Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 19, 2023 - Stew Peters Show

58:28

MRNA IN BIOWEAPON SHOTS IS FOREVER

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	but to resist the ability of your body to break it down.
	Evil by design.
	This is the Dr.
	Jane Rubishow, and you're about to enter Truth in Medicine.
	So now, all of a sudden, all of a sudden, even though you had a healthy child who grew even though you had a healthy child who grew up into a healthy adult,
	the grandkids are going to be suffering from spike protein problems because their DNA has been tainted because of what happened here in the past two years.
	This has never been done in human history that we know about before.
	That a genetic toxin has been put into the entire human genome.
	A genetic toxin that is capable of hiding and skipping generations.
	This is what has been done to us Well, you just watched Canadian Emergency Room Physician and Molecular Biologist, Dr.
	Daniel Nagase, over two years ago, warning the world that the human genome was being poisoned by these shots.
	But it doesn't stop there, because he also warned back then that this would be an intergenerational poison marked by worldwide infertility, continued mass die-offs, and ubiquitous heart attacks and strokes In the very youngest and healthiest otherwise.
	It will hide every other generation and rear its ugly head, he says, in subsequent generations for those lucky enough to even procreate, if you can call that lucky.
	Now this incredible evil is not going away anytime soon, and tonight we're going to talk to Dr.
	Nagase about his latest findings.
	They explain why this will happen.
	Because you see, the mRNA modified, not messenger, that occurs naturally in the human body, but a synthetic engineered version of it, called modified mRNA, that people got shot up with in what they were told was a vaccine, was also engineered not only to last long, but to resist the body's natural propensity to break it down and destroy it.
	This is a very well thought out evil and I don't have all the answers.
	I've never purported to have all the answers.
	But I do bring you a lot of information and I raise a lot of questions along with you to lure other scientists like Dr.
	Nagase to use the power of their intellect and their expertise to try to find the answers.
	And grim as this sounds, it is not the end until God says it's the end.
	And until then, we are all called to continue to ask the questions and search for the answers.
	But what you will see tonight, and I want to share this with you because it's really important, I want you to be prepared for what he's going to be talking about.
	Two things.
	Most importantly, I think he would agree with me that he's going to bring the evidence of his latest findings after he looked at what Pfizer and Moderna released relative to the structure of each of their mRNA materials that they put in the shots.
	By way of reverse transcriptase, he's going to explain what reverse transcriptase is, why it's important for you to understand it, and that the fact that it is responsible for this engineered synthetic mRNA, it's what allows it or enables it to get into your cell and into your nuclei and get into your cells, which is where your natural DNA is, and convert itself and mix with it.
	Let me just give you a quick definition.
	Reverse transcript days RT, also known as RNA-dependent DNA polymerase, is a DNA polymerase enzyme that transcribes single-stranded RNA into DNA. This enzyme is able to synthesize a double helix DNA once the RNA has been reverse transcribed in a first step into a single-strand DNA.
	He's going to do a little bit of a better job explaining that to you, but it's important that you have that foundation.
	And he's also going to talk about the fact that he is full on targeted right now by the College of Physicians and Surgeons in British Columbia, Canada.
	He's explaining that the witch hunt has been resurrected against health providers who have successfully used ivermectin for C19 pneumonia treatment.
	They're attacking good doctors, he's going to tell us, for warning also of the dangers of the synthetic mRNA gene injections.
	So, not to be missed.
	Please stay with me.
	We've got a couple of important words And when I return, we'll have a fascinating discussion and explanation of many of these things with molecular biologist Dr.
	Daniel Nagase.
	I'll be right back.
	Hey everyone, I'd like to say a few words tonight and give some thanks to my sponsor, GoldCo.
	GoldCo has been with me from the beginning of the Dr.
	Jane Ruby Show and I'm grateful for their support and I'm very grateful that they have helped so many Americans protect their retirement savings with physical gold and silver.
	This is an incredible company.
	They have an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, thousands of positive customer reviews.
	Give them a call today and they'll send you a free IRA loophole kit so that you can learn more about how you can use physical gold and silver to protect your retirement savings.
	You can call them at 855-791-2619.
	We don't know what's coming with this Biden White House sending all that money to the Ukraine, watching our own country go up in inflation and not doing a thing to help out.
	We've got to protect ourselves and GoldCo is here to help us.
	Call them today at 855-791-2619.
	I'll be back in a minute.
	Don't go anywhere.
	He's an emergency room physician who was pulled from his practice by the authorities for successfully treating patients with ivermectin.
	He's also a molecular biologist who's been hunting down the truth about these COVID-19 bioweapon injections and their mRNA for years.
	He's got some new findings tonight.
	That unfortunately confirmed that this gain of function material is even more evil than we first thought.
	And some other startling updates.
	He's back tonight to share those findings and so much more.
	Thank you so much for being with me tonight Dr.
	Nagase.
