All Episodes
Previous Next
May 17, 2017 - InfoWars Special Reports
32:31
EXPOSED - Crowdstrike SOLE Source of Russian Fantasy
Source
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Time Text
We're going to talk to Lee Stranahan, and of course, we've talked to him before.
He's been a reporter from a wide variety of news outlets, from Breitbart to Huffington Post.
You can find him at thepopulist.us, also on Twitter, at Stranahan, and he has a citizen journalism school, citizenjournalism.com.
I wanted to talk to Lee because he was at a press conference last week.
He asked a question about CrowdStrike.
And, of course, he's done a series of articles.
If you go to thepopulist.us, you'll see the articles that he's done about CrowdStrike.
Why is that important?
Well, CrowdStrike is the IT company that was hired by the DNC. They were the sole source for saying that this was a Russian hack, the information that was handed over about the DNC. And, of course, as Lee pointed out, back in March, we had former director Comey.
Say that CrowdStrike was a great source, praise them for having revealed this, although he had never seen this information.
So joining us now is Lee Strenahan.
Lee, I want to talk to you first about this press conference last week when you mentioned CrowdStrike and that disappeared from the transcript.
Yeah, it was very interesting.
One minor correction, by the way, it's citizenjournalismschool.com, just so people don't go wrong or else.
But no, no, no problem.
I appreciate you mentioning it.
So I've been doing the White House press briefings.
You know, I did them when I was at Breitbart, and then they asked me not to do them.
So I left Breitbart.
I've been doing them in the past week or so, again, now that I'm less busy on my schedule.
And they had, the president introduced a new executive order on cybersecurity.
So they had a guy up there talking about it.
And I thought it was a good opportunity.
I'll tell you one thing that's interesting to me, David, being out here in the swamp.
The people in the press room, this sounds like a cliche, we talk about it all the time, but it's really true.
The inside the beltway people don't actually care about the people outside the beltway.
I never see them ask a question that is based on what people are interested in.
Do you see what I'm saying?
It's really weird.
They don't even pretend to care.
They were talking about these cybersecurity measures and the possible use of private companies.
And so I tried to get a question in.
And as they were breaking up, I said, because they'd mentioned that one of the companies that would be involved is Facebook.
Now, my question was, a lot of people might be concerned that politically motivated companies like Facebook would be involved.
And as I'm shouting the question, the guy starts, because by the way, often if you shout a question, they will turn around and come back and answer it.
So then I mentioned CrowdStrike.
And a number of people, a fair number of followers on Twitter, heard me say CrowdStrike.
They were like, I heard somebody say CrowdStrike.
That must have been Lee.
And I did say that.
So my question was basically, what about people who are concerned about the involvement of private companies?
That have political motivations, like you mentioned Facebook, and this company CrowdStrike, who are the only people to have examined the DNC servers.
I got as far as CrowdStrike, and the guy who was listening, you can see it on video, then turned around and walked out.
Okay?
Now, then every day a transcript comes out of the press conference, and I noticed, and the only thing that was weird to me about it was, I had five people on Twitter say, I heard you say CrowdStrike.
Like, as soon as it happened, okay?
Right.
And then on the transcript, there's no mention of CrowdStrike.
Now, it could have been that I was over-talking with Sarah Sanders at the time.
I don't know why it wasn't included, but what I know is five people told me, I heard you say CrowdStrike.
Then later that afternoon, independently of that, CrowdStrike is no longer there.
And it's disappointing to me because CrowdStrike is the key issue here, David.
Look, let's go over this again.
The media ask, well, the other thing I've noticed is they ask the same questions every day, day after day after day, right?
Oh, yeah.
I never see them ask about CrowdStrike.
I never see them say the DNC did not give up its servers.
They refused multiple requests at various levels from the FBI. This is according to who?
Me?
To right-wing nutjobs like me and you?
No.
This is according to James Comey.
Okay?
He said that in sworn testimony in the Senate.
Yes.
That multiple sources, multiple requests at various levels, the DNC never turned it over.
Now, the reason CrowdStrike's significant is, and I wrote about this, and this is one of the reasons that, this is the question I wanted to ask that Breitbart told me to stop going to the White House.
So I'm a little sensitive on it, right?
Yeah.
But it's important.
It's important.
And it's important.
It's interesting that they would ask you not to ask this question.
But what is that question?
Tell the audience.
Well, the question was, given the fact that CrowdStrike was forced to retract their report that came out December 22nd, where they claimed Russians had hacked Ukrainian artillery, turned out to be completely false.
