All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Nov. 19, 2013 - Skeptoid
17:25
Skeptoid #389: The JFK Assassination

After so many decades, the number of incompatible conspiracy theories about the death of JFK continues to grow. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Guarding Against Conspiracy Theories 00:06:59
At least 214 different conspiracy theories have been invented to explain the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
So as you can probably guess, there's not going to be any attempts to debunk each of them here on this show.
Instead, today's examination of the JFK assassination is a lesson in what makes a conspiracy theory and how we can better guard against them.
That's up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
The JFK assassination.
November 22, 1963 did not dawn just like every other day for Lee Harvey Oswald, a former U.S. Marine and self-described Marxist who had lived for two and a half years in the Soviet Union.
But today, living in Dallas with his Russian wife and two young children, Oswald brought two extra items to his job at the Texas Schoolbook Depository, a warehouse where his job was to fill orders for textbooks placed by local schools.
He brought his .38 caliber Smith ⁇ Wesson pistol and his 6.5mm Manliker Carkano 9138 scoped rifle.
And on that same day, American President John F. Kennedy, known for his anti-communist actions against Cuba, was going to drive right past Oswald's workplace on an official visit.
On a sunny day with thousands of fans applauding, Kennedy rode past the book depository in the open-roofed Lincoln Continental.
And then beginning at 12.30 p.m. and lasting for 8.4 seconds, the first bullet sparked off the pavement.
The second burst through Kennedy's arm and plunged into the abdomen of Texas Governor John Connolly, riding in the front seat immediately in front of Kennedy.
The third and final shot blew Kennedy's head into what soldiers call the pink mist, an explosion of blood and brain matter that left a crater in his head the size of a softball, and launched what was to become the mother of all conspiracy theories.
A man matching Oswald's description had been spotted holding a rifle in a window of the book depository's sixth floor, and the description went out over police radio.
45 minutes later, police officer J.D. Tippett stopped a young man on the street who fit the description.
The young man pulled out a pistol and fired four shots, killing Tippett.
And within a matter of minutes, citizens and other officers pursued the young man into a movie theater and arrested him with the murder weapon.
It was Oswald, the same man whose rifle other officers were just finding clumsily hidden in the book depository.
But Oswald never got his day in court.
He was assassinated himself just two days later at the police station by bar owner Jack Ruby, which served only to thicken the conspiracy theories that gradually gelled over the years.
The conspiracy theories have become so prevalent that today, depending on which poll you look at, between two-thirds and three-quarters of Americans believe that Oswald was not the lone killer of Kennedy.
I don't want to burst any bubbles, but it's not my intention here today to analyze any of the various conspiracy theories about the death of JFK.
That's already been done in a format much more comprehensive than a 10-minute podcast, and the place I recommend you go for that is the 2007 book, Reclaiming History.
Author Vince Bugliosi, the famous attorney and author, successfully prosecuted Lee Harvey Oswald in a 1986 mock trial held in London.
Bugliosi is best known for prosecuting Charles Manson, and more recently for his book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, in which he lays out the legal foundation for convicting Bush for the deaths of all American servicemen in Iraq.
Bugliosi is no pawn of the government, and yet his 1,648 pages of Reclaiming History disassemble 214 JFK conspiracy theories that include 82 different trigger men.
For those who might possibly be uninitiated, the most popular conspiracy theories include the Sicilian mafia killing Kennedy for his actions against organized crime, the Central Intelligence Agency killing him because of his dissatisfaction with their progress against the Cuban regime, the Federal Bureau of Investigation killing Kennedy, not for any clear reason, but only because they seemingly must have, since Oswald was thought to be an FBI informant.
The Secret Service, also for no reason other than their failure to protect his life that day, must have been deliberate.
The Soviet KGB to retaliate against Kennedy for the Bay of Pigs attack on Cuba.
The Ku Klux Klan because Kennedy was a Catholic and a civil rights advocate instead of a Protestant and a racist.
Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson as a way to succeed to the presidency.
And Cuba's Fidel Castro to kill Kennedy before Kennedy could kill him.
And in all of these theories, and in scores and scores of others, there is always some implication that Lee Harvey Oswald was set up to be the fall guy due to some perceived connection.
Almost immediately, Johnson launched an investigation, chaired by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren.
The Warren Commission took nearly a full year to produce its 889-page report, which found in no uncertain terms that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone to kill the president.
Historians, legal experts like Bugliosi, and all serious investigations have all reached findings that unilaterally agree with the Warren report.
Why We Trust the Official Story 00:08:29
However, its nature as a government-produced version of events have caused conspiracy theorists to cast grave doubts on virtually all of its findings.
Phrases like the official story and the government's version of events are frequently peppered throughout nearly all conspiracy theories.
These terms are used as weasel words to give the impression that more than one plausible version of events took place, and the official one is just one, and that tainted by its authoritarian powerful ability to include falsehoods imposed upon a powerless public.
The phrase official story is smeared like axle grease over every major conspiracy theory, including 9-11, the moon landings, and the Boston Marathon bombings.
You wouldn't say the official story is that Allied troops landed on the beach at Normandy on June 6, 1944.
It's simply our standard history of what happened on that day.
You wouldn't say the official story is that boron has an atomic weight of 10.81.
It's our standard model of that element.
Conspiracy theorists probably would not use the term in these cases either.
They reserve it only for when they're trying to cast doubt on an event with a weasel word.
Hey everyone, I want to remind you about a truly unique and once-in-a-lifetime adventure.
Join me and Mediterranean archaeologist Dr. Flint Dibble for a skeptoid sailing adventure through the Mediterranean Sea aboard the SV Royal Clipper, the world's largest full-rigged sailing ship.
This is also the only opportunity you'll have to hear Flint and I talk about our experiences when we both went on Joe Rogan to represent the causes of science and reality against whatever it is that you get when you're thrown into that lion pit.
We set sail from Málaga, Spain on April 18th, 2026 and finished the adventure in Nice, France on April 25th.
You'll enjoy a fascinating skeptical mini-conference at sea.
You'll visit amazing ports along the Spanish and French coasts and Flint will be our exclusive onboard expert sharing the real archaeology and history about every stop.
We've got special side quests and extra skeptical content planned at each port.
This is a true sailing ship.
You can climb the rat lines to the crow's nest, handle the sails.
You can even take the helm and steer.
This is a real bucket list adventure you don't want to miss.
But cabins are selling fast and this ship does always sell out.
Act now or you'll miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
Get the full details and book your cabin at skeptoid.com slash adventures.
Hope to see you on board.
That's skeptoid.com slash adventures.
It would be much more appropriate if we could use a term like standard model to describe the understood and accepted version of what happened.
Our standard model is that Kennedy was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald with three rifle shots from the Texas School Book Depository, because Oswald suffered from many of the same psychological and ideological ideas that have always characterized most high-visibility killers.
The case of the angst-ridden loner turning killer is all too familiar to today's broadcast news audience, and Oswald checked all of the boxes.
If he had lived more than 48 hours after the assassination, the same old story is more than likely what would have come out.
Oswald's action was not just commonplace and expected from a psychological perspective.
It also happens to fit our standard model of the events of that day.
Any government's official story has very little impact upon that analysis.
And yet conspiracy theorists love to abandon that standard model and all of the evidence that supports it and instead focus on the one small fact that some official government investigation came to the same conclusion as everyone else.
Then, suddenly, what happened is no longer the standard model supported by all available evidence.
It's merely the official story.
And as a government story, it's therefore automatically suspect.
But logic does not permit us to reason in reverse like this.
To develop a well-founded understanding of what happened, we can't merely ask which version of events is believed by a given party.
Instead, we have to look at the evidence to see where it leads.
Similarly, if we want to know whether acupuncture treats illness, we can't merely ask whether the ancient Chinese believed that it did.
We have to actually analyze the test results.
Characterizing a standard model of history as the official story, or checking to see what the government says, is never a useful way to argue or to present the facts of a disputed historical event.
Any criticism of the Warren report is a red herring that does not shed any useful light on the events of November 22, 1963.
Two conspiracy theorists who hold absolutely incompatible, mutually exclusive beliefs still consider themselves allies in the same community, because they are unified by the only thing that truly matters to them, their shared conviction that the official story is a lie.
Bugliosi even pointed out a case where an individual JFK conspiracy theorist claimed that Kennedy had been killed by the government and that Kennedy was still alive in the same argument.
To this person, this irreconcilable contradiction was more plausible than the official story.
It was not an isolated case.
In 2012, the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science published a paper called Dead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories, in which many such examples were reviewed, their focal case being that of conspiracists who doubt the official story of the 2011 killing of Osama bin Laden.
They are more likely to believe that bin Laden had actually been killed months or years earlier, and that he is in fact still alive.
To you and I, it sounds like another impossible contradiction.
But to the conspiracy theorist, both outcomes are reconcilable, in that they both differ from the official story, as if that's what's important.
Many conspiratorial analyses of the assassination depend upon perceived anomalies based on careful analysis of the Zapruder film, the famous color home movie showing 27 seconds of the motorcade, including the fatal shot.
While some point to evidence found in the Zapruder film that the assassination was a conspiracy, others claim the film itself is a carefully assembled forgery created to show a false history of events.
Again, we see two irreconcilable versions of events, impossibly yet harmoniously coexisting as part of the fabric of conspiracy lore.
There are at least three other home movies showing the death from different angles, and similar claims surround these as well.
Why?
Because conspiracy theories follow these three laws.
Law number one, authorities' version of events is untrue by default.
Law number two, everything that differs from the authoritative version is more likely true.
Law number three, all evidence that contradicts number one or number two is part of the conspiracy.
Thus, the facts of November 2nd, 1963 will probably never be universally accepted.
The cycle of ill-logic will continue.
The independent conspiracy theorists, desperate to find the real killer of the president they loved so well, will continue to vehemently defend Oswald, who violently blew Kennedy's brains out.
Beyond all well-reasoned doubt, Lee Harvey Oswald was an angst-ridden loner, an ideologue, who acted in concert only with his own thoughts to murder JFK.
Accepting our standard model of history, as determined by the evidence that we have, is not always going to be right.
Skeptoid Premium Membership Appeal 00:01:53
But in doing so, especially in the lack of any cogent alternative, you will be right far more often than you're wrong.
Writing and producing this show is not just a hobby.
It's my full-time job.
Just as you depend on a new show every week, I depend on your monthly micropayment.
If you're not already a supporter, please come to skeptoid.com and click on Support Skeptoid and see just how quick and painless it is to make this a two-way street for both of us for many years to come.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection