All Episodes
June 14, 2022 - Sean Hannity Show
33:18
Saving The Supreme Court - June 13th, Hour 3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is an iHeart podcast.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markowitz.
And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down with Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
All right, news round of information overload hours, Sean Hannity Show, 800-941-Sean is our number.
If you want to be a part of the program, with the exception of Fox News Sunday, all the other Sunday shows, ABC, CBS, NBC, fake news, CNN, all they wanted to talk about ad nauseum was January 6th, January 6th, January 6th.
Of course, never talk about the riots in the summer of 2020, 574 of them in case you lost count.
Dozens of dead Americans, thousands of injured cops, billions in property damage.
But what really struck me the most is the lack of total coverage.
It was like a blackout of coverage of the assassination attempt against a Supreme Court justice, in this case, Brett Kavanaugh.
It was ignored by every Sunday show, but for Fox News Sunday.
You can't even make this up.
Now, Brett Baer was hosting and he confronted Senator Chris Koons on it and so on.
I give him a lot of credit for at least bringing it up.
Why didn't these other networks bring it up?
Now, if it was a liberal justice and a MAGA supporter, what do you think they would do?
Wall-to-wall coverage.
We need a committee.
Did Donald Trump motivate this person?
And they would have lost their mind.
Just like, for example, I can't imagine a Republican or a conservative or a Trump supporter going on the steps of the Supreme Court and making threats like Chuck Schumer did.
And I don't think we can play this enough.
Listen.
I want to tell you, Gorsuch.
I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price.
You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
You won't know what hit you.
Don't find it particularly funny.
I've been doing this for, I'm not giving out the addresses of Supreme Court justices or anybody that sits on the bench.
Number one, it's illegal, and as we have cited on this program, and number two, it's reckless, it's irresponsible, it's dangerous, and you're literally, you know, you're giving tacit approval to a bunch of nutcases.
No wonder something like this happened.
Now, the guy that wanted to assassinate Kavanaugh, they finally released on Friday the 911 tape, here it is.
And you said you came from California.
Do you know someone down here?
Brett Kavanaugh.
And what were you coming to there just to hurt yourself and him?
Or what was going to happen?
Correct.
Correct.
It's pretty unbelievable.
Anyway, joining us now is Senator Michael.
He's got a brand new book out, and it's about the left's effort to pack the U.S. Supreme Court.
And we appreciate you being with us, Senator.
We're going to put the book on Hannity.com.
It's on Amazon.com, bookstores everywhere.
How are you?
I'm doing great.
Thank you very much.
So we know that there's a lot of efforts out there by the left.
Like, for example, we'll get to this in a second.
They want to pack the courts.
They want to end the filibuster.
They want D.C. and Puerto Rico statehood.
We know that the left now is saying that they want to abolish certain people on the left, Bill Press among them, Michael Moore among them.
They want to eliminate the Second Amendment.
Jamie Raskin wants to get rid of that outdated relic called the Electoral College, which would mean New York and New Jersey and California and Illinois will pick all our presidents and all that flyover country, all those red states wouldn't have a say for the most part in a presidential election.
So you see all of these efforts, but the biggest effort seems to be on the court.
Yes.
Those efforts are all about the court.
And all of these things have at their core something common, which is a desire to erode our constitutional structure, to erode the objectivity and the independence of the federal courts, because Sean, they know that that's what they have to do.
If they want to eliminate provisions of the Constitution they don't like or they find inconvenient, they have to politicize the courts.
And to do that, they have to delegitimize the courts and isolate those members of the courts with whom they disagree.
This is a tried and true standard that they've followed.
They've been following it at least since the 1930s.
And I explain in chapters four and five of Saving Nine exactly how that unfolded last time and why we're still paying the price for it today.
All right.
So the book is called Saving Nine.
Do you think if Roe v.
Wade is overturned, now Joe Biden announced that he may take executive action.
I would argue I don't think he has the authority constitutionally to do so, but let's put that aside for a second.
Do you believe that this now reignites the left's effort to pack the courts with judicial activists with the intention of legislating from the bench?
Absolutely, Sean.
I believe that because it's already here.
It's already happening.
When I decided to write this book over a year ago, it was already starting to unfold then.
But as soon as the Alito draft opinion, which I highly recommend to all of your listeners to read, it's very informative about all the reasons why Roe versus Wade was wrong, regardless of how someone feels about abortion.
