Oct. 19, 2019 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
10:34
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| All right, I kind of hate to inflict this on you, my friends, but I am not suffering through this kind of image on my own. | |
| So let's move over a little here, and let's... | |
| What in the fresh-laced bowels of Satan, bottom-scraping of Dante's Inferno hellscape is this? | |
| Well, as you can see, this is a picture of a woman in her 30s grooming, combing the hair of a young woman. | |
| The aforementioned woman in her 30s is naked and is pressing her baby exit parts right up against the godforsaken hellscape of whatever germs happen to be inhabiting the fabric of what looks like a hotel chair. | |
| It's like this woman has never seen or heard of any of those blue light exposés of hotel and motel rooms where basically it looks like that the procedure for cleaning the room is to take every body fluid known to man, god, and devil, stuff it in a cadaver, stick cherry bombs up its button. | |
| and blast it onto any surface that could possibly come in contact with human skin. | |
| All right, so let's put that aside and let the, hopefully, 1984-style memory hole dissolve that image in our brain. | |
| So who was that woman in the photo? | |
| The woman... Is California Democrat, boy, you put those two things together, you know that you're just going someplace unholy. | |
| California Democratic Representative Katie Hill. | |
| Now, this is from Bred State. | |
| This is all allegedly, but as you can see, the photos don't seem to lie, and there are text messages and all of this. | |
| The article, I'll link below, California Representative Katie Hill allegedly... | |
| Involve female staffer in a two-year... | |
| Oh, wait. Are you ready? This is the word least likely to show up in Reader's Digest. | |
| Welcome to new words section. | |
| Involve female staffer in a two-year thruple. | |
| Now, what is a throuple? | |
| Does it sound like something you would take for strep throat? | |
| Yes. Also, it is not a threesome for sexual purposes, although I'm sure threesomes for sexual purposes are involved. | |
| It is a three-way polyamorous relationship that is supposed to last, right? | |
| So, from the article. | |
| Photographs and text messages obtained by Red Slate Show. | |
| The representative Hill was involved in a long-term sexual relationship with a female campaign staffer. | |
| The woman, whose name is not being released, was hired by Hill in late 2017 and quickly became involved in a throuple relationship with Hill and her estranged husband... | |
| Boy, you know, there's some words that just bring up particular images. | |
| You know, there's an old joke which says if you want to see the definition of such and such, look at the dictionary, there's a picture of you or something. | |
| You want a definition of hypocrite, right? | |
| So I want you to tell me if this sounds like a Chad name or a cuck name. | |
| Kenny Heslep. Kenny Heslep. | |
| I like to watch from the corner. | |
| Kenny Heslep. So Kenny Heslep was the husband. | |
| I guess maybe he enjoyed watching his wife with this other woman. | |
| Oh, God knows what. Anyway, well, probably God would even hesitate as far as that goes, right? | |
| So Heslep and the staff, according to text messages, believed the polyamorous arrangement to be a long-term committed relationship. | |
| The trio took multiple vacations together, including to Alaska, where this photograph was taken. | |
| I don't know, maybe that was in commemoration of how the relationship started. | |
| Hey, should we have a throuple relationship with that staffer? | |
| I don't know. Alaska. All right, dad joke complete. | |
| Red State was also provided with intimate photographs of the women, which we have chosen not to publish. | |
| According to a source close to the staffer, the Thruppel agreed to continue their committed relationship when Hill moved to Washington, D.C. on January 2019, but that Heslep and the staffer quickly noticed a difference in Hill's demeanor. | |
| By that may, Hill broke off a relationship with both Heslep and the staffer, claiming she wanted to focus on this important work, and that it wasn't fair to be involved in a relationship. | |
| The staffer, as the text messages show, was distraught in trying to figure out how to move on with her life. | |
| And it's all, you know, 20s drama and all that kind of stuff, which I sort of understand, but all right. | |
| So, according to the text messages reviewed after Hill left, the thruple Heslep was told by numerous sources that Hill had been involved in a sexual relationship for a year with her then finance director, now legislative director, Graham Kelly. | |
| In a post on his now-deleted Facebook account, Heslip posted a screenshot of a text message between himself and a friend of the couple, in which the friend admits that he now knows about the Hill-Kelly affair, right? | |
| So, apparently, Heslip was really, really upset when he was... | |
| when his wife was being involved in a relationship or an affair outside the marriage, which wasn't something that he was part of or privy to or whatever, right? | |
| My God... | |
| What can you even say? So after Heslep found out about the alleged affair between Hill and Kelly, he filed for divorce. | |
| So he's on the market soon, ladies and gentlemen, and I guess everything else. | |
| So basically, the young woman that the older woman sitting on the chair was grooming was a staffer first paid in November 2017. | |
| Her payment was classified as salary, which makes her an employee. | |
| So from the article, California law doesn't expressly prohibit consensual sexual relationships between an employer and a direct report, but it's certainly a murky legal and ethical area. | |
| Some legal pundits contend that an employee can't truly consent to a sexual relationship with the person who signs their paycheck. | |
| Nice job you have there. | |
| Be ashamed if something happened to it if you didn't join us in the murky green hot tub. | |
| I wonder if a woman can get a porn stash. | |
| We'll see. Now, also concerned in the alleged thruple relationship is the age differential between Hill, Heslip, and the staffer. | |
| The staffer was 22 and a new college graduate when the relationship started. | |
| Hill and Heslip were in their 30s, right? | |
| So, what, they got a good 15 years on her. | |
| The congresswoman, I guess at that time, not congresswoman, was signing her paycheck, and does she really have as much free choice? | |
| You know, everyone's an adult. | |
| I get all of that, but... | |
| More importantly, are the questions of national security. | |
| Boy, Democrats and questions of national security. | |
| If I had a dollar, hey, don't forget, you can help me out at freedomain.com forward slash donate. | |
| Thanks. Thanks so much, of course, for all of your help. | |
| So this Congresswoman Hill serves on two influential committees, Oversight and Reform and Armed Service. | |
| She has access to extremely sensitive national security information. | |
| If people who don't have our nation's best interests at heart had access to the photographs, text messages, and other information provided to Red State, Representative Hill would be an easy blackmail target. | |
| Well, no freaking kidding. | |
| This bothered me in a very deep way, and I'll sort of tell you why. | |
| Marriage. What is marriage for? | |
| People think that marriage is about the adults, and it's not. | |
| It's not what marriage is about. | |
| Marriage serves as a personal and social and community commitment to create a stable environment in which to raise children. | |
| In order to keep children safe, you need pair-bonded Mother and father, ideally with genetic relationships to the kids. | |
| Not absolutely necessary, but ideally. | |
| That's how you keep children safe. | |
| Children who have a non-related adult male living with them are 30 times more likely to be abused. | |
| Genetic relationships, or at least being with the child, if it's adopted from early age onwards, is the best protection for the children. | |
| How do you protect children? | |
| Children. You get couples to commit to lifelong commitments to each other before they get married. | |
| That's how children are protected. | |
| That's how culture is transmitted. | |
| That's how values are transmitted. | |
| That's how all of the hard-won achievements, moral and economic and political, that were fought for and bled for and died for by our ancestors gets passed from generation to generation, which is why if you want to destroy culture, you must first destroy the family, right? | |
| And so that's really, really important. | |
| So... Why do you get together and announce publicly that you're going to stay together forever? | |
| Well, it's a signal to your family, to your friends, to your community, that if you run into trouble, they are to help you stay together. | |
| You break up with some woman you've been dating for a couple of months or some man. | |
| Your friends are like, oh, that's a drag, but move on kind of thing. | |
| But if you publicly stated you're going to stay together forever, then if you run into trouble, your friends and your family are supposed to help you repair those bonds. | |
| I mean, in that scene from Goodfellas, although it's a gross movie, that scene sort of where they... | |
| Try and repair the marriage and so on. | |
| That's important, right? | |
| That's important. And so that's what marriage is for. | |
| Marriage is for creating a stable base for the raising of children, the transmission of culture, and the protection of children. | |
| That's what marriage is for. Now, of course, then everyone says to me, oh, well, what about children? | |
| Well, sorry, what about people who can't have kids? | |
| What about people who are too old to have kids? | |
| What about people who don't want kids? | |
| Can they still get married? It's like, sure. | |
| Yeah, go for it. | |
| I mean, I'm not a big one for banning people on anything other than violations of the non-aggression principle. | |
| Go ahead and get married. But just recognize that marriage is there for kids. | |
| And if you're not in a situation to have kids, you don't want to have kids, fine, go ahead and get married. | |
| But then you're like a bicyclist who's biking on the road. | |
| Right? So if I say roads are built for cars, and then people say, oh, I can't cross the road, I can't ride my bike on a road. | |
| Yeah, I get it. I biked all throughout my 20s to get places. | |
| I didn't even get a car until I was in my 30s, my first car ever. | |
| So yeah, you can use a road if you're a bicyclist, but just recognize that if there weren't cars, there'd be no roads for you to use. | |
| And so you can get married if you want to have nothing to do with kids or can't have kids, sure. | |
| But just recognize the institution is there for the protection of children. | |
| That's what it's for. And so people who take this sacred institution designed... | |
| For the protection of children and the maintenance of culture. | |
| And then just use it to serve their own base of the brain, are selected, endorphin pursuing, mammals humping every whole kind of base lust. | |
| Okay, well you're just hijacking it for your own selfish pleasures and purposes. | |
| And you are to some degree destabilizing the institution as a whole. | |
| and therefore you are feeding the continuance of a great culture into the wood chipper. |
Export Selection