Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 28, 2025 - Stay Free - Russel Brand

01:11:05

Trump’s Deportation Wave Begins – SF527

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	out there. . .
	In all sincerity, I say to you, hello, you awakened wonders, as you awaken from the illusion of reality into the bright and always available luminosity of God, that the material world and the systems that benefit from it attempt to control you by infusing your deep spiritual reality with unending profanity.
	You might be watching us on Locals Now, like Mrs. CMS. You might have just seen me doing break bread, apparently with...
	But Paul Kingsnorth sadly was not available.
	Hold on a minute, I'm going to play a sting now.
	This is going to blow your mind.
	Sadly that didn't happen because Paul Kingsnorth's internet wouldn't work over there in Ireland.
	If you're watching me on Rumble like Colorado watch, hello!
	Thank you!
	Thank you for joining us.
	We've got an incredible show.
	We've got an incredible week.
	We've got an incredible gift.
	We are alive.
	Reality can be altered at any moment.
	In fact, let me tell you something that demonstrates the plasticity and mutability of reality, something we're not paying enough attention to, because it's almost like we think it's somehow permanent.
	Cymatics.
	And Cymatics is described here by Jake, who produces the show as...
	Let me just scan up a little bit.
	Oh no, I've gone back too fast.
	Cymatics, what did you say?
	Oh yeah, the study of how sound and vibration can be made visible.
	The study of how sound and vibration can be made visible.
	In the beginning, there was the word.
	There is a powerful, powerful vibration accessible to us.
	Somewhere between wave and light, yet both, where we can access...
	A divine and powerful reality.
	A divine and powerful reality.
	We'll be discussing that and so much more.
	Much of my current luminosity is as a result of my consumption of 1775 coffee.
	I'll be bringing you a commercial from those guys any minute.
	You might be watching us on YouTube.
	You might be watching us on X. Any second, you'll only be able to watch us on Rumble.
	That's our home.
	And you'll be seeing us discuss deportations!
	Deportations and tariffs!
	Who would have ever imagined that tariffs would be like the nuclear missiles of 2025?
	I will tariff you so hard.
	I'm of course referring to the deportation story that Trump has said he's going to deport Colombians.
	Colombians say, no you don't!
	I nearly did the accent, I nearly did the accent, but I've had a brush with Colombians before and I'm not going down that road again.
	And then Trump went...
	Tariffs!
	And they went, OK, you can deport as many people as you like.
	We'll be talking about deportations.
	We'll be talking a little more about the LA fires.
	We'll be talking about Bill Gates.
	We've got a fantastic story about Fauci.
	Matt Taibbi talking about how Biden pardoning Fauci and others could be a good thing.
	I'll be interested to get that perspective.
	We'll be talking about Keir Starmer, the globalist prime minister and authoritarian in my country.
	He leads the country, if you could...
	Call it that.
	And then we've got a story about Tulsi Gabbard as well.
	I've just had a B12 shot in my arm.
	Actually, he's aching quite bad.
	And that's with getting a jab that probably is good for you.
	Lord alone knows what it's like if you allow people to pump aluminium into your body.
	What business has aluminium got in a vaccine?
	And I mean that from a scientific perspective.
	Can someone answer that in the comments and chat?
	What are they saying?
	Aluminium does.
	When I say they, I mean pharmaceutical companies that make vaccines that have aluminium in them.
	Aluminium in them.
	And is this yet another in the ludicrous and outrageous discoveries in the pharmacological world?
	In that dark pantheon, along with Johnson& Johnson's potentially carcinogenic baby powder and arsenic in baby food, I think also from Johnson& Johnson, although I think in both cases they settled out of court, presumably because there was something going on.
	Extreme Steve says, It's a mirasol in them.
	And xypher2000 in the local chat.
	And mercury.
	Aluminum.
	Oh, they're saying it in there.
	And odium31.
	I'm not good with Roman numerals.
	In the rumble chat, it's saying aluminum.
	Aluminium.
	Oh, aluminum.
	You guys say aluminum, huh?
	We don't want aluminum injected into our arms in vaccines.
	Aluminum!
	That I'll inject into my arm.
	Yes, some vaccines contain aluminum, and that's a good thing.
	That's from the New York Times.
	All the news that's fit to print, RFK Jr. and others have blamed the ingredient for allergies and other illnesses.
	Scientists say it actually bolsters immune response.
	Those carcinogens are good.
	For your baby's butt in talcum powder.
	It's good to have an opioid pandemic.
	They'll just say anything, won't they?
	Thanks for watching us.
	If you're watching us on X or YouTube, we're going to be with you here for a little while before exclusively streaming over on Rumble.
	And if you're watching this on Facebook, you should be able to now because the platform is being depoliticised because the world is changing really fast.
	Here.
	It's changing so fast, in fact, that even the CIA will admit that COVID, get this, get ready, where do you think COVID came from?
	Let me know in the comments and chat right now.
	If you're watching me on X, if you're watching us on YouTube, if you're watching us on Rumble, if you're watching us in Locals, tell me, where did COVID come from?
	Right?
	Did it come from a market in Wuhan?
	Did it come out of a bat cave like Robin after a bad night?
	No!
	It came from, yep, lab.
	It's all I can read.
	I'm reading it.
	I'm just seeing the word lab, lab, labs, labs in China, labs in China.
	And people, I know that your knowledge goes way beyond that.
	I know you know about diaper and the microbial structure.
	And I know that you know that there were relationships between Fauci and the CIA. I know how much you know.
	Well, the CIA, an intelligence agency, mark you, an intelligence agency, now says that COVID escaped from a...
	The CIA now believes the deadly COVID virus likely originated in a lab in China but admits it has low confidence in its own conclusion.
	Something like that from the CIA that has no confidence.
	See all those films.
	Jack Reacher, Tom Cruise, all those guys.
	They're confident, aren't they, the CIA? Like, you want Alec Baldwin, you know, steady, playing a CIA agent.
	You want confidence, don't you?
	You also want confidence.
	And make sure that thing's not loaded.
	The appointed CIA director declassified documents about the origin of COVID-19 on orders by President Trump.
	The findings are not new.
	they had been completed during the Biden administration.
	The agency believes their evidence makes origin in a lab more likely than a natural outbreak.
	Intelligence officials say...
	If they're doing this and the JFK files are coming out, how long is it going to be?
	Hello, this is the main news.
	Deceptive forces have taken over the world's governments and deep state agencies and furthermore numerous corporate and commercial interests.
	They've been working in alliance for centuries now to control consciousness.
	I mean, how long before the ultimate truth is just on the news?
	Because they're actually saying stuff.
	If you said that on Twitter, as it was then, or Facebook, as it was then, five years ago, I think armed guards would come to your house, drag you into the street.
	And shoot you like a pig.
	I believe that's the case, isn't it?
	Now it's just on the news.
	COVID came from a lab.
	Anthony Fauci was earning money from royalties.
	People lie to you.
	Even this news program is actually a deceptive loop of distraction and propaganda.
	I mean, we're actually catching up to reality.
	Maybe this is a good thing.
	Let me know how you lot feel about the deportations.
	We're discussing that later.
	Along with the LA fires, as there's a lovely Bill Gates story.
	Bill Gates responds to questions about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
	That's just a chat you don't want to have, isn't it?
	You don't want to go, who among us?
	I've actually got some complex matters in the UK, thanks to the darkness of this machine.
	But who among us wants to be asked this question?
	Could you explain the nature of your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
	Yeah, I don't have one, because I knew that geezer was deep state.
	Probably Mossad and was involved in getting people involved in, like, sex parties to compromise them to you.
	Yeah, that's why I don't have a relationship.
	Bill Gates has got some sort of relationship with him.
	Not me!
	Not Trump!
	Not Joe Rogan!
	Bill Gates.
	Extraordinary.
	Extraordinary.
	Okay, now, just have a moment of sweetness and distraction as we observe together that Elon Musk, in some ways...
	has the body language of a character from Sims.
	That's beautiful.
	Probably what that is, is that Elon Musk, at some point...
	Was just like a nerdy kid, and he learned his reality and his behaviour so deeply from games, probably including Sims, because isn't he like the fifth best in the world at some online game?
	He is, isn't he?
	He's so embedded in that reality, the same way as I am with television.
	Like, my whole life I've been looking at TV and sitcom characters.
	Elon Musk is so embedded in, like, the...
	That he's actually mimicking the language.
	It's like when you see them little girls...
	Have you ever seen that footage of a little girl that was raised by dogs or wolves?
	Have you seen that?
	Isaac, see if you can find it, man.
	When she drinks from a tap, like she's a human, it's like Mowgli out of Jungle Book.
	She drinks from a tap and it's like...
	Like she has dog mannerisms, canine mannerisms.
	Elon Musk was raised by Sims.
	That's what it is.
	He's like a...
	That's why.
	He is a neural link.
	He's sort of already meshed with that kind of...
	I was going to say artificial intelligence, but whatever that intelligence is.
	Whoa!
	Okay, let's see what's next.
	Let's see what's next.
	Okay, should we do a quick word from one of our partners so I can take a breath for a moment?
	This is 1775 Coffee, which is owned by Rumble, actually, and we've got a bunch of it!
	Here!
	This is Dark Roast, you sweet...
	Sweet son of a gun, you.
	I had some of this with mushrooms in it the other day.
	Yeah, no kidding.
	And I'll tell you, it's good and it's invigorating.
	Have a look at their message.
	1775 may have been a dark year for the British, but it was a great year for freedom and a great year for coffee.
	1775 coffee is a powerful brew indeed.
	Did you know that drinking two to three cups of coffee in the morning could slash your risk of death?
	And it's a risk that you're going to have to face by 29% and cut your chances of heart complications by nearly half.
	In which case, I'm going to live forever because I drink about 10. That's science.
	You can't argue with that.
	But what's the point of you if your coffee tastes like it was brewed by some hyper-woke barista more concerned with their TikTok following than caring about your coffee?
	Enter 1775 Coffee.
	In you come.
	This ain't just coffee.
	It's a revolutionary act of defiance in every cup.
	Why not have a revolution before breakfast?
	Picked at high altitude, sourced from single origins farms, this coffee don't pander to corporate overlords or sugar-laden mediocrity.
	Whether it's beans, grounds, or pods, every sip of 1775 coffee is a stand against the industrial coffee complex that's been filling our mornings and our bodies with junk disguised as caffeine.
	This is coffee for the free thinkers, the ungovernable, the seekers of truth.
	God bless you, 1775 America.
	Head over to 1775coffee.com and use the code BRAND for 15% off.
	And make mornings great again with coffee that fuels bold favour, uncompromising quality and the freedom Rumble stands for every day.
	If Rumble were a cup of coffee, it would be $17.75.
	Get yourself a cup right now.
	You'll maybe live forever.
	Is that too much to claim?
	That's a good advert, I'd say.
	I'm not talking about my performance, but generally the inserts and B-roll are pretty good, aren't they?
	I've had a look at B12 jab in my arm.
	It really hurts.
	That's my endorsement for that.
	It really hurts.
	And Jake's, that hurts as well, doesn't it?
	So you should not be getting vaccines with aluminium and MRI in it.
	Imagine that was a spike protein making its way to my heart right now.
	It's the last thing I need, or giving me some sort of weird delirium like it gave my mate Vertigo.
	Ow!
	That actually hurts even to move it, man.
	I need to spend more time around war veterans in it because, like, if I get a ache in my arm, I'm like, that's it!
	Go on without me!
	I'll just slow you down!
	But, like, I've been, like, literally only a week ago I was with people that lost their legs in battle and you just can't keep it in your consciousness, can you?
	Alright, okay, listen.
	Now, from talking about a stimulant that's derived from Central America to the subject of Colombia.
	That has no connection to any stimulants.
	And I once made the mistake of joking about that, like, you know, cocaine, it led me into a lot of trouble.
	Don't make that joke.
	Now, Colombians are being deported significantly from the United States of America as part of Trump's new deportation in action.
	Any of you that have been following politics for the last, I don't know, eight years will recognise that a significant part of Trump's mandate appears to be a strong stance on border protection and the preservation of the rights of the indigenous population, even if that encroaches into liberal ideas of what is an acceptable level of illegal immigration.
	But you'd have to underline the word illegal.
	And once you allow illegal immigration, what is that and what is the law?
	And some pretty powerful ontological and legalistic questions start to enter the conversation at that point.
	Anyway, some of the things we're going to be covering as we break down the deportation story are celebrity interjection, the irony.
	There's Selena Gomez sort of crying.
	We're checking that out.
	We're going to look at how this is being contextualised, i.e.
	Is Trump's deportation rhetoric or practice significantly worse or better than previous presidents?
	And then we can look at how media amplify or de-amplify certain points and ideas in order to control the narrative.
	So we'll look at, like, you know, Obama's...
	Deportation record.
	Then, we're going to look at Clinton, Hillary, talking about illegal immigrants in 2008 to see if the rhetoric is even that incendiary when compared to Hillary Clinton's.
	Then, we're going to look at this brilliant viral clip, I've been told it's brilliant, I've not seen it, of J.D. Vance clashing with Margaret Brennan off of the legacy media on the subject of unvetted refugees.
	Now, we'll stay with you for a while longer if you're watching us on X because I want to know what you guys think of this I need to hear it so bad, said Bill Mayer.
	Christ is present in the sub-particular reality that you can experience right now as consciousness itself.
	Whatever you want to see that as an electronic or Christ is present.
	Bill Meyer, don't worry about that.
	Would Christ be deported under Trump, Obama or Clinton as just another migrant from the Middle East?
	That's not bad, ain't it?
	That's available.
	I think you're a bit allowed to say that if you're making a connection to stuff, aren't you?
	Let's first of all look at the tariffs component.
	Who would have thought the tariff would become the nuclear missiles of 2025?
	I will tariff you into the middle of next week.
	Who hasn't been threatened with a tariff?
	Trudeau, God rest his soul, he was tariffed off, wasn't he?
	We'll tariff Canada.
	And then now, the President of Colombia said, Don't you dare, can I do an accent?
	Don't you dare send migrants back to our country?
	Sorry, that was too Mexican, it's too generic, I'm not an expert in various Hispanic accents.
	Anyway, Trump said, you will take back...
	Now, do you like, let me know in the comments and chat, a martial and proactive president like that?
	Or do you see this as a transgression against the basic requirement for compassion that the world's displaced require, deserve?
	And, furthermore, second question, what is the meaning of a mandate?
	Because one thing that Trump's pretty explicitly campaigned on is his stance on migration.
	So, if you believe in democracy and you believe that Trump was...
	...elected somewhat on a deportation mandate.
	What right do you have to complain about it now?
	or even if you do complain you have to still acknowledge it as part of the uh expression of the of you the democracy in which you are a participant and to deny would mean that you yourself the irony were a fascist for denying let's have a look first of all at the tariff aspect of this tale that That's the Colombian president caving to the threat itself.
	The president of Colombia quickly caving to Trump's demands to accept deportation flights of illegal Colombian nationals after refusing two flights on Sunday.
	First, the president of Columbia refuses the flight, then Trump...
	Mrs. Tindallstrom in the rumble chat, Canadians don't want to be terrified.
	That's brilliant.
	I can't believe you got to that before I did.
	Is that pun already out there?
	Terrified.
	Like, terrified by a tariff.
	That's good.
	If that's not owned, Luke, make a meme.
	Let's own it.
	Like, get ready to be terrified, right?
	That is block text.
	And then an image of Trump.
	And then like a hashtag or whatever, terrified.
	I mean, it's brilliant.
	Oh, tariffed and feathered, says RCD. Good, but more obscure, I would say, than the brilliant, terrified.
	So you can see that Fox News are...
	Delighted, aren't they?
	There's a kind of sense of delight in this reporting.
	Then Trump announces that if Colombia does not accept the flights, a 25% tariff on all goods coming into the United States will be placed on Colombia.
	And that tariff will increase to 50% after one week's time.
	Trump also proposed a travel ban and an immediate visa revocation on Colombian government officials, allies, and all supporters.
	Colombia now has agreed to all of Trump's terms, including taking back all illegal migrants deported out of the United States.
	The country's foreign minister and ambassador are expected to be in watch.
	That's hardcore.
	I suppose that's what, if you're pro-Trump and MAGA, you're like, whoa, man, that is how it's done.
	He says, we're deporting people.
	I've been elected on a mandate of deportation.
	The president of Colombia says we won't accept back our citizens or civilians.
	Trump says, here's my bullet-pointed response.
	We start with 25%, it goes to 50%.
	People like that that's gangster.
	Now, the mistake that the liberal media might make, I predict, is that they'll treat this as like, this is awful!
	Without realising that this is what people elected Trump for and kind of like about him.
	And if you're making a moral argument that is...
	Awful, based on the idea that we're one human family and we have an overriding obligation to be loving and compassionate to us, then you should have governed like that when you had the chance!
	Mr. and Ambassador expected to be in Washington today for high-level meetings.
	Liz!
	In fact, I'm not finished!
	Instead of which, you operated seemingly on behalf of Satan to permit...
	Children to go missing.
	I'm talking about globalists in general.
	And use rationalism and materialism and various new categories to annihilate our connection to the divine.
	You can't complain when people vote against you.
	We can go back to the news.
	Wow, your reaction.
	Well, it was really taking, like, you know, a bazooka to a night flight, right?
	What's interesting about this test marketing, if you will, of the sanctions and tariffs threat, Maria, is that we actually have a trade surplus with Colombia.
	So this is not a country where, you know, like Canada, where they are really going to be devastated, presumably, by...
	Let's talk for a while about bazooka to a knife fight.
	How many versions have you heard to that?
	Have you heard, that's like taking, I've heard, fart to a shit fight.
	I've heard that.
	Have you heard better versions of bazooka to a knife fight?
	Let me know in the comments and share.
	By tariffs.
	So this was really more, I think, President Trump getting angry that they had turned these flights away and basically saying to all our neighbors, look, we are serious about getting rid of criminals that are in our country that come from your country.
	You're going to take them back and there is no discussion about it.
	So it was, you know, was this sort of overreach by the president?
	Maybe.
	But guess what?
	It got the job.
	And I think that is, as I say, sort of a template going forward.
	Yeah, I mean, it's a litmus test, right, Cheryl?
	I mean, because if this did not go well, others would have gotten a different message.
	Now, pretty much all the people who are dealing with Trump on tariffs are receiving this message.
	The message is, he is serious.
	This is not a threat.
	Remember, last week, Goldman Sachs put out a note that said there was only a 20% chance that the Trump administration would levy these tariffs against Canada and Mexico.
	But think of that overall message from that group of investment advisors, or Goldman Sachs.
	They're saying, oh, it's a threat.
	This is negotiation.
	You have people like Stephen Miller and Howard Lutnick that are saying, no, these tariffs are real, and we're going to put them down.
	Tariffs first, and then we'll Talk later.
	And so that's why when the Columbia pushback came so fast and furious, before we had the discussion about February 1st, this is why.
	Because the Trump administration is sending that signal, this will be happening.
	This isn't a joke.
	And I understand his anger about those flights.
	It's their citizens!
	And the criminals take them back.
	So you know what?
	That would have hurt Columbia's exports, by the way, with coffee.
	And maybe my cup of coffee would have went up five cents.
	I don't care.
	That's amazing, isn't it?
	That's what patriotic, neo-nationalistic politics is going to look like.
	There's going to be deportations, but there's been a mandate for deportations.
	And that's what happens if you agree in sovereignty and nation.
	I guess we're caught in a real moral quagmire there, if you want to approach.
	This from a moralistic perspective when it comes to migration and refugees, if the native population vote against it, who are you to claim that they ought to take it?
	On what basis?
	It's a really fascinating moment we've reached historically there.
	Because I think if you undo it, you have to get rid of nations entirely.
	To say, no, actually, what we are is we're one just human people, one human family.
	You can start to make a spiritual argument for that.
	We are just one human family.
	We're all here together to protect one another.
	Whoa!
	Okay, if that's your argument, we're going to have to really radically revise and alter the way we construct all of our systems.
	Because we have been building economic enclaves of despotism and tyranny for a long, long while now.
	And making the primary function of the citizens.
	We're going to be reorganising society pretty radically.
	And because they don't want that, because they only want to use the subject of migration to, I think, create...
	Tension and crisis in areas, both ontologically but also sociologically, of economic underclasses.
	What I mean by that is poor people that will have to deal with this, both mentally and spiritually, but also physically due to, you know, topography, psychography and the way that societies are organised.
	Like, they'll end up, migrants will affect poor people more than rich people.
	I've got a lot of things to deal with, man.
	I don't know if we're supposed to get all this done.
	Do you remember, like, before I asked, have you heard a better version of bazooka to a knife fight, which is what the lady there on Fox said about Trump's stance on this issue?
	Well, someone called Darding0172 in the Rumble chat said, dildo to a pillow fight.
	And I feel like, actually, that's not the same sort of thing, is it?
	Because, like...
	Like a dildo is not an escalation of a pillow.
	Like a knife is a weapon and a bazooka is a better weapon.
	A pillow is like a comfort.
	And a dildo is a sexual object.
	So that's not an escalation.
	That's an abstraction.
	And also it doesn't belong to a pillow fight.
	Because who has pillow fights?
	You lunatics.
	Man.
	Alright, now.
	The next aspect of the deportation story that we're covering is Celia Gomez, I believe former...
	She was a Disney star.
	She's a Disney star, pop star.
	She's on Only Murders in the Building.
	Why do you know so much about Celina Gomez?
	There's a 30-year-old man behind that curtain going, Celina Gomez, now she's...
	What was the last bit?
	You said she's got a show on Hulu.
	Only Murders in the Building with Martin Short.
	Only Murders in the Building.
	That's Isaac.
	How old are you?
	27-year-old man.
	It's his wallpaper on his phone.
	It's his wallpaper on his phone.
	It's none of your business what Selena Gomez is doing.
	You're married to Jessica.
	Your son is Leon.
	Selena Gomez is none of anyone's business.
	That's the question.
	What's the point of celebrities now?
	Now that we're starting to derive morality once again from...
	Let's face it, some...
	Force majeure from some trusted place.
	What do we need celebrities for?
	And I say that as a former celebrity myself, who's literally opining, ironically, while saying, is it time for celebrity opinion to surcease?
	And why has Selena Gomez endured so much ire for this sentimental post as I think she's of Mexican descent around the deportation issue?
	And perhaps more importantly still, why does Isaac, a 27-year-old man, I just want to say that I'm so sorry.
	Only people are getting attacked.
	the children well I don't know does the internet want that anymore is that any different really than when I recently went to a church with Tullian who's one of Billy Graham's grandchildren I spoke at his church in Jupiter what's do you know the name of his church Jake I'm speaking there again soon as well as you know I've got an event at Mar-a-Lago I'm doing an event at Mar-a-Lago can you believe it come to that if you want we should post a link for that in the description guys I'm doing an event
	I can't believe it.
	I mean, life's unusual.
	Is her crying like that in essence really no different than when I sort of talked about sex workers and how I feel about sort of having participated in prostitution by having at points when I was younger and slightly more chaotic having paid for sex.
	And I sort of felt emotional.
	I suppose what it was was, how is it different?
	I didn't expect I was going to be getting emotional because I was having a general conversation on a stage, a place of performance.
	I suppose, yeah, when we see deliberately, because is she on her own in a room sort of crying?
	Now, she's allowed to have an authentic reaction, isn't she?
	Like, to that subject.
	Selena Gomez is pro-sex trafficking.
	I don't think that's what she's trying to say, Abby Tadda.
	You can't do that to it.
	No, what she's doing is she's having a personal experience and none of us now know what the boundaries are for social media.
	And what you're supposed to be expressing on there because you're rewarded for extreme behaviour.
	You're rewarded for extreme sexual behaviour, anger, conflict and extreme emotional behaviour.
	Phillips, who's coming on our show soon, was walking around in a post with literal human effluvia on her face.
	That's one of the things I'm really talking to about, is what is happening to our morality, what's happening to our essence.
	Do you think it's appropriate?
	Let me know in the comments and chat for Selena Gomez to express herself.
	Why shouldn't she, in a way?
	She's got a different experience of migration to many of us.
	Is it that you're questioning the legitimacy of her emotions?
	Do you think it's performative?
	Is that what people's objection is?
	I'd love to know what you all think.
	Anyway, when it comes to the actual facts of the matter, in a somewhat...
	The Ben Shapiro facts don't care about your feelings way.
	Is Trump any more martial and extreme on the issue of deportation and illegal, the deportation of illegal people, I suppose this refers to, than anyone else?
	Bill Clinton.
	During Clinton's presidency between 1993 and 2001, approximately 870,000 people were deported.
	During Bush, 2 million loads.
	Barack Obama, even more, 3.2 million.
	And he got the nickname, look, Deporter-in-Chief.
	Trump...
	Around a million during his first term.
	So in a way, not spectacularly different.
	So does this make you think that we approach deportations differently?
	That there's not an objective thing called deportation and then we respond to it?
	Do you think that deportation under Clinton was regarded in one way and was subsequently reviewed, at least in terms of its interpretation, in successive administrations?
	And now because there's such...
	A desire to condemn Trump around these issues is reported on in a particular way.
	Or do you think that Trump has always been explicit that he was going to deport folk and now he's deporting them?
	Or do you believe we need a radically different perspective when it comes to the subject of deportation?
	Secondarily, let me know in the comments what you think about Selena Gomez's emotional perspective.
	But while we think about that, let's have a look at Hillary Clinton talking about illegal immigrants in 2008. If you're watching this on X, we'll be with you for a few more minutes.
	Same on YouTube.
	We do our whole show over on Rumble as well as on Locals.
	If you haven't got Rumble Premium yet, consider...
	Consider getting Rumble Premium now.
	You get additional content from us and an ad-free experience over here on Rumble.
	Have a look at Hillary Clinton right now talking about deportation, or illegal immigration at least, way back in 2008. Now it's not that long ago.
	I know it's nearly 20 years, I suppose.
	But just try to note, are there any permanent states, any permanent views, any permanent positions?
	Or do politicians...
	Expediently alloy themselves to any passing trend or convenience in order to pursue power and influence.
	Let me know.
	So, I think we've got to have tough conditions.
	Tell people to come out of the shadows.
	If they've committed a crime, deport them.
	No questions asked, they're gone.
	If they've been working...
	And our law-abiding, we should say, here are the conditions for you staying.
	You have to pay a stiff fine because you came here illegally.
	You have to pay back taxes.
	And you have to try to learn English.
	And you have to wait in line.
	So there you go.
	I mean, what do you think about her body language and stuff, by the way?
	I think you could have freeze-framed her into a few Nazi salutes across all of that.
	And do you see that there's some sort of continuum?
	Is there something similar about her and Ellen?
	And what's going on with the adrenochrome?
	What is adrenochrome?
	Do you take it that far, guys?
	Do you think that there is actual occultism going on?
	Or just the...
	And, you know, frazzledrap!
	And those kind of things.
	How do you feel about that stuff?
	Do you think that there's a sort of a deep truth?
	When it comes to those rather more harsh yet esoteric conspiracy theories, or do you think that in an attempt to sort of frame what we kind of vaguely regard as evil, we look for Pizzagate, Frazzledrap, or whatever that thing is that sort of suggests that the most brutal practices go on in the circles of elite power.
	Do you think that that's an attempt to narrativise or understand or symbolise their evil, or do you think that stuff's true?
	One thing's for certain, there do appear to be elites with extraordinary influence over our planet.
	Who knows what their motivation is?
	The issue of criminality and deportation is what we're discussing right now with Trump's new stance on deportation coming into practice early in his presidency.
	And he's now already, I suppose, famous use of the tariff, the tariffator.
	There's no pun there to be had, is there?
	We're talking about all of that and whether or not Trump's stance on deportation is truly unique or just rather vague.
	And what happens when criminals can be deported as well?
	What kind of world are we living in?
	In a minute, we'll be looking at J.D. Vance's clash with CBS reporter Margaret Brennan.
	But before that, here's a quick word from one of our sponsors in its Rumble Premium.
	This is why you should get it.
	The war against free speech.
	Is in full swing.
	We are the vanguard, bravely fighting back.
	Rumble's the home of this channel, Stay Free, and a leader in defending the fundamental human right of free speech.
	They've joined X to sue a cartel of advertisers and ad agencies who conspire to block ad revenue from going to the platforms.
	Recently, they've launched Rumble Premium.
	This, I think, is going to be a game-changer for all of us.
	It's an ad-free viewing experience with great perks for viewers and creators.
	Rumble Premium will give you the ability to dive into your favourite content on your mobile or desktop or smart TV and savour every uninterrupted second of my content.
	Why don't you upgrade to Rumble Premium today?
	day support my free speech and the free speech of other content creators on this platform please go to rumble now rumble.com forward slash premium and if you use the code brand you'll save ten dollars and rumble will be aware that our stream is creating great converts so that's rumble.com forward slash premium and do use the code brand to save ten dollars anyway there's a link there at the bottom of the screen now we're posting it in the chat join up all right Do you think I look browner there?
	I am browner there.
	It's the lighting!
	Listen.
	Listen to this.
	Too good to miss.
	Barack Obama said in 2014 that if you commit crimes in America, you'll be deported.
	So is even Trump's new pledge that criminals or repeat offenders, recidivists, will be deported, is that particularly novel or extreme, or is it something that's been around for a while?
	If you're a criminal, you'll be deported.
	If you plan...
	Simple as that.
	There's Barack Obama saying it in 2014.
	Now, I mention this really for two reasons.
	One, people that condemn Trump's position as particularly draconian are negating two things.
	One, that he's just been elected on a heavy mandate.
	And two, that people like Barack Obama are saying it.
	And also, like we're saying it in 2014, 11 years ago, making very similar claims.
	And the other thing I want to say is this.
	If you're particularly celebrating the fact that this is happening, it's not all that different either.
	There's no point in being extreme or excited by any political movement, really.
	It's only about the organisation of resources.
	We're going to be on a spiritual quest, trying to attain connection to the limitless light of the Lord, that we may experience eternal life together by becoming like him.
	We're not going to be quarrelling and quibbling over which political party is slightly better and allowing them to be vehicles for our highest spiritual requirements.
	They're not capable of that, and they're not there for that.
	They're not there for that.
	If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up.
	The actions I'm taking are not only lawful, they're the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican president and every single Democratic president.
	He's actually making that point, isn't he?
	I bet what some of you lot are saying, I bet, I can't see him yet because the comments are coming so fast.
	Let me know on the comments on X and on YouTube and on Rumble and on Locals.
	I bet what some of you are saying is...
	No, Obama just said stuff like that to mask the fact that they were allowing mass migration, so fighting age males were filling up our nations and our cities, because I know these narratives exist outside of America, although we're specifically discussing it within America right now, in order to destabilise populations and to create the kind of dystopic tension required to inaugure globalism.
	globalism is the trend towards a new world order and one centralized global government that's not controlled by any sovereign nation and therefore not reachable by democracy but where a set of elites according according to conspiracy theories like soros or bill gates maybe on the right people would say right-wing ones like elon musk i don't know i don't know the absolute details of the subsets and sectarianism within conspiracy theories but the general idea is that globalism will afford maximal power
	i reckon what we'll see now with resurgent nationalism is an attempt to To reach those same globalist aims while appeasing people on the level of nationalism.
	So people feel like, see, our nationalism's being fulfilled.
	Meanwhile, nefarious forces are still able to create bureaucracies that manoeuvre the powers of dominion and information in ways that are expedient to their...
	Consistent intention which has always been total control and to create a simulacrum and facsimile of God's pure world.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	I recognise my views are not everyone's, but somehow together, and I would say the way to do this would be move the levers of power as close as possible to the people that are affected by them, i.e.
	decentralised power wherever possible, so each of us may live in our own garden filled with luminosity and alignment with him, the highest principle.
	Here's J.D. Vance clashing with a CBS reporter.
	After this, we will be leaving X and YouTube.
	And, wow, I guess I'm going to be talking for a while because I've got a lot of obligations.
	Well, Margaret, I don't agree that all these immigrants or all these refugees have been properly vetted.
	In fact, we know that there are cases of people who allegedly were properly vetted and then were literally planning terrorist attacks on our country.
	That happened during the campaign, if you may remember.
	So clearly not all of these foreign nationals have been properly vetted.
	No, but there are 30,000 people in the pipeline.
	Afghan refugees.
	But my primary concern as the Vice President, Margaret, is to look after the American people.
	And now that we know that we have vetting problems with a lot of these refugee programs, we absolutely cannot unleash thousands of unvetted people into our country.
	These people are vetted.
	These people are vetted.
	Just like the guy who planned a terrorist attack in Oklahoma a few months ago.
	He was allegedly properly vetted.
	And many people in the media and the Democratic Party said that he was properly vetted.
	Clearly he wasn't.
	I don't want my children to share a neighborhood with people who are not properly vetted.
	And because I don't want it for my kids, I'm not going to force any other American citizens' kids to do that either.
	No, and that was a very particular case.
	It wasn't clear if he was radicalized when he got here or...
	I don't really care, Margaret.
	I don't want that person in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me.
	We'll be back in one minute.
	Whoa, that's a new type of political rhetoric right there, because now what we've seen in the space of five short years is online discourse being rendered on legacy media by people in political power.
	I can't think of a precedent.
	Indeed, you can see right now, as the layers continue to peel at different rates in different territories, the United Kingdom still adhering to the previous paradigm.
	They will say in the UK, because there's been so much compromise in the UK to preserve the idea that multiculturalism is...
	Completely sanitary and without consequence that they've misreported and concealed grooming gangs, nay, rape gangs, in order to preserve the idea that multiculturalism is ubiquitously beneficial.
	Now, in the United States, post MAGA, you have what appears to be the explicit, overt, articulate expression of the ordinary patriot.
	Through the mouth of the Vice President.
	I suppose what some people might argue, what some people might argue, is that the reason that ordinary people have that perspective is because right-wing media instruments have propagated the idea of nationalism and the condemnation of migrant populations.
	That it's not native to feel...
	Protective of a country, but of course that's where you get into trouble because a nation is going to require borders and while there will be hopefully some process of migration and a nation will always be porous, the ideal is that it's preservation of a population.
	And if you don't have that, you don't have nation, do you?
	Not in the same way.
	And again, if you want to live in a globalist utopia, that's also something that could be pursued.
	But you'd have to have a mandate for it.
	You couldn't just impose it.
	You couldn't just say, we're getting rid of nation.
	That would be crazy.
	Mattress to a pillow fight.
	That is better, Camcat.
	Well done.
	Yeah, you bring a mattress to a pillow fight.
	That works perfectly.
	Don't bring a dildo to a pillow fight.
	It's got no place there.
	You wouldn't be allowed in the pillow fight with that.
	I think that could be cut together as one thing.
	One job at a time.
	All right, so J.D. Vance there.
	I suppose J.D. Vance versus Margaret Brennan shows us that we are in the age where online discourse has entered the corridors of political power in a five-year period.
	That's an extraordinary turnaround.
	OK, guys, if you're watching us on X, we're leaving.
	On YouTube, we're leaving.
	The rest of the show will be exclusively available on Rumble Premium.
	We're going to talk a little bit about...
	Well, actually, why don't you tell me what you want to see us talk about?
	Bill Gates talking about his relationship with Epstein.
	Let me know in the comments and chat.
	The LA Fires.
	Keir Starmer in the UK. It's not looking good for them.
	Or Tulsi Gabbard and John Brennan.
	Our OCIA Director John Brennan demands the Senate not confirm Gabbard.
	That's interesting because we're getting into some free speech territory.
	Click the link in the description.
	Join us over on Rumble now.
	And if you are with us on Rumble, have a look at this.
	This is Break Bread with Russell Brand.
	Now, I was meant to be doing Break Bread with Russell Brand today with Paul Kingsdorf.
	We've had to reschedule.
	Next week, we're doing...
	It's Wesley Huff, isn't it?
	I'm pretty excited about Wesley Huff.
	You might have seen him on Rogan.
	Wesley Huff is, like, he was on Rogan and I think it, like, went super viral because he's, like, an apologist and I think he must have really articulated well a bunch of Christian positions.
	And I'll tell you what we should look into.
	That young English guy called Alex Something who had a conversation with, like, 25 atheists.
	He's got, like, 3 million views.
	I recognise locals, Shannon MacDonald.
	I'm recognising you right...
	Now, have a look at my conversation from last week with Nathan Finocchio, a name that I'll never tire of saying.
	Nathan Finocchio.
	It sounds like Finocchio.
	I love it.
	I'm enjoying it so much.
	Here I am, here he is, talking about the rules given to us by a loving God.
	I'll be back in a minute and we'll talk about whatever you want me to talk about.
	The options are, you know, Tulsi Gabbard, Keir Starmer, LA Fires, Bill Gates.
	Wow, we've got so many things.
	Just choose one of those, all right?
	And then I'll be back in a second.
	Well, Margaret, I don't agree that all these immigrants or all these refugees...
	That one?
	Earth made me think that was the right button to press.
	Hold on a second.
	Excuse me.
	Sorry, guys.
	30. Is 30 that?
	I'm going to press 30. Nathan Finocchio.
	Well, Margaret, I don't agree that all these...
	Ah.
	I'm on page two.
	And page 30, the number is the number, no?
	So, hey, can you fire it from your end just because I need a second?
	I am pressing number 30 on page 2. I'll do it one more time just to prove that point beyond all doubt.
	Margaret, I don't agree that all these immigrants are all these...
	Now, if you could play the asset in.
	Nice one.
	Thanks, man, because I just need a little break to...
	There's two.
	One's 29. Let's see what 29 does for you lately.
	That's only 19 seconds, man.
	I need a little bit longer than that.
	Will you ever look at somebody and you're like, I just love this guy.
	I can't put my finger on it, but I love him.
	That's the spirit of God quickening you to just say something, do something.
	And as we learn that voice of, I love this person and I'm going to act in the spiritual way, whatever.
	I think that the new me is the true me.
	That's beautiful.
	I look well that day.
	And also, that isn't a good message.
	And that's what I felt when I met Amos, is I felt immediate love.
	Orwell writes very beautifully about that.
	The instantaneous love that you might feel when meeting someone new.
	Quiet back there.
	That's so distracting, guys.
	It's such a pivotal moment of transition in the show.
	Thank you very much because I'm about to have to really go on a run, aren't I, of getting some hero videos done.
	All right, guys.
	Praise the Lord.
	Praise the Lord.
	Okay, that's right.
	So what did you lot want?
	You didn't tell me.
	Rumble chat is full of Republicans.
	You don't worry about nothing.
	Stop worrying about all that sort of stuff, Republicans and Democrats.
	It's not time for that anymore, guys.
	Do you want Bill Gates, L.A. Fires...
	What was the page?
	Excuse me.
	Let me read it out.
	We've done deportation.
	We've done that to absolute death.
	We've got two out of that, I reckon.
	Then we've got L.A. Fires, Bill Gates...
	Tulsi, Gates, Tulsi, Gates.
	I'm looking mostly at a longer show.
	Gabbard, Gates.
	Alright, I'm going to do Gabbard and Gates.
	Gabbard and Gates together at last, selling lard off the back of a truck.
	That's no good.
	They're going to have to be done separately.
	They're not a musical number.
	It's actually two completely separate subjects.
	And first up, we're going to talk about Bill Gates.
	Bill Gates!
	Bill Gates has had to have some uncomfortable conversations.
	One that you never really want to have.
	What is your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
	The minute you're getting asked that question, you're already in trouble.
	Here he is.
	It's like, you know, when you have to get out a contract, you're already in trouble, isn't it?
	Why do you have to go, can you look at the contract and tell me what it says there?
	Once you've gone to someone, what was your relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
	Like, listen, the only answer really is, I don't know Jeffrey Epstein.
	Although with me, it's like, Did you ever go to a Diddy party?
	Yes.
	Did anything happen?
	Yes.
	I met Tom Green.
	Everyone was wearing white.
	It wasn't as exciting as I thought.
	I had no idea that just off-site there was more baby oil than anyone could ever really even conceptualise.
	And almost a whole new Texas gusher of Beverly Hillbillies worth of baby oil just waiting to be discovered.
	So, here's...
	Dear Bill Gates, trying to describe what rational reason he can have for being so close to Jeffrey Epstein.
	I don't know if this is reason.
	Let's have a look.
	Do you think, looking back at that moment, that you were being played?
	Well, Jeffrey, in retrospect, I was foolish to spend any time with him, and he sort of...
	You know, got time with various people by spending time with other people.
	So, yes, I think I was quite stupid.
	You know, I thought it would help me with global health philanthropy, in fact.
	What you reckon, what I think, when you see Bill Gates saying that, you know that's been discussed previously.
	You can sort of feel it, can't you?
	When you're watching Bill Gates, right?
	You know, in this interview, you're going to get asked what your relationship is with Jeffrey Epstein.
	What are you going to say?
	Well, you know, I just like going on private jets.
	That's not going to cut it.
	You're going to have to sort of admit that it was stupid.
	That's what they consider to be a concession.
	It's just an indication of humility.
	But what you actually want is authenticity.
	You want this.
	Only this.
	Look, when you're like rich and famous and that, Jeffrey Epstein, he's around and he's like going, do you want to come to these parties and everything?
	And I don't know, I got caught up in it.
	Or I was involved with him because he does a lot of fundraisers for sort of the kind of gear we're involved in, where CIA carve-outs get weird donations from...
	Oddly, the CIA budget.
	Things like the Atlantic Council.
	I'm part of that world!
	I invented Microsoft!
	You can't invent Microsoft or be that near the summit of power without being inveigled in some pretty deep, weird...
	Dark stuff.
	Even if you're a relatively minor celebrity, you still encounter the loose tendrils of institutions like Hollywood.
	So when you're in the middle, dealing with pivotal power, you get to know people like Jeffrey Epstein.
	That's the best it could be.
	The worst it is, is, well, I was involved with Jeffrey Epstein because he was some sort of agent of real dark, weird stuff.
	I mean agent both in the sense of deep state agent, but I mean broker of potentially Luciferian sexual experience.
	Potentially, these are just alleged concepts.
	That's the kind of thing people say about Jeffrey Epstein.
	It's certainly not an allegation that I'm making, but Jeffrey Epstein does appear to have been involved in some pretty high-level stuff to the degree where he could be un- Impersoned in a prison without shoelaces and a tie and without cameras.
	That's high levels of power.
	We know that.
	Now, if I knew that I'd been that near to darkness, that would keep me up at night.
	What keeps Bill Gates up at night?
	Let's have some guesses of what it could be.
	Could it be I made some mistakes?
	During that pandemic, I really pushed for vaccines while I invested economically and financially in vaccines, so we'll never know for sure if it was a moral or financial position or something even darker than that.
	Or I regret that Microsoft got sort of consumed into deep state apparatus and had back-channel relationships that breached the privacy rights of Americans, according to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.
	Also, I just sometimes worry about my marriage to the other part of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
	Foundation.
	I still miss her.
	Let's see what keeps Bill Gates up at night.
	What keeps you awake at night?
	You know, the chance of a natural pandemic...
	Satan asking me to do his bidding?
	In the next four years is somewhere between 10% and 15%.
	And...
	You know, it'd be nice to think we're actually more ready for that than we were last time.
	Is Bill Gates literally actually claiming that what keeps him up at night is the potential that we won't be prepared for future pandemics?
	If anyone's prepared for pandemics, it's people that have literally been preparing us for pandemics for the last 10 years with that weird event.
	209 thing where they literally prepared for a pandemic or spent the last pandemic giving us advice that proved to be downright untrue and can't be just now brushed away with, we weren't prepared for it.
	Like he's that little paperclip of himself popping up from the bottom of your screen.
	We weren't prepared for a pandemic.
	He did nothing but prepare for pandemics.
	He's invested all that money in the WHO, Garvey, vaccines.
	Getting involved in Indian agriculture, agriculture across Africa.
	I've never known anyone more prepared for pandemics.
	It's like you actually benefit from pandemics, actually, to the point where people started to call it a plan-demic.
	And now he's just doing this interview where it's as if...
	201, event 201, excuse me.
	Thanks, guys.
	Thanks for the correction.
	Anyhow, people, it's so amazing doing this job because people are like, he didn't invent Microsoft.
	He actually, Microsoft was invented by a CIA car.
	I know, I bet you're right.
	I bet you're right.
	I'm just, you know, I can't continually qualify every single word.
	The basic point is this.
	Do you think that Bill Gates is potentially connected to globalist ventures?
	The answer's got to be yes.
	Let's have a look.
	We were last time.
	So far we're not.
	You really think we're not?
	No, no, we're absolutely not.
	Why not?
	People, rather than having a consensus about, you know, what tools are missing, are mostly still replaying the various mistakes that were made.
	So, you know, I wouldn't say that we're as far along as you'd expect after trillions of dollars and millions of lives have been lost.
	Hmm, okay, do we trust Bill Gates?
	Can we trust Bill Gates?
	Why does Bill Gates want us to trust him?
	Is it coincidence that he's making new friendships and new relationships with newly elected leaders across the globe in every hemisphere?
	Bill Gates, it seems to me, is one of the avatars and indicators of a type of power that exists outside of democracy and national sovereignty.
	That peculiar piece of cartilage that appears to exist between state power and commercial power.
	And that always leads to surveillance, control, invasive medical matters.
	It seems to be power in its purest form.
	Not to yield.
	To a sort of post-structuralist argument around power replacing money as the avatar and apex of all evil.
	It has to be accepted, doesn't it, that there is some sort of ongoing attempt to amalgamate...
	Power outside of the reach of the individual, the community, maybe even the divine.
	And Bill Gates appears to be an indicator, a coordinate, a signpost on that map of how power functions in the modern world.
	But that's just what I think.
	Maybe it's just like a little real-life paperclip popping up at the bottom of your screen, giving you information you don't really need.
	Let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	Now, listen, we've got so much more to do, but I reckon probably it might be wise for us to go over to Rumble Premium.
	We've got stories about Tulsi Gabbard.
	I'll do Tulsi Gabbard now, then I will go over to Rumble Premium.
	But there's a UK COVID inquiry to discuss.
	We've got stories about Fauci to discuss.
	We've got a lot of things to discuss, Sissy Calendar and Underdog 8 and C88H and Oopsitali.
	We've got a lot of things to talk about and we'd love you to join us for that conversation.
	If you don't have Rumble Premium yet, consider getting Rumble Premium now.
	Many of us were excited when it was announced that Tulsi Gabbard, a previous Democrat and a woman who was considered somewhat radical, was embraced by the MAGA movement.
	It was an indicator that this was a new type of politics, along with RFK. Tulsi Gabbard changed the complexion and conception of the Republican MAGA movement.
	Will she be confirmed?
	Because former CIA director, who was CIA director in fact under Barack Obama, John Brennan, has demanded that the Senate not confirm Tulsi Gabbard.
	Is this an indication that this new government will be...
	Meet the new boss, same as the old boss, same old globalism under a new hue.
	Or will Tulsi Gabbard and RFK and many of the other members of this new MAGA Maha movement, they inspired...
	Optimism and hope outside of the usual demographic of Trump MAGA supporters.
	Will they actually reach power or will they be hobbled, hamstrung and prevented from reaching their democratically appointed destinations, actually?
	Well, when there are National Security Council meetings that the president chairs in the White House Situation Room...
	Usually, the first person to speak would be the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of CIA. They lay down the intelligence basis for any type of policy discussion that ensues.
	And so if that intelligence basis, that briefing, is going to be skewed or is going to be lacking some very important critical information, the policy decision that ultimately comes out of it is also going to be...
	Baseless.
	And also, you know, it's going to be potentially threatening to our national security.
	So, again, it's the President's Daily Brief, but also the role that the Director of National Intelligence, Director of CIA, play in order to ensure that the people who have to make those decisions in the National Security Council are fully informed about what the reality is, what the intelligence is, what our intelligence gaps are.
	And if they withhold things...
	Or if they skew things, it really is going to be detrimental.
	Real quick before we let you go, Director, do those agency heads have, in that moment you're describing in that room, have that realization that, wait a minute, that's not what we told you?
	I mean, in other words, how does that coordination become undone?
	When the person who's putting the final brief has skewed the information?
	Well, I like to think that, you know, Secretary of State Rubio, who is very familiar with the intelligence profession, is going to be speaking up because you have the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, others who are going to be there.
	So you want to make sure, again, that you have people who are informed, but also people who want to know the truth.
	And not just people who want to give President Trump what he wants to hear.
	That is so, so dangerous.
	And none of the six presidents that I work for ever wanted the intelligence community to give them what they wanted.
	They wanted the intelligence community to give them what they needed, and then they can make the appropriate policy decisions, taking into account what the intelligence is.
	I understand this from the legacy media interpretation of it.
	Let's have a look what Tucker Carlson and Matt Taibbi say.
	Matt Taibbi you know is one of the Twitter files journalists and frequent guest on this show and of course Tucker Carlson.
	Pretty famous person.
	Here's them discussing, in particular, the appointment of Tulsi Gabbard and its significance, in case that piece of punditry from John Brennan was insufficient to help you formulate your own understanding.
	There's panic.
	I sense panic.
	and I sense it in some of these confirmation battles, particularly the sort of offline stuff that you don't see in the media, but just when you find out the lengths to which permanent Washington is going to, say, sabotage Tulsi Gabbard, who's an army officer who's had a clearance for more than a decade, carries an automatic weapon. who's an army officer who's had a clearance for more I mean, clearly we trust her with America's, you know, defense.
	Why can't we trust her with America's secrets?
	Well, of course we can.
	So when...
	I like the detail that she carries an automatic weapon, Do you?
	Because I've met Tulsi Gabbard a few times.
	Just then I was like, oh, she was packing during that.
	That's cool.
	Also, though, the important thing to consider is the presence of a permanent Washington that is able to resist and rebuke the will of the people.
	Because, again, I know Tulsi Gabbard, I feel that she's precisely the sort of person that you should put in a position of power if you're not going to radically revise and alter the systems of power themselves.
	I suppose, in the military arena, if you have bureaucrats and administrators that don't have military experience, that's just not right.
	You can't have that because it's so specifically, it's so intense, such an intense area, i.e.
	asking people to die for what they believe in.
	You can't have people involved in that process that are not initiated.
	What is this?
	And it really is people are panicked that what they've been doing is going to come to light, I think.
	Well, they should be panicked because if you read the executive order on the weaponization of government, it specifically empowers the director of national intelligence to conduct a wide-ranging report into the possible misdeeds of the entire intelligence community and orders her to come up with You know, anything negative that they can find.
	Holy shit!
	So, can you imagine?
	No!
	Right?
	I mean, that's like trying to make a list of everything.
	She'll be doing it from now to the end of time.
	But, no, I mean, in perfect seriousness, this is, it's setting the stage for, you know, kind of a second church committee hearings era.
	And that was a great moment in American history.
	Once every 50 years.
	Right.
	What a great clip.
	That's really helped me to understand it, that there is a permanent class of bureaucrats that filter and vet appointments in order to ensure that what we call democracy or at least see as a kind of electorally...
	Mandated set of decisions and systems is actually controlled from elsewhere.
	And occasionally we're lucky we'll get symbols like Tulsi Gabbard or RFK that help us to monitor and understand that it may yet be possible to have people that are at least genuine in positions of power.
	And if that is resisted, then we'll have a deeper understanding of just how permanent the permanent state is.
	I.e.
	it can even withstand the apparent vicissitude of a transition from Biden to Trump.
	If that turns out to be irrelevant, guys, if it turns out it don't make much difference whether you have Biden or Trump, then we're going to have some pretty serious conversations about the nature of institutional power, aren't we?
	Aren't we?
	Because Tulsi Gabbard and Bobby Kennedy, I believe...
	I believe are sufficiently authentic and real that if they were in positions of real power, you would experience measurable change.
	you would experience measurable change like if you were a person that understood the intelligence community in the way that Taibbi just described or if you're a person that understood health in the way that we know that Calamine does or pharmaceuticals and the legalistics around it in the way that Aaron Siri does or the scientific aspect of it
	the way that Jay Bhattacharya and Marty Makari does and I'm listing people who are now connected with government power to indicate to you my belief that those people in office with the levers of bureaucratic and administrative power will be able to auger change and if they don't something terrible is going on Something!
	Terrible is going on.
	But that's just what I think.
	Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
	We've got a fantastic week coming up for you here.
	I'm going to be talking to Jeremy Corbell, the UFO expert.
	In a way, no one can really be a UFO expert.
	He said that himself because it's such a sort of...
	There's no permanent...
	Or there's no data that you can hold on to and understand.
	It's just like, what is going on?
	Is it human power or not?
	That's basically the question, isn't it?
	We'll be talking to Jeremy Corbell.
	We've got...
	Should we put up the Eddie Gallagher chat on Prime?
	On Rumble Premium, I mean.
	I really think we should do that.
	Also, we'll be back tomorrow with another live show.
	And we've also got our new show with Neil Oliver and Lara Logan.
	Let's create some assets for that, guys.
	Me, Neil Oliver and Lara Logan on Thursday talk through the week's news.
	Lara Logan is brilliant.
	Neil Oliver is fantastic.
	You should follow them all on X and look at their stuff.
	Susie Devine, you just tried to upgrade to Rumble Premium and you couldn't.
	You couldn't use the discount code.
	People are trying to use the discount code!
	Claudio runs it over there.
	Pawlowski!
	People are trying to use our rumble code!
	That could easily be human error, couldn't it?
	Someone just pressed the wrong button.
	Check you ain't pressed the wrong button because I'm taking this straight to the top.
	Anyway, guys, we're going to be back tomorrow with more of the same, nor the different, not more of the different.
	How could you even...
	No, with more of the different, not more of the same.
	That's the last thing.
	We can't replicate reality endlessly.
	Even if it was some sort of facsimile, it would be a diluted version of it.
	If you're not on Rumble Premium yet, I can hardly blame you because it seems like it's difficult to do.
	But it will get easier.
	I promise you that.
	Use our code.
	And, yeah.
	I mean, this is like the awkward goodbye bit.
	Well, guess I'm going now.
	Hope you're going to be okay.
	Love you.
	Miss you.
	Jude Psych.
	Thank you, Kazo, for when you typed all those emojis to take out the imagery, the sort of sexual imagery that was being posted.
	Well done.
	That was good.
	Pulling the strings.
	The US isn't a country.
	It's a business.
	Yeah, good point.
	Trash talk is run by AI. Good point.
	Fromang.
	Might be.
	Might be.
	Stop evangelising Neil Oliver.
	I like him.
	I love him.
	He's fantastic.
	Alright, I'll see you guys.
	There is a discount.
	May God protect you and keep you till tomorrow or in the meanwhile, stay free.
	Many Switching, Switching, Switching, Switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.
	Many switching.
	Switch on.

▲