All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 14, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:13:00
“Trump Is A MAJOR THREAT To The Great Reset” – Dr Robert Malone On the Globalist Agenda – SF493
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
In this video, you're going to see the future.
We are getting the breaking in.
We've got a live stop there.
Hello there, you awakening wonders.
Thanks for joining me for a very special edition of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
We got Dr.
Robert Malone for an interview exclusively.
And what I'm going to be asking Dr.
Robert Malone about is, is Trump going to be the disruption that changes the world?
If you don't know who Dr.
Robert Malone is, Dr.
Robert Malone is...
is an internationally recognized virologist and immunologist and the original inventor of mRNA delivery and vaccination technologies.
That's why it blew up when he first went on Rogan.
His appearance on Rogan was probably the moment when the establishment went, we've got to start censoring and destroying Joe Rogan.
Find some things you can say about that guy that's negative.
Has he ever said the n-word in a context that we can somehow manipulate to make bad?
If he starts advocating for ivermectin, the gig will be up.
Robert Malone was one of the early prophets in the pandemic that helped us to understand that the pandemic was being used to double down on authoritarianism, censorship.
He now is an expert in, as we've all got to become, CBDCs and how centralised government currencies will be used to control you.
Surveillance, the censorship industrial complex, the impact on the WHO of the Trump election.
You Bureaucrats across the world are running scared, and this is a conversation that's going to help you understand it.
Listen carefully, because he refers to a lot of complex stuff.
Like in the Netherlands now, they're admitting that the COVID pandemic was a military operation.
That comes up.
JD Vance talking about NATO aren't going to get their support if the EU keeps censoring free speech.
This is a conversation that will change the way you understand reality, so stay tuned for all of it.
Now, we'll be with you on YouTube for about 15 minutes, but because YouTube and Google are part of the trusted news initiative to which Dr Malone refers, that's the set of organisations that ensure there is a harmonised, consider that word, harmonised response to crisis, that...
And particularly when there are attacks on people, the TNI includes the BBC, numerous massive giant American news organisations and big tech organisations to ensure that if there's a pandemic, everyone reports in the same way.
YouTube's part of that.
Remember, when Caroline Dynage, the government minister in charge of social media back then, demanded I be demonetised, YouTube complied.
In this conversation, organically, her name comes up because she's married to Mark Lancaster, the head of the 77th Brigade, one of those shady, nefarious organizations that monitor and control online information and engage in citizen management.
By the end of this conversation, your eyes will be sparkling.
You will be bright and wild and ready for the opposition that revolution requires.
So stay with us.
Okay, I'll be going to Dr.
Robert Malone.
And remember, if you're not a member of our Wake and Wonder community yet, If you're just watching this on Rumble, which is great, it's a great way to speak freely, become an Awakened Wonder because, I'll tell you why, we do Break Bread with Russell Brand.
Just yesterday I had a conversation with J. John, and you can join us live in the stream.
You can also see my conversation with Tucker Carlson, Ruslan.
I have amazing conversations.
Eric Metaxas, I'm learning so much about how Christian Awakening will arm you with a sword of fire to face the giants of corruption that we all have to face together.
Individually, we don't have power, but through unity, we are strong as long as we're connected to the right resources and sources.
All right, so let's get into our conversation with Dr.
Robert Malone.
You are going to love it.
Dr.
Robert Malone, thank you so much for joining us today.
Thanks for being here, Doctor.
Thanks, Russell.
It's my honor.
You've just done an incredible job building this platform, and it's truly an honor to have the opportunity to participate in it.
Since you joined us for our Oracles series, which is available on locals for members of our community or people that want to additionally pay for that brilliant conversation, the world has changed, obviously, radically, even though that was just a few weeks ago.
I wonder, Dr...
How significant you regard the election of Donald Trump to be and how important having someone like Bobby Kennedy in government will be for making the kind of significant changes that appear to be necessary after the pandemic period and what it revealed.
Just to be specific for audience members that are perhaps not as au fait with these subjects as you are, which would mean all of our audience and perhaps most people in the world.
What I mean is how during the pandemic it was revealed that there was a new orthodoxy around big pharma and that because of the convergence of interests that facilitated profits for pharmaceutical companies, the ability to regulate and control for the state, the ability to censor and therefore increase the power the ability to censor and therefore increase the power of big tech, what was revealed to us I suppose was a kind of cross-section snapshot of how globalism operates now.
How will that type of globalism, not just relating to health, but of course relating to health, be impacted, do you imagine, by the ascendancy of figures like Trump, Bobby Kennedy and J.D. Vance, who sort of have an Odd blend of free market capitalism within them,
libertarianism within them, anti-establishmentism in the form of RFK. What do you think that's going to be the impact on the type of bureaucracy and sets of powers that I've done my best to outline in the question?
So that bureaucracy is really well entrenched and it's going to be very difficult to modify and displace it.
You talk about the ascendancy of Donald Trump.
This is Trump, too, remember?
And based on the electoral results, the case is well made, I think, that there was significant election interference in the prior.
If nothing else, then the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
But the data suggests that there are unaccounted excess votes in the prior election cycle that are paradoxical.
In terms of this opportunity that Trump and JD Vance have right now, they're already having an impact, clearly.
And I was just reading prior to this an excellent op-ed from Mary Harrington at UnHerd, in which she was talking about a lot of this.
I want to give credit where credit's due.
And speculating about the already building impact on many European center-right movements and particularly she's selected out Georgia Maloney that this may open up new opportunities for her in terms of political flexibility and may really shift some of the dialogue in the center-right populist movements across Europe and particularly the European Union.
The discussion about changing status in NATO is something that I've advocated for.
