All Episodes Plain Text
Nov. 1, 2006 - Skeptoid
11:22
Skeptoid #5: Sustainable Sustainability

Focus on the year's undisputed overused buzzword: "Sustainable" Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
The Vague Meaning of Sustainable 00:10:12
Sustainability is a popular theme in science.
But unfortunately, like so many buzzwords, it has come to be overused to the point of becoming essentially meaningless.
When marketers slap the label sustainable onto virtually every product or service, does the word have any meaning at all anymore?
Sustainable sustainability is coming right up on Skeptoid.
A quick reminder for everyone, you're listening to Skeptoid, revealing the true science and true history behind urban legends every week since 2006.
With over a thousand episodes, we're celebrating 20 years of keeping it focused and keeping it brief.
And we couldn't have done it without your curiosity leading the way.
And now we're even offering a little bit more.
If you become a premium member, supporting the show with a monthly micropayment of as little as $5, you get more Skeptoid.
The premium version of the show is not only ad-free, it has extended content.
These episodes are a few minutes longer.
We get rid of the ads and replace them with more Skeptoid.
The Extended Premium Show available now.
Come to Skeptoid.com and click Go Premium.
You're listening to Skeptoid.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Sustainable Sustainability.
I bet you didn't know that Skeptoid is a sustainable podcast, delivered over a sustainable internet using sustainable networks, and received through your sustainable ears.
Now you know.
But you really should have known that already because this decade's winner of the award for buzzword overused to the point of meaninglessness has to be the word sustainable.
To label your product or processes sustainable is to imply that competing products and processes are not sustainable.
What this is intended to mean is often pretty vague.
Presumably it means that competing products are manufactured from materials that we'll run out of should current methods and usage continue.
The word was first coined to describe products or methods that are generally better for the environment.
Soon, the marketing gurus got a hold of the word and now everything from toothpaste to music to real estate is being sold as sustainable.
Search Amazon for the word sustainable and prepare to be amazed by the diversity of products whose marketers have jumped onto this particular buzzword bandwagon.
It's so effective and thus popular because it's become really just an alarmist term.
Calling your product sustainable is not really saying anything about your product.
It's clanging the warning bell about the alternative being unsustainable.
Can't be sustained.
The world is ending.
It's like calling your product hate-free or cruelty-free.
In no way is it descriptive of your product.
It's simply an underhanded way to insult your competition.
As any marketing expert will tell you, people respond much better to a negative than to a positive.
One gross overusage of the term is sustainable agriculture when used by those selling organic crops.
Perhaps the word's single most common manifestation.
Organic agriculture is certainly sustainable so long as a third of the world's population is willing to die off so the rest of us can eat.
As with many people who use the word sustainable, proponents of organic foods aren't really saying anything particular about their product.
They're trying to frighten you into thinking that modern farming practices will somehow destroy or deplete the environment and are thus unsustainable.
Ironically, the reverse is closer to the truth.
Modern biotech crops require less fertilizer and less pesticide.
Many are drought-tolerant and can get by with less water, and per acre yields have skyrocketed.
Organic, the so-called sustainable method, loses on all counts of resources consumed.
The word organic is itself the same kind of deceptive marketing, intended to trick you into thinking the alternative is somehow not organic.
Strictly speaking, all plants and animals are organic, according to the word's true definition.
It's another great example of the same basic lesson.
When you hear any product defined only by a vague buzzword, especially one that's grossly overused, be skeptical.
In a world that can feel overwhelming, spreading thoughtful, evidence-based content is one of the best ways to make a positive impact.
Ask your local public radio station to air the Skeptoid Files, a 30-minute radio-friendly version of Skeptoid that pairs two related episodes promoting real science, true history, and critical thinking.
And in these challenging times for public media, we're offering these broadcasts for free to radio stations, available on the PRX Exchange or directly from Skeptoid Media.
It's an easy ask.
Just send a quick message to your station's programming director.
By helping to bring the Skeptoid files to the airwaves, you'll help promote the essential skills we all need to tell fact from fiction.
Just go to your local station's website, find the programming director's email address, or just their general email address.
You can even use the telephone.
I know that might sound crazy.
It's an old legacy device that allows real-time voice communication.
I know that's weird, but hey, it's an option.
The world can feel chaotic, but you're not powerless.
When you promote critical thinking, you can help your community tell fact from fiction.
And that's how we shape a better future.
In uncertain times, spreading good ideas can make you feel helpful, not helpless.
Let's stand up for reason, truth, and understanding.
Together, get them to air the Skeptoid files from Skeptoid Media, available on the PRX Exchange, and they'll know what that is.
The word sustainable has become so pervasive that its usage is often just plain silly.
Colgate recently purchased a company that makes sustainable toothpaste.
It contains bone powder.
Does an intelligent person really think that it's unsustainable to make toothpaste any other way?
Sustainable tourism is being marketed everywhere.
It usually describes destinations where the attractions are generally undeveloped, like the Amazon.
Is it really unsustainable to vacation in developed destinations like Paris or Tokyo?
Certainly, a cogent argument could be formed saying that it's best to shield the undeveloped areas from the impact of tourism.
Sustainable economics are particularly bizarre.
Google the term and you'll find that it's used largely to refer to wealth redistribution.
In the history of world economies, has communism really proven to be more sustainable than capitalism?
There may be fine arguments to make in favor of wealth redistribution, but that such a system should be expected to survive longer is certainly not the case.
A prominent automotive magazine recently tested for sustainable sports sedans.
Are four cars that get marginally better gas mileage than other similar cars, none of which are particularly great, honestly the only type of vehicles whose production can be sustained.
Eventually, all our cars will run on fuel that truly is sourced from an infinitely sustainable way.
But until we get there, it's disingenuous to say some current cars are sustainable and some aren't.
Sustainable music is also all over the internet.
In one case, it means the guy makes his own instruments.
Is sustainable really the word that best describes that?
Playing an instrument made by someone else is not sustainable?
In other cases, it refers to songs about anti-corporatism.
Is it truly impossible to sustain the playing of music about other themes?
These may all be fine subjects, but they should be recognized on their merits, not for their association with a buzzword.
I found a website offering sustainable real estate.
Two of the houses were built of corn cobs and hay bales.
I'll ask the big bad wolf how sustainable that type of engineering is.
There's no doubt that doing things in a truly sustainable way is good.
Accomplishing a worthy goal in a way that's infinitely repeatable is best, and that's what sustainable really means.
True sustainability might violate the laws of thermodynamics, but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
It's still a good goal, and as such, sustainability deserves not to be deluded into a meaningless buzzword.
Thus, true environmentalists should be the first ones to object to the misleading pop culture usages of the word that we see every two minutes.
When you hear it, be skeptical.
Figure out what they're really trying to say and what their motivation is.
And please, don't buy any bone powder toothpaste just because it says sustainable on the package.
You're listening to Skeptoid, a listener-supported non-profit program.
I'm Brian Dunning from Skeptoid.com.
Don't Buy Bone Powder Toothpaste 00:01:06
Hello, everyone.
This is Adrian Hill from Skookum Studios in Calgary, Canada, the land of maple syrup and mousse.
And I'm here to ask you to consider becoming a premium member of Skeptoid for as little as $5 per month.
And that's only the cost of a couple of Tim Horton's double-doubles.
And that's Canadian for coffee with double cream and sugar.
Why support Skeptoid?
If you are like me and don't like ads, but like extended versions of each episode, Premium is for you.
If you want to support a worthwhile non-profit that combats pseudoscience, promotes critical thinking, and provides free access to teachers to use the podcast in the classroom via the Teacher's Toolkit, then sign up today.
Remember that skepticism is the best medicine.
Next to giggling, of course.
Until next time, this is Adrienne Hill.
From PRX.
Export Selection