Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
*music* Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| Welcome to Sunday Night Live here at InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| I, of course, host the morning show, American Journal, each and every weekday morning from 8 to 11 a.m. | ||
| here on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| Very happy to be with you here this Sunday evening to go over just some of the Just insanity that has occurred over this weekend. | ||
| Usually on my weekends, let's just say I'm not Alex Jones or Owen Schroyer. | ||
| They somehow have the stamina and the constitution to just do this day in and day out. | ||
| I need my weekends. | ||
| I just, I'm a weak man. | ||
| And after talking about just the most horrific nonsense you've ever heard for five days in a row, I like to just try as best I can to disconnect over the weekend, have some fun with my family, get some yard work done, not have to worry too much about everything. | ||
| So I was worried this afternoon coming in to do the show. | ||
| I thought I'd need to catch up on the On the news, I need to figure out what's been happening over the last few days. | ||
| I was worried that maybe I wouldn't have enough stories to fill two hours here on InfoWars, but lo and behold, there is more than enough to talk about over the last couple days. | ||
| More than enough videos to show you, more than enough articles to talk about. | ||
| Evil doesn't take the weekends off, I guess, is what we're learning. | ||
| So we've got plenty to talk about here today. | ||
| I was just looking up. | ||
| I mean, in just a couple hours of news gathering, I have something like 90 videos or something. | ||
| I didn't put all the videos in the list. | ||
| Don't worry, crew. | ||
| You're not going to have to go through 90 different videos that I downloaded. | ||
| But it really is incredible how much stuff happens on a daily basis these days. | ||
| And especially when you just try to take it all in, you try to figure out where we are and where we're going. | ||
| Right now, there's food riots in South America. | ||
| Already, Africa is experiencing Famine conditions in certain places as food supplies dry up there. | ||
| This, of course, has been what we've been talking about for months on American Journal and elsewhere on Infowars, telling you that it's not about the destruction of the first world, all of these coincidental food processing plants being burned down or hacked and birds being culled by the millions and supply chains all of these coincidental food processing plants being burned down or hacked and birds being culled by the millions and supply chains being frozen The first world will scrape by. | ||
| We might not have as many brands on offer as before. | ||
| There might not be as much choice as we had before, but we're not going to be going hungry anytime soon. | ||
| The third world, however, is absolutely going to go hungry, and it's going to cause chaos in those nations, which, of course, will justify more action from us here in the first world, more involvement in countries that are going to be the receiving more involvement in countries that are going to be the receiving end of this plot that's been carried And of course that will inspire or again justify massive immigration into the first world countries. | ||
| It's a somewhat complicated but at its base very simple worldwide attack going on right now. | ||
| And so we'll try to lay some of that out. | ||
| I'm going to go to a lot of videos about The ole correspondence dinner. | ||
| Time Magazine correspondent labels freedom of speech a white male obsession. | ||
| And we'll show you lots of videos of Trevor Noah, elitist foreigner, mocking the American people as all of the Democrats and their media cronies laugh along at the destruction and pain that they're causing the average American. | ||
| It's so funny how much more you're having to pay for inflation. | ||
| It's so hilarious how open the border is. | ||
| Isn't it just laugh out loud funny the way that the mainstream media has just entirely stopped having any oversight over the government whatsoever? | ||
| And that previously under Trump, they were fact checking his every utterance and now they just don't even bother to do it anymore. | ||
| They just repeat and proliferate the lies of the Biden administration with complete abandon. | ||
| Isn't that hilarious? | ||
| Aren't we all having a good time? | ||
| So we'll talk about that in just a little bit as well. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Of course, COVID's not going away and the attacks on free speech are coming faster and at a greater clip than ever before. | ||
| There's even a pretty sizable hit piece on yours truly, Greg Reese and Patrick Howley. | ||
| But of course, we are just vectors of attack for an assault on InfoWars. | ||
| This one's by the Daily Beast, which... | ||
| My religious friend said they might as well call it the Daily Baphomet. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right? | |
| When you hear the Daily Beast, just picture a multi-headed winged serpent lying to you, and it's a pretty fair representation of this particular media outlet. | ||
| But of course it frames the things that I've said, and that Greg Reese has said, in the most unfriendly ways possible. | ||
| And of course, our audience is aware of this, perfectly aware of this. | ||
| It's not our audience they're targeting. | ||
| It's all of the people that might think they might want to see what this whole InfoWars thing is all about. | ||
| Yeah, I hear a lot about Alex Jones, but I've never even heard anything from the guy. | ||
| Maybe I'll go check this out. | ||
| Well, they're going to put a stop to that before those thoughts even enter into your head. | ||
| What are you, a racist? | ||
| Don't listen to the guy. | ||
| Don't listen to him. | ||
| He's a racist. | ||
| Trust us. | ||
| We're telling you that he's a racist and we do nothing but tell the truth. | ||
| But of course, the whole thing is an attack on Band.Video. | ||
| The whole article... | ||
| Was again, an attack saying, now that we've kicked Alex Jones off of all of social media, he's created his own platform and that's unacceptable. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Don't like YouTube censorship? | ||
| I guess you gotta go build your own YouTube. | ||
| All right, we did. | ||
| It's called Bandod Video, and you can go there and see just tons of material for free. | ||
| You can stream it. | ||
| Works great. | ||
| You can share the links. | ||
| And they're just like, no, no, you can't do that. | ||
| When we said build your own YouTube, we meant just die. | ||
| When we said build your own YouTube, we meant you should Roll over and die because we hate you. | ||
| We didn't mean actually go build a new YouTube. | ||
| So we went and actually built a new YouTube and now they're very mad about that. | ||
| That's unacceptable. | ||
| Why do you think they're instituting the Disinformation Governance Board? | ||
| It's because their tactics are not strong enough anymore. | ||
| They already have total control of the media outlets. | ||
| They already have total control of the corporate networks that dictate who is and is not allowed on big tech. | ||
| And even when they have all of these weapons arrayed against us firing on full blast at point blank range, they can't get us. | ||
| They can't hurt us. | ||
| They can't stop us from telling the truth to the American people. | ||
| So now they're trying to go Even further, and enact this Disinformation Governance Board, and of course the rumor is going around that it's actually one Barack Hussein Obama that is behind the whole push, and whether he's behind it or not, it's pretty clear from the inside, from some of the rumors that are being reported from the likes of Jack Posobiec, that somebody other than the people in charge is making this happen. | ||
| It's very strange. | ||
| The reporting from Jack Posobiec said neither Kamala Harris nor Alejandro Mayorkas was in favor of the disinformation governance board, and yet it's going through anyway. | ||
| It's kind of strange. | ||
| It's kind of strange being in a country that's supposed to be a constitutional republic. | ||
| We're supposed to have representation. | ||
| We're supposed to have oversight. | ||
| And be able to judge people who rule over us on the decisions that they make. | ||
| It's a little hard to do that when the people making the decisions are shrouded behind a veil of secrecy. | ||
| And the decisions that they're making are openly despised by the vast majority of the American people. | ||
| And yet, they mock us for this. | ||
| And again, we'll show you the videos in just a little bit. | ||
| But more information is coming out about this new Nina Jankowicz woman, who is the The new Czarina. | ||
| The Czarina of Free Speech. | ||
| The Minister of Truth. | ||
| Who is a terrible karaoke singer. | ||
| Who only sings songs about Harry Potter. | ||
| And she's gonna be in charge of disinformation. | ||
| It's a... | ||
| I'll be polite. | ||
| Stupid, stupid world that we live in right now. | ||
| It's incredibly frustrating, but there we are. | ||
| And of course, as they're pushing all of this censorship and, uh, you know, growing the domestic spy agencies in order to report on and investigate the American people, actual political terrorism is taking place. | ||
| And of course, it's coming directly from the left. | ||
| This weekend, there was a Just a normal, everyday political rally. | ||
| You had a conservative candidate in, I believe it was Portland, Oregon, trying to go and spread his message, doing a little on-the-ground campaigning, boots on the ground, kissing babies, shaking hands, handing out flyers, talking to the people. | ||
| And of course, this is a hate crime in our modern world. | ||
| And Antifa swiftly descended on that gathering to commit violence and vandalism. | ||
| And this is the world that we live in now. | ||
| You think we're very far from it being an official position that you're not allowed to support Republicans or conservatives? | ||
| We're really not that far from it. | ||
| Another image that went viral over this weekend, and if the crew wants to look for it, I think Wittgenstein tweeted it out on Twitter, but it is a picture that's simply titled Children's Section, and it is the children's section of a bookstore. | ||
| And I actually had this exact experience this weekend going out to lunch, and there looked to be a cute little bookstore right next to the place that we ate lunch, so we thought we'll go over there and peruse around a little bit. | ||
| And it's this weird experience because it didn't advertise itself as some sort of religious bookstore, right? | ||
| They're conservative, they're Christian bookstores, right? | ||
| You know, Christian Science Reading Room or whatever, you know, here's a, it's a Christian bookstore and you walk in and all the books are by Christians and it's a lot about, you know, Christianity from different perspectives and you think, okay, this is a Christian bookstore. | ||
| If you walked into just a normal bookstore that was just like, oh, it's just, you know, Judy's books and you walk in and every book Was about Christianity and every book was by Christians. | ||
| You go. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I thought this was just a regular bookstore. | ||
| It's not it's a it's a Christian bookstore. | ||
| I see. | ||
| It's a religious bookstore. | ||
| Nothing bad about that, but they're different things just bookstores opened anybody religious bookstores. | ||
| They have a certain message. | ||
| They're trying to put out they only choose books that align with with their beliefs and it's perfectly understandable. | ||
| So it was just a weird experience going into what we thought was a non-denominational normal bookstore and finding out it was actually a satanic enclave of some sort because every single book in that place was a tome of progressive dogma here's the one that was posted by wittgenstein children's section and this is what you see if you go to barnes and noble our audience should do this Go to Barnes & Noble and just take a picture of the children's section. | ||
| Just see what's in there. | ||
| Here you see the children's section. | ||
| It's I Descent, the story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a story of Anthony Fauci, one about Kamala Harris, A Seat at the Table, a story about Nancy Pelosi, Pride, of course, for the little gay kids, some more little gay books down there, some black history books, Life as a Girl. | ||
| Martin Luther King Jr. | ||
| It's just, yeah, she persisted there at the top. | ||
| These are religious books, and this is the thing that people really don't understand, I think. | ||
| I mean, people are kind of starting to get into this point, but what they're pushing with these books, what this mindset is that they are all, you know, coagulated around, is a religion. | ||
| It is a Set of moral beliefs. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They don't say it's a set of moral beliefs. | ||
| They don't say it's a religion. | ||
| They don't say this is a moral framework by which we say, you know, you should live your lives. | ||
| They don't define what that moral framework actually is. | ||
| What they especially don't do is argue for the superiority of that moral framework over any other moral framework. | ||
| They just take it on faith. | ||
| Much like a religion, right? | ||
| They aren't going to argue with you and say, actually, we believe that this is the best way to raise children, or this is the best way to behave because of this, this, this, because, you know, we have insight of this, whether it's a scientific or revelatory nature, whatever the, you know, reasoning would be, they don't even make that argument. | ||
| Instead, they say, this is the new moral framework of the country, and if you question it, you will be silenced. | ||
| And if you go against it, you will be destroyed. | ||
| You have committed blasphemy against our new state religion, which isn't sticking to typical limitations of religion. | ||
| It's being pushed by the schools. | ||
| It's being enforced by the state. | ||
| This is a state religion that now has these state-run enforcement mechanisms and is a Set of moral beliefs that's adhered to by just absolutely everybody in the media and also of course in the literary world. | ||
| But think about this, I can explain to you why My moral framework, I believe, to be superior than any other, right? | ||
| I can tell you that the people in the past were not Christian because they were superstitious, ignorant idiots, right? | ||
| Our grandmothers did not get married and become housewives and, you know, devote their lives to their families because they were somehow superstitious and hoodwinked or You know, some sort of religious extremist that feared they would go to hell if they didn't do exactly this. | ||
| I mean, hell. | ||
| Everybody I know, all of my friends, all of our grandparents, all of our grandmothers have college degrees. | ||
| All of them. | ||
| My wife's grandmother has a college degree. | ||
| My grandmothers had college degrees. | ||
| They all had the opportunity if they wanted to. | ||
| They could have struck out on their own and tried to make it in the business world. | ||
| And if you asked any one of them today, you know, why did you choose to become a homemaker? | ||
| They'd say because it's the best life. | ||
| It's the best way to raise a family. | ||
| It's the best way to ensure that your children grow up to be successful and happy and well-adjusted and united people. | ||
| Like, these are the reasonings behind the moral framework, right? | ||
| Is that we have figured out through thousands of years of Testing and changing inputs that the best way to create responsible, happy, unified, joyous, successful, prosperous people is to raise them in a two-family home with the mother around as much as humanly possible. | ||
| Right? | ||
| The parents shouldn't be divorced. | ||
| They should probably not be the same gender. | ||
| Like, all of these things aren't just there because, you know, we're afraid God's gonna punish us if we do things any differently. | ||
| It's because it is the best moral framework. | ||
| It is the most successful. | ||
| It is the most prosperous. | ||
| It's just the best. | ||
| And science has proven that out a thousand times. | ||
| It does it every single day. | ||
| Anything you look at, what's the one common denominator between all these criminals? | ||
| Oh, they all were raised in broken homes. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| I'm, I'm, I'm shocked, right? | ||
| Oh, none of them had good parental figures. | ||
| None of them, you know, were, were raised in the church or anything like that. | ||
| Hmm. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| I'm starting to see a, a theme here. | ||
| But the new moral framework, they aren't, they don't have the data to tell you this, and they're not going to, that this makes That this is the best way to raise children. | ||
| This is the best way to have a happy, successful, prosperous population. | ||
| Because it's not. | ||
| Because it's absolutely the opposite. | ||
| See, their moral framework is the best moral framework to have a population that is bastardized, that is hopeless, that is dependent, that is just degenerate and You know, have mental illness and have to be on drugs and have to, you know, be supported by the state and have to, you know, and they're just constantly miserable. | ||
| They're constantly furious at everybody for some reason. | ||
| Right, so that is the outcome of their moral framework. | ||
| And if you try to point that out, they don't make the argument that actually the other way is true. | ||
| They don't say, well, actually, you see here, when we implemented our policies, everything got better. | ||
| No, everything they implement makes everything worse. | ||
| Every policy they put into place makes everybody more miserable, even the people that they are claiming to help. | ||
| Yeah, this is a perfect representation, right? | ||
| The liberated feminist versus the trad wife. | ||
| Liberated feminist wearing ton of makeup because of her low self-esteem. | ||
| She got a flower tattoo when she was 17 because she was desperate for some sort of, I don't know, individuality. | ||
| Uses fake tanner so dark she looks Mexican. | ||
| Wearing clothing that barely fits, sleeps around to approve her self-esteem, but it only makes her feel worse. | ||
| Chubby from her diet of fast food and microwaved meals, aborted her baby last year, claims she's bisexual but only dated men. | ||
| Works minimum wage job because her gender studies degree didn't get her anywhere. | ||
| Meanwhile, the trad wife loves her natural face and only wears light makeup, natural hair with highlights from the sun, natural tan from her outdoor lifestyle. | ||
| Her husband works to support her staying at home and raising the kids, wears modest and feminine clothing. | ||
| And the thing is, on an individual level, it's the best way for one to be happy and successful is to go with the traditions that have created the most beautiful societies the world has ever seen. | ||
| On an individual level, it's evident that these people, with their misery, man, with just their self-hatred and hatred of everyone around them, And they always feel aggrieved, and they always have some sort of trauma that they're just having to unpack. | ||
| It's not their fault that they have to be on 50 million pills a day. | ||
| It's the Christians, probably. | ||
| It's probably our fault, if I had to guess. | ||
| To go along with the traditions, to be surrounded by a family and a community and a church, and to know that what you're doing is contributing to the greater happiness as a whole. | ||
| It's good on an individual level, but on a societal level, it's necessary. | ||
| On a societal level, you cannot have a society that's run by these psychopaths. | ||
| It doesn't work. | ||
| And you can see everywhere their policies get implemented, everywhere their mindset is codified into law, you have the resultant misery and failure. | ||
| And horror and division and crime and sadness, pathetic inability to, you know, maintain their own subsistence. | ||
| And again, it's the societies, it's the civilizations that were built on Christianity that created the most free, prosperous, happy societies in the world. happy societies in the world. | ||
| And in that society, if you don't want to go along with it, you don't have to. | ||
| If you want to go out and, you know, destroy your own life, you're more than allowed to. | ||
| That's the beauty of our system is that, you know, if you behave within its confines, you're... | ||
| You'll be rewarded to the maximum degree, not by any outside force, but by, you know, an internal success, by an internal satisfaction that you achieve. | ||
| But if you don't want to do that, if you don't want to contribute, we're not going to force you to get married. | ||
| We're not going to force you to have kids. | ||
| We're not going to force you to not get tattoos or force you to, you know, Work hard and get a job or whatever. | ||
| If you want to not do that, you are more than welcome. | ||
| The society that they're creating, you cannot have a family. | ||
| You cannot have sole decision over what your child is taught. | ||
| You can't just have a wife who stays at home. | ||
| You can't do these things. | ||
| They're actively... These things are a threat to their system. | ||
| They see them as a threat. | ||
| They're desperate for the threat. | ||
| And it was funny because there was a little flea market thing going on outside this bookstore. | ||
| And so my wife were walking around and we love, you know, we love little, little trinkets, little crafts, little household goods, household goods you can get. | ||
| And it was just this, you know, pathetic array of, of really kind of subpar art and this sort of stuff. | ||
| But, you know, it's, it's not, you don't have to be super talented to go to these things, but it would be nice to see just a, just a modicum of originality, just a little taste of creativity. | ||
| But that's nowhere to be found. | ||
| Instead, you have like these cross-stitch things. | ||
| And it was so funny. | ||
| One of them was that saying, I'm sure you've heard it if you, you know, watch M4's a lot, but it's, uh, be gay, do crime. | ||
| That's one of their sayings, right? | ||
| I'm sure, I'm sure you all have heard this. | ||
| Be gay, do crime. | ||
| It's like a rallying cry for these people. | ||
| And after we left, you know, my wife and I were just kind of talking about, we're just like, what a, what a pathetic display was on just there. | ||
| And, um, And my wife's like, I didn't get, what is that be gay, do crime thing? | ||
| She's like, what, what does that mean? | ||
| And it's like, no, no, no. | ||
| You don't look any farther into this. | ||
| It doesn't mean anything. | ||
| It means what it says. | ||
| It means be gay, do crime. | ||
| It just means be degenerate, right? | ||
| It just means be a stupid conformist to the, to the modern religion. | ||
| And my wife is like, those people don't do crime. | ||
| No, no, you're right. | ||
| You're right. | ||
| They don't do crime. | ||
| They're all gay. | ||
| Yeah, they all are very apparently gay, but no, none of those people do crime. | ||
| You know, it's like, she's just like, so why would they even have, like, why would you, why would you have that saying in the first place? | ||
| But also why would you have that saying if you aren't actually living? | ||
| this idea and it's just like because they want to do they want to seem edgy they are desperate to think that they are standing up against some you know restrictive overarching power structure that just is the is the old mayor from dirty dancing that just doesn't want the kids to dance like that's who they think they're they have created an entire society behind this identity that is monster slayers that are fighting bigfoot right they're | ||
| They're fighting something that doesn't exist. | ||
| They're fighting a fabrication and a phantom that exist only in their own minds. | ||
| But they are sure that this exists out there somewhere. | ||
| They're sure that Handmaid's Tale is just all... Anybody who's Republican, myself included, we all just are desperate to see You know, women is nothing but breeding factories and children should be taught that, you know, whatever. | ||
| You know, it's just like, none of it's true. | ||
| None of it's real. | ||
| It exists in a phantom. | ||
| And they think that by standing up against this, they're fighting back against some big power structure that doesn't exist. | ||
| And this idea, be gay, do crime. | ||
| These people don't even commit thought crimes. | ||
| These people don't even think things they're not supposed to think. | ||
| They don't say things they're not supposed to say. | ||
| They don't, you know, interact with people they're not supposed to interact to. | ||
| They're the most castrated, neutered, obedient subjects the world has ever seen. | ||
| And part of the trick Is that they tell them, you're a rebel by doing this. | ||
| You're fighting back against the power structure. | ||
| Some billionaire is whispering in their ear, right? | ||
| Some billionaire, worm-tongue, multimedia owner, just like powerhouse, corporate master is just like, yes, do crime. | ||
| We hate that. | ||
| We hate when you do crime. | ||
| That's the worst. | ||
| We don't like that at all. | ||
| Then they call up their friend. | ||
| They're just like, yeah, get us more, get us more federal police. | ||
| Yeah, so long story short, whether you know it or not, whether you recognize it or not, whether you call it what it is or not, we Can really identify the root of so many of the problems that we face today with this new religion. | ||
| This new religion that is now the state religion here in America. | ||
| It is a moral framework that is completely at odds and separate from the moral framework that built this country. | ||
| It is being instituted with the power of the state as well as the sophisticated psychological operations being carried out by corporations and spymasters and their puppets in the media. | ||
| To bring about a population that is incapable of fending for itself. | ||
| It's incapable of hearing opinions it doesn't like to hear. | ||
| It's incapable of, you know, being prosperous and making something that somebody else finds valuable. | ||
| They exist only to serve the power structure. | ||
| They exist only to be a dependent cog in a giant machine that is just eviscerating the human race. | ||
| And they're open about this. | ||
| They talk about how they're doing this, but somehow it doesn't trickle down to the people at the bottom. | ||
| And just like religions in the past, this is a moral framework that's being instituted. | ||
| But unlike the religions in the past, it does not try to justify its existence. | ||
| It does not try to tell you why this moral framework is superior. | ||
| But it will silence you for daring to suggest otherwise. | ||
| For daring to even ask, why would this be superior to the other way? | ||
| They don't tell you why. | ||
| They call you a bigot. | ||
| They call you a racist. | ||
| They call you a homophobe. | ||
| And then they sic the dogs on you. | ||
| Somehow people don't get this. | ||
| They don't get that it's real. | ||
| So this was my rude awakening, going into what I thought was a cute little bookstore. | ||
| Maybe find a kid's book for my son. | ||
| We need a new book. | ||
| He's tired with the ones that he has. | ||
| And go in there and it's just the anti-racist baby, you know? | ||
| Jin has two mommies. | ||
| You want to read that book? | ||
| That'd be great. | ||
| That'd be wonderful. | ||
| Again, they don't say this is a religious bookstore. | ||
| They don't say this is a bookstore of our new materialist religion. | ||
| They think they're normal. | ||
| They think this is totally fine and not weird at all. | ||
| And just sort of shows the boiling of the frog approach really works. | ||
| I think if you were to take somebody from the 90s and show them a children's section of the bookstore filled with fawning, cultish celebrations of modern political Uh, like politicians, like office holders, they would recognize immediately how cultish and weird it is. | ||
| That's why for the last 40 years or so, this mindset and this religion has been slowly but surely injected into our society to the point now that it has total control and is being enforced by the state. | ||
| And people don't even realize they're in a cult. | ||
| They don't even realize they're acting like a religion. | ||
| They refuse to accept that what they're doing is not It's just normal. | ||
| I just buy a kid's book. | ||
| This one's about how Fauci is a superhero. | ||
| Yeah, that's really weird, and I would wish you would understand that. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Thanks so much for being here with us on this Sunday afternoon. | ||
| Mayday, mayday! | ||
| Mayday! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mayday! | |
| The world's been taken over by psychopaths! | ||
| Mayday! | ||
| They're mocking us! | ||
| Right in our faces about what they're doing to us. | ||
| The call has gone out. | ||
| Yes, it is Mayday. | ||
| And we're very happy that you're here. | ||
| I hope that you support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com so we can get an incredible selection of anything from our self-mints to our t-shirts to the beautiful new gold bars, which I understand have shockingly enough not sold out yet. | ||
| So make sure to go to InfoWarsStore.com just as soon as you possibly can to keep this program on the air. | ||
| As you know, and I don't know if it has to do with the fact of we're getting up on the midterms, but the assault is on. | ||
| The assault against free speech has been launched on just a myriad of different Front, just think about this, in the last few months, just since January of this year, just run through it off memory if we can. | ||
| First, we started the year with the Joe Rogan Fatwa. | ||
| And I think that's the way you need to understand these things, as fatwas, right? | ||
| As religious dictates to go and destroy an enemy of the faith. | ||
| We start out with the Joe Rogan fatwa. | ||
| People trying to get him cancelled. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Dr. Robert Malone went on his program and talked about mass formation psychosis. | ||
| There's no such thing as mass formation psychosis. | ||
| Every media outlet in America shouts at exactly the same time and exactly the same words. | ||
| Yeah, really proven us wrong. | ||
| So we began with the Joe Rogan fatwa. | ||
| Of course, we moved on to the Omicron variant. | ||
| That was a little distracting for a little while. | ||
| I was just going over all these stories over the last several months, since the beginning of this year, and you see this path. | ||
| But just in the last couple weeks, even, of course, you have early on in this year, the government coming out and saying that disinformation would now be in their purview. | ||
| That would be something that the government would be getting concerned with. | ||
| You also saw the obvious evolution. | ||
| I think we may have fallen for a trick on this one. | ||
| Because remember, the Biden administration got together with a bunch of TikTok kids to talk about the vaccine. | ||
| And we just sort of mocked it. | ||
| We just sort of laughed at it. | ||
| Because obviously the thing that came out of it was that weird looking dude with long nails talking to Saki on the phone. | ||
| And it was just like a meme. | ||
| It was just a weird, you've got a weird cross-dressing flamboyant child running around the White House telling people to get injected with an experimental gene vaccine. | ||
| It was just too much for us to understand what they were doing, what they were setting up. | ||
| We didn't realize, you know, the precedent they were setting. | ||
| Yeah, this one, right? | ||
| We all just laughed at the ridiculousness of it. | ||
| Because, you know, it's just kind of ridiculous and really what we should have been focusing on was the fact that the White House, the Biden administration, was gathering together influencers who have a specifically young and impressionable audience and getting them to all fall in line and promote the same propaganda. | ||
| Maybe we should have stood up to it then because it wasn't six months later In March of this year, that many of those same TikTokers were summoned to the office, not this time to talk about the vaccine and the safety of vaccine and pushing to get people's health. | ||
| It was this time to make sure they were all coordinated in their war propaganda. | ||
| This time it was to talk about the war in Ukraine and to push War to their young impressionable audiences. | ||
| I think we may have fallen for the distraction. | ||
| They make this ridiculous comedy sketch with this flamboyant idiot and we all mock that for a little while not realizing that what they were doing was setting up a precedent to where the White House was hand in glove with popular influencers of children in order to push their narrative and how quickly and how easily and how seamlessly it flipped from vaccine promotion to war propaganda. | ||
| I see this as another attack on free speech. | ||
| Of course you have the Disinformation Governance Board. | ||
| That's the latest attack. | ||
| But at the same time you have that attack going on. | ||
| You have the lawsuits targeting Alex Jones. | ||
| You have investigations continuing into the likes of Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr. | ||
| In New York City with, or New York State, with Letitia James investigating them. | ||
| Elon Musk tried to buy Twitter and was prevented from doing it for a short while by BlackRock and Vanguard. | ||
| And now, of course, that he has bought Twitter, you're seeing, I think it was Vanity Fair and New York Times both announced they were launching a documentary investigation into Elon Musk. | ||
| Yeah, Jeff Bezos came out to talk about this and You know, I'm sure his companies are going to face the full brunt of his failure to adhere to the ESG. | ||
| His score will plummet. | ||
| That's just a modest collection of the attacks on free speech. | ||
| Same time you have Marjorie Taylor Greene being brought into a Show trial in order to grill her about her Facebook likes. | ||
| Madison Cawthorn also under investigation now because he revealed the secret that there are a bunch of creepy drug orgies going on with congressmen. | ||
| They frame it as insider trading. | ||
| Of course, they don't go after Nancy Pelosi or anybody else who's made hundreds of millions of dollars for being in public office for decades on end. | ||
| No, they go after Madison Cawthorn for supposedly pumping some Bitcoin or something? | ||
| No, it's ridiculous. | ||
| What it is, is an attack on free speech. | ||
| What it is, is a signal to everybody else, saying if you want there to be, if you want to have political representation, better keep your mouth shut. | ||
| If you don't want to be subject to investigations, trials, and be forced to testify, better just not say what you're thinking on Twitter. | ||
| Don't like that post on Facebook. | ||
| Just silence yourself, then we won't have to get involved. | ||
| It's a message to absolutely everybody. | ||
| Again, just a modest question. | ||
| Then you have libs of TikTok. | ||
| As long as we're still talking about attacks on free speech. | ||
| The doxing of an anonymous Twitter account in an attempt to encourage violence against her. | ||
| This weekend you had, again, a conservative politician trying to campaign in downtown Portland only to be attacked by Antifa and have their event shut down with paint bombs and vandalism and assault. | ||
| So it's a full-on attack against the First Amendment. | ||
| Now they're launching attacks against Bandod video. | ||
| They kicked us off social media. | ||
| That's not enough. | ||
| They want us silenced for good. | ||
| This is the fight of our lives. | ||
| This is the fight of our country's life. | ||
| Whether we have even performative motions towards being a free country anymore is uh is very swiftly going away but i'll stop talking about that just make sure to go to infowarsstore.com to support us because we are fighting the the war for free speech | ||
| we have shown by example the method by which we can defeat these people that we can continue to have free speech that we can continue to speak for ourselves and it's by setting up something like infowarsstore so that american people can support us whether the powers that be want them to or not so infowarsstore is the engine that keeps this battleship running and this battleship has proven over decades to be the most effective influential important and dangerous threat to the new world order that the world has ever seen | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com right now. | ||
| Support us. | ||
| Help to do your part to fight back in this war against the First Amendment. | ||
| And while you're at it, improve your own health, improve your own life. | ||
| Take some of our supplements and find out what they do for you. | ||
| Survival Shield X2 is one of those supplements where people call in almost every day on American Journal with some new thing that Survival Shield X2 has done for them. | ||
| I'm not a doctor. | ||
| I'm not telling you this will certainly happen to you. | ||
| But I've had people tell me that X2, they start taking it, now they sleep an hour or less every night. | ||
| Other people say they've had a chronic rash for years and years, only to have it completely disappear almost overnight with X2. | ||
| Again, I don't know what your results are going to be with X2. | ||
| All I know is that if you have some sort of iodine deficiency, and you don't know it, and suddenly you start supplementing with iodine, and you start overcoming that deficiency, you have no idea what the effects will be on your own life. | ||
| The only way to find out is to try. | ||
| So go to InfoWarsTore.com right now. | ||
| Get your bottle of Survival Shield X2. | ||
| It is back in stock and it's 25% off. | ||
| So try it out now. | ||
| See what wondrous and, dare I say it, miraculous things will come from your supplementing of iodine. | ||
| Now let's go to some videos, shall we? | ||
| Yesterday was the correspondence dinner at the White House where they Even just the idea of the Correspondents' Dinner. | ||
| The reason the Correspondents' Dinner exists is because the media is supposed to have an adversarial relationship with the President. | ||
| You get that, right? | ||
| It's supposed to be that for a year, these two factions kind of go head-to-head. | ||
| The White House is trying to get away with stuff. | ||
| The press is trying to uncover it. | ||
| It could sort of get bad, but you don't want them being at each other's throats. | ||
| You want there to be a friendly sort of competition between them. | ||
| And the correspondence dinner was kind of a thing saying, look, even though we're sort of cutthroat with each other most of the year, we're going to have one day where we're going to come together, kind of kind of jive each other, kind of poke each other in the ribs, say, it's all for a good laugh. | ||
| We all believe in the same thing at the end of the day. | ||
| So, you know, no hard feelings, see on the field tomorrow, right? | ||
| It's supposed to be sort of a sportsmanlike type thing. | ||
| Then you had the Trump presidency where the media was just vicious and ruthless and hateful and bigoted and despicable, like their behavior was unacceptable. | ||
| And then it's like, we're not gonna have a dinner for you people. | ||
| You people lie continuously. | ||
| You people are fomenting chaos and rebellion throughout the country. | ||
| You are just the most despicably dishonest, hateful, fearmongers the world has ever seen. | ||
| No, we're not gonna hold a dinner for you. | ||
| No, we're not gonna pat each other on the back and pretend like this is all in good fun. | ||
| You're out for our blood and we get it now. | ||
| That's a bit of a change. | ||
| Bit of a change from the previous years. | ||
| But now that we're back to normal, we get to see how far the Correspondent Center has fallen. | ||
| What a gigantic failure the concept of free speech has been in this country. | ||
| Because instead, what you have now is two people on the same team, the team that's arrayed against the American people, patting each other on the back, Wink and a nod, smiling with each other, going, isn't it good to be back on top? | ||
| Isn't it good to be back in charge? | ||
| Isn't it good that we have total control, once again, over the methods of information? | ||
| Isn't this fun? | ||
| So now what we're seeing is not some sort of fun, light-hearted, you know, interaction by two factions that are typically a little bit, there's a little bit of friction between them. | ||
| Now it's just a full-on Celebration. | ||
| Just a full-on orgy of tyranny. | ||
| They're just coming together and having a big laugh about the way that they're ruining Americans' lives, that everybody hates them, and that there's nothing we can do about it. | ||
| It's very fun, isn't it? | ||
| Such a fun, light-hearted event they have there. | ||
| So let's go to first the probably most popular clip from the whole ordeal. | ||
| Clip number 14. | ||
| It's Biden and the rest of the elitist cohort Laughing uproariously at the fact that Americans can no longer afford to buy basic necessities. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think ever since you've come into office, things are really looking up. | |
| You know, gas is up, rent is up, food is up. | ||
| Everything. | ||
| No, it really has been a tough first year for you, Mr. President. | ||
| I can't afford to go on vacation this year. | ||
| I had to move my son to a worse school because tuition is too much now. | ||
| I can't afford to go on a road trip to see my grandmother. | ||
| She might die soon. | ||
| So isn't it hilarious? | ||
| Isn't it so funny, all of these sacrifices that we're making? | ||
| Isn't it hilarious? | ||
| Joe Biden thinks it's just hilarious. | ||
| Everything's gone up. | ||
| The average family is spending over $5,000 a year just on inflation. | ||
| Isn't that funny? | ||
| Isn't that hilarious? | ||
| Gosh, it's just, I'm glad we're all having such a good time here. | ||
| Of course, Trevor Noah, this South African propagandist, had a little bit of criticisms to say about the media, but let's dig into what exactly he's saying here. | ||
| We'll go to clip number 12. | ||
| Here's Trevor Noah, just, again, in just the most | ||
| Sort of oblique and condescending way, just mocking the American people and celebrating the fact that the Biden administration is working hand in hand with the media establishment to cover up all of their misdeeds and to focus all of their ire and their fury and their investigations on those who are not currently in power. | ||
| It's a complete abdication of the responsibility of the press, but They're getting away with it and they think it's hilarious. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number 12. | ||
|
unidentified
|
President Biden came into office and he's done well and he's done badly and in this room I know there's a lot of mixed reviews you know there was a lot of talk about how the president really respects the press but what has he really done for you guys huh? | |
| Think of all the journalists whose careers have been hurt by the Biden presidency. | ||
| People like Daniel Dale. | ||
| He used to be CNN star fact checker on TV every day but now There's barely anything to check. | ||
| Same for Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post. | ||
| On the way here, I saw him on the street offering four Pinocchios for a dollar. | ||
| Mr. President, that's on you. | ||
| And what about Maggie Haberman? | ||
| For four years, it was exclusives. | ||
| Huh? | ||
| On the Russia investigation, corruption. | ||
| The President doesn't read his daily briefings. | ||
| On and on. | ||
| Now look at her! | ||
| She spends all day fighting with random people on Twitter like a common political reporter. | ||
| You've ruined her, Mr. President. | ||
| Now, of course, of course, President Biden doesn't often have to deal with the media directly. | ||
| Yes, that task falls to Press Secretary Jen Psaki. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Glad you could make it tonight. | ||
| Really glad you could make it tonight, Jen. | ||
| It's nice that you're willing to come over here and risk getting COVID for like, what, the 10th time now? | ||
| Let me ask, how do you keep getting COVID, Jen? | ||
| Like, your boss hooked us all up with free tips. | ||
| Does he not have your address? | ||
| What's going on there? | ||
| The word on the streets is actually that Jen Psyche is going to MSNBC next month. | ||
| Yeah? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, apparently just being on C-SPAN the ratings were too high and she wanted more of a challenge, you know? | ||
| Wanted to switch things up. | ||
| She can't laugh at that. | ||
| Don't put the camera on her. | ||
| If it's true, congratulations to Jen on your big career change. | ||
| But you know, moving to MSNBC is going to be a big switch up for you, because right now your current job is to make the Biden administration look as good as possible, you know, at all costs. | ||
| Now you're going to be at MSNBC and you're going to have to... You'll be fine, actually. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| I don't even know why I... I apologize. | ||
| By the way, MSNBC, can I just say you guys are doing great work? | ||
| I love watching your shows. | ||
| When Trump was in office, your shows were all about how bad he was. | ||
| And now that Biden's in office, your shows are all about how bad Trump was. | ||
| I'm sure that was the punchline. | ||
| I don't know, but we're not breaking new ground here, are we? | ||
| Everything is as predictable as it is stale. | ||
| It's kind of interesting, the things that he was saying there, wasn't it? | ||
| It's so funny that they used to fact-check everything, and now they don't. | ||
| Now they don't do that. | ||
| So, yeah, it's so funny. | ||
| It's so funny how the media used to just ruthlessly find the least favorable interpretation of anything Trump said and try to weave that into an overarching narrative about how he is evil incarnate. | ||
| And now they don't even pay attention. | ||
| They don't even fact check. | ||
| No, they take what the Biden administration tells them and they print it. | ||
| And then they tell anybody who's questioning it that you're dangerous. | ||
| What has Biden done for the press? | ||
| Well, he did create the Disinformation Governance Board. | ||
| So, you know, now you'll have less competition to worry about. | ||
| You know, they have spearheaded the destruction of any media that is not completely in the pocket of the state. | ||
| So, you know, they've sort of helped out there. | ||
| Of course, that media correspondence dinner, it couldn't have been the big celebration that they were acting like it was, could they, with the failure of CNN+, with all just the stuff that CNN's gone through this year, with just the numerous sex crime allegations, and the president's being forced out, and the failure of CNN+, that burned through tens of millions of dollars in barely three weeks' time, and got less views than some sort of TikTok with a cat would get, right? | ||
| Full-on humiliation. | ||
| This was them taking it back, taking back the spotlight and saying, actually, we're great. | ||
| We all agree. | ||
| We all agree that we're awesome. | ||
| And we're the ones who tell everybody else what to think. | ||
| So it's all great. | ||
| But of course, you know, it's a big joke that these fact-checking organizations just don't even fact-check Joe Biden. | ||
| Sort of horrific. | ||
| And on the topic of the disinformation governance board, You would think that the media would at least put up like a show of opposing this, right? | ||
| You would think they would want to make it look like they were still doing their job. | ||
| The job of the media is to expose the lies of the government. | ||
| It's supposed to be there to hold them in check, to tell you when they're doing something illegal or Unethical or immoral. | ||
| The media is supposed to be there to let the people know, so then the people can take that into account when they go vote. | ||
| I mean, that's the way our process is supposed to work. | ||
| But it doesn't really work that way anymore. | ||
| And you would think that the media would be ashamed of this. | ||
| You'd think they would come out and say, how dare you, government? | ||
| How dare you try to have oversight over what we print? | ||
| How dare you start to even mention the word disinformation? | ||
| Do you have any idea You are undermining the very foundations of our entire society and you are opening a Pandora's box so earth shatteringly dangerous that we will not let it happen. | ||
| You'd think at least they'd put that show on and then like a month from now go, well, we've, we've gotten assurances from the government that this isn't what's happening. | ||
| So, so we're on board now, but they don't even bother to do that anymore. | ||
| The government says we're creating a disinformation board. | ||
| Mainstream media says, good, you should make sure it goes farther. | ||
| Make sure you're punishing these people fully. | ||
| But continuing on with this clip that we just saw. | ||
| Again, just the irony. | ||
| It's just saturated in this cultish detachment of reality. | ||
| Detachment from reality. | ||
| He's like Maggie Haberman. | ||
| When Trump was in office, every day it was scoops, it was investigations. | ||
| What does he say to references? | ||
| The Russia investigation and corruption. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| She was telling lies. | ||
| Yeah, she was lying about that. | ||
| Yeah, she was spreading a false narrative that didn't actually exist. | ||
| The Trump-Russia collusion. | ||
| Like, it's, I just don't get it. | ||
| I just don't get how these people are clearly aware of things, right? | ||
| Like, they know that the Russia investigation is over now, and they know that it came up completely and totally empty, right? | ||
| They know that, they're aware of that, and yet they still bring that up as an example of the powerful work that the media was doing when Trump was in office? | ||
| It's just wild. | ||
| It's just wild the way these people act. | ||
| And then, of course, he makes jokes about Psaki being on MSNBC. | ||
| And, of course, he references the fact that MSNBC's job is to make Biden look as good as possible, which is a bit of a worry there, a bit of a stretch. | ||
| Anybody think it's weird that the press secretary is already accepted a job to MSNBC months before she's going to leave the office? | ||
| Isn't that a little bit weird? | ||
| But no, it's just what we're seeing with these videos from the press correspondence dinner there at the White House is they think they've won. | ||
| That's really the overarching feeling I got. | ||
| They think they've won. | ||
| They think There's nothing these people can do to us. | ||
| There's nothing they can do to stop us. | ||
| We, in the media, and we in the government, are working hand-in-hand to once again re-establish our control over the narrative, silence anybody that disagrees with us, cause immense suffering and pain to the regular American people in a myriad of different ways, and then we'll get together and laugh about it, mock them, and act like it's no big deal. | ||
| As I've said many, many times, the two arms of the beast are the government to screw you over and the media to tell you that it's not happening. | ||
| And that's what we saw on display there at the Correspondence Center, and them laughing uproariously, knowing full well what they're doing, and really thinking it's hilarious. | ||
| We'll show another video from Trevor Noah and then get into what Joe Biden was saying on the other side. | ||
| But I think we have time. | ||
| How long is clip 13, y'all? | ||
| I think we have time to play this. | ||
| All right, yeah, it's super short. | ||
| So here's just an illustration of exactly what I'm talking about. | ||
| Joe Biden in the media, the Democrats, the federal government in the media, just laughing about how hated they are. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I'm really excited to be here tonight with the only group of Americans with a lower approver rating than I have. | ||
| They hate us. | ||
| They all hate us so much. | ||
| Nobody likes us. | ||
| Nobody wants us to be in charge, but we are. | ||
| Isn't that hilarious? | ||
| Isn't it so funny that we are despised by the American people? | ||
| That even though we continuously have control over their every method of information gathering and we pump nothing but positive stuff out about one another and yet they still hate us. | ||
| Isn't that crazy? | ||
| Isn't that so funny? | ||
| Isn't it so hilarious that We are openly despised by the vast majority of Americans. | ||
| I think Congress has even a lower approval rating than the executive or the mainstream media. | ||
| But it doesn't matter because they're in charge now. | ||
| Because they have control. | ||
| Because they're not going anywhere. | ||
| They've neutered us. | ||
| They've destroyed our country. | ||
| They've silenced our voices. | ||
| Now they get up and they laugh about inflation. | ||
| They laugh about the war in Ukraine. | ||
| They laugh about the misery and pain they're causing you. | ||
| And then they laugh at the fact that we all know this, and they don't think there's anything we can do to stop it. | ||
| We're on the other side. | ||
| Stay tuned. | ||
| Alright, welcome back. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, the war on free speech continues and we continue to fight back. | ||
| We're going to go to a few more clips from the White House Correspondence Center. | ||
| There's also a number of very interesting appearances on the Sunday shows today from the likes of Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
| I just want to get to this clip on Naomi Wolf talking about leftist censorship because she really puts it well. | ||
| Let's go back again to Trevor Noah, clip number 11 here, where he again lovingly discusses the beautiful, wonderful, freedom-based Morality that he and his ilk are actively trying to destroy in America. | ||
| I mean that that's all this is right. | ||
| This is this is a lumberjack Telling you how much he loves trees. | ||
| This is an arsonist telling you How much he loves that that new house that you're building, right? | ||
| This is criminal Telling you how important it is that we have police on our streets to keep us all safe it's just bald face manipulation complete laughable hypocrisy as these people who are now open i mean they're not even hiding anymore the disinformation stuff and i mean even the jokes that he's telling before like they know what's They know they're destroying free speech. | ||
| They know they are using these claims, whether it's racism or bigotry or misinformation, whatever these claims are. | ||
| They know they are on a crusade to destroy the First Amendment in this country, and they're mocking you about it. | ||
| They're laughing at it, and they're doing this with complete conviction that you won't do anything to stop them and that you can't stop them. | ||
| But then of course they have to, they have to tack on. | ||
| Well, they just, they love free speech. | ||
| America has free speech and that's so amazing and great and wonderful. | ||
| And we love free speech. | ||
| It's just, your speech is dangerous. | ||
| It's just your ideas make us feel bad. | ||
| So they have to stop. | ||
| So we'll listen to Trevor Noah here. | ||
| Just keep in mind that he's a liar. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Every single one of you. | |
| whether you like it or not, is a bastion of democracy. | ||
| And if you ever begin to doubt your responsibilities, if you ever begin to doubt how meaningful it is, look no further than what's happening in Ukraine. | ||
| Look at what's happening there. | ||
| Journalists are risking and even losing their lives to show the world what's really happening. | ||
| You realize how amazing it is. | ||
| In America, you have the right to seek the truth and speak the truth. | ||
| Unlike in Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Even if it makes people in power uncomfortable. | |
| Even if it makes your viewers or your readers uncomfortable. | ||
| You understand how amazing that is? | ||
| I stood here tonight and I made fun of the President of the United States. | ||
| And I'm going to be fine. | ||
| I'm gonna be fine, right? | ||
| Like, do you really understand what a blessing it is? | ||
| Maybe it's happened for so long that it might slip your mind. | ||
| It's a blessing. | ||
| In fact, ask yourself this question. | ||
| Honestly, ask yourself this question. | ||
| If Russian journalists, who are losing their livelihoods, as you were talking about, Steve, and their freedom for daring to report on what their own government is doing, If they had the freedom to write any words, to show any stories, or to ask any questions, if they had basically what you have, would they be using it in the same way that you do? | ||
| Ask yourself that question every day. | ||
| Because you have one of the most important roles in the world. | ||
| Thank you so much for having me. | ||
| I appreciate you. | ||
| Ugh, be funny, clown. | ||
| Yes, oh good. | ||
| I'm glad that the clown ended his comedy set with a moralizing sermon. | ||
| I think we all feel enlightened by the clown. | ||
| Honk honk. | ||
| The fact that he brings up Ukraine as the example. | ||
| Anybody catch the headline this week that the ghost of Kiev never actually existed? | ||
| Anybody ever? | ||
| Did you hear that? | ||
| Did you hear that one? | ||
| I mean, Ukraine. | ||
| Just replace the word Russia with Ukraine and his comments actually make more sense. | ||
| We don't know what's happening in Ukraine because the Ukrainian government has control over there. | ||
| Information. | ||
| And it's not a democracy. | ||
| No, we're fighting for democracy, according to everybody in that room. | ||
| And democracy means the ability to say whatever you want. | ||
| Ukrainians don't have that. | ||
| But still, we're fighting for democracy. | ||
| I'll show you the video about it, too, if you want to see it. | ||
| Or maybe I didn't put it in there. | ||
| The AP just came out the long video. | ||
| Ukraine admits ghost of Kiev isn't real. | ||
| Oh yeah, gee, I'm so surprised. | ||
| Isn't it funny that everybody in that correspondence center, there's probably some of them wearing shirts that are like, I'm the ghost of Kiev in that room. | ||
| They all believe lies. | ||
| They all spread lies. | ||
| But I'll take that sappy, meaningless diatribe from the clown and respond with two words. | ||
| Julian Assange. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Did he make a Julian Assange joke in that? | ||
| I don't remember. | ||
| Did he bring up Julian Assange in that entire monologue? | ||
| I don't think he did. | ||
| See, if you're at the Correspondence Center and the entire point of your moralizing is to talk about how different America is than these other countries, these other countries, if you expose things that that government doesn't want you to see, they'll throw you in jail. | ||
| They'll do horrible things to you. | ||
| Did he mention Julian Assange? | ||
| I mean, this week, They, you know, decided to extradite Julian Assange. | ||
| Like, new things are happening. | ||
| It's not just bringing up some old story of a journalist who's been hounded nearly to death by the American administration because he exposed truth about what was going on in Iraq. | ||
| Wouldn't that have been a bit of a gut punch to everybody in that room? | ||
| How do you think they would have responded? | ||
| How do you think that room would have responded if, after this sappy, you know, you have such a powerful thing here in America. | ||
| Hang on to that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hold it close. | |
| But don't go too far out of bounds or you'll end up like Julian Assange. | ||
| Think they would have thought that was funny? | ||
| Think they would have booed him off the stage? | ||
| Not one of those outlets. | ||
| Has said word one about Julian Assange to defend him. | ||
| Not one of those people sitting in that room cheering the free speech that America talks about but doesn't actually implement. | ||
| Not one of them has gone out on a limb for Julian Assange. | ||
| Trevor Noah might not actually be okay if he mentioned Julian Assange. | ||
| He might find he's getting into a little bit of trouble when it comes to Julian Assange. | ||
| Julian Assange, I mean, it's just... It's one of the saddest stories of the modern times, right? | ||
| And God only knows what incredible information he could have uncovered in the last 10 years. | ||
| The last 10 years, he's been forced to hide like a criminal. | ||
| Actively, right now, trying to extradite him to America, basically to put him on a show trial and kill him. | ||
| Charge him with treason. | ||
| Give him to a state-appointed judge. | ||
| Maybe he'll just hang himself with toilet paper in his jail cell. | ||
| Maybe that would be the easiest and cleanest way to do it. | ||
| It doesn't matter how fake you make it look. | ||
| Look at Epstein. | ||
| You can just walk up and shoot him in the head and go, yeah, he hung himself. | ||
| What are the American people going to do? | ||
| They've already shown they can get away with this sort of stuff. | ||
| They don't even need to lie to us anymore. | ||
| And it makes it easier for them if we all go along. | ||
| But just the fact that you can go up there and talk about the mistreatment of journalists by other nations and not mention Julian Assange means these people know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They know exactly, you know, the system that they're supporting. | ||
| They know exactly the punishment that will befall them if they dare to go against the agenda And if he had mentioned Julian Assange's name, he would have been booed off the stage by the people there, righteously celebrating their free speech. | ||
| Most despicable, hypocritical, lying bunch of jackals ever gathered in a single place. | ||
| Correspondence center last night. | ||
| Of course, Joe Biden was there, the unifier-in-chief, clip number nine. | ||
| The unifier-in-chief who ran on, I mean, his entire idea was, I'll be the unifier. | ||
| I will bring everyone together on this. | ||
| Of course, that was never even remotely true. | ||
| I was going to say he abandoned that last night, but let's be honest, he's not abandoning anything. | ||
| He was never on that particular ship. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number nine, hear what Joe Biden had to say about old Donald Trump. | ||
| This is the first time the president attended this dinner in six years. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's understandable. | |
| We had a horrible plague, followed by two years of COVID. | ||
| Haha, yeah. | ||
| Yeah, see, conservatives are a plague. | ||
| Donald Trump was a plague. | ||
| I wonder... I wonder if that was the plague they were trying to defeat. | ||
| I mean, after all, we know that the lockdowns and the masking and the mail-in voting didn't do anything to stop COVID. | ||
| Maybe that's not what they were talking about. | ||
| Maybe when they said we need these things to stop the plague, what they meant was that we needed mail-in ballots to stop the plague of Donald Trump. | ||
| Maybe this was their little rhetorical trick they were pulling off. | ||
| Maybe that's what all of these measures saved us from. | ||
| Not COVID. | ||
| They did nothing to stop COVID. | ||
| They, in fact, made COVID a lot worse in a lot of cases. | ||
| Maybe that wasn't the plague that these measures were meant to destroy. | ||
| Maybe the plague, as Joe Biden references, was us, was the American people. | ||
| We're the plague that the lockdowns and the mail-in ballots were instrumental in putting a stop to. | ||
| It's just, it's great. | ||
| It's wonderful. | ||
| I love being ruled by these people who just literally mock us. | ||
| Let's go to clip 10 here. | ||
| President Biden, Ronald Reagan. | ||
| He talks about Ronald Reagan. | ||
| And again, just sort of illustrates maybe a aspect of the story that they weren't meaning to illustrate. | ||
| Let's hear what he says about Ronald Reagan here. | ||
| I'm not worried about the midterms. | ||
| I'm not worried about them. | ||
| We may end up with more partisan gridlock, but I'm confident we can work it out during my remaining six years in the presidency. | ||
| Folks, I'm not really here to roast the GOP. | ||
| That's not my style. | ||
| Besides, there's nothing I can say about the GOP that Kevin McCarthy hasn't already put on tape. | ||
| At the same time, a lot of people say the Republican Party is too extreme, too divisive, too controlled by one person. | ||
| They say it's not your father's Republican Party. | ||
| Ronald Reagan said, Mr. Gorbachev, tear this wall down! | ||
| Today's Republicans say, tear down Mickey Mouse's house! | ||
| And pretty soon they'll be storming Cinderella's castle, you can be sure of it. | ||
| But Republicans seem to support one fellow. | ||
| Some guy named Brandon. | ||
| He's having a really good year! | ||
| Well, I'm kind of happy for her. | ||
| Let me conclude with a serious word. | ||
| Yeah, it's so funny. | ||
| No, it's just that whenever Americans gather in a large enough number, they chant F.U. | ||
| Biden because you're so despised throughout America, is actually what that Let's Go Brandon meme comes from. | ||
| It's because everybody hates you. | ||
| You get that, right? | ||
| It's just like, this Brandon guy's having a good year. | ||
| Yeah, all year, people gather together by the tens of thousands to chant F.U. | ||
| Joe Biden. | ||
| Yeah, it's so funny. | ||
| So funny. | ||
| Again, they're just like, everybody hates us. | ||
| Everybody in America hates us. | ||
| Nobody approves of Joe Biden. | ||
| Nobody approves of the media. | ||
| But here we are laughing at all of them. | ||
| So I guess we win at the end of the day. | ||
| Hilarious. | ||
| And of course, two references, Kevin McCarthy and the leaked tapes. | ||
| What exactly happened with that again? | ||
| What was that? | ||
| It was that the January 6th committee that was impaneled to investigate and punish people for carrying out a peaceful protest against the federal government are being having their personal secretly recorded conversations leaked by the government to the press in order to damage their political opponents. | ||
| You know, it's like if Watergate happened today, they would do it. | ||
| Nixon would be mocking it at the next White House Correspondence Center. | ||
| That's what it would be. | ||
| It's like the stuff that America used to get outraged by is just standard practice now, and they mock you for even caring about that happening. | ||
| So yeah, Kevin McCarthy, leader of the GOP, first of all, clearly, Not exactly the strongest GOP champion, right? | ||
| Disparages Trump just like does everything he can to undermine the GOP from their leadership position and still is groveling and is You know, capitulating as he is to his political enemies, they just ruthlessly are out to destroy everything he's ever built. | ||
| And they secretly record him, and then the committee itself leaks that information to the press, and the press publishes it, and then they laugh about it. | ||
| And they mock you over it. | ||
| It's great. | ||
| It's amazing. | ||
| So funny. | ||
| And of course all of this goes to exactly why they are instituting massive censorship and now have created the disinformation board. | ||
| Before we get to some of those videos from some of the Sunday shows with Mayorkas and others just absolutely freaking out about the fact that Americans can say what they want, let's go to Naomi Wolf. | ||
| We'll go to clip 19 first and just roll it right into clip 18 there. | ||
| Two parts of the same thing. | ||
| This is Naomi Wolf on Tucker Carlson, but I thought I'd play this whole thing because... She just hits the nail on the head. | ||
| I mean, she gets it exactly right. | ||
| She explains exactly why this censorship is necessary for leftists. | ||
| It's not just a choice they're making. | ||
| Their ideas cannot exist in a world where opposing ideas are allowed. | ||
| It cannot exist. | ||
| They're... | ||
| Policies, their mindset, it cannot exist in a world that has opposition. | ||
| Because it crumbles under opposition. | ||
| And so here's Naomi Wolf saying this on Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
| I'm concerned that we're having this conversation in the United States of America. | ||
| It used to be that we all understood that we had a First Amendment. | ||
| It came first because everything else depends on it. | ||
| And you're not supposed to create restrictions or chill speech. | ||
| And the news media used to be the people who understood best that you're supposed to allow space for even unpopular discussion, even controversial discussion. | ||
| I remember that in America, we used to talk about true or untrue. | ||