	Good to see you again.
	Thank you Jane for having me on again.
	Absolutely.
	Well, I've been noticing what's going on with you lately.
	First of all, you do have some incredible research to share.
	But I thought before we get to that, I wanted you to share this newest situation because you just came several days ago from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia where you've been under attack.
	You attended a hearing.
	So I'm going to let you explain to everybody what that was about.
	and you have a wonderful statement after that that we're going to lead people to in a little bit, but tell them what this is all about.
	So the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, Canada, they scheduled me for an electronic hearing from February the 21st to 24th, and it was an electronic disciplinary hearing because I had done a speech in British Columbia and it was an electronic disciplinary hearing because I had done a speech in British Columbia warning about the dangers of the mRNA injections, talking about the safety of Ivermectin and how it was very useful for treating
	because of that And that speech was December 9th, 2021.
	So this is almost a year and a half ago.
	And I want people to know that I posted that speech again on my telegram today.
	They can go listen to it after the show tonight.
	Yeah.
	Thank you for posting it.
	You bet.
	Because that's a really important speech.
	That was the closing arguments that I made for the electronic hearing run by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia.
	Now the thing is that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, they...
	Scheduled an online hearing from February 21st to 24th, but then they didn't show up to their own online hearing.
	So, you know, normally the normal thing would be to just, you know, not attend the hearing.
	But I thought, you know what?
	I have enough materials in writing from the College of Physicians and Surgeons, their accusations against me, their expert report against me, I actually don't need them to be here for the electronic hearing to hold the electronic hearing.
	So I read out their accusations and their entire expert report for the first two days of the hearing.
	Read out my own evidence in my defense on the third day of the hearing.
	And then on the last day of the hearing, which is where your video is from, that's my closing arguments.
	So I waited all day earlier that day to offer the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia a chance to make their own closing arguments.
	I left them a telephone message.
	You know, I sent them emails.
	And again, they didn't show up to their own electronic hearing.
	So I just made my own closing statements.
	And that's the end of that.
	I attended my hearing.
	What do you make of the fact that they didn't attend?
	Did you get any intel or did you talk to anybody else in the...
	Yeah, so the week before, they tried to adjourn their hearing, and then they granted themselves an adjournment with less than one week's notice, with only four days notice.
	So that's completely unacceptable to try and adjourn a hearing that they had scheduled And they served me with notice of the days of the hearing, January 20th, right?
	So they had this scheduled for quite some time.
	And then to give me four days notice to adjourn it, I just refused the adjournment.
	I said, we're holding this hearing on the dates you scheduled.
	I don't want to get mired down in the technicalities of bureaucracy.
	I want to get right to the charges because they're outrageous.
	What are they charging you with?
	And I like what you said in your closing statement in that everything you've done, every warning, everything you've done has been on the back of science and you've got that science.
	So please tell them what the charges are and then let's get to the meaning of your closing statement.
	Well, the charge from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC was that I was causing harm by informing people about Ivermectin.
	And they called that misinformation and misinformation that was causing harm to the public.
	That was the accusation.
	And then I also failed to meet the prudence standard of the Canadian Medical Association Code of Ethics because I was disagreeing with the establishment, therefore I was not prudent.
	And then their next accusation was that I was causing harm to the public because I was warning everyone of the dangers of mRNA injections and that I had also failed the prudence standard of the Canadian Medical Association Code of Ethics.
	And it just speaks to the utter ludicrousness of the Canadian Medical Association.
	Like prudence standard?
	What happened to doing your best for your patient?
	Right?
	Correct.
	And then the accusations of harm that the College of Physicians and Surgeons did, it was all based on an expert report from an expert the college hired.
	And this expert was an expert in public health.
	And preventative medicine.
	So he has an extra certification.
	He also has a master's in epidemiology.
	So he should know a thing or two about statistics, but he doesn't.
	Or if he does, he didn't apply it.
	Because in his expert report, he went on and on about the excess mortality in Canada from COVID during 2020.
	But if you actually look at the actual mortality in Canada, the mortality rate, it's not significantly different from any other previous year going all the way back to 2010.
	So if somebody has a master's of clinical epidemiology, They should be able to do their own stats and figure out that the excess mortality for 2020 did not exist, but he doesn't.
	He just goes on and on about a 5% excess mortality.
	And then the next thing is he's completely out of his league when it comes to the mRNA injections.
	He makes all sorts of...
	False claims that mRNA doesn't affect the DNA. There's no biologically plausible mechanism, right?
	And this is a doctor.
	He's a professor at the University of British Columbia Medical School.
	This is an embarrassment.
	To anyone who's a professor, right?
	He can't even apply his own knowledge in his own field of statistics.
	And then he jumps into molecular biology, basically parrots.
	Statements from Pfizer or whatever the establishment media was saying.
	And then he's claiming that's an expert report.
	No, that's a parrot.
