All Episodes
Previous Next
July 26, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
55:39
LIVE: Stew Peters EXCLUSIVE: Groundbreaking Documentary "REMEDY" AIRS NOW & Reveals Vax TRUTH
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm clearly one of the best investments I've ever been involved in.
Just get the damn vaccine.
*Music*
*Music* Welcome!
We're so thankful that you've tuned in for this global premiere of the Truth About Vaccines Presents Remedy.
I'm Charlene Bollinger and this is my husband, Ty, and we're your hosts.
You may recognize us from previous docuseries that we've produced in the past.
The past few years have been crazy, haven't they?
Like being on a roller coaster at times, not knowing when you're going to be dropped down the next steep hill of government tyranny and mask or vaccine mandates.
Millions of people have been injured from vaccines.
Not even the CDC disagrees with this assertion.
They openly publish vaccine injuries on their VAERS database, which is on their own website.
We'll talk about VAERS in a while, but first of all, why did we produce Remedy?
Honestly, this is the documentary we had to create because what we really need today are answers and remedies to the problems created by some medical interventions like vaccines as well as solutions to the myriad of other problems created by the medical system, big pharma, and the government.
So over the next eight days we're going to cover as many alternatives as we can fit into the eight episodes.
So put on your seat belt and get ready.
Just so you can know what to expect, each episode will focus on different vaccines, and each episode will contain different remedies.
And keep in mind that the recurring theme of this docuseries when it comes to a tyrannical government or an overarching dictator figure who attempts to coerce you into violating your conscience or your bodily integrity is just say no.
With all the insanity happening across the globe, what the world needs today is hope, and that's what we're here to give you in Remedy.
But before we give you answers to the problems, and before we can counter the lies with the truth, let's take a trip to the past and learn a bit about history to understand why this documentary is needed, shall we?
If we look back in history, we'll see that people like the Italian astronomer and physicist Galileo, he was convicted in 1633 for publishing his evidence that supported Copernican theory, or the Sun-centered theory, that says the Earth actually revolves around the Sun, which we know it does.
Galileo was mocked and he was called a heretic for his anti-scientific views, and he was sentenced to house arrest, where he remained for the rest of his life, and he was excommunicated from the Catholic Church.
He was later proven to be telling the truth.
Throughout history, the truth-tellers of science were actually the ones who were mocked or called quacks or ostracized from society.
And they turned out to be the ones that simply had the courage to tell the truth as we are telling it now.
The vaccine industry is a criminal cartel.
Their products don't work as they claim.
They're not as safe as they claim.
And they harm and kill millions of people every year all around the world.
Vaccinology is an interesting word.
I do believe it applies because that's what it is.
It implies that you are all in or all out.
You are part of the group or you're not.
It's a multi-generational indoctrination of safe and effective, and this is what we do.
And we just inject our children because we have to give them this shot so they will not contract these particular infections.
And to me, it's more like a cult.
Meaning a cult that either you go along with the program or you're excommunicated from the program.
This is the schedule.
This is how we give it.
And you have to give them all at the same time, or we're going to call it vaccine hesitancy and that you're refusing vaccination and that you're being a difficult patient.
And if you don't do it all at the same time, we're going to discharge you from our practice.
That's a cult.
If you look at the definition of a cult, you look at, you know, that you need full adherence to an ideology in a cult, aggressive adherence.
You need, it's an us-versus-them mentality.
They're always looking to recruit new people rapidly.
You have to do, it's usually these radical rituals that you have to do to be in the cult, to show allegiance to the cult.
And I couldn't think of a more radical ritual than giving several untested injectable pharmaceutical products from criminal pharmaceutical companies to children.
In a combination civil and criminal settlement, Pfizer has agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice.
You have to overlook the bad behavior of your leader, of a leader, in order to show adherence to the cult, because it's for the greater good.
There's also little mantras that are used.
We have to start doing things for the greater good of society.
See that all its benefits outweigh the risk of this cult.
You see people that believe one thing or will say one thing one day and then change that the next day.
That's called gaslighting and we saw plenty of that during COVID-19.
That's also a very prominent profile of a cult is a constant gaslighting of people to tell them what truth is.
Gaslighting.
Now, that's exactly what's been happening with vaccines, isn't it?
If we look at recent history, those of us, including world-renowned scientists and virologists who warned about the potential adverse effects from the COVID-19 injections, we were called conspiracy theorists and we were slandered and maligned.
We were censored, kicked off social media, we had YouTube accounts deleted, and we were viciously attacked by the mainstream media attack dogs.
We have now been proven correct.
Myocarditis and other heart issues are exploding.
Cancer is rampant.
Sudden deaths are happening every day.
But the mainstream media is censoring these stories.
I'm disturbed that multiple press stories are trying to grasp at straws anything that they think they can associate with sudden death to distract Americans away from the real cause of sudden death, which is COVID-19 vaccination.
Despite the mainstream media's efforts to distract and obfuscate the truth, blaming the deaths and the heart attacks and the strokes on solar storms and breathing too much and eating too many eggs and daylight savings time and even video games, everybody knows that the vaccine is devastating and the injuries being caused by these vaccines are real.
The truth is that the BBC and other trusted news initiative outlets are responsible for the millions of excess deaths caused by the COVID-19 injections.
In the USA alone in 2021, nearly 700,000 excess deaths occurred that might have been prevented if it weren't for censorship by the mainstream media.
By the end of 2022, that figure had ballooned to 1.25 million excess deaths.
Sadly, but quite clearly, the purpose behind this Ministry of Truth is to keep a lid on the spread of lifesaving knowledge online.
All information must first pass through the censorship filters established by the mainstream media before it reaches your eyes and ears.
This is a coordinated effort between Big Pharma, the media, and the medical establishment to make sure that you only have access to their version of the truth, which is, in fact, a lie.
Modern medicine really functions like a mafia, and they bought off most of the mainstream media.
How many programs have you seen that say sponsored by Pfizer, brought to you by Pfizer?
Programs about COVID, about vaccines, about health and medicine in general.
So much of it is paid for by Pfizer.
Well, these media companies are just taking money to push propaganda that benefits the bottom line of Pfizer.
This is payola.
It's illegal in most industries.
It should be illegal in media and pharma.
And yet somehow this is tolerated.
It's just straight up bribery.
It's kickbacks.
It's fraud.
These are falsehoods that the media are pushing about these vaccines and their safety or efficacy profiles.
In any other industry, the FTC would crack down on this and say, no, you're committing fraud.
You're lying to the public and you're getting paid to do it.
That's bribery and fraud.
These are felony crimes that are being carried out every day by the media, the big pharma cartels, and the regulators in government.
They are a criminal operation.
They know exactly what they're doing.
And they won't stop unless we bring them to justice through the courts.
Mike's absolutely right.
Bring them to justice in the courts.
That's why we are suing the Trusted News Initiative.
And we will win because they blatantly tried to silence our voices by creating a news cartel.
The Trusted News Initiative It was launched originally by BBC, the British Broadcasting Company, which itself has ties with the British intelligence agencies.
And the BBC brought together a lot of the legacy news organizations, including the Washington Post, Reuters, AP, Associated Press, and then the social media giants like Microsoft, Google,
YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, All of those groups, and they agreed, harmonized their reporting about the pandemic and about other issues, including issues that were related to the US election, like the Hunter Biden laptop.
They agreed to not allow reporting that legitimized dissent.
Descending opinions, like anything about COVID, had to be consistent with what WHO and CDC's policies were.
And they made a secret agreement.
They all met.
We believe that it violated the antitrust laws as well as the First Amendment.
They agreed not only The censor news themselves, but to de-platform any rival news organization that tried to report dissenting opinions.
They made this deal with the social media platforms that if any of those rival news organizations printed or published information that was contrary to official protocols, for example, testimony by doctors that they were treating Patients successfully with ivermectin hydroxychloroquine,
testimony of mothers who lost children to vaccines, testimony of individuals who were injured by vaccines, testimony of people who said that the vaccines would not prevent transmission, information that made it look like the virus may have been bioengineered or that it may have come from the Wuhan lab.
That was all forbidden information.
And if a rival news organization printed that information, that rival news organization would not be throttled or deplatformed or shadow banned on the social media sites.
Their role is to speak truth to power.
But that's not what they were doing.
They were doing the opposite of that.
We're broadcasting propaganda of the powerful and crushing the little guy and the dissenting voices who tried to voice a different version that was inconsistent with official proclamations and orthodoxies.
Scientists and experts were effectively silenced and any research or findings that didn't align with the official narrative on COVID-19 was dismissed as fake news and conspiracy theory.
Meanwhile, Big Pharma and those atop the medical profession and their cronies in the mainstream media lied over and over and over to the people about the COVID-19 injections.
The lies that are permeated by the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry and our federal health agencies around the entire world are gross, disgusting, and evil in my opinion.
And so I have been hell-bent since they killed my father-in-law.
You took somebody I loved, it's now time to expose all of your damn lies as much as possible.
I will sit here.
I don't care how uncomfortable it makes medical doctors.
I don't care how uncomfortable the things I show, declare, that are published, that I review.
It doesn't matter.
The medical doctors have been lied to their entire career by the people they put their faith and trust in to allow them to follow a career path to help save lives around the world when in fact they're nothing more than drug dealers in the American Medical Association and the pharmaceutical industry are the drug cartel and they're giving a legal license to their drug dealers they call medical doctors to do their bidding and
they've all been lied to many Have become awakened to the lies and frauds of their industry, but it's not enough of them.
