All Episodes
Previous Next
July 26, 2023 - Stew Peters Show
01:10:31
Keys 2 Life EP54: Boyd E Haley PhD | MERCURY AND YOUR HEALTH
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
America is crushing us.
You've got companies laying off tens of thousands of workers, one right after the other.
Americans working two jobs just to get by.
Inflation is pushing hardworking families to the brink.
Hell, just look at the price of eggs, Michael.
And a digital dollar could be coming down the pipeline very, very soon to completely destroy your way of life.
The truth is, you have to have a plan.
I know it.
You know it.
And that's why we've partnered with a great company, Goldco.
So you can diversify your savings and investments with gold and silver before things get worse.
They're a six-time Inc.
5000 2022 Company of the Year with thousands of five-star reviews and have helped people like you And me place over $1 billion in gold and silver.
And right now, they're offering up to $10,000 in free silver while supplies last.
And if you call them today, qualified callers are going to get a Ronald Reagan half ounce silver coin.
So don't wait.
Call 855-743-1966 today.
That's 855-743-1966.
Call now.
FilterSuck.com is the leading manufacturer in filterless air purification systems.
Whether you're dealing with pollen or mold or dust, shedding from your pet, or vaccinated neighbors mRNA spike protein shedding, FilterSuck.com has solutions for every scenario at home, at work, or on the go.
Breathe with confidence.
Don't let your air suck.
Rest well knowing that your home is protected 24-7, so now you can get a unit for your home or a portable unit for on-the-go travel.
That's filtersuck.com.
Use promo code stew for 10% off when you go to filtersuck.com.
Thank you.
Wake up, America.
Christopher Key here with Keys to Life.
I want to make sure everybody understands that our government is poisoning us.
They're poisoning us with the water, the food, the air, the supplements, the frequencies.
And they're poisoning us with mercury.
And so many of you out there have mercury fillings.
Why?
Because the dentist told you it was safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective.
Well, We're bringing on somebody today, Dr.
Boyd Haley, to go over mercury and to really help you guys understand how toxic mercury is and then give you the solutions.
We're always about the solutions here at Keys to Life, showing you guys how to take care of your temple.
You can't go preach God's Word if you don't take care of your temple.
And one of the most important keys to a healthy life is to know what you're putting into this temple.
And I believe, it's my opinion, that mercury is one of the last things you should ever put into the temple.
I may be wrong, but I don't think so, because I know at my school, once when we had somebody break a thermometer, you know, they brought in the hazmat suits and whatnot, but yet here it is being put into So, with no further ado, I'm going to introduce Dr.
Boyd Haley to go over his story of who he is and about Mercury.
Welcome, Dr.
Boyd.
Hello.
Thank you for having me.
I guess we want to talk about how I got into this concept of fighting mercury and dental amalgams, and the story goes back before that.
You know, I was funded by NIH at the University of Wyoming for about 25 years.
Always had funding, always wrote good grants, and then I switched academic appointments from the University of Wyoming to the University of Kentucky Medical Center because the NIH research I was doing was very important in cancer research.
I was one of the first researchers hired at the Markey Cancer Center at the University of Kentucky based on the fact that I had NIH funding and it was quite substantial.
And so I moved to Kentucky and I took some of my graduate students from Wyoming to Kentucky and they finished out their degree there.
And while I was there, the concept, which is what the audience needs to understand, the power of the technology I developed, which was called photo affinity labeling, was you could take a normal tissue, And label all the identify and label of the ATP, GTP. These are energetic binding proteins that are very important for cell division, repair, etc.
And you can compare that Normal tissue to diseased tissue, like a cancer, from that same tissue and see what changed.
It was very basic research.
I wasn't working for a cure.
I was working to find out the differences between a diseased tissue and a normal tissue.
And that was what NIH liked.
And I did that and then I had a graduate student that graduated there and went on a postdoc because they always had to leave and do a tour in another laboratory somewhere.
And this young lady went to work at the Aging Center on an Alzheimer's project at the University of Kentucky.
And she would come back and say, tell us all the research and what was wrong.
And I didn't know a thing about Alzheimer's disease at that time except that it was a dementia.
And she was telling me, and I asked her, well, what causes it?
And she said, well, some people think it's aluminum pots and pans, etc., but they didn't have a clue, to be honest with you.
And I said, well, let's, why don't we study it like where we're doing the cancer.
In other words, take a diseased brain, Alzheimer's brain, and compare it to normal brain and other forms of dementia brain, like Picks disease or Lewy body disease, and see what the changes in the, so we can identify, maybe identify the toxin.
And we did that.
And we published it.
We found major differences between Alzheimer's brain and normal brain.
And no one has ever said I was wrong about those differences.
They're major biochemical differences that are just like you have to be a fool to miss them.
And so we published that.
And we got a five-year NIH grant to continue identifying the proteins that were different in the AD brain versus the normal brain.
In the process of going through that, I went over to the Alzheimer's Research Center and I got a book.
I found a book that talked about 200 sets of identical twins from World War II that they were following to see if diseases were truly genetic or were they just increasing your risk and your susceptibility to toxins.
And to make a long story short, Alzheimer's fit into that category.
In other words, you could have two normal parents give birth to somebody that would develop Alzheimer's disease.
You could have two identical twins, and one of them would get Alzheimer's disease and one wouldn't.
So that tells you it's not genetic.
It's not totally genetic.
It's a genetic susceptibility.
And so I wanted to find out what was causing this difference that you see in the AD brain.
And since people thought it was maybe aluminum, I thought, well, I'll test aluminum, so I'll test all the heavy metals, all the toxic metals.
And when I did that, I want to tell you, it was so simple.
It fell out like you couldn't believe.
Mercury and only mercury at incredibly low concentrations generated the same abnormal biochemistry on three proteins that I could identify and tell you what it was that were not affected in the other neurological illnesses or in normal brain.
And so we published that.
And that's when I got into trouble.
I mean, NIH did not like the fact that I was saying that mercury from the environment, and I didn't know about dental amalgams at that time.
I mean, I knew about them, but I didn't know anything in particular about them.
I was not anti-amalgam billing.
I wasn't anti-vaccine.
I damn well knew that mercury was toxic.
I knew about, you know, the Mad Hatter and Alice in Wonderland.
I knew if you gave mercury for syphilis, the patients became demented.
You know, the Danbury shakes.
I knew all the stories, you know, that chemists hear when they're a graduate student about mercury being exceptionally neurotoxic.
And I didn't think there would be any problem with that.
I was thinking it might be mercury.
Mercury in fish, it was everywhere.
But anyway, when I published that and I went back to get my grants, after 22 years of continuous NIH funding, I read my review that came back.
