All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 17, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
01:03:01
Uncensored: US Government Docs on Borgs, Weaponised Nanotech, Poisoning Water EXPOSED!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
I am your host, Maria Z, and we are here with a very, very interesting review of this paper, Future Strategic Issues slash Future Warfare Circa 2025.
This is NASA. Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at the NASA Langley Research Center.
Now, I recently did an interview with Todd Callender, We discussed some of what is in this particular presentation and an overwhelming number of people in the comments wanted to see the entire presentation.
So I'm going to go through quite a bit of that today.
There's also another DoD paper that people wanted me to go through.
We will have to go through that in another Uncensored, so I will get that out as a separate report.
That's the U.S. DoD Cyber Soldier document.
So we will do that in a separate broadcast.
Today we're going to focus on this future strategic issues slash future warfare circa 2025.
Before we get into it, a very quick mention about the sponsors of today's show, longtime supporters of this network and our broadcasts here on Uncensored.
Heaven's Harvest coming to you with one of the best possible options for long-term survival food.
They have emergency survival food options for every budget, various buckets, heirloom seeds, true heirloom seeds, water filtration, And storage and gardening and survival resources.
If you use promo code Z with three E's, you'll get 5% off your order.
And the link for that is in the description below.
Now is a very, very important time to prepare you and your loved ones considering the madness that is going on in this world.
So prepare with Heaven's Harvest.
So, as far as I'm aware, this was published in 2001.
It's a NASA document that describes future weaponry and outlines the future warfare capabilities of the US, and I'm sure most countries are onto it by now.
It includes, you know, psychological warfare, RF and microwave towers, mechanical microdust, chemical antifunctional, Anti-personnel weapons and other lethal systems all listed in this overview and immediate civilian oversight was required back then but of course this has come to a lot of people's attention recently particularly after Todd Callender started speaking about it so they say that this is going to cover capabilities of
the enemy after next ongoing worldwide technological revolutions economic trends And potential nature of father term warfare.
Bots, Borgs and humans welcome you to 2025 AD is the second slide on this and it says that the presentation was based on futures work for and with the USAFNWV 2025 National Research Council,
Army After Next, ACOM Joint Futures, Australian DoD is on there as well, DARPA, DIA, CIA. I'm not going to read every single one of these organizations, but you can see them all on there.
This presentation, they said, is meant to incite thought and discussion based in all cases upon existing data trends, analyses, technologies.
Mind you, we're going based off the fact that this is from 2001, so imagine...
What they've done since then with this sort of technology and information provides, in some cases, a somewhat broader view of prospective developments and issues.
Then they cover the utilization or applications of projections beyond 2025, I guess.
So they cover inputs to future war fighting concepts, inputs to new procurement decisions, heads up for the intel community, and inputs to the DoD, R&D and planning.
So they say that politicians can and do change overnight and potential capabilities is the future warfare issue, not who but what.
And they say that they need to plan differently.
The world is in the throes of triple exponential IT, bio and nanotechnological revolutions.
They knew this back in, you know, decades ago.
And of course, you know, we've seen how this stuff has been weaponized against the people Since then, changes occurring at scale of months instead of decades.
I would say at this point it's days.
And zeroth order, potential effects upon defense, offense equipment, con ops threat.
So, Spaceship Earth.
The crew are plundering the ship's supplies, tinkering with the temperature and life support controls.
Gosh, this is all so primitive considering where we are now, but anyway.
Engaging in bloody skirmishes on every corner of the vessel and increasing the size of the crew by two million per week.
God forbid we were increasing the population.
Anyway.
So it says that humans have taken over and vastly shortened evolution of the planet due to things like global warming, pollution, deforestation, the human species.
So they want to, you know, we're at fault for what's gone wrong with the genomic design, so they want to repair it.
Mind children products and life forms.
So cross-species molecular breeding.
That's freaky.
And directed evolution.
Where else have we heard that term lately?
Oh, I don't know.
Pfizer.
And they say at that point, over 70% of the world's research was conducted outside of the U.S., And 70% of the US research was considered commercial as opposed to government sponsored.
So what have they done since then?
Really just worked with a bunch of NGOs to get the government to fund them.
We know about the allegations of the DOD being involved in the COVID shot bioweapons.
So as of the time that they were publishing this, 29% of nanotechnology research was happening in Europe, 28% in Japan, 27% in the US and 16% in others.
And they talk about the technical ages of humankind.
So they talk about hunter and killer groups, million BC to 10,000 BC. We don't have any evidence whatsoever of humans existing 10 million years ago or a million years ago or even 500,000 years ago.
But you know, let's go with it.
Agriculture, 10,000 BC to 1800 AD. Then you've got the industrial revolution, the IT revolution, and they tell you here that the bio-nano revolution, they're expecting it from 2020, which just so happens to be when there was an acceleration of the actual nanotechnology shots that enabled this vision.
And virtual, which is what I keep describing, they want you in the virtual world, they don't want you living a real life.
So, they talk about here, you know, controlled nature, mechanized agriculture, automating industry and agriculture through IT, bio, and nano.
And, you know, I mean, when you look at what do they actually mean when they say automating through nanotechnology, that's incredibly creepy to me.