It's not grounded in the Constitution.
But all of those things could reignite, and I believe will give substantial momentum to the increasing call to pack the court.
In fact, in the wake of the leak opinion, you've seen Elizabeth Warren using extensively the moniker hashtag expand the court.
See, this is how the left refers to it now.
Court packing has kind of a taint to it, inappropriately so, and so they've come up with a euphemism to it.
Expand the court.
All these things, Sean, as I explained in Saving Nine, they're just an excuse for the liberals to control the judiciary so that it's no longer independent, so that the judiciary can't follow the Constitution and make sure that we are following it as well.
So you write this book, Saving Nine, the fight against the left's audacious plan to pack the court.
Okay.
So they're trying to pack the court.
But for Kristen Sinema and Joe Manchin, they wanted to end the filibuster completely.
You got people like Jamie Raskin now talking about this outdated relic called the Constitution and wanting to eliminate the Electoral College.
Then, of course, if they see an area like D.C. or Puerto Rico where they think they'll get, oh, additional Democratic senators in perpetuity, at least in their minds, let's go forward with that power grab as well.
So far, Republicans have been able to fend it off.
But if in fact, if the Republicans don't have this wave election that everyone seems to be anticipating, including myself, I think especially the House looks very favorable for the Republicans to gain control.
I think it's a little tougher in the Senate.
I know you're up.
We've endorsed your candidacy out in Utah.
I can't believe that Mitt Romney, when is he up?
Because he needs to go, has not enthusiastically supported you.
You've been nothing but nice to him.
But I know the people of Utah support you.
And this is a key race for Republicans, like every other race that's going on.
But, you know, we have every bellwether state pretty much up for grabs.
Do you think the Republicans grab the Senate?
I think we have a very good chance of doing that.
There are a couple of things that we've got to make sure that we don't.
Basically, unless we blow it, I think we're going to take the majority of both houses.
There are a few things we could do to blow it.
Number one, we could do things to sort of disappoint our own face or our own face doesn't show up.
We should avoid doing those things.
We should stick true to our conservative principles rather than giving in to whatever the mainstream news media is trying to tell us to do.
We also have to make sure that we get our people out to vote and to elect Republicans.
In my state, as you allude, I'm facing a challenge from an independent named Evan McMullen, one who is now endorsed by the Utah Democratic Party, which didn't win its own candidate.
My statewide paper, the Deseret News, recently ran a poll showing him within four points of me.
There's no way that poll is accurate.
Yeah, my polling shows a healthier lead than that.
But still, the fact that they could get to a poll like that in the first place is concerning.
And by the way, if your listeners want to, they can support my campaign at leapforsenate.com.
But we do have to make sure that we mind the farm, so to speak, that we stay on task.
Those of us who are serving in the Senate, we've got to make sure that we're still doing conservative things.
And one of the things that we have to do is guard heavily against attacks on the nuclear option.
If they bring about a nuclear option, they could bring about years, if not decades, of unbroken Democratic rule in this country.
And that should worry everyone.
That really is the end result of so much of what they want to do.
And it's one of the reasons why I felt so compelled to write Saving 9.
See, I think you're right on them wanting to pack the courts.
And I think that's probably the area they most want to focus on.
But then you've got all these other issues that we're talking about, power grabs, ending the filibuster, packing the courts, getting rid of or eliminating the Electoral College.
You know, you don't need a gun, Michael Moore says.
He promotes a full repeal of the Second Amendment, tells people to get dogs for protection.
Oh, okay.
Is that predicated on a belief that criminals are going to go and abide by the new laws that take our Second Amendment rights away?
Or Bill Press saying, you know, let's just get rid of the Second Amendment completely.
Is that how the things work?
Because I thought we had a process that's called a constitutional amendment.
And we all know that that would never fly with the American people.
No, that's exactly right.
And this is one of the points I make repeatedly in Saving Nine, in Chapter 3, Chapter 4, Chapter 5.
I talk about instances in which the left doesn't like key features of the Constitution.
And so when the court predictably does what courts do, and it typically interprets the language of the Constitution to mean something that it actually means, and the left doesn't like that, then they threaten to pack the Supreme Court.
This is how they, in effect, amend the Constitution without going through the amendment process.
