Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 24, 2023 - Stew Peters Show

01:03:44

LIVE - WRONGTHINK: The Trends of Politics: A Fashion Show for Ugly People

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	- I have two more people to hear from.
	I'm sorry.
	You have a chance.
	Well, I'm not sorry.
	You sit down.
	I know you're not sorry.
	That's the point.
	The hypocrisy of this speech.
	The hypocrisy of the fact that- Frank Magicia is a leading civil rights organizer.
	Can you please make a statement about President Joe Biden's speech?
	This is a clearly warmongering speech.
	President Joe Biden is calling for $100 billion of funding for Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine.
	And we're supposed to just bundle these together and pretend like we're going to rush to World War III and we're all just going to let Hillary Rodham Clinton sit here.
	Okay.
	I'm sorry.
	You know, this is not the way to have a conversation.
	If you want to have a conversation, you're welcome to come talk to me afterwards.
	You can sit here.
	Okay, right.
	You're going to wait for me, right?
	I will wait for you, and I will listen to you, and I will respond to you.
	I do not believe you.
	Respectfully, I do not believe you.
	And the fact of the matter is that the American people's voice are what needs to be heard.
	Yeah, they are being heard.
	Because our president is not speaking for the American people, and neither are you.
	Well, that's your opinion.
	That's your opinion.
	Yes, that's my opinion.
	Well, then sit down.
	We've heard your opinion.
	Thank you very much.
	Now we're going to turn to people who are on the front lines of working on behalf of human rights.
	I'm going to exercise my free speech until I'm removed.
	But it's not free speech when you are disrupting everybody else's opportunity to speak.
	Yes, it is.
	It is free speech.
	This is free speech, everyone.
	This is free speech.
	That is not free speech.
	This is people constructing narratives that are openly hypocritical.
	I'm sorry.
	The incredible hypocrisy.
	When, with Eleanor Roosevelt to bring this Declaration of the Rights of Man, John Foster Dulles was involved with the CIA! Oh yeah, well you're brilliant in your historical cherry-picking.
	And the Pinochet regime, please, could you please inform me about the United States' involvement in these historical things?
	Okay, we are going to, we're going to move on to...
	Ms.
	Clinton, will you announce Joe Biden, will you announce Joe Biden's speech?
	He's not just yelling about it.
	So Frank, I want to turn to you, because you are from Uganda, and Uganda's 2023 Anti-Homosexuality Act criminalizes LGBT conduct in Uganda.
	And, oh please, It's not about Israel's Palestine.
	It's not about football.
	This isn't football.
	It's not Team America.
	Well, I'm sorry, but some of us are on Team America, despite our flaws and our problems.
	Yes, yes, that's me!
	And some of us, every person on this stage has wished their life, their income, their reputation, their careers, and what have you done other than stand up, stand up, stand up.
	I will put my records and these women's records and Frank's records against you any day of the year.
	I'll respond.
	What I have done is I have asked Hillary Rodham Clinton to denounce the president's openly warmongering, suicidal, idiotic speech.
	And I've given my answer.
	I will not do that.
	So that's the end of our conversation.
	But I'll still meet you outside.
	But you're done.
	Okay, Frank?
	Well, well, well, that patriot, that hero, was absolutely correct.
	Absolutely.
	And I know you guys are thinking, well, could he be lefty?
	Could he be conservative?
	What might he be?
	Well, I don't really care at this point.
	If you're willing to stand up to Hillary Rodham Clinton, Hillary, a woman who literally has the power to put you to death if she wants to, that takes some balls.
	And I was so impressed.
	I actually started the show at this clip, not necessarily because it's the theme of the show, although the show is about that, because let's be honest, the trends that we're dealing with here have all to do with giving money to foreign countries, specifically Israel.
	Now, I don't know another time when the Democratic Party was wholly this supportive of Israel.
	The only reason they are right now is because they see it as an opportunity for war, because it's all about trends.
	Whatever trend you're trying to push to get your ultimate agenda in, and that of course is starting a war to line their pockets with money.
	But I also wanted to start this show with that clip because, guys, Big, exciting announcement here.
	I was able to find out who that was.
	A man by the name of Robert, Robert Castle.
	And then I also found his friend who also confronted Hillary Clinton later on.
	Amazing confrontation.
	I have it all.
	I have the footage that I'll be playing, I guess, this Friday because guess what, guys?
	I'm going to be interviewing him.
	I'm going to be interviewing him on this very show and I think we're going to air it Friday.
	I'll keep updating you guys if anything changes but I'm really excited.
	Shout out to my friend Unwoke Thoughts because he helped me find him and I'm very excited for this because you know what?
	He was absolutely spot on and someone's got to have the balls to do it.
	Because not many people in this country do.
	Most people, even if they disagree with something that you say or they don't like what the left is doing, what the government's doing, I should say, don't like the way the government is weaponizing itself against we the people, they'll just sit there and take it because that's what they try and get us to do.
	They try and get us to be scared.
	Props to him.
	He might be a student, too.
	I'm not exactly sure, but I'm just so amazed, so impressed.
	Obviously, I had to find out who he was, and thanks to our friends on Twitter, I was able to find him.
	I'm really excited to have him on this Friday and talk about all of the deep state abuses within America.
	This will be amazing.
	On that note, guys, I also want to talk about, obviously, what this show is about, of course.
	We're going to be digging into so much, guys, what's going on as far as this whole trend thing, okay?
	The Democratic Party and really the Uniparty at large, because conservatives do this too, Con Inc.
	is full of this behavior, but essentially what they do is they follow trends.
	And these trends are created by the globalist elites who have an ultimate goal in mind.
	Now that goal may vary.
	Obviously the ultimate agenda is to just destroy the population and take out all Americans, particularly white people.
	We know that.
	But there is always a tiny difference in what each action is meant to achieve.
	And when they set that trend, obviously they rely on their ignorant sheep to follow it.
	They're useful idiots, if you will.
	And those useful idiots exist within the GOP and also in the Democratic Party.
	We're going to be going through some of those recent trend changes, why those trend changes happened as far as their party platform seeming to move around a lot.
	And another big issue that we're not talking about, first of all, some of the issues we're going to be talking about, of course, is the immigration problem, the illegal alien problem, because, of course, Eric Adams didn't really care about it until it started affecting his job.
	Of course, Mayor Muriel Bowser here in D.C. where I live.
	Finally decided to do something about the terrible crime.
	We're going to be discussing that.
	And also this whole Israel conflict.
	What's really going on and why they seem to be all following the same trend.