You know, we're talking about self-replicating inorganic structures, Probably.
Virtual robotization of IT, bio and nano industry and agriculture.
So now happening in the virtual realm as well.
The key future technologies that they talk about here are in the IT, silicon, bio, optical, quantum, nanocomputing, virtual reality, holographic, immersive, ubiquitous comms, hyper, spectral sensors, virtual presence, automatic, robotic everything, and huge cost reductions.
In the bio, they think that they can double the lifespan.
It's really not possible.
Genetic engineering before birth.
We covered this in the interview with Todd Callender recently.
And plants irrigated by seawater.
And on the nanoscale, carbon nanotubes, which we know now through various sources, are in the COVID injections.
And, you know, basically we can expect them to be in all future mRNA products, or injections at least.
Assemblers, living factories.
Where do you know that from?
I mean, the amount of interviews that I've conducted with people looking under the microscope saying these organisms look like they're alive.
I've never seen anything like it.
Yeah, that's an assembler or a living factory.
We have the acknowledgement of the worldwide IT revolution with comms, computing, sensors, electronics.
You know, they talk about silicon, molecular, quantum, bio, optical, further improvement for IT beyond human AI. I don't even know what that means.
I mean, if you consider that AI right now was created by humans and then you look at what do they mean by that, probably the fact that AI will continue to improve itself and won't need any input from humans, virtually making us irrelevant as they keep telling us we will be.
Automatics or robotics in the large immersive multi-sensory VR holodex.
So this is, you know, sort of the metaverse, but even more than the metaverse, I guess.
Ubiquitous multi-physics or hyperspectral sensors.
And micro, nano, SATs, GNC sensors, etc.
So they talk about some of the impacts of this, including telecommuting, shopping, entertainment, tele-travel, tele-education, tele-medicine, tele-commerce, tele-politics and socialisation.
They talk about some of the improvements to IT. So just on this, when they say tele, I think that they are, you know, at that stage we're talking about the revolution of how everything is sort of moving to Telephone services.
Now we're way past that.
You know, we're talking about online government and essentially to the point where you're only dealing with AI when you contact some of these organisations.
They talk about some of the IT status of the world at that time and then some of their predictions back then were quantum computing, which they said would initially be available in five years.
We're now many years from this.
15% of all power today used by computers.
They said that'll reach 60% by 2010.
Wearable or implantable on-person electronics, comms, computing, sensory augmentation, health monitoring, and brain stimulation.
So let's look at some of those terms.
Obviously, electronics, you already have things like Fitbits, comms, your Apple Watch, for example.
You can get messages, you can get phone calls, you can Change your songs.
I don't know.
I don't use them.
But, you know, I'm aware of what they can do.
And now it's talking about, you know, going beyond that.
So not just wearable, but implantable computing.
Implantable sensory augmentation.
Imagine what that would look like in the hands of someone who wishes you harm as those who are pushing this do.
For example, you know, when you're talking about a VR headset and people look at some positive things that come out of that, you know, more immersive gaming experiences or whatever it may be, but when you're talking about Something that's implanted in you that can augment your senses.
Imagine torturing people through technology like this.
Imagine the ability of those in power to create senses that aren't there and weaponise that against people, against populations.
Right now they have the media To create hatred or wars or, you know, whatever narratives they want.
Imagine that being inside of you, being able to alter the way that you see the world.
It's ultimate control.
And of course, computing.
Sorry, we mentioned that.
Health monitoring.
And it'll, of course, be introduced as something to help you monitor your health.
And brain stimulation.
Stimulation is a very positive word for we can hack your brain, essentially.
So, I guess I want to go through all of this because if you consider that this is reportedly published as of 2001 and now we're in 2023, we're talking many, many years after the initial report was published, you know, over 20 years and we see how quickly technology is moving now.
So, it's important for people to realize this was always the plan and transhumanism was always the plan.
So human brain characteristics and capabilities.
They say that, you know, they talk about the neurons, the connections, calculations per second.
And then they compare that to machine capabilities.
And of course, we know that they plan to merge the two.
And then they talk about the US Human Brain Project, which began in the early 90s, was funded by 16 organizations across five agencies, which included the NIH, the DoD, NASA and others.
Neuroinformatics, the intersection of neuroscience and informatics.
Exploding Field, 10,000 individual presentations at this society about molecular geneticists providing this to cognitive psychologists.
And determining a detailed neuroanatomy of the human brain, aka a digital brain atlas.
If we think that they haven't already mapped our brains and how to manipulate them, I mean, we see how powerful social media, for example, is in that.
And we think they haven't come so far as to be able to do that even remotely after 20 years.
I'd say we are incredibly naive.
Use of IT to study the brain and use of brain info to aid IT and AI all the way back then.
So use of your brain information to aid AI. The Imagination Engine, aka Creativity Machine, aka Creative Agent, they say that this was a current AI best bet, not a rule-based or expert system, but it generates new ideas and concepts via starving a trained neural net of meaningful inputs, forcing it to dream or cavitate, create new concepts, So on and so forth.
The way I'm understanding this is, you know, essentially you feed this machine with all of this human intelligence and then you let it sort of go and create on its own and where we are now and, you know, being told that human beings will eventually be irrelevant.
