Jan. 11, 2018 - Freedomain Radio - Stefan Molyneux
06:36
3959 Twitter Targeting White Christians for Censorship | True News
James O’Keefe and Project Veritas recently released a series of undercover videos with current and former Twitter employees discussing the shadow banning and censorship of accounts displaying certain political and religious affiliations. Stefan Molyneux points out the elephant in the room nobody is talking about regarding these undercover videos and the shocking censorship of white Christian conservatives. Latest Project Veritas Undercover Video: https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/01/11/undercover-video-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning-algorithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/Your support is essential to Freedomain Radio, which is 100% funded by viewers like you. Please support the show by making a one time donation or signing up for a monthly recurring donation at: http://www.freedomainradio.com/donate
It's probably not a huge secret that I'm a huge fan and admirer of James O'Keefe and the work that he and his intrepid team of superhero reporters are doing over at Project Veritas.
So it was with great interest that I dove into this morning's offerings.
We'll put the link to it below just...
Check it out for yourself.
And I went into it just curious what he and his team of undercover reporters had discovered in the hallowed halls of Twitter regarding things like censoring and shadow banning and the deletion of accounts.
And it wasn't hugely shocking to me, but there was a little bit of a pattern that has been somewhat unremarked upon, which is that just about everybody who was talking about banning and shadow banning and censoring and mass deletions, everyone who's talking about doing that was a particular person.
And everyone, just about everyone that they were talking about doing it to, was another particular ethnic group.
Now that seems somewhat important.
It'd be lovely to live in a colorblind society, don't you think?
So basically there was a whole series of non-whites who were talking about censoring and master leading and shadow banning.
Who? Well, Republicans and generally whites.
So, in the question of, you know, how to figure out who to delete, this guy named Pranay Singh says, just go to a random Trump tweet and just look at the followers.
They will be all, like, guns, God, America, like, and with the American flag and, like, the cross.
Like, who says that?
Who talks like that? It's for sure a bot.
Boom! Right?
Targeted, I assume, for suppression or deletion.
Pranay Singh then says, to figure out, you use machine learning.
You look for Trump or America or any of like 5,000 keywords to describe a redneck.
A redneck. Now that is a racial epithet.
It's like the N-word, but for white people.
And... To target people based upon ethnicity, right?
He's looking to find white people, right?
This Indian, I assume, guy, looking for words to describe white people so that they can be targeted for suppression and deletion.
Now that seems quite significant and you should really watch the video and just keep track of who's doing the censoring and who is being targeted.
Now the other thing, I mean of course this is one of the reasons why the government wants H-1B visa applicants to come in from the third world into America or to the west as a whole because these cultures don't have a history.
of respecting free speech and if you look at the people who respect free speech and value free speech and are willing to defend free speech, it generally is whites and it's generally males.
So here we have the ancient tyrannies of the old world at war with the relatively spanking fresh new liberties of the new world and it doesn't seem like the new world and the liberties are particularly winning.
So Twitter has a guy saying the word redneck to describe white people.
That is an astonishingly immoral and racist epithet.
The other thing, too, is he says, just go to a random Trump tweet and just look at the followers.
They will be all like guns, God, America, like him with an American flag, and like the cross.
See, that is, I assume, part of the algorithm to target people for suppression, shadow banning or deletion.
So when he says God...
Okay, obviously, right?
Second Amendment guns. When he's talking about God in this context, he's talking about Christians.
He's talking about the Christian God.
So he's looking for God combined, I assume, with guns and the cross.
You see? The central, most foundational symbol of Western Christianity, of Christianity as a whole, of course, the cross.
So not only does it appear that Twitter is targeting whites, but they're also targeting Christians.
I assume the two in combination are their sweet spot.
So what that means of course is that here you have not just racially but religiously motivated censorship.
Now just to put this in context, imagine if this video Had been shot by an Indian guy and at Twitter's headquarters were endless images of whites giggling about how they were targeting Muslims using the n-word against Muslims and mass banning Muslim accounts based upon Muslim religious imagery.
The world would go insane and the bigotry The racism, the intolerance, would be clear for everyone to see.
So that is the reality, it seems, of what is going on in Twitter.
Because it is white Christians who are being targeted, nobody seems to have noticed.
Nobody seems to be commenting.
Nobody seems to be talking about it.
So it falls to me again.
If it were Muslims, if it were blacks, everybody would be going mental.
But it's just white Christians, you see?
What do they matter? You know, white Christians, just shut up and pay your taxes.
It's only white Christians.
They never get mad, do they?
Well, This turn the other cheek is okay for a while.
Basically what Christians do is they gather information about who is mistreating them, whether it's a one-time accident or whether it's a pattern of prejudice and bigotry.
So if you think that Christians never get mad, you need to study your history.
