Sean Hannity Show - The Debate Is On - 10.19

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 20, 2016 - Sean Hannity Show

01:28:43

The Debate Is On - 10.19

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart podcast.
	Let not your heart be troubled.
	You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
	All right, glad you're with us.
	It is the third and final debate tonight, right here.
	We're in Vegas in the studios of our 50,000-watt blowtorch of free speech, AM720, KDWN, K-Dawn Radio.
	Glad you could be with us.
	800-941, Sean, if you want to be a part of the program.
	And yeah, I've got some thoughts on where tonight is going to go, and I'll get to that in a few minutes.
	We got these survey Washington Post polls out that Trump, yeah, he's up in Iowa and Ohio, Florida, Nevada.
	I don't know if they're true, but we'll get to all of that.
	One of the things that is interesting, and you know, always follow the money.
	And I'm not saying, by the way, that this is true.
	I have no idea.
	I am absolutely telling you, I don't know how this is going to play out.
	I'm just trying to be honest with you and trying to set you straight.
	All these people are always saying, oh, Romney's going to win.
	Romney's going to win.
	I thought after the third debate, we were done.
	So this debate tonight is very, very important.
	And if I'm Donald Trump, my advice to him is very simple.
	And I would never be on defense ever.
	And we have the single biggest liar in the history of politics that is running the single most corrupt, self-enriching individual you've ever seen.
	And with in light of the Julian Assange WikiLeaks, in light of Project Veritas, you know what?
	There's a lot of new material to bring up tonight.
	In light of the fact that, well, we've got now a WikiLeaks dump number 12.
	Can you believe this?
	But anyway, bookies, this is an interesting side bit here.
	You know, suddenly the bookies in Great Britain, who almost always get it right when it comes to predicting the results of U.S. presidential elections, they're betting on a Donald Trump victory to pull off a Brexit-like come from behind upset victory.
	Now, 65% of all recent bets on the market have backed Donald Trump to win the presidential election.
	Donald Trump's odds to win the election may not match the bookmaker's favorite, Hillary Clinton, but a late surge of bets have been placed on the Republican candidate ahead of the final presidential debate tonight.
	Overall, Clinton remains the hot favorite to win the presidency, whereas Trump now has a 20% chance of winning compared to 15% before the weekend.
	The latest figures show that 65% of bets on the market have been placed on Trump, the remaining 35% on Clinton.
	As to why betters are backing Trump at this stage, Betting House spokesman Graham Sharp said it may just be because the race has reached a level now where people thought it might be worth taking a chance, or just as with the EU referendum, people just don't believe the opinion polls.
	Now, I'm going to tell you right now, I'm actually going with the opinion polls.
	Why, Hannity?
	You know they're fake.
	You know they oversample Democrats over Republicans.
	You know they're using an outdated model because this is an unconventional years and the model that they're using is conventional and because it doesn't matter.
	Right now, like for example, Investors Business Daily, two weeks where the media has tried to pretty much administer last rights to his presidential bid, Donald Trump has now surged into a new lead in a brand new scientific major media poll.
	And this is Investors Business Daily, where he's up 41.3 to 40 in a four-way matchup.
	This is the IBD tip poll, tracking poll.
	It's been cited as the most accurate in predicting actual election results in the past three presidential elections.
	The new results are Trump's best showing in months.
	The poll has also found that in a two-way matchup, Clinton is up by three points, but we don't have a two-way matchup.
	And this is far different from the Real Clear Politics average, which has Clinton up 6.9%.
	And what's more, Trump scores higher on voter intensity.
	That's 67% of his backers say they strongly support him, compared with 58% of Clinton supporters who say they strongly back the candidate.
	You know, there's a couple of things that I'm going to say about this that just my thoughts on it.
	I think you've got to believe the polls in this sense.
	So, you know, that's all we've got to go on.
	But there are so many balls in the air now that are not being reflected in the polls.
	For example, Donald Trump had a horrible two weeks, but the bleeding has kind of stopped.
	And a lot of the narrative about Donald Trump after the Access Hollywood tape and the five women that come out in a single day, and then their stories finally get debunked, although it doesn't get a whole lot of coverage.
	Well, now we've got the Democratic Party under fire and Hillary's campaign under fire specifically and the DNC under fire specifically because you've got James O'Keefe and Project Veritas.
	Well, they have now shown in the last two days, well, there is money coming from the Clinton campaign being funneled to the DNC, being funneled to democracy partners, being funneled to dark arts operatives that have been out there the entire campaign season fomenting violence at Trump events.
	You know, what impact, if any, will that have on the polls?
	I've got to believe some.
	And then, of course, we've got the WikiLeaks dump.
	You know, here are the latest developments today.
	You've got transcripts now of Clinton's paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, apparent because the Clinton campaign, they don't even have the courage to authenticate them because they know how damaging they are.
	And it reveals just how friendly she is with Wall Street execs.
	Now, we know she has a public and private position on everything.
	You've got to keep that in mind.
	You know, that Chelsea Clinton warned about the pay-to-play scandal that they still went forward with.
	We know that the Clintons were bought by Cutter.
	Look, we know that the Clintons used the Haiti Relief Fund to benefit their cronies by making up separate lists of who can get the contracts to rebuild Haiti.
	I mean, how disgusting is that?
	We know that Clinton received advance notice of a CNN town hall question.
	We know that they fed NBC questions.
	We know that John Harwood was in their camp.
	We know that Politico and the New York Times that they let the Clintons edit their pieces.
	I was interviewed by the New York Times two days ago.
	The piece came out last night.
	It was actually fairly, they actually quoted me, you know, accurately for once.
	Couldn't believe it.
	We know that people in Clinton's inner circle fear Bill Clinton's sex life as a liability.
	You think a new woman is out today?
	Wait, you hear the tape?
	We'll play later in the program.
	We know that Hillary privately, remember, she has a private position and a public position.
	Hang on, what are you saying?
	Grab what for me.
	Okay, he's not here.
	All right, so Hillary fears jihadists are going to enter through the refugees.
	Well, that's what James Comey said, and that's what Clapper has said, and that's what Steinbeck has said, and that's what Mike McCall has said, and that's what Brennan has said, and that's what John Allen has said.
	So she's saying that privately, but publicly, she wants to increase refugees 550% and gamble with your life.
	It's pretty amazing.
	You know, we know that the Clintons got a million-dollar birthday present from Cutter.
	You know, that's a country that allows marital rape and marital beatings.
	James, something there for you.
	Anyway, we got a new email released as part 12 of these leaks with Podesta.
	We know that the Clinton campaign manager called the New York City mayor a terrorist.
	Whoopsie daisy.
	We know that John Podesta show attempts to organize meetings with Facebook CEO Mark Zuck Zuckerberg, whatever his name is.
	And the same thing with, you know, we had the Google guy also coordinating with the Clinton campaign, apparently.
	And the Clinton campaign thinks the AFL CIO boss is annoying.
	Remember, earlier releases, what did we discover?
	We discovered anti-Semitism and sexism and misogyny and racism.
	And don't forget about the needy Latinos out there.
	And by the way, with all the talk about Donald Trump is fomenting a disbelief in the American public as it relates to voter fraud.
	Well, Clinton believed voter fraud was committed against them in 2008.
	You got MSNBC producers and hosts and management gushing over Hillary Clinton.
	You got transcripts of her paid speeches leaked.
	She sucked up to Wall Street like nobody's business.
	Coordinating apparently illegally with a super PAC.
	That's something that the FBI ought to be looking into.
	Where's the FBI on fomenting violence and they're admitting it on tape that the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton is organizing violence at rallies to stop political free speech in this country?
	You know, where is the FBI?
	James, Comey, I know you're corrupt.
	And by the way, most of your agents who I admire so much are so disappointed in you and embarrassed by your actions in this whole thing.
	And they feel disgusted having to answer questions to the general public on your behalf for your decision.
	Anyway, where's the investigation into voter fraud that they're admitting they're coordinating with Hillary Clinton money and approval?
	But of course, they say they give her plausible deniability.
	You know, we got so much here.
	Oh, no, no, don't forget they want to infiltrate the Catholic Church and they want to foment revolution within the church.
	Isn't that nice?
	Clinton insiders bashing efforts to get Elizabeth Warren to run for president.
	You know, staffers discussing the excuse for not turning over emails.
	We catch the president in a big lie saying, well, I heard about the email server scandal in the press just like you guys.
	What a liar.
	He was emailing her personally.
	He knew about the personal email.
	He knew about a personal server.
	And then John Podesta and Cheryl Mills, well, we shouldn't hand those subpoenaed emails between the president and the secretary of state over like we're legally bound to do, should we?
	Well, that would be called a crime and obstruction of justice anywhere else.
	Unbelievable.
	And that's what this is what, you know, and I'm not even, I'm just touching the surface of all of these things.
	It is so deeply corrupt.
	It is so dangerous.
	You know, Clinton on wanting Obamacare to unravel.
	Why?
	Because then she can put in a single payer system, which is even worse.
	Podesta calling Bernie Sanders a doofus.
	The campaign, get this, I love this.
	They paid men almost twice as much as women at the Clinton Foundation.
	Podesta listing potential VP candidates by race and gender food groups.
	Imagine if Donald Trump had done that.
	AIDS thought Obama's remarks about the private server didn't make sense.
	How could they make sense?
	Because he emailed her on the private server.
	Podesta wishing the San Bernardino shooter was named Chris instead of Syed Farouk.
	You got the campaign manager Mook calling Clinton's tax and health taxes, meaning the little she paid and writing off her underwear, hypersensitive issues.
	Politico reporter offered campaign chance to edit their story.
	Isn't that nice of them?
	Focus grouping, Obama's father's a Muslim, telling voters about Obama's past cocaine use.
	You know, it's unbelievable.
	And I only give you the surface of all of this election.
	And you know what's really sad?
	It's really sad that so many Republicans have been sabotaging Donald Trump.
	Because you know what they're embracing by doing this?
	You know what they're supporting by doing this?
	That means when we get left-wing activist jurists on the Supreme Court of the United States, people that believe that they can legislate from the bench and cite foreign law and foreign constitutions to justify their radical decision-making.
	Well, those of you that oppose Trump's originalists, you own it.
	Just like if you support Hillary or you sabotage Trump and you end up bringing in refugees that we now know privately she knows is a risk, and she increases the number by 550% and gambles with the lives of Americans and Americans end up getting killed, you own that too.
	Or if people are victims of crime because of open borders, you own that also.
	And when taxes go up dramatically, $1.2 trillion and spending goes up $1.4 trillion, you own it.
	When Common Core stays, you own it.
	When we end up getting out of the energy industry completely, the lifeblood of our economy, and coal miners are fired and coal companies are out of business, you own that too.
	When we don't advance our own energy independence and we're dependent on her pals in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East, you own that.
	And when Hillary screws up like she did in Benghazi and lies to us again, and Americans die and she's chanting, what difference does it make?
	You own that also.
	You own it.
	No, Donald Trump is flawed.
	He's not perfect.
	And no, he hasn't spent his whole life running for president.
	And you know what?
	Whatever you want to say on policy, he's better.
	If you want a pastor-in-chief, you picked the wrong election.
	You're going to have to stay home then.
	Because every candidate in this race is flawed.
	But where they stand on the issues, you've got principled, huge, massive differences in ideology, philosophy, and vision for where to take the country.
	That's what's at stake here.
	Now, those of you without sin, go cast the first stone.
	All right?
	800-94-1 Sean as we come to you from Vegas.
	A lot coming up in the course of the program today.
	Tell you about that in a minute, including Cheryl Atkinson on just how abusively biased your media is.
	I told you journalism is dead.
	She makes the case that I was right for a long time.
	Well, that's pretty much it, isn't it?
	America lives or dies.
	I had a lot happening.
	All right, we got other news I want to get to today.
	One other thing on the polls, because you got Rasmussen all tied up today.
	You got the L.A. Times all tied up today.
	If you believe the Washington Post survey monkey, I think that's the online poll that the media doesn't believe in.
	You have Trump up five in Iowa, three in Ohio, two in Florida, and four in Nevada.
	If that's true, that would be huge.
	But I don't know if that's true.
	I don't know.
	From my perspective, there could be a couple of things.
	Let me give you the Brexit analogy.
	And I know from somebody that was very close to Prime Minister Cameron, even the day of the vote and as the vote, even into the night when the results were beginning to come in, Prime Minister Cameron, remember his career ended over this, he thought he was going to win by five, not leave.
	It ended up being every poll was wrong.
	They never picked up the nationalist, populist anger that existed being part of the EU and Great Britain.
	And it ended up being over a 10-point swing on Election Day.
	And do I think it's a possibility it could happen here?
	Yes.
	Do I think the polls are actively factoring in the Project Veritas tapes and the full extent of WikiLeaks?
	No, because number one, Project Veritas is being shut out by most of the media except people like me.
	And WikiLeaks is not being reported on except people like me.
	So I don't think the public is being informed.
	We also know why, because journalism is dead and all of these so-called fair and balanced networks, they're all full of shh in a big way.
	They're all full of it.
	They're all in the tank for Hillary.
	They're all a bunch of liars.
	They're all manipulative.
	You know, you would think if Donald Trump's campaign was financing and fomenting violence, what do you think the whole world would be talking about today?
	If Donald Trump's campaign and people, his campaign is financing people, bragging that they're connected to him and being paid by him to go commit massive voter fraud, what do you think we'd be talking about today?
	If you had all of the WikiLeaks issues that I just mentioned in the last half hour, what do you think they'd be talking about today?
	You know, the Clinton campaign has been hit now and subject to an FEC complaint based on what we saw in the Project Veritas videos about the instigated violence at Trump rallies.
	The Public Interest Legal Foundation, an Indiana-based group that litigates to protect election integrity, submitted the complaint Tuesday to the office of the general counsel at the FEC claiming that Hillary's campaign committee and other left-wing groups may have violated campaign finance laws.
	Well, they probably did.
	My read is they totally did.
	WikiLeaks implication is, yeah, there was coordination with Super PACs and the Clinton campaign.
	But anyway, the complaint here is based on information and belief that respondents have engaged in public communications, campaign activity, targeted voter registration drives, other targeted get-out-the-vote activity under the request, direction, and approval of the Hillary for America Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee.
	Complainant's information and belief is based on findings from an investigation conducted by Project Veritas action and published reports regarding the same as well as on news sources.
	And it goes on to explain all of that.
	By the way, we have another instance where a GOP headquarters has been attacked by these left-wing agitators, this time in Delaware County.
	You have vandals striking an office there last week.
	And of course, we know what happened in North Carolina.
	Oh, excuse me.
	Trump rally destroyed one of the main disruptors.
	This is an interesting piece of information because one of the main disruptors met with Obama nearly 50 times.
	We now have evidence, in other words, linking Obama himself to the Clinton campaign's plans and the DNC plans to use violence and foment violence at Donald Trump rallies.
	Key operative in a Democratic scheme to send the agitators to cause unrest at Donald Trump's rallies.
	Get this.
	He's visited the White House a whopping 342 times since 2009, according to White House records.
	Robert Creamer, well, he stepped down yesterday, who acted as the middleman between the Clinton campaign, the DNC, and the protesters, who tried and succeeded to provoke violence at these Trump rallies.
	Well, he met with President Obama 47 times.
	Oopsie-daisy.
	And I'm sure this was never discussed, right?
	So now the president himself is implicated.
	I want to know, what did Hillary know considering her campaign financed the inciting of violence?
	What did she know about it and when did she know it?
	What did Obama know and when did he know it?
	What did they know about voter fraud activities?
	And when did they know that?
	And why did they pay for it?
	Just, you know, some questions I think need to be answered.
	We also have another Bill Clinton sexual assault accuser going public.
	I guess she's not going to be on Anderson Cooper for 45 minutes like the Trump accuser.
	It's an Arkansas woman, says she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton on multiple occasions.
	I mean, it is such a, it's like the Paula Jones story.
	Who would ever pull down their pants in front of a stranger?
	There's something so off about a human being that could do that.
	Or somebody that commits a violent act of rape or just thinks that they can grope, grab, fondle, and touch and kiss a woman against her will, or has no problem with a cigar and oral sex in the White House with an intern when you're the president.
	There's a missing chip here.
	Here's what this accuser said.
	It was a situation where it was kind of a joke at our TV station.
	My cameraman and some other people that work there would say, you know, I think he really likes you.
	And because he would always single me out when, you know, when he first walked in.
	But he started making inappropriate gestures.
	We were responsible for editing our own stories.
	And we had a very small editing room.
	And he had touched my shoulder and done other things to me before in public around other people, but that was just his nature to be very, you know, demonstrative and touchy-feely, as I call it.
	But he followed me into an editing room the first time I remember that it was very small.
	There was a chair.
	I was sitting in a chair.
	He came up behind me and started rubbing my shoulders and running his hands down toward my breasts.
	And I was just stunned.
	I froze.
	I asked him to stop.
	He laughed.
	That happened on three occasions, and each time it escalated where the aggressive nature of his touch and what he was doing behind me escalated.
	He's touching you, you say, but what specifically did he do to you?
	He came up behind me.
	It's very close quarters.
	You have to understand that his private parts were right at my neck.
	I was sitting in a chair.
	He's touching me on my shoulders, working his hands down from behind, and he starts to hunch me.
	He did that the first time.
	The second time, which was probably a week or so later, I did approach him after he did it the first time, and I said, please don't ever do anything like that to me again.
	It's very offensive.
	It's upsetting.
	And I do not want you to do that.
	He laughed.
	And the second time, about a week later, he came in.
	He made a B-line immediately for me.
	I excused myself, went to the editing room, and he came in behind me, started hunching me to the point that he had an orgasm.
	He's touching, trying to touch my breasts, and I'm just sitting there very stiffly, just waiting for him to leave me alone.
	And I'm asking him the whole time, please do not do this.
	Do not touch me.
	Do not hunch me.
	I do not want this.
	And he finished doing what he was doing and walked out.
