All Episodes
Previous Next
July 27, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show
34:50
Plea Deals Failing - July 26th, Hour 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
All right, news roundup and information overload hour.
Glad you're with us, 800-941 Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program, the big news of the day is we have been telling you a judge would have to sign off on this, you know, sweetheart slap on the wrist plea deal with with Hunter Biden as it relates to two misdemeanor tax charges and a gun diversion program.
Uh the same judge, ironically, somebody with the same exact circumstances as Hunter Biden and put that person in jail for five years just on the gun charge.
Anyway, so the day ends with Hunter Biden pleading not guilty and and the deal completely falls apart.
Uh this after a very strange night uh last night where the House Ways and Means Committee uh ends up accusing one of Hunter Biden's attorneys, I don't know who it is, of misrepresenting herself as a woman to the court late Tuesday in an attempt to block the release of evidence that could jeopardize the president's son's deal.
And anyway, by Tuesday morning, the committee filed an amicus brief.
This is the Comer Committee that and we just had James Comer on with the Delaware U.S. District Judge in this case.
Uh and anyway, this this whole case just fell apart.
And uh at one point the judge was angry that the Biden's attorney just wanted the judge to rubber stamp the plea deal.
Ended up being a three-hour hearing.
Nobody expected it to last that long.
And at times, even angrily, the judge said she felt like she was being asked to rubber stamp an agreement that she had serious concerns about.
And so that's how this day ends.
Um it's a deal that never should have been struck.
It's a sweetheart deal.
It does again shine the light on what we have been pointing out regularly, and that is a dual justice system.
Uh we don't have equal justice or equal application of our laws, sadly, at this point in American history, and if we don't fix it, we've got a we got major constitutional problems because that document, in a sense, becomes shredded.
Uh anyway, joining us now, he is the head of the ACLJ, the American Center for Law and Justice, also my own personal attorney, uh chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, Jay Seculow is with us.
Guy that is how many Supreme Court cases have you won?
Twenty-one or twenty-two?
Think about uh last count about twenty-two.
Last by the way, I love how you say that.
Oh, last count.
I only won twenty-two Supreme Court cases, that's all.
Situation during COVID where we had four cases, and we argued them, you know, it was done by phone, but I still count 'em because they came out pretty well.
So I think you have to count them.
A win is a win is a win, Jay.
Doesn't matter.
Uh it still counts as as a matter of law.
Um, there were many of us that looked at this plea deal and just immediately said, here we go again.
Here this would never have happened to anybody with the last name Trump.
And this is now becoming a big issue for the American people, and that is we don't believe that there's equal justice under the law, and that the Justice Department under Merrick Garland has been weaponized and politicized.
And James Comer, you know, echoing those comments in the last half hour.
Your thoughts on the events today.
Well, you know, it's interesting.
I've I've said this before in your broadcast.
You've said it uh Hunter Biden's lead lawyer, um, Abby Lowell is one of the best there is.
I mean by the way, he's scary good.
He's there's like five great lawyers in DC.
You're one of them, and he's on the list.
Um didn't mean to interrupt.
You're not kidding.
If he's if you're the defendant, you want Abby Law in your corner.
So Abby negotiated a uh a very good deal for his client, but what fell apart today was the entire apparatus to enter the plea.
Normally, on a hearing like this, it's just literally to enter your uh the plea bargain, the plea agreement, and the judge asked questions like what does it cover?
Do you understand all this?
And they did not have between the government and the defense lawyers, there was not a meeting of the mind.
The government said that this just involved the two tax-related charges and uh the as you said, the deferment of the gun possession from the years two thousand and fourteen to nineteen.
The defendants thought this was a universal immunity deal.
Basically, you try you you plead guilty to these counts.
And you couldn't bring any more charges.
Goes and everything that else that might have been criminal during that time period goes away.
The government said, No, no, no.
It's still an open proceeding.
It's still an open investigation, so there could be other charges.
Uh Hunter Biden's lawyer said, Well, that's not what we understand.
And to that point, the judge intervenes and says, you know what, here's the problem from a due process standpoint.
The defendant is about to waive their rights to a speedy trial, the right to confront witnesses, the right to a trial by jury, and we're not even having an agreement as to what this covers.
So I'm not accepting this plea.
Go back, work it out, file a brief, letting me know what's really agreed to here, and then we'll reevaluate.
At the end of the day, I think the judge will end up accepting it, assuming they come to an agreement.
But you're talking about chaos, and then to top the chaos off, you know, the night before you have this apparently bizarre attempt by one of the defense lawyers, apparently a uh female defense lawyer, calling the clerk of the court, acting as if she's the lawyer for the House who had filed an amicus brief to get that document off the docket sheet because they didn't like what was in it.
And so this morning everybody thought it was going to start with a sanctions hearing.
But that's not what happened.
The whole the whole plea fell apart.
I do I think it's over with, no, I don't.
Do I think there's a two-tier system of justice?
Yes, I do.
Do I think this case ultimately will resolve on a plea?
Yeah, I do.
You do, but now we're discovering more and more through Comer's committee, uh, especially as it relates to the Biden family and and monies that have uh have changed hands.
You know, it's taken a while to get the 1023 form, the suspicious activity reports.
Uh he talked at length about all these varying shell companies.
In other words, uh an LLC will be formed, but for no real business purpose, but for the purpose of just funneling money from one account to another account to another account, and and he's identified nine family members of the Bidens that have benefited financially, including grandchildren.
I'd like to know what they did for that money or how to earn the how they earn their part, but um so it seems that between the the whistleblower testimony from the IRS, the 1023 form, which I want to get into detail with you in a second, um, that we're now getting a uh um a much more objective picture of just the extent that the Biden family was making millions and millions and millions of dollars from all these foreign countries,
many of which are are our top geopolitical foes like Russia, China, et cetera.
Yeah, so here's why I still think it it resolves.
Uh it may not resolve this to these other issues, but I think for the years twenty fourteen through twenty nineteen, as it relates to taxes, drugs, and guns, this case is gonna be resolved.
Now, as it relates to foreign agent registration and that, that may be a different story, and maybe they don't come to an agreement on that.
But remember, a sitting president can't be indicted, so they can't indict Joe Biden for any of this.
That we argued that for President Trump successfully, that he could not be prosecuted as well while in office.
Uh the President Sons in a different category.
He is not the chief executive, he is not the president, so he can be prosecuted.
So the question is gonna you know what?
So Sean, here's what I think, though.
I think this is all being done, and when it does resolve, it's gonna give when when the U.S. attorney Weiss is on the stand or testifying before Congress and they say, Is this an ongoing investigation?
He's gonna be able to say yes.
And at that point, that would mean would that kill the plea deal?
Because Weiss is now expected, apparently he's gotten the sign on from the DOJ to testify before Congress in September.
And there have been all sorts of questions about whether his office, John Solomon, reported that Weiss's office had signed off on felony charges to be brought against Hunter, uh, and yet he didn't go with those charges, which would be highly unusual.
Yeah, Weiss says he did not.
That he he did not seek anything he didn't get.
There's a lot of he's gonna have to answer that question because there was reports that he wanted to bring charges in the District of Columbia, which you would have to get the permission of the U.S. attorney there or the just main justice.
Same thing in California, but he didn't.
So we'll find out what he says.
Here's the here's the real scoop on that.
All these hearings, they're good.
They're helpful, that kind of sheds a light on this.
This may result in impeachment, who knows?
Uh at least an impeachment uh proceeding before the House of Representatives.
The question becomes does Hunter's lawyers still engage in this plea?
And I think they probably do.
And the government probably says we're gonna carve out, We're not including fair violations or things like that, which we m will be able to say is still being reviewed.
Does it mean it goes anywhere?
No.
But it's good to say it's still open.
Well, we gotta now go back and look at the IRS whistleblower testimony uh on agent uh Ziegler or Gary Shapley and and the things that they were telling us.
Uh, for example, as part of their investigation, they they wanted to talk to Biden family members, including Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, etc., and that people at the top prevented them from doing their job.
But John, but to be fair, that's the same thing people accuse me of doing when I would not let President Trump sit down with Bob Mueller.
Okay, separate and apart.
You you that doesn't mean the rest of the family members can't be interviewed.
And IRS whistleblower, for example, Joseph Ziegler, the Democrat, said there's a mountain of evidence that Hunter Biden committed uh serious felonies, and then they take it a step further, is that they had an opportunity to extend the statute of limitations.
David Weiss did, and they didn't do it, and they let the statute of limitations on tax charges pass when they had the ability to extend it.
Uh I can't think of a single American that would get that accommodation, can you?
A hundred percent you would not.
And uh that I think is notice he said you would not, meaning Hannity gets no good special treatment ever.
No one will.
I mean, uh at that level, let's be honest.
I mean, who who lets the statute of limit?
I mean, and when it happens, it happens because the government made a mistake, not because they did it intentionally.
All right.
Now let's go to the 1023 form.
And and you and I talked about this both privately, and I know you've talked about it on on your radio show.
And this is this is interesting because on this form, first of all, we're dealing with an FBI informant that was extremely credible, praised by the FBI, and paid hundreds of thousands of dollars by the FBI, and the FBI even went as far as to say uh, because of this guy's great work, uh, that they were able to get successful prosecutions.
Anyway, he's meeting with the head of you of Barisma, the oil and gas giant, uh CEO, and he he's writing down uh the notes that he took about how the CEO was bragging that they hired Hunter Biden to protect us through his dad.
Uh, and they that they weren't worried at all that that Hunter will take care of all these issues through the his dad.
Uh they were angry that he said I had to pay five million to pay one Biden, five million to pay another Biden.
It'll take him ten years to ever track that money down.
He stated he didn't want to pay them.
He was, quote, pushed to pay them, uh, thought that that Hunter was stupid.
He said it over and over again, and that his dog was smarter than Hunter Biden, but everything will be okay because Joe is gonna be the one handling it.
Uh then you have the WhatsApp map uh messages with China, which I'll get to in a minute.
Now, that to me is pretty damning evidence, uh, Jay Seculah, that that in fact he's basically describing the pr the vice then vice president of the United States taking specific actions when he leveraged the billion dollars that he bragged about to get this prosecutor investigating Barisma and his son Hunter um,
you know, off the hook by firing him in six hours, and Hunter continue to get paid as a result of that of that shakedown.
A ledge shaked down.
You know, as it relates to Hunter, he could be prosecuted for this if the Department of Justice decides to seek an indictment.
The president can't be while he's sitting in office.
He could be impeached for it.
He could be impeached for it, but then he has to be convicted in the Senate, and let me tell you what's gonna happen there.
Not gonna happen.
I agree.
Correct.
Don't bring the it doesn't mean do not bring the impeachment charges.
It just means, and hopefully, and I know the Republicans will do this, unlike the Democrats who impeached President Trump, uh the de the Republicans would allow due process to the President's council.
We got none before the House.
You know that.
And I made a big deal about that on the floor of the United States Senate uh when we got the c the acquittals on both charges.
So, yes, I think all of this is live.
It's gonna they're now saying, by the way, Hunter's lawyers are now saying it's gonna take upwards of two weeks to comply with the judge's order to go through and negotiate this out.
So they've got this is going back for round two.
That's what this means.
Okay, let me go back to the the other issue, and that is the entire enterprise, because James Comer just said we're talking about over a dozen countries paying this family, usually right after visits by the then vice president, often accompanied by his son, which they they say was addicted to crack cocaine at the time.
Uh, you can add to that the WhatsApp message uh to a a Chinese oil executive that I'm sitting here with my father.
I'd like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.
I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to hold the grudge that you will regret not following my direction.
I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father.
And then in less than a week, Jay, the Bidens were wired five million dollars.
Yep.
What do you call that?
The government's got to investigate it.
And if there's charges that it violates the law, they have to be prosecuted.
At least the ones that are not the president of the United States.
Okay, so that's the WhatsApp message.