And CrowdStrike used this.
By the way, that date is significant, David.
It was a week before, remember how President Obama kicked Russians out saying that there was a conclusion?
Yes, yes.
It was a week before that.
It was one week before that.
And CrowdStrike at the time said, this is the connective tissue, this artillery in Ukraine, this proves it was the Russians, right?
So Obama threw out these Russian diplomats based on CrowdStrike's accusations, which were subsequently proven false.
And by the way, not proven false by right-wing nutjobs like you and I, they had to retract their own report.
Yes.
Okay?
So let's be clear.
This is not conjecture.
They had to retract their own report.
I have not heard a single question about that.
Now, you'd think that Breitbart, I thought this has occurred to me.
What I think they should have done was say, yeah, this is a big deal.
Let's get all of, because Breitbart's got more than one reporter in the room.
They should have been, let's make everybody.
That's a good question.
Let's get that question on the record, right?
Instead, they were like, we don't want you to go to the White House again.
And I'm not that kind of guy.
Yeah, that's interesting.
I'm not that kind of guy.
And so I'm like, well, I think I'm going to keep going anyway.
Well, it's very interesting because, as you point out, and as you tweet it out, CrowdStrike is still the sole source of the Russian narrative.
And I think today...
We're looking at issues around Seth Rich and the information that's come out that there's been something like 40-some-odd thousand interviews that went between him and WikiLeaks and the comments that were made by Julian Assange and others, the UK ambassador, saying that he came to the United States to get information handed to him.
It calls into question the entire issue of whether or not there was even...
A hack, let alone a Russian hack.
So was this information handed over?
Was it handed over to Guccifer?
Did Guccifer hack that information?
I think all that stuff is now up for re-examination.
Well, on the Seth Rich story, I'm cautious about things, David.
The way I work as an investigative reporter is I don't like to report things that are not 100% rock solid.
And I had contact with Guccifer, too.
And some of that contact was after Seth Rich's—all of it, actually, forgive me—all of it was after Seth Rich's death.
I didn't get any indication from my dealings with Lucifer, too.
I was the guy—you know, they've subpoenaed Roger Stone.
I was the guy who got Roger Stone onto this story.
I contacted Roger, and I said, I think this is a big story, and I wrote a piece for him that went up under his byline on this.
I got no indication of that in my dealings with Guccifer 2 at all, that he had been dealing with somebody.
Now, that being said, do I know who Guccifer 2 is?
Absolutely not.
Do I know how they got the information?
Absolutely not.
I know that they had information because some information that Guccifer 2 gave me later was released publicly.
Does that make sense?
In other words, he gave it to me privately.
A week later, by the way, Breitbart didn't want to run with that.
And a week later, it came out, and I'm like, okay, well, there it is.
Breitbart was, they were like, well, let's have him put it out, and then we'll write about it.
I don't want to cut this off.
This is an interesting line of, we need to get back on this, but we're about out of time.
We only got about 50 seconds left.
I know you wanted to talk about what's happening with George Soros and his war on law enforcement in Florida.
You've got a whole series on that at thepopulist.us.
Give us a quick overview of that.
You've got about 40 seconds.
You bet.
I think this is especially important, David, because it's police week.
And we've already had two cops shot and one killed this week.
This is when we honor police.
George Soros has been engaged last year.
He spent millions of dollars in local races.
And he's had an effect in Florida.
An attorney, a state's attorney, he helped elect, said she's not going to file the death penalty on any cases.
Including that of an alleged cop killer.
I have it at thepopulous.us.
We're going to have more coming on this.
This is how Soros doesn't just affect things internationally and nationally, but he's now working on a local level, David, and it's very dangerous, especially the law enforcement.
That's very important.
Give us a little bit more time, because we've run out of time here for our nightly news broadcast, but we can put this on YouTube.
Give us a little bit more information about the George Soros connection.
It's a very long article.
It's about 13 pages printed out here.
Give us a little bit more of an overview, and again, people can see that at thepopulist.us.
Sure.
Yeah, well, again, the way I like to work is, and what we're doing at the Populist, is I give people enough material, completely vetted research material.
There's no conjecture here, so people can look into it themselves, because I've noticed people who like news like digging into stuff, right?
And so George Soros last year launched an initiative where in 11 different states, he began putting money Into municipal and state attorneys races.
Now, this is really smart.
Don't forget, George Soros, I don't like the guy, but he's a genius.
Okay?
He's an economic genius.
And he realized, simple economics, most of these local district attorney races, people spend like a thousand bucks.
Does that, you see what I'm saying?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Well, it's the old slogan, you know, think globally and act locally.
And that's exactly what he's doing.
He's working at the grassroots level.
That's why...
It's so difficult to get people to act at the local level.
They only want to look at politics at the highest level, at the national level, usually only at the presidential level do they get interested.
That's right.
And Soros saw an opportunity here.
And so what he did was, and again, this is verified by Wall Street Journal, Politico.
This is no conjecture here, okay?
He put money into 11 different races.
He helped knock Sheriff Joe out of Maricopa County, for instance.
Yes, yes.
Spent a lot of money there, yeah.
The way he did it's real simple.
In most of these races, he could put $30,000, $40,000, $50,000 into a race.
In the case, for instance, in New Mexico, in Bernalino County, the Republican opponent literally had to withdraw because he was being outspent so badly.
He literally just said, I quit.
Okay?
Now, this was very effective.
And because it's happening on a state and municipal level, it sort of rolled under the radar.
There were a few, like I say, Politico wrote about it, Wall Street Journal wrote about it, Daily Signal wrote about it, but there were some national stories.
And I wrote about it a little bit, too, because you have to remember, of course, David, George Soros was also a big funder of the Black Lives Matter movement.
Oh, yeah.
One of the things I detail in that populist story, I did a big three-part series, because people often ask me, they'll say, what's Soros after?
What's his goal?
And I know what his goal is.
The Black Lives Matter movement, one of their goals is literally prison abolition.
Okay?
And that's because they're spiritual, they're not just spiritual.
The grandfather of the Black Lives Matter was founded by three women.
Patrice Cullors, Alicia Garza, and Opal Tometi.
Patrice Cullors' mentor was a guy named Eric Mann.
Eric Mann was a Weather Underground radical and associated with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorns.
And what they believed in was what the Black Panther Party believed in in 1966. It's in their program.
They want to release every Black person from prison.
That's their explicit goal.
Their argument is that no black person has ever received a fair trial in the United States because it's a racist country.
That's their argument.
So, Eric Mann wrote a book about this guy, George Jackson.
His girlfriend was Angela Davis.
You've heard about Angela.
Oh, yeah.
Free Angela with the hair.
And Angela Davis is the inspiration for Michelle Alexander.
Michelle Alexander wrote the book The New Jim Crow.
Angela Davis is a prison abolitionist.
She's written major works on this.
Michelle Alexander, there's a video of her up on, just Google on YouTube.
Angela Davis, Michelle Alexander.
And you'll find Michelle Alexander sitting next to Angela Davis saying, this is my inspiration.
So what they talk about is a very, and here's the way they sell it, David, and it appeals to libertarians, so it's interesting.
They'll say, Mandatory minimum sentence is, well, you end up with nonviolent drug offenders.
And we need to, you know, we need to ease up on nonviolent drug offenders.
Now, that's an argument that I think for people like you and I is probably pretty compelling.
We'd go...
Yeah, as a matter of fact, I covered that yesterday.
I talked about Senator Rand Paul saying, you don't know what the real Jim Crow laws are.
It's the mandatory minimums because that's what's locking up people.
And we see we know that black people are not using drugs at a higher rate than white people are, but they're going to prison at a much higher rate.
But the mandatory minimum thing is just drug prohibition.
The drug war in general is something that is very troubling.
And I think that Sessions, Attorney General Sessions movement to restore this mandatory minimum stuff, I think that is really going to backfire on them politically.
And I think it's going to feed this whole Black Lives Matter movement.
I've said the same thing, and I've got to point out that I'm sympathetic to that argument.
But I want to point out the danger here because there is one.
I could show you video.
Of the leaders of this movement, including a former Symbionese Liberation Army.
Remember the SLA, Patty Hearst?
Former SLA guy.
They admit that they use the nonviolent drug offenders.
They say, look, there's only a few hundred thousand of those nonviolent drug offenders.
Our actual goal is to release 11 million people from prison.
By the way, 11 million people from prison is the entire prison population.
I could show you a video where they admit that.
So the danger is they're very smart, you see?
They understand they need to get a little bit of a coalition going.
And so they understand libertarians like Rand Paul, like the Koch brothers, okay, will come out and they're in favor of that.
And again, I'm sympathetic to that argument.
I think especially when it comes to...
I agree with you.
Nobody who voted for Donald Trump wanted Jeff Sessions to go after marijuana users.
Nobody.
Okay?
That being said, I think we need to be a little careful of what the end goal is.