| Something was either a fact or it was not a fact. | ||
| And what's so Orwellian about this discourse about misinformation and disinformation. | ||
| And I think Jen Psaki even came up with malinformation is that it's not whether it's true or untrue. | ||
| It's whether it's naughty thinking or wrong think. | ||
| And that is un-American. | ||
| That's much more like a CCP-style socialist environment in which you can't go against those in power. | ||
| You can't go against the state. | ||
| And that's a catastrophic situation. | ||
| It's such an insightful point that you just made, because what you're saying is that truth is no longer a defense. | ||
| Well, exactly. | ||
| And, I mean, these people aren't saying, God forbid, someone might say something that's factually inaccurate. | ||
| In which case, in America, we, you know, shine light on that so that factual accuracy can prevail, right? | ||
| Sunlight is the best disinfectant. | ||
| No, that's not what they're saying. | ||
| And listen to how there's this slippery slope they've created. | ||
| They all mention hate speech, right? | ||
| Well, in just the last couple of years, speech that we might not like or that people like us think is, you know, sexist or racist or wrongheaded or homophobic, that's been turned into hate speech. | ||
| And then hate speech has become a slippery slope into white supremacist discourse and thus violence and a threat to democracy. | ||
| So that's all been collapsed and it's been collapsed intentionally so that people will be scared to have open, robust, you know, American conversations where people disagree with each other respectfully or disrespectfully disagree. | ||
| I mean, if you want to see real open debate, all you need to do is go back to the way our founding fathers newspapers used to cover events or the way newspapers covered events into the first half of the 19th century in our country. | ||
| You don't have to be. | ||
| There was so much. | ||
| You know, open debate, name-calling, kinds of discourse that wouldn't even be allowed today, but Jefferson and others understood that that was vitally important in order to keep our democracy safe. | ||
| So it's a very totalitarian thing to say that speech is violence and the left is doing it, and I'm ashamed of that. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's fascinating. | ||
| If you compare the debate over the Iraq War, and I'll admit right out loud I was on the wrong side of that debate, but there was a debate. | ||
| I mean, there was an actual debate. | ||
| Two sides went up against each other and, you know, one prevailed. | ||
| But you don't see any debate whatsoever about the current war that we're involved in. | ||
| You saw really no debate about COVID-19. | ||
| You don't see any real debate about the biggest issues in our country. | ||
| And that's partly the the real danger of these tech companies being the town square and also I would say lockdown intensified that because we were forbidden to gather in town halls or churches or synagogues or in really in the street or in our homes and talk to each other and so we were all driven onto these tech platforms and I run a tech company. | ||
| The kind of censorship you can engage in on a tech platform is very insidious because it can be invisible. | ||
| You can censor censor people by shadow banning or by algorithms or Google just sinking certain results or raising certain others. | ||
| So it's not as visible as a pile of books being burned in a German square in the 1930s. | ||
| And so we don't even know what we don't know on these tech platforms. | ||
| Super scary. | ||
| You become such an important voice on this. | ||
| I really appreciate it. | ||
| Amy Wolfe, thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Yeah, I think she has a nail on the head there. | ||
| And of course, we've talked about this on InfoWars forever. | ||
| Truth not being a defense. | ||
| That's what she started with. | ||
| It's not about truth versus untruth, truth versus falsehoods anymore. | ||
| It's about What you say about that truth, right? | ||
| And this is actually on display in some of the hit pieces that came out this weekend against me and Greg Reese and Patrick Halle and against Tucker Carlson. | ||
| For example, they spent most of the Tucker Carlson hit piece talking about his coverage of replacement migration or white genocide or whatever you want to call it. | ||
| And of course, many people on Twitter pointed to the New York Times' own reporting. | ||
| on what's going on, including one by a woman named Michelle Goldberg, just titled, Yes, We Can Replace Them. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So the fact that it's happening is not up for debate. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| And everybody acknowledges that. | ||
| It just depends on whether you report that information in a positive light or a negative light. | ||
| If you say the population of white America is declining and you cheer, that's not misinformation. | ||
| That's great. | ||
| That's wonderful. | ||
| That's progressive. | ||
| If you say that the white population is declining in America and they don't deserve that, well, Well, you're a white supremacist. | ||
| You're a white nationalist. | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| It was strange, really strange, in the article about me from the Daily Beast, or that I was featured in, I guess I should say, he actually contradicts himself in the same sentence where he talks about my coverage of the 1965 Immigration Act. | ||
| And I said that the point of that act was to open America, open the floodgates basically to the third world, and to massively change the racial makeup of America in the ensuing years. | ||
| And I was very objectionable. | ||
| I was a racist for saying that. | ||
| But in that same article, or that same paragraph, in the same line even, the author says, the point of the 1965 Legislation was specifically racial and it was to change the racial makeup of America. | ||
| So when I say it's disinformation, when they say it, it's not disinformation. | ||
| That's a very, very important thing to understand. | ||
| That's not about what's true. | ||
| It's not about what's false. | ||
| And again, this came out years ago. | ||
| Like this has been the way it's been for a long time. | ||
| This is not a new development. | ||
| I'm glad Fox News is talking about this now. | ||
| We've been talking about it on InfoWars for a very long time. | ||
| If something can be true and also be hate speech, then hate speech is hugely dangerous. | ||
| And lots of things are. | ||
| Lots of things are true and also considered hate speech. | ||
| Because what they do is they take what you say and they extrapolate it. | ||
| Extrapolate it out way far. | ||
| You want to find the actual Thing that I say, go down a little bit, a little bit more. | ||
| Great Replacement, White Supremacist Conspiracy Theory, 1965 Immigration Act, which revoked explicit racial quotas from the U.S. | ||
| immigration policy, saying that it made the U.S. | ||
| into a jumping ground for the third world. | ||
| Yeah, I stand by literally everything I said in this article. | ||
| It's just they phrase it completely, ridiculously backwards. | ||
| I'm not going to spend time on this article because I'm going to do it tomorrow on American Journal. | ||
| I'm going to go line by line and talk about exactly what was actually happening. | ||
| I won't go into it. | ||
| I won't get into it. | ||
| I could. | ||
| Oh boy, am I going to. | ||
| But I'll say you'll have to watch. | ||
| You'll have to watch tomorrow morning on American Journal. | ||
| 8 a.m. | ||
| Central Time. | ||
| Infowars.com. | ||
| Bandai Video. | ||
| And I'll do it. | ||
| I'll spend all the time I need to talk about that particular hit piece. | ||
| But again, let's get into why this is happening. | ||
| Let's go to number 15, NBC's Chuck Todd, talking about why right now all of this, all these attacks against the First Amendment are taking place. | ||
| Chuck? | ||
| Taking a look at election results over the past few decades, it shows us a flashing warning sign for Democrats, as the nation's urban-rural divide has deepened. | ||
| Democrats have increasingly lost support in rural America. | ||
| In 1996, then-President Clinton, he won a whopping 1,117 counties, rural counties, including all but 20 of Iowa's 99 counties. | ||
| Basically, he won half of the nation's rural counties. | ||
| But in 2008, Barack Obama won less than half of that. | ||
| Just 455 rural counties. | ||
| Even though he had won a popular vote by 7 points nationwide. | ||
| That's all the rural counties he could win. | ||
| Fast forward to 2020, the numbers shrunk again. | ||
| Joe Biden won just 194 counties. | ||
| That's just 17% of the total that Bill Clinton won in 1996. | ||
| And the latest NBC News polling shows you that the problem has not gone away. | ||
| It's gotten worse. | ||
| Trust me, Terry McAuliffe in Virginia knows this. | ||
| Yes, Democrats have an advantage in the urban areas. | ||
| 24 points on the generic congressional ballot. | ||
| But as you move out geographically, the Democratic numbers shrink and the Yeah, if you want to know why the Dems are desperate to do all sorts of stuff, they're desperate to get censorship enacted, obviously. | ||
| So, you know, you can't have outlets like Infowars telling rural Americans exactly What's being done to them, the attacks that they're under on a continual basis, you gotta get censorship to get that enacted. | ||
| You also, they're very desperate to enact some sort of student loan program. | ||
| They get rid of your student loans. | ||
| Just open bribery. | ||
| They're just openly bribing people for votes at this point. | ||
| And now you'll even see articles talking about all of the great things the Democrats have done for the rural communities. | ||
| So they'll probably do something else, right? | ||
| Probably in the next six months we'll have some, you know, rural support bill where they will again just try to bribe farmers and go, yes, we despise you. | ||
| We hate your way of life. | ||
| We are actively working to destroy your ability to even produce the food that your family produces anymore. | ||
| We're selling your land out to China or to Bill Gates and we're replacing you with robots. | ||
| We're teaching your children to cross-dress and to lie to you about it. | ||
| We have very open and evident disdain for your religion, your family, your race, your way of life, and your country, but how about a thousand bucks? | ||
| How about we give you a thousand bucks? | ||
| Will you vote for us then? | ||
| That's basically the argument the Democrats are making. | ||
| We'll see how well that works. | ||
| But they're going just the bribery route to try to make up some of the massive collapse that they've experienced over the last Two years as they get everything that they want and everything gets worse. | ||
| And they enact all of the policies that they think they need and everyone suffers. | ||
| Maybe the American people can actually recognize this pattern and not be so greedy and easily swayed that, you know, $10,000 off your debt convince you to cast a vote for Satan himself and the full destruction of your entire country. off your debt convince you to cast a vote for Hopefully people recognize that and can fight back against it. | ||
| Like I said, they're getting desperate. | ||
| One thing we know about the globalists is they don't just give up. | ||
| They don't recognize defeat and say, oh, we'll get them next time. | ||
| When things start looking bad for them, that means things are about to get really bad for you. | ||
| And it's the type of thing where, I mean, this is their platform, right? | ||
| Their platform is one of deconstruction. | ||
| Their platform is one of dismantling. | ||
| It's an oppositionary, reactionary faction that says everything that is bad in your life is the fault of old white Christian men, and so you have to vote for us to make them better. | ||
| And so the worse things get, the stronger that argument becomes. | ||
| They have no meaningful desire to make the life of American people better. | ||
| The worse their lives are, the more votes Democrats get. | ||
| So we're in this cyclical loop until we can realize it and break the hell out of it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back. | |
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is Sunday Night Live on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| Please do share these links. | ||
| Go to InfoWarsStore.com to support everything that we do here, including these Sunday shows, which do require still a sizable crew to run. | ||
| And all this, of course, is provided by you, the American people, by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And Boy, now is the time, isn't it? | ||
| Now is the time to stand up against what is coming. | ||
| They're not hiding it anymore. | ||
| They're not being coy about it. | ||
| They're not even trying to couch it in language that would make it seem bearable to the American people. | ||
| They think they have so much control at this point over the American people that we're going to be just fine with the idea of the government of the United States having a disinformation governance board. | ||
| Run by the same people that tell you Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, that men can get pregnant and have babies, and that Joe Biden is a coherent and cogent world leader. | ||
| Yes, the ministry of truth is here, folks. | ||
| And Alejandro Mayorkas is going to be the head of it. | ||
| You know, the guy. | ||
| Opening up the southern border to total invasion. | ||
| And he went around the Sunday shows yesterday to talk about this newly formulated ministry of truth. | ||
| But don't worry, he's going to tell you to calm down, relax, because the person they're putting in charge of it is totally neutral and good and fine. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Republicans are criticizing your decision, the administration's decision to choose Nina Jankowicz to lead this disinformation board. | |