I tell a specific story about how the Constitution was effectively amended on April 12, 1937, in response to one of these threats, in response to one of these court-packing efforts, and why the same could happen here.
We can't allow that to happen.
As far as this point about need, it galls me to hear lefties, it's always lefties, or sometimes it's left-leaning Republicans, who will spout off about, oh, you don't need a gun or you don't need this particular type of firearm.
Since when we're right about need, imagine, for example, the outcry, appropriately so.
If someone said, you don't need a newspaper, people can get their news and information from the internet or from the television.
They don't need a newspaper, so we're going to outlaw them.
There would, of course, be a widespread outcry because that's not a right.
Rights are not predicated on a specific need.
They are rights because we exist and rights exist and we exist in the same universe.
And the Constitution acknowledges that.
Hey there, I'm Mary Catherine Howe, and I'm Carol Markowitz.
We've been in political media for a long time.
Long enough to know that it's gotten, well, a little insane.
That's why we started Normally, a podcast for people who are over the hysteria and just want clarity.
We talk about the issues that actually matter to the country without panic, without yelling, and with a healthy dose of humor.
We don't take ourselves too seriously, but we do take the truth seriously.
So if you're into common sense, sanity, and some occasional sass, you're our kind of people.
Catch new episodes of Normally every Tuesday and Thursday on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you listen.
I'm Ben Ferguson, and I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So down on Verdict with Ted Cruz now, wherever you get your podcasts.
All right, as we continue with Senator Mike Lee of Utah, he's just came out with his new book, Saving Nine: The Fight Against the Left's Audacious Plan to Pact the Supreme Court, destroy American Liberty.
And by the way, it's on Hannity.com, Amazon.com, bookstores everywhere.
You know, to me, that's just basic and it's simple and it's fundamental and it's worked for us.
And yet you have all these efforts to alter, shift, change.
But we have a process for that.
That would be a constitutional amendment.
And I don't think they're going to be able to pull any of that off that way.
Let's say, for example, that Joe Biden tries to alter constitutional rights by executive order.
How does that play out?
Okay, so he doesn't have the power to do that.
And I assume you're talking here about his ability to somehow reimpose by executive order some version of Roe versus Wade.
Well, that's sort of specifically he was talking about, yes.
Yes, yes.
That is science fiction fantasy.
The idea that a president could exert that kind of power is laughable.
So if he were to do it, number one, he would not hold up in court because there's nothing, nothing in the Constitution.
There's no federal statute anywhere that gives the president that type of sweeping power.
Number two, if he were to claim to have that, the courts are going to point out it's not there.
And so they will stop him.
But it will do violence to the constitutional system in the meantime, because every time you see one of these frontiers pushed like that, you incrementally weaken the system.
And I think for the Democrats, it's a feature, not a bug.
And as I explained in Saving Nine, the feature, not a bug, for them, that when they push court packing, whether it succeeds or fails, it still does lasting harm.
It's a great book.
It's a great read.
If you want a senator that actually knows the Constitution, you're one of the few that really know it as well as you do.
The book is called Saving Nine, the fight against the left's audacious plan to pack the Supreme Court and destroy American Liberty.
It's on amazon.com, Hannity.com, bookstores everywhere.
Senator Mike Lee of Utah, your race is very important.
We enthusiastically endorse your re-election and wish you the best.
Thanks for being with us.
Thanks so much, Sean.
800-941-Sean, our number.
We'll get right to the phones when we get back.
Quick break, right back.
I'm Accountable.
Sean gets the answers no one else does.
America deserves to know the truth about Congress.
All right, 25 now to the top of the hour.
I don't know what we're going to do about this guy as president.
I mean, it's obvious now to everybody.
They're just not saying it.
They're not vocal about it.
They don't have the courage of their convictions to say it.
But these cognitive issues with Biden are just so bad.
It's so humiliating.
It's so embarrassing.
I mean, and, you know, he's on Kimmel last week.
And then we got the, my favorite, though, is the gaffe montage of all time.
And I could probably play an hour's worth of it.
It's that much material that's out there.
Listen.
And a pound of Ukrainian people.
The first lady's husband contracting COVID.
We're emerging from this pandemic.
We want to expand pre-K for three and four-year-olds, millions of free care.
40% of all products coming into the United States of America on the West Coast go through Los Angeles and what am I doing here?
We choose truth over facts.
Play the radio.
Make sure the television, excuse me, make sure you have the record player on at night.
The phone.
Make sure the kids hear words.
Make sure kids hear words.
Dean in California, what's up, Dean?
How are you?
All right, Sean.
How are you?
I'm good, sir.
What's on your mind?
When I was young, I always believed that our leaders, our politicians, mayors, president, the whole shooting match.
I always thought that they picked from a poll of the smartest and most intelligent people among us.
And as I got older, I began to realize that's just not the case.
And I wondered, why isn't it the case?
Why aren't they vetted for intelligence, a working knowledge of the Constitution, the meaning of the words in the Constitution and why they were the economy?
You see what happened, for example, to Donald Trump, three years of never-ending Trump-Russia conspiracy theory lies, right?
You know, you don't have to like Donald Trump's speech on January 6th, but he did say for people that they're going to march peacefully and patriotically so their voices can be heard.
And now we know because the people in the room have told us that he authorized up to 20,000 troops days before.
But the committee will say, well, he didn't call up the troops that day.
No, he authorized it two days earlier.
And the jurisdiction to call up the troops were Nancy Pelosi, Muriel Bowser, and the Sergeant of Arms House Senate.
But they're not going to talk to those people.
So you see the way the political arena works.
Let me ask you: why would any smart person want to subject themselves and their family to that hell?
And I'm asking honestly.
You mean like to January 6th, like what happened there?
No, I'm saying if you look at the scrutiny, if you look at how toxic politics has become, and some people accuse me of being a big part of that, okay, I'm looking for solutions to save the country, and my solutions are conservative solutions.
And what they're doing is screwing up the country so bad and causing pain and misery for so many Americans.
I'm a conservative.
Conservatism works.
It's not about party.
It's about what works.
So, but I look at, you know, half the country is nuts.
Half the country is bought into this climate alarmism crap.
And if you ask me, I mean, how many people want to go through that hell that it would take to become president, for example?
I don't think many Americans, people who are die for what they believe in, and they need to get forward.
The smartest.
We need those people.
We need the best to branch like our military.
You're right.
You raised their good.
That's the perfect answer.
You have to do it from a sense of service, not a sense of ego or self-gratification or fulfillment or whatever, narcissism.
None of those things are going to pay off in the end.
But I will tell you.
They're willing to put their life on the line to make what they believe in.
And I don't mean like the woke thing.
I mean to believe in the Constitution, to believe in the way that America was set up.
And it was set up that way for a reason.
I mean, each one of us should be able to open carry a weapon.
They took that away from us.
And now you have all these mass shootings.
If the crowd was packing a pistol on each and every one, that would never happen.
But they don't see it that way.
They want to take away the gun.
Well, that happened the weekend after that school shooting.
I told you about a case about a, I forget exactly where it was.
There was an active shooter, and a woman was armed, and she stood up, and she took the shooter out and saved probably dozens of lives.
Should be.
Yeah, but, you know, to me, it's about common sense.
It's simple, basic, fundamental common sense.
And then you ask these people like Bill Press or Michael Moore that are now saying openly they want to abolish the Second Amendment.
And Michael Moore's answer is to get a dog.
Okay, so the criminal that doesn't obey laws that has the gun, first thing he's going to do is shoot your dog and then he's going to shoot you.
So good luck with that policy.
It's not going to work.
Anyway, Dean, you raise a good point, man.
Appreciate it.
The thing is to get the best people that stand on the right principles, that will fight the hardest and understand that they're going to try and lie and bludgeon them to death and not be fearful when that happens because that's almost inevitable for anybody in the public eye now.
Chuck is in Michigan.
Hey, Chuck, how are you?
Glad you called.
I'm doing great.
Hey, I'm an owner, operator, truck driver.
I pay upwards.
Thank you for what you do.
Oh, yes.
And I pay over $500 more to fill up my truck every other day.
And it's getting worse every time I go in.
And now with the recession coming up on the horizon, they're lowering our rate.
And I just want to know why when Joe Biden says that he's pumping more oil than Donald Trump did in his first year, why doesn't anybody press him and say, you know, so then on the second, third, and fourth year, you're going to pump more oil?
Nobody seems to ever want to ask the hard questions of anybody.
Well, I mean, look, the media's given Biden a pass.
I mean, don't you find it embarrassing that he's going all over the world to two-bit dictators, begging them to produce more energy, oil, you know, talking to Iran, Venezuela, OPEC nations, and Saudi Arabia when we have enough energy resources here under our own feet.
We don't need it.
We don't need their energy.
And they're getting rich as hell off it.
And, you know, people are asking, well, why are these golfers going with LIV golf?
And in large part, these countries are so filthy rich because we have government-elected officials that are so dumb and stupid, adhering to this sick climate alarmist cult.
It's a religious cult for them.
And it doesn't matter how much we're paying for gasoline or what the inflation rate is because that agenda absolutely supersedes what's best for the American people.
And it's not based in reality.
You know, where's the money for solar and wind?
False religion is what it is.
What's that?
I said it's worshiping a false religion, is what liberalism is.
Yeah, well, to them, it's a religion because they're clinging to their failed policies and they'll pay the price for it.
But whether they make the adjustments, I think they'd probably only be surfaced anyway.
Now, let me ask you: are you putting the cost, the extra additional fuel costs, diesel costs onto the consumer, or are you eating that?
How do I do it?
I drive what's called the spot rate.
And they determine what the rate is.
And now the rate's dropping because we have a recession on the horizon.
But there's an ebb and flow to that, according to my friends.
I guess there's like a national bulletin board, and you get to pick different runs.
They offer a run from this city to that city at this rate, and you can take it or leave it or negotiate.
Is that correct?
Correct.
And now they're offering less because when a recession comes around, the brokers want to take a bigger piece of the pie because they see they're not going to make as much money down the road.
Well, don't you, as an owner-operator, have the ability to pick and choose your own routing?
Yes, I do.
But you know what?
I mean, the other alternative is for me to sit home and not make any money.
No, that's not an alternative.
No, it's not.
By the way, the day truckers start doing that is the day we all starve.
Thanks.
Please don't do that.
I don't.
Listen, I really do sympathize with you because, you know, here you are, you're hustling your ass off.
You've invested all this money.
God forbid your truck goes down now.
I have friends of mine.
They actually took one truck off their fleet.
It's a small fleet.
I think they have like 15 trucks, something like that.
And they use one truck just for spare parts so they don't have to wait for all the spare parts because one of the trucks goes down.
They can't get the parts immediately.
It takes time to get them now.
It's been down for two months because I had to do an engine rebuild on my truck that just cost $20,000.
Oh, good crease.
And now I'm coming back to a lower rate.
Yeah, and I'm hopeful that they go back up higher.
I'm hoping demand.
I mean, I guess it was like six months ago.
I read that we had a shortage of about 80,000 drivers.
So hang in there, Chuck.
I really do sympathize for you.
I mean, you're doing everything right in life.
You're working hard, playing by the rules.
And now, in the middle of a, you know, basically a recession, these inflationary times, you know, you're screwed and you end up paying more, making less.
That just sucks.
And all of it, again, is unnecessary.
Let's say hi to Stacey is in Pennsylvania.
Hey, Stacey, how are you?
Thanks for checking in.
Hi, Sean.
How are you?
Thank you very much for taking my call.
I'm a small farmer from Pennsylvania, and I'm also the 2022 Pennsylvania Elite in the United States Agricultural.
And I am calling to encourage everyone, if they haven't done so, especially the younger generations, to learn how to grow your own food.
Now you're scaring me.
Now, I do know how to grow food.
People might laugh at this.
But one time in my life, I had this huge garden.
I did it for a couple of years.
I just did it because I wanted to learn how to do it.
Corn, cucumbers, you name it, peppers.
I did everything.
But I'll tell you what happened.
Then I began to realize farming is hard work.
And it was only, it was, you know, it was, I don't know, it was not that big of a plot of land.
But I, you know, you'd have to weed it and water it.
And it just was a lot.
It was a heavy lift.
And I love corn the most.
Then I realized I could walk down the block and pay, you know, like $5 for, you know, a dozen corn.
And I'm like, I'd rather go, I think that's the better way to go.
How many acres do you have?
I have six acres and about 150 chickens and ducks and turkey.
Now, do you kill your own chickens and turkeys?
I do not know.
I'm an egg farm and I also sell different types of fruit plants.
Are you making a profit?
