All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Dec. 10, 2019 - Skeptoid
17:34
Skeptoid #705: Listener Feedback: The Plot Thickens

Listeners offer some updates and new information to previous episodes. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Roanoke Artifact Revisited 00:07:17
This week on Skeptoid, we have some updates for you on past shows.
Updates which by themselves are like little mini episodes.
Today's roundup includes a second look at an artifact that was said to be evidence indicating the fate of the lost colony of Roanoke, covered in episode number 245.
This particular artifact, a gold ring bearing what appears to be a family crest, has been subjected to some later analysis, and we need to update our picture of the Roanoke colonists accordingly.
This and more listener feedback is today on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Listener feedback.
The plot thickens.
Skeptoid episodes are always based on evergreen topics, the idea being that you can stumble across a show or its transcript page five years from now and the subject will still be equally relevant.
That's to give every show as long a shelf life as possible.
However, this does bring one downside.
Occasionally, new information emerges, and now suddenly I've got to go back and update the old shows, to whatever extent is practical.
And whenever I have enough of these bits of new information to fill a show, you get one just like today's.
So let's dive straight into the newest updates.
Episode number 245 was about the lost colony of Roanoke, an early and failed attempt to settle the Americas.
The colony was on the North Carolina island of Roanoke, and a relief party that arrived in about 1590 found that the entire population had simply disappeared, leaving tantalizing clues.
Our best evidence today is that most were either killed in fights with the indigenous or were assimilated into their populations, something for which we're developing genetic evidence.
But as so often happens with such mysteries, people succumb to their confirmation bias when it comes to anything that could be an artifact helping to solve the mystery.
One such artifact was found in 1998, a gold ring apparently bearing the crest of one of the Roanoke families, found on the island of Hatteras, one of the places some think the colonists went.
This ring was reported in my episode as one of the pieces of possible evidence.
However, there was always a bit of an odor about this ring, as it was found with other items that dated to about a century too late to have been associated with the lost colony.
And in 2017, a team of archaeologists tested the ring and found it to be merely a cheap brass trade item, consistent with other trinkets that were brought in later years to trade with Native Americans.
that family crest turned out to be just a generic image of a lion.
Thanks to a number of Skeptoid listeners who emailed me this paper when it was published, the episode transcript has been updated with the new information, and the lost colony of Roanoke remains as lost as ever.
Episode number 679 was about the Greenbrier Ghost, a case from 1897 in which it's claimed that the ghost of a murdered woman appeared to point out where her body had been buried, leading to the conviction of the killer.
The claim was made by her mother, and in an interesting twist, it's been found that on the same page of the newspaper in which her daughter's obituary was published was an identical version of the ghost story, leading to the obvious conclusion that the article is what inspired the mother to make up her ghost story.
The article gave only that the identical story came from Australia, but no other specifics.
However, there are many Australian listeners to Skeptoid, many of whom are familiar with folk legends.
One such listener, Kirk, wrote, The unnamed Australian ghost story sounds a lot like the legend of Fisher's Ghost.
This legend takes place at Campbelltown, southwest of Sydney, New South Wales.
In this story, the ghost of a murdered guy was said to have appeared sitting on the handrail of a bridge, pointing to the adjacent paddock where his body was buried.
The discovery of the body led to the conviction and execution of the murderer.
Keep up the great show.
And indeed, the Fisher's ghost story matches all the essential details of the Greenbrier ghost.
In both cases, a person made up a ghost story in order to ensure the conviction of a killer they knew to be guilty.
In the Fisher's Ghost version, a man named Farley had knowledge of the murder, but, perhaps not wishing to implicate himself, simply said that he saw the ghost of Fred Fisher pointing to a paddock.
The paddock was searched, the body found, and the murderer soon convicted and hanged.
Episode number 621 was about the Pentagon's $22 million Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program, or ATIP, widely reported in the news in December 2017.
The entire story began raising suspicions as soon as it was published, and it quickly became clear that it was a vanity project entirely run and publicized by a small number of lifelong believers in alien visitation, led by hotel magnate Robert Bigelow and UFO documentary filmmaker Tom DeLong.
Even the New York Times articles that launched everything were planned by the group and written for them by three members of their UFO community.
The update here is that further investigative reporting has been done.
Much of it focused on Luis Elessondo, the man who claimed to have been the head of ATIP.
However, the only official statement that he ever worked for the Department of Defense at all was made just once by a briefly employed Pentagon spokesperson named Dana White.
Multiple Freedom of Information Act requests have failed to find any connection between Elessondo and ATIP.
Kahneman on Carbon Taxes 00:10:14
All we know for sure about Elessondo is that he now works for DeLong's film production company called To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, or TTSA.
Although TTSA makes grandiloquent claims of doing research and so forth, they're registered as a film production company with the Security and Exchange Commission, and their only significant project to date is a UFO series for the History Channel.
So in short, reserve your gravest skepticism for any news reports you might read attributing shocking discoveries to either ATIP, TTSA, DeLong, or the ever-elusive Luis Elessondo.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Episode number 399 was about an infamous crypt called the Chase Vault in a cemetery in Barbados, with a story that every time someone would go into it to inter a new family member, they found it in disarray, as if the spirits had busted up all the family caskets.
What I would describe as, quote, lazy skepticism, has always proposed that floodwaters inside the vault would float the caskets and leave them helter-skelter.
But deeper research into the origins of the story revealed that it's most likely just a story, with no evidence that anything like that ever actually happened.
In fact, there isn't even any real proof that any caskets were ever interred in the vault.
Listener Jake wrote, My family and I made a pilgrimage to Christchurch Cemetery in March of this year, having heard this particular legend since I was about 12.
I'm no expert, but having stood inside the open chase vault and barely being able to stand upright, I'm only 5'7, I came to the disappointing conclusion that no more than two coffins could have easily fit into that vault, especially given that there are three extremely steep stairs and a doorway so small that I had to contort myself sideways to gain entrance.
It's a fun story, though.
Jake's account is purely an anecdote, of course, but it's the same as I'd heard one other time from a friend who visited the famous crypt.
But at least it's a first-hand account and it dovetails nicely with photographs of the crypt, which are widely available online.
So take it as a bit more reason to consider the entire story apocryphal.
Episode number 695 was about a carbon tax, the solution to global warming proposed by most economists.
Tax carbon emissions and the ideas that people will make choices that save them money.
with the tax revenue returned to everyone equally as a dividend.
This will cause highly taxed carbon-emitting products and services to die, and it will cause carbon-neutral solutions to flourish.
The idea is based on the economic principle that behaviors we want to discourage should be taxed, and behaviors we want to encourage should be incentivized.
I heard from quite a few listeners who felt that the economists who proposed this are wrong, that people do not necessarily make rational decisions that will save them money.
Here is one representative email from listener Chris.
A month or so ago, you had an episode wherein you seemed to me to treat as subtled science the idea that the nature of people tends generally toward making decisions in line with their own self-interest.
This idea has guided economic theory for nearly as long as it has existed, but has been challenged over several decades now with extensive and peer-reviewed scientific research.
Kahneman and Tversky come to mind insofar as Kahneman won the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for their work.
So Chris is raising a lot of points here, but first let me dispense with his recollection that I implied it's settled science that people always act in their own self-interest.
I implied no such thing and wouldn't.
Regular Skeptoid listeners have often heard me talk about behavioral economics, the field upon which Kahneman and Tversky's work is founded.
Behavioral economics is the study of how and why people make irrational decisions, which we all do every day.
The idea that Kahneman suggests a carbon tax wouldn't work because people don't act rationally misstates what Kahneman argues.
Kahneman does think that a carbon tax wouldn't work, but for an entirely different reason.
Kahneman doesn't say that the tax wouldn't change people's behavior.
He says people wouldn't accept the tax to begin with.
He's big on what he calls loss aversion theory.
Nobody likes a new tax because it's an immediate loss that's in your face.
So he thinks such a tax would be impossible to pass.
Global warming is not immediate and in your face to many people.
Kahneman believes people would rather sit back and let a nebulous threat like global warming happen than agree to the immediate loss of a new tax.
He's probably right.
But the economists are also probably right.
Go back to the transcript page from my episode and look through the references.
You'll find that carbon taxes do work, not just in theory, but in practice, in places in the world that have had them for a long time.
Moreover, note that in January of 2019, over 3,500 U.S. economists, including 27 Nobel laureate economists, signed the Climate Leadership Council's Economists Statement on Carbon Dividends, the largest public statement of economists in history, calling for a carbon tax to solve global warming.
There's no meaningful scholarly dispute on this subject.
Daniel Kahneman is among the signatories.
Amos Tversky died in 1996.
It's a short document, and you should read it.
There's a link to it on the online transcript for this episode at skeptoid.com.
So listeners, keep that feedback coming in.
If you've got more information that enhances a past show, or especially if you have a correction to something I got wrong, send it in.
Email me at brian at skeptoid.com.
I'm here at the desk working for you, but at the end of the day, Skeptoid is only as good as you make it.
And my feedback to you is to thank Premium supporters Abby Leland and Will Keeley, Rich Cattle, Alan Matthews, and Martin Crawley.
As a nonprofit, Skeptoid is almost completely dependent upon private grants and donations, mostly in the form of monthly micropayments, so small you'll never notice.
Won't you help bring great critical thinking programming to the majority of people out there who need it?
Please join us.
It takes just a few moments and it will ensure Skeptoid is here for years to come.
Just visit skeptoid.com slash important.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection