Biden being REPLACED? Dems Plans Uncovered. Far-Right VICTORY in French Elections. - Stay Free 397
Visit http://CHARLIS.beauty/Brand and use code “BRAND” for 20% offOrder your Contagion Kit today at http://twc.health/BRAND – BRAND / 10% off + FREE SHIPPING⏰ BE HERE AT 12PM ET / 5PM BST ⏰Is Biden about to be replaced? Why have all the left-wing news outlets suddenly turned on Joe Biden and was it planned from the start? I’ll also be discussing the likely upcoming “far-right” election victory in France and what might have caused it, Zelensky asking why there would be a problem involving NATO in the war to shoot down Russian missiles, as well as Tucker and Elon on the debate night fiasco! All this to come and more, remember to subscribe!Check out social medias and more - https://linktr.ee/RussellBrand
Hello you Awakening Wonders there on Spotify, Apple, Stink Whistle, Gurgle Dot, or wherever you download your podcasts these days to remain at least peripherally connected to some tendril of truth in a bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.
We appreciate you, and we love you.
You're part of our community.
So that's why we're very happy to give you an audio version of our live Rumble Show five days a week.
It's on Monday to Friday.
We decipher the latest news stories, we break down current topics that the mainstream media
should be covering, and if they aren't, then we critique why they're not and what they
are covering.
Every week as well, right, we do brilliant conversations with people like Jordan Peterson,
RFK, Tucker, Carlson, Sam Harris, Vandana Shiva, Gabor Mate.
These things are already up and you can listen to them now.
So remember, this is an audio version of our daily live show.
To tune in live, go to rumble.com/russellbrand.
4/RussellBrand.
You'll find it easily and I hope that you will love it.
Now please enjoy this episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand.
Thanks.
Hello there you awakening wonders.
Thanks for joining me today for Stay Free with Russell Brand.
A lot going on, breaking news.
Donald Trump does have at least partial immunity, it appears.
That's at least the ruling of the Supreme Court.
Let's have a look.
This is an ABC News special report.
Good morning, I'm Wade Johnson in New York.
We're coming on the air with major breaking news from the U.S.
Supreme Court on the final day of its term.
So I'm going to comb this bit of my hair up a little bit because I'm concerned that it's out of line with the rest of the do.
The court has just issued one of its most consequential rulings in recent decades, a decision that not only affects the 2024 race for president following last week's contentious debate, but also the future of the presidency itself from this day forward.
Moments ago, the justices ruling on Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution.
His core argument in both the 2020 election interference case in Washington, D.C.
and the classified documents case in Florida.
The court deciding this morning, presidents do have immunity for official acts, but there is no immunity for non-official acts.
The court then sending it back to the lower courts.
We beat Medicare this year!
We beat Medicare this year!
Well, it's extraordinary, isn't it, to watch this unravelling of the mainstream media.
It's a bit like, isn't it, conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact more broadly.
Like, haven't you been saying for the last couple of years, I'm a bit worried about Joe Biden and whether or not he might have premature, not even premature senility, senility at By an appropriate age, if ever such a sad and tragic thing could ever be called appropriate.
And now, finally, after it was shown live, it's being covered.
In a way, it's no different than the reporting around the pandemic, or the reporting around the origins of the Ukraine-Russia conflict.
For a while, there's this kind of low hum of what they regard as conspiracy theories and hate-speak, Where people say, I'm a bit worried about Joe Biden.
That doesn't look right.
He's wandered off in the wrong direction.
He didn't finish that sentence correctly.
He's making up numbers.
He can't just say that.
All these things about corn pop.
None of this stuff makes sense.
And eventually it sort of permeates the sphere of the mainstream.
And I can't work out what's happening because their hysteria suggests that it's a natural and organic reaction.
And yet it does seem tempting To consider, as Vivek Gramaswamy suggested, along with many others, that the reason that the debates were three months early was precisely to afford them the ability to replace a Joe Biden.
And certainly that seems like an increasingly necessary outcome.
But when you want reliable reactions, when you want the truth, even if he's not on CNN as much as we'd like, You turned to Brian Stelter, and that's what we're going to do now.
You may have turned away from Brian Stelter, as I have turned away from sin, but Brian is here for you, right here, right now.
Look, if you're in a battle between someone who lies really confidently versus someone who mostly tells the truth but really incoherently, the confident liar is always going to win.
And I think many millions of Americans... That's what he's framing this as now, is that The lies of Donald Trump are brilliantly delivered, whereas Joe Biden's lies are falteringly delivered, for surely there was much fact-checking to be had.
So, part of the legacy media are scrambling to reframe this.
We saw Rachel Maddow kind of say that over the course of it he got stronger and stronger, and by the end of it he was brilliant and bombastic and rousing and Churchillian.
And another portion of the establishment media, but the establishment more generally, are looking at ways to dispatch Joe Biden.
Who don't want to see Trump re-elected, were yelling at their TVs, wanting Biden to fight back harder, wanting to see an actual debate, an actual fight.
They didn't get that.
They came away disappointed.
And it makes me wonder if there will be any more debates at all.
We'll look at how this is being framed over the course of the show but we posted this on X earlier today if you're watching us on YouTube by the way guys we'll be there for another 10 minutes then we'll be exclusively available on Rumble and we're not just going to be discussing the debate and its fallout and the fact that in a way it can be seen as a pivotal moment in the Decay of our own trust in establishment narratives.
Perhaps a moment where they could no longer hold together the hydrogen-fueled, billuous balloon of nonsense that they have tried to place before our faces.
A barrage, in a sense, of nonsense and lies.
We'll be talking about that, but we'll also be talking a bit about RFK.
We'll be talking about the new Request from Zelensky that the airspace above Ukraine be protected by NATO, ultimately bringing us and the organizations that we fund further into this conflict.
We'll be looking at some of the stuff that Tucker's been saying on tour in Australia, but first let's Let's have a look at Joe Biden as he was in just 2019 where I don't remember thinking of him as a particularly garrulous and lucid individual but it is pretty alarming to see him in 2019 versus now and when you watch this I think the important thing to bear in mind and let me know what you think is that Joe Scarborough and the New York Times and various other outlets have literally been saying things like he's as sharp as a tack so forget like
If you can, Joe Biden, forget the fact that he's nominally the most powerful man in the world, forget the fact that he himself makes all sorts of extraordinary claims with motivations that are, who knows what personal motivations people have, but perhaps that's forgivable and even understandable.