I know people are having trouble with fertilizer and seeds are more expensive and equipment is more expensive and harder to repair.
How are you coping with all those challenges?
Right now I'm doing okay because I'm using the resources that I have.
Like for the for all the plants, I use all the manure and all the mulch from the barn and then I put it right on the plant.
So the amount of nitrogen is actually helping the soil.
So I can rotate crops every season.
And for deliveries too, because I'll have customers stop by the location and pick up eggs.
And then what I've also done too to save on gas is to limit my deliveries.
Like if I'm going to a certain place, I'll take care of the other customers in that area just to save on going back and forth, back and forth.
So then that'll save a delivery fee for the customers as well.
You know what I love?
I love the fact that I hear in you, you're finding ways, big and small, to streamline your entire business.
I love that because you're being creative.
You're using your brain.
And hopefully you're still making about the same amount of money as you did before all these bad economic policies.
But a bigger farmer is, they need fertilizer.
There's not going to be enough manure for them.
And I don't care how many cattle they're raising.
They need to buy the seeds.
They need to buy the fertilizer.
And without it, they got a problem.
Then they have tractors and then trying to get spare parts for them.
That now is problematic.
And what's happening, what they're telling me, what I'm reading even, is that a year from now, we're going to have a food shortage, the likes of which we haven't seen in our lifetime if this continues.
I hope that's not true.
Same here in a second.
And that's why the younger generations, they have to learn now because you can't rely on anybody but yourself.
And especially with the parents getting involved with teaching their children, because we may not have that choice to go to the grocery store and get food because there may not be that delivery or if it's going to be so expensive that no one's going to be able to afford it.
And another thing too, that you don't have to have a lot of land to grow food.
Like even people in cities, like they can have like strawberry plants, tomato plants, use their buildings, like the rooftop as a garden.
Like there's possibilities no matter how.
We just have to teach everybody how to use the resources and things.
You know, it's amazing that we have so perfected farming that we not only feed the entire country farmers, but we feed a significant portion of the world.
And they've been able to streamline, you know, the science of agriculture is so sophisticated today.
And, you know, the thought that they're having struggles of, you know, we don't have enough fertilizer.
We don't have enough seeds.
It's costing so much.
I can't even make a profit.
Why am I even doing all this backbreaking work?
Is pretty mind-numbing to me.
But it is fascinating.
It's going to be fascinating to watch if, in fact, all of this develops the way I'm reading and I'm being told by people that are farmers like yourself, small farmers like yourself, large farmers, we're going to have a food shortage.
What are we going to do then?
We're going to go to Russia and get our wheat from them?
It's scary times.
Anyway, God bless you, Stacey.
I think it's good advice.
I think everybody at some point in their life, you should get your hands dirty and definitely, you know, have a garden.
You know, grow whatever you like to eat.
You like bell peppers, you like cucumbers, you like tomatoes, you like corn.
I found it rewarding, but I found it too hard.
All right, that's going to wrap things up for today.
Load it up tonight.
Yep, tough, tough economic times.
We will give you the news.
The mob chooses to ignore.
They're too fixated on the 400th hour of coverage of January 6th with no new information.
Anyway, we'll load it up.
Laura Trump, Pete Hagseth, Senator Rick Scott, Kevin McCarthy, and his relationship with Donald Trump apparently repaired.
Adam Carolla, Mike Huckabee, Kayleigh McInaney, all coming up.
Set your DVR.
Hannity, Fox News, Nine Eastern.
See you tonight.
Back here tomorrow.
Thank you for making this show possible.
You want smart political talk without the meltdowns?
We got you.
I'm Carol Markowitz.
And I'm Mary Catherine Hamm.
We've been around the block in media and we're doing things differently.
Normally is about real conversations.
Thoughtful, try to be funny, grounded, and no panic.
We'll keep you informed and entertained without ruining your day.
Join us every Tuesday and Thursday, normally, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Ben Ferguson.
And I'm Ted Cruz.
Three times a week, we do our podcast, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
Nationwide, we have millions of listeners.
Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, we break down the news and bring you behind the scenes inside the White House, inside the Senate, inside the United States Supreme Court.
And we cover the stories that you're not getting anywhere else.
We arm you with the facts to be able to know and advocate for the truth with your friends and family.
So download Verdict with Ted Cruz Now, wherever you get your podcasts.
Export Selection