All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 25, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
59:35
WRONGTHINK: Is A.I. Going To Kill Us All?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Musk?
I hope not.
Do you feel like the government can protect us from artificial intelligence?
You should think of the future as a series of probabilities as opposed to certainties.
There is some chance that above zero that AI will kill us all.
I think it's low, but there's some chance.
I think we should also consider the fragility of human civilization.
If you study history, I think you realize that there's a rise and fall to every civilization.
Every civilization has sort of a lifespan.
And, you know, so we want us to last as long as possible.
Okay, thank you.
Do you feel like the government has been weaponized against you and your company?
I need everyone to step onto the sidewalk now.
So I think it's interesting how that question was kind of laughed at, or at least not taken that seriously.
The question, of course, being, is AI going to kill us all?
Artificial intelligence, that is.
And that's, of course, what Elon Musk is notorious for, notorious for being interested in.
But the reality is that that question is very valid.
Is AI going to kill us?
I keep wanting to say IA, I don't know why.
Is artificial intelligence going to kill us?
And by us, I mean the human race.
Well, we're going to be delving into that today because Elon Musk, his company Tesla, they just announced some details on the new humanoid bot that they're going to release named Optimus.
And when I came across this clip, it kind of scared me because I came across a slew of somewhat ad-like videos.
It sounded like they were trying to advertise for this bot.
I don't know if it's on sale yet.
They're going to sell it for $20,000.
But it's interesting because the implication of the ad was such that these robots are meant to take over humanity.
They're meant to take over the workforce.
They're meant to take over life.
And what's also interesting is after this was announced, and he also announced the addition of what he describes as the Luke Skywalker hand, now I'm not a Star Wars nerd, but apparently, and I looked it up, I watched the video and I'm going to show you guys as well, he's inventing basically a transhumanist hand, arm actually.
Which makes sense considering he met with the government recently, the Senate to be specific, to discuss the future of AI. Now, why you should actually really be concerned about that is because the government has been very open about their plans for transhumanism, which of course means turning human beings into robots.
And that sounds crazy.
It was called conspiracy for a very long time, but what we conveniently forget is that DARPA has already admitted to some of their plans.
We're going to be talking about that.
And also, guys, this shouldn't be something that we're necessarily surprised by.
The government has had an interest in robotics for quite some time, and the fact that Elon Musk seems to want to team up with them should be absolutely frightening, because a future society of transhumanists, of robots, is not a Christian society at all.
It's not a Bible-believing society.
It is a godless society.
And so the answer...
To whether or not AI is going to kill us.
Well, I'll tell you this much.
It'll kill your soul.
We're going to be explaining why that is in this episode of Wrong Think Primetime.
And welcome to Wrong Think Primetime.
I'm Anna Perez.
Thank you so much for being here on this Monday night.
I know it is late.
I know it is a Monday.
Thank you so much for staying up to watch this very important episode because we are going to be delving into a very important topic.
And I honestly think humanity, or I should say America right now, particularly the West, has put all their eggs in one basket as it pertains to Elon Musk.
Elon Musk, of course, being that basket.
Because I don't think he's the hero that they keep claiming he is.
Now, we know he's not as free speech as he claims to be.
He's got a lot of people still banned on X, which used to be Twitter, that should not be banned.
I mean, if you're going to call yourself free speech, then you better be free speech.
You shouldn't be somewhere in the middle.
There's no such thing as being halfway free speech.
Free speech absolutism is a made-up idea.
Free speech is, in and of itself, an absolute concept.
I say it all the time.
It's in the intro of my other Wrong Think show during the daytime.
So the reality is, he's not who he says he is.
We have no reason to continue to believe that, whether it comes to free speech or any other topic.
And today we're going to be discussing the AI issue, because in the past, Elon Musk has said that should it be in the hands of the wrong people, that things could go pretty badly for society.
Well, guess what?
There's no such thing as it being in the hands of the wrong people, because it is the wrong thing to be messing with.
Which is exactly what we're going to delve into.
Before we get started, I want to see who is in the chat.
We have Jarn DZZ, Glenn Dean, Annie GetYourGun32, AB502, DNice1113, ToneMan514, TexasBaldhead, that's Carlos.
Great to see you, Carlos.
Carlos says, I love mouse, but some of the things he's doing are kind of scary.
Well, I don't love him because I don't trust him and I don't love people that I don't trust.
But I don't think he's the worst person.
I think actually the downfall with Elon, and I'll be discussing this later, is that I don't necessarily believe that he knows truly all the bad things that he's actually doing.
I think he's sort of being sucked into this world, and he's kind of being pulled in different directions, oftentimes by the wrong people.
And I think sometimes that confuses him.
I don't think that he meant to be sort of thrown into the political world, or even not the political world.
That may not be the best way of describing it, but rather a world of controversy.
That was never his objective.
I don't think he really understood what he was getting himself involved in.
And I think now he's sort of going in the wrong direction with certain things, including AI, which is, of course, what we're discussing.
Zong Shi Long says, what's up?
Great to see you, Zong.
Love your passion, Anna.
Says, so salty.
Great to see you, so salty.
We have John Smith.
Let's see.
Who else am I missing?
Anybody else?
Ken KCH. Alright, we have great patriots in the chat.
I'm sure more will join.
But I do want to go ahead and get started because we do have a lot to get to, guys.
So like I said, Tesla announced on Twitter that Optimus, Elon's $20,000 humanoid bot, can now sort objects autonomously.
So essentially there's a slew of videos out there on Twitter.
They just released this one, I believe, Sunday night.
Elon retweeted it.
That's how I came across it.
But there's going to be others.
Another one that I'm going to show you.
But I believe this robot, they started announcing it in May, but now they just announced that it now can function pretty much autonomously.
So here's that video that sort of inspired this episode.
Thank you.
That robot looked exactly like a human and obviously it's meant to function as one considering it can sort things autonomously.
Obviously a trait that most humans have.
