Sean Hannity Show - Kamala's Book Tour - August 1st, Hour 1

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 2, 2025 - Sean Hannity Show

29:22

Kamala's Book Tour - August 1st, Hour 1

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart Podcast.
	All right.
	Thank you, Scott Shannon.
	Thanks to all of you for being with us.
	Write down our toll free telephone number if you want to be a part of the program.
	It's 800-941 Sean.
	If you want to join us, uh, Kamala Harris is back.
	I mean, can you think of two bigger losers 107 days, two billion dollars later, a failure and a cringe-worthy post of uh of hill of her in a bookstore somewhere, and then what's the first interview she does?
	Of course she does Stephen Colbert.
	He went on Stephen Colbert during the summer of love when the when the 574 riots took place, and we had two dozen dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions in property damage.
	And yeah, let's let's go on Stephen Colbert's show and let's talk about the fact that I'm writing a book that I guarantee you nobody is going to want to write.
	She went on this strange rant poking at her husband in an effort to sell her new book.
	Um it is it is bizarre.
	And you know, I'm I'm listening to this.
	I didn't see it.
	I just heard it because my team pulled it.
	I can't watch Colbert.
	He's not funny.
	I can't watch Kimmel.
	He's not funny.
	Greg Guttfeld's funny.
	I'll even give props to Stuart, he can be funny.
	I'll give props to Bill Mar.
	He can be funny.
	Even when they make fun of me, I really as long as you're funny, I don't really care.
	Just be funny.
	And nothing funny about Kamala Harris, it's actually chilling the idea that this woman could have been president.
	Anyway, she said she decided not to run for California governor because the system is broken.
	Well, isn't that the whole point of running for office in the first place?
	If you think it's broken and you think you've got the answer, maybe you want to run for office.
	She's she spent her entire career, you know, for for this great moment in her life, but the system's too broken.
	Liza.
	Announced uh yesterday, you made an announcement that you're not running for the governor of California.
	Correct.
	Even though in early polling, you beat every other candidate by double digits.
	You said you're gonna set this one out.
	What why are you sending some?
	Are you saving yourself for a different office that might be no?
	But uh but honestly.
	Obviously, people project on to the hopes of the state.
	And honestly, that it's it's more perhaps basic than that.
	Recently I made the decision that I just for now, I don't want to go back in the system.
	I think it's broken.
	I believe, and I always believed that as fragile as our democracy is, our systems would be strong enough.
	I can't take it.
	Every time it's like it's not even nails on a chalkboard.
	You know, the the most fascinating thing that we've learned in the last two weeks is that you know, they ran on a couple of things.
	Their closing argument is Donald Trump is a Nazi, Donald Trump is a fascist, Donald Trump is a racist, he's Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini.
	And then they ran democracy is hanging in the balance.
	And little did we know we'd have the declassification of Tulsi Gabbard, the declassification of CIA director Ratcliffe.
	Anyway, then Kamala Harris has asked a very basic, fundamental, simple question.
	All right, if you think the system is broken and you don't want to go back into the system, all right.
	So name the leader of the Democratic Party.
	Here's her answer.
	Who's leading the Democratic Party?
	I'm just curious.
	There are lots of leaders.
	And the co-leader of the Democratic Party.
	You know, like, oh, that's the leader of Democratic Party.
	Who comes to mind?
	I think there are a lot of I'm not going to go through names because then I'm going to leave somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it.
	But let me just let me say this.
	I I think it is a mistake for us who want to figure out how to get out and through this and get out of it to put it on the shoulders of any one person.
	It's really on all of our shoulders.
	That is such a cop-out, wimpy political answer.
	Uh, we know who the leaders of the Democratic Party are, and we know who are scared to death of them.
	I mean, you got Marxist Mamdanny who's gonna destroy what is left of New York City.
	It's already an Adam Schifhole.
	And if he gets elected, I God forbid, thank God I don't own property in New York City.
	Because if I own property in New York City, you know, you could just take 50% of its value and throw it down the drain, and it's probably not going to recover.
	And but if you invested in, if you're investing in Florida, my free state, you do so much better in terms of your investment.
	Because all these people, all these banks, all these financial institutions, they're all moving down to Wall Street South as they refer to it.
	Private equity companies, big bank companies, etc., etc.
	Um, maybe like maybe they realize that the system is broken too.
	We know who the leaders are.
	Marxist Mamdanny, Tommy Mamdanny.
	Uh, then we've got AOC, then we've got the squad, and then we got Grandpa Bernie and Pocahontas and the rest of the uh the lunatics.
	Now we got this guy in Minneapolis, a Mamdani, you know, Jr., uh, with the same radical Marxist statist, socialist communist views that he has.
	Anyway, then she's asked the the hardest of all questions, and this is relevant because yesterday, Mike Donlin, top aid to Biden, who who cashed in as a highly paid advisor, he made four million dollars running the uh the Biden campaign that died and was scheduled to get another four million dollars if in fact he won.
	And Kamala Harris, no Democrat can ask answer this question.
	When did you notice Joe Biden's cognitive decline?
	Stephen Colbert, at least he did one halfway decent thing as he's about to let the door hit him in the ass on the way out.
	And that is he asked the question.
	Here's the answer.
	Biden walk on stage with that debate.
	And it did it did not go well.
	Spoiler, it did not go well in that debate.
	Therefore, you became the candidate.
	At what point in the say month uh that followed that did people start saying you might need to be prepared for this.
	Let me say something about Joe Biden.
	I have to do that.
	Let me say something about Joe Biden for him.
	So much respect.
	And um, I think that the way that we should be thinking about where we are right now is remember that we had a president of the United States who believed in the rule of law.
	No, we had a president that didn't know what day of the week it was.
	Ugh.
	I hate being lied to.
	Like I can live with the fact that you know, if you have kids, all of you that have had children, you know what it's like.
	Your kids will, you know, what whatever, whatever trouble mischief they may get in.
	Okay.
	You probably did it yourself.
	If you're like me, you probably did it on testosterone and human growth hormone.
	Uh I was a kid that kind of mostly raised myself.
	I'd hate to have to confess to everything that I did.
	I've confessed a lot to a lot of what I did, but not everything.
	And but it's when your kids look at you and flat out lie to you.
	And it's like, did you eat the cookie?
	I told you, Daddy, can I have a cookie?
	No, you can't have the cookie.
	Daddy, please, I want a cookie, please, pretty please.
	This is what kids do.
	They go, please, please, please, please, please, please, Dad, please.
	That is like the most annoying thing on earth, right?
	And then you say, no, you hold your ground.
	You can't have the cookie.
	And then you see them like five minutes later, and they got cookie all over their face, and you ask, Did you eat the cookie?
	And they say, No.
	It infuriates me.
	And this is what politicians do.
	They infuriate me.
	Um, we have updates, and and I think this is uh very, very relevant.
	Uh, after with all that we've learned from Tulsi Gavard and the declassification and and CIA director Radcliffe, uh just the news.com has a piece out today.
	After the Clinton Russia ruse was intercepted by U.S. intelligence.
	Guess who took the first shot and smearing Donald Trump?
	It was Joe Biden, according to JustHnews.com.
	He's he's the one that publicly linked Donald Trump to Vladimir Putin right around the same time that Hillary Clinton had signed off on the Clinton planned intelligence.
	Now, remember, just to take you back, Hillary Clinton personally, according to these declassifications, approved the plan to smear Trump with the bogus Russia gate allegations.
	Hillary Clinton signed off on the plan, hatched by the top advisor to smear then candidate Trump with false claims of Russia collusion and distract from her own uh mounting server email scandal during the 2016 campaign.
	The plot, the brain child of Clinton, uh the Clinton campaign's then foreign policy advisor, Julianne Smith, included, quote, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump and quote, subsequently steering public opinion toward the notion that it needs to equate the Russian leaders' political influence campaign with actual hacking of election infrastructure.
	And Smith would go on to serve as former President Joe Biden's ambassador to NATO.
	I don't have any comment she said to the New York Post when they reached out.
	We've been reaching out to all these people that we've been talking about.
	Anyway, then you remember this the smoking gun.
	Then we find out.
	Now the Soros open society uh group, they are denying everything.
	They did at least they got back to us denying any of this is true.
	Anyway, their senior vice president is Leonardo Bernardo.
	And they apparently was looped into the scheme, although they're denying it and laid out its intended effect.
	Quote, Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump.
	Bernardo was quoted as writing on July 25th.
	For now, it's good for a post-convention bounce later, and this should scare everybody because this is the weaponization of three-letter agencies.
	The FBI will put more oil into the fire.
	Two days later, writing, Hillary Rodham Clinton, HRC approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections.
	That should distract people from a row missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level.
	An apparent reference to revelations of a massive state-sponsored doping campaign by Russia following the 2014 winter games in Sochi.
	Anyway, the special counsel, John Durham, uncovered the files during this multi-year probe into intelligence.
	Now, here's what maybe the most interesting side of this and the most predictable side of this.
	New York Times, Washington Post got pulled surprises.
	You may recall they are trying to make the case today.
	I don't do not agree with their interpretation that the Clinton plan emails were likely made by Russian spies.
	Now they should be returning the fullet surprises as far as I'm concerned.
	Anyway, they're talking about the at the annex to Special Counsel John Darum's uh Durham's report, and you know, he scoured the Russian investigation wrongdoing, etc., etc., etc.
	And the information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's report reveals the foundational document for the theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies.
	Now, that's not exactly what it was saying.
	If you read it, it was pretty clear that they had this information before the plan was even hatched, that the plan was being discussed.
	Uh, and apparently, according to at least the declassified intelligence, is that there was a hacking, obviously, by the Russians, and they think it came from one of the open doors group that again denies any knowledge of any of this, but then where did all of this come from?
	They have a lot of questions to answer.
	Anyway, they're talking about the July 27, 2016 email that said Mrs. Clinton had approved the campaign and the proposal to tie Trump to the Russia to Russia to distract from the scandal over her own private email server.
	The release of the annex adds new details about all of this.
	The declassification is the latest disclosure in recent weeks concerning the Russia investigation?
	The wave has come as the administration is seeking to change the subject.
	That is not what this is about.
	Now, this is why I said back in 2007 that journalism's dead.
	This is why I said after this election that legacy media is dead.
	Because these people lied and peddled a phony Russia conspiracy theory that apparently was hatched if you believe the declassified intel from Radcliffe, and if you believe the declassified info from Tulsi Gabbard, uh you had career intelligence officials do a post-mortem and an assessment, and they discovered there was no Trump Russia collusion.
	Only the top ranking deep state operatives didn't like that conclusion.
	And against very angry and very outspoken rank and file senior intelligence officials, they decided to do another assessment, one that fit their narrative.
	How does this happen in the United States of America?
	This situation in Cincinnati is really, really bothering me.
	We have, what is the name of this city councilwoman, Linda, who...
	Yeah, her name is Parks.
	What's her first name?
	Victoria Parks.
	Yeah.
	Victoria Parks.
	So she puts on Facebook, well, they kind of asked for it.
	They deserved it.
	And then she was asked about whether or not she still agrees with her own comment.
	Here's what she said.
	I am a freedom of speech.
	And um, you know, I I am a grown that night when I wrote on the internet.
	I meant to.
	That's the way I felt, and I'm not gonna back down from it right now.
	A mob that beats the living hell, nearly kills this young woman, Holly.
	As a matter of fact, this woman who was beaten unconscious.
	Now, she didn't even see the punch coming.
	Guy comes running up to her, blindsides her.
	Uh, if you haven't seen the pictures of her swollen black and blue face, it would break anybody's heart.
	She only went over to help this man that was getting the crap beaten out of him.
	I I can't believe he got kicked and punched in the head as much as he did, and he's and and the guy's not in the hospital for the rest of his life.
	It's pretty unbelievable.
	Anyway, the woman, Holly, and she had given Senator Moreno the pictures and permission to put it on the internet on X. You know, she decided to go home to Russia.
	I mean, if you want to go home to Russia, that ought to tell you how bad things are getting in American big cities.
	And, you know, Billy Cunningham was right the other day.
	It's it is institutionalized failure.
	It's New York, it's New Joycey.
	Every big city's at Chicago, it's Los Angeles, it's San Francisco.
	And the quality of life issues, defund, dismantle, no bail laws, insanity, and and it's just open season for criminals on innocent people.
	And the mayor, I think he finally shows up today.
	He's been gone the whole time.
	Great job.
	He was on vacation.
	Why would he ever want to come back from vacation?
	One follow-up on the interview, which was horrific last night between the two losers, Kamala Harris and Stephen Colbert.
	Um, I do like Mark Halford, I think he's a really strong reporter.
	I don't always agree with his political views, but I like him.
	And he was one of the few people that was willing to say all of you people watching MSDNC are losing your mind because he was one of the few people like me that was actually looking at real numbers, early voting numbers, and it was very apparent that Donald Trump was going to win this election in the days and weeks and months late once early voting started.
	I was getting a reported day.
	Now, some of you may think I should have been more honest about what I was reading every day because as every day passed, it got more apparent that the odds were higher and higher and higher that Donald Trump was going to win.
	I don't like to create false optimism.
	I like to underpromise and over-deliver deliver.
	You don't overpromise and underdeliver.
	That's why, as much as this, you know, these revelations and this declassification are so glaring and so egregious.
	I can't sit here on this program and give you any degree of confidence that the people that are responsible for what we have now uncovered through declassification are going to be held account accountable.
	I wish I could.
	Anyway, Halpern reported today that former President Joe Biden's team apparently have a ton of unflattering information that they're ready to release if former vice president Kamala Harris turns on him.
	Isn't it nice?
	Democrats, they treat each other so well.
	They didn't treat the country particularly well when they were in power.
	Halfren says, I'm going to break a little news.
	He says we talk all the time about what did Kamala Harris know.
	When did she know it about Joe's cognitive decline?
	She ducked and dodged that question last night.
	And anyway, it goes on.
	If the Biden people decide that Kamala Harris is coming after Joe Biden, wait till you hear the stories about how much they tried to help her be prepared to be vice president and be in the position to run and how much they decided not happening.
	She is not up to this job.
	And if the Biden people feel threatened, you will hear stories about Kamala Harris as vice president that will not make her look good.
	What did she do as vice president?
	But she could barely string two sentences together.
	The only difference between her and Joe is at least Joe had an excuse.
	He was in a steep cognitive decline.
	Pretty incredible times we live in.
	Let me go back to, if I can, with this classified annex from the Durham report, which is classified no more.
	And the newly revealed evidence might be more explosive than we ever knew.
	And as a reminder, Durham, you know, just to bring it full circle here, this is on top of Tulsi Gabbard's release.
	And remember, we found the intelligence showed by senior Intel officials, rank and file career people, that there was no Trump Russia collusion.
	And then once presented with that information, well, it didn't fit the narrative that we now know based on this new release that it was not the narrative that was desired by these high-ranking deep state political operatives within these three-letter agencies that had it out for Donald Trump and seemed to, from my perspective, be wanting to put cinder blocks on the scales of not one, not two, but three presidential elections.
	I mean, I was texting with Rudy Giuliani's former attorney, Bob Costello.
	Bob Costello, for example, in 2020, had a copy of the laptop from hell.
	They knew he had a copy of the laptop from hell.
	They knew Rudy had a copy of the laptop from hell, and he told me how they had it, because when they raided Rudy's house, they got into his iCloud and they knew there was a copy on there.
	So they knew it was going to break.
	They knew it would be leaked.
	They knew the public would know ahead of time.
	And Bob Costello wrote me and even said that he went as far as to tell Rudy to tell Trump that the election's over, that there's no way that Biden can win this election based on this information.
	Now think back what we know is on the laptop.
	You know, the drugs, the guns, the women, and everything in between of Hunter Biden, but more importantly, the big guy and all the money going to the big guy, and I have to give half my income to the big guy, and I have to pay for the big guy's home repairs.
	And this goes back to Barisma and CEFC, and you know, a guy that at the time is an admitted crack addict with no experience in energy oil, gas, coal, uh fracking, none of it, and is getting paid millions of dollars to sit on a board.
	And he's basically there explaining all this would have killed any presidential candidate.
	So they verify the authenticity of this laptop in March of 2020, and the FBI decides to go meet weekly with big tech companies in the lead up to the 2020 election.
	They're pre-bunking what they know is going to be leaked in terms of the laptop, warning these big tech companies that they'll likely be a victim of Russian disinformation.
	And all of this designed to impact the result of that election.
	I I would argue to me that's putting cinder blocks on the scales of an election.
	And no government agency, no government employee should abuse their power that way.
	And, you know, this now add to that this whole Russian narrative, which I was, you know, reading to you earlier.
	I mean, some of the key lines are just devastating in terms of Hillary Clinton, you know, and you know what that what the things that they were saying and doing, you know, this long-term affair uh to demonize Putin and Trump, all part of their strategy, and that they knew from the very very beginning that it was that it was simply not true.
