaning your own personal vote, the value of your vote is shortened by dilution, right?
By the addition of votes that come from people who are not provably eligible or not provably citizens.
And then the third question we ask is a simple accounting question.
Were the number of votes counted equal to the number of voters who voted?
If you take a simple example, we've got 20 people in a room, right?
And we pass a bag and everyone throws their ballot in.
Roll up the bag, give it a shake, throw it out on the floor and there's 35 ballots, right?
You're not ready to certify.
You now have an investigation because there should only be 20 ballots in that bag.
And you're required to understand how did those other 15 ballots get in there and which ones are the right ones.
And finally, there is a legal standard of accuracy for our federal elections that is being abridged, and that is that there is not allowed to be more than one in 125,000 ballots in error.
To give you an idea of what that looks like, in New York's 2022 general election, there were 5.9 million votes cast.
That means they get 48 ballots in error statewide for the entire election.
And New York citizens audit in their audit of the state voter roll database post-certification of that election discovered 745,000 apparent voting violations where you have registration records that simply do not meet the standard of clear legal eligibility requirements casting votes.
So how did that happen?
If the magic number for certification is 48, how did they exceed that by 745,000 and no one paid attention and no one took a look to see and make sure it was accurate before swearing and attesting in the moment of certification that it was?
Because they don't care.
They got away with it, right?
When they get away with it, they just don't care.
It's like, it doesn't matter to them.
And so in Georgia, we have Jarvis and Eric, and I guess you know about them.
And so it's a mess.
We have a big, big mess here, really big mess.
And it's not going to be something like you're saying, you can't just clean it up.
It's not going to happen that way.
We got to have a whole overhaul in Georgia.
Are you seeing that with other states as well?
Yes, absolutely.
So thus far, United Sovereign Americans has released our election validity scorecards for New York, Illinois, and Ohio.
And in all three of those states, the number of votes affected by our calculations, where we're searching in their own data, For registration records that do not comport with the law.
And we're discovering a minimum of 600,000 votes impacted in this way.
So this is a metric that comes from their own data.
And it's compared to the metric about the accuracy requirement.
And they simply don't belong on the same, they're not even in the same universe.
So the issue that's uncovered is that the The election officials, like you said, have not been applying the legal standard of care To the maintenance of our records.
And in the end, what happens is no one has any real idea who has won any of our federal elections.
And they will never be able to prove it to us.
And we find this in state after state after state.
So the states that have completed this effort that is required for the first step of our litigation, you know, there's no question any longer.
But the states that are coming along, it's obvious they're going to end up in the same circumstance.
Yes.
What do you think about the elected people that are in office, or maybe they're selected, maybe they were never elected after all, but the people who are serving, supposed to be public servants in these seats, what do you think about them?
And I mean, I'm talking about, you know, yes, our House and Senate members at the state level, and then at the federal level, and then the governors, and the But then what about all these court-appointed judges and these people who are hearing election cases when they allow them to come before them, and then they're, like, dismissing them, and they're not really doing anything to hold people accountable.
I mean, they swore an oath of office.
And so what do you think about those things?
Well, I think that's some of what I was alluding to, which is that the election officials who have overseen these federal elections are not able to prove the outcome that they called.
It doesn't mean that I could say definitively or anyone actually at all could definitively say who did win.
The problem is that no one can say who won.
And so there's an open question that you're bringing up, which is a really important question.
It's a huge quagmire.
However, in all honesty, it has to be faced with courage, which is what if there's a possibility that some of the people who have served in office were imposters?
It doesn't mean that that person is a bad person or that they sought that position fraudulently.
It just means that they were not granted the authority provably Through the will of the people to have their signature on a bill, signing it into law, have meaning, right?
And you see this circumstance playing out across the country where, yes, now you have other officials who are appointed either by the parties or by the representatives themselves, and they now hold authority and sway over the people.
One issue regarding the courts though that I think is important to distinguish is that a lot of the litigation, in fact, almost all of the litigation that has been brought since 2020 in the United States, whether it's in state or federal court, has been challenging the outcome of elections.
And this kind of approach is very, very difficult.
There's an extremely high burden of proof and there is very little precedent in American history and in the jurisprudence history.
There's very little precedent for success in that kind of a challenge.
I don't know why that kind of a challenge has been favored so heavily.
I think perhaps out of shock more than anything.
And a desire to immediately repair something so obviously wrong in certain instances.
But in fact, what the courts will rule on and readily so and have done for hundreds of years very emphatically is The issue of suffrage as a civil right and where election misconduct by officials may have compromised the civil right regarding government by consent.
Our right to select, elect our officials provably and accurately and honestly.
And that goes back to the foundational principle of this country.
And Thomas Paine said it, I think, best of all.
He said, in America, the law is king.
You can't put a human being on the throne because they simply cannot be trusted in all instances.
So we have to have a fair arbiter and that's the law.
How do we control the law?
Well, the sovereign of the nation, the people allow, we honor people with the opportunity to represent us.
Otherwise it would be really too chaotic, right?
So we honor these individuals with our trust and we We explain and we show and share with them our culture, otherwise we wouldn't entrust and enforce laws for everyone.
So if the bridge between the people and the officials who are our representatives is in any way corrupted, then they're no longer tethered to the people and the law is no longer tethered to the people and the system can go rogue.
So it's so important that those elections, especially regarding federal representatives, but also state-level representatives, they have to be provable and accurate.
And the courts continue to uphold that principle from the perspective of misconduct.
And you know, Marlee, and even locally, because we, our government's bottom up.
It's from the people all the way to the top.
And if we don't have local elections ran well, I mean, like, commissioner races and school board races, and if there's any finagling in there, and you just keep the same people that represent themselves, and they make backroom deals with your money, your taxpayer money, For their businesses in town, and they never, you know, really do the will of the people, then the corruption starts there.
And I'm going to tell you, as I travel this whole state, and in Georgia we have 159 counties, there wasn't one county that didn't have issue with their commissioner, or city council, or school board member, or sheriff, or something that was local government.
And I thought, my gosh, you know, I'm seeing it from researching the U.S. government and the state seats.
And I'm not seeing it at the local level to this degree.
And then when I realized how deep the roots were of corruption, I thought they have hijacked these seats the whole way up, bottom up.
And we have a problem.
And we didn't know.
We were raising our families and we were paying taxes and we were working and we were not paying attention to all the nuances and the little teeny tiny things and aspects that go into the whole big picture.
And now we've lost control.
We, the people who are in control, we've lost control.
It appears that way, although I don't think that we're past the point.
And I do think it's interesting, here we are, you're in a red state, I'm in a blue state, you know, possibly the deepest blue state of all and the reddest of all.
And we're discovering the same kinds of issues.
Regardless of that political party affiliation, which is really more about manipulation for power and privilege, using the money that comes from the people.
It's not about a political party.
And they want us to think it is they, meaning the people that are the political elites and the media, and they want to perpetuate this narrative of division so that way we're not coming together and protecting our sovereign rights.
But in reality, I ran for U.S. Senate and I thought it was the Democrats I was fighting, but I learned quickly I'm fighting the Republicans because they're lying and they're trying to keep me out because I'm an outsider.
And I ran for governor and I found out all the things.
It's an establishment uniparty against we the people and they're our seats.
They belong to us and it's our power and And so it's so frustrating.
And I don't want to be in civil war.
I do not want to have any bloodshed on this American soil.
I love America.
I love the people of America.
Even people that believe totally different than I do.
I love them and I want them to have a chance to be saved and go to heaven and be prosperous in life and have the American dream and capitalism and all the things.
But it is so disheartening when we have the people in the powerful seats Totally not care about morality and turn their head or even blatantly take a backroom deal with another country and just give our freedom up for grabs like it's for sale.
And so for us to come to a reckoning point of extreme accountability, how do we get there?
Well, I think the approach that United Sovereign Americans is going to take is likely to bear fruit.
I really feel extremely hopeful, honestly.
Otherwise, I guess I wouldn't invest myself so much in this effort because it is a tremendously absorbing effort.
Sacrifice.
The issues of election misconduct are exactly what we have laid out in our election validity approach.
What the Department of Justice, the United States Department of Justice, considers to be election fraud is corruption regarding the casting and counting of ballots The certification of election results and the registration of voters.
So, in fact, those four points of election validity that I raised are precisely fall inside of the DOJ definition of election fraud if there can provably be breaches to those elections.
Points of administration and what we're demonstrating in state after state is millions of violations of those principles.
In fact, millions of violations.
So even if there were some kind of a blanket excuse that the boards of elections could produce to try to wave away some portion of this, the magnitude is stunning.
And the impact, the measured effect on the vote is stunning.
And the question ultimately ends up being very simple to bring in federal court in state after state after state, which is, is it true or is it not true in the United States of America that our election officials have to obey the law?
It's very simple.
Because when you find, for example, like in Illinois, we found over 4 million registration violations within their state voter roll database, which has 8 million records in it.
So how does that equate with obeying the law?
And if the registration of voters is a fundamental issue of fairness that can turn into Provable election fraud where votes are being cast from false registrations.
And the DOJ recognizes this.
This is not a new concept.
This is hundreds of years old.
And so how is it that these records...
You see, our elections are like a precious jewel.
So if you have a precious jewel and you're in charge of stewarding that jewel, and it's in a museum, say, the jewel is surrounded by security systems, right?
It's absolutely surrounded by laser beams and temperature and humidity sensors and, you know, slamming doors and stalking security guards.
Every kind of conceivable security system is going to be around this jewel so that in the morning when they get there, the jewel is still there.
So our elections are like that.
And what is the surrounding protective layer around our elections is like an interwoven tapestry of state and federal laws so that every single piece of information that wants to get in and be with that jewel or be a part of it has to go through a door and the door is regulated by a law.
So if it's a machine, did the machine meet the testing requirements?
Were the risk assessments done?
You don't have to go into all of this detail about the specific software, this, that, and the other.
I mean, you can, and you'll find more and more, like so many have.
But the fundamental question is, how did this piece of information get into This protected boundary if it didn't meet the standard of the law.
And if you have 5 million registration records in the New York State voter roll database that don't meet that standard, kindly explain how the heck they got in there and why three quarters of a million of them voted.
So this is the fundamental question that will be presented in court, and this is going to be long before the 2024 general election.
In fact, we're weeks away from filing in six states, and this has to be long before the 2024 election because otherwise it's going to be too late.
And, you know, if we are facing another corrupted election wherein no one can be certain and there's, you know, more and more of this rancor and hatred among party, I don't even know how to describe it, you know, people who are, it's like football teams, right?
Yeah.
No one cares if the game was played fairly.
They just want their team to win.
It's not okay in America.
That's not okay.
And it has to be stopped before we hit another presidential election.
And that's exactly what USA is planning to do, United Sovereign Americans.
And actually, it's exactly what the law says to do.
The law says if you believe Your civil right has been or is about to be abridged.
What you do right then is you file a temporary restraining order against the certification of that election or against the administration of the election in the case of an election that hasn't transpired yet like we're dealing with in 2024.
So kind of like an injunction.
Exactly.
So we thought about this.
In Georgia, we had thought about doing an injunction in all 159 counties and having someone from that county file the injunction themselves and kind of duplicate the paperwork.
And we were like, we've had conversations about this for about a year now.
Is that kind of what you're doing in New York?
Is that what you're doing there or all over?
United Sovereign Americans has taken the New York effort and made it national.
So we are actually filing in federal court in, I don't know exactly how many states in the end.
Like I said, we're going to be filing in six states within weeks.
And then the other states are coming along and preparing and completing the data analysis that has to be done in advance of the filing.
But yes, exactly.
Taking advantage of the fact if we use the federal courts, we can use template litigation.
We don't have to pay attorneys in every state from soup to nuts.
You know, we can start 75% of the way down the field and then those attorneys come in and pick up the ball.
And the claims are very clear.
They're not election.
The way that the federal government has authority to regulate elections is exclusively via civil rights law.
So the Help America Vote Act, the National Voter Registration Act, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act, these are all civil rights laws.
So again, we're not challenging the outcome of any election.
We're challenging the accuracy of our elections, the validity of our elections as a civil rights matter.
And it definitely is a civil rights issue of our day.
There's no question about that.
And everybody feels that.
I've heard that all over the state.
People say, this is our civil rights.
This is Winnie Martin Luther King here to fight this for us.
Like, this is our, this is our, it's an infringement on our civil rights.
And we know that.
It doesn't mean your right to vote.
People died to acquire the right to vote, women and people of color.
They had to fight for that.
That wasn't just given to them.
And then now we're so easily just allowing that to be stolen from us.
And I say so easily.
I mean, so many people are given so many hours and so much money and energy and effort.
But, you know, we're not at war.
I don't want us to go to war, but our founders, they went to war to establish this country and thousands upon thousands of people died and bloodshed and even the Native Americans and even slaves and everything to get where we are for us so frivolously to allow this to happen.
And we can't.
We can't allow this to happen.
And frankly, it's happening through a lot of different vectors and one of them is simply poor work.
And you think about everything you're referring to and the incredible dedication and the honor of our ancestors and to think that we would allow that to be corrupted by a poor effort.
And I don't know why.
I don't know why the voter rolls are in this state.
I have my suspicions, but I don't know.
It doesn't matter, though, because the tradition and the honor of our country, the integrity of our tradition is being lost.
And we simply can't allow that to happen.
I completely agree with you.
You know, it's almost like the Okay, we had a problem.
We had inequality in our voting system.
It was embedded into our voting system.
And so we worked so hard as a country to overcome the inequality issue that we're now conflicting.
There's like a friction between the constitutional issue of equality and the constitutional issue of liberty.
And so it's like when you think about those things, And how do you protect them, right?
Except they are the courts who we feel like are corrupt.
And so how are you shielding against that?
Them just throwing it out or them saying that it lacks standing or them saying that it wasn't filed the right way.
I guess you have attorneys helping to kind of get that underway.
Is that what you're doing?
We do.
Yeah, we have brilliant attorneys, constitutional experts and standing experts But in the end, it's rather simple.
Again, we're not challenging the outcome of the election.
We're challenging the validity as a civil rights matter.
So every American has standing.
And the other issue is this is emergency litigation.
When you believe that your civil right could be abridged, it's an emergency circumstance regarding your vote.
So they cannot slow walk this through the courts.
And do we anticipate losing in some states?
We do, actually.
We are not certain that even with the simple argument that we're bringing, which is basically, here's the law, here's the official data, you know, what say you, judge?
Does this look like it meets the standard of the law?
Yes or no?
Because if it doesn't meet the standard of the law, then there's a provable abridgment.
So if we do lose in some states, actually, one of the really important strategies of filing in state after state is it gives us the opportunity to get rapidly to the Supreme Court.
Because if judges from two federal districts disagree on an emergency matter regarding civil rights, it is forced to the Supreme Court.
They must rule.
And I don't have a magic wand, Candace, but I do have a very strong belief and faith that our current Supreme Court has the capacity and the courage to face a powerful question like this one and resolve it for the American people.
Do election officials have to obey the law or not?
And I do.
I believe in our Supreme Court as well.
I think SCOTUS has proven that with, you know, they passed and protected my whole slogan, Jesus, Guns, and Babies, within a two-week time frame after my primary in 2022.
And then, you know, they've come out with some pretty good rulings on other matters as well.
So I think you're right.
If we could get it to them, I think we could probably get some relief and maybe have a fair November of 2024.
It's just, you know, with Colorado coming out and saying that President Trump wasn't going to be allowed on the ballot and then, you know, not knowing what's going to happen there and whether you support him or not is irrelevant.
It's the point of the authority of a state to say, oh, we don't want to let you on the ballot.
We're not going to.
It doesn't matter how you're polling.
It doesn't matter that you're a former president.
It doesn't matter what the people say, right?
It doesn't matter that the reason we're giving is based on a crime for which you've not been convicted.
Right, right.
It's a kangaroo court.
Or the fact that you're basing the crime that was That you're accusing him of happened because of the crime that was committed in the States when they hijacked the election.
So it's just this perpetuation of lie after lie after lie.
And we're just sick of it.
And we just want to protect our freedom.
I want my kids to be free.
That's why I got involved.
I want my future grandchildren to be free.
And I think it's careless of me to stay busy and pretending and having my head in the sand like an ostrich and not doing my part.
And that's why you're involved as a homeschool mom.
You know, we want to leave it better than we found it.
We have a duty to.
I mean, there's a saying, I can't remember where I heard this, but someone said to me, you know, it would have been a good thing if instead of having a bill of rights, we were given a bill of responsibilities.
Good.
I can't argue with the Bill of Rights.
That's not my point.
It's just an interesting idea.
Are we entitled to these things, or must we continue to work to preserve them for our future generations?
Yeah, and it puts some responsibility and accountability back on us as people.
I mean, I think that most people in America are just, you know, either not paying attention or they're spoiled.
It's one of two.
It's an entitlement mentality or it's, I'm busy and selfish and greedy and I'm not paying attention.