And then they've already identified.
I just asked James Comer again.
You gotta have more.
You know this.
I'm I'm not trying to play devil's advocate here, but I'm a defense lawyer, so my naturally go to a defense instinct.
That's why you're my defense lawyer.
Not that I ever want to be defended ever.
But if a five million dollar wire comes in, you know, it it that looks tawdry, maybe, but it has to be a what's the crime?
That's what the Justice Department has to determine.
What is the crime here?
Hey there.
I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started normally a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional SAS.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
Hey there.
I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
And I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional SAS.
You're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.
US uh funded resources, Phoenix Capital Group, they invite you to invest in the heart of America with our with their domestic energy corporate bonds at Phoenix Capital.
They connect private investor principal with direct investments in domestic energy assets, usually on the state level.
They'll tell you all about it.
Your venture in these U.S. back equities can gain right now up to nine to twelve percent annual interest that's paid monthly.
That's kind of a vote of confidence in the American dream and the unwavering spirit that built our nation.
Now to find out more, just download the Phoenix Capital Group's free investment packet today.
It's at PHX on Hannity.com.
Now investments in bonds have a certain amount of risks associated with it.
You should only invest if you can afford to bear the risk of loss.
Now, before making investment decisions, you should carefully consider review all risk involved.
Learn how you can diversify your investments and earn nine to twelve percent uh APY.
That's a lot of money.
Anyway, download for free their investor packet today at PH on Hannity.com.
All right, we'll have more with Jay Seculo in the next half hour of the program.
Uh we just got to hold them over.
This is too interesting to stop.
And then we'll get to your calls 800-941 Sean.
All right, 25 now until the top of the hour.
Glad you're with us.
800-941 Sean, our number if you want to be a part of the program.
Uh I want to get to back to Jay Secular for a few more minutes, then we'll hit the phones 800-941 Sean.
Look, if you're getting notices from the IRS and still have not taken my advice and called Rush Taxresolution.com, what are you waiting for?
Because every day you put it off, penalties or interests are rising.
It's making your situation worse.
Now's the time to pick up the phone, call rush tax resolution, do it right now.
They're A plus rated by the Better Business Bureau.
They are the best at what they do.
The only company I trust, the only company I recommend.
Now, many of my listeners have taken my advice over the years.
They've called Rush Taxresolution.com and now their tax nightmares are over.
Like one man, let's call him Jake.
Jake owed over a hundred and fifty Grand, rush taxresolution.com, settle with the IRS for fifteen hundred bucks.
Now not everyone qualifies for the IRS forgiveness program, but rush tax, they're gonna let you know up front and free with a free consultation uh what kind of relief you would qualify for.
And here's the best part.
They're only gonna take your case if they know that they can help you.
Period.
Call them now.
800 299 8077, 800 299 8077 on the web.
It's rush taxresolution.com.
All right, we continue with the Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice Jay Sekulow.
Let me ask you, Hunter went on Good Morning America, admitted he had no experience in energy oil, gas, Ukraine, or China.
None.
Oh, why were they paying him that kind of money?
But that's not a crime.
That's not a crime to pay the son of the vice president money without any experience at all.
Do that.
He said and when he asked what experience he had, he said I sat on the board of Amtrak and I was on a UN food commission and I'm a lawyer.
That that's not real experience.
Well, but I uh the reason I'm playing devil's advocate here, it good it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander.
So they'll turn this right around on Donald Trump.
Well, explain to can you tell me one example where the Trump kids were were shaking down foreign countries for that wanted to gain influence with their father?
Because I can't.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
That's not what I'm saying.
I'm not saying that at all.
I'm just saying if there's a charge against Hunter Biden for taking the money, other than tax evasion.
The charge has to be a substantive crime.
It's not just it looks really bad that you're the vice president's son and you're on a board of this company.
Let me ask this question.
So, okay, he's mentioning his father.
We have he implicates his own father in his laptop.
Pops takes half his income.
He has to pay for Pops home repairs, uh and ten percent for the big guy.
All right.
So Hunter Biden with no experience is is hired to sit on this board.
You have a 1023 form where the CEO of a Boris must quoted as the stupid and useless, but they they're doing it to get access to his father.
Okay.
Is that not damning evidence to you?
What what's what's the crime?
I would say influence pedaling, racketeering, bribery.
What is the crime?
High crimes, misdemeanors.
Okay, no.
That's the high crimes and misdemeanors.
Separate and apart.
I got it.
But the crime you asked me the crime.
And you know how I feel about this.
It is a two-tiered system of justice.
But let me just say this, okay?
If they're gonna bring charges against uh Hunter Biden for this stuff, make sure they do an actual job of putting a criminal case together.
Not like the nonsense they pulled on Donald Trump.
I I totally agree with you, but on the surface, is that not damning to you?
Because it's pretty damning to me, and we need to get to the bottom of it.
I'm not saying it all we know that those things happen.
We don't know to the extent looks terrible.
Yeah.
I mean, paying a guy millions for no experience?
That's that doesn't happen.
You know anybody that makes millions with no experience?
I don't.
I'm a defense lawyer.
Tell me where the crime is.
What is the crime?
That Barisman made a They were buying influence to the vice president by enriching the family.
You know what they're that racketeering?
Is that is that bribe uh maybe potentially bribery?
You talking about federal bribery statute?
No, that wouldn't be a bribery.
Then what were they paying the money for?
He was on the board, they said.
With no experience.
Well, okay, I'm I'm not saying it's looks good.
I'm just we're going around in circle.
Really make it a crime.
Show me the crime.
You know why I and and to the audience out there, understand.
I had to deal with this for four years defending the former president of the United States.
When they when nonsense was thrown at him and his family.
Do you think this is nonsense compared to what you dealt with?
Because I don't.
Statute or law that is violated by this.
Okay, is influence peddling illegal in America?
Yeah.
Influence peddling.
There's not a crime of influence peddling.
Racket you could it would fit under the the racketeering statutes, RICO statutes, you know, bribery statutes.
Are you taking actions as vice president, which is what that 1023 form alleges specifically?
Here would it be the crime would be this.
If Hunter Biden took the money and then gave it to his father for that particular action, there could be a crime.
But you're gonna have to establish not just that he took the money, but it was taking the money to get a result.
All right.
You'd have to prove the crime.
But again, it's got to be by beyond reasonable doubt.
All I'm saying is I was the defense lawyer for four years of my life defending Donald Trump from nonsense.
Okay, nonsense.
Make the call to the president of Ukraine and they're and they're doing an impeachment.
And I'm just saying, if they're gonna do a thing against the president, whether it's impeachment or something else, have the crime.
If you're gonna go after hunter for these other things, make sure you can prove them.
Not saying you can't.
Just make sure you got a case.
I think the case is growing every day, but we'll see over time.
And I'm uh I'm that's why I call it the Biden bribery scandal allegation.
You notice the word allegations there.
Yeah, yeah, because they haven't, you know, nothing's been proved so far.
They've got a lot of interesting statements.
You know, let me tell you, can I give you one last thing here?
By the way, Tevin Archer's gonna reveal a lot on Monday.
I'm gonna say on this either, but I'm your friend and I'm your lawyer, and I'm gonna tell you this.
I work for the Department of the Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, as a trial lawyer.
Agents often would want a case charged at a very high level.
And then when it came to my office, we'd say, no, wait a minute.
This case doesn't reach that level of felony, it should be this misdemeanor.
That happens all the time.
I'm not saying that with regard to these agents.
Something was played with here.
I don't think there's a doubt about that.
And I think these agents' testimonies, whistleblower testimony, are that critical to this.
The idea that these countries would would do business deals with somebody that they even admit at the time was a crack addict.
Had no experience, and they talk specifically in the case of the Barisma CEO about the influence of the father, I think is very damning, and I think they're gonna have a very hard time getting out of that.
That's my take.
Who's day?
Meaning Joe Biden when he's out of office.
And I think I think this is this is gonna follow him out of office.