Except some.
Some people can't really do anything.
But that's another issue.
There are lots of low IQ people out there But I sort of started to get curious about this video because it kind of scared me a little.
I'll be honest.
This idea of this transhumanism agenda.
The government's already been on top of that.
We're going to delve into that.
But the fact that now billionaire Elon Musk get involved in this is quite scary.
And especially with this robot.
This robot really interested me.
So I tried to find some more information on it.
There's not a whole lot out there just yet.
But I did come across another video.
It was kind of sort of like an ad, it seemed like.
And in this video, and you'll see, it's very weird the way that they frame it.
There's almost an implication that robots will start to take over the workforce.
You see a bunch of them sort of marching in place.
And again, it seems to be implying that humans will soon be replaced by robots.
You'll see what I mean.
Take a look. Take a look.
Take a look.
Take a look. Take a look. Take a look.
Oh, great.
Looks like we're gonna have robots ruling the world at some point, at least if Elon gets his way.
And what's quite scary is that while you might think, well, he's just creating these robots.
He just wants these robots in addition to the human race.
Well, actually, you might be wrong about that because he also tweeted out something quite interesting.
He tweeted out something about the Neuralink.
Take a look at this.
This was actually quite recent.
This was tweeted out on September 20th, so just a few days ago.
He talked about the fact that he wanted, this is what he says, he said, "The first human patient will soon receive "a Neuralink device.
"This ultimately has the potential "to restore full body movement.
"In the long term, Neuralink hopes to play a role "in AI risk, civilizational risk reduction "by improving human to AI and human to human bandwidth "by several orders of magnitude.
"Imagine if Stephen Hawking had this." We're excited to announce this is the Neuralink thing We're excited to announce that recruitment is open for our first in-human clinical trial.
If you have a quadriplegia due to cervical spinal cord injury or amitrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS, you may qualify.
Learn more about our trial by visiting whatever.
So it looks like they're looking for humans to be a part of this trial.
Now, when you start to realize what it is that he's talking about, it gets quite scary.
Because he also linked to a video right underneath that tweet documenting what it is that he sees this Neuralink device looking like.
So to be clear, it's not just that he wants robots in addition to humans.
It sounds like, based off of the video that he linked, that he wants to literally turn humans...
Into robots.
Now that may not be necessarily the case right now at this moment, because they're obviously not turning humans into those robots we just saw, but that does seem to be the ultimate goal.
Now that's what I meant when I referenced the Luke Skywalker hand, because that's exactly the video that he linked.
I'll show you a link to that video right now.
It's pretty scary actually that he was referring to this.
Now he's framing it as though that's gonna be helpful for people who need functioning arms that don't have regular arms that maybe got into an accident and lost their arm and And from that standpoint, you might think, well, that's great.
That sounds awesome.
He's just trying to help people with technology.
Well, I wouldn't be so naive, because when you hear about how he starts, thinks about the government, you know, kind of having a say in all of this, it's actually quite scary.
We'll get to the government's plans with transhumanism in a moment, but first I want to play this clip where he spoke about advocating for a government agency...
To exist, a regulatory agency to exist when it comes to AI. Because, of course, he met with the Senate a couple weeks ago, discussing the prospect of AI technology growing, because obviously that's the goal of Elon, and how he can further that agenda.
And I found it quite concerning that, once again, he advocated for a government regulatory, basically, organization, it seemed.
Sort of like the FDA, so to speak.
But for...
AI, robotics.
Kind of scary.
Take a look at what he said.
And we'll discuss why this is scary in particular afterwards.
Do you think any of the tech CEOs left and changed their minds?
Do you think they were changed by anything they heard from the Senate side?
Well, I can't read their mind.
But judging by the fact that they put their hands up when asked if they believe that some regulation is in order, I think it's clear that there's a strong consensus, overwhelming consensus, that there should be some AI regulation, that it would be in the best interest of the people to do so.
And I think we'll probably see something happen.
I don't know on what time frame or exactly how it will manifest itself.
Yeah, that's the question.
What were they going to do?
I don't know.
We've created regulatory agencies before, and actually just recently, just before leaving, made the point that while our regulatory agencies are not perfect, and I deal with regulators on a very frequent basis, with automotive communications, the Starlink, And then FAA with rockets.
So I've had a tremendous amount of interaction with regulators for a couple decades at least.
And while regulators are not perfect, there's no regulatory agency that I'm aware of that I think we should, at the federal level at least, that we should delete.
Do you think there should be a Department of AI or something like that?
I don't know what exactly.
Perhaps the Department of AI. I think the probability of there being some sort of AI regulatory agency that stands on its own, similar to the FAA or FCC, is likely at some point.
You think so?
I think so.
He's not just accepting that.
He seems to be encouraging it because he's more than willing to work with the government when it comes to AI. That's scary.
A guy who wants more AI power in this country, in this world, and a government that is all too eager to exert their control over the people.
Combine the two and you get a lot of, I was going to say one step, but not just a step, but rather an entire leap closer to a transhumanist society.
And by the way, this isn't conspiracy theory.
This isn't a theory at all, rather.
It's something that the government itself has openly admitted to the people.
A DARPA researcher admitted that they've already done studies on moths replacing parts of their brain with robotics.
Now an idiot might say, that's so cool, they want to control moths, blah blah blah, whatever.
No, they're looking to control you.
What they're trying to do is they're trying to test out technology to see how much they can control you.
So the government's already ahead on this.
So the fact that Elon wants to partner with the government makes that all the scarier.
Here's a clip of DARPA explaining what they've already found and kind of the study they've already done when it comes to this whole moth experiment, which as I just explained, obviously the goal is to use that on Earth.
DARPA calls it transhumanism, military transhumanism.
But in an interesting way, this is actually part and parcel of the whole movement towards robotics.
It's not only making individual warfighters comfortable with robots, it's this idea of coupling man and machine.
And merging humans and machine.