The majority of them are completely oblivious that they are being bought, they have been sold, and they are agents of the largest drug cartel in the world, which is the pharmaceutical industry.
The most common cause of bankruptcy in the United States is medical problems.
So that is insane.
It's all designed by the cartel to Extract as much money from the population as possible, and they do it primarily through the drug companies.
These are the companies that gave us the opioid crisis, which is killing 110,000 Americans every year, twice as many people who were killed in the entire 20-year Vietnam War.
These are our children that are being killed by this industry, and the industry work in tandem.
with corrupt federal regulators to tell doctors that these kind of oxycodone was safe and effective and it was not addictive.
Everybody knew it was addictive.
And yet when FDA says it's safe and effective and not addictive, for some reason, American physicians put aside their own judgment and started prescribing it and created this extraordinary problem.
How is it that these pharmaceutical companies can continue to make money hand over fist With different medications that they market now, but it's not working.
There's an assault right now going on by the pharmaceutical industry worldwide.
Why would all the governments around the world force you to take an experimental shot never proven safe or effective ever?
Who benefits the most by forcing vaccines into you and convincing you they're safe and effective and lying to you the whole time?
The pharmaceutical industry does.
And they create lifelong diseases, depending on which organs they get inside of, and which cells they shut off.
And then guess what the same industry can sell you for the rest of your life?
Every drug to mask or manage the symptoms that they created inside of you and sold you on, you needed to advance your own health.
It's a massive racket, and it's destroying lives all over the world.
We've seen so many lives destroyed over the past few years, haven't we?
Cities across our country fired teachers, firefighters, healthcare staffers, police officers, sanitation workers, and so many others because they refused to get the shot.
These COVID vaccinations did not stop transmission.
In fact, they were never tested to stop transmission before the first injections went into the arms of people in December of 2020 in the United States.
Even though it was talked about that they were 95% effective, they weren't testing for this transmission.
So looking back now, these people that lost their jobs, they took this shot thinking that I'll take it once or I'll take the two-dose series and it's going to stop this transmission.
We're going to get out of this pandemic.
You can see now that was totally proven wrong.
It was my understanding that a vaccine means that if you get it, it prevents a certain situation from occurring in your body.
Well, what the research is showing us is that these COVID-19 vaccines are not preventing.
They're actually, with each booster, you have an increased likelihood of getting it.
The CDC and the FDA only require drug manufacturers show immune reactions at the site of injection.
Which is pretty disgusting because they're telling you vaccines are there to prevent diseases until COVID-19's vaccines.
It's the first time ever they said it's not there to prevent illness.
It's only there to reduce your likelihood of hospitalization or death.
Not to keep you from getting COVID. It's the first time ever a vaccine was ever introduced to the world where they said this doesn't actually prevent you from getting the disease we're telling you it's for.
Well, that's true.
Why do we need it?
And then why do they tell us in the media that we need to get COVID-19 vaccines for others?
To protect others.
If it doesn't prevent yourself from getting COVID-19, how's it going to prevent the others?
It's a massive, massively ridiculous lie.
Doesn't even make logical sense.
It is a massively ridiculous lie.
But people believed it anyway.
And many governors took a hardline approach.
It's either my way or the highway.
You either do it or we're going to punish you.
And if you don't do it the way we say you should do it, then we're going to punish you more.
With societal sanctions like no shots, no school, no shots, no medical care, no shots, no health insurance, no shots, no job.
Any group or entity or human being who's taken away your rights to make choices or have freedoms of choice are anti-God and they're removing your God-given rights.
And oh my God, what was this country supposedly founded on?
The belief in God and the rights to freedom of choice.
Our country was founded on a belief in God and freedom of choice.
But how did the United States get to a place where we are even discussing forced vaccinations?
And what exactly are vaccines?
Let's go all the way back to the early 1700s and learn about the concept of variolation.
So in the 1700s, there was this idea that was being used.
This wasn't the first time.
It's actually been around for centuries, even at that point, where if they found infections or diseases or pustules, some people believed if you could take the smallpox pustule, for example, the blister and cut it open and extract some of the pus, you could go take a healthy person and cut open their skin and drop that pus into their body to create an immune reaction For that uninfected person against a future infection of smallpox.
This is the scenario.
It didn't work very well.
So that went by the wayside and was replaced by vaccination.
So the idea again of vaccination based on the term vaca, meaning cow, scraping it from the udder of cows, it was identified that the milkmaids were not seemingly suffering from the so-called smallpox or cowpox.
And so it was posited that maybe the exposure was preventing them from having or succumbing to the most severe forms of the disease.
But they didn't really encounter how normally it would be encountered because they weren't having open sores and open wounds.
In which this was being administered to them in a natural setting.
In smallpox, they called it variolation, where there would be emanations from an outgrowth of the skin, for instance.
