Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 23, 2025 - Sunday Night Live - Chase Geiser

01:56:04

SUNDAY NIGHT LIVE — FULL SHOW 3/23/25 — Globalist System In Freefall As Trump Secures Victories On Border Security & Immigration! Venezuela Caves, Agrees To Resume US Deportation Flights As WH Revokes Legal Status Of Biden-Era Immigrants! Plus, Democrat Support Implodes, AOC/Sanders Rally Full Of Serial Protesters!

Source

Participants

Main voices

alex jones

23:35

chase geiser

34:52

kyle seraphin

43:02

Appearances

jon bowne

02:20

tucker carlson

01:06

Clips

kirk elliott

00:36

peter kuznick

00:35

tim dillon

00:37

Callers

mark in california

02:05

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		It is Sunday Night Live, and Chase has got a big guest, huge show lined up for you.
		But I wanted to finish up with Ms. Lou, Dude, and Alan.
		But here's the bottom line.
		The old globalist order failed.
		When Communist China 15 years ago double-crossed them and went into military operations instead of just being given all the major economic development and a rare earth mineral monopoly, 97% of it.
		That's all being reversed, so they were already trying to move a lot of the jobs back to the West, but EU double-crossed the US in the deal and the UK partially, and that's why they did Brexit as a pressure on Europe because the UK empire The British Empire has all those areas in the Pacific Ocean,
		Australia, New Zealand, a bunch of others.
		And China's moving in on them in Africa and a bunch of globalist mining operations and other things there.
		And so it made sense to see what's happening.
		Because the globalists were failing.
		Well, I said, let's go on with a cultural change, too, when this whole globalist thing falls apart.
		And let's make, destroy the globalist cultural so we get that.
		Not just globalists, but a different alliance with all their...
		Pedophilia and open borders and New World Order and Satanism and centralization and social credit scores.
		And it's happening.
		And so their system's failing.
		And so the U.S. is in a position, because China's in trouble, the EU's in trouble, they've run together now.
		They're trying to prop up their operation with a war against Russia.
		Russia knows China's allied with that, but acting on the surface like they're with Russia.
		And so...
		Trump's making all the right moves on the economy, the border, $8 trillion already coming back in the U.S., all of it.
		He's doing a great job.
		He's dismantling the globalist system and cutting off hundreds of billions that were going into NATO and the EU and the U.K. and how they would fund them to run propaganda against us.
		So, yeah, you see Starmer here a few weeks ago with a secret note about joining the Commonwealth and now King Charles is coming to propose it publicly.
		And Trump's like, oh, I love it, yes, I'll.
		I mean, I think he's just acting friendly, but obviously won't do it, plus you'd have to have the Senate ratify it, and people won't put up with this.
		And when you actually look at the fact that the king can dissolve any parliament he wants, and it's not ceremonial, it's terrible.
		So I just had to say, in action, if they were serious, it's horrible, and I'm totally against it.
		And then I just explained for two hours, a snapshot, sounded deep, just at the surface.
		Most people don't even hit the surface.
		But you've got to know the different power blocks, different history.
		It's fascinating.
		And that's what I just did.
		Let's take three final calls, then Chase Geyser.
		The whole new show is coming in, loaded for bear.
		All the news, all the breaking stuff I didn't get to, but I wanted to focus on this mainly today.
		He's about to cover.
		So be sure to share the live feed at Real Log Shows on X, at AJNLive on X, different feed, at InfoWars, different feed, backup feed.
		And if that ever goes down, InfoWars.com forward slash show, band out video.
		And if they take that over soon, they're trying.
		The Paul Weiss group that Trump just sanctioned.
		And just confess to all their lawfare against him?
		Well, they're doing it to me.
		But if they're able to do that here, we've got a bunch of civil actions against them.
		We've got the Alex Jones Network there.
		That's why we need funds right now at thealexjonesstore.com to do all of that.
		So that's why our support's vital, plus our great products.
		Miss Lou in Florida, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey, Alex.
		I'm a product buyer.
		Thank you.
		I've reposted all this show today everywhere.
		When I first heard you tell about it.
		I fell out of my chair.
		And then I realized exactly what you've been saying over the past two hours, that we have to know the strategy.
		Because trusting the globalists is, you know, well, you already know.
		But when Britain left the EU, we all thought, oh my God, Brexit, they're going to have a sovereign nation, how great.
		And then Floppy Boris got in, and then subsequent bad leaders, including Starmer.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Who was brought in by Nigel Farage.
unidentified		Uh-huh.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Uh-huh.
		And now he's gone.
		Again, they were only using it on leverage on the EU because the EU was going with China.
		That was all about that.
		The people wanting it was legitimate and it was real.
		The EU is a tyranny.
		But notice, you don't hear a lot about that from Nigel now.
		He's, you know, because it's a new era.
		And Nigel Farage is, oh yes, join us.
		He runs the American Society, started a decade ago, of the Commonwealth.
		He's the agent pushing that.
unidentified		Alex, remember when Trump said to Zelensky, you have no card.
		Yes. You have no card.
		I keep that line in mind with this.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		No, I agree.
		They're on their knees.
		And so they're trying to run in and merge with us completely.
		And I just think Trump is being polite to them.
		I just had to say the statement saying it's a great idea just on his face is disgusting.
unidentified		Well, here's the danger, and I'll leave because I know you're busy.
		My worry is that it might cause a brief chism in MAGA.
		There are a lot of people pissed off about this.
		They're not waiting to find out what the strategy is.
		They're just saying, no way, an effing king.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Well, I mean, I agree.
		Listen, the strategy is Trump's being friendly.
		They're collapsing.
		They're suing for peace.
		They want to make it look like in this alliance that they're the ones actually in charge.
		We've got to see what he actually proposes, what the documents are, and if it's them capitulating, and then we see the social change and stuff, we'd have to see the proof of this first, and then they'd have to have some new alliance.
		It'd have to be ratified by the Senate, and we'll have to have no every detail, not some secret trade deal, EU commission, 1956, that turns into the EU.
		So, you know, to me, this is the globalists knowing they're done, running over here.
		Saying, we'll leave you alone, Trump.
		We'll get behind you.
		But, you know, basically merge with us officially.
		Great points, great call, Ms. Liu.
		Thank you.
		I didn't fall out of my chair.
		I got nauseous.
		I mean, I'm not supposed to get nauseous a lot when I hear news.
		I was just like...
		Of course, I immediately knew what Trump was probably doing, but still, just the idea of it.
		I mean, folks, the UK is the heart of the New World Order.
		Dude in Oregon.
		Dude, thanks for holding.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey, Mr. I am shooting in the dark here, and Trump is America first, and I'm hoping this deal with King Charles is going to help build the infrastructure in America with the tariffs that Trump wants to do.
		And how he wants America to be independent.
		We don't have the infrastructure.
		But he is getting deals with Japan, Taiwan, and hopefully now with England to build up our economy.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Well, you have to understand, the globalists don't build anything in England.
		They've taken the Brits' jobs and the Scots' and the Irish' jobs and are flooding with illegals.
		Yeah, I mean, if the UK globalists say we're going to do a bunch of investment here, that's great.
		My issue is you don't hear about it, a secret deal with the king and all this, whatever comes good where it's a secret deal.
		And then now they do this trial balloon.
		I mean, I'm just saying it stinks from the start, the way it's being done, and we need to let folks, and here's the thing, it's good for MAGA to get upset.
		It's good for us to hold Trump's feet to the fire.
		We got him elected.
		We're the populace.
		We're 1776.
		And so Trump rides on our train.
		We don't ride on the Trump train.
		And I love Trump.
		They tried to kill him, and he's doing all the right moves.
		So I'm sure he's got something here, and he's not even intending to do this.
		He's just patting him on the head and not insulting him, which makes sense.
unidentified		Yes, sir.
		You are 100% right.
		And, yeah, we do got to hold Trump's feet to the fire, and he needs to do what we want him to do.
		But maybe there's something in the cards that he's playing that we don't know about.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Well, I mean, no, I know what it is.
		He's trying to get the UK to stop going along with the EU in this World War III, because it's the British Empire still running this on record.
		Thanks for the call.
		I mean, I know what he wants.
		Alan in California.
		Alan, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		Alex, you're great.
		And I wanted to say, everybody, if you've not gotten your blood into the Infowar, get your money in the Infowar.
		Support the AlexJonesStore.com.
		As a subscriber for the CMOS and all the other products, we've got to do it.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Well, I mean, I'm taking on the globalists.
		We've got a great crew.
		They're so amazing.
		And, you know, we go out to rabid leftist protest and openly cover what they're doing and put our lives on the line because it's a pleasure and an honor to do it.
		But we do need everybody's backing, and I'm very thankful everybody's backing that does back us.
		And I ask those that, you know, share the articles, videos, that's great, keep doing that, but have you ever bought anything at theologyofthestore.com?
		You really should.
		Go ahead.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		I have, and I'm sharing the article.
		So to kind of come full circle, I'm glad I'm the tail gunner.
		All the other colors touched the War of 1812 and so on, but here's the thing.
		My grandmother was born in 1910, was a daughter of the American Revolution sorority member.
		Beautiful. A Protestant Episcopal.
		She was a true patriot, okay?
		Fast forward.
		My mother, not so much, because they have been infiltrating our culture with this whole...
		You know, everybody loves the British news anchors with the Pierce Morgans and stuff.
		It's all sophistry.
		Okay? I know you're a...
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Oh, there's a giant...
		It started after World War I on record.
		It's like documentaries about it.
		Right. Hollywood was heavily funded by the British.
		They affected British accents.
		They tried to sell on the teacups to women, having tea parties.
		The tabloids.
		Yeah, they're trying to anglicize us.
		You know, the British invasion, the Beatles, all of it.
		And again, the globalists have captured the great people of the British Isles.
		I love them.
		That's a lot of my ancestors.
		It's just that it's the globalists hiding behind the people of England.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		Right, but let me bring this full circle, okay?
		The British have had a hard-on against the Russians forever, okay?
		The Russians supported us in the Revolutionary War, a minor degree.
		I know you're aware of that, but...
		Most people, I want to go pow.
		I was going to tell you about the War of 1812.
		We don't have to cover it.
		Your prior call is covered up.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		The Russians back to the north in the Civil War.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. I was going to say, if it wasn't for the Russians...
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Russian ships did stuff like blockade the British trying to bring weapons to the south.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		Correct. The Russians fought and were against the British out of a really...
		It's the war between the states.
		By the war of Northern Aggression, they call it the Civil War, which is wrong.
		The point is...
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Well, as an example, John Paul Jones, the founder of the U.S. Navy, after the war, went and worked for the Russians.
		So again, this hating the Russians thing only started when the West and British intelligence put Lenin in in 1917.
		And the Russians all know that now.
		Putin talks about it.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		And I'm bringing it full circle.
		It was still...
		It was this guy, Steele, who's a British guy, who come up with the Steele dossier against Russia, excuse me, against Trump, saying it was Russia.
		The British have been at war with Russia, and they're using us as their muscle.
		So this whole thing with, and hopefully you're right, Trump is trolling him.
		But the point is, the British will not give up power.
		You know, the prior callers, difference to them.
		The British don't give a rat.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		I want to stop calling the British, the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Austrian-Hungarian Empire bloodline.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		You understand, there have been no English kings for over 300 years, okay?
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		The city of London.
mark in california ▲ ● ▼		I mean, I got...
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		You understand that Edward VIII barely could speak English.
		He was German.
		And I'm not putting the Germans down.
		It's just that...
		Yeah, but I hear and I appreciate your call.
		Great points.
		And I was going to end with what he just said before I took the call.
		I'm glad he brought it up.
		The United States has the world currency.
		We have the biggest military still.
		We have the best weapons.
		The UK doesn't have it, and they've been using us to enforce their system, just like the EU.
		Trump is pulling their chain, pulling the rug out from under them.
		They're on their knees.
		And I understand that Trump wants to sound magnanimous to them.
		When they come with their hat in hand, and that's what this is.
		I just have a responsibility as a 1776er, because my family, same thing.
		Daughters of the Republic of Texas, same thing.
		Daughters of the Revolutionary War, all that stuff.
		And even though my mother's mother was in that, my mom's a historian, has a degree, very smart, she still likes the British stuff and likes the Queen and thinks that's English culture.
		Even though she knows that's not true.
		I learned from her when I was a kid that the House of Windsor was just a PR name.
		But still, they hypnotize people with the Beatles and all of it.
		And I'm not an Anglophobe.
		But I'm not an Anglophile.
		And that's just who I am.
		And it's not like I'm just born in America and so I support it.
		It's the best system.
		I was blessed to be born here.
		So I am 1776, 100%.
		When the FBI came and tried to give me $3 million, the first of $10 million from the Russians, and I knew it was the FBI, but if it was real Russians, I wouldn't take it.
		They couldn't get one Trump-prominent person to take money from the Russians.
		I'm not trying to get money.
		I'm trying to build a republic and be successful, and then money comes with that.
		I don't work for the people.
		I work for the idea of America that we make real.
		And we've been doing it.
		So, again, and all the British Empire PR, oh no, it's ceremonial when you're in the Commonwealth.
		Bullshit. Bullshit.
		I just showed it last hour.
		I'm going to dig out more of it and do it tomorrow.
		Because I know all about this stuff.
		And the globalist empire is the Rothschilds merge with the British royal family.
		The British royal family is...
		They got breeding rights after the Battle of Waterloo.
		They bred the Rothschilds with these guys.
		That's what different powerhouses do.
		They breed together.
		And everything you see going on is the center of it is that island.
		And then you got the Vatican.
		It's just all of it.
		It's just...
		It's all interconnected.
		Israel, all this stuff it's doing.
		I'm not against the people of Israel.
		I'm not against the people of the UK.