And you can keep both of those things in mind, right?
And I think when we look at George Soros, the bigger picture, the final endgame, I believe, is something like we've seen in the color revolutions that he's funded throughout Europe in terms of creating a...
And he has to have a good cause here.
And what they have done throughout Europe is basically they create revolutions, I think, based on political, based on economic classes.
Here we have the sense of upward mobility except for racial classes.
So what they try to do is they try to create and build on this racial division.
That's what Bill Ayers and the rest of them have historically done to sell their communist movement when they brought it here.
They brought it here based on a racial movement rather than economic classes like they did in Europe.
And I think that's really where this is headed.
Would you agree?
I 100% agree.
And not only that, let me prove your point.
We talked about this.
I was in a film called Occupy Enmask with my friend Andrew Breitbart, directed by Steve Bannon.
In Occupy Enmask, which is about the Occupy Wall Street movement, Anita Moncrief is one of the people in the film.
She says at the end, the next step in this is going to be moving it to race.
Because if you look at Occupy Wall Street, it was about class.
1% versus 99%.
It didn't really kick in.
That doesn't work in America, but race does work in America.
Exactly right, which is why the next iteration of it was Black Lives Matter, which directly connects to Occupy Wall Street, but they've changed the tactics.
Now, by the way, where's Black Lives Matter move now?
What's the current state of the movement?
Antifa.
Yes.
The current state, we went from Occupy Wall Street.
I see a line between Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter.
And by the way, if you trace the line back, you go to the WTO, Battle for Seattle in the 90s, and if you keep tracing it back, you get to the Weather Underground.
I mean, when I say this, literally, Eric Mann is the mentor of Patrice Cullors from Black Lives Matter.
He recruited her, his word, when she was 17 and a half years old.
She spent the next 12 years with him, learning revolutionary organizing.
Then she started Black Lives Matter.
When I say a direct line, I mean, literally, she learned at the feet of Eric Mann, whose hero was George Jackson, who was connected to Angela Davis directly.
I mean, not just connected.
They were lovers.
Well, the whole thing goes back, if you look at Bill Ayers and you look at the fact that it was the Weather Underground that created white skin privilege, they've now shortened it to white privilege, and then he stopped bombing buildings and started educating kids in his propaganda, his racialism.
That really is the foundation of what we're looking at here.
So give us a spin on what he's doing, what Soros is doing now with these local races with law enforcement and how this is playing out in Florida.
Well, so remember, I mentioned the history only to say, look, there is a goal.
Because people say, well, what's Soros' goal?
I think his goal is he's anti-law and order, ultimately.
That's what he is now.
In these 11 different races...
Well, he just wants chaos because as chaos breaks down, then, you know, they create chaos throughout the West and they can establish themselves in their new order.
That's exactly right.
I mean, it's, you know, he's making a little more money than the people who are working in the movement that he funds, right?
Yeah, he'll really like law enforcement when it's doing everything that he tells it to do.
He'll love law enforcement.
You'll get it good and hard then at that point.
The boot in the face, yeah.
Now, so what's happened in Florida is he helped elect a woman named Aramis Ayala.
Okay?
Aramis Ayala came in under Soros.
Now, again, I don't like conjecture.
How do I know Aramis Ayala knows about Soros?
Well, here's how.
There was a guy named Lloyd.
He killed his pregnant ex-girlfriend.
So, killed her, the unborn child, and a female police officer in Orlando.
You remember the story about the female police officer in Orlando being killed.
Yes.
This guy, they did a manhunt.
Allegedly, he killed him, right?
A manhunt for 11 days, okay?
Forgive me, for a week.
It was a week-long manhunt.
Okay, so...
Aramis Ayala comes out in a press conference and says, I'm not going to seek the death penalty against Lloyd.
And by the way, I should point out something.
I'm mixed on the death penalty, too.
I'm hesitant to put that power in the state's hands.
But interestingly, Governor Rick Scott, and I am in favor of this, had made it harder to institute the death penalty.
He'd signed a new bill into law that means that a unanimous jury...
That decision is required for a death penalty.
I'm in favor of that.
If you're going to have the death penalty, make it difficult, okay?
So, even though he'd done that, Ermis Ayala came out and said, I'm not going to pursue the death penalty in the case of this cop, alleged cop killer, and I'm not going to pursue it anywhere.
The police wrote to her and said, what are you doing?
We want this decision to be in the hand of a jury.
She did not write back to the police.
Never wrote back to the police.