	Hillary Rodham Clinton approved Julia's ideas about Trump and Russian hackers hampering with U.S. elections.
	That should distract people from their own missing email uh scandal.
	That means Hillary's scandal, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level, an apparent reference to the revelations of a massive state-sponsored doping campaign by Russia following the 2014 winter games in Sochi.
	I took it to mean something else, but I took it to mean meaning it goes it really gets to be a big, big story.
	But John Durham was tasked under Donald Trump's first term to investigate the sketchy origins of the Russia hoax.
	This annex has been there available.
	Just like this treasure trove of you know, this burn bag, things that the FBI normally would take and literally burn.
	You have armed agents that take it to incinerators and they watch it being burned, and this is how they get rid of sensitive information that they never want to get in the hands of the wrong people.
	That part doesn't bother me.
	That's part of the job.
	But the email from July of 2016, these documents declassified by Chuck Grassley, and in this case, a top Soros back Clinton ally named Leonard Bernardo wrote, quote, HRC, Hillary Rodham Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering with U.S. elections.
	That should distract people from our own missing email.
	Well, tell me what part of that does not mean that this is all being hatched.
	You know, I'll get into this maybe later in the program.
	People say, well, Hannity, sometimes you're a little too repetitive.
	If I did not go out on a daily basis, we spent three years on this and explained to people how Hillary Clinton's campaign used a law firm to hire an op research firm that went and hired a former MI6 agent that put together a series of individual documents that collectively later became known as the dossier.
	And if I didn't point out so regularly it's a Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier, then I don't think people would would understand this story as much.
	I don't think they'd understand it at all.
	And that's a big problem.
	you So Hillary Clinton approved the idea about Trump and Russia hackers.
	In the absence of direct evidence, CrowdStrike and Threat Connect, by the way, their DNC linked tech firms will supply the media.
	And this is the other part of the story is that the media took every single thing that was being fed to them, manufactured by and then fed to them as gospel truth, and they spent three years peddling the lies and the conspiracy theory.
	Then you have to ask yourself this question.
	How does this possibly happen in the United States of America?
	Now, one interesting side note here, uh, as they're spreading this propaganda.
	If you go back to July 27, 2016, only four days before the FBI decided to open their investigation into Trump and Russia.
	You know, maybe it's an insane coincidence, as I said on TV last night, because it gets interesting.
	A prior email on July 25th from the same Clinton ally stated, quote, That Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump.
	Now's a good time for a post-convention bounds.
	Later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire.
	Well, what does that mean?
	That means that the FBI is gonna put cinder blocks and blow up a story that they know to be false.
	We know that James Comey was warned not to use the Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier.
	And Lindsey Graham was very clear last night.
	He signed three of the four FISA warrants.
	The bulk of that information came from the from the dirty dossier.
	And he's never been held accountable.
	It was years later that Lindsey Graham actually got James Comey and everybody else that signed off on that dossier to admit under oath that knowing what they know now, they never would have, they never would have signed off on those Pfizer applications.
	So you start connecting the dots here.
	You know, and and I can go on and on and on.
	But they were so desperate to get, you know, this new report after the senior intelligence career people came out and said there was no Trump Russia collusion.
	And by the way, we did reach out to everybody involved in all of this through my TV show, Brennan and Clapper and Comey, all of them reached out to the Soros-backed uh Clinton ally in those released emails.
	Reached out to Obama Clinton, Brennan Clapper, the Obama advisor mentioned in the annex.
	We have yet to hear back from these people.
	You know, the Soros-backed Clinton ally in the organization for the release.
	No, not a word.
	The only people that got back to us is the Soros people, and they said, nope.
	We had nothing to do with any of this.
	Well, that's why we present the information and you get to decide.
	But to me, the biggest scandal in history.
	All right, when we come back, it's been a transformational week as it relates to health care.
	Everybody worries about their health.
	I'm not a big health warrior, but I guess for good reason.
	And you know what?
	Healthcare is about to change for the better.
	Democrats are demagoguing it, trying to scare older people.
	They're going to kill you and take away your your health insurance.
	No, they're not.
	They're cutting Medicaid.
	No, they're not.
	They're increasing it by seven percent.
	Dr. Roz next.

▲