	You're just repeating what CNN said about the vaccine safety.
	And so that's what the college was using as their damning evidence to show that I was causing the public harm from warning them.
	Well, it sounds like he was a shill for the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
	Do you think, I mean, this is outrageous, do you think that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia are part of the government narrative?
	I mean, where is that coming from?
	Absolutely.
	The College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia tried to force a vaccine mandate on all the doctors in BC. And what they tried to do was they tried to say, you can't renew your license unless you get vaccinated.
	And then there was such an uproar over that, and they faced the possibility that a majority of physicians who were in British Columbia might not renew their license and leave the province.
	That they at the last minute withdrew that threat that you had to get the vaccine or else you couldn't renew your medical license.
	So they withdrew it at the last minute, but then after everyone renewed their medical license, they tried to reintroduce the mandate that in order to maintain your medical license that you have to get vaccinated.
	So that caused a lot of backlash with the doctors in British Columbia.
	So I don't think it ever actually went into effect.
	Do you feel, your boots on the ground up there, do you feel that there is a significant number, rather, of physicians who are kindred spirits who understand the dangers as you do?
	Where is that shaking out?
	You know...
	In Canada, there's a few really outspoken physicians, and then it seems to me a vast majority who are too polite.
	They go along with things just to get along.
	You know, it's your stereotype of ultra-polite, very easy to get along with Canadians, right?
	But they're not being vocal with their disagreement.
	And it seems that the government takes advantage of that.
	The college takes advantage of that.
	That if people aren't out there speaking out in the streets, the government keeps taking two steps forward because there's no resistance.
	Yeah, and this has cost tremendous numbers of Canadian lives, especially babies and children.
	I'm sure you know.
	I don't have to tell you that.
	Where do you stand now?
	Have they officially They suspended my license on January the 19th, 2022.
	So after that, because my license was suspended, I didn't renew it.
	And then, get this, you'll love this.
	Then they sent me a threat letter that if I didn't renew my license, they were going to start charging me a fine so that I had to officially resign.
	So then I signed a resignation retirement contract with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC.
	So that was back in March of 2022.
	In spite of all that, in the fall of 2022, so almost eight months later, the College of Physicians and Surgeons, they started an investigation and held a disciplinary committee hearing.
	They served me with notice that I was going to be brought in front of a disciplinary committee even though I had no license.
	Oh, that's absurd.
	What they were doing, essentially, it sounds like is fining you into taking the shots or doctors in your situation who refused and who were doing the right thing and protecting themselves, right?
	It sounds like they're essentially going through another process to fine maybe thousands or, I don't know, tens of thousands of dollars to those doctors not taking the shot, right?
	In order to renew, you had to take the shot.
	If you don't renew, you get fined.
	Exactly.
	How dirty is that?
	They wanted to send a message out that even if you retire and you quit the province, they will come after you.
	Even if you quit.
	And there's new legislation that's come in through the province of British Columbia.
	It was just passed in November that allows the government to issue $200,000 fines And six months jail and property seizures if any registrant, so a nursing college, physiotherapist college or medical college, if anyone disobeys the college.
	And the government said, and this is how ridiculous, this gets into international things.
	The British Columbia government passed the legislation that said they are still allowed to issue a fine even if the person has left the country and is no longer registered.
	So that means now in British Columbia, the government is going to be issuing fines and then selling it on the international bounty hunters market.
	So if someone, let's say, they're sick of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, the government, once they've left the country, let's say they move to the U.S. or they move to Texas, Some bounty hunter or dog the bounty hunter from whatever,
	Los Angeles, can drive all the way up to British Columbia, bid $10 US for a $200,000 Canadian bounty, get that bounty slip, Go back down to Texas and point a gun in your face and say, you pay up the $200,000 that I bid $10 to collect on.
	That's unbelievable.
	That's what the British Columbia government has done.
	What a scam.
	What a scam.
	I want to move on, Dr.
	Nagase, but I want to...
	I encourage people, first of all, to go to your Rumble and watch your closing statement.
	It's about 15 minutes, it's easy to watch, and it's really powerful.
	It's D and then your last name, N-A-N. D-N-A-G-A-S-E. Correct.
	And that's the username.
	And I'll type in the whole address.
	It's rumble.com and it's slash user slash D-Nagase.
	D-N-A-G-A-S-E. Perfect.
	I want to encourage people to do that.
	And for all of your discussions on there as well.
	So let's move to really the main topic of tonight.
	And by the way, I wish you well with that.
	I want to keep that alive.
	I'm going to repost it myself and all that.
	So folks can reach you on your Rumble and maybe they can support you as well.
	We'll talk about where they can find you elsewhere and what else you're doing when we close out.
	We are going to do an after talk with Dr.
	Nagase, by the way.
	And my audience loves the after talk.
	They know that it's much more relaxed and sometimes we get a bombshell or two.
	And you've done an after talk with us.