	So it's all really interesting stuff to dig into because there's always a root of the problem and there's always an answer.
	But just like D.C. is Hollywood for ugly people, guys, politics are fashion shows for ugly people.
	It's just about following trends and then when your voters catch up to the fact that you're actually just trying to destroy their lives, then that's when you make a change.
	We're going to be talking about that all on today's episode of Wrong Thing Primetime, guys.
	So stay tuned.
	And welcome to Wrong Thing Primetime, everyone. everyone.
	I'm Anna Perez.
	Thank you so much for being here on this Tuesday night.
	Really excited to be here for you guys because guess what?
	We have so much to discuss, as you just heard there.
	Before we dive right in, I want to go ahead and ask you to please rumble this show.
	Hit that thumbs up button.
	It's also called the rumble button, the like button, whatever you want to call it.
	Would really appreciate that.
	Also, share the link on your social media.
	Send it to your family and friends.
	Guys, it's really important that we get the truth out there because very few outlets are Are even allowed to speak the truth.
	And that is how we get the truth out.
	Because the deep state we know makes it very difficult for this information to get out there.
	So definitely help us out by sharing the link.
	Telling people to be here at 9pm.
	Our Stu Peters Network is the place to be.
	And also by liking this show and all the other shows on the Stu Peters Network.
	On that note, I want to go ahead and see who is in the chat.
	My computer's a little slow right now.
	I hope it doesn't affect the show.
	Let's see.
	Ike Anderson says, Anna wears too much makeup.
	Get that fallen angel tech off of you.
	Fallen angel tech.
	I don't exactly know who you're referring to.
	I don't have a makeup artist, so I don't know what you're talking about.
	As far as my makeup goes, it's actually a lot less than you realize.
	It's just that on camera it looks a certain way, but you'd be shocked.
	You'd be shocked.
	Most of the women in this industry wear a hell of a lot more makeup than I do, believe me.
	Let's see.
	Dnice1113 says, you guys ever heard of ex-KGB named Yuri Bezmenov?
	He had a bunch of videos in the 80s that survived and foretold the fall of the USA. No, that sounds very interesting.
	Let us know about that.
	Actually, put that link in the comment area because I'm curious about that.
	Anyways, I want to say hello to everyone.
	I don't know why I started reading comments.
	That wasn't what I was going to do.
	I was just going to say hello.
	We have Realtor Dan Grimes.
	We have Will Bond.
	We have B-Man 6262.
	We have Will Bond.
	We have this freak, Ike Anderson, who just accused me of wearing too much makeup even though I'm on camera.
	InfoQWarrior, great to see you.
	Ejack, great to see you.
	CassSRumble29, Freethinker26, who else?
	Mdar211, ToneMan514, LenoreFamily5, great to see you as well.
	Salty Debbie, let's see who else.
	Jack 2022, Cooper Cooper, great to see all of you.
	Rstar77, I want to make sure I don't miss anyone, at least not off the top of the show.
	FanoBoss12, already said hi to you guys as well.
	D-Nice.
	WilliamHugSteeden, great to see you as well.
	Let's see, Willie Bond.
	I think I said hello to you.
	And I'm sure more amazing patriots will join as we go on.
	But, of course, I do want to tell you about our amazing sponsor here at the Stu Peters Network.
	And that would, of course, be for Patriots.
	Guys, before we move on, I do want to tell you a little bit about...
	Four Patriots.
	Four Patriots is so important to us right now because guess what, guys?
	The question that's looming over everyone right now is the obvious.
	When things go sideways, will you be prepared?
	And the sad answer to that question is we think maybe we are.
	We buy some ammo, we buy our guns, but we don't necessarily think about the other things that we might need because guess what?
	The government will do absolutely anything they can to us, okay?
	So some people are concerned.
	They might have to go for a long time without electricity or maybe even food.
	And those are valid concerns.
	They will go there.
	They meaning these elites that absolutely hate us and want to kill us.
	That's why I want to introduce you to 4Patriots.com.
	Get preparedness products you can use now and that could save your life later on.
	Seriously.
	Literally.
	My favorite is for Patriots new solar generator, the Patriot power generator 2000 X.
	It uses the endless free power of the sun to power lights, your TV, medical equipment, even run your fridge.
	Plus it's expandable and comes with a free solar panel or pick one of for Patriots best selling survival food kits, delicious tasting and designed to last for 25 years.
	They even have kits with real meat, which is pretty incredible considering it lasts for 25 years.
	And if the power's out, no worries.
	Just boil water over a fire, simmer, and serve.
	You'll enjoy a hot meal and stay safe in a crisis.
	More smart people than ever are Finding Four Patriots.
	Over 2 million customers trust them.
	You might even have seen them on TV. I had the folks at Four Patriots set up a special page for you.
	4Patriots.com forward slash Anna.
	Guys, I got you all set up, okay?
	Listeners of this show can see this website.
	When you go to this website, you can see all of the deals they have set out for you guys, okay?
	It's a special made website for you guys to access these deals.
	All you have to do is go to 4Patriots.
	Again, that is the number 4, 4Patriots.com forward slash Anna.
	And make sure you hurry up and check this out because these deals will not last long.
	And guys, I'm telling you, their products for Patriots, not only does buying their products, a portion of that go to helping veterans, which we know the United States government doesn't care about, so it's a good thing that we have amazing companies like for Patriots doing that, but also their products are literal lifesavers.
	You never know when the government's going to get your city next, going to come after your town next.
	So this is super important that you check this out.
	4patriots.com forward slash Anna.
	Alright guys, so I do want to go ahead and jump right in so we don't run out of time like we did last time.
	I didn't get to get to my last segment of the show.
	That was okay.
	We're going to get to it today.
	But I want to start out, guys, by talking about something very interesting that I came across.
	Now, obviously at this time we are inundated with news that has to do with Israel and Nobody's really talking about the news at home.
	And if they are talking about it, it's usually the mainstream media with their stupid morning shows just giving you a rundown of basic things that probably information that comes directly from the government, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Nothing actually, no actual research that goes into it, I should say.
	And so that's sad.
	You know, we're not really actually getting the full picture of what's going on in this country.
	But guys, I came across a story that kind of wrapped all of this into one, because it made me think.
	When I came across this story, I thought to myself, It seems what's going on now is there's a lot of these trends that the Democratic Party was following that they're suddenly kind of changing their perspective on.
	Well, what do I mean by that?
	Well, this first story I want to talk about is Mayor Muriel Bowser in D.C. proposing new policies, essentially, to combat the high crime in D.C. And as somebody who lives in D.C., I could tell you right now, I'll put it this way.