Something trying to leave the body.
They would take that substance and in variolation, they would actually cut open the skin of an innocent victim and shove that material under the skin into the bodily fluids and blood with the hopes that it wouldn't cause the disease and alert the immune system in some way shape or form to prevent a worst case scenario.
The sad reality is that in many cases what was found is that the The infection that they would cause was as devastating or perhaps more so.
We would see sepsis cases, systemic infection unrelenting to causing the death of the patient and or such infection within the area of variolation where they administered it, like in the arm, that they would have to actually remove the arm of the patient before they would die of overall systemic sepsis.
Robert's correct.
Some sources indicate that up to 10% of all those who were given the smallpox variolation actually died from it.
Variolation eventually morphed into vaccination and the modern vaccine era began in the late 18th century with a smallpox vaccine by Edward Jenner.
If you just take a look at the biochemistry of the body and the physiology of the body, the body is not meant to have anything injected into it.
And you can see the same thing in nature, right?
What happens when you get bit or stung by a bee?
Or you're getting a venom injected into you.
And I always have believed that with the creation of vaccines, there's always some sort of poison that's associated with that.
Because if you just look at poisonous snakes, for example, they inject you just like a needle would inject you with a poison.
If you look at the history of vaccines, even dating back to that vaccine, what are you going to add into that And you still have to inject it into the bloodstream.
Looking at how nature works, whether you get bit by a poisonous snake, you get bit by a jellyfish, anything that's going to inject a toxin into you in nature can be poisonous.
You have the chance of dying.
If you get bit by a black mambo, you're most likely going to die if you don't have an antidote for that.
So I think that what happened, if you look at the statistics back in England during the smallpox and during the creation of the vaccination, is that ultimately more people died from the vaccination than they did from the actual smallpox once the vaccination was In 1853, around then, they had a compulsory smallpox vaccination act in England and Wales.
So at that point, really seeing this first time this government steps in and says, everyone needs to take this shot.
If you're a child four months old or older, you have to get this shot.
From the 20 years since that compulsory vaccination went forward, there was more outbreaks and deaths of smallpox than 20 years before that.
So it was a catastrophic failure.
It was a huge failure.
The truth is that once the smallpox vaccination became mandatory in England, massive epidemics began to occur.
According to the official figures of the Register General of England, between 1857 and 1859, there were 14,000 deaths from smallpox.
Then between 1863 and 1865, there were over 20,000 smallpox deaths.
A few years later, there were almost 45,000 smallpox deaths between 1870 and 1872.
In 1871 and 1872, there was a really terrible smallpox outbreak.
And it went through the United States, it went through England as well.
And there was a town called Leicester, England.
And in Leicester, England, there was an anti-vaccination, anti-compulsory vaccination league.
And they found that there was this thing called the Lester Method.
And they found, you know, they've seen enough people get smallpox after getting the vaccine or die after getting the vaccine and complications from it.
So they said, well, there's a point here where we can actually take someone with smallpox and we can isolate them.
We can quarantine them.
Because, again, think about that.
Don't think about the lockdowns here in the U.S. or in other countries or China during COVID. Think about, at that time, people were packed into houses.
You had kids, five, six, seven kids, sleeping in one bedroom or the size of one bedroom with the whole family there.
So you have one person with a smallpox.
Outbreak happens very quickly.
So they said, let's just take that person and isolate them.
Let's have specific locations, hospitals or whatever will isolate those people.
And it was working.
And people were saying, I think I'm going to do that instead of take that shot.
And by 1871, in the middle of this outbreak, we had over a thousand parents that were refusing to get their kids compulsory vaccinations.
And a lot of them decided to go to jail instead of taking the fine, just as a point of protest.
1885 happens, you have the largest It's called anti-compulsory vaccination protests, really in the world, the world's ever seen, in Leicester, England.
And by 1898, they had to change that bill.
So that Compulsory Vaccination Act that came through in 1853, they had to change that bill to allow for conscientious and philosophical exemptions, basically, for these kids.
So a couple pieces of history or what we can learn from that, it took a while for them to get that legislation changed, just like we see here in the United States.
Once these bills pass, it's a big time uphill battle for that.
But they did get that changed and that was really the start of people saying, I think there's a better way here than compulsory government mandated vaccination for a vaccination that doesn't stop, doesn't stop the transmission of the illness.
It's interesting because if the smallpox vaccine was put out today, we would know pretty quick that it wasn't effective.
The efficacy was not quite there, just like the COVID vaccine.
Much like the COVID injections, as vaccination rates increased, so did the incidence of smallpox and deaths.
But in Leicester, they refused the vaccine mandate and practiced isolation.
And it worked.
We should constantly be attempting to learn from history because there's usually a current day application.
And the smallpox vaccine is no exception.
Here's Dr.
Edward Group with more.
