All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Dec. 3, 2019 - Skeptoid
17:56
Skeptoid #704: The Green Children of Woolpit

In the 12th century, a pair of mysterious children with green skin surprised English villagers. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Green Children of Woolpit 00:09:36
There is an old legend from England about a pair of children who showed up at a village in the 12th century.
They couldn't speak English, and strangest of all, they were green.
Like they literally had green skin.
The story remains unsolved, but if we look close enough, we can learn a great deal.
First, were these children actually green?
Or maybe was there something about their health that made them look green?
Or is the entire thing made up?
We're going to see what we can find out.
The Green Children of Woolpit is coming up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
The Green Children of Woolpit The time was the mid-12th century, the place Woolpit, England, a green farming and market community in eastern England.
Reapers working in the fields came upon two small children wearing strange fabrics and speaking in an unknown tongue.
But strangest of all was that their skin was green.
They were taken in by a local noble who raised them, and though the brother soon died, the sister grew to adulthood and assimilated, but she was never able to tell them very much about where the two of them had come from.
Even today, they remain the subject of much speculation, with theories to explain them ranging from the mundane to the outrageous.
They're known as the Green Children of Woolpit, and today we're going to point our skeptical eye straight at their famous story.
Woolpit is named for its wolf pits, deep pits into which a livestock carcass was dropped as bait to trap wolves.
It is from such a pit that the children are said to have emerged.
Details, however, are virtually non-existent.
The entire story is known only from two original sources, two history books independently written in Latin, both right around the year 1200.
Historia Rerum Anglicarum by William of Newburgh and Chronicon Anglicanum by Ralph of Cogeshall Abbey.
Both historians dedicated only a few paragraphs to the story, but what's interesting is that both accounts are nearly identical, while the style of the two books is very different.
William included lots of wild fanciful tales like pirate stories and animated corpses, while Ralph wrote a much drier account of hard facts and events.
Ralph gives his source for the story as Sir Richard de Calney, the knight who raised the children, while William says simply that he got it from, quote, so many and such competent witnesses, end quote.
The story is brief enough to give it in its entirety.
The children were found in the fields, green of color, wearing strange clothes and speaking only gibberish.
They were taken to the home of Sir Richard, where they grew up, learned to speak English, and to behave like anyone else.
Around the time they were baptized, the brother fell ill and died, hardly an unusual fate for a child in those days.
The sister eventually married, but was only able to give scant details to explain her origins or their green skin color.
As children in their homeland, which they called St. Martin and said was Christian, they were tending their father's flock when they heard a sound like church bells.
They followed it through a cavern, and when they emerged, they found themselves surrounded by the Wolpet Reapers.
Interestingly, the most detailed part of both accounts has to do with the children being given beanstalks to eat when they were first found.
But they didn't know how to eat them.
They tried to find edible beans in the stalks, cried when they couldn't find any.
Then, when locals showed them how to open the pods to find the beans, they ate ravenously.
Gradually, over a period of time, they learned to eat other foods as well.
Once this happened, their greenish skin color returned to normal.
There is a bit of a dating problem.
Of the two original chroniclers, only William gave a specific date range, which was, quote, during the reign of King Stephen, end quote, placing the event somewhere in the years 1135 to 1154.
But Ralph, who says he heard the story firsthand from Sir Richard, didn't start writing his book until 1196, half a century later.
How both of these authors could be so specific on the beanstalks detail, but missing each other by decades on the timing, is interesting.
What can we draw from this?
Well, we don't know for sure, other than that neither version can be considered an absolute account of literal events.
One or the other made substantial factual errors, or one or the other either fabricated their sources or were given false information to report.
If you read other accounts of the story, you'll get more details not found in the originals.
All such details have been added by later authors, drawing either upon their own imaginations or upon those of their fellow authors for the new material.
The first author to publish the story widely was Thomas Keatley in his 1850 book, The Fairy Mythology, in which he accidentally misspelled William of Newburgh as William of New Bridge, and this error is repeated in many of the modern accounts.
If you see that error, you're reading an author whose research consisted of little more than copying and pasting from Keatley.
Another tip that your particular version may be an unreliable one is the claim of a third contemporary source, an unspecified work by the historian Jarvis of Tilbury.
Jarvis lived at the right time and was a known historian of the period.
The existence of his reference to the green children was first claimed in 1958 by author Harold T. Wilkins in his book Strange Mysteries of Time and Space.
Skeptical researcher Garth Haslam spent a long time trying to track down any such mention by Jarvis, unsuccessfully, and finally concluded that Wilkins probably fabricated the source.
Other authors who do minimal original research have parroted Jarvis as an original source for the story, based solely on Wilkins' probably false citation.
One author, John Macklin, even created his own new version of the entire story, lifting all the details point by point, but relocating it in the non-existent Spanish town of Banjos and moving the date to 1887.
Put a neat story out there, and it's guaranteed that some authors will run it through their own mill to give it their own touch.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finish the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating, skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts, and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert, sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast, and this ship does always sell out.
Act now, or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Fiction vs Reality in the Tale 00:06:18
Another such author is Scottish alien visitation theorist Duncan Lunan, who is among the more prominent claimants that the green children of Wolpet were visitors from another world.
He makes a number of extraordinary claims about their arrival, including that it was, quote, one of a series of events at linked sites and seems to have been anticipated by the authorities of the time, end quote, and that there were some, quote, strange things happening in the sky at the same time, end quote.
His hypothesis is founded upon his belief that during the 12th century, quote, there might have been mass abductions from Earth by extraterrestrials for experimental purposes with the knowledge, if not the agreement, of the authorities, end quote.
Lunan considered it an unassailable fact that the children must have been extraterrestrial, based upon William's account of the hearsay of the sister telling, in later years, how St. Martin is dark all the time, but with a luminous country visible in the distance across a considerable river.
But lest we dismiss Lunin's version as entirely conjectural, it's a good time to mention another early work that likely influenced him.
It's the book The Man in the Moon, or A Discourse of a Voyage Hither, written by the Church of England bishop Francis Godwin under the pseudonym Domingo Gonzales and widely considered to be one of the very first works of speculative science fiction.
Probably written in the 1620s and published posthumously in 1638, it is considered an important landmark in the history of English language fiction.
It's the first-person account of Godwin's narrator, Gonzales, who travels to the moon where he lives for some months with a race of utopian Christians called the Lunars.
The Lunars of sending their people to Earth, and Gonzales notes that the green children of Wolpet, by name, turn out to have been two such people.
Godwin even threw in the detail that the lunar called their deity Martinus, an obvious reference to the green children's assertion that they came from a Christian land called St. Martin.
In a 2006 issue of the academic journal Science Fiction Studies, writer John Clark found that Godwin's piece was only the tip of the iceberg of how much English language science fiction has been informed by the humble little story of the Green Children of Wolpet.
In this context, Duncan Lunan's claim would make a lot more sense and be consistent with the history of the tale, so long as it was confined to the realm of fiction.
However, let us not tarry on the story's later influence upon authors of both fiction and non-fiction, and instead get to the item you tuned in for.
What was the original grain of truth from which this legend grew?
There is, as I'm sure you can imagine, a quote, leading theory to explain the story of the green children in purely prosaic terms.
It was detailed most notably by Paul Harris in a 1998 article for Fortean Studies magazine.
Noting that the region had plenty of Flemish immigrants, some of whom lived in the town of Fornham St. Martin, about a 12 or 15 kilometer walk from Wolpet, it's entirely plausible that these were simply runaways or had gotten lost and had grown up speaking only Flemish, a language that could easily be unknown to the Wolpet Reapers.
The fact that both William and Ralph gave St. Martin as the children's origin, and that a town named that was very close by, it seems there's very little here that's mysterious.
And of course, they need not even have been Flemish.
They could have been the children of any foreigner, either living in the region or just passing through.
Except, of course, for that significant detail of the green skin.
Harris went through perhaps a few too many gymnastics trying to find explanations for every little detail of the story.
For example, trying to match the wolf pits from which the children are said to have emerged with the tunnels of flint mines located some 50 kilometers away.
But the green skin is the central oddity of the story, as the story wouldn't exist without it, and it does demand at least some plausible explanation.
Harris's theory was that the children may have hidden in the forest long enough to develop malnutrition significant enough to produce chlorosis, an old name for hypochromic anemia.
This is a reduction of hemoglobin in red blood cells, giving the patient a pallid appearance.
There are both hereditary and acquired forms of hypochromic anemia, and patients today do present with skin colors, of which the most serious can have a notable greenish tinge.
So it's not implausible that two children in the 12th century could have had this, and might be quite the curiosity to neighboring villagers who had never heard of such a thing before.
Whether this could be acquired simply by hiding in the forest until malnutrition sets in is more problematic, as you'd likely starve to death or suffer some other symptoms long before you'd get this specific condition, which we don't find in other people who nearly starve.
But, as noted, there are plenty of other ways to get it, and as it's a real thing today, it shouldn't be too surprising that it was a real thing then, and so we leave the green children of Wolpet pretty much as we found them.
Elements of the story are probably true and, as some of the most significant are not extraordinary, i.e the proximity of a place called St. Martin and that the striking presentation of an unfamiliar medical condition could well trigger a story that lasts for centuries, I'm going to call this one perfectly plausible in all its essential details, though with no need to travel to the moon to find them,
Thanking Our Premium Members 00:01:58
and we also don't need to go to the moon to thank our supporting premium members, like Skeptical Bunny, a fugitive from Hermiston Oregon, Dave Brennan and Joe Sorich.
Perhaps the children were merely green with envy over the amazing benefits our premium members receive.
Want to know more about those.
Come to Skeptoid.com.
Slash important to find out how to become a premium member and to learn more about how your donation is used by Skeptoid Media, a 501c3 educational nonprofit.
Skeptoid.com slash important.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary Canada, the land of maple syrup and Moose, and i'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as five Us dollars per month, and that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles and that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrian Hill From PRX.
Export Selection