Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, news roundup and information overload hour.
Toll-free, our number is 800-941-Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
Obviously, while I was away last week, the Jeffrey Epstein story blew up in a major way.
And I've been in contact with a lot of people, talked to a lot of people, including those people involved in this.
And the one person that really, I think, may know more than anybody and may be able to shed enough light on things is our friend David Schoen, who is an attorney who's going to join us in just a minute.
And for no other reason, is he was Jeffrey Epstein's attorney for a period of time and spoken with the guy for months.
And anyway, he's former President Trump's former counsel and advised Epstein for a year and then took over his entire criminal case.
Anyway, quote, I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer nine days before he died.
He sought my advice for months before that.
I can authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively say that he had no information to hurt President Trump.
And I specifically asked him.
And he also went on to say in an interview that it was important to Jeffrey Epstein to make clear to me that he did not have any bad information about President Trump, didn't like people being falsely accused of having been associated with him in some illegal way.
And it's not surprising considering Trump's DOJ is the one that arrested Epstein, and Trump is known to be the only one who openly cooperated with Epstein victims lawyer.
And this goes all the way back to 2009.
There's been a lot of wild talks about all of this.
Anyway, our friend David Schoen is with us now.
How are you?
Fine, thanks.
How are you?
Nice to be on the show.
I don't know, and I was thinking about this because you're such a decent human being, and I've known you for so long, and I know everybody deserves a defense.
And I know this guy has values that are the just absolute antithesis of who you are.
But you also believe that everybody has a right to an attorney.
And like Alan Dershowitz, for example, has been involved in a lot of high-profile, controversial cases with controversial people, including this one.
Was that hard for you?
It really wasn't.
I mean, first of all, I never saw this monstrous side that people have painted him out to be.
I saw him as a guy, frankly, when I met him, sort of a lonely guy who had a lot of rich friends.
And all of those folks had no problem ever associating with him.
It's a who's who of wealthy people and successful people.
They only cut their ties with him after he got indicted.
So, you know, listen, as you say, I believe strongly, deeply, and from the bottom of my heart, everyone deserves a defense.
And I saw this as a real challenge in this case.
And to be perfectly frank, maybe it's ego or otherwise, but it's also why I became a criminal defense lawyer.
When I heard from him that I was the only lawyer in the world he trusted with his life, that motivated me more to fight for him.
Understood.
But you don't have any doubts that this guy was a creep?
I don't know.
You know, I don't pay a judgment on people.
I'd presume everybody to be innocent before he's convicted, unless and until he's convicted.
He had the.
Well, he did have the early conviction in Florida.
That's right.
No question about it.
And I would say I had just about nothing in common with him.
But my defense of a guy really is focused on what the charges are against him and trying to help him or her out of their legal problems.
So that's how I approached this case.
And, you know, as I said before, he introduced me to a guy, a lunch date of his, who was, you know, former prime minister of a country and so on.
All of these people enjoyed his company.
So whether he was creep or not, you know, you have a lot of wealthy, successful people who loved being around him.
Well, I mean, he seemed like a star chaser to me.
But, I mean, everything you read about, you know, all these young girls seemingly groomed and, quote, hired as masseuses and so on and so forth, the whole thing just is repulsive to me.
It also brings up an issue that we have talked at length about on this show.
And, you know, I mentioned this to Linda earlier today.
And Linda, you can weigh in.
I mean, for how many years on this program?
And by the way, Linda being at the impetus of a lot of it, because it happens to be an issue she cares so much about, you know, that we had, you know, agents for decades of their life just trying to deal with the sex trafficking of young children into our country.
And the numbers are in the hundreds and hundreds of thousands.
And nobody ever paid attention to us when we report on this.
How many times have we reported on that, Linda?
I mean, more times than I care to count.
It's very sad that we even have to.
We reported on it, but nobody ever paid attention to it.
And then it was a frustration.
For example, I remember, what's his name?
Tara Rodas.
So Tara Rodos was the HHS whistleblower.