And DARPA is doing that with programs now with what they call biohybrids, which people might call cyborgs.
You know, they're able to actually control the rats through a labyrinth remotely because they've implanted electrodes in its brain.
They can do the same with a moth.
DARPA in 2014 created a steerable moth by inserting electrodes in the pupa stage of the moth, which then transformed The wings came out, and this part of the machinery is now part of the animal system.
DARPA is able to steer a moth.
Yeah.
So that's quite scary as it is, it seems.
The government has had this plan in place for quite some time.
They started doing that, running those experiments in 2014.
So, where are we now?
Well, we're at a point where there's a billionaire willing to invest in this technology and is very willing to partner with the government over it.
That should scare all of us.
All of us.
Because then what happens to you?
Well, do you want to be a robot?
Yeah, I didn't think so.
Of course you don't want to be a robot.
This entire plan would destroy humanity as we know it.
We know that's the globalist agenda.
They have wanted transhumanism for quite some time.
And now, now they have the perfect person to facilitate it.
He has the money, and he has the influence.
And not only does he have the influence, but he has the influence over a specific group of people.
Conservatives that are often way too willing to trust this man.
Do not trust a man that is trying to replace the human race with robots.
Didn't think I had to spell that one out.
But there are so many conservatives that worship him over the issue of free speech too, even though he's not even a free speech person.
He claims to be, but people claim to be a lot of things.
Open your eyes, people.
Wake up.
Elon Musk is not your hero.
He doesn't even want you to exist.
He wants to replace you with robots.
Yeah, maybe that sounds crazy to you, but why else would he be all in for this AI technology?
He wants to replace human arms with robot arms, this Neuralink technology.
I don't buy for a second that this is going to be good for humanity because it seems that we're just going to keep pushing and pushing and pushing until literally humans are basically all robot.
At what point are we going to say no?
That should be the concern because it seems as though there is no point.
The government wants control over us and Elon loves his AI technology.
Combine the two and you have a recipe to destroy humanity.
You have a recipe for transhumanism to flourish.
And it's not just the replacement of the human race.
That it ends at.
No, it actually is a lot worse.
It's a lot deeper than just we're going to be replaced by robots, which is bad enough.
I mean, obviously.
But there's a much deeper problem here.
There's a much deeper problem, and that's what they're trying to basically create their own God.
That's what this is all about.
They already want to destroy God's creation, but now they want us to worship God.
That creation that has nothing to do with God, but rather is quite blasphemous.
We're going to be looking into that next, guys.
But before we move on, I do want to tell you about Four Patriots, guys.
It's awesome, guys.
This is an amazing website that you're going to want to check out.
In a startling description, the UN food chief already warned the world with these words.
Knocking on famine's door, he called what we're facing a perfect storm of a perfect storm, and he's not alone.
Barron's published that a food shortage could be coming, even here in the U.S. Farmers see it too.
John Boyd Jr., a fourth generation farmer, told Fox News that we're going to see empty food shelves in the coming months.
That's why getting survival food is more important than ever.
Create your own stockpile of best-selling For Patriots survival food kits.
It's not ordinary food.
We're talking good for 25 years super survival food.
So obviously lasts a really long time and we're going to need that because we never know what the government's going to throw at us.
Hand-packed in a family-owned facility in the USA and giving jobs to over 200 Americans that, of course, Elon wants to replace with robot factory workers.
But I digress.
They have different delicious breakfasts, lunches, dinners.
You can make these meals in less than 20 minutes.
All you have to do is add boiling water, simmer, and serve.
Super easy.
And when you're caught in a storm, the last thing you're going to want to worry about is, you know, needing all this equipment and ingredients to cook.
Well, you don't need that with Four Patriots.
And right now, the best part is, for the next few days, listeners of Wrong Thing Primetime will get 10% off their first order at 4patriots.com by using promo code ANNA. That's right, guys.
Go hit up 4patriots.com.
This is a deal that you'll be able to get to in the next few days.
Just make sure you use promo code ANNA, that's A-N-N-A, not just A-N-A, A-N-N-A, and you can get 10% off, okay?
This is super important, guys, because you know what?
The government is coming.
They want to, basically, they already are controlling the weather, and we just never know what they're going to throw at us because they're trying to prove climate change.
So the worst position you want to be in is one where, you know, you're left without any food and you never know when the good old US of A, that's of course in bed with the UN and all these other horrible organizations like the WEF, When they're going to throw another hurricane at you or another tornado, it's just not worth the risk, guys.
Go check out 4Patriots and definitely use my promo code ANNA. Highly recommend that.
All right, guys, so I want to go ahead and see what you're saying in the chat.
I'm curious what you think of this topic.
Let's see, DNice1113 says, Yeah, Grimes' lyrics are beyond creepy.
And what was with Elon dressing up in some satanic suit of armor for Halloween?
Yeah, no.
Yeah, these people are scary, likely satanic.
And even if he doesn't know what he's doing exactly...
It's still bad.
It's still bad because he's creating a situation.
He's working with all the wrong people.
So even if you trusted him before, you certainly shouldn't trust him now.
If he's willing to create a regulatory agency with the very people that already seek to control you, is this really somebody you want to put your support behind?
Well, the answer should probably be no.
Also, guys, I want to just go ahead and ask to please, please go ahead and like this video.
Hit that thumbs up if you like this show.
If you want to support the Stu Peters Network, that is how you can do so.
Hit that thumbs up button and do that for all the other shows on this network, guys.
Also, share the link on your social media.
Send it to your family and friends.
This is a new show and we want to get the word out about the show at 9 p.m.
because I do think we cover some really important topics that not many people are getting to.
I don't know anybody who's covering AI right now.
Because it's super important and really the goal is to sort of sneak up on us.
And it's not like the mainstream media is going to cover it.
So certainly this is important.
Please share it in as many places as possible.
Let's see.
Annie, get your gun.
Said, this is making my skin crawl a bit creepy.