But what's interesting is to see the legacy media attempt to reframe this.
How did they not notice it before, and what is it they're trying to do now?
Is it all an attempt to produce such a giddy and delirious state that none of us know what reality is anymore?
But here's one thing for sure that we can rely on and actually watch in real time.
This is the relationship between Joe Biden 2019 versus Joe Biden just last week.
I continue to think we have to make fundamental changes in civil rights.
And those civil rights, by the way, include not just only African Americans, but the LGBT community.
I did not oppose busing in America.
What I opposed is busing ordered by the Department of Education.
to the ability to for the I did not oppose busing in America. What I opposed is busing ordered by
the Department of Education. That's what I oppose. Making sure that we're able to make every single
solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do with the with the COVID. Excuse me with
dealing with everything we have to do with look if You will determine the outcome of this election.
Vote, vote, vote.
If you're able to vote early in your state, vote early.
If you're able to vote in person, vote in person.
Vote whatever way is the best way for you.
Because you will.
He cannot stop you.
And I'm going to continue to move until we get the total ban on the total initiative relative to what we're going to do with more border patrol and more asylum officers.
President Trump?
I really don't know what he said at the end of this and I don't think he knows what he said either.
Look, it's got to the point where even the legacy media are starting to abandon him and rescind their support.
It can still rely on a few people but what are their motivations?
When you see Nancy Pelosi who's a figure that doesn't really inspire a great deal of Trust going to bat for Joe Biden.
You have to wonder if this cadre of senescence and decay is somehow the living symbol of the decline that we are living through.
Elsewhere in the world, the media establishment Feeb Riley describes a lurch to the right as if nationalism and a connection to your land and political figures that talk about that country, your country's interests first, isn't an understandable response to this kind of peculiar, soulless, vampiric, Nosferatu-style zombie globalism that has no roots, that has no clear human aims.
That makes me, at least, consider that some gaseous demonic power has co-opted the world.
And on that note...
And, you know, while he may be saying we're enablers, we see Joe Biden up close.
We know how attuned he is.
What it was is we were too far away from him.
If you just get very, very close to television, you get real near, lean right into that debate, you suddenly realise he's like Oscar Wilde in there.
He's firing off the epigrams and the bon mots at a rate of knots.
It can't be distance, Nancy.
Is there another reason?
To the issues, how informed he is.
I debate with him about legislation.
Not debate, but... Imagine seeing Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden debating together.
That would be electrifying, wouldn't it?
That'd be like Gore Vidal and William Buckley again.
Throw James Baldwin into the mix.
It'll be extraordinary to watch those skilled, steel-on-steel, sharp minds.
Sparks are flying.
And the real winner?
Democracy itself.
Or the Republic.
I know that you have some strong attachments to those words.
They're in your country.
And I have some strong attachments to these principles.
Authenticity and integrity, decentralization and the sense that you somehow are tribally, viscerally connected to the way that your community is run.
Why should we be forced to conceptualize vast tracts of three hundred and thirty-three million people populated nation continents is a difficult
thing to bring into your mind and hold together, certainly for Joe Biden these days, and
I would imagine for Nancy Pelosi too. And it's only worth undertaking if there's some
extraordinary benefit to it.
Maybe what we are witnessing now is something more significant than whether or not you should
vote for Joe Biden or Donald Trump in November, or Kirstahmer or Rishi Sunak in a couple of
days in my country or whoever you're being offered in France.
It might be a little more fundamental than that, I sometimes think.
Isn't this time for us to summon somehow, collectively, a new vision?
And some of that may yet be arcane and simple.
Politics is managerial.
Politics is about organisation and logistics.
Maybe the vision has to be drawn from our hearts, from our collective spirits.
No longer can we perhaps rely on these corporatist, globalist, odd figures to tell us what it
is to be an American or a French person or a Chinese person or a Brit or a European.
Maybe we can't look to them anymore.
Joey Yodo in the chat says, "It's not a battle of good versus evil, it's a battle of morality
versus amorality."
But I suppose, Joey Yodo, from what would morality be derived if not an ontological
principle of goodness itself?
You can't derive morality from anything other than a universal notion of good unless you're
saying local cultural customs that amount to goodness, which are kind of strategic and
derived perhaps from evolutionary biology.
That's not going to work because I do believe in absolute good and absolute bad.
Maybe this is an argument we'll get into at a later time.
If you're watching us on YouTube, we'll be there for another couple of minutes, then
we'll get into what's going on in France.
We're still looking at the fallout of that astonishing debate and we'll be looking at
the likelihood that while we're not distracted but perhaps engaged by watching the media's
sort of swirl of confusion, bafflement and repositioning, that we still are edging closer
to an apocalypse.
There are still regional disputes that are terrifying, breathtaking and galling taking
place right now, even as we speak and reflect.
And just try not to recall this moment.
As they say in these spaces these days, well this didn't age well.
People would ask me, knowing what you know now, do you wish you had a third term?
And I used to say, You know what if I could make an arrangement where I had a Stand-in a front man or front woman and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats Looking through the stuff and then I could sort of deliver the lines, but somebody else was Doing all the talking and ceremony.
I'd be fine with The actual truth is I'm sure that's a sort of a joke that it's not a cadre of ex-presidents that runs America but powerful global corporate interests that for the purposes of corroboration we can track and look at financial dominion and resource power.
We can see how that maps and moves and is manoeuvred.
And who spends money on donations and who spends money on lobbying and who remains wealthy,
powerful and influential regardless of which party is in government and which interests
donate to both parties.
That would be a way of tracking it.
You can get into some occultism if you want to.
Why not?
It's a good enough pastime.
But do you really think that it's, you know, that you saw Donald Trump's Truth Social post
the weekend at Bernie's one, I'm sure.
I don't reckon that it's actually the Obamas jostling Biden through this.
I feel that there's a kind of Democrat Party aristocracy that move through the hierarchies of that party, but...
Where's real power?
It's global, and it bows not to flags.
Maybe it bows to horns.