	I don't walk anywhere alone unless I'm going to somewhere right down the street to the coffee shop right next to my apartment.
	I don't really go anywhere else alone unless I'm in a car.
	Obviously, that's different.
	But as far as being out in the open alone, I don't do that because that's how dangerous DC is.
	And you might ask, well, Anna, why is it so dangerous?
	Well, the obvious answer to that would be, of course, defunding the police.
	Their favorite, favorite mantra that, of course, was going viral throughout the entirety of 2020 because, well, BLM, Black Lives Matter, had to push that narrative.
	Now, let me be completely clear.
	I'm not one of those people who blindly trust any government force.
	I learned my lesson during 2020 when it comes to trusting the same police that will then stab you in the back and will enforce vaccine mandates.
	I'm not vaccinated, so that certainly affected me.
	I live in D.C. They enforce the same policies that they enforced in New York City.
	So let me be completely clear.
	I'm not one of those people that blindly follow anything, whether it be the police force or any other part of the government.
	After all, the police at the end of the day is government funded.
	Also take into account the whole January 6th thing, yada yada.
	You get my point.
	One thing I will say is that for the most part, we do need some sort of protective service.
	I do value what the police bring, obviously, to the city.
	I'm also not the kind of person who's retarded enough to say, oh, let's ban police because they're big, bad racists.
	No, that's retarded and untrue.
	All of these incidents that we look at, obviously it's black people not following directions and then screaming racism.
	So, you know what?
	That's also not part of it.
	So, it was quite interesting to me to see how Mayor Muriel Bowser suddenly changed her stance on all of this too.
	First it was, oh, we have to help the poor black people.
	Oh, police are so racist.
	Yes, we'll ban them.
	And then suddenly I come across this clip.
	This was from actually earlier today, a press conference she gave, literally talking about how we need to fund the police.
	And, of course...
	Interject all of these new policies that would protect us from crime.
	Pretty reasonable, although pretty unreasonable, that we had to wait until now to see this action taking place.
	Take a look.
	Good morning.
	I'm Ariel Bowser.
	I'm joined by members of my public safety team and D.C. residents.
	We are located in the heart of Ward 4.
	I especially want to acknowledge the Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice, Deputy Mayor Lindsey Appiah, and the Acting Police Chief, Pamela Smith.
	You've heard me brief and speak many times on public safety and how ensuring the safety of our city is our first priority in working hand-in-hand with policy makers and community to ensure that we are doing everything possible to make our community safe.
	And to that end, today I'm announcing new legislation that will address recent crime trends and give law enforcement more tools to hold criminals accountable and keep our neighborhoods safe.
	The Addressing Crime Trends Now Act will create an environment that better supports communities and victims as well as NPD's ability to hire and retain qualified officers.
	And some of the changes are just plain common sense.
	We know, for example, that the criminal behavior directed at our business community, particularly our retailers, is unacceptable.
	And people in our city are sick and tired of it.
	People want great businesses in their neighborhoods, they want to go to stores and restaurants, and they don't want to have to worry about those businesses being robbed repeatedly and brazenly.
	So with this legislation, we are creating criminal penalties and establishing a new crime directed towards organized retail theft in our city.
	And under the new law, it will be illegal for any person to organize a theft-for-profit scheme by recruiting or directing other individuals to commit organized retail theft.
	We are also reinstating the law that makes it unlawful to wear a mask for the purpose of committing criminal acts or threatening people or causing fear.
	Obviously, our community's relationship around wearing masks has changed significantly since 2020, and thank God for that.
	But we've all seen the videos.
	In fact, there was one from The Wharf last Monday where everyone who jumped out of a car with a gun, pointed at an innocent person, had on a ski mask.
	And we need to address that.
	These changes, of course, won't apply to people who are wearing masks for their health.
	And one thing that you've heard from Chief Smith and her team frequently out in the community, they're out over the last several months and visited favorite neighborhoods across our city and there has been overwhelming support for addressing open air drug dealing and loitering.
	People in the community are not fools.
	They know what's happening at some of these sites.
	And the new legislation will allow MPD to limit loitering by reinstating...
	I just want to pause this for a second and let you guys know that much like other cities around the United States, D.C. has this problem where no matter where you go, there's a heroin addict falling over right in front of you.
	Especially, you know what's interesting?
	I would say the drug addict problem is far worse around the Capitol building and around the White House.
	That's more so the Capitol building area.
	It is so bad there.
	It's so dirty and disgusting.
	And this has been going on.
	I've lived in D.C. since 2015.
	And it started getting really bad.
	I'm not exaggerating.
	So this crime problem has been around for a while.
	Even when Trump was there, it was still pretty bad.
	Because obviously those things are all dictated by the mayor, Muriel Bowser.
	So even though Trump was president, even with that being said, Mayor Muriel Bowser still was the one in control of her city and she wasn't doing anything.
	So that means she wasn't doing anything for like six, seven, eight years, guys.
	Only now is she finally stepping in, and we'll discuss more of that after I'm done playing this, but I want to play a little bit more of it for you guys.
	...the ability for the police chief to declare a drug-free zone for up to 120 hours to disrupt and prohibit people from congregating on public space for the purchase, sale, or use of illegal drugs.
	The establishment of a temporary drug-free zone will allow MPD and community members to work together to interrupt illegal activity and allow neighborhoods to reclaim our space.
	And finally, Chief Smith will go over the next part in more detail, but I want to start by saying this.
	MPD continues to be a leader in fair and constitutional policing across this nation.
	They continue to work every day to have and keep the trust of our city, and this legislation won't change that.
	And there it is.
	There it is, guys.
	She just admitted she trusts the police force in D.C. And why shouldn't she?
	That's the one thing that we're missing or we have been missing for the past few years.
	Why?
	Why?
	Because it was trendy to defund the police, so you did it!
	You did whatever it was that your globalist masters were expecting of you, you useful idiot!
	And that's why it's quite interesting that she's making this speech.
	Oh, so it's actually not racist to have tough-on-crime policies and police that are actually doing something after all.
	So actually, after all, police, it turns out, aren't racist.
	Because if they really were, then how is it possible that you would suddenly make that change in your policy decision, your policy-making decision?
	Because D.C. police were defunded.
	So were every other city.
	Even if they didn't come out and say it, when you look at the trends and you look at the funding for police, it did go down.
	And that's the one area that should have gone up, if anything.
	Not how much money from our taxes went to Ukraine.
	No.
	Should have been our police, if anything, because crime in not just D.C., but in many other cities, is out of control because of defund the police messaging.