The statute of limitation expires, you're right.
Okay, that's a good point.
You never know, right?
You don't.
And if he if he's in office, there's nothing you can you know the only way to do that is you impeach him, convict him, and then you can try him.
He'll end up pardoning himself at Hunter before it's all of a sudden done.
He has the absolute authority to do so.
He does, agreed.
So now the par power of the pardon is absolute.
Nobody's gonna be mad at you.
You're being you.
We like you being you.
That's all right.
All right, Jay Seculo, Chief Council of American Center for Law and Justice, thank you.
We appreciate your time.
Now let's get to our busy, busy telephones.
Uh let us say hi to Maria is in the great state of Wisconsin.
Maria, how are you?
Glad you called.
Oh, just fine.
I've been listening to you.
That's great.
Oh, thank you.
I'm glad you're out there.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for being a part of our program.
What's going on?
I wanted to find out if he is found guilty.
Can Joe pardon him as president?
Pardon Hunter?
Uh-huh.
The power of the pardon is absolute.
He absolutely can.
Oh my god, why are we spending all this money on it?
Well, I mean, it's a good question.
You know, I I know in the case of Donald Trump, you know, one of the things that he said is, you know, he felt that people had a right to be found innocent and that he'd wait to the end of the process, and then he ended up pardoning some people that he felt were unfairly treated and unfairly targeted.
You know, I mean, I we we this is where the dual justice system kicks in.
The the actions of James Comey and and General Flynn and Paul Manafort and Papadopoulos and Roger Stone.
I mean, it all fits in, doesn't it?
You know, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
You know, 30 agents, guns drawn, pre-dawn raids, fake news CNN cameras, frog men in the back.
I mean, it's it's insane.
Thank you for taking my call.
Thank you, Maria.
Glad you're out there.
Uh Mark's heart is troubled.
What's up, Mark?
What can I do for you, my friend?
Well, uh, thanks for taking my call.
So over the past several elections, I know I have, and I know many other people have completely lost faith that the elections are fair.
So it's it's uh, you know, you always get the same mantras, oh, nothing to see here, steamer all the results as long as they comply with what the left wants.
And we see countless policies and d and divisions of the government fail the American people.
You know, the Homeland Security, FBI, Department of Justice.
So now in my lovely state of Michigan, rumor has it that election laws are are now changing.
So, like for example, ballot boxes, you know, the Zuckerberg boxes or however you want to call them, don't need bipartisan representation.
They call them drop boxes, yeah.
I know what you mean.
And then I've heard the term Zuckerberg boxes.
I've heard that.
So if there is not bipartisan representation when the box is open, how can they guarantee the proper chain of custody?
The beauty of how every state votes or maybe the curse of how every state votes is the the states will get to decide.
Now, in a perfect world this is how I think our voting system should be.
You need voter ID, you need signature verification, you need chain of custody controls, you need updated uh voter rolls and partisan observers watching the entire process all day and all night long.
And if I had my way, we'd have paper ballots only, with exceptions for the elderly, the infirmed and the military, and make it a national holiday election day, and everybody gets to go to the polls, use a paper ballot, and you have partisan observers in every precinct in the country watching the voting that day, so no shenanigans take place.
And when the polls close partisan observers all sides watch the vote counting.
And then they declare a winner after they've added them all up together.
And that's what I prefer, but that's not the system we have so we got to deal with the army we have the the system we have not the one we wish we had.
And that means that Republicans now they've taken a very big effort now on this issue of banking your vote.
Republicans have been reluctant and resistant towards early voting and voting by mail.
That must end.
They have to get in the game earlier.
You cannot start out election day down hundreds of thousands of votes.
Many states allow legal ballot harvesting ballot harvesting defined as somebody else handing in other people's ballots.
I don't think that practice should happen.
It it to me it could lend itself to a lot of corruption not a good idea.
But as long as it's what the Democrats are doing, Republicans better match their efforts and frankly they ought to surpass their efforts if they want to win future elections.
And then when we win more elections then Republicans and states they can change the voting system to the one that I described the one with the most I think would that would the the one that would have the most integrity and that people would have the most confidence in the results on.
