All Episodes
Previous Next
July 4, 2024 - Stay Free - Russel Brand
01:05:11
TRUMP'S SHOCKING LEAK: Biden Destroyed | UK Elections: Just a New Face for Globalism? - SF 400
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
so so
Brought to you by Pfizer.
In this video, you're going to see the kid first.
We're getting some breaking news.
We've got a live shot there.
Hello there you Awakening Wonders, thanks for joining us today for Stay Free with Russell Brand and what an important day it is.
In our country there's a general election where you get the opportunity to vote for another centralist in your nation.
Happy Independence Day!
What a move you made in severing ties with that syphilitic, unelected Decaying, senile monarch George III in order to ultimately end up being led by that, I'm not suggesting syphilitic, but definitely senile autocrat that's sort of unresponsive and seemingly hovering above democracy.
Nevertheless, there seems to be a charge to replace him now.
It appears too that whatever dear Joe Biden is suffering from is spreading throughout your nation, throughout his party.
Well, you worked in the White House with him for all those years.
Every expectation that assuming everything goes well, in five days we're going to see the president back running around the country again.
Yeah, I think so.
Oh no.
The last thing you need, I think, if you're in a time of political crisis, is an endorsement from another loathed individual.
Like, Ted Bundy shouldn't ask for Jeffrey Dahmer to be a character witness, right?
So is this going to help Joe Biden?
It just looked like a bad night because my interaction with him was what I described in the book and what happened even subsequent to what I described in the book after I got out.
You know, he's very probing in his questions, very analytical, very calm about things.
When you go in to brief him, Major, you better really know your topic because he's going to ask you Very relevant questions, and he's very reflective on things, and just doesn't jump out with conclusions or anything, but is very analytic.
He doesn't jump out with conclusions.
The whole thing's extraordinarily baffling, and it appears that effectively we are now into the process of selecting a new candidate, and I'm really interested to watch how the mosaic is created, how the tiles are laying out.
Because it would seem to me that if anyone that was watching independent media of this variety, you would be well aware that Joe Biden was likely to struggle in a 90-minute on-camera situation.
Surely then, the people closest to him, the people that were advising him, were similarly appraised of reality.
So how is it that they seem so baffled?
Or are we just watching an unfolding strategy?
You'll be aware that many people that occupy this kind of space, our kind of space, independent media, anti-establishment punditry, would say that if you're trying to generate a situation, you can't just go from A to Z. You have to create incremental episodes.
Let me know in the chat, in the comments, do you believe that what we're experiencing now is the maneuvering?
In fact, was the debate itself part of a maneuvering towards the removal of Joe Biden?
Why was the debate three months early?
Why was that, before he became the official nominee?
Why was it prior to the Democratic Party convention?
Is it that we are now in a period where either Gavin Newsom will be pushed to the forefront, or Gavin Nuisance, as a lot of people call him, or where Kamala Harris rightly assumes her position as President of the United States?
One person I feel pretty sorry for in all this, actually, is Karen Jean-Pierre, the White House Press Secretary, who has to continually Manage exhausting questions.
I can't imagine that she has any kind of private life now where she's able to sort of slough off the exhaustion of having to deal with a less obedient press pack.
Although it's difficult to imagine that they would be as polite and as compliant as they currently are while under Donald Trump.
We can recall that they weren't.
Here she is anyway just Exhaustedly trying to come up with some combination of reasons that could justify that debate performance, presumably as we ultimately prepare the way for another candidate.
Is it jet lag?
Is it a cold?
Is it dementia?
There's no question that international travel can be rigorous.
I think the confusion is that he's still suffering from the effects of that nearly two weeks later.
When she heard she got this job, it must have been a good moment, mustn't it?
To be the White House Press Secretary.
It must be like, yes, I've done it.
I've done it.
I've reached this position.
Now, all she's thinking is, give me my MSNBC show.
I'm sick of this.
I just want my paid media gig.
Like, she does not look very happy.
That's someone fulfilling their dreams.
In a way, it gives us an opportunity to look at the inability of this system to fulfil any of us.
All of us, like just little nodes dragged temporarily into a net.
The system breathes you in, whether you're Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton or Carrie Jean-Pierre or presumably people from across the aisle and across the political spectrum.
It uses you for a while and it sputters you back out, a broken and emptied husk.
Your dreams spent, your hope expired.
...articulate a little bit about, like, do you guys usually have accommodations for him after he does a trip?
That he's gonna have jet lag for that long a period of time?
These are, like, trivial questions.
Is there normally, like, after he's done a trip, is there a way to get him back?
Like, why are we examining, like, the sort of the entrails, the discarded... Like, we're in the autopsy of that performance.
We're in the autopsy of Joe Biden's presidency.
Either he runs and loses to Trump or they put forward Kamala Harris, who presumably still loses to Trump, or they take some sort of radical Michelle Obama, Gavin Newsom step and presumably still lose to Trump in a sort of a fair...
And balanced bout, one might assume.
Remember, this is the 4th of July.
This is Independence Day.
In our country, there are elections.
But what we're really dealing with now, I think, are various sets of institutional systems trying to cling to power through authoritarianism, which they cannot Overtly declare, so have to justify through crises.
If there isn't a pandemic or a war, then Donald Trump is the crises.
They have to frame the election as saving democracy itself.
But that narrative can't be sustained now that we've all seen Joe Biden in his natural environment that appears to be sort of weary senility.
And in our country, they're pushing forward a very carefully managed bureaucrat.
We'll be talking about him a little later, but Spare a thought for Carrie Jean-Pierre, who not long ago was just a little girl with a dream, who achieved that dream and just found that ultimately it's like cleaning up a cat litter tray filled with turds of dementia.
So when you say two weeks later, what do you mean?
He arrives back in the United States 12 or 13 days before the debate.
So his explanation for a poor debate performance is jet lag.
So what I want to say is it's the jet lag and also the cold, right?
It is the two things that occurred.
And you all heard it in his voice when he did the debate, right?
And it is not even something that we shared ahead of time.
You heard it in his voice and we confirmed it.
And I think that's important to note as well, like it is the jet lag and the cold.
Jet lag and the cold.
It's jet lag squared.
It's cold plus.
For a moment, zoom back and reflect on the level of excellence that you would really require from a person who occupies the position of what amounts to world king.
You are world king.
Are you able to fulfil that role if you are tired or if you have caught a virus in a world where viruses seem increasingly likely?
The answer has to be yes.
Or indeed, maybe consider whether or not you want a role called World King, or you might want to look at decentralising power wherever possible, having some nominal head of the United States of America, federalising wherever possible, empowering governors and states and Towns and cities and boroughs and principalities as much as possible rather than continuing to prop up a system that's expiring before our very eyes.
Look at that sort of gerrymandering and maneuvering of information as compared to the casual, off-the-cuff, out-the-back-of-a-golf-buggy, lackadaisical, spitting troves and disses and bars quite lazily there with the clubs on his back, Donald Trump while being secretly filmed.
By a member, presumably of one of his own golf clubs.
Look at the difference between the management of information here we're seeing from the official White House press secretary.
It's a cold!
First plush jet lag, versus Donald Trump just going, he's out, he's over, he's a pile of crap.
You gave me so much.
How did I do with the debate the other night?
Oh, you were fantastic.
Did you get all broken down, pile of crap?
Yeah.
It's a bad guy.
He just quit, you know, he's quitting the rest.
Is that right?
Yep.
I got him out of the race.
And that means we have Kamala.
I think she's gonna be better.
She's so bad.
She's so pathetic.
It's so amazing.
She's so fucking bad.
I just can't imagine.
Can you imagine that guy dealing with Putin and the president of China, who's a fierce person?
He's a fierce man.
A very tough guy.
And they see him, they probably... But they just announced he's probably quitting.
Good.
Very good.
Just keep knocking him out, right?
Off he goes just to continue playing golf quite casual and relaxed in this while the Democrat party apparently collapses into total panic, spiralling and decline as their whole narrative, as their whole strategy disappears down the toilet.
If indeed it is to be Kamala Harris, we better have a look at her.
We better look at how she campaigned when she too was pursuing the nomination.
As president, you better look at what her skills are when she's out interacting in public.
If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be with you for another five minutes, then the rest of the show will be being streamed, of course, on Rumble.
And you might want to consider being in Awakened Wonder.
That's our locals community where we make additional content, do little after-show parties, and give you access to more content.
Let's have a bit of access now to Kamala Harris.
Potentially the next president of the United States of America.
How does she communicate when unbridled and free?
You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?
You exist in the context.
Of all in which you live and what came before you.
That's right, we exist in the context of all right.
Okay, again, now it's difficult.
I don't understand that one either.
But nevertheless, it looks like she is being maneuvered into a position of unimaginable power.
Biden is facing, it says here in the legacy media, increasing pressure to withdraw his
candidacy following the debate performance and it's likely to be Kamala Harris.
A CNN poll published Tuesday found that Harris was within striking distance of Trump.
She could strike at him in a hypothetical matchup, 47% support in the former president
and 45% support in Harris.
So it may yet become real.
Glenn Greenwald reminds us that in 2020 she called Biden a racist and the New York Times,
the legacy media that's now backing her, didn't like her.
I do remember that moment when she called Biden a racist and I thought, oh yeah.
Yeah, she's kind of a plucky individual.
This is interesting.
But when you see her speak extensively, there are a lot of peculiar slogans and poems.
Here's Donald Trump talking with Tucker a little while ago on the subject of Kamala Harris, saying that she speaks in rhymes a lot of the time.
She has some bad moments.
Her moments are almost as bad as his.
I think his are worse, actually.
Yeah.
She seems pretty senile, too.
She speaks in rhyme.
It's weird.
It's weird.
But she has bad moments.
In rhyme?
Well, the way she talks, the bus will go here, and then the bus will go there, because that's what buses do.
It's weird.
The whole thing is weird.
This is not a president of the United States future.
Maybe we created a monster, maybe we created conditions that were unreasonable.
What do you want from a leader?
Do you want someone that's mind is based in logistics and operations?
What do you expect from the government?
What do you expect from a president?
Is it reasonable anymore to expect them all to have some Clinton-esque trick like a saxophone or to be good at keeping a soccer ball up or Like Tony Blair?
Or to be affable and charming?
What is a president now?
Are they post-Reagan all essentially actors?
What do you expect from a leader?
Do you want dedicated and devout public servants?
Or do you want a showman?
What is it?
Is it just a symbol now?
Do you think anyone's really capable of holding up the freight of the level of world power that the United States currently wields?
Do you think that any of the individuals we're discussing now are capable of tackling the
peculiar problems of emerging financial models that will oppose the dollar in the process
of de-dollarization?
Do you think there is a person that is available to us that can help with the escalating conflict
between Ukraine and Russia, events in the Middle East, opposition increasing against
China?
Who is it?
Which individual human being, which human being can tackle a problem of that magnitude?
Is it Gavin Newsom, who must surely regard Adam Carolla as a kind of, it's on the next page for me here mate, as a kind of personal nemesis at this point.
Here's Adam Carolla on the day of the election talking to Gavin Newsom.
And then a clip that I saw for the first time myself a little while ago, where Gavin Newsom gets shut down by Adam Carolla in a way that makes you realize why he was one of the first people to succeed in this podcast space.
He crushes Gavin Newsom.
The first one's good, but the second one's amazing.
Stay with us for it.
If you're watching this on YouTube, we'll be here for a couple more moments.
Adam Carolla here.
Governor, why did you shut the beaches in California during COVID?
Yeah, I think we all were working on information at the time.
We had no basis of deeply understanding the virus.
Even that's not a good enough answer because it suggests that in the absence of information, the tendency is towards authoritarianism rather than liberty.
And I would say that liberty is a principle that seems pretty significant.
in the United States history, constitution, self-image, general rhetoric, understanding,
personal mythology on Independence Day, who someone whose instinct is control, control,
authority, authority. Does that seem like a viable president to you? Let me know. It's just a question.
I know anything. So why did you shut the beach like Florida?
If you didn't know anything, why did you shut the beaches? Well, we didn't know.
Because people were concerned early in the pandemic.
Information was coming out as it relates to how it was transferred, the disease, and people were cautious, trying to keep people alive.
And I should say this, I didn't let him go in the sunshine and get vitamin D and exercise, so he shut the beaches.
Okay.
And you arrested a guy who was paddleboarding in the bay.
He arrested a guy that was paddle boarding in the bay.
I like how he talks.
I like it that sort of Gavin Nuisance might be a David Hasselhoff style figure that bay watches and interjects in sort of crime that's near the seashore.
Hey, you're paddle boarding in the I'm going to shut this shit down.
For all we know, something could be happening.
Listen, we're going to leave you if you watch this on YouTube now.
We've got so much more coming up.
We're going to be talking about the UK election, which is obviously significant and pivotal to a good many people.
We are about, presumably, to elect Keir Starmer, a centralist, globalist fan of Davos, a man who doesn't seem to keep his promises, whether it's on gender theory, whether it's on pledges to the the people of Liverpool against media magnates, whether it's
to Julian Assange, whether it's to the CIA and his own party, he's a
significant figure, yet there are likely to be gains for populism in the form of Nigel
Farage. Click the link, join us for this. I want to just enjoy with you this next
clip. I saw it for the first time because I didn't know much about Adam Carolla
other than he's a kind of early adopter and pioneer in the online space and
in particular the podcast space and I was really astonished to see how he
deals with Adam Carolla in this conversation.
It's just like watching someone, like his mind must work very quickly, watch how he handles this and the subject is sort of race and Whether or not particular demographics suffer more economically, or put more bluntly, from poverty than other races.
It'll be interesting to hear in the chat how you lot feel about that.
But certainly Adam Carolla pushes Gavin Newsom to the point where if what he is doing is virtue signalling, or pretending to care about something he doesn't really care about, or trying to use an argument to appear a particular way, Adam Carolla does not allow that to take place in a very deliberate and brilliant way.
Have a look at this.
Half of African-Americans in the state of California, roughly half of Latino families, have no access to a checking account or an ATM.
Things we take for granted.
They don't have a checking account.
What's wrong with them?
Well, because they don't have the resources to sock those things away.
Why do we have them?
A lot of different reasons, but roughly half those families don't.
Why do Armenians have them?
But where they end up is in check-cashing places.
But I want to know why those groups.
Why those two groups don't have access?
It just happens to be that way.
So they're flawed?
No, they're hardly flawed, but they're struggling.
Genetically flawed?
Hardly.
Do Asians have this problem?
A lot of communities have problems.
A lot of whites have these problems.
So it's not just black and Hispanic?
No, but I'm giving you... But why did you bring up black and Hispanic?
Because the magnitude is ominous.
But why so many of them?
It just happens to be the magnitude.
Is that the way God planned it?
Not at all.
Well, what happened to them?
There are a lot of issues, and the communities are struggling.
Why are they struggling?
A lot of different reasons.
Lack of opportunity.
Hispanics have been here.
Blacks have been here longer than we've been here.
Well, we can surmise all that.
What about Asians?
They were put in internment camps.
Yeah, we, in fact, it all initiated out of San Francisco.
The Chinese Exclusion Act came out of progressive San Francisco.
Are they the chess boys?
A lot of Asians certainly do.
Why don't you conclude them?
Because the only reason why is the magnitude of the problem.
There's so many more.
The magnitude in percentage terms of Africa.
But there's no way to figure out how that happened.
We could talk about it.
You know what I'm dealing with?
I don't want to have a sociological debate.
Sure, why would you?
No, here's why.
Why would you want to do that?
Because the person from the Times wouldn't write good things about you if you did that.
No, no, that's not the case because I want to deal with reality.
You want to deal with reality?
I want to deal with the reality of people that are struggling, people are suffering.
I want to deal with the problems in a pragmatic way.
Why are they struggling and suffering?
We can hold hands and surmise about all these underlying reasons.
I don't want to do that.
I want to focus on the challenge.
Why are they struggling?
A lot of folks are struggling because they can't find jobs.
Why blacks and Hispanics?
Why blacks and Hispanics?
Across the board.
Why?
Okay, so everybody.
Everybody's struggling.
So Asians are suffering just as much as blacks.
The face of welfare is not an African-American family.
It's Asian, Jewish, it's all of them.
Caucasian, it's a lot of folks who are struggling.
Okay, so we're all struggling.
A lot of folks are struggling.
Amazing.
I love the way that Adam Carolla closes Gavin Newsom down and it exposes something that's pretty common these days, a kind of deracinated rhetoric that's not attached to virtue, principle or anything, that's just a kind of Untethered set of pledges and ideas that operate as just a kind of platform upon which to walk to power.
If there is going to be a replacement for Joe Biden, Adam Carolla should conduct the debate.
If it's going to be Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris, I want to see that debate.
Moderated by Adam Carolla.
But what does it matter really?
Can you see that there's a route to power for the Democrat Party after the exposure of this ineptitude?
And do you feel that a second Trump presidency is going to meaningfully change America?
Is it going to change the world for you?
I suppose what you probably feel Is that it will mean a withdrawal from the Ukraine-Russia conflict.
It might mean significant change to the deep state agencies.
It might mean less censorship.
I wonder what the hysteria of the Democrat Party establishment is all about after there's already been a term of Trump.
And as far as I can tell, whilst I appreciate there were no significant wars, was it that different?
And will it be that different tomorrow morning when we wake up Under the rule of a new government in the UK, stewarded by another globalist.
Take it over from the current globalist.
We're going to be looking at the UK election after this message from our partner.
Fielder greens could be the key to a good health future for you.
It's not like any other green product out there, where it's just watered down extracts.
With fielder greens, you get an organic superfood.
Whole fruits and vegetables selected by legit doctors that care about health to support your bodily functions, whether that's heart, liver, kidneys, your metabolism, or most importantly, in my view, the immune system.
Field of Greens is backed by a better health promise.
You will notice your health improve, your vitality, your nails, your hair, your shimmering visage improve before your very eyes, or they're going to give you your money back.
Get started by getting 15% off And free shipping by using my code.
If you use my code BRAND when you visit BrickHouseRussell.com, two S's, two L's, and use the promo code BRAND, you too could be fighting against time.
You too could be preventing entropy and decay.
You too could have glimmering organic systems shimmering with brick house goodness by using Fielder Greens.
So use the promo code BRAND at BrickHouseRussell.com for 15% off and free shipping.
Let's get back to the content.
Are any of these political solutions going to meaningfully change our life?
The elections, the nomination of a new leader for the Democrat Party, an election in the United States in November.
Are we attached to or connected with the source and resource that we require?
Are we making the steps that are necessary?
That's why since becoming baptised a couple of months ago, I've been talking to a lot of Christians.
I've been exploring my own faith.
I've been trying to surrender more.
I'm trying to make sense of how this book or library of books is applicable in my life today.
For if a spiritual theology ain't applicable right now to you and to me, what is it?
It's just aesthetics.
It's just an artifact.
It's just some pretty historical object.
No!
I need a living faith and I need a living connection and that's why I had a conversation
with Bishop Barron, a high up Catholic who's been extremely successful in the online space
in conveying his message and the message of his religion.
If you are an awakened wonder, this will be up from tomorrow.
You get access to it a week early.
Same as you did with our Jonathan Ruby conversation.
Same as you get access to the five things I can't live without.
The reason to become an Awakened Wonder is you are supporting us, you are part of our movement, and we will be responsive to you, ensuring that you're a member of our book club, a member of our meditation group, that you get first access to live event tickets, like the live shows I'm doing in the United Kingdom and the United States.
We give first access to you.
And here is just a moment of me talking With Bishop Barron, and in this clip, he explains how we shouldn't look at the Bible as a book, but as a library.
And he indeed indicates that that library has one very particular point to make.
It's a fascinating clip, enjoy it.
The Bible is not a book, it's a library.
And this is a huge problem with a lot of the opponents of religion.
When they say, oh, the Bible, you know, is all this nonsense, and it's pre-scientific, and it's Bronze Age mythology, and you can't take it literally, etc.
And I always say, look, it's like walking into a library and saying, do you take the library literally?
Well, it just depends.
What section are you in?
Because the Bible, it's a collection of texts written at different times by different authors to different audiences
to different purposes and using wildly different genre.
🎵 Click the link in the description and take advantage of the
special offer to become a member of our community.
Like Sensitive Hearts, like Ashella, like Claude, like Kay Cotswolds.
Become one of us, one of us. Make them one of us.
By the time you are watching this, the assumption is that Keir Starmer, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service,
that's like being an Attorney General, Career politician, or at least career bureaucrat.
A man who appears like Gavin Newsom, willing to change his opinion according to the currents and climate of the time.
Not as a result of personal evolution, not as a result of further import, but because of polling, because of data, because we are moving, no doubt, into a political era.
That it's not about vision, but it's about management.
We have a management class of politicians that many people believe are just managing the decline of our nations, ensuring that we facilitate further globalist centralised authority.
Making sure that when the various crises that we encounter impecuniate and impoverish large portions of the population, we're able to be controlled, that we've been introduced to control mechanisms, like being locked in our house, or being told we have to carry certain documents, or maybe even introducing the idea of chips under the skin, or maybe saying you have to take certain medications.
These are ideas that are difficult to corroborate.
But over time, because of the miracle of independent media and instantaneous communication, we can track in real time the kind of things these political leaders say and then what they do.
Keir Starmer is significant because he has openly said his allegiance is to Davos rather than his own nation.
Now, maybe from his perspective, Davos is just a conference where billionaires and world leaders get together, and indeed, if there is a global conspiracy to control the world, we probably won't know the times and places that they meet up, and what owl god they worship, and what type of robes they wear, and what kind of sacrifices are made.
All of those things must remain in the realm of conjecture, but what we can observe over time, is whether or not we believe in good faith, The things that these political figures tell us.
It's likely this election will be defined by a centralist Labour Party landslide.
It's no longer the Labour Party of the trade unions or the Working Party.
It's a Labour Party that represents a certain set of cultural values and a metropolitan professional class.
That's why we're seeing the rise of reform and populism currently headed up by Nigel Farage.
The clear question about Keir Starmer is, obviously for anyone at the most basic level, is will Britain under Keir Starmer improve?
Can we trust him?
Can we rely on him?
What kind of leader of the opposition was he?
What kind of ally was he to former leaders of the Labour Party?
What's his relationship with the deep state?
What's his relationship with the truth?
Let's have a look at Keir Starmer making a pledge to the people of Liverpool who have always hated the Sun newspaper because the Sun newspaper, after the disaster that was Hillsborough where 97 people ultimately died as the result of poor policing and poor conditions in the ground, were condemned and blamed for their own tragic deaths.
The Sun ran to print a headline, The Truth, at a front page that condemned, criticised and even sneered at the people of Liverpool.
The Sun newspaper is important because it was a very significant populist device, as well as being owned, of course, by Rupert Murdoch, who still remains very powerful, at least his organisations remain powerful, in British media.
Here we see Keir Starmer telling the people of Liverpool I would never give an interview to The Sun.
I think he even touches his heart.
After what they did to your city, I never would do that.
Well, all you have to do to see if someone's got integrity is watch and wait.
So, let us, like the people of Liverpool, watch and wait and see what Keir Starmer says and how it matches up with what he ultimately does.
This city has been wounded by the media.
The sun in this city.
A hurt for this city.
And I certainly won't be giving interviews to the sun during the course of this campaign.
Yeah, see?
That's worked.
I've said a thing.
People like that.
Good.
Good on me.
I'm playing this crowd.
Hang on a minute.
I'm brilliant.
Look at me go.
Yeah, this is me.
I am delighted to have the support and the backing of The Sun.
I think that shows just how much this is a changed Labour Party.
It certainly does.
What it shows you is that the Labour Party ultimately, like all political parties, has to form relationships with the media, with corporate globalists that have business interests in a variety of territories that they are We are able to cross-reference and cross-pollinate in order to create favourable conditions, primarily, I assume, economically, but that might play out in ways that I can't even begin to speculate on.
But what I will tell you is that that story was breaking on Sky News, that's ultimately owned, at least for a significant part of its history, was ultimately owned and considerably influenced by Rupert Murdoch and News International and the newspaper that they're talking about, the Sun newspaper, is owned by Rupert Murdoch and News International and these
instruments are used to create the kind of consensus among what you might call working class
people or blue collar people to ensure that they're shepherded and herded in the general
direction when it comes to general elections that is suitable for very powerful
interests.
Maybe it's not so pronounced in our country as it is in yours.
But we are governed by elites.
Maybe our elites were monarchistic, oligarchical, aristocratic, and yours have been billionaire and globalist and corporatist.
The truth is I simply don't know enough to say.
But what I do know is that democracy in its current form is a type of tyranny with SOMA, to use a Huxley-esque piece of language there.
We are medicated.
We are docile, not as docile as President Joe Biden, but we are kept, I would say, subdued and distracted, presented with the sort of spectacle of election day.
Yeah, we get to vote!
We get to vote and then what?
Because now, because history appears to be moving faster just because of the sheer weight of information, we can calculate, catalogue and observe in real time what these people say and what they do.
Now I'm not saying that I haven't made mistakes or changed my mind or changed my trajectory.
Indeed, many of you watching this will say, well, Russell, didn't you used to be like a champagne socialist?
Go back and watch all the stuff I say.
What you'll always sense is anti-establishment, anti-establishment, doubtful, cynical, sceptical, looking for God, confused, baffled, making mistakes every day.
Thank the Lord for this book!
Thank the Lord for the possibility of redemption.
Thank the Lord for the possibility of change that goes beyond the thin grawl and offerings of a system that is interested in nothing but keeping us all contained and controlled.
To give you a little more insight, here is once more, if you've not seen it yet, Keir Starmer, prior to becoming leader, pledging his allegiance to Davos, the WEF, globalism, over Westminster, the National Parliament, which in itself is already Once removed from the people, controlled, co-opted and manipulated.
Let's just ask you quickly, you have to choose now between Davos or Westminster?
Davos.
Why?
Because Westminster is too constrained and you know it's closed and we're not having meaning.
Once you get out of Westminster, whether it's Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people.
People like Klaus Schwab, real people like Albert Baller.
I'm a man of the people, of the billionaire class.
Now a few more things about Keir Starmer, the presumed leader of the United Kingdom.
Is he our Macron?
Is he our Trudeau?
Is he just a reshuffling of Rishi Sunak?
You tell me in the comments and the chat.
Certainly, when he was leader of the opposition, he had ample opportunity, particularly with his experience as head of the CPS, to make it clear that he was opposed to the incarceration without trial of the now blessedly released Julian Assange.
Did he do that?
Was that his position?
Was he regularly going to Belmarsh where Julian Assange was incarcerated to go, this is disgusting, the minute I'm Prime Minister, you're out of there.
What was his position?
He says he's anti-Sun, then he announces proudly that the Sun are supporting him.
What does he do about a real journalist held in jail?
Well, let's have a look.
The CPS, England and Wales' public prosecutor, has deleted all its record of its former head Keir Starmer's trips to the US, it can be revealed.
Starmer served as Director of Public Prosecutions for that period there, 2008 to 2013, during the period where Julian Assange's proposed extradition was being overseen.
During his time in the post, the CPS was marred by irregularities surrounding the case of the WikiLeaks founder.
The organisation has admitted to destroying key emails related to this silence case, mostly covering the period when Starmer was in charge.
Hmm, that's extremely interesting.
But what was he like when he was head of the CPS?
You may have seen him on various phone-ins, which are designed really to garner populist appeal.
Let a member of the public talk to a new leader.
Drag them over the coals, grill them on an important issue.
I recently saw Keir Starmer talking about female-only spaces after he had spoken out, sort of quite vociferously, on gender identity issues, saying that there is no such thing as a biological female, and then saying there is such a thing as a biological female, or can a woman have a penis, and all of those cultural arguments that, ultimately, I think we can all get a little bit distracted by, and perhaps the general principle of, you know, allow people to be who they are, and love, and love, and protect, and remember, Allow people to be who they are would be a two-way street.
You would say, yeah, yeah, yeah, you run your life how you want to.
And then they would say to you, yeah, you run your life how you want to.
That's a sort of principle that's in this little old book, baby.
Although there are some pretty strong moral suggestions in there as well.
I'm not oblivious to that.
Here is some information on how Keir Starmer handled a spate of riots that broke out in London about 12 years ago now, which in a way were a response to the kind of nihilism that was beginning to pervade the country in the post-2008 economic environment.
It was of course ignited by the death of a young black man in police custody, but at the time I remember feeling That just beneath the surface there is a powder keg waiting to go off.
People are sick and tired of the establishment.
People are sick and tired of politicians like this.
People are sick and tired of having nothing to vote for.
Nothing that makes any difference.
They're sick and tired of hearing empty rhetoric.
What we actually need is control of our own individual lives, our own communities, and the ability to truly be different without getting trapped in the linguistic quagmire of cultural issues.
Here is how Keir Starmer, who was head of the CPS then, The most powerful lawmaker in the land.
This is how he handled that period.
The penal response to the rioters was enormous and unprecedented in a bid to ramp up the shock and awe of the criminal justice system.
Remember, you first heard the phrase shock and awe when?
In the Iraq war, when there was an imperial attack on Iraq based on the lies of WMDs, which was ultimately a colonial war rebooted and repackaged, which created more terrorism.
Well, Keir Starmer wanted to create shock and awe.
In the justice system, in order to shut down an uprising, what could grow into an uprising, because if you're going to change the world and it's not going to be by the ballot box, and it won't be by the ballot box because the ballot box prohibits that, one way or another, right guys?
Then it's going to be by public disobedience and public action.
Obviously I'm not suggesting violent action, but I think disobedience and mass movements and grassroots movements are obviously going to be required to create meaningful change.
Now whenever you see something like that, Whether it's, you know, wow, do you pick your poison?
The January 6th insurrection, stroke protest, the Black Lives Matter protest.
All in all, whichever side you're on, and I know whoever you are watching this, you'll think that one of those sides was wrong, right?
You have to acknowledge That riots and public disturbances don't happen unless people are unhappy and disturbed.
And the great trick that the establishment is able to do is make us oppose one of those parties or one of those arguments.
If we were able to go, I support both of those groups in that I believe that the establishment should be overthrown and that new institutions that are truly representative of the people should be created.
Now the riots in London and across the UK were no different and because of that they were responded to with incredible authoritarianism.
How do you tally that with the kind of wokeism that Keir Starmer pays lip service to?
Because the people that were penalised under the instantaneous legislation were Young black people in significant numbers.
The Crown Prosecution Service, led at that time by Keir Starmer, immediately relaxed the threshold used to determine whether or not to press charges.
Long-standing advice that suspects under the age of 18 should not be tried for minor offences was suspended.
So, you know, they got rid of that.
Oh, these people are children.
Uh-uh.
Actions normally regarded as theft were treated as burglary so as to ensure maximum jail time.
They tweaked the conditions, they tweaked the laws, they tweaked what was their understanding of, oh well, for this type of crime the age is 16, for this one it's 18, for this one it's 20.
They changed it to make it as punitive as possible.
Cases were pushed from the magistrates to the Crown Court, ensuring that longer sentences were available and costing minors their right to anonymity in the press.
So they shamed people, huh?
Existing sentencing guidelines were abandoned, and despite criticisms that he was playing politics, Starmer ordered the courts to stay open 24-7.
Like Walmart!
Like Asda!
Supermarket justice round the clock!
Now, I mention this because this is now the leader of the United Kingdom.
Presumably, by now, What is it that he says in public?
I would never talk to the Sun.
What is it he does in public?
We are allies with the Sun.
Just watch!
We can see, can't we?
We'll be able to watch over real time how this plays out.
We'll be able to see how ordinary people's interests are served.
We'll be able to see whether it's a divisive administration that tries to find ways to smear and shut down dissenters to control any opposition, whether that's in the media or politically, whether the alliances appear to be to increasing war.
Every suggestion so far is that Keir Starmer will continue to fund this war, perhaps even sending British troops, perhaps even supporting ludicrous ideas like conscription.
We'll see, won't we?
We'll see.
We'll be able to watch that.
Play out.
Certainly, it's likely that we're seeing a rise in populism as a response to this kind of authoritarianism.
That's the thing I've never understood about the Democrats in the United States.
You are creating Trump's popularity with your own decline.
With your own disingenuity, with your own errors.
And if the response to losing Biden is newsome, or Kamala Harris, when you could have had Bobby Kennedy, when you could have undertaken, forget personalities and figureheads, a massive, massive inner reckoning.
And in an inventory of yourself, of like, where have we gone wrong?
Well, what happened is we stopped supporting people.
We stopped supporting ordinary people.
We got co-opted by the corporate donor class.
Our most notable politicians are totally identified with either financial corruption, like Nancy Pelosi, whether rightly or wrongly, I'm certainly not alleging anything, or warmongery, like Hillary Clinton.
And sometimes worse in both of those cases.
Jesus, in the corners of the internet that I have sometimes had the misfortune to visit, there are rumours abound that are pretty appalling and I pray, I pray to God they're not true.
But there's no doubt that this lack of trust has led to the rise of a new political movement that does seem to be anti-immigration, that is pro-national because people want control of their countries again, and does sometimes give way to, sometimes we would have to say, good public orators that are able to manoeuvre a crowd.
And when you're looking at what's available to you, you have to choose.
What do you want?
Authoritarian globalists or slightly retroactive, patriotic, somewhat nostalgic anti-immigration when both of them, all of the main parties are anti-immigration to some degree now?
That argument seems to have been won.
What is it that you want?
What is it that you're going to choose?
Because I imagine that we're going to have seen a good number of votes for reform if not a significant number of reform seats, but maybe, maybe
there'll even be surprises there.
Let's have a look at this because certainly one indication of that, or the rise of a globalist
movement, is that a figure like Nigel Farage can now go on Jordan Peterson's podcast. Doubtless
he'll soon have a conversation with Tucker Carlson. So while the central authoritarian
establishment controls certain media spaces, There are a plethora of alternatives that are actually more powerful now emerging.
They cannot control the narrative anymore.
That's what terrifies them more than anything else.
Man, once in a while I need a little caffeine.
And whilst it hurts me to celebrate 1775 as a British person, this is your Independence Day, this is your revolution, and this should be your coffee!
Hey, this is exciting.
We've got a great partner today.
It's Rumble.
But beyond Rumble, it's Rumble's latest venture.
Let me ask you first, are you a Sleepy Joe type character with zero cognitive performance, struggling to master focus and brainpower for basic things like running the United States of America?
You gotta stop drinking woke, liberal coffee that hates you and your way of life.
And start your day by drinking Rumble's very own 1775 coffee.
This is gonna be the best tasting coffee you've ever had.
Seriously good, ethically sourced, from a family farm in the high altitude mountains of Bolivia.
Not in the Bolivian lowlands run not by a family but by a single man still living with a pe- No!
Instead of waking up and drinking your big corporation owned woke ideology coffee that's probably making you sick from the pesticides it's sprayed with, try Rumble's!
1775 Revolutionary Coffee.
Support freedom of speech.
Build a parallel economy that actually values you and loves you.
My favourite?
It's dark, of course.
I've always found the lure of the dark irresistible.
I'm sorry, how can I stay mad at you, but you're just gonna have to wait over there for a little while.
Level up your morning routine with a 1775 coffee.
Sleep all night knowing your hard-earned dollary dues are going towards supporting freedom-loving creators like me on Rumble.
Visit 1775coffee.com now, pick up your first bag, use the code BRAND to save 10% on your first order.
Oh, come on.
Why choose, you know?
Okay, back to the content.
Nigel Farage may have been attacked by the establishment media in what looks like it
may have been another one of those famous Channel 4 stitch-up jobs, in this instance
involving actors, potentially, it's still being scrutinised and analysed, but he can
go to more favourable media spaces around the world and still reach a significant audience.
We don't know just yet how impactful being able to talk to, say, Jordan Peterson will
be when dealing with a British electorate, but if there is a rise of what is known as
the alt-right or right-wing politics or newly emerging conservatism, then an interview like
this one will be significant.
This election isn't really about the Conservatives and Labour Party, which would be the same as the Democrats and Republicans in your country.
It's more like the Democrat Party, a centralist, authoritarian, globalist party, versus a sort of Tea Party movement, as happened under George W there, or immediately prior, or an independent candidate like Bobby Kennedy.
It's extraordinary.
There are obvious differences.
There are differences in the setup of our nation, all sorts of differences, but there are perhaps significantly major changes in the way that global media operates.
So seeing Jordan Peterson talk to Nigel Farage is an indication an interesting indication of how those changes might affect
politics.
What does reform have to offer?
Well we believe in family, community and country.
We believe they're the three building blocks that matter to all of us, whatever age we are.
And if you deny those, well, you're entitled to deny those.
But it's rather important that through the education system, people don't just hear that argument, they hear the positive argument.
And I think what progressivism is doing, it's confusing.
Young people.
I mean, young men.
Young men are being told they can't be men.
We've got England through to the quarterfinals of the European Championships, as I speak, and they're being told that if you go to Germany, Please don't drink too much beer.
Please don't chant in the stadiums.
Please don't sing songs that are funny but might cause offence.
Please don't be young lads.
I mean, that's effectively what we're telling people through this progressive agenda.
And we're telling women, now look, you know, what's the problem?
You're in a changing room, you're in a locker room, and there's somebody there with male anatomy, but that person calls themselves a woman, so what's your problem?
And then when we send a double rapist, violent double rapist, to a woman's prison, we're telling women, don't complain, how dare you?
That's transphobic.
I mean, all this stuff does is totally confuse everyone, and then you can move on from that, to the diversity and inclusion agenda, which says that companies, corporate companies, government organisations don't employ people on talent.
No, no, no, no, no.
You've got to fill your quotas according to race, ethnicity, sexual preference.
And all we're doing here is we're dividing everybody up, we're putting them in pigeonholes, And far from bringing us together, actually all we're doing is causing ever greater division.
You'll have to tell me how that message impacts you and whether or not you think it will impact the British election.
There's not too much longer to wait till we see the final results of that.
But it appears that there is a significant counter-movement against authoritarianism, globalism and two-party systems that amount to a uniparty.
The previous incumbent, excuse me, of number 10 was Rishi Sunak.
Rishi Sunak, God love him, was the former Chancellor and before that a hedge fund manager
who you've heard me talk about a lot of times because he's married to the woman whose father
owns Infosys, which is a significant tech company that sponsors and is heavily involved
with the WEF.
He's hedge-fund invested in Moderna before, get this, before Covid.
Again, I'm not suggesting anything conspiratorial.
I know that there was Event 219.
I know that there were certain medications that were patented an extraordinary amount of years ago.
But when you see Rishi Sunak, it's pretty impossible to imagine that he's the kind of Machiavelli who might have exploited that type of knowledge or even been able to retain it.
What's pretty risible, though, is to watch him refer to himself while during hustings, during a kind of a political rally, that's what we call it in this country, as an underdog figure.
He's a pretty, I mean this in a sort of the most human sense, because one of the things I get from watching all of these elections and all of this, the kind of mad scramble and static and freneticism of election campaigns and leadership spats is A personal duty to return to a state of love.
Like, it's so kind of attractive and ugly and ghouling and ghoulish that I think, oh, then I must find love again in my heart.
I've been sucked into this nightmare.
So much pain and so much suffering, so much awfulness and that simple commandment, the final commandment of Christ, that they will know I am with you if you love one another.
And how hard that is to do sometimes.
How hard it is to find love in your heart when you're irritated, agitated, frustrated, fearful, lost, full of desire, full of self.
Must become our purpose.
Looking for that must become our purpose.
And when I'm in that state, it's very easy to see, until recently, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Rishi Sunak, is a kind of a sort of a sweet schoolboy, just trying his best in this world.
And perhaps we have to look at all of these people as simply trying their best and not to to regard them in the darkest light, but to regard them as
best as we can, with love.
It is not over until the final whistle blows, my friends.
That's a populist reference to a late goal in an England football match.
Yeah, that's right, football.
I know about football.
I'm just like you.
Remember when you invested in Moderna and then there was a health crisis and Moderna
stock shot up and you made a windfall that you'd never reveal to the public?
I remember that!
And I can also tell you that this underdog will fight to that final whistle with your support.
We have urgent work to do, my friends, because at this point now we only have a day left to save Britain from the danger of a Labour government.
A Labour government that might have a super-majority to hike up everyone's taxes by thousands of pounds, to shift our policy.
What's inside his eyes?
What is that behind his eyes?
What is his consciousness?
What is his heart?
Where is he now spiritually?
On some beach somewhere?
Another member of the former Prime Minister club?
Another person just shipwrecked off into the ...boardrooms of globalist firms just waiting for his next billion to roll out, take a seat on the board at Infosys, get back involved with another hedge fund.
There'll be people watching this right now that make money in a similar way, and who am I to judge anybody for what they do?
But it's interesting to watch increasingly what...
Is trackable as spectacle play out as if it really is an electoral process?
Let's have a look at him on the equivalent of like the today show or you know what's that show you have the view where like even the kind of Quite light and friendly TV hosts seem to be able to really drag dear Rishi Sunak over the coals in the twilight of his premiership.
What would be Rishi's dream final supper at number 10 before the night of 11?
Have you got a dinner planned with the girls?
I'll be at home in North Yorkshire.
Right.
What is on the menu?
We've made a dinner plan.
Do you feel like a little bit like sort of Kamala Harris or anything?
Like you feel like...
Why are we forcing these people into this pretense?
Why are we not awakening more quickly?
Should we even be blaming and damning them?
They're just really floating around in the currents of their class and their life and their professions.
Here I'm a kind of a financier person from a kind of hedge fund background.
Kamala Harris, she was a Attorney General, wasn't she?
Albeit not a very good one.
All of these political figures, Newsom, whatever, just doing what they think they're supposed to be doing.
Poor sods, part entertainer without the chops or charisma, part politician without the actual power, their strings being tugged.
from behind the scenes.
What do we expect from these people?
Shouldn't we just expect more of ourselves?
Is that it?
Is that what our prayer should be?
To look at them compassionately and move beyond them rather than continually making them the subject of our eye?
A serious question, let me know in the chat.
Well, my favourite meal generally is sandwiches, so that is...
Sandwiches.
Have to say sandwiches.
Like sandwiches, really.
What do you want in sandwiches?
Doesn't matter.
Don't say the sandwich is somewhat defined by its filling.
Not me.
Peanut butter and jelly.
Mouse tails.
Put anything you like in there, really.
Bovril.
Broken-ups.
Kettles.
Anything.
Put what you want.
Just sandwiches, really.
I'm a big sandwich person.
But actually, when I was out on election night, we have a bit of a tradition.
My local butcher, one of my local butchers, called...
A few local butchers, there's a local butcher there, there's a local butcher there.
... in Northalland and High Street, always do a special election pie.
Election pie?
Yeah, so you get a pork and apple...
I hope it's not a humble one.
No, no, no, it's a pork, it's a very good, you know, very good pork pie with a special chutney.
... gently mugged off from the bonket there on this morning, but even that sadly contributes
to the framing that the purge that's required will take place if that globalist is replaced
with the other globalists and that simply isn't going to make any difference.
But don't worry, because this is presumably being recorded.
And in four years we can look back and go, well, how was that?
And maybe it'll be like, wow, no, look at that, there's been sort of a generation of more jobs, there's more peace, there's more security, we're not involved in these wars anymore, there's more liberty and freedom, people feel happier, more spiritually engaged, the issues that matter to people appear to have been Listen to and addressed and people up and down the economic scale feel that there's a sort of fairness and justice to the way that their country is run that is in a sense what you would expect from a former head of the CPS being in charge.
It feels like a fair and decent society run in a fair and decent way.
Do you feel that's likely to happen or do you think it's more likely that in four years you'll be saying, oh no, there's been further decline?
Further dispute, further moves towards authoritarianism, globalism, surveillance and censorship and control, the packaging up and selling of your data, exploitation of crisis to implement further authority and control, increase in wars, an increase in wealth transfers, and just attempts to tell you that actually it's better than ever, like sort of bombastic speeches in the halls and corridors of power telling you that, well, it was your government that left us and we're still clearing up your... It'll be that, won't it?
That's what it will be.
So, in a way, It's our fault for continuing to participate and continuing to pretend that any kind of solutions are possible within that framework.
We keep giving people the qualities we wish they had.
They don't have these qualities and neither does this system.
It's systemic change that's required and if you see anyone that's offering that...
Vote for him.
If you don't, you might need to do what you want with that bit of paper.
It won't make a great deal of difference to you or to anyone else.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
Democracy everywhere or democracy nowhere seems to be the question of the day.
Happy Independence Day, people of America.
I hope that we get the leader in your country and in ours.
That we deserve.
Surely then the real work is in deserving more.
We'll see you tomorrow, not for more of the same, but, excuse me, sorry about all that, for more of the different, when we'll be letting you know about the results of these elections and of course...
Any further maneuverings or machinations in the political space across the world, where globalists and corporatists conspire to control us all, even as we awaken.
So we'll see you then.
Not for more of the same, but for more different until then, if you can.
▲
Export Selection