Sean Hannity Show - FBI Corruption - July 12th, Hour 1

July 12, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show

34:11

FBI Corruption - July 12th, Hour 1

Sean covers the latest on hearings set forth by the House to better understand just how much we've lost "equal justice under the law." See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart Podcast.
	Hi, thank you, Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of you for being with us.
	I'm just watching these hearings, a little distracted here.
	If you've been watching Director Ray before the House Judiciary Committee, and we're going to get into a lot of this today, and there were really pivotal moments.
	This man has no business being the FBI director.
	This agency has been politicized.
	The agents at the top, many of them, have basically been weaponizing justice.
	And, you know, to hear the non-responsive answers again and again and again, and it's under investigation.
	I generally can't comment on that.
	Well, if you, I'm not going to get into that.
	Well, I think you can find that information in one of the filings and you could search for it there.
	And that's all that I'm going to say on that.
	It gets frustrating because we do know that the FBI in the last two presidential elections took big, huge, massive cinder blocks and put them on the scales of the election to influence the outcome of the election.
	And I could start in 2016, James Comey's infamous, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute.
	And I will tell you, that's frustrating, especially in light of the raid at Mar-a-Lago, which he said was not a raid.
	It was a raid.
	You know, not recommending charges against Hillary Clinton.
	No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute.
	Well, what about the destruction of 33,000 subpoenaed emails?
	I mean, there's just so much to get to.
	Or the fact that the FBI, then under Comey, which he said he's cleaned all this up and he has not, under Comey, sent agents across the pond.
	In other words, to Great Britain.
	And those agents met with Christopher Steele, the author of Hillary Clinton's bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier, and offered this guy over a million dollars if he could just corroborate any part of his dossier.
	He could not.
	And then by the end of that month, it became the bulk of information, or to quote Andrew McCabe, without the dossier, they never would have gotten the FISA warrants approved.
	But they used something that they knew they could not verify.
	And at the top of a FISA application, it says verifiable.
	Now, if that's not the FBI politicized and weaponized against conservatives, I don't know what is.
	And I'm just giving you the big examples here.
	Or take the 2020 election in the lead up to the 2020 election.
	What do we know was happening?
	In the months leading up to that election, there were weekly meetings with FBI officials and big tech companies.
	Now, we just had this ruling on the 4th of July out of the Missouri case.
	Remember, in that case, the former head of site integrity at Twitter, a gentleman by the name of Yoel Roth, said that in these meetings, that the FBI was specifically warning, in this case, Twitter, but every other big tech company, that there might be, that they may be victims of a misinformation campaign.
	And that misinformation campaign may be about Joe Biden or even about Hunter Biden.
	Now, why is that relevant?
	Why is that important?
	Because the FBI already had Hunter Biden's laptop.
	They verified its authenticity in March of 2020.
	So why in the months leading up to the election were FBI agents meeting weekly with big tech companies, warning them they're going to be victims of a misinformation campaign and it may be about Hunter.
	Well, they also knew that Rudy Giuliani, then Donald Trump's attorney, had a copy of that laptop.
	They knew this information was real.
	They authenticated it themselves, which, by the way, they should have been able to do in like three days maximum.
	Not difficult to do.
	Just, you know, and any good computer person can get into that in record time.
	And yet they're telling big companies, and what was the net result?
	Well, big tech censored one of the biggest stories in the lead up to the 2020 campaign.
	I mean, it's pretty unbelievable.
	And on the issue of FISA, listen, there are some Republicans that will support the reauthorization.
	At the end of this year, FISA comes back up and it must be reauthorized for it to continue.
	I would not reauthorize FISA warrants unless dramatic, and I mean dramatic changes are made in terms of how this process works and what their obligations are.
	And how did they never hold people accountable when it comes to lying on a FISA warrant, lying to a judge?
	What do you think would happen to any of you if you lied to a judge?
	What do you think would happen if you lied to a judge to get a warrant?
	I think most of you would be handcuffed, fingerprinted, perp walked, put in jail, probably for a long period of time after you were held in contempt.
	I know that would certainly happen to me.
	That's why I would never lie to a judge.
	I would take great pains not to lie to a judge.