	Wow.
	That is so disgusting, what she's describing.
	Now, there's this woman on the plane that has now been debunked by a guy that was sitting right next to Donald Trump and hers, and none of that happened.
	And that woman's story was, well, I didn't mind the first 15 minutes of groping.
	Okay, first of all, you're on an airplane.
	Hello?
	Help.
	Stop.
	You know, that would stop anything.
	So she could have stopped it at any moment.
	Well, I didn't mind it up here, but I didn't want him to go down there.
	She actually said that.
	And 45 minutes, CNN gave that woman.
	I'm like, you've got to be kidding me.
	So there is a story in the National Inquirer.
	It's going to be interesting to see if the media that went crazy over the Trump allegations.
	During the 80s and 90s, I was working at Hollywood as a reporter for several national magazines and newspapers.
	This is how the story starts.
	Because of my good relationship with stars and publicists and press, I became a fixer, someone who helped stars keep embarrassing stories coming out in the press.
	I helped keep secrets safe for some of Hollywood's leading men.
	In 1991, my reputation was such that I was asked to work on behalf of a fast-rising figure on the national stage, Arkansas Governor William Jefferson Clinton.
	I attended a meeting in Hollywood where I was told by an intermediary, there will be a lot of stories coming out in the tabloid press.
	We want them buried.
	I was informed that these stories would involve rumors of Bill Clinton's many sexual dalliances and alleged ongoing affair of Hillary Clinton with a male member of the law firm Vince Foster, as well as a female mover and shaker in Hollywood.
	Starts there.
	For a retainer of $4,000 a month paid by a third party, not the campaign, I was told to keep these stories hush-hush in one of two ways: by trading access to the Clintons for positive interviews or by paying the reporters.
	The payments were always cash, usually delivered in a movie theater, a restaurant, or Sunset Boulevard, and came in two denominations: $100 for a heads up, that a bad story was coming, and considerably more to kill the peace.
	It did not appear that the job would be terribly time-consuming.
	After all, Hillary reportedly had just one lover, and Bill's girlfriends were all in the past.
	Well, not so.
	The sexual dalliances were ongoing.
	And so my communications with the West Wing Air Force One Camp David continued through 1988, a stunning length of time when one considers that both the president and the first lady were supposed to be devoting their full energies to the business of the people of the United States.
	The gravest example of a Clinton lack of judgment occurred in March of 94 when the president's brother, Roger Clinton, was marrying his eight-month pregnant bride, Molly.
	There was a bachelor party.
	Prostitutes were involved.
	Recordings were made, recordings involving Bill Clinton.
	Arrangements for a meeting between Bill and a 26-year-old brunette were discussed when the president was to arrive in Dallas for the ceremony.
	Ooh, it's on tape.
	Arrangements for that.
	The tape recording was offered for sale to the National Inquirer before the publication, and its then-editor could publish a transcript.
	I swooped in, negotiated for the White House to give this paper exclusive access to the ceremony itself.
	Not even the Washington Post, the New York Times had that.
	The Inquirer had given leave to publish, was given leave to publish exclusive White House photographs.
	At the reception, Bill Clinton sang with the piano player.
	Hillary was introduced, or inquirer reported, blah, blah, blah, and they killed the story.
	Of course, we were not done.
	This was one of many in an endless string of sexual stories arising from what effectively was Clinton's open, polyamorous marriage.
	I have kept these things secret, Guy goes on to say on this particular piece.
	I have kept, let me go.
	I just lost my place.
	I'm sorry.
	I have kept these secrets for a quarter of a century because Bill Clinton had become an elder statesman with heart trouble.
	Hillary seemed to be focused at last on the business of doing her job for better or worse.
	I'm coming forward now because of all the endless attention of alleged indiscretions of Donald Trump and what that's received.
	Nothing I have heard comes close to the sexual and moral corruption of the Clintons, many of which yet to be revealed.
	I mention some of these here and now because we have only two serious candidates for the presidency.
	And in the weeks remaining until the election, we should not be weighing whose corruption is worse.
	It's the Clintons.
	They win by a landslide.
	But who has the best ideas and leadership skills to become president?
	That's the beginning.
	When the full story comes out, I think as long as Anderson Cooper is interviewing a girl, a woman whose story has been debunked, saying she had an affair on an airplane, I think we ought to pay attention to that.
	Anyway, in the Reuters poll, I think this is pretty interesting.
	If I can pull this up on my computer, no, I guess I can't.
	As usual, it's not working.
	Oh, did you notice in Georgia?
	We got a tour bus owned and operated by the environmentally sensitive Democratic Party was caught dumping raw sewage in the middle of a Georgia highway, Lawrenceville, Georgia.
	Anyway, it came after a witness took pictures and photos.
	Witness, apparently, it was a Hillary Clinton bus.
	Anyway, the Reuters poll shows Hillary with a slight lead, but the bump she got from the Trump hot mic tape is now completely gone.
	So we'll see.
	Four-point lead.
	All right.
	800-941-Shawn is a toll-free telephone number.
	You want to be a part of the program.
	Cheryl Atkinson's going to talk about how journalism is dead and what she calls Newsgate 2016 when we get back.
	The thing that has most animated this election on the Democratic side has been the sense of a rigged system.
	The game is rigged against them.
	So there's a sense the game is rigged.
	Yes, this is what a rigged economy is about.
	A rigged system.
	They'll do anything to rig the system for those at the top.
	The game is rigged against a lot of people who have done their dead-level best.
	That the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	Keeps the system rigged for those at the top.
	The system is rigged.
	Their obstruction is keeping a system that is rigged.
	The game is rigged.
	We must fix an economy in America that is rigged.
	The game is rigged, and it's not right.
	A rigged economy.
	The game is rigged.
	And the economy is rigged.
	The American people know that the system is rigged against them.
	The system rigged against the middle class.
	Oh, I know, it is rigged.
	It's still rigged.
	Too many people feel like the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	The game is rigged.
	Our economy is rigged.
	People feel like the system is rigged against them.
	And here's the painful part.
	You're right.
	You know, the system, folks, is rigged.
	It's a rigged system.
	Our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state.
	So we have our problems, too.
	Litigation that they've just taken the unprecedented step of the director of national intelligence and director of homeland security have said are at the root Russian hacks.
	So all the transcripts is acting as a, and look, if this was about transparency, they put them all out.
	So they're dribbling them out because they want Donald, because the Russians are in.
	All right, glad you're with us.
	Hour two, Sean Hannity Show from Vegas, toll-free.
	It's 800-941.
	Sean, you want to be a part of the program?
	One of the things we have learned the most in WikiLeaks is just how abusively biased the so-called objective, fair, balanced mainstream media is.
	And one of the big narratives is it's so irresponsible.
	It's so over the top that Donald Trump is saying that the system is rigged.
	Well, anyway, I give our friends at the Washington Free Beacon all credit for putting that together because I think they blew that narrative out of the water.
	There was a phenomenal piece written by Cheryl Atkinson.
	It's on her website, CherylAtkinson.com.
	You may recall she was an investigative reporter for CBS News for years.
	And I just want to read the opening paragraph to you, and then she's going to join us and we'll discuss in more detail exactly what it is she was referring to here.
	She writes, regardless of who is your chosen or least favored presidential candidate, independent minds should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media's unseemly relationships with government and political actors.
	Now, while there are many responsible journalists working today, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses, constituting the most far-reaching scandal our industry is known.
	It's our very own newsgate.
	And Cheryl Atkinson joins us now.
	How are you?
	I'm good.
	How are you, Sean?
	I've been quoting this fairly extensively.
	I have another article here in front of me with a list of all of the journalists that are dining with the Clintons or their top staffers.
	I mean, Cecilia Vega, David Muir, Diane Sawyer, George Stephanopoulos, John Carl, John Heilman, Mark Halperin, Nora O'Donnell, Breanna Keller, Gloria Borger, Jeff Zelany, Kate Bodine, Sam Feist, let's see, from the Daily Beast, Jackie Kucinich, MSNBC, you've got Alex Wagner, Phil Griffin, the head of SNBC, Rachel Maddow, Shock There, Savannah Guthrie, Jonathan Martin, Glenn Thrush, Mike Allen, John Allen.
	And I mean, honestly, it just goes on and on.
	And these are all people.
	Now you could say, well, we're there on background.
	But if you're buying me dinner and giving me booze, to me, that's a little too cozy of a relationship.
	Am I wrong?
	Well, I won't go that far.
	That's up to individuals to decide.
	I just think the problem is some of those very people you named have then been proven to have, in my opinion, crossed the line and made agreements And what I call transactional journalism made side deals and behind-closed door deals to report things a certain way, to share information, to let quotes be combed over and vetoed and things like that that are, in my view, wholly inappropriate.
	And since many of those names are on the cushy-cozy list of vendors and so on, I guess you could say there is a relationship.
	I don't think you have to say no to all sorts of those things, but when they lead to inappropriate journalism decisions, that's a problem.
	When you learn in WikiLeaks, as we have learned all that we've discovered, I mean, you've got CNN hosts that once worked for the DNC feeding questions to Hillary before a town hall, and you've got hosts on MSNBC literally being fed questions that they're to give the candidate, and then you've got Univision advising the Clinton campaign on how to attack Donald Trump, and then you got John Harwood, a moderator of a debate, not only advising Clinton, but bragging about how he got under Donald Trump's skin.
	And then you got the New York Times and you got Politico.
	Well, they're giving edit opportunities to the Clinton campaign.
	I've been interviewed by the New York Times.
	Trust me, that's never happened in my case.
	And it gets worse from there.
	Cheryl, you call this Newsgate 2016.
	I just want to give you an opportunity.
	This article really, really blew me away.
	And especially, look, I've known you over the years.
	I don't think you agree by any stretch with everything that I say.
	Yeah, probably there are times you agree with me, but I don't know where you stand politically.
	I don't think you're a conservative.
	I don't think you're a liberal.
	I don't know.
	I think you're what a journalist actually should be.
	And you actually suffered in your career because you wanted to report things and you were pressured for political reasons not to.
	Tell us what Newsgate 2016 is.
	I think we always know some of this has existed, but we now have through WikiLeaks documents, but also Freedom of Information documents, hard evidence of these, I think, inappropriate relationships at times between some journalists and newsmakers.
	And you can see when the newsmakers now know, and OPPO research groups, that they can come up with a narrative, call a reporter, get it put out, the timing as they want it, and as they demand it, the topic as they want it, and make the timing be where it drowns out a negative news story, for example, and have all that happen just because they want it to happen.
	They now control, you know, to a large extent the news narrative.
	And if it gets to the point, and I think we're kind of there, where much of what you see on the news, if not most of it, are narratives contrived by political, special, and corporate interests and who pick up the phone and in surreptitious ways influence the narratives and the media reports it, then you're really not getting the news anymore.
	You're just getting propaganda and PR.
	It really is sad to say, you know, I've been hit hard during this election cycle.
	I don't know if you follow any of that.
	And I don't, by the way, I give out my opinion four hours a day, Cheryl.
	I deserve to get hit because there are people that disagree.
	I am not shy about criticizing them.
	And if they don't like the fact that I'm a conservative, that I'm supporting and voting for Donald Trump, I understand that.
	That's fair.
	But at least I'm open and honest about it.
	When you read WikiLeaks and you see the Univision president advising the Trump campaign, when you see John Harwood advising Clinton and bragging about getting under Donald Trump's skin, when you see Donna Brazil, I happen to like as a person, she's lovely, but verbatim giving a question as a CNN representative to Hillary and her campaign before a town hall, or host at MSNBC being fed the questions and then reading them verbatim before a Hillary interview.
	Or if you take it even further than that, the stories that they choose to cover or don't cover.
	I mean, don't you think it's been overkill, the coverage of Trump and the five women that came out in a single day?
	Excuse me for being suspicious.
	Many of those women's stories have been debunked now, but there's no, oh, sorry, we were wrong, no major coverage on that point.
	They just leave the impression that, in fact, all of this happened.
	And while I'm simultaneously ignoring the Clinton women from years past, that plenty of millennials don't know.
	Well, I was in the newsroom at CBS when Clinton and Women were coming forward, and we didn't report nearly all the charges that came up, in part because a lot of people did like Clinton and want to defend him.
	But there were also very reasonable discussions going on that said these are very serious charges, and we can't just throw them all out there on TV.
	And we didn't.
	It's a different environment today, but I also think it's different because there is a hold or a stranglehold on much of the media by certain special interests that the Democrats have that right now the Republicans don't have.
	I'm sure they would like to have it the same way.
	And I actually don't blame the Democrat and Republican interests who want to influence the news.
	That's what they do.
	I blame us as an industry.
	We've done a very poor job at insulating ourselves from the improper influence of these groups.
	They've literally infiltrated us with employees and writers and people who are trained to then go to the news media and write articles that are biased and get them published.
	I mean, we've allowed all of this to happen.
	Well, you went through very specific examples.
	Let's start with the AP and the friendlies within the Associated Press that, in fact, like Hillary Clinton.
	They're talked about as friendly reporters, and this is, again, not uncommon when you comb through emails, that Clinton campaign officials, and I assume the other side has them too, but not at the same organization, but they have their favorite reporters who they say, or believe at least, they can go to to get their narratives published the way they want them published.
	So instead of reporters seeking the news, reporters are getting phone calls and getting tips from these people as to what kind of story they can have or what kind of interview they can have if they report it a certain way.
	And so, yeah, there are names of reporters in there that are counted upon by the campaign to report things the way the campaign wants.
	Yeah.
	And then you go on to the Atlantic and then you go on to CNBC and John Harwood and CNN.
	What do you find is the what is the big picture story for you?
	Because to me, this is basically you're exposing that this whole corruption, this bias, is institutionalized and it's now a part of their DNA.
	Well, I'm writing about this in a book.
	Actually, it's due now.
	It's coming out next year, though, that talks about how reporters have become convinced that the great get, meaning the great stories, come from relationship with these politicos for these exclusive interviews, which to me are nothing more than propaganda and PR.
	But their bosses buy into the fact that, hey, an exclusive interview with so-and-so that will not address these controversial topics, we'll promise in advance, but at least you'll get the interview.
	And it will be circulated as inside baseball a bunch among all these usual suspects, whether it's Politico and The Hill and The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Slate, and they'll all copy each other once.
	And they'll all amplify it and everybody gets patted on the back.
	Often there are topics that people don't care about.
	It's like I say, inside baseball, but it's this little cottage industry that's developed within the press, we're reporting on ourselves and each other and the politicos.
	We've got like a little news service for them.
	And then they use what we report as their own sort of narratives and propaganda to get out their messages and influence the public.
	And again, I think the big picture is that we the media have too often let it happen.
	I think it's our fault.
	We've done a poor job at protecting ourselves from that.
	You did a great job of exposing.
	Now, Media Matters is run by David Brock.
	David Brock is sort of one of the dark arts operatives for Hillary Clinton, and he's a major smear artist with Media Matters.
	But what you pointed out is how all of these different news organizations, and there are many of them, that Media Matters admits that they can basically take their material, which is all pro-Hillary, all pro-Clinton, all pro-left, and get it on MSNBC and get it in Salon and get it in the San Francisco Chronicle and even the Washington Post.
	Media Matters, a source spoke to this, and Daily Quala did the article a couple of years back that name names and news organizations, again, that can be counted on, at least Media Matters believes, to report whatever they want out there.
	And they talk about it in those terms, that here's the reporters we can use.
	They'll report anything we want.
	They've been very helpful to us.
	There's little difference between these reporters, if that's true, and a PR service or a propaganda firm if they're simply waiting for the phone call from the special interests and then publishing, in some instances, verbatim, whether it's Media Matters or something generated by Brock's Super PAC American Bridge or by Brock's Super PAC, Correct the Record.
	This stuff is going out pretty much verbatim within some news organizations without the disclosure that it's coming from political paid operatives.
	It is kind of funny from my perspective.
	You've got to admit, considering I get criticized.
	What do you think of the difference or delineation between a talk show host like myself, which I would argue a talk host takes on many roles?
	Sometimes I do straight interviews, which I'm kind of doing with you today.
	And other times I'll take on an advocacy role and give my opinion.
	And other times I'm fostering a heated debate on whatever the hot issue of the day is.
	But I'm always honest with my audience.
	And yet I have come under heavy fire this election season for being honest.
	And meanwhile, they're dishonest.
	I think you're coming under heavy fire, not because you're honest, but because you're effective in what you're trying to do.
	They wouldn't bother with you if not.
	I think disclosure is the key.
	In fact, you know, I like George Stephanopoulos.
	I actually think he's a good reporter.
	But I think every time he does anything of a political nature on ABC, it should be prefaced with the note that he worked for the Clintons and contributed to the Clinton Foundation, is very close to them.
	People today don't remember or know that.
	There are many people who don't.
	And yet I see him conduct interviews.
	We deserve to have that context, even if he thinks it doesn't come into play.
	I think it's only fair that if you're going to hire a politico in a news role, that that be disclosed.
	And then I really don't have a problem with it.
	But in too many cases, these things are not disclosed.
	And I think disclosure is your friend.
	I think it helps everybody, including the person disclosing, because then the public can't feel as though the wool has been pulled off their eyes if they discover the ties.
	I admire your integrity and your honesty.
	And I think whatever this new book is, could be very, very powerful as we now see that, as I said in 2008, journalism is dead.
	And I stand by that today.
	I don't think you go that far, but I certainly think there are real issues within the news media that need to be addressed.
	Cheryl, I appreciate everything you do.
	It's on CherylAtkinson.com.
	We'll link it to Hannity.com.
	It's called Newsgate 2016.
	It is definitely worth a read.
	Thank you for being with us.
	Thanks, Sean.
	800-941.
	Sean, you want to be a part of this extravaganza.
	We'll have a lot coming up in the course of the program today.
	Now, the debate is 9 Eastern, 6 Pacific.
	It goes on at least an hour and a half.
	They usually go a little over.
	Then we're on at midnight Eastern till 2 a.m.
	And we're on 9 to 11 p.m. here on the West Coast.
	And that means, let's see, what time will that be?
	That'll be 2 a.m. Eastern time.
	About 2:15, I'll be wheels up, heading home to New York.
	So let's see.
	That means we'll get home, Sweet Baby James, at 6:30 a.m.
	Great.
	And you know what it's like to sleep on a plane with Sweet Baby James.
	God help you.
	The only good thing is we'll have In-N-Out Burger on the plane.
	I've had In-N-Out Burger for lunch every single day.
	I get it with the lettuce wrap.
	It is so messy to eat, but I don't like the bun, trying to stay fit.
	Haven't been doing my workouts because I'm on the road.
	And anyway, it should be exciting.
	Look, what do I expect tonight?
	I expect hard questions from Chris Wallace on both sides.
	That's what Chris does, and he's good at it.
	And if he does it fair, which I expect, it'll be probably the best debate so far.
	I expect Hillary Clinton is going to try her usual Donald Trump's unfit to be president.
	She'll come in with her practice regurgitations.
	And Donald Trump, I think, has a lot of material to work with.
	And I think he's got to balance a few things.
	One, he can't be too interruptive.
	Two, he has got to be like he was in the last debate.
	Would never go on defense with her.
	And he can pivot to any topic he wants to talk about.
	And if he wants to talk about she's the single biggest liar and most corrupt individual to ever run for the presidency, that's great.
	And if he wants to talk about how what a change election this would be, and this is about the Supreme Court, this is about vetting refugees.
	This is about saying radical Islam.
	This is about an economy and giving corporations the lowest tax rate in the industrialized world so it will incentivize business to invest in factories and manufacturing centers here.
	That's important.
	Energy independence.
	You know how many jobs we'll create?
	Repatriate trillions.
	You know how many jobs we'll create?
	Our educational system, which has been decimated?
	A sensible foreign policy.
	No, we don't want to be the world's policeman.
	We can't, but nor can we accept people that come from countries that practice Sharia without properly vetting them if we can even properly vet them.
	How do we know?
	What do you want to come to America and like in Qatar, Qatar, where they literally rape is legal of your wife and beating your wife is legal?
	It's unbelievable.
	All right, let's get to our phones here, as promised.
	I know a lot of you have a lot to say here.
	Let's go to Maria is holding down the fort.
	She's in New York in the Bronx.
	And Maria, my grandfather, lived in the Bronx.
	I know the Bronx well on Lincoln Avenue.
	Glad you're with us and holding down the fort at AM 710 WOR.
	Hi, Sean.
	I think you're the best.
	You're fair and balanced, and I watch you every night.
	When I can't watch you, I DVR you.
	Maria, you got to pick up your phone.
	Darling, you got to pick up your phone.
	I think you're an amazing man.
	Thank you.
	Balanced.
	I watch you every night.
	Thank you.
	When I can't watch you, I DVR you.
	I just want to say one thing, too.
	I am so ashamed of the Republican Party, especially Paul Ryan, who did not rally behind their candidate.
	Okay, they should have.
	Meanwhile, here's the Democratic Party.
	Yeah, I'm listening.
	Democratic Party, who are endorsing a crook, and they're all so gun-ho, drinking the Kool-Aid, like she's the greatest thing.
	I can't stand her.
	The thought of listening to her for four more years scares me.
	I hope Donald Trump wins.
	My mother goes to Mount Carmel Church.
	She prays that he wins every day.
	But you're an amazing, amazing talk show host.
	You're good.
	You're fair and you're balanced.
	Keep up the good work, Sean.
	I really appreciate your kind words.
	We're trying hard.
	But you're right.
	After this election in 20 days, we've got unfinished business.
	And the question of Paul Ryan being the next speaker is something we need to debate very, very seriously here.
	Anyway, I appreciate your call.
	Thank you.
	Norman is in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
	You're next on the Sean Hannity show.
	Glad you called, sir.
	Hey, Mr. Hennedy.
	The stakes couldn't be any higher for this country and for myself personally.
	My wife has basically threatened to divorce me if I vote for Donald. Trump.
	Wait a minute.
	Do you think she means it?
	She'll divorce you?
	Well, we've been kind of going through a little.
	I've been married for over 30 years.
	But this is like with her, like the camel that broke the camel's back.
	Now, I'm going to.
	This election.
	So you guys have had your issues like every couple.
	I get it.
	All right.
	But if you vote for Donald Trump, she has ultimatum you to say, you vote for Trump, I'm divorcing you.
	That's literally what she said.
	You know what I'd say to her?
	What?
	I'd say, that's your choice.
	You're not going to tell me how to vote.
	That's pretty much what I said.
	And then I'd say, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
	I'm not going to.
	I mean, seriously, what husband or wife feels they have the right to ultimatum their spouse that they're supposed to love?
	Either vote my way or you're on your ass out of here.
	You know what?
	I'm not taking your ultimatum.
	No way.
	Tell her, don't let the door hit her on the way out.
	Pretty much, Sean.
	That was my position.
	I'm away from my house a lot anyway.
	If she loved you, she would maybe try to persuade you.
	If she loved you, she would respect your well-thought-out position.
	You know, can I give you my perspectives, the good, bad, and the ugly on the campaign so far?
	Yeah.
	Okay, the good is Donald Trump had mentioned that he was considering running for president several times before.
	And my initial impression was, I would vote for that guy.
	I would definitely vote for that guy.
	Then when he announced that he was going to run, I said, okay, I'm going to support that guy.
	I was one of the first people to, you know, log on to his website and join his campaign.
	Then when the campaign got going, I started checking out Marco Rubio.
	And one thing that I liked about him, he could speak.
	He was very inspiring, you know, what he said, when he addressed the crowd.
	Marco's story is very, very inspiring.
	I can see Marco being president one day.
	I definitely can.
	Yeah, I liked him.
	And John Kasich, I thought that he could have a good chance to win, but Trump won.
	When Trump went, then that's the man.
	You know, first choices anyway.
	Okay, so that's the good.
	The bad is all the stuff that's come out.
	All right, let me ask you a question.
	Where's your wife right now?
	My wife is in Atlanta.
	All right, I'm going to put you on hold.
	If we can get your wife on the line, I'm going to talk to you and your wife together.
	All right, so stay right there.
	No, no, no, no.
	No, no, no, no, Norman.
	Norman, let's try it.
	I'm going to try and save your marriage.
	We'll get her on the phone.
	Stay right there and give Lauren your wife's number.
	We'll try and conference you guys in.
	I think I got to fix this.
	And if you're going to ultimatum your spouse, either you vote for Hillary or I'm out of here.
	I'm like, I'm not going to, who does that?
	If you're in love with somebody, you don't tell somebody who to vote for or I'm out of here.
	What's wrong with that marriage ain't going to make it?
	How did it make it 30 years?
	All right, let's go to Maria's in Louisiana.
	What's up, Marie?
	How are you?
	Sean.
	What's going on?
	Well, I'm basically calling to try to get you as well as all your listeners to start calling out certain Republicans.
	For instance, John Kasich, Ted Cruz, Nikki Haley.
	Just for the mere fact that I understand that they do not wish to come out and publicly support Donald Trump.
	However, they're invisible.
	You don't even hear them or see them even talking about Hillary Clinton.
	So it's just getting kind of down to the wire, and everyone is just getting a little upset.
	So people kind of formed a group, and they're all encouraging people to start ringing these people's phones off the hook because we basically feel like, you know, by them staying silent, they can't come out and say that they care about the American people because it seems like their pride is in the way more so than the need that the American people are seeking.
	Because if we get Hillary Clinton in office, imagine what our children are going to face.
	And, you know, and I would like to pose this out to women, women who are against Donald Trump.
	You know, overlook that.
	Look at the Supreme Court.
	Look at Hillary Clinton.
	Any mother that has a child in the military, is she willing to vote for Hillary Clinton just because she's a woman?
	And then what if that was your child that was left over in Benghazi?
	Are you willing to sacrifice your child simply so if some form of politics would benefit her?
	I mean, are you willing to take that chance with the future of your kids, the safety of your kids, your family?
	So all these Republicans that came out, ran for president, said they truly cared about America and American people.
	Where are they?
	Well, listen, I appreciate what you're saying.
	I agree with you.
	We have unfinished business 20 days from now.
	I don't have the time.
	I mean, if I start talking about, well, this person needs to go, this person needs to go, I can't support this person right now.
	And they have sabotaged and betrayed the voters and their party, and they stand for nothing, and they fought.
	They didn't fight against Obama, and they're partly responsible.
	You know, I got to tell you something that's very, very frustrating to me.
	And some of the names you mentioned, John Kasich is one of them.
	John Kasich made a promise and pledge and broke it.
	Paul Ryan, I don't hear him criticizing Obama or Hillary Clinton as fiercely as he feels the compulsion to go after Donald Trump.
	You know what?
	He better off keep his mouth shut.
	If you're not going to hold Hillary and Obama as accountable as you're holding Trump, I don't have respect for you.
	Just tells me you're out for yourself.
	And by the way, there's a new woman out talking about how Bill Clinton treated her.
	Do we have the mainstream media talking about it?
	No, listen to this.
	He's touching you, you say, but what specifically did he do to you?
	He came up behind me.
	It's very close quarters.
	You have to understand that his private parts were right at my neck.
	I was sitting in a chair.
	He's touching me on my shoulders, working his hands down from behind, and he starts to hunch me.
	He did that the first time.
	The second time, which was probably a week or so later, I did approach him after he did it the first time, and I said, please don't ever do anything like that to me again.
	It's very offensive.
	It's upsetting.
	And I do not want you to do that.
	He laughed.
	And the second time, about a week later, he came in.
	He made a B-line immediately for me.
	I excused myself, went to the editing room, and he came in behind me, started hunching me to the point that he had an orgasm.
	He's touching, trying to touch my breasts, and I'm just sitting there very stiffly, just waiting for him to leave me alone.
	And I'm asking him the whole time, please do not do this.
	Do not touch me.
	Do not hunch me.
	I do not want this.
	And he finished doing what he was doing and walked out.
	One night at 10.30, knocked on my apartment door.
	My grandmother was there with me.
	He knocked on the door for probably five, ten minutes, knocking, calling my name, you know, saying, I know you're home.
	Please answer the door.
	I did not answer the door.
	Bill Clinton, governor of Arkansas, knocking on your private apartment door, you say.
	Correct.
	Why do you think he did that?
	What do you think he wanted?
	Well, I think he wanted sex.
	I don't know, you know, he had been very aggressive toward me the last couple of weeks before that happened.
	I feel he was really, I think he was very irritated and surprised that I wasn't interested in his, you know, his offers and his approaching me.
	And I think he was there to, I don't know what would have happened.
	Always in my young mind, keep in mind I'm 20 years old.
	I see this as a threat.
	I feel like, you know, maybe he's going to rape me.
	Maybe he's going to try to convince me to have sex.
	I really don't know.
	I can't say, you know, what he was going to do.
	I can tell you the way that I interpreted it.
	Did he give you anything of his during the initial, let us say, flirtation?
	How did he act toward you?
	He did.
	Gave me.
	There was a bridge dedication, I believe, and we met with the governor of Oklahoma in Arkansas it was a bridge between the two states and he took his tie and he cut it in half and he signed it and he gave me a piece of his tie and he said, you need to keep this because I'm going to be president of the United States someday and you're going to really wish that you paid more attention to me and given me more attention.
	And he said it in a very off-the-cuff way.
	I also had another incident where I had my reporter's notebook that I took notes on every day and it was sitting on my desk in the newsroom one day and he came up and my name was written Leslie on it.
	And he came up and wrote Clinton on top of my name and I said, what are you doing giving me an autograph now?
	And he said no, I just wanted to show you how good Clinton looks on top of Leslie.
	All right, that was Leslie Millwee who made that allegation.
	Wonder if she's going to end up on CNN?
	Tend to doubt it.
	The thing that has most animated this election on the Democratic side has been the sense of a rigged system.
	The game is rigged against them.
	So there's a sense.
	The game is rigged.
	Yes, this is what a rigged economy about, a rigged system.
	They'll do anything to rig the system.
	To those at the top the game is rigged against a lot of people who have done their dead level best that the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged, keeps the system rigged.
	For those at the top, the system is rigged.
	Their obstruction is keeping a system that is rigged.
	The game is rigged.
	We must fix an economy in America that is rigged.
	The game is rigged and it's not right.
	A rigged economy and the economy is rigged.
	The American people know that the system is rigged against them, rigged against the middle class.
	All I know it is it is rigged and it's still rigged.
	Too many people feel like the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	How the game is rigged or economy is rigged.
	People feel like the system is rigged against them.
	And here's the painful part.
	They're right.
	You know the system folks, is rigged.
	It's a rigged system.
	Our, our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state.
	So we have our problems too that they've just taken the unprecedented uh step of uh the the, the uh.
	The director of national Intelligence and director of Homeland Security have said uh are at their root uh, Russian hacks.
	So uh you know all the transcripts is acting as a uh.
	And look, if this was about transparency, they put them all out.
	So they're dribbling them out because they want Donald, because the Russians are.
	The Russians are doing it.
	That's who it is.
	But meanwhile, we need to shut down Julian Assange in an Ecuadorian consulate who's been in hiding.
	But it's the Russians.
	The Russians are doing it.
	Anyway, News Roundup Information Overload Hour.
	Glad you could be with us.
	Joining us now is Rose Tennant.
	And Rose is the host of Rose to Unplug, Leslie Marshall, host of the Leslie Marshall Show and the Fox News contributor.
	You know, all you guys on the left, well, Donald Trump is saying that the system is rigged.
	It's rigged.
	Well, he only learned that from you Democrats, Leslie, based on that montage.
	How funny is that?
	Well, I don't think that we, hey, Sean, I don't think we have a rigged system as I'm walking in my high heels in Vegas here.
	I don't think we have a rigged system.
	And honestly, you know, if Donald Trump wins, can we then say the system is rigged?
	Because it would be rigged in his favor.
	I don't think we have a rigged system.
	Quite frankly, I think we have a man that knows he's going to lose the election, and he's putting that forward, foreshadowing an excuse before, you know, the loss comes on November 9th, the day after the election.
	Well, we don't know what's going to happen the day after election.
	I got to tell you, of course.
	I really have never been at a point where I've seen a media conspiracy now being revealed through WikiLeaks.
	Rose Tennant, there really, you know, there really is collusion here.
	I mean, you've got CNN giving questions.
	You've got the Clinton campaign giving NBC host questions.
	You've got editing authority given by the New York Times and Politico.
	Then you've got Univision offering advice.
	CNBC planting moderators that hate Trump, and they're colluding with the Clinton campaign.
	Then you've got the three major networks.
	They don't care about WikiLeaks.
	They don't care about Julian Assange and this Veritas videos.
	All they want to talk about is Donald Trump and a debunked story about a woman on a plane that said it was okay to grope her for 15 minutes.
	But the other, you know, once he went 16, then it was way too far.
	Hi, Sean.
	Hi, Leslie.
	Yeah, you're absolutely right.
	Everything that we've suspected about the media has now been confirmed.
	And when we get back to what Trump was initially warning us about, was the need to watch what was happening at the polling places, and everybody jumped all over him.
	They said he was attacking our most revered institutions.
	So then his campaign pulled back that message to it was a one-sided media, which is also true, but the media is rigging the election.
	That's also true.
	But listen, here in Pennsylvania, my home state, our voter fraud is fabled in story and song.
	I mean, it's what we're known for.
	We've got it down to an art form here.
	But as always with Trump, though, Hannity, and I think this is important, Sean, is he's responsible for opening up a discussion on the issues that we've been suspecting for years, and he's bringing light to it.
	We've been talking about dead people voting.
	We've been talking about how the Democrats keep counting the votes until a Dem wins.
	But he's reignited a subject that is so important to us and a great concern, and that's voter fraud.
	Obama said it was unprecedented.
	No candidate has ever said anything like this before.
	But guess what?
	Maybe it's time that they did.
	So Trump, once again, has directed the discussion.
	And now we're seeing in the Heritage Foundation is printing up the cases of voter fraud all over the country.
	People are coming out and saying, wait a minute, there is an issue here.
	We've been trying to tell you this for years.
	And I mean, he is forcing everyone to look at this.
	And that's important.
	What did you think of the Project Veritas videos, Leslie?
	Do you see that there's something wrong when you've got money going from directly from the Clinton campaign to the DNC to these dark arts operatives that are fomenting violence?
	Does that bother you?
	Does the revelation that money is being paid to people that are actively pushing advancing voter fraud in the country?
	I mean.
	I am a pacifist, as you know, so I hate violence of any kind.
	I think it's disgusting in a political atmosphere, whether it's Democrat to Republican, Republican to Democrat, whether it is a campaign headquarters, whether it is rallies, that any kind of violence would be supported.
	That's horrific.
	You asked me what I think.
	I would like to see all of these videos unedited in context.
	I'm not sure if you're a good person.
	That's a cop.
	That is such a cop-out.
	I'm concerned about put it forward.
	Stop.
	Stop.
	We hear the Democratic operatives explaining the money comes from the Clinton campaign.
	That's where it originates.
	Then it's funneled through the DNC.
	Then it's funneled through democracy partners.
	Then it's funneled into the fomenters.
	Then they're on tape bragging, yeah, that was us in Chicago, you know, inciting a riot.
	And by the way, we do that at every Trump event.
	This isn't a matter of editing.
	This is a matter of looking with your own eyes and seeing your operatives paid by Hillary Clinton's campaign fomenting violence.
	And on top of that, a lie and a false narrative about Donald Trump and Donald Trump supporters.
	There's enough information there that you can come to the conclusion that your side is doing this like they're encouraging and orchestrating voter fraud.
	What's so hard about that to acknowledge?
	I'm not.
	Look, you can't blame people like me and all the Democrats for the actions of a few that are obviously.
	But your candidate, your candidate paid for it.
	Your candidate funded this.
	Sean, we are not blaming the Democrats, but when the Democrats' response has always been initially right away, oh, it's an issue of editing.
	Rather than saying, let's get to the bottom of the issue, let's find out if there's any truth to this.
	Their first response is always, oh, it's a matter of editing.
	This can't be true.
	So if they really do care, we're not blaming any specific Democrat, but if there's an issue here, clearly there is, then we should be concentrating on that, not the editing.
	The editing can prove itself.
	Of course, you know, they did the same thing with Planned Parenthood.
	It's not an issue of editing.
	It's an issue that we have to get to the bottom of.
	And that's the fraud.
	It's so upsetting when we see this because all along we have suspected this kind of behavior.
	We've been trying to bring it to light.
	The only person that has, really, to any degree right now has been Mr. Trump.
	Because because of the things that he's been saying, now people are writing about it.
	People are letting us know.
	We're finding out that everything that he has been, that we have suspected all along is actually happening.
	It's happening.
	I think if he wins, I think if he wins the election, I'll never hear the word rigged again.
	So I love how the Democrats play that game, too.
	So it's rigged if he loses, or it appears that he loses.
	But all of these stories, all of these accounts, history has even shown us that there is a voter if it's a rigged election in Pennsylvania.
	And that's not fair either because the election is rigged, correct?
	You know what?
	You're missing.
	Let me just add a point here.
	You're missing the whole point.
	And that is that they are describing a well-financed effort to foment violence in the country, to advance a propaganda narrative and lie to the American people.
	And by the way, Hillary is a big liar.
	We all know that.
	And then they are also fomenting and paying for voter fraud on a wide-scale basis.
	And it's all there for you to see.
	And what's frustrating, and I guess it's frustrating to Rose as well, is that you see it with your own eyes.
	You hear it with your own ears.
	And what I guess we're trying to expect, Leslie, is for you to say, you know what?
	What I saw on that video is repugnant.
	It's disgusting.
	Sean, I'm not sure.
	The fact that my father is.
	Okay, go do TV in Vegas.
	And this is the point, Rose.
	I'll give you the last word here.
	But the fact that this is where they are is amazing to me.
	It is absolutely amazing.
	And I'm tired of the excuses and I'm tired of the word games.
	I really am.
	I mean, this is serious.
	This is serious stuff, and we have to get to the bottom of it.
	I would much prefer her to say, rather than, oh, I've got to see it unedited, I would much prefer her to say, you know what, I would like to get to the bottom of this.
	If there's any truth at all to this, Sean, you and I would say that.
	If the party was accused of what they are being accused of, I think that you truly would say, then I want to get to the bottom of this.
	I want to find out if this is really happening.
	But it's clear that it is.
	And it's so frustrating to the rest of us because we're watching this.
	We suspected it.
	And now it's being confirmed.
	It's all being confirmed.
	What do you think of this new woman that came out, this woman that worked at a television station that claimed that on multiple occasions, Bill Clinton came up and rubbed up on her until he achieved omnipotent ecstasy?
	I mean, what are we to make of that?
	We make of it what we will.
	I don't doubt a word of it.
	I really don't.
	We're talking about Bill Clinton, right?
	Yeah, of course it's Bill Clinton.
	This is a man whose hands were around his ankles in the Oval Office.
	I mean, of course.
	Let me play clips of this woman.
	You know, considering the media went all in on the allegations against Donald Trump, you're not going to hear what we're about to play.
	It was a situation where it was kind of a joke at our TV station.
	My cameraman and some other people that work there would say, you know, I think he really likes you.
	And because he would always single me out when, you know, when he first walked in.
	But he started making inappropriate gestures.
	We were responsible for editing our own stories, and we had a very small editing room.
	And he had touched my shoulder and done other things to me before in public around other people, but that was just his nature to be very, you know, demonstrative and touchy-feely, as I call it.
	But he followed me into an editing room the first time I remember that it was very small.
	There was a chair.
	I was sitting in a chair.
	He came up behind me and started rubbing my shoulders and running his hands down toward my breasts.
	And I was just stunned.
	I froze.
	I asked him to stop.
	He laughed.
	That happened on three occasions, and each time it escalated, where the aggressive nature of his touch and what he was doing behind me escalated.
	He's touching you, you say, but what specifically did he do to you?
	He came up behind me.
	It's very close quarters.
	You have to understand that his private parts were right at my neck.
	I was sitting in a chair.
	He's touching me on my shoulders, working his hands down from behind, and he starts to hunch me.
	He did that the first time.
	The second time, which was probably a week or so later, I did approach him after he did it the first time, and I said, please don't ever do anything like that to me again.
	It's very offensive.
	It's upsetting.
	And I do not want you to do that.
	He laughed.
	And the second time, about a week later, he came in.
	He made a beeline immediately for me.
	I excused myself, went to the editing room, and he came in behind me, started hunching me to the point that he had an orgasm.
	He's touching, trying to touch my breasts, and I'm just sitting there very stiffly, just waiting for him to leave me alone.
	And I'm asking him the whole time, please do not do this.
	Do not touch me.
	Do not hunch me.
	I do not want this.
	And he finished doing what he was doing and walked out.
	You know, for all the outrage expressed about a woman that sat next to Trump on a plane in first class with a witness that said it didn't happen.
	But putting that aside, the woman got 50 minutes on CNN with Anderson Cooper.
	Is this woman going to get 50 minutes on CNN with Anderson Cooper?
	No.
	Yeah, just hold your breath.
	I mean, if it weren't for you, you're the only one talking about the aggression and the violent behavior towards women that Bill Clinton has demonstrated over the years.
	And this woman has witnesses.
	She has a specific account.
	I think he likes you.
	Yeah, I think he really likes her.
	But you're the only one who's really covering it.
	It's kind of sad, right?
	It's kind of sad.
	And, you know, for the media that criticized me for being honest, open, and truthful about being a conservative this election season.
	And then they themselves are such hacks, especially CNN.
	They're the worst.
	I mean, at least MSNBC is open about it for crying out loud.
	CNN has gone so in the tank.
	I mean, anyway, Rose, we love you.
	Thank you so much.
	Keep up the good work, Sean.
	We count on you.
	Really, a lot of people are counting on you.
	Listen.
	You're not letting them down.
	Right now, the polls show that Donald Trump's losing.
	And that's not a good thing.
	I'm not sure I believe that.
	I really, I'm really not.
	I'm of the school that you have to believe the polls and then assume you're five points down and fight your ass off every day for the next 20 days.
	I agree that we should continue to fight and never give up.
	But I also think.
	Not giving up.
	I think the media wants to deflate the turnout and make people think it's over.
	But, you know, I'm just the way I work, I work harder when I'm down.
	Okay.
	I understand that.
	Okay.
	All right.
	I think we all should be working very hard.
	I think I'm taking care of that.
	Yeah, I agree with you.
	All right, I got to roll.
	Your calls are coming up next.
	Toll-free, it's 800-941.
	Sean, you want to be a part of the program?
	Well, I think that everybody is in favor of free and fair trade, and I think that NAFTA is proving its worth.
	I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning.
	I believe that marriage is not just a bond, but a sacred bond between a man and a woman.
	LGBT Americans are our colleagues, our teachers, our soldiers, our friends, our loved ones.
	And they are full and equal citizens and deserve the rights of citizenship.
	That includes marriage.
	Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?
	No.
	No.
	Okay.
	So you're saying your opinion on gay marriage changed.
	Or you changed your mind.
	You know, I really, I have to say, I think you are being very persistent, but you are playing with my words and playing with what is such an important thing.
	I'm just trying to clarify so I can understand.
	No, I don't think you are trying to clarify.
	I think you're trying to say that, you know, I used to be opposed and now I'm in favor and I did it for political reasons.
	And that's just flat wrongs.
	You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center.
	I plead guilty.
	I take a back seat to no one when you look at my record in standing up and fighting for progressive values.
	For the record, are you a progressive or are you a moderate?
	I'm a progressive.
	So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our nation.
	I've made it very clear that I made a mistake, plain and simple.
	We've not yet signed off on it, but we are inclined to do so.
	We're either going to be dependent on dirty oil from the Gulf or dependent on dirty oil from Canada.
	I think it is imperative that we look at the Keystone Pipeline as what I believe it is, a distraction from the important work we have to do to combat climate change, and unfortunately, from my perspective, one that interferes with our ability to move forward to deal with all the other issues.
	Therefore, I oppose it.
	We are making progress toward finalizing a far-reaching new trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
	The so-called TPP will lower barriers, raise standards, and drive long-term growth across the region.
	Now looking back on it, it doesn't have the results we thought it would have in terms of access to the markets, more exports, etc.
	Do you believe that this is radical Islamism or radical Islamic terror?
	Will you use those words, and if not, why?
	Well, first of all, from my perspective, it matters what we do more than what we say.
	And now it mattered we got bin Laden, not what name we called him.
	And I have clearly said that we face terrorist enemies who use Islam to justify slaughtering innocent people.
	And, you know, whether you call it radical jihadism, radical Islamism, I think they mean the same thing.
	I'm happy to say either.