And the review sounded good, the scientific aspect of what I said I wanted to do, which wasn't all mercury toxicity.
He was making new compounds because I'm a pretty good chemist.
And anyway, what happened at the end of it is that Dr.
Haley, they talked about the mercury aspect I put in there because I thought it was important, looking at Alzheimer's disease.
And they said, Dr.
Haley has to realize we don't want to see any more of this kind of research.
In other words, N and I was telling me they didn't want to see That mercury causes the same abnormal biochemistry as you see in AD brain.
And I will tell everyone, this was a bit more elegant than that.
We found out you can even drink mercury liquid mercury or mercury chloride.
It'll make you sick, but it won't cause dementia because mercury cation can't get in the brain.
But if you breathe mercury vapor like comes off of dental amalgams or take methylmercury from eating fish, Or get Tamerisol, ethyl mercury from vaccines, you'll cross the blood-brain barrier very quickly.
They're organic mercury compounds and they're the ones that cause the neurological illnesses.
And I just thought that we have a decent discussion about this and NIH would do and the FDA would do the right thing and put money into doing research on Looking at the effect of mercury on the mental health and the neurological illnesses that are found in the United States.
And I would like to also point out, the person that pointed this out to me, I got invited to give a talk in about 1993 at the International Academy of Oral and Medical Toxicology, the IAOMT. This is a group of dentists and medical doctors Who, by their personal experience, think that dental amalgams were toxic and that we should not be putting them in people's mouths.
I didn't know.
I thought they were a group of toxicologists.
I had no idea who they were.
I accepted their talk.
I went, I flew there, and I was giving, I gave my talk.
I can tell you they didn't understand the damn thing I said.
Most of them.
It was all photofinity labeling and chemistry.
But Dr.
David Kennedy, a dentist with a modicum, a good degree of biochemical knowledge, was in the audience.
And at the end of my talk, when I said, well, ask for questions, and I knew they didn't know enough about what I would talk about to ask a question.
He just said, Dr.
Haley, does your research indicate that having mercury in your mouth or breathing mercury vapor would be a bad thing to happen?
And I said, well, yeah.
Anybody would agree with that.
You shouldn't be breathing mercury vapor.
He says, do you know about mercury coming off of dental amalgams?
I said, no, I don't believe that.
And I didn't.
I said, the FDA would not allow you to put something in somebody's mouth.
That would leak mercury vapor.
I said they just wouldn't allow that.
But see, I worked for the FDA. I was a John F. Kennedy Scholar in Washington, D.C. when I graduated from college with a degree in chemistry.
And I worked for the Food and Drug Administration on thalidomide.
I mean, for a summer thing, it was a student enhancement program.
And I had a lot of respect for the FDA at that time.
I mean, I just thought they were doing the right thing, and I thought they can do it.
But Dr.
Kennedy took me down into the audience, and he took a mercury vapor analyzer, you're holding your hand, and he showed me that it wouldn't register mercury anywhere in a room.
And then he'd call people over and they'd come over and he'd put it in their mouth and he'd press it.
No mercury.
They had no fillings.
He went to a person that had a filling or two.
I don't know how many they had.
And he put it on there and I saw the meter change.
I thought, well, that can't be.
And then he had them chew gum.
He said, chew this gum for a little bit.
And they said, now I'll read it again.
And then he let me do it.
Because I really didn't trust him.
At that time, and I apologize to him publicly because he's a good friend now and he knows he's the one who got me started in this.
But when I did that, I saw the meter go up when a person of three or four amalgam chewed gum.
Anyway, that was my introduction to mercury and amalgam.
And I thought, our government must be missing this because they would not want you to breathe mercury that had the level that I was sitting there because I was chairman of the chemistry department.
If I had that much mercury in one of my laboratories, in the air that we found in the mouths of these people, OSHA would shut me down.
And they came in quite often and checked around.
And one time they found a room that we had osmometers in it that contained mercury.
And the mercury leaked out and the room was kind of high in mercury vapor.
And they made us clean it up.
And it wasn't that high as in some of these mouths.
But anyway, when I went back to the department, I called OSHA and I got their mercury vapor analyzer that they used to test my laboratories when I was chairman.
And I went around and I kind of harassed people, my secretary, I mean, there were several secretaries there, and faculty members, anybody that would volunteer to let me test the mercury in their mouth.
And if they had dental amalgams, some of them, it scared them.
When they saw that meter flip over, or that digital, it would go in and lock in there, and they would be shocked at how much mercury was in their mouth from dental amalgams.
These are all educated Ph.D. chemist of different backgrounds and training.
It's just amazing how ignorant, and I was one of them, people were of the dangers of having amalgam fillings.
And now, to follow this on down, I then Started giving talks on it, and I started testing.
I mean, I had them to send me fillings, a teeth they had extracted with amalgam fillings in it, and I would drop that filling in a mill of distilled water, and then I would take microliters, that's 10 to the minus 6, a little less than a drop, 20 microliters would be about a normal drop that you would see off of a deal.
And I would add this to the brains, the normal brains we had in the laboratory, the samples.
And if you soak the dental amalgam, and I've published this, this has been shown on numerous talks, if you take an amalgam filling and put it in the middle of water, it takes it just a few minutes, and that water will be so toxic that if you take microliters and add to a brain homogen, you'll inhibit all the nucleotide binding proteins in the brain.
I mean, amalgams produce a very toxic material that's in your saliva, in your breath, and going out.
And I thought, my God, we've got to get this out.
It was bad enough that I was married to a lovely lady that had 15 amalgam fillings.
I made her get them all taken out.
I mean, she had them all replaced at a quarter at a time, not all at one time.
And she had medical history that indicated that she was fighting for her health.
And getting those amalgams out after a long period of time improved quite a bit.
And there's no doubt about this.
Look, I'm a hardcore scientist.
You don't tell me.
I don't believe this or conspiracy theories.
I don't do conspiracy theories unless you show me data.
I mean, I'm a data.
I mean, that's my religion, is that you have to do good science, you have to do follow your nose research, and you have to follow it.
And I can tell you right now, our FDA is not.
I mean, if there's a conspiracy theorist around that are doing it invalidly, it would be the FDA and the CDC. They don't look at data at all.
Consider this.
The FDA has been in charge of medicine in this country since 1933 and today we do not have A treatment for mercury, lead, or cadmium toxicity.
And whose job was it to make sure we get that done?
Because those are the toxins that are in your body that make people sick.
And you don't have to believe me.
Go back and look at the NHANES, the National Health and Nutritional Evaluation Survey funded by the CDC. And they measure the toxic metals in the bodies of maybe 3,000 to 6,000 women or men every other year.
Over the past 20 years, that level has gone up dramatically, and nobody does anything about it.