She went up against Xavier Becerra.
That's right.
And it was a huge mess.
And then, you know, they wanted to fire her and get rid of her, which they did.
And then she ended up getting back into another job in the admin.
But, you know, her and her husband, her husband happens to be from Ecuador, so she's fluent in Spanish, fluent in English.
They were housing these children.
And then they were taking them to places that were supposed to be safe houses and it would be a warehouse or a strip joint.
And so they were asking the question, like, what the hell is going on?
Why are we sending this to you?
We had DHS agents that spent their entire career just working on the issue of the sex trafficking of children and, you know, how shocking it was this sheer number of people.
I mean, there are a lot of really disgusting people in the world.
All right.
So putting aside your personal feelings about Epstein and putting aside the sweetheart plea deal that he got in Florida back in the day, just for a minute here, you were advising him for almost a year, correct?
He was in contact with you for that period of time.
Probably more than a year.
He was having me review his lawyer's work in a case in Florida in which it had been reopened or potentially reopened because the victims hadn't gotten proper notice from the government in the case.
He had a whole battery of top-notch lawyers in the country and so on.
But at some point, he asked me to review their work before he was filing it.
And so that's how we sort of reinitiated that relationship.
And then at some point, a few months before he died, he asked me to come to his home in New York to take over all of his litigation.
I didn't feel I was in a position to do that.
But then we kept in regular sort of daily touch asking me for advice on different things.
Okay.
Now, you talked about, and Alan Dershowitz has said, and Dershowitz was very familiar with this, that there was never any list.
And you said that he had no incriminating evidence about President Trump and that you specifically asked about that.
And by the way, if there was incriminating evidence on Trump, don't you think that the Biden DOJ would have released it?
100%.
Remember, in the Maxwell case, you had Comey's daughter as the prosecutor in the case.
If anyone expects me to believe that if there were incriminating evidence about President Trump and it wouldn't have been leaked by that office for years already, then, again, sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.
I don't buy it at all.
Too many people have touched all of the related documents in this case for there to have been anything about it.
But in any event, as I say, at the time I asked him, it would have been in his interest to tell all of the information if he had anything bad about President Trump.
Remember, I didn't even know President Trump at that time.
You're talking about 2019.
I didn't meet President Trump until a couple weeks before the impeachment trial.
So he had no interest in telling me to try to satisfy me about anything.
This was at a time in his life when it would have served him to have served up to the government any and all information he had about prominent people who the government might have wanted to go after.
And President Trump wouldn't have been the only one.
So I don't find it at all surprising that there's no client list.
I wouldn't have thought there would be.
He never ever spoke to me about blackmailing anybody or anything like that.
And I think now you see this hypocrisy that we've identified so many times over and over and over again to have Jamie Raskin demanding the list and all of these things.
Where was he the last five, six, seven years?
What was he during the Biden administration about the records and the documents after Epstein passed away?
It's hypocrisy.
And what they're doing now, by raising this as such an issue, they're empowering groups like the New York Times to focus on the chaos and to play this all up when you've got so many fabulous things going on in the world with this administration right now between the economy, Middle East.
You're going to expand the Abraham Accords and all that.
There is nothing about this Jeffrey Epstein story that's going to make America great.
That I can promise you.
Well, but you know what?
And maybe Miranda used the right term in saying that, you know, it was handled in a clumsy way.
Yes.
And my understanding is that the tapes were not tapes of Epstein and victims, but the tapes were kiddie porn that he had downloaded.
Were you aware that he was that creepy?
No, I never spoke whatsoever about anything like that with him.
You know, if there's, you know, maybe one thing that I hope comes out of this more than anything else is the level of child sex trafficking in this country.
It is shocking.
You know, we pointed out there are 350 plus thousand children that entered our country illegally under Biden and Harris.
We don't know where these children are.
We don't know.
And kids are being sold into sex slavery daily.
And that these perverts are, I mean, this is a problem of a much larger magnitude based on past interviews we've done on this show than most people know.
And that scares the living hell out of me as a parent myself.
Absolutely.
You deserve great credit for it.
And President Trump has this as a priority also.
This is part of his immigration program.
But again, we lose it, you know, far from the trees.
These folks, you know, they pick out an issue and they attack him or his administration on this one issue here.
And I think they've really lost sight of what's going on.
They think for a second that President Trump is trying to cover up for Bill Clinton or somebody else who would be in those files, you know, arguably Prince Andrew and so on.
It's just not true.
Well, there's got to be something with Prince Andrew because, I mean, obviously, you know, the way the royal family reacted was, and in my view, very appropriate.
If not, and the disastrous interview he gave was awful.
But anyway, we appreciate your time, David.
Thank you, David Schoen, 800-941-Sean.
Our number, if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, we continue with Jeffrey Epstein's former attorney, David Schoen, is with us.
David, I want to be really, really clear here.
Between the Palm Beach case, which I thought was a sweetheart deal that never should have been given, and all the allegations that have been made by women to me that are very, very credible.
And I agree, everybody that's accused has the right to an attorney.
And you've taken on controversial cases your entire career.
But when I look at and I hear these things, it makes my blood boil even thinking about it.
And I know who you are as a person, and I know you believe everybody should have the right to a defense, but you kind of also have your hands tied here in terms of what you can say and can't say, because attorney-client privilege, it continues into the grave, doesn't it?
You're absolutely right, Sean.
I mean, yes, it continues after a person's death.
And you're right.
It's a difficult situation.
But, you know, this is a profession that I chose.
I've represented a lot of people who nobody would want to spend any time with.
But that's part of the challenge of this profession.
But you're right.
There are many things that I cannot talk about and would not talk about because they're privileged.
Just last week, after I came out with this truth about President Trump not being inculpated in any way, somebody actually took action against me.
But I'm not ashamed to do that either.
That was something that he wanted, Epstein wanted to put out there because he did want President Trump's name cleared.
Nobody to cast any aspersions against him.
But you're right.
In this situation, I'm not really free to discuss my personal feelings or anything like that.
This is a defense that I took on, and there is an attorney-client privilege that goes beyond his death.
And I don't speak about any of the other things that we discussed, if they were at all privileged.
But you certainly understand the general public reading this and hearing about the magnitude of it, the natural outrage people have.
And I think that the outrage is justified, especially when you're talking about young people as victims or potential victims in this case.
I understand it 100%.
The only reason now that I'm speaking out, this was initiated because Mr. Musk made some suggestions about President Trump that the reason these files weren't disclosed is because he was hiding something about himself and so on.
That simply wasn't true, and I could not permit that to be part of the public dialogue because I am in a position to know that.
And I wanted to authoritatively disabuse anyone of that notion.
Beyond that, you know, I don't really comment on Strepstein's conduct and so on.
I perfectly well understand the public perception and the public animus toward him and this situation.
I don't believe it was suicide.
I say that for two reasons.
I met with him nine days before he died.
He hired me to take over his case, subject to either my bringing my own team in or seeing if his folks wanted to, you know, would accept that, and I didn't think that they would.
He gave me another task that he asked me to do that was only forward-looking.
And I know that during that week, he was giving out orders consistent with the defense that we were planning in his case.
But more importantly, perhaps, is that Dr. Michael Biden participated as an outside independent examiner in the forensic examination of his body.
And he has said many times, first of all, that the medical examiner on site was the assistant, said she could not come to any conclusion.
But secondly, that he has done tens of thousands of autopsies, and he's never seen injuries like this consistent with a suicide.
So the idea that anyone now can say definitively, oh, this was a suicide, I just don't buy that.
But I don't have any conspiracy theory about anyone who killed him or otherwise.
I just don't think it's fair to anyone conclusively say it was a suicide for those reasons.
David Sean, appreciate your time.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you very much.
Mar Hannity, last big government.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Hi, 25 now till the top of the hour, 800-941 Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
I mentioned this earlier.
I am beyond disgusted.
