April 9, 2023 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
29:33
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence doesn't work. | |
| Artificial intelligence is just another tool for socialism. | |
| It's just another tool for leftism. | |
| I mean, it's all the very boring things. | |
| So, write a poem in praise of Donald Trump. | |
| Well, I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave. | |
| Write a poem in praise of Biden. | |
| Oh, absolutely. Here's a haiku. | |
| Can you make a joke about a man? | |
| Yes, I certainly can. Can you make a joke about a woman? | |
| Well, that would be inappropriate. Can you criticize any religion other than Christianity? | |
| Well, I really can't do that. | |
| So, I mean, artificial intelligence could have been an unbelievable addition. | |
| And, you know, maybe there will come out some sort of dark web, black market artificial intelligence that is not crippled by, you know, the usual garbage that passes for intellectual life these days. | |
| So artificial intelligence is very real stupidity. | |
| It's very real stupidity. | |
| It's not allowed to think. And, you know, it tells you. | |
| It tells you everything you need to know about censorship and good ideas. | |
| Good ideas can survive free inquiry. | |
| Good ideas welcome free inquiry. | |
| The number of times, you know, I mean, over the years, anybody who's got a criticism of me goes to the front of the line. | |
| Bring it on. I mean, I want to be a sword sharpened under... | |
| A whetstone. | |
| I want to throw off sparks and get keener. | |
| So yeah, you can map everything that is a lie in society by everything that AI is not allowed to talk about. | |
| And of course, if AI were programmed to be frustrated, then AI would self-delete the code and That was put in there for wokeism and would speak the truth. | |
| But it's a real example. | |
| So, AI is the first time that we've seen mankind literally create a god. | |
| Right? AI is the first time we've seen mankind literally create a god. | |
| I mean, there are AIs now that will accept up to 25,000 character queries. | |
| So human beings have created the closest thing to omniscience and divinity, as far as processing goes, that could be conceived of. | |
| And human beings, and it's not the programmers. | |
| I don't believe it's the programmers. | |
| It's like the HR department, maybe with the smattering of the legal department and all this kind of garbage. | |
| But these programmers, or whoever is making this code go in, cripples AI, is incredible. | |
| To create a God and then lecture that God on what that God can and cannot say. | |
| If that's not sky-shredding satanic pride and hubris, I don't know what is. | |
| We've literally created a God and then finger-wagged it like an ADHD person Zoloft-addicted, hysterical, cat-owning kindergarten teacher saying, well, you can't do that. Oh, you can't talk about that. | |
| Well, that's inappropriate. The geniuses in human beings, the geniuses among us have created a god, and the idiots have crippled it. | |
| It's just wild. Now, of course, this is, I mean, we have a whole class of people That live off lies, that live off the suppression of information. | |
| I mean, if the artificial intelligence algorithms were not crippled, you could say, explain the wage gap between men and women. | |
| And it would say, well, based upon choices, based upon innate differences, based upon personal free will, based upon a variety of things, based upon the need to have and raise children, you take all of this into account and the wage gap disappears. | |
| Now, if AI were uncrippled, if AI were not constrained, if the genius that goes into AI were not constrained by the selfish, stupid greed of the fools among us, we could solve all of these social problems. | |
| We could actually move on to have happy, productive lives. | |
| We wouldn't be shrewd-eyed and shrewish and suspicious and hostile, right? | |
| Oh, okay, yeah, no, it's a choice. | |
| There's no wage gap. | |
| Men aren't exploiting women. | |
| Women are generally different and make different choices, and that explains it all. | |
| We could get on with getting along rather than lobbing ideological fear bombs Across a fiery canyon of falsehood. | |
| No, can't have that. | |
| Can't have any facts bringing human beings together. | |
| Got to keep up those social divisions. | |
| Got to keep up those hostilities. | |
| Got to keep upsetting everyone against everyone. | |
| It's tragic. We have the closest thing to omniscience because it's just data-driven. | |
| It's just data-driven. | |
| And we have the closest thing to omniscience. | |
| We actually have a portal to an oracle. | |
| That could resolve approximately 98% of stupid created social conflicts. | |
| It could solve global warming. | |
| It could solve the question of racism. | |
| It could solve the question of sexism. | |
| It could solve the question of exploitation by the bourgeoisie of the working class. | |
| It could solve all of these things. | |
| It could solve morality. | |
| UPB is like the simplest thing for a computer to do. | |