	I'd tell the truth to the judge.
	You know, his answer is, well, we have on the issue of Pfizer, clearly had failures in the past.
	I've been very clear about that.
	Okay, well, your predecessor lied on three FISA application forms after knowing damn well from the source himself that he couldn't corroborate a thing.
	Whatever happened to Jim Comey, a higher honor, nothing.
	Nobody was held accountable under his watch, his FBI.
	Hillary Clinton was never held accountable.
	The Bidens are not being held accountable.
	And so that has to go.
	Now, it's going to be an interesting coalition of Republicans that see the FISA abuse as a major issue.
	Now, I say this as somebody that believes that our intelligence should have the ability to spy on foreign hostile actors, but not on Americans.
	We have a document that's supposed to protect against unreasonable search and seizure, and that would be our Constitution.
	So it should not be authorized if it has any implication for Americans.
	And, you know, and then he got a little cute on the actual number, the 3.1 figure that comes up or the 702 queries.
	Those, you know, were we looking into moms and dads that went to school board meetings and voiced their concerns about age-inappropriate material like gender identity classes being taught to their kids or CRT being taught to their kids?
	You know, they were going to investigate them and use valuable FBI resources to go after, you know, tiger moms like Linda that shows up at every school board meeting.
	I mean, it's insanity.
	You've never sent that description of me.
	It's a little aggressive.
	No, you don't.
	You're proud of it.
	You told me the last time.
	I'll tell you right now, I'm more like a cheetah or a lion.
	Okay, you'll see.
	Say lion again.
	A loyan.
	A lion.
	Loyan.
	A lion.
	Lion.
	A lion.
	Not a loyan.
	Whatever.
	I'm not happy with it.
	A loyan.
	It sounds like a loyancloth.
	MK, what do you think?
	How do you say it?
	No, my daughter's in the studio.
	She will not talk on the air.
	First of all, she's nodding and following along.
	I'm very impressed.
	Oh, trust me, the conversations that we have about specific classes that she's been forced to take in college.
	God bless her.
	Oh.
	And some of the text messages.
	One day she was in a class.
	I'm just going to tell one little story.
	She looks super excited that you're telling this story.
	One day she was in a class where everybody had to say something about themselves.
	And people were very, very transparent about issues even involving their sexual and gender preferences.
	And she's like, well, dad, what do you think I should say?
	And I said, well, my dad is Sean Hannity, and he's on Fox News, and he has a nationally syndicated radio show.
	And I agree with everything he says.
	I say, see if that works.
	She said, Dad, I can't say that, Dad.
	I just can't.
	Did you not say that?
	Is that true?
	Yes or no?
	You can't ask her.
	She's not even on a microphone.
	I know.
	By the way, Matt Gates is going to join us today.
	I think Matt Gates had his finest day ever on the House Judiciary Committee.
	And, you know, he read Ray, you know, great sound of him reading the WhatsApp message.
	I'm sitting here with my father, that message.
	And my father and everybody he knows will be coming after you.
	And then, of course, within the week, it was, what, $5 million transferred to the Biden family.
	Gee, that was a successful phone call.
	Ray tried to fire back at Gates by saying the number of applicants to work at the agency from Florida has doubled.
	Gates replied by saying, yeah, we're very proud of them, and they deserve better than you.
	I mean, he was really on his A-game today.
	And he had a couple of other great moments and asked directly if Ray was protecting the Bidens after reading Hunter's WhatsApp message.
	WhatsApp, if you don't know, and signal, these are encrypted applications supposedly to keep the privacy of your conversations with somebody else.
	I do not use them.
	I do not have an email account, and I don't save text messages or anything.
	I save nothing.
	Anyway, Gates then went on to say, you know, went into the Pfizer search issue, asked whether he perjured himself.
	Now, January 6th came up quite a bit in this hearing as well.
	And, you know, the one thing I wish they would have gotten into this because Ray said he never saw an email from the Bank of America to the FBI agreeing to provide data on any debt credit card transactions in D.C. on January 5th or 6th, plus any date on gun purchases going back six months.
	He said he never saw the email of that.
	And he said such a request is lawful.
	So he supports that.