The proof of that, how many of you have ever gone to a medical doctor and had the medical doctor say, well, let's set your heavy metal toxicity levels in your urine or your blood?
They don't even want to talk about it.
Ask your medical doctor how many courses, how many hours of teaching did they have about heavy metal toxicity when they were going to medical school.
It'll be less than one hour or no more than that anyway.
And so the FDA has totally dropped the ball.
And we took them to court a couple of times, people at the IAOMT using me as a witness and presenting data, and the FDA lost every time.
And the last time, all we wanted them to do was to put on their website that dental amalgams leaked a substantial or measurable amount of mercury that might be very toxic to certain people that could not excrete mercury.
Not might be, it is.
There's no might to it, is it, Doc?
I mean, you know that it's toxic levels.
Well, I know that.
But when you're fighting with somebody, you try to get a step forward and go on.
But anyway, we did this and they put it on there.
And then when Obama became president, he put a lady in charge.
They said that they would put on their website that dental amalgams leak mercury and that people that were sensitive to neurological illness should be aware of that.
But when Obama put Hamburg in as the head of the CDC, pardon me, the FDA, She immediately put it on the back pages.
She took it off.
And so we had that start all over.
So there was nothing about that.
But now just recently, two years ago, the new head of the FDA under, I think he started under Trump, but I'm not sure.
I don't follow politics that closely.
Good.
They have now put it on.
The FDA's stand now, unlike what it was five years ago, Is that 66, about 66% of American people should never have amalgams in their mouth.
People who are going to get pregnant, children under 12 years of age, or if you have an overriding medical issue, like if you're diabetic or have asthma or something like that, then they say no, then you shouldn't get it.
But old men, healthy men should be happy to breathe mercury vapor.
I guess that's the message they're giving anyway.
And that's silly.
I mean, and then you have the Minamata Bay Agreement.
That's the United Nations.
And what they have done is all the countries of the world have decided, and a good number of them have already done, abolished the use of mercury in medicine and dentistry.
And they're not allowed to put amalgam fillings in people in their mouths in those countries.
What countries are this done?
Pardon?
What countries are they not using mercury anymore?
I can't remember.
A lot of African countries.
Nigeria, I think, is one of them.
And some other countries.
The Scandinavian countries have put limitations on the amalgam fillings because they had lawsuits over there about that.
And so I don't go around.
I stick with the signs.
I don't stick with trying to memorize all the countries to do that.
Why would we continue to use mercury in the mouth?
What benefit does it have?
When there's so many other substances, if you've got to do something that would be safe and effective, why would you continue to use mercury?
Well, you know, I want to separate what I think from what I know, and I don't know why we don't, but I would think...
Since you can get very good composite fillings that aren't toxic and hold the tooth in the unit and do a better job according to the dentist I've talked to, I would say the reason they don't is because the American Dental Association and the American Medical Association have used mercury in drugs and in the teeth and they're fearful of mass action lawsuits.
That would be their fear.
I can tell you, when I talk to them, that's more what they're worried about, and I've had them even bring that up to me saying, you know, if we believe you that mercury from dental amalgams was a contributor to Alzheimer's disease, and I strongly do believe that it is, I can tell you why.
The first case of Alzheimer's disease was first reported in America in 1903.
We started putting amalgam fillings in people's mouths in 1850.
Say that again.
We didn't have Alzheimer's in America until 1903 and we started using mercury in 1850.
That was the first case that was reported.
And understand, an Alzheimer's disease brain is a brain that has lost about 25% of its volume.
And you tell me that they couldn't see that in the 1700s when they were taking out brains in the 1600s.
They did autopsies all the way back into the 1400s.
And the first one that was ever reported was in 1903 by Alzheimer's.
And that's 50 years after we started putting amalgam fillings in people's mouths in America.
We led the charge on putting in amalgam fillings.
It was started by the French Concours brothers came over to the United States because they were driven out of France because the French would not let them put mercury in people's mouths because they knew if you put mercury in the people with syphilis, you made them go demented.
And so they said, no, it's too toxic and you can't do that.
And even the American College of Dental Surgeons in the 1850s was against putting amalgam fillings, mercury fillings, in the mouths of people.
But the ADA, and there was not much science done in the United States.
There wasn't many, hardly any laws.
Your dentist might also be your town blacksmith.
And they got it started.
So the ADA introduced the use of mercury fillings.
And they were better filling military as far as treating the tooth and getting it to last and everything.
But at that time, they never thought about mercury causing Alzheimer's.
I don't think anybody even mentioned Alzheimer's in the 1800s.
I mean, I don't think it was a disease that was recognized.
And so we have to wake up and do things in light of modern chemistry and modern medicine.
And the ADA, they grandfathered in amalgam fillings and they don't want to take them out.
They don't want to eliminate because of the business aspect to the American Dental Association.
Well, Doc, so from this, you've, like me, have realized that the FDA, the CDC, the AMA, they're not here to protect us.
And those of you that are listening, you need to wake up and take your head out of the sand and understand the FDA, the AMA, the CDC, they're here for one simple reason.
They are there to protect the corporations, plain and simple.
You know, we've been programmed to believe that they have our best interests at heart.
No, they don't.
They have the corporation's interests at heart.
Am I wrong in saying that, Dr.
Boyd?
Well, you know, I would really like to disagree with you, but I can't.
You know, what I would tell you what I really think is like the FDA is loaded with really good people.
Yeah.
So the people sitting at the very top.
They control everything.
And the same thing with NIH. And we looked at FOSI and the head of the NIH about the COVID thing.
They're there to protect the medical, I mean, the financial interests of big pharma.
I really feel that.
And why did NIH drop my...
My reports, and I've never been asked to give a talk at any Alzheimer's Association meeting.
When I have the only compound, the only, I've identified the only compound, the only element in the world that will mimic all of the aberrant biochemistry, if you put it in an animal model, in a cell model, it'll do every one of the diagnostic hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease, and the NIH and the FDA and the CDC totally ignore it.
And that's how they do it.
They do it by putting people like me in the background, taking away your research funding so you can't have a, you know, you can't publish papers and everything else.
You don't have the money.
And so I'm not an admirer.
Look, I think we need an FDA. We need a CDC or the equipment.
I wouldn't call them that.
I wouldn't say you should have food and drug in the same regulatory body.
But, you know, we need to replace ours.
We need to rebuild them because they have...
I mean, the silliness is this.
In 1977, a Toronto hospital published an article on the death of 10 children out of 13 that they treated with umbilical cord infections.
And in that treatment process, they painted their stomach area with a compound material put out there called morphiolate or mercuricone.
It contained thimerosal, and it killed all the bacteria on the skin of the stomach.