		People are Catholics.
		All these big power groups are globalists now.
		I want to reform the Vatican.
		I want to reform the UK.
		I want to reform America.
		I want to reform Israel.
		I'm going to reform the Muslims.
		Stop it.
	I'm an ideas man.
	And I'm a policy person.
	We can all agree on good policies, can't we?
	But if you make it about a group, it doesn't work that way.
	But when your group's under attack, you've got to stand up and be proud of it.
	I'm proud to be an American.
	I want to end now with two video clips.
	And Chase is going to take over with Sinai Live.
	Because this ties into Snow White.
	It's totally bombed.
	The first one is, this is really important, what percentage of the world's population is white?
	And they get one woman who's black who actually knows the answer.
	It's 7%.
	You get 3 or 4% that identifies that.
	Whatever. The point is, white people are 7% of the world population.
	It's estimated within just 15 years will be 5%.
	And there's these attacks that white's inherently bad and white's inherently evil.
	Why is everybody trying to get into countries that were created by white people?
	And the Renaissance.
	And Western culture.
	Okay? So I'm proud to be white.
	I'm proud of everybody else.
	I'm proud of your culture.
	But I will not sit here and be told I'm a piece of crap.
	We should be proud of ourselves, whatever color you are.
	But that ties in to the culture and the media and all the different history shows now where you turn it into a Viking show, about a historical Viking show, and like half of them are not white.
	They have all these weird storylines.
	None of it's real.
	You don't have a movie about Shaka Zulu and he's white.
	And, you know, the Google and AI and Microsoft AI that won't show you a white person.
	Because, and the global's right about this, is the rebellions that came out of Scotland, Ireland, and England, the peoples there, spread around the world.
	Our revolution came out of the civil wars in England.
	That's why we were able to be successful.
	We had a lot of allies in England and in France that wanted real freedom.
	So our enemy's not the British people, the Irish people, the Scottish people.
	They've been under globalist enslavement.
	The modern term is globalist, but the empire.
	And it hides behind, oh, it's for England and all this.
	No, it hates it.
	It's destroying it in real action.
	So I want to end with white people being an endangered species and under attack and why the globalists want to get rid of Western culture.
	They can demonize white people.
	They can also then demonize Western culture.
	Free market, self-defense, common law, checks and balances.
	Well, how do you get people to reject that?
	Well, you make it white.
	So then you demonize white people, and by extension, all that, how do you demonize Bill of Rights, Constitution, Declaration of Independence?
	Oh, white men.
	That's what this is all about.
	But there's also a hatred that's being pushed by old globalists that are fundamentally threatened by Western culture, and genuinely don't like white people for some reason.
	So here's this little short piece.
	What percentage of the world's population is white?
	And then John Bounds' latest report.
	Disney's communist Snow White dumpster fire.
	Prepare for a historic box office flop.
	And it's already totally flopped.
	People are walking on it so bad.
	Because Hollywood is dead.
	It's sick.
	It has its ESG talking points.
	You say, well, BlackRock just killed that, at least partially.
	Well, this has been made for the last two years.
	Giant, you know, $300 million budget, whatever.
	It's a retarded musical.
	And it's all just a bunch of woke-ism.
	Because Snow White's supposedly set in Western Europe.
	Snow White's supposedly a European thing.
	Well, you can't have that.
	And then the Snow White isn't really a white lady.
	But then most of the cast isn't white.
	Because again, you can't have something with white people.
	And then you've got all these other folks because they've seen so much culture from the West with whites in it, they think whites are the majority.
	Go to India.
	Go to China.
	Go to Africa.
	You're not going to see a lot of white people.
	Well, I tell you, I know a lot of racist black people, professors and people that would go to Africa for a year, you know, as part of a university study, and they come back, okay, I like Western culture, I'm sorry.
	And most of the black people in Africa look at American black people thinking they got a bad deal and go, you people are freaking nuts.
	So... And I'm not saying America's perfect, but damn it, it's under attack by the globalists because they don't want that model for everybody to aspire to.
	They just want a giant, they don't want to raise the third world, they want to lower us down to it.
	And then they sit in their castles, feudalism, above us.
	It's a system of feudalism.
	That's what the Great Reset of the New World Order is.
	It's not communist or fascist.
	They use those as models.
	They're very similar.
	They're direct command and control.
	They want feudalism.
	Neo-feudalistic fascism is the term I coined.
	It's now used widely.
	Here's the two reports.
	Chase Geyser takes over to the other side.
	Share the live feeds right now at Relox Jones, because you're the Paul Revere's.
unidentified		percent of the world's population is white?
		She was actually right.
		What? Seven percent.
		Seven? Seven to twelve percent, but seven is the most recent estimate.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		What is it, eight or nine percent?
unidentified		Yeah. Something like this.
		Is it like ten percent or something like that?
		Yeah, seven to twelve percent.
		Nice. You're one of the few to actually get it right.
		Well done, bro.
		Sixty percent?
		Come on, guys.
		We are, if people don't know, white people are a minority.
		It might seem like we're everywhere when you're in a white country, but if you ever leave these countries, you'll see how few of us there are.
		To give you a perspective, there are more Indians than all white people combined.
		And it's not really close.
		There are 400 million more Indians than all the white people in the world.
		And that's just India.
		That's one group of people.
		Never mind the Chinese.
		All of Asia, Africa, Nigeria has 230 million people, which is like a quarter of all white people.
		That's one country in Africa.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Disney's 2025 live-action Snow White remake is a full-on assault on the innocent 1937 classic.
unidentified		I know that you've told me before that your version of Snow White is different, and it's more of a 2022 version of Snow White.
		What did you mean by that?
		I mean, you know, the original cartoon came out in 1937, and very evidently so.
		There is a big focus on her love story.
		With a guy who literally stalks her.
		Weird. Weird.
		Super weird.
		So we didn't do that this time.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Rachel Zegler, a Colombian-Polish actress as Snow White, crushes the perceived racist, skin-as-white-as-snow German fairy tale for a go-woke...
		Go broke, anti-white, diversity, occultic power trip.
		The prince and his hetero true love narrative is sidelined for the chronically mentally ill feminazi crowd.
unidentified		She's not going to be saved by the prince and she's not going to be dreaming about true love.
unidentified		She's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be and the leader that her late father told her that she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave, and true.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		It's Disney once again with another $270 million diversity gamble after going in the red from the DEI Little Mermaid flop.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Seven dwarves replaced by magical DEI hires and then due to massive backlash restored with CGI.
tim dillon ▲ ● ▼		Because you have Rachel Zegler, who's in Hamas, and Gal Gadot, who's in the IDF.
		They're stars of the movie, and they're on both sides of the Middle East.
		And both sides of the Middle East are conflict.
		And there's no f*ing dwarfs because Peter Dinklage from Game of Thrones opened his mouth and said, this is f*ed up having dwarfs in the movie called Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
		So now we got a lot of pro-Palestine, a lot of pro-Israel, and no f***ing dwarfs in Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		You can't just murder hot chicks because you're an old hag.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		That is inappropriate.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		New sweat.
unidentified		Yay. We're no strangers to evil plots by disgusting freaks.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		Welcome. Zin is total BS.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		However, if you'd like to relax in a huge way...
unidentified		Heavens to Betsy, young lady.
		Get in the house, warm yourself up, and let's draft up a plan to absolutely wreck your idiot stepmom.
		Magic Mirror.
		Show me the biggest smoke show in all the land.
		Hey Nancy, you lose, get over yourself.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		But the one thing that remains and is amplified is the occult roots.
		Fast forward from the 1937 version to 2025 and Gal Gadot's Sorceress ramps up the CGI occultism as a centerpiece aimed at further perverting the original 1937 classic and in the process,
		the minds of 2025's children.
		The original music from the 1937 classic Snow White are now American standards, while the 2025 music makes reference to the Communist Manifesto, where Snow White's parents ruled a kingdom for the free and fair,
		where the bounty of the land belonged to all who tended it.
		And oddly, there is no mention of Snow White's hairy back in either version, but that didn't stop Rachel Zegler from sharing hers.
		Would it be too much to ask these twisted satanic pedophiles running your brand into the dirt to read the writing on the wall and just take their ball and go home?
		Why is there softcore porn and inappropriate dialogue for children on the Disney Channel anyway?
		Well, because it's all part of the plan.
		You want diversity, Disney?
		Fine. Write another classic in the style of the Grimm Brothers, if you are able.
		But leave your bread and butter and these iconic American classics alone.
		John Bowne reporting for InfoWars.
unidentified		Networks lie to you about what's happening now.
		Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
		Infowars.com forward slash.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Sunday Night Live.
		I am your host, Chase Geiser, and we have an outstanding guest that's going to be joining us in about 34 minutes, Kyle Serafin.
		We're going to be talking about his work at the FBI, what he blew the whistle on, and he's going to give us all the insights that he was able to dig up this week.
		Regarding the FOIA request that we submitted last year and received right after the Trump administration was inaugurated, the FOIA request that proved that Infowars has been spied on by the FBI out of their Boston office since December 10th of 2013.
		Twelve years in order to set up a parallel construction so that they could find some kind of crime that we may have committed and then...
		Apply pressure to a witness or a source to be an official source in a criminal case against us.
		Of course, they've been spying on us for 12 years.
		They found absolutely no criminal evidence against us whatsoever.
		And so they decided after their frustration was catalyzed to wage a civil suit war against us, which we've uncovered time and time again.
		Whether you take the word of FBI agents directly who have spoken about this or whistleblowers who have been caught on camera and hidden microphone explaining that the intelligence community was after Infowars.
		So that interview is going to be absolutely amazing coming up in 33 minutes now.
		So please stay tuned from that.
		I'm going to be getting into so much news today.
		I'm going to do a little bit of analysis on what I believe is going on with I'll explain why on the other side of this break.
		In the meantime, please go to thealexjonesstore.com and show your support because it's impossible for us to tell the truth to such an amazing audience worldwide without your support.
		And don't just go there because freedom of speech or humanity is important.
		The products are amazing.
		The prices are amazing.
		The deals are amazing.
		The giveaways are amazing.
		Whether it's knives, whether it's shirts, whether it's supplements, all of these products are designed to be something you'd be proud to wear, something you'd be happy to consume, and they keep Alex Jones on the air as well.
		So please go to thealexjonesstore.com right now and stay with us for more groundbreaking news on the other side as well as updates about the FBI's espionage on Infowars.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		It'd be a shame if you went to thealexshownstore.com and got one of these limited edition, super sharp, amazing stainless steel.
		2025 versions of the famous World War II trench knife.
		10-inch, razor sharp, deadly blade to defend yourself.
		The skull crusher, the brass knuckles.
		This never runs out of bullets if there's a zombie apocalypse or an attempted communist takeover and you're defending your family.
		But you know when you purchase it, you're funding the Infowar.
		So, over 400 designs of t-shirts, ball caps.
		Hoodies, you name it.
		Collectible limited edition, knives, the very best supplements.
		You find it all.
		It enriches your life at thealgyshowstore.com and it funds the most hardcore Patriot organization worldwide that is absolutely devastating the globalist in our peaceful information war.
unidentified		intro
kirk elliott ▲ ● ▼		Here's where all eyes now are on gold and silver.
		Because gold went over $3,000 an ounce, it's at an all-time high.
		That's a very strong technical and psychological threshold number, that 3,000.
		So now that the world is looking at gold, the world is also going to be looking at silver.
		So even the massive growth that we've already seen...
		I'm guessing it's just the beginning.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Gut level, where do you think gold is in a month?
kirk elliott ▲ ● ▼		3,100 in a month, like in the next three to four weeks.
		And then I think it gets to 3,200 by the beginning of the summer.
		And we could literally see 4,000 as momentum starts to gather and as the eyes of the world get on it.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		And then silver, you know, probably 50 to 75. People need to call you, do a free consultation, leave your name and number, 720-605-300-KEPM.com forward slash gold.
		Do the form.
		They'll call you back.
		They'll do a free consultation.
		They can roll over your IRAs, 401ks.
		Do it now, folks.
		Dr. Kirk Elliott, thank you so much.
kirk elliott ▲ ● ▼		My pleasure.
unidentified		See ya.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		It's good to be right, isn't it?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Wow. Helpful to me in the last seven days.
		He's going to share some of the information with you that he shared with me about the results of our FOIA investigation, our Freedom of Information Act request, where I simply just asked the government to send me everything that it had on Infowars.
		It sent me about three documents, but Kyle Serafin's former FBI, and he was able to tell me what all the serial numbers meant.
		He was able to reach out to his contacts and find some very interesting details about why the FBI has been spying on us since December 10th of 2013.
		In fact, I need to put a report together this week where I actually share with you some of the interesting things that Alex Jones said on December 10th of 2013 because I went back and listened to his broadcast on that date.
		I wanted to know what was said on that date that caused the FBI out of the Boston field office to decide that it was necessary to spy on Alex Jones and Infowars under a Type 3 assessment for at least six years.
		Understood from speaking with Kyle Serafin that our type 3 assessment is actually still open.
		And I'm not being critical of Donald Trump that the FBI was spying on us throughout his entire first term.
		I'm not even being critical of Joe Biden that the FBI was spying on us throughout his entire term.
		And I'm not critical of Kash Patel, who's been the FBI director for what, like a month now, that the FBI is spying on us.
		Because frankly, I don't think that he knows.
		When you're the head of an entire nation or when you're the head of the FBI, Or the CIA, there's no way that you can know every single thing happening in every single department at all times.
		These organizations are just way too big, they're way too complicated, and there's all sorts of conflicting different interests being represented.