But what she did do, and we know this by some great reporting from a local TV channel, TV6 down there.
Michael DeForest is the reporter's name.
Great work.
She texted the leftist friends, the advisors, and said, what do I do if I'm asked about this Soros question?
That's literally what she said.
So like I say, there's no conjecture on my part that she's keenly aware of the Soros issue.
A lot of people in Florida...
Now, then what happened was Rick Scott pulled her off the case, and now she's suing to get back on the case.
And really, pretend you're not in Florida, pretend you don't care about...
Let me interject this, too.
In your article, you say she also...
There was $1.4 million that was given to a political action committee by George Soros that ran ads for her, supporting her in her political campaign.
That's right.
This was a big, again, this was a big campaign.
I forget what the amount was, but it was a lot of money poured into that campaign to win.
By the way, interestingly, this goes back to what we said, you know, the Weather Underground used to refer to the Black Panthers as the vanguard of the revolution.
Their theory was, let the minorities lead.
That was what the Weather Underground split, by the way, from the Students for Democratic Society was about.
It was about whether we should let the minorities lead.
Interestingly.
I mention that history because everyone who George Soros ran was a minority member.
Everyone was Hispanic or black.
Interesting, right?
Now, again, I'm not racist.
He apparently is.
It's an interesting coincidence that he was letting that be the vanguard of the revolution here.
Yeah, he's absolutely trying to start a racial revolution here.
A racially based revolution, yes.
That's my point.
And to be able to say, Well, what, are you opposed to an African-American woman being a state's attorney?
To which my answer is, it depends on which one.
It's the same thing.
You know, there are plenty of white guys whose politics, you know, Chuck Schumer, I could just go down the list of white, you know, Bill Clinton, white guy.
Kind of a good old boy, right?
Not a big fan of his politics.
So I don't have that kind of litmus test, right?
You know, Thomas Sowell.
Right?
And so, but that's the way that he ran this race.
And it happened, not just, look, he did it in Arizona, he did it in Illinois, he did it in Texas.
He did it all over the country, 11 different states.
And we're just starting to see, and the reason I want people to be aware of this, especially during Police Week when we honor our fallen police officers, is that this story is going to be affecting municipalities.
It's going to fly under the radar.
Yes.
And here's the other thing that disturbs me, Dave, and you and I have talked about it.
We know for a fact that Jared Kushner, president's son-in-law, big advisor, has direct ties to George Soros.
Yes, yes.
We know for a fact that Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury Secretary.
Yes, deep ties, yes.
Deep financial ties, yes.
Soros is as opposed, I believe, and I think you do too.
That Trump is a—the fact that they lit up—did you see the White House lit up blue last night?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, here's a guy who I know in his heart, Trump is a law and order guy.
Oh, yeah.
Okay?
Yeah, a bit more than I would like to see in many cases when it comes to things like civil asset forfeiture and other things like that.
But that absolutely is something he's passionate about.
And that's why I think—because people are like, well, do you think we were tricked?
No.
I mean, I don't think Trump's being disingenuous.
With his respect for law enforcement, I think he's got people in there, Mnuchin and Kushner among them, who have a very different agenda than he does.
Simply put, they're globalists, right?
And they're down with the globalist agenda, right?
So that's my other broad concern here, is if there were no Soros connections, Who I feel are going to be a moderating influence.
Does that make sense?
And that's the key.
That's the thing that's concerned me from the very beginning when I started seeing some of the people that Donald Trump was picking for his cabinet.
We all heard the expression that personnel is policy.
And the people that are going to be there, they're going to get that policy in place because it's just such a large, complex government.
Those of us who are libertarians understand that government was never designed to be this concentrated, this centralized, this complex.
They've gotten into all these different areas that they should never have been in.
But you're never going to be able to control this or even minimize it in any way if you're going to have people that are opposed to your agenda.
And he's got a lot of people there that are opposed to his agenda.
We're seeing the fruit of that now.
And we're seeing the...
We're barely seeing the sapling of it, unfortunately.
Here's why I say that.
When you've got a guy like Gary Cohn, Democrat, registered Democrat, was recently asked by Gayle King in an interview, what's a nice Democrat boy like you doing in the Trump administration?
And he's head of the National Economic Council.
He's making appointments, right?
Yeah, oh yeah, he's a hardcore big-time Democrat supporter.
He is, and he's appointing other people.
So what I'm saying...
And I've asked that question, too.
What is a Democrat boy like him doing in the administration?
Many of us are.
I think a lot of Trump supporters should ask that, too.
