All Episodes
Previous Next
March 21, 2025 - Sean Hannity Show
34:17
Woke Judges - March 20th, Hour 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart podcast.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markowitz and I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
When we're coming to your city, we're going to play our guitars and say you are contrasting.
We'll all be in dying higher than a jail I know.
And if you want a little bang in your yin yang, come along.
The alternative is cut off the government spending.
And here's what would happen if we cut off government spending.
It would be devastation like we have never seen.
Worse than we're seeing now?
Much.
Democrats, call your office.
You know where March Madness Times, terrible, terrible, terrible, to quote the great Charles Barkley.
Once you have a president who's just disregarding what judges say, you're in a totally lawless state.
Freedom is back in style.
Welcome to the revolution.
Yeah, we're coming to your city.
Gonna play our guitars and say you are contrasting.
Sean Hennity.
The new Sean Hennity Show.
More behind the scenes information on breaking news and more bold, inspired solutions for America.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, news roundup, information overload hour toll-free.
Our number is 800-941.
Sean, if you want to be a part of the program, I think our friend Miranda Devine of the New York Post summed it up extraordinarily well.
And that is that Donald Trump is fighting a cartel of vile, corrupt, far-left judges trying to kill his campaign promises.
Caroline Levitt, the White House press secretary, ripping this partisan judge over President Trump's migrant flights, illegal immigrants, in this case, linked to Trende Aragua, the violent gang now labeled a domestic terrorist organization.
And then we have a whole laundry list of background on the judges that have been blocking key Trump executive orders.
And we see that many of them have a history of left-wing activism and Democratic donations.
The Biden-appointed judge blocking transgender military, that band used to be an anti-Trump legal activist.
Trump's attorney general claims this judge in this particular case as it relates to deportations.
And she's right.
And we went through the four private prior presidents that have used the Alien Enemies Act to deport people and the Supreme Court decision in 1948 that absolutely upheld that law in a landmark decision that you think John Roberts would be aware of.
And the AG, Pam Bondi, is fighting back as hard as she can.
The federal judge temporarily blocking the Trump administration from reclaiming the billion-dollar climate grants that have been out there.
This is the same judge in this particular case that was involved with Jack Smith in the case on January 6th.
It just never seems to end.
And we have a list of the Obama judges who are working to sabotage Trump's agenda and a Biden-appointed judge blocking Trump's Pentagon from banning transgender troops.
And they're stopping what the American people voted for.
Now, Governor DeSantis, my governor, had a great idea and others have discussed it.
We've discussed it as well.
He very articulately laid it out on X. Congress has the authority to strip the jurisdiction of the federal courts to decide these cases in the first place.
Sabotaging President Trump's agenda by resistant judges or resistance judges is predictable.
Why are there no jurisdictions stripping bills teed up?
You can't have all these local judges, in most cases, unelected, unaccountable to the American people that are just ruling by executive fiat and taking away a president's power, a duly elected president's power to do the job the American people sent him to Washington to do.
Now, Pam Pondi spoke out about this, and here's what she had to say: Is there something you can do, or do you need the Supreme Court here to play ball to get this going quickly, to get resolution?
Yeah, well, we will appeal through the process, but we do anticipate getting there quickly.
Yes, we do need the Supreme Court.
We anticipate that because many of these lawsuits, of course, are filed right here in D.C. Many of these injunctions, these liberal activist judges are based right here.
These judges who have no right to control President Trump's agenda.
But yeah, of course, we need the Supreme Court.
We will get there.
We will get there fast and we will prevail.
Now, Pam Bondi also is not the only one in the administration that has spoken out.
Mike Waltz defending the deportations to El Salvador, a wholesale shift of what a terrorist is.
And he is correct.
Why is this being done to protect you, the American people?
We see what has happened with gangs like Trende Aragua.
We have known terrorists, murderers, rapists, cartel members, gang members in our country.
We've got to be able to deport them.
The president has the authority to do it as codified by the U.S. Supreme Court and by precedent.
We had 9-11 to begin thinking about Al-Qaeda like the terrorists that they are.
Trende Agua has been labeled a terrorist organization.
They are no different than ISIS.
They maim, kill, torture, create mayhem chaos on our streets in the United States.
And I think if you had some of those tattooed, shaved-head men labeled ISIS, then we wouldn't even be having this debate.
So this is about a wholesale shift on what a terrorist is and how they should be treated in the United States, how they should be treated when they're attacking our soil and when they're violating our sovereignty and when they're terrorizing our citizens.
All right, joining us now is the Attorney General of South Carolina, and that's Alan Wilson, who is with us.
And a group of Republican state attorneys general is filing an amicus brief at the U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C., urging the circuit court to reverse a judge's order to block Donald Trump from deporting the alleged Trende Aragua gang members and basically saying, one AG saying these judges are basically supporting foreign terrorist organizations over the safety of the American people.
And by the way, these are, you know, all this is all connected to Democrats, all of it, because what they cannot get done electorally at the ballot box, what they cannot get done legislatively, they race to these activist judges.
They go judge shopping, and this is how they're trying to stop in its tracks the agenda that Donald Trump was elected to enforce.
Anyway, Mr. Attorney General, welcome back.
Good to have you.
It's great to be with you, Sean.
Thanks for having me.
Well, I think that we could put a final end to it if Republicans would unite behind Governor DeSantis and his idea, and other people have had the idea as well, and just put this to rest once and for all, and they won't have jurisdiction.
Although, you know, it's frustrating when you have a 1948 Supreme Court ruling on this very topic, and in that very ruling, it says that they don't even have a right to judicial review, and that raises the question, what part of Supreme Court precedent and what part of that ruling John Roberts didn't understand.
Well, Sean, I want to remind people that Trendi Aragua, the gang at the center of this, is a gang that has actually been stood up and supported by the Maduro regime in Venezuela.
So this is not a domestic terrorist organization.
While they may be doing domestic terrorism, they're a foreign terrorist organization as designated by the Trump administration.
So that makes them foreign actors of a foreign government, which supports the Alien Enemies Act arguments that have been made by the Trump administration.
Last summer, there were no TDA in South Carolina, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration officials I met with.
Now they're all over our state.
So this is why me and other 25 other state AGs are very concerned that a single court of federal district court judges trampling all over the president's Article II powers to be able to engage in foreign affairs and promote national security.
You know, we can't do this without President Trump and his team, and so that's why we're doing what we're doing right now in federal court.
Well, I hope you're successful at it.
Now, the problem is, is this has gone to the D.C. Court of Appeals, and I appreciate the fact that you've put forward this brief along with the other attorneys general.
However, I don't really feel the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is the best venue for you, and I would imagine that the odds are probably against you.
Well, my aim, my target is the U.S. Supreme Court.
I mean, we have a 6-3 court that 90% of the time gets it right.
Not 100% of the time, but I think we've got a legitimate shot here of getting this to the U.S. Supreme Court where the Supreme Court can underscore the President's Article II powers and his federal statutory power, which was the codification of the Alien Enemies Act.
That's Title 50 that we've been talking about that allows the President to push back against predatory incursions by agents of foreign governments, which is what TDA is.
And so getting this to the Supreme Court, I think, is what our ultimate goal is, not the Court of Appeals and the D.C. Circuit.
Well, I think that that probably is a good strategy on your part, and I appreciate all of that.
What are the main arguments you're going to make?
Because I think the 1948 Supreme Court precedent should pave the way for their decision.
And by the way, and by the way, two of the four presidents, you know, we're not doing this during wartime, and the president is saying that this is an illegal invasion.
No, no, you're absolutely right.
I couldn't agree with you more.
I mean, our arguments are very simple.
I mean, obviously, if you look at the U.S. Constitution and the court's prior interpretations of the Article II powers of the President, they're very broad.
They're very wide.
They allow the President in areas of foreign policy and national security to have unfettered discretion to go ahead and do things like this.
This judge and courts and other judges like him have no more right to go to the Pentagon and tell generals That they can't fire missiles at enemy combatants or direct troop movements in a foreign battlefield, and they can tell the president of the United States he can't remove, you know, enemy combatants or foreign terrorists.
There's no difference than if Osama bin Laden was being taken out of the United States, in my opinion.
So that is our legal argument on this issue.
Well, I think the legal arguments are on solid ground.
How would you, what would the other arguments be if this does eventually make it up to the Supreme Court?
What are the other arguments you think you can make?
Well, I mean, honestly, Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution, Title 50, Section 21 of the Alien Enemies Act, I mean, are the two primary arguments, but also not, you know, the respect for presidential authority that the TRO, this temporary restraining the judge order gave is the wrong remedy.
I mean, these people are being basically about whether they have a hearing before they're deported or, you know, after they're deported.
The point is, is they're being deported no matter what, and they are stopping the federal, the federal government is being stopped by judges from removing foreign terrorist actors that are being stood up by a foreign government regime in Venezuela from being removed from the United States.
This is the kind of stuff that is putting our citizenry in harm's way.
This is having a negative impact on public safety.
And so the court needs to allow the executive branch to execute the laws and get the federal district court judges out of the business of being law enforcement officers or enforcement agents.
Yeah, well said.
Anyway, we're going to keep up with this case.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, South Carolina, thank you and thanks to the other 24 AGs around the country that are joining with you to put an end to this so that the president can enact his agenda that he was duly elected to enact.
And I find this, you know, this is a common tactic of the left.
We appreciate your time, sir.
Thank you, Sean.
800-941-Sean is our number if you want to be a part of the program.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Ham, and I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass, you're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down at Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
All right, let's get to our busy phones.
John is in the great state of Arkansas.
John, hi, how are you?
Glad you called, sir.
I'm great.
How about yourself, sir?
Hey, I got a question.
I'm good.
Not a question, more of a statement.
It seems like to me that the Democrats are kind of like, it's like a marriage when one person is cheating on the other.
They're telling you what they're doing.
And it sounds so outlandish.
Like, like, say, like when all the Democrats wouldn't stand up and clap for that kid during the speech that president gave, and they were told, you know, don't do this.
But they're all sitting there saying, you guys are Nazi.
Trump is Hitler.
Well, when you're being told not to do something and you do it, even knowing in your heart that, hey, you know what?
Let's stand up for this kid.
I mean, I don't care if they don't like anybody else.
That kid has no partisan.
And the other thing, another thing that they're telling is like Maxine Waters.
She's like, Trump is going to start a civil war.
No, ma'am.
It is you that are going to start the Civil War with all your rhetoric.
If you would just tone that down, bring it back, because I don't know what these people are burning up these Tesla stations and shooting stuff.
I don't know where they're getting their news from, but I mean, I think common sense would be going, hey, let's not do this.
This is a crime.
And all for saving money.
I don't get this.
I don't get it either.
Except that I can say is that they have totally, completely gone off the rails.
I've never seen a party disintegrate like this before our eyes.
And I've been doing this a long time.
And in many ways, if that's their path, let them do it.
You know, there's been one Democrat that I can now name that has a Tesla manufacturing center in his district, Rokana, that said, please stop doing this.
This has got to stop.
No other prominent Democrat has spoken out against the violence and the domestic terrorism.
And if they don't have the soul and the spirit and the conscience and the heart to stand for mothers that lost their children, a young man that won his battle against cancer and has dreams, or the wife of a slain hero officer, or a young man who lost his father that was informed he's going to West Point.
If they can't stand for the first lady and they can't stand for the president of the United States, and they want to play bingo and they want to stand up for men and women's sports and their rights to do so, and they want to stand for the rights of illegals, even trende Aragua members over the safety of Americans, and they want to be the party that spends hundreds of billions in waste fraud and abuse and liberal activism abroad, then let them be that party.
And if they're going to be the party that sits silently while Tesla dealerships are destroyed and we run the risk that hardworking Americans are going to lose their career jobs at dealerships, at manufacturing centers, mechanics are going to be out of work, let them be that party.
I'd rather be the party of the hardworking men and women, which is why we have our Tesla contest.
And by the way, you can win a free Tesla on this show.
Proudly, we're giving it away.
And every day, you can register.
You can register once a day, every day, when you enter the keyword when you go to Hannity.com.
It's that simple.
Today's word of the day is freedom.
Just go to Hannity.com, go on the contest page, and it will take you to the entrance page.
And you put in a way we can contact you, and you put in the word of the day freedom, and you've just given yourself a chance to win the Tesla of your choice.
Okay?
And we're going to stand up for what's right.
You know, the people that work for Tesla, I don't know anything about their politics.
You know, all I know is they make the most American car on the road, and it is one of the most innovative machines I've ever seen.
It's incredible.
And I'm like, if you prefer a different car, fine.
But if you want a free one, I'm buying it myself and I'm giving it away on this show.
And am I going to be able to save Tesla?
No.
Am I going to hopefully send a message that what is happening is just morally repugnant, evil, and wrong?
Yes, I'm going to send a loud message.
Anyway, my friend, thank you.
800-941 Sean is on number if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, quick break, right back, and we will continue on the other side.
800-941 Sean is on number if you want to be a part of the program.
Keeping Uncle Sam accountable to you every day.
Hannity is on.
All right, let's get to our busy phones as we say hi to Jim in Tennessee.
What's up, Jim?
How are you?
Glad you called.
What part of Tennessee are you in?
We're in West Tennessee, Sean.
It's great to be alive and living in the volunteer state, sir.
Yes, sir.
Go Vols.
I'm sure you're a big volunteer fan.
And my wife and I are both grads.
We're playing tonight.
But Sean, I really, why did I know that?
How did I have that insight?
I just assumed.
I know how popular they are in Tennessee.
What's on your mind today?
Well, I really had two things to share.
Number one is very short.
There's a lot being said by the left about Elon Musk not being duly elected.
And I would just, it's never been said that I've heard that all these activist judges that are these federal judges that are going against President Trump's programs, they're not duly elected either.
They were appointed as well.
And I fail to see it just seems like a lot of hypocrisy there.
And with respect to Elon Musk, I would just tell you that my wife and I owe him a lot.
And this will take 30 seconds.
I know you're busy.
But in the fall of 2013, my wife and I were in the Oakland, San Fran area.
We drove by the Tesla factory there when we were out on the road.
And I suggested that we go find a dealer and drive one.
And we did.
I'm an engineer, and the tech was just amazing, even back there in 2013.
We considered, strongly considered, buying one then.
But with us living in kind of rural Tennessee, lack of infrastructure, we decided against it.
But I just couldn't shake that idea of what a neat tech product it was.
So about two weeks after we returned, I talked to my wife.
Listen, I want to be honest.
I was ignorant about how great this product is.
And, you know, I was kind of resistant to the idea of the government forcing electric vehicles into our driveways.
But I've always said that I'm pro-choice.
In other words, if you want to drive an electric vehicle, drive one.
If you want to drive a hybrid, I once had a hybrid, drive it.
If you want a gas-powered vehicle, then stay with your gas-powered vehicle.
And I always believed in freedom of choice.
And I didn't like the fact that the government was pressuring companies like Ford and GM to invest billions and billions of dollars into an EV program that was not the car that their customers wanted or that they are the business they wanted to be in.
And Ford lost one year, $4.5 billion.
And if they continue to lose money like that, then high-paying career jobs are going to be lost.
And so I said, stop it.
Tesla wants to be in this business.
Now I've gotten a little bit more informed.
And now that we have our Tesla giveaway and I know a lot more about the car, it's the most American-made car on the road.
And in terms of parts and labor and everything else, number one.
Number two, self-driving technology is the most incredible thing I've ever experienced.
It is amazing.
You just put a new destination.
Let's say you have your car parked.
You don't need a valet.
All you do, you can call your car and have it come to you and pick you up.
I mean, how cool is that?
And it just is, it goes from zero to 60 in 2.0 seconds, not 0.2, which I said to Elon, and a lot of people made fun of me.
And more importantly, it's got over 1,000 horsepower.
This thing is a, and I love muscle cars.
And this thing even beat my favorite Z06 in a drag race.
And it's on videotape.
I'm like, wow, because that's a killer car.
It really is by GM.
And so, you know, what has this man done to incur this kind of hatred?
And the answer is nothing.
He has done a lot of good for this country.
And he helped President Trump win.
And he's helping save us money.
And he saved these astronauts.
And he helped the people in North Carolina, in your state of Tennessee, and the people in California after the wildfires.
And he's got one of the most innovative plans in terms of AI technology to help cure, you know, help people that are blind to see and people with spinal cord injuries maybe to walk again.
I hope he's successful.
And I'm like, why is he hated?
Because he likes Trump and because he's identifying all the corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse in Washington.
And if we don't do this now, we're not going to save our country.
And to me, I just hate what they're doing to this man.
I hate it.
I hate what they're doing to his employees.
I don't want to see these people lose their jobs.
And if this continues, if this domestic terrorism continues, they will lose their jobs.
There'll be no choice.
And they want to drive him out of business.
And there's a lot of unsavory money behind this.
This is not an accident.
That's why I went after that jackass.
Jimmy Kim only thought he was being funny about it on his low-rated, soon-to-be-canceled late-night comedy show.
Does Mickey Mouse really approve the inclusive Disney brand?
Does Bob Iger approve of that type of quote humor, if you want to call it that?
Because there's nothing funny about domestic terrorism to me.
Nothing.
Well, I agree with all that, sir.
And so anyway, last year when Elon Musk came out to support my man for president, my wife and I decided to go buy a Model S plaid.
So we were a bit ahead of you on that, Sean.
But we purchased it last year at 2024.
It's just an amazing car, as you have said.
It's amazing.
And my friends have been telling me, and I'm just like, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, I just hadn't been paying attention to it.
And they're like, you don't know what you're doing.
And now.
Under two seconds, you know, zero to 60.
And so what that says to me is if these folks that think they can embarrass me or threaten me into selling this car, you know, they truly are candidates for a drug test.
I am so proud to be a Tesla owner, and I'm so glad that last year my wife and I bought this car.
Fantastic car, fantastic performance.
I think it's the most innovative car on the road.
I mean, its innovation is amazing.
And I'm glad you called.
I'm glad you're letting people know there's a reason why I'm buying a Tesla for one lucky listener.
And I hope people, every day, you can go to Hannity.com.
You can have a chance every day from now until April 11th.
Every day, I'll give you the word of the day.
You go to Hannity.com and you enter that word.
Today's word is freedom.
And you can enter once a day, every day, until the end of the contest.
And then I'm going to give away the car.
Okay.
And I feel like Oprah giving away cars on the show.
But, you know, it's, to me, it's important that we stand up for people that are being bullied, that are victims of this terrorism, and for the rights of their workers to continue in their jobs.
Well, he's cutting jobs at the federal.
Those are jobs that are being cut are jobs that never should have been in existence.
Anyway, I appreciate the call, my friend, John in my free state of Florida.
What's up, John?
How are you?
If this God you love so much, who you deem as a loving God, really exists in actuality, God is pure evil.
And I'll give you one illustration that breaks my heart.
First of all, that's a judgment on your part, but go ahead.
It's a statement.
Yeah, a fact.
I believe.
The fact in your mind, I disagree with it, so it's not a fact, but go ahead.
Okay.
Well, there's a commercial for St. Jude's Children's Cancer Hospital that shows a little baby girl, about two years old, running with her backpack to greet her dad.
Your God gave this poor child leukemia, and she is dying.
She went into a hospital to be saved by humans, not by the God who gave her the cancer.
It's a commercial that breaks your heart.
There are many children who are born deformed with horrible diseases that kill them slowly and painfully.
Babies who are born dead, stillborn.
Your evil God created to not even begin.
All right, I get where you're going.
So basically, it's an age-old question, and that is, why do hard, difficult, challenging things happen to good people?
That's what you're asking me, or in this case, to innocent children.
Why does that happen?
I wish I had a good answer for you.
I don't because I don't understand the mind of God, nor do I believe humankind is meant to understand the mind of God.
What I do know is this.
For you to be an atheist, you know, you talk about faith.
I look at the majesty of creation.
And what have we learned from science?
We've learned that there are universes within universes, within universes, and a level of perfection that is so deep and so profound that it is beyond human comprehension.
And I just acknowledge that there are things that we are not supposed to know or understand.
I do believe mankind is in a fallen condition and in need of salvation, and that that is part of the human experience.
And for you to be an atheist, you're making your judgments and you're free to do so.
You live in a free country.
And however, to believe that those universes within universes, within universes somehow magically created itself lends itself to the next question.
Where did the energy originate from?
If there's not a God that always has been, always is, I am sent me, if you will.
If there isn't a creator behind it, then you would have to believe that somehow energy existed on its own and that something can come from nothing and that all of a sudden it just collided together and created this perfect majestic creation that we only are beginning to understand the vastness of.
Sean.
And I believe that we are mind, body, and spirit, and that part of the challenges on this earth, and the Bible tells us this, that our challenges are meant to strengthen us and to draw us closer to our creator.
And everybody in this life, without exception, has challenges.
And I have found through the challenges in my life that it has brought me closer to God.
Can I speak now?
But you have to believe that something can come from nothing.
And I don't believe that.
Okay.
You talk about the perfection of the universe and the earth.
And why is Earth in a shooting gallery of huge space rocks?
Why did God create trillions of galaxies, each with 100 billion or more suns contained within them?
You didn't answer my question.
You're trying to answer a question with a question.
I'll ask you this.
How is it possible for all of that majesty to be created?
And where did that energy come from if there's not a creator?
Answer that question.
Well, astrophysicists who are extremely intelligent are exploring that question.
And hopefully.
So the answer is you don't have an answer.
And does it, now, what makes more sense that there's something beyond our understanding and comprehension that actually created the energy or your theory, which is that something can come from nothing?
I would say there is more logic and reason behind faith than there is behind your atheism and your judgment of God.
I don't judge God.
I just try to understand him better.
Okay, these suns exploding and dying.
Where did the energy come from?
You're not answering.
Let me finish.
I'm getting it.
Answer the question, and I'll let you finish.
It's a very violent universe, black holes that suck and destroy everything that comes within their game.
Where did the energy come from if there's not a creator?
You're not answering.
I just don't know.
We're exploring.
Okay, so your answer is you don't know.
And hence my proposition to you stands that you believe that something can come from nothing.
Energy and matter are interchangeable.
E equals MC squared, the astrophysicist.
I understand the speed of light.
I got it all.
But you're not answering my question.
How can I answer it?
Astrophysicists can't answer it, for God's sake.
So then, hence, back to my proposition to you.
For you to be an atheist, you have to believe something can come from nothing.
And I would argue scientifically, mathematically, if you're looking at the physics behind it, it is impossible for what you believe.
Now, at least an agnostic leaves open the possibility of a creator.
You're an atheist and you seem to just hate God and you judge God.
And if that's how you want to go through your life, you're free to do so.
I'm not going to try to convert you.
I'm not proselytizing to you.
I just think you lack all logic and common sense being applied to the issue of a God.
Okay, there are particles that form spontaneously out of nothing.
Look into it.
Why did God come?
Something can come from nothing.
That's your answer to me?
There are particles that come out.
Particles can just come out of nowhere with no source of energy.
Yes, they do.
Look into it.
Sean, why did God.
There's no looking into it.
What you said is complete BS.
It's not complete BS.
It's science.
It is scientifically impossible for something to come from nothing.
Another question for you.
Look into it.
I don't have time for your other question, but it was fun bouncing it back and forth with you.
But I appreciate you being with us.
800-941, Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
All right, that's going to wrap things up for today.
Tonight, Hannity on the Fox News channel, the dismantling of the Department of Education.
We're going to ask people to think out of the box.
How much better can we make education in America?
Bill Bennett, Kim Reynolds, Vivek Ramaswamy.
Also, Greg Jarrett, Nicole Parker, Senator Josh Hawley, Jim Jordan.
SetU DVR, 9 Eastern.
Hannity, Fox News.
We'll see you tonight.
Back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
Thanks for watching tonight.
And don't forget, Hannity.com, word of the day is freedom if you want to win a free Tesla.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markowitz, and I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media, and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
▲
Export Selection