I spoke about at the Make Europe Great Again conference in Romania and that discussion about the limitations of NATO and its increasing Irrelevance, I think, in a globalized multilateral world that we're in right now is consistent with this ongoing dialogue.
What is NATO? What are its real functions?
What should it be doing?
The discussion is that there might be a prohibition on Ukraine joining NATO for up to 20 years as part of a settlement.
Getting out of the weeds and focusing more on the big picture, the reaction that seems to be coming across from many of these groups that are closely aligned with what I'm calling the New World Order, because that's the term that's been used now for decades, including by George Bush.
The appearance is that there is a sense of uh significant of fear and loathing trepidation uh as uh expressed in part by Yuval Harari himself who is uh really kind of speaking in apocalyptic terms that their uh planned great reset Yuval Harari for the audience being uh the science officer behind uh the world economic forum uh and
uh the author of uh um A whole thread of books that are taught in academia that purport that God is dead and man is God, basically.
And talk about transhumanism, etc.
So, Harari seems to be saying that this Trump ascendancy is a major obstacle to achieving the Great Reset and the long-planned Moves to advance the various agendas of the World Economic Forum, which are closely aligned now through treaty, as I understand it, with United Nations.
So then this response by Tedros almost immediately after the election was fascinating.
He seems to be distancing himself from what took place.
He's very agile politically.
So I think in some What the emerging dialogue seems to suggest is that Trump is viewed as a major threat, not only within DC, but globally,
to these various long-standing plans to move towards these policies that many of us object to, like universal digital ID, central bank digital currency, These various tools that seem to support a globalized government structure.
And I applaud that.
I think perhaps you might even.
So that's what I see is by the reaction of those that have been Acting in a very kind of unilateral, entitled way in advancing non-democratic, autocratic agendas having to do with centralized one-world government.
Their reactions indicate that they perceive Donald Trump and this new administration as a major threat.
I think that they may actually be overreacting.
And I personally, I think that the implementation of policy changes that are being proposed is going to be a lot more of a challenge than many people are assuming is the case.
Now, for the rest of this conversation, we're going to have to be exclusively on Rumble.
Start the countdown.
We're going to be talking about so many things that are fascinating and exciting.
You're going to absolutely love it.
You're going to be awakened and invigorated by it.
Yuval Noah Harari.
He comes up.
Ursula von der Leyen.
She comes up.
Heads of the EU.
Globalist intellectuals and why the WHO are determined to destroy free speech, but they might not be able to.
Click the link in the description.
Join us.
Get over there.
I suppose if there are domestic institutional challenges that make the implementation of policy difficult, that is by definition a diagnosis of failing systems.
That means that even with a mandate, a popularly elected president will not be able to put in place policies that they campaigned on.
That's just the sort of domestic side of it.
You said a lot that was interesting.
For a moment, to bring a focus to the EU and NATO, it's interesting to learn the bodies that present themselves as logistical, regulatory, and managerial are increasingly becoming dictatorial.
This is an It's an interesting trend that's grown out of social democracies and social democracies' tendency towards totalitarianism rather than the old 20th century forms of totalitarianism.
We're witnessing bureaucracies that take power in ways that are surprising because obviously the critiques of the Soviet Union or the critiques of fascism We're about a totalitarian power that is implemented through terror.
This is a new kind of terror that we're experiencing now, and some of the names that you mention are indicators of the aesthetic and complexion of this new terror.
Yuval Noah Harari, for example.
I've met him.
I've interviewed him a couple of times.
When the book Sapiens, perhaps his most famous and popular book, was a sort of a global hit, I was at the same publishers, I think Penguin as him, in the UK, and I did an event with him at school.
Now, prior to me being as well-versed as I now am in some of these subjects, thanks to media like this, I was thinking as you were speaking, Isn't it extraordinary that because of this media, someone like you,
who I think 10 years ago would have been regarded as an esoteric academic, who you'd only hear at lecture theatres if you were at an Ivy League university, we can now hear you chatting for three hours on Joe Rogan, if your bladder can take it, And we're able to hear your diagnosis on, you know, the kind of academics and intellectuals that the establishment gives us, like Yuval Noah Harari.
Now, when I interviewed him at the time, it was at a school in South London as part of a PR stunt to make it seem like what we were doing was super accessible and down with the people.
Yuval Noah Harari said, so I experienced this first hand, he said, like the kids here, you know, we're going to be living in a fully automated AI society, so these kids best learn skills connected with AI and programming.
And I, again, this is some time ago, maybe eight years ago, maybe ten years ago, so me, I didn't know as much as I know now about globalism and the threats and challenges to globalism and the way that globalism is being implemented.
Even then, on some intuitive level, I said, that's not what we should be telling these kids.
I said it live.
We should be telling these kids to oppose these systems of centralising authority, that they can stand up against it, that it's not a foregone conclusion, that the future doesn't belong to globalism, that life is in session, that debate is happening now, the war beyond the debate is happening now.
And you also talked about Tedros Adhaman Ghebreyesus, who's, for those of you that don't know, I think, very high up in the WHO. And we've talked a lot on our show about the WHO treaty and how it was being advanced.
Again, some people said it's the storm.
Stop Joe Rogan Treaty.
Because built into the treaty were things like, social media should be censored if people do not toe the line, as well as stuff like demanding, or at least requesting, taxes from member nations, and requesting that member nations be mandated to take vaccine.
It's very interesting, as you say, Doctor, to see Tedros Backing out of that position.
Now people were like, you know, on our channels and channels like ours, people were campaigning and setting up petitions against the WHO treaty, precisely because it was the kind of artifact that suggested there was an appetite to establish global power.
Not in the way that we were familiar with from the 20th century, fancy uniforms and terrible genocides, but...
Boring uniforms and still potentially genocides, but genocides conducted more diffusely and across populations.
I suppose that's not a genocide, but still a lot of people dying.
It's not a genocide in the strictest sense.
But it clearly already is an indication that even if you were to accept Trump's detractors personally, Portrait of the man.
A misogynist.
A racist.
A psychopath.
Whatever they want to call him.
A solipsist.
A narcissist.
He clearly is a thorn in the side of this kind of trajectory towards centralized authority, digital management, manageable currencies through CBDCs, and he is a spanner or a wrench, in your language, in the machine that's clearly got its sights set upon...
Creating absolute control using the language of absolute care.
And you can only justify care of that degree if we are in states of continual crisis, health crisis, military crisis, environmental crisis.
If people don't believe that they're in continual crisis, they're unlikely to yield to that kind of authority.
So it's interesting that what you say about NATO is that maybe we don't need NATO in the same way we did...
Coming out of the Cold War.
Maybe we don't need a World Health Organization if people are inclining towards national sovereignty.
And that, as you say, is happening across Europe and there's just been given a mandate in the United States of America.
We can't make this content without the support of our commercial partners.
Here's a message from one now.
Then we'll be right back with Dr.
Robert Malone.
The Root brand have launched this fantastic product called Clean Slate.
It's been going for five years.
In that five years, they've sold over a million bottles, and it's proven to remove these toxic metals, biotoxins, graphene, glyphosate, viral particles, nanoparticles, and more.
Now, if this product can decalcify and recrystallize your pineal gland and clean up your body, that means that you will benefit neurologically and, obviously, spiritually.
A multi-patented nanobiotechnologist has taken the science of the crystal behind it and turned it into the most advanced solution for cleaning up the body, mind and spirit.
Obviously, this is significant because you only have to glance at the news for an hour or so to see that toxicity is entering our systems through the air, through the food, and through the soil.
We have to clean up ourselves first in order to unlock the potential that is within us.
This is part of our shared awakening.
To take advantage of this incredible product, go to therootbrand.com forward slash russellbrand and get a clean slate today.
Why not take advantage of the opportunity to detoxify using an incredible product that seems to straddle multiple extraordinary worlds?
How important by your reckoning, Doctor, are the kind of independent media spaces that we are in now and through which you've gone from being a very respected academic and scientist to being one of the new pantheon of emergent celebrities that's curiously come about and clearly been so impactful in this election cycle?
How important do you think that social media will be and do you see signs that that will remain under threat?
Even in spite of this election result.
So Russell, I want to give you a new term that you could look up and consider.
It's called inverted totalitarianism.
And what you're describing, this instead of totalitarianism coming from a single autocratic leader, Um, inverted totalitarianism is, uh, a concept that, uh, this system is emerging from the bureaucracy and that that has become the norm in American government.
Uh, so we speak of the deep state and in particular, we speak of the senior executive service, which are the, you know, few thousand people that, uh, run the U S government and they are, um, uh, unassailable.
It's very, very difficult to fire them.
They have functionally their own union.
They have their own flag.
They were put in place largely by Carter and then intentionally expanded under Obama.
I think about 5,000 or 6,000 additional slots in SES. So these are the ones that literally run our government.
And that does seem to be a key model if you look at what's going on in the European Union under Ursula.
With the European Council, that's a very similar kind of system and that is the model in my opinion.
That's the metaphor.
The European Council and the European Union structure in which nation states are subsidiary to a central authority.
Leave is the basically the structural model that the United Nations is promoting.
Now in terms of alternative media, I I'm reminded of a report that I read from the Trusted News Initiative about two years ago, and you may recall the TNI is something that's sponsored by BBC. I'm credited by Wiki Spooks as the person who really raised the alarm about the Trusted News Initiative.
I don't know if that's really true, but I'll take it.
Trusted News Initiative is one of the tools that the BBC has initiated To manage approved narratives, I think is the best way to put it, globally.
And a trusted news initiative, kind of like the GARM agreement that Elon Musk sued, that ties together all the advertisers and harmonizes them.
The TNI is intended to harmonize all of the major, what we call corporate media across the world.
So, audiency, front press, All the European major outlets, Reuters, Associated Press, New York Times, Washington Post, etc.
They're all part of the TNI, of course, BBC. And the TNI has a set of rules about content which is provided by their members, which is not aligned with an approved narrative.
So The way that this works is it used to be that you would have a major outlet, let's say Reuters, publish an article that would then be distributed throughout the corporate news network.
They would all cross post essentially these kinds of articles.
And under TNI, they're still allowed to do that.
But if a major wishes to publish an article which is contrary to whatever the approved narrative is, then the agreement is that they can do so, but the others won't functionally cross-post it.
They won't republish it.
So it drops.
You know, the New York Times is allowed to say something, editorialize or whatever, that's contrary to the general thrust of TNI. But then none of the others are supposed to pick it up.
So TNI is functionally a trade union that is set up to maintain the primacy, the supremacy of corporate media and their ability to control the narrative.
And they put out a report a couple of years ago that I read in which they talked about the failing corporate media, the Drops in viewership, the drops in revenue, etc.
And then they had a section in the back talking about new media.
And the specific poster child, as you point out, was the Rogan podcast.
So they perceive, as you correctly identify, Rogan as the metaphor for new media and the threat.
That that represents to their business model, because that's how they perceive it.
This is a core business model in which they control all information.
You know, I talk about this in Sidewar.
The goal here is to control all information that individuals can access in ways that are consistent with the interests of whoever is driving this, whether it's sponsors, nation states, supranational organizations, etc., such as the World Health Organization.
And clearly they perceive alternative media such as your broadcast as a major threat which explains once you kind of comprehend that that's the ecosystem what I've just described and the structures that are put in place globally these are transnational structures to tie these major organizations together Then it's no surprise that the likes of you,
as your viewership started to climb, was subjected to a concerted effort to delegitimize.
Now, for me, I've experienced that, but at a lesser level.
But then, I mean, the stuff they pulled out on you was pretty hardcore.
But nothing that either of us have encountered even begins to scrape the surface of what Donald Trump has experienced.
So this ability of these kind of shadowy bureaucrat administrators that we don't even know who they are.
And by the way, that's one of the goals in fifth generation warfare is you should not be able to tell who it is behind the messaging.
So this is intentional.
It's part of the strategy.
And remember that fifth generation warfare is a core to the new NATO battle plan.
Which they call hybrid warfare.
So NATO specifically acknowledges that this kind of message management control, media control, information control is a core part of NATO battle operations.
And they have built a lot of infrastructure in order to do that.
Of course, that feeds into this growing narrative, thanks to this Dutch I'm a politician that's disclosed the role of NATO in promoting the COVID crisis.
I think the lovely thing about the COVID crisis is that it's, as you say, it's given us a window to see what these mechanisms and structures are and how they operate and how they're intended to be operating in the future.
And again, to loop back to your question, clearly alternative media Is a major threat to this.
Now, X is a major threat.
I think that Elon Musk has been radicalized based on, you know, in his own experiences with EU and others in Brazil, etc.
And I don't know that he started off wanting to be the champion of free speech across the globe, but that's the role that he's now thrust into.
And X is one example, but the open format podcast is another.
And hence, it's no surprise that these tools of censorship are being very actively weaponized, including debanking.
I don't know if you've experienced debanking.
Nigel has.
I have.
The Canadians have.
That is our canary in the coal mine about what is most likely to come down with central bank digital currency.
So yeah, so alt media in this election, I think, someone posted the other day on X that Trump is the first podcast president.
There's no question that Trump and Kennedy and JD Vance and many others in this political sphere have embraced alternative media to great effect and it demonstrates the failure of in the in the failing business model of corporate news once again as does the collapse of viewership for MSNBC these are American broadcasters MSNBC and CNN a global broadcaster their
their viewership crashed In the context of this election.
And what I'm reading is that MSNBC is now up on the block for sale by Comcast.
So this is how we beat them, frankly, is we make their business model obsolete.
If they don't have the revenue, they can't sustain operations and they can't sustain these plans.
They can't sustain the bureaucrats and other administrative folks.
That are underneath this inverted totalitarianism plan.
We need our commercial partners in order to bring you this content.
We're going to have to interrupt Robert Malone for like 60 seconds or something like that.
Here's a quick message from one of them now.
Oh no, I hate thinking about debt, don't you?
No one wants to think about it, but the truth is that we live in a debt-based society, even though the Bible forbids it.
And over the course of the holidays, unless we're careful with our expenditure, we're going to get into even worse debt, trying to make people love us.
Last year, half of American consumers took on debt to pay for their holidays.
I'm sorry to learn that.
This year, that could be you, could be me.
I'm already in debt.
It's never too early to start planning to get out of the senseless, mad usury we've found ourselves in.
And my friends at PDS Debt can help with a personalized solution just for you.
If you're making payments every month on your debt and your balances aren't going down, I hate that feeling.
PDS has a solution for that.
Everyone with $10,000 or more in eligible debt qualifies and there's no minimum credit score required.
Bad and fair credit are accepted.
Save more while paying off your debt in a fraction of the time.
Start your plan today.
Get a free debt analysis right now at pdsdebt.com forward slash brand.
Only takes 30 seconds and you'll get the analysis.
That's pdsdebt.com forward slash brand.
pdsdebt.com forward slash brand.
I hope and pray you can get yourself out of the nightmare of debt which seems to be the foundation of our entire financial system.
Fifth generation warfare was not a phrase I'd heard before and many of the ideas that you're Not alluding to, describing, have previously only been located in discourse that belongs to 1980s style deep state conspiracy conversations or a cultist analysis of the true nature of
the dark power that might be running the state.
When you talk about fifth generation warfare as being diffuse, I'm reminded of something I once heard about the CIA, is that functionally the CIA was kind of like a hive that you couldn't locate, and even not really like a hive, in so much as a hive would have a queen bee in it, which one might locate and identify as its nucleus.
The power was diffuse, that it was a Hydra model by nature, that you would never be able to identify the person, one person, that's like, we're doing this, then we're going to do that.
I like this idea.
The term, it's highly siloed.
Highly siloed, inverted totalitarianism.
It's interesting because anyone that's experienced the ire and attack of that machine will know that it has this kind of terrifying, semi-sanitary Kafkaesque quality of that you cannot identify where it's coming from.
That's my intention.
It's the intention.
Yeah, because the people that are attacking me in media aren't rubbing their hands together saying, and here we are doing the bidding of the state.
They genuinely believe they're undertaking an important investigation into the misconduct of a womanizer who on the surface of it was a party boy having fun.
But if you dig deep enough...
You will find that there was malfeasance.
They probably never stop to question why is it not these celebrities that are having an investigation done into them?
Why is it that it's this celebrity At this time.
Why is it that this celebrity didn't have things come out during Me Too, for example?
They're unaware.
No cog in the machine even knows it's a cog in the machine.
And they're kind of invested in not undertaking.
That investigation.
No one wants to undertake an investigation and learn.
Like Chomsky said to Andrew Marr some time ago when Andrew Marr, a BBC reporter, said, Well, I'm not participating in the agenda of a state propaganda unit.
And Noam Chomsky said, If you weren't already primed, you wouldn't be sitting in that chair.
It's already happened before you arrived there.
You've been pre-tued.
And now I know that about the academics that rise to the top.
Someone sees a Steven Pinker dissertation the same way that Serge Brin and Larry Page were being sponsored by a CIA cutout even while they were...
Stanford, or wherever it was that they were, and then they're on the conveyor belt at that point.
The system is- The same is true with a lot of the entertainment industry.
Sorry, sir?
The same is true with a lot of the entertainment industry.
It's not just academics.
There's an opportunity to go back and understand the structural underpinnings of this.
If you go back to the 50s and 60s, keywords are the great The Grand Wurlitzer is a book to that effect.
And the other one is Operation Mockingbird.
And Operation Mockingbird was partially revealed after congressional investigation, but they pulled their punches.
They didn't disclose, for instance, many academic links that existed between the CIA and academe.
And I'm very aware of that.
I've run into multiple people that exist within academe that are CIA agents, trained as CIA agents, and then placed back into academics.
So this was really well covered by Carl Bernstein in an article in the old Rolling Stone.
That's available largely, you have to go to the Wayback Machine Or some other alternative source.
I don't think you can still get it off of Rolling Stone servers, but because Rolling Stone now has got sold and is compromised, just as the Atlantic Monthly is.
But once you understand, and it's documented, the structure of Operation Mockingbird, which was this, and probably still is in operation, the CIA structure in which there was Payments made to credit accredited journalists,
as well as I don't know the language stringers, the kind of the second tier people that occasionally write articles and do investigative work for the major publications and their editors.
So in terms of the structural change, chain of control here, it seems to flow through the editors down to individual reporters, including Uh, those reporters that are not formally accredited.
The reason why I emphasize this is that I think it was under Colby.
There was a decision that, uh, they would, that CIA would no longer capitalize the accredited reported pool, but there was no commitment that they would withdraw their funding from these, uh, academics and from the, uh, stringers or whatever you call them, the, the, uh, More informalist informal journalist core.
So once once you this, this is all fact, well documented.
Once you see that, and understand that and and understand that that structure was never stopped.
It was slightly modified in response to public pressure, but it can appears to continue into the present.
So the in and then then Russell, we have A fantastic document that can be very helpful to people if they want to really understand the structure of these things.
It came out from the Energy and Commerce Committee of the House last month in October.
It's a report on a, the slang is Beltway Bandit.
These are the contracting companies that work for the government that are typically located in and around the DC Beltway.
So that's hence the slang.
And the company's called Forest Marsh and they were paid about 991 plus change million dollars to operate a propaganda campaign throughout the COVID crisis that among other things had a specific objective to increase the level of fear about the virus in order to manipulate or manage human behavior to be more compliant with government policies.
So this is all documented And the House report is just fantastic because it lays out the specific commercials and the contract language that was implemented by HHS and then the kind of almost daily collusion between, in particular, Rochelle Walensky, who is the head of the CDC, and this major contracting company to promote all this false messaging that was demonstrated to be false.
And this loops back to Tedros' comment Well, the WHO didn't actually force mandates.
They didn't actually force these things.
Well, what they did do was they promoted false narratives that were then reinforced informally through a whole series of structures that centered very much on censorship, defamation, delegitimization, and all the other tools of modern fifth generation warfare.
There's the best language for it, you know, like Psychological warfare is another term for this, but we've had Schellenberger and others, if your UK audience is not familiar, you can look them up, and Matt Taibbi,
of course, former Rolling Stone journalist back in the old days, that have documented through the Twitter files, the Facebook files, etc., the growth And extent of the surveillance censorship state structure,
which is which transcends the United States because we have these various alliances like the Five Eyes Alliance of the intelligence agencies and which is UK, US, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.
Some of the most heavy handed COVID responses all came from that and You know, credit where credit's due.
There's a number of people that have been promoting the thesis that all of this was a military operation.
And as we mentioned a moment ago, this is now coming out by more peripheral nations disclosing that, in fact, they were pressured into these positions by through their NATO alliance structure.
So and we have in the UK, You know, I want to get Andrew Bridgen on my podcast, maybe you can get him too, talking about his own experiences with the 77th Brigade and the mutton crew there in the UK. The 77th Brigade was specifically empowered, and we talk about this in the book, the whole genesis of it.
It's covered in a Wired magazine, which has strong CIA ties.
In the origins of the 77th Brigade as coming out of your UK marketing capabilities and merging with defense capabilities.
In the United States, we have an operation that is a core.
They call themselves the Psi War Soldiers.
A fantastic recruitment video you can find on YouTube if you want to scare the dickens out of yourself.
But You know, we have deep capabilities in the United States, Canada, all these nations in the military in psychological warfare.
And this was all deployed, apparently, according to a variety of press reports from all these countries obtained under freedom of information.
This was actively deployed against the citizens of their respective nation states under the thesis there had to be a whole of government response.
So when Tedros says, oh, my hands are clean.
I didn't do that.
Oh, that's that.
That is really a contrivance.
Tedros, together with the public health infrastructure of those respective nation states, were responsible for distributing what was the approved narrative.
And then that was all reinforced with the logic of misinformation.
Remember, misinformation, which I'm accused of, and I'm sure you are too.
So, the sin of misinformation is saying anything which is contrary to the approved narrative of the time, coming from one of two things, either WHO or your National Health Service.
So, that's the way that ecosystem works is, yeah, they don't have to reinforce it at the top level.
They can say, oh, my hands are clean.
I was just putting out what my scientists believe to be the approved narrative, the science, right, at that time.
And then it all gets reinforced through this structure that's been set up that Schellenberger calls the censorship industrial complex.
Rumble's the home of this channel, Stay Free, and a leader in defending the fundamental human right of free speech.
They've joined X to sue a cartel of advertisers and ad agencies who conspire to block ad revenue from going to the platforms.
Recently, they've launched Rumble Premium.
This, I think, is going to be a game changer for all of us.
It's an ad-free viewing experience with great perks for viewers and creators.
Rumble Premium will give you the ability to dive into your favourite content on your mobile or desktop or smart TV and savour every uninterrupted second of my content.
Why don't you upgrade to Rumble Premium today?
Support my free speech and the free speech of other content creators on this platform.
Please go to Rumble now, rumble.com forward slash premium.
And if you use the code brand, you'll save $10 and Rumble will be aware that our stream is creating great converts.
So that's rumble.com forward slash premium and do use the code brand to save $10.
Anyway, there's a link there at the bottom of the screen now.
We're posting it in the chat.
Join us.
It's extraordinary that there's unlikely to be the required reckoning when we can see now the information that was available relatively near the advent of the pandemic is now being verified.
And also, if we take, for example, Bobby Kennedy's book, The Real Anthony Fauci, which is where I read for the first time about the sort of connections between bioweapons and vaccines and their fundings, the way that Anthony Fauci has connections to HIV, the way that he earns money through royalties even as a government employee, how difficult it is to track that.
How diffuse and clandestine his relationship is with other state agencies, the CIA, the way that he communicated with other agencies in order to repress the Wuhan lab leak theory, as it was then known.
That's just sort of one branch.
The efficacy of vaccines, the likelihood of adverse events, the foolishness of trying to vaccinate at the height of a pandemic, the importance of vitamin D, the potential effectiveness of ivermectin, all of these things that were bunched together under that term misinformation,
all of that I think?
In the past, when there was centralized control over media, that information could be marginalized.
And it would only be Alex Jones or David Icke or this sort of early pioneers of this space, who in a sense were in a way the sort of curious forefathers of independent media because they kind of existed, along with, I suppose, what you might call more credible who in a sense were in a way the sort of But to be a credible journalist these days means you have to take oaths of fealty and fidelity to systems that will ultimately prevent you telling the truth.
That means that you are going to get this more difficult, esoteric and more, I would say, controversial but true information from sources that have already been pre-bunked.
Now, though, that they have begat a thousand children, most evidently and obviously the sort of totem at the center of it all, Joe Rogan.
But there are hundreds of voices, Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger, they've been on my show a number of times.
I've done live events with Schellenberger and Taibbi talking about the censorship industrial complex, how that's playing out in Ireland, how it's playing out in Canada.
Even someone like me, an autodidact entertainer, I get it.
When you mention Ursula von der Leyen, I know about her text messages with Albert Baller.
When the subject of Canada comes up, I know about the truckers' bank accounts being frozen or people that donated through PayPal.
Like, now we've got such an accumulated wealth of information that their machine has to work so hard to deny and decry and undermine, to smear and attack opponents, to find, as Elon Musk said, citing that Stalin torturer, Show me the man and I'll show you the crime.
They have to find ways to bring down the opponents in real time while recognizing now that there is a general sense that most countries will be better off with a nativist approach, even if that is reviewed in the most simplistic terms.
Put France first.
Put the UK first.
Put the US first.
Put Sweden first.
And that sort of plays out across a variety of narratives, whether it's Migration and the way that migration can be used to destabilize populations.
Granting control to the WHO, which as you've described, they're busily in the business of denying they even tried to do.
A total mistrust of mainstream media as CNN sack off employees and MSNBC and the BBC, which is, of course, still publicly funded, become more questioned and questionable because of, as you said at the beginning, an institution like the TNI.
Even I've heard of that, thanks to probably a mutual friend of ours.
I know what the Trusted News Initiative is.
I know they likely played a role in the attacks that I experienced last year.
I know what the 77th Brigade is and who Mark Lancaster is.
And that he's married to Caroline Dynage, who is the MP that wrote to Facebook, Rumble and X and said Russell Brand and YouTube are saying Russell Brand should be demonetized.
Have you seen these allegations?
Demonetized.
That they are married.
All of this can be tracked.
I know that it was a CIA carve-out.
The funded media that was going out in the Ukraine to say that I was a Russian disinformation proponent.
The problem is now that we've all got access to all of this information.
So what the Barack Obamas and Ursula von der Leyen and Victoria Newlands have to do is work.
Don't trust Robert Malone, but don't trust Russell Brand.
Don't trust Joe Rogan.
Don't trust Michael Schellenberger.
Don't trust yourself.
Your nature is evil.
You need to be managed.
You need us to help you.
Won't you please let us help you?
Get in your house.
Take your medicine.
And it starts increasingly to be unavoidably hysteria.
On their part.
And probably a concomitant component of this fifth generation warfare that you're describing, which is by its nature diffuse in order to avoid our ability to identify their culprits, is probably a type of hysteria might come along with it, because ultimately the participants can't have a deep faith in what they're doing.
Even its sort of oligarchal billionaire figureheads, whether that's Soros or Gates, or its superstar politicians like Obama, must surely now be recognizing that the plan is under threat, that the wheels are coming off.
And there's only so many times you can call people racists and rapists and misogynists before a general population starts thinking, we're better off on that side of the line than on your side of the line.
It's amazing, though, that there are still protests against Trump going on because people are like, this guy's not my president, not my America, the sexiest pig.
The turkeys are still trying to vote for Christmas.
But now there's not 20 million extra turkeys that seem to have disappeared since Biden's election.
But that was an epic rant.
Thank you very much.
So here we are, right?
We can see it.
As you say, the wheels are coming off the bus.
You can see it in that remarkable photograph of Barack Obama as he's going offstage looking like he's just eaten glass fragments.
And you're right, this is falling apart and they are becoming increasingly desperate.
And when that happens, it's the moment of greatest peril, which is where we're at right now.
And I think that there needs, the risk here, as I posted something on Twitter last night, I just finally had to say it, that the truth is, I'm angry.
I'm angry about what we've experienced.
I'm angry about what I've experienced.
I'm angry about the fact that neither political party in this recent election, none of the majors discussed the COVID crisis and the mismanagement.
That was excluded from the Overton window.
We were not allowed to discuss that.
And that thing went viral.
Just that simple statement that was kind of akin to my network.
If you remember the movie, I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.
I didn't put it quite that strongly.
But people are pissed off.
And they can see it as you say.
And the question is, can we move through so you're you're raising the the core thread here is the election results that the left did not anticipate that just happened in the United States and are likely to trigger a cascade across Europe and most of the Western world.
And the risk is that we overreach.
This is what I keep Warning about because we're pissed.
We're mad as hell.
We there is a natural desire for retaliation.
And if we give into that, we will lose the midterms in the United States.
There will be a backlash.
And this is this happens again and again and again in American pivots is that we have a mandate, a major election, a major disruption and The new folks come in.
They want change and they want it now because the structure of American politics basically everything runs on a two-year cycle because the house and so the risk that I perceive right now is that we move into a phase where the urge to retaliate is Almost unavoidable.
And with that will come overreach.
And with that will come destructive process, which may have merit, but which will create risks, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities over the near term.
And that How to manage this in an environment where people feel betrayed and angry is not a trivial task.
And this is my concern about the appointments that we're hearing from Trump.
Is he selecting loyalists clearly?
And many of those loyalists are I'm very supportive of major change, and clearly we need major change.
But they, because they're coming from the outside, people like, if I was to join the administration, Bobby's a great example.
As far as I'm concerned, Bobby is a transformational leader, but he is not an administrator.
And he's gonna, he, you know, what I'm hearing is a lot of new thinking, which is good, about major change.
Let me give you an example.
The Director General of the United Nations in promoting the Pact for the Future in Agenda 2030 speaks that, in his own words, we have the best plans.
And he feels entitled and empowered to implement those plans.
Those plans have never been tested before.
And so He is in the United Nations is busy trying to implement these new plans like thesis that it's a basic human right to migrate wherever you want in the world and advancing the climate change agenda and DEI and all those kinds of things.
They've never been tested before.
And a number of them are already failing.
And they're not the best plans.
And that's the risk.
Is that as this new wave of firebrands comes in with Trump, that they throw baby with bathwater and that we end up with dysfunctional solutions that are perhaps novel, but perhaps may not be optimal.
And that I think it's almost inevitable.
And the consequence will be further disruptions, further turmoil, and frankly, speaking from a Western perspective, the winners in that kind of situation are those entrenched opponents that are taking a long-range tactical and strategic view.
One, you know, a case could be made, that's the situation with the CCP in China.
A case can be made that that's the situation with these various entities that sit behind this globalism agenda, and we could name them in terms of these think tanks and non-governmental organizations and large financial interests.
You know all the names, same as I do.
I don't think it serves any purpose to call them out right now, but we know they're there.
And those Entities have the advantage of being stable, well capitalized, and able to sit back, let this play out, and then take advantage of missteps that are made in haste.
And that's my fear.
You mentioned network fleetingly there.
And you also talked about the vicissitudes, the sort of bi-annual or every two-year vicissitudes that mean that somehow the polarity created by those movements allows entrenched power to continue to remain entrenched.
And you talked earlier about how you sort of spoke to a Make Europe Great Again committee.
There's a conference in Romania.
What concerns me, I suppose, is that because we've talked around, and I've learned these two terms today, inverted totalitarianism and fifth generation warfare, Because what we appear to be describing is a set of ulterior powers that are by their nature designed to withstand precisely the kind of popular uprisings and populism
that this recent election is an indicator of.
And the technology that we have now could be used to create new systems that sustain the mandates achieved in these elections.
But it is also simultaneously being used as a prophylactic against the success of those systems.
And because you mentioned network, you know, we're all like my favorite moment in network is like when eventually he sat down in a boardroom with someone who explains to him.
Yeah.
Yeah.
How about a lot?
This is this is what power is really.
This is what power is really.
And I wonder, you know, because we've talked a lot about that power these days, Doctor, being diffuse, and it's unlikely that there is one individual that represents it, that somehow makes it more frightening, that it is so amorphous.
Like, that, you know, while I'm listening to you, some of the...
There are many calls, but there's much cause for optimism.
But I can hear...
The nodes throughout this conversation of your concerns, of how, hmm, Bobby Kennedy may not be able to implement policy in this new administration.
There are ways through global bureaucracy of opposing a figure even as robust as Trump.
And let's not forget, Trump's already had four years in government, and I know his greatest advocates would say it was better than ever.
America was getting great again, and it was the pandemic that stopped his ascent.
But as an outsider, in general...
It seemed like the framework remained the same.
There were less wars.
There's loads of things that you could credit Trump for if you like him and probably loads of things you could attack him for if you don't.
Let me give you an example.
We just wrote a substack about this, about Schedule F. So Schedule F was Trump's structure to try to circumvent the power of the senior executive service.
And what is functionally what it was designed to do is make these people at will employees so they could be fired.
Because right now they can actually it's it's absolutely impossible.
They are the they are a diffuse royalty in the American bureaucracy.
And so under Schedule F, Trump tried to create a new employment category that he would then transfer these people into that would be at will so they could be fired.
Remember, that's his kind of his his signature, you're fired.
And so it took a long time to get it through the courts and the challenges because the SES has their own functionally union that fought this thing tooth and nail.
And finally, he got the approval.
He set it out as an executive order right at the end of his presidency.
And literally, the first thing that Joe Biden did was rescind that executive order, which shows kind of the influence of the SES on and the, you know, we call it the Deep State Party on Joe Biden, because that was his top priority.
Since then, there's been a series of legislative maneuvers And bureaucratic maneuvers to make it so that Trump cannot implement, nor can anyone else, a Schedule F type structure.
So that's the way this works.
When we show a strategy, and this part of the criticism I got for publishing this was I was revealing a tactical opportunity prematurely in raising awareness of it.
Every time one of these initiatives comes up, somebody figures out some way to counter the growth and increased power of this entrenched bureaucracy, they fight back.
Now, there's one thing that I think could be really effectively exploited that's changed the landscape for the bureaucracy in the United States is the overturning of what was called Chevron deference.
Now, in UK, there's nothing like that overturning.
In the UK, the courts defer to the state routinely.
As Murray Rothbart proposed in his classic work, Anatomy of the State, the function of the courts in a modern, whether we call it a democracy or whatever, in the modern state, the function of the courts are to legitimize and support the state.
They're not to promote equity or rule of law.
And that's absolutely, as you look across the COVID crisis and you look across at the court's responses to various challenges, they have been entrenched in supporting the interests of the state.
And what the courts did in the United States, the Supreme Court, is they placed a ruling that made it codified that if a case came up in which the Functionally, the administrative state or the bureaucracy or whatever you want to use to call it, asserted a set of facts, scientific facts.
Then that was presumed to be the core truth.
And you could bring up expert witnesses and tell you're blue in the face.
But primacy was always given to the position that the administrative state took.
And that was overturned in just not so long ago in the last year by the Supreme Court in the United States.
That Chevron deference no longer applies.
What that enabled was basically lawmaking by administrators.
That's what's been going on in the United States for about a decade.
That's now been overturned, which means that all of those administrative laws that were put in place are either going to get taken out piecemeal by lawyers.
I mean, this is like Full Employment Act for lawyers, this overturning of Chevron deference.
To sue the state on behalf of their various clients that are aggrieved by this, that, or other regulation.
Or the Trump administration could say, um, look guys, we, it's a, it's a new game.
Chevron deference is over.
And we are directed by the Supreme Court to go through and eliminate all those regulations and rules that were put in place that were not congressionally authorized.
So it's that kind of thing, I think, that has to be done, is to use the structure of the Constitution and the position of this conservative court to work through, in a workmanlike fashion, the bureaucracy and eliminate a lot of these things.
And you already have the legal coverage to do so.
An example of that is what happened with housing and urban development during the prior Trump administration, where this neurosurgeon from Johns Hopkins was put in charge of housing and urban development.
Who would have thought it?
What he did is he set up a group And they went through methodically HUD, looking for regulations that were superfluous, not appropriate, etc.
and eliminated.
It's very much like Javier Millier, right?
And the consequence is that now housing and urban development is considered to be one of the most effective departments in the federal bureaucracy.
So I think there's ways we can do this.
I don't want to end on a glum note.
But there's a real risk of implementing radical changes that involve untested solutions that will inevitably create blowback.
It's amazing to hear the sort of ingenuity that is available to us successfully deployed.
And I reckon many people will feel optimistic, even if cautiously, about Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk being given their own department, because it's precisely the kind of entrepreneurial ingenuity that could make changes in an optimistic appraisal.
I'm sure the detractors will say, he's an oligarch and a lunatic and Vivek Ramaswamy is a capitalist.
I know there are a million ways to attack people.
Dr.
Robert Malone, thank you for your heroism up to now.
Thank you for being able to cross-pollinate and create new constellations of information on the fly for us in ways that are so easy to explain.
I feel that you're giving us access to a university that, frankly, we don't deserve and wouldn't be able to afford if we had to pay for it.
Thank you so much for your time today, Doctor.
Thanks for having me on, Russell, and deep respect for all you're doing and for your own ability to make connections.
I'm constantly astounded when I watch your podcast.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you very much.
Well, I hope you enjoyed that show as much as I did.
I feel brighter.
I feel enthusiastic.
I feel empowered to take on the world now.
Remember, intellectuals and academics like this are only available because of platforms like Rumble, because of podcasters like Joe Rogan, whose name came up, but there are many more.
Lex Friedman, Chris Williams, whoever you're into, just continue to support independent media and consider becoming a member of Rumble Premium.
And if you're not on Awake and Wonder yet, you're missing I'm sitting out on Break Bread.
Look at the light in my eyes.
Look at the glory I have.
We are being attacked from every angle and yet we feel stronger than ever.
And that is because of the stuff I'm learning on Break Bread.
So become an Awaken Wonder and join me for Break Bread every single week.
We will be back tomorrow for another fantastic show.
Rudy Giuliani, he was the mayor of the United States, of New York City, excuse me, during the time.
That's how easily I'm distracted.
That pen.
He was the mayor of New York City during 9-11.
He is going to be talking to us about stolen votes, about stolen hearts, and will Trump be able to govern the way he's campaigned?
And those of you that are concerned about Trump, I'm going to have questions for Rudy Giuliani about that too.
Join me tomorrow, not for more of the same, but for more of the different.
Until then, if you can, stay free.
Many switch in, switch on, switch off.
Many switch in, switch on, switch off.
Many switch in.
▲
Export Selection