Yeah, the whole thing is very scary.
I mean, it's really creepy.
Dnice113 says, Anna gets deep into the point.
Wow.
Tower of Babel stuff going on.
Yeah, you're right.
You're absolutely right on that.
Very scary stuff.
Walking stick three, two, one says if his girlfriend is, then it's fair to say he is two.
That worries me.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, well, I don't think he's dating Grimes anymore.
That's the funny part, too, is like this is a guy who has like a million different baby mamas but hasn't married a single one.
So he's not a Christian guy.
It's not like we're going to be relying on him to have a biblical standard in life.
So not exactly a good thing.
Someone said my sound keeps cutting in and out.
Is that true?
Are you guys having difficulty with the sound or is that just that one person?
I hope that's not...
Hope it's not for everyone.
I'm sorry they're having that problem, Special K-121.
That's not good.
AlanS333 says AI has already been being used by Google and other net searchers along with Wall Street algorithms.
Yeah, we've already incorporated AI a fair amount into our lives, and we may not think about it, but we actually...
It's really bad already.
Like, even at Whole Foods, I should have included this video in the show, but actually they...
If you...
Put your hand...
I think they use your hand to pay at the end.
I've never done it, so I couldn't tell you how it works, but I have seen videos of people using their palm to pay at Whole Foods.
That's quite scary, but that's definitely considered...
That's in the realm of AI technology.
Like, why are we scanning people's palms?
Alan S333 says, sound is good, but sometimes must refresh.
Yes, sometimes there's just issues with...
Sometimes there's just issues with a rumble.
It just happens.
It's a new platform.
So, you know, especially at this hour in the night, there's a lot of different streams going on.
So, you know, it's hard to keep it looking good.
John Smith says they might have palm implants.
Well, that's what's so scary because obviously all of these The idea behind this is that we'll all have implants of some sort.
And I don't mean, like, breast implants like silicone.
I mean, like, you know, actual technology.
Like, we're gonna be robots.
I mean, the whole hand idea, the Luke Skywalker hand, Elon Musk literally tagged that below his Neuralink thing.
So that's what he's trying to say.
That's what he wants humanity to look like.
And the worst part is, this is all going to be framed as better for humanity.
It's the same tactic that the WEF uses.
They always tell us, well, you know, we need less cows.
We need to protect the environment.
This is better for humanity.
I'm sick and tired of being told what's better for humanity.
I want to do what's good for my family and myself.
And I don't believe that getting a robot arm is going to be better for humanity.
For myself or my family.
And quite frankly, I don't even know if I'd get that if I needed an arm.
I think that's really creepy and weird.
And obviously the goal here is to destroy humanity as a whole.
And that's a problem because that's completely against God's creation.
We are God's creation and we're supposed to be following the word of God.
And when you create robots, when you turn humans into robots, that's blasphemous.
That's just such a horrible thing.
I don't know what could be more disrespectful to God than, oh, we didn't think your creation was good enough.
We want to be the omniscient perspective here.
We want to be the all-knowing.
So we're going to create artificial intelligence, which implies not only do we not think your creation is good enough as it is, but rather we want to know more, right?
I think that's such an anti-God stance, anti-Christian stance.
Alan S333 says, Amen, we should decide that, not government or billionaires.
100%.
AB502 says, You cease to be human.
That's the goal.
That's exactly what they want.
Hablo Pacheco says, The hand and forehead for the mark are metaphors.
The hand is a metaphor for your actions, and the forehead is a metaphor for your mind.
The death is a metaphor for slavery.
Yes, good points.
Deep.
The dreaded beheaded says, Totally.
Antichristism is the goal.
100%.
Annie Get Your Gun says we would never die on God's time.
I refuse to get any of these weird surgeries.
I will never do it.
Realtor Dan Grimes says the goal of the satanic inverted society is to get you to willingly give up your birthright.
Absolutely, 100%.
Get Funked says we need to succeed from the nation, get land build or own towns.
Yes.
A.I. is a godless heathen.
What could go wrong?
And that's the thing.
Like, the whole idea from Elon Musk for so long, he's been trying to convince us that, well, you know, A.I. can be dangerous.
He always talks about A.I. safety, which is kind of ironic because there's nothing safe about A.I. And that's what he doesn't seem to grasp.
Like, he keeps saying to us, well, if it's in the right hand.
Sorry, I have a hair on my face.
Maybe it's an eyelash?
I don't know.
There's something on my face that keeps...
I don't know.
It's bothering me.
Whatever.
I'll try to get through it.
Oh my gosh.
It's like a...
I don't know.
But what he keeps telling us is that, oh, well, if it's in the right hands, it's going to be okay.
If it's in the right hands, nothing could go wrong.
Like, okay, well, who gets to decide who the right hands are?
Because I don't believe that's you, Elon.
And frankly, I don't believe that's anybody.
Why?
Because AI is in itself godless and dangerous for society.
Why in the world would we trust anyone with this?
That's like the whole Nina Jankiewicz argument with the Ministry of Truth.
How she was like, you know, the whole argument was everybody kept making it, framing it around how crazy she was.
But the reality is it doesn't matter who's in charge of the Ministry of Truth.
It's still abhorrent.
And it's still antithetical to the Constitution and it completely encroaches on our First Amendment rights.
There is nothing normal about the concept in and of itself.
Same thing with AI. There's nothing acceptable within the realm of AI. It doesn't matter whose hands it's in.
You're still going to destroy humanity.
And, you know, this has been an ongoing conversation.
This is not a new discussion we're having as a society.
This conversation has been going on since the first Industrial Revolution.
We've been scared since day one of humans being replaced by robots, and to be quite frank, that's exactly what has happened.
We weren't wrong to begin with.
Machines definitely replaced humans.
They lost a lot of jobs during the Industrial Revolution because of that.
And what happened to the quality of our products?
Well, they went down.
The quality suffered.