		And I know we often say that the CIA did this, or the FBI did that, and it's really kind of a misnomer.
		It's true, and it's not at the same time, because these organizations don't have one Consciousness.
		They don't have one will or one objective.
		There's all these siloed departments and groups and rogues within the organizations that operate using the tools of the macro organization, but with their own political agendas.
		So just because the CIA may have in large been behind.
		The assassination of JFK doesn't mean that the entire CIA was behind it.
		It just means that it was rogue elements operating within the CIA, for example, probably in conjunction with Mossad, because there's all sorts of overlapping interests that incentivize people to assassinate JFK.
		And frankly, the fact of the matter is that political leaders seldom get assassinated for one reason.
		Typically, there has to be A cacophony, a litany of overlapping reasons that create enough incentive for individuals or groups within organizations to take the tremendous risk of doing something like that.
		And I actually want to show you a clip here if I can find it of the last speech that JFK Gave before he was assassinated.
		I thought I had it circled here.
		Let's try clip 12. Yes, it is clip 12. Did you know about the last big speech of JFK?
		And then we'll get into some of this news about the Commonwealth.
		Thank you.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		What was the last big speech he gave before he was murdered?
peter kuznick ▲ ● ▼		It was a great speech.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		What did he say?
peter kuznick ▲ ● ▼		It was called the strategy for peace speech.
unidentified		Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave.
unidentified		I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on Earth worth living.
peter kuznick ▲ ● ▼		And they didn't let the CIA, the State Department, or the Pentagon even see it beforehand.
unidentified		I realize the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war.
peter kuznick ▲ ● ▼		What he says there, among other things, is that the relation between the U.S. and Soviets is tragic.
		Why should we be enemies?
		Why should we see them as enemies?
unidentified		We must conduct our affairs in such a way that it becomes in the communist interest to agree on a genuine peace.
peter kuznick ▲ ● ▼		What Kennedy says is so relevant to today.
		He says to put...
		A nuclear adversary in a position of either suffering a humiliating defeat or using nuclear weapons is either a colossal failure of statesmanship or a collective death wish for humanity.
unidentified		Nuclear powers must avert those confrontations which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war.
peter kuznick ▲ ● ▼		Which is exactly what Biden...
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		It's doing it.
		It's what we face right now.
		How was it received in Washington?
unidentified		They saw him as some kind of idealistic fruitcake.
		What kind of a peace do I mean and what kind of a peace do we see?
		The kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living.
		Peace for all men and women.
		Not merely peace in our time, but peace in all time.
		When a man's way pleases the law, the scriptures tell us, he may get even his enemies.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		And I know it's 50 or 60 years ago and it's an old story and you've got the Ben Shapiro's and others coming out and saying, look, it's interesting, but I know.
		I don't really care about some political assassination that took place 50 or 60 years ago.
		I mean, he literally said that this week right after posting a video about how Israel has a right to Israel because of Abraham, which was comical.
		And look, Ben Shapiro's really smart.
		I actually like Ben Shapiro.
		I hate the fact that he's Israel first and an American citizen.
		Other than that, you know, I like Ben Shapiro.
		I think he's a smart guy.
		But the reason I bring this up is because what is mentioned...
		In this video of JFK's final speech before his assassination is totally relevant to what we're experiencing today.
		Because ever since the end of World War II, we've been trying for some reason, probably because it's so beneficial to the military industrial complex, to get involved in a war with Russia.
		That's what the Cold War was really all about.
		And if you look at the history of the heat map between nuclear tests that were happening between the United States and between Russia, we would always do more and then they would do some to respond.
		And they had like half as many nukes as we did at some point.
		They were just frantically trying to keep up with what we were doing.
		We had this whole propaganda that happened on our people, great movies, which I love, like Red Dawn coming out against this communist threat.
		Obviously, communism is a terrible problem.
		But it was totally unnecessary for us to have a conflict with Russia after they helped us win World War II.
		And then what's happened in Ukraine has been part of the extension of the Cold War propaganda.
		We always have to have some external threat in order to justify the expansion of our own military-industrial complex, conflict after conflict, because that's how we ensure that our military is always in a region over there in order to protect the interests of the dollar as a global reserve currency and allow our political class to skim.
		But now what we've seen is a backing away from the war with Ukraine because, frankly, the war has been lost.
		Everyone's just yet to admit it.
		It's over.
		It's done.
		Now everyone's frantically trying to figure out how to admit to the public that the war has been lost and how to do it in some way that saves face or just preserves whatever interests are left in the region.
		That's what the Zelensky's are doing by flying around to the United States and talking to Donald Trump and Vance like he embarrassed himself weeks ago and then having to go to Keir Starmer after we abandoned Ukraine.
		And abandoned has a negative connotation.
		I'm so glad that we did because every time we embrace another nation, we abandon our own nation.
		So we should be abandoning other countries for our own people.
		I mean, why is it that we're trying to save every Ukrainian but our government won't even go into space to pick up the astronauts that are there for nine months?
		Seems unbelievable to me.
		And as soon as that humiliation happened with J.D. Vance and Zelensky, and it was just the final nail in the coffin of U.S. support for Ukraine, you've got Lindsey Graham coming out with his Ukrainian-colored tie on, obviously surprised at what happened,
		but immediately okay with throwing Zelensky into the fire, with putting him on the cross.
		I mean, it's like a week before Zelensky would come to the United States on a donkey with...
		You know, Lindsey Graham with the palms, just excited.
		And then, you know, seven days later, he's celebrating the fact that Zelensky's on the cross.
		Not to liken Zelensky to Jesus Christ by any means, but there is some similarity between the two stories in that everybody loved him until they didn't, and then it's like, what the hell happened?
		And it's because the Lindsey Grahams and others understand that there's another major war right around the corner so they can sacrifice the Ukrainian war, which is lost, for the next one.
		They'll only be a few months without the major wars that they love so much.
		And which war is that, you say, Chase?
		Well, it's a war with Iran.
		And I talked about this last week when I mentioned that Donald Trump came out with a statement saying that, look, if there's any Houthi attacks on any of our ships in the region, we are immediately going to blame Iran.
		And he didn't say this explicitly, but he basically did.
		Go to war with Iran.
		Which, of course, the problem with that is you open up the door then for any false flag to take place in order to get us to war with Iran.
		I mean, you've got conservative influencers all over the Internet right now.
		Lobbying for big Pepsi for like $50 a post.
		Totally selling out other values, totally selling out other principles for $50 a post.
		Anybody with a million dollars could bribe some Houthi ship or some rogue ship to pretend that they're Houthi and attack a US ship.
		Hell, they could even use an unmanned ship so any retaliation wouldn't result in the death of whoever was bribed.
		So we're in tremendous risk for war with Iran.
		And the reason that the Political class of the world is going to give you is that we have to go to war with Iran because Iran is sponsoring terrorism all over the Middle East.
		And it's probably true that Iran is sponsoring terrorism throughout the Middle East.
		I'm not even taking issue with that, but that's not the reason that we're going to war with Iran.
		It is and it isn't.
		The only reason that the United States would go to war with Iran is because it would help the United States protect...
		The dollar as the global reserve currency, in my opinion.
		So you've got Israel, which is our strategic ally in the region, trying to introduce this IMEC corridor to compete with the Belt and Road Initiative.
		It goes from India through Saudi Arabia through the Port of Haifa in Israel, and that's how we secure the dollar as the global reserve currency throughout the 21st century.
		And if Iran is sponsoring terrorism all over the region, That creates instability in Israel, and if there's instability in Israel or a full-scale war between Iran and Israel, then it undermines all of our strategic objectives in the region to compete with China in the economic war that we're in right now.
		So just as the Ukraine represented the United States or the CIA's interests in a proxy war against Russia, so Iran represents China.
		In a proxy war against the United States.
		So we'll go in.
		Israel will be our proxy.
	Iran will be China's proxy.
	And it's really a war between China and the United States and England.
	So as we begin to withdraw from NATO and allow NATO to continue to wage whatever war it wants with Russia.
	We've got this conversation coming up about a new Commonwealth with England and the United States.
	I love King Charles, Donald Trump says.
	I'm interested.
	It sounds good to me for us to join the British Commonwealth.
	They're talking about how it's just ceremonial.
	And I'm thinking to myself, even if it is just ceremonial, what the hell are you guys doing?
	Doing ceremonial trash?
	Well, we're about ready to be in World War III.
	It's like when Pam Bondi just goes on Fox News every single night.
	I'm thinking, I'd rather have you looking at files than going on Fox.
	And I think she's a good person, and I think Trump probably made a good pick.
	But, you know, there's some reason to be critical of some of the recent events.
	And did a good job with most of the JFK releases.
	Did a terrible job so far with the Epstein releases.
	I'm told there's a thousand FBI agents practically going through all the Epstein documents.
	Interesting to me how 300 Spartans could hold off 100,000 Persians.
	And it takes three times the amount of FBI agents as Spartans who held off the Persians to just go through all the crimes of Epstein.
	For redactions, I mean, that's the extent of the corruption that we face in the United States today.
	But what's happening is a neo-NATO between the United Kingdom and the United States of America in preparation for a massive war with China through the proxies that are Israel and Iran.
	Iran will represent China's interests.
	Israel will represent its own and the United States' interests.
	And so that's why we have all this buddy-up stuff, buddy-up stuff.
	And if you remember the conversation that Donald Trump had with Keir Starmer just a couple of weeks ago, we've showed you the clip.
	I'm not going to make the crew find the clip again.
	You can look it up and find it.
	We've already showed you.
	He says, could the United Kingdom hold off Russia without our help?
	Keir Starmer kind of embarrassingly laughs and nods, conceding that it would be impossible for the United Kingdom to hold off Russia without the help of the United States.
	And so as Trump is acknowledging that Europe needs the United States and withdrawing from NATO at the same time, more than they need us, you see this new coalition forming, this neo-League of Nations, this neo-United Nations, which actually probably excludes most of Europe because they're too busy and involved in the NATO front against Russia.
	And it's going to have all of the superpowers, all of the nuclear superpowers in it under this British Commonwealth for the sake of a proxy war against China.
	And if people don't play their cards correctly, and despite what Zelensky says, everybody's playing cards.
	It could result in the total annihilation of all civilization as we know it.
	I mean, just look at what happened to Ukraine.
	Frankly, I'll show you clip number 30 here.
	This is a good breakdown on Tucker Carlson of what's happened to Ukraine.
	Since it has been weaponized in the proxy war against Russia.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		So this is a tweet from you.
		I don't normally read people's tweets, but in standing with Ukraine, the Biden-Harris administration convinced them, Ukraine, to abandon a peace deal that would have ceded only half of the territory that Russia now occupies.
		And for that opportunity to lose twice as much of their homeland, they paid with tens of thousands of innocent lives.
		We did this to control the 11 trillion of minerals under the Donbass.
		We did it to grind down the Russian war machine on the grist of Ukrainian teenagers.
		We did it to hand out hundreds of billions of dollars to U.S. hedge funds who are, as we speak, Well,
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		there you have it, folks.
		Ukraine has been used as a proxy and it resulted in the death of millions upon millions of people unnecessarily, at least the displacement of millions upon millions of people unnecessarily.
		And so now that Trump is teasing the idea of joining the British Commonwealth, saying I love King Charles, King Charles secretly delivering the message, Keir Starmer meeting with Trump just weeks ago.
		As Trump admitted or just forced Keir Starmer to nod and acknowledge that England was nothing without the support of the United States, what we see now is a neo-NATO being formed.
		There is an attempt between the United States and King Charles to form a neo-NATO for the sake of waging World War III against China through a proxy war in Iran.
		And it's all because the dollar is a lie.
		And the only way that we can back it up is with war.
		It's not even really a fiat currency.
		I mean, they say the dollar isn't backed by anything.
		The dollar isn't backed by anything.
		I believed this for a long time until I realized that actually it's not a fiat currency.
		It is 100% backed by something very real.
		The death of hundreds of thousands and millions of innocent people in constant war, in constant countries, all over the world.
		For reasons not disclosed to the public, always in the name of protecting democracy, always in the name of some humanitarian crisis.
		You've got Secretary Blinken coming out under the last administration and talking about gay rights in Kenya.
		I'm thinking, what the hell is going on?
		Oh yeah, there's black market deals in all the countries of Africa exporting uranium to Iran.
		And so that's why Secretary Blinken all of a sudden is concerned about human rights in Africa.
		No, no, no, no.
		He has to apply pressure because there's a war with Iran about ready to take place.
		Now, I don't know if this war with Iran will be between Israel and Iran explicitly and then obviously a proxy war in reality, or if the United States and England and Israel will all explicitly get involved in this.
		But I would be very surprised.
		If we don't go to war with Iran in the next 180 days.
		Either through a proxy war with Israel or explicitly declaring war on them.
		Because Lindsey Graham is backing away from this war with Ukraine.
		You know he loves war.
		I mean, he loves war more than he loves Brad Pitt without a shirt on.
		And same with the rest of our political class.
		I mean, you got damn...
		Dan Crenshaw out there literally bragging about how, hey, if we fund Ukraine, we can kill hundreds of thousands of Russians without losing a single American life.
		Failing to acknowledge that between the $180 billion that we funded Ukraine, that has been how many thousands of Americans' lifetimes of federal tax?
		I mean, Benjamin Franklin came out and said that, hey, you know, time is the stuff that life is made out of.
		And if one out of every four hours that we work as Americans at least go to the federal government, and then that money is spent, then that's a fourth of all of our lives just trashed.
