Oct. 16, 2019 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
15:47
Faked Syrian War Video + Trump Murder Meme!
|
Time
Text
Hey everybody, it's Stefan Molyneux Free Domain.
Hope you're doing well. Please don't forget to like and share and subscribe and click on the notification bell and all the other things that I constantly forget to tell people to do.
So, a tale of two videos.
Really, really fascinating.
A lot to unpack here. So, put the sources to this below.
ABC News aired a video on Sunday that host Tom Lama said depicted a Turkish attack in northern Syria against Kurdish civilians.
Turkey is indeed pushing into Syria and slaughtering Kurds along the way, but the video ABC News played last night is from a military gun demonstration in Kentucky that was published to YouTube in 2017.
Quote, this video right here appearing to show Turkey's military bombing Kurd civilians in a Syrian border town, Lama said on the October 13, 2019 broadcast as the video played.
But the explosions in the video are identical to explosions seen in a video titled, quote, Knob Crete Night Shoot 2017.
Knob Crete Creek Gun Range in the town of West Point, Kentucky hosts a by- And, you know, side by side, there looks to have been some post-processing, but the videos are the same.
Now, this is really quite a remarkable moment in American history because Trump is withdrawing troops from this particular border conflict, Syria and Turkey.
And, of course, the troops in Syria were only supposed to be in there for 30 days.
It's been going years and years now.
And those of you who have, of course, a non-1984-style continuous memory apparatus remember the number of times that Bashar al-Assad was accused of gassing his own population, using chemical weapons on his own population, and so on.
I mean, mostly lies and nonsense, and pretty obvious lies and nonsense.
And this happened every time people talked about withdrawing, right?
So there is a war party, and the war party, like the deep state, is around control, manipulation, and war.
And there's a lot of money to be made in war.
And you say, well, it's not that many troops.
It's not that much money. Well, yeah, but the principle matters, right?
If a president can end one particular war, maybe he can end other ones.
And there's hundreds of billions of dollars at stake in this.
There is a massive amount of money to be made from disassembling human beings, not just in Planned Parenthood, but around the world.
Turning human beings into dust and liquid is a highly profitable transformation because of the power of the state and of fiat currency and debt and you name it.
So there's a lot of vampiric, sociopathic, money-lust profit to be made through the state, through war.
There's a great article called War is a Racket.
You should go look it up and read it.
It's really powerful and kind of terrifying.
Now the role of the media in selling the war is, I mean there's a lot of dimensions to it, but obviously if there is some kind of war, people are glued to their TV and it's highly profitable to show these images and to talk endlessly about war and lie basically endlessly about war.
And so the media has an incentive for conflicts to remain around the world and that's pretty horrendous.
The media spearheaded the lies about weapons of mass destruction, amplified by Condoleezza Rice, who said famously that she did not want the smoking gun of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction to be in the form of a mushroom cloud, that somehow Iraq was going to send nuclear weapons all around the world and blow up an American city in Hiroshima style and so on.
And the media was key and instrumental in driving, goading, lying the U.S. into a horrific invasion of Iraq wherein hundreds of thousands, half a million Iraqis have died.
The weapons have been so horrendous that in Fallujah there's been almost a total genetic destruction of the population.
In the same way that even now, I think, in Vietnam, there are birth defects traced back to the use of Agent Orange in the Vietnam War.
I mean, it's not just landmines.
I mean, the genetic destruction of entire populations, or compromise, to put it as nicely as possible, is one of the deep, powerful, and...
Well, I mean, war has always altered things, right?
So war alters your...
Neurological response, PTSD, and so on, and war.
Trauma can be transmitted genetically through the generations.
And this, of course, is after, what was it, ten years of sanctions against the Iraqis, ostensibly for invading Kuwait and other things.
And, of course, Saddam Hussein asked if he could invade Kuwait, and Americans said, go for it.
And then, of course, there was this invasion.
It's just absolutely monstrous.
What was it? The then Secretary of State at the time said regarding the sanctions against Iraq when she was informed that half a million Iraqi children had died.
She was asked if that was acceptable and she said, sure, yeah, no, it's reasonable, it's acceptable.
I mean, it's worth it to me.
Why? Because it's not your kids, right?
So the fact that the media would publish this video from Kentucky and claim that it was from Syria just shows you how bloodthirsty and destruction-hungry the American media can be.
And it also shows you the power of social media, the power of alternative media, the power of the unbought, unpaid-for, uncompromised, uncorrupted, honest media.
I mean, imagine, this would have totally passed muster in the past.
So it just gives you a sense of just what's going on in history when these kinds of fakes, not even deep fakes, these kinds of fakes can be presented as news.
It makes you question all of history.
It reminds me, and I've said this story before, but it reminds me...
When I first, when I took my first class in history at a campus of York University and I was very enthusiastic and I was asking the teacher questions or the professor questions and so on and then at one point she turned around and she hurled her glasses at me and I had pretty good reflexes so I caught them and then she asked the students In the class, hey, what just happened? And the answers were amazing.
Nothing happened. He threw his glasses at you.
Some people said you did throw your glasses at him.
Some people said you threw a piece of chalk at him.
And this is before cell phones, so it wasn't like everyone was glued to their cell phones not listening to the lecture.
And she said, so this is, you know, this is history from five seconds ago, and a good proportion of you are just getting it wrong, and you're certain about what you saw, and you're wrong.
That's history five seconds ago with eyewitnesses.
History is...
well, of course, it's written by the victors and it serves current narratives and so on.
So anyway, that's really powerful.
Let's talk about another video. So there was a conference, American Priority I think it was called, that was held at a Trump resort.