Now, part of that is because 90% of the things we make are made in China and sweatshops or Sri Lanka and whatever.
You know, they're shipped over here.
But the other part of that is that we've taken the human aspect out of everything, and now everything's made by machine, right?
By robots, essentially.
Everything is a robot.
Everything is created by a robot.
And the more we go down that path, the more dangerous it is for society.
The more godless society is.
The more we've gone down this AI path, the less of a human touch we've seen.
Even when it comes to art and architecture, because I talk about this all the time, but art is a great indication of where you're at in society.
Like for example, the Renaissance period.
So if you look at, and I used to study Art history in college.
So I remember, you know, talking about the difference between medieval art and Renaissance art.
Vastly different.
Why?
Because as society progressed, they learned new techniques, new painting techniques.
They learned the vanishing point because people were investing in artists, so they were able to spend their time on this.
They learned how to create the vanishing point.
They learned dimension.
They learned all these things.
And it was a time of enlightenment, so people had the time to spend on the arts, right?
As a result, you have these beautiful works of art.
That's where we were at in society.
We also created these beautiful churches.
Are people doing that anymore?
No.
Our art is hideous.
Modern art is hideous.
Sorry, it is.
Our architecture sucks.
It's like these giant square concrete buildings.
There's no human touch to anything anymore when you look at art.
There's nothing unique.
You know, everything is such, it's such an indication of how robotic we've already become, how much AI has already influenced society.
I don't know why I said already, but it's already influenced society a lot, and I think whoever said that, I forget, was 100% correct.
Let's see.
Oh, we have a troll.
Actually, the trolls...
I just realized this.
The troll in the chat actually helps viewers.
So I'm going to let him stay for a little while.
Keith Day says, don't knock Anna's show.
It's okay, Keith.
He's a troll.
Let's see.
Get Funked says, Andrew Tate says the same thing about art.
Yeah, but it's true.
It's absolutely true.
That's the thing.
Oh, Keith Day, you're amazing.
He's just said to the troll, you knock Anna, I'll castrate you with my bare hands.
I love you, Keith Day.
That's awesome.
Guys, please go ahead and like the video if you haven't already.
Would really appreciate that.
Texas Baldette says, the trolls love you, Anna.
I know, it's kind of crazy.
They're obsessed.
But we already know this particular troll wants to date me.
He called me pretty last time.
So obviously, according to AOC, that means he wants to date me.
So obviously that's what's going on here.
I don't want to date you.
Please leave me alone.
Not interested.
Goldenbolt says this copy pasta bot is entertaining.
I know.
It's quite interesting because then it's so sad because he remakes a new account every time.
Let's see, Ron Greene says, January 20th, 2025, Donald Trump will be president.
Read it, learn it, live it.
100% Ron, I agree.
That's why they're trying to destroy this country with as much force as they can before he gets into the office because they're actually trying to do that.
And earlier today, funny you bring that up, I saw a clip of Hillary Clinton.
Where she was already starting to say, I think Putin might be influencing this upcoming election.
It's like, no, what it is, is that when you lose, you want to have an excuse, which is ironic because you got mad at everybody else, all the conservatives who claimed we didn't lose the 2020 election and that there was really just fraud.
But we were conspiracy theorists, but when you say it, it's totally fine.
Make it make sense.
Anyways, Philly Kids says, another douche troll, absolutely.
Let's see.
AlanS333 says, we love you too, but we are really people.
Let's see.
CableSplisserNTX says, great show.
Thank you.
Appreciate that, Cable.
Let's see.
I'm going to ask them to take the troll out because now it's starting to interfere with my ability to read your comments.
GetFunked says, you are pretty.
Not trying to date you.
Just shows anyone can state the obvious.
LMAO. Catch more flies with honey.
No, I'm just joking because I'm making fun of AOC's joke.
She was like, oh, you must want to date me.
Can we get rid of the troll?
Let's see.
Philly kids laughing.
Deep state establishment has double standards.
Yep, you're absolutely right.
LenoreFamily5 says, hey troll, leave Anna alone.
Grow up and respect differences in opinion.
Or just don't watch the show, but obviously he wants to because he has nothing else to do, which is quite sad.
Jat 2022 says, troll full of Mountain Dew and pizza roll energy.
So true, so true.
That's so sad.
I'll just come back under another name, honey.
Oh my goodness, that's really sad.
I mean, imagine having no life that you just sit here on Rumble harassing a 26-year-old woman and you just create more account after account after account after account.
Alan S333 says, you know you're good when you're getting trolled.
So true.
Glenn Dean says, Hillary Clinton has an inaugural dress that she's never been able to wear.
Thank you, President Trump.
That's actually a really funny way of putting it.
That's so true.
So, so true.
Very, very funny.
Alright, so I do want to go ahead and move on because I do have more to get to as it pertains to this transhumanist agenda.
So, obviously they're trying to replace humanity, which is bad in and of itself because, I don't know about you, but I don't want to be turned into a robot.
But the real ultimate goal here is not just to replace humans, which already is trying to, you know, is such a, you know, basically a slap in the face to the word of God, essentially.
But in addition to that, the ultimate goal here isn't just to replace humans, it's to replace God in God's will.
And it's interesting because the thing about living in a Christian society, and we've definitely abandoned this already to a large extent, and I blame this on the industrialization to some degree.
That's the one thing that I think sometimes Amish people are a little bit right about.
The Satanism behind the progression of technology and how much it's become a big part of our lives.
And we can see that with child abuse and everything that's become as a result of that.
There's already AI technology that exists to make that possible.
But what I found interesting and pretty prevalent to the show were Dennis Prager's comments relating to this very topic in which he states that he actually thinks that child porn is okay as long as it's AI. And this is breaching into the territory into why AI is so sketchy and godless because it basically creates an alternative, another way to...
Circumvent what's normal in society or what should be normal, what should be a Christian society.
It's pretty sickening.
And instead of like saying no to these problems, all it is, it's an alternative.
And that doesn't fix the problem.
If you're attracted to children, you're sick, okay?
If you're a pedophile, you should be publicly hanged, let's be completely clear.
We shouldn't feed your demon, your inner demon.
But according to Dennis Prager, with AI, we can totally do...
Not only can we do that, but we totally should, which I find quite disgusting.
Take a look.
Would you use the word evil of animated child pornography?
No, I would use evil only with behavior.
That's where we might differ from forgetting the sex issue.
You can't be evil...
You didn't do evil if you thought evil.
If I'm masturbating to animated pictures of pornography, I'm not doing something evil.
That's correct.
Yeah, I think that's despicable.
Really?
Yes, of course.
Yeah, that's disgusting.
That is despicable.
The guy interviewing him is 100% right.
And this is where it starts to be a problem with God's Word.
AI meaning.
Because not only are they trying to replace humans with robots, but the society they want to create with robots is completely, completely antithetical to Christianity.
The whole idea of AI is that it could act as a tool to circumvent societal ills.
But we shouldn't be circumventing these societal ills.
We should be confronting them head on.
We should be executing pedophiles.
We should be executing people who abuse children, animals.
Those are societal ills.
We should be treating them, not circumventing them.
That is a godless idea, a godless society.
And AI, being that it's a virtual reality of sorts, would allow for all sorts of things to go on.
So then if that's okay, right?
If child porn is okay if it's AI, is murdering people okay if it's AI? Is that what this is going to be?
We're just going to create a society where we allow certain things to go on within a certain realm?
Like, how would that even work?
No.
We have to make it clear that there is a moral right and a moral wrong.
And that guideline here in America, at least, is supposed to be the Bible.
Now, I know we've strayed a very long way from that.
I'm aware of that.
But the further we go along this pro-AI path, the even further we will stray.
From the word of God as our rule of law, essentially.
Because remember, the Constitution is derived from that.
Nobody wants to say it, but it's true.
And I've said this a million times.
We are supposed to be a Christian country.
That's made very clear in our nation's history and our founding documents.
The one thing the troll does get right is he says Prager is a pervert.
I totally agree.
Prager is a pervert.
And I don't think anybody who just heard that clip would disagree.
But that's the problem.
They want to replace God.
God wouldn't want you to watch child porn, whether it's AI or not.
That's disgusting.
You're wrong.
There's a special place in hell for you if you're even attracted to that.
It doesn't matter.
You can get into a debate over logistics or ethics over it, but the reality is that is disgusting.
That is amoral according to the Bible standards.
But they don't want you to go by the Bible standards.
That's why the entire concept of AI is so godless.
Which is quite interesting.
Because the takeaway that Elon has, like I said, is that if it's in the hands of the right people, nothing can go wrong.
Well, he sort of contradicted himself because he actually did an interview with Tucker Carlson a few months ago where he explained that the co-founder of Google, the co-founder of Google, guys, wanted to create a digital god when it came to AI. Which is ironic because what he may or may not realize is that he's trying to do the same thing with his transhumanist agenda.
When you create...
Artificial intelligence, when you seek to advance it, you're seeking to create and replace humans with a creation that is not God's.
And in addition to that, you want to have a higher perception than what a human would have of what's going on.
The goal is to advance technology.
Well, at what point are you just trying to replace God?
At what point does it not matter whose hands it's in?
Elon, you're just as bad as the co-founder of Google that you described.
Here he is explaining that.
That was a non-profit?
Yes.
The reason OpenAI exists at all is that Larry Page and I used to be close friends, and I would stay at his house in Palo Alto, and I would talk to him late into the night about AI safety.
And at least my perception was that Larry was not taking AI safety seriously enough.
What did he say about it?
He really seemed to be...
One sort of digital superintelligence, basically digital god, if you will, as soon as possible.
He wanted that?
Yes.
He's made many public statements over the years that the whole goal of Google is what's called AGI, artificial general intelligence or artificial superintelligence.
No, and I agree with him that there's great potential for good, but there's also potential for bad.
And so if you've got some radical new technology, you want to try to take the set of actions that maximize probably it will do good and minimize probably it will do bad things.
Yes.
It can't just be health leather.
Let's just go, you know, barreling forward and, you know, hope for the best.
And then at one point, I said, well, what about, you know, we're going to make sure humanity is okay here.
And then he called me a speciest.
Did he use that term?
Yes.
And there were witnesses.
I wasn't the only one there when he called me a speciest.
And so I was like, okay, that's it.
Yes, I'm a speciest.
Okay.
You got me.
What are you?
Yeah, I'm fully a speciest.
Busted.
So that was the last role.
At the time, Google had acquired DeepMind, and so Google and DeepMind together had about three-quarters of all the AI talent in the world.
They obviously had a tremendous amount of money and more...
Yeah, so what Elon at least appears to not understand, and maybe he does fully understand it, is just pretending to not...
Is that he's the same as his friend, his co-founder, the co-founder of Google.
The co-founder of Google that he just described as wanting to create a digital god.
Well, Elon, how is what you're doing any different?
You want to replace humankind with robots.
You didn't say it, but it seems to be your intention based off of the evidence we've provided and what I've found in my research.
And in addition to that, It doesn't seem like you're too concerned with the power, the role that the government will play in all of this, because you're more than happy to hand over that power to them, the very people who have made it clear that they don't even want you to worship anything other than man.
Well, when man is replaced by robots, you're gonna be worshiping robots.
So Elon, it doesn't matter whose hands the power is in.
It's still wrong.
The concept itself is wrong.
The concept of AI is frightening.
Because the goal of AI is to replace God.
And if we're no longer worshiping God and we're worshiping robots, then to answer the question, will AI kill us all?
Well, like I said, it will kill your soul.
And that, in effect, is killing you.
They don't want us to live a full, happy, colorful life where we worship God and we go to heaven.
No.
They want us to be their little slaves.