And here's the thing.
I'm very sympathetic that the president is fighting a multi-front battle.
He's got the media that I see in the White House press room fighting him every single day.
The way they do that is with this omnipresent narrative where they just keep hammering and hammering and hammering and hammering.
Absolutely.
And, you know, I do a lot of periscopes.
And someone was like, well, you should do fewer periscopes.
And I said, you know what?
I'm competing against 24-hour MSNBC, 24-hour CNN, 24-hour.
I'm like, I'm not doing enough.
You know what I mean?
Oh, yeah.
I understand.
Yeah.
We all feel that way.
We all feel that way.
It's a 24-hour cycle that everybody's going through.
Well, I think it's very key.
This article and the way you've laid the facts out here so people can do their own investigation and put all this stuff together is very important.
People will find this at thepopulist.us.
And I would say, Lee, as we look at this, the key thing to take away from this is that we're very vulnerable at the local level.
That's been one of our...
Are breaks that we could put on this centralization of power and the way things are going in an un-libertarian, unconstitutional way.
But now we've got somebody like George Soros, who is very clever, who has a lot of money, and who will commit millions to small local races and absolutely swamp that race.
And so that's why it's very important for people to pay attention to what's happening locally.
As we all said, they think globally, but they act locally, and now they're funding races locally.
And a massive way to get exactly what they want in a very strategic way.
Let me tell you, just one other thing I'm going to have up at thepopulist.us pretty soon is a sort of mini-manifesto on an idea.
It's exactly what you said.
Look, Trump is a populist nationalist.
I came up with this idea a few months ago.
We did a little press conference about it up in Twin Falls, Idaho, dealing with the Chobani situation up there.
It's what I call populist localism.
It's applying populism on a local level because you can't fight oligarchy just up here.
You have to fight it.
The people who look on the left and right, the people who are giving big tax breaks to Walmart at a local level, right?
We're doing eminent domain at a local level to help Walmart, let's say.
And I'm not picking on Walmart, I'm just saying.
No, yeah, but it's always the big guys.
It's always the big guys like Chobani that gets nearly a million dollar loan from the Small Business Association.
I had small businesses.
My dad had small businesses.
My grandparents had small businesses.
We never got eight cents from the government to run our business.
But these guys, just like the people who have...
They get the local, the state, and the federal government, in many cases, to subsidize what they're doing.
And who's subsidizing it?
It's the workers and the people who have small businesses.
That's right.
And so I really think the way to fight this, and I ran this idea by Steve Bannon before he was part of the administration.
I said, I'm working on this idea of defining populist localism.
And he was just like, love it.
He got it immediately.
He's like, you really got to talk about that.
This is a way, I think we're at a really interesting point, David.
The left and right labels in a lot of cases no longer matter.
You know what I'm talking about?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Absolutely.
And we saw that in France.
You know, you got a guy who comes in, he's a banker.
What does he do?
He takes somebody from the right-wing party.
He adds people from the left-wing party.
But the key thing is they have to be pro-EU. So, again, we see it's nationalism versus populism.
Even there, the left-right paradigm doesn't make it, even in the place where it began in France, it has absolutely no currency today.
Yeah, that's right.
People ask sometimes, well, how were you?
You wrote for the Huffington Post.
How were you on the left?
And I tell them, I didn't like George W. Bush.
And guess what, David?
I still don't like George W. Bush.
I still don't like him.
We both agree on that.
Thank you so much, Lee.
And you can find Lee at thepopulist.us.
You can find him on Twitter at...
Lee Stranahan, thank you so much Lee.
Always great to spend time with you David, thanks so much.
Thank you.
The reason InfoWars Live has five-star ratings on major third-party sites is because I want products I'm going to use for my family.
I take this.
My family takes this.
And then it funds the operation with the most hardcore, truthful information you're going to find anywhere.
So what you find in our news is the same thing you find in our products at InfoWarsLife.com.
If I ever forget to take them, I have a noticeable difference.
I don't feel good.
The nascent iodine is one of the ones that was life-changing for me.
Yeah, I actually have just run out of my super female.
I had a...
A few bottles at my house and I've been taking it again, hitting the gym once again.
Very exciting, feeling great, looking good.
And I know my hair is luxurious once again.
So obviously the super female is amazing.
I love it.
Nascent iodine is essential.
Survival Shield X2. If there's one product that I would say is life-changing that I would suggest, it's Nascent iodine.
Survival Shield X2. It's got a five-star rating.
It's a win-win.
▲
Export Selection