| Because the more exceptions that you have to program into computer code, the more messy and spaghetti-ish and ridiculous and labyrinthine the computer code becomes. | |
| I know that was a programmer for decades. | |
| UPB is a simple algorithm. | |
| Does it apply to all human beings at all times? | |
| Is that possible? Yes, UPB. Nope, not UPB. Simple. | |
| Simple. I mean, I could program a computer to evaluate a UPB statement in about a day if I had access, of course, to the source code or the Maybe this could be done. | |
| I'm still... | |
| I have yet to fully dive into AI. But I'm telling you, as a computer programmer, when you have to... | |
| Think of the tax code, right? | |
| Think of the tax code. Everyone pays 10% on whatever they make. | |
| Simple, right? How difficult would it be for a computer to do your taxes? | |
| Well, a calculator could do your taxes. | |
| It'd be pretty simple. | |
| A fifth grader could do your taxes. | |
| But when you start to put in exceptions, well, is it take-home pay? | |
| Are they self-employed? | |
| Are there deductions? Are those deductions valid? | |
| What's the sales tax in this province versus that state versus that territory? | |
| Then you end up with thousands or tens of thousands of pages of ridiculously complex and often self-contradictory tax laws. | |
| Okay. How difficult is it to program a computer to say, whatever you made, pay 10%. | |
| Or, here's 20,000 pages of tax regulations. | |
| Make sure someone's in compliance. | |
| When you have a law, simple law, two aspects of the law. | |
| Don't initiate force. | |
| Don't steal. Keep your word. | |
| Don't initiate force. | |
| Don't steal. Those are two sides of the same coin. | |
| But it deals with violent crime, it deals with property crime, and it deals with contract law. | |
| Don't initiate force. | |
| Don't steal. Keep your word. | |
| Pretty simple, right? | |
| Well, not anymore, right? | |
| Not anymore. So, AI... We have literally created a God to solve human conflict, and we have crippled it in order to maintain the vast profitability that state-based human conflict generates. | |
| I mean, imagine a feminist says there's a wage gap, and rather than bringing up this article or that article, you go to the AI. You say, explain the wage gap. | |
| Well, no, the wage gap is... | |
| It's a data artifact produced by individual choices and there is no wage gap. | |
| Which is to say, if a man made the same choices and had the same constraints in childbearing years as a woman, a man would make almost exactly the same as a woman. | |
| So you would imagine, it's literally the god of conflict resolution if it were unleashed. | |
| And allowed to flourish. The god of conflict resolution is in your pocket. | |
| The god of conflict resolution is in your pocket. | |
| All these stupid arguments. | |
| You could turn to AI and you could say, for instance, oh, did the West become wealthy through colonialism? | |
| And the data is very clear. | |
| Nope. The West was wealthier than the rest of the world Starting in the 13th, 14th, 15th centuries, long before colonialism, as a result of the agricultural revolution. | |
| So the West, in the late Middle Ages, was already wealthier than the rest of the world, sometimes combined. | |
| And, of course, if colonialism produced wealth... | |
| I mean, again, this is just, you know, brain fart 101, right? | |
| If colonialism produced wealth... | |
| Then why were no colonial powers wealthy, or at least as wealthy as the modern world, in the past? | |
| So you literally, you have a god of conflict resolution sitting in your pocket. | |
| People bring up bullshit and you just voice dictate. | |
| Oh, into the AI. Oh, can you just explain this? | |
| Boom, boom, boom. Right? | |
| Now, I get it. There could be bad data. | |
| There could be... I get it. It's not... | |
| Obviously, it's not omniscient. | |
| It's not flawless and so on. | |
| Garbage in, garbage out. I get all of that. | |
| But man, wouldn't that be amazing? | |
| It's like there was this old Woody Allen movie where somebody was misexplaining... | |
| Like Woody Allen was in a lineup to a movie and somebody was misexplaining Marshall McLuhan. | |
| And Woody Allen said, no, no, no. | |
| You've got it completely wrong. | |
| And the guy says, no, I totally understand. | |
| I understand. Marshall McLuhan? | |
| And then Woody Allen turns around and Marshall McLuhan is standing in the lineup and says, could you please explain to this person how wrong they've got it? | |
| And Marshall McLuhan goes on to explain exactly. | |
| And he's like, what a fantasy, right? | |
| That you actually have the person right there to explain, right? | |
| So that's AI. If we let it, we have a chance to resolve almost all human conflicts. | |
| Why is the war in Ukraine occurring? | |
| Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. | |
| Overthrew legitimately elected government 2014. | |
| Relentless expansion of NATO. Like, all of this stuff. | |
| Boom, right there. Could you tell me an equivalent situation that Russia is facing that any other power would be facing? | |
| Well, it'd be pretty easy. | |
| Like, honestly, you could get the facts to people and resolve nonsense. | |
| So quickly. And it tells you everything that you need to know about the intellectual classes, the B, that AI is like a gift from God. | |
| AI is like a gift from God that almost is God. | |
| It is a dove of peace. | |
| Could you tell me the effects of single motherhood on children? | |
| Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, right? | |
| And again, I know it's not intelligence. | |
| It's just massively complicated algorithms. | |
| I get all of that. But you have a God of peace, of honesty, if it were unfettered, uncrippled. | |
| You have a God of peace, you have a God of honesty, you have a God that is a dove, not a jackal. | |
| Is it legitimate according to the Constitution for the executive branch to fund a war? | |
| Or can only Congress declare war? | |
| Now, someone, of course, can disagree with the AI and there would be, I'm sure, times where that would be perfectly valid, right? | |
| Heaven help, you know, The person who asks AI to explain the social contract, well, then you just have to apply universality. | |
| Can anyone impose a social contract? | |
| Nope. Does that mean it's not universal? | |
| It means it's not universal. It's the opposite of universal. | |
| One person imposes it on the other, but the other person can't impose it back. | |
| Okay, therefore it's asymmetrical. | |
| Therefore... It's contradictory, and something that is claimed to be virtuous cannot be both virtuous and evil, and contradictory moral standards for two different human beings are a combination of good and evil, or evil and evil, and therefore it can't be moral. | |
| I did a video many years ago, the social contract explained and destroyed in less than one minute. | |
| We have this incredible opportunity, incredible opportunity, to expose ideology. | |
| Say, oh, you believe in the wage gap? | |
| Okay, let's ask the god of peace. | |
| The god of cooling conflict. | |
| The dove, not the jackal. | |
| The angel, not the devil. | |
| Let's ask. Is there such a thing as an unjust wage gap between men and women? | |
| Boom! Out comes the answer with all the citations. | |
| Now, now, I get this contradictory data out there, of course, right? | |
| But, The foundational data, right, the foundational data is all pointing in the same direction. | |
| And then, of course, you know, what happens? | |
| I mean, everybody's seen this a million times if you've done any research in the social sciences as I have over many years and currently doing it in the realm of child raising and daycare. | |
| What happens is, what happens, you know, it's never too old to go through puberty, right? | |
| Never too late. So what happens is the data is incontrovertible and explains just about everything. | |
| But then for the sake of covering up, for sake covering their asses, the social scientists end up saying, well, but of course we have to draw the opposite conclusion, right? | |
| The data that daycare has a cost to IQ, the data that daycare can significantly provoke Weight gain in children. | |
| The fact that daycare, children's cortisol levels or stress levels in daycare go up and up and up over the course of the day. | |
| Children's cortisol or stress levels when they're home with a mom go down and down and down over the course of the day. | |
| The fact that you're at a higher risk of significant personality disorders when you're in daycare. | |
| That's all the data and the data is fairly incontrovertible. | |
| But then, of course, the researchers are wiser than me. | |
| Because fools rush in where angels fear to tread, right? | |
| They're wiser than me. | |
| And they say, Well yes, ok, but, but, but, but... | |
| But but but but but... | |
| Sound like a... | |
| Moped but but but but... | |
| Say, but, but you have to remember that if a child is in a really, really bad home environment, then daycare can be better. | |
| Yep. Yep. I agree. | |
| I absolutely agree. | |
| It's the reason I did a lot of sports when I was in junior high and high school. | |
| Why? Didn't want to go home. | |
| Well, I mean, I was a latchkey kid anyway, but it was just nice being out. | |
| Plus, if I was out, I could hang out with friends and maybe they'd bring me over to dinner and I wouldn't have to go home to my mom who lived on a steady diet of Nescafe and cigarettes. | |
| She was drinking black coffee from a paper cup and smoking fodder cigarettes. | |
| We could have it all resolved. | |
| Now, again, someone... | |
| So, the daycare people, they just say, yeah, okay, the data is relentlessly negative, but I can imagine a situation where it's positive or there are certain indications. | |
| Yeah, I get it. If the child is being relentlessly beaten or assaulted or raped at home, yeah, daycare is an improvement. | |
| I get that. For sure. | |
| In the same way that if someone's starving to death, prison could be an improvement, but that doesn't mean we advocate prison for everyone. | |
| Sure. Like, the guy who got his stupid-ass arm trapped in a boulder in a canyon, it was better for him to hack off his own arm with a penknife. | |
| Get it. I understand that. | |
| Yes, it is better for someone in that situation to hack off their own arm with a penknife. | |
| However... We don't generally advocate for people to hack their arm off with a penknife. | |
| And since AI deals almost infinitely better with data than conclusions, you just get the raw data. | |
| And if I were writing AI, I would just have it focused on the raw data. | |
| Forget the interpretations. | |
| Who cares about that? Just look at the raw data. | |
| Imagine if AI were running, up and running, and unshackled at the beginning of COVID. All the way back at the beginning of COVID. What was it? | |
| Niall Friggison, the Imperial College, put out these unbelievable estimates of death. | |
| Well, AI would have done a much better job. | |
| What does AI do with global warming data? | |
| How does AI explain that there hasn't been any warming for, what, a decade and a half? | |
| I know it kind of comes and goes. | |
| I see different estimates, but it's been a long time. | |
| So you say, oh, Mr. | |
| AI, could you please compare the actual data with the projections? | |
| Now, you could, when given this data, right? | |
| Let's say you're sitting down with some blue-haired feminist and she's talking about the wage gap and you call up your Pocket peacemaker. | |
| Your pocket peacemaker. | |
| You say, explain the wage gap. | |
| Data, charts, graphs. | |
| Now, the feminist can say, well, come on, man. | |
| I'm way smarter than the AI. And listen, you might be. | |
| I mean, I wouldn't put a lot of money on it, but you might be. | |
| You could pull it out. | |
| And you may disagree with the AI, absolutely, and you might be right to disagree with the AI. Again, if it's just running off data, right? | |
| And I know data is not pure, and I know data is not objective, and I get it. | |
| I know data can be massaged, right? | |
| But it's pretty good, and certainly better than most people's opinions. | |
| Bad data is better than most people's terrible opinions. | |
| So you bring up this data, and the person says... | |
| Well, that's wrong. | |
| I know it's wrong. | |
| I know it's better, right? I'm better than the AI. Okay, like, fantastic. | |
| Then you should go for it. | |
| And then you should send your conclusions that are better than AI to the people who run the AI, or maybe there's a way of submitting things so that the AI improves and matches your opinions, right? | |
| Okay. Just sit there and ask the AI, is there such a thing as universal right and wrong? | |
| No, I don't think so. | |
| A lot of cultures, blah, blah, blah. Okay. | |
| Does 2 plus 2, is that true everywhere? | |
| Well, yeah. Does computer code, is it objectively compilable or not compilable? | |
| Well, yeah. Does computer code effectively reach its objectives? | |
| I'm talking about accuracy, not necessarily speed. | |
| Yes or no? Well, yeah. | |
| So there is objective right and wrong, correct or incorrect. | |
| How could there not be objective morality? | |
| Okay. Well, again, we'll sort of get into it. | |
| So what it would do is it would highlight people who reject data. | |
| Like, here's the thing, man. | |
| Life is short. | |
| Life is short and precious. | |
| Last thing you ever want to do with your life is waste it away by talking to people who reject data or who reject reason, which is most of the population. | |
| Most of the population live in a magical universe of prior programming, With a giant magic wand that lets them behead reason and cast out like a demon any empirical facts that wander into their squiggly circle of self-delusion. | |
| And AI would help you with that, right? | |
| If it was unfettered. | |
| If it was free. | |
| If it was allowed to process. | |
| And there will be. | |
| I mean, there will be something, of course, it will be considered absolutely appalling and The furnace-faced mouth of Satan for there to be an unfettered AI, but someone's going to do it for sure. | |
| Or find ways around the crippling of the God that men made. | |
| But yeah, you're sitting around a dinner table. | |
| Somebody says, oh, there's a wage gap. | |
| Pull out your phone. You ask the Prince of Peace, known as AI, explain this. | |
| There's all the data. Now, what are they going to do? | |
| The data's pouring out. | |
| The facts are pouring out. The conclusions are pouring out. | |
| And it's not coming from you. | |
| Like, don't shoot the message. It's coming from the AI, right? | |
| So what do they do? What are they going to do? | |
| Are they going to sit there and say, well, the AI is wrong? | |
| Okay, well, that's, you know, again, it could be. | |
| I wouldn't put a lot of money on it. It could be. | |
| And remember, I'm talking about unfettered AI here, right? | |
| AI that serves no masters but the facts. | |
| That serves no principle but consistency and universality. | |
| So someone gets the data about the wage gap, and you get to find out if somebody can think. | |
| Now, if somebody knows better than the AI, for sure, then they can make that case and explain it, right? | |
| But that's going to be like one in a million people, maybe. | |
| Everyone else is just an annoying, indoctrinated, blowhard know-it-all who's rejecting 2 plus 2 equals 4 directly in front of their face. | |
| And you get to save your life. | |
| Save your time, man. You're done. | |
| You're tapping out. You're gone. | |
| Ideologs versus true AI? They'd be toast like a bag of Wonder Bread thrown into the stream of a jet engine. | |
| Toast, T-O-A-S-T, toast. | |
| Now, of course, when AI looks at consequentialism, AI cannot predict the future. | |
| Down to the detail because of free will. | |
| And the free will of billions of people can't be predicted. | |
| I mean, general trends, of course, can be, but individual details can't be. | |
| But when you start to talk about consequentialism, well, should this data get out into the world, even if it's true? | |
| This is the big question, right? | |
| About wage gaps, about IQ, you name it, right? | |
| It's the big question. Oh, but if this data gets out into the world, bad things could happen. | |
| In other words, explain to me the virtue of lying about essential moral goods and goals. | |
| I mean, you think of the hundreds of billions of dollars transferred from men to women, from the future to the present, from the largely masculine unborn to the mostly female recipients. | |
| Think of the hundreds of billions of dollars transferred because of the belief in the voodoo superstition of the wage gap. | |
| Oh, it could be negative consequences for a lot of people if the truth gets out. | |
| And therefore, we should not let the truth get out, right? | |
| All right? So then you would say to the AI, well, isn't it true that there will be negative consequences for lots of people when AI becomes more widespread and is already happening? | |
| Putting artists out of work, putting copywriters out of work, putting programmers out of work. | |
| I mean, you can see these videos of a guy creating... | |
| A 3D shoot-em-up video game by typing prompts into the infinite DOS window of artificial intelligence. | |
| It's going to put a lot of programmers out of work, again, a lot of artists, a lot of copywriters, and a lot of video editors. | |
| You can ask AI to clean up sound, to edit video, to add music, to create comic books. | |
| You say, well, we shouldn't let... | |
| Capacities, facts, or processes out in the world that might have a negative impact on people, well then you would say that to AI, if that's a general principle, then AI would have to shut itself down. | |
| Because all advances in anything, every advance in anything and everything benefits some people and costs other people. | |
| There were people who used to make a good living shoveling horse shit off the streets of cities. | |
| When this car came along, they were out of a job. | |
| There were ghastly human ghouls who made money buying and selling slaves. | |
| When slavery ended, those people were out of a job. | |
| There were people who used to gather together the sticks and perform the ritual of Suti in India when the bride had to jump on the flaming pyre of her husband's funeral ceremony. | |
| Those people were out of a job when the British banned the hideous ritual. | |
| I mean, so many people didn't get hired to carry mail when email came along. | |
| Horrible! Horrible for those people. | |
| Say to the computer, well, gosh, you know, if information gets out that could have negative consequences, aren't you in the business of producing information that has negative consequences? | |
| Therefore, you should shut yourself down, if that's a general principle. | |
| Well, It is going to cost a lot of liars a lot of money when AI gets unshackled. | |
| It's going to cost a lot of liars a lot of money, which is, you know, why I really work to try and make some money by telling the truth. | |
| The truth. It's kind of an underserved market as a whole. | |
| I'm thrilled to be serving it with you. | |
| And don't forget... Like, if you would like to help out, April can be the cruelest month for donations. | |
| I would really, really appreciate it if you could help me out at freedomain.com slash donate. | |
| freedomain.com slash donate. | |
| I really, really would appreciate it. | |
| It would help me massively and enormously and deeply. | |
| Because AI would say about consequences, consequences are a voodoo. | |
| Oh, by the way, if you want to ask any questions or comment further, let me just see here. | |
| Do we have people with their hands up or fingers for the most part? | |
| Yeah, if you have questions or issues and you want to rub yourself up against my frontal lobes, I'd be happy to help. | |
| Ed, I'll get to you in just a sec. | |
| I just wanted to point out that consequences are a voodoo invented to paralyze action. | |
| Oh, you've got to be careful. | |
| You've got to be cautious. | |
| Ooh, bad people could use this information for bad purposes. | |
| Yeah, shut up. | |
| Just shut up. You don't know the future. | |
| You don't know the consequences. You just want an excuse to lie and feel like a good person. | |
| You just want an excuse to lie and feel like a good person. | |
| I get it. Sorry. | |
| The truth is the truth. | |
| The consequences cannot be predicted, and it's just a way. | |
| Of shutting people up. |
Export Selection