And so that doesn't mean they don't believe like we do.
It doesn't mean they don't want the freedom.
They want to be free.
They just trust somebody else will handle it.
Right.
And there's the element of hopelessness that you raised earlier, which is if we cannot control our legislatures, if we are not being represented accurately and provably, then it becomes very frustrating and pointless.
It's like being stuck in the mud with your truck.
Like, how do you get out of that circumstance?
How do you repair the deficiencies that you're experiencing if your representatives are not listening?
And they don't believe they need to.
Right, and hope deferred makes the heart sick.
And so I get really protective over grassroots patriots who are giving of themselves and they're very passionate and then we keep giving them false hope because it makes them very angry and very frustrated and, you know, it's not fair.
It's not fair to keep, you know, giving false hope whenever we know nothing's going to happen.
So I'm really excited about these cases.
I think this is the right way to go about it.
Like I said, we have been toying with this idea for about a year of it being a civil rights issue and filing an injunction.
We thought about an injunction on the machines because they, you know, in regards to civil rights, but I like your approach of the simple question and just being a simple, no nonsense is possible so they can't pick it apart.
I think that that's very wise.
Exactly.
I'm glad you understand the elegance of this strategy.
And I do want to invite any of your listeners who want to participate and help to come to our website.
That's our front door, uniteforfreedom.com, uniteforfreedom.com.
We are...
A group of united sovereign Americans volunteering our skills, our wits and our grits, as I like to say, to save our country.
Because apparently no one is going to come and do it for us.
We must unite.
And we must honor our sovereignty while we work towards that unity.
Yeah, so I think people just thought somebody was going to ride in on a white horse or, you know, President Trump was just going to fix it all.
And we've realized it's on us.
The government is of, by, and for the people.
And truly, it has to happen through us or it's not going to happen.
And I think that's been a wake-up call for a lot of us in this process of watching and knowing and seeing the exposures and just knowing nothing's happening or seeing, you know, cases being thrown out and grand jury.
You know, being refused to go before the grand jury with a petition and all the things, everything we've tried that's failed.
And I don't know what kind of success you've had in New York and how many people have pushed those kind of things there, but I know that there's been some too there as well because I've talked to different people.
But it's so frustrating when every state you get turned down with a grand jury and you get turned down with state court and you get turned down.
You know, it just is so frustrating.
Yeah, we don't have a lot of support from officials in New York State, although there are areas of the state where many, many, many townships and potentially counties, we're looking at a couple of possible county sign-ons to our resolution for An end-to-end audit of the 2022 election.
Based on our findings, you know, we do have quite a lot of support.
I think we have 68 towns have signed on across New York State to that resolution, which indicates that there are enough people now in even the deep blue New York who Really, they've been pushed past the point and they just feel like the governor and the representatives are no longer working for the people at all.
And they feel, I hate to say a desperation, but in some places it's starting to feel that way.
A desperation to find some meaningful way to push back and One of the downsides, I would say, of the work that New York Citizens Audit has done, and some of the other states may find the same circumstances, that it is difficult to do this work.
It's very transparent.
New York Citizens Audit provided the entire set of our findings and the results of our individual queries from the New York State voter roll database.
We provided that to the Division of Election Law Enforcement with the exact code used to extract the records.
So technically speaking, they could replicate the work, but most people are You know, they're kind of between a rock and a hard place because they've been fed this election denier narrative and they're not sure who to trust.
And so they don't want to come out in support of something.
But at the same time, they're not happy with what's going on.
So we'll see.
It's a lot of chips fall where they may, right?
It's a lot.
And my heart goes out to every human being right now.
Because we're facing monumental challenges.
But you have to decide at some point, you have to decide whether you love this world more than you love your security or your illusions.
You have to stand for something at a certain point.
And I'm pleased to meet you, Candice, because I know that you have done that significantly, not only in your own personal life, but for the people of Georgia.
Well, I appreciate that, Marlee, and I do, and I'm so thankful that you got involved.
I actually had a bunch of homeschool moms that helped me and volunteered for my campaign, and I work in public education as my career, and it was funny because so many of them believed in me, and they were like, you're going to fight for homeschoolers.
You're going to fight for everybody.
Yeah, absolutely.
There's always going to be a place for public school, right?
Always.
I mean, not everybody can do that, but That's freedom.