		So you can quantify how many American lives are totally wasted, even if we're only giving money to a foreign ally or a foreign war.
		You can absolutely convert dollars, U.S. dollars, to American lives.
		So you got the Dan Crenshaws, you got the Lindsey Grahams, you got all these others that just love waving the Ukrainian flag around, they love waving the Israeli flag around, and I don't even really have a problem with Israel.
		I understand why it's a freaked out nation, willing to do almost anything to protect its national security, whether ethical or not.
		Our problem isn't that Israel tries to control the foreign policy of the United States, folks.
		Our problem is that our own leaders...
		Concede to foreign interests at the expense of the American people.
		We have a character problem in D.C. Can you blame Zelensky for coming over here and asking for money all the time?
		I mean, that's what I would do if I was in his position.
		I wouldn't skim it and steal it and do all this corrupt stuff that he's doing.
		But he's just doing what's best for Ukraine, which is to get as much money over there as possible.
		I mean, honestly, if he was really doing what's best for Ukraine, he would just surrender and end the war immediately.
		But we can't blame Zelensky for trying to do what's best for Ukraine.
		We can't blame Israel for trying to do what's best for Israel.
		But we can blame our nations for trying to do what's best for these other nations at the expense of our own people.
		And that's exactly what I'm doing.
		I mean, honestly.
		People criticize Alex Jones for saying globalists, globalists, globalists instead of Jews, Jews, Jews.
		But you realize that the class of people in this world that are evil globalists is much more than just the Jewish people who are part of the globalist cabal.
		Globalists are not consisting only of Jews, and not all Jews are globalists.
		So that's why we don't just say Jews, Jews, Jews, Jews, Jews.
		I mean, it's retarded to think that one ethnic group is responsible for all evil.
		Does that mean that we're not too descended from Adam and Eve?
		Does that mean that, oh, the only people in the world that are...
		Our victims of the fall of mankind and original sin are the Jews.
		I mean, we're blaming every single evil in the world on them.
		We're blaming all the currency problems on them.
		We're blaming every war on them.
		We're blaming pedophilia on them.
		We're blaming every single unethical thing on one ethnic or national group.
		That is retarded.
	Yes, Israel is problematic.
	Yes, the region is complicated.
	Yes, there are major problems.
	But it's so stupid and myopic.
	I mean...
	You guys have been listening to Infowars for 30 years.
	And I believe that the vast majority of you understand that it's a lot more complicated than that.
	But we've got Kyle Serafin coming on in three minutes to talk about the espionage that's taking place against the United States.
	Excuse me, against Infowars and the United States, all the people of America, frankly.
	And his bio is really long.
	So I'm going to skim through it.
	I'm going to read some of it to you.
	Kyle Serafin is a federal whistleblower, former FBI special agent and U.S. Air Force veteran.
	Graduate of the University of Oklahoma.
	He managed restaurants, worked in B2B sales, performed financial analysis for a major movie studio prior to enlisting at 27 years old.
	And you can follow him.
	By going to kileserafin.com, that's K-Y-L-E-S-E-R-A-P-H-I-N.com, or at Kyle Serafin on True Social, Twitter, YouTube, kileserafinshow.podbean.com, rumble.com slash kileserafin.
	Highly recommend that you follow him.
	I'm very honored that he agreed to come on.
	Point of this segment is, I want to draw your attention to the fact that we are about ready to be in a proxy war with China through an overt war between Israel and Iran.
	And it's going to happen within the next six months, and it's directly tied in to the neo-NATO that the English are trying to establish with the United States since the United States has pulled out.
	So if the United States is pulling out of NATO, rather than trying to manipulate and beg them to rejoin NATO, wouldn't it make more sense to just set up a new NGO, set up a new organization, and then try to coax Trump into that one?
	So you can say, hey, I pulled us out of NATO.
	Then there's this neo-NATO.
	Then there's this new World War III.
	And I said it before.
	I'll say it again.
	The only way you can have one world government is to have world war.
	World government requires world war.
	We got a third of the way there with World War I. It became the League of Nations.
	We got two-thirds of the way there with World War II.
	It became the United Nations and then NATO.
	And there's one world war necessary to subjugate the entire world, to take over the last one-third of the world.
	Under this new one world government.
	And that's what the British are trying to do.
	That's what Israel's trying to do.
	That's what the United States is trying to do.
	Whether Trump knows it or not, I trust Trump.
	I like Trump.
	I like his administration a lot.
	I voted for him happily.
	I'm glad that I did.
	There were certainly no better choices on the ballot.
	I just don't like war.
	People say that we're a hate organization.
	I mean, we were unclassified December 10th, 2013 as a white, racially motivated extremist organization.
	But we've been opposed to every single war that the United States has ever been in since at least World War II and probably going back all the way to the revolution, if you talk to Alex about it.
	I can't speak for him.
	And so when you come out for peace, it's funny how you get branded as hate speech while all these other mainstream media outlets, whether it's CNN, MSNBC, NPR, or others, are constantly publishing stories that get us into war after war after war.
	Most obviously in our generation and our lifetimes is...
	Lie about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that got us into a war for God knows whatever reason.
	So folks, stay tuned.
	We're going to break for two minutes, and Kyle Serafin's going to be on the other side.
	I can see that he's all connected up.
	I love his studio.
	It looks awesome.
	Honored to have him with us on this show.
	Make sure that in the meantime, you go to theallyshonesstore.com and make it possible for us to continue to broadcast the truth as we see it to as many people as possible forever.
	Stay tuned for more on the other side.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		There's nobody in media more effective than this operation of my crew and my host and what we do and you.
		You're the Paul Revere's.
		You are the Infowar.
		You're everything.
		So, share the article.
		Share the videos.
		Buy the products at thealexshownstore.com.
		But the biggest thing you can do at thealexshownstore.com is commit.
		You can cancel any time for free, but sign up as a VIP month-to-month for $30 a month, and then you get $40 to spend on the store on products.
		You get special deals, special sales, sales about the sales, special offers of products nobody else gets.
		We're adding more grubbles all the time.
		Biggest selection of Patriot apparel.
		T-shirts, ball caps, hoodies, sweaters.
		We're adding a lot more stuff.
		Collectible, limited edition.
		Knives with special inscriptions.
		So much at TheAlexStore.com.
		But the supplements are really the most amazing thing.
		The very best Irish Sea Moss.
		Don't know about that?
		Get it.
		The very best super concentrated turmeric with other super ingredients that are so good for your whole body.
		Just do things for everything.
		That's back in stock.
		The ultimate turmeric.
		But getting back to the VIP.
		We need to be able to gauge that we've got the support.
		We've had to beef security.
		We've had to do a lot of other things.
		We're battling these legal battles.
		We're winning.
		But if people think we've won the war and just go back to sleep, it's going to be hellish.
		The globalists are done, but they could really drag us in with them.
		It is critical that all of you make the commitment to yourself and to this operation that you are at the heart of realize that.
		I'm not just telling you that.
		It's true.
		Think about it.
		Without you, we're nothing.
		I can have all the will in the world.
		You magnify us millions and millions of times.
		You are the info.
		Become a VIP member now.
		I want to thank those that haven't VIP members.
		I want to encourage those that haven't.
		Go now.
		Make the commitment.
		I need your support.
		We're winning this fight, but I can't do this without you.
		This is my Alamo message.
		My letter out to you.
		Fire in the bat signal.
		Become a VIP member right now at TheAlexJonesStore.com.
		for so many benefits.
unidentified		Oh my gosh.
		music
		Now, back to our program.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to Sunday Night Live.
		I am pleased to be joined by Kyle Serafin.
		Kyle, it's an honor and a pleasure to have you on the show.
		And I just want to give a little preamble to this conversation, and I will not talk over you to the best extent that I can avoid it.
		Sometimes I get excited just like Jones does and do on accident, so please forgive me for that.
		But I want to hear from you because you're the one that actually knows what you're talking about.
		I'm just the guy with opinions doing the best that I can to figure out what the hell's going on, right?
		I'm a lot like the audience in that way.
		So basically what happened was we did a FOIA request last year.
		I did.
		And I just did for the keyword Infowars.
		And I must have done it specifically for the FBI because all the information we got back was for the FBI.
		Nothing came for like a year, three days after Trump is inaugurated as the President of the United States.
		They sent it out.
		And then like about six days later, I got it in the mailbox on a CD-ROM.
		I'm like, great.
		I don't even have a CD-ROM drive.
		They might as well have sent it to me on like a VHS tape.
		Like, how do I figure out how to interpret this data?
		So I call my buddy, who's a cybersecurity expert.
		He's my next-door neighbor.
		He's my best friend.
		I go over to his house.
		We load up these PDFs, or this disk, and it's got like three or four PDFs on it.
		One of them is kind of irrelevant.
		And I don't really know what these documents mean.
		I see a serial number at the top.
		I see that we're classified on December 10th, 2013, as a white, racially motivated extremist organization, and that we've been under a Type 3 assessment.
		Since 1210 of 2013, and that the three documents that I'm looking at seem to have been created in June of 2019.
		I can't remember the exact date.
		So I'm thinking, all right, we've been under a Type 3 assessment for at least six years.
		And I look up December 10th, 2013.
		I realize that it's within 90 days of James Comey becoming the director of the FBI.
		Not that he had anything to do with this, but I'm thinking like an InfoWars guy.
		Like, maybe it was Comey.
		We talk a lot of shit about Comey.
		For good reason.
		And I pull up the, and you'll know this, I don't know, whatever the acronym is for the FBI field manual, for lack of a better term, that explains what type 3 assessments are.
		I'm like, holy cow, they classified us as a national security threat and they're allowed to follow us around in public.
		And as far as I understand, this kind of complicated document that I'm looking at is a layman.
		They have to reevaluate us every 30, 60 and 90 days to keep us in the status.
		So that means that there's got to be tons and tons of documents.
		And I don't understand whether we had to go through a one assessment into a two assessment to get to a three assessment.
		I don't know any of this infrastructure.
		All I know is what I was able to research for like an hour and a half after I got these documents.
		So can you tell me and the audience what the hell a type three assessment is, please?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely. So a type 3 assessment is the lowest level of investigative activity that the FBI is able to authorize certain types of files being stored.
		So that means that there actually is an investigation.
		It's referred to as an assessment.
		And above an assessment is a thing called a preliminary investigation.
		Beyond that, you'd have a full investigation.
		Usually what happens is assessments generate full investigations.
		You can have single assessments that carry on for years.
		Maybe even decades.
		They can be on domain-level threats.
		So all the types of this kind of thing that happened in the city of Boston or, you know, drug activity that is subsidized through gang members in this area, right?
		So you have very kind of nebulous terms.
		And because it's the lowest level of an investigation, they have the lowest predication required.
		That's the sort of how we articulate what it is that we are going to do.
		So a type 3 assessment, there's multiple types.
		I think there's six different types.
		And they don't actually follow sequentially.
		They actually break off.
		So as I recall, and they're not all things that I used because assessments are almost too low level for most FBI agents to use.
		They're generally a tool that we find the intelligence sphere using, which is going to be the intelligence analyst.
		And so people understand the FBI is kind of this bifurcated animal.
		It's a criminal organization in so much as it is investigating criminal activities.
		It also does some criminal activities from what we can tell.
		But they're actually investigating criminal statutes.
		And then they are also doing this national security work.
		Because the FBI lists itself, and you alluded to it a moment ago, the field manual.
		It's called the DIOG, which is the Domestic Investigations Operations Guide.
		Interestingly enough, a new version of that was actually published in February of 2024, after years of not being able to see them.
		And so people could actually go read.
		What is it that the FBI does, and how do they do it?
		What are they doing with your $40-plus million?
		I'm sorry, your $11 billion a year.
		40-plus is what they spend on the tactical operations.
		So the crazy thing is...
		You guys were opened up, as I'm looking at the file over here on my other screen, white racially motivated extremists.
		That's actually an old term.
		They don't use that term anymore.
		When I went and revealed to America, writ large, that they were investigating Catholics, they used the brother of that particular acronym, white-rotivated...
		White, racially motivated extremists is now known as racially motivated violent extremists.
		They've added the word violence in there because they've escalated the type of discussion that's going on.
		So RMVE is the new term for white supremacists.
		And it almost always means that.
		You could theoretically be a black supremacist.
		You could be something else.
		But RMVE, racially motivated violent extremists, almost always refers to white supremacists.
		And that's the same thing that they had categorized or at least thought they were going to find Catholics.
		You're in good company as far as that goes.
		TLM Catholics tend to be pretty nice people if you like going to Latin Mass and Gregorian chant.
		You're usually not the kind of terrorist that people are looking for.
		Infowars in the same sort of category there.
		So you can tell how broadly they can categorize it.
		The type 3 just means that they were authorized to use certain techniques.
		What we call Pfizer, which is physical surveillance.
		Various types of national security letters could be queried, which is a subpoena that is not signed off on by a court.
		It's actually signed off on by an FBI supervisor, like the head agent at a field office.
		And then what they do, it's almost like the just trust me bro sort of situation.
		They'll send it off.
		And they send off a letter.
		So it sounds very ominous.
		They'll send it to your bank so they can get your bank records.
		They'll send it off to your telco company so you can get your phone records.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		So under a type 3 assessment, they can get our phone records and our bank records if we work here?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and what it's not going to usually be, it's not going to be content.
		It's going to be who you've been calling and the length of the call and where that call originated from, that kind of stuff.
		So they'll get tower information generally.
		They won't actually get the words that you were saying or the text message you were sending.
		But it kind of varies depending on how...
		That particular company, like a T-Mobile or a Sprint or AT&T or Verizon, however they decide to interpret it.
		And they literally get a letter that's called a national security letter that just says, because of national security, we are asking for this stuff.
		The reasons of it are classified, so we can't share it with you why we need it, but we need it.
