All Episodes
Previous Next
July 13, 2019 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
12:12
No Excuses for Female Evil!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi everybody, it's Stefan Mullany from Freedomain Radio.
So yesterday, a woman drove into a police checkpoint about a block away from the White House, was yelled at by police to get out of her car and to turn off the car's engine.
She backed out, hit a police car, went screaming off down the road, injured another officer apparently.
And then, I guess at the conclusion of this high-speed car chase, she was shot.
I guess they feared that she had a car bomb or something.
of that nature in the car.
And then, when police approached the car with the woman's dead body inside, what did they find in the back seat?
Well, they found a one-year-old, little, helpless, baby girl.
Now immediately, of course, the media, as is almost always the case when faced with rank female evil, rushed in to defend, to explain, and to strip the woman's body of any moral responsibility for dragging a child into basically a suicidal death by cop situation.
It may be hard for you to process just how evil this is, because there's so much propaganda shielding women from actually having moral responsibility, which is a terrible form of sexism.
But you may remember some time back in Colorado, a young orange-haired lunatic named James Holmes went into a movie theater and began shooting up people.
Imagine if It was found on his body, if he'd been shot, if it was found on his body that he had a baby in a little backpack when he went on the shooting rampage.
Would we not find that even more appalling?
I mean, it's obviously evil and appalling to shoot up a movie theater if he'd had a baby with him at the same time.
What if Timothy McVeigh, the guy who blew up his truck outside the federal building in Oklahoma, had had a baby In the back seat when he blew his truck up.
See, when this woman went on this drive to crash into barriers, to scream down the highway right outside White House, she knew she was going to get shot at.
Most likely outcome.
Now, the baby could have been shot.
Didn't know he was in there, that the little girl was in there.
A baby could have been hit by fragments, could have lost an eye or both eyes.
A bullet could have hit the gas tank, engulfing the whole car in flames and burning that poor little child, that poor little baby, to a crisp.
And immediately the media, oh well, you see, she's depressed.
She has postpartum depression.
It's her hormones that made her do this.
What happened to women being morally responsible for what they do?
Maybe she had a brain tumor.
Maybe she inhaled a railway spike and it destroyed her near frontal lobe.
I don't know, right?
I don't know.
But the reality is people just immediately rush in to excuse the men, blame it on hormones.
The evil that women are capable of, and the evil that women do, not all women, but the evil that women do, is generally invisible to society, which is why there's so much violence in society, fundamentally.
So, did you know that women abuse children more than men do?
And whenever I do research, I go to psychological papers or professional papers in these areas, and you'll read this statistic, which is incontrovertible.
Women abuse children more than men abuse children.
Women certainly murder children a lot more than men murder children.
And immediately, when this fact is stated, what always follows this fact being stated, it's like a metronome.
is well yes it's true you see that women abuse children more than men but you see women spend a lot more time around children and that's why really that's why so if i said well if it were true if i said men beat up women they're married to like husbands beat up wives a lot more because obviously
Husbands spend time around wives.
They spend more time around wives, and because wives are so innately annoying, of course they're going to beat them up, because they spend time around them.
It's the wives' fault, you see, for being annoying, and therefore any man who spends more time around women is going to end up beating them up, because they're just so annoying.
Really, we're at the point where it's just proximity to children that causes abuse.
I don't ever remember that being used as a justification for men hitting women.
But, see, men have moral responsibility, but we have to build these little shimmering cathedrals around the sensitivity of these little dandelion-souled women who just float around without any responsibility, just being pushed and buffeted around by hormones and society and patriarchy, and oh my God.
Oh my God!
Women used to be heroic.
We used to give them responsibility.
Do you know that the only people we strip moral responsibility for are either the completely insane or the unbelievably mentally deficient?
They're not responsible.
You've got an IQ of 60 or something.
Then you're not morally responsible.
Or if you're completely insane, you're not morally responsible.
This is the category that we put the majority of women in when we basically say that circumstances dictate what they do.
How insulting!
I have a daughter!
For God's sakes, please give her moral responsibility.
Do not take that precious gift of self-ownership away from women!
It is deeply condescending, insulting, and incredibly sexist.
For instance, did you know that women initiate incidents of domestic violence at a higher rate than men do?
Domestic violence is initiated by women more often than it is initiated by men.
Do women have any accountability or responsibility for that?
Oh no, I'm sure it's hormones, or it's postpartum depression, or that the guy brought it on himself by being a jerk, although why would she be with a jerk?
Is she not even responsible for that?
Or the way that...
The way that the media and society and art all talk about single mothers like they're just heroic, like they just, the waves of chance tossed children into their home and they're just heroically taking them on.
No fault, no responsibility, no choice to not use birth control or to get married to the wrong guy or to have sex with the wrong guy, an unprotected sex with the wrong guy.
Then not to have an abortion, then not to give the child up for adoption.
They're just heroic!
They're victims, you see!
Are they not responsible for having unprotected sex?
Are they not responsible for keeping the children?
Are they not responsible for choosing entirely the wrong man as the father of their children?
No!
They're victims!
They're little dandelion fluffs, blown around the universe by the wings of chance and the winds of patriarchy and no responsibility, no choice, nothing!
This would be insulting to a four-year-old, and we apply this victimhood, infinite, no standard gobbledygook to adult women.
Or, I've also read in the media, that this woman who put her daughter directly in death's path, it's only quite a miracle that the child that this woman who put her daughter directly in death's path, it's only So, Somebody posted this on my Facebook page.
I was wondering if she was freaking out because her baby was hungry.
She was broke and the government stopped WIC.
Women, Infants and Children.
It's a welfare program.
It's a shutdown, you see.
It's the government slimmed down.
That is the problem.
Postpartum depression was the problem.
She was depressed, you see.
No hormones.
No responsibility.
Do people Do people have an internal mirror where they review things that they say just to find out if they're not completely insane and immoral?
We say, well, this woman almost got her child killed because we weren't giving her free stuff through the government, you see.
That's the problem.
What this actually translates to, in reality, is the proposition that we pay women not to abuse and kill their children.
That basically we have no problem whatsoever with giving this speech to women, holding up a baby saying, give me free shit or the baby gets it.
Bang!
We have no problem bribing women to not hit and abuse and kill their children.
I mean, do we even listen to ourselves as a society anymore?
Have we completely given up?
Do we just have this one-way verbal barrage of diarrhea, like throwing browned water into a jet engine, watching it hit a wall and turning away?
Mad!
If you feel that you need to pay people not to harm children, that's called a hostage situation!
That is not called being a mother!
Or a parent that's called having hostages and saying, give me stuff for free or I hurt my children.
That's actually illegal.
Ah, but the poor victims, they didn't make the choice to have children.
It's madness.
It's madness.
When we take away moral responsibility from women, we treat them as condescendingly, as patronizingly, and as inhumanely, and as insultingly, as humanly possible.
And I call attention to this fact because I really love women.
I really care about women.
Which means that I will not strip one iota of moral responsibility from them.
Because to do so is demeaning and insulting to the nobility of their potential natures.
This past, this endless white knight mangina invention of excuses for the evil that women are capable of is deeply harmful to women.
It is deeply harmful to the children that are in the care of women.
It is deeply harmful to the future.
It is deeply sexist.
And I, for one, will not stand for it, at least in my life.
All the people in my life who are adults have the same level of moral responsibility.
And I say this and bring this to your attention and ask you to watch out for it.
Don't take my word for it.
Just review the literature.
Review what is being written about women when women openly do evil things.
And I point this out that we need to have the same moral standards for men and for women.
It's really insane to have to say that in the 21st century.
We need to have the same moral standards for Men and for women.
▲
Export Selection