That's what I think.
Okay but furthermore to take it one step further you take it furthermore go ahead.
Do you do you honestly feel as though the FBI the Department of Justice can all be completely revamped without destroying them and rebuilding them because they've they've proven time and time again that there is an outrageous amount of bias.
Yeah I think the the FBI's involvement in the last two presidential elections I I I you you're singing from the Hannity written hymnal.
I've been saying this for a long period of time.
And uh do I think that the I I don't think it's a majority of FBI special agents and employees as a matter of fact I'd say over ninety percent of them are honorable people that live in our communities and and put their lives on the line to stop you know really dangerous bad people from harming us.
And but it's the upper management the upper echelon seventh floor people if you will deep state people if you will they're the ones that you know have corrupted the system the FBI had Hunter's laptop in December 2019.
They verified its authenticity in March of 2020 then why were FBI agents in the months leading up to the 2020 election meeting with big tech companies weekly and warning them they may be victims of disinformation campaigns and it may be about Joe and Hunter Biden.
That to me they they could have confirmed that laptop was real to the big tech companies they did not they had authenticated it themselves by that point.
They didn't do it and Facebook specifically asked and they refused to give them an answer.
Right.
And so they were pre-bunking a story that they knew would be public because they knew Rudy Giuliani had a copy.
Right.
Okay does that answer your question so I think it can be cleaned up and you need more honorable people that believe in our constitution and the rule of law and equal justice and equal application of our laws you need more of those people in power.
Right but the problem is anybody watching the congressional hearings today, you know, about the oversight committee and all of that?
We see these, you know, the head of the FBI.
We see everybody that goes on stand.
They're lying under oath, but nobody ever Christopher Ray, you know, sometimes they I think they do lie, and and you know, Merrick Garland and and David Weiss may have some serious questions to answer.
You know, you watch Christopher Rain, his last appearance, what, a week, week and a half ago, whatever it was, um, before the committee, he dodged, he ducked, he weaved, he obfuscated, and answered very little.
It was uh it was frankly a uh an effort and futility.
He has no interest in restoring this what should be and once was the world's premier law enforcement agency to its prior greatness, and that's to me is a shame.
I totally agree.
All right, my friend, thank you for the call.
All right, everybody knows if you're a Second Amendment lover, ammo's expensive, it's in short supply.
What you may not know is you can train without ammunition in the convenience of your house or in your backyard, and it's all because of the technology, military grade technology of Mantis X. You may not also know the best shooters in the world, the majority of them, actually all of them, do most of their training doing dry fire practice at home.
Now, the Mantis X firearms training system, it's no ammo, it's an all-electronic way to practice, improve your shooting accuracy.
You simply attach it to your firearm and you know, put on your phone and you're you're good to go.
It gives you data-driven real-time feedback on your shooting technique, guides you through drills and courses.
Mantis X is even used by the Marine Corps, the Army, Special Forces.
In other words, you're getting military grade technology at an affordable price.
Mantis X will improve your shooting dramatically.
It's a must-have for anybody that's a serious gun owner.
And of course, if you're a gun owner, you've got to act on your second amendment responsibilities.
That means being competent and confident in your shooting ability.
Anyway, just go to their website, MantisX.com.
That's M-A-N-T-I-S-X.com.
Bad for America, CBS TV, and it's the news like nobody else.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
All right, that's gonna wrap things uh up for today.
We got an amazing uh Hannity tonight, the crazy unfolding of events from yesterday.
Uh we have Jim Jordan, James Comer, Ted Cruz on all of that.
Also, Congressman Jason Smith, he's on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.
Yeah.
Uh this weird experience where uh apparently someone on Hunter's defense team, a woman of uh that's a lawyer, tried to represent herself as having been from the Ways and Means Committee.
What's that all about?
Uh the UFO hearings, we'll get an update on that.
All coming up, set your DBR, Monday through Friday, 9 Eastern, Hannity, Fox News.
We'll see you tonight, back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
▲
Export Selection