However, 10 of those children they treated that way died, and they didn't know why, so they quit the whole process.
And when they checked them out and did in-depth studies on the organs of these children after autopsy, they found out they died of mercury toxicity.
And the bottom line was merthiolate and mercuricome contained thimerosal, That's a preservative use in vaccines today.
And when you put that, if you're a chemist and you look at it, you know that thimerosal breaks down very quickly and releases ethyl mercury, which can go straight through your skin, get into your blood, go all around your body, and it killed those children because infants can't excrete it.
Now, people your age and my age could take thimerosal or methylate and put it all over our cuts and everything and survive it because we can excrete mercury.
Babies cannot.
I mean, babies on the average do not do it nearly as well.
It takes a period, you have to live a period of time before you're able to excrete that mercury.
And so, in 1978, the FDA outlawed the selling of methylate and macaricone.
You can't buy it anymore.
You haven't been able to buy it for years.
You'll find a jar every now and then in somebody's medicine cabinet that's 20, 30 years old.
But the Einsteins at the CDC decided that that same material that caused mercuricome and methylate to be outlawed by the FDA would be a good thing to put in as a preservative and inject it into a baby on the day of birth.
And that was a CDC mandated vaccine program that started in 1988, I think.
86.
86.
And, you know, I mean, that was thoughtless.
I mean, that was just a thoughtless thing that they did.
And that, and when they did that, and this wasn't my data, because I got into this, even at that time, I wasn't worried about autism or anything like that.
But I've seen the data since then, and it showed that the autism rates started going up with the start of the CDC mandated vaccine program.
Yes, it does.
But what I did, what I did get into, and this is, tell you how I didn't, I didn't go in there because of getting vaccines.
The stuff I published on mercury causing Alzheimer's disease and has the toxicity.
It's not just that.
It also kills your kidney.
You're a biochemical train wreck.
If you're mercury toxic, you're a biochemical train wreck in every organ in your body.
Anyway, there were two people.
Basically, the first guy that contacted me was Colonel Frank Schmuck.
He is an Air Force pilot, and he flew in Gulf War I, and he was also involved with the class Reunions and everything that the people who graduated from the Air Force had.
And he called me and said, would I go with him?
Because he got very sick taking the vaccines.
He never ever landed in the Gulf.
And he told me that, and I think this is true, that a lot of the pilots were from Fighting in the Gulf War were dying of unusual diseases, cancers, etc.
And a lot of them were getting very sick and they didn't know why.
But they had up their vaccine program and they gave them the vaccines all at one time.
And I had an early experience because I was a soldier in the Army at a time right after John Kennedy got shot.
And I got nine vaccines in my arm walking through.
Not only me, everybody else did too.
But I was one of them that went down like a rock.
I mean, just from the vaccine.
It wasn't because it hurt.
I mean, I can take that pain, but I had to drop out and go to the clinic and rest for a couple days and then went back into training.
Some of those guys never came back into training.
I don't think they died, but they sure as hell didn't get well fast.
And so I knew that vaccines was something I had to be careful with.
They told me that.
The doctors that was talking to me at that time.
So anyway, I... When I got out of the Army, you know, I went to graduate school at Washington State University and went to Yale for a postdoc.
And then I had a job at Wyoming and I had money.
And I don't look like it now, but I'm an avid outdoorsman.
I like to hunt.
I like to fly fish.
I just like walking and I like hiking in the woods.
I mean, I like the outdoors and I like to ski.
And so I was getting contact lenses.
And when I got my contact lenses, it was the lady optometrist, she put the contact lens solution in my eye and set me on fire.
Just dropped.
I mean, it was enough that I really responded in a lot of pain.
And she said, my, you have sensitive eyes.
I said, sensitive eyes?
No, I don't.
I've never had this kind of pain in my eyes.
I've never got salt in my eyes.
I swim in the ocean.
I don't get this kind of pain.
And she said, well, you're sensitive to the preservative.
And that's when I first heard about the Marisol.
The Marisol was used to preserve contact lens solution and contact lens storage.
And so I had to make my own salt solution.
And to wear contact lenses, I couldn't put the Marisol in my eyes because they would just Brighten up.
I mean, I'm very sensitive to the Marisol.
So I went to my, I went to the physician's desk residence in my laboratory.
I looked up the Marisol and thought, why in the hell would anybody put this in a biological treatment solution?
It's just too toxic.
I mean, just ethyl mercury?
Go into that then.
How did this happen?
How did they put it in our feelings?
How did they put it in our vaccines?
How did they put it in our visine that we're putting in our eyes?
I mean, surely to God, the CDC scientists, the FDA, these doctors and these researchers that you know, surely they know what you know.
How did they allow this to happen?
Because this is completely, totally makes no sense to me, you know, knowing that...
When a thermometer breaks, they bring in guys in hazmat suits, but yet they're going to put it in all these different solutions.
How did that happen?
Again, separating what I think from what I know, what I think is that these were all grandfathered in because people were making money, putting in amalgam fillings, making vaccines that they could store for months or years at a time.
Anything that made money, the FDA would not...
Go against.
If it was making money and going to cost somebody, the medical community or the dental community, interfere with their fundraising, their money, intake of money, they didn't do a thing about it.
I mean, Congress told the FDA to test every drug that was in line at that time to see if it was toxic, and they've never, ever tested amalgam fillings.
They would never pass.
Never have.
Just because they were grandfathered in or what?
Well, I think they knew they wouldn't pass.
I mean, you know, like you say, these are not stupid people.
I mean, I've met people that have enough sense to, you know, take a mercury vapor analyzer.
And I testified in front of Congress, and Dan Burton, who's a representative from Indiana, asked me if I would come there and talk about mercury toxicity.
And I took an amalgam filling in a tooth.
It was 50 years old.
And I took a vapor analyzer.
In the Congress.
Yeah, and this is testifying in front of Congress, yes, and not all of them, but the ones at that committee on health, and I forget what the name of the committee was, but anyway, they had a film, a camera on me that showed up on the wall, a big picture, and I showed them that if you push on the button without holding it near the tooth, the room was not, no mercury.
But if you put it down there, that tooth, And holding it with a pair of pliers so I couldn't squeeze it.
I mean, the little clip.
And I could tell you that the meter moved up.
And then I took a toothbrush and I brushed it.
And that's all on record, I think, somewhere.
If you brush it with a toothbrush, it pegged the meter.
Indicating that if you brush your teeth, you're really knocking the mercury off of your amalgam fillings.
You're brushing off the surface and disrupting the surface and they're causing it to lose a lot of the mercury.
And I did a study.
I took, I think it was six different dentists, and I sent them plexiglass molds that looked like they had holes in them, and they could cut them in half.
They could undo it and pull them in half and push them around.
And I had them by Mercury filling material, composite material, and put it in these things.
Each dentist did it, and I did it with all the different filling materials that were dental amalgam, and they mailed those to me, and I took them out, and I put them in containers and tried to measure how much mercury came off, but nothing bothering them.
And I thought, well, I'll brush them if I have to.
I didn't have to brush them, especially when they were fresh and new.
They just put off huge amounts of mercury.
I couldn't even read it on my instrument because it paid the instrument every time I tried to read it.
And so after a period of time, I compared it and it's all published in a journal article.
That with different dentists using the same amalgam filling, depending on how hard they press it into the cavity, it leaks mercury at a different rate.
But they all leak mercury at a rate that nobody should have them in their mouth.
Not a one of them.
There's not a mercury safe dental amalgam out there that uses mercury as one of the metals.
It's just not there.
And the ADA and the FDA, they have caused a lot of illness in this country because they don't do that.
And we'll find out when we start talking about the research I've done on developing a chelator.
A lot of the modern man diseases, I mean the Mad Hatter was a modern man disease.
That was people making hats.
When they started burning coal and everything like that, they used mercury in preserving the hats.
I don't know exactly what they were used for, but hatters dealt a lot with mercury and they all became demented.
There's enough proof out there, but we don't have regulatory agencies that really check and do everything right.
If we did, we wouldn't have the flint lead problem.
We wouldn't have the mercury in a lot of locations, and we wouldn't have the AT&T lead cables that are all over the place leaking mercury into the water people are drinking.
We wouldn't have heavy metals on our vaccines.
I mean, if they looked at it and did the research, there's no way that they would approve that.
Well, Doc, you know, the moral of this story is, first and foremost, I believe, do not trust the FDA, the CDC, the AMA, any of these government alphabet soup organizations.
Do what the Lord commands each and every one of you to do, and that is test and prove all things.
Not some things, but all things.
And I promise you, if you do this, you'll find the truth.
But these government agencies are there to protect the interests of the corporations.
This is all about money.
This is all about power.
And it's time that we, the people, wake up.
So basically what happened with this whole...
Thing is, you started doing research, and because you came to the smoking gun, the NIH took away your grants.
You people out there need to understand that autism, 1 in 36 of the children born today will be autistic.
1 in 22 of the boys born today are autistic.
By 2035, at the current rate, It's one and two.
One and two.
You know, we can't...
Take care of these children.
We can't.
We've got to wake up and change things.
And I think it starts, first and foremost, with the vaccines, with the water, with the food, with the air, because these toxic chemicals are in all of those things.
You know, because they know from all the research that Sigmund Freud did, you know, what makes us tick.
And they understand fear is a huge motivator, and they understand how all these toxic chemicals, you know, Kill the body.
But we are resilient, and that's one of the things that frustrates them the most is how we're able to store the mercury and the aluminum and the genetically modified organisms and the fluoride and dilute it into water.
But I want to come up with some solutions because they defunded you and wouldn't give you any more funding because of all the information you found out about mercury.
So then you started doing research trying to find how to chelate the body and get rid of the mercury.
Is that correct?
That's correct, and what I found out right away was all the chelators that we're talking about today that the government has evaluated, they're not really chelators.
I mean, a chelator means something to a chemist, and the compounds like DMSA and DMPS, they call them chelators, and they're not.
I mean, they bind mercury, but they bind it in a sandwich complex.
It's not like it covers up the electron shells so that the metals inhibit it.
And I would say that how I got into this, I think it's important.
When I was talking, when Frank Schmuck and Chad Henning, who's a Dallas cowboy of renown, was also in the Air Force.
He played at the Air Force Academy.
They took me to meet General Mike Ryan and talked to him about not vaccinating all these Air Force people all in one day or giving them a lot of vaccines because the vaccines are toxic.
And I gave a talk there and he had his Surgeon General from the Air Force who immediately told me, you know, you're wrong because we've had autism forever and he was wrong about that and that vaccines are totally safe.
And then I asked him a question.
I said, well, where'd they all go?
And he said, where did everyone go?
I said, everybody your age that should be autistic, should be loaded into mental health places, should be treated for autism.
There wasn't autism with people your age.
I know I'm your age, or I was near his age anyway.
I said, I never knew an autistic child.
Never knew one.
And then I went all the way through college.
You know, through the Army?
I just didn't know one.
And anyway, I was there because what they found out in Gulf War I syndrome, you didn't have to land in the Gulf.
You had to take the vaccinations to get Gulf War syndrome.
And so that piqued my attention that, you know, these vaccines are a little more than just slightly dangerous if you're taking a lot of them.
And I wanted to save the military.
I mean, I'm partial to, you know, saving a good military.
Anyway, that's what the talk was about.
And so, to make a long story short, this guy, Mike Grine, called me back and had me talk to not only him, but the generals of all the services and all the surgeon generals to talk about the dangers of mass vaccines.
And that's my story at that time.
You should not be getting...
Multiple vaccines.
I wasn't anti-vaccine.
I mean, who would be anti-vaccine if they worked and didn't make you sick?
And they did what they say they did.
I mean, everybody being fair, the fact is they don't.
And they're not perfect.
They're not totally safe.
And when anybody tells you they're safe, The very fact that they're protected against lawsuits tells you that they are inherently dangerous.
That's the words they used when they got permission to give it and not have to worry about whether it hurt anybody or not.
Because it's inherently dangerous if you get a vaccine.
And so everybody should know that when they go in and they should if they're going to give a vaccine, it should be tested extensively to show that it's safe.
And they don't do that.
And they haven't done that with any vaccine that I know of.
But anyway, people at Cure Autism Now in Louisville, Kentucky heard about me talking to the the generals of the Air Force about Gulf War Syndrome.
And so they invited me to go to Louisville and they wanted to talk to me about vaccines being harmful to children.
And I was in favor.
My children up to that time were vaccinated.
I mean, and I went there and they told me their theory and their concern that autism epidemic had gone up.
And I told them about the toxicity of thimerosal because I had researched that.
I had researched data.
It wasn't me just making a wild guess.
I mean, I took the time to study thimerosal.
I bought it.
It was a chemical you could buy from Sigma Chemical Company.
And anyway, they got so concerned that they invited me to go to talk to a group in California that a guy, a doctor, Bernie Grimlin, was leading, called Autism One or something like that.
His autism is.
And so I went there and I gave a talk.
And I will tell you that that was the first time anybody in that group had ever heard of a mercury being the likely cause of that because they just flooded me.
And there were other people saying, no, it's the MMR vaccine.
And they were wed to that.
It's not.
But the real reason is, if you're on the CDC-mandated vaccine program on day one of birth, you give a child a thimerosal-containing vaccine for hepatitis B. No reason to do that.
I mean, unless they're having wild sex before they're a year old.
And sharing intravenous needles.
You know they're back there injecting up in the neonatal room.
They're having a big orgy and sharing needles, right?
Sure.
I mean, the silliness and the stupidity of doing this just to sell vaccines is incredible.
But on two months or three months in, on a well-baby visit program, you go in and you get four vaccinations.
One of them is MMR and the other three are thimerosal-contained vaccines.
And that's when the children really mostly responded almost the next day with screaming or not feeling well.
And the MMR is not helpful, but MMR doesn't have thimerosal in it.
I ran into a lot of people not liking what I was saying because they were convinced it was MMR. And so it wasn't like I was accepted by the autism community, and I didn't care.
I mean, I wasn't trying to make any money.
I was just trying to say, let's get the mercury out of the vaccines.
They're toxic, and you can have your thought, but you have to agree with me, mercury is toxic.
It shouldn't be put in a three-month-old baby or in a day-old baby.
And the fact that the CDC promoted that and allowed that tells you they are not careful.
They are not careful, and they're certainly not good scientists.
They don't believe in the scientific method of checking things out because you cannot inject the Mirosol into any biological, any living organism or any living animal without having a negative biochemical response.
It's not the thing to preserve vaccines with at all.
And I stand by that.
I mean, I just think it's a major thing.
To tell you I'm right, I don't know if you've read the Simpson-Wood minutes of the Simpson-Wood meeting.
Do you know about that?
Yes.
Well, let's tell you, you know, for your audience, Simpson-Wood meeting was a meeting held by the Center for Disease Control outside of Atlanta so they could keep it secret.
And in that, the CDC invited the FDA, NIH people, people making vaccines on the vaccine programs, pharmaceutical companies, and they said, we have a problem that we think the vaccines may be involved with autism.
They didn't say, as Dr.
Haley said, because they didn't like me at all.
They don't even want to mention my name.
But I was the only one standing up on stage saying, you should look at the vaccines, and you should look at the Marisol.
Mercury in the vaccines.
It could be having a major effect on babies.
The results of that meeting was they hired an epidemiologist from Denmark to come in and look at the CDC data on vaccine to see if there's any correlation between the Marisol-containing vaccines and autism.
And I haven't seen his paper.
I haven't been privy to get a hold of it.
But he gave a talk to that audience that even the people in the audience said it appears as if this is a no-brainer.
Thimerosal-contained vaccines are causing autism.
And they swore everybody to secrecy.
But their effect of that meeting was that, yes, mercury in the vaccines and the CDC-mandated vaccine program was what caused the autism epidemic at that time.
And you don't hear anybody talk about that.
And, you know, that's when the It was shortly after that that the FDA shut down my use of NBMI to treat autistic children, which was working by the way.
I got two years Of emails sent to me because I checked it out because I took it through the FDA as a dietary antioxidant.
The compound we're going to talk about now is very effective at treating heavy metal toxicity, especially mercury toxicity, but it also is very effective at scavenging hydroxy-free radicals.
It can be classified as a superglutathione molecule.
Superglutathione molecule?
It is not glutathione, but it looks like glutathione.
It has two reactive sites.
Glutathione has one reactive sulfur.
My compound has two, and the three atoms back is the same as the active arm on glutathione.
Beautiful.
And so this compound, when I got it made, I hired An ex-FDA lawyer.
He was one of the lead lawyers at the FDA for many years.
And I had him help me write it because I wanted to have his put off as a mercury chelator.
And when I was doing it, I also showed him the data for the antioxidant capabilities.
This compound is phenomenal.
Nothing even comes close to it.
Antioxidant that is easy on your stomach, does not cause any adverse effects in the 20 years I've been working with it.
I have yet to see an adverse effect with my compound, going through all the FDA, doing rat studies where you give massive amounts.
It just is not toxic.
And anyway, this guy, this guy from the FDA, and I don't want to mention his name because I don't have his permission.
I'm sure he would tell you of this.
He said, Dr.
Haley, why don't you sell this as a dietary antioxidant?
It's made out of natural compounds, because I had told him how I made it from.
He said, and if you look at the FDA site, it says, Anything can be a natural product or dietary substance if it's made out of one or any combination of any two dietary products.
And mine was a combination of two dietary products.
Benzoate, which is found in the beer and stuff.
The Indians used to mix it with pemmican and blueberries and raspberries and stuff like that because it scavenges, it prevents spoiling because it scavenges hydroxy radicals.
And then coupled to that is cystamine, which is a On the end of the coenzyme A in the body, it's in meat and stuff like that.
It's just assisting the amino acid without the carboxylate group 1.
So there's nothing about this compound that you would look at to say it was non-toctose.
That was my first priority when I got a grant from some people to try and develop a chelator that was safer than DMSA and DMPS, which was making people sick.
And my first thing was to make all these compounds that one, they had to get inside the cells.
And these people were stupid.
Saying that trying to kidate mercury out of the body and having something that can't cross a bio-membrane, that's where the mercury goes.
It crosses the bio-membrane, gets inside the cell, and then they have it.
And so my first thing is the compound had to be uncharged and partly hydrophobic, so it could cross a blood-brain barrier, get inside the cells, where the mercury and the lead and the unbound iron are having their damaging effect.
And so I had this money and I started developing it and I made a compound and what we would do we took several compounds we injected them in rats to see if they killed them and if it made them sick it was off the list and we found a couple compounds that did not make them sick and then we said which ones are the best for preventing mercury toxicity and what I published and this is published and it just amazes me That medicine hasn't jumped on us like crazy.
We took rats and injected them on the left side of their stomach underneath subcutaneously so we knew we got in the right amount of mercury.
We gave them a lethal dose or two lethal doses or 14 lethal doses of mercury.
And then we waited 20 minutes, and then on the other side of the stomach, subcutaneously, we injected in an excess of our compound to see if it would get into the body and move around and have an effect on preventing mercury toxins.
It's a rough, crude kind of thing that I like doing.
I want to jump way ahead and not waste my time.
You know, find it in.
If it didn't save them, then it wasn't worth working on.
And what we found, and this was published in 2012, A compound that had saved every one of the rats that were given one lethal dose or two lethal doses.
They didn't even get sick.
They didn't lose weight.
The ones that we gave 14 times the lethal dose, they were convulsing before we took the needle out of the rat.
And, you know, by the time we were going to inject them with the compound, we thought they were going to be dead the next morning.
But we went ahead and injected into it.
These rats couldn't even stand up.
They were just lying down convulsing.
And the next day we went back, they were all alive.
All of them were still alive.
Yeah.
And the rest of them were all dead in three to six hours.
But of that group of rats, the three of them, about four days, five days later, developed tremors and died.
But we didn't treat them anymore.
I didn't give them just that one dosage.
I think if I treat them several times, but six of them lived.
I mean, and the 14 times the lethal dose, that's just unheard of.
One lethal dose is unheard of for a human to take, usually.
And so here's a compound and the FDA in a report to me said they considered that result weak proof that I had a good, effective mercury chelator.
I mean, you know, you have to be stupid to say that's weak proof.
You have to be really stupid.
And as a bureaucracy, that's bureaucratic stupidity.
I don't know who said that, and I know most people at the FDA would say that's not true.
This is really strong proof.
But somebody at the very top said, we consider that weak proof.
But I was taking the compound through all the FDA Required treatments for testing for toxicity and the major one that made most drugs fail is called the DART studies.
Developmental and reproductive toxicity.
That's where you take pregnant rats or take males and inject them with mercury and other compounds and see if you can develop any adverse reproductive or developmental effects Not enough babies born of the babies born of Velasovig.
And to make a long story short, we did that on two species of animals, and our compound did not induce a single drug-related adverse in these DART studies.
It's totally safe.
Very safe.
And I knew that.
We'd already done that on a different level.
And so, right now, my compound is sitting with, and I had a meeting with the FDA, and they're the ones that told us I had to do the DART studies on two species.
And this is an IMD study where you go there and you meet the FDA face to face a room of 18 people.
Only two or three of them talk.
I mean, I don't know.
It's kind of a coffee-esque type of meeting, I think.
But anyway, they said you have to prove that your compound works under the animal rule because you can't put mercury in a human and test humans with mercury toxicity.
It's just unethical.
They do it every day with the fish and the vaccines.
Right.
But we spent 300 plus thousand dollars when we went to London because you couldn't get people in the United States to do studies like this.
And they made our compound radioactive and they tested it and they found out no toxicity and that the compound disperses throughout the body within two hours.
Three hours, it's always in the blood-brain barrier.
It crosses in the brain cells.
It gets everywhere.
And then if you follow it, 73 hours later, all the radioactivity, or not all of it, but 99% of it's gone.
I mean, it's excreted through the P450 system.
And that's kind of slow, actually.
But I mean, if you took, for example, DMSA and DMPS, if you give it to them, it's excreted out of the urine within four to seven hours.
Our compound has a half-life in the blood of 22 hours and in the body of about, I'd say, 30-40 hours.
And so it sits there, but it doesn't do anything wrong.
It doesn't interact.
It's very non-reactive.
So where can we get this at?
Why is it this product to market?
You said it was basically a supplement if you put the two greenies together.
Why are you trying to go through the FDA approval process?
Because that's never going to happen.
The FDA is never going to let a product make it to market that that's going to get mercury out of the cells, I believe.
Well, I mean, I obviously didn't agree with you because I've taken it through the FDA process, and I thought they would go, but every time I go, they set their goal a little farther.
And so they saw we were on the animal rule.
We had to show it was efficacious in animals.
We successfully did that.
We showed that if you gave NBMI and then tried to kill rats with mercury to make your kidneys go bad, it wouldn't happen.
If you let the kidneys go bad by pre-injecting them with mercury and they had bad kidneys, If you injected in the compound, they would get better.
But when we went back the second time, they changed the advisory committee.
You don't talk to the FDA. They put you up with the advisory committee because I'm an orphan drug.
They're supposed to help me get it through because it's something that the country and the doctors say we need this.
We need something to treat mercury toxicity.
But if the FDA has never called me, never contacted me, never encouraged me to do anything, if being an orphan drug, they give you extra help.
I can tell you I'm an orphan drug and I have never gotten any extra help, not only from the FDA, but from the EMAI, the one.
That's a joke.
They don't want to find cures.
They don't want to find preventive medicine.
And they don't want to find anything wrong with anything.
Okay, so we know that.
You know that.
So where's your product now?
How can we get this product to market?
Because the FDA is never going to approve it.
Why can't we just manufacture it as a supplement and get it to the masses?
Well, you know, we've got 90 kilograms we could sell tomorrow if we were allowed to, but we can't.
I mean, the FDA would put us in jail if we did.
You said it was a supplement.
You just can't market or advertise it as curing anything.
The only thing they can treat, prevent, or cure anything is an FDA-approved drug.
But no, I sold it for two years as a supplement, and the FDA shut me down because mothers of autistic children on their blog sites were writing that this was the only compound that reversed the autism symptoms of their children.
And the FDA wrote me a letter saying, your drug is being used to treat a medical condition, therefore it cannot be a supplement, and you have to pull it and take it through the FDA process.
So I can't sell it as a supplement.
I would if I could.
The Chinese can't.
You didn't sell it as an antioxidant or a detox.
I did.
They said no.
Now, where we are, we've gone all the way through all the FDA safety and testing, and we did the animal study that they requested, but then they changed the advisory committee.
The second advisory committee said, your compound is safe in animals, it's safe in humans, and it's efficacious in treating mercury toxicity in animals, but we don't know about humans, and you have to do this in humans, a phase three, which costs you a lot of money.
And I said, where would I find these mercury toxic people in the United States?
In one place where you can have a study.
And they said, we don't know.
We don't have any mercury toxicity in the United States.
Well, I mean, that's what they said.
I mean, that's what some of them indicated.
And so what we're doing, we went to Columbia, South America, where they have the Magdalena River that runs through Columbia.
It's had gold mines in it for 200 years.
And all the people, and not all the people, but a bulk of the people in that Magdalena Valley are eating fish from that estuary and that river are mercury toxic.
And we did a study, and we found out that the people in that area were doing 60 urinary analysis.
The average person was 20 times higher in mercury, cadmium, and other toxic minerals than what you would find in the United States.
So now we went back and we repeated that.
We have a large number of urinary samples being tested in the United States by mass spectrometry to identify what's a level of mercury.
We're going to identify people, and I would say in August, we're going to treat them with NBMI and try and get the last requirement that the FDA has.
For us to get marketing authority in the United States.
But at the same time, we're trying to get marketing authority in South America.
And Vima has approved this and they've helped us get this started.
A lot more helpful than the NIH or FDA, I can tell you that.
And so hopefully we'll help solve the problem in Colombia and Ecuador and Peru and Bolivia and places like that by getting it approved in most countries.
And then that data hopefully will be able to convince the FDA and the EMA that it should be approved in Europe and the United States also.
I mean, I'm trying to play the game straight up, but I'm not going to lie about things.
Brother, I don't see the FDA ever allowing this product to market.