Anyway, if there is going to be a kind of a replacement, we're going to have to look for some sort of handsome, swoonsome matinee idol who's done a pretty fantastic job there in turning California, as I understand, into a horrific This is good.
Gavin Newsom starts well.
Loyalty.
Decency.
Stand up for Joe Biden.
He's still the president.
during COVID lockdowns, finds a little time to party.
It's Gavin Newsom, he looks slick.
You were out there getting a chorus of questions about whether Biden should step down.
There is panic that has set in.
I shouldn't panic.
Well, there is panic.
This is good, Gavin Newsom starts well.
Loyalty, decency, stand up for Joe Biden.
He's still the president.
By the end of it, you sense that what he's actually saying is, "I would be a good and very handsome president.
And I wouldn't let a little thing like lockdowns Get in the way of a damn good cocktail party.
...that has set in among people who have watched this debate, who are Democrats, people who are strategists, and some even inside Democratic campaigns.
Do you think it's unfounded?
Well, I think it's unhelpful, and I think it's unnecessary.
We've got to go in, we've got to keep our heads high, and as I say, we've got to have the back of this president.
You don't turn your back because of one performance.
There wasn't one performance, it was two years of people first gently and delicately saying oh no I think Joe Biden might be senile but we've all known for a while that the president isn't really the person that runs America.
We know that these people are, generally speaking, puppets, and if there isn't a projection,
and there clearly is within media circles and establishment circles, that Donald Trump
is perhaps because he's a kind of uncontrollable, mercurial oddity that they won't be able to
puppet in the same way that they would a career politician like Joe Biden.
You can just watch footage of lying his way through the decades with whatever bombast
was required at the time that he was saying it.
Now Gavin Newsom, he looks to me like the very kind of person that would fulfil that
role elegantly.
Kissing babies, probably plays a musical instrument rather well, I bet he's got a sport that he's
good at, you know, the sort of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair moves, you know, or Michelle Obama
and Barack Obama sort of like doing something affable, like a do that looks cool and down
Maybe some fist pump.
Maybe just some token that you can throw out into the culture.
Hasn't Gavin Newsom got a nice hairline?
Doesn't he look quite refined?
Couldn't he be some sort of Jason Bourne character?
Some elongated Yankee Bond?
I don't know.
What do we want from politics these days?
The bar seems to have been set so, so very low and yet They managed to limbo beneath it.
Party does that.
It's been a masterclass.
15.6 million.
A job.
Masterclass.
That's a masterclass.
Forget the debate.
Anyone can have a 90 minutes off and ignore someone that's landing on a parachute just in front of them.
And anyone could walk the wrong direction off a stage.
We've all done it.
But other than that, there's been a masterclass!
That's eight times more than the last three Republican presidents combined.
The only thing the last three Republican presidents have in common is recessions.
Democrats deliver.
This president is delivered.
We need to deliver for him at this moment.
With all due respect, the more time we start having these conversations go down these rabbit holes is unhelpful to our democracy, our fate and future of this country, the world.
They need us right now to step up, and that's exactly what I intend to do.
I'm going to step right up, swoop right in, peel off my top and run this country if anybody asks me.
But if it's not going to be Gavin Newsom, it's going to be... In the figure of the Vice President, we have a wonderful option.
I saw a post that said it's impossible to replace Joe Biden as the candidate for the next election without acknowledging that he's not Fit for office.
So how do we handle that?
I have a solution for you.
It's Kamala Harris and she has a vision and it's a good one.
See if by the fourth or fifth time she says this, you can understand what it is she's saying.
I can imagine what can be and be unburdened by what has been.
You know?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What can be unburdened by what has been?
What- What can be unburdened by what has been?
Try to understand it.
You, AwakendWonders in the locals chat, stop watching Douglas MacGregor, your early access video.
You, on Rumble, try to understand it.
Try to understand what I mean.
Unburdened by what has been.
What?
Can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What we can... Someone said this to me, like, in a time of doubt.
And I've had times of great doubt in my life.
Someone goes to me, I go, I'm not feeling very good.
I've had a very difficult day.
I'm frightened.
I'm nervous.
I'm not sure that I'm good enough.
I can't cope anymore.
Kamala?
See what we believe can be unburdened by what has been.
What can be...
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Saying it to Bill Clinton!
I've did some bad things in office, in this very office as a matter of fact.
Feeling pretty bad about it.
Can't keep paying these dry cleaning bills.
I don't even want to smoke anymore.
What can be is unburdened by what might have been.
Wait a minute.
Like maybe it's like a koan or something.
Maybe if you sort of reflect on it there might be a moment where your mind glitches into a deeper understanding of the nature of reality like some imminent transcendent thing.
God is both within you yet beyond you.
Oh no, I'm just made of energy!
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
Unburdened by what has been.
What can be.
The mask version is good.
Hey listen, if you're watching this on YouTube, we're leaving right now and it's well worth clicking that link in the description Why?
Why?
Because we're talking about France's lurch to the right.
What's it about?
Is it anti-Islam?
Is it the rise of populism?
How does it relate to the Gilets Jaunes movement and those protests on the very steps of Black Rock?
If you're not an awakened wonder yet, become one now because you get access to my reaction Unburdened by what has been?
historic moments, you get intimate access and connections with to me. You'll be the first to learn about live events
when they happen.
So click the link in the description, get on over to Rumble, and if you're here with us, consider becoming an awakened
wonder.
So like I say to my own daughters, be unburdened by the future of what once might have been.
Unburdened by what has been. Who we can be, unburdened by who we have been.
She must have said that at some point and people have gone, fuck, that is... Yes.
Yes, actually, I have been unburdened what might have... But I still don't understand, I've watched this for a while now.
Can be unburdened by what has been.
Where we can be unburdened by where we have been and unburdened by where we are right now.
What can be.
It doesn't make sense.
It doesn't make sense.
I've tried it.
I've tried to make sense of it in a thousand ways, and it's that's simply not words.
You're not using language to relay concepts.
You're doing something else there.
It's more like, I don't know, like sort of linguistic painting.
It was too abstract.
It confused me enormously.
Tucker Carlson, he were in Australia.
Did you see him reacting to the debate?
The dementia, the fallout, but what I like here is Tucker gets to the point, and the point is, what does this tell us about democracy?