It's kind of the end of all human creativity.
You fed this AI beast with all of this information and now it can do it without you, is what they're saying.
In this world economy our ability to create wealth is not bounded by physical limits or resources but our ability to come up with new ideas.
However, even universal wealth will not obviate the other causes of warfare which include politics face religion.
So the global problems that they had at that time were energy, water, food, land, population growth.
It's a real problem.
The population's growing too much.
Wealth generation.
We can't have that.
Can't have people being wealthy, anyone other than those in power because money talks.
And when you have all the money to be in power, then you can do things like manage population and depopulate.
Pollution warming, global warming, big problem.
And they talk about some killer AP solutions, which is distance learning.
That's made a really big, you know, impact in the world.
Distance learning, big push from governments for that.
And of course, we know that during lockdowns, we had remote learning, students being starved of any human interaction, turning them into mindless drones that simply learn from machines.
It's quite terrifying, actually.
But biomass, food, seawater, irrigation in current what they call wastelands.
And I dare say that, you know, they'll define a lot of areas as wastelands, by the way, and say that because of conservation, we can't go into these places anymore.
They're effectively wastelands.
And the interesting thing is if you caught...
The report that I did some time ago on geoengineering, it's up on zmedia.com where we showed the contracts in the United States, the various projects that have been completed.
And then we went into why does the NOAA have this stuff available on their website?
And they say that it's because they're doing an omics project where they upload all of this into the cloud and then AI basically sorts through the data.
And so what you're telling AI is that geoengineering is needed to manage climate change.
So you can imagine the sorts of information that AI is going to populate as solutions where we need to continue to conserve all of these areas because they're at risk.
And even with all the geoengineering we've done to help those areas, they're not capable of preserving themselves or even surviving with...
With human intervention.
So this is what AI is going to be feeding the world.
And of course when you remove the human element, remove governments, remove all human checks and balances, no one will really have a say anymore.
That is what the digital dictatorship looks like.
So that is why we must stop it.
They go on to talk about, you know, the inexpensive motivational and web-based distance education enabling the demise of the US underclasses, wealth creation from enabled invention,
stabilization of the world population, According to what they deem as stabilisation and stabilising the growth of the world population too, I would say, by this language and just by what they want.
You know, if we indoctrinate people through distance education, remove the human interaction from them, tell them that this is just the truth, this is true education, And then they become convinced that we have too many people on this earth and we need to depopulate.
Even more rapid technology diffusion.
We're seeing that.
Equalization of haves and have-nots.
Think about the cultural impacts that this has.
And how you're able to convince people.
I mean if you push people into a digital existence, their understanding of what is required in life or what we should have and shouldn't have in life really does change because they're living out the existence in the virtual world and that's the purpose of this.
And altered political or military outlooks worldwide.
Of course they say here that they want to change everything.
I don't know what that strikethrough is there for, but really they talk about shifting the global economic warfare requirements and an accelerated increase in knowledge based on what they want you to know.
And of course, this helps them because it reduces the societal cost.
And one of the selling points of everything that they do is increased convenience and accessibility.
But all it really is doing is imprisoning mankind.
By 2025, 40% of private and 15% of public colleges and universities are expected to close due to web-based competition.
It's really interesting because you have all of these university lecturers, all of these various teachers at the moment that are taking part in indoctrinating children and aspiring professionals in universities.
To indoctrinate them into the very ideologies that are helping the globalists accelerate towards this goal of Agenda 2030 and eliminate humans from the process.
So they think that they're helping shape a future world and they're taking pride in this education that they're doing.
What they're actually doing is making themselves irrelevant, obliterating their own positions and forfeiting it to AI and creating this society of people that think that that's somehow progressive.
The ultimate education approach, plug and play.
So direct silicon or other such device connections to the brain.
Very rapid uploads.
Education in minutes instead of many, many years.
So for all of the teachers that, you know, are teaching children how to cut off their genitals right now and trying to separate them from their parents, You're going to be replaced, you're going to be irrelevant, and you're feeding into this monster that eventually plans to, through direct indoctrination, through direct brain upload, tell people how they have to think.
If we go on, this is a seawater irrigation.
You know, they're talking about how to fix global warming, which isn't even real.
Potential, probable, sorry, circa 2025 societal changes.
So much increased lifespan through biotechnology.
Which is just a pipe dream.
The life span of humans keeps dropping because you have big pharma intervention.
You have poison being put into the land, the water, the air, the food supply, through injections, through pharmaceuticals.
And yet they're telling you that you're somehow going to increase your lifespan.
Well, maybe if you keep getting upgrades from whatever shiny new product Big Pharma provides, I would not even be surprised if eventually they admit that these products are killing people and that people need a new product to help them actually survive into the future.
Solution to energy and water and warming through biotech.
Global distribution of technology, far more, they say.
Which, of course, you know, I've spoken a lot about this agenda to connect everyone to the internet.
The biggest lesson that they say came out of COVID was that Too many places didn't have the internet because you can't control people who don't need your systems, who don't need your technology, who don't even need your currency and they know how to live off the land.