	But it was trendy for like two, three years to defund the police, to have soft on crime policies.
	We destroyed our cities because of trendiness.
	Think of it that way.
	And obviously that wasn't the ultimate goal.
	The globalists weren't sitting here thinking, ooh, let's start a trend.
	And then it'll just be fun to see everybody destroy themselves.
	Maybe that was part of it, sure.
	But the real goal here was, where did this trend come from?
	That's the question you have to ask yourself.
	Well, it came from the whole BLM movement.
	The whole idea that all police are racist and that they're out to kill black people.
	They're out for black genocide, which is absolutely absurd and retarded, a retarded concept in general, and anybody with an IQ over two would see that.
	Sadly, many of the people in this country don't have an IQ over two, so they fell for it.
	They were the useful idiots.
	They were the retarded white liberal college girls who posted black squares on their Instagram, okay?
	Those were the useful idiots that were just following it because it's trendy.
	Same with Mayor Muriel Bowser.
	She's not the globalist elite.
	She's not the top.
	She's just enforcing whatever their agenda is because it's a trend.
	She notices the trend and she wants to be part of that trend.
	That's what the Uniparty is all about.
	They're all about following trends, particularly the Democratic Party.
	They're worse with this.
	But the GOP does it too and we'll be talking about that in the second part of the show.
	But one thing that I want to mention here...
	Is that, well, the root of the problem is, of course, BLM, right?
	Because in order to understand what's really going on here, you have to figure out what was the reason for it.
	Because the real reason behind starting these trends, the globalist elites start the trend, okay?
	Why do they start these trends?
	Well, they wanted, in the case of the 2020 BLM defund the police movement, they wanted to make Trump look bad.
	That's what it was all about.
	They Create enough chaos just in time for the election.
	They also wanted to make a case for the fact that America was so racist under Donald Trump and that we were in such a terrible predicament that we absolutely needed to defund police immediately and that that was just the tip of the iceberg, but that we needed to do so much more, including pass reparations for black people.
	That's what this all came from.
	It came from the trendy BLM movement.
	And of course, Mayor Muriel Bowser was all in for it.
	But then when the globalists already established what they wanted, they already stole the election in 2020, you slowly started to see that trend, well, fade away.
	And so there was no need to destroy your city in the name of trends, in the name of fashion, if you will.
	And so instead, what happened is everybody looked around and they realized, holy shit!
	I might die if I walk around my very own city alone.
	I'm not going to vote for whoever is in charge doing this, allowing this to occur.
	So then that's why Mayor Muriel Bowser decided to take action.
	And she's not the only one with this approach.
	Obviously, this is something that the entire Uniparty follows, because similarly, Eric Adams is dealing with a problem just like that in New York City, except his problem is dealing with the migrant crisis.
	There are illegal aliens flooding New York City as we speak, making a mess wherever they go.
	Taking up space in five-star hotels that the government is granting to them.
	People are living in New York City impoverished while the government continues to shell out resources to migrants.
	Illegals, actually, is the better word for it.
	And quite frankly, not only is the city an absolute asshole and crimes up, it's disgusting, it's a mess, but get this.
	It's also...
	Taking away from taxpayers' money.
	And we simply cannot afford.
	It doesn't matter which side you're on.
	At the end of the day, you have to admit the truth.
	You have to face the truth.
	A government cannot afford to keep up with the constant numbers of illegals flooding a city, a massive city like New York.
	And that's exactly what Mayor Adams, Eric Adams, admitted the other day.
	Actually, I believe it was from today or yesterday.
	Here's the press conference.
	Do you know what, in over 50 years, I never thought I would sit down before people understand what outer room means.
	Yes, we're placing people in conditions that are unfair for migrants and it's unfair for New York City taxpayers.
	That's what we've been trying to say over and over again.
	And we're doing it like no other municipality.
	No other municipality is accomplishing what we have accomplished.
	But I want to be clear.
	the visual signs of this crisis in our city, people are going to start to see it.
	Yeah, people have already started to see it.
	This has been going on for quite some time, Mayor Eric Adams.
	And you know what's so interesting is prior to Mayor Eric Adams even being there, Bill de Blasio, of course, was arguably worse than Eric Adams.
	Maybe not worse.
	Maybe right about the same.
	Honestly, they're all the same.
	They all just want to destroy this country, let's be honest.
	Point is, Mayor de Blasio His whole thing was, oh, we're a sanctuary city.
	No borders, no walls, no USA at all.
	Why?
	Well, because he was the mayor during the Trump years.
	And the agenda was still the same, just as it was in D.C. during BLM. That agenda was make America look as bad and racist and terrible as possible so that we can get Trump out of here.
	We can look at Trump and we can make him look bad.
	Now that they've effectively destroyed their cities by actually acting as a sanctuary city, as they said they would, and allowing all of these random illegals into their home, now the residents of New York City are quite aware of what a sanctuary city actually looks like when it acts in its full capacity, beyond its full capacity.
	There are literal sidewalks trashed.
	With all sorts of shit, you wouldn't believe, guys, what some of these five-star hotels look like and the surrounding sidewalks.
	I don't know if you've been to New York recently, but if you have, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
	It's not even something that they can be covert about.
	They are flooding the city.
	They are infesting the city.
	These migrants.
	These illegals, rather.
	But, of course, that was what they asked for, right?
	That was what Mayor Eric Adams, what the entire Democratic Party asked for.
	No borders, no walls, no USA at all, right?
	Right?
	Because that's what I remember.
	Oh wait, no.
	It was just trendy to say that.
	It was just trendy for the useful idiots to perpetuate that messaging.
	But at the end of the day, the globalists who were setting those trends knew exactly what would happen.
	And it did happen.
	They destroyed this country.
	They tried to make Trump look bad.
	They stole the election in 2020.
	And now they got what they want, so that trend is useless.
	And in fact, it probably makes the Democratic Party look worse.
	So they're slowly backing away, and suddenly Mayor Eric Adams is being honest.
	Suddenly you're starting to see Democrats be honest about this problem, at least in New York City.
	That's what's going on, guys.
	That's what this is all about.
	It's about fashion.
	Fashion.
	Fashion for fat, ugly people.
	I don't think Eric Adams is fat, but certainly Mayor Muriel Bowser is, and ugly.
	They're all hideous, that's for sure.
	But most of them are overweight.
	The point is, guys, this has nothing to do with what's right for America, and we all knew that.
	But what makes matters worse is that it's all to serve a purpose for them.
	And I don't mean just the Democratic Party, I mean the Uniparty.