	So getting on with our main show here and our main topic.
	From the beginning, you have been an incredible warrior against the science that's being used in these mRNA shots.
	I remember there was a very passionate speech you made on the steps of the University of British Columbia, if I'm correct, almost two years ago or more.
	Oh, that was the art gallery in Vancouver.
	Okay, because you made a stunning statement, and that's where I first found you, that the human genome is now either going to be or is poisoned.
	They were rolling out the shots everywhere.
	So you have some new findings.
	I want you to maybe give a little foundation of why you made that statement that the genome is being poisoned, and then we'll lead into, and I'm sure we're going to go into the second segment on this topic, because there's a lot to talk about.
	Then we'll lead into what you've found in your latest research around how the mRNA is protected, this synthetic, you know, modified, not messenger RNA. So start at the beginning, though, why you think the human genome has been poisoned by these shots.
	So at the very beginning, when I was in McGill doing molecular biology and physiology, that was 1995 to 1999.
	And there was something known called reverse transcriptase.
	And that's the enzyme in the cell that can take anything that's mRNA and turn it into DNA. And carry it into the nucleus of the cell.
	So that was well known in the 90s.
	It was first discovered in the 70s.
	So because of reverse transcriptase, anything that you put into a cell that's mRNA has the potential to be turned into DNA. And once it's turned into DNA, it can alter the DNA of the cell.
	So anytime someone's doing an mRNA experiment, especially for something that's gene therapy, injecting people with mRNA, the very, very first safety experiment to do is to take a thousand or so breeding pairs of rats And then you give them the mRNA injection,
	and then you test the children rats or the grandchildren rats to see if they have genetic alterations, if they have a DNA copy of that mRNA that was injected into the parent or grandparent generation, right?
	And rats breed very fast.
	This isn't a long experiment.
	This experiment will take six months, eight months at most.
	And that's the very, very first experiment.
	If you find genetic changes in the children or grandchildren generation of the rats, you know that that mRNA injection changed the DNA for that population.
	Let me ask you this.
	How do you differentiate, whether it's the rats or later on maybe in humans, how do we differentiate Between the mRNA-induced changes that are from the shots versus the natural sort of processes from the messenger RNA, which is natural, God-given, directed.
	So there shouldn't be any DNA versions of the spike protein gene.
	Anywhere, right?
	So if the grandchildren rats and you do a PCR on their entire genome, all of a sudden their entire genome is showing copies, DNA versions of the spike protein gene, then you know that the mRNA that you injected to the grandparent rat got turned into DNA and changed that entire lineage, right?
	Wow.
	That's the very first experiment that has to be done.
	That's the first safety experiment.
	And I'm not aware that that experiment was ever published by Pfizer or anyone.
	So that's the ground level.
	That's when I first knew there's something wrong.
	They didn't do the basic safety test.
	And then some people started sending me articles and links to the actual sequence of the Pfizer mRNA injection.
	And I thought, well, let's look at the sequence.
	So I looked up the sequence of the Pfizer mRNA injection.
	And what's noticeable there, in both the Pfizer and the Moderna, is there's a very long polyadenine tail.
	They call it a poly-A tail.
	Now, one of the interesting things is a naturally occurring human gene called Line 1.
	It's a repeated gene that's repeated many times throughout the human genome.
	Some people say that up to 40% of the human genome by weight is copies of Line 1 genes.
	And you've provided us a link, we're scrolling through it now, of the line one sequence from the NIH. And Dr.
	Nagaseed, we're getting close to the end of the first segment.
	So I think what we'll do at this point is take the break and we'll resume this when we come back.
	Hey everyone, I'd like to say a few words tonight and give some thanks to my sponsor, GoldCo.
	GoldCo has been with me from the beginning of the Dr.
	Jane Ruby Show and I'm grateful for their support and I'm very grateful that they have helped so many Americans protect their retirement savings with physical gold and silver.
	This is an incredible company.
	They have an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, thousands of positive customer reviews.
	Give them a call today and they'll send you a free IRA loophole kit so that you can learn more about how you can use physical gold and silver to protect your retirement savings.
	You can call them at 855-791-2619.
	We don't know what's coming with this Biden White House sending all that money to the Ukraine, watching our own country go up in inflation and not doing a thing to help out.
	We've got to protect ourselves and Gold Co.
	is here to help us.
	Call them today at 855-791-2619.
	I'll be back in a minute.
	Don't go anywhere.
	Stress is a common factor that affects everyone in today's world.
	It leads to serious health issues, too.
	But what if the root cause of your stress is actually a deficiency in key nutrients?
	I'd like to introduce you to Magnesium Breakthrough, a unique supplement that offers seven types of magnesium that are better at absorption.
	What sets Magnesium Breakthrough apart is its ability to lower your stress hormones like cortisol and reduce your stimulating neurotransmitters, all leading to a more peaceful and restful state.