Remote communities in the middle of nowhere that literally, you know, hunt an animal and live off it together for the week and work together to do that and naturally have kids and don't inject themselves with poison and don't have a television to disconnect them from the natural way of life Did not experience the COVID problem, so we've got to connect them to the internet to destroy the natural way of life.
That has always been the plan.
Tremendous increases in the capability of automatic and robotic everythings.
And that incorporates IT, biotech and nanotech.
So they say that that's going to result in reduced tensions associated with the have and have-nots.
And historical or religious issues.
Well, of course, when Yuval Noah Harari tells you that AI is going to rewrite the Bible and correct AI, Yes, it will decrease the tensions around the world because you won't have free-thinking people anymore that actually believe in anything and stand up for anything.
You simply have what the silicon chip in your brain Tells you that you need to think like and behave like.
So by all means, if you want to be a mindless drone programmed by people who worship Satan, go for it.
Otherwise, we really need to fight against this and have a human being, a natural human revolution, in my opinion.
Also resulting in greatly increased individual destructive power and general societal disaffection and they admit that that will be the case.
The major emerging law enforcement issues that they see are with privacy.
Oh, you don't say?
IT or net crime?
Well, they're working on making that impossible as well through censorship and having their own global governance, their own global internet, which you have to be verified via a zero trust model to access.
So even I think, you know, it will be very challenging for hackers.
I'm not saying they won't exist, but very challenging for hackers to destroy this system once it's up and running in full scale.
And Europe's very much on the way.
They've just passed digital IDs in Parliament.
Bio-crime.
So this is another huge consideration for everyone.
I mean, consider, you know, you have this silicon chip in your brain.
You think it's helping you.
You're somehow functioning better and contributing better to society, if you think.
And then you get hacked.
Once the hackers figure out how, then you get hacked.
And when you're talking about something that can directly send you thoughts and learning into your brain in a matter of seconds, imagine what a hacker could do.
And make you do.
It's terrifying.
And by the way, on the point of biocrime, it's not just the brain, the chip in your brain.
Imagine having a network of nanotechnology all throughout your body and then having hackers or even the government come in and create those illnesses.
In fact, this is already happening to people around the world, we suspect.
And it's a very real possibility that this technology already exists.
Now if the government can do it, imagine a nation that's really angry with you and some hackers in another nation.
I mean, the possibilities of this stuff are really endless as far as how dangerous it is to human beings.
They talk about the need for protection of these human electronic implants but considering they don't even admit that it's happening or that it's already happened I dare say they don't really have a plan for the protection of human beings And they say, you know, things beyond terrorism and societal disaffection, upheaval caused by rapid technological changes.
And we're seeing that.
And they even talk about psychosomatic illnesses, withdrawal.
We're already seeing that in society today.
We were seeing it, to be honest with you, we were seeing this as people were becoming more and more addicted to social media and their phones.
And, you know, for those that aren't awake, we already see how disconnected they are from reality.
They can't wait to put a picture of their dinner.
They're sitting there at a group of, at a table with a group of people enjoying their dinner, enjoying their social time, and they're all too busy posting a picture of their dinner to their social media and then periodically checking it to see how many likes they've gotten because they're so addicted to dopamine hits rather than real-life human experiences.
And so imagine, once there's technology in them, which we think is already there, that controls their experiences and controls their senses and controls their brains.
They'll become more addicted to a fake reality or the augmented reality than they want to be involved in real life.
I said this from the very beginning.
I said life will become so miserable for people that aren't awake, and maybe even some of those that are awake, to be honest with you.
Because the destruction of these globalists around us, to those that don't have God in their lives, honestly, I'm concerned for them.
They will become depressed with the world that these maniacs are creating if we don't stop them.
And they know it.
And they don't care.
Join us or do whatever.
We'll offer you medical assistance in dying, I suppose.
It's crazy.
So, look at their particular concerns at the time.
Uncontrolled or uncontrollable self-replication of brilliant robots, nano-replicators, and rampant or recombinant bio.
Do you not think that this is already happening through the nanotech in the injections?
This was of particular concern to them.
I would say that it was identified as an opportunity to hack the human, and they figured out how.
So they're talking about their competitive landscapes.
How do we get on top of this?
How do we be the leaders in this?
The multipolar economic world, they talk about that in this report.
I'm going to link whatever I can find.
I have this full PDF. I don't know if I can find the full PDF, but I think it's available in archives.
So I will link what I have in the description below so people can review this for themselves.
Bio-revolution applications.
So they talk about farm animals, drugs, spare parts, fast-growing plants.
And, you know, when they talk about bio-revolution, they may talk about more efficient ways to grow things.
Really what we're seeing is a push for everything to be, you know, infused with mRNA.
Probably, you know, ultra-quick growth of fake products disguised as food.
Polymer growing plants.
Spider genes in goats.
Allow spider silk spinning from goat milk for bio-steel and binary bio-weaponry.
So the examples that they give of this confluence of IT, bio and nano are a brain of sea lamprey inserted or connecting to a body of robotic fish, an initial cyborg.
This stuff is crazy.
Choo-choo, a flesh plant-eating robot that hunts or bio-digests natural foods to live off the land.
Choo-choo.
They talk about carbon nanotubes, which we already know have been found in the injections, and revolutionary Power or generation storage opportunities.