		So please respond with the following documents that we're looking for.
		And it's really good for getting bank records.
		You can get hundreds and hundreds of pages of bank records from people on a regular basis.
		So that's what they were doing.
		We got a little bit more information on there.
		If you have the actual graphic and you guys want to throw it on the screen, I can walk people through what it is that you got.
		What it is is mostly redacted, right?
		I mean, that's the other wildest part.
		You get almost nothing back from the FBI because they don't feel accountable to you.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, well, the crew can find screenshots of the document and that report that I did that you guys had up.
		You can just pause it and pull it up whenever you have it.
		I'm sorry that I wasn't prepared enough to print those out.
		I should have done that.
		It's just been a hell of a week.
		It was interesting to me a couple things that you pointed out.
		First of all, it was serial number 195 that we got.
		Second of all, based on the serial number, you were able to determine that the Type 3 assessment came from the Boston office of the FBI, which had some implications in and of itself.
		I'd like for you to talk more about that.
		And obviously, the purpose of what they were doing, at least as of 2013 through...
		Until we got the information from the FOIA request, it wasn't intimidation because we didn't know that it was happening.
		You can't intimidate somebody without them knowing, right?
		So there was a real incentive to put us under this status that wasn't just harassment or intimidation, but they were hoping to use whatever information they could garner for some agenda, right?
		Can you speak a little bit to that?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Sure. So the case, the way FBI files are set up, and the system is called Sentinel, so that's the...
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		That is the program that every FBI agent does.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Just like the AI and the Matrix, right?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Those were called sentinels.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, just like the AI.
		Not related, I don't think.
		There's some other really funny things.
		Actually, I found out when I was working in the Air Force that if you lose track of one of the drones that you're flying, if it's a manned drone, so you're the one who's actually manually controlling it, and it loses connection with whoever the pilot is, let's say it's back at Nullis Air Force Base or something, and it's halfway around the world, it will automatically return to base.
		It does an RTB, and the system and the actual program that captures it and brings it home is called Sky.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Yeah. Yeah.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		These people either have no sense of irony or at least they have a really good sense of humor.
		Either way, it's kind of scary.
		Okay. So Sentinel is the name of the program.
		And the way that things are labeled, if people look on the screen right now, you're seeing Federal Bureau of Investigation.
		That's going to be on all of them.
		It says it's an unclassified file, which is the only reason you're able to get it.
		And then it tells you at the top in that thing.
		It's 801, and then there's an alphanumeric in there, and I believe it's I. That's what we took it to be.
		So 801 is an intelligence-type file.
		801I specifically is human intelligence.
		More on that in a second.
		Then it's got a dash.
		Then it tells you the field office, and the field office is going to be BS.
		That's Boston in this case, which is kind of interesting.
		It's interesting because you guys aren't in Boston.
		Even though Boston sounds a lot like Austin, it's really not the same place.
		So outside of that sort of silliness, what it means is that somebody in Boston actually generated this case, and then you have the actual case file, which is that seven-digit number afterwards, and then serial number 195.
		So we're just translating basically bureau documents with almost all redacted information into what it actually means.
		195 means it's the 195th.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		This is in 2019, so presumably there's more now.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		One would think, yeah.
		And so I talked to some people that worked out of the Boston field office, particularly people who worked in the national security area.
		Now, it's worth noting, we're going to refer back to the DIOG again, which you brought up earlier.
		The DIOG tells you right up front that the FBI thinks of itself as an intelligence agency.
		First. This is kind of the wild drum that I've been beating since maybe September of 2022.
		I did my first public interview with Dan Bongino, who's now the deputy director, so that's wild.
		And I sat down and told him, the FBI considers itself an intel agency first.
		And most people don't think that way.
		Infomore's audience is probably a little more sophisticated in some ways because they have an idea of what this group does.
		But intel first, criminals second.
		The problem is, you can generate...
		Criminal cases out of purely intelligence cases, and the intelligence cases do not require articulation of a federal crime.
		So in a broad situation, I will tell you two sort of egregious things.
		The first, let's say, eight or nine cases that I inherited.
		Day one, I step into the Washington field office, which is in D.C., and I start working.
		I get counterintelligence against the Chinese, and I get eight or nine cases, most of which are between five and eight years old, some of which actually were signed into existence by Peter Strzok, which is also just kind of weird.
		Wow. The number of little paths that I've crossed over that other people have heard those names.
		Andy McCabe was the boss of the field office at that time, for whatever that's worth.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Hell of a guy.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, everyone loves him.
		So when you open these things up, you realize that they're not alleging that anybody is involved in anything criminal.
		In fact, one of the cases I had was that there was a former government worker who now worked in the private industry.
		And when I finally got a chance to interview him, he said he had zero interest in ever working for the government again.
		So not a threat, never going to be a threat again, no longer working for the government.
		And that guy was under investigation for something like eight years because he didn't list.
		A legitimate Chinese spy who was PNG'd and kicked out of the country that had been kicked out of the country years ago.
		And they had gone to grad school together.
		But there was no inclination that they were buddies or anything.
		They had like a couple of interactions on Facebook, which was like a response to a post.
		And after eight years of investigation, and I'm only saying how long it was because that's similar in the sort of time scope we're talking about here with the file you guys have.
		After eight years, when I finally got to sit down with him, he's like, didn't that guy get kicked out of the country for being a spy?
		And I said, yeah, he did.
		And he goes, yeah, I wouldn't talk to him.
		I don't think he'll ever talk to me either.
		I go, okay.
		And I had to tell him, I was like, the reason we're here is because you didn't report him on a background check.
		And he was like, oh, I was probably just lazy.
		And I said, no, I knew that from reading your files.
		So when you understand that there's literally nothing in this that indicates that this guy had done anything wrong, that's what's crazy.
		There's nothing about a Type 3 assessment that says InfoWars has actually generated, let's say, white racially motivated extremist propaganda or any sort of movement towards that.
		It's a human file, which means they were probably looking to recruit somebody either around InfoWars or in InfoWars.
		That's what the human part of it is.
		Human stands for human intelligence.
		So in the intelligence sphere, they break them out into these acronyms, signals intelligence, geo-intelligence, you know, various different kinds of intelligences.
		And human specifically means that there was a person who would have been theoretically looking at someone either around InfoWars or in InfoWars as a source.
		And that's pretty crazy.
		So we did a little bit of digging on this.
		Do you want to do names or do you want to not do names?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		You can do names.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		All right, screw it.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I cannot confirm or deny anything that Kyle says.
		That's exactly right.
		Everything here is just what we've looked at.
		We're not making any specific claims about anyone or any wrongdoing.
		We're just speculating based on the information we've been provided.
		Go ahead, Kyle.
unidentified		All right.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		So the human intelligence squad that works out of Boston worked integrally with a friend of mine who ran the national security squad.
		So I have good access to people that worked in there.
		And he said the odds are the person who would have generated this high probability.
		We do this in terms of confidence.
		That's how they do it, too.
		So they would say I would say with a high degree of certainty or a high degree of confidence that a person named Scott Brown was the intelligence analyst who actually generated this.
		And likely the FBI supervisor, I'm referring to my screen over here because I've got my notes, the supervisor who would have been in charge of the squad at the time, that was an agent because you have both an intel analyst and an agent working over there.
		The supervisor's name was Craig.
		And then there was another person, what is called a supervisory analyst, and that person's name was Tim Coates, C-O-T-E.
		So these people are likely the ones that opened it up.
		Interestingly enough...
		My contact said, you know, I've spoken to Scott Brown specifically about InfoWars because I monitored all forms of, you know, right to left to middle to people that are in alternative media.
		Because if you are an intel person, you want to know what's going on.
		And while I can't say that everything InfoWars broadcasts 100% passes like the Kyle Serafin standard of what I will stand on.
		I know that we have different sources.
		We know different things.
		And a lot of times, you guys are saying things are correct.
		And at the end of the day, regardless of whether you're accurate or you're not, if you're doing your best estimate based on the information you have, you have a First Amendment right to broadcast whatever the hell you want.
		And that's what's really critical.
		I've actually gone and spoken with people who I don't particularly like.
		I'm not a big fan of James O'Keefe personally.
		And that has nothing to do with anything because I actually put what I felt like at the time was my life on the line, flying to Washington, D.C. to talk to him because the FBI was investigating Project Veritas.
		This goes back to May of 2022.
		So I will draw a line in the sand, even for people that I'm not that keen on as human beings or keen on the way they behave.
		And I don't always think that the way that Project Veritas conducted itself is the best way to get information.
		Human sources are actually notoriously bad at this.
		However... You have a right to do that, and nobody would say what they did was not journalism, except the FBI and the Southern District of New York did that in May of 2022.
		That's actually where I ended up, you know, I was already suspended.
		I figured, what else can they do to me?
		I'm going to go and talk to people that need a knife in a knife fight because they are fighting unarmed.
		And this kind of stuff, I'm happy to talk about it because Infowars has a right to broadcast.
		I've been down to your guys' studios.
		You know, I like the folks that are working there.
		I think you guys operate in very good faith.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, we're doing our best.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		And it's not acceptable.
		I mean, even listening to some of the things you were saying earlier, very reasonable hedging sort of, there are things that you can confirm, there's things that you have to say, look, we're shading around the edges because we don't know everybody's motivation in their heart.
		But what we do know is that this is the information that we can see, this is the best analysis we can do, and I can tell you that is a bad faith thing.
		And the last thing is, I don't see this on there, but they should have listed you guys as what's called a sim.
		A sim is a sensitive investigative matter that is also categorized inside that diog that we referred to earlier.
		And it says that if you're a member of the media, which Infobars personnel clearly are, whether they're doing reporting, whether they're behind the scenes, or whether they're actually on-air talent, you're all going to be involved in media.
		Any reasonable person would think that.
		They actually consider influencers and bloggers and things like that to be media.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I think back then we might have even been on Sirius satellite radio.
		I mean, we're on the same...
		Yeah. The audience is being reached on the same stations and the same medium, at least as NPR.
		So if NPR is the media, then we are too.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah. A hundred percent.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		We don't take any money from the federal government.
		We just get sued.
		Yeah.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		You cannot make a reasonable and a good faith argument that InfoWars is not operating as a media outlet.
		Like, you just can't do it.
		And so the fact that they didn't consider you guys a sim is problematic for me as well.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		And what are the different implications in the way the investigation or espionage, for lack of surveillance rather, can be conducted if it's a sim or not?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I mean, are there actual different rules that you have to follow?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Well, yeah, I want to correct that word because when possible, we want to use the right word.
		So espionage is very specifically, that's almost always nation-state level, or it is spying for the purposes of getting very specific and maybe trade information so you can have corporate espionage as well.
		But what they were doing is they're doing an intelligence investigation.
		So I want to tweak your language just a little bit so that we're most accurate.
		I used to do this for a living.
		I did surveillance for a living.
		I did it for three years in a row, thousands of hours a year, where I would literally sit in a car with a camera and a piss bottle, and you have a radio so you can call your team, and you follow people around and find out who are they associating with, where are they going, what is the pattern that they live in,
		can you document actual crimes?
		Sometimes you can, sometimes you can't.
		Can you put them in the vicinity of certain things that are going on where you have additional, let's say, surveillance that's happening from the electronic end?
		And does that coincide with certain things?
		So espionage is not what the FBI is doing.
		They're doing intelligence investigations, which is to say they are investigating you solely for the purpose of gathering information.
		I understand that the nuance of the wording is a little bit tweaked.
		Espionage tends to have a lot more—it's a criminality, and that's not what they're alleging there.
		And they're not even claiming that there's any criminality there.
		There's nothing about being a—by the way, let's just assume that you guys were the thing that they claim.
		Being a racially motivated extremist is a— Is a protected position in the United States.
		As I used to always tell people, you can be a racist a-hole, but it doesn't mean that's illegal.
		You just don't have to associate with that person.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		That's good for Ibram Kendi and Joy Reid.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, there's plenty of them.
		If you're on the left, you can actually go ahead and get yourself an MSNBC show, right?
		But at the end of the day, you're allowed to be that person.
		You're allowed to have really atrocious opinions about other people because that's what we think you have a freedom to associate with.
