All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 18, 2024 - Sean Hannity Show
30:55
Harris on Fox - October 17th, Hour 2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
We'll be right back.
We'll all be fired.
Highland of jail.
And if you want a little bang in your yin-yang, come along.
That's what caused inflation energy more than anything else, including their stupid spending on the Green New Deal.
One thing they've been saying, a lot of your presents get criticized.
You know, folks that you come off with uh very scripted.
They say you like to stick to your talking points, and some media says you had that would be called discipline.
Ooh.
Uh-huh.
Okay.
You have not had a conversation with Joe Biden since that happened.
Have you had a conversation too?
Nuts in Semno.
So I'm prayerful about it.
T minus 19 days until the presidential election.
Yeah, we are coming.
Don't play our guests and send you a conscious song.
From coast to coast.
From border.
From sea to shining sea.
Sean Hannity is on.
All right, thanks, Scott Channel.
Sean Hannity Show, 800 941 Sean is on number.
If you want to be a part of the program, I'd like the Federalist headline.
Fox News interview may have finally exposed Kamala Harris over at Town Hall.
Kamala's campaign is over after Fox News interview.
I don't want anybody to believe that, but certainly the joy is long gone.
That was not a joyful interview because she actually got pressed for the first time ever, even under very difficult circumstances.
And anyway, I want to play this, and then we'll talk about it in the final hour of the show today.
This is Rep Bear interviewing Kamala Harris last night.
Thank you.
It's good to be with you, Brett.
You know, voters tell pollsters all over the country and here in Pennsylvania that immigration is one of the key issues that they're looking at this election, and specifically the influx of illegal immigrants from more than 150 countries.
How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your administration has released into the country over the last three and a half years?
Well, I'm glad you raised the issue of immigration because I agree with you.
It is a it is a uh topic of discussion that people want to rightly have.
And you know what I'm gonna talk about.
Yeah, but do you just a number?
Do you think it's one million, three million?
Brett, let's just get to the point.
Okay, the point is that we have a broken immigration system that needs to be repaired.
So your Homeland Security Secretary said that 85% of apprehension.
I'm not finished.
We have a we have to be a good idea.
It's a rough estimate of six million people have been released into the country.
And let me just finish.
I'll get to the question, I promise you.
I was beginning to answer.
And when when you came into office, your administration immediately reversed a number of Trump border policies.
Most significantly the policy that required illegal immigrants to be detained through deportation, either in the U.S. or in Mexico.
And you switched that policy.
They were released from custody awaiting trial.
So instead, included in those were a large number of single men, adult men, who went on to commit heinous crimes.
So looking back, do you regret the decision to terminate remain in Mexico at the beginning of your administration?
At the beginning of our administration, within practically hours of taking the oath.
The first bill that we offered Congress, before we worked on infrastructure, before the Inflation Reduction Act, before the Chips and Science Act, before any before the bipartisan Safe Communities Act, the first bill, practically within hours of taking the oath, was a bill to fix our immigration system.
Yes, ma'am.
It was called the U.S. Citizen Citizenship Act of 2005.
Exactly 21.
It was essentially pathway to citizenship for the election.
Yes, ma'am.
But here but you have to let me finish.
You had the White House and the House and the Senate, and they didn't bring up residents.
And I'd like to finish.
Yes, ma'am.
We recognized from day one that to the point of this being your first question, it is a priority for us as a nation and for the American people.
And our focus has been on fixing a problem.
And from day one, then we have done a number of things, including to address our asylum system and put more resources, getting more judges, what we needed to do to tighten up penalties and increase penalties for illegal crossings.
What we needed to do to deal with points points of entry between border entry points.
That's the work we did, and we worked on supporting what was a bipartisan effort, including some of the most conservative members of the United States Congress to actually strengthen the border.
That border bill would have put 1,500 more border agents at the border, which is why I believe the border patrol agents supported the bill.
It would have allowed us to stem the flow of fentanyl coming into the United States, which is a scourge affecting people of every background, every geographic location in our country, killing people.
It would have allowed us to put more resources into prosecuting transnational criminal organizations, which I have done as the attorney general, former attorney general of a border state, a couple of things.
But let me just finish.
Six Democrats voted against that bill.
And Donald Trump learned about that bill and told them to kill it because he preferred to run on a problem instead of fixing a problem.
And in this election, this is rightly a discussion that the American people want to have.
And what they want are solutions, and they want a president of the United States who is not playing political games with the issue.
I hear you.
But actually is focused on fixing it.
Six Democrats voted against that bill.
It would have allowed 1.8 million illegal immigrants into the country a year.
A lot a lot of conservatives had a problem with it.
These are the six Democrats.
But more importantly, back to the original premise, Jocelyn Nungary, Rachel Morin, Lakin Riley, they are young women who were brutally assaulted and killed by some of the men who were released at the beginning of the administration, well before a negotiated bipartisan bill.
Former President Clinton actually referred to Lakin Riley Sunday campaigning for you in Georgia, saying if those men had been properly vetted, Lakin Riley probably would not have been killed.
So if it wouldn't have happened, this is well before any negotiation.
This is well before Donald Trump got involved in the politics.
This is a specific policy decision by your administration to release these men into the country.
So what I'm saying to you, do you owe those families?
An apology.
Let me just say, first of all, those are tragic cases.
There's no question about that.
There is no question about that.
And I can't imagine the pain that the families of those victims have experienced for a loss that should not have occurred.
So that is true.
It is also true that if a border security had actually been passed nine months ago, it would be nine months that we would have had more border agents at the border, more support for the folks who are working around the clock, trying to hold it all together to ensure that no future harm would occur.
And this election in 20 days will determine whether we have a president of the United States who actually cares more about fixing a problem, even if it is not to their political advantage in an election, because there was a solution, Brad.
Madam Vice President, it was a policy decision in the early part of your administration.
Take a listen.
Because of the Biden Harris administration open border policies catch and release, they were enrolled in the alternatives to detention program.
This meant that they were released into the United States.
It was not even a full three weeks later that they would take my daughter, Jocelyn Nungaree's life.
I believe the Biden Harris administration open border policies are responsible for the death of my daughter.
That's the early days.
So do you owe them an apology as well as I will tell you that I am so sorry for her loss.
I'm so sorry for her loss.
Sincerely.
But let's talk about what is happening right now with an individual who does not want to participate in solutions.
Let's talk about that as well.
But do you want to answer that?
In all fairness, I told you I feel awful for what she and her family have experienced.
During that time you said repeatedly that the border was secure.
When in your mind did it start becoming a crisis, I think it we've had a broken immigration system transcending, by the way, Donald Trump's administration even before.
I have no pride in saying that this is a perfect immigration system.
I've been clear, I think we all are that it needs to be fixed.
We need more j I was just down at the border talking with border agents, and they will tell you, and I'm sure you probably I know you investigate and you are a serious journalist.
They will tell you we need more judges.
We need to process we need to process those cases faster.
We need this support for those cases that should be prosecuted.
They need more resources, and Congress ultimately is the only place that that's gonna get fixed, Brett.
That's how this system works.
That's the premise of this question.
There were 90 plus executive orders that were rescinded in the first days.
Many of those were Trump border policies.
I'm not gonna stay here because there's other things to talk about.
But you frequently were talk to the border patrol union for support of that bipartisan bill, and they did.
They supported it.
But they also just endorsed Donald Trump and said you've been, quote, a failure with border security.
Why do you think they said that?
I think they're frustrated, and I get it.
They want support.
They want support, and that's what that border security bill would have done.
These guys down at the border, these men and women, they're working hard.
They're working around the clock.
I get it.
There's a lot of people that look back and what you said at 2019 when you first ran for president.
Uh and there have been changes, and you've talked about some of them.
When it comes to integrate immigration, you supported allowing immigrants in the country illegally to apply for driver's license, to qualify for free tuition at universities, to be enrolled in free health care.
Do you s still support those things?
Listen, that was five years ago, and I'm very clear that I will follow the law.
I have made that statement over and over again.
And as Vice President of the United States, that's exactly what I've done, not to mention before.
You, if that's the case, you chose a running mate, Tim Walls, who governor of Minnesota, who signed those very things into state law.
So do you support that?
We are very clear, and I am very clear, as is Tim Walls, that we must support and enforce federal law, and that is exactly what we will do.
So decriminalizing border crossings, like you said in 2019.
I I do not believe in decriminalizing border crossings, and I've not done that as vice president, and I will not do that as president.
So these are evolutions that you've had.
But let's be very clear.
I'm the only person who is running for president who has prosecuted transnational criminal organizations from the Sinaloa cartel to the Guadalajara quota cartel to people who have trafficked in guns, drugs, and human beings.
I have spent a significant part of my career going after people who present a threat to the safety of the American people and and cross our border with the intent of doing us harm and cross our border illegally, and I will do that work as vice president.
I take that work quite seriously.
This is a time when voters, especially here in Pennsylvania, are inundated with commercials and ads.
They just want it to stop because it's every commercial.
But many of them add noise, but a few of them seem to break through.
This particular one from the Trump campaign has gotten a lot of attention.
Kamala supports taxpayer-funded sex changes from prisoners.
For prisoners.
Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access.
So are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars to help prison inmates or detained illegal aliens to transition to another gender?
I will follow the law.
And it's a law that Donald Trump actually followed.
You're probably familiar with now it's a public report that under Donald Trump's administration, these uh surgeries were available to on a medical necess necessity basis to people in the federal prison system.
And I think frankly, that ad from the Trump campaign is a little bit of like throwing, you know, stones when you live in a glasshouse.
The Trump aides say that he never advocated for that prison policy and no gender transition surgery.
Yeah, no surgeries happened in this pregnancy.
Would you still advocate for using taxpayer dollars for gender reassignments?
I will follow the law.
Just as I I think that's a good thing.
You would have a say as president.
I like I said, I think it's real he spent twenty million dollars on those ads, trying to create a sense of fear in the voters because he actually has no plan in this election that is about focusing on the needs of the American people.
Whereas at twenty million dollars on that ad.
On an issue that as it relates to the biggest issues that affect the American people, is really quite remote.
And again, his policy was no different.
Look at where we are though.
My plans for the American people, I'm offering a plan to deal with affordable housing.
I'm offering a plan to deal with what we need to do to strengthen small businesses, which are the backbone of America's economy.
I am offering a plan that is about taking care of young parents and giving them the support they need.
My plans for the economy will strengthen the economy, as have been reviewed by sixteen Nobel laureates, uh Goldman Sachs, Moody's, and recently the Wall Street Journal, which have all studied our plans and have indicated my plans for our economy would strengthen our economy, his would make them weaker.
Why do you ignite inflation and invite a recession by the middle of next year?
Those are the facts.
Why do you think more people say they trust him on the economy than they trust you?
I think that when you look at an analysis of our plans for what we would do as President of the United States, it has been clear to those who study and understand how economic policy works that moving forward, because I do believe the American people are ready to turn the page on the divisiveness and the the type of rhetoric that has come out of Donald Trump.
People are ready to chart a new way forward, and they want a president who has a plan for the future, and a plan that is sound and will strengthen our country.
His plan would be, again, to give tax cuts to billionaires and the biggest corporations in our country and blow up our deficit.
All right, we'll take a quick break.
We'll come back.
More of the interview Brett Baier had last night on Fox with Kamala Harris did not go well for her.
We'll get some of your reaction in the final hour of the program today.
Nineteen days till election day.
Yeah, it's coming fast.
Quick break, right back more of the interview on the other side.
We'll have more with Brett Bear and his interview with Kamala Harris on the other side as we continue.
We are on the Sean Hannity Show, a place where free speech and the First Amendment are still alive and well.
Get your dose of independence and liberty every weekday, right here with Sean.
All right, 25 now to the top of the hour.
Toll free, our number is 800 nine four one Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program, we're gonna get your reaction and your calls in the final hour of the program today, uh, in terms of this disastrous uh day for Kamala Harris yesterday.
Why she's not going to the All Smith dinner tonight, I have no idea.
Well, a full coverage of that.
I hear it's going to be amazing.
Donald Trump will be speaking in my hour, nine PM Eastern on the Vox News Channel.
Uh, we will cover all of that start to finish.
You know, uh but before we get to back to the interview with Brett and Kamala and then later your calls.
Uh, you know, I get asked by a lot of people, you know, a lot of they they want to support companies that share their values.
Now, COIN is a visa card.
And here's the beauty of coin.
It's C O I G N dot com.
It is a visa card that supports your conservative values.
And many, many cards do not support your conservative values.
It is a conservative credit card.
And it was billed for conservatives by conservatives.
You can check it out.
Go to C O I G N dot com and with every transaction you advance conservative causes And charities, you even get to vote on what charities they donate to, no cost to you.
And coin is empowering all of us to take back our country with every swipe.
Uh it's a great looking card.
You're gonna love taking it out of your wallet or your purse or your pocketbook, whatever it happens to be.
It's bright red as we the people on the front.
is also accepted everywhere.
Visa is accepted.
It has 100% U.S.-based customer service.
It has consumer protections.
In other words, get woke out of your wallet.
What's in your wallet?
Well, you can say I'm getting woke out of my wallet.
Start earning cash back while fighting the liberal agenda today.
I applied for my card.
It's simple to do.
Just go to CoinC O I G N dot com.
Linda's applying for hers at C-O-I-G-N.com.
And be sure to select my last name, Hannity in the How did You Hear About Us section?
Just go to Coin C O I G N dot com.
All right, we'll get some of your reaction to the interview last night.
Uh the Al Smith dinner will have President Trump's remarks on Hannity Nine Eastern tonight.
Uh, but yet in the meantime, let's go back to this interview.
The first time ever, Kamala Harris was pressed, and they couldn't wait to race out of there, as I told you earlier.
Here's Brett Bear and Kamala.
It's interesting you said turn the page, Madam Vice President.
You were asked on two different shows last week, what, if anything you would do differently than President Biden.
Here's what you said.
Would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?
There is not a thing that comes to mind in terms of, and I've been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact.
Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be?
And what would say the same?
Sure.
Well, I mean, I'm obviously not Joe Biden.
Um that would be one change in terms of but also it I think it's important to say with you know 28 days to go, I'm not Donald Trump.
So you're not Joe Biden, you're not Donald Trump, but but nothing comes to mind that you would do differently.
Let me be very clear.
My presidency will not be a continuation of Joe Biden's presidency.
And like every new president that comes in to office, I will bring my life experiences, my professional experiences, and fresh and new ideas.
I represent a new generation of leadership.
I, for example, am someone who has not spent the majority of my career in Washington, D.C. I invite ideas, whether it be from the Republicans who are supporting me, who were just on stage with me minutes ago, and the business sector and others who can contribute to the decisions that I make about,
for example, my plan for increasing the supply of housing in America and bringing down the cost of housing, addressing the issue of small businesses, which is about working with the private sector to bring more capital and access to capital to our small business leaders, including my plan for a twenty-five thousand dollar down payment assistance for first-time home buyers and for small businesses extending the tax deduction from five thousand dollars to fifty thousand dollars.
I've heard a lot about those plans in in recent days.
Your campaign slogan is a new way forward, and it's time to turn the page.
You've been vice president for three and a half years.
So what are you turning the page from?
Well, first of all, turning the page from the last decade in which we have been burdened with the kind of rhetoric coming from Donald Trump that has been designed and implemented to divide our country and have Americans literally point fingers at each other.
Rhetoric and an approach to leadership that suggests that the strength of a leader is based on who you beat down instead of what we all know.
The strength of leadership is based on who you lift up.
The strength of an American president, which is one who understands that the vast majority of us have more in common than what separates us.
That is about turning the page on rhetoric that people are frankly exhausted of Brett.
More than 70% of people tell the country is on the wrong track.
They say the country is on the wrong track.
If it's on the wrong track, that track follows three and a half years of you being vice president and President Biden being president.
That is what they're saying.
Why are they saying that?
If you're turning the page, you've been in office for three and a half years.
And Donald Trump has been running for office.
But you've been the person holding the office.
You and I both know what I'm talking about.
You and I both know what I'm talking about.
I actually don't.
What are you talking about?
What I'm talking about is that over the last decade people have become power.
But listen, over the last decade, it is clear to me, and certainly the Republicans who are on stage with me, the former chief of staff to the President Donald Trump, uh the former defense secretaries, National Security Advisor, and his vice president.
One that he is unfit to serve, that he is unstable, that he is dangerous, and that people are exhausted with someone who professes to be a leader who spends full-time demeaning and and and engaging in personal grievances and it being about him instead of American people.
People are tired of that.
If that's the case, why is half the country supporting him?
Why is he beating you in a lot of swing states?
Why, if he is as bad as you say that half of this country is now supporting this person who could be the 47th president of the United States.
Why is that happening?
This is an election for President of the United States.
It's not supposed to be easy.
I know, but it's not a good thing.
It's not supposed to be.
So are they misguided, the 50 percent?
Are they stupid?
I would never say that about the American people.
And in fact, if you listen to Donald Trump, if you watch any of his rallies, he's the one who tends to demean and belittle and diminish the American people.
He's the one who talks about an enemy within within, an enemy within, talking about the American people, suggesting he would turn the American military on the American people.
We asked that question to the former president today, Harris Faulkner had a town hall, and this is how he responded.
I heard about that.
They were saying I was like threatening.
I'm not threatening anybody.
They're the ones doing the threatening.
They do phony investigations.
I've been investigated more than Alphonse Capone.
He was the greatest bank.
No, it's true.
We don't think of it.
It's called weaponization of government is a terrible thing.
So Brett, I I'm sorry, and with all due respect, that clip was not what he has been saying about the enemy within that he has repeated when he's speaking about the American people.
That's not what you just showed.
he was asked no no no that's not what you just showed in all fairness and respect to you the You didn't show that, and here's the bottom line.
He has repeated it many times.
And you and I both know that.
And you and I both know that he has talked about turning the American military on the American people.
He has talked about going after people who are engaged in peaceful protest.
He has talked about locking people up because they disagree with him.
This is a democracy.
And in a democracy, the President of the United States in the United States of America should be willing to be able to handle criticism without saying he'd lock people up for doing it.
And this is what is at stake, which is why you have someone like the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff saying what Mark Milley has said about Donald Trump being a threat to the United States of America.
He's quoted in the Bob Woodward book that way, yes.
Let me ask you this, Madam Vice President.
You call Donald Trump.
He's misguided.
You say now he's not a good thing.
He's unstable.
He is unstable, but he's not well.
You say he's mentally not stable.
He's not stable.
Let me ask you this.
You told many interviewers that Joe Biden was on his game, that ran around circles on his staff.
When did you first notice that President Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished?
Joe Biden, I have watched in from the Oval Office to the Situation Room, and he has the judgment and the experiment and experience to do exactly what he has done in making very important decisions on behalf of the American people.
Joe Biden is not on the ballot.
I understand Donald Trump.
But you talked about it.
And Donald Trump is.
After George Clooney said within a few minutes of talking to President Biden at a fundraiser that he thought this was not the same Joe Biden that we saw on the debate stage.
Donald Trump is on the ballot.
I understand.
You met with him at least once a week for three and a half years.
You didn't have any concerns.
I think the American people have a concern about Donald Trump, which is why the people who know him best, including leaders of our national security community, have all spoken out, even people who worked for him in the Oval Office,
worked with him in the situation room, and have said he is unfit and dangerous and should never be president of the United States again, including his former vice president, which is why the job was open for him to uh choose another running mate.
So that is a fact.
That is a fact.
Madam Vice President, two more things.
You were asked on 60 minutes about the biggest threat that the world faces, that the U.S. faces.
This is what you said.
Which foreign country do you consider to be our greatest adversary?
I think there's uh an obvious um one in mind, which is Iran.
Iran has American blood on their hands.
Okay.
This attack on Israel, 200 ballistic missiles.
Um, what we need to do to ensure that um Iran never achieves the ability to be a nuclear power.
That is one of my highest priorities.
A number of extra experts thought you would say China.
Um the FBI director had said that.
But you said Iran.
If that's the case, what do you say to critics?
Uh who look at the actions of your administration and say you're not acting like Iran is the number one threat.
Well, uh I will tell you most recently, whether it was in April or in October, and then several hours on each occasion, that Iran posed a threat to Israel.
I was there.
Uh most recently in the situation room and the most recent attack, working with the heads of our military and doing what America must always do to defend and to support Israel in its requirement to defend itself and to give American support to be able to allow Israel to have the resources to defend itself against attack,
including from Iran and Iran's terrorist proxies in the region.
Right.
And that is...
But those proxies were getting funded by the line.
And my commitment to that is unyielding and unwavering.
Critics just say that you either relaxed or failed to enforce sanctions on Iran, allowing all of this money to flow into Iran.
Let's go back to Donald Trump who pulled out of a deal that would have actually put But here Iran in check.
The estimates in billions.
During Donald Trump's administration, towards the Iran regime.
That we had an American military base that was attacked, where American soldiers suffered traumatic brain injuries, and Donald Trump dismissed them as headaches, not to mention how Donald Trump has treated and talked about America's military and military service people calling that it goes to the suffers and losers.
Hamas has diminished the significance we're talking over each other I apologize and I I wish I would like that we would have a a conversation that is grounded in full assessment of the facts, which includes I think this interview is supposed to be about the choices that your viewers should be presented about this election, and the contrast is important.
Yes, ma'am.
▲
Export Selection