I dare say they aren't interested in actually, you know, storing power at all.
And that's evidenced by the fact that, for example, I said it in Australia, you know, they shut down a bunch of coal power plants.
They had this A plant for power storage that wasn't enough to even supply the local area, so they had to borrow from other areas.
I mean, it's just that these people are not serious about this when they talk about these power storage and, you know, green energy.
They're not serious about it.
And the stocks dropping in the industry are a clear indication of the fact that no one's buying it anymore.
So some of their sample or newer sensors they talk about include, you know, molecular biosensors, nanotags, smart cards, nano IR, sorry, smart dust.
I could do a 10-part series on smart dust alone.
I mean, please, if you're not familiar with what smart dust is, please do some research into it.
And then we have sensor swarms.
So...
Smart dust floats in air currents.
Nano tags placed on everything, everywhere.
When I did my interview with Aman Jarby, he spoke about the fact that they were essentially planning to tag every single living life form, every leaf, every blade of grass with this nano tag.
We believe geoengineering is linked with that and that's how they're achieving it.
And then they'll have essentially a digital twin of everything in the fake world.
And, you know, I'll go through an example quickly before we wrap up today of how they've already done this to a particular island, telling them that due to climate change, they can't live there anymore.
So they have to live their existence in the metaverse.
And Australia's taking in some climate refugees, of course.
But we'll talk about that briefly at the end.
Co-opted insects.
Explosives.
Smart dust opportunities.
Optimal poisoning.
Sorry.
Positioning of explosive dust or dust air explosives.
Formation of explosive lenses.
Infiltration of deeply buried and other such targets.
And they go on to talk about the micro-dust weaponry.
Micron-sized, mechanized dust, which is distributed as an aerosol inhaled into the lungs.
This is happening through geoengineering.
And they said that this is a, you know, executes various pathological missions.
The dust mechanically bores into your lung tissue.
And it's a wholly new class of weaponry, which they just love, is legal, because no laws have been implemented to stop it.
And, you know, you have so many in government that are good people that deny that it's happening, so of course no laws have been implemented to stop it, and they've exploited it.
They talk about some of the givens.
I won't go through all of that.
And then the agreed-upon assumptions combat in 2025.
So, proliferation of TBMs, IT precision strike, targeting ubiquitous ubiquitous micro sensors camo spoofing robotics biochem munitions logistic assets highly vulnerable in or out of theater you know uh let me just go to beam weapons being increasingly prevalent And we see the use of directed energy weapons.
In fact, some people think they were used in Israel due to the fact that the cars were burnt in a specific fashion.
And of course, you know, Hamas rockets can't do that.
It doesn't create a uniform disintegration of these vehicles, which very, very much mirror what happened in Lahaina and September 11, funnily enough.
Cruise missiles.
We won't go through that right now, but they do say UAVs.
Potential cruise missile.
50 countries have UAVs.
I'm not sure why Todd highlighted that.
Perhaps we can get him on for a future discussion about this.
Volumetric weaponry.
RF. EMPs, Info, Net, Psy Warfare, Miniature Brilliant Sensor or Mine Combos.
They talk about ChemBio anti-functionals and carbon fibers, blades, acoustics, so on.
This is really important, guys, because they talk about these alternative weapons that they can deploy.
EMPs are one of them.
They consider psychological warfare a weapon.
So when we keep saying we are currently in a war and you keep hearing that, it's not an exaggeration.
There is a psychological warfare operation which is a weapon of war on the populations.
Information war is war.
And RF is of course one of those.
Low frequency modulation through the brain interactions.
That is of course achieved through frequencies.
Effects of low power microwaves.
So they say that they can achieve behavioral performance decrements.
Seizures, gross alteration in brain function.
And the lethality as well.
They can increase lethality.
So it really does beg the question, how many people dying right now from the injections?
You know, is it a controlled death?
People expected people to just drop dead within two years and it hasn't happened at the numbers that we were thinking it would.
They're potentially being done in stages so that people won't notice.
The fingerprintless bio-archipelopryons, parasites, direct and undetectable binary biohacking.
So some interesting veneer possibilities that they talk about.
Airborne varieties of Ebola.
Binary agents distributed via important products through vitamins, your clothing, your food.
Clothing's another one we haven't considered actually.
Gosh, we need to go back to sewing ourselves.
Genomically, individual or society targeted pathogens.
And long-term fingerprintless campaign, which means no one will know they did it or be able to pin them down for it.
They talk about existing biocalmative easily transmitted via aerosol.
They said it was weaponized by the US and USSR in the 50s and 60s, tested on humans in Operation White Coat.
No treatment available.
And the frontiers of bio on the battlefield include, and they say here, an attack on your sustainment, your food, your water, your soil, your air.
Air purification or purification of any of these.
Meds.
Health.
Biovirus into biocomputer.
Sensors.
What is apparently legal?
So which ways can we do it and get away with it?
Microwave, RF, anti-functional, anti-personnel, weaponry.
Chemical, psychological effects.
Via sensory organs weaponry.
Affecting you via your smell sense.
Cyborg acoustic weaponry.
And this is the non-nuclear explosive for volumetric weapons of mass effect.
And they have a list of those.
Again, I'll link it in the description below so people can have a look at all of this.