Robotic slaves.
Don't you see where this is headed?
They already forced you to get a vaccine under COVID. Hopefully you didn't fall for it.
I know I didn't.
But they know that if they can force you to do that much, there's no telling what else they can't force you to do.
What if there's mandatory surgery now at some point?
Obviously not now, but at some point down the line.
They're testing their limits with you.
And with Elon's money and his influence...
There's a lot that they can do.
They can totally pull one over on humanity if they have the right resources, which is exactly what they're positioned to do.
AI is scary.
And yeah, it's not funny.
It will absolutely kill us all if we let it.
We just have to be aware of what exactly they're going to do with it, and we have to say no.
And at some point, we have to wake up, and we have to stop the government from having this control, because if Elon keeps working with them, there's no telling how far this will go.
We've already seen a slice of what he wants humanity to look like, and quite frankly, I don't like it.
Maybe you disagree, but as a Christian, I cannot back this, and I hope that you don't either.
Alright guys, so I do want to go ahead and move on because I have one last thing I want to show you.
It's actually a really funny clip.
It's about Carrie Lake.
She just went on Roseanne Barr's show and she had some funny things to say about Obama and I agree and I have somewhat of an analysis to give you here because it's something I've thought about for years.
I do think Obama's presidency was revenge of the nerds so we're going to be talking about that in a moment.
But before we do that, I want to go ahead and see some of your comments, guys, because I'm curious what you're seeing.
Egyptian princess says, pureblood, glad to hear it.
Mandatory boob job says, the dreaded, beheaded.
Well, I don't need that.
But yes, it is frightening, Anna says, Annie, get your gun.
TrueAnna says, Jarn, DZZ, thank you.
GetFunked says, no, Elon wants to change his son's mind with Neuralink to make him the right sex.
Wouldn't that be hilarious if that was really the goal?
He just wants to make his son normal again.
That's why he invented Neuralink.
Love this girl, OMG. Oh, thank you, the dreaded beheaded.
I love you, too.
On that note, if you love the show, or if you just like it, or even if you don't, if you're like, eh, I'm not sure yet...
Just go ahead and hit the thumbs up because that's how we're going to grow here as a show and as a network.
And I'm going to be able to bring you more content, better content that way.
So please go ahead and rumble it if you haven't already.
Hit that thumbs up button.
And also share it on your social media platform.
Send it to your family and friends so we can tell everyone what's going on.
Let's see.
We have...
Smokey Oki says we should all expedite his trip to Mars.
You guys are hilarious.
I want to do that.
Alan S333 says I would love for Anna Perez to interview Elon.
I would love to interview Elon.
That would be very interesting.
That's actually one interview that I think could be really interesting.
A lot of people are like, interview Trump, interview Trump, and I would love to.
I'd love to interview Trump, don't get me wrong, but I think that that one interests me.
I've interviewed Trump before, and I met him too, and that was fun, but I would really love to interview Elon.
I feel like not enough people really do, at least in the conservative movement.
Alan S333 says, Anna Perez, love your night show.
I can finally see you more often.
Thank you.
Well, I'm glad you like it.
And that's kind of what I wanted to do because I knew that a lot of you couldn't watch my daily show, my day show, my 3 p.m.
one, because it's a little too early.
And some people are still working.
So yeah, I know that's hard for you guys to make sometimes.
Also, guys, a little heads up.
After this, Crosstalk will be on, and they're interviewing David Icke, so that should be really interesting.
You're definitely going to want to stick around for that.
That's going to be right after this show, so just wanted to quickly give you a heads up on that.
Don't just leave after Wrong Thing Primetime.
There's a lot of great content coming up.
Let's see who else is...
Oh, the Savannah Hernandez of the Stu Peters Network says Hablo Pacheco.
I've gotten that a lot before.
Let's see.
Iman87 says, death to the deep state.
Beautiful.
Absolutely death to the deep state.
Smokey Oki580 says she's very pretty.
Yes, I like Savannah Hernandez very much.
I think she does great work.
Let's see.
JarnDZZ says, I think Elon doing and saying this, maybe he cut a deal so they back off of the attacks of him with Twitter and Tesla and SpaceX.
No, that's a great point.
I did a show on this the other day as well.
I was talking about the fact that he met with the Prime Minister of Israel, of course, Netanyahu, and it just seemed a bit sketchy.
I mean, either way, he's still buying into their agenda because he's selling his soul to Doing whatever it is that they want, and that's not right.
It doesn't matter how much you're being paid or for what reasons you're doing it.
If it goes against your principles, you shouldn't be doing it.
Now, I don't necessarily think it was that much against Elon's principles, but I do think he was pressured to make some sort of deal or to acquiesce to their let's fight anti-Semitism agenda, which we all know is a total sham because it's ridiculous.
It just gives more, you know, whatever.
It gives more power to Israel.
Anyways I want to go ahead and move on because like I said I have one last clip to show you that I think was pretty funny and I have a pretty good analysis of because it always cracks me up to see like praising of the Obama administration.
So anyway like I said Carrie Lake went on Roseanne Barr's podcast where she called Obama a beta male and we're going to discuss after that but first I want to go ahead and show you the clip.
We came out and did an event during the campaign for my opponent, and he's just a shell of the man he was.
I interviewed him one time.
You did?
Yes.
Did you find him charming?
He seems charming.
It was in March.
It was the day before Trump pretty much secured the nomination.
It was Trump versus Ted Cruz, and the next day Trump had the number of electoral votes to win.
And so I asked Obama some pretty tough questions.
Most people go in there and softball him.
They gave me three minutes with them.
He spends the first two minutes filibustering so we didn't have to get many more questions.
But I asked him a few questions about Trump.
Oh, the American people will never elect Trump.
I will say this.
When he walked in, actually I walked in the room, he was in there.
I was like, it was such a letdown because he had been built up by the media to be this larger-than-life character.
And I was like, wah, wah, you know?
