They want to show that they are loyal to this, you know, I don't even know what to call him.
I've called him so many things, but this wannabe Hitler for sure.
They have been ordered by Donald Trump, who is their political puppet master, to try to do everything possible to avoid a free and fair election.
Freedom is back in style.
Welcome to the revolution.
Yeah, we're coming to your center.
Going to play our guitars and saying you are country souls.
Sean Hannity, the new Sean Hannity show.
More behind the scenes information on breaking news and more bold, inspired solutions for America.
All right, thanks, Scott Channel.
Hour two, Sean Hannity Show, toll-free on numbers 800-941.
Sean, if you want to be a part of the program, so much happening in Washington.
We don't want to let anything go uncovered.
There was a hearing that was taking place, and it has to do with Joe Biden, his brother, the catastrophe that ensued as a result of his failed policies.
And Senator Ashley Moody from My Free State of Florida, former Attorney General of Florida, watched the Biden administration put the safety of American families at risk.
And here is what she says she uncovered.
And as I pursued litigation, a judge said, Biden and his administration has turned our border into nothing more than a meaningless line in the sand.
And when there were warnings that our border would be overrun when Title 42 was expiring, Florida uncovered documents saying that their grand plan was to step back and let it be overrun.
And in my litigation as Florida's Attorney General, I uncovered that not only were they pushing more and more and more and more and more historic numbers into our country unvetted, that they established quotas every day to make sure that Border Patrol pushed a certain amount of numbers into our country that was barely vetted.
So as Attorney General, when I had sheriffs from all over my state calling me to say that the Biden administration was canceling detainers on criminals in their jails and telling them to release them back into the communities, I was horrified.
All right, Senator Ashley Moody from Florida joins us now.
Senator, can you give us more details about this?
We know that they lied when they repeatedly said the borders closed, the border's secure, the borders closed, border secure.
It infuriates me beyond words that all of these people that have been murdered and raped and victims of violent crime, the Democrats never talk about them.
They are putting the rights of so-called rights of illegals over the safety of Americans.
That infuriates me, but let's get to the specifics of what you uncovered.
Yeah, and this is why I am so not only honored, but really passion-driven in the Senate now to be able to use my background as Attorney General and everything that I saw happening under the Biden administration and bring it to the forefront, make sure the people know what their government was doing to them, to their communities on purpose.
And it has really been just an incredible six months as the newest United States Senator.
But you're right, we had a hearing this week, and it was to show what Biden did intentionally to the border and pushing people here into our communities that were unvetted, knowing that many of these were criminals and pushing them into our communities.
And to be able to shine a light on that, and Sean, we're seeing this all over the place with agencies right now in terms of the real intentions of what the government was trying to do.
And now we're uncovering it now that we have a new administration in here and they're going back and saying, wait a minute, not only was this immoral, it was downright illegal.
We see that happening in so many different levels right now.
I think it's important that we stay on this immigration hunt, if you will, because Maorkis was brought before Congress numerous times.
And like you said, he said, the border is secure.
The border is secure.
The border is secure.
Meanwhile, those hearings were conducted while the government agencies under Biden were holding on to all of the documents that disproved what he was saying, that he was being deceitful.
But Senator, isn't it bigger than documents?
I mean, I was documenting all of it in real time by showing the videos of wide open borders and the thousands of and thousands of unvetted illegals pouring across that border.
It was self-evident to anybody with eyes to see.
What we didn't know exactly at the time is that known terrorists were among those people that entered our country illegally.
We have Iranian assassination squads in the country.
We know we have murderers and rapists and other violent criminals and cartel members and gang members and drug dealers in the country too.
We don't even have an exact number.
It's an estimate anywhere between, what, 10, 12, and 20 million people that they allowed into this country unveted.
Yes.
Yeah, and I think what I'm trying to get at is you are absolutely right.
The American people could see with our eyes and you accurately and repeatedly reported what was happening.
But what they didn't share with us was that in month one, when he was putting out his plans and policies and executive orders, his own administration said, if you do this, the border will be overrun.
We will not have the ability to contain this, and we will not be able to control who's coming into the country.
They knew it.
Intentionally, they went ahead and broke down the borders.
We only got those documents a week before when we were forcing them to trial.
They held on to them until they released them to us.
And I think what that shows is there was this time and time again when they said the border is secure and we are not jeopardizing this country and we're not releasing criminals.
We have been able to show that they not only were telling sheriffs to release people into their communities.
A witness testified at the hearing this week.
We're also able to show that they took prisoners out of the federal prisons that were here only because they committed crimes and pushed them back into our communities as opposed to deporting them.
So, you know, really getting down to the intention of that administration and what they were purposefully doing to this country and to families and communities, I think is so important.
And I thank John Cornyn and other members of the judiciary who joined me in highlighting that deception.
I have been saying that they have blood on their hands.
And I also have said that if, God forbid, and I pray to God I'm wrong, I think it's a matter of when, not if, that these terrorists that they let into the country, we know that they're plotting, planning, and scheming an attack on our homeland.
They'll have more blood on their hands.
Let me ask you this.
If you are one of the families, the thousands of families where you had a loved one that was murdered or raped or victims of violent crime and they were sitting there knowingly lying to us is what you're saying.
Is there any legal recourse?
I mean, you were the Attorney General of Florida.
Absolutely.
I mean, you're already seeing it in some of these other things that we're uncovering.
We're referring to the FBI and to DOJ cases where people might not have been truthful with Congress.
I mean, I believe that Mayorkas lied to Congress, and I don't think at the time when...
Don't you think they all lied when they said the border was secure when they knew otherwise?
When I was uncovering these documents, when the chief of Border Patrol was saying, you know, we are pushing dangerous people into this country and the plan was to let it be overrun.
and Mayorkas was saying differently, I absolutely believe he deceived Congress, knowingly deceived Congress.
Well, that in and of itself is a crime.
If I go before your Senate committee and I willfully lie, isn't that a crime?
It is a crime.
I think it needs to be looked at.
And I do believe it will be.
You know, I can't understand how we have the documents that showed their own people said that they would be overrun.
They're overrun.
And then he comes to Congress and says, all is well.
It was the biggest gaslighting of the American people in the history of our country.
It was an evasion.
What do you think the purpose of this was?
Was this, you know, if you discuss the possibility that their hope was to offer something of great value, American citizenship, to large masses of people, that that would benefit them in the long run, especially if there's close elections and you have 12 million people, you give them citizenship.
You know, well, that's the great white replacement theory.
No, it's not the great white replacement theory because I'm in favor of legal immigration and I don't care where you come from, but we do need to vet you.
We need to know you don't have radical associations.
We do need a health check and we need to know you're not going to be a financial burden on the American people.
After that, I really don't care where you come from.
Welcome to the country.
Thanks for coming in legally.
So do you think this was all designed with a grand scheme to offer citizenship and hence create a voting base of grateful people that you gave them free citizenship?
Well, we've talked about this before, Sean.
When Biden got in office and I started seeing some of these policies get cranked out by executive order and the insanity to the safety of this country in terms of releasing serious felony offenders that are here illegally just right back into the community.
I mean, even Democratic administrations would not have done that.
This was a total upheaval of order and structure and safety and everything that both sides had always agreed on.
I started referring to it as Biden's handlers pushing these crazy policies out.
And I believe there are people that believe that there should not be borders.
And it was a radical's wish list in terms of what was pushed out as to immigration and so many other things that related to policy.
And as they were getting put out, pushed out, I was doing my best as Attorney General.
Many of my colleagues around the country were speaking out and not just speaking out, fighting in court to try and stop it.
But I truly believe that there is a subversive, almost anarchist agenda.
And many of those people believe there should not be borders.
And if you go back and read those executive orders that came out in month one, when their own people were saying we're going to lose control of the border, there is no other conclusion to make other than it was intentional.
And whether that was a handler or someone that had an agenda in the administration, whether that was Biden himself, it was done on purpose.
That's unbelievable.
Well, let me ask you one other thing.
We've learned from Tulsi Gabbard that evidence was available to James Comey on Hillary Clinton and our top secret classified information that he purposely didn't use.
We learned that, in fact, that the Hillary Clinton bought and paid for dirty Russian dossier was, in fact, suspect from the beginning, and they were even told not to use it.
It became the bulk of information for not one, but four FISA applications and three of them signed by James Comey himself, even after it was totally debunked.
If you look at that, if you look at the FBI knew in March of 2020, they verified the authenticity of the laptop, and then they went out and pre-bunked it to big tech companies.
My question is, is there a pattern or a grand conspiracy to put cinder blocks on scales of elections?
You know, I think that what the referrals that were made both by Radcliffe and Gabbard are incredibly important to restoring faith in this government and bringing us back to the understanding and belief that it is truly a representative government of us, the people, not just a government run amok with its own agenda executed by a few people who want to enact a partisan playbook.
And so, you know, I am, I for one, and I hope all of America agrees that going back and looking through this, and I think one of the allegations is that Brennan was not truthful when he testified in terms of the collusion and whether or not he thought that should be included in the report.
I think it should be looked at.
And again, just as we started off this conversation, if there is nothing to hide, a review of all of this should concern no one.
But to restore the Americans' faith in this system of government, it has to be.
We've got to get to the bottom of it.
I mean, it looks like deep state actors have been involved in corrupting the system for a while.
We appreciate your diligent work, and you're doing great for the state of Florida.
Florida Senator Ashley Moody, thank you for being with us.
As always, we appreciate it.
Great to be with you, Sean.
All right, let's stay in my free state of Florida.
We have Jerry checking in.
Jerry, you're on the Sean Hannity show.
How are you, sir?
Hey, doing fine.
Thanks for taking the call.
I just had the comment.
It's a few days old, but with Hunter's profanity-laced three-hour podcast, probably the only thing that really rang true to me that he said was just on how successful he thought his father's presidency was.
And after I thought about it for a second, it was very successful for Hunter and the Biden family.
The pardon flew.
Millions of dollars came in riding around on Air Force One.
So I think that from Hunter's perspective, it probably seemed pretty successful.
I was shocked, and I like Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan definitely isn't as political as I am.
And I think he doesn't really want to be involved in the political world, which is probably a smart move on his part.
And I was shocked when he said, oh, wow, I've looked at this.
Maybe he should run for president.
Like, do you know anything about this guy?
Not a good idea.
But with that said, everyone's entitled to their opinion, right?
Yeah, he had the best life of anybody.
He got rich off access.
There's not one person that is listening to this show that can make millions and millions of dollars acknowledging that they have no background, no experience at all whatsoever, and sit on boards and go on Good Morning America saying you have no experience in energy, oil, gas, coal, or Ukraine or China, none at all whatsoever.
And he made a fortune.
Yeah, good gig for him.
Not good for the country.
And certainly we didn't exactly see much progress from his father.
And he's just angry and lashing out and bitter.
And, you know, maybe he thinks he sounds cool dropping an F-bomb every five seconds.
He sounds stupid to me.
And I don't know.
He seemed off.
He sounded like a very angry man.
All right.
I appreciate the call, my friend.
800-941-Sean is on number.
We'll get right back to the phones when we come back as we continue.
800-941 Sean, if you want to call, we'd love to hear from you.
He gives you the latest breaking news when he hits the air.
This is the Sean Hannity show.
It is amazing.
You would think, based on the chatter, that Stephen Colbert actually had a big audience.
He did not.
We have about three times the audience size that he has, or I guess he still has it.
And, you know, the desire to blame all of this on Donald Trump has just gotten way out of hand.
Stephen Colbert has been fired for very basic, fundamental reasons.
And as somebody who in October will have completed 30 years on the Fox News channel, I know a lot about television, and I can tell you how it works.
The only reason I'm still on TV is because all of you watch my show.
And if you stop watching my show, you, in combination, would have the ability to fire me.
Some of you are salivating at that thought.
But it really comes down to basic, fundamental issues in terms of radio and television.
And that is audience size and reach, number one.
And number two, it comes down to revenue.
He was supposed to be a late-night comic, and he tried to be an MSDNC anchor.
He was a radical leftist who was not funny.
And you could see over the years, month by month, week by week, day by day, the slippage and the attrition of a massive audience that he inherited at the time.
I mean, he's down to about a third of what David Letterman left him.
Well, that means it's not a viable show.
Apparently, they have over 200 staff members.
It's a lot of people to write his jokes for him.
And apparently, none of them were particularly good at their job because he wasn't funny.
Or I guess maybe this was based on his guidance.
And so the show was losing anywhere between $40 and $50 million a year.
Well, if you don't have ratings, you don't have audience, you're not funny, you're supposed to be a late-night comic, and you're losing all that money, you're not going to survive.
Now, Stephen Colbert keeps going after CBS and their new owners, Paramount.
And if he thinks he's going to make it to May of 26 and continue this diatribe of blame and attack against the very people that are paying him, he's dreaming.
Now, in my view, he probably is itching to get fired because he thinks in his own twisted mind that that'll turn him into a martyr.
I would argue he'll be doing a podcast someplace, somewhere that not many people are ever going to care about.
But here's what he said: We have just achieved a big and important win in our historic lawsuit against 60 Minutes, CBS, and Paramount.
Paramount CBS, 60 Minutes after Day, paid $16 million in settlement.
And we will also anticipate receiving $20 million more from the new owners for a total of over $36 million.
Wow, hold on.
Plus, they're paying us legal fees.
16 was 23.
That means by bending the knee, they lost like $40 million this year.
They better watch out.
They better watch out.
they might get canceled for purely financial reasons.
The present owners are denying that additional $20 million, which I hope is true.
Because could you imagine how angry people would be?
Last year, Paramount laid off 2,000 employees, then cut another several hundred just last month, firing that many people and then handing over 36 mil to a guy who was putting your neighbors in alligator camps, all because of a lawsuit that your own lawyers said was completely without merit.
If that's true, it would make CBS look morally bankrupt.
Also bankrupt.
Why do I think MSNBC or MSDNC is a potential home for him?
You think that's far-fetched?
Or fake news, CNN?
I mean, he's already got Rachel Maddell's glasses, so he already fits right in.
He's doing great.
Glasses would make it work.
Joyless Behar, I mean, look, Jimmy Kimmel, just like Colbert and Fallon, and I've been saying it for some time, are all officially on cancellation watch.
You cannot allow the type of audience decline in attrition occur and the subsequent loss of millions of dollars for your company that is employing you to occur without you at some point taking a financial hit and likely getting fired.
They have all made a decision to be political.
There's been no course correction on their part.
They're not funny.
They haven't been funny in a long time.
It's insufferable to watch.
And just like that hard-hitting news show, The View, I mean, when I saw that Harris Faulkner was beating The View in the ratings, I'm like, it's close to the end.
There's only so long ABC is going to put up with this.
Here's Joyless Behar announcing that The View is going on hiatus.
And before we go on hiatus, we only have one more show after this.
I'm allowed to say that right.
Too late now.
So it doesn't really matter.
Before we go, I wanted to tell people that the tide is turning.
The tide is turning and things are changing.
No, it's not.
Then she goes on to predict Fox News is going to be the ones that take down Donald Trump.
I'm like, okay, good luck with that ridiculous theory.
I think long before Donald Trump will finish his presidency, whether they like it or not, as long as his health is as long as he's in good health, which he is now.
And I think that's just wishful thinking on their part.
They can't continue to have this attrition and audience decline and survive either.
All right, let's go to our busy phones as we say hi to Robbie's in Oklahoma.
Rob, hi, how are you?
Glad you called, sir.
Great day, Mr. Hannity.
You are a great American patriot, sir, and Katie is a great call screener.
My point is.
Man, the sucking up to Katie and Linda.
Oh, man, what is going on here?
Well, you're a lucky man.
You got great, great people working for you with you.
I do.
I agree.
What's going on?
My point is that these charges must be brought.
The evidence must be presented, not to get Obama, because we know he's got presidential meetings, but him and Biden are the only ones that do.
It's the army of cockroaches that support him, and this would be a deterrent to any future recruits to do these unconstitutional activities at the behest of their political bosses.
And I would remind them that they're federal employees, and the following orders nonsense has been completely eliminated with Nuremberg and Meli.
They cannot just say, oh, we're just following orders.
That doesn't work.
So anyway, locking up the army of cockroaches is the goal here.
Cut off their supply of recruits for the communists.
Well, I just got to tell you something.
I said this at the time, and we covered this story extensively, and we were proven right on our reporting.
If there was any Russia collusion that took place in the 2016 election, it only had to deal with Hillary Clinton's bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier.
And it was one big hoax.
It was a lie.
It was a peddled conspiracy theory.
Everybody fell hook, line, and sinker with it.
It's beyond frustrating.
I've been playing montages of the media, you know, claiming the Russia hacked the 2016 election.
Here's a small version of it.
Look, I think that the president does not want to come to terms with the fact that the Russians hacked the election.
President-elect Donald Trump still not sounding convinced that Russia hacked the election.
Russia hacked the election to tilt it to Mr. Trump.
The question is, did Mr. Trump cooperate?
Unlike President Trump, he has no doubt the Russians hacked the election.
The Russians definitively hacked the election.
If you can get him to accept that Russia hacked the election, see if you can get them to accept who won the Civil War.
Definitively.
Russia hacked the election and Russia is doing it again now.
Now, I can go on and play hours of me on this show and on Hannity the TV show telling people the truth about what really happened.
I'll play a small snippet here, but it is representative of the hundreds, if not thousands of times I said it on radio and TV.
Listen.
Hillary Clinton actually colluded with Russia by paying millions and millions of dollars for that fake news dossier, Russian propaganda, Russian collusion to smear Donald Trump.
And she tried to influence you, the American people, to swing the election with those lies.
Ironically, Hillary is the one that colluded with Russia with a phony Russian misinformation dossier.
Three and a half years, Donald Trump colluded with Russia.
The only one that colluded with Russia and bought a dirty, Russian, dirty dossier was Hillary Clinton.
And they used that unverified to spy on a presidential candidate and a president.
Unbelievable.
Well, you know, I'm not.
I do think one of the things, if you're looking at a media landscape where people have more choices, more options than ever before, it is imperative that if you come to this show, if you come to Hannity the TV show, one of the prerequisites, I believe, for any success is you've got to get things right.
That's why we don't rush the judgment.
That's why when, and I learned that lesson with Richard Jewell, I've talked about all the cases and they're very high profile and they went on for months at a time.
But I don't care if it's the Russia hoax.
I don't care if it's the dirty disinformation dossier and FISA abuse.
I don't care if it was impeachment one.
I don't care if it's the novel legal theory, you know, cooked up by the Get Trump DA of New York, even though the statute of limitations have passed.
Again, none of these details covered by the state-run legacy media mob.
The valuation of Mar-a-Lago.
Nobody in the media would tell you that the $18 million valuation for a $1 billion plus property was absurd, but they never covered it.
Just like we got Duke La Crosse right, I took the time.
I met with the families.
I met with some of the kids.
I had information that others in the media could have gotten, but didn't bother to get.
In the case of Ferguson, Missouri, I took the time.
I made phone calls.
I talked to law enforcement.
I was reassured by source after source after source that this whole narrative, hands up, don't shoot, didn't happen and that there'll be multiple eyewitnesses that will corroborate Darren Wilson's story.
I was told the same thing in the case of Freddie Gray in Baltimore.
I was told the same thing in the UVA case and the George Zimmerman case.
So, I mean, maybe I don't, maybe I'm not going to be the first person.
It took us three years to unravel every layer of the onion for the Russia hoax, but we got it right.
Anyway, I hope that means something to people because I think going forward, you need to know who's going to tell you the truth.
Quick break, right back to our busy phones, 800-941-Sean, our number.
If you want to check in with us, we'd love to hear from you.
What's on your mind today?
Final hour roundup is next.
You do not want to miss it.
And stay tuned for the final hour free-for-all on the Sean Hannity Show.
Back to our busy phones.
800-941-SEAN is our number.
We have Teddy in North Carolina.
Hey, Teddy, how are you?
Glad you called.
It's been an honor to speak to you.
I got a quick question for you.
I'm just wondering how much tax dollars was spent and wasted on this hoax and this lie that me and you and the rest of your listeners have paid for.
Well, if you factor in the media coverage, being complicit and peddling the lies for the Democrats, I don't know if you could even factor in a number.
If you factor in, you know, Robert Mueller, the tens and tens of millions of dollars and everything aligned with and associated with it, I'm sure it was hundreds of millions of dollars.
I'm sure.
Yeah, at least the hundreds of millions.
I appreciate it.
Yeah, that's our money, man.
I'm telling you.
The way they waste our money is nauseating.
It is.
That's money we're stealing from our kids and grandkids.