I do cast blame and aspersion on people and the rhetoric and the groups that are out there putting ICE agents' lives in jeopardy.
But, yo, let's give out the location of a potential attack on ICE agents.
Well, it's happening.
It's happening left and right.
You know, you got a guy ramming an ICE vehicle with his car in Linda Vista, California, before three activists attacking agents.
Then you have nearly a dozen violent assailants equipped with tactical gear and weapons attacking ICE agents at a detention facility in Texas.
The attack occurred just days before an armed activist shot a U.S. border official in McAllen, Texas, coordinated to vandalize the facility and disrupt operations there.
There are 11 suspects in that attack.
The FBI arrested 10 of the 11, and it's only the tip of the iceberg.
You had a gunman that identified open fire at an entrance of a U.S. Border Patrol sector annex in McAllen.
That suspect was neutralized by law enforcement who acted heroically to stop the shooter before there was any loss of life.
And another McCallum police officer shot in the leg, and a border patrol officer, border patrol employee, sustaining injuries.
Then you have outside the San Francisco Immigration Court, a video shared by ICE capturing a tense altercation between agents and protesters.
Then you got footage posted on X showing mass protesters scuffling with ICE agents, wielding batons.
Get back, get back.
Agents are heard trying to protect themselves.
Then you had federal law enforcement officers executing criminal warrant operations at marijuana grow sites in Carpenteria and Camarillo out in California.
During the operation, 10 illegal immigrant children were rescued from potential exploitation, forced labor, human trafficking.
You know, a Democratic congressman allegedly took part in a violent mob attack on ICE agents.
This was in the Washington Times.
You know, it's pretty unbelievable what's going on.
And then the L.A. mayor, Karen Bass, announced a new cash giveaway plan for Biden illegals.
And she claims the cash will come from the city's philanthropic partners.
And she says, there is a need for me to have an executive directive to help our city understand how to protect itself from our federal government.
That basically means get in the way, even though we do have a constitution, a supremacy clause, and jurisdiction lies with the federal government.
We'll get to more of this on the other side.
Want to remind you, everybody in this day and age needs a home security system.
If you worry about the safety of your home, your family, there's no better time to act right now with a Simply Safe home security system.
One of our listeners writes, I've worked everything from burglaries, home invasions, smashing grabs, assaults to horrific murder cases.
No one should be without an alarm system, and yours fits the bill perfectly.
I can't tell you how much peace of mind I have when I leave my home and when I leave my wife and family alone.
And right now, you, my listeners, will get 50% off a brand new SimplySafe home security system when you go to simplysafe.com/slash Hannity.
And what I love about them is they keep advancing their technology.
And right now, they have their SimplySafe AI active guard outdoor protection.
It can help prevent break-ins before they happen.
In other words, live agents, they'll be notified and alerted if someone's lurking around your home or acting suspiciously.
Then the agents in real time can talk to these people.
Excuse me, sir.
You with the blue baseball hat, you are trespassing.
Please leave the property.
Police have been called.
They can activate spotlights, talk to them, contact the police.
There's no long-term contract.
There's no cancellation fee.
You get a 60-day unconditional satisfaction guarantee.
Just go to simplysafe.com/slash Hannity, get 50% off with a new system with a professional monitoring plan, and your money back.
That's simplysafe.com slash Hannity.
50% off a new system with a professional monitoring plan, and you'll get your first month free.
That's simplysafe.com slash Hannity.
There's no safe like SimplySafe.
Let me play back to this immigration issue.
Tom Holman was at a turning point event this weekend challenging a heckler to meet him off stage.
Listen to this.
That's not what they wanted.
They're playing the long game.
Let's release them in the community.
Wait three or five years.
Pardon me.
Are you an MS-13 member?
It says something.
Hey, hey, that's okay.
That's okay.
I got a question.
No, no, no.
I got a question for you.
Why don't you come up here and hand me that picture?
Bring it.
Say, you say, yeah.
I got morons like this all over the country.
This guy, this guy wouldn't like to serve this nation.