And he doesn't spend an hour and a half wondering whether we should say democracy or republic, either of you lot.
What he does is, he means some sort of system of the will of the people enacted through systems of government, which are just sort of ultimately administrative at this point.
Let's have a look.
President Biden digging in.
There's so many things I could have shown you, but that's not one of them.
I'm going to show you this thing.
Wait a second.
There you go.
But I watched CNN today and they had the presidential debate, the U.S.
presidential debate.
And maybe some of you saw it.
And if you did, well, it was amazing.
It was amazing on every level.
But what was... Idiot says it's an NLP without the end.
Linguistic programming without the neuro.
That was good.
And I love the gypsy curse thing.
Yeah, Tim Dillon, that was dope.
Especially amazing was afterward they went to the panel of assembled Democratic operatives posing as journalists and all of them were like shocked to discover that Joe Biden has dementia like they couldn't believe it!
What?
Oh my gosh!
He's non-compass menace!
No way!
Are you serious?
I'm thinking to myself, what year is it?
2024-ish?
Middle-aged people?
Identify with that?
Okay, 2024, people are saying.
It was 2019 that I heard from a friend of mine who's friends with his sister, Val, that the family was very upset because Joe has dementia and he's running for president.
And well I said this on TV by the way at the time and was denounced as a racist or something I mean everything in the United States like that's just like the all-purpose term for shut up Racist it's like I think he's white shut up racist.
Okay anyway But the point is, in my country, and probably here, the self-described mission of everyone in the media is to save democracy.
And democracy, simply defined, is the idea that the people own their country.
You know, it's their country.
And they hire people to represent them.
But fundamentally, they are shareholders in this enterprise.
They're owners.
They're not serfs.
They're not renting it.
This isn't a rental car.
It's your car.
You change the oil in it because it belongs to you.
Right?
And that's what citizenship is.
And so in a democracy, you know, you don't have to do everything the majority wants every moment, but over time, if what you're doing bears no relationship to what the majority wants, then you know for a fact it's not democracy.
Pretty simple stuff there.
If you ignore people, it's not a democracy.
If you lie to people, it's not a democracy.
If you censor people, it's not a democracy.
and here's why, but you can't ignore them or else it's not a democracy.
Pretty simple stuff there. If you ignore people, it's not a democracy. If you lie to people,
it's not a democracy. If you censor people, it's not a democracy. If power isn't where we think
it is, and plainly it's not in the hands or mind of Joe Biden or in the heart of Kamala Harris,
or likely even to dwell on the wet plump lips of Gavin Newsom.
Where is that power?
Well, we could all speculate and conject, couldn't we?
But one thing we could certainly do is watch the migration of funds.
Look at the trajectory of world power.
Look at the unpopular events that take place that cannot be opposed.
And there you might see the outline of power, its silhouette emerging.
But that's just what I think.
Why don't you let me know what you think in the comments and the chat.
Of course, we make this content with the support of some pretty fantastic partners.
Charlize, for example, run by my friend Charlene, a good damn fine Christian woman that's got a cosmetic range that is toxic free.
And she was so outspoken during the pandemic period that the Biden administration turned against her.
And it's a shame they did because her toner could put a lease of life into that guy.
Here's a message from Charlize.
Stay with us.
I would like to send a message of love to our sponsors at Charlize.
Charlize make this incredible product.
Now have you noticed that I'm looking incredibly young?
It's not just the tiny hat, it's my skin and my skin is looking good because of this range of extraordinary products.
Now I don't know if these products are going to be for you but they might be for someone you love and they make a perfect gift and there's 20% Off this pack, if you use the code brand.
They're absolutely toxin free, unlike a lot of cosmetics, you know, like you use things to make you look younger.
It sinks poison, venom into your face.
One of the components of this product that makes it extraordinary is Citrus Paradisi Peel Oil.
This is a beautiful organic ingredient and the very kind of thing that you would expect from Charlene, the founder of this company.
These products can do all manner of things.
Elevate your skincare routine using the unmatched power of nature.
Toxin free, baby.
So say yes to natural goodness and show your skin its true potential.
Visit charlees.beauty forward slash brand and use the code brand for 20% off.
Discover a new era of personal care.
One that's truly toxic free.
Stay radiant, stay conscious, stay beautiful.
I'm English of course and you may not know what that means.
It means that I live with a degree of complexity that might be hard for an American, any American really, to understand.
It means that we have football tournaments, not that football, this football.
It means that we have a football team that somehow reflects the national psyche and perhaps it somehow manages to Convey complex ideas that we don't even understand that come from deep within our unconscious, our sense of impotence, a sense of impotence and castration that perhaps began with the American Revolution of Independence.
A sense of priapism might only be retained in moments of footballing glory and those have been few and far between.
And even in this ongoing Euros tournament, there's a sense that the England team are underperforming even when we are doing enough to continue onward in the tournament.
We beat Slovakia Just yesterday.
And this is how English people respond.
Now, there's no audio to this, so I'll commentate over it to help you understand what's happening as best as I can.
Now, watch very closely.
These are some English people watching a man called Jude Bellingham score an overhead kick after a lad, a centre-back, Mark Gahee, I think is his name, nodded on the ball from a long throw-in, I think was taken by Karl Palmer.
Now, look how they celebrate.
Now look how simian it is.
Now why would someone run across a pool table like that?
Now what's happening here?
An informal dance.
He jumps on top of the dance.
These lads, there's a few lads closest to camera, they've bailed on it.
Now I think someone actually ends up with their bum out.
That's an odd thing about England.
We are repressed people in many ways, but you get the distinct sense that there's something extraordinary just below the surface.
What that thing is below the surface doesn't appear to be a coherent strategy for attacking football that best utilises a beautiful array of young attacking talent and the width of the pitch and the natural abilities of our wide players, but It certainly involves some homoerotic component and Jude Bellingham's goal celebration seems to confirm that.
There's some interesting celebrations emerging from the terraces.
Watch this lad closely and you'll be able to see what he's doing because there's a sort of an on-screen hand to help you see a little more closely what you may otherwise have missed.
On the pitch, get to a moment like that.
Look, in open play, we haven't been brilliant.
We've hardly created chance.
In set plays, we have to talk time and time again how important they are.