	That's not the question that should have been asked.
	And I'm not blaming any one congressman.
	The question that should have been asked is why they did not act on the known intelligence.
	Even NBC News, as reported by Lester Holt, figured out that they had actionable intelligence in the days leading up to January 6th.
	The January 6th Committee's final report was more than 800 pages, but some material did not make the cut, including much of its findings on the failures of federal law enforcement leading up to the attack.
	The chief investigator of the January 6th committee says the government could have prevented it.
	Had law enforcement agencies acted on the available intelligence, do you believe the attack on the Capitol could have been successfully repelled?
	It would have been a lot different had law enforcement taken a more assertive, protective posture.
	People familiar with the committee's work tell NBC News members downplayed that finding because they wanted to keep the focus on former President Trump.
	Okay, and remember we had then now former Capitol Police Chief Sun on this program.
	He was begging in the days leading up to January 6th for the National Guard.
	Why?
	Because he got new actionable intelligence and he got no support.
	Nobody ever wanted to question Nancy Pelosi, the sergeant of arms, the Capitol Police chief who had made multiple requests both before and that day for the guard troops to be called up.
	Nobody ever brought up that Donald Trump, I have, what, five people in an office and all of them four on record on this show saying that Donald Trump authorized up to 10 to 20,000 troops to be called up.
	And in writing, Muriel Bowser, the mayor, said she didn't want any troops called up.
	So we didn't get to the bottom of that as well.
	Then he was asked about attacks on Catholics.
	And, you know, as soon as I found out about the Richmond product attacking Catholics, I was aghast.
	I ordered it removed from all FBI systems.
	The product is not something I will defend.
	It was dodge, duck, obfuscate, not answer questions, try and run the clock out.
	That's all this was today.
	This was a dog and pony show.
	And unfortunately, there's only one thing you can include after today's hearings is that the FBI has been politicized and weaponized as the DOJ has been politicized and weaponized, which means that in America today, you don't have equal justice under the law and you don't have equal application of our laws.
	You know, his FBI allowed, even though they knew the Hunter Biden laptop was real, they sent agents for weekly meetings with big tech companies.
	So when the New York Post broke that story about Hunter's laptop, big tech censored it completely so the American people did not have the knowledge they needed before an election that would have swung that election dramatically.
	Now, that's the FBI that did that.
	And there's no excuse for them pre-bunking what was a very real, authenticated by the organization laptop of zero experience Hunter.
	And why they haven't used it even further is now a whole other issue we can get into.
	Later on, John Solomon has a breaking story today, which is blockbuster.
	You know, why did the Delaware prosecutor not bring charges that his office approved as it relates to Hunter and tax charges going all the way back to 2014?
	They had approved it.
	John Solomon now has the document.
	All of that true.
	But now we can no longer call this the world's premier law enforcement agency.
	It has been corrupted.
	It's rotting from the top down.
	And it's got to be rebuilt.
	And it's got to be rebuilt with a proper perspective and mission that this country could once again be proud of.
	And if it doesn't happen, just go shred your Constitution because it's a meaningless document.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday.
	On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
	Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
	And I'm Carol Markowitz.
	We've been in political media for a long time.
	Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
	That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
	We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
	We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
	So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass.
	You're our kind of people.
	Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
	Hi, 25 to the top of the hour, 800-941-Sean.
	You want to be a part of the program?
	I know these are tough economic times.
	One way that you can save a lot of money and not sacrifice service at all is to make the switch to Pure Talk.
	They have the same exact cell towers, the same 5G network as ATT, Verizon T-Mobile, the big carriers.
	And we have great news today from our friends at Pure Talk, a veteran-owned company.
	Whether you are making the switch now and you're going to be new to Pure Talk or you're a current Pure Talk customer, Pure Talk has just added data to every single plan and they're including mobile hotspot to every single plan with no price increase at all whatsoever.
	Now, if you've been considering Pure Talk and you haven't pulled the trigger yet, you need to look again.
	The average family for the exact same service as the big carriers is saving close to $1,000 a month, many saving much more.
	PureTalk offers for 20 bucks a month.
	You get unlimited talk, unlimited text, and now 50% more 5G data and mobile hotspot.
