All Episodes
Previous Next
July 4, 2023 - Sean Hannity Show
32:22
Best of Hannity - Jim Jordan - July 3rd, Hour 3

Congressman Jim Jordan on this Best of Hannity episode.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart Podcast.
We're coming to your city.
This is the final battle.
With you at my side, we will demolish the deep state.
We will drive out the globalists.
We will cast out the communists.
We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country.
He cannot articulate the economy the way you just did.
Yeah, but I don't think he's capable.
I know he's capable.
I see results.
God bless you all.
Let's go.
Let's go late and let the world.
Let's get it done.
Freedom is back in style.
Accentate.
More behind the scenes information on breaking news and more bold, inspired solutions for America.
Coming up next, our final news roundup and information overload hour.
All right, news roundup, information overload hour.
Toll-free, our number is 800-941-Sean.
If you want to be a part of the program, well, obviously, the trust in our FBI and DOJ is at an all-time low.
Rasmussen survey shows for the first time in the history of the FBI, the American people no longer approve of how the Bureau is doing their job.
I could say, great job, James Comey, and great job, Chris Ray.
All right.
So now I want to bring in Congressman Jim Jordan.
He's heading up the House Judiciary Committee.
His committee specifically investigating whether or not the FBI has been politicized and the DOJ has been weaponized.
Now, we've been hearing rumors, you know, again this week, like we've heard in past weeks, that a pending indictment of Hunter Biden could be forthcoming any day now.
Are you hearing the same thing?
Well, we do.
We do hear the same thing.
Whether it's going to happen, you know, who knows?
I think some people have been hearing this for a couple years now.
So we just don't know.
But what we do know is what you said, Sean.
There's a reason why 60% of the country doesn't have a whole lot of faith in the FBI.
It's because they've earned that untrusting attitude on the part of the people.
They've earned it.
I mean, you go back to 2016, when we've talked about this so many times, but again, I'm looking through the Durham report.
When the FBI uses a dossier that they never corroborated one substantive fact in there, and they used that as a basis to spy on an American citizen associated with a presidential campaign.
Oh, my goodness.
And it just seemed to have gotten worse since then in so many ways.
So you can understand why they're.
And by the way, it says at the top of a FISA application, I've said it many times, verified, and they didn't verify one single thing.
And before they ever used it in the dossier, and Andrew McCabe acknowledged that without Hillary's bought and paid for dirty Russian disinformation dossier, they never would have gotten the FISA warrant approved.
But before it was ever used, the FBI sent agents over to meet with Christopher Steele and offered him a million-dollar bounty, and he couldn't receive a penny of this.
The Durham report references that.
So not one single substantive fact in that dossier was ever proven.
As a matter of fact, it's now all been debunked, but it was used as the basis for four FISA applications, three of them signed by James Comey.
Now, you tell me, Jim Jordan, you're a congressman, what would happen if Sean Hannity went before any judge in any court and just outright lied to them and said, I verified something that's not even verifiable.
Yeah, no, you'd be in big trouble.
It's even worse, though, Sean.
In the Durham report, there was intelligence that came into our government in the summer of 2016 that said this whole Trump-Russia thing is coming from the Clinton campaign.
That intelligence was credible enough that Brennan briefs the vice president, the president, the attorney general, and the FBI director.
So Obama, Biden, Lynch, and Comey all get briefed.
Then they put that intelligence into a memo, they call it a referral memo.
They give that memo to Jim Comey.
But guess what Comey does with it?
He doesn't share it with the lawyers.
He doesn't share it with the FISA court.
He didn't even give it to the agents on the case.
And then Durham points out in his report, he says one of those agents, when Durham is interviewing one of those agents, he shows him that referral memo.
And it was just amazing to see because you can just picture this scene.
He said the agent read the memo, becomes visibly upset, gets up and leaves the room, talks to his lawyer, comes back in, and basically says, if you read between the lines, it says, this is BS, that we didn't have access to this information.
This could have changed everything.
So they not only knew the dossier was baloney, they didn't validate anything in the dossier, they had exculpatory evidence that they failed to show to the court, to the lawyers preparing the FISA application, or to even the agent on the case.
That's how bad this was.
And that's why 60% of the country has concerns about the FBI.
And then we go to 2020, and then we have the FBI.
They had Hunter Biden's laptop.
John Solomon said they authenticated it in the spring of 2020.
They had it in 2019.
But yet FBI agents were pre-bunking it.
According to the case in Missouri, the former head of site integrity for Twitter, Yoel Roth, said, yeah, they were telling us that there may be a misinformation campaign to big tech companies, and it may be about Joe or Hunter Biden.
Well, they knew that that laptop was likely going to be leaked because they knew Rudy Giuliani had a copy of that laptop.
So they pre-bunked it.
They sure did.
They said it's going to happen in October.
It'll be a hack and dump operation.
It's going to buy, and it'll be about Hunter Biden.
Now, I mean, it's like, wow, they were like, they could predict the future.
I mean, they could tell what's coming.
I mean, it's like, well, of course they could tell because, as you point out, they had access to the laptop itself, and they knew it was legit.
And yet, they just didn't do it.
They pre-bunked the story, and they let 51 former Intel officials sign a letter with their titles, former head of CIA, former head of ODNI, with their titles, putting out a piece of information that was false because it said that this laptop was a Russian information operation when it wasn't.
Well, you just actually put out a letter regarding this, and you sent it to Tony Blinken, and that your permanent select committee on intelligence conducting oversight into all of this.
What are you asking for Tony Blinken to do considering he's up to his eyeballs and organizing all this?
Well, he prompted it.
He's the one who he initially contacts Mike Morrell.
Mike Morrell then goes and organizes this.
Tony Blinken, the campaign was telling Mike Morrell, here are the news outlets we want you to first give this letter to when you get the 51 people to sign it.
I mean, he was into this thing all the way, and he was the guy who prompted it, you know, initiated the whole thing.
So that's why we want to talk to him.
We want to know who all was involved.
We want to get documents things that may have happened there.
We're looking for all that information because it was a huge factor in the 2020 race.
And as we said many times before, for once, just stay out of these elections and let the American people decide.
But this is three presidential elections in a row, is it not where the DOJ vis-a-vis the FBI have now put cinder blocks on the scales to help Democratic candidates.
Is that a fair statement?
It's a fair statement, but it's also the midterms in between because 16 they spied on his campaign, 20 they did this, 24 they've now indicted him.
But in between on 2018, it was the Mueller investigation in 2022.
Remember, it was just 91 days before the election in 2022 when they raided President Trump's home.
And oh, by the way, when they're raiding President Trump's home, as we go into that election, they know about Joe Biden has the same thing, has a classified document concerned.
And they don't tell us that, even though they knew about it before the election.
So, yeah, it's every election since 16, 16, 18, 20, 22, now 24 that they've interfered with.
All right.
Let me go to this issue involving Burisma.
One of the deputy FBI officials was before the Senate committee, and Ted Cruz just tore this guy up.
Listen to this.
Last month, a whistleblower brought to light the existence in the FBI of a report in FD 1023 in which the informant alleges that President Biden and his family members engaged in a $5 million bribery scheme during his time as vice president.
Deputy Director Abati, is it true that the FBI has a report making those allegations?
I'm not going to comment on that, Senator.
And why is that?
I'm just not going to comment on information we received, investigations around.
Do you owe an obligation to the American people to be candid about evidence of corruption by the President of the United States?
This is an area that I'm not going to get into with you, Senator.
Well, I understand you don't want to, and that's why people are mad at the FBI, because you're stonewalling and covering up serious allegations of evidence of corruption from the president.
Now, what's interesting is the FBI, they've been doing nothing but stonewalling your colleague, James Comer.
Director Wray never wanted to hand over or even let him see that 1023 form.
Then they send redacted versions because Comer has to threaten contempt for Director Wray.
What is your take on this whole issue?
And, you know, we're reading now that there's a possibility of 17 tapes in total with a Burisma executive.
15 are with Hunter Biden, and two would be with then-Vice President Joe Biden.
Do we know anything about those tapes?
I don't know if they exist or not, but we do know what Senator Grassley told us.
And one thing about Senator Grassley, he doesn't usually make claims that aren't credible and that he doesn't have a basis to believe are actually accurate.
But I just don't know.
I do think what was interesting, though, the response that Mr. Abate gave to Senator Cruz is he didn't give a reason.
He said, I'm just not going to share that.
Well, what's the reason?
Is it because it's classified?
No, it can't be that because we know the document's not classified.
Is it because there's an ongoing investigation?
He didn't say that either.
So what's the reason that the American people can't see some pretty important information, alleged information, alleged wrongdoing by the guy who's now commander-in-chief, president of the United States?
I don't get it.
Remember, they initially told us when this document was raised, when the whistleblower came to Senator Grassland, they initially told Chairman Comer, we can't confirm whether that document exists.
And then they said, well, you know what?
Later on, it does exist, but you can't see it.
Then they said, well, it does exist, but we'll let you see it.
We'll let the ranking member of the committee see it.
And then finally, they said, we'll let all the members of the committee see it.
Look, let the country see it.
If it's not classified, just redact the source's name and let everything else be made available to we, the people.
That's how our system works.
That's called transparency.
That's what a government's supposed to do.
But no, no, no, the FBI doesn't even give Senator Cruz a reason for why they won't talk about this or confirm someone.
Well, let me play that from yesterday where the FBI deputy director refused to answer the question about the tapes.
Deputy Director Abate, does the FBI have 17 voice recordings laying out evidence of a bribery scheme?
Senator Daid Adol, I would add also that we've worked with the House Oversight Committee.
Yeah, this is the Senate.
We're the other side of the Capitol.
This is the Senate.
Do you have those 17 recordings?
I'm not going to comment on any investigative matters, Senator.
And the FBI has been stonewalling.
Now, my question is this.
You know, at some point, what levers does Congress have?
You obviously have the powers of the person in the House, and I know the FBI wants their new headquarters to be twice the size of the Pentagon.
I'm hoping that you guys will defund that, and maybe it's time for a total, complete restructuring of the FBI with certain checks and balances in place so they cannot involve themselves any further in presidential politics or elections in this country.
You said it better than I could, Sean.
It's like you're exactly right.
In the end, it's about the money.
And so you got to put restrictions on the money.
You maybe have to tell them you're not going to get as much of the American tax dollar as you've got before.
You're certainly not going to get money for a new headquarters, for goodness sake.
And maybe most importantly, this Congress, we aren't going to reauthorize FISA in the form that it's in.
It has to be changed dramatically, fundamentally.
And maybe even the FBI shouldn't be involved in FISA at all.
I said to someone yesterday, there are two.
I can't support FISA considering they never owned what they did.
We allowed top officials in our government to lie to FISA court judges without any consequences at all whatsoever.
I can't support that anymore.
And neither can the American people.
And 278,000 times the FBI illegally searched, queried the database, the FISA database.
So there are 278,000 more reasons than the one you decided for us not to reauthorize it that way.
So, yeah, that to me is maybe the biggest fight we have to prevail on.
We have to win this.
I'm just wondering what the odds are Sean Hannity's name shows up in all this.
It seems to show up all the time in text messages that I don't have access to.
Yeah.
All right.
So what's that?
But Sean, in that vein, remember what they did to President Trump here.
They got access to his lawyer's note.
Whatever happened to attorney-client privilege?
You don't break that unless there is a clear, clear problem, a crime fraud exception.
But like what they did here is so ridiculous, but it's in that same vein.
If we can go to a court, not tell the court what we're doing, lie to the court to get a FISA to spy on someone, why can't we also break the attorney-client privilege, which is exactly what they did to President Trump?
And on and on it goes.
And again, that's why 60% of the country is fed up with it.
All right, quick Frank Moore with House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan on the other side.
Then your calls, 800-941-Sean, as we continue.
I will continue with the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Jim Jordan is with us.
Let's talk about the status.
In many ways, you are working in tandem with the Oversight Committee, your Judiciary Committee, and that's Jim Comer's committee.
What is the status?
Because I think we're getting close.
Look, it took them less than eight months to bring indictments against Donald Trump.
We don't hear word one out of the special prosecutor assigned to Joe Biden and his document-classified scandal issues.
And yet we've had Hunter Biden's laptop since 2019, and now they're going to try and throw the American people a bone and create a false perception that they're fair and balanced by saying, oh, we're going to hit him with a gun charge.
He lied in his gun application, and he owes us back taxes for these three or four years, but ignore everything that involves Burisma and Joe and Hunter and all the other countries they have business with and all what the SARS report tells us and everything about every LLC this family has access to.
No, I know it's once again the double standard that drives Americans crazy.
You got Clinton, you got Biden, you got President Trump, and they all been, you know, there's all been concerns about how they handle classified documents, but only one of them gets indicted.
Are you kidding me?
So, yeah, the country gets that.
But we knew this was the case.
I think this is so important.
When Merrick Garland picked Jack Smith, when he selected Jack Smith as a special counsel, I said, this thing is so political because Jack Smith, I actually sat in a deposition with Jack Smith.
Deposed him back on May 29th, 2014, because Jack Smith, when he was working at the Justice Department then, was actually looking for ways to prosecute the victims, prosecute the people who were targeted by Lois Lerner and Barack Obama's IRS.
And so when you have a guy who's that focused on getting his political opponents, that focus on going after Tea Party patriots, what he was trying to do, that's the guy Merritt Garland picked to go after President Trump.
So it didn't surprise me that he went as fast as he did and he came out with a ridiculous 37 count indictment.
That is how political it is.
And that's how the dub, such a double standard.
Because like you said, Sean, we haven't heard the first thing from Robert Hurt what he's doing with the Biden special counsel investigation.
All right, Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, please keep up the good work and we will follow every detail as it becomes available.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you.
We're listening to the best of the Sean Hannity Show.
The radio show the mainstream media loves to hate.
This is the Sean Hannity Show.
All right, 25 to the top of the hour.
By the way, Biden today had a mini presser.
He needed cue cards to actually answer a few questions, not many.
He wasn't there very long.
Reading his answer to Ukraine at the press conference today.
That's how bad this is.
His eyes firmly focused downwards.
You know, think of that compared to the town hall I did with Donald Trump.
We finished the town hall.
We finished the hour.
Let's do some more.
I have more material than I can even air by the time we leave because he wants to stay so long and talk and has the ability to talk about any topic.
Doesn't matter, you know, fully, completely, you know, just engaged, aware.
Just so embarrassing, this guy.
Hey, want to remind you, exciting news from Hillsdale College.
If you want to take advantage of the classes and programs offered and you don't live there, they have new ways that you can connect with them.
Just go to the website we set up.
It's Seanforhillsdale.com, S-E-A-N-Hillsdale.com, and expand your knowledge this summer and all year round.
So Pat Robertson passed away.
I did not know him as well as I knew Jerry Falwell better, and I liked Jerry Falwell a lot.
But he was definitely a part of the integration of the American Christian community with politics and the conservative movement.
Played a huge, tremendous role.
He even ran for president himself, I believe it was in 1988.
And always nice to me.
Anytime I had a new book out, you know, I mean, they had a massive audience at TBN, huge.
And I know he said things at times that people hated or were controversial, but you know something, you know, the better part of his life, I think he lived out his faith.
That was what drove him.
And he has an amazing legacy of success, but hate, I mean, he's just hated by the left.
I mean, you know, I looked at some of the things that were said just briefly.
I mean, I didn't even spend any time.
And I'm like, people are just so vicious, even in death, they don't really care.
I wish I could come back and respond after I'm dead with all the horrible things they say about me.
I've been talking a lot about death the last two days, which is funny.
So anyway, our thoughts and prayers are with his family.
I know his son has pretty much taken over the day-to-day duties of the broadcast.
And he played a very integral part in helping this country get on track and build this conservative movement that we have in the country, as did Jerry Falwell with the moral majority.
And anyway, Linda says, well, we should pay homage to Pat Robertson today.
And I said, homage?
You mean homage?
And so we get into a big argument.
She's confident as can be, and I'm willing to like.
I'm still confident.
I'm willing to lay down $1,000 that most people.
First of all, that is so fake news.
When I finished it, it's $100 off air.
On air, it's $1,000.
Is there a rate increase?
No, I wouldn't fight for it.
I would have bet any amount of money.
Listen, bet $2,000.
You're wrong.
I'm right.
You know why you're overtalking me?
You're over talking me because you're dead wrong.
No, I'm just copying you.
I'm emulating you.
You're my mentor.
Okay, so then Linda says, okay, I can prove it to you.
Indeed, I did.
Okay, and then she pulls up, I guess, on your computer thingy.
On YouTube, on YouTube, some guy that does not sound exactly like he's like you from Philly and wherever the hell you grew up in and whatever Adam Schiffold neighborhood you grew up in.
Well, it was, was it not?
I don't even think I would call my neighborhood comparable to Adam Schiff.
Nothing is worth Adam Schiff.
Okay, well, it was, according to you.
It was bad, but you know, I mean, my God, I wouldn't even insult it that much.
Adam Schiff is the worst of all things.
All right.
So, anyway, she pulls up and how to pronounce it.
All right, so I asked Jason to download it.
This is, is it homage or is it homage?
And notice the order in which the pronunciations.
Can I no, no, no, no, because I'm not asking for your commentary.
I am throwing the tape.
I'm telling the no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
We'll talk about it on the other side.
You're getting nervous.
You don't want to hear it.
Not nervous.
You're very nervous.
All I want to do is.
You can admit it.
It's okay.
So you looked.
So they have programs that tell you how to do a proper pronunciation of words.
Now, in one way, it was a little surprising.
In another way, I was right.
Let's play it.
We are looking at how to pronounce this word that designates the gesture one makes as a special honor or a sign of respect shown publicly.
It could be a ceremony, a speech, or else to pay tribute to something or often to someone or a group of people.
So how do you go about pronouncing it?
There's essentially three different ways.
The British pronunciation is something like homage.
Homage.
Ding, ding, ding, Hannity Wright.
Homage, right?
Well, the British pronunciation does not deliver the H sound quite as much.
Homage.
But of course, the word originally comes from French, and in France, it said homage.
This is why you will hear people, even in English, saying homage, as it can essentially be said homage, homage, or homage, homage.
As an homage to this video, give it a quick thumb up before you go.
So the first one was how I said it.
The second one says, oh, not as much H, but there's still an H in there.
Homage.
Uh-huh.
With the H. Uh-huh.
That's how American says.
That's what it said.
I wrote it down.
I'm glad you wrote it down.
H, not as much.
But nobody says homage.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I'm pretty sure, as I was going to preface before we aired it, what are you looking for?
What are you looking for?
Are you looking for evidence?
I was looking for calls to see if it was right.
Okay, what's the first, what's the first pronunciation?
What was the first one he gave you?
The first pronunciation.
Because that's how he says it.
The first pronunciation is how the British people say.
For a person that has a thick New York accent and talk radio and forget about it and coffee.
What are you trying to say?
I can't be refined.
For you to say homage.
Homage.
It sounds ridiculous.
And let me tell you why I say it.
Nobody says homage.
Yes, they do.
You know why?
Because homage is the OG of the word, okay?
That's the original gangster version of how you say it.
Is that the French version is now referred to as the OG original gangster version?
So you're giving the OG version of homage.
Homage.
Nobody talks like homage.
No normal person talks like that.
I don't talk like that, but that word is France.
You said to me, should we give homage to Pat Robertson?
Yes, because he was so sweet and he was so nice.
And I said to you.
Homage.
What do you mean, homage?
And you looked at me, you said, you mean homage?
I said, you mean homage?
Sorry, are you from England now?
Forgive me.
You've been there twice.
You mean the way the guy said it?
Yeah.
He said, people in England say homage.
People in America don't say the H too much.
They say homage.
The H, not as much.
They said homage.
Homage.
But the original two out of three, I win.
First of all, how could you be two out of three?
You didn't say homage.
A girl that grew up in the worst part of Philly suburbs is telling us that the way to say homage is homage.
You should not grow up in the suburbs.
You just say you grew up in the suburbs.
Where'd you grow up in?
I grew up in the city.
Well, that explains this.
Yeah, that explains homage.
That explains this.
Every once in a while, this explains the desire of you to get out of your past.
Do you want us to bring up old tapes of you from when you were first on Fox News with that Long Island accent that you used to be saying?
Okay, are you done?
I implore you saying homage, actually, because I'm sure that exists.
No, I've never said homage.
You know how many times you said it today?
A lot.
Okay, but today doesn't count.
But do you want to have a little memory of Pat Robertson in our homage?
No, I just want something.
I mean, he played a very integral part.
The Christian Coalition, he leaves a legacy of this great law school, Regents.
It was a great university.
And I love that he was hated.
And he was hated for his faith.
And, you know, did he say some kind of out there things when he pray for storms to, you know, God, please divert them?
I mean, you're allowed to have prayer in your heart.
So what?
You know, there's only three groups of people now that you can legitimately attack.
Well, four, if I include those that say homage.
But the three are: if you're African-American and conservative, you can attack them.
I think the board is speaking that I'm correct.
I'm seeing a lot of Linda's right.
Linda's correct.
It's a very smart audience, as you often say.
It's the smartest audience.
All right, Greg in Rhode Island.
What do you mean Linda's correct?
I just played for you the three ways to say it.
Sean, I love you.
You're a great American.
How do you think?
Don't give me the butt.
Here comes the butt.
How do you think Billy Kennighan would say it, by the way?
No, Linda.
Sean Hannity, you're a great American.
God bless you.
God bless America.
I need a full report.
Yeah, it's homage, though.
Okay, it's homage.
And do you say homage?
I'm going to pay homage to my favorite so-and-so that passed away.
You actually say it that way.
He's gone.
He went to pay homage to the money.
Matt, North Carolina.
Do you agree with this nonsense?
I got to tell you, man.
Let me ask you: when you take your car home, where do you park it in?
In the garage.
Yeah, you don't say garage, right?
Thank you.
Checkmate.
No, is he whose side are you on?
He's on my side.
Did he say that?
I want to hear him say it.
Say it.
No, no, no, Sean.
You got to say it the right way.
The way is homage because it came from the French.
That's why you said it.
Oh!
I'll tell you that thousand years ago.
So forget about the, so let's just bastardize our entire language and turn it into French derivatives and forget about the English version of saying it and the American way of saying it, considering we were once colonized by England.
I think I'm going to order you some fish and chips for dinner.
You get you back with your people.
I do not like French, so they're always going to say it differently.
But it was worded.
Let me tell you something.
We should have learned a long time ago.
And we learned it more recently with Macrone when he went to China and basically tipped his hat to President Chi that he can take Taiwan.
Don't trust the French government ever.
Like a lot of fun out of the conversation, Rahab.
You took it mad serious to Macron in China.
We're just talking about words here.
You know, he had a wonderful analogy.
Right.
And what was the first?
He said there are three pronunciations.
Say the first one.
There's homage.
The way I said it.
This is the way you say it, weird from England.
Then there's, and sweet baby, of course, sides with you because you know he's the bloodline.
The H, not as much.
On the American.
And then homage, OG, OG, original, because that's the way it's supposed to be said.
Homage.
Homage.
No, it's homage.
No, it's not homage.
Like a fine cheese.
And they do have good cheese.
You know what I can't stand?
That's one thing France does well.
It's cheese.
Why don't you like cheese?
I hate cheese.
Why not?
Isn't that keto?
I'm not a big cheese.
Isn't there another caller that might want to agree with me?
I think there is.
There might be one or two more.
Porter, what do you got?
What's up, Porter?
Hey, sorry.
Let me take your speakerphone.
Good idea.
Thank you.
Or as they say in French, speak off phone.
Speak off a phone.
I was just commenting.
Mademoiselle, how beautiful you look this evening.
May I get you?
So I want to play.
Sorry, Porter.
I want to pay homage to your beautiful dress tonight.
Come on, man.
It's Pepe Le Pue.
No, I was just commenting the end of the video.
Technically, it was saying that the original use of the word was a French word of homage.
The one that you just got done playing in the video there.
Right.
How many Americans can speak French?
Not many.
I don't speak French, and I would have said homage as well.
Thank you.
Man, one in your coffer.
Go ahead.
Check me.
Thank you.
Debbie, last word in Florida.
What's up, Debbie?
Homage.
Oh, Debbie.
That's three from me, girl.
All right, Debbie, do you know anybody?
How many people do you know in your life, Debbie, that speak French?
Mademoiselle?
Oh, Polyvous Fonfré.
Oh, my love.
You actually look pretty good.
Oh, you look so beautiful.
I pay homage to French.
I'm pretty sure that's just English sound in French.
I pay homage.
I pay homage to your beautiful dress.
The bottom line is: three callers in your very smart audience agreed with me today.
Debbie, do you know anybody that actually talks that way?
Me?
I don't know anybody who says homage.
I'm sorry.
Oh, Debbie.
Wow.
Debbie's on the Christmas card list.
Well, look, I'm sticking to my blue-collar roots, man.
I don't really give a flying rip.
Homage to the blue-collar people of America.
Pay homage to them?
Homage, homage.
Any way you want to say it here in your world.
No, let's play homage to them.
I mean, listen.
Because I'm sure the average guy on a construction site, if you ask them, is going to go, how do you say, how would you say homage?
Homage, Mr. Hannibal.
That's homage.
And he's going to order a little nice cheese on a sandwich.
He's going to, you know, maybe you'll get a cheese blint.
Maybe he'll order a cheese crepe.
I mean, I guess we could like the wine.
Maybe.
Italian wine is a lot better.
I love France.
Italian is better.
Italian.
Oh, number four.
No, we got to go now.
Oh, it's two.
We're moving over here.
800-941 Sean is on number one.
Now we wasted a whole half hour on this.
And I am so much wealthier than I was 10 minutes ago.
By the way, Mike Pence, who's jumped into the enjoying yourself?
I really am.
I'm going to be quiet.
I'm sorry.
It's a good idea, but you can't contain yourself.
You're going to literally wet your pants if you keep laughing this hard.
Good grief.
Here we go.
Now that laugh is about to go.
Let's get the laugh out so people can hear that.
I swear.
We'll give homage to the laugh.
All right.
Give me my piece here.
I got to.
What are we doing?
Is it time?
Oh, is it time?
Oh, sorry.
Yeah, you've wasted the whole segment.
aggravating all right when we come back we'll pay more homage to other more people calling and saying i'm right than you Now that we've actually really opened the phones, let them vote on Nanny D.com.
No, no, because you guys run the website and you're gonna stack it.
You always say like Linda.
It's already up.
Well, take it down.
No.
My website.
What happened to this show?
No freedom in America.
All right, when we come back, homage.
Homage.
Vice President Mike Pence now announcing he's run has run for the presidency.
He joins us.
▲
Export Selection