Sean Hannity Show - Debate Recap - 10.20

Oct. 20, 2016 - Sean Hannity Show

01:29:29

Debate Recap - 10.20

Sean sits down with Ann Coulter, Jess Tarlov and Ron Christie to break down Donald Trump's performance in last night's presidential debate. With all the liberal media spin, journalism does seem to be dead... after you read the reaction from last night's debate there can be no question that journalism is not in a healthy state. The Sean Hannity Show is live Monday through Friday from 3pm - 6pm ET on iHeart Radio and Hannity.com. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is an iHeart Podcast.
	Let not your heart be troubled.
	You are listening to the Sean Hannity Radio Show Podcast.
	Governor Pence pledged on Sunday that he and you, his words, will absolutely accept the result of this election.
	Today, your daughter Ivanka said the same thing.
	I want to ask you here on this stage tonight: do you make the same commitment that you will absolutely, sir, that you will absolutely accept the result of this election?
	I will look at it at the time.
	I'm not looking at anything now.
	I'll look at it at the time.
	What I've seen, what I've seen is so bad.
	First of all, the media is so dishonest and so corrupt, and the pylon is so amazing.
	The New York Times actually wrote an article about it that they don't even care.
	It's so dishonest, and they've poisoned the minds of the voters.
	But unfortunately for them, I think the voters are seeing through it.
	But, sir, there is a tradition in this country.
	In fact, one of the prides of this country is the peaceful transition of power, and that no matter how hard-fought a campaign is, that at the end of the campaign, that the loser concedes to the winner.
	Not saying that you're necessarily going to be the loser or the winner, but that the loser concedes to the winner and that the country comes together in part for the good of the country.
	Are you saying you're not prepared now to contest about that?
	The country is that I will tell you at the time, I'll keep you in suspense.
	The thing that has most animated this election on the Democratic side has been the sense of a rigged system.
	The game is rigged against them.
	So, there's a sense the game is rigged.
	Yes, this is what a rigged economy is about.
	A rigged system.
	They'll do anything to rig the system to those at the top.
	The game is rigged against a lot of people who have done their dead-level best.
	That the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	Keeps the system rigged for those at the top.
	The system is rigged.
	Their obstruction is keeping a system that is rigged.
	The game is rigged.
	We must fix an economy in America that is rigged.
	The game is rigged, and it's not right.
	A rigged economy.
	The game is rigged.
	And the economy is rigged.
	The American people know that the system is rigged against them.
	The system rigged against the middle class.
	Oh, I know, it is rigged, and it's still rigged.
	Too many people feel like the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	Oh, the game is rigged.
	Our economy is rigged.
	People feel like the system is rigged against them.
	And here's the painful part.
	They're right.
	You know, the system, folks, is rigged.
	It's a rigged system.
	Our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state.
	So we have our problems, too.
	Is this the last battleground, sir?
	If you lose at the Supreme Court of Florida, what do you continue?
	Well, the effort I have underway is simply to make sure that all the votes are counted.
	And when the issues that are now being considered in the Florida Supreme Court are decided, that'll be an important point.
	But I don't want to speculate on what the Florida Supreme Court did.
	Seminole and Mark County count.
	The absence of the ballot.
	Well, there were more than enough votes to make the difference that were apparently thrown into the applications for ballots were thrown into the trash can by the supervisor of elections there, apparently.
	Even though they were missing the same number that the Republican Party workers were allowed to come in and fix the other applications with.
	So I don't want to speculate on what remedy might be.
	I'm not a party to that case or the Martin County case.
	But more than enough votes were potentially taken away from Democrats because they were not given the same access that Republicans were.
	Remember, according to what's come out in that case, again, I'm not a party to it, but I've read about it.
	And apparently the Democratic Party chair was denied the opportunity to even look at the list of applications, whereas the Republican Party workers were allowed to roam around unsupervised inside the office and bring their computers in and fix all of the ballot applications for one side,
	even as the Democrats were denied an opportunity to come in, denied a chance to even look at the applications, and those applications were thrown out.
	That doesn't seem fair to me.
	And apparently in Martin County, they were able to go in and take all the applications home with them.
	So, you know, that's a fairly important thing.
	Excuse me, said that what?
	The black votes that were discounted, Reverend Jesse Jackson and the NAACP said the black votes were discounted in Florida.
	Well, I am very troubled by a lot of the stories that have been reported about a roadblock on the way to one precinct, questions raised about various activities there.
	I do not have any personal or first-hand knowledge of those events.
	But whenever there are problems of that kind alleged, they are deserving of attention.
	Will you meet with Jesse Jackson or something?
	Oh, I talk with him.
	I dog with him regularly, of course.
	And I have worked with him closely.
	I have spoken with Kwaisi Umfume and Julian Bond.
	Penn DeHare, who is ahead of the efforts by the NAACP against voter suppression, has been in touch with our people.
	But I have no knowledge of those activities.
	I just want to say to you clearly that in my opinion, whenever you have allegations of those kind, that is a matter that the entire country ought to take seriously.
	They are not part of the ongoing court action.
	And I don't want to mislead you on that, but I certainly want you to know that I think that there are serious allegations.
	I remember very well back in 2000, there were those who argued that people's votes should be discounted over technicalities.
	For the people of Florida who voted in this primary, the notion of discounting their votes sounds way too much the same.
	The votes of 1.7 million people should not be cast aside because of Of a technicality.
	The people who voted did nothing wrong, and it would be wrong to punish you.
	All right, glad you're with us.
	Our post-debate, final debate edition of the Sean Hannity Show back in New York, Red-Eyed Home.
	Yes, arrived at 8 o'clock in the morning.
	800-941 Sean, you want to be a part of the program.
	The reason I started with these montages here is because if you listen and watch and follow the mainstream media, which we now have learned, Univision, NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, CMN, ABC, CBS, NBC, I already mentioned the New York Times, the Boston Globe, and Politico, and so many others we now know are an extension of the Clinton campaign.
	So their fixation after last night, even, you know, never Trumper guys, even, you know, I was watching Charles Krauthammer last, well, Donald Trump was winning the debate until he said that, that I'll keep you in suspense about the election results outcome.
	Byron York had a similar piece out today.
	How could you possibly, how does the media not possibly remember, you know, pimpled and dimpled and hanging and swinging and perforated Chads and the entire Gore lawsuit,
	his unwillingness to accept the results of the election, or that Hillary Clinton, you know, was saying Bush was selected and not elected, and last week reiterating that point about the 2000 election.
	When WikiLeaks this election cycle has pointed out to us that Bernie Sanders was systematically cheated by Hillary Clinton in their collaboration with the DNC, even giving Hillary a heads up on what the Bernie Sanders campaign was doing and what they did with the superdelegates.
	And then here you have on tape Al Gore and Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
	And again and again and again, they are talking down the electoral system saying that it is rigged, it is rigged, it is rigged, it is rigged.
	And that, you know, you go back to 2004, John Kerry thought Bush rigged that election.
	And Barbara Boxer was running a protest in Washington, D.C. at the time.
	I mean, you've got, you know, all of everybody here, just like they have selective moral outrage on anything Trump, you know, if Trump sits on a plane next to a woman and you have an eyewitness that says nothing happened in the plane, and the woman claims she didn't mind the groping for 15 minutes.
	And it was only when he moved from one part of the body to another part of the body then it mattered.
	But she never said help in a crowded airplane, not one time.
	And a witness said no groping had gone on, but that didn't stop CNN from going nearly an hour with the woman.
	They didn't spend an hour when it came out.
	The eyewitness said it's not true.
	You know, how in a year where we know that Bernie Sanders was cheated in many, many ways in a primary, how in a season where WikiLeaks has now described in detail so many different things about how that primary was handled,
	or that the Project Veritas tapes show that money goes from the Clinton campaign to the DNC to a Democratic group right into the hands of dark art political operatives that brag on tape that they have been fomenting violence at Trump rallies the entire election season and that they are involved in a widespread voter fraud effort.
	And we've now since discovered that the key operative in this scheme, not only to send the agitators, but to advance this voter fraud effort, had actually visited the Obama White House 342 times.
	How could you not, you know, you're asking Donald Trump to say, you're going to accept the results even if there's cheating, right?
	You're going to accept them.
	And to his very good credit, he didn't fall for the bait.
	He said, well, let me see if it's fair or not.
	That's what he was saying.
	And he's actually funny today.
	He said in Ohio earlier today, I'll accept the results of the election next month.
	If I win, here's what he said.
	I would like to promise and pledge to all of my voters and supporters and to all of the people of the United States that I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election if I win.
	Poll out showing 72% of Americans have concerns over voting security.
	You have the Texas Attorney General now is investigating voter fraud in that state.
	You got the Florida Democratic Party wanting ballots allowed before the registration of the individuals verified.
	We have John Podesta in WikiLeaks saying immigrants, illegal immigrants with driver's licenses, can vote.
	We have one instance after another.
	We'll chronicle a lot of these instances today.
	Legals, it's okay for illegals to vote with driver's licenses.
	Well, that's just a lie.
	And all the coverage last night took away from all of the amazing debate performance that I thought Donald Trump had last night.
	And when you, you know, Bill Clinton, for example, Bill Clinton urged Al Gore not to accept the results of the 2000 election and praised him for not conceding the election on election night.
	And during the lawsuit of Al Gore, Clinton refused to help the Bush team with any type of transition preparation.
	And the White House of Bill Clinton said they were not willing to open government offices to Mr. Bush to begin a presidential transition until legal challenges were resolved.
	You know, I'm going to say maybe I'm the only one that feels this way, but I actually think that Donald Trump was, especially in light of Project Veritas and the Clinton campaign and DNC funding voter fraud efforts, and that the guy that was responsible, that's one of the heads of it, was at the White House 342 times.
	I think it was right not to agree before the first vote has ever even been counted or to concede an election if he loses before he examines the results.
	And by the way, let me say, I thought Chris Wallace did a great job last night.
	I thought this was by far the best moderated debate out there this year.
	And I think, you know, it should go, I think he should be the go-to guy at this point to moderate some of these debates the way maybe Jim Lehrer was for decades and get rid of the current completely corrupt, phony baloney presidential debate commission where members donate to Hillary's campaign.
	On this question, though, I thought the only thing I would have done differently is ask Hillary the same question and ask why you have said in the past George Bush was selected and not elected.
	You know, and he said he wasn't assuming Trump would lose, but if you notice, Hillary wasn't asked that question.
	And she belongs to the party with a long history of using the courts to try and overturn election results when they lose.
	Just ask Al Gore and Al Franken.
	And by the way, according to the Washington Post, Hillary's husband actually urged Gore not to concede in 2000.
	And the New York Times subsequently reported Bill Clinton had urged the White House staff not to cooperate with the Bush transition team.
	I've got a lot more to say about this and last night's debate.
	We got full coverage of all of this today.
	We got 19 days to go to Election Day.
	We have I'm not sure if the public is even beginning to completely absorb the Project Veritas videos that have come out, nor are they completely absorbing the magnitude of what we are learning about how corrupt, even racist, and sexist and misogyny and anti-Semitic the Democratic Party is.
	But we'll try and do their job for them because they're never going to do it because we now know they're colluding with the Clinton campaign.
	And it's a criminal enterprise.
	And so many people are going to be a very good person.
	It's a criminal enterprise.
	Saudi Arabia giving $25 million, Qatar, all of these countries.
	You talk about women and women's rights.
	So these are people that push gays off business, off buildings.
	These are people that kill women and treat women horribly, and yet you take their money.
	So I'd like to ask you right now, why don't you give back the money that you've taken from certain countries that treat certain groups of people so horribly?
	Why don't you give back the money?
	I think it would be a great gesture because she takes a tremendous amount of money.
	And you take a look at the people of Haiti.
	I was in a little Haiti the other day in Florida, and I want to tell you they hate the Clintons because what's happened in Haiti with the Clinton Foundation is a disgrace.
	As far as Japan and other countries, we are being ripped off by everybody in the world.
	We're defending other countries.
	We are spending a fortune doing it.
	They have the bargain of the century.
	All I said is we have to renegotiate these agreements because our country cannot afford to defend Saudi Arabia, Japan, Germany, South Korea, and many other places.
	We cannot continue to afford.
	She took that as saying nuclear weapons.
	Look, she's been proven to be a liar on so many different ways.
	This is just another lie.
	And we're going to enforce those agreements, and we're going to look for businesses to help us by buying American products.
	I ask a simple question.
	She's been doing this for 30 years.
	Why the hell didn't you do it over the last 15, 20 years?
	You were very much involved.
	Excuse me, my turn.
	You were very much involved in every aspect of this country.
	Very much.
	And you do have experience.
	I say the one thing you have over me is experience, but it's bad experience because what you've done has turned out badly.
	For 30 years, you've been in a position to help.
	And if you say that I use steel or I use something else, make it impossible for me to do that.
	I wouldn't mind.
	The problem is you talk, but you don't get anything done, Hillary.
	You don't.
	Just like when you ran the State Department, $6 billion was missing.
	How do you miss $6 billion?
	You ran the State Department.
	$6 billion was either stolen.
	They don't know.
	It's gone.
	$6 billion.
	If you become president, this country is going to be in some mess.
	Well, first of all, those stories have been largely debunked.
	Those people, I don't know those people.
	I have a feeling how they came.
	I believe it was her campaign that did it.
	Just like if you look at what came out today on the clips, where I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago and other rallies where we had such violence.
	She's the one in Obama that caused the violence.
	They hired people.
	They paid them $1,500.
	And they're on tape saying be violent, cause fights, do bad things.
	I would say the only way, because those stories are all totally false.
	I have to say that.
	And I didn't even apologize to my wife, who's sitting right here, because I didn't do anything.
	I didn't know any of these women.
	I didn't see these women.
	These women, the woman on the plane, the woman, think they want either fame or her campaign did it.
	And I think it's her campaign because what I saw, what they did, which is a criminal act, by the way, where they're telling people to go out and start fist fights and start violence.
	And I'll tell you what, in particular in Chicago, people were hurt and people could have been killed in that riot.
	And that was now all on tape, started by her.
	I believe, Chris, that she got these people to step forward.
	If it wasn't, they get their 10 minutes of fame.
	But they were all totally, it was all fiction.
	It was lies and it was fiction.
	Open discussion.
	He said, now I'm going to go to the bottom plays by Mr. Trump's face.
	He's unfit.
	And he proves it every time.
	You are the one that's unfit.
	You know, WikiLeaks just actually came out.
	John Podesta said some horrible things about you.
	And boy, was he right.
	He said some beauties.
	And you know, Bernie Sanders, he said you have bad judgment.
	You do.
	And if you think that going into Mosul, after we let the world know we're going in, and all of the people that we really wanted, the leaders, they're all gone.
	If you think that was good, then you do.
	Now, John Podesta said you have terrible instincts.
	Bernie Sanders said you have bad judgment.
	I agree with both.
	Wow.
	Powerful night.
	23 now till the top of the hour.
	Write down our toll-free telephone number.
	It's 800-949, Sean.
	If you want to be a part of the program, that was the third and final debate.
	You know what James Carville said?
	You know, he actually said, of course, there's going to be some fraud.
	Why do we have to accept in this country the idea that there's going to be voter fraud?
	Now, I want to talk about this from a different perspective here.
	So much of the so-called tradition, which we have now debunked for you, especially modern-day Democrats, including Hillary and Bernie and Al Gore and John Kerry and Barbara Boxer and all these Democrats.
	And Bush was selected.
	He was never elected and that whole nonsense and that whole mantra.
	All right, let's talk about other traditions we have.
	Maybe telling the truth, honest Abe.
	Let's talk about the tradition that no person in this country ought to be above the law.
	You know, I think that's a whole lot more of a tradition.
	Equal treatment under the law is actually a constitutional principle.
	Which brings me to the primary season.
	And you know what?
	How did we go through that whole campaign discover there's such collusion?
	Do you know the level of collusion in this campaign between the DNC, the Hillary campaign to deny Bernie Sanders a fair shake in the primary for the Democratic Party?
	You know the amount of collusion?
	Imagine if Donald Trump offered a quid pro quo to the FBI to get them to alter the true classification of emails on Hillary Clinton's server.
	That's called bribery.
	That's called obstruction of justice, whatever you want to call it.
	People go to jail for that.
	I'd go to jail for that.
	You'd go to jail for that.
	But Hillary Clinton, her team, those involved, they don't go to jail.
	You know, it's, you know, Trump saying repeatedly, and he's right, that if Hillary Clinton were treated like an average person, the one that she doesn't like talking about average people anymore, regular people, you know, the ones that make this country great, she would have been indicted.
	She would have been prosecuted.
	She would have been convicted.
	But because the Obama administration literally shredded this principle of equal treatment under the law, because Bill Clinton got to lobby personally the Attorney General just days before she made her decision, and because the Obama White House themselves were caught in a lie by the president directly to you, the American people, about what he knew about Hillary Clinton's email server.
	Remember, Hillary emailed him personally, and he emailed her personally as it relates to that server.
	And then he said that he only heard about it from the press, and when in fact that was an entire lie.
	And then you've got John Podesta and Cheryl Mills and WikiLeaks discussing whether they should turn over the emails between the president and the Secretary of State, which of course would be obstruction of justice considering all of those documents were under subpoena.
	And imagine if it was Donald Trump who did this, who's been audited now 18 years in a row.
	Well, you got in truth here, Hillary Clinton running for president.
	It's sort of like the O.J. Simpson here of American politics.
	Everybody knows she's guilty.
	Everybody knows she lies.
	And polls show that even Democrats say she deserves to be prosecuted.
	But instead of heading off to a trial and then later the big house, which is where the average Joe would be headed right now, she is now contending to be the next president of the United States.
	Now, look, that's not merely an injustice.
	It is a monumental perversion of not only our legal system that has destroyed any integrity they may have had as it relates to this presidential election.
	If the law has been followed the way it should have been, by law, she would have been disqualified from running.
	Another point that Trump made last night.
	But because the strings were pulled, because access was given, because of the connections that are made, because the attorney general was pressured, because the FBI took a dive, because the Justice Department, State Department, and Obama White House were tipping off the Clinton campaign every step of the way, colluding with them.
	It's like a criminal enterprise.
	And the president publicly announced that Hillary's innocent in the midst of the investigation, unethical in its own right, justice, along with the integrity of our electoral process, now has gone out the window.
	And let me say this.
	If Hillary Clinton wins this election 19 days from now, if she does, you could make a case that because of her ineligibility, because people have been tried, convicted, and denied any opportunity ever to work for the government again, because that is what the law says, we're going to talk about the legitimacy of the presidency,
	a case could strongly be made that she would be an illegitimate president.
	In other words, she would be treated, you know, she could be treated the way she treated George Bush as selected, not elected.
	Well, she was the one that was not prosecuted for the very same crimes others have been charged with and have spent time in jail for, and as part of the punishment, could never work in any government capacity ever again or have any security clearance ever again.
	So she'd then have the highest office in the land by rigging a criminal investigation with the cooperation of a Justice Department, with the cooperation of an FBI director and an attorney general and a State Department who wanted her to win to protect, in the case of Obama, his disgraceful legacy, and in the case of everybody else, whatever their own motive happens to be or politics happens to be.
	You know, you would just, would you rather have Republicans roll over and look the other way?
	I mean, you know, look, I know Paul Ryan will look the other way.
	I know John McCain will look the other way.
	I know Mitt Romney will look the other way.
	And I know the Bushes will look the other way, sadly.
	You know, and unfortunately, as I look at this race, and I think it's infinitely winnable.
	I don't think anybody knows which way this is going to, in the end, turn out.
	I think I know there are more tapes from James O'Keefe coming out because he's told us.
	We know the Democratic operative that's highlighted in both the films that foment violence and plotting and planning and scheming of voter fraud.
	We know he was at the Obama White House some 342 times.
	I mean, how is that not the biggest issue in the campaign?
	And then you can add that Benghazi lies.
	Then you can add, you know, that it was related to a YouTube video.
	We can look at the before Benghazi, 600 requests for security denied.
	Well, in that case, she failed on a spectacular level.
	Lives were lost.
	You know, talking about Donald Trump and attacking him last night as a puppet, I'm thinking, wow, you're the same person that wouldn't even send troops in when Americans were under fire.
	You were more concerned about getting permission from Libya and what clothes they were going to wear if, in fact, you sent them in to rescue Americans, which you never did.
	And then the lie afterwards, you tell the Libyan president, Egyptian prime minister, and your own daughter one thing while lying to the American people all throughout.
	Then you got the whole issue of pay to play and the Clinton charities.
	You know, look at Hillary extolling the virtues of the Clinton Foundation last night, falsely claiming that 90% of the money they collect goes directly to charitable causes.
	It turns out that's not true.
	You know, that one of those charitable causes happened to be her husband's lifestyle.
	Bill Clinton receives expensive gifts, is personally paid by sponsors of the Clinton Global Initiative.
	We know that the surprise claim was made by Doug Band, Bill Clinton's longtime aide, another WikiLeaks development, November 17, 2011.
	Band appeared frustrated that he was forced to sign a conflict of interest policy for his role at the foundation as a member and as a CGI board member and advisor to the Clinton Foundation, while Clinton did not.
	I signed a conflict of interest policy as a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, he wrote to John Podesta.
	And, you know, he said, oddly, William Jefferson Clinton doesn't have to sign such a document, even though he is personally paid by three donors and sponsors and gets many expensive gifts from them.
	And some of that are at home, et cetera.
	And I could add 500 examples like this, he said.
	So there's a lot in play.
	I just don't know how much the American people are going to ultimately be able to absorb here.
	I don't know.
	You know, but they didn't accept the election results in 2000.
	They didn't accept the election results in 2004.
	Frankly, I think the case has pretty well been made that the Democrats stole the 1960 presidential election in Illinois.
	You got the Texas Attorney General launching an investigation into widespread voter fraud.
	You got Indiana uncovering thousands of forged voter registrations.
	This is happening in real time.
	This is not circa 1986.
	This is modern day America.
	You know, a lot came up last night.
	The thing that stood out to me are the profound and distinct differences in terms of the vision for this country.
	And it's everything I've been telling you.
	It's the Supreme Court.
	It's vetting refugees.
	It's saying radical Islam.
	It's building a border wall.
	It's Obamacare or free market solutions.
	It's education top-down or run from the states.
	It's energy independence or not.
	On judicial activism, I mean, Hillary basically says, well, you could have an abortion up to the ninth month.
	You know, Trump said that's not okay with me because those children are viable on their own outside the mother's womb.
	And even the most strident pro-choice people that I know are against partial birth abortion.
	We've learned from the WikiLeaks that you said this, and I want to quote, my dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.
	So that's the key question.
	Is that your dream?
	Open borders.
	Well, if you went on to read the rest of the sentence, I was talking about energy.
	You know, we trade more energy with our neighbors than we trade with the rest of the world combined.
	And I do want us to have an electric grid, an energy system that crosses borders.
	I think that would be a great benefit to us.
	But you are very clearly quoting from WikiLeaks, and what's really important about Wikileaks is that the Russian government has engaged in espionage against Americans.
	They have hacked American websites, American accounts of private people, of institutions.
	Then they have given that information to Wikileaks for the purpose of putting it on the internet.
	This has come from the highest levels of the Russian government, clearly from Putin himself, in an effort, as 17 of our intelligence agencies have confirmed, to influence our election.
	So I actually think the most important question of this evening, Chris, is finally, will Donald Trump admit and condemn that the Russians are doing this and make it clear that he will not have the help of Putin in this election, that he rejects Russian espionage against Americans, which he actually encouraged in the past.
	Those are the questions we need answered.
	We've never had anything like this happen in any of our elections before.
	That was a great pivot off the fact that she wants open borders.
	Okay.
	How did we get off the vote?
	First of all, I had a very good meeting with the President of Mexico, very nice man.
	We will be doing very much better with Mexico on trade deals, believe me.
	The NAFTA deal signed by her husband is one of the worst deals ever made of any kind, signed by anybody.
	It's a disaster.
	Hillary Clinton wanted the wall.
	Hillary Clinton fought for the wall in 2006 or thereabouts.
	Now, she never gets anything done, so naturally the wall wasn't built.
	But Hillary Clinton wanted the wall.
	I would like to promise and pledge to all of my voters and supporters and to all of the people of the United States that I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election if I win.
	I just wanted to come back and say hello.
	Some of you have been on the trail for the whole time.
	No more debates.
	No more naps.
	No more naps for Hillary.
	She may have to actually go out and work.
	Anyway, glad you are with us, 800-941-Sean.
	You want to be a part of the program, hour two.
	And joining us now is probably one of the strongest conservative voices that has been with Donald Trump from day one, and that's Ann Coulter.
	And Ann Coulter has a new book out, by the way, that's doing very well about Donald Trump.
	How are you?
	Fantastic.
	How are you, Sean?
	I am good, Ms. Coulter.
	So who's going to win this election?
	I don't know.
	That's why we hold elections.
	But as I say in my column today, Hillary's advantage is the media, Trump's advantage are the issues.
	And I'm really glad that that came out last night.
	I must say, I've been critical in the past.
	Chris Wallace was a few nitpicking complaints, but Chris Wallace was really terrific last night by keeping this debate, by and large, on the issues.
	I mean, it's amazing that in an election that has been rocketed by a single issue, immigration, we have had two 90-minute debates until last night and not one question on immigration.
	We finally got that one question last night.
	I could have done without the question on this nonsense about, you know, women coming forward three weeks before an election.
	Oh, I remember now.
	He groped me.
	You know, the New York Times did a massive investigation back in May of Donald Trump's treatment of women.
	Remember that one?
	They come up empty-handed.
	But now, suddenly, anyway, I'm spending too much time talking about it now.
	Wallace was fantastic by talking about issues.
	I loved the first question on the Supreme Court.
	And I would like to note that Hillary Clinton's answer about the Supreme Court did not use the words constitution or interpretation.
	No, she sees the Supreme Court, as liberals do, as this governing body that will enforce the Dionysian lifestyle of Hillary and Bill and Hillary Clinton.
	It's all about things that aren't in the Constitution.
	They will force this on the American people.
	She actually referred to the Supreme Court as being a representative body.
	No, it very much is not.
	As Justice Scalia hilariously pointed out in a recent dissent, I believe it was.
	I forget the details, but it was, okay, we have, what is it, three Jews, four Catholics, maybe it's five Catholics.
	We are all from the Northeast.
	We all went to, you know, a total of like three schools.
	This is anything but a representative body.
	And that doesn't matter because it's not supposed to be a representative body.
	They are lawyers who are supposed to be interpreting the Constitution.
	It doesn't matter if all nine of them are Hindus.
	If we're going to have this grand group of philosopher kings deciding issues for us, then maybe it should be representatives.
	Just shut it down.
	Trump was fantastic, and I'm so glad he reminded viewers that it will be open season, not only on the Second Amendment, but on the unborn, if Hillary is elected the next president, appoints a fifth Supreme Court justice, and you know they are just, the left is just itching to overturn Heller.
	That's going to be it.
	Well, and I was actually pretty impressed that Trump had so many details about Heller in his head.
	Look, he's been in politics 18 months.
	These are issues you and I cover at nausea every day.
	It's what we do.
	And I don't think the average person understands how profound this issue of the court alone is going to be in terms of impacting the country.
	Yes, that was a very important question.
	I also wanted to praise Chris Wallace when he got to immigration.
	It has been driving me crazy that I have a whole chapter in my book in Trump We Trust because, you know, people go on TV and they have to say something, but apparently they don't know anything.
	So one of the catchphrases everyone has been using about Trump basically since the moment he announced is he won't give us policy specifics.
	There are no policy specifics.
	I have a whole chapter just quoting him saying that interspersed with the precise date on which he gave a major policy speech or at least a major policy paper.
	When in fact he's given us specifics on everything.
	The only thing we don't know is the name of the company that's going to supply the rebar for the wall.
	But Hillary has not been asked what are the specifics on what she's going to do on immigration.
	She says she's going to grant amnesty to all the illegal aliens here.
	Well, they've been claiming for a decade now there are 11 million illegal aliens.
	We know it's at least 30 million, probably more like 40, 50 million.
	Could we get her to answer?
	You know, as you're granting all these amnesties, if you get up to $40 million, if you get to $41 million, $42 million, is there any point at which you will say, okay, that's enough?
	Also, how many crimes can they have committed?
	Under Rubio's amnesty bill, I believe you got three misdemeanors.
	She says the only ones she won't amnesty are the violent criminals.
	Well, the illegal alien who had been deported several times before and murdered Kate Steinley, he wasn't convicted of any violent felonies until he killed Kate Steinley.
	Could we get some details on what her plans are for the border?
	And that is what Chris Wallace asked.
	He said, what is your plan for securing the border?
	And it was the same nonsense I describe in my book, In Trump We Trust, anyone who says, I will secure the border, personnel, boots on the ground.
	That is all code for open borders.
	Because what are the troops going to do?
	What, you're going to have technology and drones?
	What, so we can watch them run across the border?
	Are the troops going to shoot the illegals?
	How about a wall that just sits there day and night, doesn't need to break for sleep or eat, doesn't need unemployment insurance, a continuing salary.
	How about a nice wall?
	Let me ask you the big liberal media spin, which is kind of ironic in light of all the WikiLeaks dumps that prove what I have said for many, many years, that journalism is dead and the press is an extension of Hillary Clinton and her campaign.
	But I mean, you know, literally, they cannot say it enough.
	This was outrageous that Donald Trump said, I'll keep you in surprise about accepting the election outcome.
	Now, this comes on the heels of this very week, Project Veritas releasing videos talking about direct funding coming from Hillary Clinton and the DNC and being funneled into dark arts operatives that have been fomenting violence all throughout this political cycle.
	But more importantly, as it relates to this question, they're also describing in all its detail a Clinton DNC financed effort at massive voter fraud.
	And I think a lot of people forget that you and I, this is not our first rodeo.
	You do remember 2000.
	You do remember Hillary in 2002 saying Bush was selected, not elected.
	You do remember John Kerry suggesting the same thing after losing an 04.
	Not only that, there was a protest led by Barbara Boxer in the Senate in 2004.
	This isn't 2000.
	No, I got to say, this is, I do, and he was generally good, but certainly better than the other moderators.
	But I do have a complaint with Chris Wallace in asking Donald Trump if he'll accept the results of the election, but not Hillary Clinton.
	No, my entire life has consisted of Democrats refusing to accept the results of an election.
	Not only 2000, not only 2004 with their crazy conspiracy theory about the diebold machines in Ohio, Barbara, but there was a protest in Congress to prevent the certifying of George Bush beating John Kerry.
	There was also in 1985, Republican won a congressional race in Indiana.
	That was back in 85 before the Gingrich Revolution.
	House was very, very Democratic.
	They refused to seat the Republican, a guy named McIntyre, who had beaten the incumbent, McCloskey.
	They refused to seat him, demanded that the ballots be sent to the House.
	They recounted them, and guess what the Democrats found when they recounted?
	Oh, the Democrat won.
	They not only refused to accept the result of an election, they then stole it.
	Oh, and how about two more elections they didn't accept?
	How about the result of a popular initiative in California of Californians saying, no, actually, if you ran across the border and are living here illegally, I don't want to go to work every day to provide you with welfare.
	That, not surprisingly, passed overwhelmingly.
	The Democrats refused to accept the results of that election, and they ran to a court.
	Just recently, California rejected the idea of homosexual marriage.
	What did Democrats do?
	Refused to accept the results of an election, ran to the court.
	This is an example of something I described many years ago in my book, Slander.
	Democrats always advance as if under threat of attack.
	Whatever they accuse you of is what they're planning on doing or what they are doing.
	And here, through our entire lives, only one party has repeatedly refused to accept the results of an election.
	That is the Democrats.
	But the Democrat last night wasn't asked, will you accept the results of the election?
	I would also add, I had a horrible deja vu moment because I remember, in fact, I remember discussing it with you on your TV show.
	It was Donald Trump in the primaries who was browbeaten into saying he will support whomever the eventual Republican nominee is.
	And I asked you at the time on television, well, could you ask the other candidates that?
	Well, okay, they all raised their hands.
	And he took the pledge, and look at what they're doing now.
	They are betraying that pledge.
	So yeah, I think.
	Well, they're betraying the pledge, and they lied.
	Let me ask you, let me ask you this question because, you know, here we are 19 days out of the election.
	I don't think the public has fully and completely absorbed the magnitude of the Clinton campaign, the DNC financing and fomenting violence at rallies and pushing a massive voter fraud effort.
	They certainly haven't digested last night's debate, although the media is spinning frenetically in terms of helping Hillary.
	But here's my question: If you look at the polls, what is your take on the polls?
	Now, I generally take it this way: I think you've got to believe knock out the high, knock out the low, look at the average, and you're probably somewhere in there.
	But with so many balls up in the air in terms of I don't think the public has absorbed Veritas, the Veritas videos, Project Veritas, I don't think they've absorbed WikiLeaks, they certainly haven't absorbed the debate last night.
	So there are way too many balls in the air.
	We know the media is an extension of the Hillary Clinton campaign, and I don't think we're going to get anything that resembles an accurate poll number until probably three days before the election.
	I totally agree with you.
	I'd forget the polls.
	And I don't want to sound like a nut.
	I would not say this in a normal election year.
	Usually an average of the polls genuinely accurately tells you about where we are.
	Though I must say they were wrong in 2012.
	They had a dead-even tie, which is why I don't like making election predictions.
	The night before, I said if it's a tie, I think that goes to the challenger.
	I was wrong about that.
	But generally, the polls are pretty accurate.
	But as you say, I've never seen anything like this.
	As you know, Sean, I've written extensively about the McCarthy era, about Goldwater era.
	There has never been an all-out attack on a candidate like this.
	This puts what they did to Sarah Palin in the dust.
	And I'm sorry with the media behaving that way.
	I'm just saying, ignore the polls.
	Just go out and vote.
	Just go out and vote.
	I do not believe this.
	I mean, there are a lot of ways that you can't.
	And I'm not saying he's going to win.
	I'm just saying, I don't know.
	We'll not be a person.
	Listen, I'm saying I don't know.
	I don't have a read or a pulse on this at all, and I don't think anybody else does either is my take.
	But I do take the polls seriously in terms of averages and aggregate.
	But, all right, Ann Coulter in Trump We Trust, a brand new book.
	Thank you for being with us.
	You know, it was interesting in the course of the debate last night that Chris Wallace, who I thought did a good job, brought up the issue of, well, all these women made allegations at once against Donald Trump.
	Most of them, as Trump said, were debunked.
	But the issue, there is a woman that has now come out, and she is saying, hey, wait a minute, let me tell you my story.
	Leslie Millway is her name, and she talks about her experience with Bill Clinton.
	She was a local reporter in Arkansas at the time, and she joins us now on our newsmaker line.
	How are you?
	I'm wonderful.
	Thank you for having me, Sean.
	I heard you had a hard time getting in.
	Did you feel it was politically motivated?
	Absolutely.
	Our car, we left the hotel at 4.20.
	We were singled out.
	I was actually in the car with Obama's half-brother, Malik, and the other car held Sean Smith from the Benghazi situation, his mom and dad, and also Chris Stevens' fiancé.
	We were singled out.
	The Rodham car was next to us, who also had the brother, I guess Hillary's brother.
	And the ironic thing was they didn't come to the debate, I'm meaning the Clintons, in one car.
	There were three different motorcades with them.
	Hillary came in one, Bill came in one, and Chelsea came in one, so it held everything up.
	We were literally kept for one hour.
	Then they let the Rodham brother go ahead.
	We relate to the debate, as you saw how security was crazy.
	We were held at security, and we were not even able to go in and sit in the chairs that we were assigned.
	I was on the second row in the first chair.
	Malik Obama, I believe, was right next to me, and the Stevens fiancé and also the Smiths.
	We were placed in the back behind a screen, and Secret Service would not allow us.
	They said they had direct instructions not to allow us to go to our seats.
	So if you don't think that isn't politically motivated, I don't know what is.
	I mean, it was orchestrated by the Clintons, I have no doubt.
	Let's talk a little bit about your story, but before we get to it, let's go back in time and let's listen to Hillary Clinton.
	I thought Donald Trump, especially on the issue of taking money from countries that abuse women and challenging her to give that money back, I thought that was a really powerful moment during the debate.
	You know, and Donald Trump parried away very strongly the idea that any of these women were being honest and truthful.
	The one woman in particular was on an airplane, claimed that he was groping her.
	She claimed she didn't mind the 15 minutes of groping.
	It was only the 16th minute where she got upset.
	We have an eyewitness that said he was sitting right next to them, and that didn't happen.
	And of course, this is all taking place in an airplane that is fully booked with flight attendants.
	And if he was groping her, I assume all it would have taken was help, one long yelled-out help, and she would have gotten it.
	So, you know, like in the case of others, I feel the veracity is just not there.
	And, you know, if any woman's getting groped and you have a group of people around you, just saying help would solve the problem.
	So, and she didn't do that.
	So, I don't really trust that story in any way, shape, matter, or form.
	But Hillary says she's the champion of women's rights.
	Now, she's also referred to Monica Lewinsky as a narcissistic Looney Tune wanting to crucify Jennifer Flowers, part of an effort to smear slander and besmirch people like Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick and Kathleen Willey.
	But she's claimed still she's the champion of women's rights.
	Let's listen.
	If somebody's willing to pay you $130,000 or $170,000 to say something and you get your 15 minutes of fame and you get your picture on the front page of every newspaper and you're some failed cabaret singer who doesn't even have much of a resume to fall back on and what's there she's lied about.
	You know, that's the daughter of Willie Horton as far as I'm concerned.
	He'd get off the phone and tell me that she said sort of wacky things which we thought were attributable to the fact that she was terrified.
	People have been harassing my husband for, gosh, I don't know, ever since I've known him.
	I have to believe that it is in large measure motivated by people who just flat out disagree with the kind of politics and policies that my husband believes are best for America.
	A great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.
	I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault.
	Don't let anyone silence your voice.
	You have a right to be heard and you have a right to be believed.
	We're with you.
	All right, unless, of course, your name is Juanita Broderick, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, or Monica Lewinsky, or a whole host of other women.
	What is your reaction to that tape of Hillary claiming to be the great champion of women's rights, Leslie?
	Well, it's absolutely not true.
	My experience has been, and that was one of the reasons why I never came forward, is because I was afraid of the Clintons.
	Everyone knew her protection of what Bill did, how she reacted.
	I was going to come out and come forward in the 90s when, you know, in support of Kathleen Willey and the other women, but I was terrified.
	I had small children, you know, a family, a very conservative career in pharmaceuticals.
	I was not about to jeopardize that, you know, and go against the Clinton machine.
	So I made the decision then.
	My husband's been supportive.
	I've been married almost 35 years.
	I said, you know, he said, you'll know the right time.
	You know, someday you need to tell this story because it's so important that people understand the way he stalked women.
	He was so inappropriate, made no apologies, and got by with it, and not only got by with it, was protected by his wife, and she also would go after these women.
	So it's a powerful story you need to tell it.
	So I'm happy to do it now, and that's the reason that I've sat on it so very long.
	Now, there are two issues as it relates to Bill Clinton.
	There is the consensual affairs, which are numerous that he had.
	Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers would fall into that category.
	And then there's the Bill Clinton that literally exposed himself to Paula Jones.
	There's the Bill Clinton that grope, grabbed, fondled, kissed, touched against her will with Kathleen Willey in the Oval Office.
	Then there's the Juanita Broderick story, which is an outright rape.
	Tell us about your experience.
	Tell us your story.
	Well, I was a young reporter, just turned 20.
	I had to spend a lot of time at Fort Chaffee because the Cuban refugee crisis occurred.
	There were about 20,000 Cuban refugees that had come over in the Mario Flotilla.
	And as a result, Clinton had to spend a lot of time at Fort Chaffee.
	There was a lot of discourse in the state.
	People were not happy to have, you know, all of the Cuban refugees that stayed there for very long periods of time.
	So he would come into Fort Smith and the area, if not on a weekly basis, even more often than that.
	And he would use our station sometimes as a base of operation.
	And when I say that, I mean he would come in and make phone calls and take care of things when he was there.
	And he would single me out, follow me around, compliment me, say things like, how are you doing, pretty lady?
	And things like that.
	And touch my shoulder or come up and pat me on the back, things like that, which were not terribly offensive, but I always felt like there was an ulterior motive.
	So finally, over the course of a few months, he would start to really become aggressive, say things to me.
	One instance is I had a reporter's notebook with my name that said Leslie on it.
	He came up and wrote Clinton on top of my name.
	And I said, are you giving me an autograph now?
	And he said, no, I just wanted to show you how good Clinton looks on top of Leslie.
	So that progressed.
	I was in the editing room one day and he followed me in and came up from behind.
	It was a very tiny small room, about six by six.
	And I had a low-back chair.
	He came up and was prepped.
	And you're still 19 at the time.
	He's the governor.
	You're 19 at the time.
	Yeah, I had just turned 20, actually.
	My birthday was in February.
	This probably occurred in April the first time.
	And he literally started hunching me from behind and running his hands down my front and trying to, and I would grab a ticket.
	What do you mean hunching?
	What is that?
	Well, he was pressing his genitals against me and, you know, groping me.
	You mean like a dog kind of humping?
	Exactly.
	He just would come.
	So wait a minute.
	I mean, this is so creepy.
	I mean, one of the reasons I think Paula Jones got her $850,000 settlement is she was able to identify specific characteristics about his private parts.
	And there's an issue there of some kind.
	But I mean, you're saying like he would just, you're pretty much a stranger to him.
	And he kind of let it be known that he was attracted to you.
	And he's the governor.
	And he would go in this edit room.
	Was it visible to the newsroom?
	Was it visible to any other person?
	No, no, no, no.
	This was very private.
	It was even more private than like a bathroom or something.
	It had equipment on tables.
	It literally was so small that there was room for the table and then a chair that you could, you know, scoot up to the actual editing area.
	And then the door right behind that.
	So there was literally, you know, a space of maybe two feet between the door and the tables that you were on top of each other anyway almost.
	So, you know, one person would go in there.
	We were responsible for editing our own stories.
	So the first time he did that, you know, I was mortified.
	I'm saying, you know, it wasn't a very long time the first time, probably two minutes.
	And I said, please stop.
	Do not do this to me.
	I'm just absolutely terrified.
	And it's kind of surreal.
	You don't really believe this could be happening to you.
	And he laughed.
	He left then.
	The second time, it happened a total of three times.
	The second time he was more aggressive.
	He started hunching me from behind.
	His private area, because I'm sitting in a chair, a short swivel chair.
	His privates are like right on my neck and lower back area.
	And he begins to hunch me.
	So he's literally rubbing his private parts up against your body, I guess, up and down in some fashion.
	To my neck, yes.
	That is so creepy.
	Really a very creepy, creepy story.
	What happened?
	That to the point of, you know, he had an orgasm, and I just sat there for a while.
	And after he left, he left as soon as that happened.
	And I was just, I was just absolutely amazed.
	I was so distraught.
	My grandmother, who lived several hours away in a different state, I had shared with her my, you know, what had happened.
	She came over and literally was living with me because he kept saying things like, we're going to get together soon, or this needs to, you know, we need to be together sooner or things like that.
	And it was just so unnerving.
	I was terrified.
	I was this young, young girl alone in a strange state I'd never lived in.
	I was afraid to go to my news director or anyone because who's going to believe me?
	I'm this young girl and I just have this new great dream job and this person is doing this to me who happens to be the governor.
	I'm going to lose my job and I'm going to be slandered.
	You know, I, you know, like my grandmother said, no good's going to come out of that for you.
	You cannot win in that situation.
	And you have to understand the time we were in.
	You know, it was 1980.
	Women.
	Well, what happened after that?
	I'm running out of time, but how many more times did he assault you this way?
	This happened one more time after that.
	I did not even know he was in the station or I would have never been in that room alone.
	I understand he came in.
	He went to seek me out.
	Came in.
	The same thing happened as in the second time.
	I begged him.
	I said, please do not do this to me.
	I think I started crying.
	He, again, had an orgasm, laughed.
	He literally laughed when I said, please stop, walked out.
	I went directly into the bathroom and started crying.
	A woman came in and said, are you okay?
	I said, yeah, I've just had a bad experience and never told anybody.
	I went home.
	That night he knocked on my apartment door at 10.30 at night.
	How he got found out where I lived, I have no idea.
	But he stood there and knocked and pounded on my door for five to ten minutes.
	My grandmother happened to be with me, thank God.
	And we decided then and there, she and I talked.
	I did not let him in.
	She said, you have to get out of here.
	You know, this is not a good situation.
	I went in, and within a day or two, I quit my job and moved.
	Changed the trajectory of your life and you kept it quiet.
	Last question.
	Absolutely.
	Do you think that I know it's this is him and he has a history of this, but many of the other women that have been victimized by him talk about Hillary's involvement.
	You have no knowledge if she knew or not.
	I don't know.
	That behavior, as we know, was so prevalent and so specific over the years.
	I have to believe, and we also know that the Jennifer Flowers affair was going on at this very time.
	Chelsea was literally a newborn baby when this was happening.
	And I would say things like that: Do you not have a moral compass?
	You have a newborn baby.
	You have a wife.
	Leave me alone.
	I'm not interested.
	And he just found that to be so amusingly funny.
	He would laugh when I said that.
	And that in itself is creepy, too.
	I'm so sorry, Leslie, that you had to go through that.
	I've met a lot of the other women and interviewed them.
	I have no reason to doubt your story at all.
	I think the champion of women's rights, Hillary Clinton, has probably known about his behaviors for many, many years.
	I think there's a lot of evidence to prove that and is covered up and really helped enable him in so many ways.
	But thank you for sharing your story.
	And I apologize.
	No woman should ever have to go through the horror of what you're describing.
	That is so beyond perverted and creepy and predator-like.
	It's shocking.
	It shocks the conscience.
	Well, thanks for letting me tell my story.
	It's been very cathartic and very helpful for me to express it and to tell it and to finally get it out there because I want to reach the millennials.
	I want to reach these young women that are on the fence.
	And I want them to understand what kind of a person, yes, Bill Clinton did this, but Hillary was an enabler.
	She allowed this type of behavior by all the things she did to support him through all these many years.
	So, you know what?
	Young women need to understand that.
	She is not a champion of women.
	She, you know, what she did to these women is unthinkable.
	She literally ruined lives.
	And I wasn't going to allow her to ruin my life.
	Just the opposite of what she says she is, a champion of women's rights.
	Leslie, thank you for telling your story, and I hope people are paying attention because they need to.
	Thank you.
	I appreciate it.
	God bless you.
	And I'm so sorry.
	Wow.
	That's so sad.
	That is a predator at a very, very deep, you know, psychopathic level.
	I remember very well back in 2000, there were those who argued that people's votes should be discounted over technicalities.
	For the people of Florida who voted in this primary, the notion of discounting their votes sounds way too much the same.
	The votes of 1.7 million people should not be cast aside because of a technicality.
	The people who voted did nothing wrong, and it would be wrong to punish you.
	Is this the last battleground, sir, if you lose to the Supreme Court of Florida?
	Well, the effort I have underway is simply to make sure that all the votes are counted.
	And when the issues that are now being considered in the Florida Supreme Court are decided, that'll be an important point.
	But I don't want to speculate on what the Florida Supreme Court do.
	Count the absolute truth about it.
	Well, there were more than enough votes to make the difference that were apparently thrown into the applications for ballots were thrown into the trash can by the supervisor of elections there, apparently.
	Even though they were missing the same number that The Republican Party workers were allowed to come in and fix the other applications with.
	So I don't want to speculate on what remedy might be.
	I'm not a party to that case or the Martin County case.
	But more than enough votes were potentially taken away from Democrats because they were not given the same access that Republicans were.
	Remember, according to what's come out in that case, again, I'm not a party to it, but I've read about it.
	And apparently the Democratic Party chair was denied the opportunity to even look at the list of applications, whereas the Republican Party workers were allowed to roam around unsupervised inside the office and bring their computers in and fix all of the ballot applications for one side,
	even as the Democrats were denied an opportunity to come in, denied a chance to even look at the applications, and those applications were thrown out.
	Now, that doesn't seem fair to me.
	And apparently, in Martin County, they were able to go in and take all the applications home with them.
	So, you know, that's pretty obvious.
	Excuse me.
	The black votes that were discounted.
	Robert Jesse Jackson and the NAACP said the black votes were discounted in Florida.
	Well, I am very troubled by a lot of the stories that have been reported about a roadblock on the way to one precinct, questions raised about various activities there.
	I do not have any personal or first-hand knowledge of those events.
	But whenever there are problems of that kind alleged, they are deserving of attention.
	Will you meet with Jesse Jackson or?
	Oh, I talk with him.
	I talk with him regularly, of course.
	And I have worked with him closely.
	I have spoken with Kwaisi Umfume and Julian Bond.
	Penn DeHare, who is ahead of the efforts by the NAACP against voter suppression, has been in touch with our people.
	But I have no knowledge of those activities.
	I just, I want to say to you clearly that, in my opinion, whenever you have allegations of those kind, that is a matter that the entire country ought to take seriously.
	They are not part of the ongoing court action.
	And I don't want to mislead you on that, but I certainly want you to know that I think that they're serious allegations.
	The thing that has most animated this election on the Democratic side has been the sense of a rigged system.
	The game is rigged against them.
	So there's a sense the game is rigged.
	Yes, this is what a rigged economy is about.
	A rigged system.
	They'll do anything to rig the system to those at the top.
	The game is rigged against a lot of people who have done their dead-level best.
	That the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	It keeps the system rigged for those at the top.
	The system is rigged.
	Their obstruction is keeping a system that is rigged.
	The game is rigged.
	We must fix an economy in America that is rigged.
	The game is rigged, and it's not right.
	A rigged economy.
	The game is rigged.
	And the economy is rigged.
	The American people know that the system is rigged against them.
	The system rigged against the middle class.
	All I know, it is rigged.
	It's still rigged.
	Too many people feel like the system is rigged.
	People say the game is rigged.
	Oh, the game is rigged.
	Our economy is rigged.
	Feel like the system is rigged against them.
	And here's the painful part.
	They're right.
	You know, the system, folks, is rigged.
	It's a rigged system.
	Our presidential election came down to one state where the brother of the man running for president was the governor of the state.
	So we have our problems, too.
	There you have a montage of Democrats, well, basically saying what Donald Trump said last night, but of course it's a far different reaction.
	You know, Al Gore explaining why he would not concede the election and then took the whole case to court.
	And Hillary Clinton, even two years into George Bush's presidency, questioning the legitimacy of his presidency, saying George W. Bush was selected.
	He was not elected.
	You know, last week, Hillary agreed that Gore won in 2000.
	I mean, that's how deep this goes.
	John Kerry thought Bush rigged the 2004 election.
	I give you specific incidents where, in fact, the Democrats themselves have done this repeatedly.
	There are eight specific times where liberals, the left, have claimed that the election was stolen.
	A labor union leader, Roseanne DeMaro, said it.
	NYU professor Mark Miller said it.
	You know, Erza Klein has said it.
	Ben Wofford of Politico.
	You got Daryl Linda said it.
	Salon's Farid, Farhad Manjou has said it.
	John Marshall of Talking Points has said it.
	And Elizabeth Warren has said it.
	And if we go back to the year 2000, the media claiming it's absolutely unprecedented today.
	This is their, they can't say that Hillary won the debate because she didn't win the debate.
	She lost on substance.
	She's exposed as a fraud.
	Her policy is exposed as being hard, hard left.
	So they always look for one narrative.
	And now we know there's collusion with the media and the Clinton campaign, which has been exposed now through WikiLeaks.
	And we know Univision and ABC and NBC and CBS and CNBC and MSNBC and the New York Times and the Boston Globe are all in the tank and Politico are all in the tank for Hillary Clinton.
	And the media is claiming this is absolutely unprecedented.
	Al Gore refused to accept the results in 2000.
	Hillary Clinton, even after Bush is president, did not accept the results of the election.
	And she, if you go back, Clinton refused to help Bush with the transition while Gore was contesting the results.
	You know, this goes back to, as the New York Times reported, November 27, 2000.
	Nearly three weeks after Election Day, the developments, you know, brought formality without finality to the race when the White House said it was not willing to open government offices to George W. Bush to begin a presidential transition until the legal challenges were resolved.
	Now, as it relates to voter fraud, we have in Texas, the Attorney General launching an investigation into widespread voter fraud.
	You have an Ohio woman who was convicted of voting eight times for Obama.
	Eight.
	In 2008, 11, 12.
	Anyway, she voted eight specific times for this man.
	Indiana has uncovered thousands of forged voter registrations.
	We have nearly 2 million dead people around the country that are still registered to vote.
	So there clearly is a problem.
	Now, Donald Trump earlier today at a rally actually said that I will accept the results of the election next month if I win.
	Just totally playing with him.
	Look, my take is what I said earlier.
	Trump is right to say he wouldn't concede, especially in light of what we learned from Project Veritas this week, that we have a guy that had been to the White House nearly 400 times since Obama's been president, met with the president nearly 50 times on tape, orchestrating a massive, well-funded through the Clinton campaign voter fraud effort.
	Why should anybody accept it at this particular point?
	Let's see how this plays out.
	Anyway, news roundup information overload.
	Your call's at the bottom of the hour, 800-941 Sean is our number.
	Jessica Tarlove is a senior strategist at Shoan Consulting, and Ron Christie, former special assistant to President Bush, welcome both of you to the program.
	So the media narrative is false.
	The very people we now know in the tank for Hillary, Ron Christie, we can't trust them.
	And they're telling everybody this is all unprecedented, but there is, you know, the players involved in this election that are making the claim themselves have done the very thing that Trump was talking about last night.
	That's absolutely right, Sean.
	And for one who is actually on the ground as the Northern Florida recount lawyer for Bush Cheney, I can tell you it's miraculous to me that the media is concocting a story out of nothing.
	The very Al Gore clip that you just played really hampered our ability to have the incoming Bush administration to take office because, of course, Gore was contesting this issue in court.
	It set us back several weeks.
	We weren't allowed access to actually have the transition office for our use to bring the government up to force.
	But more importantly, Sean, why in the world should Donald Trump concede anything given what we've heard from these Project Veritas?
	Hey, it's clear that the media is in the tank.
	It's clear that the DNC and officials within the Obama administration are colluding to try to thwart justice and, in fact, to install Hillary Clinton in any way, shape, or form they can.
	So again, the media has made this up.
	If I were Donald Trump, I would ignore it and I would keep doing what he's doing.
	Yeah, look, and on substance, he won the debate.
	It's even interesting to watch the analysis.
	I saw Byron York today and Charles Krauthammer last night.
	They both said, yeah, Trump had this debate.
	Trump won this debate until he said this.
	And I'm like, guys, do you have not any recent knowledge of history?
	We don't have to go back to the 1800s.
	We don't have to go back to 1960 where it's fairly well believed and well thought that Chicago, I'm sorry, Illinois was stolen for John Kennedy and put him over the top in the election against Richard Nixon in 1960.
	Jessica, you've got to admit there's media, a media double standard here.
	There's media hypocrisy here and Democratic hypocrisy here.
	I mean, to some degree, listen, I mean, we've talked about this before, and we know that the vast majority of journalists do support Hillary Clinton or are liberals.
	96%.
	Sure, 96%.
	Well, and we can also talk about, you know, people with college educations and what happens to your political leanings when you get indoctrinated at those fantastic institutions that I love so much.
	So you're saying that the people that are supporting Trump are dumb.
	Is that your insinuation?
	It is absolutely not what I'm saying.
	I'm saying that there's a correlation between people who have college degrees going into journalism, right?
	I mean, this is not, I don't know how many journalists you know who don't have a college degree.
	I do not think that Donald Trump voters are dumb.
	But we do know that he has a larger share of the white working class vote who have not gone to college.
	You mean the people that have been screwed?
	The people that have been screwed out of jobs because of horrible people?
	Well, to me, I mean, look, I mean, I got into radio, but my background was a strong blue-collar worker and somebody that washed dishes and cooked and bused tables, weighted tables, and tended bar and laid tile and framed houses and did roofing and painted houses and hung wallpaper.
	You know, my background is kind of there, unfortunately, for a lot of those blue-collar workers that used to be able to make a real good living for their family and have retirement and have a nice house and a safe neighborhood.
	That dream has been demolished under the Obama years, so they're struggling right now.
	Yeah, listen, and I think that that has always been a strong suit or a strong aspect of Donald Trump's argument for why he's the best person to handle the economy, right?
	To bring these jobs back and to support, you know, the workers that we're not paying attention to.
	But, you know, to the point, I agree with what Charles Krautheimer said.
	I thought the first 40 minutes Donald Trump did really well for himself, and he wasn't taking the bait largely, and he was sticking to the issues.
	He had some good lines.
	I was impressed with how much he actually knew about the Heller decision.
	I was shocked, actually.
	And he obviously prepared for this debate.
	I think that where the difference here is versus what went on in 2000 is that Al Gore didn't say he wasn't going to accept the results before the results had already happened.
	And you talk about the fact that he didn't have to say it when he was questioning it, bringing it into court and doing everything he could do not to say.
	Hang on a second.
	And they took a Supreme Court decision.
	Now, with Donald Trump, did you see the Project Veritas tapes?
	I did see it.
	Well, I don't know if I saw all of them.
	I thought some.
	All right, we're going to pick it up there when we get back because on those tapes, and again, we have a money funding.
	Look, the people involved tell us where the money comes from.
	It comes from the Clinton campaign to foment hang on to foment violence and build a widespread voter fraud operation.
	So it's all on tape.
	It ought to concern every American, not just Republicans or conservatives.
	And I'll ask you about that when we get back because it's a really important issue.
	Democrat Meloise Richardson has worked at Hamilton County polling places since 1988.
	She's also registered thousands of people to vote, most of them for President Obama.
	But this report suggests she may have gone too far and she's going to have to appear before the Hamilton County Board of Elections to explain her actions.
	There's absolutely no intent on my part to commit any voter fraud.
	Yes, I voted twice.
	I, after registering thousands of people, certainly wanted my vote to count.
	So I voted.
	I voted at the poll.
	Then there's the finding that Richardson's granddaughter, India, a first-time voter, cast two ballots and that Richardson sent in one of them.
	I absolutely voted an absentee ballot for her, but I did let her know that I was getting the absentee ballot for her and sending it in.
	I had to get her social security number for that.
	But I assume she forgot or was just excited and she went to the polls herself.
	Another claim is absentee ballots for Montez Richardson, Joseph Jones, and Marcus Barron all came from Richardson's Wetzel Avenue address, were received by the board the same time as Richardson's, and the handwriting on all four of them was similar.
	Marcus Barring lives here.
	Joseph Jones is my brother.
	He's here from time to time.
	I am Montez's power of attorney.
	I voted for her in her absence.
	So were these all legal votes in your mind?
	Absolutely, legal votes.
	Absolutely.
	So this woman, Richardson, literally was a Hamilton County in Cincinnati, just outside Cincinnati County poll worker from 1998 until she got arrested in 2013 when she was charged with eight counts of illegal voting.
	She pled guilty, was convicted of four counts in exchange for the other four being dismissed, convicted of voting twice in the 2012 election, three times in 2008, 2011, 2012, and so on and so forth.
	Now, this is only one instance of many.
	How many dead people are going to end up voting this year?
	We have a history of this country of presidential candidates questioning the legitimacy of the vote.
	And add to that, we've got Project Veritas.
	On Project Veritas, we've got tapes.
	And of course, they talk about where the financing for efforts involving fomenting of violence and voter fraud, and it comes from the Clinton campaign through the DNC, through Democracy Partners, through the black arts operatives in the political world that go out, train, and foment violence at Trump events that they've been doing all year, bragging about what happened in Chicago and elsewhere,
	and also expanding in great detail what they believe is a widespread, what they want is a widespread voter fraud operation.
	And the head of this is a guy that recently resigned, but he had been to the White House nearly 400 times since Obama's been president.
	Now, when you watch those efforts and know that that money came from the Hillary campaign and the DNC, Jessica Tarlove, you cannot tell me that Donald Trump does not have a legitimate right to be concerned about widespread voter fraud funded by the DNC and Hillary's campaign.
	It's just a fact.
	Well, that video was not linked to the Clinton campaign.
	I know it was linked to the Protestant.
	Excuse me.
	No, no, no.
	They say right there on tape, they say where the money comes from.
	From the Clinton campaign, it goes to the DNC, the DNC to democracy partners, democracy partners to the Foval group, the Foval group, including Foval themselves, describe in detail their efforts to foment violence and to expand voter fraud.
	Okay.
	It's fine for people to be concerned that every vote counts.
	I get that.
	We have not been able to do that.
	When you see that video, they're telling you where the money's coming from.
	People who were fired for that video.
	I just, when you look historically, and you've been playing a lot of tape about what has gone on here, but we have, what, between 2000 and 2014, 31 instances out of a billion votes cast of there being any voter fraud.
	That's what the concern is.
	And Donald Trump is signaling to his supporters that it is okay for there to be unrest after this election.
	That's what he knew.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	That's your spirit.
	When has Donald Trump said that he wants unrest?
	What did he say that he's fomenting unrest?
	Because you say that in light of the fact that we have audio tape of these Democratic operatives that are admitting and bragging about causing violence at Trump events where people can get injured and hurt.
	And now you flip it and turn it around and say Donald Trump's saying it's okay.
	When did Donald Trump say that?
	Sean, I'm saying that what goes on in those videotapes is horrendous.
	The DNC has condemned.
	But that's not my question.
	You said Donald Trump is telling his supporters it's okay.
	He's telling them at the election that the Democratic process does not work in this country.
	That's what he's telling them.
	We saw all over Twitter last night, right, people saying like, oh, I'll rise up about the woman who tweeted that she's got her gun ready.
	He signaled, remember his two Second Amendment comments.
	Excuse me, some keyboard warrior, and I'll go to Ron Christie on this, on Twitter, you know, in the confidence and privacy of their own bathroom or basement or wherever they're involved in tweeting out, is not the Donald Trump campaign.
	In this case, they are implicating the Clintons and the DNC of organizing and financing voter fraud and fomenting violence.
	There's a huge difference here.
	There's a huge difference, and there's a huge distinction as to why the mainstream media doesn't have this on the front page, top of the fold of every newspaper and is not leading every newscast in this country shows you that in an essence that Trump is right, that this is rigged.
	The media is so in the tank for Hillary Clinton that they're not willing to discuss, A, people who are casting multiple ballots, which is a crime, and people should be prosecuted and put in jail for that.
	B, that there was complicit coordination between a shell organization and the Clinton campaign to get people to dress up to incite violence at Trump rallies that he had nothing to do with.
	And C, perhaps most importantly, aren't we a democracy?
	Aren't we supposed to have a free, fair, and open election cycle?
	What this looks like to me, Sean, is a banana republic that has now established itself in the United States, that they're willing to do everything they can to throw this to Hillary Clinton.
	Consequences be damned.
	It's a sad day for our democracy here in America, and the fact that the media won't even discuss it is disgusting.
	Well, we know why the media is not going to discuss it.
	Now, I would think that, Jessica, if Wikileaks showed that Univision and NBC and MSNBC and CNBC and ABC and CBS and the New York Times and the Boston Globe and Univision and whatever other news outlet is involved in helping Hillary, I would think that you would be upset about that.
	So we really can't trust the media, can we, in light of what we've learned through WikiLeaks?
	They are in the tank for Hillary.
	You don't think what they're doing, what we've discovered, you don't think what these companies specifically, which is a big part of the mainstream media, you don't think this is ethical or politico.
	You don't think what they're doing is right, do you?
	I think that you've gone way further than I'm willing to go here.
	Yes, there are obviously.
	Okay, let's go over it.
	I'll go instance by instance with you.
	Univision, the chairman, the head of Univision, advising the Clinton campaign.
	Is that unethical?
	I don't see why it's unethical.
	What was the problem?
	Wait, they're supposed to be covering the news, and they're advising Hillary Clinton on how to challenge Donald Trump, basically an extension of the Hillary campaign.
	Do you think it's ethical for the New York Times and political?
	Do you think it's ethical for the New York Times and Politico to allow the Clinton campaign to edit their stories?
	No, well, that procedure and also the Glenn's rush thing that I've seen, and he's doubled down on the defense of this.
	It is common practice that reporters and journalists do send back to the public.
	Well, okay.
	I've been interviewed in the last month three times by the New York Times.
	I have not been given that opportunity.
	Well, you should ask then, because if you're wrong, if I ask, okay.
	And let me ask this.
	Do you think it's appropriate for a moderator like John Harwood to be advising the campaign?
	Do you think it's appropriate that he brags that he got under Donald Trump's skin?
	I thought the John Harwood email was inappropriate.
	Do you think it's appropriate that CNN feeds the questions to Hillary?
	That would be true.
	I mean, CNN and Donna Brazil have both denied that.
	And Donna Brazil looked pretty dumb on television last night defending it.
	And do you think it's appropriate for the Clinton campaign to hand over questions to Chris Hayes or whoever the anchor is?
	I don't think that there has been evidence that the proven evidence that that is.
	I think there has been, actually.
	Roland Martin to Donna Brazil to the exact verbatim question that was given in the debate.
	That's not even up for dispute, Jesse.
	Well, it is up for dispute because there are people disputing it.
	So, and people who, I don't think Donna Brazil has a long career of being a liar unless I missed something.
	So, I mean, she seems pretty vehement about it last night when she was a little bit more.
	So you think it's just a mere coincidence that you think it's just a mere coincidence that she says sometimes I get questions ahead of time.
	She forwards a question that is used verbatim in the town hall the next day, and you think that's a coincidence.
	What I'm saying is that this is not a woman.
	No, no, no, no, I'm not asking.
	I'm asking, that's what happened.
	The subject line was sometimes I get questions beforehand.
	She sends a question during the town hall, the question is asked verbatim, and you're saying it's a coincidence.
	Certainly, if that is what happened and that she was actually feeding it, that the email isn't fabricated or that this I did.
	Listen, nobody's saying that these fabricated WikiLeaks emails.
	Are you kidding?
	You think John Podesta writes never do well instead of never do well?
	No one's disputed the authenticity of the emails.
	I mean, they've never been able to do that.
	Well, let me take it a step further.
	WikiLeaks and Julian Assange have never been wrong in 10 years.
	Not one time.
	Not one time.
	Listen, you can say whatever you want about the media.
	You can list every organization that you're going to say is in the tank for her, and that's fine.
	Totally your parole.
	We're reading it.
	Give me one instance where WikiLeaks has been proven wrong.
	I have to look it up, but I know that there are.
	No, no, no, no.
	The reason you can't, Jessica, is because they've never been proven wrong.
	Okay.
	You're right.
	I don't know what you want me to say, besides.
	I just conceded that everybody is in the tank for her, right?
	So if we're going on that basis, people still have to turn out and they have to vote.
	So you still agree with me.
	Not because of fraud.
	Donald Trump is now down to eight points.
	Even though we have a tape of Clinton supporters and operatives saying they're getting money from the DNC in the campaign to foment violence and to foment voter fraud.
	That's appalling, Sean.
	I said it was appalling.
	It's on record on your radio show that I've said that.
	And when there were people going to Donald Trump rallies when Bernie Sanders was still in the primary race and they were linked to him, I said that was appalling, as did Bernie Sanders.
	And do you think that they still have to- Do you think that the DNC, do you think the DNC colluded to prevent the Clinton, to colluded to prevent Bernie from getting the nomination?
	No, no.
	Bernie Sanders had no chance of getting the nomination.
	None.
	3.8 million votes.
	How about the recent FBI release where we have a Justice Department, no, I'm sorry, a State Department official offering a quid pro quo to the FBI.
	Is that called bribery?
	Well, both of them, both sides have disputed that.
	That was one FBI official who said that that's what they perceived had happened.
	No, that was in the official FBI report that was released to the public.
	And do you think it's appropriate for the...
	Yeah, I said that.
	If that's what happened, obviously not.
	But both sides are denying that.
	And there are conversations that go on.
	And do you think it's appropriate for the State Department and the Justice Department to be tipping off the Clinton campaign about what they will be releasing as it relates to the email scandal server investigation?
	I did see that email.
	I wasn't completely sure about that where it says that there was more that was going to be coming out in specific timing.
	I think it went to Robbie Mook, but it might have been to another official.
	No, of course it was appropriate.
	We could have Hillary on tape shooting somebody in the head and it'll be defended by Clinton supporters.
	Of course.
	And, you know, Patrick Kennedy, the Undersecretary of State, who's the official that we're talking about here, they should convene a grand jury and determine whether or not crimes were committed.
	What he was trying to do, Sean, was to have the FBI declassify some of Hillary's emails so then she could go out and peddle the lie of, well, I never sent or received anything that was classified on my email account.
	And the FBI said no.
	Then what did he do?
	He wanted to speak to another official at the FBI, an assistant director, and said, well, maybe if we declassify this, we can allow FBI agents to go to countries that they're currently not able to go to.
	If that isn't a quid pro quo, if that isn't bribery or corruption or against the law or the spirit of the law, I don't know what is, but the media will never report it.
	Hillary will never go down because they are in the tank for her.
	I've got to tell you something.
	This is a criminal enterprise that the Clintons run.
	This is nothing short of a criminal enterprise.
	Everything from the emails, everything to the money from the Clinton Foundation, everything to their voter fraud financing, everything to their voter intimidation and fomenting violence.
	The whole thing just reeks of corruption beyond an insanely insane scale.
	And, you know, I guess convincing you is not going to happen on this program, but hopefully other people benefit by us putting this all together.
	All right.
	We went longer than I thought, guys.
	Thank you both for being with us.
	Ron Christie and Jessica Tarlove.

▲