Sean Hannity Show - Jonathan Harounoff - December 29th, Hour 3

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 30, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show

39:52

Jonathan Harounoff - December 29th, Hour 3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart Podcast.
	You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
	We got you.
	I'm Carol Markowitz.
	And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	We've been around the block in media, and we're doing things differently.
	Normally is about real conversations.
	Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
	We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
	Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So Dell a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	When I told people, I was making a podcast about Benghazi.
	Nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked why.
	Benghazi, the truth became a web of lies.
	From Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries, this is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	Welcome back to the Sean Hannity show.
	I'm Greg Jarrett filling in for Sean.
	In this last hour, I invite you to pick up my new book, The Constitution of the United States and Other Patriotic Documents.
	It's a compilation of 65 of the most important addresses, speeches, letters, and documents in more than 200 years of our esteemed heritage.
	And you know, the this is a tribute to the great patriots who made America this beacon of hope for prosperity and freedom, for justice and for liberty.
	And it's, you know, frankly, it's something that students on college campuses should be reading.
	As they have held hundreds of protests since the October 7th Hamas attacks on Israelis, innocent civilians, women and children, murdered, slaughtered.
	And yet, so many of these demonstrations, they're not just pro-Palestinian, they are pro-Hamas, glorifying terrorism.
	And these students need to learn something about our great country and what it stands for, and the cherished liberties that allow them to demonstrate even sentiment that may be fundamentally wrong.
	And so uh the book is called The Constitution of the United States and Other Patriotic Documents.
	And while we're on this subject, I'd like to invite into the conversation Jonathan Haranoff.
	He recently graduated from Harvard, and he penned an op-ed last month that got her attention.
	You can read it in the Jewish News Syndicate.
	It's entitled, As Jewish Students, We Are No Longer Safe on Our U.S. Campuses.
	Jonathan holds a Bachelor of Arts, a Master's from the University of Cambridge, also an MS from Columbia Journalism School.
	He's currently the communications director for the Jewish Institute for National Security of America.
	And Jonathan, thank you for taking the time to speak with us, and I commend you on a courageous uh column that you wrote.
	And let's talk about it for a little bit.
	You know, we would all expect that students and faculty on American campuses would denounce in unison the horrific atrocities of October 7th by Hamas terrorists.
	But the denunciation, Jonathan, didn't happen.
	Instead, academics seem to celebrate Hamas while vilifying Israel and blaming Jews, even accusing Israel of genocide for their justifiable act of self-defense.
	It's shocking, isn't it, Jonathan?
	The level of anti Semitism on college and university campuses.
	Thanks very much for having me on the show, Greg.
	And yes, it is shocking.
	It's disappointing.
	And if we go back to October 7th and look at the barbaric acts of Hamas, um, you know, it's also obviously shocking and disgusting, but it's not necessarily surprising because all you have to do is look at Article 7 of Hamas's founding charter.
	And it's explicit in what it as a terrorist organization wants to do to the Jewish people.
	It's genocidal intentions are plainly laid out there, and they were never a secret.
	So in some ways, October the 7th was, you know, shocking, outrageous, but it wasn't necessarily surprising.
	What was surprising to me and to many students that I've spoken to was the gleeful celebration of what had happened on October 7th across American campuses, not a month after, not after Israel had launched any sort of um air offensive or ground offensive.
	It was on the day of the day after October 7th, and that was what really shocked students to see student organizations at some of our most elite institutions blame Israel exclusively for the beheadings, murder, rapings, mutilations and kidnappings of Israelis.
	To blame Israelis for that is, you know, unforgivable, really.
	Yeah, I there's a part of me that just thinks these students are completely ignorant.
	They've probably uh never read the Hamas doctrine, which is to uh destroy Israel and kill all Jews.
	I maybe they don't know that.
	But where do you think their anti Semitic hatred comes from, Jonathan?
	Does it emanate from professors and academic leadership and administrators who have indoctrinated or brainwashed students?