Set plays save us moments in time.
We've had so many set plays.
Get him eating the powdery nose yoghurt like that.
Hunched homunculus troglodyte like over it.
Nasally ingesting.
Mmm lovely.
We've scored a goal.
Neil Diamond's playing.
Caroline is sweet.
Get it up your hooter.
Anyone who's ever done nasally ingested drugs in a jostling situation, shoulder to shoulder with other people.
No, we'll know that it ain't easily achieved taking cocaine out and about on the move.
Not the cubicle for you.
Not the back of a toilet or a dashboard.
Heaven forbid a mirror.
No, do it out and about in the streets.
But I'll tell you what, it's very effective because right after this, this lad's given a real boost.
It's quite unbelievable.
I don't know what happened to the set play coach, whether he's still there or not, or whether it's just because of the change of people, change of personnel.
It's not quite working enough.
But I do know, way, way back in England, where the fans...
That's basically what it is to be English right there and in the background you can hear some quite intelligent analysis from the people in the room where the television is actually being played talking about how set pieces for England definitely have to improve if we're going to play basically a defensive deep game such as we've been playing up to now.
Thank you for indulging me as I managed to express myself just for a few A few moments as an Englishman mid-tournament.
Other things that are happening in our nation are comparable to events in yours across Europe.
We are seeing what is being called the rise of the right.
You may be familiar with Nigel Farage because he's friendly with your own Donald Trump and as I've told you whenever I've discussed him before that I've had public jousts with Nigel Farage on a couple of occasions at least.
But at times like this when one thing that I'm certain of is that we absolutely cannot rely on the establishment and that there is no viable movement towards bringing down these institutions, you have to look, I suppose, mostly at what is it the establishment doesn't want.
That's about as good as it can get.
There is no vision.
There is no vision from anybody.
Perhaps the best thing we can do Is bring them somehow to their knees by denying them their preferred pathway.
Their preferred pathway currently is Keir Starmer.
That's what the establishment want.
That's what the actual powerful want.
The people whose interests will not be affected negatively, only amplified and improved by the election of Britain's next Prime Minister who has connections to the CIA.
I don't want that to sound opaque or Uh, needlessly, what am I trying to say?
Nevertheless, he had a couple of meetings with the CIA, and as I've said to you before, the kind of leader you'd want would be the kind of man that throughout their opposition to the governing party was saying stuff like, Julian Assange shouldn't be in jail, we've not given the geezer a trial.
All he did was spoke out against war crimes.
Hang on a minute.
And in fact, he's just kind of a journalist, isn't he, really?
I mean, if he's in prison just for receiving and publishing information, isn't there a case that journalists everywhere could be charged with the Espionage Act?
Isn't this unprecedented?
That's not what you have in Keir Starmer.
So you have to start looking at what you have in some of these populist figures, even if there might be Myriad, dozens of ways that you don't agree with them.
Here is a man who has certainly captured the hearts of many people in our country and who the establishment and mainstream media loathe and indeed it seems to me at least like many legacy media organisations are collaborating in a way that's all too familiar to me to bring about Scandals and insidious attacks.
Again, please don't take this as me saying this is necessarily a political party or movement I would support, but one I do support is one that was just outlined pretty articulately by Tucker Carlson.
The will of the people.
The will of the people.
What the People want is what should happen in a democracy and of course you have the right to lead and guide and suggest and persuade.
All of those things are important but what you can't do is ignore, bamboozle, censor and control and create, possibly create but certainly exploit crises in order to legitimise further authoritarianism.
Here's Nigel Farage giving a little bit of a tough time on a British TV show and responding pretty articulately I'd have to say.
um you also run a you are online on a website called cameo where you'll record paid shorts of you doing roasts or pep talks for people um i was just wondering he's not embarrassed by that because he's not embarrassed by Sort of ordinariness and ordinary culture.
You go on Cameo, you accept 70 pounds and you go, happy birthday, happy birthday.
It's kind of, there's a snobbery throughout the culture.
There's this elitism and progressivism.
I'm not accusing this like individual person in the audience.
How TV shows work, you know this right, is like they ask the audience if they've got any questions and they look for questions that were the sort of questions they would like asked.
That's their opportunity to editorialise.
Then they can claim that this was a question that was asked by the audience when in fact it was a Pre-agreed question.
The kind of question they were going to ask anyway.
Anyway, what I mean by the elitism and the progressivism is progressivism.
I don't mean cultural progressivism in the way that you might assume, like around gender identity or whatever.
Again, I believe people should do what you want to do.
I mean progressivism as in the idea that human beings are, in general, ascending through technology and medicine, where there
certainly has been remarkable, miraculous almost, progress. So we're sort of moving
towards something, which in a sense is a kind of an idea derived from Christianity, because
that would be the second coming or the rapture. And the idea that we are improving all the
time, that there haven't been sort of lost civilisations and peaks of glory, and that there
isn't a spiritual dimension to our nature that is ultimately where from what our
purpose is derived. No, it's through rationalism and materialism that we'll make our
achievements. Elsewhere, we believe in a kind of elitism, a kind of aristocracy, not only of ideas,
but of sort of interrelated cults and classes. There's a kind of an acceptance that
ordinary people aren't good enough anymore.
That ordinary Americans or ordinary French people or ordinary British people, there's
something sort of disgusting we don't want to listen to anymore.
Perhaps that was a big lie all along.
The pledge of socialism and Marxism that the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia would somehow galvanize and represent the proletariat.
Would create systems where ordinary people, excuse me, were represented.
Certainly Maoism didn't work out too well.
Stalinism didn't work out too well.
So it's difficult to make an argument for the success of socialism, except for where it is derived, again I would say from Christian principles like fellowship, fraternity, service, kindness.
They say often in our country that British socialism is derived as much from Methodism as from Marx, meaning be kind!
Be kind!
Look after one another, not empower the state, not centralise power, have some values in your systems of government.
Now this kind of Eliteism that you can sort of see here of like, oh, why would you participate on a website where people pay 50 quid and you say happy birthday to someone or whatever?
Like, that, that is, that's something that's endemic in our culture.
Someone mentioned populism there.
We had a populist movement and moment in our country a few years ago.