I think we should have learned a lot of lessons from that experience.
We could have even gone this way or we could have gone this way in the fork of the road with that smallpox European with Edward Jenner creating the first vaccine.
I think that was the start of where we are today.
Unfortunately, we went the wrong way.
And if you look at the numbers and if you look at The Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and if you look at the people that were coming in to play at that time, you look at the development of drugs for money, that answers a lot of questions because it was really about a money game, which it still is today, in my opinion.
It's not about addressing the root cause.
It's not about Teaching people how to heal themselves, teaching people how to strengthen their immune system.
For the allopathic model, it's all about money, control, and taking the educational component away from you.
And the development, which started from that in the 1800s into the big pharma conglomerate, The big agriculture conglomerate, the big media, because back in the 1800s, newspapers and they didn't have TV, but everything was about information.
If they feed you the truth or if they feed you a lie, you're not going to know the difference.
Because they're the ones in charge of feeding you the information to begin with.
So you have big pharma, big media, big agriculture, big oil and gas, and big education.
Now big education was, let's teach it in the schools too.
So the dumbing down of society from the late 1800s to the 1940s also was to take Keep you looking outside and never look inside and never ask questions, never challenge what the big organizations are saying.
And we're going to teach you what we want you to learn, whether it's true or whether it's false.
One of the purposes of Remedy is to challenge the status quo and ask questions about the dubious information we are constantly fed by the mainstream media.
And one of the most repeated myths today is that vaccines were responsible for the eradication of almost every communicable disease and that we wouldn't be here today without vaccines.
They saved us miraculously from all those bad germs and viruses.
But is this really true?
One of the ways we know that vaccines were not the savior of mankind is by looking at reductions in disease mortality in the 20th century.
It is famously reported that disease mortality reduced by 74% from 1900 to 1977.
It was the great decline in disease mortality.
People were living, people were not dying from disease during this time period, and vaccines took all the credit.
But there are three studies that expose that vaccines are only responsible for maybe about 1% of them.
The rest of the 74% is due to advances in engineering, refrigeration, access year-round to good food in supermarkets.
But in particular, it is sanitation.
People were washing their hands.
People had access to improved plumbing, and also especially engineers and architects and builders who decreased crowding in cities.
That was major for the decline in disease mortality.
So what we see for all of these diseases, such as measles, whooping cough, polio, scarlet fever, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, you see the reduction in disease mortality for all of them.
But only some of them have vaccines.
For example, scarlet fever, there's no vaccine for that.
Yet it follows the exact same trend as other diseases for which there is a vaccine.
And in many cases, such as measles, the vaccine was introduced only years later after the decline in mortality.
For example, measles mortality declined massively in the 1940s and 1950s.
It had basically reached zero.
No one was dying from measles by the 1950s.
Yet the vaccine was only introduced in the year 1963.
10 years later, yet the vaccine claims all the credit.
People were living in extremely crowded dwellings.
People took their wastewater and basically dumped them into ditches in the streets, and those eventually made their way into the drinking water at that time because there wasn't much water filtration or anything like that.
We're talking livestock were packed with people, butcher houses.
Around 1850, 1860, we see the first kind of consciousness change around this, and it was a movement, a sanitation movement, if you will.
They gave government the authority to build water sewage treatment, to basically make overcrowding illegal, things like that, to try to really up-level the human experience here.
And so you're seeing, at that point, you're seeing this big shift in the way things started happening by By 1908, you're seeing this idea of water closets, which was an indoor bathroom with indoor plumbing.
You're seeing the idea of chlorinated water, which is vastly different than fluoridated water.
So they started chlorinating water.
You have basically no more cholera outbreaks, which was a major killer at the time.
Typhoid, dysentery, all that stuff starts to go away just drastically.
That was really the turning point when it comes to a lot of these big killer diseases that were monsters in the past.
You started to see that really start to wind down.
Routine vaccination of the American public against smallpox stopped in 1972 after the disease was eradicated in the United States.
In 1979, the World Health Organization officially declared that smallpox had been eradicated.
Here's Dr.
Brian Artis discussing a natural remedy for smallpox, although you won't hear about this on the nightly news.
There's been a lot of attention going on right now around the world about concerns that there has been smallpox, like Doses of it being found in vaults or health agencies, departments, like they've got smallpox in their refrigerators.
Why would they have that?
And there's concerns that smallpox is going to become another threat.
Supposedly it was eradicated back in the 70s, 1970s.
Is there a antidote to smallpox?
Yeah, Native Americans had one for years and years and years and years and years and years.
I mean, since like the 1700s.
So there is a plant called Saracenia purpura.
It's better known as the pitcher plant, but there's extracts of that that are absolutely proven.
Not by Native Americans even, even though they utilized it to do that.
But there are individuals at the University of Arizona who have confirmed in the last several years, just in the last couple years, that the pitcher plant, this Saracenia purpura extract, completely inhibits smallpox viral replication.
That's published.
That's not a That's not a theory or a conspiracy.
No one has to worry about smallpox.
There's always been a plant-proven antidote for smallpox.
Historical sources suggest that in the 1800s, when smallpox still posed a serious threat, the Mi'kmaq Native Americans of Nova Scotia treated the disease using a botanical infusion derived from the insectivorous plant called Saracenia purpurea, a species of the pitcher plant.
And there were other remedies being utilized during the same time period.
During the mid-1800s, when iodine was first created, iodine was a very powerful remedy For working with smallpox.
And there's also evidence of natural immunity, antibody creative processes that the body goes through or that God creates would be mother's milk, colostrum.
You know, that's going to transfer antibodies.
So if there were pregnant individuals, let's say the mom had recovered from smallpox, then had a baby, then they could use that colostrum from the mother's milk and they could even dilute that into homeopathics.
Homeoprophylaxis is a technique utilized by homeopaths to prevent disease from occurring, per se, although it's fascinating because it's a little bit, well, let's just say it's distinctly different from vaccination as a means of protection or prevention, whereas they would utilize via typically injection Quantities of substances that can cause disease, yet they would claim they're either attenuated or killed.
What we would do in homeopathy is convert those disease-causing organisms or disease processes from something manifesting in the midst of something like smallpox And convert them via serial dilution and succussion to a point where they could not any longer cause the disease.
No possibility of actually causing it.
So it's a much safer way to do that.
And so what we do in homeopathy is quite different.
We will take substances from disease processes Like the pus that would come out in terms of a canker or a sore of some kind and then convert that form into a homeopathic remedy via serial dilution and succussion, completely neutralizing whatever it is so that it couldn't possibly cause disease but have the elements of that original reality or substance and introduced more of it in a subtle form.
And then it would be taken primarily orally because typically how do we encounter the world through various means of normal exposure through the skin.
It could be the mucous membranes through the eyes, the nose, or the mouth through ingestion.
So this is a big part of the difference and distinction with homeoprophylaxis.
We can take these things and we convert them and we call them nosodes, N-O-S-O-D-E-S, nosodes.
And there are nosodes for any and every disease or disease process you can imagine, whether it be smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, Polio, measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, influenza, meningitis, and it's just an extraordinary thing to realize that you can take any of these things and convert them for safe ingestion via a homeoprophylactic method.
In Cuba some years ago when they had Been unable to afford the leptospirosis vaccines that they were relying upon every year in the wet or rainy season.
There would be a lot of stagnant water and pools and things that were growing and then that would impact the health of those that were exposed to it.
And the leptospirosis was, you know, deadly in some cases.
And so when they could not access the vaccinations, they found that for pennies on the dollar, they could afford The homeopathic version of leptospirosis and they applied it.
And not only did the result of the homeoprophylaxis, in that case almost nationwide in Cuba, result in far fewer cases, but it also resulted in far fewer deaths.
And that extended not just one year but into two years.
And so this was quite extraordinary to realize that there are methods of preventive use of homeopathic remedies, not just reactive use.
This account of Cuba's successful treatment of leptospirosis with homeopathy is well documented.
As Robert Scott Bell just mentioned, there are homeopathic nozodes.
They're readily available online or in your local health food store for all of the major vaccines, including MMR, flu, meningitis, DTaP, and even smallpox, although natural smallpox no longer poses a health threat.
Nevertheless, there is a remote possibility that it could eventually be used as a biological warfare agent.
So, these are vital remedies to put in your quiver.
And that's why we created Remedy.
Because you deserve the truth.
And you deserve answers and solutions.
Do you have friends and family that need this information too?
Please share the viewing link with them and please share it on social media as well.
We invite you to join forces with us to help defeat the censorship industrial complex.
Please share this docuseries with everyone you know.
We really appreciate your help in getting this life-saving information out to everybody who needs it.
So back to smallpox.
About a decade after the city of Leicester, England proved that isolation rather than vaccination was the key to stopping smallpox, in 1905 the US Supreme Court in Jacobson versus Massachusetts said That the states have the constitutional authority to use police powers to mandate the smallpox vaccine.
A horrific decision against medical freedom.
Since then, many court cases regarding mandatory vaccines have cited the 1905 Jacobson versus Massachusetts decision, including the 1927 Supreme Court case, Buck versus Bell.
Buck v Bell was a United States Supreme Court case from 1927, where the Supreme Court decided that the same principle that legalizes mandatory vaccination allows for the sterilization of mentally handicapped individuals.
The Buck v Bell decision came out of the Jacobson era.
The case Jacobson versus Massachusetts was a Supreme Court case where a preacher from Massachusetts named Henning Jacobson challenged a local ordinance that required all residents of the county to receive a smallpox vaccination.
And if they did not receive the smallpox vaccination, they would have to either pay a fine of five dollars or they would have to leave the jurisdiction Meaning, leave the county.
And Henning Jacobson challenged this law after he was convicted under it, because he decided not to pay the fine and not to leave the jurisdiction.
And the case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where Justice Harlan, writing for the court, said that mandatory vaccination is like a military draft.
In the same way that the military can draft individuals to go to war, So too, the Public Health Department can draft individuals to go to war on disease.
And that was the principle that sustained the decision.
And that case has been cited since 1905 all the way to today in favor of mandatory vaccination.
One of the principles here is the principle of autonomy.
Only the person can have Control over their own body.
When the principle of autonomy is given up, under no circumstances can that person be thought to have any additional civil rights.
That's actually the last right to be taken.
A person in prison, in a prison block, can still maintain their personal autonomy.
But if they have a vaccine forced in them against their will, Their autonomy is violated.
So it's actually worse than being in a prison.
To have a vaccine force, to be forced to undergo a procedure.
This happened years ago in a horrific time called eugenics, where there was forced sterilization.
Buck versus Bell essentially said it was okay for states in the United States of America to pass eugenics laws to force sterilize those who were deemed unfit to breed.
No one We don't ever should allow governments around the world or any industry to mandate or force us to do anything against our will.
That's called communism.
Communism was what we grew up fighting, wasn't it?
It's why we were so ecstatic in 1980 when the USA beat the CCCP, USSR in hockey.
I was 12 and I still vividly remember it like it was yesterday.
Do you believe in miracles?
Yes!
Unbelievable!
I still get chills when I watch that.
Communism was the enemy.
We hated communism.
It's what President Ronald Reagan was fighting against.
But at the same time, in the mid-1980s, when he was condemning the communism of the CCCP, he also signed a bill that had horrific consequences.
I think that the origins of the current dilemma that we face globally with vaccines in general and the Coronavirus vaccine in particular, I hesitate to call it a vaccine, but the coronavirus shots started with the 1986 Act.
And this was the passage or writing into law of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which took away liability from the manufacturers for injury and death caused by their vaccines if they were on the CDC's recommended schedule.
And this applied initially to childhood vaccines and it came about because of problems with the whole cell pertussis vaccine.
Huge problems.
Problems that when we go back, as we do in the film, 1986, the act, we go back into the history of that, you see how corruption in the medical profession and the industry allowed them to pervert the course of justice, to blackmail Congress and to get them to pass this act which took away Almost all liability from the pharmaceutical companies, with the exception of fraud.
And what happened beyond that point?
When they had no liability, they had the perfect business model.
They had a mandatory market.
Every child in the United States to receive a public school education was required to be fully vaccinated.
And they had no liability.
So they had a mandatory market, no liability.
They had the perfect business model.
All they could do was make a massive profit, and that's what they did.
But worse than that, they realized that they could now expand the vaccine program dramatically for increasingly more trivial diseases.
Ronald Reagan signed a bill in 1986 that provided immunity to all manufacturers of vaccines.
In 1986, which means any pharmaceutical drug company could create any vaccine they wanted.
And if it hurt someone, it never mattered.
You can't sue that company.
they're not liable for the injury because the vaccine supposedly now per Ronald Reagan and signing this bill are too great too great and the benefits far outweigh the risk and so we can't allow big pharma the pharmaceutical giants who pushed for this bill with Ronald Reagan
their threat was we're not going to manufacture vaccines anymore unless you the government provide immunity to us because we're losing our butts on lawsuits for injuries with our vaccine program since 1986 there has never been a drug company who had to pay out injuries to someone for receiving their vaccine
Can you believe there is an industry of any kind who makes a product commercially available and they are completely devoid of any responsibility for injury or harm to the individuals that receive it?
It's out of this world to me.
McDonald's got sued for handing somebody a coffee that got spilt on her and it burned her.
She said it was too hot to be delivered through a drive through and she won massive amounts of money for compensation.
Up through 1972, the general public was given the smallpox vaccine routinely.
And they stopped doing that in 1972.
And then up through 1985, there were only three vaccines in the childhood schedule.
There was MMR, DPT, and polio.
So when I was in medical school, there really wasn't much to talk about.
There were those three shots.
You learned how to give them.
They were not mandatory or required.
Some people got three or four shots of DPT. Some didn't.
They only recommended one MMR at that time.
There were three doses of polio at that time.
So there really wasn't much to talk about.
I don't remember having any specific class or any specific education on the vaccines up through that period of time.
And then it wasn't until the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act passed in 1986 that the wrap-up of the schedule began in 1991.
And from there, now, today, Children get 16 or 17 doses of vaccine, depending on how you count them, and up to 72 different vaccines by the time they're 18 years of age.
The Vaccine Act was passed in 86.