It was like, this is Obama?
I mean, I covered him all these years and seen the video of him and the media, just everything he did.
He'd move and they would be like, ah, ah.
And so it was underwhelming.
He was very beta.
Not an alpha guy at all.
And not as big as I... I thought he was going to be taller and he was kind of like skinny and we did the interview.
It went fine.
Afterwards, I take a picture with him.
They took a picture with everyone who interviewed him that day and it was my producer, me and Obama.
And of course, that picture...
My opponents used that against me so much in the race.
They clipped the producer off, and I'm smiling in it.
I remember somebody said something funny in there, and I was smiling.
I'm in the White House, which is pretty cool, to interview a sitting president.
I'm smiling.
They took that picture of Obama and me, and they tried to make it look like we were at prom or dating or something.
So I'm like, oh, that picture that I took.
I was so happy to be interviewing a sitting president and then that came back during the campaign.
It was like the picture they kept using.
At one point I woke up during the primary and my opponent, who was a woman about my age, married to a 95-year-old billionaire, spending his money for a vanity project to run for governor.
We wake up and there's pictures of Obama and me And it says, donated to Obama.
Kerry donated to Obama.
And I was so mad.
I'm like, you know, first of all, 10 million Obama voters crossed over and voted for Trump and brought us President Trump.
And every day, Democrats are waking up realizing the Democrat Party of yesteryear doesn't exist anymore.
And they're realizing that we've got to start putting America first.
And Trump was not some extreme right winger.
He put forth common sense policies that actually put our country first to try to...
Alright, so I basically wanted to play that clip.
I sort of let it go longer than I wanted to or was going to, but I don't know, I found it interesting.
But I thought it was hilarious that she called Obama underwhelming, essentially.
She even called him a beta male.
Because here's the thing about Obama.
He was the revenge of the nerd's president.
For once, the weirdos had somebody to look up to because he wasn't just a beta male, he was a gay man.
And we all sort of got those vibes from him.
We all sort of knew that this was a weak loser.
He was a nerd.
A nerd.
And all the nerds knew that.
They could sense that.
He was sort of an empty suit.
There was nothing to him.
He was obviously propped up by the Democratic Party, the socialists there.
And all he really served the purpose for was to advance the socialist agenda by basically mobilizing nerds.
And what Trump was, in contrast to him, was bringing cool again back.
He brought back the 80s, essentially.
And so when he referenced Make America Great Again, of course, the slogan of his campaign, they all made it out to be some racist thing, some racist trope, which is hilarious.
Nobody really says that anymore because we're all sort of over that.
They really tried to slander him that way.
What Trump meant was, no, let's bring back the 80s, a cool time.
Not the Obama early 2000s.
What a loser.
Or mid-2000s, I should say.
20-teens.
Obama literally, he represented the nerds.
The nerds looked at him and they were like, wow, finally somebody like me.
Finally.
A man who gets it.
A beta male just like me.
A loser.
A low-T loser.
They were so happy to have somebody like him.
So that's what he served as.
He wasn't actually a strong figure.
He didn't really demand respect for people, not the way Trump did at least.
Was he more high-functioning than Joe Biden?
Yeah, sure, but Obama's still running the presidency to this day, so it really doesn't even matter.
He's been the person behind the wheel for the whole time.
Basically, the past, I would say other than Trump, obviously, the past three terms.
So guys, the reality is he's not just a beta male.
He's a gay man.
He also had sex with Larry Sinclair and others.
So Carrie Lake's 100% right.
And the reason why that is is because he really was the revenge of the nerd's president.
He brought being nerdy back into style.
And for a period of time, that was cool.
And the reason why they hated Trump is because Trump brought masculinity back into style.
He brought being strong back into style.
And really, it was a personal issue for the nerds that voted for Obama and for the nerds that wanted somebody like Obama to be in power.
That's what this has always been about.
A battle over masculinity.
No one's really phrased it that way, but it's absolutely true.
Barack Obama represented the lowest T members of society.
And that's the truth.
Alright, so it is 9.58, so we do have to get going soon.
I want to see what you guys are saying.
Alan S333 says, Ha ha ha, Anna, you're so funny, describing Obama.
Thank you.
I don't know why I read the ha ha ha so robotically, but I guess the topic of the show is kind of robots, so it's fitting.
Let's be honest, Obama was charismatic.
I fell for his rhetoric in 2008 and 2012.
It was toward 2017 that I started waking up realizing I was lied to.
It says, Hablo Pacheco.
Yeah, I mean, he was charismatic in the sense that he basically was like, there are no standards in society.
You can be whatever you want.
Everything's acceptable.
Oh, you want to be a transsexual?
That's totally fine.
Like, he had this, like, everything goes vibe.
And everybody was like, wow, that's so cool and progressive.
I like this guy.
So he sort of made being a nerd cool.
So I get what you're saying.
But like, obviously, now I'm sure looking back on it, you're like, oh, that was cringe.
I probably should not have supported that.
But 100%, I see what you're saying there.
Every last thing about Obama is fake.
Yes, 100% true.
Down to his own wife, who is obviously a man, Michael Obama.
Clap your hands, everybody.
Clap your hands.
Everybody clap your hands.
Michael and Obama are here to do our show for you.
That would be hilarious.
Imagine that.
All right, guys.
Well, it is 10 p.m.
I do have to get going.
Please make sure to rumble the show on your way out.
And don't forget to catch Crosstalk right after this.
They have a great interview coming up.
You're not going to want to miss it.
And on that note, I will see you back here tomorrow for another episode of Wrong Think Primetime on the StuPeters Network.
Also, check out my daytime show on LFA TV at 3 p.m.
Eastern Time tomorrow.
I will see you then as well, guys.
Have a great night.
Make sure to catch Crosstalk.
I know I will be catching it.
I hope you sleep well.
I know I won't because I never sleep well.
I don't know why, but I'm an insomniac.
Anyways, guys, see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection