Sean Hannity Show - Jeffries under Fire

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 20, 2025 - Sean Hannity Show

29:14

Jeffries under Fire

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart podcast.
	Thanks to all of you for being with us.
	Write down our toll-free telephone number.
	If you want to be a part of the program, it's 800-941 Sean.
	If you want to join us, wow, we're learning a lot about the Epstein files.
	We're learning a lot about why Joe Biden didn't release them for the four years.
	And we're also learning why a bunch of so-called conservatives have been so, you know, in a frenzy.
	You know, why were they so quiet for four years?
	Why didn't they demand the release of all this when Biden was president?
	Because now it's impacting Hakeem Jeffries.
	You have one congresswoman taking questions directly during a hearing with Michael Cohen, apparently, according to reports and information in the documents, verbatim asking the questions of Jeffrey Epstein, at that time, a convicted felon for what was it, soliciting prostitution from a minor.
	By the way, you know, the Bible is very clear.
	Don't hurt children.
	I mean, I just, I shudder to think what level of Dante's inferno people like that will end up in.
	But it's just horrible.
	I mean, now they're talking about thousands of victims.
	And even with the release of it, the only, you know, with all the talk about this, thank God they put in there a provision to leave people that have been victimized that probably live with this for the rest of their lives alone if they want to, you know, deal with it privately and not expose them.
	I can't imagine the pain, the tragedy, you know, and the horror of such evil of young children.
	It is disgusting on every level.
	A new Republican bill in the House, by the way, will expedite deportations for criminal illegals.
	We'll hit that one illegal immigrant who was caught and released by the Biden administration, charged in a brutal hammer attack on a Texas woman, 17-year-old, illegal alien, arrested and released by the federal immigration authorities during the Biden years, charged with a brutal hammer attack on a woman jogging in a Texas park.
	Unbelievable.
	By the way, did you see Nikki Minaj praising President Trump for prioritizing the issue of the persecution and slaughter of Christians in Nigeria, thanking him for his leadership on the global stage?
	I mean, I can only imagine the attacks have probably begun with the Hollywood lunatics out there.
	Linda, am I wrong about that?
	Or am I right about that?
	Not at all.
	It's a very real thing.
	But she's being attacked for standing up for people.
	And President Trump said, if they don't stop this, radical Islamists apparently attacking and killing innocent Christians.
	And, you know, Donald Trump has a moral compass.
	He has moral clarity.
	And this is why I really don't understand, even some people that claim to be MAGA, what part of the Trump doctrine some of these people have trouble understanding and why some people have interpreted this and misinterpreted this to mean isolationism, because some have.
	And they seem at times to be the louder voice in the MAGA movement.
	I'm all for no forever wars.
	You know, many years now, I've been saying on this program, we can never, ever allow what happened in Baghdad and elsewhere to ever happen again.
	And that is, you know, going door to door, stepping over IEDs without up armored Humvees.
	And, you know, our brave men and women, our soldiers, our heroes getting their legs and their arms blown off and their faces disfigured.
	That's not how modern warfare is going to be fought.
	I mean, you see the beginning stages of it now.
	You saw it with the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
	You see it the way, you know, even Israel is now being attacked with bombardments of ballistic missiles.
	And thank God they have missile defense systems that are able to shoot those things out of the sky.
	Back in the day, they mocked Ronald Reagan.
	They called it Star Wars.
	It was called strategic defense.
	Now President Trump wants to modernize it and protect our entire country.
	It's called the Golden Dome.
	Because of my sources, I could tell you we are progressing at a level that would really impress most of you.
	However, I keep some sources private.
	It's not that I want to tease you and tell you that I know something you don't know.
	It's just that it's not in our best national defense interests.
	I'm just getting little bits and pieces and putting it all together.
	And I'm really feeling very confident that we will achieve that goal of being able to stop any type of attack on our country with the technology that is advancing and that we're discovering.
	All of which I think is very, very needed and necessary.
	All of you should be angry about what I am about to play for you.
	We have senators Mark Kelly, Elise Slotkin, and others, all these Democrats.
	They are actually on tape, and they are telling people in the intelligence community.
	They are telling people that are in our military not to obey unlawful orders, illegal orders of the president.
	Problem is, they don't identify what the hell they're talking about because I don't think they can, and I don't think they have any intention to do so.
	But there's such great damage and danger in what it is that they are saying in this tape.
	And there's danger, you know, it's almost like a subversion.
	It's almost like they're calling for insurrection among our intelligence community and people in our armed forces.
	What is President Trump ordered that caused them to tell them they have a duty to disobey orders of the commander-in-chief?
	I mean, the Constitution is clear.
	Not Elise Slotkin, not Mark Kelly, not any of the people in this video.
	They're not the Commander-in-Chief of the United States of America.
	The President is the Commander-in-Chief of our armed services.
	He is the guy.
	He makes the decisions.
	That's not Congress.
	That's not a senator.
	That's not a former CIA officer.
	Not a former astronaut, not Elise Slotkin.
	But here's what they say: We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community who take risks each day to keep Americans safe.
	We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
	Americans trust their military.
	But that trust is at risk.
	This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens.
	Like us, you all swore an oath.
	To protect and defend this Constitution.
	Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
	Our laws are clear.
	You can refuse illegal orders.
	You can refuse illegal orders.
	You must refuse illegal orders.
	No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.
	We know this is hard and that it's a difficult time to be a public servant.
	But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy, the Air Force, your vigilance is critical.
	And know that we have your back.
	Know that we have your back.
	Now think about this.
	How scary is that tape?
	This is TDS, Trump Derangement Syndrome on steroids and human growth hormone.
	It is not just, it is so morally repugnant and inappropriate, but it's downright dangerous.
	What they are saying there is, again, if they had a specific issue where they identified the very examples where people must refuse illegal orders, they have a duty and obligation to spell it out.
	They didn't do that.
	No, it is just, you know, as far as I'm concerned, constitutionally, they're undermining the authority of the president and his constitutional authority as commander in chief.
	I mean, if that's not subversion, tell me what it is.
	If that's not a call for some type of insurrection, then please tell me what it is.
	I'll give you a number.
	It's 800-941-Sean.
	I'm open to any points you want to make on this.
	But, you know, they might as well just breach the walls of the White House and, you know, send in their radical supporters.
	Because remember, it was a 574 official riots in the summer of 2020.
	Their radical base, and they never lifted a finger to stop them.
	They never criticized them.
	No, they just flat out.
	Either their silence was deafening, or they went out there and just flat out lied and said they're mostly peaceful, or they went out, like you know, their vice presidential candidate at the time, later vice president Kamala Harris, and you know, said those rioters aren't going to stop, they shouldn't stop and we're not going to stop supporting them.
	Okay, and then they claim to only care, they ignored those 574 riots.
	They rationalized something that wasn't true.
	Dozens of Americans that summer of love lost their lives.
	Thousands of cops were injured during the summer of love.
	You know, they were pelted with bricks rocks bottles, Molotov cocktails, things like that.
	Billions of dollars in property damage took place.
	You know where was Benny Thompson and and, or whatever his name is, and and Liz Cheney at the time they cared so much about one riot where the president actually said, many of you will peacefully and patriotically, you know, march to the capital so your voices will be heard.
	That's what he said at the time.
	But they didn't.
	Of course.
	That never came up and then all the records magically just disappeared.
	They just gone, you know, in thin air.
	You know, and if we're going to talk about moments where maybe, just maybe, you know, members of our intelligence community, for example, and high-ranking people in law enforcement, for example.
	Maybe they should have stood up against the rush a hoax that they knew was a hoax.
	We now know they knew it was a hoax.
	We now learn from the declassified materials of Tulsi Gabbard that, in fact, they had information it was a hoax.
	They had a meeting about Hillary Clinton's plan to unveil this hoax against Donald Trump.
	And then, when career senior intelligence officials did their job after the 2016 election and came to the determination that, in fact, there was no Russia-Trump collusion, well, then it was presented to Barack Obama.
	And according to these declassified documents and Tulsi Gabbard, Barack Obama didn't like the conclusion.
	So he got his political operatives involved and they decided to redo the intelligence assessment, come up with a new one that had a completely different conclusion.
	And again, based on the dirty Russian disinformation dossier, which they also were warned about that it was political in August of 2016.
	They apparently were warned multiple times.
	And again, statute of limitations run out unless they come up with a grand conspiracy investigation.
	But, you know, you think about that, the Russia hoax, the Mueller investigation, that witch hunt, two bogus impeachments of Donald Trump.
	And then, of course, we've got three phases of the grand conspiracy.
	One includes no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Hillary Clinton's servers with top secret classified information on them.
	They didn't raid her home or office, just like later, they wouldn't raid Joe Biden's homes or offices, the four locations where he had top-secret classified information.
	Presidential Records Act actually gave Donald Trump a lot more leeway than any of them, but they raided Mar-a-Lago.
	That sounds like a dual justice system to me using the dirty Russian disinformation dossier that not only was not corroborated, but it was completely bogus.
	And even after they knew it was completely bogus and Christopher Steele was long gone, they used it three more times for three separate FISA warrants, lied to a FISA court.
	Law requires that once you know it's false, that you're supposed to go to the FISA court.
	You know, with the fact that intelligence now, we're finding out, we don't know how many Americans, including senators and congressmen and other people and groups like Turning Point and so many other conservative organizations were targeted by our government to be spied on without any indication that a proper warrant was sought or granted.
	Whatever happened, unreasonable search and seizure.
	I'm sure there was great need to rip through Melania Trump's closet and Baron Trump's bedroom, you know, and then four years of weaponization because, well, they couldn't stop him.
	Remember, originally, the dirty dossier was designed to prevent Trump from getting elected.
	Then after the election, it was used to sabotage the incoming president, which it did effectively.
	Then, of course, the suppression of the very real laptop from hell that they've had verified as authentic in March of 2020.
	And then they pre-bunked it, meeting weekly with big tech companies in 2020 because they didn't want the truth about that laptop coming out.
	And then, of course, big tech asked, well, is this information in the New York Post real?
	They knew the answer, but they wouldn't tell them.
	And they didn't want the American people to know.
	Then, when that didn't work, let's just, you know, take a case where the statute of limitations had run out that's only a minor misdemeanor in New York, and let's turn it into 34 felony counts and let's value Mar-a-Lago at $18 million, not $1.5 trillion, and let everybody not say a word about any of it because we're okay because it's just to prevent Trump from becoming president.
	This is sick stuff.
	These are sick people.
	This is a sick time that we're living in.
	All right.
	So I may lose Linda here a little bit.
	Linda doesn't love technology the way I do in this sense.
	Now, I've never been the most technologically savvy person in the world, but I am obsessed with artificial intelligence because I can learn so much from it.
	There is a friend of mine who is pretty high-ranking with Elon Musk and smart as a whip.
	I mean, this guy is so out there smart.
	He's spectacularly smart.
	You know who I'm talking about, right?
	And he's also the nicest guy you'd ever want to meet in your life.
	He works so hard.
	I mean, when you work for Elon, you don't stop working.
	By the way, you think I'm puff as a boss?
	I'm really not.
	I'm actually, you know, a pussycat compared to Elon Musk.
	But anyway, and they are driving and driving and driving.
	I mean, Elon will sleep on his office floor for like an hour and a half and get up and start working again.
	He just doesn't stop.
	I mean, it's pretty fascinating to watch it.
	Now, do I think he was designed for the D.C. Washington swamp or bureaucracy?
	Absolutely not.
	It just goes against his very nature.
	He is a genius, CEO at the highest level and an innovator and creator.
	And there's a great series on the history channel, The Men That Built America.
	And it talks about, you know, the Rockefellers and the Carnegies and the Mellons and, you know, the Morgans and all these people.
	By the way, they were all ruthless, ruthless business people.
	There's a side of them is rough.
	But I think with genius, I think, you know, when people have really spectacular gifts, I think, and I've been blessed in my life to meet a lot of brilliant people.
	And it's a very common trait that with their gift comes a little bit of a curse and it manifests itself in different forms.
	Linda, that makes sense.
	You're with me so far, right?
	Sure.
	And, okay, but the work ethic that Elon has, coupled with the genius that he has, is it's just undeniable that he is the brightest guy in the world that I can think of right now.
	If there's anybody smarter, you can tell me, but I don't think there is.
	Having spent time with him and spoken with him, actually at dinner with him one night, and it was outside, and he was looking up at the stars, and he's pointing out that that's Venus, that's Mars, that's this, that's this, that's this, and he's like pointing all this stuff out to me.
	And the difference is the way my mind works, which is, you know, rather on hip-haste compared to his level, very simple and basic.
	I don't look at Venus and Mars and think that I want to figure out a way to travel there and maybe establish life there and send people there and bring them home.
	But that's how he thinks.
	It's just a whole different dimension of thinking.
	I've met people that are so insightful in terms of politics.
	You know, one of the geniuses of Rush, I always felt Rush had a take that nobody else would have.
	And I think that was part of his great creativity and genius.
	And he was a great entertainer on top of it.
	He was just great at everything that he did, which is why when he passed, God rest his soul, we miss him dearly.
	You know, I said, nobody can replace this guy.
	He's irreplaceable.
	And we all, he would want all of us to do our very best because he believes so much in the individual, in the concept of liberty and freedom and talent that God gave every individual.
	And that the only way that those talents can be brought to fruition is if you live in freedom and liberty, which is the antithesis of top-down government-run everything in our lives.
	So, you know, we've gone through many different revolutions, if you will.
	I mean, when the train was first created, that was a big deal.
	You know, going shopping with Linda to buy a little toy train for her son at the time was the biggest deal I've ever seen in my life.
	And after an hour of her picking up every single solitary train and turning it over and playing with the wheels and looking at the price and comparative shopping, I couldn't take it anymore.
	I went and got a shopping cart and I just filled it up full of a bunch of trains and I figured let our son pick it out on his own and he'll be happy with more trains rather than a few trains.
	And I don't think he's going to miss out on whether or not Linda picked out the perfect train.
	And Linda doesn't like when I tell that story, but it's true.
	So why am I bringing all of this up?
	So there's an article in Business Insider and it says, Elon Musk says Optimus will eliminate poverty in a speech after his $1 trillion pay package was approved.
	This is with Tesla if he meets certain goals and certain benchmarks that they have set out for him.
	And what I've been trying to communicate to people is we are living through an age that is going to be so impactful.
	Everybody's going to be impacted by it.
	And it's a matter of, are you ready for it?
	Are you ready to adapt to it?
	Are you going to get ahead of the curve or are you going to be behind the curve?
	And my hope is as we discuss this periodically to make sure that you are ready for it.
	It doesn't take you by surprise.
	It doesn't overwhelm you and that you actually take advantage of it by having more knowledge than other people and are fully aware of the magnitude of what's about to happen.
	It would be the equivalent of, okay, well, communications changed when we had telephones.
	It would be the equivalent of electricity versus, you know, having, you know, a gas lamp in your house.
	It is that dramatic an innovation with artificial intelligence.
	So, you know, the Tesla's Optimus robot, which is what he was talking about on this call, he actually believes ultimately will eliminate much of the need for human labor.
	Now, that is a little bit shocking, earth-shattering, but something I think I want all of you to be aware of so that you're prepared for it.
	And he's talking about humanoid robots are going to be a production challenge.
	It's not launching anytime soon.
	But again, I want you to be thinking in the future and not be shocked or surprised by it.
	As I have spoken to people that are involved in this industry, what they're telling me is middle-class families, this is sort of like the creation of the Model T and, you know, Henry Ford and the fact that he made it in a way that was affordable so the average person can own one.
	And the way they're designing these robots that would take care of mundane tasks for middle-class Americans, we're talking about robots that will clean your house, cut your lawn, cook your dinner, you know, do all of these mundane tasks that you take for granted, put the sheets on your bed, et cetera, et cetera.
	It may sound crazy, but I'm telling you, this is what they're telling me.
	And he has a bigger vision for robots.
	He wants them to transform the economy.
	That should be scary to everybody.
	He says, you know, people often talk about eliminating poverty, giving everyone amazing medical care.
	And this goes to my conversation with Gary Brecker, who's in the health, wellness, fitness, nutrition space.
	And Gary Brecker says, if you live the next five years, the odds of you living to 100 will go up exponentially.
	I agree with him.
	And I talked to a friend of mine that's in radiology, and they are already using artificial intelligence.
	And what he has discovered is the ability of artificial intelligence to pick up spots on an MRI that no human eye would be able to detect.
	In other words, early detection is the key to longevity, especially on issues like cancer.
	And I believe probably we're going to look back on how we treat cancer today.
	And one day we'll say we were living in the dinosaur era.
	And there are going to be far more sophisticated ways of detecting and treating cancers long before they get bad.
	Anyway, so Musk doubled down.
	He said, Optimus will actually eliminate poverty.
	Minutes earlier, the crowd cheered and broke out and chance of Elon Elon, and the shareholders approved a trillion-dollar pay package, and he's the world's richest person.
	It will unlock up to a trillion dollars in shares if Tesla achieves the lofty targets, including selling a million Optimus robots in the next decade.
	I believe that will happen.
	Musk said that Optimus would change life for incarcerated people.
	He said instead of physically jailing prisoners, he said, you know, Optimus will follow you around and stop you from doing crime and things like that.
	I don't know how, but just follow me here.
	These are his remarks, not mine.
	He said the robots would increase global economy by a factor of 10 or even possibly 100.
	And I would argue even maybe greater than that.
	He did this on the Tesla third quarter earnings call.
	He imagines a world of sustainable abundance, a goal outlined by the Tesla Master Plan Part 4 with Optimus leading the way.
	An Optimus robot would have five times the productivity of any human being per year.
	He predicted because it would be able to operate 24-7.
	Now, let me stop here.
	There's a company in Australia.
	A friend of mine sent me this video.
	And sure enough, in less than a week, a massive, big warehouse is being built perfectly.
	No flaws at all, where it would take a construction company six months to a year.
	And you can see it.
	And maybe I should post it online, Linda, because it's worth posting.
	And eliminates waste, and they work 24 hours a day, and the job gets done.
	He said there's no limit how much AI can do in terms of enhancing the productivity of humans.
	And there's not really a limit to AI that is embodied, he said.
	He said, described how sustainable abundance and a robotic future, he told Joe Rogan this, will transform the economy.
	He said, I came to the conclusion that the only way to get us out of the debt crisis and to prevent America from going bankrupt is artificial intelligence and robotics.
	And he said that robots like Optimus will make working optional in the future.
	I don't like that part of it as long as I think people need to be of service to other people.
	I really, that's spiritual for me.
	But put that aside.
	It's not my thoughts here.
	We'll have a benign scenario, universal income.
	He's saying that the wealth that will be created and generated and food production generated, that there won't be something like poverty that exists.
	If you can build a home at $150 a square foot, everybody's going to have their own home.
	And that's how once the robotics are up and running and building homes or building out 70 or 75% of them, that's what you're going to have.
	He said, anyone can have any product or service they want, but there'll be a lot of trauma, disruption along the way.
	This is why I'm warning all of you.
	And he's not the only business leader that is touting the prospects of universal basic income, saying that the money is not coming from the government.
	He's not suggesting that.
	I don't interpret it that way anyway.
	And Rogan, you know, said there's an economic irony here.
	The capitalist implementation of AI and robotics, assuming it goes down the good path, and there's always a danger with technology that it can be used for something horrible, you know, could result in this utopia that we as conservatives staunchly disagree with.
	He said, I do believe that human beings are designed with talent and gifts from God, and you've got to bring them to fruition.
	And you can't be all about being served all day.
	But he said, AI robots will replace a lot of jobs.
	Working for some will be optional, like growing your own vegetables instead of buying them is optional.
	That's a pretty ambitious prediction.
	I'm not saying all of this is going to be true, but what I am saying is the economy is changing.
	And what I want to tie this into is Donald Trump securing another trillion dollars.
	You know, the Saudis committed up to a trillion to manufacturing in this country in the next four years.
	Okay, that's going to be, you know, we're going to need workers for these jobs, and I want you to be ready to get those jobs.
	We're going to have the energy sector building out like never before, high-paying career jobs.
	And if you're interested, I want you to be ready for those jobs.
	I want you to be ready for the semiconductor manufacturing facilities, the pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities, the AI and robotic manufacturing facilities that they're going to need workers, and they're also going to need a very well-educated population to get in on this and be productive members of this new technology.
	And I would add to that, the tax cuts automatically are going to kick in.
	And when that does, that's going to be economic growth, prosperity, hopefully the golden era that Donald Trump talks about.
	To me, it's just fascinating.
	Did that interest you at all, Linda?
	I wonder if I can hire a robot to replace you.
	Yeah, why don't you?
	Same sassy, same activity.
	We'll teach him to be sassy, sarcastic, you know, to try and get me angry every day before the.
	It's full of vinegar.
	It'll be great.

▲