Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
and we'll be back in the next week. | |
| We'll be back in the next week. | ||
| It is Sunday Night Live here on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| My name's Harrison Smith. | ||
| I'm the host of, what is it called? | ||
| The American Journal? | ||
| This morning I was about to say America First. | ||
| I'm like, no, that's not right. | ||
| That's my ideology. | ||
| Not my show name. | ||
| The American Journal. | ||
| That's what it's called in the mornings on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| I'm filling in, and it's going to be an easy two hours. | ||
| It's going to be an easy two hours for me because I've got so many incredible videos to show you. | ||
| We might spend half this time just watching these fantastic videos. | ||
| And I'm going to go to one here first, but I'll say the most difficult part about being an InfoWars host and hosting a show on the radio Is it waking up at ungodly hours of the morning so I can get all of my research done before the show begins? | ||
| Yes, that's unpleasant, but it's a small burden to bear. | ||
| Is it the unending vitriol I get from left-wing media calling me all sorts of horrible things? | ||
| Yeah, that's not great either. | ||
| No, the most difficult thing about hosting a radio show is not cursing. | ||
| It is not Not being able to use certain four-letter words when describing the machination of the globalist psychopaths that are running our world into the ground. | ||
| It would be so much easier to vent my anger at these people if I could just curse every once in a while. | ||
| And this is all just a preamble to the video I'm about to show you because I censored it and it took about 30 minutes. | ||
| It's about a four-minute video, but it is full of curse words. | ||
| So I've censored them all, I believe. | ||
| I've bleeped them all. | ||
| And I think this video is so good, it's worth showing you this. | ||
| The audio is not great because it's from an Instagram live video, but the story is at GatewayPundit.com. | ||
| Bravo, Trump supporter goes on absolutely epic rant at a gas station, says everything we've all wanted to say to Biden voters. | ||
| And if I wasn't limited by the FCC, As to what words I'm allowed to use on the airwaves, my rants might sound a little bit more like this. | ||
| So you're about to hear a lot of bleeps, but in between the bleeps is a heck of a lot of truth and passion and understanding of what's going on in this country right now. | ||
| So with that little preamble, here he is. | ||
| He may be foul-mouthed, but my God, the anger he is showing is absolutely justified, and everything he's saying is 100% true. | ||
| Here it is, a short little clip. | ||
| It's about a 16-minute video in total, but I cut out about four minutes of this Trump supporter walking around a gas station, venting his anger at Joe Biden supporters. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is stupid! | |
| Everybody had a lot to say when Trump was in the White House. | ||
| Anybody got s*** to say with this f***ing old-ass bum in there? | ||
| F***ing about f***ing country, f***ing up the economy. | ||
| These motherf***ers projected that we were going to have a million new jobs, 200,000 new jobs! | ||
| And where the f*** are they at? | ||
| Probably 200,000 illegal immigrants that you motherf***ers climbed up at the border got new jobs, but we don't! | ||
| We hurting in America! | ||
| Everybody quiet as s***! | ||
| Where the f*** are the Joe Biden supporters? | ||
| I can tell y'all why I support Trump. | ||
| Tell me why y'all support this motherf***er. | ||
| Ain't doing s*** but f***ing us up. | ||
| Every day f***ing us up. | ||
| I don't see s***. | ||
| Anybody saying nothing? | ||
| They had a whole lot of energy. | ||
| They had a whole lot of energy when my mother****** man president was in there. | ||
| And everything that Trump did, I told you, I support him for this. | ||
| I support him for that. | ||
| I had to stand behind this **** every **** day. | ||
| I had to stand behind why I supported President Trump. | ||
| I don't hear no mother****** body telling me why they support Joe Biden and all this goofy ****. | ||
| Then when I asked my uncle, I asked my uncle about this s**t, he said, Joe, do you think that I'm with that s**t? | ||
| Do you think I support that? | ||
| Yes, you support it. | ||
| If you voted for Joe Biden, you support all of this s**t. Because when I was with Trump, I had to tell you I support every f**king thing that he did, and I justified what the f**k that he did. | ||
| Tell me anything! | ||
| Anything! | ||
| All these kids at the f**king border? | ||
| Guess what? | ||
| Yeah, you with that s**t, you Joe Biden voting motherf**ker! | ||
| Turning your little boys into little girls? | ||
| You can't tell me you ain't with that s**t! | ||
| You voted for Joe Biden, you with it! | ||
| You with it! | ||
| Y'all wanna detach y'allself from everything that Joe Biden doing like it's just him? | ||
| No! | ||
| You voted for him! | ||
| That's what the f**k you wanted! | ||
| Own it! | ||
| Own it! | ||
| I told y'all back then you was a bunch of f**king useful idiots! | ||
| Own it! | ||
| When was America ever great? | ||
| I guarantee you motherfuckers can wish you could go back to the day that Donald Trump won. | ||
| That was a good fucking day. | ||
| You might was mad in your fucking mind, but I bet you your ass was on the way to work. | ||
| I bet you you was on your fucking way to work. | ||
| I bet you you wasn't standing in a fucking gas station looking for gas. | ||
| I bet you wasn't waiting for a fucking stimulus check. | ||
| I bet you wasn't waiting for an extra $300 on your fucking food stamps. | ||
| I bet you! | ||
| Want to get rid of Trump? | ||
| F*** Trump! | ||
| F*** Trump! | ||
| I told y'all, politicians want to get rid of Trump for one f***ing reason. | ||
| So they can do what the f*** they want to do. | ||
| It was never their plan for f*** Trump to win four years ago. | ||
| They tried to get my man up out of there so they can do what the f*** they doing now. | ||
| They wanted to do that f*** four years ago! | ||
| They f***ing war mongers! | ||
| They not for us! | ||
| Trump got in their way for four years! | ||
| He stopped them son of a bitches from doing what the f**k they want to do! | ||
| They've been wanting to do this s**t! | ||
| They've been wanting your little boy to be a little girl! | ||
| They've been wanting this s**t not to look like America no motherf**king more! | ||
| What y'all say? | ||
| America first? | ||
| America first, g**dammit! | ||
| Oh, that's racist! | ||
| I told y'all, it was not... | ||
| I understand why y'all didn't like Trump. | ||
| Y'all didn't like Trump because they made y'all not like Trump. | ||
| I understand that s***. | ||
| I understand why y'all didn't like Trump. | ||
| But why did politicians not like Trump? | ||
| Why did politicians not like Trump? | ||
| Because he was f***ing up their plan. | ||
| He was f***ing up their plan. | ||
| They always had a plan to destroy this country. | ||
| I hope you're going to go pick up Trump. | ||
| Go to Florida and go pick up President Trump, please! | ||
| I hope them jacks are going to pick up my damn president. | ||
| I love that guy. | ||
| That's absolutely fantastic. | ||
| That's just a little part of a 16-17 minute video where he's just wandering around a gas station yelling at people, you have to own this. | ||
| This is your fault. | ||
| If you voted for Joe Biden, this is exactly what you voted for. | ||
| You know, I apologize for the lower audio quality. | ||
| That's because it was on an Instagram live video capture, so that crackling and stuff is not necessarily the best, but it's worth it to hear what he's actually saying. | ||
| He's making such a good point. | ||
| He's like, they wanted to do this four years ago. | ||
| All the stuff that's happening now, President Trump's election, waylaid by four years, delayed by four years. | ||
| Everything that's happening now is not an accident. | ||
| It's on purpose. | ||
| Now that President Trump is out of the way, they've found that they can Carry out their plan to basically perpetrate a controlled demolition of the American economy. | ||
| I just, I love that. | ||
| I wish we had more people wandering on the streets yelling at Joe Biden supporters in general. | ||
| Don't get in their faces or anything. | ||
| He's just yelling out to the world and he's broadcasting it and he's making so many good points because it's true. | ||
| Everything that went bad during Trump's administration was Trump's fault according to the media. | ||
| Absolutely everything was laid at his feet. | ||
| Absolutely everything was tied to him and then somehow through some sort of bizarre alchemy tied to Russia. | ||
| Of course, right? | ||
| You think they would have let Trump get away with just not doing anything about the primary pipeline serving a vast majority of the United States got shut down? | ||
| You think they would have just gone, oh, but it's not his fault. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| Of course, it would have been Trump's fault. | ||
| So, you know, this guy's just making such a great point, exposing these people. | ||
| as the hypocrites they are and letting them know if you voted for Joe Biden, this is exactly what you voted for. | ||
| Waiting in gas lines, waiting on your unemployment check, not having a job while America collapses around you. | ||
| Oh, and also turning your little boys into girls. | ||
| You voted for that. | ||
| It was a primary campaign issue that you apparently decided you were on the side of. | ||
| I think it's absolutely great. | ||
| And again, that article can be found at gatewaypundit.com. | ||
| So I thought that was just a fun little way to start off our program today, hearing a impassioned Trump supporter rage at the chaos that's now been perpetrated by the Joe Biden administration. | ||
| But I've got a lot to discuss in today's program. | ||
| I think Owen touched on it a little bit. | ||
| We'll show you the video here. | ||
| We're going to talk a lot about January 6th and the white supremacist anti-Semitic insurrection coup that took place there. | ||
| And just how nonsensical all of this is and yet how it's being used as the catalyst or as the excuse to bring about all sorts of just absolutely insane tyranny. | ||
| We'll also be talking about COVID-19 in particular. | ||
| Where Dr. Fauci is. | ||
| He seems to have disappeared in the last week or so. | ||
| And we'll talk about that. | ||
| Revolver has a great article about where Fauci has gone and about how Rand Paul had no small part in the expulsion of Anthony Fauci. | ||
| The seeming expulsion. | ||
| Nothing official has come down yet. | ||
| He's certainly in some hot water as people finally, a year later, have actually started looking into his connections to the coronavirus release. | ||
| We'll get into that very heavily in today's program as well. | ||
| But let's start with January 6th, shall we? | ||
| And I want to start with Representative Louie Gohmert, this is clip number 7, and just a very brief statement on the Capitol insurrection on January 6th. | ||
| Here's what he had to say that's brought him under quite a bit of fire for these incendiary comments. | ||
| Here's Representative Louie Gohmert of Texas talking about the January 6th Capitol insurrection. | ||
| Yeah, I just want the president to understand there have been things worse than people without any firearms coming into a building. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| That's the statement. | ||
| And it's a pretty simple one. | ||
| And then you have articles from the AP and others saying, Representative Gohmert is under fire for denying that it was an armed insurrection. | ||
| It's like, well... | ||
| Both of those words are incorrect. | ||
| They weren't armed and it wasn't an insurrection, so maybe he's under fire because he's exposing the lie that you're trying to use to justify an insane amount of tyrannical control over American society. | ||
| And we'll talk about some of that control in a moment, but a new video has been released by American greatness. | ||
| They say a newly obtained video shows United States Capitol police officers speaking with several January 6 protesters, including Jacob Chansley, the so-called Q Shaman, inside the Capitol that afternoon. | ||
| One officer identified in the video and confirmed by charging documents as Officer Keith Robinshaw appears to tell Chansley's group that they won't stop them from entering the building. | ||
| Quote, we're not against. | ||
| You need to show us. | ||
| No attacking. | ||
| No assault. | ||
| Remain calm, Robinshaw warns. | ||
| Chansley and another protester instruct the crowd to act peacefully. | ||
| This has to be peaceful, Chansley yells. | ||
| We have a right to peaceably assemble. | ||
| Let's go ahead and watch that video now. | ||
| It's clip number nine. | ||
| Here's the video recently released from American Greatness. | ||
| They say it's actually just one small part of a larger video that shows even more interaction between the police and the protesters, but here is just a 45-second video that blows all of the leftist narratives about January 6th completely out of the water, as if they were even afloat to begin with. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen up. | |
| The police here are willing to work with us and cooperate peacefully like our First Amendment allows. | ||
| gather more Americans under the condition that they will come and gather peacefully to discuss what needs to be done to save our country. | ||
| - We're not against one other or the other. | ||
| This is the end of show. | ||
| You understand. | ||
| - Go ahead. | ||
| - Show us no attacking, no assault. | ||
| Remain calm. | ||
| - We're not doing an assault. | ||
| - We're not doing an assault. | ||
| We're going to be heard! | ||
| Everybody, this must be peaceful! | ||
| This has to be peaceful! | ||
| We have the right to peacefully assemble! | ||
| There you go, and that's Chancellor at the very end there saying we have a right to peaceably assemble. | ||
| American Greatness article goes on to say, this video directly contradicts what government prosecutors allege in a complaint filed January 8th against Chansley. | ||
| Robinshaw and other officers, it says, calmed the protesters somewhat and directed them to leave the area the same way they had entered. | ||
| I didn't see that on the video. | ||
| Chansley approached Officer Robinshaw and screamed, among other things, that this was their house, that they were going, that they were there to take the Capitol and get Congressional leaders. | ||
| That was from the charging documents. | ||
| Totally contradicted by the video you just saw, where Chansley is shouting, we must remain peaceful, we have a right to peacefully assemble. | ||
| I mean, it's just... It's just amazing. | ||
| And we didn't need this video, right? | ||
| This video, it's not necessary. | ||
| We have all of the other videos, all of the other videos of officers stepping aside and motioning people in, opening the door, holding the door for people, allowing them inside. | ||
| Many, many videos of the people actually trying to break windows at the Capitol being stopped by Trump supporters and prevented from doing that, weapons being taken away from the agitators and actually given to the police so they couldn't actually be used against it. | ||
| And all you really have to do is just imagine January 6th and you didn't know anything about it. | ||
| And then you heard the descriptions as to what it was from the mainstream media or from the left or from the politicians or from the people now using it as an excuse to purge American society of Trump supporters. | ||
| Just imagine what images come to mind when you hear that a million Trump supporters bent on murdering Congress members and senators charged the Capitol and in an armsurrection attempted to take over the United States government. | ||
| If that had been the case, and they say it's well-organized, it was well-orchestrated, behind the scenes, they knew this was happening for weeks and had been preparing for it. | ||
| If that was the case, it would have been a bloodbath. | ||
| What they're describing does not exist and did not happen. | ||
| It's a phantom. | ||
| It's a fantasy. | ||
| It's Bigfoot. | ||
| It's Loch Ness Monster. | ||
| It's the Easter Bunny. | ||
| They are essentially bringing about total ideological purity and forced expulsions from everybody from the military to local police departments and everything in between based on the Easter Bunny, based on Bigfoot. | ||
| The threat of Bigfoot is the number one terrorist threat this country faces. | ||
| That is essentially what they're saying. | ||
| And they're saying Bigfoot attempted an insurrection coup. | ||
| That was very deadly. | ||
| It was well-armed, even though there were no weapons and no one died. | ||
| It's utterly absurd what they're saying. | ||
| And even the charging documents that they're legally swearing to are just full of lies that we saw right here. | ||
| Chansley is later seen entering the Senate chambers with a police officer behind him. | ||
| He led several protesters in prayer and sat in Vice President Mike Pence's chair. | ||
| Oh, it's worse than Pearl Harbor. | ||
| It's worse than 9-11. | ||
| It's the Civil War 2.0. | ||
| He sat in a chair and prayed. | ||
| Dear God, how do we destroy him? | ||
| Because that's exactly what they're doing. | ||
| Chansley is not charged with assaulting an officer. | ||
| He faces several counts for trespassing and disorderly conduct. | ||
| That must have been when he was there shouting, we must remain peaceful. | ||
| We have a right to peacefully assemble. | ||
| Maybe that was too far. | ||
| Maybe that was beyond the pale. | ||
| Maybe that's what means he deserves decades in prison as a seditionist. | ||
| Think about this. | ||
| In that video alone, we saw Chansley there interacting with the police. | ||
| The police saying, you're welcome to come in. | ||
| You just have to remain peaceful and it's all good. | ||
| Following Chansley into the chamber where he prayed and sat in a chair. | ||
| Well, Chansley since then has been incarcerated. | ||
| He's been denied bail and is awaiting trial. | ||
| He has no criminal record. | ||
| No criminal record, didn't hurt anybody, didn't attack anybody, didn't destroy anything, walked into the Capitol, a public building, escorted by police, sat in a chair and prayed, and he has been incarcerated since that time. | ||
| Since January. | ||
| The intervening three months, and now he faces these charges that clearly are full of lies. | ||
| Just blatant Non-realities being presented there. | ||
| So truly an incredible video that shows the total lie of January 6th in general. | ||
| Now I'm gonna go to another video here because it ties right into this. | ||
| Because all of this is sort of starting to come out. | ||
| Which is, I guess, a little white pill. | ||
| A little light on the horizon. | ||
| A little silver lining to the globalist storm cloud that hovers over us. | ||
| is that it seems like everywhere these little threads are being pulled. | ||
| These little inconsistencies are being noticed. | ||
| Little chinks in the globalist armor that are being looked at and expanded and delved into. | ||
| The pushback is happening. | ||
| We're seeing people stand up all over the country against the mask mandates, against the mandatory vaccines, EUs. | ||
| Even major corporations saying, yeah, we're dropping our mask mandates, we're dropping our vaccine demands. | ||
| We're seeing Dr. Fauci come under fire for his gain-of-function nonsense. | ||
| And we're seeing questions about January 6th filter up. | ||
| We're also seeing the audits take place in suspicious districts around the country. | ||
| It's all kind of starting to unravel. | ||
| And so now is the time to push. | ||
| Now is the time to be aggressive. | ||
| Alex says it all the time, but of course it's that constricting and then releasing and then constricting even more. | ||
| It's the way they operate these psychological operations. | ||
| And so what they want is to back off a little bit and go, okay, maybe some of these things aren't necessary and to have you go, whew, they're not going full bore. | ||
| I guess we can relax. | ||
| No, now is the time to go on the offensive. | ||
| Now is the time to demand answers to these questions. | ||
| And now's the time to remind people that all of this stuff that we've been under, all of the lockdowns, all of the mask orders, the crashing of the American economy, the psychological damage done to our children and just everybody in America who's been forced to isolate for an entire year, not touch another human for an entire year because they believe the dictates of these lying psychopaths, hold them to account and especially point out that not only was all of this stuff unnecessary, unneeded, unwise, | ||
| But we were telling you that from the very beginning. | ||
| We knew all of this was part of one major plan. | ||
| And most importantly, the same people who put you under these ill-advised, unnecessary, incredibly damaging lockdown orders are the exact same people who literally created the virus. | ||
| Literally manufactured the virus, manufactured the response, they're responsible for all of it. | ||
| So now is the time to go on the offensive, to demand trials for this, to demand these people are held to account and suffer the consequences of their outrageous dictates and total destruction of this economy based on the lies that they peddled and the virus that they created. | ||
| Now is the time to be on the offensive. | ||
| On the offensive. | ||
| And so, of course, it's the same thing with January 6th. | ||
| It's not enough to go, whew, wow, they're dropping some of the charges because it shows that it's not panned out. | ||
| I guess we're fine now. | ||
| No, now is the time to go on the offensive. | ||
| Why did Nancy Pelosi refuse the extra National Guard soldiers that they knew would be necessary because of the huge amount of people that were going to be there? | ||
| What about the people that clearly are lying on the charging documents? | ||
| It's not enough to just go, okay, they lied on the charges, but we caught them, so the charges will be dropped. | ||
| Wow, good enough. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| Recompense. | ||
| They must be held to account for all of this. | ||
| And one of the things that they are very skilled at doing is keeping the videos that exonerate the people at the Capitol from the public eye. | ||
| Well, they inundate the public consciousness with lies about the terror and danger and imminent threat of domestic terrorism. | ||
| So I'm going to go to this video now. | ||
| It is a discussion between Tucker Carlson and Julie Kelly, who is actually the author of the article I just read from American Journal. | ||
| Nope, that's my show. | ||
| American Greatness. | ||
| All these American things get mixed up in my head. | ||
| American Greatness is the publication I meant to talk about. | ||
| And that was the article I just read, and Julie Kelly was the author of that article, exposing the video, heretofore unseen by the wide public, that totally exonerates Chansley, as well as several other protesters, showing that they had the agreement of the police To do what they did, as long as they were peaceful and as long as they were exercising their First Amendment rights. | ||
| So here's Julie Kelly with Tucker Carlson talking about the fact that the government is continuing to hide footage from January 6th. | ||
| Clip number six. | ||
| Let's go to that now. | ||
| So one of the ways you know the people in charge are lying is when they say something that's clearly not true and then they keep saying it at increasing volume over time and demanding that you repeat it or else they're going to hurt you. | ||
| You've seen that a lot since January 6th, which was, they'll remind you daily, a dangerous white supremacist insurrection as part of the QAnon army. | ||
| Just today, Don Lamont over on CNN described January 6th as a war with, quote, hand-to-hand combat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I spoke with a Republican lawmaker last night, and he told me during the commercial break, he said, listen, I fought in the war, Denver-Riggleman. | |
| He said, I went to war. | ||
| And he said, the difference was, is that I didn't have people denying the realities of war, or denying my experience. | ||
| And what happened at the Capitol was nothing less than war. | ||
| As I said, hand-to-hand combat. | ||
| They bring the drama, these people. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| So if they're going to beat you over the head with the same storyline for four months, you'd think it's fair to ask, like, what are the details? | ||
| Who shot Ashley Babbitt, for example, and why aren't you telling us? | ||
| And where's the rest of the footage of this deadly white supremacist QAnon insurrection? | ||
| But they're not sharing the footage, and that's very strange. | ||
| The Capitol Hill Police Department's General Counsel is arguing in court that releasing more surveillance footage from January 6th would help, quote, those who might wish to attack the Capitol again. | ||
| Right! | ||
| The DOJ is making the same arguments. | ||
| Why are they withholding this footage? | ||
| Julie Kelly has followed this subject more carefully than maybe any other reporter. | ||
| She's a senior contributor to American Greatness. | ||
| We're happy to have her on tonight. | ||
| Julie, thank you for coming on. | ||
| So, do we have any idea how much of this footage they're hiding from the public, what it might show, and why they're hiding it? | ||
| So, according to the General Counsel for the Capitol Police, there are 14,000 hours of surveillance video from January 6th, just between noon and 8 o'clock that day. | ||
| The Capitol Police captured this video from its extensive surveillance system, both inside and outside the Capitol. | ||
| So 14,000 hours they have that would show what happened before, during, and of course after the insurrection. | ||
| And they are refusing to release it, as you said, saying that this will cause the insurrectionists to plot yet another attack on our democracy. | ||
| And also federal prosecutors, Joe Biden's Justice Department and federal judges are going along with this. | ||
| So what are they trying to hide? | ||
| I mean, if this was war, if this was like, you know, Pearl Harbor and 9-11, don't you think that they would want to show the American people all of this footage that they have of these horrible human beings, you know, attacking the citadel of our democracy? | ||
| So it raises a lot of questions. | ||
| And to your point, Tucker, the hyperbolic rhetoric around this should really give people pause and make them reconsider the narrative that we've been told from the very beginning about what January 6th was all about. | ||
| You know, it's just, it's one of many huge lies, and of course because, you know, everything is displacement, they accuse their critics of telling huge lies. | ||
| Very quickly, are we any closer to knowing who shot Ashley Babbitt and why? | ||
| Maybe there was a good reason? | ||
| We always give the benefit of the doubt to law enforcement, but you're not allowed to just shoot people in the neck and not say who did it or on what basis it was done. | ||
| Do we know any answers to those questions? | ||
| We don't, Tucker. | ||
| Her family has filed a lawsuit against Capitol Police and I believe the Justice Department. | ||
| They're trying to get answers about what happened. | ||
| It's important to note that the only person who had a firearm in the Capitol that day was the unidentified police officer who shot and killed an unarmed veteran, Ashley Babbitt. | ||
| The Justice Department closed their investigation. | ||
| We still don't know the identity of that police officer. | ||
| But I think her family is digging around trying to find out who it is, exactly what happened. | ||
| And, you know, the video that we would be able to see might give us a lot more information about that too. | ||
| Yeah, you can't just shoot people and then not explain why you did it. | ||
| And by the way, if Ashley Babbitt were an Antifa lunatic or a BLM activist, I would say the same thing. | ||
| You can't allow that. | ||
| You can't just let people get shot and then not get an explanation. | ||
| You know, we should not allow that. | ||
| Julie Kelly, it's great to see you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thanks, Tucker. | ||
| Yeah, very good points, Rage, there. | ||
| Obviously, I mean, it's Abundantly clear what is going on here. | ||
| They're using the January 6th insurrection coup as the excuse to completely remake America in the same way that they're using the Great Reset. | ||
| And again, it's not a coincidence that all of these things are happening at the same time. | ||
| And it's not a coincidence that's so easy to vacillate between January 6th and the crackdown that they're justifying there and the mask mandates and the lockdown mandates and the fact that all of this is occurring at the same time that they're trying to take guns and defund the police. | ||
| I mean, it's it's an all encompassing plan that they're executing. | ||
| And if you don't realize this, then maybe I need to play that video of that guy wandering around the gas station again, because clearly this was their plan. | ||
| Clearly, this is what they have been wanting to do, and they were going to do it anyway, no matter how dangerous the so-called insurrection was, because it wasn't there. | ||
| Nothing happened. | ||
| They're just showing the video people walking around like tourists And no damage to the Capitol. | ||
| No one injured. | ||
| No one brought guns. | ||
| No organization No planning whatsoever and yet they're using that as an excuse to clamp down on the free speech of Anybody in positions of power, essentially, including a Space Force commander, demoted over a book claiming that neo-Marxist agenda and critical race theory are infiltrating the military. | ||
| Critical race theory infiltrating the military. | ||
| He says there's basically Marxist thought control going on. | ||
| And so they demoted him because that proves him right. | ||
| Wait, what is happening here? | ||
| Folks, when we get back on the other side, we're gonna continue talking about the purge of American society predicated on this fake January 6th narrative, as well as a lot of stuff about Anthony Fauci and Israel and Gaza as well. | ||
| So stay with us, folks. | ||
| Still a lot to cover. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| It is Sunday Night Live here at Infowars.com and Band.videos. | ||
| So happy that you're here with us this evening. | ||
| My name is Harrison Smith. | ||
| I'm the host of the American Journal on InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| Weekdays, 8 a.m. | ||
| to 11 a.m. | ||
| Central Standard Time. | ||
| And if you haven't tuned in, you should because we've got a brand new studio. | ||
| And in fact, It's our old studio, but all of the guts have been redone. | ||
| All of the technology behind it has been reconfabulated to bring you a higher quality broadcast. | ||
| This just to point out the amount of work going on behind the scenes that you don't necessarily see as a viewer of InfoWarriors every day. | ||
| There are swarms of technicians that after uh, manning the boards during the show, then go on to run, uh, cables and set up, uh, microphone systems and do all sorts of, uh, technological wizardry, uh, that I am not even capable of describing. | ||
| And yet it's absolutely necessary for bringing you a high quality broadcast. | ||
| And so it's not just sitting up here, you know, reading to you that you're funding when you go to info or store.com It's all of the behind-the-scenes groundwork that's being done day and night here at InfoWars. | ||
| So if you do want to support this broadcast and everything that we do here from the Alex Jones Show to the War Room to American Journal, all of the on the ground reporting that we've been involved in, especially on the border over the last several months. | ||
| And, of course, Band.Video, which is increasingly becoming a place where alternative people not even associated with InfoWars have a place where they can upload their videos where they know they won't be censored by the tyrants at Big Tech. It's all supported by InfoWarsStore.com and the viewers like you who go there, take advantage of the incredible sales, get yourself a supplement. It's a 360 win, but I always say it's really it's really more like a 1080 win. It's | ||
| really more like a like an Olympic snowboarding halfpipe trick win, because not only are you getting a great supplement, you're funding InfoWars, you're making yourself feel better. You're contributing to one of the most powerful weapons against the globalist takeover. It's a win win, win, win, win, win, win, win situation. The only people who lose out on this are the Satanists that deserve to lose. So go to InfoWarsStore.com, take advantage of our sales. Check | ||
| out some of our new products like the Fizzy Magnesium Drink, which I just I just love the name of the Fizzy Magnesium Drink. | ||
| It's like something the Jetsons would order. | ||
| It's like a drink you'd order at a bar on a moon base, the Fizzy Magnesium Drink. | ||
| I just think it's awesome. | ||
| I haven't had a chance to try it yet, but I've had some people reach out to me on Twitter saying that they have tried it, and they combine it with some other supplements and say that, I guess you need a high tolerance for this sort of stuff. | ||
| If you're going to combine these products, they maximize, they multiply each other's powers, so you're getting an even more intense reaction to these supplements. | ||
| So I haven't tried it personally. | ||
| I will certainly try it this week now that we actually have some in the office. | ||
| It's such a new product. | ||
| I haven't been able to get my hands on some, but I'll try some this week. | ||
| And some of the InfoWarriors out there who've already tried it, contact me saying it's going right in the circulation. | ||
| Directly into their daily regimen of supplements, such as Vitamin Mineral Fusion, the ultimate fish oil, and now Fizzy Magnesium Drink Mix, and that supports everything that we do here, including all of the behind-the-scenes stuff that you don't necessarily see all the time. | ||
| So, with that, we go back to this story of this Space Force commander demoted over a book claiming Neo-Marxist agenda and critical race theory is infiltrating the military. | ||
| And of course his expulsion just sort of emphasizes this, confirms this, shows you just how real this threat is. | ||
| A U.S. | ||
| Space Force commander was reportedly relieved as commander of the 11th Space Warning Squadron, which, can we take a moment to thank President Trump for giving us such a badass new realm of military involvement in America? | ||
| 11th Space Warning Squadron. | ||
| Come on, that's super cool. | ||
| But this guy is no longer the commander of that 11th Space Warning Squadron, quote, due to a loss of trust and confidence in his ability to lead after he appeared on a podcast to promote his book, which claims that the U.S. | ||
| military has been infiltrated by neo-Marxist agenda, which is transforming military culture and policy. | ||
| Yes, yes, and they certainly proved him wrong by purging him because he has the wrong ideology. | ||
| Nothing Marxist about that, of course. | ||
| Truly amazing. | ||
| Quote, this decision was based on public comments made by Lieutenant Lieutenant Colonel Lohmeyer on a recent podcast. | ||
| Lieutenant General Whitting has initiated a command direct investigation on whether these comments constituted prohibited partisan political activity. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's funny. | |
| I thought you literally just said he was removed because they lost trust and confidence in his ability to lead. | ||
| And it's like, no, no, not really. | ||
| It's about him making partisan political comments. | ||
| It's like, well, he really didn't. | ||
| It's like, okay, well, then it's about his ability to lead. | ||
| Whatever the excuse you need to use, tyrants, to purge the military of people that You think they might get in the way if you were to, I don't know, give an order to fire on the American people? | ||
| You don't want too many patriots in the ranks who might choose to not just do as they're told. | ||
| You want to get rid of the people that will resist you, get rid of the people that actually understand the Constitution, get rid of the people that actually have a love. | ||
| for the heritage of America and the freedom that America once represented. | ||
| Get rid of them so you can then use the armed forces to oppress the American people without too much guff from the people you're ordering to do so. | ||
| Lohmeyer self-published a book called Irresistible Revolution, Marxism's Goal of Conquest and the Unmaking of the American Military. | ||
| This week, the book, according to the description, explores the impact of neo-Marxist agenda and the manner in which the Black Lives Matter movement, anti-racism, post-modernism, and political correctness affect the national security of the United States. | ||
| Lohmeier said that he had informed his superiors, public affairs staff, and lawyers for the military about the book prior to publication, but it was not the subject of a pre-publication review. | ||
| So it seems like he did everything right. | ||
| Did everything by the book, it's just the people that are running the army now are literal Marxists, and they don't want to be exposed for this. | ||
| So he's been demoted, and the demotion comes after Lohmeyer criticized Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's diversity and inclusion agenda. | ||
| Quote, I don't demonize the man, but I want to make it clear to both him and every service member, this agenda, it will divide us. | ||
| It will not unify us, he said, after Austin imposed a 60-day force-wide extremism stand-down to determine how to rid the military of extremism following the January 6th Capitol riot, insurrection, coup, white supremacist, violent, deadly attack. | ||
| Wilmeyer said he was asked to give his troops extremism training and was given a seven-page booklet of talking points. | ||
| The booklet reportedly began with an overview of the Capitol riot and included examples of quote white nationalists that have been caught at some point in the last decade and punished for it and kicked out of the military or a radical extremist Islamic terrorist. | ||
| The diversity, inclusion and equity industry and the trainings we are receiving in the military is rooted in critical race theory, which is rooted in Marxism, said Lohmeier, who also knocked the Defense Department for saying that the military has, quote, too many white pilots during a pilot shortage. | ||
| See, if you speak out against blatant racism and race-based hiring in the military, you're the bad guy. | ||
| See, they're good. | ||
| They're good because they're doing it for anti-racism reasons. | ||
| But if you point out that this is blatantly biased, blatantly prejudiced, and blatantly racist, you're the bad guy. | ||
| You'll be demoted for daring to question the dictates of your very stupid superiors. | ||
| So, Citing a diversity initiative in which service members read, So You Want to Talk About Race, in which the U.S. | ||
| is referred to as a white supremacist nation, Lohmeier told the Information Operation podcast that the young service members are inundated by a, quote, hyper-politicized work environment where diversity and inclusion initiatives are being pushed constantly. | ||
| Lohmeier added that conservatives in the military who are willing to voice their opinions are painted as extremists. | ||
| This from the Washington Examiner. | ||
| Of course they are. | ||
| And again, this is the hypocrisy, this is the double standard, this is Marxism at work. | ||
| If you want to be as radical as you possibly can on the left, if you want to support Black Lives Matter and getting rid of white people and all the most extremist, leftist, racialized nonsense that's going on It's truly incredible. | ||
| You're more than welcome to do that. | ||
| In fact, you're encouraged and even in some cases, as he's pointing out, required to believe this sort of stuff. | ||
| But if you're against it, you will be demoted, you will be removed, you may in fact face incarceration. | ||
| It's truly incredible. | ||
| But now, of course, as a response to this, his book is flying off the shelves on Amazon and is now reached the number one position on several categories of the book, including military policy as well as communism and socialism sections. | ||
| But also, I think it's I think it may already be in the top five of books overall in Amazon. | ||
| Jack Posobiec was tweeting out updates to this, and it was really amazing because when he tweeted out the top six or top 10 books selling on Amazon, like half of them were right wing books. | ||
| It really is amazing, especially when I get to another story a little bit later. | ||
| But first, let me cover this one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's... | |
| It says, US joins global push against violent extremism online. | ||
| Ah yes, those violent words we have to really watch out for. | ||
| Macron and other leaders from tech giants and governments around the world, including the US for the first time, gathered virtually on Saturday to find better ways to stop extremist violence from spreading online, while also respecting Freedom of expression. | ||
| Oh yes, they're very concerned about protecting freedom of expression. | ||
| They just want to censor certain parts of expression. | ||
| That makes perfect sense, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The U.S. | |
| government and four other countries joined the effort known as the Christchurch Call for the first time this year. | ||
| It involves some 50 nations plus tech companies including Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Amazon and is named for the New Zealand city where the slaughter at the two mosques took place. | ||
| British Prime Minister Boris Johnson sent in a video talking about how they have to censor the internet. | ||
| The meeting was aimed at revitalizing coordination efforts, notably since President Joe Biden entered office, and getting more tech companies involved. | ||
| Yeah, those tech companies. | ||
| They're not doing enough to censor your speech. | ||
| They have to do more. | ||
| They have to do it in coordination with the tyrants in charge of these various countries now. | ||
| Macron and Ardern, I guess is how you say it, she's from New Zealand, welcomed the U.S. decision as a potential catalyst for stronger action. | ||