If what you're saying is real and it does everything you're saying, they're never going to let it be an FDA-approved drug.
So I just don't understand why we can't...
As long as you weren't marketing and advertising it for curing autism and doing all these other things, I don't see how they were able to shut you down, but they're pure evil and they can shut anybody down.
So they physically made you stop selling this as a supplement?
Yes.
And they were in my laboratory, my office, my company area, nine days in a row.
And they were there and they monitored where we had to give them all of our drug that we had, or not drug at that time, it was a supplement.
They made it loaded up in a truck and they hauled it away.
They hauled it all away?
Yeah.
And how much were you selling this supplement for?
A month's supply was costing how much roughly?
A doctor could buy enough to treat a person for a month for $30.
For $30?
We were thinking about dropping a price because a lot of the parents of autistic children just don't have any money.
I wasn't doing it for money.
I had a job and I had a good retirement plan.
I had a wife who was a registered nurse.
We were doing it because the looks on the faces of mothers of autistic children is heartbreaking sometimes.
I met a lot of them and I was trying to help them.
But that's the reason they shut me down.
It was because the mothers on blog sites were saying it was helpful for their children.
And every time a mother sent me an email of a positive result of NBMI, we called it OSR at that time, on their child, I would print it.
And I had two years of a stack about that thick of reports where the compound had It dramatically helped and even reversed all the autism symptoms if the child was young enough.
And that was the only file that the FDA did not want to look at.
They absolutely refused to look at the people that were there representing the FDA. I shouldn't say the FDA, but they were interested in that this might stop autism or help autism.
Not at all.
And they haven't called me and they've heard me talk like this before.
The FDA is not at all concerned about the autism epidemic in the United States, and I wouldn't say that's everybody in the FDA, but the people that manage the top, they don't want you hurting the vaccine program.
Well, it's not just a vaccine program.
It's the money meal.
Because that causes a problem, which causes another problem, and you become a patient for life.
And that's what people have to understand.
You know, God created you with an immune system.
Build up your immune system.
It's not real hard.
You know, it's really simple.
You know, when do you think...
What's your thoughts on whether or not this product will make it to market?
I'm hoping that we'll make it to market in South America because they really need it.
I mean, the people in Colombia, if you look at their urinary mercury analysis of a general population, incredibly heavy metal toxic because they have gold mines that are predominant in that country.
They've been there for 200 years using mercury to extract the gold.
And so if they don't do it, They're going to be a very sick population and they already are.
One of the clinics that's doing a testing for us is the center for renal dialysis because they're going broke because they have to do so many renal dialysis amongst their population to keep people alive.
And so I think those people, people that are mining gold and using mercury to extract it, or using mercury, and have been doing it for a long time, will want this compound to save their population.
The FDA is not worried about that, I can tell you that.
And they really don't give a rational end about the people in Colombia or Ecuador or Peru.
They're not concerned about them at all.
Try and talk to them about it.
I've not had a decent conversation with anybody in the administrative branch of the FDA, and all the time I've been fighting with them about dental amalgams, etc.
It's all about money, and I would like to disagree with you because I would like to think that there's more good in the FDA than there is bad, but I wouldn't win an argument with you.
I know that.
I mean, because I had no proof.
Well, brother, this is, I believe, completely satanic.
It's totally Luciferian.
I believe this is all about mass eugenics.
And I believe this is real, and I believe the audience needs to go do their own research.
Right there in Georgia, they said on the Georgia Guidestones that they only wanted 500 million of us left on this planet.
if that means 7.5 billion of us have to be exterminated.
And Bill Gates even said in one of his TED Talks that, you know, the best way to get the carbon emissions down is to get the population down.
The best way to do that is with better birth control and with vaccines.
I mean, he said it right there.
Well, Doc, we only have about three or four more minutes.
Can you tell people how they can get more information about you and keep in touch with you in case this product ever does make it to market, brother?
Well, my company name, if you go there, it's Emeramed, E-M-E-R-A-M-E-D.com, or Palmer.com.
And that website will contain most of it.
and we're working very hard right now to try and get funding.
But see, you hit the nail on the head.
When I try to raise money to get this through the FDA, The people that have a lot of money tell me, FDA is never going to approve this.
You know that.
They didn't like ivermectin.
You think they're going to approve something that might prevent the rate of Parkinson's and other neurological illnesses like Alzheimer's?
See, I'm well known early on for saying mercury causes a major exacerbating factor for Alzheimer's disease.
And that's going to break our Medicare.
The number of people that are going to be demented.
And yet, you know, you can't get them.
They don't talk to you.
They're not interested in something that will stop and prevent that disease because people are making money.
And you know, the last drug the FDA approved to treat Alzheimer's disease Was used as a monoclonal to interact with the beta amyloid protein in the brain that builds up if you have Alzheimer's disease.
And I tell everybody, I have for years, 20 years ago, I said that is a result of the disease.
It's not the cause.
Whatever causes the beta amyloid increase is what causes Alzheimer's disease, not the beta amyloid itself.
And yet, they've made a monoclonal to beta amyloid, and they approved it.
I think it costs $23,000 a year if you buy it.
And they say it'll extend.
It won't prevent the disease.
It just extends the time you live in dementia.
Give that.
We've got to run.
I've got to go to another show.
But give that website again real quick.
Emeramed, E-M-E-R-A-M-E-D.com, www.emeramed.com.
Well, Doc, I so appreciate you coming on here today.
I so appreciate the research and everything you've done.
One of the things you were talking about earlier was glutathione, and Dr.
Rick Lantini brought the most amazing glutathione to market that has a 98% absorption rate.
This, I believe, is one of the best detoxes in the world, except for your product that hopefully we'll see.
Maybe we need to team up and rebrand this and bring it back to market.
But again, guys, understand we're not funded by Big Farmer, Big Ag, Big Government.
We're funded by you, the people.
You can go to GetIGF1.com and get your amazing glutathione.
And if you haven't gotten your deer antler velvet to make men, men again, please go to that website, GetIGF1.com.
Last thing you want to say, Doc?
No, that's fine.
Thank you for having me.
And I think, you know, we just have to fight and try to get our environment cleaned up.
And if you can't clean it up, at least get the people some protection against these heavy metals like lead and mercury and cadmium that's floating around and arsenic.
I think we really have to treat individual people right now until we get the environment to where it's safe.
Well, again, guys, please don't believe anything we've told you today.
Do what the Lord commands each and every one of you to do, and that is test and prove all things.
Not some things, but all things.
And understand the power that each one of you have, where you can take the information you've learned from me and Doc today, and you just share it with one person.
One will turn to two, two will turn to four.
Before you know it, eight billion souls will know that satanic luciferian mass eugenics is going on right now.
▲
Export Selection