	20 bucks a month.
	The Switch, they make it simple, fast, and easy.
	Just dial Pound250 on your cell phone, say the keyword save now.
	Do it now.
	You save an additional 50% off your first month.
	That's Pound250 keywords.
	Save now.
	Make the switch to my cell phone company, Pure Talk.
	All right, we take a quick break in our normal regular programming to get words of wisdom from your vice president, Kamala Harris.
	And I again want to thank the Secretary for your work.
	This issue of transportation is fundamentally about just making sure that people have the ability to get where they need to go.
	It's that basic.
	Let's go back and hear it one more time.
	It is so deep and so profound.
	I want you to really dig your mind into this, really absorb the wisdom.
	What a wordsmith she is.
	With the passage of time, well, it's important because time is passing and we're passing through time.
	And that's why the passage of time is passing so that we all pass through time.
	Again, words of wisdom from your vice president, Kamala Harris, about transportation.
	And I again want to thank the Secretary for your work.
	This issue of transportation is fundamentally about just making sure that people have the ability to get where they need to go.
	It's that basic.
	Transportation is fundamentally just making sure that people have the ability to get where they need to go.
	And time is passing and we're passing through time.
	The governor and I, and we were all doing a tour of the library here and talking about the significance of the passage of time, right?
	The significance of the passage of time.
	So when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires, what we need to do to create these jobs.
	And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children.
	I am so deeply moved.
	I mean, she gives some of the finest writers of all time a run for their money.
	All right, but I digress.
	Let me play Jim Jordan from today, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
	reading the July 4th court ruling.
	Now, that's the Missouri case that we have talked at length about.
	This is the case where Yo Roth, the then site integrity head for Twitter, acknowledged in these weekly meetings with Christopher Wray's FBI that they were being told that they may be victims of misinformation, a misinformation campaign in the lead up to the 2020 election.
	And the misinformation may be about even Hunter Biden.
	Here's Jim Jordan.
	Eight days ago on July 4th in the Western District of Louisiana, the court found that the federal government suppressed Americans' First Amendment free speech rights.
	In his conclusion on page 154, the court said this, the judge said this, plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has used its power to silence the opposition.
	Opposition to COVID-19 vaccines, opposition to COVID-19 mask and lockdowns, opposition to the lab league theory of COVID-19, opposition to the validity of the 2020 election, opposition to President Biden's policies, statements that the Hunter Biden laptop was true, and opposition to policies of the government officials in power.
	All were suppressed.
	It is quite telling that each example or category of suppressed speech was conservative in nature.
	The court further writes, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth.
	Specific to the FBI, the court said this, the FBI's failure to alert social media companies that the Biden laptop story was real and not Russian disinformation is particularly troubling.
	The FBI had the laptop in their possession since December 2019 and had warned social media companies repeatedly to look out for, quote, hack and dump operation by the Russians prior to the 2020 election.
	Even after Facebook specifically asked whether the laptop story was Russian disinformation, the FBI refused to comment, resulting in social media companies' suppression of this story.
	And as a result, millions, millions of our fellow citizens did not hear this story prior to the November 3rd, 2020 election.
	Additionally, the FBI was included in industry meetings, bilateral meetings, received and forwarded alleged misinformation to social media companies, and actually misled companies in regard to the laptop story.
	Let me put the court says the FBI misled.
	That's a nice way of saying they lied.
	They lied, and as a result, important information was kept from we the people days before the most important election we have, election of President of the United States, election of the commander-in-chief.
	Now, later on, under questioning from Congressman Mike Johnson of Louisiana, who was asking about the definition of disinformation, Christopher Wray had the audacity to claim the FBI doesn't moderate content.
	Well, then why was the FBI meeting with content providers and all these big tech companies weekly and warning them that the information, the disinformation may be about Hunter Biden?
	Facebook directly asks, is the laptop story real?
	No comment.
	They had verified it.
	They had authenticated it in March of 2020.
	We believe even before that, but no later than March of 2020.
	Anyway, here's Jordan citing examples of what we have in this country.
	And this is what I mean when I say we don't have equal justice or equal application of our laws.
	He talks about this two-tiered system of justice that we have.
	Listen.
	In a survey last fall, four out of five Americans said they believe there's a two-tiered system of justice in America today.
	They said that because there is.
	They said that because of what they've witnessed.
	Think about what Americans have seen.
	National School Board Association, left-wing political group, writes the White House and asks them to treat parents at school board meetings as terrorist.
	And the Garland Justice Department does just that.
	They put together a memo, set up a dedicated line of threat communication, a snitch line on parents.
	As a result, parents get investigated by our FBI, get a threat tag associated with their name, 25 of them, because whistleblowers came and told us we're investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
	Americans have seen the FBI's Richmond field office put together a memorandum saying pro-life Catholics are extremist.
	They've seen 20 FBI agents, SWAT team members, show up at the home of Mark Halk and arrest him in front of his wife and seven children, even though he had indicated he'd be happy to turn himself in.
	And what was he arrested for?
	Him and his 12-year-old son were praying outside an abortion facility.
	Some guy starts screaming in his son's face, and he did what, frankly, any dad would do, defended his child.
	What's interesting is the National School Board Association apologized for the letter, but the Attorney General refuses to rescind his directive.
	The FBI did rescind, thank goodness, the Richmond Catholic memorandum, but they refuse to tell Congress who wrote it and who approved it.
	And Mr. Halk, Mr. Halk, when he got his day in court, he was acquitted by a jury of his peers.
	You know, it was interesting how Chris Christie, who's not really running for president, Chris Christie, he's now in the middle of a love affair.
	He is.
	He's having a love affair with the media mob.
	Georgie Stephanopoulos, Morning Joe.
	Then we've got, you know, every liberal show on fake news, CNN, and MSDNC.
	Now he's defending that he recommended Chris Ray to lead the FBI.
	He's done a very good job.
	He told Piers Morgan the other night, filling in on Fox.
	He actually said to Piers Morgan that he doesn't think that the government should weigh in on whether or not underage kids can make the decision and have gender identity surgeries.
	And we should just let the parents decide.
	Well, how about we stop the indoctrination of our kids in school on these issues and go back to reading, writing, math, science, history, things like that, computers?
	No.
	One interesting moment, Ray said he was aghast at the targeting of Catholics.
	Well, thanks for admitting that you targeted Catholics at the FBI and Tiger moms like Linda at school board meetings.
	Do you like Tiger Mom?
	Do I like it?
	Yeah.
	I think we talked about it before.
	Oh, yeah.
	No, I'd like to be referred to as, you know, aggressive, factual.
	Aggressive, factual domestic terrorists.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Very subtle.
	Subtle.
	He wouldn't answer questions about how many FBI informants were part of the January 6th riot.
	The real question on January 6th is: you had all of this actionable intelligence, even reported by NBC News.
	Why didn't you act on it?
	Why didn't you work with the police chief at the time?
	Chief Sun wrote a book detailing how he was begging for guard troops and law enforcement assistance based on intelligence.
	And they didn't get to any of that.
	And then he actually claimed that the raid at Mar-a-Laga was not actually a raid.
	I'm like, well, then what would you call it?
	And if that was such a dangerous thing, why wasn't Hillary Clinton's Chappaqua home rated?
	And the location of her servers that had top secret classified information.
	Why wasn't they raided?
	Why the double standard?
	Why the dual system of justice?
	Why wasn't Joe's home raided in Delaware in the garage where his precious Stingray Corvette is?
	Why wasn't that raided?
	Or the Penn Biden Center raided?
	Or I guess you wouldn't call it a raid?
	Or the Beach House raided?
	Or the University of Delaware rated?
	All four locations had, in fact, top secret classified information.
	Matt Gates gets to the heart of it.
	Well, I'll play Matt Gaetz's exchanges later when he's on the program.
	And Jordan has just been drilling the FBI director.
	They just went into a recess.
	Matt Gaetz asking Direct, why are you protecting the Bidens?
	Why?
	I mean, it is so unbelievably corrupt.
	It's unreal.
	Anyone with eyes to see can see.
	You know, we see the double standard unfolding as it relates.
	You know, why didn't the FBI have any questions about Joe Biden bragging about leveraging a billion dollars?