	And we're going to be talking about the Israel conflict coming up next, because what could be a better example of following trends than what we're seeing with Israel?
	I'll explain more, but something occurred to me.
	I did a segment on Stu's show earlier today, and it occurred to me when we were filming the segment, Stu brought up an incredible point about the fact that suddenly the media are caring about the wide-open border because it affects a good percentage of their population, of their voting bloc, which of course are liberal Jewish people.
	Liberal Jews Are a big part of the Democrats voter block.
	And so they have to at least pretend like they care about Israel and partly pretending like they care about Israel's closing the border right now and many other issues.
	I don't want to get ahead of myself because we have a lot to discuss because it's not just the Democratic Party that seems to be switching their stance on something because it's the trendy thing to do, not because they care.
	But also, the Republican Party is doing something quite weird as well we're going to be discussing coming up.
	Before we do move on, though, I want to go ahead and ask you to please rumble the show.
	Hit that thumbs up button if you haven't already.
	Share the link on your social media.
	I would really appreciate that, guys.
	Help get the word out about the show.
	And I want to see what's going on in the chat.
	Let's see.
	We have, uh, thank you, Anna.
	This is r-77.
	Oh, you don't have to thank me.
	I love doing this, but thanks, I guess.
	Dan Dreyer says, those who implemented these policies should be locked up.
	I agree, Dan, because clearly they want to destroy this country, but no one's going to hold them accountable because they're going to let them get away with what they get away with time and time again because it's all, of course, being funded by Soros, which is a perfect example of what happened with BLM. Who funded BLM? George Soros.
	He was the elite that set that trend, and boom, there you have it.
	We defunded our police, destroyed this country, they stole the election.
	Oh, and now it's not a useful, trendy policy that already destroyed this city, so now they're going to backtrack on it.
	See what I mean?
	See what I mean?
	George Soros is a perfect example.
	Jatt2022 says, You start to display what inner energy is driving you evil, distorts, and disfigures a mutation of morality.
	Couldn't have said it better myself.
	Absolutely.
	Let's see what else.
	Let's see.
	Infowarrior says, Think Stu gonna get jelly.
	His chat ain't poppin' like Anna Bananas.
	Okay, well, in all fairness to Stu, the difference is, like, if you're...
	When you pre-record a show, it's obviously, like, you're not gonna interact as much, so it's like...
	You know, it's not that people don't want to be in the chat with him.
	It's that he's not there to, you know, talk.
	And that's fine.
	Like, everybody does their show differently, right?
	So, but it's certainly not because people don't want to talk to Stu.
	I'm sure if he was active in his chat, people would be all over it.
	But, let's see.
	Freethinker26 is a great topic that needs to be covered, Anna.
	Thank you, thank you.
	Yeah, I mean, look, the reality is, when you look at what the left is doing, and the Uniparty as a whole, this is the thing that blows my mind, and I'm going to talk about it more coming up, but it's pretty interesting to me.
	You can always tell somebody's true agenda, true intention by how scared they are of you coming up with the contradicting point, right?
	What I mean by that, or not contradicting, the The inverse perspective, right?
	So, like, for example, when I... Like, I'm not scared of the left, right?
	I'm not scared of them.
	I can sit here and have a conversation with you.
	Like, if you want to have a debate over...
	It's not really the left, rather, because a lot of the Republicans felt for this, too.
	But if you think that the vaccines are awesome and they're so amazing and you got 15 vaccines and you're ready to go to town debating on vaccines because you just love them so much and you really believe in those masks and you want to wear three or four of them on a daily basis...
	Okay, you want to be an absolute walking freak show?
	Be my guest, okay?
	I guess that's your prerogative.
	I hope you don't have kids and you're not, you know, enforcing that same lifestyle on them.
	But point is, whatever.
	In theory, I don't really care that much.
	Now, if you want to sit here and have a conversation...
	I'm not going to sit here and shut you down immediately.
	Sure, I'll probably think you're mentally ill, but I'm willing to have a conversation, meaning I'm not scared of you.
	I don't have to sit here and throw labels at you and say this or that.
	I'm willing to talk.
	I will list off all of the issues with the vaccine that I'm aware of off the top of my head.
	I will sit there and I will talk about the fact that the masks aren't even effective.
	I will sit there and I will walk through what a low actual issue COVID is, how low mortality rate it actually causes.
	We can have a debate over this.
	You know what I mean?
	Whereas the left or not even the left, but the uniparty, when they don't want to talk to you about something, they'll just shut it down completely.
	They'll say something that is completely and utterly ridiculous that all it says to you is that, hey, I'm scared of having this debate.
	They're scared of you.
	I'm not scared of the left.
	When I see a crazy person, for the most part, I'm not scared of them.
	I'm just like, oh, you're mentally ill, but sure, I'll have a debate with you.
	I'll at least try.
	So the point of me saying that is when you start talking about Israel and where you stand on it, and let's say you're like me, who's very America first and doesn't want to give funding, and I don't want Americans to die for Netanyahu.
	Sorry, I just don't.
	Sue me, okay?
	Okay.
	But if I say that to somebody who's a huge Israel supporter, and this happens to be on both sides, and this is why I've become so disillusioned with the Republican Party, with the conservative movement right now, they'll then look at you and say, well, then you're supporting Hamas.
	And I'm like, that tells me right here that there's something that you don't want to get out there.
	There's information that you don't want to be confronted with.
	You're saying that out of fear.
	You and I both know that that's utterly ridiculous.
	Why in the world would I align myself with Hamas just because I said I don't want American citizens to die for Netanyahu?
	What about that phrase tells you I support Hamas?
	What about that phrase?
	And so that tells me that there's something weird going on here with all of the support for Israel.
	It's like, you must do whatever we say and ask no questions.
	And you must have no nuanced thoughts here.
	That is the demand that is being placed on us.
	And anytime a demand like that is placed on society, there's more where that came from.
	So, it's pretty serious.
	Let's see.
	What are you guys saying?
	He has, Lauren Witzke has his executive producer here.
	Yeah, Lauren is incredible.
	She does amazing work.
	Her and Stu do great work.
	I'm really impressed with, I remember when I came across, I think I said this, when I came across Stu, I was like, oh, I know this guy is going to be huge.
	I know he's going to be huge.
	Because he's saying things that everybody else is scared of saying.
	He's pointing things out that no one else will.
	Um, let's see.
	Uh, OMG, where did they, where did, where are you Murphy?
	Oh, let's see.
	You are 100% correct, Anna says Salty Debbie.
	Thank you, Salty Debbie.
	Appreciate that.
	Appreciate the support.
	Um, let's see.