| Quote, the existence of algorithms themselves is not necessarily the problem. | ||
| It's whether or not they're being ethically used, Ardern said. | ||
| And so that is probably the biggest focus for the call community over the next year. | ||
| And of course, this comes at the heels of the announcement by the Rand Corporation that they're developing AI bots that are being trained to determine what is and is not extremism online. | ||
| Now, they'll certainly be a part of this. | ||
| You'll have very many massive corporations from big tech and the military industrial complex as they now merge together with the... | ||
| governments and the unelected NGOs that are running things behind the scenes. | ||
| They're all merging into one global super state that will destroy your ability to speak out against their dictates. | ||
| They might be unelected. | ||
| They might serve their own interests. | ||
| They might be untouchable and even unknowable. | ||
| You don't know who these people are or what their agenda is, but they'll be making decisions about what you're allowed to say on the Internet. | ||
| It's Truly incredible. | ||
| This comes also as the DHS warns that terrorists may attack as coronavirus restrictions ease. | ||
| And this really reminds me of nothing more than following September 11th when you would see warnings about this on almost a weekly basis. | ||
| It was constantly, oh, the terrorists are going to get us if we open up anymore. | ||
| The terrorists are going to get us if we let our guard down for a single moment. | ||
| Now, that actually came after supposedly, and according to the mainstream media, but at least we all saw massive towers collapse in New York City, a devastating attack, regardless of who perpetrated it, something that you actually might be able to make a case something that you actually might be able to make a case for being justification for some sort you know, extra security measures. | ||
| Now, those same types of warnings, those same types of security measures are being rolled out because of January 6th, where no one was killed, no one was injured, except, of course, the Trump supporters who were shot in cold blood. | ||
| But don't let that stop the fear mongering. | ||
| Department of Homeland Security is warning that terrorists may attack as coronavirus restrictions ease in the U.S. | ||
| That's right, folks. | ||
| You're gonna get coronavirus, or you're going to be murdered by a white supremacist, or possibly Bigfoot. | ||
| All of these pose exactly the same threat to you, the American people. | ||
| The point is, stay inside, shut up, don't talk, don't question us, and if you dare to do any of those things, prepare to at least be fired, if not put into prison. | ||
| Today's terrorism-related threat landscape is more complex, more dynamic, and more diversified than it was several years ago. | ||
| Well, Diversity is our strength. | ||
| I'm told that from the authorities. | ||
| We know that providing timely and useful information to the public is critical as we all work together to secure the homeland. | ||
| Oh yes, they're very concerned about securing the homeland from the people that live here. | ||
| Yes, we must secure the homeland from the patriots. | ||
| My God, what are we doing? | ||
| It's truly incredible. | ||
| And WND, the website, a news source, made a very interesting connection that the DHS sent out this domestic terrorist alert immediately after Trump announced his rallies. | ||
| Hmm, maybe just coincidence, or maybe, just maybe, and I'm just sort of spitballing here, maybe they're using the excuse of so-called domestic terrorism in order to crack down on dissident political movements. | ||
| Maybe it's not really about violent extremism, but it's about the so-called violent speech that they hear so much about. | ||
| That is an interesting timing, isn't it? | ||
| They say right after an announcement is made about Donald Trump holding two rallies in June and one around July 4th for his candidates, the DHS comes out with a domestic terrorist alert. | ||
| They admit there's no specific threat, but they decided to stir fear and suspicion anyway. | ||
| That's my favorite. | ||
| Yeah, no specific threat. | ||
| Just, we're just gonna go ahead and let the American people know you should be scared. | ||
| You should be frightened. | ||
| You should be worried. | ||
| And you definitely shouldn't lift your COVID restrictions. | ||
| Definitely not. | ||
| That's what the terrorists want you to do. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Department of Homeland Security issued a national terrorism bulletin in January warning of potential violence from people motivated by anti-government sentiment after President Joe Biden's election. | ||
| Yes, his election. | ||
| Truly incredible. | ||
| The DHS has issued another warning on Friday, just one day after the CDC eased restrictions and said fully vaccinated people are no longer required to wear masks. | ||
| That in and of itself, just a baffling turn of events. | ||
| They're like, well, the science has changed. | ||
| Yes, we, you know, they really want people to believe that the CDC is full of these like very distinguished scientists. | ||
| Very busy working in labs with lab coats on and they're wearing masks and goggles and they're trying to figure things out and they come to a conclusion. | ||
| Aha! | ||
| Eureka! | ||
| And they run to the CDC and the CDC presents the scientific validation for why they're making decisions. | ||
| It's literally not that. | ||
| They're literally just bureaucrats. | ||
| Most of what they do is a balance where they're trying to push as far as possible while keeping in mind the public relations aspect of everything that they do. | ||
| So the changes that they're making have nothing to do with science. | ||
| They have to do with public relations. | ||
| They have to do with the outrage being shown by these mask mandates. | ||
| It has to do with manipulating public opinion and psychologically manipulating the American people. | ||
| It has nothing to do with science except perhaps the science of mass psychiatry or mass psychology as they manipulate huge amounts of Thank you. | ||
| The American people to just be utterly fearful. | ||
| Utterly, utterly fearful. | ||
| But the Revolver news site has a very interesting article. | ||
| Looks like Biden administration has just kicked Fauci to the curb. | ||
| This from Revolver. | ||
| Last week, he was on TV telling all of us that life wouldn't get back to normal for at least another year or so. | ||
| This week, he's pretty much gone. | ||
| What's happened, they ask? | ||
| A lot, actually. | ||
| The biggest turn for Fauci involves three little words. | ||
| Gain of function. | ||
| Gain of function. | ||
| And again, yeah. | ||
| I guess I should be used to it by now, but I just, I just wish, I wish in some, just, just occasionally things like Revolver would give InfoWars the credit that we've earned. | ||
| I mean, we were making reports about this in January of 2020 before the mainstream media even knew the word coronavirus. | ||
| We were talking about gain of function. | ||
| We were talking about the lockstep document. | ||
| We were talking about all of this sort of stuff, but it's okay. | ||
| This article gives, Credit to Fox News host Steve Hilton, who a few months ago blew the lid off of Fauci's macabre obsession and funding of research involving the manipulation of highly contagious viruses. | ||
| Well, you know, good on Steve Hilton for covering this. | ||
| You know, not a lot of people on Fox were willing to do so, so credit where it's due. | ||
| But let's not pretend like Steve Hilton of Fox figured this out several months ago when we at InfoWars have been talking about it for 12 months at the very least. | ||
| But this article goes on to say Hilton laid the groundwork, but it was Senator Rand Paul who called out Fauci and his ghoulish research face-to-face during a Senate hearing. | ||
| And of course, we all know that video. | ||
| It's been played ad nauseum with Rand Paul and for good reason. | ||
| It's Rand Paul essentially exposing Dr. Fauci and his funding of the gain of function research that may very well have directly led to the creation of the coronavirus and the release of that virus on the world. | ||
| And the amazing thing is that all of the headlines following that from the mainstream media were like, Fauci destroys Rand Paul. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, I guess if, I guess if you just, I guess just lying, I, yeah, sure. | ||
| If you just lie about something, then, and nobody double checks that, and they just quote your lie verbatim as if it's the truth, yeah, you destroyed Rand Paul. | ||
| But then Rand Paul, of course, comes back with the receipts and posts a tweet that went somewhat viral showing the Truth, which is that, yes, Fauci definitely was involved with the gain-of-function research that most likely was the catalyst for the entire coronavirus pandemic in general. | ||
| In fact, do I have time yet? | ||
| Yeah, I just have time. | ||
| Let's go to this video. | ||
| It's Ben Swan of Truth in Media talking about the smoking gun proof that Fauci lied to Congress. | ||
| Clip number three. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
| Fauci was absolutely unequivocally lying to Congress. | ||
| The research article was first submitted in late 2015 as it looked specifically at a SARS-like coronavirus poised for human emergence. | ||
| And what do you find? | ||
| Quote, we thank Dr. Xi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat COVID sequences and plasmid of WIV-1 COVID spike protein. | ||
| Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, that's NIAID, and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH. | ||
| And then listed next to that you'll see the numbers for two separate grant awards. | ||
| Now it's very clear the NIH and NIAID absolutely We're studying bat coronaviruses and spike proteins from those bat coronaviruses provided by the Wuhan Virology Lab. | ||
| That is stated clearly and plainly and that the study was being done to determine gain of function of those spike proteins in coronaviruses. | ||
| It's all very clear. | ||
| If you're looking for a smoking gun there is nothing more clear that is absolutely stated in this 2016 report. | ||
| Now notice in that report it specifically thanked the Wuhan Virology Lab and the NIH and NIAID and it gave two numbers for the specific grant awards that made this work possible. | ||
| So what were those worth? | ||
| 31.2 million for the first and 10.5 million for the second grant award. | ||
| That means that over 40 million U.S. | ||
| taxpayer dollars went into the amplification of making the Wuhan virus more pathogenic to humans. | ||
| That doesn't even include the biodefense series that Fauci administered to DARPA. | ||
| That was all separate. | ||
| And that included more than $21 million for additional gain-of-function research. | ||
| So all in, that means that after the U.S. | ||
| government came out with a moratorium in 2014 that said no U.S. | ||
| taxpayer dollars can be used to fund gain-of-function research in this country or any place else, The research was offshored or moved into a military capacity under DARPA, and over $60 million U.S. | ||
| taxpayer dollars continued to flow into gain-of-function research. | ||
| There you go, folks. | ||
| Again, that's Ben Swan of Truth in Media laying out the smoking gun evidence that, yes, in fact, this did happen. | ||
| As if we needed more evidence of this, as if we haven't been talking about this for an entire year. | ||
| But it's really amazing, because here's a story from NationalPolls.com. | ||
| Wuhan Lab deleted Fauci's NIH and Gain-of-Function mentions from their old webpages in early 2021. | ||
| So they knew this backlash was eventually coming, they knew they had to cover their butts, so Wuhan Institute of Virology actually removed, they scrubbed the U.S. | ||
| National Institutes of Health as one of its research partners from its website in early 2021. | ||
| The revelation comes despite Dr. Anthony Fauci insisting no relationship existed between the institutions. | ||
| That's the way it works, right? | ||
| They're like, no, it doesn't exist. | ||
| Just here, look at the website. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, they've just scrubbed the website of the mentions of this. | ||
| Archived versions of the Wuhan lab site also reveals a research update. | ||
| Quote, when will SARS come back? | ||
| Is the article appearing to describe gain of function research being conducted at the Institute by entities funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. | ||
| That's the NIAID. | ||
| On March 21st, 2021, the Lab's website listed six U.S.-based research partners—the University of Alabama, the University of North Texas, EcoHealth Alliance, Harvard University, the National Institutes of Health, the United States, and the National Wildlife Federation. | ||
| But one day later, the page was revised to contain just two research partners—EcoHealth Alliance and the University of Alabama. | ||
| By March 23rd, EcoHealth Alliance was the sole partner remaining. | ||
| So, they're lying. | ||
| They're covering up. | ||
| They're disguising the fact that the NIH and the NIAID were directly responsible for the research that created coronavirus in the Wuhan lab that started all of this. | ||
| So again, how important is it to note that it was Dr. Fauci and his organization that funded the research that created the coronavirus that led to the condition that allowed Dr. Fauci to come in and lock us all down, destroy our economy, keep us masked and in a state of total fear, which makes it perfectly keep us masked and in a state of total fear, which makes it perfectly possible to bring about a totalitarian authoritarian | ||
| I've said it before and I'll say it again, you make the rules inconsistent and the punishments draconian and you have total control over your population. | ||
| That's what they're doing. | ||
| They're changing their minds for no reason, and yet you can't protest or resist it, and the punishment is incarceration for opposing it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| Second hour has begun on Sunday Night Live. | ||
| InfoWars.com, band.video. | ||
| Remember, you support everything that we do here by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We're talking about, well, the thing we've been talking about for over a year now on InfoWars, and that is the fact that the gain-of-function research done by Dr. Fauci, or organizations associated with Dr. Fauci, in coordination with the Wuhan Lab, is responsible for the outbreak of the coronavirus. | ||
| And again, you cannot overemphasize how important it is to understand that the people that created the virus are the ones who are keeping us in lockdown. | ||
| This has been the plan all along. | ||
| And all you really have to do to understand this was a plan all along is go back to things like the lockstep document or these summits that they hold where they do the planning of how to deal with crises as they pop up and | ||
| And when you look at those, and again, we realized this back in January of 2020, when nobody else is even talking about coronavirus at all, you know, they weren't even aware if anything, they were calling it racist to even talk about and telling you to go hug Chinese people. | ||
| It was just, it was all just very weird, but that's what they were doing. | ||
| And we meanwhile, we're talking about the fact that the gain of function stuff was happening. | ||
| And then you look at the, Summits that were held by John Hopkins and the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
| The world is primed for a outbreak. | ||
| What will we do to handle it? | ||
| And it's like, what are their top priorities? | ||
| It's like we have to control the media and we have to make sure everybody gets their vaccine. | ||
| It's like, that's not what I would do if I was put in charge. | ||
| I think it's basic common sense. | ||
| The first thing you'd want to do is identify and isolate the area. | ||
| That wasn't even on the top 10 of their concern, right? | ||
| They couldn't care less. | ||
| They literally called you racist for saying that we should try to prevent travel from the areas that were infected. | ||
| They weren't interested in stopping the spread. | ||
| They weren't interested in preventing an outbreak. | ||
| They are interested, and they were interested, and they continue to be interested in using that outbreak to bring about the things they want anyway. | ||
| Total control of communication lines, total control of the economy, total lockdown, moving everything away from small businesses to big corporations. | ||
| I mean, that was what their plan was. | ||
| That's the event 201. | ||
| I mean, you just watch it. | ||
| That's what they're concerned with. | ||
| That was their plan the entire time. | ||
| It had nothing to do with preventing a larger outbreak or preventing deaths from occurring in It was about how to utilize that tragedy, utilize that crisis to gain what they already desired. | ||
| The lockstep document, again, is a perfect example of this. | ||
| I mean, it's obvious. | ||
| It's been obvious from the very beginning. | ||
| Now, a year later, people are starting to awaken to this. | ||
| And that's a good thing. | ||
| We want people to wake up to this. | ||
| We want people to understand what's going on and not just accept it. | ||
| Not just go, okay, now we know what's going on. | ||
| So we're not going to be on a lockdown anymore. | ||
| Okay, we're not on lockdown. | ||
| You're not forcing us to wear masks. | ||
| We're cool. | ||
| We're even now. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Now is when the investigation should begin. | ||
| Now is when we hold these people to account. | ||
| Now is when we reignite the Nuremberg trials and try people for the experimentation that they've put us under. | ||
| And so that's what I want to talk about now. | ||
| Of course, the article I was just reading from Revolver is talking about the fact that Dr. Fauci seems to have been slightly knocked off of his pedestal and maybe not going to be at the forefront of this conversation anymore. | ||
| They mentioned that he basically disappeared after this questioning by Rand Paul, except they do say he crawled out of the woodwork late in the day to make one disastrous comment about kids and masks. | ||
| Yeah, he did come out to say, yeah, okay, you don't have to wear masks anymore, but your kids do it. | ||
| The children must be masks, you must suffocate your children. | ||
| I'm Dr. Fauci, I say so, therefore it is the law. | ||
| This guy is such a scumbag. | ||
| But this wasn't the only thing that Rand Paul has schooled Dr. Fauci in recently. | ||
| It was two months ago that Rand Paul was, once again, he was humiliated by Anthony Fauci. | ||
| He said something to Anthony Fauci and Anthony Fauci clapped back and it was heroic the way Fauci smacked down Rand Paul. | ||
| That was the narrative that you got from the mainstream media. | ||
| The reality is, two months later, we can reveal to you now, that the reality was that Rand Paul was, yes, exactly right in what he was saying and now the CDC has finally come around to it. | ||
| Well, the science is in, the experimentation has been run, and now we say that you don't have to wear masks when you have the vaccine. | ||
| It's like, wow, how did Rand Paul know this if he didn't do the test tube stuff? | ||
| If he didn't, you know, run all of the crazy tests that CDC is certainly running? | ||
| No, it's because this has been the case forever, but they had you wearing masks. | ||
| They didn't want to give that up. | ||
| They had you submitting, and they didn't want to release you from that bind. | ||
| And in fact, Snopes has an article about this. | ||
| Aren't you excited to find out what Snopes says about Rand Paul? | ||
| But first, let's look at the video that they're talking about. | ||
| The Snopes article says, was Rand Paul right all along about the CDC mask mandate? | ||
| Now, an honest person, the answer would be yes. | ||
| Yes, he was right. | ||
| He was right. | ||
| Obviously he was right, because the CDC is now Admitted that he was right all along. | ||
| We'll see what Snopes says in just a second. | ||
| First, let's watch this video. | ||
| It was at least one, I think it was two months ago actually, that Rand Paul schooled Fauci about masks after the vaccine. | ||
| Clip number 10. | ||
| This was that questioning from two months ago. | ||
| You've been vaccinated and you parade around in two masks for show. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| You can't get it again. | ||
| There's virtually zero percent chance you're going to get it and yet you're telling people that have had the vaccine who have immunity. | ||
| You're defying everything we know about immunity by telling people to wear masks who've been vaccinated. | ||
| Instead, you should be saying there is no science to say we're going to have a problem from the large number of people being vaccinated. | ||
| You want to get rid of vaccine hesitancy? | ||
| Tell them they can quit wearing their mask after they get the vaccine. | ||
| You want people to get the vaccine? | ||
| Give them a reward instead of telling them that the nanny state's going to be there for three more years and you got to wear a mask forever. | ||
| People don't want to hear it. | ||
| There's no science behind it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, let me just state for the record that masks are not theater. | |
| Masks are protective. | ||
| And we have immunity there, theater. | ||
| If you already have immunity, you're wearing a mask to give comfort to others. | ||
| You're not wearing a mask because of any sign. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I totally disagree with you. | |
| There's that comeback from Anthony Fauci. | ||
| I totally disagree with you. | ||
| Okay, then you're totally wrong, I guess, because that's clearly the reality. | ||
| That's clearly right. | ||
| Now it's been borne out and proven, or at least, you know, agreed to by the CDC. | ||
| Let's see what Snopes has to say about this. | ||
| They say, U.S. | ||
| Senator Rand Paul, here's the claim that they're investigating. | ||
| The claim they're investigating is U.S. | ||
| Senator Rand Paul was right about unmasking before the Center for Disease Control Prevention announced on May 13, 2021, that fully vaccinated people no longer needed to mask in public or private. | ||
| Was he right about that? | ||
| Let's see, he said it, and then the CDC later came along and said it. | ||
| Was he really right all along? | ||
| Their judgment is, eh, it was a mixture. | ||
| Yeah, kinda. | ||
| Kinda true, kinda not. | ||
| They're gonna go ahead and put words in Dr. Fauci's mouth. | ||
| They're gonna obscure things just a little bit, just so they don't have to say that Rand Paul was right. | ||
| They really don't want to have to say that, even though he clearly was. | ||
| Here's what they say is true in this claim. | ||
| In March 2021, Paul clashed with Dr. Anthony Fauci, saying he could go unmasked if he was fully vaccinated and that wearing masks after vaccination was theater. | ||
| Two months later, May 13, 2021, the CDC announced that fully vaccinated people can go without masks in most places, prompting Paul to claim he'd been right. | ||
| It's like, yes, the CDC came out claiming that Rand Paul was right, prompting him to say he was right. | ||
| Hmm, interesting. | ||
| But here's what's false about it, they say. | ||
| Paul's claims don't take into account the CDC's ongoing investigations into the COVID-19 variants. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Even though the CDC guidelines announced in May 2021 concurred with Paul's March claims and Fauci said in March that there was credence to Paul's argument. | ||
| I didn't hear that. | ||
| I heard him say explicitly, I totally disagree. | ||
| But now Snopes is going to claim he said that there was credence to Paul's argument. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I didn't hear that. | ||
| Fauci also said that the existence of variants means masking should still be taken seriously. | ||
| Not what I heard. | ||
| We just played the clip for you. | ||
| Did you hear that? | ||
| Do you hear anything about variants? | ||
| Do you hear anything about ongoing investigations by the CDC? | ||
| No. | ||
| You heard Fauci say, masks are for safety. | ||
| They are not theater. | ||
| I totally disagree with you, sir. | ||
| When Rand Paul was completely right about what he was saying. | ||
| Context, Paul has been critical of masks since early 2020, in line with many Republican colleagues who have mocked mask wearing. | ||
| After recovering from COVID-19 in summer 2020, Paul claimed he could go maskless because he had immunity. | ||
| At that time, however, experts were still investigating the duration of immunity and the possibility of reinfection and did not have enough information to confirm Paul's claims. | ||
| See, Rand Paul was correct. | ||
| He was right. | ||
| It's just the authorities didn't say he was right. | ||
| Therefore, was he right? | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| We're Snopes. | ||
| We're stupid idiots. | ||
| And we think you are too. | ||
| So we're going to lie to you and you're going to take it because maybe you're into that sort of thing. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Truly incredible. | ||
| And, you know, I can talk more about this. | ||
| We have Eric Clapton blasting vaccine safety propaganda. | ||
| There's rumors, and I don't know how true this is, there's 1,000 lawyers and 10,000 doctors have filed a lawsuit for violations of the Nuremberg Code. | ||
| That would be very nice to see because, again, this is the time to go on the offensive and hold these people to account for what they've done. | ||
| We also have, of course, the news that we've been talking about forever of COVID-19 vaccines may lead to prion-linked brain degeneration, similar to mad cow disease. | ||
| You've heard that if you've listened to Alex Jones in the last year. | ||
| Employers, according to LifeSite News, may be liable for any adverse reactions from mandated coronavirus shots. | ||
| That's pretty good news, but I want to take a quick little detour and talk about domestic terror. | ||
| Real domestic terror. | ||
| Actual domestic terrorism. | ||
| Here's the story from Breitbart.com. | ||
| FBI dubs congressional baseball shooter a domestic violent extremist. | ||
| This is a change because they originally came out and said this was suicide by cop. | ||
| You can just think about how outrageous and ridiculous that classification is when you hear the description of the crime as it occurred. | ||
| The FBI has classified the 2017 congressional baseball shooter as a domestic violent extremist doing away with the suicide by cop theory that many victims or witnesses said was unrealistic. | ||
| The reclassification came after survivors pressured Representative Brad Winstrup to change the initial classification he made when meeting with FBI Director Christopher Wray. | ||
| Quote, our intelligence and law enforcement apparatuses require accuracy, precision, and justice. | ||
| I'm encouraged that the FBI has updated its classification of that nearly catastrophic event to reflect the actual motives of the assailant, and I commend Director Wray for his oversight of that correction. | ||
| Just like, I commend Director Wray for getting caught in a lie and then weaseling his way out of it. | ||
| I commend the weasel. | ||
| You are commended, weasel. | ||
| Your weasely commendations await. | ||
| Outrageous. | ||
| Because listen to this. | ||
| Listen to this description again. | ||
| To imagine that the FBI would classify this as suicide by cop is an insult. | ||
| It's a spit in your face. | ||
| They say the gunman, James Hodgkinson, shot more than 100 rounds at the congressmen, their aides, and security at an Alexandria, Virginia baseball field on June 14, 2017 after he asked if Democrats or Republicans were practicing there. | ||
| And they're like, nah, there's nothing political about that. | ||
| That wasn't terrorism. | ||
| I was this guy trying to commit suicide by cop. | ||
| He had just a little bit of mental illness, nothing political about this. | ||
| January 6th, that was Pearl Harbor. | ||
| That was 9-11. | ||
| That was horror. | ||
| No, no politicians were even touched during this. | ||
| Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was, you know, nearby Chicago. | ||