	I mean, as you point out in your op ed, one professor at Cornell said he was exhilarated by the murder of hundreds of Jews.
	And this is the kind of person who's teaching young people.
	So is this anti-senimenti uh anti-Semitism learn behavior?
	I think social media highlights just how rampant anti-Semitism is.
	You mentioned the Cornell professor, that that was a video that went very viral, and you it's concerning that those are the people teaching our students.
	But I think that the fact that anti-Semitism and conspiracies and all sorts of harmful, untrue content is allowed to proliferate and is proliferating online and is what many of the students on at these elite universities use, you know, in instead of textbooks.
	That that's also pretty concerning, um, Greg.
	I I recall a time when, you know, in order to get gain entry to places like Harvard, Columbia, Yale, you know, you had to study really hard, you had to have a very strong foundation in in all sorts of knowledge, and nowadays, based on the behavior and the knowledge or the lack of knowledge that I've seen from any of these students.
	Um I I'm really questioning that.
	And what um one thing that really uh came to mind that I found particularly enlightening was a Wall Street Journal piece recently that polled uh, I think 200, 250 students who were taking part in many of these protests, and they asked them a very simple question.
	It wasn't an unfair question, it wasn't a loaded question.
	They asked them, they asked students who were chanting from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
	They were just asking them which river are you referring to, which sea are you referring to?
	And they didn't know.
	It's great uh were completely baffling.
	You know, most people gave answers like the River Nile or the Dead Sea or the Euphrates, all sorts of extremely bizarre responses.
	Some people thought that it didn't really matter, like knowledge no longer matters.
	Fact truth doesn't matter anymore.
	We know that Israel is an apartheid state.
	Um, and that was more than enough for them to take part in these protests where um there were explicit calls for genocide, and in uh in answer to your earlier question, I think um, you know, uh the schools that where many of these protests are taking part, the administrators should be doing a lot more in order to prevent what's happening.
	And the congressional testimony that we saw earlier this month is absolutely outrageous.
	And if I were if we're talking about Harvard and President Gay's conduct at that testimony, if I were to give her a grade, it would be an F. Yeah, I mean, i and it wasn't just Gray, uh Gay, uh Claudine Gay.
	It it was three university presidents, Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania.
	They all testified before Congress.
	Their refusal to condemn calls for the genocide of Jews and whether it would violate the university's code of conduct was, I think, a wake-up call for many Americans to see just how demented the leaders are at some of these esteemed institutions of learning.
	I mean, that's what you're talking about, right?
	It's concerning because many of these Ivy League institutions are or are meant to be places of enlightenment and supposed supposed safe spaces for students, but they really have unfortunately some of them become poison ivies and safe spaces for for hatred,
	for Jew hatred, and and by not explicitly condemning the mass genocide or just the genocide of Jewish people of any people, the inability to do that by your leader is uh you know speaks volumes of of your character and it makes Jewish students extremely unsafe.
	The students that I've spoken to at Harvard at Columbia, all these universities, you were no longer talking about uh you know being afraid to express support for Israel.
	We're talking about being afraid to wear your kippah, your couple, your yarmika in public or having a mezuzah on your door, just being outwardly Jewish.
	And these are not fears that Jewish students should have at elite universities in the 21st century.
	I want to quote any university for that matter.
	I want to quote from your op ed uh because it was elegantly and eloquently written.
	Uh if large groups of their classmates can justify and celebrate the mass slaughter of Jews, then Jews are no longer safe on campus.
	If their own professors join this carnival of Judeophobic hatred, then Jews are no longer safe on campus.
	End of quote.
	So let me ask you directly, Jonathan, how unsafe is it for Jews today on American campuses.
	It could be a lot safer.
	Right now, there is a lot of uneasiness and it's not unjustified or unfounded at all.
	There have been plenty of incidents of violence against Jewish students across U.S. campuses.
	And when you when you speak of Cornell, for example, when students are told not to dine at Kosher Dining Hall, because another student had posted on a on a uh forum that they wanted to, you know, rape Jewish students and and shoot up you know Jews of the college, that is extremely telling and concerning.
	And and I think Jewish students are fully right to be concerned, and more much more should be done.
	And um thing that I think should be done is student safety should become a factor in the college rankings of you know respected publications, and because I think the most effective way to keep students safe, including Jewish students, of course, but let's not forget them, is to align a university's stated intention to protect its student and its desire for a higher national ranking.
	Yeah.
	You know, uh what's so ironic, Jonathan is that students and faculty both seem to love to demean America and its freedoms, while at the same time they enjoy the freedom to preach hatred, which is protected speech, and they they don't recognize their own hypocrisy.
	And their favored phrase on campuses is colonizers.
	To blame Israel and by extension, Western nations like the United States who are allies.
	There's ample evidence that students here are being taught to hate America, to hate capitalism, to hate our prosperous way of life.
	And all you have to do is look at these ugly demonstrations on college campuses.
	Photographs and videos are everywhere.
	Or go off campus, walk the streets of New York City and Los Angeles.
	You can see it for yourself.
	What I've noticed is that the rhetoric is not so much pro-Palestinian, but pro-Hamas.
	It's in their signs that they hold up.
	The chance that they utter on the streets.
	These protesters are glorifying a heinous terrorist organization, aren't they?
	They are.
	And or at least some of them are.
	Let me let me just reiterate that there is, and I'm sure you'll agree with this, Greg, that there is absolutely nothing wrong with peaceful protests, and it's you know a core pillar of of any democracy, including America.
	Um it's it's an important part of any thriving democratic society, but there is a very clear difference between peaceful protests calling for peaceful outcomes and very sinister modern anti-Semitism camouflaging itself, or sometimes not even camouflaging itself behind the guise of a social justice movement or a protest movement.
	Um what we're seeing today by many students is a combination of visceral hatred and ignorance, and students just using catchphrases from you know TikToks that they've seen and them not taking the time to to do their proper studies to read up on you know the history instead of what Jonathan.
	I'm afraid we're gonna have to leave it there.
	Jonathan Haranoff, thank you very much.
	We'll be right back.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass, you're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
	What I told people I was making a podcast about Benghazi.
	Nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked, why?
	Benghazi, the truth became a web of lies.
	It's almost a dirty word, one that connotes conspiracy theories.
	Will we ever get the truth about the Benghazi massacre?
	Bad faith, political warfare, and frankly, bullshit.
	We kill the ambassador just to cover something up.
	You put two and two together.
	Was it an overblown distraction or a sinister conspiracy?
	Benghazi is a rosetta stone for everything that's been going on for the last 20 years.
	I'm Leon Navok from Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries.
	This is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Locker up.
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So Delaware, verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	Hey there.
	I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
	What I told people, I was making a podcast about Benghazi.
	Nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked, why?
	Benghazi, the truth became a web of lies.
	It's almost a dirty word.
	One that connotes conspiracy theory.
	Will we ever get the truth about the Benghazi massacre?
	Bad faith, political warfare, and frankly, bullshit.
	We kill the ambassador just to cover something up.
	You put two and two together.
	Was it an overblown distraction or a sinister conspiracy?
	Benghazi is a rosetta stone for everything that's been going on for the last 20 years.
	I'm Leon Nafok from Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries.
	This is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Locker up.
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So Dow, verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	And welcome back to the Sean Hannity Show.
	I'm Greg Gerrett, Fox News legal analyst filling in for Sean, who has a couple of days off.
	Richly deserved, I might say.
	We're going to be getting to your phone calls in just a few minutes.
	Our number is 1-800-941-7326.
	Again, that number is 800-941-SHAWN.
	We've been talking a lot about Colorado and Maine kicking Trump off the ballot.
	I have to think the U.S. Supreme Court is going to step in here because the Colorado ruling, for example, was absurd to the point of being laughable.
	The justices twisted the facts and contorted the law on the meaning of the Constitution's 14th Amendment, and they violated that very amendment, depriving Trump of his due process rights.
	And the same can be true of Jack Smith's two federal indictments.
	In the classified document case, he's criminalized what is a civil violation.
	The J6 case smacks of political persecution, and Americans aren't buying into these charges.
	They've only elevated Donald Trump's poll numbers and his fundraising.
	I'm Greg Jarrett.
	We'll be right back.
	Ed, welcome back to The Sean Hannity Show.
	I'm Greg Jarrett, filling in for Sean.
	Our number is 1-800-941-7326.
	Again, that's 1-800-941-SHAWN.
	You know, among the dozens of states where Democrats are trying to bar Donald Trump from the presidential ballot, you knew there would be at least one, maybe two, that would manage to pull it off.
	Colorado, I think, was always a fair bet.
	Its Supreme Court, after all, is stacked with, you know, the kind of progressive jurists who view the U.S. Constitution as merely an advisory document.
	Yeah.
	Fidelity to the law.
	Eh, that's strictly optional.
	Mostly it's an inconvenience.
	So sure enough, Colorado, the centennial state didn't disappoint the odds makers by fiat, the state high court disqualified Trump from a hearing on the primary ballot next year, making this the first time that it is actually happened in a presidential contest since the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868.
	And to accomplish that tremendous feat, the justices were forced to mangle Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
	No problem, piece of cake.
	They did it.
	The decision itself, of course, was quite narrow, a bare majority of four to three.
	And bear in mind that all members of the Colorado court were appointed by Democrat governors.
	But at least three of them had the good sense to reject the majority's tortured ruling.
	They recognize that this is nothing more than an illegitimate attempt to disenfranchise voters.
	Deprive them of their right under the Constitution to choose.
	Now, the decision has already been appealed by the Colorado Republican Party to the U.S. Supreme Court.
	Will the court take it?
	I think they must.
	It's too important to let it go.
	And if they take it, and they should, they will surely overturn it because Colorado got it fundamentally wrong.
	Let's go to our phone lines.
	In Florida, Alicia joins us, and Alicia, thanks very much for tuning in and giving us a call.
	Happy New Year to you.
	What's your uh comment or question?
	Happy New Year to you as well.
	Thank you for taking my call.
	Um, I really just had a question about Colorado in the sense so in the event that Trump wins the primary, um, is Colorado automatically going to get the electoral votes swayed Democrat, or are they going to have a box for people to check off like we would have voted Republican, but we can't?
	Well, you know, it's an interesting question.
	Um the Colorado decision was really two parts.
	Um he's not going to be on the ballot, and you can't write in his name, and if you do write in his name, uh, you know, we're not going to count it.
	So, you know, they they want it all ways.
	Um, you know, it's hard to know at this juncture what's going to happen.
	I, as I said a moment ago, I Supreme Court has to take this case, and they have to throw out the Colorado ruling and yesterday's ruling by the main Secretary of State.
	So I'm not sure we'll ever uh get to that bridge uh and be forced to jump off of it or cross it.
	Let's go to our next caller, Mark joins us in Mississippi, and Mark, thanks for giving us a call.
	Happy New Year, Greg.
	My question is for Trump's January 6th case trial.
	Should or can he subpoena Nancy Pelosi to testify on why the National Guard was not brought in?
	Yeah, I think that's uh exactly, Mark, what President Trump's legal team wants to do, which is why Jack Smith filed this motion in Lemine, which means it's basically a pretrial motion to exclude an anticipated defense by Donald Trump.
	And that defense is uh multifold.
	One is that you've targeted me for who I am, not because of what I did.
	That's selective prosecution.
	It's an affirmative defense, a procedural maneuver that effectively negates all of the charges.
	But the other thing that Jack Smith put in his motion in Lemonade of the judge, who will probably agree to anything Jack Smith asked for, because she is horribly biased against Trump, is that uh he shouldn't be allowed to present any evidence about faulty security.
	Uh, And that involves the actions of Nancy Pelosi was in charge of security.
	She had the final say.
	And the record is replete with evidence that she rejected additional security.
	And the argument from Trump's lawyers is urge supporters to behave peacefully, and there would have been no riot had Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser, the mayor of uh Washington, D.C. engaged in the proper, cautious security measures that the administration was recommending and indeed demanding.
	Uh National Guard troops that they offered up.
	There is a January 5th letter from Muriel Bowser, the mayor of D.C., in which she specifically puts in writing that she will reject any assistance from any outside source other than D.C. and Capitol Police.
	Uh, but for Nancy Pelosi and Muriel Bowser, the events of January 6th arguably would never have occurred.
	So that's part of Trump's defense.
	He simply wants to present a full picture of what happened on January 6th in a trial uh in which he is accused of uh illegal actions on January 6th.
	So it seems proper and fitting to me that he should be allowed to present the defense of his own choosing.
	That's what we do in America.
	We don't let the prosecutor play the defense attorney as well.
	Let's go to our next caller on the line from South Dakota is Mark.
	And Mark, I know you've been holding for a while.
	Thanks for doing that.
	Happy New Year to you.
	Happy New Year.
	Thank you for taking my call.
	Uh my point is actually about the border and what's going on down there.
	And I think I have a way that would really help and uh with the problem down there, and that is okay, it doesn't take every congressman or woman or senator to do it.
	They just have to, or you know, maybe even an American legal team or you know, uh can bring forth an action or a uh a bill to the Supreme Court directly to say that they can no longer the federal government or state or local governments can no longer use our taxpayer dollars,
	anything that uh creates a bill on the American uh taxpayer or use money from programs such as Social Security or uh veterans' money to re that you know reflect to the bill on the American people, and they cannot use that money to fund illegals because what they're doing with this money is absolutely illegal.
	Yeah.
	Funding illegals, this is illegal, and this is an abuse of our taxpayer dollars.
	Well, it you know, listen, uh Mark, I totally understand your sentiment.
	Look, bills uh are in the legislature.
	Um citizens can't just go directly to the Supreme Court and request something.
	It has to go through uh lower courts, and it has to be a legal action, either a criminal or a civil matter.
	So as a matter of uh question of procedure, you know, you have to follow the rules.
	But I I totally get what you're saying.
	I mean, i this is unsustainable financially for the United States.
	I mean, you've got the mayors of New York City and Chicago, who at one point in time were bragging that immigrants should come there, illegal immigrants should come there, that they were sanctuary cities.
	Now they're angry and blaming President Biden uh for for doing it.
	We can't afford it, we're gonna go broke.
	Uh New York City is claiming uh the mayor Eric Adams claiming, you know, New York City is is gonna go bankrupt because we can't afford the flood of illegal immigrants into the country.
	I mean, millions and millions have come here.
	That is a burden on our education system that it can't afford, a burden on our health care system that it cannot afford, a burden on law enforcement and safety that it can't afford.
	I mean, the list goes on and on.
	You you cannot just open the floodgates and allow it to have no negative consequences.
	And the damage that Joe Biden has done by opening the borders and inviting people to defy the law and come here illegally, that damage will last for more than a decade.
	multiple decades perhaps we cannot absorb that many people all at once Needy people without having extreme negative financial consequences.
	So I understand Mark your sentiment.
	Let's go to our next caller.
	Scott joins us from Texas.
	Hey Scott, how are you?
	Hey, I happy New Year, Greg.
	Yeah, United States financially is losing money, but Mexico isn't.
	And that meeting with the president the other day was nothing more than a dog and pony show because all the cartel, all the politicians, the president, they're all in cuts.
	It's all about payola, and they're making a fortune.
	They're making millions and millions of dollars a day while we're losing millions of dollars a day.
	They're making millions of dollars a day all the way to the president.
	And uh all they that was a dog and pony shows.
	That's all that was.
	They're not going to get anywhere with him with fentanyl or with immigration.
	They're making a fortune down in Mexico with it while we're losing.
	And it's just a big game.
	He's basically going to get into a catch-22 because you're gonna have to put some sanctions on Mexico and hit them in the pocketbook, because that's the only thing they understand in Mexico is payola.
	That's line.
	Yeah, listen, uh, it was a dog and pony show.
	Um it it you know was like that nanosecond visit that Biden reluctantly and grudgingly and belatedly made, and he didn't really go to the border.
	Uh and if he did, you know, you if you blinked, you missed it.
	Um it was a dog and pony show.
	Look, he has no intention of reversing course.
	He is too heavily invested in open borders.
	And the reason is quite simple, because Trump was in favor of closed borders to enforce legal immigration.
	Uh, and you know, the moment Joe Biden took office, he decided that his mantra was going to be I'm gonna reverse everything Donald Trump did, whether it was good or not.
	And and he that's exactly what he did.
	And he opened the borders, and millions of people that we cannot financially afford have flooded in.
	But I'm glad you brought up fentanyl because along with the illegal migrants into the United States, the U.S. has been flooded with deadly fentanyl.
	Roughly 75,000 people a year in the United States die of fentanyl overdoses.
	Most of them are young people.
	Where is the outrage over what is essentially the murder of 75,000 young people every year because of the open border that has allowed fentanyl to flow like a river into America?
	Where is the outrage?
	That is outrageous in and of itself.
	We're gonna pause and uh take a quick break.
	More of your phone calls on the other side, one-eight hundred-nine four-one seven three two six one eight hundred-nine four one Sean.
	I'm Greg Jarrett, filling in for Sean Hannity on The Sean Hannity Show.
	Music.
	The left is trying to extinguish conservative voices, and he's fighting fire with fire.
	Standing up for your beliefs.
	It's Sean Hannity on the air right now.
	You know, Mike Lindell is always looking for ways to solve everyday problems.
	For example, you go into a store, you're looking for a towel, you touch the towel, it's soft at first touch, and you bring them home, you use it once or twice, and you realize, oh, it's not so soft and it's not absorbent.
	Well, that's why Mike Lindell made my towels.
	They actually work and they stay soft and absorbent.
	And my pillow is now excited to announce two brand new lines of my towels for you to try.
	And what makes these towels so great is they're now made with 100% what's called long staple short piercing.
	Now, this comb ring spun cotton is what makes these towels absorbent and softer than ever.
	Right now you get a six-piece set.
	You can get the sale price as low as $29.98 with the promo code Hannity, and you can get the designer premium line, again, 50% off.
	Or you can just go to MyPillow.com and click on the Sean Hannity Square, or just call and mention my name.
	It's 800 919 6090.
	Promo code Hannity.
	And welcome back to the final moments of the Sean Hannity Show.
	I'm Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal analyst and author of the new book just came out called The U.S. Constitution and Other Patriotic Documents.
	It is a tribute, as I said before, to the great American patriots who made this country a beacon of hope for liberty and prosperity and justice throughout the world.
	65 of the most important speeches, letters, documents, addresses that shaped our country, our ideals and aspirations.
	Beginning with Patrick Henry, John Adams, George Washington, through Abraham Lincoln.
	Six of his most important addresses.
	Frederick Douglass, The Suffragettes, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony.
	Continuing with Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, John F. Kennedy, and several of the important addresses by Ronald Reagan.
	The book is The Constitution of the United States and other patriotic documents, available nationwide in bookstores everywhere and online.
	Thanks for listening.
	I'm Greg Jarrett filling in on the You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
	We got you.
	I'm Carol Markovich.
	And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
	Normally is about real conversations.
	Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
	We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
	Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
	I'm Ben Ferguson.
	And I'm Ted Cruz.
	Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
	Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
	Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
	And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
	We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
	So down a verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
	When I told people I was making a podcast about Benghazi, nine times out of ten, they called me a masochist, rolled their eyes, or just asked, why?
	Benghazi, the truth became a web of lies.
	From Prologue Projects and Pushkin Industries, this is Fiasco Benghazi.
	What difference at this point does it make?
	Listen to Fiasco Benghazi on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

▲