Transoceanic UAVs.
So they list here smart dust and explosives, bio-dispensers, anti-people, things and plants.
This is so damning.
I mean, the minute that this was released and spoken about, there should have been a stop to this.
But I guarantee you that even back then they would have been saying, oh, this is a conspiracy.
And look at the year that it came out, 2001.
Is that a coincidence?
And you know when you read their language what you see is that in 2001 and from what I'm seeing on the bottom of the page it was actually July 01 that this presentation was published.
From 2001 they knew about these emerging warfare weapons and it's really been a race as to who can get there first and as Klaus Schwab says he who controls The internet essentially, or all things AI, or all things digital, will control the world.
And it is a race right now as to who's going to do it.
They know that this train is, you know, not going to stop unless the people rise up and demand it.
And so they are racing right now.
Who's going to be the global power that has all of this control?
Which is terrifying.
Terrifying capabilities.
They talk about emerging characteristics of robotic systems, and they say, you know, AI and beyond.
Greatly improved accuracy and lethality.
Oh, great!
This is great!
Greatly improved lethality.
Robotic intelligence, their two flavors are traditional AI, which is rule-based or experiential, behavior-based, neural nets, soft computing.
Combination of these is the current best bet to produce artificial or cyber life, which will possibly to probably be sentient, but will not be anthropomorphic.
When I keep saying guys, they're creating a digital fake world for you to live in.
I'm not saying that from an uninformed position.
I've read their documents.
I've researched these people for thousands of hours.
I know how they think.
This is the world that they're building.
And if only the rest of humanity understood that they're talking about an artificial or cyber life for everyone.
I know here it says that this particular life will possibly to probably be sentient but not anthropomorphic.
They're actually talking about transitioning all of humanity, as per the UN100, into a fake digital existence where you don't get to live out your real life.
And you are essentially coupled with AI or you don't get to live real life at all.
Imagine if all of humanity understood what this really means.
They're treating AI like it's, you know, something at a freaking carnival to be played with.
This is a weapon.
They go on to say what is beyond these robotic systems, and I won't read it word for word, but you can see here, high-level soft sciences, human aspects, boundary conditions, and they talk about these sociological or humanitarian, political, environmental, religious, psychological, economics.
What are they saying are their boundary conditions, and have they actually broken through those boundaries?
I would say they have.
And again, they go into this, you know, non-explosive warfare here.
Further down, natural warfare, sensors, weapons, munitions, utilizing animals as delivery systems, feeding, swarming, biting, biting, poisoning, I don't know, Bill Gates, mosquitoes,
genetically modified mosquitoes coming, swarming you, biting you, delivering whatever they want to deliver, merging you with This fake quantum realm they're creating, this real-time internet of all, bio, nano things, internet of everything.
This is what this is.
From 22 years ago.
So they're CONUS or Continental US or CONUS, the 48 Connected States and District of Columbia is what they're talking about.
O-CONUS is outside of the Continental US. And they're talking here about the then year Direct CONUS attack capabilities.
So again, what I'm trying to say is, yes, this could have been an assessment of future attacks, you know, or disguised as an assessment of future attacks to mitigate those attacks before they happen from a military perspective.
But as we know, this has been weaponized against the populations for ultimate control, an arms race of who can get there quicker.
And they very, very clearly here talk about binary bio into the food supply Trojan horses into civilian systems.
They go on to talk about nuke deliveries.
I won't get into that right now.
This is more about the unseen warfare realm.
National banking system computers.
Interruptions on national or international payment systems being recoverable.
That's why they want to offer you a global solution where everything is real-time.
But what they're actually doing is building a digital ID and social credit system around that so that it's ultimate control.
So while this might have been initially, oh, because of interruptions to payment systems, no, no, no.
It's all done under the guise of, oh, let's stop the interruptions.
But actually what we're doing is this.
All freight cars networked everyone.
Takes down the auto industry, power grid, chicken farms.
And I guess that's highlighted there because of all of the attacks on the food supply.
And, you know, it's interesting that we would talk about, oh, the potential of attacks on our food supply, so we've got to do this, that and the other.
And then they go ahead and destroy the food supply anyway because Big Pharma comes in with a solution.
And all the countries agree that we're just going to infuse mRNA into everything and work with Big Pharma and work as one big globalist family to destroy humanity.
It's sick.
Alright, we're almost done here.
And then there is Nano.
It's got its own slide.
Future Warfare on the cheap.
Nano is cheap.
Once you've injected technology that can manipulate human beings remotely or covered everything in Nano, it's going to be cheap to do Warfare moving forward.
We can just get AI to do it for us.
Who's going to make the best AI in time?
So they talk about info or net warfare.
This is why they need to control the internet because they want AI to do the warfare for them.
Binary bio, non-lethals, miniature brilliant sensor mines, micro nano sats, long leg precision UUVs, then year peer competitors.
So they...
Well, I guess this is a bit of a separate conversation.
I'll let people read through it.
They talk about some interesting possibilities, including surreptitious nano-tagging with MW interrogation of everything and everyone, detonation of offshore seabed methane hydrate deposits, and demise of stealth via ubiquitous multi-static multi-physics sensors operated on Take A Vote.
