All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Nov. 12, 2013 - Skeptoid
18:01
Skeptoid #388: 6 Problems with Wind Turbine Syndrome

Despite activist claims, wind turbines are not making anybody sick. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Wind Turbine Syndrome Debunked 00:15:12
There will always be those who insist that any effort to develop clean, renewable energy is a tyrannical example of government overreach, and they're often amenable to any idea that paints such technologies as dangerous or harmful.
Wind turbine syndrome is one such example.
A made-up imaginary medical condition caused by the windmills.
And today, we're going to discuss six reasons why it doesn't exist.
That's coming up next on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Six problems with Wind Turbine Syndrome.
Today we're going to take a look into the high-powered world of wind-generated electricity and of one of its alleged side effects, wind turbine syndrome.
For the past few years, a growing number of activists have charged that proximity to a wind turbine causes detrimental medical effects in humans.
It's called wind turbine syndrome, and depending on who you ask, it causes everything from fatigue to cancer.
Is it possible that such a relatively simple and common machine could be sickening people?
For a long time, these giant modern windmills, usually clustered in wind farms, were known only to be ugly and annoying, as well as visually distracting.
Other than being audible, mainly from the industrial roar of an air conditioning unit attached to the larger ones, they are not known to have any other environmental effects.
I wanted to hear what they sound like, so I went out to some nearby, some really huge three-bladed ones that are pretty typical.
I found that the air conditioners, which appear to be the same size and type as my own at my house, were the only audible noise.
However, when you stand almost directly under the blades, you can hear a faint whoosh as each blade goes by.
Here's a recording I made by pointing my phone up at the blades.
Note that it's really hard to hear anything other than the hum from the air conditioners.
Here's another I found online.
And here's one more, said to be from a smaller wind turbine on a really windy day.
Note how you can hear the blades better.
Things changed in 2009 when a New York pediatrician, Dr. Nina Pierpont, self-published a pamphlet she called Wind Turbine Syndrome, a report on a natural experiment.
Her natural experiment was to speak on the telephone with 23 people who answered her advertisement asking if they lived near a wind turbine and if they ever felt sick.
15 of them said they had family members who would probably agree.
Based on these 38 personal assessments, Pierpont claimed science proved her belief that wind turbines cause a vast array of maladies.
A number of activists, including a handful of other doctors, have joined her crusade, convinced that wind turbines are causing a huge number of physical ailments that we all previously took for granted.
Unfortunately, she has failed to win any significant support from the science or medicine communities.
Let's now look at six reasons why that's the case.
Problem number one, there's no consensus on what it does or who it affects.
The first thing you'll notice if you do any independent research on wind turbine syndrome is how nonspecific it is.
Do pay attention to the fact that every article lists different causes and different effects.
Is it sound, light, radio frequency, electromagnetism?
Does it cause headaches, cancer, irritable bowel syndrome, dizziness, chronic fatigue, multiple sclerosis?
Just about everyone who's written about wind turbine syndrome has a different idea about what it is and what it does.
This fact doesn't prove anything, but it should serve as a radiantly waving red flag to warn you that the subject might be something upon which there's little agreement.
And on matters of sound science, there's generally at least a standard model of some kind.
So while this doesn't prove anything, it should give any responsible researcher cause to reconsider.
Problem number two is that the symptoms attributed to wind turbine syndrome do not require any cause.
The complaints boil down to a few basic symptoms that are most often reported.
Fatigue, headaches, anxiety, insomnia, dizziness, irritability.
These are among what we call symptoms of life.
Things that happen to everyone very often, none of which require a specific cause.
We all feel fatigued sometimes.
We all get headaches.
Everyone's got anxiety about something, and we all sometimes have trouble sleeping.
In other words, the symptoms of wind turbine syndrome are indistinguishable from normal, healthy responses to life.
I searched and searched and found exactly zero blinded studies done to see if the proximity of active wind turbines produces a physiological reaction that deviates from the norm.
So at this point, there's no reliable evidence the problem exists at all.
There are any number of personal stories.
Nina Pierpont relates dozens on her website.
But without any controlled study, her reports of these people's personal beliefs tell us nothing.
Problem number three, the timing of these complaints is too unlikely.
If wind turbines did cause medical problems, we would expect to find a relationship between when they're installed and when people begin experiencing symptoms.
But we don't.
Nina Pierpont's Wind Turbine Syndrome website tells us that symptoms come on as early as 10 minutes after getting close to a turbine.
The first complaints, though, began not within minutes or days, but more than 10 years after people began to be exposed.
In fact, the literature seems devoid of any cases of wind turbine syndrome prior to Nina Pierpont's 2009 book.
But pointing to this raises an obvious counter-argument.
Just because we didn't know how to diagnose it yet doesn't mean nobody suffered from it.
While this sounds like a valid argument, it doesn't stand up.
Whenever we've discovered the cause of a disease like tuberculosis or leukemia, we have data that tells us people still suffered from the condition, undiagnosed though it may have been.
With wind turbines, there's never been any evidence to suggest that symptoms of life have increased since the early 2000s when construction really started to take off.
In short, the timing of symptoms of life and the appearance of wind turbine show no relationship.
Problem number four, the geographic dispersion of these complaints is too unlikely.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding together.
Get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
If wind turbines did cause medical problems, we would expect to find a relationship between prevalence of the syndrome and populations living near wind farms.
But we don't.
In fact, it's almost the case that the opposite is true.
The people who should be most affected are those who live on the land where the wind turbines actually are.
However, a number of surveys of registered complaints have found that not a single person who has leased land to wind companies has reported illness as a result.
And that worldwide, the residences of anti-wind activists are no closer to wind turbines than other people.
Activists have charged that gag orders prohibiting complaints are part of all such lease agreements.
But Dr. Simon Chapman, a public health researcher in Australia, has reviewed many such contracts and has yet to find such a clause.
It's also noteworthy that wind turbine syndrome seems to happen almost exclusively in English-speaking countries.
In countries where little media coverage or activism has taken place in the local language, nobody seems to have noticed any problem with wind turbines.
In countries like Germany and Spain, which are major users of wind power, mentions of wind turbine syndrome have only just begun to appear, creating an even starker contrast than that in the English-speaking world between how long the farms have been in use and when complaints of problems have appeared.
China has the world's largest installation of wind turbines with over a quarter of the world's total, and wind turbine syndrome remains virtually unheard of.
In short, the locations of wind turbines and the locations of people suffering from them show no statistical relationship.
Problem number five is that only implausible causes have been suggested.
When you read the whole history of wind turbine syndrome, various activists have suggested various mechanisms by which it causes physiological damage.
Electromagnetic radiation has been suggested, but has largely dropped out of the popular literature, perhaps due to the fact that wind turbines are not significant sources.
The glint of sunlight reflecting off the spinning blades has been blamed, but this seems to have been dropped also, probably because the white painted blades don't make any noticeable glint, and actual glints from reflective office buildings, etc., don't produce any ill effects.
About the only cause that remains in the literature is sound, infrasound, to be specific, sound that is of such low frequency that it's below the audible spectrum.
There are two massive problems with this lone remaining claim.
First and most obviously is the easily measurable fact that wind turbines do not produce any significant infrasound.
And second and only slightly less obvious is the fact that infrasound has never been shown to enhance the symptoms of life, headaches, insomnia, and so on.
A number of laboratory experiments have found potentially interesting effects on people from infrasound, but they don't include these symptoms and have only been found when infrasound was played at high levels in an enclosed room.
Out in the open, where the source is far away and producing almost no infrasound to begin with, we shouldn't and don't find any effects.
Problem number six, almost nobody seems to agree that it exists.
From a survey of the published literature, I could only find the names of 11 authors who have written more than one published piece claiming that wind turbines are dangerous, published by someone other than themselves or each other, and I am including blogging as self-publication.
In terms of impact factor, a common way to gauge the influence or reliability of a published source, this puts wind turbine syndrome below just about any crazy idea you can come up with, less popular even than the claim that world leaders are reptilian aliens wearing electronic disguises.
Considering this, it's received an outrageously disproportionate amount of attention from the press.
Why?
Probably the same reason the press promotes any wild or sensational idea.
It garners eyeball share and sells ads.
Now obviously the lack of support among researchers does not prove that wind turbine syndrome doesn't exist.
The bandwagon fallacy explicitly states that popular belief does not constitute proof.
It's absolutely possible that Nina Pierpont and her supporters are that much farther ahead of today's scientific understanding.
But fringe beliefs remain on the fringe for one overwhelming reason.
They're wrong far more often than they're right.
Why Fringe Beliefs Fail 00:02:45
If it does turn out that science is wrong and Pierpont is right, then Skeptoid and the rest of the scientific literature will gladly report on that new development.
There's one piece of consistency with wind turbine syndrome, and that is that it bears all the signs of a psychogenic condition.
Stress affects everyone, producing the effects we term symptoms of life.
When we hear that some new cause has been identified that's said to trigger those symptoms, we tend to attribute our suffering to that cause.
When life happens to take us near that cause, wind turbines in this case, anxiety causes us to focus our attention on those symptoms.
From our anecdotal perspectives, the reality of the syndrome has just been confirmed.
Once a sufferer has made a correlation between the wind turbines and the symptoms, it's a virtual certainty that that sufferer will attribute the symptoms to the wind turbines.
This has so far been the conclusion of the vast majority of serious researchers who have sought a cause for what Pierpont calls wind turbine syndrome.
Every Skeptoid episode has complete bibliographic references on its transcript page at skeptoid.com.
Plus further reading suggestions if you want to know more.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported program.
I'm Brian Dunning from skeptoid.com.
Hello everyone, this is Adrienne Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile nonprofit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the teacher's toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX
Export Selection