	Willie Bond says, see, it's the criminal syndicate that's basically the WEF, and you should focus on them and their minions.
	Get smart Jews to take down Newton Yahoo.
	I love the way you spelled that.
	Who has killed them in his mandates.
	Good points, good points.
	Dnice1113 says, Not one congressperson has taken a stand against this COVID operation.
	That is very telling.
	Absolutely.
	100%.
	AnnaChapPopinCast says, InfoQWarrior.
	Absolutely.
	Jat2022 says, I love when Stu simply calls all of the MSM freak show fake and gay.
	They are fake and gay.
	He's totally right.
	They're all faggots.
	Is somebody...
	Oh, I'm lagging right now.
	I think there's something...
	Am I lagging, guys?
	I don't know what's going on.
	Something's weird with my OBS, which is the software that I use for the show.
	So I hope it's not gonna stay that way.
	Oh, it's already...
	Flip.
	I hope it's...
	I hope I'm not...
	I hope it's not too bad for you guys.
	Sorry about that.
	Anyways, I want to go ahead and move on because it's already 9.42 and I don't want to run out of time like I did last time.
	So guys, as I said, I want to delve into what's going on with Israel because this has everything to do with the whole point I'm making, which is that the unit party is all about trends, okay?
	They will support something if it's trendy.
	Then when it loses its appeal, they'll stop, okay?
	They're all about...
	They'll only support, and the trend will only exist for as long as the globalists need it to exist.
	So you have the Uniparty, which is the useful idiot branch of the globalists.
	They kind of perpetuate these trends and they make it a thing.
	They're the ones that basically decide what you should support and what you shouldn't.
	So that the sheep voters will say to themselves, okay, what's the accepted narrative?
	I will support that accepted narrative.
	I will ask no questions.
	Whatever you say, Uniparty.
	And then the Uniparty, of course, answers to the elites who set the agenda.
	So with that said, guys, what they're doing now with the Israel conflict is exactly that.
	As far as conservatives go, or I should say conservatives, right?
	Supporting Israel is the same concept as supporting Ukraine.
	You know, and I've said this a million times, it's quite interesting.
	With the whole Ukraine setup, there were conservatives that still, there are conservatives, I should say, to this day that still support giving money to Ukraine, and they're all uniparty hacks.
	We know that.
	But for the most part, I would say they had been exposed.
	Towards the end, when it became clear that Ukraine wasn't winning, the government's lying to us, the media's fake and gay, so obviously they're lying to us, right?
	We've known that for quite some time.
	So, you know, if your argument about Ukraine is, well, I don't want to give foreign aid away just willy-nilly like that, I don't want to support a war, I don't want to get involved in the war, those are all valid arguments that we were hearing from much of the Uniparty when the truth started to come out about Ukraine.
	It sounded like they were starting to admit the truth.
	But then suddenly the whole Israel agenda came out and everybody was up in arms ready to support Israel.
	And now it's quite interesting because they will seriously tell you to your face, we should stop funding Ukraine and we should be more focused on Israel.
	What?
	Are you aware of the fact that we give billions to Israel already every single year?
	As far as I'm concerned, we should be giving zero foreign aid right now to any country.
	I'm sick and tired of it.
	We can't even get our own shit together here in America.
	But anyways, here was Mike Huckabee on Newsmax, of course, Uniparty headquarters, explaining that basically...
	Somehow, it makes sense to support Israel, but not Ukraine right now.
	Even though, if you're going to believe in not funding Ukraine, the same logic would apply to not funding Israel.
	But that's not what we're hearing from him.
	Take a look at this.
	I thought it was very telling what was going on.
	President Biden's address last night from the Oval Office, only the This coming just hours after a new CBS YouGov poll came out that showed that only 44% of the American people approve of Joe Biden's handling of the war in Israel.
	Joining us now for more on this, let's welcome in former Arkansas Governor, presidential candidate Mike Huckabee.
	Governor, great to see you.
	Good morning.
	Good morning.
	Great to be with you this morning.
	So, Governor, the President is asking Congress, again, we don't have a speaker, 17 days and counting, for a $105 billion aid package, $60 billion for Ukraine, a huge number, $14 billion for Israel, $14 billion for border security, nothing about a wall in there.
	What was your reaction to the President's address last night?
	I deeply appreciate that the president went to Israel.
	I'm grateful for the very strong statements that he and Anthony Blinken have given in support of Israel.
	I think, let's be fair, they've done well in that.
	But I thought the speech last night was less about Israel and a whole lot more about Ukraine.
	And it was an opportunity to push for the military support of Ukraine.
	It's a lot shakier than is the support for Israel right now, and maybe that was his intent.
	I also am a little concerned when the president It seems to put some pressure on Israel about how they conduct themselves going into Gaza.
	And I'm not sure that it's our place to tell Israel how to defend itself and how to avenge the slaughter, the just absolutely barbarian slaughter of women, babies and elderly people.
	I think Israel is going to take every step possible to minimize civilian deaths.
	But on the other hand, this is all for one reason.
	Hamas, terrorists, evil, evil people started this.
	They're the ones who have precipitated an incredible onslaught against civilians, both in Gaza as well as in Israel.
	Let's take a listen to that, Governor.
	This is Joe Biden asking the people of Israel not to stoke anti-Islam sentiment.
	So he's...
	Oh my gosh, is the clip still playing?
	Okay, there it goes.
	It's gone now.
	Okay.
	So basically he's saying, not basically, he's literally saying, oh, now's the time to support Israel.
	Not just by giving them money or aid, I should say, but rather by giving them military equipment.
	But that we shouldn't really be worried about Ukraine that much anymore.
	Well, why?
	What's the difference between Israel and Ukraine?
	If anything, we already give Israel billions of dollars every single year.
	I don't want to give Ukraine...
	By the way, I'm not in favor.
	I'm not making the argument that we need to give Ukraine more money and not Israel.
	Quite the opposite.
	I'm saying that we should be giving zero money at all to these people, to these foreign countries.
	That's my point altogether.
	But because it's trendy now, because the globalists have set the trend to be all on the side of Israel, we now have to be all with that, all part of that trend.
	We have to perpetuate that.
	And by we, I mean conning.
	They rely on people like Mike Huckabee, To, you know, essentially toe the party line.
	Make sure that you're doing exactly what we say.
	You have to sit here and you have to make sure that everybody believes that somehow Israel is more worthy of billions of dollars and billions of dollars of military equipment.
	Oh, and also America's military intervention.
	More than Ukraine.
	I'm not going to sit here and have a debate over which one I want to send my son to die for more than the other.
	I want zero zilch, nothing to do with these countries as far as sending American citizens there to die.
	I don't have a son, to be clear.
	But if I did, I certainly wouldn't want him to die for Netanyahu, and I also wouldn't want him to die for Zelensky.
	So to be clear here, there is no difference.
	It would be the same argument either way.
	If we're going to be America first, we should be America first.
	There should be no exceptions.
	Right now we are struggling as a nation to actually contain our own border, to make sure that our own American citizens are safe.
	There's no time and no space and no money to be worried about the rest of the world.
	But it's the trend.
	It's the trend.
	So just like the Democrats did it for everything else, Khan Inc.
	is also a part of this.
	And so is the media, guys, when it comes to Israel.
	The media is all in for stoking this war as well.
	What do I mean by that exactly?
	Well, this was the part that I started thinking about thanks to the segment I did on Stu's show.
	he was bringing up the point that suddenly the media started to care about our wide open border um when we started to get engaged in this conflict and the reason why that is is because the border is the reason why a lot of terrorists are able to get into this country why because we've already stoked them we've already made them angry now they want to infiltrate this country and destroy us okay and the way we stoked them the way we got them
	angry in the first place was by doing things like um giving aid to israel constantly and by getting involved in everybody else's foreign conflict We have been setting ourselves up for this day for quite some time.
	And so, to get everybody on the side of Israel, to get everybody on the side of going to war for Netanyahu, I guess the media, the mainstream media, suddenly decided to chime in and actually report on our border for once.
	Quite convenient, the timing, might I add.
	Take a look at this.
	Hamas militants may potentially try crossing the southern border, U.S. officials warn.
	That is from ABC. Then we have number of people on terrorist watch lists stopped at southern U.S. border has risen.
	That's from ABC as well.
	Terrorists crossing the U.S. border, rising encounters, explained.
	That is from Bloomberg, I believe.
	Suspected terrorists are streaming across Biden's broken border.
	That is from The Hill.
	So suddenly the mainstream media is more than happy to admit what's really going on in our border.
	People are able to pour right in.
	People whom we don't even know are able to come right through our open border.
	And the only reason they're admitting that, the only reason they're willing to admit anything that we the little people have been screaming about for years is because there is an agenda.
	And that agenda is of course to get us to go to war for Israel.
	And it's also quite interesting because there's something that the Democratic Party has started suddenly caring about that I don't really remember them ever caring about before.
	That would, of course, be supporting Israel.
	Now, I don't know if you guys have been paying attention for the past few years, but...
	No, let me be clear.
	The left is more than happy to accuse you of being anti-Semitic.
	They're more than happy to accuse you of being anti-Jewish, hating Jews, whatever.
	But that's only if you're a conservative, okay?
	They're only going to throw that label at you if you're a conservative.
	But what's kind of interesting is that within the Democratic Party, there's actually been far more support for Palestine in the past...
	Than there has been for Israel, if anything.
	It used to be that, you know, being pro-Israel wasn't really something that the entire Uniparty was actually in favor of.
	However, it seems that there's less and less divisiveness over this issue in the Democratic Party today.
	In the entirety of the Uniparty, but rather the Democratic Party specifically.
	It used to be that many Democrats actually were on the side of Palestine.
	Now I'm not saying that's good or bad, I'm just saying that that's just the reality of what the Democratic Party has looked like in previous years.
	And yes, there are still supporters of that now.
	There's Rashida, there's what's her name, the other freak, Ilhan Omar, the whole whatever they call it, what's the squad, AOC. They love, they love Palestine, they love Hamas, right?
	That's true about them.
	They certainly love Hamas, okay?
	But what's interesting is that you're now starting to see the Democratic Party care about anti-Semitism.
	They never really cared about that before, which is weird, because normally they would be scared to eat their own.
	Now if there's one thing that the left could be complimented for, it's the fact that they have a very low tendency to actually destroy themselves, come after themselves, and yet we're starting to see that on the issue of Israel.
	Take a look at this clip from Karine Jean-Pierre pertaining to anti-Semitism and Israel.
	Take a look.
	Alright, I want to make something clear at the top because I understand how important moral clarity is.
	So, when Jews are targeted because of their beliefs or their identity, when Israel is singled out because of anti-Jewish hatred, That is anti-Semitism.
	And that is unacceptable.
	Can you guys hear that?
	I don't know if it's playing for you guys.
	I'm going to play it again.
	All right.
	I want to make something clear at the top because I understand how important moral clarity is, especially at this time.
	So when Jews are targeted because of their beliefs or their identity, when Israel is singled out because of anti-Jewish hatred, That is anti-Semitism.
	And that is unacceptable.
	There is no place for anti-Semitism.
	Full stop.
	Period.
	This is important to the president.
	It's important to me personally and to everyone in the administration.
	Following the Hamas terror attacks in Israel, which were the deadliest for Jews since the Holocaust, the president has been consistent and clear.
	We must all do our part and forcefully, forcefully speak out against anti-Semitism.
	And we must ensure that there is no place for hate in America.
	So I hope you guys heard that.
	For some reason it was muted on my end.
	But, yeah.
	Suddenly they're all concerned about everybody being anti-Semitic towards Jews because of the whole Israel-Hamas conflict.
	Now, ask yourselves, is that really rhetoric you would have heard out of their mouths maybe two years ago?
	Well, no.
	Because that would mean going against the very own members of their party.
	See, what's interesting about the left is they don't actually care about anybody, whether it be Jews or Muslims or Christians.
	They don't care about anyone.
	They're just doing something because it's convenient for a certain agenda.
	In this case, it's all about going to war for Israel.
	So that's why suddenly they're all up in arms about what's going on there.
	They're all up in arms, ready to call out anti-Semitism where they see it.
	So guys, here's the thing.
	They're following trends, whatever trend makes sense for them in the moment, for whatever goal it is that they're trying to achieve.
	Whether it be through making Trump look bad during the BLM years or the immigration crisis, they're not switching sides on that because that's not really convenient.
	They're too busy focused on what's going on in Israel.
	They already have a new goalpost in mind.
	And that would be destroying America through World War III. So now they have to employ all of their resources, the Uniparty, the media, the entirety of the Democratic Party, everybody, everybody is involved with this.
	So my advice to everybody is think clearly and critically.
	Don't let these people get into your heads.
	I know it sounds obvious, right?
	But it's actually easier said than done because there's a lot of social pressure to think a certain way or do something a certain way just for the sake of public approval.
	Now, I don't believe you guys will really face that problem because you're already watching wrong think.
	But the reality is it's an actual issue that many Americans struggle with and You know, I just pray that Americans think clearly about this because the reality is they want nothing more than for all of us to die for a war that we never should have been involved with.
	And why?
	Well, because it's trendy.
	At least, that's their argument.
	But at the very tippy-top, it's, well, so that we kill them.
	That's what they want.
	Alright guys, so please go ahead and like the show if you haven't already.
	Also share the link on your social media.
	I have one last clip I want to show you, but I'm debating whether or not to show it because everything's so choppy right now.
	Eh, it's not that important.
	I'll show it to you guys.
	If it doesn't...
	If it's not like...
	If it breaks up a lot, it's fine.
	Whatever.
	It's just kind of funny.
	So this woman, guys, she gets interviewed by a guy.
	I don't know what city she's in, but she looks like she's in a city.
	And he asks her how much a guy should spend on a date.
	And her interesting was quite interesting.
	Her answer...
	Sorry, her answer was quite interesting.
	I'll give you my take on all of this after the clip, but...
	I will say this.
	It caused a lot of uproar on the internet.
	And I think a lot of it is just seething men who don't really seem to understand the sentiment of her answer.
	Because it has less to do with money than what she was making it out to be.
	I think she explained her answer poorly, but I don't disagree with her.
	Here's the clip.
	What's the most a man should spend on a first date?
	I feel like if I'm gonna get ready and I'm gonna use my products to come out with you, I need like a minimum of $200.
	A minimum, and that's like being nice.
	And what does a man get in return for that?
	My presents.
	Aren't you having his presence within you already?
	I hear you, but no.
	No.
	I mean, like, I'm here to get to know you.
	How is it different?
	I'm here to get to know you.
	You invited me out.
	But he has to drop $200.
	Yeah.
	Minimum.
	Yeah.
	Because you invited me out.
	Just because you have to do your makeup?
	Because I have to...
	Okay.
	So we're gonna do the math.
	My moisturizer is $400.
	My eye cream is $300.
	My serum is like another $300.
	My makeup, you know, not included.
	So if I have to spend, you know, that's my money.
	I'm spending my money on these products.
	I'm gonna use these products.
	What are you using them for though?
	For myself.
	Okay.
	But I'm gonna use these products and I'm gonna show up because it's not like I'm gonna show up in sweats.
	The man doesn't owe you anything if you're just getting to know each other.
	If you're inviting me out, you owe me a day.
	So the internet exploded over these comments.
	And let me be completely real with you.
	And you may not like this answer, but allow me to explain this.
	She's right.
	She's right.
	Now, let me be completely clear, I think she's inarticulate and did not explain it properly, but the sentiment of what she's saying is not incorrect.
	What do I mean by that?
	Well, going on a date is all about putting your best foot forward, okay?
	And what she means to say is that if I'm going to put in all of this effort to look my best, as a woman should, when a man that you like asks you on a date, then the man should also put his best foot forward.
	He shouldn't take you to Burger King for a first date.
	Now, should it be as transactional as she said?
	Oh, well, if he's paying $200, then he needs to pay this much because I spend this much on my skincare.
	No, but the point she was making is correct.
	It costs a lot of money to look very good and all done up as a woman.
	It really does.
	And any married men out there will understand what I'm saying here.
	So, if you as a grown man are going to ask out a grown woman who is...
	Who is an attractive woman, clearly takes care of herself, then yeah, you should put the effort in to be taking her to a nice place.
	Maybe that means dropping a few hundred dollars, a couple hundred dollars.
	In a city it certainly does.
	I live in Washington, D.C., and it's hard to get even a drink for under $20.
	Obviously, that may sound like a lot if you live in a small town, but I'm going to assume she lives in a city, so that's actually not that much money.
	Anyways, I'm curious to get your thoughts.
	I'm sure some of you disagree or will get angry over that, but that's the reality, guys.
	And also, understand what you're dealing with.
	I'm not saying that woman is Melania Trump, but be realistic.
	If you're going to ask out an attractive woman...
	You shouldn't take her to Burger King also because, you know, that's just not an appropriate thing to do.
	Do you think Melania was asked to go to Burger King by any men she was with?
	No.
	And quite frankly, it just doesn't come up very often.
	Obviously, if you're dating and you're 16 years old or you're 20 years old, it's different.
	You have less resources.
	But if you're a grown man, if you're in your 30s and you're unwilling to take a woman on a nice date that costs maybe a little bit more than your usual dinner spot, that's not good.
	That's not good, and a lot of men will say, well, it's because I spend so much on dates, I'm dating around all the time, I can't afford it.
	Okay, then be more selective about who you take on dates.
	You know, I know men who go on multiple dates a week, and they'll be swiping through dating apps.
	Yeah, don't do that.
	Talk to the girl a little bit, because chances are, most of the women you're talking to Could be weeded out within just a simple conversation.
	There's probably something that is a deal breaker that you disagree on.
	And so therefore, don't take her on a date.
	Don't do it immediately.
	Speak to her.
	Talk to her a little bit, okay?
	Don't be blinded just by the way she looks and then wind up spending all this extra money you don't need to spend.
	Be a little bit more selective.
	Quality over quantity, okay?
	And that's where I'll end it.
	We're already over, but I just...
	I wanted to weigh in on that video because I got in a couple arguments about it and...
	I don't know.
	I just think that's an important...
	Being single would be awful if it comes down to $200.
	Anyways, good luck, men, says Aunt Lyon.
	Glendene says she eats way too much.
	Look, she's definitely annoying, but I don't think...
	If you're a bachelor and you're dating in a city...
	Again, presumably she lives in a city.
	I just want to end on this one last thing.
	Presumably she lives in a city, probably Miami, judging by the way it looks.
	That's a lot of money.
	I mean, that's not a lot of money for a dinner.
	It will cost you anywhere between $150 to $200 for two people to have...
	Let's say you get a bottle of wine.
	You're at a nice restaurant.
	Not a five-star restaurant, but maybe a three- or four-star restaurant.
	That's a bottle of wine, two entrees, maybe you share an appetizer.
	That's going to run you $150, $200 right there, okay?
	Or maybe you get cocktails, $20 a cocktail at least.
	I live in D.C. I'm using D.C. pricing, New York City pricing, Miami pricing.
	That sounds like a lot for people who don't live in cities, but with inflation and the city situation, that's not a lot.
	Not that I'm saying she should say...
	Not that I'm saying that, like, she should say on a date, like, oh, I want you to spend this much.
	I'm just saying she's not being totally unreasonable when you actually break it down.
	Just being honest.

▲