	So, for example, you use the term war on radical Islam.
	Well, we've made a judgment based on a lot of research that bringing Islam into the definition of our enemy actually serves the purpose of the radical jihadists.
	And I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants.
	I made this exception basically on humanitarian grounds because of the individual stories.
	But certainly we've got to do more at our borders, and people have to stop employing illegal immigrants.
	Do you, the New York Senator Hillary Clinton, support the New York governor's plan to give illegal immigrants a driver's license?
	You told the National New Hampshire paper it made a lot of sense.
	Do you support his plan?
	You know, Tim, this is where everybody plays gotcha.
	It makes a lot of sense.
	What is the governor supposed to do?
	I am going to back and support what President Obama has done to protect DREAMers and their families, to use executive action to prevent deportation.
	And I have said, if we cannot get comprehensive immigration reform as we need and as we should, with a real path to citizenship that will actually grow our economy, then I will go as far as I can, even beyond President Obama, to make sure law-abiding, decent, hard people in this country are not ripped away from their families.
	So, yes, we do need to be vigilant in screening and vetting any refugees from Syria, guided by the best judgment of our security professionals in close coordination with our allies and partners.
	Applying a religious test, discriminating against Muslims, slamming the door on every Syrian refugee, that is just not who we are.
	We are better than that.
	And remember, many of these refugees are fleeing the same terrorists who threaten us.
	You were against same-sex marriage, now you're for it.
	You defended President Obama's immigration policies.
	Now you say they're too harsh.
	You supported his trade deal dozens of times.
	You even called it the gold standard.
	Now, suddenly, last week, you're against it.
	Will you say anything to get elected?
	Well, actually, I have been very consistent over the course of my entire life.
	I have always fought for the same values and principles.
	All right, glad you're with us.
	We have the third and final debate right here in Vegas.
	We're in the studios of AM720K Dawn, the 50,000-watt blowtorch of free speech.
	What, two hours and I'm sorry, three hours.
	Yeah, two hours and 24 minutes from right now.
	Oh, is it three?
	Anyway, so let's get to your busy phones here.
	I know you've been very patient.
	Let's go to Michelle who's in Colorado.
	Michelle, hi, how are you?
	Glad you called.
	Hi, Sean.
	I'm good.
	How are you?
	I'm good.
	What's going on?
	Well, I have some advice for Mr. Trump tonight.
	You know, I've been talking about this video that you posted.
	I've been talking to friends of mine who are Democrats.
	They don't want to hear it.
	They don't want to know.
	They don't care about videos.
	They don't care about emails.
	Here's my advice, and it has to be put this way.
	You have to look at the current state of our country, the American public, as I'm not being cruel, but somewhat stupid.
	In other words, every point he has to make tonight, every point that he has to make regarding what her plans are for this country have to be broken down like a second to like you would to a second grade class and explain to them, step by step by step, how this will destroy your way of life, everything that you believe, everything that you live with.
	It will change, how her open borders will change, how her hiking taxes on businesses and corporations will affect every individual person and break it down even more.
	Take every red cent from Soros, from everybody, the top billionaires in the world Okay, in this country, take all their money.
	It still won't fund all the government programs they want to do.
	It still won't take care of it.
	You have to tell these people what you have to speak to them like children.
	I can't take it anymore.
	I just can't take it.
	Look, you got to understand, there's been a conditioning, and people have been brainwashed into thinking the government's going to take care of everything.
	And by the way, you're kind of breaking up on me.
	Thank you for your call.
	You know, the government was supposed to put Social Security money, your retirement, in a lockbox, but they squandered it, they spent it, and they used it.
	More recently, you want a recent example?
	Keep your doctor, keep your plan, save on average $2,500 per family per year.
	Millions lost their doctor, lost their plan, have no choices, like we were promised choices, and are paying $4,100 more per year than when Obama became president.
	Well, that's like a tax.
	That is, you know, way out, and you're paying more for less, too.
	Higher deductibles.
	Less things are being actually covered.
	It's a shame what has happened.
	It's a shame so many people put their faith, their hope, their dreams.
	The government's going to take care of you.
	Don't believe it.
	You know, if you're a regular listener to this program, I don't care.
	At the end of the day, regardless of who wins this election, and I have no clue what's going to happen here, you could have a blowout either way.
	You can have a very tight election.
	You can have a stolen election.
	Who knows?
	I don't know what's going to happen.
	The polls show, pay very close attention.
	Polls show that Hillary is, if the election were held today, if the polls are right, she wins.
	But I would argue that there's way too many balls up in the air right now to actually get the pulse of where people are.
	Have people absorbed WikiLeaks?
	Have they absorbed Project Veritas?
	Have they absorbed that the women that made accusations that many of those stories have now been debunked about Trump?
	You know, have they absorbed what a fundamental corrupt liar, congenital liar, pathological liar who has enriched herself that Hillary Clinton is?
	Have they absorbed how bad her policies are going to be?
	Have they absorbed her failure as Secretary of State?
	Have people, are people able to cut through the clutter?
	You know, one of the biggest problems is for a lot of people, and this is not a criticism, is that they're busy getting up in the morning, shoveling a little coffee down their throat, you know, trying to get their eyes open, going through their daily grind, their 12, 14, 16-hour workday, taking the kids to school, taking the kids to activities, you know, making sure the kids study, preparing meals for the kids.
	And by the time they get their ass in bed with a glass of wine or a beer, they're wiped out.
	How can they possibly absorb everything I know about this election?
	That's why it's my job to try and simplify it.
	That's why for the last three nights on television, I'm putting up on the screen the headlines of WikiLeaks and Project Veritas so you can get informed quickly.
	And I'm trying to make it as easy as possible for people.
	I have defined what the differences are in this election, what's at stake in this election.
	I've described how much of a liar and how corrupt she is.
	And it's really, you know, and I still don't have a feel that the American people get it.
	And then you've got this whole mentality is, oh, the government's going to provide for me.
	Listen, regardless of how this election comes out, do not ever put your faith, your hope, your retirement, your health care in the hands of government because they're going to disappoint you and fail you.
	Oops.
	And even if you do put your hopes in them, have a backup plan.
	Have a plan B. You know, I encourage every young person, Linda can verify this.
	How many people have worked for me that have gone on to so many bigger and better things, Linda, right?
	Yeah, lots of people.
	Okay.
	How many other jobs do you have besides this one?
	Two.
	Two.
	Okay.
	Well, really, I'd argue three.
	Yeah, maybe three.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	If you take, for example, Rachel Yemeni, who worked on this show, or you take to, you know, Michaela, who recently worked on the show, you take, you know, or Alicia who worked on the show.
	You know, what have I always done if somebody, I've encouraged them to do other things too?
	And on top of it, you can verify this.
	I try and pay people enough so they can save a little, right?
	Yeah, you always encourage us to save.
	You're kind of like an annoying third parent.
	Okay.
	And I tell them you never know what's going to happen.
	Yes.
	Impending death, doom, and destruction.
	And how many times have I factored in things that I want to say on this program that might get me fired, but I don't do it because I'm thinking about my team.
	Usually when you're yelling at me, because I said, why didn't you say that?
	Yeah, pretty much.
	And I'm like, really?
	You want me to say that?
	I said, do you like your job?
	Yeah, you said you're feeding your family.
	Do you like meeting?
	Do you want to get over your head?
	Do you like to feel that little football player that's in your house every night?
	You're my little linebacker.
	Little Liam that wants to be a linebacker.
	He already knows.
	The 14-pound baby when he was born?
	He's already better than Kaepernick.
	He's at 14 months.
	All right, let's get back to our busy phones.
	Staz is in Vegas right here at AM720, K-Dawn Radio.
	How are you, Staz?
	What's going on?
	Oh, I'm doing awesome.
	Thank you so much for taking the call, Sean.
	What an amazing time.
	So many things are being exposed for the first time in America.
	I said it before that the big loser in all this is going to be the media, the liberal media.
	You're doing such a fantastic job.
	We're exposing so many things.
	Finally, for the first time in America, these next three weeks are going to be the most fun three weeks we've ever seen.
	It's more fun than sport.
	Great job, buddy.
	I really appreciate it.
	Look, there's a lot of people that are angry at me, and I'm angry at a lot of people.
	And I'm going to make a promise and a pledge here.
	In 21 days from now, I've got some unfinished business with people.
	And those people that have sabotaged Trump, stabbed him in the back, undermined him every step of the way, those people that helped elect Hillary Clinton, those people that are the very reason Donald Trump became the nominee because of their failure.
	Well, we're going to have a big discussion here in 21 days, win, lose, or draw.
	Names are going to be named.
	The Republican Party needs a reboot in a major way, and we're going to start it.
	They don't stand for anything.
	They don't fight for anything.
	And that's going to change because we're losing our country.
	I'm just hoping we get through this electron.
	I'm hoping upon hope that these polls are wrong, that there's a Brexit effect, that Trump wins because his agenda will help the country.
	He's flawed.
	He's imperfect.
	I get it.
	She is dishonest, corrupt, a liar, and way beyond imperfect.
	She's a disaster in waiting.

▲