I'm not sure what the Take A Vote part is.
We'll pass through this.
Centres to counters, sorry, to US information dominance.
EMP, jammers in the large, fry with lasers or blow-up, anti-sensor, various, including D&D, software, chaos to excite and psi warfare.
Of course, counter US logistics.
So they talk about, you know, how they'll counter it.
And I suppose it's interesting for people reading it because, as I said, it's a race for who will get there first.
So how are they actually planning on countering other nations doing this?
The anti-US RMA strategic strategies or tactics.
So they say threaten bio to force, suit up or degrade effectiveness.
Keep forces beyond a range of short-legged fighters.
And you can read through all of this as you have the time.
Exploit CNN Syndrome.
Capture tortured Americans in living colour on primetime.
Terror attacks within CONUS. So just think about what this page is saying guys and how you're being exploited through CNN syndrome right now with the war in the Middle East.
Just have a look at this again.
Capturing people Torturing them in living colour on primetime.
Threatening about terror attacks.
And they even have it in parentheses.
Terror attacks in the US. Threatening you with the takedown of EMP, RF against your brain, all of that sort of stuff.
But mind you, and serious cyborg, mind you, this is all stuff that they're doing to us.
This is stuff that they've weaponized against the populations to keep them in a state of fear, anxiety, unable to control their futures, and for the most part, The population is being exploited through CNN syndrome.
They can create whatever narratives they want and shove it in your face.
I said recently.
Think about how many people have died.
And I'm not minimizing what's happening in the Middle East right now.
Yes, Israelis have lost their lives.
Yes, Palestinians are losing their lives.
And it is absolutely disgusting.
Disgusting what is happening in that region.
And it has been manufactured and you can argue with me until the cows come home on that.
I've presented a multitude of evidence on that and there are some great people out there reporting on it about how this entire thing has been manufactured.
But think about the fact that injections, people, far more people have died from injections than they have in that region and it's not okay to This isn't saying that what's happening there is okay.
But hear my point.
Millions of people have died from the injections and not one word on the mainstream media.
But the minute that they want you to have CNN syndrome, all it takes is the push of a button to get all mainstream media outlets to tell you about death.
They'll only tell you about death and destruction when they want you to hear about it.
They won't talk to you about genocides they don't want you to know about.
So that is very important to bear in mind with any future global conflict, and there will be many.
So this is really important to look at.
A typical scenario, takedown of US by 10 people and $10 million.
Binary bio, or greater than.
Binary bio, imported via vitamins, clothing and food supplies.
Terra bio, usual plus physical agents, keynotes such as railroads, takedown of the economy.
Selective Anti-personnel towers, water supply contamination accompanied by a serious psi war.
I'll go back to this.
So just think about the fact that they're talking about risks for the future.
I keep making this point and this is what is happening to us now.
So these are things That we have to consider.
The very government that studied the threat of other governments is doing this to their own people.
And what can we expect via imported vitamins or clothing or food supply?
What can we expect via a water supply contamination?
We already know that recently at the World Economic Forum they were talking about how people don't really understand climate change but they sure understand the need for water.
And it all comes under this guise of making sure everyone has equitable access to water.
But what it's really about is controlling your water supply and doing God knows what else to it.
So this is really important to look at.
A typical scenario, takedown of US by 10 people and $10 million.
Binary bio, or greater than.
Binary bio, imported via vitamins, clothing and food supplies.
Terra bio, usual plus tactical agents, keynotes such as railroads, takedown of the economy.
Selective anti-personnel towers, water supply contamination accompanied by a serious psi war.
I'll go back to this.
So just think about the fact that they're talking about risks for the future.
I keep making this point and this is what is happening to us now.
So these are things that That we have to consider.
The very government that studied the threat of other governments is doing this to their own people.
And what can we expect via imported vitamins or clothing or food supply?
What can we expect via a water supply contamination?
We already know that recently at the World Economic Forum they were talking about how people don't really understand climate change but they sure understand the need for water.
And it all comes under this guise of making sure everyone has equitable access to water.
But what it's really about is controlling your water supply and doing God knows what else to it.
So the US Commission on National Security as of the 21st century, they say that it will soon be possible to connect human brain cells to silicon chips.
And due to IT technology, we will witness the death of distance.
The death of distance...
Really relates to, you know, what they've done with COVID and technology in general, conditioning the population to You know, to travel less and interact via Zoom and broadcasts, you know, connecting people from all over the world.
And while that's absolutely been a gift to us to wake up the world, at the same time a conditioning has occurred where people don't desire to go too far anymore or don't see the need and certainly can't afford it as the cost of living keeps going up.
So they continue to connect with people In the online realm and eventually, as Mark Zuckerberg says, you'll have them in your lounge room.
You know, it'll appear just as real as that person is physically in front of you.
So they say around 2025 machines will be as creative or smart as humans.
Robotics will be the norm.
They are trying to eliminate humans and the need for us.
They mention here again the CNN syndrome forces.
And finally, I want to show you this slide, which is in the second half of the 1900s.
Nuclear biowarfare was unthinkable in the first half of the 2000s.
Conventional warfare may become so deadly or effective as to become unthinkable.
Killer apps available to mitigate the causes of war.