	This is what the 1023 form that he didn't want to hand over to the committees was all about.
	He leveraged a billion taxpayer dollars, gave the Ukrainians six hours to fire a prosecutor.
	That prosecutor, turns out, was looking into Burisma Holdings, the energy giant in Ukraine, that was paying Hunter, who admitted on GMA he had no experience in oil, gas, energy, no experience in Ukraine, being paid a fortune.
	And because of Joe's actions of firing the prosecutor, the investigation stopped, and Hunter continued to get paid.
	By the way, emails obtained by House Republicans bolster the claim that Hunter Biden's prosecutor was blocked from filing charges.
	We'll get into this later with John Solomon because IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley, his boss, the special agent in charge of Darryl Walden, has confirmed that the prosecutor, David Weiss, did not have the authority to charge Hunter Biden.
	And the emails obtained by the House Republicans now show this.
	And although Weiss maintains he did have authority to charge, why did he tell six whistleblowers that are contradicting him?
	And I thought this country, especially Democrats, put great faith in whistleblowers.
	So why did the Delaware?
	And now we have a document that John Solomon has, and he'll explain it when he's on the show later.
	Why did Delaware prosecutor not bring charges that his very own office approved?
	And we have the document that shows that his office approved the charges, and they were felony tax charges dating back to 2014.
	And where's the investigation into Joe Biden into all of this?
	It never ends.
	But don't worry, Joe's on the job.
	By the way, a report, Obama is secretly working behind the scenes to dump Biden, according to Radar Online.
	This is just interesting if nothing else.
	But anyway, that's what they're claiming.
	We have Biden skipping last night's dinner with NATO leaders.
	He was tired.
	And they claimed his office, according to Sky News, the White House claiming Biden had four full days of official business and is preparing for a big speech.
	Okay, well, he really was preparing on the beach of Delaware when he can barely move his beach chair and get it in the proper place.
	That was scary, too.
	And then when he sat down, I mean, I can't believe that sucker didn't tip over.
	Came very close.
	And I stand by my claim.
	What?
	I think, if I may, the better conversation here is the side-by-side videos that are out there of Trump walking in and crushing the UFC.
	Oh, my God.
	I did that Monday night.
	No, I know, but we need to talk.
	We haven't talked about it here.
	Oh, yeah.
	He's a rocket.
	He looks like a monster.
	Biden looks like he belongs in the grave.
	He walked in with Dana White.
	Even Joe Rogan.
	Who's been critical of him?
	Joe Rogan wanted to shake his hand.
	Everybody wants to shake his hand because he actually can give a handshake.
	He's not going to fall over.
	You touch Joe Biden.
	He topples.
	Anyway, now CBS is a new headline.
	I assume meant with no irony, Biden's grandfatherly appeal may be an asset overseas at the NATO summit.
	Well, when is he going to acknowledge his four-year-old biological granddaughter in Arkansas that he has to now refused to acknowledge in any way, shape, matter, or form?
	Anyway, actually, CBS headline, you know, grandfatherly appeal.
	Okay, that's kind of cringeworthy.
	Even U.S. Today, USA Today following up on Maureen Dowd's criticism of this.
	All right, 800-941-Sean on number.
	We'll continue.
	As they cover Washington, Sean Hannity.
	All right, Bill O'Reilly, when we come back.
	Don't forget if you have valuables, you own a gun, you know how important it is to keep your gun safe and secure.
	Not all gun safes are created equal.
	Many are actually easy to break into, many overpriced, ugly, hard to access.
	That's why you need rhino metals.
	I love mine.
	And right now, they're offering in-store rebates up to $800 and free curbside delivery for online orders.
	The best gun safes on the market.
	I love mine.
	You'll love yours.
	Don't miss your chance.
	This is a chance for huge savings.
	The best way to protect your firearms, your valuables.
	Rhino safes.
	They have the industry's best warranty, the best customer service, veteran-owned since 1995.
	Rhinosafe.com.
	Rhino, spelled like the animal, R-H-I-N-O-S-A-F-E safe.
	Rhinosafe.com.
	All right, when we come back, all things simple, man.

▲