| They say she is not somebody who is neutral. | ||
| Your response? | ||
| Eminently qualified. | ||
| A renowned expert in the field of disinformation. | ||
| And neutral? | ||
| Absolutely so. | ||
| Now, you're going to have to tune in tomorrow because I wasn't able to compile all of it for this show. | ||
| Oh boys, there's a lot of information coming out about ol' Nina. | ||
| Ol' big sister over there. | ||
| Boy is she dumb as a rock and just believes all sorts of outrageous lies and spreads them and has said all sorts of horrific stuff about Donald Trump and his supporters and just, just the worst. | ||
| Don't you love the way this is framed? | ||
| First of all, the question that is asked is, Republicans are criticizing. | ||
| As if this is a partisan issue. | ||
| As if the idea that the United States government would have a disinformation board in the DHS, Department of Homeland Security, I'm not sure who pointed it out, I think it was a congressperson pointed it out, that, like, you don't put this with the Department of Homeland Security unless you have enforcement mechanisms that you need department resources to facilitate. | ||
| Wasn't in the FCC, right? | ||
| Wasn't part of Some other government outlet that already has some sort of oversight over communications know it's under Department of Homeland Security. | ||
| Because see, if you don't go along with the government, you're a terrorist. | ||
| You have to be destroyed. | ||
| But isn't it amazing? | ||
| First of all, that they frame this as a partisan point, which it shouldn't be. | ||
| Maybe it is, but it damn well shouldn't be. | ||
| But then they act like what the criticism is, is that the person in charge is not neutral. | ||
| Well, obviously she's not neutral. | ||
| That's obvious. | ||
| That's not the issue. | ||
| The issue is that it exists in the first place. | ||
| It's like, well, they're, you know, they're, they're worried you're going to mow them down with a machine gun. | ||
| Can you guarantee us that the person operating the machine gun is licensed to do it? | ||
| Oh yes, he's a very qualified machine gun operator. | ||
| He's the best of the best of machine gun operation. | ||
| Oh well good, then I'm satisfied now. | ||
| Yes, we're going to murder you. | ||
| We're going to eviscerate you. | ||
| We're going to skin you alive and leave you gasping for air until you die on the floor. | ||
| But don't worry. | ||
| The surgeon that we've hired to skin you alive is just top in his class. | ||
| He's the best. | ||
| He's Mayo Clinic Surgeon of the Year. | ||
| He does beautiful work. | ||
| So we'll be skinning you alive, but don't worry because very, very capable surgeons are going to carry out this operation. | ||
| It's just amazing. | ||
| I mean, this is the subtlety, right? | ||
| You don't think they're thinking about this? | ||
| If they were honest at all, they would say, people are really kind of mad that you are burning the First Amendment. | ||
| No, it's Republicans are complaining that Nina Jankowicz isn't qualified. | ||
| No. | ||
| No, that's not the issue. | ||
| The issue is that you have Lady Liberty strapped down on a sacrificial table and you're about to cut her heart out. | ||
| That's the issue. | ||
| I don't care who's wielding the knife. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But it's just incredible. | |
| It's just incredible. | ||
| So, because now, of course, they act, right? | ||
| They're like, well, we really held his feet to the fire, right? | ||
| Is she qualified? | ||
| And he's like, of course she is. | ||
| And they're like, okay, good. | ||
| Moving on. | ||
| Oh, good. | ||
| Oh, isn't it great to have an opposition press here? | ||
| Gosh, what would we do without the First Amendment? | ||
| We don't even, it's like, the First Amendment doesn't even exist anymore. | ||
| The press is nothing but an outlet for the criminals. | ||
| So, do away with the First Amendment, it's not gonna affect anything. | ||
| Except for us, except for InfoWars, except for us here on the periphery, actually trying to tell the truth, actually talking about this stuff in, you know, reality. | ||
| It'll, we'll suffer, but for the mainstream media out there, You might as well have the KGB, have the, you know, have the Stasi, whatever the Nazi domestic surveillance people were, like, it wouldn't, it wouldn't matter to them because they don't ever report or even question anything contradictory to the dictates of the, of the masters. | ||
| So everything's going to be normal for them. | ||
| It's going to be totally fine for them. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number three here. | ||
| Days after installing the Minister of Truth, Alejandro Mayorkas was still a little bit iffy on the whole Steele dossier thing. | ||
| Yeah, we just don't know. | ||
| Let's check. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Was the Steele dossier disinformation? | |
| I, it's not for me to, to opine on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
| Uh, yeah, I'm just, I'm just a different disinformation czar. | ||
| I mean, I, I am just, uh, you know, we did just create a whole, uh, branch of the government in order to punish people for spreading disinformation. | ||
| But when it comes to the Steele dossier, gosh, we just don't know. | ||
| We just don't know if it's real or not. | ||
| It's not up to him. | ||
| He appointed the lackey to do that sort of stuff. | ||
| Go ask her. | ||
| I mean, my God. | ||
| Again, do we think he doesn't know about the Steele dossier? | ||
| Do you think that Alejandro Mayorkas, deep in his heart, in the truth of his soul, does he really think the Steele dossier may in a million years possibly have ever been real? | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| He knows the Steele dossier was fake. | ||
| He knows it's been investigated. | ||
| He knows it was funded by the Clintons. | ||
| He knows who fed it to the FBI. | ||
| He knows that the FBI knew it was fake when they used it to launch the FISA court hearings. | ||
| He knows that every minute of the hundreds of thousands of hours that mainstream media devoted to the Steele dossier, they were spreading misinformation. | ||
| They were spreading disinformation. | ||
| They were lying to the American people. | ||
| He knows that full well. | ||
| So the fact that he wouldn't answer that question shows you exactly what this disinformation board is all about. | ||
| And he goes on to say actually that this is not going to be targeted at the American people. | ||
| No, of course not. | ||
| No heavens no. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| So yeah, right. | ||
| This guy cares so much about the American people. | ||
| I mean, he can't tell you whether or not or how many terrorists crossed the southern border under his watch. | ||
| That, when it comes to caring about the American people, that's not his thing. | ||
| That's not his purview. | ||
| I mean, it is. | ||
| It is directly in his purview. | ||
| I mean, it is literally his only job. | ||
| But he doesn't care. | ||
| He doesn't know. | ||
| This was a question asked to him recently by a senator. | ||
| How many domestic terrorists have been in your possession under DHS? | ||
| And where are they now? | ||
| And he's just like, I don't know. | ||
| It's like, I don't know, I just care too much about the American people to find out whether we're letting terrorists into their country. | ||
| I care too much about them. | ||
| I care so much about America that I'm opening the border because I want everybody to be an American. | ||
| That's just how much he loves America. | ||
| He loves America so much, he is selling your country out from under you to everybody else in the world, regardless of whether they even like America or not. | ||
| That's just how much... how American he is. | ||
| It's amazing and admirable. | ||
| Let's go to... | ||
| Clip six here. | ||
| Again, Secretary of Homeland Security. | ||
| Just weirdly enough, I know this is ironic, a little bit hypocritical, but try to bear with me here. | ||
| Lying about the Disinformation Governance Board. | ||
| Yeah, wrap your head around that. | ||
| Here's Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's talk about a different topic, which is what you are calling, your department is calling the Disinformation Governance Board. | |
| You unveiled that this week. | ||
| Republicans are calling it Orwellian and comparing it to the Ministry of Truth in the novel 1984. | ||
| Can you clarify what exactly is this? | ||
| What exactly will this Disinformation Governance Board do? | ||
| Will it monitor American citizens? | ||
| Dan, I'm very pleased to do so. | ||
| It's clear, I mean, those criticisms are precisely the opposite of what this small working group within the Department of Homeland Security will do. | ||
| And I think we probably could have done a better job of communicating what it does and does not do. | ||
| The fact is that disinformation That creates a threat to the security of the homeland is our responsibility to address and this department has been addressing it for years throughout the years of the prior administration and an ongoing basis. | ||
| Disinformation from Russia, China. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We know the problems but it's still not clear to me how this governance board will act. | |
| What will it do? | ||
| So what it does is it works to ensure That the way in which we address threats, the connectivity between threats and acts of violence are addressed without infringing on free speech, protecting civil rights and civil liberties, the right of privacy. | ||
| And the board, this working group, internal working group, will draw from best practices and communicate those best practices to the operators, because the board does not have operational authority. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Will American citizens be monitored? | |
| No. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Guarantee that? | |
| So what we do, we in the Department of Homeland Security don't monitor American citizens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You don't, but will this board change that? | |
| No, no, no. | ||
| The board does not have any operational authority or capability. | ||
| What it will do is gather together best practices in addressing the threat Republicans are criticizing your decision, the administration's decision, to choose Nina Jankowicz to lead this disinformation board. | ||
| They say she is not somebody who is neutral. | ||
| that have been executing in addressing this threat for years. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Republicans are criticizing your decision, the administration's decision, to choose Nina Jankiewicz to lead this disinformation board. | |
| They say she is not somebody who is neutral. | ||
| Your response? | ||
| Eminently qualified, a renowned expert in the field of disinformation. | ||
| And neutral? | ||
| Absolutely so. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would you be okay if Donald Trump were president, if he created this disinformation governance board, or if it is in place and he wins again in 2024, that he's in charge of such a thing? | |
| I believe that this working group that gathers together best practices, makes sure that our work is coordinated, consistent with those best practices, that we're safeguarding the right of free speech, that we're safeguarding civil liberties. | ||
| I think it's an extraordinarily important endeavor. | ||
| That's right, folks. | ||
| The point of the disinformation board is to safeguard free speech. | ||
| I don't know if you heard that right, but the Ministry of Truth is here to tell you That freedom is slavery. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And the disinformation board is there to preserve free speech. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Do we understand this? | ||
| This human worm, this way that he talks, he's got this way of like tilting his head back. | ||
| Just like, yes, we're, we're very proud of what we're doing. | ||
| It's just like, don't you love how, how essentially what he's saying there is that the governance board just not, isn't it. | ||
| They aren't going to do anything. | ||
| They aren't going to have any power, they aren't going to do anything, so let's just get rid of it then. | ||
| I mean, if it's not going to do anything, it's going to gather best practices for the operators, like, does he really think we believe this? | ||
| And it's interesting because, you know, I guess she starts off by saying, here's what the Republicans are saying is happening. | ||
| And his first reaction is that is completely untrue. | ||
| I'd love if she would ask him, is that disinformation? | ||
| If they're saying that the disinformation board is going to damage the First Amendment, wouldn't that be disinformation? | ||
| And if people are saying the disinformation board is an attack on the American people, And that they're attempting to destroy our most basic freedoms in an act of war against us. | ||
| Couldn't that possibly inspire some people to take up arms against the American government? | ||
| And wouldn't that come in the purview of the Department of Homeland Security? | ||
| So isn't that disinformation about the disinformation board? | ||
| Dangerous disinformation that should be under the purview. | ||
| Is it starting to make sense that you're opening a can of worms that you haven't even started to consider the consequences of? | ||
| Of course they know this. | ||
| They know what they're doing. | ||
| They're lying to you. | ||
| They're just bald-faced lying to you. | ||
| Just like how the NSA never surveilled any American people, right? | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| No, never. | ||
| Why would they? | ||
| The amazing thing is, he says the DHS doesn't monitor American citizens. | ||
| They do monitor American citizens. | ||
| The post office even monitors American citizens. | ||
| Remember that story from last year? | ||
| The people that the DHS doesn't monitor are the illegal immigrants they let into this country. | ||
| They're not being monitored. | ||
| It's just incredible. | ||
| And then, of course, he mentions Russian disinformation. | ||
| And of course, we know that Nina Jankiewicz supported and enforced or, you know, helped to push along the statement by 50 intelligence community members that the Hunter Biden laptop was helped to push along the statement by 50 intelligence community members that You know, kind of like how the Pfizer court is there to make sure that nobody ever spies on an American citizen. | ||
| But of course, there's like a three jump rule where if they can connect you to a foreign citizen within, you know, several connections, well, then they can monitor you, obviously. - Okay. | ||
| This is the world that we live in now. | ||
| So even if, you know, it's discovered, like, this is how this will go, right? | ||
| The left is going to push this forward. | ||
| We're creating a disinformation board. | ||
| Oh, well, the other thing, just to just tell you what Alejandro Mayorkas was really thinking, because I can read minds, when he's asked, Are you worried about, you know, what if Donald Trump gets into office and then he's in charge of this governance board? | ||
| What he said was some sort of, you know, rhetorical trickery, nonsense, bullcrap. | ||
| What he was thinking was, we're still going to be in charge. | ||
| You can elect Donald Trump. | ||
| You could elect Elon Musk. | ||
| You could elect Jesus Christ himself. | ||
| They're still going to answer to me, not the president. | ||
| They're still going to put forward our agenda, not the president's. | ||
| They still work for us, not the people that voted them into power. | ||
| We are the deep state. | ||
| We will be here long after Joe Biden is gone. | ||
| We will create this Bureau. | ||
| We'll create this branch of the government. | ||
| We'll obscure its funding with a myriad of other programs so the Congress can't have any oversight over it. | ||
| They aren't going to be able to restrict our funding or prevent us from doing things. | ||
| We'll have complete operational control. | ||
| Even if we don't have it now, we'll get it soon enough. | ||
| No one's going to stop us. | ||
| And it doesn't matter who you elect. | ||
| It doesn't matter who you vote for. | ||
| This board will remain, it will remain funded, it will remain operational, and it will continue to carry out our dictates from us, people nobody's ever voted for, who have no pressure to justify their actions or defend their decisions. | ||
| It'll all happen in the shadows. | ||
| It'll all happen in secret. | ||
| It'll slowly but surely balloon and expand and take on more powers. | ||
| And change its mission. | ||
| And it will become all of the things the Republicans are saying that it is. | ||
| And then even if this comes to pass and the Republicans find it somewhere in their cold, frozen, dead hearts to actually stand up for the American people and bring Alejandro Mayorkas in front and say, we have evidence that you are spying on the American people. | ||
| He'll just say, no, I'm not. | ||
| He'll lie to them. | ||
| Just like James Clapper with the NSA. | ||
| They'll say, not to my knowledge. | ||
| Not to my knowledge, we're not doing that. | ||
| The DHS does not monitor American citizens. | ||
| Just, you can hear, you can hear almost a little bell go off. | ||
| It's like the asterisk that bugs what he's saying. | ||
| We do not monitor American citizens. | ||
| Unless we want to. | ||
| We definitely do not monitor American citizens. | ||
| Unless they're friends of a friend of a friend of somebody who's foreign, then yeah, of course we can monitor them. | ||
| Yeah, of course. | ||
| No, we're not going to monitor them, but we are going to have cooperation with the biggest tech companies in the world who do have root-level access to everyone's communications and will provide us with that without even having to get a warrant first. | ||
| We're not monitoring the Americans. | ||
| We don't monitor anybody. | ||
| We just gather information from outside groups and operational forces and collate that and provide best practices for how to deal with it. | ||
| They should be ashamed of themselves. | ||
| The American people should be ashamed of ourselves that we allow these people to get away with this sort of stuff. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number seven here, where again we have CNN's David Zerowick saying how dangerous it is for people to speak freely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I think there's a bigger problem that when we focus on the personalities of people like Elon Musk and people say, oh, I think Elon's thinking this or that. | |
| There's a bigger problem here about how we are going to control the channels of communication in this country. | ||
| In 1927, we had the Radio Act. | ||
| 1934, the Communications Act. | ||
| Congress stepped in. | ||
| We made rules. | ||
| FCC wasn't great, but it's still regulating the broadcast industry. | ||
| You can't use vulgar language. | ||
| You can't do all these things with speech. | ||
| We gave over what amounts to our airwaves or our internet waves to Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, and we are in so much trouble. | ||
| Because those guys believe in making money. | ||
| We've already seen that with the 2016 election in Zuckerberg when he was taking rubles for ads from Russia and saying, oh, I think it's crazy to think they had any influence on this election. | ||
| Musk is the same. | ||
| Musk doesn't want it. | ||
| Oh, you know, he's upset with the SEC. | ||
| How dare they question him? | ||
| You know what I'm saying? | ||
| This is dangerous. | ||
| We can't think anymore in this country. | ||
| We don't have people. | ||
| No, I'm serious. | ||
| We don't have people in Congress who can make regulations that can make it work. | ||
| I think we can look to the Western countries in Europe for how they are trying to limit it. | ||
| But you need, you need controls on this. | ||
| You need regulation. | ||
| You cannot let these guys control discourse in this country or we are headed to hell. | ||
| We are there. | ||
| Trump opened the gates to hell and now they're chasing us down. | ||
| Just incredible. | ||
| Just this, this panicked, desperate fear of the idea that people will have uncontrolled channels of communication. | ||
| That was the word he used. | ||
| He said, we no longer control the channels of communication. | ||
| And again, it's just amazing how many times, I haven't played them. | ||
| I've played seven clips, something like that. | ||
| Maybe 10 clips at this point. | ||
| In almost every single one, Democrats, while justifying their machinations against the First Amendment, reference Russiagate. | ||
| Like, it's just amazing. | ||
| Like, do you understand the fight that we're fighting? | ||
| It's not about what they're doing right now. | ||
| It's that they've spent the last several years building up a lie that people still believe, and that they're justifying these decisions on. | ||
| He just brought up The ads that Russia bought from Facebook in 2016. | ||
| I was sort of surprised at first. | ||
| He said Mark Zuckerberg making money the last election in 2020. | ||
| I thought maybe for a second he was going to talk about the fact that Mark Zuckerberg spent billions of dollars to permanently alter the election process in this country and make it far less safe and reliable. | ||
| Now that's not what he's talking about. | ||
| No, he's talking about Mark Zuckerberg taking rubles from Russia to put ads on his platform. | ||
| This is the most debunked conspiracy theory of all time. | ||
| It's been thoroughly investigated, thoroughly, you know, figured out that you had some Russian dude spend like $100,000 on like six ads. | ||
| And that's what they're justifying control of our communication channels over. | ||
| Like, it really is amazing. | ||
| As we're trying to fight the onslaught of disinformation legislation right now, the disinformation from four years ago is what they're using to justify it. | ||
| Trevor Noah brought up Russian disinformation. | ||
| Mayorkas brought up Russian disinformation. | ||
| And now this panicky human worm on CNN brings up Russian disinformation. | ||
| So, just so you all know, Emanuel Goldstein is at it again, okay? | ||
| We have always been at war with East Asia. | ||
| We always will be at war with East Asia. | ||
| Slavery is freedom. | ||
| War is peace. | ||
| And the point of the Disinformation Governance Board is to protect free speech. | ||
| This is the upside-down clown world nonsense that we're having to deal with. | ||
| Please, for the love of God, support us at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| It's now or never, folks. | ||
| and footwarstore.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Please remember the only way we stay on air is your support. | ||
| And I am extremely excited that a product that I thought I might have to discontinue because the supply chain breakdowns, because we get it from France through an American distributor, is available again. | ||
| i put the money in 11 months ago to get this almost demanded it back a few months ago and they said no france is open back up in the farm that makes it you're going to get it and and they documented it over the last hundred years it does better in a lot of different studies and tests than even over the counter antihistamines and things it's all natural it is the shells of a special type of quail that a special diet where they learned it had a major anti-allergy effect helps support healthy sinus function helps enhance respiratory function pollen block promotes clear | ||
| clear airway passages and normal breathing promotes respiratory health and normal breathing supports eye comfort and sinus health quail egg extract decades ago researchers in france discovered the ability for certain quail eggs to alleviate season-related symptoms when eaten and it is powerful and despite the fact it'll sell out before i ever get more of it in i'm offering it out of the gates 40 off at infowarstore.com | ||
| We're also going to end the sale at the end of the week for Pazzo Beets Beet Concentrate that's documented so good for your heart, creates nitrous oxide in the blood, wonderful for your cardiovascular system, fights blood clots, everything. | ||
| That is back in stock, 40% off. | ||
| And BioTrue Selenium sold out for more than eight months. | ||
| From the mustard seed, the highest quality, very powerful, all your electrochemical activity. | ||
| It's just like the iodine, but different. | ||
| You need the two together. | ||
| It is back in stock. | ||
| It is 40% off. | ||
| That sale is going to be ending on Monday or so, because we've already sold out a lot of the stock. | ||
| And we're trying to, again, reach our underages with things we don't have in stock anymore that people buy by selling out of the t-shirts. | ||
| And we had 63,000 t-shirts over the last few years. | ||
| I ordered and did and never promoted or sold. | ||
| We had a lot of some t-shirts sold well, some didn't. | ||
| We had a lot of them just building up. | ||
| Some of the best sellers are there as well. | ||
| We're never going to reprint any of these. | ||
| We'll have all new shirts after this. | ||
| And I appreciate everybody coming through. | ||
| We've already sold out 20% of the stock. | ||
| So in another week or two, we should sell out of all these t-shirts. | ||
| Your last chance to get them ever. | ||
| We're selling them at cost at infowarestore.com. | ||
| Thank you for your support. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| This is a collectible. | ||
| It funds us, and we're selling it for way lower than everybody else is. | ||
| You can go to InfoWarsStore.com to see this. | ||
| Support free speech and InfoWars. | ||
| Get the new limited edition InfoWars gold collectible. | ||
| InfoWarsGold.com. | ||
| We have teamed up with the nation's leading mint to bring you a new way to support InfoWars and free speech while owning a piece of history and real gold. | ||
| It's a little gold bar. | ||
| The new limited edition InfoWars gold collectible is minted in the form of a card that features a 24 karat gold in the center using proprietary technology. | ||
| Only $25,000. | ||
| These limited edition InfoWars gold collectibles have been minted. | ||
| This is a one-time run of InfoWarsGold.com. | ||
| And thank God these came in right when we needed the money, because I finally decided to do this like four months ago, and it finally just came in. | ||
| Each one is authenticated using holographic technology. | ||
| The same Precious Metals Group recently sold 300,000 gold cards for $170 each. | ||
| We are bringing you these collectible cards for just $129.95. | ||
| For 170 each, we are bringing you these collectible cards for just 129.95 to help us. | ||
| And when you purchase it, you get a discount on the next one for 99.95 and the price goes down from there. | ||
| And so when you buy three, you receive 50% off. | ||
| This is the first ever run of the proprietary design and exclusive to InfoWars. | ||
| The Mint was extremely excited that InfoWars would be making this product available to customers for the first time. | ||
| The limited edition InfoWars gold collectible comes in cards that can be stacked in your wallet, drawer or glove compartment for easy travel. | ||
| And again, they're very collectible. | ||
| People are going to love them. | ||
| You're financing the American rebellion against the globalists. | ||
| This is so historic. | ||
| Be part of history. | ||
| Support InfoWars Free Speech and stock up today at InfoWarsGold.com before we completely sell out of this limited run. |
Export Selection