	So go to magbreakthrough.com forward slash ruby and get 10% off.
	And when you buy three bottles, you'll get a free gift.
	This is a limited time offer, so don't wait.
	Go to magbreakthrough.com forward slash ruby.
	Welcome back to this next part of our interview with Dr.
	Daniel Nagase.
	We left off, the doctor has been taking us through some of this information on the mRNA sequencing and Dr.
	Nagase, finish.
	I know you wanted to just wrap up on the line one sequencing that we were looking at on the NIH website you provided.
	So the thing is, we know that reverse transcriptase can turn mRNA into DNA, but we don't know if that actually does happen for the spike protein gene that's coded by Moderna and Pfizer.
	So one of the things we can do to estimate the likelihood that the Moderna or Pfizer genes are going to get reverse transcribed is to compare it to a gene that does reverse transcription.
	And a gene that does reverse transcription is line one.
	Now line one is kind of a funny gene.
	We actually don't know what it does.
	We have a lot of theories of what we think it does, but it gets transcribed, it gets turned into mRNA, it leaves the nucleus, it transcribes a couple of proteins called ORF1, ORF2, and then those proteins attach to the line 1 gene, the line 1 mRNA, And carry it back into the nucleus.
	So it seems to go back and forth, and we don't know exactly why it does that, but all the proteins it goes for seem to be transport proteins that take things into and out of the nucleus and have the capability of inserting whatever they transported, whatever mRNA they transported from outside the nucleus, They can insert it into the DNA that's inside the nucleus.
	Okay, there it is.
	You just said it.
	You explained it.
	I want people to understand.
	You just verified that this mRNA that's the gain of function, that's synthetic, it is getting into your own nucleus, which holds your own DNA. DNA doesn't live anywhere else in the body except the nuclei.
	Okay, thank you.
	I just wanted people to understand.
	What you just said was very powerful.
	So, the thing is, we know that's a possibility.
	Is it a probability?
	So, when you look at the line 1 gene, the tail of the line 1 gene has something called a polyA.
	And the polyA, when it's transcribed into mRNA, it's an attachment site for the transport proteins.
	So, when we look at the sequence of the Pfizer injection and the Moderna injection, we find that those two mRNAs, those two artificial mRNAs for the spike protein, have a very similar poly-A tail.
	That is, they can attach to the nuclear transport proteins made by line one, The same way line 1 attaches to its own proteins for transport into and out of the nucleus.
	So if something has a poly A tail, that increases the chances of a reverse transcriptase, such as line 1, taking it into the nucleus and inserting it into the DNA. Now, how important is the poly A tail?
	Well, there was one study done by Rudolf Janisch, and he took a plasmid, which is a segment of mRNA, that had a poly-A tail that was only 25 A's, 25 adenines long.
	And he found that it didn't, for the most part, get inserted into the DNA. Hmm.
	The line 1 poly-A tail is 33 adenines long.
	We know that already gets inserted and transferred in and out of the nucleus.
	However, the Moderna poly-A tail is 100 adenines long.
	The Pfizer poly-A tail is 70 adenines long.
	So that means that both the Pfizer and Moderna Have poly-A tails, which can be attachment site for the nuclear transport proteins, that are much larger than a regular line one.
	So my question is, were they trying to increase the chances of the spike protein mRNA, Moderna and Pfizer?
	They wanted to increase the chances and the transport into the nucleus by making a ridiculously long poly-A tail.
	I see.
	It would theoretically ensure that that would get reverse transcribed and move that synthetic gain of function.
	I want to remind people, poisonous mRNA that's in these shots, it would up the chances that it would get it into the nuclei, which actually, you know, you really explain things like a real scientist.
	You leave room for, because nothing is absolute, I learn, ironically, in science.
	It's a lot of Propensity toward, you know, all that.
	So I don't want to take up your time on that.
	You have, is there anything special about the two links?
	We have a link for, the second link you gave me was for the Moderna mRNA sequence, which you just compared to the, what was found in the third link you gave us.
	So I want to keep this straight for my producer.
	So you put up the right things for the Pfizer mRNA sequence, but you just spoke about the difference in quantity of the Length of the adenine tails.
	Do you want to look closer into either of those, the Moderna or the Pfizer links, for anything else that we can scroll over that you wanted to share with us?
	Because this is really fascinating.
	That's probably for an expert cell biologist or molecular biologist.
	I'm not that good at reading DNA. I see.
	Well, you know what we'll do, Dr.
	Nagase?
	We will put...
	I will add those three links that you gave me that we've scrolled a little bit through so people could get a feel for it.
	But anybody who does want to dig into it, a lot of people do like to read this level of science, and some are fellow scientists.
	We'll put those in our link stack.
	You'll see them for everybody's purpose underneath the show description below me here.
	So I wanted you to be able to Expound more on what those things mean when you're seeing proof of the physical structure of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA.
	And again, it's modified for the layperson.