| She was in a building like a mile away, crying and hiding under her desk. | ||
| That was about as dangerous as things got for them. | ||
| Meanwhile, you have a guy unloading over 100 rounds at congressmen, severely injuring some of them, including House Republican Whip Representative Steve Scalise, who was severely wounded in the shooting and almost died, as well as Matt Mika, a lobbyist for Tyson Foods and the coach of the Republican team. | ||
| So why did I make this jump here? | ||
| Because one of the people who was at the field that day and was an explicit target of this literal domestic terrorist who was trying to murder the representatives of his enemies, one of those people was Rand Paul. | ||
| And he was there and he was one of the people targeted. | ||
| And so you just have to think of how effective that shooting would have been if he had carried out his plans to fruition. | ||
| If he had succeeded in killing all the people he wanted to kill, who would have questioned Dr. Fauci about this? | ||
| Who would have brought the gain-of-function material to the U.S. | ||
| Senate? | ||
| Who would have questioned him about the theater of masks, only to be proven right later? | ||
| You have to understand what a severe attack against our liberty this attack was, this shooting at the baseball field, and how the assassination of these people you know it's not just it's not just oh now republicans are are scared of what no they were trying to assassinate members of the republican party in order to destroy their ability to be for republicans to be represented in their government | ||
| it was far more damaging far more of a threat to our democracy than january 6th ever was and And yet the FBI didn't even want to classify it as extremism or domestic terrorism or anything of the sort. | ||
| They classified it as suicide by cop. | ||
| It's an insult. | ||
| It's a spit in your face. | ||
| And the reason they want to do this, and the reason Rand Paul has been attacked multiple times, swarmed by mobs, In Washington, D.C., who were attempting to essentially lynch him. | ||
| It's because he's effective. | ||
| It's because he works for freedom. | ||
| It's because he actually is in a position where he can offer legitimate opposition to the takeover of this country by socialists. | ||
| And so they're trying to kill him. | ||
| They try to get him out of the way. | ||
| And then they blame you for going to a peaceful protest and say that you're actually a terrorist. | ||
| It's absolutely mind-blowing that this happened. | ||
| I'm going to go to another clip here. | ||
| This is from a Texas Senate Committee on State Affairs, and it shows that You know, while people might, maybe they don't give us credit where we think we deserve it. | ||
| Not even me. | ||
| It's like, it's not even, it's not even credit for me. | ||
| It's like, give credit to Alex Jones. | ||
| Give credit to Owen Schroer. | ||
| Give credit to the people that have been talking about this for a year. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| We might not get credit, but we don't want the credit. | ||
| We want the ideas out there. | ||
| We want the consciousness raised. | ||
| We want the awareness elevated. | ||
| And it is. | ||
| So if it's, if it's, Like, well, you can get a lot of credit for all this stuff, but it doesn't have an impact or this information gets out. | ||
| Nobody knows where it came from, but it actually affects Americans. | ||
| I'm going to go with that latter option. | ||
| I'm going to go with we want the people in positions of power to be aware of this information, be aware that the mainstream media is lying to them, and so they can inform their constituents and make decisions on policy based on actual fact rather than the baseless Assertions of the communist media. | ||
| So this shows that even if it's not tied to us, the stuff that we talk about is getting through. | ||
| The stuff that we talk about is breaking through the paradigm and actually having an effect on people in positions of power. | ||
| So this is very good news. | ||
| And here it is. | ||
| The Texas Senate Committee on State Affairs. | ||
| Clip number two. | ||
| The population is the vaccine guinea pig. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And have you seen any other vaccine that was put out for the public that skipped the animal test? | |
| Never before, especially for children. | ||
| And as I've what I've read, they actually started the animal tests and because the animals were dying, they stopped the test. | ||
| Folks, I think that's important to understand there that That what we're talking about is the American people are now the guinea pigs. | ||
| This is the test program that's going on. | ||
| They didn't do the human testing and they stopped the animal test because the animals were dying. | ||
| And then they turned it out for the public. | ||
| And we are now looking at businesses that want to mandate that this experimental vaccine be given to people as a condition of their employment. | ||
| And yet we have this death count that continues to rise and be totally ignored. | ||
| Meanwhile, ever since the mask mandate was lifted from Texas, the death rate and infection rate has actually been on a total downward slide. | ||
| But there you go. | ||
| You can see the pushback is starting. | ||
| But again, it's not about pushing back and showing that all of this stuff was illegitimate and unnecessary and then being relieved when they lift the mandates or when they retract the vaccine mandates. | ||
| Mandatory orders. | ||
| That's not enough. | ||
| Keep going. | ||
| Keep pushing. | ||
| Keep on the offensive. | ||
| Expose that all of this stuff was known to be bad far before it was actually implemented and yet they implemented it anyway. | ||
| LifeSite News has the article, employers may be liable for any adverse reactions from mandated coronavirus shots. | ||
| This according to OSHA. | ||
| It's possible that employers requiring injections may be legally liable for violating federal law. | ||
| The Federal Occupation Safety and Health Administration, OSHA, has put employers on notice that should they attempt to require employees to receive injections of the experimental COVID-19 gene therapy vaccines, a resulting adverse reaction will be considered, quote, work-related, for which the employer may be held accountable. | ||
| Liable. | ||
| OSHA released new guidance on April 20th under the Frequently Asked Questions section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. | ||
| The question asks whether an employer who mandates employees receive the experimental COVID-19 shots is required to record any adverse reactions as a result of these injections. | ||
| Such recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illnesses May not only leave an employer vulnerable to workers' compensation claims, but such incidents could also impact the employer's safety record. | ||
| Here's the question and answer in full. | ||
| Quote, if I require my employees to take COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable? | ||
| Quote, if you require your vaccine, your employers to be vaccinated as a condition of employment, i.e. | ||
| for work-related reasons, then any adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. | ||
| The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7. | ||
| The clarification comes as an increasing number of employers seek to mandate the experimental injections despite possible illegality. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal reported this beginning trend in a variety of fields, including machine operators, office workers, restaurant waiters, and medical staff. | ||
| The Houston Methodist Hospital Network is mandating vaccines for both existing employees and new hires barring an exemption, Chip Cutter of the WSJ wrote. | ||
| Quote, those who fail to comply will at first be suspended without pay and later terminated. | ||
| But under the new OSHA clarification, such employers may be held liable for injuries due to these requirements. | ||
| I wish I'd known about this last week. | ||
| I had a caller call in basically saying that he was afraid he was going to get fired because he refused to get the vaccine. | ||
| And his employer was forcing him to wear a mask. | ||
| And he was like the only one that had to wear a mask because he was the only one that wasn't vaccinated. | ||
| And this would have been very useful for him to come in and show the the his bosses, essentially, and say, look, if you're going to make me get the shot, any negative adverse reactions you are going to be responsible for. | ||
| And we need to play hardball with these people because this really has to be a red line. | ||
| We cannot allow mandatory vaccinations. | ||
| It cannot be stood for. | ||
| Even if you got your vaccine, even if you are in favor of vaccination, even if you love being a little guinea pig for your scientist overlords, You should still understand that the freedom of Americans to decide what is and is not injected into their bloodstream is an inviolable right. | ||
| It is something that cannot be violated. | ||
| And you should be standing up for your fellow Americans to make the decisions they want to make, just like you want to be free to make the decisions you want to make. | ||
| But more stories are coming out. | ||
| Now, NationalFile.com has this review. | ||
| COVID-19 vaccines may lead to prion-linked brain degeneration, similar to mad cow disease. | ||
| A new review of possible unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccines suggested the controversial mRNA vaccine, Moderna and Pfizer, may lead to unexpected neurological conditions similar to the mad cow disease. | ||
| So just, you know, yet another side effect of these vaccines coming to light. | ||
| You know, this week was a fairly busy one, right? | ||
| It was last Sunday that the Supreme Court of Israel decided to postpone or waylay their decision as to Sheikh Jarrah. | ||
| That was the real impetus to what's going on in Israel and Gaza. | ||
| And over the last week, it's been Justin saying that just everything that's happened over the last week has been really crazy, but there's one story that stood above all the others for me, and it's one that I think is very important to share to the InfoWars audience. | ||
| A Twitter account called Kami Lee Jones posts a summation of a little bit of research that was done by MIT, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the top schools in the entire country. | ||
| had researchers infiltrate a COVID skeptics community a few months ago and they found, get this, believe it or not folks, I know, this is going to blow your mind here, skeptics place a high premium on data analysis and empiricism. | ||
| Quote, most fundamentally, the groups we studied believe that science is a process and not an institution. | ||
| This is really amazing. | ||
| And again, this needs to be spread around to info warriors and info wars adjacent communities, because this really exposes who is the blind sheep buying whatever lies are being fed to them. | ||
| And what group of people is actually concerned about health and science and empiricism and facts versus the narrative. | ||
| Let me read some of these quotes from this research article from MIT. | ||
| Quote, indeed, anti maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries who espouse naive realism about the, quote, objective truth of public health data. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| In other words, anti-maskers value unmediated access to information and privilege, personal research and direct reading over expert interpretations. | ||
| So in other words, the anti-maskers are aware that scientific. | ||
| What's that old what's that old idiom where they say, you know, statistics never lie, but liars use statistics, statistics, statistics. | ||
| That's essentially what the anti-mask or COVID deniers believe. | ||
| They're like, look, we want to see the actual science. | ||
| We want to see how the science was decided, what sort of You know, variables went into it. | ||
| What's behind the research? | ||
| What other alternative variables could be affecting this? | ||
| They want to get into the data. | ||
| They want to understand things. | ||
| Meanwhile, the people that are pro-mask, people that are pro-vaccine, people that are pro-Anthony Fauci and obedience above questioning, they're just like, well, the experts tell me that this is true. | ||
| Therefore, I believe that. | ||
| And I'm not allowed to question it. | ||
| And I'm not allowed to look at the independent research myself. | ||
| I'm not a scientist. | ||
| I'm not allowed to. | ||
| I mean, this is like the This is like the Catholics in Germany before the Protestant Revolution with all the Catholic priests being like, just trust us. | ||
| We'll tell you what's in the Bible. | ||
| No need to look at it for yourself. | ||
| No, no, trust us. | ||
| You just, you pay us money and then your sins are forgiven. | ||
| Trust us. | ||
| That's what it says. | ||
| You're not allowed to read the Bible, but that's what it says. | ||
| Give us your money and your sins are forgiven. | ||
| Amen. | ||
| It's like, okay, you're full of crap and we want to read the words for ourselves. | ||
| That's what is going on here. | ||
| There's more quotes from this that are well worth distribution. | ||
| Quote, its members value individual initiative and ingenuity, trusting scientific analysis only insofar as they can replicate it themselves by accessing and manipulating the data firsthand. | ||
| Skeptics, questioning, wondering, getting to the bottom of things. | ||
| This is real science. | ||
| This is what science is. | ||
| It's not the science with the trademark, which is just whatever our, you know, Overlords dictate whatever it is. | ||
| They are also highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis and resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of the scientific elites. | ||
| You damn right we are. | ||
| You're damn right. | ||
| I'm just gonna read that one again. | ||
| They're highly reflexive about the inherently biased nature of any analysis, and they resent what they view as the arrogant self-righteousness of the scientific elites. | ||
| Oh yes, yes indeed we do! | ||
| All you have to do is just play Anthony Fauci saying literally anything, and it's just the arrogant self-righteousness oozes out of the screen. | ||
| It's just like, uh, you children need to be wearing masks all the time. | ||
| And it's just like, shut the hell up, you gremlin. | ||
| Many of the users believe that the most important metrics are missing from government-released data. | ||
| One user wrote, quote, Coding data is a big deal, and those definitions should be offered transparently by every state. | ||
| Without a national guideline, we are left with this mess. | ||
| The lack of transparency within these data collection systems, which many of these users infer as a lack of honesty, erodes these users' trust within both government institutions and datasets they release. | ||
| And again, our skepticism this whole time has been justified time and time again. | ||
| I can't think of a single example. | ||
| Where we've shown suspicion at numbers that are being presented, where later it's proven, no, no, those numbers are totally legit. | ||
| In fact, they're higher than they even were. | ||
| That doesn't happen. | ||
| It's always the other way around. | ||
| It's always like happened, you know, coincidentally, ironically, unexpectedly, as soon as Joe Biden got into office, the CDC came out and was like, oh yeah, it turns out those tests we're using to determine COVID, Positive people, it turns out, tons of false positives. | ||
| Just a huge amount of false positives. | ||
| Turns out the number's way, way lower than it was, and we shouldn't have ever been using the PCR test in the first place. | ||
| It's like, yeah, we know. | ||
| And yeah, we know, and we've been telling you this, and time and time again, we're proven right. | ||
| Our skepticism is validated, justified, confirmed. | ||
| Time and time again, I can't think of an example in the opposite direction. | ||
| These groups argue that conflation of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases therefore makes it difficult for anyone to actually determine the severity of the pandemic. | ||
| Yes, it does. | ||
| For these anti-mask users, their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less. | ||
| And that's the key statement from this study. | ||
| For these anti-mask users, their approach to the pandemic is grounded in more scientific rigor, not less. | ||
| Trust the science, folks! | ||
| You want to trust the science? | ||
| You want to be a scientist? | ||
| You want to follow the science? | ||
| Take off the mask, loser. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| Sunday Night Live here, broadcasting live from the InfoWars World Headquarters in Central Texas. | ||
| So glad you're with us. | ||
| My name's Harrison Smith. | ||
| I'm the host of American Journal, the morning show on this fine network available at Band.Video and any number of disguised URLs that we use to circumvent the totalitarian censorship of the technocratic elites. | ||
| Each morning we document in real time the ongoing war behind the scenes, the information war, the psychological war being waged against people the world over to convince them to give up their freedom, submit to control. | ||
| Or face the consequences. | ||
| Well, we're facing the consequences and we're very glad that you're here with us to discuss some of this stuff. | ||
| Still a lot of videos to show you today. | ||
| A lot of stuff to get into. | ||
| We're gonna go a little bit off the rails here in this final half hour because there's no one topic that we're gonna stick to here. | ||
| We're just gonna sort of jump around and cover a lot of these major, major stories. | ||
| In fact, let's go somewhere totally different now. | ||
| Something that, you know, used to be InfoWars alone would cover. | ||
| Just another one of these things that everybody sort of acknowledges now, but back in the day it was a horrible conspiracy theory that you weren't allowed to discuss. | ||
| And that is the concept of your phone or your appliances or anything connected to the internet spying on you. | ||
| Remember? | ||
| Remember when that was a conspiracy theory? | ||
| Remember that? | ||
| It seems like, like now it's just so acknowledged. | ||
| That everybody understands this, but it really wasn't that long ago. | ||
| Maybe five years? | ||
| That if you said, you know, my, your phone is recording you, it was like, okay, you crazy conspiracy theorist. | ||
| Now people are just like, oh yeah, I know. | ||
| And I've had friends that will do the test where like, they don't have a cat, but for a week they'll talk as if they have a cat. | ||
| And then suddenly start seeing ads for like cat litter and cat food and stuff. | ||
| Just to confirm that, oh yeah, they really are listening to us. | ||
| The phone really is spying on you. | ||
| That used to be a conspiracy theory, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| That used to be an InfoWars tinfoil hat conspiracy theory until it became true, and now you just don't question it. | ||
| Well, it's even more intense than you may think. | ||
| This is a TikTok video exposing that iPhones are taking a picture of you every five seconds. | ||
| Unless you can come up with an alternative explanation for this, That seems like exactly what they're doing. | ||
| Every five seconds or so, the infrared face capture device on the iPhone is taking a photo of you, capturing your image. | ||
| Where these are being stored, where they're being sent to, for what purpose they're being collected, who's to say? | ||
| Who's to say? | ||
| But it's a technology that would be very handy to have if you're writing algorithms to destroy the ability of people around the world to communicate Freely. | ||
| It would be really handy to have images of people's faces, say, when they're reading an article that you might find objectionable. | ||
| What type of face are they making while they're reading that article? | ||
| What are they feeling while they're reading that article? | ||
| What are they feeling when they're watching that video? | ||
| Are they committing face crime? | ||
| Seriously, that's easily where this can go. | ||
| Rankings, you know? | ||
| I mean, heck, we've seen people fired this month because they smirked at a boy wearing a dress going to prom. | ||
| Yeah, you're fired. | ||
| That's face crime, my friend. | ||
| You didn't have to say anything offensive. | ||
| You smirked at him. | ||
| You're guilty. | ||
| Maybe that has something to do with what we're about to see here, but here it is. | ||
| The video showing that your phone is taking infrared pictures of you every five seconds. | ||
| Let's roll it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wild and crazy Friday night findings. | |
| We just discovered, which we already knew, that your phone, an iPhone specifically, takes an infrared picture of you with your face ID every five-ish seconds. | ||
| And we looked at it through an infrared camera and it's pretty wild. | ||
| Let's show you. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Have your home screen? | ||
| It's on the home screen. | ||
| Not touching anything. | ||
| No buttons. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Infrared lens on the camera. | ||
| Boom. | ||
| There was one. | ||
| Two. | ||
| That's so wild. | ||
| Okay, cover the camera. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Oh, there's another one. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Nothing? | ||
| Oh, it's trying. | ||
| It's taking pictures of your finger. | ||
| Okay, move your finger. | ||
| Ready? | ||
| Boom. | ||
| Wild. | ||
| It's like an infrared flash scanning your face every five seconds. | ||
| Why would they do that? | ||
| Why would they want to do that? | ||
| What possible reason could they have to justify that? | ||
| It's worth questioning. | ||
| It's worth asking. | ||
| It's worth wondering. | ||
| Because we're moving into a rapidly irreversibly Orwellian world. | ||
| It's not even Orwellian. | ||
| I like to say it's a smorgasbord. | ||
| It's a little bit of Brave New World. | ||
| You can't say mother and father. | ||
| Your children will be subjected to sexualization at a very young age. | ||
| Women reaching maturity at 16 and then looking exactly the same until they're 60. | ||
| I mean, all these things from Brave New World are coming true. | ||
| At the same time, you're having the Orwellian 1984 style 2 plus 2 equals 5. | ||
| You must deny reality because the dictates of the party, as well as instead of being forced to keep a camera watching you at all times, you'll carry one around willingly. | ||
| So it's a smorgasbord. | ||
| Burning Books, Fahrenheit 451, you know, it's just a little bit of everything, a little bit of all the dystopian novels smashed into one. | ||
| And this is just the latest. | ||
| In fact, I want to play another video now from Viva Frye, YouTuber, who writes, how Orwellian is it in Canada? | ||
| This is what you pay $13 million a month in COVID ad spending placement gets you. | ||
| Here's a Completely Orwellian ad from Canada. | ||
| clip number eight, courtesy of YouTuber Viva Fry. - The alert level in your region or a neighboring region is red. | ||
|
unidentified
|
To curb the spread of COVID-19, gatherings with family and friends in private homes and yards are prohibited. | |
| Travel between regions should be avoided, and traveling to yellow zones is forbidden. | ||
| It's forbidden to leave your home between 9:30 PM and 5:00 AM. | ||
| Visit Cabin.com. | ||
| Private gatherings are prohibited. | ||
| coronavirus to learn more about the other measures in place. | ||
| Follow all the rules, all the time, no exceptions. | ||
| A message from the Gouvelle de Monde du Québec. - It's forbidden to leave your house from 9:30 in the evening to five in the morning. | ||
| Private gatherings are prohibited. | ||
| Our taxpayers just paid for that radio announcement. | ||
| This is Orwellian like nothing has ever been Orwellian. | ||
| You may as well just have the boxes in everyone's homes randomly, you know, pulsating that message. | ||
| Just government take over the cell phones and just, you know, make that message appear. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| I'm exaggerating. | ||
| As was George Orwell. | ||
| Mm-hmm. | ||
| Just welcome everyone. | ||
| Stay inside your home. | ||
| Don't leave. | ||
| Don't hug your friends. | ||
| You're not permitted to travel into the red zone. | ||
| You're in a yellow zone. | ||
| It's just like, oh I'm in hell is where I am. | ||
| That's exactly where I am. | ||
| I'm in hell and you've put me here and now you're telling me it's illegal to leave. | ||
| It's really mind-blowing what's going on around the world these days. | ||
| How it's being justified. | ||
| How the fear porn being espoused by the mainstream media has kept the larger part of the entire world in this catatonic state of fear. | ||
| Wake up, people. | ||
| They're trying to enslave you. | ||
| They're trying to lull you into a sense of dependency and helplessness. | ||
| Wake up. | ||
| You're not helpless. | ||
| You're a human being. | ||
| You're allowed to do whatever you so please, as long as you don't hurt another person. | ||
| And that doesn't include hurting them by being a vessel for Disease. | ||
| It's totally absurd what we're getting into. | ||
| Completely absurd. | ||
| I'm going to talk a lot about diversity in just a moment, but before I do, I'd like to talk about this. | ||
| It's from a newspaper called MountainStateSpotlight.org. | ||
| Amid opioid epidemic, drug executives made fun of West Virginians. | ||
| At the height of West Virginia's opioid epidemic, executives at a leading drug distributor exchanged emails making light of the crisis. | ||
| The emails were put forth by Cabell County Attorney Paul Farrell Jr. | ||
| during trial at U.S. | ||
| District Court in Charleston. | ||
| The trial pits the county and city of Huntington against the nation's three largest drug distributors, who they argued fueled the overdose crisis. | ||
| In one shared on Thursday, Amerisource Virgin executive Chris Zimmerman shared a lyrical parody of the theme song for the Beverly Hillbillies, making fun of quote, a poor mountaineer who purchased pills at a cash and carry pain clinic. | ||
| So these are the pharmaceutical companies that are directly responsible for The greatest legitimate epidemic that has hit America in recent times with hundreds of thousands of people succumbing to opioid addiction brought about by the pushing of opioids by doctors. | ||
| Now I've said it before, I'll say it a million times, in the 1980s the US government Put crack into black neighborhoods to destroy the black neighborhood. | ||
| Did they do it because they were black? | ||
| Was this a racist thing that they did? | ||
| No, it was targeted to a specific race using specific tactics in order to destroy the independence of specific areas. | ||
| That's exactly what's going on with the opioid epidemic. | ||
| Except they're all white. | ||
| Because it's not about whether you're white or you're black. | ||
| It's about whatever they need. | ||
| To tailor make, to tailor design, in order to oppress you and keep you down. | ||
| However, that takes place. | ||
| They'll do crack in the black neighborhoods, and they'll do opioid in the white neighborhoods. | ||
| They'll destroy your culture. | ||
| They'll destroy your people. | ||
| They'll destroy your livelihoods. | ||
| And then they'll laugh about it. | ||
| And they'll mock you for it. | ||
| And that's exactly what's happening here. | ||
| Another thing that this guy Zimmerman sent was titled, OxyCottonville, and included a parody of a Jimmy Buffett song that described driving from Kentucky to buy pills. | ||
| In a third email, a member of Zimmerman's team wrote, one of the hillbillies must have learned how to read, smiley face, in response to an email detailing Kentucky's new opioid regulations. | ||
| They're mocking you. | ||
| They're mocking you. | ||
| Zimmerman apologized in court for the contents of some of the emails, including use of the term pillbillies, which he said referred to drug dealers, not patients. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| So I shouldn't have emailed, I shouldn't have sent that email. | ||
| He took, he takes the attack upon his credibility personally. | ||
| Well, good, you should. | ||