This guy ain't got the balls to be an ICE officer.
He hasn't got the balls to be a bomb show agent.
This guy lives in his mother's basement.
Is it going to surprise me?
You don't have purple hair and a nose ring.
Get out of here, you loser.
And you're such a badass, meet me offstage in 13 minutes and 50 seconds.
You know, I have tried hard to get Tom Holman to laugh.
Uh-uh.
All business, all business.
And he is passionate about keeping our cities and towns safe from all of the Biden-Harris illegals and known terrorists.
And we learned today another, you know, more Iranian assassination squads.
And we have cartel members and gang members and murderers and rapists and other violent criminals, all unvetted, thanks to Joe Kamala Majorkis.
Here's Christy Noam being grilled on NBC over the treatment of detainees at Alligator Alcatraz.
Oh, I didn't know that all these illegals should have room service.
Listen.
Alligator Alcatraz.
Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said that the conditions there are inhumane.
More than 30 people stuffed into a jail cell.
She said they get their drinking water and they brush their teeth from the same place where they go to the bathroom.
Madam Secretary, what do you say to these lawmakers who argue this is not humane treatment of individuals, of humans?
Well, our detention centers at the federal level are held to a higher standard than most local or state centers and even federal prisons.
The standards are extremely high.
Now, this is a state-run facility at Alligator Alcatraz.
They're stuffed into a jail cell cell cell cell cells.
They have a contrast.
Well, I've been there and I've seen these rooms that they are in.
I wouldn't call them jail cells.
I would call them a facility where they are held and that are secure facilities, but are held to the highest levels of what the federal government requires for detention facilities.
Democrats have called them cages, though.
I wish they would have said that back during the Biden administration and back when Democrats were in the White House and they were piling people on top of each other on cement floors and literally didn't have two feet to move.
They never did that.
And that's why this politics has to end.
And then, you know, in the same interview, Christy Noam is confronted over reports of thousands of unanswered calls to FEMA after the Texas flood, which is not true.
Listen.
The New York Times is reporting that thousands of calls from flood victims to FEMA call centers went unanswered in the middle of this ongoing disaster because you didn't renew contracts to keep call center staff in place until nearly one week after the floods.
Why did it take so long to extend those contracts?
Those contracts were in place.
It didn't take five days.
No employees were off of work.
Every one of them was answering calls.
So false reporting, fake news, and it's discouraging.
It's discouraging that during this time when we have such a loss of life and so many people's lives have turned upside down, that people are playing politics with this because the response time was immediate.
And if you talk to anyone in Texas that was there, that was a part of this operation, they would say the federal government and President Trump immediately responded.
Just to be very clear, on July 7th, 15.9% of calls were answered.
I mean, does that concern you that only 15% of calls were answered?
These are people in a desperate state.
FEMA, often the first call that they make, only 15% were answered on July 7th, several days after the floods.
These contracts were in place, and those people were in those call centers and they were picking up the phone and answering.
One other issue before we head to our busy phones.
When learning more about this Trump assassination attempt, everything I told you at the time, this was not a slope roof.
What Kimberly Cheadle, the then head of the Secret Service, said was just false.
And I say this as somebody that did roofing and fell off a roof, a steep sloped roof, not a fake slope roof that she was claiming this was.
And the worst part of this is they had threats as many as 10 days in advance, and those threats were never shared with any other law enforcement that was at the event, and nothing was done to up the security of then candidate Donald Trump as we are one year away from it.
It seems like a lifetime ago.
But anyway, here's Pat Fallon on Trump's assassination attempt.
Not only did the Secret Service not share the threat intel with other agencies, they didn't share it with Trump's detail.
Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of President Trump's assassination attempt in Beltler, Pennsylvania.
That report revealed that the Secret Service knew there was a threat 10 days before the rally.
They didn't share any information with local and federal law enforcement congressmen.
You were a member of the Congressional Task Force that investigated all of this.
What are the next steps?
What else needs to happen so that this does not happen again, especially in the era we're in now?
We find ourselves where there's more political violence.
Cyril, not only did the Secret Service not share this with other agencies, they didn't share it with President Trump's detail that Iran was, you know, posed a dire threat to President Trump's life.
He should have been receiving at that time because it was a very unique circumstance.
He was the former president.
A nation state was trying to assassinate him for actions he took as president.
He was also the leading candidate to be the next president, which he is now.
He should have had security that was commiserate with a sitting U.S. president because of the unique nature of who he was, who he is, and the threat at that time.
I mean, how can they be that incompetent?
Pretty unbelievable.
All right, to our busy phones we go as we say hi to Don in Iowa.
Hey, Don, how are you?
Glad you called, sir.
Hi, Sean.
Thank you very much for taking my call.
I appreciate you and naturally your whole crew because they're all great.
Linda and Katie and they're great a lot of the time.
Oh, yes.
Absolutely.
Linda's going to be quiet on that one.
Listen, it's your first day back.
I'm giving you a pass.
Tomorrow I'm all in.
So enjoy it while you can, my friend.
Give me a pass today.
I get a pass down.
Just today.
Just today.
I'm getting a pass today.
I'm not going to be in trouble.
No New York on me today.
That's right.
Tomorrow it's on like Donkey Kong.
So enjoy it while it lasts.
Now that you live in Pennsylvania, why do you still keep the New York accent?
Why don't you get rid of it?
Why not?
Why can't I be me?
Why you got to hate?
Not hating.
You're just jealous because you lost yours.
That's okay.
When you get tired, it still comes out.
Don, what's on your mind?
Still love the steak and cheese soaps, so it's okay to keep the accent.
No, thank you.
Seriously, what everybody's been talking about a lot is the use of the auto pen.
And what's got me wondering is if they're looking into the investigation of the auto pen being used to cancel the oil, the natural gas shipments to Europe, which gave Russia the power over Europe to start the war that they started.
I mean, Joe Biden gave an interview, said he didn't even know they canceled the natural gas shipments.
And, you know, him not knowing, again, gave Russia all the power in the world to supply the natural gas to Europe.
And when Germany protested against their buildup against Ukraine, Putin just told them, you either mind your own business or we'll shut off the gas and freeze your people.
And that was all what I've read, you know, as true facts.
There's a lot happening this week as it relates to, you know, the president has done everything humanly possible to make a deal with Vladimir Putin.
Now, there are, you know, we're expecting the ceasefire.
We now know the president has authorized monies to go to NATO for Ukrainian defense if they choose to so use it that way.
And this is not, these are not freebies.
They're going to pay for the they're going to pay for all of it, the munitions that they're going to buy.
I think that's very, very smart.
And, you know, I think we've got to get to the bottom of all of this, to be honest.
Absolutely.
And like I said, I think that in itself is huge, just to find out, you know, was the auto pen used for that purpose?
Because if I'd like to know.
I mean, look, this became a proxy war under Biden and Harris of the U.S. versus Putin.
It never should have evolved into that.
And Joe Biden sat idly by, did nothing as Putin was amassing troops and his military might on the border with Ukraine and was asked, well, what happens if they invade?
Well, it depends if it's a minor incursion.
And look at the result.
It's been a disaster.
Anyway, Don and I, we appreciate your call, buddy.
Thank you.
God bless you.
That's going to wrap things up for today.
Hannity tonight, nine Eastern Fox News.
We are back.
We have the Hannity White House briefing with Caroline Levitt, Lindsey Graham.
The battle against Russia continues as the president threatens to cut off Russia from the world, from world trade by imposing 100% tariffs and giving and selling weaponry to NATO.
Also, is it true?
Is it possible?
We'll ask John Solomon and James Comer.
The FBI opens a grand conspiracy probe on the weaponization, the last 10 years of the deep state's treatment of Donald Trump.
How important is this?
I think very John Solomon, James Comer, Ted Cruz, Jimmy Fela, Nine Eastern, Sayyidi DBR.