Jeremy Corbyn was very, very popular and the length to which the establishment went to crush that guy, accusations of anti-Semitism, People within his own party, including Keir Starmer, turning against him, working against him, ensuring that he was destroyed and crushed.
There was a lot of intrigue and interest, because if you have a Prime Minister that says stuff like, I'm going to stand up against corporations, I'm going to regulate the City of London, which seems to have this odd principality of power all of its own, then of course that's something that's considered, ultimately, a global threat.
That movement was crushed.
Now what we have in the United Kingdom is a nationalist populist movement in the form of Nigel Farage's Reform Party.
Now again, there's a sort of focus on Britain first.
He obviously plainly considers the most significant issue to be immigration, and I know that's an issue that concerns a lot of you, and I suppose if you have a nation, the nation has borders.
And even here, in answering this question, he talks about Types of immigration.
Let's have a look at how he responds to that question, which I took as an opportunity to explain my own thoughts on both progressivism and elitism, though I'm not suggesting that the individual young person selected there is in any way a representative of them, just someone that was selected because their question fitted in with a narrative that the BBC would have, you know, wanted to use anyway.
Your cheapest ones you do are £70.
If I paid you £70 now, would you admit that this country would be nothing without our rich history of immigration?
Well, I'll tell you what, I'll tell you what.
I'll tell you what.
Another thing that's a bit Trump-like there, do you see he's not embarrassed and he's not defensive?
Do you see how he's not sort of like, no, actually, no, look, look, I only do that app because I was, you know, trying to earn a few quid, right?
He's just like, no, actually, listen, I want to take this opportunity to talk to you.
It's interesting, man.
And this is what's gone wrong.
Because you talk about immigration, and it ran from after the war up until the millennium at a net 30,000 to 40,000 a year.
And yes, it worked.
In fact, we had the most successful immigration policies of any country in the whole of Europe.
No question.
Now, it is so totally out of control.
Just think about this.
Two and a half million people have come in the last two years.
You wonder why you can't get a house.
You wonder why your rents have gone up 25% in four years.
You wonder why our infrastructure is struggling.
You wonder why we have to build a new house every two minutes just to cope with the numbers.
And that's the issue.
It's now We are running at numbers that are literally unimaginable and are diminishing the quality of life of everybody in this country.
And frankly, this should be the biggest issue of this election.
You could only improve that by saying, and that's £70, please.
In order to fund our ongoing endeavour, we have partnerships with good organisations like the Wellness Company.
Here's a little message from them now.
We'll be back talking about France.
Vive la France or, oh no, France.
The Wellness Company are some of my favorite partners.
Will your doctor even prescribe you Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine?
Hey, I did it.
The Wellness Company's Prescription Contagion Emergency Kit is unique, providing carefully selected effective medications for COVID-19 and respiratory illnesses.
Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, which some people call HCQ, don't know why.
Z-Pak and Butanide, along with a nebulizer and guidebook for safe use.
Do not muck around with a nebulizer.
This is, of course, backed by research and endorsed by experts.
Specifically, Dr. Peter McCulloch and Dr. Harvey Rich, both friends of the show.
Avoid the chaos, wait times, and price of the hospital.
Get the entire kit for the cost of a single doctor's visit.
It is only available in the USA.
Every American home should have one of these, don't you think?
Visit twc.health forward slash brand and use our code brand to save $30 plus get free shipping on your Contagion Kit.
Okay, back to the content.
Hey, AwakendWonders!
How you getting on in there?
Did we hook up that camera?
Or could we do it down there?
Hey!
I'm talking to you, dday99!
I'm talking to all of you guys in there!
Can we do that, Abel?
Yeah, we can look down there at you's.
Thanks.
Thanks, man.
SensitiveHearts25.
When I do my content with the locals community, I'll do it down there.
You've probably already seen the Douglas McGregor interview that we've done, right?
You saw that?
You enjoyed that?
I like talking to Douglas McGregor because he's a proper military man and former Trump advisor.
He understands war.
He's an America First type figure, ain't he?
You enjoy that conversation?
It's been up on Locals for a while now.
I think you can have a look at a little bit of it now.
Here it is in the chat, Awaken Wonders.
Tell me what you thought of it.
It will be on Rumble this Friday.
I love Douglas McGregor.
Customs and traditions are undoubtedly beautiful.
When you encounter them anywhere, there's a sort of an allure, a beauty.
This is what a culture does together.
And the idea of a centralized entity bleaching that into ruin simply to create a malleable and plastic set of tools for their own power disgusts me deeply.
I think that's where we are right now and we're fighting against it here because we really believe there is such an animal called an American.
We think there is a core American population, people that actually believe and love this country.
We have to continue to fight against this tendency to treat us as though we're nothing,
as though we're fungible.
Nice trailer, good work guys.
In there, I see some things.
In the rumble chat, someone just went, who fucking built Stonehenge?
That's it, that's what they said.
And then someone else said, can I sell stolen bikes on your show?
No, you can't!
You can't sell stolen bikes on our show.
I don't know.
Well, I'm actually... No, you can't!
We're drawing the line!
Awaken Wonders, I call you.
Flower Power, 678.
Who said that about Stonehenge?
Who fucking built Stonehenge?
Why are you angry about that now?
That was ages ago.
You didn't have to let that go.
I want to know why they sprayed that orange paint on it.
That's more important.
Now, as we are told to continue to vote for Well, clearly candidates that have a menture in you toodle stooges put before us while they turn the screws on us.
Let's have a look at what's going on in France.
France is becoming more populist because people, I think people, don't like Macron and don't like globalism and don't like the way that companies like BlackRock and Vanguard have been maneuvering and manipulating around us for a long, long time.
So eventually, in the end, they're like, hmm, fair enough.
Le Pen now.
Let's have a look.
France's far-right hasn't been this close to power since the Second World War.
Democracy has spoken, said Marine Le Pen, who toiled for decades to move her party from the political fringes to now, the cusp of power after the first round of parliamentary elections.
They have rounds.
Here's Macron.
You can see why they get wound up by him.
Is it weird?
You know these days, maybe it's an online thing, there's always rumours about the partner of globalist leaders.
You're aware of Barack Obama's partner, Michelle Obama, rumours.
This dude's got a bunch of rumours about his partner.
What about Justin Trudeau and Fidel Castro?
There's always some sort of mad rumour around them.
If you have verification, By all means, send it in.
The snap election was an immense gamble for President Emmanuel Macron.
His centrist party, Renaissance, was trounced in recent European elections by the far-right, but Macron bet voters would balk at the prospect of the Rassemblement Nationale actually forming a government in France.
From the start, though, polls suggested the RN and its youthful leader, Jordan Bardella, were out in front.
Our will is to gather all French people Our desire is to unite French people, Bardella said, as his party released a platform heavy on tax cuts and anti-immigrant messaging.
Parties on France's left mobilized as well, joining forces and holding rallies to try to block the RN from winning a majority.
It was Macron's party in the political center that appeared to be getting squeezed out.
Racism, or anti-Semitism as it's called, He'd be.
After the final leaders debate, Macron invoked the specter of what he said would be racism, uninhibited anti-Semitism, and a profound betrayal of French values should the RN win the most seats in Parliament.
So, as usual, the arguments that are presented is that the right is racist.
Now, I'm not down with the old racism.
I'm very, very pro-community.
I'm very pro-people coming together and being in total control of their own communities and, in a sense, having no opinion on how people outside of my own community want to organize and formulate their own.
It's very interesting to see how the charge of racism is deployed.
One of the things before I knew Tucker Carlson that I'd heard about him was that he was racist and often what I was given as evidence of that fact was that he was a proponent And a disseminator of what is known as replacement theory, the idea that immigrants are brought in to replace white Americans.
I'd heard that a lot of times.
Now, an Australian journalist took that claim to Tucker Carlson, where he's performing live at the moment, and look at his response.
I think it's pretty cool.
Let me know what you think in the chat, guys.
Thanks Tucker.
One final question from the press gallery.
Kat Wong from IAP.
Hi Tucker, thank you so much for your address today.
So you talked a little bit about immigration and in the past you've talked about how white Australians, Americans, Europeans are being replaced by non-white immigrants in what is often referred to as the Great Replacement Theory.
Have I said that whites are being replaced?
I don't think- Look how long she holds onto the idea.
It's brilliant.
I think I said that.
Well, it's been mentioned on your show 4,000 times and- Really?
When did I say that?
I said whites are being replaced?
You have said that before.
Really?
Yeah.
I would challenge you to cite that, because I'm pretty sure I haven't said that.
I said native-born Americans are being replaced, including blacks.
Native-born Americans.
Native-born Americans.
Black Americans have been, African Americans, have been in the United States for, in many cases, their families, over 400 years.
And their concerns are every bit as real and valid and alive to me as the concerns of white people whose families have been there 400 years.
So I've never said that whites are being replaced.
Not one time.
And you can't say it.
I believe that's untrue.
We just met, but when our relationship starts with a lie, it makes it tough to be friends.
Let's pull that back.
I'm happy to explain what I do think.
You actually can't say it because I didn't say it, and I don't believe it.
And I'm telling you that to your face, so why don't you just accept me at face value.
My concern is that the people who are born in the country are the main responsibility of its leaders.
And as noted earlier, when those leaders shift their concern from the people whose responsibility it is to take care of to people around the world to put their priorities above that of their own citizens, that's immoral.
And they are being replaced in my country, people who are born in the United States.
And the birth rate tells the whole story.
Hmm.
Hmm.
It's interesting, isn't it?
Interesting.
Someone says they're not racist if someone doesn't...
I believe in racism, isn't trying to implement racism, isn't advocating for racism, but is in fact saying that if you have a nation and your political systems are built around the sustenance of a nation, the management of a nation, then there's a few things you have to investigate.
What kind of global powers are able to influence it?
I'm talking about corporate powers and bureaucratic powers, philanthropic organizations, lobbying organizations.
What kind of projects is that nation involved in that are not good for that nation?
Like wars would be a good and clear example.
And how does that nation protect its borders or manage the size of its population
in order that the taxes derived from the population are able to be spent in accordance
with the will of the people?
Now, there are a lot of issues.
And personally, I question how high, when someone says like the reason
that you can't get a doctor's appointment or the reason you can't get housing
is as a result of population explosion, I'm sure that that is a factor.
But I would also say that there are financial factors that are beyond the remit of a strata of the population
that have little power and are much more the province of extremely
Powerful financial elites that are, for example, when you take that kind of quite colloquial example that people would use, like a couple of generations ago, a person, usually a man, would be a carpenter and would be able to support a wife that didn't work and three or four kids, and now the idea that one person in a working job could support a family, a man or a woman or whoever, It's ridiculous and risible.
Now that's not solely because of immigration, is it?
That's because of, I would say, there have been extraordinary financial fluctuations and maneuvers that I'm really not equipped to fully articulate how inflation works and how property prices work.
But what I do know Is that groups like BlackRock and Vanguard do make moves to acquire and manipulate property prices.
What I do know is that the 2008 crash ultimately benefited the financial industry.
I do know there was a massive wealth transfer during the pandemic period.
So ultimately, a time and period that was deleterious and traumatic for the majority of people was advantageous for elites.
And that's how I have my kind of somewhat muddled understanding of how power is operating.
And in order for it to continue to manoeuvre in that manner, it's really convenient if you and me and other various groups, cultural, racial or religious, are kind of locked into some salivating, foaming, slanging match.
with one another rather than saying, "A lot of these issues, we are different from one
another." Clearly, indigenous people of anglophonic nations have rights, and clearly, regardless
of their race or cultural affiliation, beyond the national ones. That doesn't actually exclude
any religious group, does it? There are people that are Catholic or Muslim or Hindu that
have lived in my country for generations and generations.
As you are aware, they are often among, often blue-collar people or working-class people,
regardless of religion or race, are concerned about escalating immigration because they are the
people most affected by people competing for the kind of jobs that working-class people,
by definition, are competing for.
That's not racist to say that.
Working class is a sort of an economic category.
includes people from all sorts of backgrounds. So listen, I can see that, you know, who cares
what I think, you know, in so many ways, but what I do think above all else is if the majority of
people are anti-immigration, then hey, there's your answer.
You don't have to discuss it anymore.
Not if you're in any kind of representative electoral system, whether you want to call it
a republic or a democracy, because I'm not referring just to America, I'm referring to
all of our countries. My personal pang has always been sort of lit up when I hear that companies
like Thames Water, that's who runs the water in various regions in our country, are majority owned
by Chinese or Canadian or Hong Kong corporations and dump shit and sewage into the rivers in order
to continue to be able to take dividends out of the country.
That's a kind of a corporatist example of how foreign power is deleterious and detrimental to the native people of the country.
You lot and your immigration issues, I don't mind what you think.
What I think is, if you're going to have a country, you've got to protect it.
You've got to elect people that want to protect it.
Please God, compassion and kindness are the utmost of our values.
But God, who among us for a second believes that compassion and kindness is what motivates these globalist, corporatist, Trudeau, Newsom, Sue, Nax, Starmer, Biden, Obama, Clinton politicians when it comes to any of their politics.
When they go to war, kindness, compassion just doesn't make sense.
Immigration, kindness, compassion doesn't make sense.
None of it makes sense anymore.
And so I think...
Sometimes the simplicity of nativist political movements at least has a kind of resonance.
That's what I feel, and I don't blame people for being into it, man.
Yeah, and yeah, you're saying illegal immigration versus migration.
I don't get all of your points, but I'm listening to all of your points.
I'm listening to you in the chat, because that is what we are here to do.
We're here to listen to you.
So we've discussed quite a lot today, haven't we?
How the fallout of this debate becomes about sort of management, information management, as people recognize, oh no!
Joe Biden, like people have been saying for years, is not fit for office.
So people now know that that guy can't be running the country, and it's ridiculous to imagine that he would run the country for another four years, but we can't admit that without replacing him with Kamala Harris.
And bloody hell, look at Kamala Harris.
She's a lunatic.
Or who are we going to offer you now?
This sort of matinee idol, corrupt dude from California?
The whole thing doesn't make sense.
We're not going to keep Trump out now using lawfare because he does have a degree of immunity, presidential.
We're going to have to try and reframe that.
The whole thing, just to get a sense, it's all sort of quaking.
My country is slightly weird because we're about to elect a sort of centrist, sort of pro-Davos leader.
So we're a little bit behind the curve.
Oh man, it's confusing.
I do hope... Who are you voting for, Russell?
You don't want to know, baby.
You don't want to know.
Okay, hey, all right, well, let me tell you, like, tell me in the chat, do you want to see me talking about George Galloway on Piers Morgan, Jerry Seinfeld, all right, one, George Galloway on Piers Morgan talking about Putin and world leaders, two, Jerry Seinfeld responding to a heckler in a show Australia, or do you want to see some stuff about how Ukraine are pushing NATO to create no-fly zones.
That's three.
So, essentially more World War III stuff.
One, two, or three, tell me over there.
You Awaken Wonders, will you tell me?
Because I can rely on you guys.
One.
Now, I can't remember what those categories are.
One was Galloway, wasn't it?
Two was a... Don't say seven, Jim Earthsey, that's confusing!
Some of you are saying three.
Klaus Schwab, two, two.
Um, Gallery, do you think... Do you get a sense of democracy from the mad number babble?
Oh look, they're voting over there, someone put 69, that's childish, that bell is for me.
Boobs, someone's put, talk about small hat.
That small hat...
Yeah.
One's edging it.
We're going for one, which is Galloway on Piers Morgan talking about leaders.
Now, George Galloway is one of those.
He's very much of the left.
He's very much nailed his colours to the mast when it comes to what he would call the genocide in Gaza.
Here he is on Piers Morgan talking about Putin.
Let's have a look at that.
Starmer, Biden, Trump, Sunak, I trust Putin more than any of them because they're my leaders.
They're the leaders of my part of the world and they've betrayed me and they've betrayed their own people time and time and time again.
So if I was negotiating with Putin, I would look him straight in the eye.
I'd put to him the Piers Morgan question.
Do you intend to take a piece of Britain?
Good, that's very flattering to Piers Morgan isn't it?
Saying that Piers Morgan asks hard questions.
A piece of Britain?
I think I could rely on him when he said I certainly do not.
Russia is the biggest country in the world.
It's one of the richest countries in the world, fourth richest economy in the world now.
It is indissolubly linked now to China.
What an achievement of American statecraft.
Nixon and Kissinger spent all that time trying to keep Russia and China apart.
We have driven them together to the extent that they are now hip to hip, joined at the hip.
And growing numbers of countries, some of whom were once allies, satraps even, of ours, are joining the BRICS, joining the Shanghai Cooperation.
The problem is, George, he'll be watching this interview, I'm sure, I don't know if he will, will he?
Vladimir Putin, he's got that weird 1980s deck of missile buttons that he runs from that sort of looks like the panel in Inside Out.
Vladimir Putin, he'll have already heard you say that, yeah, if you invade stuff like Crimea and the Donbass, you get to keep it.
And he'll be thinking, Why can't I do that in the UK?
No, if the people vote for it.
That's the problem with appeasing dictators.
He's not a dictator.
He's got a better mandate from the people than Rishi Sunak, who's never faced a vote.
Why do you think that is?
Rishi Sunak's never been voted by anybody.
Rishi Sunak doesn't kill and imprison his political opponents.
Well, ask Julian Assange, who nearly died.
Yay, Julian Assange is free!
Oh, that's a little boost.
That's nice, isn't it?
I think of Julian Assange now, obviously deeply traumatized by his time in prison, but out there with his sons and his missus in Australia, free.
Wow, that's good.
That's a nice boost.
That is a nice way to end the show.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
We'll be back tomorrow.
Cully Means, if you don't know who Cully Means is, he's an insider on Big Food.
He knows the score on Big Food.
He knows how they control the government through lobbying and through donation and how we're ultimately being poisoned and made sick.
Because that interlocks so nicely with the ideals, desires, and drives of Big Pharma.
Remember, we're coming to Wake & Wonder on Locals, and you get more access to our content earlier.
You can watch our Douglas MacGregor interview right now.
And everything we post, we post there first, baby, as well as doing a lot of additional content there.
I hope you had a good time today.
I hope it's helped you to understand Some things that are pretty baffling and extraordinary.
We will see you tomorrow, not for more of the same.
Oh no, we would never insult you with that, Claptrap, but with more of the different.