It gave immunity from liability to the vaccine companies.
There was then a gold rush by the vaccine companies to add new vaccines to schedule.
Each new vaccine can guarantee that company up to a billion dollars a year.
Without any advertising or marketing costs because the vaccines are mandated for 76 million children by the government.
They can save money on safety studies because it's the only medical product that doesn't have to do relicensing safety trials.
That's hundreds of millions of dollars in savings potentially.
And they save money also on downstream liabilities because they're immune from liability.
So these products Are just like printing money.
So there was a gold rush to add new ones.
By 1989, the vaccine schedule had exploded.
The vaccine schedule ramped up dramatically, and that made them very, very wealthy, very powerful.
They came to control the media.
They came to control the medical profession, medical training.
The medical societies, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, They came to own doctors.
They came to own medical schools.
They came to own everything.
They bought politicians.
They bought people within the regulatory agencies like the FDA and the CDC. They bought influence and they were They were very successful at doing it, and that made them even more powerful.
And so we now face a situation, a catastrophic situation, with the COVID shots where, once again, they put it onto the childhood vaccine schedule of recommended vaccines so that those vaccines are now exempt from liability for death and injury.
Even though they are entirely experimental, entirely new forms of genetic manipulation, in effect, And those who are injured, really, are going to have a terrible time proving liability, proving fraud, getting any kind of compensation.
And this is extremely important to know, is that the act put the burden, the onus, upon the patient, the injured person, to prove that it was the vaccine.
Not the other way around, not the industry had to prove that the vaccine did not cause it, that the vaccine was safe.
The burden of proof was now upon the injured party.
How can they do that?
If you're a person who is not trained in science, you don't have a laboratory, you don't have a training in epidemiology or reading scientific papers, you're not well.
You've fallen ill as a consequence.
You're struggling to just stay alive and to live from day to day.
How can you possibly...
Win against the might of the pharmaceutical industry backed by the government.
You can't.
And so it is iniquitous and in a very, very dangerous situation in which we find ourselves.
Shockingly, since the 1986 Act, almost $5 billion have been paid out to the families of vaccine-damaged children.
But the money did not come from the vaccine manufacturers, since they have immunity.
That's right, the money actually came from the Vaccine Injury Trust Fund, also known as the VICP, Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which is funded by a 75 cents per dose excise tax that is collected on every vaccine that's sold and given to children and adults in the United States.
And, get this, the plaintiff, in other words, the injured family, files a claim against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, seeking compensation from the Vaccine Injury Trust Fund.
And, the United States Department of Justice actually gets involved, and a court-appointed special master decides whether or not to compensate the plaintiff, the injured family.
The fact that there is a Vaccine Injury Trust Fund proves that vaccines can injure and they are not safe.
Since 1986, the CDC has been legally obligated to conduct safety studies and issue a safety report on children's vaccines every two years.
In 2018, it was determined they had never done this.
Seven years prior, in 2011, there was a landmark Supreme Court case with a shocking ruling about the safety of vaccines.
2011, the pharmaceutical attorneys in the Supreme Court case, they even pitch drug companies cannot be held liable for vaccine injuries because vaccines by nature are unavoidably unsafe.
Really?
And why in the world are we giving those to people?
And if it's unavoidably unsafe as a technology, why are we making it required or at least projecting a narrative that it's required that every child in America has to get all these vaccines that are deemed by the attorneys representing the pharmaceutical industry to the Supreme Court?
Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.
If that's the case, why are we requiring all children to receive them?
Before they go to our federally funded and tax-backed public school systems.
Why are we doing that?
It's ridiculous.
They know it's unavoidably unsafe and they even use that as their argument to protect them from liability.
At that time, with the law, it said if you could make vaccines safer, if it was a designed effect, and you could make vaccines safer, and you didn't do so, then you're liable for everything.
So in 2009, What we showed was we could no longer manufacture any vaccine in an animal or human cell line.
Yeast, bacalovirus, nothing.
It was the fermentation.
It was the monkey kidney cells.
It was the dog cells.
So the Bruchowitz decision by 11, so our paper was out almost two years from October 8, 2009.
By October 11, you know, Tony Fauci knows he has a problem and he knows we know it.
And so that Bruchewicz decision just literally shut down designed effect because they said, oh, we can't make them any other way.
Although vaccine injuries are extremely common, the reality is that other than general symptoms like redness at the site of injection, doctors are not really taught how to spot a vaccine adverse reaction.
Doctors are not taught what a vaccine adverse reaction looks like.
In fact, When a parent calls the doctor and says, my child was vaccinated.
I can't wake him up.
He'll only wake up to feed.
He's sleeping for two days.
The parent is told that's normal.
And when the parent raises the question, could this have been from the vaccine?
Meanwhile the kid had never done that before.
The doctor almost unanimously says, no, it's just a coincidence.
▲
Export Selection