Trump was not of course there and he didn't approve of it or anything like that.
And there was a violent video played in a side room that was unvetted, seen almost by no one, which was streaming memes.
It was about memes or whatever like that.
And the video was an edited scene from a pretty horrific movie called Kingsman the Secret Service.
So, Colin Firth, a British actor, plays a character So there's some Christians and, you know, they're usually portrayed as this kind of deliverance, cross-eyed, cousin marrying, sister bride, group of inbred racists and so on.
It's really, really horrendous the way that Christians are portrayed in the mainstream, quote, entertainment.
So there's, I think, someone up front of the Christian church and they say something racist and then Colin Firth's character goes in and It murders dozens or hundreds.
It's really hard to tell. I stopped watching the movie at this point because it was absolutely just horrendous.
Murders all of these Christians.
Now, in particular, after lunatics have gone into mosques and shot people and gone into synagogues and shot people, and of course a black guy who went in a racially motivated attack to shoot a bunch of Christians in a church, it's pretty gross, right?
Now, this scene from the movie was reviewed by the New York Times and other places, and nobody had any problems with that scene.
Nobody said, oh my gosh, this is a horrendous mass slaughter of Christians.
No, they didn't have any issues with that.
They didn't say this incites violence against Christians.
They didn't say this is a disturbing thing.
They didn't say this is a horrible thing, especially because I think the movie came out after some of these shootings, not the Christchurch ones, but other ones.
So, that is really, really quite fantasy.
Fantastic. Of course, the New York Times has published fantasies of killing the president.
There was a Snoop Dogg video where he shot a president lookalike.
There was, of course, I think it was Julius Caesar.
Which New York Times had sponsored where a Trump Julius Caesar gets killed by everyone.
And you may remember Mike Cernovich in the White House press room asking the reporters to disavow violence against Trump supporters, political violence against Trump supporters, and they all just laughed at him.
I mean, it's just like crazy, right?
So in the doctored video or the meme video, the Colin Firth character is Trump and he's attacking logos, right?
Like mainstream media logos and Democrat politicians and so on, right?
So it's really fascinating to me that...
This is considered to be, you know, horrendous and grotesque and incitement of violence, while the original movie is not, right?
So this tells you something about the non-Christian or anti-Christian bias within the mainstream media, that a movie that depicts a man slaughtering dozens or hundreds of Christians It's not considered to be an incitement to violence.
It's considered to be artistic. It's considered to be a great movie and so on.
But the moment that the logos of the media are superimposed over the faces of the Christians being slaughtered, suddenly this is a terrible thing.
He has to disavow.
It's an incitement to violence.
I mean, this is so...
It's nasty and manipulative.
It really does make me feel physically nauseous.
It's a great movie when it shows graphic, accurate, detailed, vivid, blood-soaked depictions of a man slaughtering Christians.
That's a great movie, according to the mainstream media.
But the moment some joker puts media logos over the faces of Christians, suddenly it's a monstrous attack and it's an incitement to violence and it must be disavowed and so on.
I mean, good lord.
One of the organizers of the conference said, we find it shocking that the New York Times would not report on any of the sanctioned events in their article.
There was a panel conversation literally condemning political violence.
American Priority said, in an emailed statement Monday to NBC News, a spokesperson for American Priority said, and I quote, It has come to our attention that an unauthorized video was shown in a side room at AmpFest19, referring to the hashtag for the event.
And... The organizers didn't okay the video.
It was shown in a side room of just supporters.
And... I don't know if anyone knows who made the video.
This is the kind of funny thing.
This is like the information warfare, the meme warfare that's going on, should lead everyone to be incredibly suspicious of convenient events.
Justin Trudeau claims that he was the victim of credible threats to the point where he had to be surrounded by a phalanx of security and so on.
And like two days later, he's out there mingling and hugging with everyone in the crowd.
Nobody's been arrested to my knowledge, so I assume the danger is still out there.
It's just kind of weird.
And in this situation, this was, as far as I understand it, a side room that was not monitored or controlled or in control.
So I assume that people submitted memes.
They weren't vetted and the memes were shown in a sort of little presentation on memes or whatever.
So what is entirely possible, entirely credible, and what I would do if I was some evil genius, is you would create this kind of video, you would show it at this conference, and then you would report on it to the media.
Right? This would be a way of discrediting the conference, of discrediting Trump supporters, and of giving the hysterical hypocrites in the mainstream media an entire news cycle where they got to condemn this kind of stuff.
So, this could be a false flag, right?
This could be a planted video in order to get the word out.
But I'm telling you, it's really, really kind of going to backfire.
And I think it already is, because this is, I mean, this is the left, right?
This is the liberals, the mainstream media.
So, what's happened is, now a whole bunch of people have seen this movie, this clip from the movie, and this Kingsman movie, and...
They have seen that the mainstream media praised this movie until someone put media logos on the face of the victims and they've also now are aware if they haven't seen the movie and of course most a lot of the people who saw the clip hadn't seen the movie I'm sure so now there are now millions of people in America who are aware probably for the first time that a mainstream Hollywood movie Or a mainstream movie,
for sure, had in it a scene of Christians being mass slaughtered, and the mainstream media praised it.
That's news to a lot of people, right?
It's news to a lot of people. So...
The other thing that I think is important is that because the slaughter of the Christians in the movie is supposedly justified because the Christian says something racist, then they're saying that, I mean, the implicit premise of the movie is it's fine to slaughter people or it's okay to slaughter people, or at least the reviewers who didn't have an issue with it would say, well, it's fine to slaughter them because they're racist.
And what that means, of course, is that calling someone a racist is an invitation for violence against them.
And because the media calls just about everyone racist.