But as we see, nothing's been mitigated.
As much as they want to tell us that this was all for mitigation, it's actually been weaponized against the populations.
Really quickly I want to bring up this Tuvalu story because it's important.
So some time ago I reported on Tuvalu and maybe I'll go to the backup plan first actually.
So this was published in ABC. I reported on it months ago because I could see what was happening.
They created this narrative for the people of Tuvalu which is an island saying that because of climate change they can't live in Tuvalu anymore.
So it says that the impact of climate change have forced it to create a digital copy of itself in the metaverse.
But in the real world, not everyone's convinced.
So, of course, the residents aren't happy with this.
They don't want to leave.
I was watching the ABC just the other day because I do a lot of watching of mainstream media to track the propaganda.
And there was an interview with a gentleman from there and he was saying, you know, the people aren't happy.
They don't want to leave.
This is their land.
Their ancestors come from there.
But just climate change has just become too unmanageable.
So we have to leave.
And they've been forced to.
Australia's created this treaty with this island and is taking in climate refugees now.
And so what they did was...
What they were proposing even then was that they were going to create a digital twin of this place and force the people to move from there and told them that they can just live out their lives in the metaverse.
They can visit Tuvalu in the metaverse.
And here's the radical...
Proposal Tuvalu on the front line of the climate crisis.
Halfway between Australia and Hawaii, the country is made up of nine islands and low-lying atolls with its highest elevation about four metres above sea levels.
It means even modest sea level rises threaten not just to destroy arable land but to drown entire communities.
The threat of total evacuation in the decades to come is being treated as serious by the country's leaders, with the UN describing the nation as being on the extreme front lines of the global climate emergency.
So the Foreign Minister there unveiled a world-first response at the United Nations COP27, where he delivered the speech Virtually standing on a digital replica and an uninhabited islet on the atoll and basically said we have no choice but to become the world's first digital nation.
So that was his address there and basically telling the people now that they have to leave And live in a digital world.
So, you know, where people say, how are they going to get to their smart city initiatives?
How are they going to get rid of all these people?
There's so many.
Well, as you've seen, there are various different ways.
One is burning an entire place with directed energy weapons.
Another one is saying, oh, climate change, it's too bad.
You've got to leave your country.
And of course, Australia is now offering...
We've just created a treaty with these people and we've offered them the right to resettle in Australia as climate change is apparently threatening their very existence.
Now, you know, we...
If it was a serious threat to these people and they were seriously in danger, that would be a different story about offering them the opportunity to resettle.
We have a lot of land in Australia that's unpopulated themselves The problem is they keep bringing people into the major cities and overcrowding them and now we have a housing shortage and construction companies are going under and it's pretty much the same in every single country.
And that's the replacement migration and putting everyone into areas that do have internet and can connect to the internet of everything and then corralling them into the smart cities.
And so, you know, if it was a genuine crisis, okay, we have plenty of land, but that's not what's happening.
These people have had their land stripped from them under the guise of climate change and been told they can, if they still want to visit, they can do it in the metaverse.
This is sick.
This is sick.
But I dare say it will not be the last example of this.
And I have done a call out.
for anyone from Tuvalu to contact ZMedia and we're happy to share their story because we can definitely see what's happening here and they acknowledge people aren't happy about it but you know climate change it's it's sick and so as we continue to see this acceleration in the agenda I really do think it's important for people to prepare I talk about this a lot Start doing your own gardening.
Grow your food as much as you can.
Get your food from suppliers that you know you can trust.
Prepare yourself for some off-grid living.
Get yourself a go bag.
Get yourself some water filtration.
If you're in Australia, go to Survival Supplies Australia.
Get yourself.
They have fantastic water filtration options there for you and 20-year life water also.
Get yourself some alternative communications.
We've just had one of the biggest outages in history where half our country lost communications.
Total collapse of the city of Melbourne's train systems.
And so alternative communications from a satellite communicator you can trust, which is sat123.com forward slash Maria, the satellite phone store fully encrypted by the satellite phone store.
They are fantastic people.
We love them very, very much.
And they have great deals on all their products, including power banks, everything, the whole deal.
And Stockman Stakes, if you are in Australia, head over there and get yourself some Guaranteed.
The Guaranteed is provided by Stockman.
You can even give them a call and ask them the question.
No MRNA. Fully, fully grass-fed, antibiotic-free, pasture-raised.
The meat is fantastic.
I don't eat anywhere else anymore and I refuse to because I know these guys and they are very, very committed to ensuring their promises.
The point is, guys, we have to support the people that want to be outside of this crazy system.
What I've just shown you today is while it may have been presented as the way to minimize future threats, we know that this has been weaponized against our population and the word Borg is there and all of the mainstream media outlets that attacked Todd Callender and I can shove it because we've now aired pretty much the entire presentation from NASA. Again, the link for that is in the description below, as are all the partners I spoke about.
Prepare yourself and your family for anything that's coming ahead.
And you know what?
As the people that are not awake or just waking up see that we are strong and prepared for any single outcome, once they've realized that they're at war with their governments who waged war on them, they will flock to us.
They will flock to us.
And the better prepared we are, the more they will flock.
God bless you all.
I will see you next week.
▲
Export Selection