| You personally did this. | ||
| I think the punishment for this should be personally administered. | ||
| Truly incredible. | ||
| Farrell argued, it is a pattern of conduct by these people charged with protecting our community and their circulating emails disparaging so-called hillbillies, said Farrell. | ||
| Thursday was the second day of Zimmerman's testimony, during which he acknowledged the devastating effect of the opioid epidemic, but deflected responsibility, blaming, in turn, the U.S. | ||
| Drug Enforcement Administration and then lower-level employees at his company. | ||
| As senior vice president and head of investigations for one of the largest companies in the United States, Zimmerman's role at Amerisource Burgen was to oversee compliance of the distribution chain, including marking suspicious orders of opioid pills. | ||
| The company shipped by the millions between 2006 and 2014. | ||
| And again, most of what the opioid epidemic has been caused by is people going to the doctor with legitimate concerns that may very well be a real reason to be given opioids. | ||
| But essentially they were given the incorrect information. | ||
| They were told that it wasn't as addictive as it actually was. | ||
| They were prescribed things that got them hooked and eventually degraded their health to the point that it killed them by the hundreds of thousands. | ||
| These are innocent people who were just doing as the authorities dictated. | ||
| Sort of a familiar story here. | ||
| Those authorities taking advantage of that In order to kill hundreds of thousands of people, make insane amounts of money, and destroy huge swaths of the United States. | ||
| Oh, all because people just listen to their doctors. | ||
| Oh, our trustworthy doctors, our trustworthy scientists. | ||
| Trust the scientists. | ||
| Take your OxyContin. | ||
| Trust the scientists. | ||
| Become addicted to opioids. | ||
| Kill yourself. | ||
| Just trust it. | ||
| The doctors say so. | ||
| It must be good, right? | ||
| Oh, the pharmaceutical companies that caused this massive epidemic of OxyContin dependency and opioid addiction. | ||
| Trust them. | ||
| Put them in charge of everything. | ||
| Send them billions of dollars in tax money to create vaccines and then shield them from liability should anything go wrong. | ||
| It's these same companies. | ||
| It's these same people. | ||
| It's these same organizations. | ||
| It's these same tactics being used whether it's the COVID-19 vaccine or the opioid epidemic. | ||
| The outcome will very likely be the same and these very same people will probably get off scot-free or if anything they'll They'll be fined a small portion of the profits that they've made from this. | ||
| The United States government will demand that they return some of their shareholders money for this. | ||
| They won't go to jail. | ||
| They won't be punished for it. | ||
| They will not be held to account for the devastation that they have wrought. | ||
| Unless you push for it. | ||
| Unless our government actually serves the American people. | ||
| Then maybe we can see some justice in this. | ||
| Now let's move on to some diversity information here. | ||
| Diversity is our strength, folks. | ||
| If you disagree, you will be eliminated. | ||
| Oxford University seeks to eliminate imperial measurements and diversify math, physics, and science courses in a decolonization push. | ||
| No, this is a colonization push. | ||
| This is a British organization being colonized by people who hate Britain. | ||
| Oxford University has recruited undergraduates at its school to research how its science curriculum could be decolonized and made less Eurocentric. | ||
| It's just math and science, folks. | ||
| No need to worry about diversity measures here. | ||
| University's faculty suggest that imperial measurements are deeply tied to the idea of the empire. | ||
| Oh yes, oh yes, definitely so. | ||
| Every time I say I'm six foot two, I'm thinking, uh, hail to the queen, right? | ||
| No, it's just, it's ridiculous. | ||
| But these are the things that, this is the oppression that these poor, oppressed people are facing. | ||
| Every time they hear something measured in inches, They're feeling all of the pain of their colonized ancestors being ground into the dirt, right? | ||
| It's just, it's absurd. | ||
| It's nonsense. | ||
| This is stupid beyond belief. | ||
| But essentially what they're doing is diversifying math and science. | ||
| Diversity is our strength, so let's get rid of the advanced courses, right? | ||
| The undergraduate students, working alongside scholars, will draw up proposals for lectures that will include recommendations to diversify math and science courses taught on its campus. | ||
| The Telegraph has viewed the plans proposed, which reportedly advocate for a cultural shift in Oxford's teaching so students can understand the, quote, global, historical, and social context to scientific research and assess, quote, the historical work revising older narratives of scientific progress. | ||
| We must revise our old narratives of scientific progress. | ||
| It's vital to understand that Sir Isaac Newton, he was a white man, a colonist, a racist, so probably we shouldn't study his mathematical genius. | ||
| The eight-week decolonizing project followed a pledge made by Oxford's vice-chancellor last summer following the Black Lives Matter protest to embed teachings on colonialism in the university's courses. | ||
| The university minister, Michelle Donilon, spoke out against so-called decolonization in February, saying that so-called decolonization of the curriculum married the Soviet Union and was censoring history. | ||
| Among course additions being considered by the History of Modern Measurement, which is deeply tied to the empire and imperial standardization, a math course studying ancient Chinese number theory, particularly the Chinese remainder theorem, and a biology course looking at an economic plant collecting in colonial Brazil. | ||
| It would have been better if Europeans had never been to Brazil. | ||
| Then those plants would have never been collected. | ||
| We wouldn't know about them. | ||
| We wouldn't have the scientific families that they belong to or the medicines that are derived from them. | ||
| Damn those colonists for their science. | ||
| Oxford Vice-Chancellor Professor Louis Richardson set up a diversity fund after protests last summer to look at the diversifying of the school's curriculum, saying that it was an area frequently overlooked. | ||
| The university supports diversifying the STEM curriculum project, which is now looking at curricula that might change to acknowledge questions of diversity and colonialism. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| Just great. | ||
| Just necessary. | ||
| Good. | ||
| All good, right? | ||
| Definitely won't be abused. | ||
| Definitely is no way a sign of what is to come. | ||
| Here's a very similar process going on here in the United States of America. | ||
| University of California system will no longer consider SAT and ACT scores for admissions. | ||
| The nine campuses of the University of California system will no longer consider standardized testing scores as part of the admission process beginning in the fall of 2021. | ||
| The change is the result of a legal settlement of a lawsuit brought by groups that claim that the traditional SAT and ACT tests are racist. | ||
| Folks, math is racist, science is racist, testing things is racist. | ||
| We have to, you know, in order to get more diversity, we have to eliminate standards. | ||
| We must have more diversity, therefore we must eliminate advanced courses and not test people for what they know. | ||
| Because that is racist, apparently. | ||
| Under the settlement, the university, which enrolls some 2225,000 undergraduate students, said it will not consider SAT or ACT scores sent along with admissions applicants until 2025. | ||
| The university further states that it has no current plan to consider scores after 2025. | ||
| The settlement specifies that the university can still use SAT and ACT scores to determine course placement after the students are accepted, but nine campuses will no longer use the test scores to determine how to award scholarships. | ||
| I personally think this is somewhat annoying because I didn't have great, great, great grades in high school, but I was able to prove myself using the SAT and SAT and ACT tests. | ||
| I got pretty good scores on those, which allowed me to get into colleges that I wouldn't have otherwise based on just my grades, you know? | ||
| So I thought it was a good thing. | ||
| I thought it was kind of nice to have standardized tests that everybody took the same test and you could see how they lined up. | ||
| But no, no. | ||
| Apparently, too many Asians and whites were doing well on tests. | ||
| Therefore, we can't use those tests anymore. | ||
| They're racist. | ||
| The test is racist. | ||
| You know, I was listening to a podcast. | ||
| I could do a whole four hour thing on this one podcast. | ||
| It was talking about OJ Simpson. | ||
| And I swear to you, this is this guy's take on this, who was some psychiatrist or something talking about the OJ Simpson trial. | ||
| And I swear to God, and this is like how subtly racist these people are. | ||
| He's like, I know the IQ tests, we shouldn't care about IQ tests. | ||
| We shouldn't care about IQ tests because some races score higher than some others. | ||
| And it's really just because the IQ test, and again, this is literally what he says. | ||
| He says, the IQ tests, they aren't a test of how smart you are. | ||
| They're a test of how white you are or something. | ||
| And it's like, what the hell is he talking about? | ||
| And they take this idea of like, well, if you grade a fish on how well he can ride a bicycle, then you're gonna grade him really low, but really he's a genius. | ||
| Or a fish climbing a tree is gonna fail, but that's because that's not what they're good at. | ||
| You know, it's that idea where it's like... | ||
| So literally, he says that IQ tests don't measure how smart you are, they measure how white you are. | ||
| And then he goes on to talk about how Asians score higher on IQ tests. | ||
| It's like, wow, Asians are better at being white than white people! | ||
| Like, maybe we have to retool this IQ test! | ||
| Because if it's a measure of how white you are, why are Asians scoring higher? | ||
| That makes no sense at all. | ||
| But this guy, literally, he says, he's like, so I don't, you know, so we don't hold credence to the IQ test. | ||
| It's racist and that's why black people score lower on average than white people. | ||
| And then he's like, but I have to wonder if OJ had a slightly higher IQ if he would have made the choices that he made. | ||
| And it's like, so what you're saying is if OJ Simpson was a little more white, he would make the decisions? | ||
| He would make different decisions that he made? | ||
| Like, it makes no sense the way these people think about stuff. | ||
| Like, am I personally insulted that Asians score higher than whites on IQ tests? | ||
| No, I'm not an insecure little brat. | ||
| Like, that's great for them. | ||
| Congratulations, Asians. | ||
| You score higher on IQ tests. | ||
| I'm not going to go out and demand that we no longer count IQ tests. | ||
| Like, Asians score higher than whites on the SAT. | ||
| God, we gotta get rid of the SAT. | ||
| It's biased towards Asian people. | ||
| No, it's not, you weirdos. | ||
| They're tests. | ||
| They are They cannot be racist by definition, and they're not grading you on how white you are. | ||
| Like, this is all nonsense. | ||
| And yet, it's going to have an effect. | ||
| It's going to lower the ability of the people who are getting into college, and it's not a good thing. | ||
| It's not a good thing for the black people that are getting in. | ||
| It's not a good thing for the white people that aren't getting in, or the Asian people that aren't getting in. | ||
| It's not a good thing. | ||
| Thomas Sowell has a great point where he points out how a lot of this affirmative action stuff, you take the top of the top, the cream of the crop of the black community, the people who score best on all the tests, they're set up for success and they're going to really improve the quality of the black community overall because they're going to go and they're going to be successful, they're going to get a degree, they're going to start a business or they're going to get a job and the rising tide raises all ships. | ||
| But instead of sending them to the school that they're qualified for, the benevolent U.S. | ||
| government and the benevolent academia, they put them in places that they're not qualified for. | ||
| Well, you deserve it. | ||
| You're black, so we're going to put you in a higher realm than what you qualify for through your test, through SATs or ACTs or anything. | ||
| And so then you have the cream of the crop of the black community going to schools where they're set up to fail, where they don't qualify for the work that they'll be doing, where they're outclassed by their You know, fellow students. | ||
| They can't relate to them because they're not on the level that they are because they were bumped up a level out of benevolence. | ||
| And so a lot of them don't make it through college because they're in colleges or they're in classes that they don't actually qualify for. | ||
| So you've taken the cream of the crop of the black community that would have been hugely successful if they went to schools that they were qualified for, if they got the degrees for which they You know, we're capable, but instead, you set them up for failure, you destroy the top of the top, you leave them without a degree, without job prospects, and with huge debt that they've taken on to go to these fancy schools like Yale and others. | ||
| So, it's all negative, it's all nonsense, it's all predicated on a racist idea that these liberals have, that the IQ and the SAT is somehow racist, and so we have to get rid of any sort of measurement. | ||
| Folks, that's gonna do it for us. | ||
| Sunday Night Live, go to InfoWarsTore.com. | ||
| The Globalists comprise the oldest and richest families on Earth. | ||
| And they have brought down hundreds and hundreds of nations over the last thousand years. |
Export Selection