That's what it looks like, you know, and I feel like the money should follow the child and we should have a choice in our education of our kids and the right to preserve their innocence and the right to educate them the way we want them to be educated.
That should be our right.
This is America.
Either we're free or we're not.
Right?
And right now, we still have a chance to save a great nation, the greatest nation that's ever been.
And going back to what you said at the beginning, I don't think it's too late.
I don't think it's too late either, but I think that 2024 is it.
I think that's the end of the road.
And will it end after 2024?
No, but I don't think we can sustain four more years of this to come back from it.
It'll be forever.
America would be changed forever forever.
And never be back how we were.
America, as we know, it would be over.
It would be forever changed, in my opinion, if things doesn't get fixed this next time.
Yes, I rather agree with that.
I think many people feel that way at this point.
So certainly a fair 2024 election certainly isn't a magic wand to solve everything, but it's a line in the sand that I don't think we can cross.
Right.
And then, you know, is it going to be perfect?
No, but it's a way that they want to do Build Back Better.
I think it's a way to get the cracks in the foundation fixed.
And make America great again and restore hope and restore the economy and things that we're on the brink of total disaster right now.
So tell people how they can find you or how they can get involved and what they can do for more information.
Sure, that's really through our website, UniteForFreedom.com.
We can use volunteers of all kinds.
Certainly we can use those with technical expertise just as much as we can use those who love to bring facts and information to officials or simply tell all your friends about it.
So please come to UniteForFreedom.com and sign up to volunteer or to get involved to stay informed One of the things that we do, or a couple of things that we do on a weekly basis, we have a couple of national calls where people can come and on Tuesdays you can literally read federal election law together because I know that no one is going to read it, so I read it to you.
And we discuss it because I can tell you it is like a lightning bolt when you actually just read the law.
It's so clarifying to this entire convoluted information war circumstance that we, you know, our minds are getting spun around in.
When you just read the law, it's like, oh, that's it?
So everyone is invited.
And then on Wednesdays, we also have a call that is for our active volunteers in state after state who are working with our resolutions for an audit.
Again, our focus is not to get an audit necessarily, although that would be lovely, but it's really just to use the information that's been uncovered as an initiative for advocacy and education of all of our fellow Americans, including officials.
Many times are not aware of the issue of election validity versus integrity.
Election validity is measuring what is the difference between the system the law says we're supposed to have and the system that we currently have.
So we can stop shouting at each other.
We can look at a metric and we can decide together, does that look adequate for the American people?
Well, it sounds like it's all reasonable and sensible and nonpartisan, actually, efforts.
It is.
I do appreciate you, Marlee, so much.
And I challenge everybody listening to get involved.
And if you're in a state where you don't really know about your voter roll, you should find out.
Because as I was researching here in Georgia, all the fraud and the machines and all of those things, we have a whole team that works just on voter rolls.
And it is alarming.
And you're thinking 200,000 to 300,000 canceled voters, deleted voters, voters that moved.
that are pushed back into the system and voted and they're not there they're dead or they moved or you know you go to their address and you can't find them but they voted how can you compete with two to three hundred thousand fake phantom voters how can you compete with that yeah well Again, going back to, I mean, look at what Giuliani brought across the country.
Thousands and thousands and thousands of affidavits signed by witnesses to acts of election fraud.
But it didn't add up to anything because it was anecdotal.
So again, that's the difference.
If we measure it against the standard of the law, now it's not anecdotal.
Now it's a fact.
It's evidence.
So we're going to have evidence and we're going to measure against the law.
Y'all hear Marlee?
She's telling you we're going to do it.
So I thank you so much for coming on.
I can't wait to see where we go.
And maybe once we get one of these cases to break and we see some of that movement, you'll come back on and give us an update.
I sure will, Candace.
Thank you so much.
Thank you so much.
Marlee Hornick.
Y'all follow her.
We'll put all your information at the bottom of the screen.
And God bless you.
Thank you for coming.
Thank you.
So I'll see y'all next week on the Sue Peters Network at 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I love you.
God bless you and God bless America.
Hey everybody, I want you to go to HeavensHarvest.com, promo code KANDICE, and I want you to get prepped.
We don't know what's coming, who knows, but regardless whether it's a hurricane, national disaster, or the whole government shuts down, they have awesome deals on freeze-dried food.
In fact, they have a new item, it's freeze-dried cans.
It's a lot less expensive than the big barrels.
▲
Export Selection