		You shouldn't be policed by the government.
		It's one of the scariest things that I saw.
		And for some reason, having done a lot of these, like what they called white supremacy cases, I'll call them RMVEs because that's what we call them.
		A lot of times it's like a racist kid in his 20s who probably is going to end up marrying a black girlfriend sometime in the future.
		I'm just telling you how the numbers work out and God has a sense of humor.
		So you'd find these kids that are in their 20s, they're wearing penny loafers and khakis and a polo shirt and they're drinking a Starbucks latte and they're on Reddit and they're tweeting things that are semi-racist or putting out memes and trying to be edgy.
		So a lot of the times these people are not the things they want to be or they claim that they are.
		There's someone on the internet and that's literally what the FBI will devote.
		$10,000 a day surveillance resources to.
		So were you guys being followed specifically?
		Maybe, maybe not.
		They could have just been doing this from Boston, so they may not have tasked anybody in Austin to follow you specifically or to follow Jones or anyone else.
		What they could be doing...
		Is finding out if there's any vulnerabilities, if there's any approach mechanisms, if there's any people that are sort of in the sphere of influencers, so jaded lovers and things like that, because they can get all kinds of different bank accounts and comms and so on.
		They could try to find people that would be able to do what we call reporting on it.
		And that just means that they're just giving information.
		Again, it goes into a file, a totally different type of file.
		If they were getting information from legit sources about anybody there, it would actually go into a totally different system and it wouldn't be part of that 196 serials that you see.
		So all of this stuff is concerning only because we don't need to be following around people, whether they're journalists you like or journalists you don't like.
		Don Lemon doesn't need to have anybody following him around.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Well, nobody's following him at all.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		That's true.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		I think he's basically, he's trying to do like TikTok videos where he spills cake on the ground, right?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, he's done.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Or done.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		It's just not the world that we need to be living in.
		It's not the America that we should be in.
		And more importantly, this is the thing that I actually came forward with.
		I actually started telling my bosses in 2017.
		I started with the FBI in 2016.
		And to be a whistleblower just means you go through the official channel one of the appropriate ways.
		And you say, I believe that we are violating policy, rule, or law.
		Or we are causing some sort of significant damage to the public.
		And I said, I think we're actually violating the law with the way that we conduct these investigations because I don't know what we're doing.
		And they go, well, we're just getting information.
		I go, okay, for what?
		And they go, well, then we'll know more stuff.
		And I'm like, no, that's what happens when you gather information.
		That's not what we're going to do with it.
		What are we going to do with it?
		And the answer was never, like, you know, they just said we're going to know more stuff.
		We'll know more about the Chinese threat.
		We'll know more about what Infowars is telling people.
		That's not an acceptable thing to spend your government resources on.
		There are actual threats out there.
		And then that's when you hear these things where somebody slipped through the cracks or someone actually perpetrates a real terror plot, God forbid.
		And I do say it because that's awful.
		And it comes at the opportunity cost of somebody.
		Following you guys around for a shift when they could have been following someone else.
		Or someone like me sitting and watching some turd who's got no job, who's sitting on his parents' basement couch, and he's being racist online on 4chan or 8chan or something like that.
		And my team of highly skilled professionals who are really capable of following on legit jihadis, let's say.
		And we were prepared to interdict them.
		I followed a guy who was obsessed with Omar Mateen one time.
		He's actually in custody.
		He actually got convicted of material support of terrorism.
		He was driving 110 miles an hour in southern Florida, like all over the highways at crazy hours.
		And he wanted to go and kill people and take over their houses.
		He wanted to do all this wild stuff.
		And he was obsessed with Omar Mateen.
		So he would actually do pilgrimages where he would drive to the remnants of the Pulse nightclub.
		And my team would follow him at like 3 in the morning kind of deal.
		So when you're doing stuff like that, and they said, we don't have a SWAT team available, it's just you guys.
		And it's like, no problem.
		My team is former military.
		We're all former law enforcement from other places.
		We all have backgrounds.
		We had tactical guys.
		We had medical.
		Cool, guys.
		We were prepared, and then we might be following around someone from InfoWars.
		What a waste.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		What a waste of resources.
		Let me ask you this question, and maybe this is a major stress.
		Let's just say they put us under a Type 3 assessment for the purpose of assigning someone, whether in Boston or wherever else, to just watch every single broadcast that Alex Jones did, or listen to it, and document the things that he says.
		And let's say that whoever put this together really wanted to bring down InfoWars.
		This is all hypothetical, and it's all speculation.
		So I'm not saying that's what happened.
		But let's say they really wanted to bring down Infowars, and what they wanted to do was put us under a Type 3 assessment to assign resources from the FBI to listen to all our broadcasts and take notes as to what could possibly catalyze a civil suit against Alex Jones or Infowars based off of what he said on the air.
		And so things like if an F word was said on radio, making sure that there was a fine that was submitted, or stuff like claims were made about certain tragic events.
		Or loosely, is it possible that we were spied on by the FBI and information that was collected?
		I know I'm not supposed to be using the word spy, excuse me.
		But this type 3 assessment was going on by the FBI for the purpose of collecting information in order to provide to law firms in a civil suit against Infowars down the road.
		Is that possible?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Possible. I don't know that it's probable, but then I just found out, like everybody else did in the last couple of years, that Perkins Coie actually had an FBI terminal on a skiff in their building.
		So I would never have guessed that.
		And I worked down the street from where apparently they had FBI terminals.
		So anything is on the board.
		This is the worst thing about what I've gone through in the last couple of years and having seen the way that my former agency worked.
		There were things that I would have said, absolutely not.
		There's no chance they could have done that.
		That's just not, you know, it would have been always, it would have been a mistake and not malfeasance.
		And I can't rule that kind of stuff out anymore because I saw them come after me.
		I mean, I know they went and subpoenaed my records.
		Could they have taken an IA, an intelligence analyst, and had them plunk down and watch every Infowars broadcast?
		Absolutely. Would they have been looking for civil information?
		Unlikely. More likely, they'd be looking for criminal violations.
		Let's say they were trying to find what they would call a threat case.
		Right. They were trying to find someone making...
		Because when you're broadcasting, you're now doing an interstate means of communication.
		So interstate threats is an actual violation of law.
		It's usually too low, low level for the FBI to get too involved in.
		But if Jones were to say something wild and he was, you know, just getting, you know, riled up about something and somebody construed that as a actionable threat, then yeah, you could generate a case out of that.
		And could they have theoretically shared it with their friends?
		Because here's the other crazy thing we know.
		A huge chunk of the folks that are working in the intel space.
		Are left-leaning.
		They spend a lot of time in college.
		They oftentimes have like masters and PhDs and so on.
		So they're very indoctrinated towards the leftist thinking.
		Not liberals where they're open-minded and saying maybe libertarian and everybody should live and let live.
		We're talking about people that are kind of dyed in the wool saying that Donald Trump is the apocalypse for them right now and they're scared about it and they're walking around crying at headquarters.
		Those kind of people, I don't know that they don't have friends that are working at, you know, loony-lib leftist law firms and want to do something to try to further that cause.
		And if they're sitting there watching it, it's not like their friends at the law firm are watching it, per se.
		We used to joke that there's probably somebody from the FBI that was assigned to sit and watch my podcast because I got legitimate information saying that they had watched my podcast and said this.
		I know that Democrat staffers watched me, and I'm all over the record for the 217th Congress because they went through and they were listing.
		They were like, on this show, he said this, and on this show, they did this.
		Where do these people get this information?
		And I don't know that the FBI didn't generate it.
		For the Democrats.
		So I couldn't rule out.
		And like I said, previously, I would have said probably not.
		Today, I would say 50-50, maybe like unlikely, but it wouldn't shock me.
		Like if they came back and told us that it happened, I'd be like, okay, yeah, got it.
		That's where we're at right now.
		This is the rot that guys like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino have sort of inherited.
		And Jones said something the other day, because I was watching you guys and you were discussing this when you were talking about swatting and you first were kind of discussing this information, putting it out on Twitter.
		He brought up a term, parallel construction.
		And if you want to wait until after a break, we can get into the deep.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, we do have a break coming up in 90 seconds, and that was the next thing I did want to mention with you.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, we can get dark into what it is and what it isn't, so I think it's worth explaining it.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Let's do that in one minute and 18 seconds.
		Well, we're going to break in one minute and 15 seconds, and then we'll have a four-minute break, and then we'll be back on the other side for the rest of the show.
		And I'm going to take this opportunity, since we're broadcasting interstate, to just show you the most dangerous thing ever.
		Overhead cam, please.
		On the alexjonesstore.com right now, we are selling this amazing blade.
		And we could not be on the air without your support.
		This is a design that Alex and I worked on together with the Bigly guys.
		We often refer to the Spartans saying, with your shield or on it, as one of their phrases to mean never give up.
		You either go to battle to win or you die fighting.
		You don't surrender and drop your shield and run away.
		This one is InfoWars, tip of the spear, the Spartan.
		It's got the beautiful graphic here.
		And then on the other side, it's got the InfoWars logo.
		Please check this out because this is going to go out of stock this week.
		The sales were amazing when we launched it on Friday.
		If you want it, now is your chance to get it.
		Please go to TheAlexJonesStore.com.
		Amazing deals, amazing specials.
		There's even bundles with this product.
		You have to go to TheAlexJonesStore.com right now and check out this amazing blade.
		It's got everything that you would ever want in a self-defense weapon other than the fact that it doesn't fire bullets.
		But folks, we don't sell firearms.
		We just sell awesome knives and healthy supplements.
		Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com right now and stay with us for more on the other side.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Anybody who's halfway informed about health and vitality knows that turmeric is one of the top super nutrients in the world.
		But concentrated turmeric is what you want.
		Most turmeric pills are 4%.
		That's raw.
		This is the strongest.
		95% curcuminoid with a bunch of other concentrated super nutrients like ginger and black pepperdine.
		And it's finally back in stock.
		Ultimate turmeric gummies at thealexjonesstore.com.
		Just go see what Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says about turmeric.
		And this stuff is the Godzilla of turmeric.
		And it funds the info war.
		And while you're at thealexjonesstore.com, be sure and check out the widest selection anywhere of Patriot 1776 Part 2. Incredible clothing, ball caps, t-shirts, hoodies.
		It's all there like this baby.
		The Second American Revolution at thealexjonesstore.com.
		And you're funding the tip of the spear in the Second American Revolution when you support us.
		So I thank and salute you all.
		Now take action at theyellowshieldstore.com.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Optimal Human is back in stock with all new packaging.
		Now this super green is absolutely amazing.
		We can't even keep it around in the studio because the crew is consuming it so much.
		Just one cup of this powder mixed in water, soda, water, tea, whatever you want, and you will have everything that the body needs.
		It's a superfood greens, functional mushrooms, 10 billion plus probiotic, digestive enzymes, and so many more amazing ingredients.
		Fine print is so small because they had a hard time packing all of the ingredients
		So please, check out Optimal Human.
		The AlexJonesStore.com Welcome
		back to Sunday Night Live, ladies and gentlemen.
		I am joined by the incredible, legendary, infamous Kyle Serafin embodying a predisposition to militant rebellion to tyranny.
		It's an honor and a pleasure to have you on the show.
		Thank you for all the work that you do.
		You've been enlightening me and the audience as to what the implications are of the results of our FOIA, which proved that there was an intelligence investigation.
		On Infowars since at least December 10th of 2013, probably still going on, definitely going on at least through June 28th of 2019.
		And we were going to get into parallel constructions and how these intelligence investigations can be weaponized down the road.
		Please enlighten us.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, those are all the right words.
		You're saying the right things there.
		So first of all, let's dig back into the, this is sort of like lecture time, but two different types of cases.
		One of them, intelligence case.
		An intelligence case doesn't have an end.
		That is the really key thing for people to imagine.
		It spins around in a circle, and in fact, it's actually listed as being an intelligence cycle, which means that it starts somewhere and then it just goes around in a circle forever.
		And what it can do is spin off other cases that are more circles that never have to end.
		And as long as you can predicate them, you can say, hey, we did something on this case, and there's still something there to find, and we still would like more information, then you can continue them indefinitely.
		The worst example of this, and this is a really good way for people to understand how dangerous this stuff is.
		Where I used to work in Washington, D.C., we had a lot of different cases on people in what are called counterterrorism investigations.
		Now, counterterrorism doesn't mean that there's an allegation the person even did anything terroristic or that they're associated with terrorists, but there's enough there that they are, let's say, a particular religious type of person, and maybe they know some people that are in bad places, or maybe they're going on the Internet and reading things that make people alerted.
		Whatever it is, there was an allegation or information that started a case.
		We had a guy who was under investigation for something like 23 or 24 years.
		The specifics, it was one of the two.
		Either way, it was far more than 20 years of investigation, and they were all intelligence investigations ongoing with the same squad handed off from agent to agent to agent to agent, and eventually they actually arrested this guy.
		But they didn't arrest him for anything that was terroristic.
		He was the member of a mosque down in Woodbridge, Virginia, and they ended up arresting him.
		I think he was in his 60s or 70s.
		So they started that 23 years earlier.
		They arrested him for child pornography.
		I'm a father and I don't want anybody trading in child pornography and I don't want anyone creating it.
		And I think we throw the book at anyone who does.
		But if the government has to investigate you for two and a half decades to come up with something completely unrelated to the thing that they were investigating.
		We've got a real problem here.
		And that is the issue with these things.
		These intelligence investigations can start.
		And they don't ever have to end.
		And the scariest thing is, when I started to go and close out the cases I got, I made reference to like, you know, eight cases I got when I inherited, started off at the FBI, they go, here's all your cases.
		So you read through everything in them, all those serials that we talked about earlier.
		And I'm reading hundreds of serials.
		These things had five, six hundred different pages in the file.
		And those are all multi-page, you know, documents.
		And at the end of it, I go, I don't think there's anything here.
		So I go to my boss, I say, hey, can I shut this thing down?
		Can I go interview this person?
		And hit them with an accusation, or hit them with a question, or just see if they even register.
		I'd like to see this person face-to-face with my own eyes.
		I'm a pretty good judge of character, and I worked as a paramedic, and I worked in the military, and I've looked people eye-to-eye in every situation, and I would just love to go do that.
		I used to do sales.
		You know how to close people and see where they're at.
		So I did this, and then she was like, well, if you close this case, then what will you do for your file review?
		And the file review has to be done every 60 days when you're new, every 90 days when you're a seasoned agent.
		And if that's the reason we're going to keep a case open on an Infowars or a guy who's been at a mosque but basically hasn't done anything else dangerous, what in the actual hell are we paying for?
		So that's the scary thing.
		These circles that never end.
		Now we can talk about the pieces where it gets weaponized.
		Because once you have something that is just investigating people for its own sake, maybe just open for the sake that I have a file to review so that when I sit down with my boss every 90 days, she can say, hey, what have you been doing?
		And I go, well, I got this case.
		And she goes, I don't remember that.
		Tell me about it.
		So I tell her eight years worth of history in a few minutes.
		I brief it to her.
		And she says, great.
		What have you done this review period?
		I said, I did some surveillance.
		We did a trash poll.
		We went and looked through some of his bank records.
		You know, we've read his emails, and they go, great.
		Okay, cool.
		Great work.
		What about your next case?
		So if that's all that I'm keeping it open for, the danger is that maybe I actually find that somebody is involved in a crime that has nothing to do with what we're looking for.
		I always use the word money laundering because if you're doing an intelligence investigation, oftentimes you're pulling financials.
	So let's say you find evidence that has nothing to do with what you were looking for them.
	You're out there looking for threats against the United States, someone selling secrets.
	You're looking for someone who is interacting with one of our foreign threat nations, like an Iran or a China or a Russia or something like that.
	And I find out that you just have strange business movements, and you're moving cash around at ways that don't make a lot of sense.
	And we look into it, and we think there's pretty good probable cause to believe that you've done money laundering.
	But because I got it through a national security letter, which means I'm using national security tools, I don't necessarily want to declassify the probable cause or even the underlying reasons that we had this case open in the first place.
	So what am I going to do?
	I'm going to try to parallel construct this case.
	Now, I can tell you I've never done this because it seems totally unethical.
	And I don't know people that have specifically gone out and done it, but I've heard allegations of it.
	And it's too easy to believe that it doesn't happen because everybody knows this.
	Any of the conspiratorial types, and that's what they call you when you talk about this, they say, well, there's no such thing as parallel construction.
	Of course there is.
	Imagine you have a FISA on somebody, which is a very invasive, similar to a Title III.
	It is an invasive surveillance tool that goes into all of your electronic means, and they can either put cameras in your house, all kinds of wild stuff.
	Let's say they've done that and they find out that you're keeping something that's totally unrelated to what they were investigating.
	They thought maybe you were selling secrets to the Chinese, but in reality, you just have a machine gun hidden in your safe.
	You bought one of those stupid Glock switches from Alibaba and you had it shipped in and it made it through Chicago and you put it on the back of your Glock and so now you've got a fully automatic pistol that dumps the entire mag when you press the trigger down.
	Let's say that's the thing.
	Now, I don't want to reveal that I have a FISA on you to get you for a gun charge, but what I could do is go find one of your friends who's gone to a range and shot it with you, and how would I know that person?
	Because I know who you've been hanging out with and who you've been talking to and where you've been going.
	So if I were to go and do this in an unscrupulous way, I could lean on your buddy and say, hey, I know that Chase has that machine gun hanging out there.
	I know he's got that Glock with the switch on it.
	I'd like to talk to you about that.
	And by the way, I'd hate to find out that you're an accessory because that's a serious charge for you as well.
	You're punishable by up to the same thing.
	Right. And your friend goes, yeah, I'm willing to turn him in for that.
	Yeah, we could talk about this.
	So once he says it, now I can predicate that case based on a human source.
	I don't need to go and use my classified means.
	And so now I will build that case starting from a different area, knowing exactly what I'm going to find.
	I'm going to write a search warrant looking.
	For that machine gun that's hanging out in your safe, I'm going to go to a judge.
	And even if my probable cause is very thin, it's going to get signed off on.
	And I'm not worried about embarrassing the judge because when they sign off, we know it's in there because we've been paying attention because we're doing it through alternative methods.
	That's how you parallel construct a criminal case using national security sort of instigators and never indicating what those original reasons were.
	And the reason they don't like to go through that is because it's always the same argument you hear about them not wanting to disclose sources and methods.
	The FBI loathes to disclose sources and methods.
	They don't want to have to tell anybody.
	But it's way easier to burn a human source, particularly one that you picked up just to open a case, than it would be to use some of the technical surveillance.
	And that's what they call it.
	In fact, if you ever get any of your FISA's back and it says something about a technical source, a technical source is when you actually have somebody inside the telephone company that is giving your information.
	That's your FISA.
	That's going to be your Title III, things like this.
	And so this is a real problem.
	This is why having an intel agency, and I actually, I talked to, what is Seb Gorka's position right now?
	He's like the senior.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Oh, Sebastian Gorka, yeah.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Advisor on counterterrorism or something.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Right, so I used to go on his program.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I'm Sebastian Gorka.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Oh, and he goes like, Kyle Serafin.
		Kyle, Kyle.
		Yeah. It's special.
		Seb and I actually had this sort of revelation while we were talking one time.
		And he said, we're talking about a law enforcement entity that actually has all of the same tools that a national security and an intel agency would have.
		And I said, yeah.
		And he said, when in Western history have we not referred to that as a secret police?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Oh, my God.
		That's a good point.
		And he's exactly right.
		That's a good point.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		When you think about it, that's the guy standing there who made that revelation to me.
		And once I've connected the two, it's like, yeah, of course.
		I used to always tell people when I started seeing the way that the FBI operates, it's really bad.
		It's not good for the law enforcement end.
		It's actually really not good for the intel end.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		When did this start happening?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I mean, has it operated like this for many decades?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Well, first of all, it's September 12th of 2001 was the beginning of that.
		That was the nemesis or the sort of the nexus where this sort of branched out of.
		And so this is a Patriot Act outgrowth, but it actually got way worse.
		In, let's say, October of 2016.
		So I officially, I was at the FBI Academy at this time, but I was talking to one of my buddies.
		My curiosity was, how do we know this got worse when Trump was about to get into office?
		Why do we think it was weaponized against Trump and conservatives and so on at that point?
		Because the FBI is actually a pretty conservative organization, for whatever it's worth.
		There's a lot of gun carriers that have beards, and they have kids, and they're married, like they're men married to women, and they have a gun, and they have more than one gun probably, and they like to do fitness.
		It's not that crazy.
		You don't have that many leftists that are running it.
		But there's two problems with this.
		Number one is, the agents are no longer the most superior position inside the FBI.
		It's actually being quarterbacked a lot of times by analysts, and that is a post-9-11 construct.
		And the second thing is, is that agents are actually the minority.
		of the total employee pool.
		They represent about 14,000 of the 38,000 employees.
		So you used to always have FBI agents filling in all the top jobs.
		That's no longer the case.
		We now have what are called senior intel analysts.
		We've got intel analysts that are standing in assistant director positions.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		So it's like a bureaucracy within a bureaucracy.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Oh my God.
		It's so horrendous and gross because these people have a totally different agenda.
		The intelligence analysts don't even answer to the FBI's prerogative.
		They actually answer to ODNI.
		They answer to what Tulsi Gabbard does right now.
		And my recommendation to Kash Patel was right off the bat, I said, you should take all the IAs, the intelligence analysts, and ship them out.
		If they're not going to do what we call tactical intelligence, in other words, they're not going to be digging in on gang members and finding out what the house layout is when we're going to go do a search warrant.
		If they're not going to go map out the criminal organizations, if they're going to be trying to just get information for its own sake, get them the hell out of there.
		Send them over to ODNI to go write term papers, which is what they do.
		Let them go out there and spin their wheels and write papers about how InfoWars is full of white racists.
		Let them do that where they don't have anybody with a badge and a gun that can go do anything about it.
		Because nobody cares if you write a term paper off into the void.
		It's just another term paper that we can ignore.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Let me ask you this.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Do you believe that the reason this human intelligence, this intelligence investigation was open on InfoWars was for the sake of trying to see if over the course of years and years and years they could construct a parallel construction?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		That's a very reasonable possibility, particularly about the person that I'm told that opened this thing up, this guy Scott Brown.
		He was leaning to the hard left and he just would not have understood that people could have contrasting viewpoints.
		This is, again, I'm taking this secondhand, but from a source I trust.
		So, sure, that's a possibility.
		The other possibility is, it's like, I need to write.
		Imagine this.
		Imagine your job is that you write term papers for a living and you work for the FBI.
		So that is a real job, and it's called intelligence analysts.
		They have to write three finished Intel products per year in order to get paid.
		That's what they have to show they've been doing.
		So they're just working on things for the sake of it.
		They imagine what it is, and then they write about it.
		And then they go get information.
		And they send information over to a guy like what I used to do, and they'd say, hey, Kyle, do you have any sources that can tell us about Infowars?
		Do you have any sort of information where it touches your cases?
		And I go...
		No, I'm pretty sure that's a TV program.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		So you mean to say there's a way that the government will pay me to listen to Infowars?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I mean, you're kind of pitching the FBI right now.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Well, it probably wouldn't be that.
		They'd probably have you watch CNN.
		I never saw CNN not on a TV that was kind of anchored in our national security spaces.
		They're called SCIFs, the Sensitive Compartment Information Facilities.
		Every single SCIF I ever saw always had CNN on it.
		Every one of them.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Well, you want to know what your agents are reporting.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		I suppose so.
		This is the craziest thing, though.
		When you have these people that are so ideologically motivated, and the second piece of it, because we kind of said it was post-9-11, there actually is a more nefarious and uglier piece of this, and it happened in September, October of 2016.
		This is the tail end of the Obama administration, right?
		So Trump was already, they didn't know he was going to win.
		In fact, everybody thought he wasn't going to win.
		One of the funniest nights of my life that I can recall.
		I laughed so hard I had tears at like 3 a.m. because I was at the FBI Academy.
		And I actually was a Gary Johnson guy because I'm kind of like a libertarian at heart.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		What is Aleppo?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Who cares?
		That's what I said.
		Who cares?
		Are you trying to be in charge of Syria?
		I didn't care.
		I had friends who knew him and thought he was a really good guy.
		He made his own money, whatever else.
		So long and short, we're watching that.
		And Donald Trump ends up winning.
		And so I'm laying there in bed at the FBI Academy in a bunk bed with another guy living next to me.
		And I'm in my late 30s.
		And I died laughing.
		I'm just watching the television with my tears coming down.
		And right about the time that all that stuff was going on, the Obama administration allowed the FBI to put their hand inside of a cookie jar they've never had before.
		And it's called the Data Warehouse System, DWS.
		This is not breaking anybody's brains, but the NSA does a lot of collection domestically on all kinds of things.
		They get not just voice, but they get all the transactions that happen on all of the telco that you guys do.
		Right? So we all kind of know the NSA can do it.
		But unlike the secret police part of it, the NSA doesn't have anyone to come out and bother you.
		There's no NSA agent that's going to come knock on your door and throw handcuffs on you.
		That doesn't exist.
		For the first time in history, Barack Obama redefined Executive Order 12333, which both establishes the domestic collection priorities and it allowed them, for the first time, to share what's called raw FISA.
		So by the time that I showed up in December...