	They say mRNA like it's messenger, and messenger is what's natural and found in the body.
	But the modified is what you're talking about that you've seen proof of.
	These are the synthetic in silico generated mRNAs that are getting injected into people with these shots.
	Well, those are the sequences that Pfizer and Moderna have published on the websites that it's listing.
	This is the actual sequence of what they're injecting.
	So just going by what they have published, that the sequence of the mRNA that they are injecting into people...
	There's something suspiciously dangerous because it has a poly-A tail that is greater than 33.
	So a natural poly-A tail from line one is 33 sequences long.
	The poly-A tail on Pfizer is 70 A's long.
	And then the one on Moderna is 100 adenines long.
	So that is a big, big, big warning sign.
	Because if it was a short poly-A tail of only 25 sequences, then at least according to the study by Rudolf Janisch, then it wouldn't.
	At least Rudolf Janisch's study showed that if the tail was short at 25 sequences long, 25 nucleotides long.
	For the most part, it did not get inserted into the DNA. I think there was only one instance in a thousand cells where it got inserted into the DNA. Wow.
	So that's how you know.
	I mean, I want people to be able to make the connections.
	And you've done a great job of explaining it.
	That's how you know.
	So the longer those tails of adenine or whatever, I'm assuming it's for this purpose, the adenine.
	But the longer the tails, the relationship is, the higher the chance that it's going to reverse transcriptase and push that synthetic, this stuff they're injecting into you, into your DNA.
	So when people say, "Oh, that's hogwash." That doesn't integrate with your own DNA.
	You've got the proof from Pfizer and Moderna's own, the little bit that they released, right, of the sequences of their material.
	And that's all they've told us.
	The link to the original paper by Rudolf Janisch.
	Perfect.
	So he showed that a 25 nucleotide poly A for the most part didn't get reverse transcribed, but he for some reason didn't test 33, 100 or 70 nucleotide long poly A tails.
	So my big question is, Rudolf Janisch, he's a smart cell biologist.
	Why did he not test the Pfizer or Moderna which have long poly-A tails to see if they got reverse transcribed?
	And my view of it is It's very suspicious that someone with the knowledge that Rudolf Jaenisch had would somehow intentionally avoid creating a...
	Because, you know, he probably has the capabilities once he, you know, with the published sequences of Pfizer and Moderna, is to use a coding machine and make his own version of the Moderna or Pfizer sequence.
	Right?
	And he could have easily tested those sequences out to see if those got reverse transcribed.
	And that would be a brilliant paper because it shows that a 25 sequence Paulier-Tael doesn't get reverse transcribed, but a 70 This nucleotide sequence will get reverse transcribed.
	So why did he avoid doing that one test?
	Because they don't want to demonstrate that it wouldn't reverse transcribe.
	Let me ask you a question.
	You mentioned to me that you have been in a couple of You know, like scientific Zooms, some meetings with other folks, doctors, whatever, researchers.
	And you said you've gotten some pushback from some people.
	I don't know if you want to talk about that or you want to share who that was or what it was about.
	You know, I don't understand why your fellow scientists...
	I mean, I can get it, and I'm not a molecular biologist.
	I can get the gist of this.
	Why would anybody want to...
	Could this happen by a natural accident?
	Do you feel that by having those tails two and three times longer than what occurs in nature is intentional?
	But why would your fellow scientists try to push back?
	Talk about that a little.
	Or maybe we should save that for after talk.
	We can talk about that on the aftertalk.
	The reason supposedly that Moderna and Pfizer say they put on such a long poly A tail was to prevent their mRNA from getting degraded by the cell too quickly.
	But again, we're talking about poly A tails two to three times longer than a natural poly A tail.
	Right.
	So, yeah, maybe it will prevent the mRNA from getting degraded.
	How long did they intend for the mRNA to last in the cell, right?
	Right.
	Did they try to make this into a forever mRNA, one that never gets degraded?
	Because it seems to be that's what they were angling for.
	They did a three prime, no, they did a five prime cap on one end of the mRNA.
	They used methyl pseudouracil.
	Which is a non-natural nucleotide.
	So it's made out of segments of nucleotides that are not naturally occurring mRNA or DNA components.
	So they've done all these modifications to try and prevent this mRNA from going through a natural mRNA degradation cycle.
	So why did they have to put on top of all that a ridiculously long polyadenine tail, which increases the chances of reverse transcription?
	And also, if I just understood what you just said, it also ensures not only that the reverse transcriptase will be able to be effective and get this poisonous synthetic thing into your nucleus, but what you're essentially saying is that's what the built-in protection is.
	That's what makes this mRNA tougher and likely to stay in your body longer, cause more problems longer, because the body's not able to break this particular With these long tails, and they had to know that, right?
	They had to know that.
	The designers.
	They're criminals.
	I mean, when you think about it, they're criminals, right?
	The designers of this?
	Engineered.
	They're criminal engineers.
	There's no way this happens by accident, right?
	And I mean, we know that because once people started dying and getting injured, they were silent.
	They didn't pull anything back.
	And in fact, the authorities pushed further.
	We all know that.
	We've got a few minutes left, Dr.
	Nagase.
	Before we go into the aftertalk, and people, you're not going to want to miss this, we're going to talk about some interesting things and maybe a little more on what's going on, what you're going to be doing next in this attack on you and on your practice and your credentials and all that.
	But first of all, before we totally close out, where can people find your work that they can read?
	Information like this is, in addition to the rumble, which we can repeat, do you do a substack?
	Are you writing?
	Tell us about where they can find you.
	My Substack, the first few articles are very entry-level, but it also gets into a lot of heavy molecular biology.
	It's danielnegase.substack.com.
	And if it's too heavy or if it's too far advanced and people have questions, I'm usually pretty good on keeping up with any comments on the Substack.
	And answering them by the next, within the week.
	That's wonderful.
	So that you're able to answer questions.
	That's wonderful.
	Good.
	Okay.
	And then we have the Rumble, which is rumble.com forward slash D-Nagase.
	N-A-G-A-S-E. Okay.
	Great.
	So again, like I said, we've got a couple of minutes.
	What do you want people to know?
	How can they best use this information besides don't take any more and don't take any boosters?
	Is there any intel that you have on the boosters?
	We have some intel, but we're trying to put pieces together.
	Any information you have or belief that you have that the boosters are more potent or contain more of this material or anything else about the boosters?
	You know, I think a lot of people in Canada stopped taking the boosters.
	And I think because so many were noticing side effects from the first couple of shots.
	Of course, there's some people who didn't get any side effects with the first couple of shots and they ran and they lined up for boosters.
	But again, you know, it's...
	It's very suspicious that they keep pushing this injection repeatedly.
	It's like they're trying to maximize the percentage of the population that has this mRNA injected and persistent within their bodies.
	It's because Like with previous seasons, flu shots, you'd get one flu shot and then you'd forget about it till the next year and then sometimes people just wouldn't get it the next year.
	But for some reason with this injection, anyone they didn't get the first time around, they want to get again.
	Or anyone who might have got a placebo injection.
	With the first or second dose, they want to make sure that they don't get left behind, and they want to make sure that by the third, fourth, or fifth dose, they actually get the actual injection.
	It's hard for me to say, because I don't have enough of a sample of all the different batches to say how many percent were placebos, how many percent were this or that.
	Right, but they've built in pacing this thing out, that's for sure.
	Dr.
	Daniel Nagase, thank you so much for being back here.
	Your work always informs and educates.
	It's just a blessing.
	Oh, there's one more thing just quickly to mention.
	Very quickly, we're out of time.
	Are you guys noticing down in the States a lot of street lights that have an unusual purple hue?
	We can talk about it in After Talk.
	Thanks, Dr.
	Nagase.
	I have to run.
	I really apologize.
	All right.
	Sounds good.
	So guys, don't forget After Talk.
	It'll be up in a day or two with Dr.
	Daniel Nagase.
	You don't want to miss this conversation.
	It's probably going to go a little bit longer because we've got three major things to catch up on.
	So I'll be back in a moment with these important words.
	And you won't want to miss also the last segment, which is our Wednesday, Ask Dr.
	Jane.
	Hey everyone, I'd like to say a few words tonight and give some thanks to my sponsor, GoldCo.
	GoldCo has been with me from the beginning of the Dr.
	Jane Ruby Show and I'm grateful for their support and I'm very grateful that they have helped so many Americans protect their retirement savings with physical gold and silver.
	This is an incredible company.
	They have an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, thousands of positive customer reviews.
	Give them a call today and they'll send you a free IRA loophole kit so that you can learn more about how you can use physical gold and silver to protect your retirement savings.
	You can call them at 855-791-2619.
	We don't know what's coming with this Biden White House sending all that money to the Ukraine, watching our own country go up in inflation and not doing a thing to help out.
	We've got to protect ourselves and GoldCo is here to help us.
	Call them today at 855-791-2619.
	I'll be back in a minute.
	Don't go anywhere.
	Stress is a common factor that affects everyone in today's world.
	It leads to serious health issues, too.
	But what if the root cause of your stress is actually a deficiency in key nutrients?
	I'd like to introduce you to Magnesium Breakthrough, a unique supplement that offers seven types of magnesium that are Better at absorption.
	What sets Magnesium Breakthrough apart is its ability to lower your stress hormones like cortisol and reduce your stimulating neurotransmitters, all leading to a more peaceful and restful state.
	So go to MagBreakthrough.com And when you buy three bottles, you'll get a free gift.
	This is a limited time offer, so don't wait.
	Go to magbreakthrough.com forward slash ruby.
	Welcome back.
	Well, as you know, every Wednesday, you, the audience, have the last word because it's Ask Dr.
	Jane, where I've selected some of your questions from my social media and I answer them directly.
	This is a segment you might remember that has been sponsored since day one, over a year ago, with the launch of the Dr.
	Jane Ruby Show by MyPillow.com and the great Mike Lindell, an American success story himself.
	And when you support his business by purchasing things for your home, like sheets, towels, slippers, baby blankets, incredibly soft pet beds, you're not only getting great products, but you're also supporting my voice and the continuation of this show.
	So make sure you use the promo code RUBY when you go to MyPillow.com, R-U-B-Y, RUBY, and you'll get huge savings and free shipping.
	Okay, well, let's get to the questions for tonight.
	First question to me comes from Jessica Lynn, who asks me, Dr.
	Jane, is your team researching the contents of the chemtrails and how can we potentially detox from them?
	It's a serious problem here in Central Florida.
	Thank you.
	Well, Jessica Lynn, first of all, I don't have a research team.
	You're looking at the Dr.
	Jane Ruby Show research team, a one-woman band here so far.
	I'd love to, and hopefully we'll grow to that point.
	But what I have done is talk to fellow frontline doctors, experts, and political leaders On our side who are researching into this thing.
	I was just in central Florida, or near, I would say, over the last couple of days.
	And we actually all went outside after the dinner party I told you about in Coffee Chat with some great patriots, including Dr.
	Pete Chambers.
	And we looked at the crisscross.
	The sky was so clear.
	You could see the stars.
	We looked at the crisscrossing of those chemtrails, and they're very worrisome.
	And I asked, well, what is in this?
	They were not quite sure themselves, but it really was troubling to see.
	Really hard to understand that you would have all those military pilots doing that and not questioning a thing.
	So as we learn more, I will definitely let you know, Jessica Lynn.
	Thank you so much for the question.
	Second question tonight is from Jen Utley, who asks, Dr.
	Jane, in your conversations with your friend, Dr.
	Pete Chambers, has he mentioned when his report stemming from his trip to East Palestine might be ready?
	God bless him and you.
	Well, thank you, Jen.
	I did ask him, and he said that it was still underway.
	Remember, A lot of these analyses take time because they're run under different conditions, they're run in a lab, there's a certain procedure to follow, but at least we know that they are in process right now.
	And believe me, as soon as he has them and he lets me know, he knows he's got an open invitation to come on the show and give us an update.
	My third question, and last, it's a short segment tonight, comes from BJJ23. Well, B asks, do you have any recommendations to find holistic doctors for children?
	I'm in Massachusetts, and it's so hard to find these kinds of doctors.
	Still need physicals for certain activities.
	Thank you.
	Well, unfortunately, you're not homeschooling, and I think that's really the number one protection for your children right now.
	But I will answer the question, of course, because so many parents like yourself are worried about this, and you do have your children in some kind of a school system.
	This is what I'm going to say to you.
	You can't stop looking.
	I don't have a repository of names of naturalistic doctors.
	Maybe somebody does, and they'll write to me at my protonmail, drjainruby, at protonmail.com and let me know, and I'll post it over and over again as a source for parents.
	The only option you have right now is to continue to do word of mouth.
	Continue to search on the internet.
	Also make a recommendation that you use something like DuckDuckGo because I see a glaring difference between using Google and DuckDuckGo.
	And so many times you may not even be paying attention, but you automatically go to a Google search.
	I would intentionally go to DuckDuckGo.
	I got hundreds more responses and pieces of information.
	So I hope that helps you in some way.
	But B, you're just going to have to keep looking.
	And I do talk to parents all over the country that eventually find them, and they will actually write exemptions from all of these childhood vaccines.
	Protect your children as best you can.
	Uh, and don't worry.
	So if you want to do ask Dr.
	Jane, when I do post the request, please be sure your question is brief because if it's too long or you editorialize on it and give me all your opinions, I don't have time to read it and I don't have space on the screen to post it up.
	Okay.
	Uh, my, my telegram mostly for ask Dr.
	Jane.
	Is t.me forward slash drjane ruby.
	Don't forget to subscribe to my Rumble channel so that you never miss my special events, coffee chats, after talks, and of course the individual show segments.
	And I'm going to give you a little heads up.
	There are going to be some big announcements coming in the next two to three weeks, and you'll only see them on my Rumble channel.
	That's rumble.com forward slash drjane.
	Follow me on Telegram.
	Twitter, Gab, Truth Social, and Getter.
	Your prayers are invaluable, especially for my protection in this baseless, senseless defamation lawsuit by Robert Malone, the self-proclaimed inventor of the mRNA injections.
	I appreciate your support of my legal defense, because even innocent people must spend money to defend themselves.
	Please go to GiveSendGo.com forward slash Protect DR Jane.
	See you tomorrow morning on Coffee Chat and back here Friday night for the Dr.
	Jane Ruby Show.

▲