		Of 2016, when I went into some of the information that I was looking at, it was like looking in your own email box.
		I would open up a FISA and I would be able to see exactly what you see.
		I'd see your spam.
		I'd see your folders.
		I'd see all your stuff.
		The difference was when I touched it, it didn't actually show that it was red.
		So I could see all of the things that were going on there.
		And that's crazy.
		That never existed prior to Barack Obama.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Now, does that exist under a Type 3 assessment or is that something that would require a FISA?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		That's what we usually called – it was either FISA 702, which is the broadest category of it, and then specifically what we would call a full FISA.
		So that's where they actually have to go into the court and make an argument of it.
		But the issue was when they changed this and they allowed them to come in here and see all these things.
		We now have a process where the FBI is getting raw data that is not what they used to call minimized.
		That's where you'd see like it was person one, person two.
		And if you wanted to know who it was, you had to petition the NSA and say, hey, I really need to know this person.
		And you'd have to show a compelling reason for them to tell you who these people were because you weren't entitled to that information.
		This is the scariest thing.
		They only abused that information a few million times.
		And Chris Wray, the former director, went in front of Congress and he was like, look, we're doing way better now.
		I think probably like 2019, 2020, he goes in and testifies, hey, we're doing a much better job.
		We only violated federal law like 285,000 times this year instead of the several million.
		So they only did that a bunch of times when they weren't supposed to.
		And the worst part of it is, is they're actually breaking federal law in doing this because when you got that tool.
		And as I said, you hear a lot of people say what 702 FISA is.
		They don't know what it is.
		They have no idea.
		But the NSA collects all this information.
		Anything that touches an American wire that an American company is able to hoover up, they do.
		And then you can kind of like go there and nominate people for certain kinds of coverage.
		702 FISA is designed for one thing and one thing alone.
		And that changed as well in 2016.
		But it was designed to do one thing.
		Touch foreign entities.
		When they were in a foreign country.
		So in other words, if I'm talking to, let's say, a Chinese spy or I'm watching a Chinese spy and I'm collecting their information and they're in China, fair play.
		They got a Gmail account.
		They got a Hotmail account.
		They got a Yahoo.
		All good.
		I can read all that stuff.
		The minute that they get on a plane and fly and land at LAX or land at Dulles or land at JFK, the minute I know they're there, I've got to turn off my Pfizer-702 coverage because it is not designed for people inside the United States until they started doing the thing that you hear called hops.
		And then they begin to hop to that second circle.
		Remember, we're talking about Intel operations.
		These are circles.
		The next circle might be someone that that person knows.
		So maybe that's a researcher who's working in Omaha, Nebraska.
		Now I'm looking into an American using 702.
		And then that researcher starts talking to you because they want to share with you some findings they have.
		Now I'm looking into a journalist.
		And that can happen.
		Two hops away.
		So you started with a Chinese spy and you got two hops away.
		That's how you ended up getting the United States president in 2017 actually being investigated by his own FBI, which was never his FBI.
		And that's the whole point.
		People understand this, to the point where the FBI was actually lying when they were going in front of the FISC, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
		They actually lied.
		And by the way, the same judge who gave that guy his law license back, that was Kevin Clinesmith, the same judge also said, you've got to turn around a plane that's full of Venezuelans that are part of the TDA gang, and you can't take them to a prison in El Salvador.
		So we're leaving.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		So like a final blow of the Obama administration was to turn the FBI into secret police.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		What's crazy is, I think they thought they were enabling Hillary to take it.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Because it would have made her so much more powerful.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Everyone did.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		So Obama wanted to set her up to have a secret police at her disposal.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Can you imagine?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and she was really good with classified material, if you remember.
		Like, I mean, what difference does it make at this point?
		But the lady who, there's a great song.
		It's like a Jim Comey remix from his press conference.
		And he just lays out all the proof that if anybody else had done that, if I had done that working for the Bureau and started taking things home, you know, I'd be in jail.
		I'd still be in jail.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Any other administration, I wouldn't have been able to get away with it when he talks about sending the FBI to investigate General Michael Flynn under the Trump administration.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		I'll tell you even something more on that.
		So, Chase, on that note, I actually used to work within the space where we would actually look into that violation called FERA, right?
		The Foreign Alien Registration Act or the Foreign Agent Registration Act.
		They never enforced it.
		I went to the chief prosecutors for the FERA unit in Washington, D.C. I went there with three other FBI agents.
		I was the most junior person, but I was the only male.
		So they talked to me like I was the boss.
		It was really funny because the women there who were more senior than me, they were like, why do they look at you?
		And we had this conversation and I go, what can we do?
		We've got some people that we think are guilty of Farrah violations.
		What is your recommendation?
		And the guy goes, here's what we do.
		If you're violating Farrah, we have pretty good evidence you are.
		We're going to send you a very sternly written letter.
		And I said, oh, okay.
		And then what?
		And he goes, 90 days, we're going to send you another one.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Oh my God.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		And I said...
		I said, good to go.
		I said, what happens when they ignore those letters?
		He goes, if you ignore letter one and letter two, after 90 days, we will send you a third and even more strongly worded letter.
		And that's pretty much the entirety of what we do here.
		We don't really have the authority to go after.
		We don't use Farrah as a standalone charge.
		And Michael Flynn experienced something that was completely abnormal in everybody's estimation, having talked to the chief prosecutors who did this stuff.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		That's unbelievable.
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		They just didn't use it.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		So in the next four minutes that we have left together, do you have faith that Kash Patel is aware of these issues and able to address them?
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		I mean, is the FBI a salvageable organization or does something else need to just replace it?
kyle seraphin ▲ ● ▼		Strong maybe.
		Okay. I'm pretty pragmatic.
		I think Kash had a slow start.
		I think a lot of people are seeing that.
		I think that this next week is probably going to be very pivotal because they're essentially like a people who are landing on the beach.
		This is like, this is an invasion.
		Whether you like it or not.
		Okay, we're talking about a hostile takeover of an agency that doesn't want to be managed.
		And the FBI is used to managing its own directors.
		And what I mean is, the FBI culture actually trumps whatever the FBI director thinks.
		Chris Wray used to say, I have oversight of the FBI.
		And he would openly talk about being, quote-unquote, bubble-wrapped, which means they kept FBI people away from him.
		He didn't get the complaints.
		His job was to set sort of like vision and let the deputy director, which is a long-term FBI person, come in and handle that.
		That was Paula Bate.
		These are people who...
		Understand the culture, and they are institution over constitution type people.
		They believe that the agency is more important.
		In fact, the cardinal sin in the FBI is not breaking the law.
		You can totally do that and keep your job.
		It's actually if you embarrass the FBI.
		That's what I did.
		I went forward and told people things that made them upset with me, which is why they actually turned around and investigated me, even though they broke the law to do so.
		Like, this is the craziest thing.
		So can they save it?
		Maybe. It's a strong maybe.
		I think they're doing something that nobody's done before, at least in a long time.
		We've got a non-former FBI agent in the deputy director role.
		That usually represents the person that sort of keeps the director at arm's length and handled bureau business the bureau way.
		Dan Bongino represents a departure from that.
		So I pray to God they're successful.
		I really do.
		But the alternative is that you have to break this agency apart.
		And bringing in ATF agents is pretty atrocious.
		I don't think that's a great idea.
		I think it's sad that ATF agents now are going to get their life dream of becoming FBI agents before my friend Garrett O'Boyle, who's been suspended for 30 months, is going to get to go back to the agency that suspended him.
		So all of that stuff is pretty bad.
		Should we be cutting the teeth out of the ATF?
		100%. Should we be trying to deal with things like, you know, make sure that these weaponized processes are not being used?
		Yes. Could they get rid of the Intel branch tomorrow?
		Yes. My concern is, and this is the really big one, I'm afraid that it's like the ring of power.
		Nobody wants to throw it into the fire because it's really helpful to have it on your side when you're in charge.
		And I'm hopeful that Cash and Dan understand.
		I've been telling them for two years.
		And not quietly, some in public interviews, some privately, that this is a real problem, that this animal, generally speaking, does not want to be tamed and oftentimes cannot be.
		So they have to at least have everything has to be smashed down to the ground as one of the possibilities.
		And then the lighter measure means we really get a loyalty test of FBI agents and FBI analysts and so on, where you have to be loyal to the Constitution.
		And you should know what the Bill of Rights means.
		You should be able to cite all of them.
		And what they mean to you in your job.
		And that would be a useful survey to send out just to find out where people stand on their constitutional requirement, that oath of office that they swore.
		Because if they don't get it, and they've been working there for more than a couple years...
		They should crank them out.
		There's no reason to be sticking around if you don't understand.
		Your job is defend the Bill of Rights.
		Nobody needs you to defend the Article I powers of Congress or the Article II powers of the executive.
		No, no, no.
		Your job is to not infringe using the awesome power and authority of this agency on Americans who shouldn't be stepped on, which is why Infowars should have never had that case open in the first place.
chase geiser ▲ ● ▼		Well, thank you so much, Kyle.
		It's been an honor and a pleasure to have you on the Sunday Night Live broadcast from Infowars.
		Please feel free to reach out anytime.
		I'm very grateful for the time that you took this week to just kind of answer my questions and actually call people.
		I mean, it's amazing the work that you've done, and I really applaud you for standing up against this level of corruption.
		Everybody listening should follow him.
		Go to kylserafin.com.
		Follow him at Kyle Serafin on True Social, X, YouTube, and all the socials.
		Thank you so much, Kyle.
		I appreciate it.
		And make sure you guys don't forget to go to thealexjonesstore.com because we are under attack in this information war, and they're not trying to get to us.
		They're trying to get to you through us.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Think about the accomplishment that the corporate media is trying to obscure of oil prices dropping more than $30 a barrel just since he got in the last 56 days to $65 a barrel.
		Think about eggs dropping now more than $2 a carton since Trump got in.
		That is Trump administratively.
		Going in and undoing as fast as he can the things that the Great Reset, WEF, New World Order, BlackRock combine.
		That's who was really running things, not Joe Biden the puppet, Mr. Autopit.
		I mean, this is really amazing.
		Trump is doing a better job on the economy quicker than I thought.
		But he understands he's got to have momentum.
		The globalists are trying to crash the economy to stop not just our populist revolution, but populist revolutions around the world.
		And that's why listeners and viewers have to understand, and I know you know this, but really get it consciously, In yourselves.
		We're winning major battles.
		We haven't won the war.
		That's why we have to intensify our efforts.
		Normally, when a Republican gets in, and most of them were milquetoast or traitors, people go to sleep and then the left comes back.
		This is an ongoing major political realignment, not just here but globally, and we've got to stay engaged.
		And that means sharing the reports, sharing the videos, sharing the information, sharing the truth, and supporting.
		Trump, Elon, and other independent media like Tucker Carlson and myself.
		And you do that at TheAlexShowStore.com with the very best supplements, the widest selection of Patriot apparel, and so much more.
		I can't fight the deep state that's still trying to shut us down desperately.
		I can't continue with this crew and the incredible work we engage in reaching 30, 40, 50, 100 million, sometimes more people a day without your help.
		And we're on record.
		The bad guys admit this.
		So do the good guys.
		Being the folks that built, that means you too, the platform, the runway, the foundation, the launchpad of what Trump, Elon, and others are doing at levels just that are amazing.
		We are dismantling the globalists.
		Their system's over.
		Only question is, can they gloss into their grave with them?
		And they're trying to do it.
		So please support the broadcast.
		Please share this report.
		Remember, you decide what gets out.
		You decide, because you're the Paul Revere's.
		And you decide whether we can stay on the air.
		And you need to become a VIP at thealexandstore.com.
		$30 a month.
		Cancel any time.
		Get $40 to spend on the store.
		Special offers, special deals, special sales.
		And then you commit.
		To month to month, you're canceling time to get the special offers and special deals, and it reminds you about how great the products are.
		It reminds you of how they've empowered your life.
		And then anytime you want to stop, you can with one click.
		But I'm asking you to commit, like I've committed to our shared destiny together, at theolishowstore.com with the VIP.
		You can also subscribe to supplements like our Ultimate CMOS, Ultimate Turmeric, our Ultimate Shilogy, all the very highest quality super nutrients that do incredible things for your body.
		These sell out quite a bit.
		Because the quality is so high, it's hard to source them.
		But when you are a subscriber to them, it just bills you every month.
		You cancel any time if you want to stop.
		You lock in even better deals and sales on it and prices.
		And then they hold it back for you at the warehouse in Arkansas.
		That way, you always get the Irish Sea Moss, the Shilogy, the Ultimate Turmeric.
		These are amazing.
		Widest selection of patron apparel.
		So much more.
		TheAlexJonesStore.com because we are all in this together.
		And you don't just...
		Get Trump in, and then he fights the lower inflation and fights to bring industry and jobs back.
		We've got to continue to fight in the Infowars because you got off the bench, you voted, you spoke out, you stood up to the bullies, you didn't care what they said, you called them on their mind control bluff, that we're having these victories.
		But you've got to support the epicenters of the fight, and Infowars is one of those, and I can't do it without you.

▲